Viva La Cola!

Founded in January 2009, PubliCola is a blog about Seattle written by journalists who are dedicated to non-partisan, original daily reporting that prioritizes a balanced approach to news. Started by longtime local editor and award-winning reporter Josh Feit, PubliCola is the first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol.

PubliCola was off and running. In June 2009, PubliCola hired another award-winning journalist, super-sourced Seattle city hall reporter Erica C. Barnett.

People were afraid that blogging would change journalism. Instead, we believe journalism can change blogging. Twenty-first century journalism may look and feel different, and yes Erica isn't afraid to get cranky, but we're committed to making sure online news still delivers independent, reliable, even-keeled coverage. And most of all, we're committed to making sure the coverage sparks honest civic debate.

Bringing you cola for the people, PubliCola is named after Publius Valerius PubliCola, the alias for the authors of the Federalist Papers—the original bloggers.

The first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol and Seattle city hall, PubliCola has been called a “must-read” by the Seattle Post Intelligencer and a hot “New Media Mover and Shaker” by Seattle Magazine—which also cited our own Erica C. Barnett as the city's No. 1 news nerd.

PubliCola Picks Stan Rumbaugh for State Supreme Court Position 1

Trial attorney Stan Rumbaugh would be a welcome, progressive alternative to Justice Jim Johnson, a conservative judge whose most enduring legacy on the court was a ruling upholding the state’s ban on gay marriage.

Over his six years on the court, Johnson has compared gay marriage to polygamy, voted in favor of dismantling state disability law, sided with banks that gouged consumers with excessive fees, and sided with negligent companies over injured workers. In 2009, Johnson wrote a lone dissenting opinion favoring the rights of minors to own handguns. In 2006, he disagreed with the rest of the court on a case upholding the federal Defense of Marriage Act, arguing that their ruling did not go far enough to establish that marriage could only be between a man and a woman. And he has supported various anti-transit, pro-roads, and anti-tax proposals, including Bellevue developer Kemper Freeman’s efforts to open HOV lanes to all cars, and Tim Eyman’s initiatives to cut taxes and restrict government spending.

Like his colleague Richard Sanders, Johnson is also deep in the pockets of the Building Industry Association of Washington, the builders’ lobby group. In 17 Supreme Court cases in which the BIAW filed amicus or friend of the court briefs, Johnson sided with the lobby 16 times.

Rumbaugh, though he lacks judicial experience, would be a vast improvement over angry conservative Johnson. An attorney for 31 years, Rumbaugh has served on the board of Planned Parenthood and Tacoma Housing Authority, and has the endorsements of the League of Education Voters, Equal Rights Washington, the Washington Education Association, and NARAL Pro-Choice Washington. PubliCola picks Stan Rumbaugh.

EDITOR’S NOTE: The primary is a key date for Washington State Supreme Court races. If there are only two candidates, as in this race, the candidate who receives a majority of the vote wins.

In races with more than two candidates, such as the Sanders vs. Wiggins matchup, if any candidate receives more than 50 percent of the primary vote, that candidate moves on, unchallenged, to the general.




  • Beacon Hill Pasta Boy

    Right On Erica ! Johnson is a right wing shill for the BIAW.

  • shadow_man

    To those of you using the Bible as a weapon against homosexuality, you are wrong. Homosexuality is not a sin. The Bible is constantly being taken out of context to support anti-gay views. Scholars who have studied the Bible in context of the times and in relation to other passages have shown those passages (Leviticus, Corinthians, Romans, etc) have nothing to do with homosexuality. These passages often cherry-picked while ignoring the rest of the Bible. The sins theses passages are referring to are idolatry, Greek temple sex worship, prostitution, pederasty with teen boys, and rape, not homosexuality or two loving consenting adults.

    http://www.soulfoodministry.org/docs/English/No…
    http://www.jesus21.com/content/sex/bible_homose…
    http://www.christchapel.com/reclaiming.html
    http://www.stjohnsmcc.org/new/BibleAbuse/Biblic…
    http://www.gaychristian101.com/

    Thats why Jesus never mentions it as well. There is nothing immoral, wrong, or sinful about being gay. Jesus, however, clearly states he HATES hypocrisy. If you preach goodness, then promote hate and twist the words of the Bible, you are a hypocrite, and will be judged and sent to hell. Homosexuals will not go to hell, hypocrites will.

    This is very similar to the religious bigots of the past, where they took Bible passages to condone slavery, keep women down, and used Bible passages to claim blacks as curses who should be enslaved by the white man. People used God to claim that blacks marrying whites was unnatural, and not of God's will.

