Viva La Cola!

Founded in January 2009, PubliCola is a blog about Seattle written by journalists who are dedicated to non-partisan, original daily reporting that prioritizes a balanced approach to news. Started by longtime local editor and award-winning reporter Josh Feit, PubliCola is the first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol.

PubliCola was off and running. In June 2009, PubliCola hired another award-winning journalist, super-sourced Seattle city hall reporter Erica C. Barnett.

People were afraid that blogging would change journalism. Instead, we believe journalism can change blogging. Twenty-first century journalism may look and feel different, and yes Erica isn't afraid to get cranky, but we're committed to making sure online news still delivers independent, reliable, even-keeled coverage. And most of all, we're committed to making sure the coverage sparks honest civic debate.

Bringing you cola for the people, PubliCola is named after Publius Valerius PubliCola, the alias for the authors of the Federalist Papers—the original bloggers.

The first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol and Seattle city hall, PubliCola has been called a “must-read” by the Seattle Post Intelligencer and a hot “New Media Mover and Shaker” by Seattle Magazine—which also cited our own Erica C. Barnett as the city's No. 1 news nerd.

City Revenue Forecast: Worse Than Ever

(Sorry to do so many posts based on the mayor’s presser this morning, but it was seriously action-packed.)

The city’s budget office will have to “revise the [city's] revenue estimates downward” for next year, Mayor Mike McGinn said this morning. Currently, the city estimates a $56 million budget shortfall for 2011. However, both the state and the county recently revised their own revenue forecasts due to the ongoing recession and delayed economic recovery.

“It’s a very volatile situation right now,” McGinn said. “Because of that volatility, we are taking a real close look at that revenue forecast and it will be lower.”

Asked whether he had given further thought to city union employees’ demands that he cut managers’ and strategic advisors’ salaries before reducing their cost-of-living raises next year, McGinn said, “It’s not either/or; it’s all of the above.” He did say he expects that an executive order he issued just after he came into office, requiring all city departments to get mayoral permission before hiring contractors, will “have a chilling effect on the number of contracts,” potentially saving the city money.

McGinn also fielded a question about what effect the many initiatives on the ballot this year could have on the city budget.

While the city would lose about $3 million if the liquor-privatization and candy-tax repeal measures pass, McGinn said, the city would benefit if voters pass a proposed sales-tax increase in King County. That measure, which splits the proceeds between the county and its cities, would bring the city an estimated $12 million a year, of which one third would have to be spent on public safety.

McGinn said he plans to propose new revenue sources, “including new fees and charges” for city services, as part of his budget proposal to the council. McGinn will release that proposal in about three weeks.


  • Barleywine

    Whomever chose that picture RULES!
    I’m leaning over my laptop wondering if it will…

  • Barleywine

    I meant, whoever.
    Subject, object.

    Whom is so gay anyway.

  • Anonymous

    I hear SAM has a decent amount of money!

  • city minion

    Mayor McGinn needs to wade in and take a long look at each city department. He has to identify who does work on behalf of citizens and use this opportunity to cut the dead weight.

  • Fgruben

    Time to raise taxes ( well isn’t that what will be proposed???)

  • Anonymous

    That would require actual work on his part, instead of platitudes — not his strong suit.

  • http://spifflines.blogspot.com/ John Bailo

    Dwindling urb population means a lower tax base.

    Time to undensify Seattle and join the 21st century Ring Of Exurbs!

  • Anonymous

    What part of 617,334 (Seattle’s highest population in history, and also its most recent estimate) do you not understand?

  • SGK

    612,000 is the most recent by the State

    http://www.ofm.wa.gov/pop/april1/finalpop.pdf

  • get the money.

    user fees…good idea. How about charging all the people who park for fre on city streets? A modest $100 a year license to park your car for free in spaces that do not have meters. Oh wait, that would be making car owners pay more, that’s verboten, off the table.

    Okay, hows about collecting the $50 million in outstanding parking fines? We could, you konw, use the boot. Oh wait, that would make car owners pay more money, they have a right to break the law and not pay, verboten, off the table.

    Okay. How about raising parkin rates at metered sites when you’r eparking a huge SOV that takes more space? you know, punch in vehicle length like at a marina. Oh wait, that would make escalade and RAM and Ford 250 lowners pay more than those driving a smartcar or a scooter or a motorcycle or a Min!!! Verboten, off the table, can’t make people who use city streets more, pay more, city streets are to be handed out for free to the big planet killers in town.

    Okay, guess we will have to raise taxes and fees that poor people and “everyone” pays, we can’t target car owners or SOv or SUV drivers…

  • Comment

    Good point … especially since as we all know, poor people never drive cars to their workaday jobs. That’s why when you drive up 99 through Lynnwood you hardly see any “Your Job Is Your Credit” signs. Or, maybe it’s just that poor people in Seattle don’t drive cars. Maybe the answer is to make all poor people move to Seattle so that they won’t drive cars here? You’re confusing me.

    I actually like the idea of paying a $100 annual fee to park on the street. Direct tax for direct benefit. I tore down my dilapidated garage and removed the foundation to have more space for my kids to play in my backyard and chose to park on the street. But, to confound your post with the idea that this would somehow not be a regressive tax on the poor is ludicrous.

  • Comment

    Good point … especially since as we all know, poor people never drive cars to their workaday jobs. That’s why when you drive up 99 through Lynnwood you hardly see any “Your Job Is Your Credit” signs. Or, maybe it’s just that poor people in Seattle don’t drive cars. Maybe the answer is to make all poor people move to Seattle so that they won’t drive cars here? You’re confusing me.

    I actually like the idea of paying a $100 annual fee to park on the street. Direct tax for direct benefit. I tore down my dilapidated garage and removed the foundation to have more space for my kids to play in my backyard and chose to park on the street. But, to confound your post with the idea that this would somehow not be a regressive tax on the poor is ludicrous.

  • Comment

    Cleveland is east of Kent, not north. Maybe you make all the right arguments about the wrong city?

  • Anonymous

    And the 617k figure is from a Census Bureau estimate. Regardless, every figure puts Seattle’s population at an all-time high. Despite this, Bailo keeps falsely claiming that Seattle is depopulating. He’s like the Birthers; he won’t acknowledge facts.

  • Mongo

    Easier said then done. Personell rules, labor contracts annd bumping rights often create a situation where the great people get canned and the dead weight is protected