Viva La Cola!

Founded in January 2009, PubliCola is a blog about Seattle written by journalists who are dedicated to non-partisan, original daily reporting that prioritizes a balanced approach to news. Started by longtime local editor and award-winning reporter Josh Feit, PubliCola is the first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol.

PubliCola was off and running. In June 2009, PubliCola hired another award-winning journalist, super-sourced Seattle city hall reporter Erica C. Barnett.

People were afraid that blogging would change journalism. Instead, we believe journalism can change blogging. Twenty-first century journalism may look and feel different, and yes Erica isn't afraid to get cranky, but we're committed to making sure online news still delivers independent, reliable, even-keeled coverage. And most of all, we're committed to making sure the coverage sparks honest civic debate.

Bringing you cola for the people, PubliCola is named after Publius Valerius PubliCola, the alias for the authors of the Federalist Papers—the original bloggers.

The first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol and Seattle city hall, PubliCola has been called a “must-read” by the Seattle Post Intelligencer and a hot “New Media Mover and Shaker” by Seattle Magazine—which also cited our own Erica C. Barnett as the city's No. 1 news nerd.

Fitzgibbon’s Feminism

Given the jag we seem to be on during the last 48 hours about the ladies (Erica’s reporting on Summerfest vs NARAL and my reporting on renegade pharmacists vs. state Board of Pharmacy rules), I thought I’d throw in one more piece of news that’s relevant to the wymyn (!)

About two weeks ago, we had the four candidates who are running to replace state Rep. Sharon Nelson (D-34, W. Seattle, Vashon, Maury, Burien) in for an endorsement interview. The only woman in the race, campaign finance reformer Marcee Stone, is the candidate of choice for the National Women’s Political Caucus of Washington.

But when we asked each candidate what bills got the short shrift in the 2010 legislative session (and that they would commit to jump starting in Olympia in 2011 if elected), Fitzgibbon stood out as the lone feminist.

Fitzgibbon said he would try to pass the limited service pregnancy centers bill. Sen. Rodney Tom’s (D-48, Bellevue) bill would have required the bait and switch centers (which actually don’t provide abortions and often have religious affiliation), to disclose more information to the public. The bill died in committee in February.

Stone, not surprisingly, said she would get behind a bill that would have established public financing in state Supreme Court elections.

On a related note: As Erica reported yesterday, it was another candidate in the 34th race, King County Council aide, Mike Heavey, who bravely said he was going to boycott Summerfest (a giant campaign must for 34th District candidates) if NARAL was kept out.

Heavy’s legislative do-over, he said, would have been the hazardous substance tax, which failed under pressure from the oil industry.


  • EJasper

    this is a story? seriously, come on publicola. this is fitizgibbon fluff.
    the story to me is the last sentence. joe's talk, whereas mike actually did something. kudos to him.

  • tpn

    Everytime a lame ass Democrat is up for reelection, the abortion card gets played. We are supposed to put up with economic policies that lead to the eradication of our rights through the regulatory capture of government and the lobbying process, in exchange for a short term temporary fix of extending single issue rights exclusively, so that these same politicians can dupe us into selling the long term prospects of the security of our rights (speech, choice, search and seizure, etc) in exchange for the long term prospects and security of these same politicians to enable this process in echange for power and wealth.

    The year 1992 called: they want their failed political discourse back.

  • Ericacbarnett

    Language police alert: Many feminists prefer to call guys who support women's equality “pro-feminist,” not feminist, on the grounds that feminism is a belief system developed for, by, and about women, not men. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pro-feminism

  • Mary

    I liked Joe's constructive response that he was going to turn out volunteers to help NARAL get their message out even when it looked like they weren't going to have a table. Rather than skipping the event altogether (by which Mike likely meant that he would not drop by for the usual candidate 20-minute walk-through of the festival), Joe offered to help NARAL in their effort to make lemons into lemonade. Mike's boycott plan typifies a confrontational style that served his dad poorly in Olympia and bodes ill for Junior's likely performance as a legislator.

