Viva La Cola!

Founded in January 2009, PubliCola is a blog about Seattle written by journalists who are dedicated to non-partisan, original daily reporting that prioritizes a balanced approach to news. Started by longtime local editor and award-winning reporter Josh Feit, PubliCola is the first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol.

PubliCola was off and running. In June 2009, PubliCola hired another award-winning journalist, super-sourced Seattle city hall reporter Erica C. Barnett.

People were afraid that blogging would change journalism. Instead, we believe journalism can change blogging. Twenty-first century journalism may look and feel different, and yes Erica isn't afraid to get cranky, but we're committed to making sure online news still delivers independent, reliable, even-keeled coverage. And most of all, we're committed to making sure the coverage sparks honest civic debate.

Bringing you cola for the people, PubliCola is named after Publius Valerius PubliCola, the alias for the authors of the Federalist Papers—the original bloggers.

The first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol and Seattle city hall, PubliCola has been called a “must-read” by the Seattle Post Intelligencer and a hot “New Media Mover and Shaker” by Seattle Magazine—which also cited our own Erica C. Barnett as the city's No. 1 news nerd.

No Written Communications Between Chopp and Gregoire on Tunnel Provision

We were wrapped up in endorsements yesterday and didn’t have time to link  the PI.com’s interview with Gov. Chris Gregoire.  We’ve been trying to get the governor to directly address the controversial statements that state house Speaker Rep. Frank Chopp (D-43, Seattle) made to the Stranger, namely that the infamous cost overrun provision came from Gregoire, not Chopp, who otherwise has been widely blamed for the poisonous provision.

We did get denials from Gregoire’s spokesman, but the PI talked to Gregoire herself.

Have you spoken with Speaker Frank Chopp since he said the ‘stick-it-to Seattle’ clause came from you?

I have not talked to him. I had my legislative liaison call him and ask for a retraction. And I don’t know what he’s going to do.

Just to be clear, that language did not come from you?

You heard from the fellow members of the House caucus. This was the speaker’s office’s idea. They come out with the language. Yes, there was debate about it, and maybe some changing of the words as the process went along, but, no, sorry, didn’t come out of my office.

We did a public disclosure request for all communications between Chopp and Gregoire on the tunnel provision to see if perhaps Chopp had a smoking gun—perhaps an email documenting Gregoire’s role in coming up with the provision.

He does not. We got the response to our request yesterday and were told that Chopp does not have any records of communications with the governor on the overruns provision.

Footnote: Communications by members of the legislature are not subject to public-disclosure law. (The legislature is responsible for writing the public-disclosure laws under which it operates, and the exemption is a perennial complaint of public-disclosure advocates.) However, state House Democrats spokeswoman Melinda McCrady said she didn’t believe there had been any communications between Gregoire and Chopp on the overruns issue, and the response from Chopp’s office said there were “no records responsive” to our request.




  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr. Baker

    Both of them could take responsibility for taking it out, the governor already said she would sign such a bill, and Frank Chopp…

  • http://sciencevsromance.net joshc

    the provision is only poisonous (to Seattleites) and palliative (to other state reps) if you believe it can be enforced.

  • Josh Feit

    What's funny is this: The crowd that McGinn's got so riled up about it (the Lesser Seattle, anti-tax crowd…which isn't actually his base) is generally all for taxing fancy water front property owners who benefit from public investment. It's weird to see that same bloc, the group that defeated the Commons, defending “Seattle property owners.”

  • Barleywine

    I think the language is so vague that the people who would like to soak someone else don't really know in this case if it's themselves or not.

  • Barleywine

    Just think what the reaction would be if the language said:

    “Seattle area ugly people will pay all cost overruns.”

    Who would fight that, besides me?

  • Trevor

    Josh you managed to make at least 4 false suggestions in 2 sentences here:

    1) most of people “riled up” about cost overruns on tunnel are part of “lesser seattle, anti-tax crowd”
    2) “lesser seattle” and “anti-tax crowd” are same “bloc”
    3) anti-tax crowd supports taxing waterfront property owners who benefit from public investment (which anti-tax crowd supports high taxes again?)
    4) only people protected by keeping Seattle govt off the hook for cost overruns are property owners (see Real Change saying this is a way to protect human service funding, for instance)