Viva La Cola!

Founded in January 2009, PubliCola is a blog about Seattle written by journalists who are dedicated to non-partisan, original daily reporting that prioritizes a balanced approach to news. Started by longtime local editor and award-winning reporter Josh Feit, PubliCola is the first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol.

PubliCola was off and running. In June 2009, PubliCola hired another award-winning journalist, super-sourced Seattle city hall reporter Erica C. Barnett.

People were afraid that blogging would change journalism. Instead, we believe journalism can change blogging. Twenty-first century journalism may look and feel different, and yes Erica isn't afraid to get cranky, but we're committed to making sure online news still delivers independent, reliable, even-keeled coverage. And most of all, we're committed to making sure the coverage sparks honest civic debate.

Bringing you cola for the people, PubliCola is named after Publius Valerius PubliCola, the alias for the authors of the Federalist Papers—the original bloggers.

The first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol and Seattle city hall, PubliCola has been called a “must-read” by the Seattle Post Intelligencer and a hot “New Media Mover and Shaker” by Seattle Magazine—which also cited our own Erica C. Barnett as the city's No. 1 news nerd.

“If the Number of Campaign Signs Mattered, Ron Paul Would be President.”

1. Heading into primary week, Sunday’s Tacoma News Tribune challenged Dino Rossi on his signature issue—earmarks.

Rossi has criticized Sen. Patty Murray for securing hundreds and millions in federal budget line items for Washington state, but voila—Rossi did the exact same thing as a legislator in Olympia.

The TNT reports:

However, in Olympia, as the chairman of the Senate Ways and Means Committee, Rossi wrote a 2003-05 state budget that contained dozens of member requests. Nestled in the budget were $19 million worth of projects funded through the Department of Community, Trade and Economic Development and $5.6 million funded through the Community Services Facilities program.

It also provided grants of $500,000 or less to 47 projects through what was known as the Local Community Projects program.

The Rossi budget included $500,000 for a pirate-themed water park, $150,000 to acquire land for new gun and archery ranges, $500,000 for new turf at a high school, $350,000 for baseball fields, and money for a farmers market, a skateboard project, a naval museum and salmon habitat restoration.

Rossi also sounded a little like Murray when he described the money he’d secured.

“That wouldn’t have happened if I didn’t make it happen,” Rossi was quoted by the Northwest Asian Weekly as saying about $1.5 million he secured for the Wing Luke Asian museum in Seattle.

PubliCola wrote about state senator Rossi’s $25 million bundle of earmarks (and the irony) back in June, noting, additionally, that Rossi has benefited from a state budget earmark himself, one directed at the Everett Aqua Sox, a team he was part-owner of.

Rossi often takes credit for the state budget he wrote and passed in 2003, when he was a senator in Olympia. That budget contained nearly $25 million in earmarks.

Rossi has also personally benefited from earmarks. In 2007, the Everett Aquasox, of which Rossi was a part owner, got a $433,000 earmark in the state budget to upgrade their stadium. That one actually caught the attention of a conservative think tank, The Washington Policy Center—fans of Rossi, and vice versa—which included the earmark in its 2008 “Piglet Book” documenting wasteful pork in the state budget.

2. The Seattle Times ran a story this Sunday outlining Lake City residents’ concerns about a proposal to reduce NE 125th St. from four lanes to three, adding bike lanes and crosswalks. (As in other neighborhoods where the city has implemented similar “road diets,” neighbors have complained about traffic impacts and loss of parking.) The aim of the project is to calm traffic and make the street safer for pedestrians and cyclists.

BikeNerd will have more to say about the Times’ story later today, but it’s worth noting that the Times didn’t talk to a single neighborhood supporter of the project.

For a more complete explanation of why the city recommended the road diet, visit SDOT’s blog.

3. A front-page New York Times story on Sunday documented the secret “shadow war” the U.S. is waging around the world (although, no price tag mentioned) to fight al Qaeda—a new “scalpel” strategy that’s replacing the U.S. “hammer” strategy. They also described the plan as “multigenerational,” meaning it’s longterm.

Washington state’s own Rep. Adam Smith (D-WA, 9), who’s on the House Intelligence  and Armed Services Committee, was quoted as a main advocate for the new strategy:

“Where we want to get is to much more small scale, preferably locally driven operations,” said Representative Adam Smith, Democrat of Washington, who serves on the Intelligence and Armed Services Committees.

