Viva La Cola!

Founded in January 2009, PubliCola is a blog about Seattle written by journalists who are dedicated to non-partisan, original daily reporting that prioritizes a balanced approach to news. Started by longtime local editor and award-winning reporter Josh Feit, PubliCola is the first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol.

PubliCola was off and running. In June 2009, PubliCola hired another award-winning journalist, super-sourced Seattle city hall reporter Erica C. Barnett.

People were afraid that blogging would change journalism. Instead, we believe journalism can change blogging. Twenty-first century journalism may look and feel different, and yes Erica isn't afraid to get cranky, but we're committed to making sure online news still delivers independent, reliable, even-keeled coverage. And most of all, we're committed to making sure the coverage sparks honest civic debate.

Bringing you cola for the people, PubliCola is named after Publius Valerius PubliCola, the alias for the authors of the Federalist Papers—the original bloggers.

The first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol and Seattle city hall, PubliCola has been called a “must-read” by the Seattle Post Intelligencer and a hot “New Media Mover and Shaker” by Seattle Magazine—which also cited our own Erica C. Barnett as the city's No. 1 news nerd.

The Feasibility of Family Cycling


Tim King at the Fiets of Parenthood. Photo from flickr user bikejuju

People often say they need a car because of family obligations–dropping their kids off around town, going out to dinner, running errands. As a childless twentysomething, I’m certainly not going to criticize parents’ use of cars to conveniently meet those obligations. But Seattle is home to more than a few parents who buck the trend and use bicycles to get around.

The John Stanford School recently played host to dozens of bike-riding families at Seattle’s first Fiets of Parenthood event (it’s pronounced “feats”). Organized by local family-cycling bloggers Tim and Anne King of Car Free Days and Julian Davies of Tot Cycle, the event featured fun rides, family races, helmet fittings and advice from a Cascade Bike Club representative, a cargo-bike converted to serve gelato, and nearly every configuration of child-carrying bike contraption in existence, including classic trailers, long-tail cargo bikes, front-loading cargo bikes, trail-a-bikes, and more.


Cargo bike at Fiets of Parenthood.

Tim says that although there are a lot of bike events in Seattle, few really emphasize family cycling. “We wanted a real participatory event where people could see the bikes, try them out, and also see that there’s a support network for them to take their family cycling to the next level.”

Tim and Anne have certainly done that with their own family cycling. For them, it’s about “setting an example for our kids that there are alternatives to driving everywhere in the car that are healthy, alternatives that are more fun, and in many cases faster and more cost-effective.” They use bikes for nearly all their trips around town with their two elementary-school-aged kids. Though they still own a minivan, it pretty much only gets used for trips out of town.

The Kings chose equipment that facilitates riding with young kids. They use long-tail cargo bikes—Tim rides a Surly Big Dummy, and Anne rides a mountain bike equipped with an XtraCycle attachment. The cargo bikes allow them to carry tons of groceries, supplies, and their kids (the Big Dummy holds up to 400 lbs, including rider weight). As you can see in the photo above, an extra set of handlebars gives passengers a secure place to ride.

“We over-prepare for everything,” Tim said. “You have to really think about when [events] are going to end, have snacks ready, know your routes, know your limits.”

People often ask if they’ve made sacrifices for their bike-based lifestyle. Tim says that they’ve had to change their approach to family activities, but they haven’t had to sacrifice anything. “Yeah, we don’t hop in the car to go to Edmonds for the day, or drive to Bellevue to see the new movie theater. But 80 percent of the stuff we want to do is within riding distance. And for the other 20 percent we can usually find a substitute that’s just as good and doesn’t require the extra hassle.”

Tim says using bikes instead of driving is “freeing and empowering. Once you’ve made that commitment and once you’ve figured out your system, it works out for everyone.”




  • Bluneck

    Cute, but unrealistic. It should be the priority of all concerned about the environment (and pub;lic health) to get people to walk and ride their bikes when they would typically take a car.

