Viva La Cola!

Founded in January 2009, PubliCola is a blog about Seattle written by journalists who are dedicated to non-partisan, original daily reporting that prioritizes a balanced approach to news. Started by longtime local editor and award-winning reporter Josh Feit, PubliCola is the first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol.

PubliCola was off and running. In June 2009, PubliCola hired another award-winning journalist, super-sourced Seattle city hall reporter Erica C. Barnett.

People were afraid that blogging would change journalism. Instead, we believe journalism can change blogging. Twenty-first century journalism may look and feel different, and yes Erica isn't afraid to get cranky, but we're committed to making sure online news still delivers independent, reliable, even-keeled coverage. And most of all, we're committed to making sure the coverage sparks honest civic debate.

Bringing you cola for the people, PubliCola is named after Publius Valerius PubliCola, the alias for the authors of the Federalist Papers—the original bloggers.

The first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol and Seattle city hall, PubliCola has been called a “must-read” by the Seattle Post Intelligencer and a hot “New Media Mover and Shaker” by Seattle Magazine—which also cited our own Erica C. Barnett as the city's No. 1 news nerd.

This Video Makes it Clear

1. In yesterday’s Seattle Times, state Rep. Mike Armstrong took credit for (and the Seattle Times incorrectly went along with him) sponsoring the now-controversial cost overruns provision in the state house bill authorizing the tunnel.  Qu’est-ce que c’est?

As we reported yesterday in our story about about the overrun provision, House Transportation Chair, Rep. Judy Clibborn (D-41) proposed the amendment.

Go to the 30 minute mark here and watch Clibborn propose the amendment.

She also is pretty darn clear about the intent.

“If we have cost overruns … we will ask the city … the people who live along the viaduct, the property owners in Seattle, to come forward and pay for the cost overruns.”

It was sure clear to Seattle State Rep. Reuven Carlyle (D-36) (go to the 34 minute mark), who asks the legislature to reject the amendment saying that “Seattle area property tax payers be on the hook for potential cost overruns.”

If this issue goes to court, and intent becomes the legal linchpin, this video makes it clear what the legislature meant.

2. A PubliCola public records request reveals that despite working only 4.2 hours a day (officially; unofficially, county sources say it’s often less), Joe Fain, chief of staff to county council member Pete von Reichbauer, still receives full county health care benefits, at a cost of $1,194 a month.

Fain, who headed up the 2008 campaign to make the King County Council nonpartisan, is running against state Sen. Claudia Kauffman (D-47) as a Republican this year.

3. When we were trawling through city campaign-finance records yesterday, Fizz noticed that Dorsol Plants, who ran in the open seat for Jan Drago’s old council position last year (Sally Bagshaw won), has already registered to run for council in 2011, when five incumbents are up for reelection.

An Iraq war vet, a 34th District Democrats PCO, and homeless advocate at the Family Adult  Services Center, Plants, a good speaker and talented organizer who won consistent praise for a first-time candidate, hasn’t specified which seat he plans to seek, and so far, he hasn’t raised any money.

4. Last night, the Fizz was in Everett at Governor Chris Gregoire’s second budget forum. (Watch for some PubliColaTV on it and a full write-up later today).  For now, we thought we’d report on the unusually poetic testimony from the audience:

“Education is the bridge between rags and riches.”

“Small business is the canary to the state recession’s coal mine.”

“We have to take the milk out of the grocery cart, and the gas out of our cars, and work together to solve this problem.”

There were also some more straight forward messages:

“Abortion is not health care. De-fund Planned Parenthood!”

“No new taxes!”

4. Sound Transit board member and dissident Bellevue City Council member Claudia Balducci (she’s for light rail through downtown Bellevue) says she plans to vote for the Sound Transit-preferred light-rail alignment on the west side of 112th Ave. through south Bellevue at tomorrow’s ST board meeting

On Monday, the Bellevue council voted 4-3 (with Baluducci opposed) to make no recommendation on the 112th Ave. alignment. They opted instead to send a letter to Sound Transit expressing support for an alignment that is no longer on the table—the so-called B7 alignment, which would travel alongside I-405 to the east of Bellevue’s residential and job centers, bypassing the South Bellevue Park-and-Ride, and necessitate construction of a new park-and-ride at a cost of between $170 million and $210 million.

Balducci is up for reelection next year. She says she isn’t worried that tomorrow’s vote, which puts her at odds with many south Bellevue residents, will affect her reelection chances. “The position I’m taking is, in my opinion, in the best interests of the whole city,” Balducci says.

