Viva La Cola!

Founded in January 2009, PubliCola is a blog about Seattle written by journalists who are dedicated to non-partisan, original daily reporting that prioritizes a balanced approach to news. Started by longtime local editor and award-winning reporter Josh Feit, PubliCola is the first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol.

PubliCola was off and running. In June 2009, PubliCola hired another award-winning journalist, super-sourced Seattle city hall reporter Erica C. Barnett.

People were afraid that blogging would change journalism. Instead, we believe journalism can change blogging. Twenty-first century journalism may look and feel different, and yes Erica isn't afraid to get cranky, but we're committed to making sure online news still delivers independent, reliable, even-keeled coverage. And most of all, we're committed to making sure the coverage sparks honest civic debate.

Bringing you cola for the people, PubliCola is named after Publius Valerius PubliCola, the alias for the authors of the Federalist Papers—the original bloggers.

The first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol and Seattle city hall, PubliCola has been called a “must-read” by the Seattle Post Intelligencer and a hot “New Media Mover and Shaker” by Seattle Magazine—which also cited our own Erica C. Barnett as the city's No. 1 news nerd.

140 Trees To Be Removed During Mercer Project

Earlier this week, anti-deep-bore-tunnel activist Elizabeth Campbell sent out a furious email to the Seattle City Council (and the rest of her extensive list) decrying the city’s Department of Transportation for marking about 40 street trees along the route of the Mercer Corridor project, part of the overall tunnel construction project, for destruction.

“[H]ere we go again, subjected to the rank hypocrisy of the City of Seattle,” Campbell wrote. “Almost down to the AGC building all the trees that are planted both along the Lake Union water edge and along Westlake Avenue are to be torn out.  Is that anyone’s idea of sustainable or green practices?”

As it turns out, it’s worse than Campbell thinks. According to SDOT spokesman Rick Sheridan, the city plans to remove about 140 trees for the Mercer project, many of them directly in the right-of-way that will become the new two-way Mercer and Valley Streets. The rest, Sheridan says, are “immediately adjacent to construction” and could endanger Mercer construction crews.

Sheridan says SDOT will replace all those trees on a two-to-one basis, meaning they’ll plant 280 new trees. However, he didn’t know how many of the trees SDOT is removing are mature trees, and SDOT isn’t using anything like the “tree credit” formula the city’s Department of Planning and Development plans to use to limit tree cutting for residential developments, which could result in the removal of fewer trees (or their replacement with larger trees).

Instead, he says, SDOT will choose species that “preserve the tree canopy in a way that’s appropriate for an urban area” like South Lake Union; additionally, he says, SDOT plans to plant around 10,000 shrubs and build a rain garden.


  • Mikeg

    “rank hypocrisy”

    is campbell a beck-sian? a palinite? this is a favorite catch phrase of tea baggin morons. can this loser please crawl into her magnolian hole and shut her mouth. por favour?

  • Anonymous

    So we get more trees, and should be upset about this why?

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr Baker

    Is she, other than as concerned citizen, involved in the story?
    I get that she is trying to force a rebuild of the AWV. Does that somehow make everything she writes “news”?

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr Baker

    Is she, other than as concerned citizen, involved in the story?
    I get that she is trying to force a rebuild of the AWV. Does that somehow make everything she writes “news”?

  • Selma

    Campbell’s rotten. Why Barnett uses her as her personal Drudge I don’t know.

  • bs caller

    So trees threaten construction crews? What do they do, drop leaves on them?

    SDOT should at least tell the truth once in a while…..bulldozing is easier than stepping around….

  • http://www.MajorityRules.org Stevezemke

    Trees are part of Seattle’s urban forestry infrastructure that helps to reduce storm water runoff, remove toxics from the air and provide living space for birds and insects. The benefit of trees to an urban landscape are well documented and include economic and ecological values.

    The value of individual trees increases with the size of the trees and the tree species. Removing a 60 foot tall tree thats 50 years old and replacing it with 2 saplings is not equivalent in value and benefits lost. Mature trees are of more value. Replacing the function of a 50 year old tree takes 50 years to just get back to where it is now.

    As trees get lost to development that doesn’t try to build within the existing environment, more and more of our urban forest canopy gets lost and so does our heritage as the Emerald City. We can do better and our city government needs to lead the way by pushing for more tree protection and setting a good example.

