Viva La Cola!

Founded in January 2009, PubliCola is a blog about Seattle written by journalists who are dedicated to non-partisan, original daily reporting that prioritizes a balanced approach to news. Started by longtime local editor and award-winning reporter Josh Feit, PubliCola is the first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol.

PubliCola was off and running. In June 2009, PubliCola hired another award-winning journalist, super-sourced Seattle city hall reporter Erica C. Barnett.

People were afraid that blogging would change journalism. Instead, we believe journalism can change blogging. Twenty-first century journalism may look and feel different, and yes Erica isn't afraid to get cranky, but we're committed to making sure online news still delivers independent, reliable, even-keeled coverage. And most of all, we're committed to making sure the coverage sparks honest civic debate.

Bringing you cola for the people, PubliCola is named after Publius Valerius PubliCola, the alias for the authors of the Federalist Papers—the original bloggers.

The first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol and Seattle city hall, PubliCola has been called a “must-read” by the Seattle Post Intelligencer and a hot “New Media Mover and Shaker” by Seattle Magazine—which also cited our own Erica C. Barnett as the city's No. 1 news nerd.

Education Reform Takes Center Stage in Fight for Suburban State Senate Seat

The eastside Seattle burbs overwhelmingly voted for President Obama in 2008. And the eastside Seattle burbs are hot on education reform. Ironically, it’s a Republican candidate for the state Senate, investor and consultant Gregg Bennett,  who’s running on Democratic President Barack Obama’s education reform platform in the 48th Legislative District (Bellevue, Redmond) this year.

“He [Obama] and Race to the Top [Obama's education reform program] are right on, it’s moving us in the right direction,” Republican Bennett says.

Bennett is running against incumbent Sen. Rodney Tom (D-48) in the GOP’s effort to take back the hotly contested swing turf on the eastside. Tom (who used to be a Republican before switching to parties in 2006) also hypes education reform and was a lead player in passing both 2009′s and 2010′s educations reform bills.

However, those bills—which expanded the definition of basic education to make students more competitive when it comes to meeting college prerequisites and tweaked guidelines around accountability—fall short when it comes to the big reforms Obama (and his aggressive education secretary Arne Duncan) have been championing—like statewide, uniform evaluation standards for teachers that are tied to data on student acheivment.

“It’s all window dressing,” Bennett says. “How does this improve test scores or graduation rates.”

Bennett says: “We must have a data system that captures student progress across the sate. We’re spending $10 billion on education in this state, and we don’t even know what works.”

Republican state Rep. Skip Priest (R-30) and Republican State Sen. Curtis King (R-14) tried to  amend the Democrats’ reform bill to include a state-level, teacher evaluation system—and Bennett told me he would have supported those amendments. They were killed by the Democrats who sided with the teachers union against state-level evaluation standards. There was no roll call on King’s amendment, but Tom tells PubliCola he voted for it and Sen. King confirms that Tom supported him on it. (The teachers union told us that the local level knows best when it comes to evaluating teachers.)

The state’s application for Race to the Top funding (about $250 million in federal dollars for schools) is based on the legislature’s education reform bills and Bennett says, “we have little to no chance [of getting Race to the Top money]. There are so many flaws in our application.”

In addition to not including uniform, data-driven teacher evaluations, charter schools are another Race to the Top litmus test. Bennett accuses Washington state’s appliction of  “stiffing”charter schools.

He right. Kind of. While Washington state’s Race to the Top application doesn’t include charter schools, it does focus on innovative public schools. “It turns out the X factor in successful schools,” says Gov. Gregoire’s spokesman Viet Shelton, “is not charters, it’s well run, well taught, innovative schools.” Indeed, Gregoire’s Race to the Top application plays up innovative public schools like the School of Arts in Vancouver, Aviation Highschool in Des Moines, and Delta Hight School, a math and science school, in the tri-cities.

Sen. Tom (who supported charter schools in 2002) says, “In Washington state, charters are not the first avenue to education reform. The voters have told us so.” (Charter initiatives have been voted down three times.)

Tom, who’s been on the senate education committee for eight years, defends the reform bills, pointing out that they made “significant progress” by increasing teacher tenure from two to three years and changing the teacher evaluation system from a binary “satisfactory” or “unsatisfactory” rating to a more nuanced four-level rating system. “This will have a significant impact on our education system,” he says.

Tom does, however, acknowledge that the bill failed on meeting Obama’s state-level, teacher evaluation standard and points out that “I bucked” the teachers union on that front (they’re not supporting him)  by supporting Sen. King’s failed amendment.

