Viva La Cola!

Founded in January 2009, PubliCola is a blog about Seattle written by journalists who are dedicated to non-partisan, original daily reporting that prioritizes a balanced approach to news. Started by longtime local editor and award-winning reporter Josh Feit, PubliCola is the first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol.

PubliCola was off and running. In June 2009, PubliCola hired another award-winning journalist, super-sourced Seattle city hall reporter Erica C. Barnett.

People were afraid that blogging would change journalism. Instead, we believe journalism can change blogging. Twenty-first century journalism may look and feel different, and yes Erica isn't afraid to get cranky, but we're committed to making sure online news still delivers independent, reliable, even-keeled coverage. And most of all, we're committed to making sure the coverage sparks honest civic debate.

Bringing you cola for the people, PubliCola is named after Publius Valerius PubliCola, the alias for the authors of the Federalist Papers—the original bloggers.

The first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol and Seattle city hall, PubliCola has been called a “must-read” by the Seattle Post Intelligencer and a hot “New Media Mover and Shaker” by Seattle Magazine—which also cited our own Erica C. Barnett as the city's No. 1 news nerd.

Morning (After) Fizz

PubliCola’s Primary Election night party at the Five Point Cafe was a mob scene last night, (thus the latest Morning Fizz ever) with appearances by U.S. Reps Jim McDermott and Jay Inslee (he trash-talked U.S. Rep. Dave Reichert), state Sens. Jeanne Kohl-Welles and Adam Kline,  and state Reps. Eric Pettigrew, Ross Hunter, and Reuven Carlyle (he told us how he schooled Mayor Mike McGinn on the phone earlier that day re: the cost overruns debate).

More on all those asides later today.

Also on hand: Progressive fave Joe Fitzgibbon (we’ve got a PubliColaTV interview queued up for later), the young candidate in the 34th legislative district who emerged from the crowded primary field and will face Democrat Mike Heavey in November. (Heavey was in first, 33 to 32, after last night’s vote.)

Here’s Fitzgibbon with his sister, who flew in from D.C. for primary night:

And here’s Josh with U.S.Rep Inslee (who won last night with 56 percent):

And here’s some Morning (after) Fizz:

1. Tea Party revolution? No. Rather than being kingmakers, the Tea Party may be spoilers in November.

Republicans like Dino Rossi (who came through the U.S. Senate primary with 34 to incumbent Democratic Sen. Patty Murray’s 46) and Jaime Herrera (coming in second in her Third Congressional District race last night with 27 percent to Democrat Denny Heck’s 32 percent) need to tack to the middle in order to make up the difference in the general.

That may be difficult. Tea Partier Clint Didier (who got 12 percent in the U.S. Senate contest) already told the Seattle Times that he wants a meeting with Dino Rossi to get some promises before he supports him.

2. Republican revolution? Yes. Maybe. In the Eastside Seattle suburbs where moderate Republicans are trying to take back the “crescent” swing turf that they lost last decade in the state legislature.

Three incumbent Democratic state senators, Eric Oemig in the 45th, Claudia Kauffman in the 47th, and Randy Gordon in the 41st, are losing to Andy Hill,  Joe Fain, and Steve Litzow (a GOPer who’s on NARAL’s political action committee board) respectively.

Also, Republican incumbent, Rep. Glenn Anderson—one of the last GOP incumbents on the Eastside, had an impressive showing against two Democratic challengers, getting 58 percent.

And, at the federal level, U.S. Rep Dave Reichert scored 48 percent.

In a bright spot for the Democrats on the Eastside, house finance chair (the budget guy), Rep. Ross Hunter (D-48) blew out his high-profile GOP challenger, former Republican state party chair Diane Tebelius, 53 to 45. Meanwhile, incumbent Democrats, state Sen. Rodney Tom and liberal Rep.Roger Goodman are locked in jump balls with their GOP opponents, Gregg Bennett and Kevin Hastings respectively.

3. Independent expenditures work. No they don’t.

Independent political committees—groups that raise money independently of candidates and then weigh in with mailers and TV spots to affect the race—showed up biggest against incumbent Everett Democratic Sen. Jean Berkey (D-38) and against State Supreme Court Justice Jim Johnson.

