Viva La Cola!

Founded in January 2009, PubliCola is a blog about Seattle written by journalists who are dedicated to non-partisan, original daily reporting that prioritizes a balanced approach to news. Started by longtime local editor and award-winning reporter Josh Feit, PubliCola is the first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol.

PubliCola was off and running. In June 2009, PubliCola hired another award-winning journalist, super-sourced Seattle city hall reporter Erica C. Barnett.

People were afraid that blogging would change journalism. Instead, we believe journalism can change blogging. Twenty-first century journalism may look and feel different, and yes Erica isn't afraid to get cranky, but we're committed to making sure online news still delivers independent, reliable, even-keeled coverage. And most of all, we're committed to making sure the coverage sparks honest civic debate.

Bringing you cola for the people, PubliCola is named after Publius Valerius PubliCola, the alias for the authors of the Federalist Papers—the original bloggers.

The first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol and Seattle city hall, PubliCola has been called a “must-read” by the Seattle Post Intelligencer and a hot “New Media Mover and Shaker” by Seattle Magazine—which also cited our own Erica C. Barnett as the city's No. 1 news nerd.

In Our Effort to be Neutral, We Created a Far Greater Stir Than Expected

1. Late yesterday, the West Seattle Junction Association announced that NARAL is now allowed to participate in this weekend’s annual West Seattle gala, Summerfest. All hail ECB.

On Tuesday Erica broke the news that the West Seattle Junction Association had decided to ban NARAL Pro-Choice Washington and Planned Parenthood from participating in West Seattle Summerfest  because, the WSJA said, the pro-choice groups stirred up too much controversy for a family atmosphere.

Yesterday, in a follow-up story, Erica busted WSJA spokeswoman Susan Melrose, for making contradictory statements about the decision.

Meanwhile, in response to Erica’s story, pressure was building on the WSJA to allow NARAL to participate.

Late in the day, Melrose sent an email to Erica (and to the West Seattle Blog, where a discussion about ECB’s story was tearing up the comments threads) saying NARAL (or Planned Parenthood), along with one pro-life group, would be allowed to participate. Here’s Melrose’s email:

After the 2009 West Seattle Summer Fest, the West Seattle Junction Association (WSJA) decided to not accept organizations into the event to discuss the issue of abortion.  In past years, WSJA received strong negative feedback from the public against how the issue of abortion was being presented though we had asked these organizations to be contentious.  Many families wrote, called and emailed that the graphic displays still offered by certain groups were not appropriate for their children.  Summer Fest is a family and community oriented event, therefore WSJA listened to community input and chose not to accept anyorganizations to debate abortion. This seemed like a fair way to address the issue since not all applicants are accepted into the festival due to limited space.  The first responsibility of the WSJA is to our community and we were responding to community feedback.

Now the West Seattle community has spoken out again.  After it was publicized that pro-choice and pro-life organizations would not be registered with Summer Fest, we received calls and emails that many do want this issue to be presented at the event.  Our organization has no position on this issue and our decision to not accept organizations from either side of this debate was based solely on the feedback of the community who we tried to accommodate.

Based on recent community input, WSJA has made the decision to allow one booth for each side of the issue into this year’s festival.  In our effort to be neutral, we created a far greater stir than expected.  We hope to respond to and remedy the initial complaints by having vendors sign a statement that all displays and handouts are subject to approval by WSJA.

Great reporting Erica. And way to live up to this whole thing.

2. Speaking of NARAL, Josh filed a 900 word story last night about the state’s decision—which has flabbergasted women’s rights groups—to back away from its legal case defending current State Board of Pharmacy standards that mandate full access to emergency contraception. It’s a must read.

3. As BikeNerd Josh Cohen has reported, Cascade Bicycle Club and other environmentalists are suing the Puget Sound Regional Council, charging that the PRSC’s Transportation 2040 plan doesn’t go far enough to meet state-mandated greenhouse gas emission standards. The trial is scheduled to start January 31, 2011.

One potential wrinkle: If the trial ends up delaying any pending roads projects, pro-roads legislators in Olympia could rewrite the greenhouse gas legislation—which currently requires a reduction of emissions to 1990 levels by 2020, a 25 percent reduction of 1990 levels by 2035, and a 50 percent reduction of 1990 levels by 2050—which could bring the PSRC in compliance.

The emission goals were merely “aspirational” anyway, according to Eastside state Rep. Deb Eddy (D-48).

4. President Obama’s Secretary of Education, Arne Duncan, whose name is synonymous with education reform—is coming to Washington state on Friday. He’ll be at Aviation High School in Des Moines, a math and science specialty public high school, with U.S. Sen. Patty Murray.