  • Tboyreid

    Time is what prevents everything from happening at once. A couple of things to think about in the meantime: 1) In 20 years, the additional trees will be nice; and, 2) I hope the corridor works as described. Honestly I care twice as much about number 2 as I do about number one. I’ve spent too much time in Mercer traffic in my life, thanks.

  • Anonymous

    Because, as Steve Zemke points out below, replacing older trees with saplings is a huge reduction in value and function. We don’t know the quantity because neither SDOT nor Erica Barnett have given us any data beyond the number of stems.

  • Richard Ellison

    New Seattle street trees have a notoriously short life span (average less than 10 years), and existing mature trees are actually the ones that are the good survivors and need to be saved.

    Promises of 2 new sapling trees for each healthy mature tree cut is like giving your hard earned retirement account away and hoping that Social Security promised from the government promises will be enough to live on…..

  • David Miller

    “Trees endangering the construction crews?”

    What, they’re afraid the trees will go all Entish on their ass?

    Seriously, though. It’d be nice if SDOT took the time to share data supporting their claim these trees would endanger construction workers. A little CBA might also be nice as well as a peek at where all these new trees will go and what species they’ll be.

    Such information is the difference between a reasonable course of action and more trees-are-a-burden BS.

  • David Miller

    “Trees endangering the construction crews?”

    What, they’re afraid the trees will go all Entish on their ass?

    Seriously, though. It’d be nice if SDOT took the time to share data supporting their claim these trees would endanger construction workers. A little CBA might also be nice as well as a peek at where all these new trees will go and what species they’ll be.

    Such information is the difference between a reasonable course of action and more trees-are-a-burden BS.

  • Anonymous

    There are a handful of mature trees at 9th and Broad:
    http://maps.google.com/maps?q=broad+and+9th+ave+n,Seattle,WA
    Those will have to be removed for the new wider Mercer St but looking at the map and thinking about it I don’t see 140. There are some up Westlake Ave N but that’s not part of the project area. Maybe in the Mercer West (Phase II) project?

  • Anonymous

    Its not like we are talking old growth trees here. I also would imagine that SDOT is going to plant reasonably mature trees if for nothing else than aesthetics.

    Put regardless the benefit here of the project dramatically outweighs the cost.

  • Anonymous

    I’m not sure there are that many 60 foot tall trees along mercer. Down around 9th there are some that are around 20ish and the same near the lake, but they are nothing all that impressive or mature. Most seem to be your standard road trees that can be replaced by one nearly the same size.

  • LH

    This project will not significantly – if at all – reduce the amount of time that you spend in traffic on Mercer. Depending on which direction you are traveling travel times may increase.

    Further, there hasn’t yet been any travel time analysis that incorporates the three Aurora crossings that are now part of the project. SDOT’s earlier travel time analysis didn’t include the crossings, as they weren’t funded yet.

    If you want read more on the topic (including how to get the bike and ped improvements w/o the price tag) read, Rethinking Mercer West:

    http://licata.seattle.gov/2010/05/13/the-budget-and-rethinking-mercer-west/

  • LH

    This project will not significantly – if at all – reduce the amount of time that you spend in traffic on Mercer. Depending on which direction you are traveling travel times may increase.

    Further, there hasn’t yet been any travel time analysis that incorporates the three Aurora crossings that are now part of the project. SDOT’s earlier travel time analysis didn’t include the crossings, as they weren’t funded yet.

    If you want read more on the topic (including how to get the bike and ped improvements w/o the price tag) read, Rethinking Mercer West:

    http://licata.seattle.gov/2010/05/13/the-budget-and-rethinking-mercer-west/

  • Anonymous

    A fifty year old tree in the urban environment is “old growth” for purposes of function. And without huge pressure and outcry there is no way SDOT will “plant reasonably mature trees” because they cost a fortune.

    As for the “benefit of the project,” what are you referring to? All the hype and blather from SDOT and Vulcan. As Nick Licata dug out and exposed years ago, this project will NOT reduce your sit time in the Mercer mess. Sample quote from his Oct. 2, 2008 newsletter: “SDOT’s Environmental Assessment Report… revealed that the two-way Mercer resulted in a measurable increase in traffic congestion.” Has that changed? So, the project will “improve” your Mercer Mess sit time, because you’ll have lots of nice young trees to contemplate.