This was liberal money—the unions were dead-set on ousting Berkey (whom they view as a conservative for voting for state worker furloughs and for killing a move to end a tax loophole for big banks) and on ousting Johnson, the arch conservative on the court.

The candidate the liberal IEs backed in the Berkey race, young newcomer Nick Harper, a progressive, came in first with 35 percent. Incumbent Berkey got just 33 percent.

However, in the Johnson race, Johnson trounced his opponent, Stan Rumbaugh, 63 to 37 last night.

4. State Sen. Steve Hobbs (D-44, Snohomish) was also the target of independent spending in the primary. Hobbs, the leader of the conservative caucus in the state legislature, was targeted by unions. However, Hobbs did well last night, coming in first with 37 while his progressive challenger flopped with just 15 percent. David Schmidt, a Republican, came in second with 35.

Another independent expenditure standoff  could be shaping up here for the general, though, that may pit teachers unions vs. reformers in the education reform debate.

Hobbs is a darling of the ed reform movement and backed by big dollars from the Stand For Children PAC). Meanwhile, the teachers union has already endorsed Republican Schmidt.

Look for the traditionally  pro-Democratic unions to go after Hobbs again

5. Some other noteworthy (and surprising) results:

•Even after the Seattle Times abandoned him, U.S. Rep. Dave Reichert (R-8, Eastside Seattle Suburbs) got 48 percent last night over Microsoft-y Democratic challenger Suzan DelBene, who got 26.

•Liberal state Rep. Tami Green (D-28, W. Tacoma, University Place, Lakewood), who heads up the house liberal caucus and was widely viewed as vulnerable heading into the primary, came out with a solid 48 percent, in first place over the nearest Republican, Paul Wagemann, who got 27 percent.  Even more surprising: the other Republican, a Lakewood police officer, Brian Wurts, campaigning on the (understandable) but reactionary fervor to this year’s shooting, came in third.

• A sales and use tax in Thurston County (.2 percent) to fund transit passed by 63 percent.

• Incumbent State Sen. Chris Marr (D-6, Spokane area) came in second to his GOP challenger Michael Baumgartner.

• Ultra-conservative 2nd U.S. Congressional District John Koster is neck and neck with Democratic incumbent U.S. Rep. Rick Larsen in Northwest Washington. Larsen is winning, barely, 42.8 to 40.9.


  • Tony

    Instead of spending all of your time butt-sniffing Democratic pols, why didn’t you guys do some reporting on Election Night? For a political site, it was absolutely pathetic. And then, on the morning after, you have nothing and use as an excuse that you partied too hard? The future of journalism … right.

  • Andrew

    Go Joe Go!

  • http://43rddemocrats.org Michael M.

    Finally! Jesus Christ, that took forever!!!

    Now, on to the big show –

    Berkey may be down now, but I wouldn’t be surprised if she pulls it off in November. Furloughs suck, but they’re better than mass layoffs.

    It is sad to see so many good Democrats obviously on the out, but it’s not as bad as it could have been. The dreamy Eric Oemig and Randy Gordon can pull it off with some hard work, and the results in the 1st should kick the Democrat candidates asses into gear.

    And if the left wastes their money trying to put a conservative Republican into Hobbs’ seat, then they’re stupid. It’s bad enough that we have Fitzgibbon and Heavey duking it out with Demo Dollars in the 34th, we should be focusing money, voter outreach, foot soldiers, etc, where we can keep GOPers out of the state leg.

  • http://43rddemocrats.org Michael M.

    Hey, I’m sure they were doing some serious info gathering or something. And Erica’s dress was totally cute.

  • Ben Trovato

    In these vote-by-mail times (when procrastinating folks like me put their ballots in the mail on election day), how well do these numbers reflect the final outcome? Do you know the proportion of votes counted to votes received? How about a comparison between the total received and the average turnout over the last 10 elections? In fact, do you have any data at all to indicate a confidence level in the percentages you report?

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr. Baker

    Is “Joe” the person that placed second but is getting frontrunner pixels from Publicola?

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr. Baker

    The 48th pretty much held.
    Good for Hunter, bad for establishment Republican representation.

  • http://twitter.com/fattailed fattailed

    The depth of Marcee Stone’s loss in her race is only rivaled by the pathetic showing of Jan Drago in the the mayoral primary last year. And it sorta puts to bed the idea that the 34th District Democrats have any pull in contested races in the district, given that she won their sole endorsement.

