Viva La Cola!

Founded in January 2009, PubliCola is a blog about Seattle written by journalists who are dedicated to non-partisan, original daily reporting that prioritizes a balanced approach to news. Started by longtime local editor and award-winning reporter Josh Feit, PubliCola is the first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol.

PubliCola was off and running. In June 2009, PubliCola hired another award-winning journalist, super-sourced Seattle city hall reporter Erica C. Barnett.

People were afraid that blogging would change journalism. Instead, we believe journalism can change blogging. Twenty-first century journalism may look and feel different, and yes Erica isn't afraid to get cranky, but we're committed to making sure online news still delivers independent, reliable, even-keeled coverage. And most of all, we're committed to making sure the coverage sparks honest civic debate.

Bringing you cola for the people, PubliCola is named after Publius Valerius PubliCola, the alias for the authors of the Federalist Papers—the original bloggers.

The first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol and Seattle city hall, PubliCola has been called a “must-read” by the Seattle Post Intelligencer and a hot “New Media Mover and Shaker” by Seattle Magazine—which also cited our own Erica C. Barnett as the city's No. 1 news nerd.

Stalled Roosevelt Bike Lanes Should be a Wake-Up Call

Part of the Seattle Department of Transportation’s proposed redesign of Roosevelt Ave from NE 75th St to NE 115th St has been put on hold until at least 2011. SDOT had proposed adding uphill bike lanes and downhill sharrows and installing a marked crosswalk at 90th St. In order to accommodate bike facilities between 75th and 85th (a particularly narrow section of the road), SDOT would have to remove parking along the west side of the road.

Unfortunately, it appears that SDOT caved to pressure from Maple Leaf residents who opposed the project, and will now postpone plans to add the bike lanes from 75th to 85th. The redesign of 85th to 115th (including the 90th St crosswalk) will go forward as planned later this year.

From SDOT’s press release:

The Seattle Department of Transportation (SDOT) received and reviewed more than 100 comments regarding this project.  We heard support for additional bicycle facilities, more marked crosswalks and traffic calming.  We also heard concerns about the impact of losing on-street parking and possible impact on transit operations with only one southbound lane between NE 75th and NE 85th.

In order to conduct additional traffic and parking analysis over the fall and winter months, SDOT is postponing implementation of the plan between NE 75th Street and NE 85th Street until 2011.  We anticipate the 15th Avenue Bridge will reopen by that time and traffic on Roosevelt will normalize.  We will return to the community in early 2011 with an updated proposal.

It’s a shame that SDOT caved to a small contingent of NIMBY Maple Leaf residents who are too selfish to give up half of 10 blocks of parking in order to make bicycling safer and easier.

Though arterials like Roosevelt pose some issues for cyclists (higher traffic speeds, more air pollution), they’re still the fastest, most direct routes through Seattle and bicyclists deserve safe access to them. Bike lanes and, to a lesser degree, sharrows help facilitate that safe access.

SDOT isn’t the only one to  blame for this setback. It’s also the fault of bike advocates (myself included) who say we want bike lanes, but rarely seem to turn out to express our support. In my experience with SDOT project open houses, opponents of bike projects almost always outnumber supporters. Not only does this mean that the majority of comments on bike projects are generally negative, it also bolsters people’s perception that bike projects only benefit a handful of roadway users and therefore aren’t worthwhile.

Furious and fearful opponents put forth the effort to attend these open houses and deliver their comments to SDOT. Supporters, already largely content with the proposals, do not. I wasn’t at the Roosevelt open house (see?), but I would guess it was similar. Bike advocates need to show up and voice their support for SDOT’s bike projects—or, at the very least, submit comments through SDOT’s web site.




  • tedb310

    Is SDOT's press release supposed to say 45th Avenue Bridge, instead of 15th?

  • Mr. X

    Nope, it's 15th (it's a bridge that crosses the ravine just before Northgate Way).

    And score one for the majority of Seattle residents!