“For the first time in our history, an entity has declared a covert war against us,” Mr. Smith said, referring to Al Qaeda. “And we are using similar elements of American power to respond to that covert war.”

4. A lot has been made about Clint Didier’s grassroots insurgency, particularly his ubiquitous yard signs.

However, heading into this week’s primary, Jennifer Duffy, Senior Editor at the non-partisan Cook Political Report, the insider’s bible for political punditry, threw a wet blanket on the notion that Didier has the momentum, telling PubliCola: “If the number of campaign signs mattered, Ron Paul would be president.”




  • http://www.joeszilagyi.com/ Joe Szilagyi

    @1 Someone complained last time either here or Slog or Crosscut rather forcefully that what Rossi did wasn't “earmarks”. If the media lets him get away with that, it's absurd. I'm waiting to see how the Seattle Rossi Times weighs in.

    @2. The Times story was pure hackery and poor reporting for not covering both sides.

    @4 if Ron Paul, his Aqua Buddhist son, or a true Tea Party member were president, our more perfect union would be done as a nation. I don't think we could survive that brand of lunacy.

  • http://43rddemocrats.org Michael M.

    HA! @4 is funny not only with the Diddier business, but over in the 5th, David Spring is running with only signs. I mean, he can't run on what he stands for, because it all sucks, and he can't afford mail, or phone banks, or pretty much anything…except signs from last time around, and new ones for this time around.

    Yet one more reason that Dean Willard is the bomb-diggity.

  • Barney

    “if Ron Paul, his Aqua Buddhist son, or a true Tea Party member were president, our more perfect union would be done as a nation. I don't think we could survive that brand of lunacy.”

    The Paul's both described themselves as Constitutionalists. So you're saying you detested the Founders, the Constitution and the Federation until the country drifted 180 degrees from those ideals?

  • http://43rddemocrats.org Michael M.

    That's some awesome hyperbole. Congratulations.

    Please explain to me, however, with your obvious superior knowledge of the Constitution, how we have drifted 180 degrees.

  • herrnichte

    Did any of you actually read the Times story? It sure seems to cover the pro-bike side given this quote from that story (egads folks, not every story is going to be 100% pro-bikes -sigh- you're just making an anti-bike backlash more likely. i like bikes – but geez):

    David Hiller, advocacy director of Cascade Bicycle Club, said the change is a safety project, not a bicycle project. “There's a higher percentage of injury crashes” on that street, he said. “If any roadway could use rechannelization, 125th is on the top of the list.” He said bikers don't use 125th “because it's a hostile, dangerous situation. No one wants to be there. The folks are trying to confuse the issue. The fact we can improve conditions for bikes is a win-win. It's hard to understand how an adult can come to the conclusions that neighbors have come to.”

  • http://www.joeszilagyi.com/ Joe Szilagyi

    I can't speak for Josh/Fizz but I meant that they didn't apparently reach out to a single local neighborhood fan of the project for comments.

  • Oldcyclist

    Ending the property qualification for the franchise. Abolition of slavery. Equal protection of the laws. Female suffrage. Income tax.

  • http://spifflines.blogspot.com/ John Bailo

    Did you say Rand Paul?

  • Dustinrbk

    Ron Paul predicted the economic collapse while McCain, Bush and Obama supported the Bailouts, Tarp and more power to the Federal Reserve ect…..Ron Paul 2012

  • Biliruben

    The car volumes are relatively light on 125th.

    Here's the reason:

    I live in Lake City, and if I want to go south on I-5, I hop on Lake City Way. If I want to go N. I would probably drive 125th, except for the simple fact that there is no on-ramp going N. on I-5!. So I take 145th instead.

    Ditto for coming home. I take Lake City Way coming from the south, and there is no off-ramp coming from the North.

    I love 125th. A beautiful, tree-lined residential street that was the first connection Lake City had to I-5, built in a slower, more genteel time 60 or so years ago. I just rarely ever go on it, because in the car it doesn't take me to where I want to go, except perhaps Maple Leaf. On bike, it is currently suicide. I might even walk it, if we didn't have cars cruising by at 50 mph. It is not at all relaxing to walk on a street with traffic moving that fast by you, and it's very difficult to cross safely.

    This will make the road a much more pleasant and useful corridor for all modes transportation.

  • stop speeders

    if cars are going too fast, enforce the speeding laws.

  • Right Thinking

    Yes, we should not have done the TARP or the stimulus; let the banks fail, let GM fail, it's only by culling out the weakest members of the herd that the strong can flourish!