“I do agree with him [Bennett] on evaluations,” Tom says. “We will get hit on our Race to the Top Application for not doing more on that. I was disappointed that we only did a pilot project on teacher evaluation [tied to student achievement.]”

He also sponsored a failed amendment with Republican state Sen. Joe Zarelli (R-18 ) to allow principals to dismiss an under-performing teacher after three years. Tom is on the WEA’s shit list for that vote too, he says.

Meanwhile, the League of Education Voters and Stand For Children, two education reform groups that are in sync with Obama’s push for reform, are supporting Tom over Bennett.

Bennett has raised $226,000 to Tom’s $39,000 according to the Public Disclosure Commission web site.




  • http://ithoughtathink.blogspot.com Ryan

    “we have little to no chance [of getting Race to the Top money]. There are so many flaws in our application.”

    Given that only 2 out of 40 states got the cash in the first round, it's apparent that we had little to no chance of getting the money no matter what we tried.

    “We must have a data system that captures student progress across the state.”

    OSPI is implementing that now, with CEDARS. If Bennett doesn't know that, he's out of touch.

  • http://ithoughtathink.blogspot.com Ryan

    “we have little to no chance [of getting Race to the Top money]. There are so many flaws in our application.”

    Given that only 2 out of 40 states got the cash in the first round, it's apparent that we had little to no chance of getting the money no matter what we tried.

    “We must have a data system that captures student progress across the state.”

    OSPI is implementing that now, with CEDARS. If Bennett doesn't know that, he's out of touch.

  • slbewing

    I'm thrilled to continue seeing education as a priority topic in the news and for candidates and elected officials. Reflecting on this session and the attempts to create state-level evaluation standards, I'm wondering how the argument from teacher's unions for local control is different than charter school proponents arguments for local control at the school level? I'm not just trying to be provocative, but am genuinely interested in responses to this question as I have a hard time arguing it myself.

  • slbewing

    I'm thrilled to continue seeing education as a priority topic in the news and for candidates and elected officials. Reflecting on this session and the attempts to create state-level evaluation standards, I'm wondering how the argument from teacher's unions for local control is different than charter school proponents arguments for local control at the school level? I'm not just trying to be provocative, but am genuinely interested in responses to this question as I have a hard time arguing it myself.

  • John S.

    I have worked with Senator Tom for a number of years on education reform and he is the real deal. He has been there when the kids needed him and he will be there tomorrow and the day after that. He is a man of integrity and intellect and knows how to work to make the system better and is not afraid to buck his party caucus or the WEA when necessary. And his voting record is sterling on education.

    I have also talked with Mr. Bennettt and heard his pitch about how everything is broken in Olympia and he is going to apply a businessman's approach and fix it all. When I pointed out to him that much of what he says he will work on is already being done under ESHB 2261 (which Sen. Tom championed), through the State Board of Education, OSPI and the Quality Education Council, he was silent and just looked unhappily at the floor. That was not in his script.

    Actions speak louder than words (or no words) and Senator Tom's actions are real and positive for education. This is a no contest race if support for real and lasting education reform is an issue, Senator Tom has been there, done that, and will be there again, while Mr. Bennett will still be trying to understand what the talking points he has been given really mean. He is a nice, smart man, but woefully outclassed in this race and in the deeper understanding of the substantive issues in education reform that is not just slogans and random numbers. Senator Tom has earned a second term and we can expect more excellent work for education transformation from him in the next four years. Good to have a discussion, but in the end, Sen. Tom will actually deliver what is needed in education today, Mr. Bennett, who knows?, so why take a chance?

  • John S.

    I have worked with Senator Tom for a number of years on education reform and he is the real deal. He has been there when the kids needed him and he will be there tomorrow and the day after that. He is a man of integrity and intellect and knows how to work to make the system better and is not afraid to buck his party caucus or the WEA when necessary. And his voting record is sterling on education.

    I have also talked with Mr. Bennettt and heard his pitch about how everything is broken in Olympia and he is going to apply a businessman's approach and fix it all. When I pointed out to him that much of what he says he will work on is already being done under ESHB 2261 (which Sen. Tom championed), through the State Board of Education, OSPI and the Quality Education Council, he was silent and just looked unhappily at the floor. That was not in his script.

