Viva La Cola!

Founded in January 2009, PubliCola is a blog about Seattle written by journalists who are dedicated to non-partisan, original daily reporting that prioritizes a balanced approach to news. Started by longtime local editor and award-winning reporter Josh Feit, PubliCola is the first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol.

PubliCola was off and running. In June 2009, PubliCola hired another award-winning journalist, super-sourced Seattle city hall reporter Erica C. Barnett.

People were afraid that blogging would change journalism. Instead, we believe journalism can change blogging. Twenty-first century journalism may look and feel different, and yes Erica isn't afraid to get cranky, but we're committed to making sure online news still delivers independent, reliable, even-keeled coverage. And most of all, we're committed to making sure the coverage sparks honest civic debate.

Bringing you cola for the people, PubliCola is named after Publius Valerius PubliCola, the alias for the authors of the Federalist Papers—the original bloggers.

The first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol and Seattle city hall, PubliCola has been called a “must-read” by the Seattle Post Intelligencer and a hot “New Media Mover and Shaker” by Seattle Magazine—which also cited our own Erica C. Barnett as the city's No. 1 news nerd.

Phillips to Call for Audit of Sheriff’s Department

This story was originally posted yesterday afternoon.

Democratic King County Council Member Larry Phillips tells PubliCola he’ll be calling for an audit of the sheriff’s department this week.

We had called to ask him why—given the debilitating cuts on tap for the county’s criminal justice system—he’s come out loud against the 0.2 percent sales tax increase that King County Executive Dow Constantine, Sheriff Sue Rahr, and County Prosecutor Dan Satterberg are proposing.

Phillips reasoning? “To propose an increase in the most regressive tax during a great recession, with unemployment in local construction industry at Great Depression levels, 35 percent, making the sales tax 10 percent in some parts of Seattle … this is getting to be ridiculous.”

He also complained that his constituents (downtown Seattle, South Lake Union, Capitol Hill, Queen Anne, Magnolia, Northwest Seattle) wouldn’t be served by the sheriff’s office. “If you live in Seattle you’re already paying for police. To raise your taxes during a recession for a service you’re not going to see? Does that make sense?”

And that’s when we got to Phillips’ idea for an audit. Asked how he would fund the pending  $9.5 million cut (82 positions) to the sheriff’s department, the $5 million cut to the prosecuting attorney’s office, the $4.3 million cut to the public defender’s office, and the $4.3 million cut to the Superior Court, Phillips hearkened back to his earlier call for an audit of King County Metro.

The analogy: When Metro was facing crippling cuts two years ago, Phillips called for an audit and found about $20 million in savings. Phillips, who contends the sales tax is a band aid fix for the County’s structural deficit, says a better way to quickly shore up the sheriff’s department (while coming up with ways to really address the problem) is to find efficiencies now.

Rahr spokesman John Urquhart, boasting that the Sheriff’s office has gone down as a percentage of the budget over the last ten years, says, “We welcome an audit. Good idea, Larry. Thank you very much.”

He adds: “For years we’ve heard grumblings from various council members—although Larry was not among them—that the Sheriff’s office is hiding stuff, and we’re flush … Well, are you writing this down? We welcome an audit.”

Urquhart also pointed out that of their $150 million budget, $75 million is fixed contract costs.

UPDATE: Urquhart called back. He wanted to address Phillip’s point about Seattle constituents paying for Sheriff’s services they “wouldn’t see.”

“Larry knows better,” Urquhart says, pointing out that “any time one of his constituents is served a summons, gets subpoenaed, is evicted, or there’s a siezure of property, that’s done by the Sheriff’s office.” Urquhart also said the County helicopter service—”[the] SPD uses it on a regular basis, near daily!”—is provided by the Sheriff.




  • co-pays are a good thing

    I still do not understand why we are paying for a Cadillac health plan for King County employees and are being asked to approves a sales tax increase. Why can't they start with changes to the KC employee health plans and then look at other cuts before increasing sales taxes? If we still need the sales tax proposal, then we can discuss it, but doing so with so much waste in the health plan is troubling.

  • fount

    Something tells me Seattle residents wouldn't mind doing away with KC Sheriff services (“…served a summons, gets subpoenaed, or gets divorce court information…”) altogether.

  • huskycharlie

    I completely agree. Feel free to cut all those services to Seattle and it's residents and give us the tax break.