    BUT –!!! — we in the conservation community lose credibility when we focus on moving families and kids around this town /region on bikes. It’s just not feasible in a city with no subway, little light rail and dwindling bus service, especially on weekends when children’s activities are seemingly endless. I want my kids p[laying sports and music for as long as possible. When we need to travel across town on a cold, rainy/snowy Saturday or Sunday for a 8:00 AM game, neither a bike or bus will do.

    I appreciate your disclaimer upfront, Josh. It’s an important one for all who report on this issue who seek a “livable city for families” but who haven’t yet had the reality of raising kids here hit them squarley in the face.

  • Jakers

    I appreciate the voice of reason.

  • Anonymous

    I find it very enjoyable and freeing to take my son on a bike to do errands. He hates the car seat but loves riding on my bike (I highly recommend the iBert on front for the kid and a standard rack on back for carrying stuff). I also walk with him quite a bit, but when you need to get somewhere fast this is the way to go. Of course I still have a car and still drive him around when needed, but biking is a nice option for reasonably short trips.

  • http://www.totcycle.com Julian

    I respectfully disagree. As the other organizer of this event, and the parent of a 1 and 3yo child, there are MANY trips in this town that can very reasonably be made by bike. Look at the data on how many car trips are under 1-2 miles. Look at the data on how much of morning traffic is school dropoff. Look at cultures where infrastructure supports cycling in a way that families both feel and are safer on the roads on bikes. Look at the crisis of obesity in children.

    When you do, you’ll find that you’d lose credibility by NOT promoting active transportation for families. Or maybe that makes sense in your “conservation community” (whatever that is), but for the rest of us, we’re not riding bikes to save the planet, we ride bikes as a familiy because it’s fun, social, healthy, convenient, and cheap.

    As for your “endless” (your words) activities on the weekend that you sustain by driving all over town, that’s your choice, but not everyone’s; the pendulum may be swinging towards more unstructured time for play and less over-scheduling for our kids.

  • Fgruben

    What about us people that like cars? I ride my bike quite a lot. But I would never think about trading in my car to depend only on a bike ( more than a gallon of milk at a time is not fun). I think articles like this blind the extremists in the “bike only” crowd that there are people that don’t intend on giving up their cars. And if Seattle continues on the hopes of making it “bike only”, jobs and people will continue to leave Seattle.

  • Family Bike Guy

    love the emphasis on family biking, you might consider how this means putting bike lanes in arterials isn’t too safe whereaw bike boulevards a block off the arterials and parallel to it is way more safe and congenial to biking to the store or even longer.

  • Julian

    Did we read the same article? I really didn’t get any sort of “bike only” vibe here. Feels like you’re projecting a wee bit here from other articles and local drummed-up controversies.

    By the way, if you like to ride your bike, but struggle with groceries, check out the xtracycles featured above.

  • Julian
  • http://twitter.com/mcgarty mcgarty

    We’re an internal combustion engine heavy family (four cars and a motorcycle) but we’ve been integrating more and more cycling into our daily lives. I enjoy the freedom and built in exercise from commuting to work and the kids just love it. Matter of fact it’s now a battle of who gets to ride on the Big Dummy first. My wife went from hating bikes to towing the kids to school every so often.

    The cars still gets plenty of use, but so do the bikes.

    Thanks again to Tim, Anne, Julian and Kim for putting on the Fiets–it was a great time!

  • Anc

    Why not both?

  • Anc

    What evidence do you have that people are leaving Seattle? The last census estimate seems to disagree. In fact, if I remember correctly Seattle actually grew at a faster rate than the county as a whole.

  • kurisu

    what evidence suggests that bike lanes aren’t safe?

  • Anonymous

    First, we have a subway, albeit a limited one at this point. It is currently being extended to Capitol Hill and UW, and then on to U-District and Roosevelt.

    Regardless I’m not sure what our relative lack of public transportation has to do with biking. Copenhagen’s Metro is not much more extensive than Seattle’s Link rail system, and it’s still known for being a cycling paradise. It may not be practical for everyone, but, for example many people in North Seattle could bike east or west to Green Lake as a family instead of driving. The trip along Ravenna Blvd. is fantastic for that for example. Those in South Seattle might make a similar bike ride to Seward Park. Folks in Ballard or Wallingford could bike to Golden Gardens park, or Gas Works Park, etc.

