Viva La Cola!

Founded in January 2009, PubliCola is a blog about Seattle written by journalists who are dedicated to non-partisan, original daily reporting that prioritizes a balanced approach to news. Started by longtime local editor and award-winning reporter Josh Feit, PubliCola is the first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol.

PubliCola was off and running. In June 2009, PubliCola hired another award-winning journalist, super-sourced Seattle city hall reporter Erica C. Barnett.

People were afraid that blogging would change journalism. Instead, we believe journalism can change blogging. Twenty-first century journalism may look and feel different, and yes Erica isn't afraid to get cranky, but we're committed to making sure online news still delivers independent, reliable, even-keeled coverage. And most of all, we're committed to making sure the coverage sparks honest civic debate.

Bringing you cola for the people, PubliCola is named after Publius Valerius PubliCola, the alias for the authors of the Federalist Papers—the original bloggers.

The first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol and Seattle city hall, PubliCola has been called a “must-read” by the Seattle Post Intelligencer and a hot “New Media Mover and Shaker” by Seattle Magazine—which also cited our own Erica C. Barnett as the city's No. 1 news nerd.

PubliColaTV: Freddie Mac. What Would Sen. Murray Do?

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mtDGvw1fHJc[/youtube]

At a press conference yesterday, Senator Patty Murray touted the Wall Street Reform bill passed by congress last month, saying that the new law “holds Wall Street accountable, and guarantees that American taxpayers will never again have to pay to bail out Wall Street or clean up after big banks’ messes.”

But the New York Times reports that Freddie Mac posted a $6 billion loss in the second quarter this year, and Freddie is requesting an additional $1.8 billion in federal aid money. So I asked Murray whether she would support sending some more money Freddie’s way.

And she almost answered. She said it will be a treasury department decision and there won’t be a senate vote on the topic.

Which is fine. But for a campaign that has focused so much on eliminating bailouts—“American taxpayers will never again have to pay to bail out Wall Street or clean up after big banks’ messes,” she said at the press event— it seems like she should be able to offer an unequivocal no.

Murray’s Campaign Communications Director Julie Edwards followed up with me via email to clarify the senator’s answer:

“Senator Murray firmly believes that we need to reform Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae. This process must be done carefully and thoughtfully given their role in stabilizing the housing market.”

Edwards went on to bash the potential Republican plan for reforming Freddie Mac:

“She is looking at all proposals on reform, but it’s important to note that the preferred Republican approach—assuming the big banks take over the entire mortgage market—would likely mean a massive loss of credit availability to future homebuyers. [And] it would be particularly damaging to homeowners who are currently at risk of foreclosure. And she’s not exactly ready to hand the entire future of the housing market over to the big banks that helped get us into this mess.”

I’ve emailed the National Republican Senatorial Committee and called Dino Rossi spokeswoman Jennifer Morris to get their take on Edwards’ claim.

UPDATE:

Edwards is referring to a GOP plan, sponsored by Sen. John McCain, that would have first limited government support of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae —the federally supported firms that buy mortgages and sell them to investors to increase the pool of money that’s available for mortgage lending—and set up a plan to phase them out of government stewardship.

National Republican Senatorial Committee spokesman Brian Walsh tells PubliCola:

“She [Sen. Murray] voted against a measure that would put a firm timeline in place for Congress to end the bailouts.  So her tired rhetoric of simply blaming the Republicans rings hollow when she is on record opposing even a basic timeline.”

Sen. Murray voted against the McCain amendment back in May, which lost 56-43 on a straight party line vote with only Sens. Russ Feingold (D-WI) and Evan Bayh (D-IN) siding with the Republicans. (The Democrats argued that putting Fannie and Freddie on the fast track to dissolution would have atom-bombed the mortgage market.)

Additional reporting by Josh Feit.




  • tpn

    Huh. So GSEs are the same as Wall Street? Please explain that framing.

    Second, Freddie and Fannie at the behest of the Obama administration got all of the bad MBSs as a result of failures like Lehman; this is the mechanism thorugh which the flacid HAMP and HARP programs were attempted with abysmal results– mostly because of contradictory directives from the Treasury. Homeowners were told that they could not take part in a program if they were not distressed, and then when they became distressed, were told they had to be current to take advantage of the programs. The bottom line is that the GSEs were the backstops for the MBSs that would have otherwise completely brought down the shadow banking industry. As it is, these banks, along with some TBTF banks, are technically insolvent. Look at the stats on the percentage of subprimes and option/ARMs that were underwater got refinanced. And look out for the second wave at the end of 2011, as the 3-5 year option/ARMs issued between 2006 and 2008 reset.