    This is why the small-government states like Somalia today, or say Guatemala in 1955 ar such models of growth, opportunity and freedom for all! We should emulate them! No government is best, let's have the rule of the jungle, a tooth adn claw free for all, that's how we evolve the strongest!

    BTW damn that Roosevelt and his ww2 spending…obviously if we'd followed the Hoover program of letting people die we'd have been better off today as the entire lower class would have died off back then.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_DGEHFDURZ465SXVQGXIJ7KZSLE malalingua

    Too bad some people view peace, prosperity and private property as lunacy. @Joe you probably had a government education and get all your news from either cnn or msnbc, for that I have pity for you. There is still time to wake up. If you really understood Ron Paul's views on government than you wouldn't be saying such nonsense. But I understand your comfort in slavery, freedom is scary and will make the individual more responsible.

  • Dfgh543

    “peace, prosperity and private property”

    For white people… because civil rights laws infringe on freedom, right?

  • http://43rddemocrats.org Michael M.

    I am of the belief that if we ignore them, they'll go away. Remember, the followers of the Paul family are not right in the head…even worse than Seattle area political junkies…and won't stop unless ignored!!!

  • Biliruben

    Hire more cops at 80K annually, or just spend 60K once, and problem solved.

    I'd prefer that cops focus their efforts on burglaries, rapes, murders and such, and let the chronic traffic issues, where the occasional speed traps and shown a complete failure to slow traffic, be solved using smart engineering.

    This is a no-brainer. A win-win-win, except for those who want to speed on a residential street that is.

  • Biliruben

    Hire more cops at 80K annually, or just spend 60K once, and problem solved.

    I'd prefer that cops focus their efforts on burglaries, rapes, murders and such, and let the chronic traffic issues, where the occasional speed traps and shown a complete failure to slow traffic, be solved using smart engineering.

    This is a no-brainer. A win-win-win, except for those who want to speed on a residential street that is.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_DGEHFDURZ465SXVQGXIJ7KZSLE malalingua

    for ALL people! Let's not see people as a groups let's see them as individuals. So peace, prosperity and private property for ALL PEOPLE.

  • ivan

    Josh Feit lecturing Susan Gilmore on journalism is like the Count on Sesame Street lecturing Einstein on math. Josh marches in lockstep with the Massholes who want a road diet for every four-lane arterial in the city, and never subjects their position to any journalistic scrutiny.

    This is entirely apart from the substance of the issue, which is: Should NE 125 St get a road diet? I have no opinion on that, and for all I know, a road diet might be called for there.

  • Barney

    When the Colonists took up arms against King George, their taxation rate was about 25%. King George's tax burden would be a relief today.

    The Colonists rebelled against the red coats writing their own warrants to search and seize property to enforce the Stamp Act. Today, FBI agents can write their own warrants search/seize your property and it would be illegal for you to tell anyone including your spouse.

    We went from “”Peace, commerce, and honest friendship with all nations-entangling alliances with none.” to an empire of 700 military bases in 130 countries and a military budget equivalent to the rest of the world combined! We have openly prosecute aggressive pre-emptive wars against a TACTIC, “Terror”?!… which essentially means perpetual war. And the President now asserts to right to assassinate anyone including Americans without due process just like any banana republic dictator thugs.

    After the lessons of the Continental dollar the Founders explicitly prohibited fiat money. We went from a century of sound money to one that has been devalued 97% since the inception of the Fed.

    We went from a vision of limited gov't and maximum individual liberty, to a cancerous mutation that purports to take care of everything and everyone but in reality most of it are just schemes to enrich themselves and their friends.

    Make no mistake about it, the Founders did not intend for a Federal gov't of this size and scope. So you are either for the original intent of a Fed gov't restrained by the Constitution or you are in favor of today's system, one with no bounds.

  • CVBrown.PE

    Actually, Biliruben, 125th is NOT a “residential street”. It is an arterial street. Period. Arterial streets are supposed to carry large volumes of traffic at efficient speeds. Maximum vehicular capacity, by the way, is found in the 35 mph range.

    Chris

  • Biliruben

    Chris –

    It's a residential street in the sense that it is lined almost exclusively with residences, except for the few blocks coming into Lake City.

    But you are right, it's an arterial. A low-volume arterial, but an arterial non-the-less.

    The engineers say that volumes will not decrease, only speeds, and given my personal observations I have no reason to doubt them. Low volumes going fast seems to be the perfect combination for this sort of a modification.