  • Bill B in the Central District

    Julian, wait till the kids are older than 1 and 3– and you can’t haul them around yourself. The roads are unsafe, the kids can’t negotiate hills, and you’re herding cats when the team is on the move.

    Sadly too many of us have friends throughout the city that requires transit other than bike – and often the buses fail there. Our hub and spoke bus network through downtown makes neighborhood to neighborhood visits extra painful from a time standpoint.

    And most of the school traffic is not parents bringing kids to schools in a 1-2 mile radius. It is the cross town enrollment – or eastsiders dropping kids at in-town daycare that causes the bulk of this traffic.

  • Bill B in the Central District

    even if they aren’t less safe, its the psychology of it that will keep people from riding.

  • Julian

    From a biking with kids perspective, the current crop of narrow bike lanes in the door zone on busy arterials feels sketchy. The buffered lanes now being planned for Dexter are an improvement, though. I say “feels” because there is a dearth of data about cycling safety and kids. Besides, “subjective safety” may be well more of an influence on decisions to cycle or not than “objective” safety.

  • Julian

    I completely agree about bus/transit.

    Wish I agreed about car dropoffs being from far away, but believe me there are plenty of families driving kids 1-2 miles to school. And cross town enrollment is dropping, no?

    The usual “it might rain”, “what if I have an errand to run”, “is it safe” qualms are a hurdle, sure. And it can be self-perpetuating (I won’t let my kids walk/bike because of all that dangerous car traffic near school, so let’s drive and be that dangerous traffic).

    But programs like Safe Routes to School, Bike to School month, “Bike Trains” (supervised groups of student riders) have been helping with that.

    As for older kids, you can haul them up until about 5-6, with proper bikes (see above for examples), and haul them and their bike at times (for busy arterials, etc) with an xtracycle or follow-me tandem type attachment. And route selection for traffic-calm streets and flatter routes is key. Believe me, I’m hardly a model of fitness. Or electric assist (stokemonkey and others, LOTS more to come in the electric-assist cargo bike dept).

    Tim and Anne may be out of town, but they’ve been writing an excellent series of posts on managing kids’ transition to independent riding. Start here:
    http://carfreedays.com/2010/07/05/transitions-from-kids-as-cargo-to-kids-as-riders-a-new-series/

    I realize I’m over-commenting in this thread, but it’s depressing to me to read such defeatist comments as a reaction to what to me was a cool, optimistic article. Of course, I’m biased.

    But I sure would like to see Seattle start to live up to its image as a progressive, bike-friendly city, rather than one where people see themselves as green progressives or whatever (“the conservation movement” commenter above) but still nurture oddly car-culture-biased perceptions of what is easily possible in this town, as is. No one here is asking families to go “car-free”. I prefer a “low car diet”, myself. Or Tim and Anne’s car-free *days*.

  • Anonymous

    In the long run, childrens’ activities will need to be closer to home. The cost of moving people around will increase, making that result inevitable. Basically, why should we be driving them to a baseball game ten miles across town when a league focused on games one or two miles from home works just as well? There are benefits to urban density beyond supporting transit to take you ten or twenty miles across town.

  • Anonymous

    And don’t forget Brynnen Ford’s Madsen “minivan alternative” that she hauls a carpool of kids in!
    http://www.worldchanging.com/archives/011049.html

  • Anonymous

    For what it’s worth, we have two kids and haven’t owned a car in 7 ears now but I have no intention of “giving up” on cars. We took a zipcar to a party the other night, and went car camping a couple weekends ago. There’s just no reason to depend daily on a personally owned car when we live within easy walking distance of a great park (and almost every family activity we do together regularly).

    I have to confess something, though: two kids killed our family bike rides. I still ride and we have one toddler seat but we have not figured out a good option for the 5 yr old. Maybe a Madsen but it’s quite an investment.