  • shadow_man

    For those of you claiming homosexuality is a “lifestyle”, that is a false and ignorant statement. Homosexuality is not a choice. Just like you don't choose the color of your skin, you cannot choose whom you are sexually attracted to. If you can, sorry, but you are not heterosexual, you are bi-sexual. Virtually all major psychological and medical experts agree that sexual orientation is NOT a choice. Most gay people will tell you its not a choice. Common sense will tell you its not a choice. While science is relatively new to studying homosexuality, studies tend to indicate that its biological.

    http://www-news.uchicago.edu/releases/03/differ…
    http://www.newscientist.com/channel/sex/dn14146…
    Gay, Straight Men's Brain Responses Differ
    http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,155990,00.html
    http://www.livescience.com/health/060224_gay_ge…
    http://www.springerlink.com/content/w27453600k5…
    http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2008/…

    There is overwhelming scientific evidence that homosexuality is not a choice. Sexual orientation is generally a biological trait that is determined pre-natally, although there is no one certain thing that explains all of the cases. “Nurture” may have some effect, but for the most part it is biological.

    And it should also be noted that:
    “It is worth noting that many medical and scientific organizations do believe it is impossible to change a person's sexual orientation and this is displayed in a statement by American Academy of Pediatrics, American Counseling Association, American Association of School Administrators, American Federation of Teachers, American Psychiatric Association, American Psychological Association, American School Health Association, Interfaith Alliance Foundation, National Association of School Psychologists, National Association of Social Workers, and National Education Association.”

  • shadow_man

    The National Library of Medicine pubs confirm that sexual orientation is natural, biologically induced in the first trimester of pregnancy, morally neutral, immutable, neither contagious nor learned, bearing no relation to an individuals ability to form deep and lasting relationships, to parent children, to work or to contribute to society.

    From the American Psychological Association: homosexuality is normal; homosexual relationships are normal.

    The American Academy of Pediatrics, American Psychological Asociation and American Psychiatric Asociation have endorsed civil marriage for same-sex couples because marriage strengthens mental and physical health and longevity of couples, and provides greater legal and financial security for children, parents and seniors.

    America's premier child/mental health associations endorse marriage equality.

  • Prsteve11

    Shadow_man, you are spouting lies and hypocrisy. The Bible does condemn homosexuality and there is no way of getting around that. Besides, if the Bible condoned it, why don't we read about these so-called 'loving' couples in the Bible? It's immoral and wrong and these so-called geniuses don't know what they're talking about.

  • misha

    Very true. The bible does condemn male homosexuality and there is no way around that.

    “You shall not lie with a male as with a woman. It is an abomination.” (Leviticus 18:22)

    Right before it condemns shaving.

    “Do not cut the hair at the sides of your head or clip off the edges of your beard.” (Leviticus 19:27)

    And right after it condemns lobster.

    “Whatever in the water does not have fins or scales; that shall be an abomination to you.” (Leviticus 11:12)

  • Barleywine

    Misha, you rock.
    Unless that is an abomination somehow.

    But let us live. And let them live who believe in this shit.

    Who knows who's right?
    Let it go. It doesn't affect us.

  • shadow_man

    Sorry, but you are misinterpreting Levticus.

    Leviticus is constantly taken out of context. These two lines do not condemn homosexuals when you examine Leviticus as a whole and relate the historical times.

    Leviticus 18:22:
    “You shall not lie with a male as those who lie with a female; it is an abomination.”

    Leviticus 20:13:
    “If a man lies with a male as those who lie with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination and they shall surely be put to death.”

    Both of these verses refer to heterosexuals who participated in fertility rituals in order to guarantee good crops and healthy flocks, not homosexuals, there is absolutely no mention of sexual orientation or homosexuality. Also, the word abomination was used for anything that was considered to be religiously unclean or dealing with any type idol worship.

    The Hebrew word “toevah” was used in Leviticus 18:22 and Leviticus 20:13. “Toevah” has been translated in our Bibles as “abomination” or “detestable”. The “toevah” was used throughout the Old Testament for activity involving ethnic contamination and religious idolatry. “Toevah” refers to things that were ritually unclean – like eating pork.

    It is significant that another Hebrew word, “zimah,” also translated “abomination,” which means intrinsic evil or evil by its very nature, was not used in Leviticus 18:22, or Leviticus 20:13.

    It is also significant that female homosexual relationships are not mentioned in the old testament. That's because they aren't talking about sexual orientation, they are talking about idolatrous practices.

  • shadow_man

    Notice how you call it lies, yet you cannot refute a single one of my links =)

  • shadow_man

    Whoops, didn't read your whole post Misha. Thought it was another one of those anti-gay Leviticus posts =p. Now that i read the whole thing, he's right, you do rock =)

  • InformedVoter

    Thanks guys. Didn't know who to pick but when I saw the criticisms of Johnson, I knew who to vote for… Johnson.