Footnote on item #1. Yes, Rep. Armstrong sponsored an amendment, but not the one that, as the Times story says, is causing all the controversy now.


  • giffy

    “By the way, if this issue goes to court, and intent becomes the legal linchpin, this video makes it clear what the legislature meant.”

    There is nothing to even litigate over. A vague statement of intent is not a legally enforceable tax. That would have to be passed by a body having jurisdiction solely over the property owners that benefit. State law cannot change the Constitution.

  • http://43rddemocrats.org Michael M.

    I've ignored it, but I can't any longer.

    For the love of God, will you please make links pop out into a new (tab/window), instead of just navigating from this page? I know, I can right click (or whatever you mac people do) and open in a new tab on my own, but wouldn't it be easier to just add a bit of code to do that for me? I mean, if the Stranger can do it (most of the time), why not Publicola?

    Please?

    Pretty Please?

  • ivan

    What “Mac people?” I can do this in Firefox with a PC.

  • http://43rddemocrats.org Michael M.

    Now, on to the meat of the post –

    I would also recommend people to listen to the speech in favor by Rep. Larry Seaquest (D-22, Gig Harbor), which immediately follows that of Rep. Carlyle. (The two GOP speeches are pretty good, too, as they clearly show that it is unclear exactly what this amendment does).

    Rep. Seaquest points out that for him (and many others) to support State funding for the tunnel (or any rebuild, for that matter), this language would be necessary. He reminds the body that in his district, because the State couldn't afford to replace a bridge, the local governments are replacing a state highway bridge, and paying for it at the local level, yet Seattle is considered important enough to have the State pay for their replacement of an unsafe structure.

    This amendment is what made the underlying replacement bill able to pass. Period. I wouldn't be surprised if, in order to build a new viaduct even, at this point the same language wouldn't be required. And as Rep. Clibborn points out, there's not just the $485mm in extra money in the event of overruns, but the allowance for an additional $400mm in tolling money (which would be fronted by bonds directly tied to tolling). So, realistically, the event of overruns above and beyond what is already allocated is not that high. In fact, if I remember correctly, the recent report that showed a 40% chance of overruns also showed a less than 5% chance of overruns more than $500mm (or something like that), which means we're still, in a roundabout way, very unlikely to go above and beyond what is already allocated, and what funds can be generated additionally beyond that allocation.

    Or, shorter – the whole “overruns paid by Seattle taxpayers” is a scare tactic, and an attempt to kill the replacement. Seeing how close the vote was, and with the potential of having even fewer friends of Seattle in the House next year, we as a city should be very careful not to screw up the entire project, or we can be looking at what the 22nd District had to do, and have to fully fund a replacement on our own.

  • http://43rddemocrats.org Michael M.

    Well, there's a lot of young, hipster-”politicos” here, who hate Microsoft and only use Mac. I don't picture you as a Mac user :-)

  • kurisu

    Except that Larry is not on a quest, and the original (well, the one that didn't collapse) Narrows Bridge is still standing, and if you have a 5% chance of paying $500m, pretty soon you're talking about real money. I have a house on a 20-year flood plain to sell you.

  • kurisu

    Larry Seaquist, D-26 that is

  • http://43rddemocrats.org Michael M.

    I refuse to be constrained by technicalities!!!!

  • http://43rddemocrats.org Michael M.

    Damn you pointing out my spelling errors! Now I can't go fix them! (well, I could, but then some of what you said wouldn't make sense).

    What I'm saying is that there's the ability to have up to $885mm allocated for overruns, without using the provision that is now the center of attention, and while some people point to the 40% chance of any overruns, that includes the very small 5% chance of overruns above the $485mm already allocated for overruns, at which point the toll bonds start being used. So a 95% chance that the project that the State is paying for doesn't go over the money allocated to pay for it.

  • Pop

    You don't even need the video to show who sponsored the amendment, it's all spelled out on the Legislature's website.
    Here's the amendment in question, with the language, sponsored by Clibborn, and noted as adopted. It is one of only two amendments to the committee amendment adopted that day, the other was by Sharon Nelson.
    http://apps.leg.wa.gov/documents/billdocs/2009-…

  • Jen

    Seriously. Hold down Ctrl while you click the link. It's not that hard.