  • http://peacetreefarm.org N in Seattle

    Current counted votes, as of late Wednesday morning, come to about 26% turnout. Projected total turnout is 38% (matching the last non-presidential federal/LD election year, 2006).

    Historically, King County late-counted votes don’t differ much from the early votes. On a statewide basis, late-counts, i.e. the big blue Puget Sound counties, are more Democratic than early-counts.

  • http://43rddemocrats.org Michael M.

    Last night was a bad night for District Democrat Organizations (except, of course, the 43rd, who pwned in our endorsed races, especially Wiggins). Marcee was the nominee, not just sole endorsed, of the 34th. The nominee of the 5th, Dean Willard, also came in third (which was personally very disheartening). The 31st was just a mess, so we won’t talk about that. And, of course, the nominee of the 38th (and incumbent) came in 2nd.

  • ivan

    Quit being stupid. He’s down 120 votes, with tens of thousands yet to be counted. It’s a virtual tie.

  • Jakers

    #3: No way is the 38th 69% democrat (35% Harper, 34% Berkey), so something else is going on there. In 2008 McCoy won with 58%, where did the other 11% come from? Higher turnout for dems? Republicans voting for dems?

    Center-left Berkey will easily win over uber-lefty, Publicola-endorsed Harper in the general election.

  • ivan

    Most of the people who do, uh, the actual WORK in the 34th ignored the endorsement and campaigned for Fitzgibbon. So your statement is based on ignorance.

  • http://twitter.com/fattailed fattailed

    I was referring to the 34th district dems as an organizational endorsement.

  • http://43rddemocrats.org Michael M.

    Well, no, because doing that undermined the endorsement, the nomination, the process, and damages the credibility of the Party. The 34th is still boss in many areas, but considering that 2009 they backed a few high profile losers, and then this fiasco this year…perhaps it’s time to change things.

  • ivan

    The credibility of the party rests on the quality of the people it elects, not the people it endorses. Who represents me in Olympia, and who writes the laws for my state, is more important than the endorsement, the nomination, and the process put together. The voters agreed.

  • David Miller

    Until the LDs move up their endorsement meetings to match the Voter’s Pamphlet deadlines, the influence of their endorsements for August primaries will not reach their full potential. Our State-level Democrats should make a priority of changing state law to move the filing deadline up a month to facilitate these endorsements.

  • http://twitter.com/fattailed fattailed

    Which sounds pretty congruent with the notion that the Stone results put to bed the notion that the *organizational endorsement* of the 34th District Dem organization doesn’t have any weight. Of course doorknocking and other “actual WORK” matters. What doesn’t matter is the words “endorsed by the 34th District Democrats”. It doesn’t even matter to the hard core of 34th district Dem activists apparently!

    I think we’re actually in agreement here. But maybe I’m just getting so used to reading through the pugilistic attitude and finding the content?

  • http://peacetreefarm.org N in Seattle

    Continuing the endorsement-irrelevancy trend that’s been ongoing for quite a while. District Democratic organizations have very, very little influence on the voters in their districts.

    It goes back at least as far as 2006 in the 43rd, when the candidate who came closest (by a wide margin) to gaining the endorsement of the 43rd Dems finished dead last in a field of six. The winning candidate had never been seen anywhere close to a meeting of the 43rd Dems until he decided to run for office.

    In 2008, the 36th Dems backed the landslide loser, and ripped their organization to shreds as part of the bargain. At the same time, the 46th’s endorsement procedures collapsed under the weight of accusations of double-dealing and sneaky late-night recounting. I honestly don’t recall who ended up as the nominee, but the general election result certainly didn’t match the inside-baseball split decision of the 46th Dems.

    As a 43rd Dems PCO of long standing, I must admit that the organization of which I am a member is an infinitesimal factor in the political life of the LD.

  • ivan

    The “pugilistic attitude” you speak of is what the voters look for, and respect, in a winning candidate, and a winning campaign. Team Fitzgibbon banged more doors, called more voters, handed out more lit, raised more money, got more endorsements, and built a broader base of support than the endorsed candidate did.

    The endorsed candidate didn’t — and couldn’t — match our efforts. Her supporters — no personal slurs intended here — don’t know how to campaign, and we do. We canvassed all their precincts, in some cases more than once, while they were waving signs on the street, or whatever the hell else they did.