    That has got to be one of the dumber defenses of the Sheriff's Department ever.

  • iviola

    “…served a summons, gets subpoenaed, or gets divorce court information…”

    and that justifies a tax twice as large as the Transit Now package we voted for last year? What a load

  • guest

    Don't give that much credit to the audit of Metro resulting in a fix of their budget, like your article implies.
    Most of the fix came from transferring the tax that was being collect for the ridiculous Ferry District, and from a 25 cent increase in bus fare.

    Besides, I didn't think that the King County Council was proposing a sales tax increase – no – I read that they are considering a proposal to put that question on the ballot for the voters of this county to consider. HMMMM.
    This little detail got lost in your article.

    The audit is ok.

  • Seattle Cop

    Seattle pays KC for the chopper. People pay deputies to serve those court papers. Those are the weakest arguments I have ever heard for the fleecing of Seattle by suburban and unicorporated King County. There are some arguments that are better, few and still weak, but a spokesperson for the Sheriff should know a lot better…

  • giffy

    I have been wondering a lot lately what Seattle gets from King County. It seems we pay for almost every service they provide, while say unincorporated areas do not.

    Then we get studies based on dishonest metrics that claim Seattle is subsidized by the outer areas on bus service so we get saddled with 40-40-20.

    I get the feeling like we are suckers in this whole arrangement. We support taxes and good government and the only ones who benefit are people out in the suburbs who cote against both of those. No different from Eastern and Western Washington.

    Plus the County could solve much of this shortfall if Satterberg decided to follow Seattle's lead and say not prosecute marijuana possession.

  • http://twitter.com/B_Mar Brian Martin

    That audit would be a good start, but don't stop there. There must be plenty of excess, redundancy and just waste in general throughout various city, county and state offices. We'll never know if we don't at least look though.

    Minor nit-picking matter, I don't believe Sgt. Urquhart's job is appropriately described as 'Rahr spokeman'. He is the MRO/spokesman for the entirety of the KCSO, not just the Sheriff, and is not the Sheriff's personal spokesperson.

  • WOW !

    giffy – your lack of local government is staggering. What does Seattle get from King County ? How about Harbor View. Seriously injured – one of the foremost trauma units in the country. Don't have insurance ? Doesn't matter, they will treat you anyway. Not enough for you ? How about the criminal justice system for all felony crimes. I am not talking about smoking weed here. Need more ? You know when you flush your toilet and the shit (not talking about your post) magically goes away – yes, once again King County. Larry is grandstanding here and is exhibiting symptoms that alot elected officials are these days. It's called the fear of unemployment.

  • http://twitter.com/B_Mar Brian Martin

    I agree (what does Seattle 'get' from King County?), but I would also add that much of the rest of the county seems to wonder what benefit is to be had from being in the same county as Seattle.

    Frankly, I'm getting to the point of thinking that the state should follow Connecticut's lead and do away with counties altogether and just incorporate all of the currently unincorporated areas into the nearest cities and towns.

  • giffy

    Harborview is basically self sustaining and is run by UW medicine. Plus almost all the funding for indigent and low income care comes from the state and feds.

    Fair enough on superior courts however we pay the same as other areas which get both that, plus local police service. We also have to pay money to KC to use the jail. Unincorporated areas do not.

    And I pay for sewer services. We are also not building Brightwater for Seattle. Our population is reasonably stable.

    Look I am not saying we don't get anything at all from the County. What I am saying is that I bet we get back much less than we pay in taxes.

  • saddadbadhad

    Larry has been a weird tool for a long time…the older he gets, the weirder and more plastic and calculated he becomes. He's trying to be a good politician and nothing more, bordering on being the Democrats' Pete Von Reichbauer. The fact the two of them get along so well should speak volumes about Larry. Too bad – he's generally a nice guy, but clearly has some issues about inferiority. Oh, and his Cathy allen ads last year – “our future's so bright we've gotta wear shades” – was so disingenuous that voteres saw right through him. He needs to real up.

