Viva La Cola!

Founded in January 2009, PubliCola is a blog about Seattle written by journalists who are dedicated to non-partisan, original daily reporting that prioritizes a balanced approach to news. Started by longtime local editor and award-winning reporter Josh Feit, PubliCola is the first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol.

PubliCola was off and running. In June 2009, PubliCola hired another award-winning journalist, super-sourced Seattle city hall reporter Erica C. Barnett.

People were afraid that blogging would change journalism. Instead, we believe journalism can change blogging. Twenty-first century journalism may look and feel different, and yes Erica isn't afraid to get cranky, but we're committed to making sure online news still delivers independent, reliable, even-keeled coverage. And most of all, we're committed to making sure the coverage sparks honest civic debate.

Bringing you cola for the people, PubliCola is named after Publius Valerius PubliCola, the alias for the authors of the Federalist Papers—the original bloggers.

The first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol and Seattle city hall, PubliCola has been called a “must-read” by the Seattle Post Intelligencer and a hot “New Media Mover and Shaker” by Seattle Magazine—which also cited our own Erica C. Barnett as the city's No. 1 news nerd.

A Potentially Controversial Change

1. The King County Council voted yesterday to repeal the legislation they passed just last week putting an 0.2 percent sales tax increase for public safety on the November ballot, and replaced it with a different 0.2 percent sales tax measure that would include funding to replace the crumbling juvenile justice center at 12th and Alder.

Previously, the council rejected a proposal to put a separate 0.1 percent sales tax increase on the ballot, in addition to the 0.2 percent increase.

Under the new proposal, 100 percent of the county’s portion of the tax would pay for public-safety programs in King County. Forty percent of the proceeds of the tax would go to cities, which would have to spend one-third of the proceeds on criminal justice.

2. U.S. Sen. Patty is a main cosponsor of the DISCLOSE Act, which would force funders of independent campaign ads—like the one a group called the American Action Network took out against her earlier this month—to identify themselves at the end of the ad (much like the “I’m Barack Obama and I approved this ad” disclaimer that candidates are required to do.)

The legislation (New York U.S. Sen. Chuck Schumer is the main sponsor) is the Democrats’ response to the Citizens United ruling which allowed corporations to directly fund IE ads with unlimited contributions. (Previously, corporations could not put their own money into IEs.)

Republicans, including Rossi’s campaign, didn’t support the legislation because it included an exemption for unions.

However, Schumer got rid of the exemption. It’s queued up for a cloture vote today.

3. Central District activist Bill Bradburd is appealing changes to the city’s sign code on the grounds that they’ll harm views and “degrade” Seattle’s skyline. Bradburd’s appeal isn’t likely to get much traction—he’s appealing under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), and it’s hard to see what environmental harm signs cause—but his appeal does highlight one potentially controversial change being considered by the city: An amendment that would allow lighted signs above 65 feet on the side of large private buildings.

Currently, only hotels are allowed to have illuminated signs above 65 feet; the proposal would extend that rule to private buildings. The rules would only apply to buildings with “major tenants” (tenants who lease more than 200,000 square feet), and would only allow one major tenant to have a sign above 65 feet per building.

4. PubliCola reader Seth Geiser ( who lives on Capitol Hill and interns at the city while finishing his  Masters of Urban Planning and Masters of Public Administration at UW) won our ticket giveaway yesterday by correctly naming the five Seattle-area state house reps who voted against the infamous tunnel cost overruns position—Reps. Reuven Carlyle (D-36); Bob Hasegawa (D-11); Phyllis Gutierrez Kenney (D-46); Sharon Tomiko Santos (D-37); and Scott White (D-46).

Congrats Seth!

The ‘Yea’ votes (putting unprecedented obligations on local residents for a state project) were: Reps. Eileen Cody (D-34, W. Seattle); Mary Lou Dickerson (D-36); Zach Hudgins (D-11), Sharon Nelson (D-34); Jamie Pedersen (D-43); Eric Pettigrew (D-37); Frank Chopp (D-43).





  • Ziggity

    @2: Removes the unions, but leaves the exemptions for the NRA and AARP…

  • giffy

    What we really need to do to help solve the criminal justice issue is to do away with unincorporated areas. Form a city or join a city, but no more of this subsidized living at the expense of the rest of us just because you don't want to pay more taxes.

    Then they can contract with the County, on a fair market basis for sheriff and court services. That would at least make this system a bit more fair.

    As a Seattle resident I can't see why I should support this. We lose money on the deal, it further fucks over the poor, and I just don't see how we benefit.

  • ivan

    Sharon Nelson is from Vashon, not West Seattle. Thanks for reminding me to send her a check.

  • Josh Feit

    Changed it just the numbers to keep it simple. Nelson represents W. Seattle—along with Burien, Vashon, and Maury.