  • Steve

    I'm a cyclist who regularly commutes to work, and I live near the area where the bike lanes were proposed. I love riding in a dedicated lane, but not all bike lanes are created equal. I'm afraid the residents — the people who will live with and use the bike lanes– are right: this was just not a good proposal.

  • Joshua Newman

    Local residents are very concerned about parking, which the Maple Leaf Community Council’s Board reflected in our letter to SDOT. But our primary concern is the impact on traffic and transit along Roosevelt. At the intersections of 75th and 80th, there is room to make right turns on red lights, allowing drivers to turn towards the freeway, get around drivers making left turns, and get around buses that stop to un/load riders. SDOT’s current plan is to remove parking on the west side of the street and shift the traffic lanes over, thereby taking away those three options.

    Parking could be removed from the east side of the street, but this would remove more parking than the west side and prevent a continuous bike lane, due to curb blubs the project into the street. There are trade-off in every scenario, and the community that will use the bike lane the most needs a little more time, study, and 15th Ave reopened to make a decision.

    Joshua Newman
    MLCC Board Member

  • drshort

    I dont blame the residents for opposing the plan. The houses in that area generally have very little off street parking. Suck it up and go down 8th for 10 blocks if its too scary.

  • Mr. X

    I rode by bike to the meeting on this proposal going about 10 blocks downhill on Roosevelt (which was fine to ride on with the current configuration) and back uphill on 8th – which is a quieter street with a gentler uphill grade than Roosevelt (I will concede that it's a bit tougher crossing 80th on 8th, though).

  • ORCA_holder

    Isn't Maple Leaf the neighborhood that argued the climate change importance of not cutting down trees at the Camp Fire site? Now, they argue the importance of plentiful free street parking and easy vehicle flow. Are they environmentalists or are they just good at arguing whatever suits their comfort at the time?

    I hope SDOT will move ahead with this wonderful project as soon as possible.

  • Robert_Cruickshank

    I don't see how this can be a legitimate concern. (Note: I lived on NE 81st street, between Roosevelt and 8th Ave NE for several years in the '00s.) Right turns on red and getting around a stopped car or bus are not critically important things, certainly not over and above providing better facilities for bicyclists. Those are perks, but traffic has been proven to be able to flow effectively even if those options aren't there.

    There's no doubt that Roosevelt is narrow, especially between NE 82nd and NE 75th. But the SDOT proposal seemed a sensible way to handle this. It's too bad you guys did not see fit to embrace it. Maple Leaf can and should be a more walkable and bikeable community, and this proposal would have gone a long way toward making that possible. Instead you've opposed it out of a desire to maintain the primacy of automobiles, especially for automobile practices that really are pretty low on the list of street use priorities.

  • http://www.MapleLeafCommunity.org David Miller

    Josh —

    Too bad you didn't call or email us before you wrote the article. As Joshua Newman points out above, the Maple Leaf Community Council's primary issue was the potential delay of transit service and not parking.

    Despite being the second highest point in Seattle, we have a large number of cyclists in our neighborhood. Cyclist safety is a priority, but so is transit service and pedestrian safety. We raised questions about transit throughput and SDOT realized they made a design error in this stretch and needed to study those intersections in greater detail. SDOT decided to postpone the study to 2011 so the travel studies wouldn't be complicated by the fact 15th NE is currently closed to through traffic to remodel a bridge.

    Because of our proximity to Northgate, it is in Maple Leaf's best interest to encourage alternatives to car transportation. That's precisely what we are doing here and why we support 30 blocks of bike lane striping from 85th north to 115th.

    We'll stay on top of SDOT to make sure the additional study happens. We'll work with SDOT to get Metro experts and drivers at the table and put it all through a process allowing for public comment. We're looking for a better solution, not inaction.

    I invite you to keep in touch with us as to the progress of this 10-block stretch.

    David Miller
    Maple Leaf Community Council
    David.Miller@MapleLeafCommunity.org (for next time, Josh)

  • Let's POLARIZE!

    It sounds much more like many in the community was concerned about transit routes, rather than turning it into the tired cars-vs.-bikes argument you (and Publicola) seem to wish it were.