  • intheknow

    One of the dumbest things King County voters ever did was make the Sheriff's position an elective office. After that happened, Ron Sims was terrified to take on the Sheriff, and the Sheriff could no longer be fired. So,what happens now? The Sheriff's office negotiate service provisions with the smaller cities in King County that don't want to create their own police force. But since these smaller cities don't want to pay the Sheriff for the full cost of service (in part b/c employee costs are out of control), the Sheriff's office allows them to pay less than the service costs and then makes the County coffers cover the rest. That's right Seattle, we're already subsidizing the Sheriff's office…whatever Seattle “gets” from King County, were already paying for, and then some. Josh, the best way to cover those Sheriff's deputies is get the contract cities to pony up the real cost of service, or cut what these cities aren't willing to pay for (I like the way the Sheriff threatens to cut off service to the unincorporated areas, the one place they shouldn't be cutting service to). Larry should audit the hell out of those guys, just wondering what took him so long.

  • Michael G

    I'm disappointed that Constantine, who otherwise has a lot of good ideas on the county's budget, backed off on his idea of negotiating the health plans. For my part, I will be very reluctant to vote for a regressive sales tax increase as long as this issue remains unaddressed.

  • http://www.joeszilagyi.com/ Joe Szilagyi

    I'd love for Publicola to do a long research project as an article to see how much in taxes per resident each Seattle resident pays that goes to Seattle-specific costs and agencies, and then toward King County–and then do the same thing going back the other way. Let's see who's paying a fair share.

  • http://www.joeszilagyi.com/ Joe Szilagyi

    The electing of any LEOs is just plain stupid.

  • giffy

    Agree 100%! They should also look specifically at bus service. The way metro calculates how much they spend in each subarea is inaccurate.

  • ratcityreprobate

    Provided he is not looking to the buffoon we have as State Auditor to do the audit it sounds like a good idea. Can't imagine anyone believes there are not substantial savings to be found in the way those three departments are operated. The threatening tone from law enforcement when they are asked to share in necessary cuts is getting very old.

  • ben trovato

    Perhaps so. Ontheotherhand, sometimes a regular citizen needs to have a summons served, a subpoena issued; regular citizens have even been known to get divorced.

  • ben trovato

    A modest proposal: we need to amend the 13th amendment to the Federal Constitution by adding an exemption for civil servants. Thus we could create a class of unfree bureaucrats who could be clothed in potato sacks, housed in abandoned factories, and worked until they died of exhaustion. Imagine the savings!

  • JJSP

    Calling for an audit is just a smoke screen. The Sheriff is responsible for policing unincorporated King County, which has shrunk with the incorporation of more than a dozen new cities over the last 20 years. Unfortunately, previous executives and the county council haven't had the guts to shrink the sheriff's department proportionately. Most of those newer cities contract with the sheriff, but those contracts are all subsidized by the county – meaning all taxpayers and especially Seattle.

    Despite Phillips rhetoric, I'd bet he'll ultimately vote for the tax increase.

  • Anondyne

    The problem isn't the fact that the Sheriff is elected, it is that the previous Executive, and this one so far as well, is afraid to reopen talks with the unions. The Sheriff didn't negotiate the police contracts, the Executive did. Same with the regular KC employees. There will be no meaningful reduction in KC's expenses until those terrible contracts are redone.

  • huskycharlie

    I agree that all those things are necessary. I just thought it was funny that those were “services” that they came up with. If you are going justify increased taxes I would humbly suggest the county tie it to something heroic sounding like “we will protect widows and orphans from rampaging packs of pilled-up hillbillies.” Not “Who is going to give you a summons if we are not around?” Just sounds lame.

  • dportjoe

    JJSP has part of it right-the county tax base has plunged while demand for service has skyrocketed. This mind set of the overpaid public sector worker is just flat wrong! You cut benefits you lose officers and support staff-even in economic bad times many departments hire lateral nationwide.
    The state constitution sets out the duties of a Sheriff-not the county executive-Phillips is acing like a republican with this move and will look like an idiot when the numbers come in. After 25 years in north Seattle and the U district a nd having just bought my first home in Shoreline I have no problem calling Seattle spoiled brats.

  • jeffw66seattle

    Philips is right – and Constantine's tax proposal was only designed to polarize the public against frontline County workers and divert attention from the County's own bloated, overpaid bureaucracy filled with redundant managers earning over $100K per year.

    Philips' one mistake here is only calling for an audit of the Sherriff's Department – and not the entirety of County government.

    Read more about Dow's Rope-A-Dope at:
    http://pstransitoperators.wordpress.com/2010/04…