  • Pop

    Link didn't work. Try this:
    http://bit.ly/bMvt60

  • L. T. Gator

    the court just looks at the plain meaning.
    the state cap words have a plain meaning: stte not paying overruns.
    result: who pays is legal limbo, and could lead to years or decades or litigation whilst the boring machine is stuck under a viaduct that has collapsed onto it. (N.B.: scaremongering worst case scenario. True, the bad outcome doesn't have to be 300 deaths and 300 wrongful death lawsuits and a $800 million construction contract lawsuit that takes 12 years to resolve. The bad outcome could be a $200 million lawsuit that takes five years to resolve, if it's fast tracked, and $40 million in legal bills for the city. Or, the bad outcome could be both contractors add 20% to their bids because of the political/litigation risk — and we end up paying it. there is a whole range of bad outcomes and this is why figuring out “whoi pays” is usually done BEFORe you remodel your kitchen or build a $4 billion megahighway tunnel).

  • Jen

    I'm curious as to the relevance of item #2. There are countless employees at the state level of government who work part-time and still receive full benefits — I used to at UW (kicking myself for quitting that job).

    Why single out this guy when this is a pretty common occurrence?

  • http://www.google.com/profiles/bicievino bicievino

    If you click with the scroll wheel on your mouse it will open in a new tab automatically. Even in Internet Explorer!

  • Stopthemadness

    Key words in Clibborn statement: “we will ask”. The city will say “No thanks” and that will be the end of it. There is no way the state can force the city to do anything. For the billionth time.

  • http://43rddemocrats.org Michael M.

    A: my touch pad on my laptop doesn't have one of those.

    B: Is the code that hard? (seriously, I don't know.)

  • http://43rddemocrats.org Michael M.

    He's a Republican candidate for State Legislature, and thinks government is too big and State employees have too generous of benefits and pay.

  • http://twitter.com/fattailed fattailed

    “Small business is the canary to the state recession’s coal mine” ain't poetry, it's a botched allusion to a cliche. It's the deadly gas in the coal mine that the canary detects before anyone else, not the coal mine itself.

  • BombasticMo

    The code is very simple to alter, it's like changing a letter or two. I think it's a stylistic choice, although I would also prefer if links opened in a new window. It means I can easily read through what they link to and then come back to the post I am reading.

  • http://www.joeszilagyi.com/ Joe Szilagyi

    On the code level it's just a target=new or target=blank href change. In WordPress, it's simply a settings change. On apple, it's Command+click; on windows it's control+click.

    But yes, as a usability thing, I prefer opening in new windows too by default.

  • http://www.joeszilagyi.com/ Joe Szilagyi

    Considering the impact study implies traffic-wise we'd be fine with no viaduct and no replacement except for like +10ish minute travel times from West Seattle to downtown, I'm OK with us not doing shit to replace the viaduct at this point, barring that point being clarified. It's starting to feel like we're going to build something for the sake of building something and for political points.

  • http://www.joeszilagyi.com/ Joe Szilagyi

    What Michael said.

  • what part of "supremacy"…

    the state passed a law allowing creation of cities. the state can pass laws governing cities. the state can pass a law eliminating cities. the state can pass a law saying the mayor has to wear his underwear on the outside. the legislature makes state law, the city is a municipal corporation, it is a legal person, it makes ordinances and such but they are subject to state law do you disagree with this most basic legal point?

    vis a vis the state, a city has about as much power as corporation, or me or you. We're all just legal persons to the state.

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr. Baker

    Giffy, you are wrong, Erica is right, just accept it.

    Clearly the legislative intent is to “ask”.

    I suggest we say no, as the council is outlining in their agreement and ordinance.

    She said “ask” because she knows they can't “make” a municipality pay for that state highway.

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr. Baker

    Umm, do we have to revisit the McGinn iPhone and Mac extravaganza from last January?

  • elaineinballard

    The way Publicola is set up now, clicking on an external link TAKES YOU AWAY from the site. This is bad, bad, bad in terms of keeping visitors and racking up average time/visitor on site. Cause I follow the link, and then forget that I was reading Publicola and don't come back. If you have links open in a new window, the user still has the Publicola page open and can easily return to it.

    All of this benefits the visitor AND Publicola. And it is just about the easiest thing to do as far as coding. You should just set it up as your default.

  • http://43rddemocrats.org Michael M.

    So you are saying you're OK with Seattle taxpayers paying for the entire project? The surface street “option” has no funding support from the State. None. Zero. The State has made clear they will not fund anything like that.