    Actions speak louder than words (or no words) and Senator Tom's actions are real and positive for education. This is a no contest race if support for real and lasting education reform is an issue, Senator Tom has been there, done that, and will be there again, while Mr. Bennett will still be trying to understand what the talking points he has been given really mean. He is a nice, smart man, but woefully outclassed in this race and in the deeper understanding of the substantive issues in education reform that is not just slogans and random numbers. Senator Tom has earned a second term and we can expect more excellent work for education transformation from him in the next four years. Good to have a discussion, but in the end, Sen. Tom will actually deliver what is needed in education today, Mr. Bennett, who knows?, so why take a chance?

  • seabos84

    I did not feel qualified to discuss the current state of k-12 math education until I was in my 3rd year teaching in high school. Education issues are VERY complex, but, because most people have gone to school, and, because most people who are doing o.k. in life also did o.k. in school, education issues are ideal for most people to wax emotional over and demagogue about.

    It took me 3 years before I felt competent to make meaningful comments on the math wars, and in the 6 years that I've been ACTUALLY doing the job, I couldn't count the number of highly degreed, highly credentialed, highly titled, highly paid, incredibly worthless know nothings adding little to nothing of value to my job of helping our kids.

    Don't chuck out someone doing a decent job for someone with glib raygun-esque “solutions”, unless you want glib raygun-esque … ha ha ha … “solutions”.

    I HOPE Mr. Tom is interested in really working on the systemic problems we have and we all want to fix, instead of the faux reform which is focused on blaming teachers.

    So far, in the last 18 years, voting HOPE has been a serious disappointment.

    rmm.

    p.s. Josh – another masterpiece of misinformation!

    (Sh!! – Don't tell anyone where most of the funding for the education astro turf organizations comes from! People might think you're angling for a good paying job with 1 of those Gates blame-the-teachers clubs!)

  • Maxwell Carter

    Redmond, WA

    Public education is the corner stone upon which we build and sustain our nation’s democracy and economy. Analysis of what is happening in our schools has provided evidence throughout the system of academic failure. We are not keeping up with the challenge offered by other developed nations. Weak management of our schools has resulted in special interest groups diverting resources to uses other than academic student achievement.

    Too many children achieve at very low levels and fail or drop out because schools do not meet their needs, and too many dysfunctional families cannot or will not support their children properly. The biggest human rights issue we have today is effective public education for all our citizens.

    Children are our greatest resource and responsibility. They deserve a world class school system to meet future challenges and to attain success and happiness. However, too many K-12 public schools are failing them — the system is broken. Even though educators, politicians and union officers have routinely spent significant amounts of taxpayer dollars negotiating changes (decreased class sizes, added professionals to the educational bureaucracies, upgraded buildings and equipment, etc.), student achievement remains stagnant. The system does not self repair. We are a nation at risk and can wait no longer.

    I propose we consider systemic changes to the way we educate our children. The new American School System will:

    Focus on students and their educational goals. The system is composed of those educational resources that bring about world class levels of success.

    Recognize that teachers are the most important educational resource in schools. Therefore, their pay is made commensurate with their students’ level of achievement (high end pay comparable to scientists and engineers). We publicly recognize teachers for great accomplishments — the best are treated like the “rock stars” of the community. Payrolls are frugal and include only employees who directly affect positive student achievement.

    Provide students with enough time in learning environments (schools, professional labs, work places, etc) to achieve goals. The school day is longer and many more days are scheduled in the school year.

    Promote active cooperation between schools and community to broaden student real life/work experience. Volunteers are recruited to assist teachers and/or become mentors to individual students and families.

    Recruit the best, brightest and most knowledgeable college students as well as successful people in important fields of work and professions to be teachers. Teachers who do not bring about student achievement are provided with help or counseled into other fields of work.

    Assign all school personnel clear responsibility for their part in assisting students to learn and hold them accountable. The school as a whole is responsible for student success.

    Find adequate funds to implement changes from within the current failing School System. Savings can be made by reducing and eliminating unproductive, redundant elements from the budget, such as administrative entities, supplemental services, duplicate activities, etc.

    Establish national academic standards and develop achievement tests to determine student levels of achievement.

    Give parents school vouchers equal to the cost per student per year which they can spend at the school of their choice. Public funding follows the student. Schools with inadequate enrollment will be closed.

    Constructive changes make a difference. Input must come from as many people as possible. We will develop strategies for implementation when our ideas become workable for our new educational reality.

    Let’s get the ball rolling. A great way to get up to speed on our public schools is viewing the documentary Waiting for “Superman”, currently playing at neighborhood theaters.

    Please visit my blog: http://k12-students-achieve.com

    Maxwell Carter