  • NWPC-WA

    Org name police alert, it's the National Women's Political Caucus of Washington. http://www.wpcnet.org.

  • Eye on 34th

    Thanks for this coverage. So helpful to read real reporting on where candidates actually stand on issues important to all of us. Joe's answers reflect a deep and nuanced understanding of the issues–something the other candidates in the race seem to be lacking. Boycotting a festival? Easy (and shallow) answer. Fighting for a bill on limited services preganncy centers? Real help in the fight for choice. Also, as I understand it, NW Women's Political Caucus endorses only women, so the feminist (or pro-feminist) in this race was out of luck on that one…

  • Marcee Stone

    My NARAL rating is 100%. I believe public campaign financing for the State Supreme Court is very important because if anti-women's choice groups, such as the US Chamber of Commerce, the Big Insurance lobby, have their way, they will spend millions electing a judge that could sway court decisions the wrong way for women. It only takes one to ruin the progress made.

    I want you to know that being pro-choice isn't simply a political statement on my part. In the spring of her senior year of high school my mom became pregnant. My birth father refused to marry her or recognize me as his child. My mother married another man when she was five months pregnant with me. He was an alcoholic and an abuser. I'm sure she thought it was worth the price to be married and pregnant no matter how bad the prospect of who she was marrying. My mother became pregnant again but this time gave up her second child for adoption as she felt she couldn't care for another child as the marriage was in ruins around her.

    When I was three, my mom moved us to live to Delridge where she had found a roomate and a babysitter for me while she worked in the collections department at Sears. Mom remarried when I was four years old. We moved to White Center proper at that time.

    My half-sister who was born from that marriage ended up pregnant at the tender age of 13 and a mother at 14 even though a woman's right to choose was now legal. Her daughter became pregnant at 15 and a mother at that time. As you can see I know from personal experience that this misery is handed down generation to generation and it is hard to stop the cascade of failure.

    I know what it's like to begin life 10 steps away from the starting line. That is why I believe in fairness and access to affordable healthcare for all. We must preserve a woman's right to choose and stop the constant encroachment on that right. We must support fact-based sex education in our schools. We must find a way to fund health programs for those who can't afford it. It is simply a waste of life, a waste of an education, a waste of the state's money, and a foregone conclusion that we will all continue to pay more on down the line.

    I am proud to be the first person in my family to graduate from college despite my beginnings and even prouder that my daughter became the second person to do so last month.

  • MikeHeavey

    Josh & Erica,

    Last night when I first read Erica's post about Mike Heavey boycotting West Seattle Summerfest, Joe Fitzgibbon's quote was he was disappointed that NARAL would be barred but he hadn't really thought about whether he was boycotting the event since “he had been attending Summerfest for as long as he can remember”.

    THEN
    It was changed with removing the wishy-washy position to its current version that says he will be helping volunteers handing out pro-choice information.

    NOW
    This nothing news story couldn't be less newsworthy. No doubt that all the Democrats in this race support limiting crisis centers.

    Why change Fitzgibbon's quote?
    Why run this “story”?
    Only questions for the journalists that run this news site.

  • 34th voter

    I think the point was the Joe has done more than talk, whereas Mike just chose to grandstand on an issue.

  • 34th voter

    Here is another question for Publicola–why give so much attention to Heavey's obvious political stunt?

  • Jim

    Mike Heavey, it's interesting that you call Joe wishy-washy here when generally you're the one who has no idea how to answer a question if Joe doesn't answer first.

  • ivan

    Eye on 34th says:

    “Joe's answers reflect a deep and nuanced understanding of the issues–something the other candidates in the race seem to be lacking. “

    Agreed, and voters will find that this is true across issues, across the board. The other two candidates are good people and good Democrats, but Joe has put in more time IN OLYMPIA than both of them put together, and that experience counts.

