Viva La Cola!

Founded in January 2009, PubliCola is a blog about Seattle written by journalists who are dedicated to non-partisan, original daily reporting that prioritizes a balanced approach to news. Started by longtime local editor and award-winning reporter Josh Feit, PubliCola is the first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol.

PubliCola was off and running. In June 2009, PubliCola hired another award-winning journalist, super-sourced Seattle city hall reporter Erica C. Barnett.

People were afraid that blogging would change journalism. Instead, we believe journalism can change blogging. Twenty-first century journalism may look and feel different, and yes Erica isn't afraid to get cranky, but we're committed to making sure online news still delivers independent, reliable, even-keeled coverage. And most of all, we're committed to making sure the coverage sparks honest civic debate.

Bringing you cola for the people, PubliCola is named after Publius Valerius PubliCola, the alias for the authors of the Federalist Papers—the original bloggers.

The first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol and Seattle city hall, PubliCola has been called a “must-read” by the Seattle Post Intelligencer and a hot “New Media Mover and Shaker” by Seattle Magazine—which also cited our own Erica C. Barnett as the city's No. 1 news nerd.

Liberal Consultant Does Mailing for Right-Wing Candidate

A new political committee, Cut Taxes PAC, has gotten involved this year’s state legislative races. Given their name, it’s no surprise their first spend was $3,000 on mail against incumbent Democratic state Sen. Jean Berkey (D-38, Everett) and $3,000 supporting her GOP opponent, Rodney Geiger.

Here’s the surprise, though: The mail firm is Moxie Media, a Democratic firm—the same firm that’s done about $70,000 in mail against conservative state Supreme Court Justice Jim Johnson and, in fact, is doing TV for Berkey’s Democratic opponent on the left, Nick Harper, on behalf of a progressive political committee called Stand Up for Citizens.

Moxie may not be the only ones playing both sides of the fence.

The Public Disclosure Commission has not reported the contributors behind Cut Taxes PAC yet, but sources close to the Berkey campaign believe it’s being funded by labor unions—specifically, the Washington State Labor Council’s Don’t Invest in More Excuses PAC, the main funder behind the Harper independent expenditures that Moxie has done.

DIME PAC has  pledged to campaign against Democrats who did not vote labor’s way, and despite Berkey’s strong labor record, she did vote to furlough state workers, which really pissed off the unions this year.

Labor council spokeswoman Kathy Cummings said she was “not familiar with that one” when asked about Cut Taxes PAC and referred us to Moxie. (Moxie has not returned our call or email.)

Cummings did say, “We would like to see her [Berkey] not make it through the primary.”

With Reiger, a Tea Party-esque Republican whose campaign site blares “Cut Spending & Reduce Taxes,”  (the opposite of labor’s agenda, by the way) attacking from the right and Harper attacking from the left, Cummings may just get her wish.

However, be careful what you wish for.




  • http://twitter.com/fattailed fattailed

    Painfully ironic to have such a short-sighted approach to implementing what is otherwise a smart long-term-minded strategy of undermining conservative dems.

  • ivan

    Will you ever learn. Josh? There's no such thing as a “liberal consultant.” They're all about the Benjamins, period. They're mercenaries, first and foremost.

  • George

    I think you missed the point of the post Ivan. It seems certain that unions are paying Lisa to hit a Democrat who voted to raise taxes and thus save many of their members' jobs.
    I agree with fattailed that this completely undermines what was a very interesting strategy to this point. Why would a moderate Democrat ever vote for a tax increase again if unions are going to attack you for having done so?

  • Tongue in cheek, head in ….

    how dare they try to earn a living. If you look deeply, you will see moxie supporting dino rossie and then chris gregoire, they have NO VALUES other than the benjamins!

    Same thing with Axelrodand Plouffe. Mercenaries! Likely after they leave Obama they will work for SarahPalin.

    Fortunately, ivan and I have never, ever supported any candidates using these horrible mercenary political consultants –we are above that slime!

    thank god ivan's candidates from obama to Joe Fitzgibbon never, ever have used these mercenaries, and are above it all!

    BTW that's the better strategy to win! Let the GOP be all bare knuckled fighters, we liberals will abstain from dirtying our tender hands in this messy stuff called fighting

  • ivan

    Stop being an ass. Of course we all use them. It's perfectly legitimate to bash them for supporting our opponents.

  • A.S.

    damn capitalist firm!

  • http://twitter.com/fattailed fattailed

    BTW, points to PubiCola for this scoop. Good straightforwarding reporting on a piece that I'm sure all involved wanted to keep quiet. Nice.

  • Some Dude

    I heard as a child Josh had a hard time understanding Baskin Robbins business model after learning that they sold 30 other flavors in addition to his favorite.

  • Edog

    Actually, you are wrong. Political Consultants are usually tightly bound with one party. I don't know about out here. But in DC, if a firm aligned with D cantidates and issues did some work for an R, that would be the end of them, and their work would dry up, overnight. THE END

  • ivan

    THE END my ass. Tell it to Cathy Allen, the “Democratic consultant” who worked for the Republican Tom Albro in the “nonpartisan” Port Commission race, and sent out union-bashing hit pieces against the Democrat in the race, Max Vekich.

  • kurisu

    Yes, Cathy's “Purple Connections”

  • Edog

    My THE END comment was in reference to what I know of DC culture, not out here.

  • tpn

    Considering the anti-union screeds, knee jerk condemnations of SHARE, and admitted support of things like the WTO, do Publicola politcal writers have any leg to stand on to decide what “progressive” really means?

  • Phil

    Do you? Does anyone?

    By that logic, no one can actually call anyone progressive if they don't subscribe to every single progressive issue—and someone has to decide and prioritize all of those issues first.

  • tpn

    Yeah, um okay. So one can be a ” progressive “– except that thing about racial equality, and the love of war, and “free trade”. Or something else. In this oh-so-post-modern-world, I guess we can take any word in the English language, and redifine it for our own interests, lest we dare support the dominant paradigm of attaching meanings to words long enough to make a concrete reference? But I gess without the loosey-goosey semantics game, we couldn't have political manipulation of language, could we?

  • Redderthanred

    Bourgeois liberal reformist.

  • whattaload

    ivan, take yer head out. you said this:
    “There's no such thing as a “liberal consultant.”"
    You're wrong. Most are aligned with a party and there are plenty o' libeeral consultants. When you're wrong, you're wrong. Btw pointint to one example out of an “n” of thousands (Cathy Allen) isn't proof of anything and is a pathetic attempt to respond to something you said that's wrong.
    “They're all about the Benjamins, period.”
    What an ass hole comment. the vast majority of them work for shit pay for a few years while they do shit jobs on campaigns. Then they move up to doing mail for state rep candidates barely paying their bills. Then they might hit the “big time” of earning $6000 a month being manager of a senate campaign or something. of course it's only for nine months then tthey are unemployed for maybe a year. Then a few like SAxelrod and Plouffe hit the real big time and your notion they're only in it for the money is rude, wrong, and asinine.
    “They're mercenaries, first and foremost. “
    Well I hope you voted for Obama Murray et al. using these mercenaries. See above comments. The fact is, the vast majority aren't in there changing sides every election and every one knows this and it's rude, wrong and asinine to contend otherwise.

    You didn't bash them for supporting our opponents btw. You bashed them in generic and insulting terms which is fine if what you say is true, but it's not if you're wrong.

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr. Baker

    Sinderman.