Viva La Cola!

Founded in January 2009, PubliCola is a blog about Seattle written by journalists who are dedicated to non-partisan, original daily reporting that prioritizes a balanced approach to news. Started by longtime local editor and award-winning reporter Josh Feit, PubliCola is the first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol.

PubliCola was off and running. In June 2009, PubliCola hired another award-winning journalist, super-sourced Seattle city hall reporter Erica C. Barnett.

People were afraid that blogging would change journalism. Instead, we believe journalism can change blogging. Twenty-first century journalism may look and feel different, and yes Erica isn't afraid to get cranky, but we're committed to making sure online news still delivers independent, reliable, even-keeled coverage. And most of all, we're committed to making sure the coverage sparks honest civic debate.

Bringing you cola for the people, PubliCola is named after Publius Valerius PubliCola, the alias for the authors of the Federalist Papers—the original bloggers.

The first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol and Seattle city hall, PubliCola has been called a “must-read” by the Seattle Post Intelligencer and a hot “New Media Mover and Shaker” by Seattle Magazine—which also cited our own Erica C. Barnett as the city's No. 1 news nerd.

How Are Sound Transit’s Bike Racks Working Out?

The bike blogs were justifiably annoyed by an alert Sound Transit sent out yesterday, clarifying that because “Travelers LOVE Link Light Rail,” bicyclists must now share the bike storage areas on trains with people’s luggage, “on a first-come, first-served basis.”

Seattle Bike Blog:

When I read this I thought, Oh! Travelers LOVE Link Light Rail. That’s great. But are bikes getting in the way or something? Then you read Sound Transit’s rules, and they say that only four bikes are allowed in a train car at the same time. So if you get on and there were already four there, do you have to get off at the next stop? Is there a fight to the death to see who stays?

In fact, as Seattle Likes Bikes pointed out, it’s worse than that: Because bikes can’t block the handicapped seating or the aisles, “The only location … that works is against whichever doors are not going to open at the next station.”

This is far from ideal, and seems like allowing the two additional bikes was an arbitrary compromise on Sound Transit’s part. Excluding the bicycle storage area, which is now officially shared with luggage, effectively bicycles may only be brought on trains without standing passengers.

Obviously, many transit systems don’t accommodate bikes at all, so Sound Transit’s decision to include two hooks per train was a big concession. However, once you decide to allow bikes on trains, you’ve got to come up with a system that works for cyclists.

That means: One that doesn’t force bikes to share their only dedicated space with luggage, one that includes enough bike storage space to meet demand, and one that doesn’t allow bikes to protrude into the aisles. One example is the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority, which allows six bikes on trains—four of them on a bike rack situated in between the two parts of each articulated car. One bonus is that the racks are ground-level, avoiding the need to hang a bike on a hook seven feet in the air.

Side note: As inadequate as Sound Transit’s bike-rack system may be, it’s at least less complicated than Metro’s new plastic three-bike bus racks, which prompted an explanatory flier with no fewer than eight (!) steps (including one with substeps a), b), and c)) to show riders how to load their bikes. This (combined with Metro’s 700-word FAQ, which includes handy advice for “small people” who can’t manage the heavy racks, AKA women), is a sign that you are Doing it Wrong.)




  • downbythefreeway

    The first time I tried to use one of those damn metro racks, the bus driver refused to get down to show me how to use it, so I struggled with the thing for a full 5 minutes and then got on a bus full of people who hated me all the way home. Nice incentive to bike in Seattle. Thanks, Metro.

  • Thieves of Seattle

    By all means, if you are going to the airport, PLEASE PUT YOUR LUGGAGE OVER IN THE BIKE RACKS.

    Then, please go to your seat 10-40 feet away and enjoy your ride in peace, without hassling about keeping your paws on your luggage!

    Thank you.

  • NoSpin

    Why boot bikes instead of luggage? Why not make people move their luggage if someone with a bike boards?

    I also don't see the problem with letting someone with a bike simply hold onto it in the aisle – I see people holding onto baby strollers, luggage, and all sorts of things that block the aisle and/or seating.

  • Random Engineer

    More often than I see a train with people standing I see a train that was amply primed with roller bag equipped travelers in Westlake, who feel quite free to put their luggage in the handicap seating area.

  • Selma

    Jesus are Seattle bicyclists needy. They need racks on buses, racks on trains, special lanes, “road diets,” bike boxes, special streetcar instructions, special bike rack instructions, public bike storage lockers, public bike racks, and a deep public understanding of how very important their mode of transportation is and how they need to be accommodated with every thing they do.