  • greenlakemom

    I really wish the city would be bold. Bold enough to remove parking here and there. I drive, I bike, I walk. When I see Seattle go bold enough to make me feel comfortable biking with my children, I'll drive less. It continues to disappoint me to see the city make it ALMOST to the mark only to just miss.

    Further south on Roosevelt is a good example. Warm fuzzies, SDOT, for putting in the bike lanes. Cold pricklies for not removing parking on the right side and giving all users the space they deserve. Today during rush hour, I saw a big delivery truck that was too wide for the new parking zone, so it overlapped the left traffic lane. Nice. That's how bicyclists feel when trucks are in the bike lane.

    Bike boxes = great idea. What would make them excellent? How about a bike priority light so I don't feel the F500 breathing down my neck immediately upon a light change.

    I like cheap and free parking as much as the next car driver, but I recognize that it's not a right, it's a privilege. I also see a cycle. I'm willing to give some parking so that better, safer facilities will be built to entice me to bike/walk more and drive less to that parking spot I gave up.

    Go bold, Seattle. Some of us are waiting.

  • a special inquiry

    Way off topic, since there aren't any open or tunnel threads…a group is filing an anti-tunnel petition, and there is no news at Publicola….what gives?

  • reduce reuse recycle

    yes they said they want a cable stayed viaduct.

    Maybe we should just cable stay the viaduct we've already got??

  • Jakers

    No bike lanes until there is a public vote by Maple Leaf residents! The city shouldn't be able to force this upon a neighborhood!

  • seandr

    My current Capitol Hill house has no off street parking – we have to park our cars on the street in front of our house. Same with Central District house I lived in prior to this one.

    If the city decided to remove street parking for a bike lane, they would completely screw me over.

    Josh, I know you're the bike nerd and all, but there are other things to consider in planning a city besides bikes.

  • ivan

    Elitist urbanazis think you shouldn't even *have* a car, much less be able to park it.

  • http://twitter.com/robespierrette Carol Monahan

    No: They're talking about the current bridge closure on 15th *Avenue* NE, not the NE 45th *Street* viaduct, which is in an entirely different neighborhood. Roosevelt is currently carrying additional traffic through Maple Leaf, due to the redirected traffic from 15th. It does make sense to wait until 15th is open to make major changes to Roosevelt.

  • drshort

    The city is being bold. They're gonna build the biggest damn tunnel ever!

  • roosevelt_realist

    Are you willing to give up parking in front of your house? If so, please tell me your address so I can make sure you follow through on your promise. I will make sure you don't stop to unload something heavy or drop off an elderly visitor.

  • Spandex for All

    It's impossible for cyclists to move over one block for their ten or twenty block rides from 95th to 75th…..no, instead people should park a block away….

    this way, we can concentrate the bikes off the nonarterial a block away…by concentraing bikes with busses, and cars on Roosevelt, then we can achieve the maximum slowdown possible of cars ….

    this provides a disincentive to use cars. The plan is to make them a crappy form of mobility, thus people will shift to bikes, see?

    In a few years, we'll probably have 45% of all trips on bikes. Then you won't need the parking spaces or the lane for cars, and you will forget you opposed giving up the lane. it's like a diet, see, it's all FAT you car drivers are just like FAT and you're bad and unhealthy and the plan is to get rid of you!

    What's elitist about that?

  • Mr. X

    Upon reflection, the characterization of Seattle's bike activists as “silent” is a rib tickler. If ever there was a “silent majority” that was neither….

  • http://bruteforcecollaborative.wordpress.com/ mike

    “It’s also the fault of bike advocates (myself included) who say we want bike lanes, but rarely seem to turn out to express our support. “

    that's funny, if you read neighborhood blogs, that is all those NIMBYs say ever happens.