    The only argument that I've heard that makes me even mildly concerned is how the 41 stops will be handled. I think it's solvable using increased spacing and curb bulbs, but I am not particularly knowledgeable on the variety of solutions available.

  • Paitch D

    Excellent summary. When one understands that the Constitution is a LIMITING – not living – document, it becomes obvious how far we have fallen.

  • antiwhiner

    Barney, logic fail. Founders created a national government with power to tax. so stop whining about your taxes, they are among the lowest of all advanced nations. Founders created national government with power to regulate commerce. So stop your whining just because your side loses an election. Founders used military force to put down stupid ignorant treasonous tax protestors like yourself btw.

    Founders also provided in our constitution for majority rule, well understood in our English traditions to be a bulward against depradations public or private, so stop your whining about how the majority likes to pass things like social security, health care reform, etc. Founders understood that maximum liberty includes having a strong national government — they ditched the articles of confederation. Later on we extended the bill of rights to the states, putting feds in charge of enforcing that on the states. So our various founders well understood that a king, a corporation, or a state OR a national government can screw you and take away your freedom and opportunities and one of the wways to fight back is thru a national legislature with majority rule and the power to tax and regulate. That's why they put that in the constitution you dumbkopf. Why do you hate our founding fathers so much? You want no government, why don't you move to Somalia?

  • Barney

    Guatemala? Why did Clinton issued a belated apology to Guatemala?

    Hoover was just as big as an interventionist as FDR. Ever heard of the crash of 1920-21? Probably not, because it was over so quick. The markets plunged 40%, but Harding resisted looting the public to prop up markets. The whole ordeal was over in less than a year.

  • Tlforker

    Wonderful!!! You have written the truth. So many are blinded and don't see this truth.

  • http://twitter.com/tollilf Tolli

    I agree with your first paragraph – from that point on you lost it… good start – poor ending.

  • http://43rddemocrats.org Michael M.

    Um…you didn't state one example of how we have, in your words, gone 180 degrees from the Constitution. This was just a bunch of dribble that is all objective, with limited subjectivity strewn about.

    Not logic fail, but a total answer fail. Stop sucking all that tea-party juice, and learn a little about how the world actually functions, learn that the “founders” consisted of people who had stark disagreements on many issues, and put together a framework for future generations to bend to the needs of the present day.

    Paitch talks about the Constitution being a “limiting” document, and to a degree he is right – there are limits to what laws can and cannot be passed. But it is limiting more in the sense that it is a framework, and not something to be taken as the only laws and rules.

    While some would argue, as you seem to be, that the government is too large, and that, because in the late 1700's the economic, industrial and technological advances were not foreseen, they therefore cannot and should not have government respond in kind, I would state simply that those arguments are bullshit. Only an imbecile would believe that if the founders were alive today, they would be against public education, social security, health care access for the poor, desegregation of schools, outlawing of slavery, a robust foreign policy, a robust defense of our nation, and so on and so forth. As the world evolves, so must our union, and it has. While the Ron Pauls of the world would like to send us back to the 1700's, it is not something that will happen, and anyone who thinks it could is either a child of Sarah Palin (specifically the youngest one), or…well, no, that's about it.

  • kurisu

    I thought that Massholes enjoyed weaving between lanes while stopping at every Dunkin' Donuts along the I-95 corridor.

  • Barney

    “Founders also provided in our constitution for majority rule”

    Epic fail!
    The United States is not a majority rule! If you don't even understand that you need a lot of learning.

    strong national govt' = max liberty?!

    Where do you get your sh1t from? Do you even know what the enumerated powers are?

    And the 16th Amendment was introduced in 1913. I'm pretty sure none of the Founders were around then.

    Getting all pissy and cursing can't mask the stupidity of your post.

  • drshort

    I'm guessing they're a little more difficult to find.

  • http://43rddemocrats.org Michael M.

    I'm sure you're smart enough to remember that the Constitution allows for amendments as needed to expand the powers of the government, and if you're going to talk about defense of the Constitution, then you're defending the amendments, as well. l

  • Tammy30

    Thanks for making it so obviously clear you were “trained” from the government schools.

    I had my 11 year old child read your response and he was able to point out most of the errors in your rant.

    Whining is one of the few liberties we can still enjoy in this country. Why silence dissent? And why do you think people were searching for a new country to settle? would you call them whiners as well?