    It's one thing to have a general idea or position on any particular issue. It's another thing altogether to know exactly how legislation that deals with that issue will take shape IN THE HOUSE, long before it does.

    People can scoff and call it “Fitzgibbon fluff.” Thinking voters who demand the best qualified, hardest-working legislators will recognize that Joe's advantages are real and not imagined. We have consistently demanded high achievers and workhorses in our Legislative delegation, and we have gotten them. Joe will continue to keep our level of representation at or near the top.

  • David B.

    There's also this, quoted from the same Wikipedia article you linked above:

    “Those who claim that “feminist” can apply equally to men and women often point out that the arguments made by advocates of the term “pro-feminist” are based in notions of biological determinism and essentialism, and are actually contrary to feminist principles.”

    Why be exclusionary?

  • gloomy gus

    Looks like claws may be coming out here. Note to whoever's posting as Mike Heavey: referring to self in third person NOT A GOOD CAMPAIGN STYLE.

  • Ericacbarnett

    Because women's experiences are unique to women, just like any other group that's been oppressed (African Americans, GLBTQs, etc.). Men can be allies, but–the argument goes–they can't be feminists any more than they can be women.

  • Progressive34ther

    Heavey's stunt was at least something that he did. Publicola's non-stop promoting of Fitzgibbon's campaign through fluff like this and by advertising his fundraising events is beyond ridiculous.

    This lies at the heart of why no one takes Publicola seriously. If Publicola was interested in reporting on the 34th District race, rather then shilling for a particular candidate, they might have asked Fitzgibbon some hard questions about why he supports a Value Added Tax for Washington State (for example). Instead, we're scraping the barrel for the last bits or credibility left here.

  • just wondering

    All legit questions, Mike. I've got one for you too – what are your stances on the issues? I've been checking your website pretty routinely, as I have with the other 34th candidates, and yours is the only one that doesn't have anything up on the issues. http://www.mikeheavey.com/index.php?option=com_…

  • http://twitter.com/VoteSizemore Scott Sizemore

    Erica, breaking us into different groups is incredibly unhelpful in fostering mutual respect. “We go through different experiences, you wouldn't understand,” is a great way to turn off sympathizers. If I can't understand, then I have no way of showing any meaningful support. Either women and men are in this together, or it's us against them. I prefer the former.

  • Progressive34ther

    “Joe has put in more time IN OLYMPIA than both of them put together, and that experience counts.”

    2 years as a legislative assistant is the experience that counts? Knowing off-hand the extension of your friend in OPR can shave a good 5 seconds off a legislator's day, but how exactly does that make you qualified to lead a district of 135,000 people?

    The two times Joe's tried to lead have either failed miserably (25% Yes for building sidewalks by increasing taxes in Burien) and his top-down “I know better then you” style for quashing public comment in planning commission meetings both paint a different picture of leadership.

    I have no doubt that Fitzgibbon knows how to talk a good game. 2 years answering constituent emails and letters means you get the talking points down. I just think that voters in our district should demand more.

  • ivan

    Oh, you think voters “should demand more?” Who else in this race do you expect to provide “more?” If you can answer that question with specifics, and not with generalities or superficialities, I'm all ears.

    Joe “knows how to talk a good game” because — wait for it — he has a firmer, more detailed grasp of the issues, and of potential legislative remedies for those issues. It has begun to dawn on Publicola, and it will dawn on the voters.

  • 34th'er

    Josh & Erica,

    When is Publicola going to annoouce their endorsments for this election cycle? It's obvious your going to endorse Joe Fitzgibbon, which your editorial choice to do. However, if you would just get it over with, it would shine a little clearer light on the reporting you are doing on this race.

