Viva La Cola!

Founded in January 2009, PubliCola is a blog about Seattle written by journalists who are dedicated to non-partisan, original daily reporting that prioritizes a balanced approach to news. Started by longtime local editor and award-winning reporter Josh Feit, PubliCola is the first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol.

PubliCola was off and running. In June 2009, PubliCola hired another award-winning journalist, super-sourced Seattle city hall reporter Erica C. Barnett.

People were afraid that blogging would change journalism. Instead, we believe journalism can change blogging. Twenty-first century journalism may look and feel different, and yes Erica isn't afraid to get cranky, but we're committed to making sure online news still delivers independent, reliable, even-keeled coverage. And most of all, we're committed to making sure the coverage sparks honest civic debate.

Bringing you cola for the people, PubliCola is named after Publius Valerius PubliCola, the alias for the authors of the Federalist Papers—the original bloggers.

The first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol and Seattle city hall, PubliCola has been called a “must-read” by the Seattle Post Intelligencer and a hot “New Media Mover and Shaker” by Seattle Magazine—which also cited our own Erica C. Barnett as the city's No. 1 news nerd.

A Veto-Proof Majority

1. The city’s parks department is reportedly considering a plan to put term limits, perhaps as short as three years, on P-Patch garden plots on Parks-owned land, irking some P-Patch tenants who have maintained plots for years. (Twenty-two of the city’s 70 P-Patch gardens sit on Parks property.)

According to 20-year Bradner Gardens gardener and P-Patch Trust Board member Joyce Moty, the majority of those who garden on Parks-owned land would have to give up their plots immediately. Moty says that term limits would make it impossible to establish stable gardens and would discourage the volunteerism that’s necessary to keep parks and gardens in good condition.

Joelle Hammerstad, a spokeswoman for the parks department, says she can’t “speak to any specific proposals, but as a philosophy, our intention is to make P-Patches available to the greatest number of people possible.” Mayor Mike McGinn reportedly plans to meet with the heads of the parks and neighborhoods departments this week to discuss the term limits proposal.

Meanwhile, the city is seeking input from wannabe gardeners on where they’d like to see new P-Patches in the city.

2. McGinn told Slog he would veto the aggressive panhandling proposal, up for a vote by the city council this afternoon, even if it passes with six votes, a veto-proof majority.

Last week, we broke the news that six council members have said they’ll support the proposal, including frequent McGinn ally Mike O’Brien. Also, check out this weekend’s dueling Cola editorials by Tim Burgess and Tim Harris, the most prominent proponent and opponent of the proposal.

3. Washington State got a shout-out in the New York Times this weekend, but not for the reasons state lawmakers might have wished. Washington, the NYT reported, joins a growing number of states that are relying on “sin taxes”—sales tax increases on things like cigarettes, alcohol, candy, and soda.

4. Dozens of environmental and community groups, organized as Streets for All Seattle, have asked the city to help them come up with a dedicated funding source to pay for $30 million a year in unmet walking, biking, and transit-related needs. In a letter to the mayor and city council, the group notes that the city’s bike and pedestrian master plans are woefully underfunded; meanwhile, King County Metro faces an ongoing budget crisis. The letter is signed by groups like Cascade Bicycle Club, El Centro de la Raza, FutureWise, and the Sierra Club.

5. The city’s multifamily housing tax exemption program, which gives a property tax exemption to developers who agree to build “affordable” units, expires this year unless the city council decides to extend it past 2010. Affordable-housing advocates are asking pointed questions about how well the program has succeeded since it was put in place in 2004, such as: How many of the affordable units created under the program would have happened anyway? Did any of the projects built under the program displace low-income housing? And: Are the “affordable” rents allowed under the program really affordable?






  • voter

    @4 – A little more context: http://streetsforallseattle.org/

  • voter

    @4 – A little more context: http://streetsforallseattle.org/

  • if not now, when?

    Streets for All Seattle has a web site: http://streetsforallseattle.org/

  • Guest

    Streets for All Seattle has a web site: http://streetsforallseattle.org/

  • Stephanie Pure

    I applaud groups like Sierra Club and El Centro de la Raza working together for this campaign. Walkable neighborhoods are a social justice and equality issue; so glad El Centro is on board! Viva Streets for All!

  • Stephanie Pure

    I applaud groups like Sierra Club and El Centro de la Raza working together for this campaign. Walkable neighborhoods are a social justice and equality issue; so glad El Centro is on board! Viva Streets for All!

  • http://twitter.com/fattailed fattailed

    Big credit to McGinn for sticking his neck out here and showing some leadership — a rare quality in a Seattle politician.

  • http://twitter.com/fattailed fattailed

    Big credit to McGinn for sticking his neck out here and showing some leadership — a rare quality in a Seattle politician.

  • maybe take turns?

    pea patch users get to keep their patches forever, to the exclusion of others who didn't apply?

    Forever??

  • maybe take turns?

    pea patch users get to keep their patches forever, to the exclusion of others who didn't apply?

    Forever??

  • elaineinballard

    The Streets for All Seattle group has a lot more groups on board: http://streetsforallseattle.org/who-we-are/

  • elaineinballard

    The Streets for All Seattle group has a lot more groups on board: http://streetsforallseattle.org/who-we-are/

  • oplo

    I'm glad someone is calling BS on the “affordable” housing issue. Does BIAW really care about affordable housing?