  • F.B. guy

    Some are; some aren’t. I am saying that often on arterials like Stone Way or Roosevelt the bike lane is crammed into a skinny speace next to cars zipping by, a space thru which busses have to cross repeatedly to get to the curb, a space invaded often by the doors of cars that just parked, etc. Itt would be safer to channel bike riders on a side street bike bolevard a block from the arterial, and parallel to it, which is safer because of no bus, and much less traffic/turners/door openers etc.
    And yes, you can do both; doing this doesn’t mean you can’t ride your bike on an arterial if you like. You can. But it would make sense to put up signage on a bike boulevard off the arterial to channel more riders there and build it up as a nice short or long through route.

    Serously, if we get bikes up to 10 or 20% of all vehicles, and we get more people on busses, the bike-bus conflict will intensify. You can choose to suck the bus fumes and screech on your bike brakes when the bus cuts over the bike lane, that’s your choice and you have every right, but for those looking for safety first an off arterial route (say, 9th NW) is far superior to an arterial route (say 8th NW). There’s just less traffic and less everything.

    It’s more a question of putting down paint and putting up signs to create short and long routes thru the city so that kids grandmas and old farts can ride bikes too.

  • Fgruben

    You’re right. I took the positive stokes about families that do without cars and turned that into a car bashing scenario. My bad.

  • kids in kapillaries

    great idea, electric bikes to haul kids in. But seriously are you going to haul 4 kids on an e bike up Roosevelt Avenue where on one side you will have drivers cutting over bike lane to park, then opening their doors and on the other side cars zipping along at 25-30 mph and turning right right in front of you? You’d be crazy. No, the smart thing to do is to go a block east or west and go on the residential side street. We’re simply overloading our Skinny Seattle “Arterials” when we put in bikes, ANd buses, and parking, and cars, and lots of peds, why not disperse it out in the capillaries, too?

  • Some Dude

    To hear most bicyclists describe it, riding a bike in this city is like walking through a lion’s den. With how dangerous it seems to be to ride a bike on busy streets, it always struck me as high irresponsible to put a small child’s life at risk–taking them, completely exposed, through traffic with no protection other than a helmet. It seems like these kinds of parents are willing to risk their child’s life to make a philosophical point about the environment. The incidental decrement in a family’s carbon footprint does not seem worth risking the life of your child on a regular basis. One flight to take the kids to visit family on the east coast instantly erases any benefits gained by dragging kids through rush hour traffic on a bike.

  • Julian

    Spoken like someone with little personal experience of riding a bike around this town, and given the level of judgment in your tone, precious little parenting experience (if there’s one thing actually raising kids does, it’s make you eat a LOT of crow about judgmental attitudes about parenting you held Before Children).

    The complaints you hear are from commuters and other “single occupancy velos.” Riding with kids entails a complete different set of choices regarding route selection, speed, level of caution, etc.

    Speaking for me, I could care less what my carbon footprint is when I choose to bike over drive. It’s not a political or philosophical decision. Not saying that the safety issue isn’t a concern. If you’re interested in thinking about this issue before you pass judgment, start here:
    http://totcycle.com/blog/is-family-cycling-safe.html

    Perhaps you are aware of the #1 cause of death of children in this country? Driving your kids all over town is not as safe as you think it is, for you or the rest of us.

    But thanks for your pseudo-concern.

  • USRealist

    Blueck – your comment might make some sense in a country like the Netherlands where child poverty is low, but this the US – where one of out of five children is poor. So making it possible for those families to have inexpensive mobility is very much a practical question.

    Your elitist attitude shows you as sadly out of touch with the needs of a lot of American families. If you can’t bring yourself to deal with the US move to Holland! :-)

  • Mhikelple

    yall are so lame…. but i like bikes because you guysss. wait until i tell my friend about this web site. she going to tell all her friends and then this site will be a hit. whoooooooooo! go bikes.

  • Mickey

    well look, bikes cost a lot of ass cheek. i just dont have that kind of money to give to the poor kids for xmas. so lets start a funraiser. hummmmm. just think the kids would be happy. contact me at [ 1888-45mury.thanks