Viva La Cola!

Founded in January 2009, PubliCola is a blog about Seattle written by journalists who are dedicated to non-partisan, original daily reporting that prioritizes a balanced approach to news. Started by longtime local editor and award-winning reporter Josh Feit, PubliCola is the first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol.

PubliCola was off and running. In June 2009, PubliCola hired another award-winning journalist, super-sourced Seattle city hall reporter Erica C. Barnett.

People were afraid that blogging would change journalism. Instead, we believe journalism can change blogging. Twenty-first century journalism may look and feel different, and yes Erica isn't afraid to get cranky, but we're committed to making sure online news still delivers independent, reliable, even-keeled coverage. And most of all, we're committed to making sure the coverage sparks honest civic debate.

Bringing you cola for the people, PubliCola is named after Publius Valerius PubliCola, the alias for the authors of the Federalist Papers—the original bloggers.

The first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol and Seattle city hall, PubliCola has been called a “must-read” by the Seattle Post Intelligencer and a hot “New Media Mover and Shaker” by Seattle Magazine—which also cited our own Erica C. Barnett as the city's No. 1 news nerd.

Gregoire Submits Race to the Top Application to Feds

As we noted in today’s Morning Fizz, Gov. Chris Gregoire was set to officially send Washington State’s application for Race to the Top funding ($250 million in federal education assistance) to the Department of Education today.

She held the press conference this afternoon at a middle school in Lacey.

PubliCola has been skeptical of Washington State’s chances because our education reform bill—the blueprint for our application—fell short on several of President Obama’s (and his aggressive Department of Education head, Arne Duncan’s) standards. Without uniform standards for teacher evaluations that are also tied to student achievement, for example, our application merely gives lip service to one of the centerpieces of Obama’s overhaul. And our application doesn’t even broach charter schools, another Obama prerequisite.

However, Gregoire’s application does hit some reform litmus tests, like allowing alternative routes to teacher certification and empowering the state to head up makeover efforts at failing schools.

And perhaps a much bigger deal in Washington’s favor: While other states tack more closely to Obama’s standards on charters and teacher evaluations, they can’t demonstrate buy-in from local districts (and unions). Gregoire made a point of getting local school boards, local unions, local superintendents, and local principals to sign off on the RTTT application. So, while our plan might not be splashy with radical reforms, it might actually be realistic. This will certainly be Washington State’s pitch when Gregoire’s representatives travel to DC this summer as part of the application process. Two-hundred sixty-five out of 295 districts signed off on the application.

One of the loudest critics of the timid legislation during the session was state schools superintendent Randy Dorn. He called for stronger teacher evaluation standards. Today, however, Dorn joined Gregoire to announce the application.

“Our work continues and we are still very engaged in this important effort,” said Dorn. “We need to keep building on the momentum we’ve made in the past year to create a brighter future for all of Washington’s students.”

Finalists will be announced in late July or early August. Winners will be announced in September.




  • http://saveseattleschools.blogspot.com Melissa Westbrook

    Well, it's a crapshoot.

    First, the RTTT money looks and sounds an awful lot like the Gates Transformation money of the '90s. Gates had given Seattle Public Schools money for each school to take a hard look at itself and create a “transformation” plan. Now I think it's a great idea to make every single person working at a school be part of a hard look at what is happening, not happening and how they serve the students at their school.

    However, we had every school do this and then, because Gates wasn't happen with the pace/outcomes/you pick, they pulled the money a couple of years later. So naturally, with no continuing money OR long-term funding, the plans were doomed (although some schools did try to carry them on).

    So what will RTTT money do? It's easy to start something, it's another thing to keep it viable without continued funding.

    What's interesting is that Seattle Public Schools has its own version of charter schools. (They were called Alternative schools and now, under the new Student Assignment Plan, they are called Option Schools.) They do have teachers in the teachers' union but that was, until recently, one of the few non-charter things about them. Nearly all were started by parents/community, most have been around 20+ years (so there's longevity for their programming) and the programming is what RTTT wants – innovative and non-traditional.

    And yet, despite all that, Seattle (and Washington State) can't use them on the RTTT application because they aren't “charters”. It's just ridiculous. (School Board Director Harium Martin-Morris asked a Dept of Ed person in D.C. if it were possible and the answer was no.) Over in the Tri-Cities, they created a new STEM (science, technology, engineering and math) high school in the 3 districts. It's innovative but no, they can't claim that because it is under 3 districts not one.

    But really it's about getting charters (good luck with that in this state) and teacher assessments (based on student assessment outcomes). I really doubt Washington State will win this and frankly, I'm not sure, in the end, we will really miss the money.

  • seabos84

    How many hundreds work for the Gates Foundation?

    How many potential applicants get to apply by being astro turf “independent” flacks spewing Duncan-Gates Speak disguised as “reporting”?