    Often we just list one high profile area of a rep's district, like W. Seattle in the 34th, to give readers a basic on the LD.

  • ivan

    Why not make a list of where legislators actually LIVE and just use that, instead of trying to guess, when you really don't know, what a “high profile area” in a given LD is?

  • gloomy gus

    Re: your @4, don't you mean “feigning unprecedented obligations on local residents”?

  • jane b.

    the problem is that cities have already cherry-picked the unincorporated areas that can pay for themselves (in terms of the amount of tax revenue they would generate) leaving places like White Center that don't have enough revenue to incorporate as a self-sustaining city – and that Burien and Seattle don't want to annex because the area will be financial hit to the city that annexes it. So Giffy – as a Seattle resident, if you want to change this, write to your mayor/city councilmembers and tell them you support annexation.

  • Josh Feit

    Good question, and it's an ongoing debate in the office. The problem with the solution you recommended is that some legislators are from spots that most readers might not have a sense of geographically. If we list a more recognizable town in the district, it gives readers a bead on the LD.

  • giffy

    I think really its going to take action from Olympia to resolve this.

  • qfranklin

    Who the legislator represents is much more useful information than where they actually live. And since the majority of people in the 34th district live in West Seattle, then I think it's very appropriate to include that information.

  • foolish consistency etc.

    Josh, go back to your original decision to just list the main geographical identifier. You're falling into Seattleitis — the disease of listening to very pesky little objection, then backtracking on a sensible decision because one person has pointed out one negative consequence of the decision made, then retreating into something equally unsatisfactory for all but that has a veneer of “fairness” that fails to achieve the underlying goal.

    ivan should just have to live with the fact that the 34th is mainly, 80%, fucking West Seattle and to the rest of us that's the key identifier. And he'll just have to live with the fact that we can't list the entire set of neighborhoods in each L.D. It's rough, isn't it, but we can't say (Ballard Crown Hill and Queen Anne and parts of Freemont and well to some of you you like to say parts of Freelard, and Magnolia, oh, and Interbay, AND parts of the Denny regrade and lower Queen Anne, oh wait some of you don't like that name, never mind, andoh yeah parts of Cascade…when referring to the 36th.

    Just say dickerson 36 – Ballard, Carlyle 36-queen anne Kohl Welles — QA Phillips – 4 – Magnolia WHATEVER.

    The vast majority of readers have no clue where the 34th or the 46th are.

  • Jakers

    Why should the state get involved in telling the cities what to do when the issue of annexation is easily handled on the county level. Lots of counties don't have the same problems as King County; so unless King county needs some kind of new authority to resolve the issue, the state should stay out of it.

  • ivan

    So you're advocating that Publicola pander to ignorance instead of reporting facts. Hmm. Could be that you're the target audience around here, and I'm not. Oh well, such is life.

  • ivan

    Even the Seattle Times does it right.

  • Robt. Peel

    Sorry, but wrong. Everybody assumes the criminal justice system only exixsts oustside Seattle and is therefore subsidized by Seattle citizens, but it is not. County citizens pay taxes as just like city residents, and all benefit from the criminal justice system in King County. For example:

    The Prosecutor's Office serves all of King County, including Seattle and other cities.

    Superior Court serves all of King County, including Seattle.

    District Court ajudicates many cases that occurred inside an incorporated city, including Seattle.

    Public defenders serve defendants arrested in all of King County, including King County.

    The Youth Center holds suspects arrested everywhere in King County, including Seattle.

    Even the Sheriff's Office, which consumes less than 2% of the King County budget and only 11% of the County's Genereal Fund, serves all of King County through their Civil Unit, helicopter and Search & Rescue.

    Yes you could do away withe unincorporated areas, but the need for criminal justice facilities and functions would still be there.

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr. Baker

    This is similar to how TVW show “where” a Rep is from.

    (the 46th is where both of my Reps voted “no”, and are going to replace the Sen with one of those Reps.)

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr. Baker

    Only if you want McGinn to get pissy with Erica (again) at his next press conference.

  • http://43rddemocrats.org Michael M.

    The 43rd is where awesomeness is from! And this:

    http://www.brownpapertickets.com/event/120679

    YAY!

  • Grobins

    Well said – “feigning” is a great word.

  • David Miller

    SEPA encompasses a holistic view of the environment, which includes visual pollution. It's perfectly reasonable for Bill to have appealed under SEPA, particularly since what he's appealing is a SEPA DNS.

  • Matt_the_Engineer

    #3 I don't see why lighted signs are necessary at all. I'd love to see an ordinance that lighted signs are only allowed if they're powered only by solar panels.

  • Barleywine

    And the libraries.

    (and the aqueducts…)