Given that Aviation H.S. is a public alternative school that Gov. Gregoire, who’s applying for Duncan money, has boasted about in lieu of charter schools—Duncan loves charters, but Washington state does not—and given that Sen. Murray is a master at getting federal dollars to come our way, does Duncan’s visit mean Washington state made the first cut in his Race to the Top education grant program (worth $250 million)?

Perhaps. However, given that Gregoire won’t be there (she’s out of town that day), the Fizz doesn’t expect any surprise announcements on Friday. The RTTT semifinalists will be announced on July 26.

5. We weren’t able to make last night’s Seattle Center forum on what to do with the Fun Forest space. The PI (which summed up the evening as “hipsters against oldsters”) and the Seattle Times both have reports.

We were, however, at a raucous Sound Transit hearing in Bellevue. We’ll report on that later today.


  • N8

    Publicola and its readers are driving me to the right as I now see that the left uses the same dumb rhetoric the neocons use to push their agendas and personal beliefs wholesale. I used to think that the left was more intellectual and tolerant, unfortunately, I see that those and the left can be just as intolerant and bigoted in opinion as a racist, backwoods, gun- and religion-clinging, confederate-flag-waiving all American.

    I came to Publicola months ago figuring I had found a treasure, but what I found is the Seattle Times on a much smaller scale and opposite biased spectrum.

  • Fairness at Fairs

    I'm glad that NARAL (or Planned Parenthood) is back in the festival, but the decision to allow only one group from “each side” of the abortion debate into the festival is wrong.

    NARAL and Planned Parenthood don't just represent one side in an ideological debate. Each organization has a unique mission and unique constituencies, and neither organization focuses solely on abortion. For example, Planned Parenthood provides reproductive health services, whereas NARAL is solely a political advocacy organization. The organizations don't just attend festivals to promote their point of view, but also to greet supporters and offer information. If I attend the festival hoping to get information about healthcare services, and only NARAL is present, I won't get what I'm looking for.

    WSJA is also instituting an approval process for displays, and this policy will fix the problem, without excluding legitimate organizations from participating in Summerfest.

    In reducing the conversation to “sides” of an issue, WSJA is drawing more attention to the “abortion debate” than we ever would have had otherwise.

  • Josh Feit

    And then there's this:
    •We debunk Democratic U.S. Sen. Patty Murray's false claim she didn’t take any money from Goldman Sachs.
    •We call BS on an anti-Dave Reichert (R-WA, 8 ) press release from Democrat Suzan DelBene's campaign.
    We give the mike to Dino Rossi's campaign in an article about Sen. Murray's support for a big labor bill. We talked to Murray's office too, obviously. But Rossi's campaign, which was happy to chat, gets the last word. And it's a zinger.
    •We credit GOP state Sen. Curtis King (R-14) and GOP state House member Skip Priest (R-30) for their education reform amendments (and for embarrassing the union-lackey Democrats.)
    •We call BS on another anti-Dave Reichert press release. This one is from the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee.
    We talk at length with the state GOP about their strategy to win back the Eastside Seattle 'burbs from the vulnerable state House Democrats.
    •We give props to Republican Attorney General Rob McKenna for his “Ambitious Legislative Agenda” (We follow up a few weeks later to report that “all of McKenna’s bills are still in play except [one].”)
    •We kick off our Cola guest op/ed series with a piece by Republican AG (and likely GOP gubernatorial candidate) Rob McKenna.
    •We head to Vancouver and write two articles (one, two) about promising GOP U.S. Congressional candidate Jaime Herrera's campaign kick-off. And using U.S. Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers' (R-WA, 5) words (McMorris Rodgers, the 4th ranking Republican in the U.S. Congress, was happy to talk to us), we call young, Latina Herrera the “new face of the party.”
    •We give Team McKenna props for a national award.
    <a href=” http://www.publicola.net/2010/06/16/where-rossi… Rossi is happy to talk to PubliCola again, this time, candidly spelling out his position on abortion legislation.
    •Remember that article we wrote about the GOP strategy to take back the Eastside 'burbs? We hype Eastside Republican candidate Steve Litzow's campaign. (We hyped Litzow's campaign again yesterday.)
    •Remember that article we wrote about the GOP strategy to take back the Eastside 'burbs? We hype Eastside Republican candidate Gregg Bennett's campaign.
    We second Joel Connelly's excellent editorial about the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee's pathetic anti-Rossi story pitch. I believe we called the DSCC pitch a “damn dumb story.”
    •We put down WTO protesters. http://www.publicola.net/2010/06/30/dear-wto-pr…
    •We accuse Sen. Patty Murray of playing politics with veterans. http://www.publicola.net/2010/06/29/murray-gets…

    Just to cite a few instances that challenge your claim of left bias.