    Josh – do NOT put the following on your email signature when you go to work for The Big Guy – it got me in trouble –

    CASSIUS: Why, man, he doth bestride the narrow world
    Like a Colossus, and we petty men
    Walk under his huge legs and peep about
    To find ourselves dishonourable graves.

    (Josh – I took the quote a bit of context to serve my purposes … ya know how to do that, right? You do it all the time with your

    Education problems = bad teachers

    editorializing passed off as reporting!)

    rmm.

  • seabos84

    Yo! Josh!

    My wife just told me about Nellie Bly!

    Do NOT emulate this woman or her work!

    Tho$e you a$pire to hang out with are highly credentialed, highly degreed, highly titled, and usually highly paid – ANY taint of reality & stench of real experience will disqualify you from rubbing elbow$ with thi$ $ocial cla$$!

    Remember – well, actually you seem to have internalized what I'm going to say, so, it doesn't look like you'll have a hard time remembering -

    Afflict the Afflicted, Comfort the Comfortable!

    rmm.

  • Dan Dempsey

    Josh,

    RttT is an outlaw extortion. Why not mention that?

    http://mathunderground.blogspot.com/2010/06/did…

    Not authorized by congress just a power grab by the FEDS.

    I hoped for a free press …. Not a press purchased by the Powerful.

    Do some research and stop rewriting puff press releases.

    Danaher Dempsey

    Math Underground Blog

  • phranc68

    What Seabos once again fails to recognize is that this application was essentially written by the WEA. Josh correctly points out that this involvement, and buy in, is the strongest element of the application. It is FAR from the basic tenants of Obama's reform agenda.

    You cannot slam this as anti-teacher when the WEA wrote the bill!

    Josh is also correct that one great strength, is that the Washington application includes things that the State might actually be able to accomplish. The application does not include unproven ideas that are attractive to some (Charters, merit pay etc.).

    Some teachers act like they work in a salt mine 7 days a week or something. They are well paid, have great benefits and their entire political power base is paid for by the taxpayers. We have a right to demand results for our money.

    The WEA deserves credit however, for being a genuine partner in creating an application, and passing new laws this last session, that might help all the students of Washington state.

  • Mikos

    No doubt RTTT has taken a page right from the Gates Foundation: use a relatively small amount of money to leverage cash-strapped school systems to do what you want them to do. That's why one educator called RTTT “the carrot that feels like a stick.” Some states have walked away from the process simply because they decided it wasn't worht the trouble. Washington may be a winner by virtue of hanging in there — but how much difference will the money make? Don't look for a revolution. At less than a hundred dollars per student, it's hard to imagine much change.

  • hardly skeptical

    “skeptical”? You repeatedly lauded gregoire for being “savvy” and smart to try to make up her own rules to win the contest, which is obviously a dumb approach. “Oh look we got buy in — by lowering standards!” is hardly going to be a winning argument when the basic issues is standards v. seniority.

  • ivan

    “The basic issue is standards vs. seniority?” Bullshit. You can't demonstrate that they are mutually exclusive.

  • seabos84

    Phranc, who won't tell us who he is, like usual, has to take a swipe at something I did NOT say using right wing talking points!

    Pharnc – just say it bluntly – management is wonderful and teachers are lazy ingrate scum. All problems are problems with teachers, NOT problems with the people who are well paid and who are in charge of these collapsing systems!

    So phranc, do you sit in a cube next to Josh at a shrine to the Great Gates and his Munificent Management of Genius? Are you higher up in the food chain, and you already have a paycheck from 1 of the worship organizations? I don't think you're the Frank Luntz creating the lies which sound so helpful and so caring – just 1 of the Luntz wannabees?

    Anyway – best of luck bashing us! It is certainly better paying than what we make!

    rmm.

  • Dan_Dempsey

    “The WEA deserves credit however, for being a genuine partner in creating an application, and passing new laws this last session, that might help all the students of Washington state.”

    The WEA ignores the members often preferring to steer them as mindless sheep. Read a bit of Diane Ravitch.

    The four RttT “solutions” for failing schools hardly offer much in the way of improvement unless the plan is to improve bottom lines for various Ed-u-Corporations.

    Take a look at the ridiculous New Technology Network's results at any of their 41 schools that are old enough to have standardized state test scores…… pathetic.

    If results are desired then sound practices need to be employed…… and this is NOT happening.

    NSF/EHR grants are loved by Universities for the cash flow but academic improvement in k-12 schools are rarely the result.

    A recent FOIA sent to the NSF showed only plans to spend money and how the money is spent…. NOTE Results are not important… Spend 10s of millions and no results are required.

  • Dan_Dempsey

    Get the 900 pages of WA RttT here:

    http://mathunderground.blogspot.com/2010/06/was…