    More specifically, they have made clear it's either a two lane in each direction tunnel, or a four lane in each direction (with wider lanes than are there currently) replacement. So, a bigger structure, or a tunnel. Those are the choices. Period.

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr. Baker

    Yep, I have been pointing out this for a while, any replacement option could have this provision put on the bill.

    This one in particular is so poorly worded, and failed to materialize in the city agreements with WSDOT, that I do not see how they can “make” the city do this.

    This kind of policy change has to originate from a policy committee, and not some adhoc amendment on the floor.
    Cost sharing would and must be a policy change uniformly applied.

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr. Baker

    It took them 9 years to fight over the choice, resolving in another dozen years to thumbwrestle over who pays if the $350 million dollar tunnel goes 3x the cost is par for the Seattle municipal course.

  • http://43rddemocrats.org Michael M.

    I totally didn't even think about that!

  • http://43rddemocrats.org Michael M.

    What Joe said.

  • Make an effort

    The real answer is is Publicola hates Republicans, and for some reason have it out for Joe. Has Publicola ever met Joe? Try it, you might like it.

  • http://www.joeszilagyi.com/ Joe Szilagyi

    What entire project? One of the implications from the EIS is that we may be just fine if we don't replace the viaduct and absorb the traffic hit aside from a longer West Seattle commute (which could be offset with just adding more Metro lines/runs in theory).

  • http://43rddemocrats.org Michael M.

    While he's fun to look at, I wouldn't say his policies are all that great. But then again, I'm a Democrat :-)

    But, on point – it is a bit funny that someone who claims to be “small government” is living off of the government teat in this fashion. While the hypocrisy may not have been articulated in the post, I don't think it should have been. This is just a fact that they are pointing out (with a touch of rumor thrown in), leaving it to us, the dear readers, to interpret as we will. :-)

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr. Baker

    Hey, you act like he is some kind of Tea Party asskisser sopping up government money to enrich his farming lifestyle choice.

    Hey, cola kids, has Dino come out against the Murray South Park Bridge earmark yet?

    Socialism is bad for other people.

  • http://43rddemocrats.org Michael M.

    With no road improvements whatsoever? with no improvements in connections with I-5? No improvements to the grid connecting downtown with Alaskan way? As is, you're saying, they said if you closed the viaduct right now, and had all of the traffic instead just flow onto city streets and I-5, they can handle it, no problem?

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr. Baker

    That is policy, applied uniformly, not amended to an appropriations bill.
    (but you knew that part)

  • http://43rddemocrats.org Michael M.

    Well, not to defend Diddier, but even if someone is against subsidies, if they're a farmer, they'd be stupid not to take them. It's what allows them to compete.

  • giffy

    There is a 400m cushion using tolls. Beyond that and it is no different from any other project. Governments do not write blank checks to build things. If there are overruns then it will be up to that future legislature to decide what to do, just as it is with any other project.

  • Donolectic

    I lol'd.

  • giffy

    Well the Constitution comes into play as does standard requirements of due process and other protections.

    The State cannot impose a tax on a subset of property owners and it cannot compel a city to do the same. It can say we are not paying, but that is about it.
    “ARTICLE XI
    COUNTY, CITY, AND TOWNSHIP ORGANIZATION
    SECTION 12 ASSESSMENT AND COLLECTION OF TAXES IN MUNICIPALITIES. The legislature shall have no power to impose taxes upon counties, cities, towns or other municipal corporations, or upon the inhabitants or property thereof, for county, city, town, or other municipal purposes, but may, by general laws, vest in the corporate authorities thereof, the power to assess and collect taxes for such purposes.”

  • Make an effort

    Has he claimed to be small government? I think he's for lower taxes (who isn't), but I don't think he's claimed that health care shouldn't be provided by the county/state. He's a pretty moderate and smart dude, if you take the chance to get to know him and his policies, instead of just blindly posting whatever Claudia's campaign is feeding publicola…

  • http://43rddemocrats.org Michael M.

    If he is a Republican then, by definition, he stands in support of the GOP platform, which has a lot of “small government” business in it. The GOP that opposes real health insurance reform, that believes the market will solve all economic and social problems, yet stands in direct contradiction to their “keep your government out of my life” mentality when it comes to a woman's right to choose or equal marriage for gays and lesbians.