    Thanks…

  • Jim

    I think Publicola has been very evenhanded and neutral in their reporting on the race. Mike, Marcee and Joe are coming across on this blog pretty much how they come across in person and how they will come across in Olympia. If Joe looks like the most qualified candidate it's because he is. If you think they are missing something that is going on in the race I'm sure Josh would be open to reporting on it. Publicola isn't making Joe look good. Joe is making Joe look good. That is why he has racked up a mountain of endorsements and stands to continue to do so. All of the candidates are good people. One stands head and shoulders above the others in terms of understanding the issues and readiness.

  • 34th'er

    Jim, it just seems to me there really isn't even a story here. Publicola posted an article that reflects positively on Joe by rehashing something he said to them two weeks ago on the grounds that it was now somehow more pertinent. Using that thresehold of “news worthiness” they could write something positive about each candidate everyday if they tried.

  • http://www.mikeheavey.com Mike Heavey

    Sorry for the confusion, I just want to clear this up – I mistakenly passed on my comments for Mike Heavey. I didn't realize I was posting under Mike's account. I as his campaign manager followed this issue closely and was irritated with the coverage around this issue, but I want to be clear that Mr. Heavey did not write this post.

  • Just Johnny

    Are you kidding me? It's grandstanding now to stand for something? Isn't this what we complain about Democrats not doing enough, standing for something? It's obvious there are trolls from all campaigns on here so this is in no way indicative of what people really think. What a shame. Like your candidate, work your ass off for your candidate, but don't troll around. I think it's really pathetic to be honest and any campaign who participates should really be disgusted with their staff or supporters who do this type of crappy campaigning.

  • Josh Feit

    We ran a positive article on Heavey yesterday on this very same issue.

    http://www.publicola.net/2010/07/07/34th-distri…

    …and as a result, we've been accused (by 34th'er himself) of giving Heavey cheerleader coverage.

    We've run three long feature stories on Fitzgibbon, Heavey, Stone.

    They're all linked here: http://www.publicola.net/2010/05/12/mike-heavey…

    Every time any one of these candidates gets a noteworthy endorse, like Heavey's Stand for Children endorse and KC Young Dems endorse, we've noted it.

    http://www.publicola.net/2010/06/10/failed-to-i…
    http://www.publicola.net/2010/06/22/ed-reform-e…

    We also hyped on rumors about a poll that had Heavey up.

    http://www.publicola.net/2010/06/18/extra-fizz-…

  • elaineinballard

    Josh, about that opening paragraph, are you serious? When have you ever pointed out that you were covering “news” relevant to men/boys/guys? The issues presented here (NARAL, Pharmacy Board) are relevant to EVERYONE, regardless of gender.

  • Barleywine

    I think that if the R v. W thing turned out differently, NARAL might be handing out red-painted coat hangers to eight year olds (hang on to it, kids!) while the pro-lifers got a booth in West Seattle.
    And the boothers might be asked not to attend this family event, this year. It's a family event, after all.

    And as ever, the smart guys will be pro-feminist if it might assure that they got laid at least occasionally. Busyness is busyness, after all.

    You have a very interesting story to tell, but so do lots of other people that got screwed by someone else's choice. I support choice reluctantly; but it's not all about you, or women.

  • Guest 2

    Agreed with Mary. How refreshing for a candidate to live is values for once instead of bullshitting and hoping someone buys it!

  • Guest

    NWPC's only qualification for an endorsement is a vagina and therefore renders their opinion in this race utterly meaningless.

  • Clporter11

    Just so you know Publicola, Feminism goes beyond abortion. Just ask the female candidate trying to vie for a sea in a heavily male dominated system. I have worked in a female dominated professional all my life and I can tell you that, while abortion is important on both sides of the political spectrum, true feminism goes beyond supporting a bill in the legislature about abortion support, but believing that women can and will contribute in ways not seen because so much of what we see is male dominated. Can we get a real story of feminism and try asking women who have been working all their lives to break barriers and model for the women coming up that they in fact they matter and they can achieve what ever their hearts desire.
    Chris Porter
    Nurse Practitioner