  • Tammy30

    Thanks for making it so obviously clear you were “trained” from the government schools.

    I had my 11 year old child read your response and he was able to point out most of the errors in your rant.

    Whining is one of the few liberties we can still enjoy in this country. Why silence dissent? And why do you think people were searching for a new country to settle? would you call them whiners as well?

  • Barney

    When Congress decided to ban alcohol back in the 20's, people still had enough respect for the Constitution to introduce and pass a Constitutional amendment.

    Since then, we've had an endless parade of entitlements with absolute disregard for the document. That is my definition of 180 degrees.

    Constitutional abuses aside, just look at these programs. Social Security has been looted to bankruptcy. Anyone looking to retire on SS is seriously delusional and try counting up how much the gov't looted the public for that do good promise and measure that against how much good it actually did.

    Prior to Medicare, NO ONE was ever turned away or credit checked before being treated. Health care was affordable and charity hospitals were abundant. Today, everyone is charge the maximum because it's “someone else's money”. People like to blame the HMO's, but HMO's are Federally mandated creatures. Just like Freddie/Fannie, another do-good program gone awry. Meanwhile, segments where gov't doesn't get involved like laser eye surgery, costs actually go down.

    And the Senator who championed Prescription Drug Bill left immediately after the Bill passed (by one vote) and took a million dollar Pharma lobby job. And an audit of the Pentagon a couple of years ago reported over $1 TRILLION unaccounted for. And people like you want everyone to continue to bend over and take it with a smile because the assailants says it's for our own good.

    Furthermore on civil advances, historically gov'ts has been the obstacles. It was individuals like MLK, Rosa Parks, Alice Paul, Lucy Burns who ended the social injustices and it was gov'ts that resisted.

    People like you like to mock Ron Paul's ideas as ancient and backward looking. But the truth is the Freedom experiment which began with the founding of the United States is relatively new. Kings, Monarchs, Emperors, Czars and other forms of central planning and authoritarian rule are the truly ancient systems. How many Czars do we have now?

  • Marc

    How awesome would it be if Ron Paul were Prez!

  • http://43rddemocrats.org Michael M.

    Again, cite one example. Not platitudes. Not hyperbole. But an actual example.

  • http://43rddemocrats.org Michael M.

    Josh and Erica – if you ever mention Ron Paul again, I will deflate the tires on your bikes.

  • MikeBoyScout

    Prior to Medicare, NO ONE was ever turned away or credit checked before being treated. Health care was affordable and charity hospitals were abundant.

    This is BS on multiple fronts, but let's just pick the first one to show how deluded you must be to make it.
    Medicare became a reality with the passing of the Social Security Act of 1965.
    Equal access to any public accomodations did not become law until Civil Rights Act of 1964.

    To assert that prior to 1965 no one was ever turned away for medical care is flat out ridiculous and easily knowable for anyone.
    That you missed even this simple fact shows you don't know squat about which you so adamantly opine.

  • Barleywine

    I'm afraid I've got to side with Barn on his last comment.

    I don't know Ron Paul (beyond his cameo in Bruno), but Barney has lots of good points here that can't be brushed away so easily.

    They probably could be brushed, and will be, but not so easily.

  • Blonduxo

    Your ignorance is amazing. Try reading the Constitution and you might just learn something about the republic in which you live and about how only certain powers, 17 in fact, are ennumerated powers that the Federal government is delegated by the States and those not delegated nor prohibited are reserved to the States respectively , or to the people. You see the individual states had to unite before they could delegate powers…that is why nullification is an option. Maxiumum liberty is diametrically opposed to having a strong national government.

    You are right on one thing…if you want no goverment go to Somalia and enjoy your anarchy. If you want limited government as proscribed by the Constitution then elect Ron Paul in 2012 to restore the republic.

  • Sparhawk2k

    Personally, I've talked to more people in favor of it. I've also talked to a LOT more people who were in favor of it before it started getting press because one of the main priorities in the neighborhood for a while has been reducing the speeding on 125th. It's one of the worst arterials in the city.

    Also, there were numerous positive comments on the neighborhood blog where I directed her and I had contact info for more but she never asked. She just wanted to find out the Pinehurst CC's official position.
    –Phillip Duggan

  • Celestebonn

    You should list specifics about Ron Pauls lunacy. If balancing the budget and living in peace is lunacy then that makes me a lunatic. It is obvious you know nothing about what he stands for . He is the only hope for this country.

  • Jucaţi cazinou online

    James?