    I mean, if you're telling me that Mr. Fain supports a woman's right to choose, is pro-gay marriage, supports health care for all, would never vote to lower taxes by cutting Apple Health for Kids or education, and thinks that there is no problem with how much State workers make, and opposes furloughs…well, then there's a conversation starter.

  • Make an effort

    For some reason I can't reply to you, Michael, so here's my reply–

    You should definitely talk to Joe. He's in line with most of those items you mentioned. Seriously–this is what gets me with these blogs–if you actually took the time to read his website, or get to know the guy, you would probably end up thinking he's worth electing. I know there was a bunch of controversy regarding the Muni League's ratings, but he was rated “outstanding.” Very few candidates rated outstanding. It's very easy to pooh-pooh someone based on their party affiliation without getting to know the actual candidate, which makes for an uninformed electorate…

    And, BTW, a side point–just because you're an R or a D, doesn't mean that you necessarily agree with every item on the platform–you of all people should know this. I don't know you personally (other than the fact that you're on the Board of the 43rd Ds), but I highly doubt that you agree wholely with the National D's platform on every single issue, and maybe not always with all of the big ones. For instance, the national Democratic platform does not endorse gay marriage.

  • http://43rddemocrats.org Michael M.

    @MAE:

    They have a limit of how many direct replies. Then we end up with this madness.

    While I may be relatively young, I do remember a time when not all Republicans were to be viewed with the conservative lens they are today. Renee Radcliffe from the 21st is a classic example. Rodney Tom and Fred Jarrett are two more (both of whom are now identified as Democrats).

    Unfortunately, the GOP has allowed itself, especially in Washington, to become the Party of Val Stevens, and not the Party of Dan Evans. While I can easily say that not a single elected official from either party agrees with every single plank and word in their respective platforms, once you disagree with most, then it's time to leave the Party.

    As for Mr. Fain – you'll have to be more specific. His issues page doesn't indicate if he is pro-choice and pro-gay marriage. It speaks in platitudes about education and investment in education and protecting homes at risk of flooding.

    At the same time:

    “We can run government more efficiently. I’ve seen firsthand how government can be made more efficient by streamlining overhead and setting measurable goals.”

    This falls under the “government spending” portion, and we all know that “run[ning] government more efficiently” is a way of saying “less government”. Unfortunately, government is what provides that education.

    So, based on his apparent priorities, coupled with those of the GOP, I can only be led to understand that he would cut from social welfare and health care for the poor to pay for what he deems priorities – schools, floods and property rights.

    Which means that, to get to most, he's pro-choice and pro-gay marriage.

    Ladies and gentlemen, Joe Fain is a pro-gay, pro-choice Republican!

    (right?)

  • David B.

    Hi Michael: After talking this over with the powers-that-be, code has been added so that all links on PubliCola that point to other websites will open in a new Window.

  • http://43rddemocrats.org Michael M.

    *like* times infinity!!!!!

  • http://43rddemocrats.org Michael M.

    *technical point*

    There's a $485mm cushion for overruns, PLUS an additional $400mm in tolling/bonding capacity. So, $885mm.

  • giffy

    *technical point*

    *excellent point!*

  • http://profiles.yahoo.com/u/6SAQ6R2ZBGQQNNBXVJZG66K6KY Mickymse

    Except, hey, WSDOT isn't actually assessing tolling as part of completing an EIS on the Project. Gee, you think that might impact use of the tunnel?

  • http://profiles.yahoo.com/u/6SAQ6R2ZBGQQNNBXVJZG66K6KY Mickymse

    I believe Dorsol has recently received a $100 check. A supporter contacted him and asked why he wasn't running again because he wanted to make a donation… so voila! campaign re-opened so it's all legal.

  • giffy

    I know Joe and he is not some ragging TeaBagger. He is more a government efficiency type republican. I've never talked to him about gay rights or abortion, but I would surprised if he was very conservative on either. I doubt he would vote for tax increases, but at the same time he is not out screaming for cuts.

    Where he is rather conservative is on the CAO and other land use issues falling more on the side of property rights than environmental protection. But he's views are pretty reasoned, and while I disagree with him, he makes good solid arguments for how property owners should be engaged in conservation not forced into it by the County.

  • MVH

    That check doubled Dorsol's fundraising totals from the last election.

  • ivan

    You're right. I lead a totally wired, totally productive, totally fulfilling, totally Apple-free existence.

  • ivan

    Oh, rubbish! Everybody who knows anything right-clicks on everything and opens it in a new tab.