  • herrnichte

    In order to be a good proponent of “more intellectual and tolerant” it would be useful to us dumb lefties if you would attempt to be more specific about what you've discovered to be so very bad here.

  • http://www.joeszilagyi.com/ Joe Szilagyi

    I think you're seriously misreading this site and Josh pointed out. Were you expecting utter neutrality (doesn't exist in real life, on news sources) or something that was a hard partisan zone (ala Horses's Ass vs Sound Politics)?

  • http://www.joeszilagyi.com/ Joe Szilagyi

    “Rossi is happy to talk to Publicola…” has a broken href tag.

  • tpn

    Re Josh:

    On the topic of bias, the commenter always has a point here when you offically deny it. So why deny it?

  • Josh Feit

    I don't always agree but yeah, I shoulda just let it stand.

  • jeffw66seattle

    Good on ya' Josh.

  • jeffw66seattle

    The issue being largely overlooked on the NARAL/PP exclusion is one of fundamendal Constitutional rights, and the WSJA's blatant violation of the First Amendment in creating an “issue ban” for a PUBLIC event using PUBLIC resources.

    If the WSJA wants to create guidelines for booth presenters that follow a theme – then that's fine. However, saying that you can have a booth presenting information about political issue “X” but not political issue “Y” is a matter that the Justice Department should really be looking into.

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr. Baker

    Summer reruns of media bias, already?

  • sarah68

    Can nobody either write intelligibly or proofread anymore? I don't mean Publicola (I don't think they did it); in this case I mean the West Seattle group.

    “In past years, WSJA received strong negative feedback from the public against how the issue of abortion was being presented though we had asked these organizations to be contentious.”

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr. Baker

    Yes, nobody can.

    My guess is that more informal writing and less formal writing may contribute to the discerning reader feeling dissapointed in content quality.

  • teve

    why do you care.

  • http://www.joeszilagyi.com/ Joe Szilagyi

    What's really more interesting is every time any group says anything like “we received strong negative feedback…”

    From who, and how often? 10>? 20>? 50>? 100>? 500>? 1000>?

    From individuals or other advocacy groups?

  • jeffw66seattle

    N8,

    Just curious – how does “dumb rhetoric” drive you to either extreme?

    If it's dumb from the left – why would it “drive” you to the dumb of the right?

    Also curious about what “dumb rhetoric” you see in Josh – or anyone else's – article here. Actually I found the reporting on the WSJA “abortion topic ban” refreshingly challenging journalism. As someone who has often been critical of Erica Barnett's reporting – this one I thought was not only newsworthy, but original and asking the right questions. Ditto (if I may use that co-opted term) both Erica and Josh's follow-ups.

    If a group organizing a community event is going to engage in this type of ideological exclusion – dancing around Constitutional issues and hell, common sense – then it's good that there's organizations like Publicola and WSB out there to call them on it.

  • jeffw66seattle

    tpn,

    What point did the commenter have? All I saw was an accusation of “dumb rhetoric” from “the left”, without citing any examples of said rhetoric or who on “the left” they were talking about.

  • jeffw66seattle

    Joe,

    Not to mention the real bottom line question:

    “So what?”

  • Donolectic

    I think that the issue is one of people being supportive of NARAL, even though they support “murder.”

  • sarah68

    Because it doesn't make any sense, unless the West Seattle group did indeed intend for the groups to be “contentious”. Don't you care if things make sense?

  • Barleywine

    I came to PubliCola to get away from the small-minded folks in the Rainier Valley, not that everyone is that way.
    And I'd hoped I got away. But it's true, it's all just narrow agendas + a few who are bigger. And that's why I tune in anyway.

    Car crash.
    N8 bigger. N8 needed.

  • jeffw66seattle

    Donolectic,

    You think wrong. Whether or not you believe that abortion should be classified as “murder” – it is not. NARAL supports the continued legal practice of pregnancy termination. “Murder” is a legal definition. Abortion is not legally classified as murder, so your claim is – well – a lie.

  • Donolectic

    Jeff, let me be clear – I don't think pregnancy termination is murder, that's why I used quotes around the word. N8 who you responded to is the one who's called it that. You asked what his point was and I tried to answer you. :)

  • jeffw66seattle

    Ah. Well – therein lies one of the many problems associated with trying to speak for someone else.
    :)