    When I was a kid, I managed to ride my bicycle from my home to the store and back again. If I wanted to go someplace far away (like someplace that might be as far a distance as a light rail trip), I road my bike there.

    Why do we need to put so much effort into transporting your mode of transport?

  • Hyptest

    It's light rail that has one terminus downtown, and one terminus at the Airport and you're complaining that sound transit is putting the needs of Airport users above bike users?

  • Kent Pikey

    Get ready to drool when you see this picture of a London Bicycle “Superhighway”

    http://www.good.is/post/london-opens-bike-super…

  • Grover

    “So if you get on and there were already four there, do you have to get off at the next stop? Is there a fight to the death to see who stays?”

    What a stupid question!

    The answer is no. If there are already four bikes on a Link car, you can not board that car with a bike. Some twit at Bike Blog really does not understand this?

  • Grover

    One way to make this “fair” would be to charge an extra fare for every bag that is not held on someone's lap or does not fit under a seat. And charge an extra fare for every bicycle. A bike or a large bag takes up at least as much space as a passenger, so it's like having two passengers on board when someone has a bicycle or large bag.

    Then, if someone complains about your bike or bag taking up space they want to use, you can tell them, you paid an extra fare, so you have a right to use that space. If you pay only one fare, why should you be allowed to use an extra seat or standing space with your bike or luggage?

  • giffy

    Any statistics on how many bikes are on the average care? I rarely seem to see them, luggage seems much more common, but then I don't ride link all that much.

  • giffy

    Probably because more people board with luggage than with bikes.

  • misha

    It's not like car riders need parking spaces, special bridges, park and ride lots, driveways, alleyways, highways, arterials, local roads, streetlights, gas stations, tow trucks, traffic reports, signal sensors, drive-thrus, parking garages, parking meters, meter readers, DUI patrols, rest stops, or traffic signs, right?

    Give me a break. Give back your trillions ($1,000,000,000,000's) of dollars of car infrastructure and we'll shut up about our $100 bike racks.

  • Transit Guy

    C'mon. Link cars are 95 feet long — there's no way to conveniently see all of the car, only the end you are boarding. And even then, if the train is crowded, you may not see that bicycle in the next vestibule.

    As a practical matter, most all people just use good judgment, whether it's with their bicycles or their luggage. Blocking the handicapped seating (misnamed; it's nearly impossible for a truly handicapped person to pull those seats down into place for sitting) and someone needs it? People just move out of the way.

  • Some Dude

    It often feels like bicyclists aren't interested in sharing. They insist that everyone accommodate them, but when they get something, it's for their use only. It's called sharing. It is public transport. Functionally speaking, on the train, there is no difference between a bicycle or luggage. It is just shit that takes up space. So if the train is crowded and the storage area is full of shit, and your shit doesn't fit, then wait for the next train. Or ride your bike to the next station.

    ____________

    Just wait for the next train, no big deal.

    Steve Jobs

    Sent from my iPad

  • ivan

    What part of 'there are more of us” do you insist on not understanding?

  • None

    I thought bike were the perfect mode of transportation? Why even use the light rail with them? I don't (but some do try to) put my car in a train!

  • kurisu

    People in ivan's world fit into such neat categories… I wish it were that simple in reality.

  • Meanie

    Man I know, we tell this to minorities all the time, but they just don't get it.

  • ivan

    Unlike being black or being gay, bicycling — like driving — IS a lifestyle choice.

  • Qwerty123

    OK, everybody needs to get a grip… on their shit.

    Don't travel with more luggage (ie. rolling shit) than you can easily carry, particularly if you are on public transportation. Put it somewhere where it fits… which might be on a different car, and might be on the next train.

    If you are taking your bike (ie. different rolling shit), be prepared to put it somewhere where it fits… which might be on a different car, and might be on the next train.

    Maybe, when ST orders more cars and Link goes to 4 car trains, they can get some like BART and Caltrain have, so that one car of each train (usually the last car) has more luggage and bike space.

    Until then, manage your shit.

  • L. Smith

    I think they should replace the double seat across from the bike hooks with a luggage rack. There is constant demand for luggage storage, and very frequently there are trains with at least two bikes on board. I don't think current ridership is enough that removing four (or two; perhaps the conversion only needs to happen on half the car) uncomfortably small leg room seats would make a significant difference to travellers, and having luggage out of cyclists' and riders' way is a big enough advantage.