    Endorsements are meaningful only when they are backed up with the day-to-day scut work of campaigning. In this case, the people who won the day at the endorsement meeting ended up writing a check with their mouths that their asses couldn’t cash.

    I warned them this would happen, and they wouldn’t listen. We outworked them and more than doubled their vote. They can chalk it up to “life experience” now.

  • mt_spurr

    What about the failure by 80% to 20% of the levy lift in Lake Forest Park? A bipartisan no campaign beat back a proposal by the City of LFP to raise property taxes.

    The City of Shoreline is up next, and the no campaign is just getting started.

    Both Shoreline & Lake Forest Park are in the 32nd LD, known for voting Democratic, but now fighting back against local taxes.

    But, as I have said before, Publicola doesn’t seem to care much about the ‘burbs.

  • Jakers

    And apparently from the 2004 election cycle we found that democratic ballots have a greater tendency to get lost and then found for recounting in KC.

  • Trevor

    Voter turnout is going to be the biggest issue for the general. If the pro-1098 folks bring large numbers of irregular but Dem-leaning voters to the polls by giving them something to vote for instead of vote against, and by bringing out voters in King County in particular, there will be no serious Republican backlash in WA state in 2010.

    The sec state predicts voter turnout will end up being a little less than 28% in King County for the 2010 primary, with Pierce County even worse. The fate of a number of initiatives, and perhaps even of Patty Murray’s Senate seat, hinges on how much improvement can be made in those two heavily Democrat counties, where 41 percent of all voters in the state reside.

  • http://43rddemocrats.org Michael M.

    What I would say is that on LD races, Mayoral races, Governor races, etc, the endorsement means little, I would say that for judicial races, school board races, and other lesser known, less sexy races, the endorsements can help – but only if PCOs and volunteers do their duty to drop lit, doorbell, phone bank, etc. That’s where an LD endorsement can be most helpful. Unfortunately, I don’t think we see enough people actually hitting the phones or the doors, instead focusing on hitting the parties and events.

  • http://43rddemocrats.org Michael M.

    The credibility of the Party endorsement (i should have made that clearer) rests on wins, quite frankly. And I wholeheartedly agree with what you stated in response to fattailed – an endorsement/nomination doesn’t mean anything if the work isn’t done to follow it up. And not just money. What is more important is hitting the pavement, making the calls, dropping the lit. Sign waiving, as fun as it is, is…well, it is what it is.

    Either way, Team Fitzgibbon clearly did a great job. It was nice to finally meat the guy last night, and it was great to see Angie last night! How you did that is beyond me ;-)

  • ivan

    I know damn well that you didn’t “meat” the guy last night. In your dreams, maybe. };->

  • http://43rddemocrats.org Michael M.

    @Ivan:

    Not in my dreams. He needs to eat a cheeseburger or two, have some…well, let’s just say he’s not my type.

    And my typing is all screwy today. I’m still recovering. Christi and Kimber are a blast, and a certain other person who’s name I’ll politely not mention.

    Next time I see you, though, ask me about my conversation with Mr. Fitzgibbon. You’ll appreciate it.

  • kurisu

    School levies were dropping like flies in the ‘burbs. It’s hard not to just give up on those voters when they can be such heartless bastards.

  • kurisu

    Not sure if irregular voters are the ones who are going to say “yay taxes!”

  • http://peacetreefarm.org N in Seattle

    My earlier reply didn’t appear (moderated due to too many links?). In short, your “sec state predicts voter turnout will end up being a little less than 28% in King County” is a complete misreading of the SoS data. That 28% was the number of ballots already in KCE’s pipeline as of some time last evening — the 23% of the electorate already counted plus the 5% already returned but not fully processed.

    Ballots arrived today, and will arrive tomorrow, and will continue to arrive in significant numbers into next week. Last Friday, KCE estimated that final turnout could be approximately 45%.

    In other words, take last night’s reported totals in King, including Patty’s 72K margin over Rossi, and double them. Meanwhile, the easterm WA counties will add a few more ballots to their already near-complete counts.

  • Mr. Baker

    Fuck you.

  • ivan

    He’s down by 21 votes now. He’ll probably be leading after the next count.

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr Baker

    As long as the bias works for you.