  • Steve Cyr

    I for one am happy to see neighbors standing together to make a difference in the Maple Leaf neighborhood. Kudos to the MLCC for asking SDOT to “know the impacts” BEFORE implementing the plan. Bike lanes are great when they are done right. Cramming them in narrow stretches of road and pinning cyclists between buses and parked car doors seems irresponsible. In case you haven't counted lately there are 28 buses per hour in the stretch of Roosevelt between 75th and 80th during peak hours. That 14 buses in each direction.

    But then again, some are more into fantasizing about spandex than intelligent thought.

  • misha

    Oh that sucks, you would have to resort to using the 12 frequent neighborhood bus lines, 73 neighborhood Zipcars, new light rail, new streetcar, bike infrastructure, taking advantage of the most walkable neighborhood north of San Francisco and west of Chicago, or actually paying market rate for a parking spot instead of having taxpayers subsidize it for you.

    You would be SOOOOO screwed!!

  • misha

    The new Seattle Bike Blog has a good post about this, including data on the number of people who actually use the parking, and a comment from a bus driver who drives down Roosevelt every day:

    http://seattlebikeblog.com/2010/07/29/roosevelt…

    (I'm not affiliated, it's just a good new blog)

  • Doug Campbell

    An important fact is missing from this discussion.

    Unlike most lots in Maple Leaf, those along this stretch of Roosevelt have back alleys. These back alleys generally make accessible driveways, garages, carports and parking for multiple vehicles on each property.

    It's still a loss to not have a parking space in front of your house, but it would not deny homeowners vehicular access to their properties.
    .

  • mapleleafer

    The attitude from people like Spandex for all makes my support for bike riders go away.
    Come talk to me as an equal and I will listen. Until then you are doing more damage than good.

  • ivan

    Right on schedule, here is misha, to prove my point yet again.

  • misha

    Hint: Spandex for All is an anti-bike nut who is mocking bike riders.

  • http://www.MapleLeafCommunity.org David Miller

    This is one important consideration. However, there is no alley from 81st to 85th on the west side.

  • Mr. X

    Effectively mocking them, I might add.

  • seandr

    Thanks for your empathy!

  • Doug Campbell

    True. I should have made it clear that my original comment applied to most residents, not all. There is, however, very little street parking actually being used on the west side of Roosevelt from 81st to 85th.

    I am under the impression that the thornier issues are those at 80th and south. Unless I am missing something, these residents all have excellent alley (or in one case side street) parking access.

  • kurisu

    So, there would only be parking on one side of the street. If parking functions as you claim it does and residents are able to consistently park in front of their own homes, it's evidence of ample parking in this area.

  • Robbiehamilton

    Robert – you’re insane.  Do you really think it is clear in your head that “automobile practices.. are pretty low on the list of street use priorities”?  That’s like saying “airplane movement is pretty low on the list of runway priorities.”
     
    By the way, don’t say things like “..has been proven…” when it comes to talking about bikes having anything close to a priority over cars.  You cannot back up a claim like that but on the positive side, it matches the insanity of the rest of your argument.
     
    The vast majority of people will own cars for the rest of your lifetime (that can be proven on several levels including common sense (to which you do not subscribe), statistics, and trending).  Quit fighting cars and put your energy into something else like complaining that omnivores (the vast majority of humans) should quit clogging the aisles of supermarkets because it makes the vegetarians uneasy.

  • Robbiehamilton

    Misha:
    What’s your point?  Where do you want ‘seandr’ to park?  Or do you just want him to dress in Old West clothing and ride a horse.  We live in the modern times no matter how much you want to go backward.  The future is not without cars.  We need more, not less, parking.  We cannot afford to remove parking or reduce traffic flow for the sake of 0.5% of the population (bikers).

  • Robbiehamilton

    Yes, it would be amazing to see 45% of all trips on bikes because none of us lived in the 18th Century so it would be interesting to see how the population lived two hundred years ago.  Of course, Seattle would have empty buildings and no economy so the bike trips would be a slow ride to pick up food stamps – but hey, the remaining people would be slimmer!  I’m not sure I understand how killing the prefered mode of transportation makes anything work better.  No one in their right mind makes an argument that includes a high percentage of trips on bikes!