  • otter

    Luggage Racks . . . simple. Overhead luggage racks. No modifications to the seats. Also make it so the bike area holds two bikes.

  • kurisu

    Driving is not a choice for the 2 million people in WA without drivers licenses

  • Tchhhht!

    Start paying the same fees and taxes that motor vehicle owners have to pay and then you might have something to bitch about. Until then you are nothing but a goddamned self-centered crybaby.

  • ivan

    Walking is not a choice for paraplegics. What's your point? Are you telling me that all those 2 million are incapable of ever having driver's licenses? That includes small children; do you think people are too dumb to catch that?

    I'm all for building wheelchair ramps and I'm all for building mass transit. Unlike you, I neither require, nor do I insist, that we must necessarily punish and deprive drivers to accomplish that. But that, apparently, is all you want to do. So why should I regard you as anything other than a petty, vindictive asshole?

  • misha

    3% of commuters in Seattle commute by bicycle, compared to 60% of commuters who commute by driving. So, I guess that means bikes should get 5% of the infrastructure funding that cars get, right?

    We can ignore the tens of billions of dollars of car-specific infrastructure already in place in Seattle for now. Let's start with the deep bore tunnel. Car drivers get $4.2 billion for a new car-only highway on the waterfront. That means bikes get 5% of that – $210,000,000 – in bike-specific infrastructure funding then, right?

    For every park and ride lot, bikes get 5% of the funding for bike racks, lockers, and bike lanes. For every parking spot, bikes get 5% of the funding. Etc.

    Sounds fair to me. Right now, we can't even get $30 million for walk/bike/ride funding, even though walk/bike/riders make up 40% of Seattle.

  • Guest

    Otter called it right, just add those open rack luggage racks like they have in the ST buses. That way there is plenty of room for luggage. Also the bike rack area needs a second hook. There's only one there.

  • Grover

    There are only two doors on each light rail car through which bicycles can enter — the middle two. If the door you want to enter with your bicycle opens and you see two bicycles inside that car by that door, you can't take your bike inside there. You then walk about 20 feet to the other middle door where bicycles are allowed, and if there are two bikes inisde that part of the Link car, also, you can't board that Link car with your bike.

    If there is one bike, or no bikes, inside that Link car near the middle door when the door opens, you can board with your bike.

    “If the train is crowded”….then use your “good judgment” and don't take your bick on the train. Only a selfish jerk would take a bicycle on a crowded train.

    Not that difficult, is it?

  • http://twitter.com/btmspox Bryan McLellan
  • http://twitter.com/btmspox Bryan McLellan

    You're limiting the space that transit riders with bicycles are allowed to use with the small amount allowed to them. If your argument was expanded to include all of the train, it would be much more complicated.

    Why can't the handicap people in wheelchairs share room with riders with bicycles? Why do they get their own space?

    Why can't the people standing in the aisles share room with riders with bicycles?

    There are good reasons for these being the case that are a longer discussion. What we're talking about is sharing space on the entire train by allowing some for riders with bicycles.

    Waiting for the train is a huge deal. If you live on Beacon Hill and you're traveling to Seatac, that's a 24 minute ride. Show up a couple minutes early and say, 27 minute trip. The train comes, and you can't get on, and you have to wait 10 minutes for the next train (depending on headways). It's now an unreliable 37 minute trip. You spend those 10 minutes wondering you don't just buy a car and forget all of this mass transit business.

    And keep in mind that the people you're targeting aren't people who are just want to bring a bike with them, these are people whose starting point and destination are more than two miles from each link station. Adding bicycle facilities to the vehicles themselves rather than just the transit facility is a clear effort to increase the walk-shed of these facilities that we've invested a lot of time and money into. This is only more important in a financial climate where we're losing Metro and ST bus routes rather than building new ones.

  • http://twitter.com/btmspox Bryan McLellan

    Central link is the backbone of a larger system that is being built. The Link light rail system isn't built with airport travelers as the primary users, it is a regional transit system for getting people between different parts of the city. People who live in one part of the city, work in another, and go out to eat in yet another are primary. But Seattle isn't that dense yet, everywhere you want to be won't be within one mile, walking distance, of a Link station. Bicycles increase this walk-shed.

  • http://hitchmountrack.com/ hitch mount rack

    Thank you …The world just need more bike rack : )