  • Anonymous

    I was completely wrong, according to the overlay at the bottom of this page:
    http://www.seattle.gov/transportation/ppmp_mercer_desc.htm
    Looks like part of the “improvement” will be to widen Westlake Ave N north of Valley St to five lanes (!) and remove the sidewalk on the east side. Pedestrians will have to use the narrow walking paths in the Lake Union Park. So yes, they are removing all the medium size trees along Westlake up to about Kenmore Air… to make room for another traffic lane.

  • Anonymous

    Oh, and look at my inbox…

    How many trees are being removed and why?

    Over the next three years of construction on Phase One of the Mercer Corridor Project (Mercer East), approximately 140 trees will be removed and replaced. Trees will be removed during the project’s four construction stages and replaced at the end of the project.

    Trees along Westlake Ave N near Valley Street will be removed in the next few weeks to accommodate the immediate replacement of a nearly 100-year old sewer line from 9th Ave N and Republican Street to Westlake Ave N and Aloha Street. Removal of these trees is also necessary to widen Westlake Ave N and construct a new rain garden; both will happen in later construction stages.

    Trees were identified for removal to accommodate roadway widening and improvements. Some trees are directly in the footprint of new or widened roadways; others, due to their proximity to construction activities, would be impacted and cannot be retained without a risk to public safety.

    When the project is completed, how many more trees will there be overall?

    When Phase One of the Mercer Corridor Project (Mercer East) is complete, nearly 280 new or replacement trees will be planted throughout the project area along with more than 10,000 new shrubs, and installation of a rain garden on Westlake Ave N near Valley Street. Two new trees will be planted for every one removed, in accordance with City of Seattle standards. Tree types included in the project design were selected to increase the canopy cover beyond what exists today.

    The attached image is a conceptual design showing the areas where new trees and shrubs will be planted. This image does not show each individual tree and shrub, but is an accurate overview of where major plantings will occur.

    How many are being kept? -What steps are being taken to protect the trees that will be kept?

    Trees that do not need to be removed to accommodate roadway widening and improvements, and that are not at risk of damage during construction, are being kept in place. Approximately 20 trees near the construction area will be marked and fenced for protection.

    What environmentally friendly elements does this project contain?

    The Mercer Corridor Project integrates many environmentally friendly and sustainable design features and construction methods, such as:
    Planting nearly 280 trees and more than 10,000 shrubs throughout the project area. These plantings have been selected and designed for low water use and optimum compatibility with the growing conditions associated with the site.
    Adding environmentally sustainable features such as the rain garden on Westlake Ave N near Valley Street.
    Recycling trees that are removed, including reviewing opportunities to salvage the wood for future uses.
    Recycling raw materials from demolition activities.

    Please let us know if you have further questions.

    LORELEI A. WILLIAMS, PE, PMP

  • Jakers

    Are any of these trees being removed to accommodate a wider roadway for bike lanes?

  • Transit voter

    Yes, ‘nutherneighborhoodactivist, heaven forbid that we should EVER improve a travel corridor and NOT reduce traffic congestion for all those single-occupant commute vehicles….

  • Anonymous

    Sit time is not the only concern. It makes access easier, improves things for bikes, buses and pedestrians and reintegrates other roadways with the areas.

    Plus part of the reason for the increase in congestion stems from what is happening with 99 and will happen anyway.

  • tpn

    McGinn is a supporter of the Mercer Project. Glad to see all of the “outrage”.

  • Anonymous

    OK. A couple of questions: If the project doesn’t improve vehicle throughput time, how does it improve access? The bike thing maybe. And maybe the reconnection of the grid across 99 north of Mercer, but see: LH said: “there hasn’t yet been any travel time analysis that incorporates the three Aurora crossings that are now part of the project. SDOT’s earlier travel time analysis didn’t include the crossings, as they weren’t funded yet.”

    As for “what is happening with 99 and will happen anyway” do you mean the DBT? And if that bloated waste of money doesn’t happen, then what?

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr. Baker

    I have given this a great deal of thought, and I have only one question: is there any way I can directly participate in chopping down this trees?

  • Jakers

    Just hit a couple of them in your car while driving along. Better yet, rent a hummer or RV to do it.

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr. Baker

    Raffle off chopping them down and spend the money on planting even more trees.

  • Jakers

    For some reason I don’t see politicians and local celebs vying to out bid each other for the photo op.

  • Anonymous

    No worries. These trees can easily be replaced in the generous 4-foot wide planting strips the City requirers developers of new building along Mercer Street to provide. LMAO.