    These problems are much larger then the Senate. Any Senator that says they he or she can “do something” is lying out of their ass. When regulators are completely caputured, and the congress is captured by banking interests (lets see if Liz Warren gets that new post, eh?) we must look to how we ended up in this situation; Murray and others has only to look in the mirror to answer this question. Where were they when the only engine for economic recovery– our industrial and manufaturing base– was shipped out to sea?

    I think they call it “a snail farting in a hurricane”.

  • Nindid

    TPN, I appreciate your comments but I think your details go well beyond Publicola's interest here. The point is not to actually see if Murray's position makes sense in a complicated world, but rather an attempt to embarrass her by finding a reason no matter how true her answer might be.

    This has really been a pattern here going back a good while now and if I had to guess I would say it is a conscious editorial decision. I don't know how else you get articles like this and Josh Feit's earlier masterpieces arguing that the DCCC should not have pointed out that Reichert supported rewarding companies that outsource jobs because a Democrat voted the same way or that Gregoire must be in a great tizzy because she had to ask a Republican DA to do his job.

  • Phil

    You know what tpn? I can tell you're a know-nothing ass-hat even though you use have six usages of undefined acronyms.

    it never says that GSEs are the same as wall street. Murray says “big banks” as well in her answer, and Fannie and Freddie are essentially that: large banks that focus on buying up mortgage loans–good and bad. I work at a credit union and we sell almost all of our mortgages to fanny.

    And your overly-verbose, nigh-on-impenetrable comment neglects the broader point of the article: Murray doesn't have an answer about how to reform these groups, except to say that we shouldn't do what the republicans want.

    I'm also interested in the level of expertise you claim about the senate. These issues are “larger than the Senate”? Please. I'd advise that you don't try to shift the conversation to international outsourcing to dodge the real question (what do we do about failing Freddie—unless you think that we can't do anything a gov't-controlled institution losing $6 billion) here—it only betrays what a hack you are.

  • Phil

    Please. Everyone knows that PubliCola has a nearly-explicit liberal bias. You just look silly with this comment.

  • tpn

    OK, Phil. So what is your CUs return on assets? How is your capitalization doing? Feeling pulled under by the fact that the TBTF banks are getting all the breaks, while the CU corporates are having to be propped up by credit unions who had nothing to do with the whole mess (and may be dissolved anyway?) How is all that regulation affecting your operational costs, regulations that were rammed through without any consideration of the fact that credit unions were not part of the problem, and have an entirely different business model? What's Murray doing about that? (What would her opponent do? Also nothing, likely).

    And you are a lender that doesn't service or carry your own mortgage loans? I guess you are as much of a hack as anyone.

  • off high horses!

    The above is a prewtty good reason why democrats and libverals for fifty yhears have failed in the mesge wars. Can't you guys boil it down to language people can understand? Are you trying to act like effete intellectuals and view this as a policy intellectual m.bation issue or do you care about real people?

    Try this.

    Rich paople aided by the GOP ripped off Americans, as they always plan to do. Too many Americans got fooled and this includes many democrats who let the bubbles get too big. Then the Obama team did a stimulus and a bank takeover move that stopped the worst from happening, a great depression; but the GOP acting greedily as always blocked doing more to solve thejobs problem. So hell yes if we need to do more bank takeovers and more regulations and bigger stimulus in the future we're going to do it and this is because a BIG government is what you need so that these big evil banksters don't rip you off again!

    BTW a message of “I am against future bailouts” is like saying “oh the GOP is right, what I voted for is wrong” and it totall is a GOP message so why in hell is patty murray using that kind of message? Could this have something to do with the fact that survey usa gives her only 41 points which is far behind the total of the GOP trio?

  • hmmmm

    you mean teh Dems are off the hook on this? Get Real.

  • Flynlobo

    VOTE THE CROOKS OUT

  • Flynlobo

    Print more money because the Banksters are sitting on Piles of cash, Not one Banker Fired not on arrested and they continue to pay $10,000 a plate to go to dinners and get access to Congress wake up America get in the Revolution Sheeple this crooks of GOP and DEMS are selling us out they need to be put in jail Vote this Bitch out with the rest of them or we deserve the crap coming down our way