  • oplo

    I'm glad someone is calling BS on the “affordable” housing issue. Does BIAW really care about affordable housing?

  • marymaryquitecontrary

    Meh. It isn't really “leadership” when every Democratic LD has passed a resolution condemning the ordinance & you have the likes of John Fox hopping up and down. It's an easy “stand” to take and may score some points but I'd be more impressed if Hizzoner actually put forward an action plan to address this issue (because it *is* an issue) proactively. Being the Mayor of No isn't the same as being a leader.

  • Charles

    Meh. It isn't really “leadership” when every Democratic LD has passed a resolution condemning the ordinance & you have the likes of John Fox hopping up and down. It's an easy “stand” to take and may score some points but I'd be more impressed if Hizzoner actually put forward an action plan to address this issue (because it *is* an issue) proactively. Being the Mayor of No isn't the same as being a leader.

  • Stacy

    Neither is putting for a plan to address a problem without any funding.

  • Stacy

    Neither is putting for a plan to address a problem without any funding.

  • Panhandler

    It is a cool website with a great idea.
    I am sure it will gain a wide support from diverse groups.
    Good job

    http://streetsforallseattle.org/who-we-are/

  • Panhandler

    It is a cool website with a great idea.
    I am sure it will gain a wide support from diverse groups.
    Good job

    http://streetsforallseattle.org/who-we-are/

  • Anc

    I think the answer to the P-Patch shortage is not necessarily term limits, but more P-Patches. The city should work to streamline the process for turning unused land into productive community gardens.

  • Anc

    I think the answer to the P-Patch shortage is not necessarily term limits, but more P-Patches. The city should work to streamline the process for turning unused land into productive community gardens.

  • http://twitter.com/fattailed fattailed

    You're sorely mistaken if you think John Fox gets his way every time he's “hopping up and down.” For better or worse, this is just not the case.

  • http://twitter.com/fattailed fattailed

    You're sorely mistaken if you think John Fox gets his way every time he's “hopping up and down.” For better or worse, this is just not the case.

  • marymaryquitecontrary

    McGinn's veto is going to be purely symbolic if / when the council passes this ordinance with a veto-proof majority– which is why this isn't leadership.

  • Charles

    –comment deleted by author–

  • marymaryquitecontrary

    Many movies with horrible premises are much better than you'd expect, but I will tell you this: never has a movie had more of an uphill climb than this one, in my book. I'd have higher hopes for Wedding Planner 2: The Buffet.

  • Charles

    McGinn's veto is going to be purely symbolic if the Council passes this with a veto-proof majority– which is why it's not leadership.

  • Scott

    Cutting long-term experienced gardeners out of p-patches will also cut out the bulk of the knowledge, leadership, donations, and volunteer hours which keep the gardens healthy and functioning. This is a terrible idea. A better solution would be to increase the number of p-patches and garden plots.

  • Scott

    Cutting long-term experienced gardeners out of p-patches will also cut out the bulk of the knowledge, leadership, donations, and volunteer hours which keep the gardens healthy and functioning. This is a terrible idea. A better solution would be to increase the number of p-patches and garden plots.

  • sarah68

    I think that if he vetoes a less-than-majority vote, they have to go back and vote again. In the meantime, some might have changed their mind, which means he's trying to have some effect.

  • sarah68

    I think that if he vetoes a less-than-majority vote, they have to go back and vote again. In the meantime, some might have changed their mind, which means he's trying to have some effect.

  • 42-year Seattle voter

    No matter how big the initial vote by Council, the mayor can still veto the ordinance and the Council still has to vote again to override that veto. And that second vote, to override, occurs after yet more public discussion. Yes, minds on the council can change.

    Interesting comments about symbolism here. that's really what this ordinance is all about — stating the City's intent, its belief, that SOMEthing is going to happen to make Seattle streets safer. At least allow people to Perceive that they are safe(r).

    Personally, I'd like to see the grandstanders shelve the symbolism and the perceptions and start dealing in the real world.

  • 42-year Seattle voter

    No matter how big the initial vote by Council, the mayor can still veto the ordinance and the Council still has to vote again to override that veto. And that second vote, to override, occurs after yet more public discussion. Yes, minds on the council can change.

    Interesting comments about symbolism here. that's really what this ordinance is all about — stating the City's intent, its belief, that SOMEthing is going to happen to make Seattle streets safer. At least allow people to Perceive that they are safe(r).

    Personally, I'd like to see the grandstanders shelve the symbolism and the perceptions and start dealing in the real world.

  • Long-term Seattleite

    The only thing worse than kicking out experienced P-Patchers is giving them the right to cultivate their plot For Ever. C'mon folks; this is a finite resource and some mechanism needs to be found to share it more equitably. If not term limits, then something else (a lottery?)

  • Long-term Seattleite

    The only thing worse than kicking out experienced P-Patchers is giving them the right to cultivate their plot For Ever. C'mon folks; this is a finite resource and some mechanism needs to be found to share it more equitably. If not term limits, then something else (a lottery?)

  • too tempting

    cutting long term experienced families out of UW admissions will cut the bulk of the knowledge and leadership, donations and volunteers hours which keep the UW healthy and flourishing. This is a terrible idea. A better solution in lieu of ending legacy admisions, would be to increase the number of schools so the have nots stop bothering us haves. Of course, I have no funding for that expensive proposal and no interest in doing it, but it sounds good.

  • too tempting

    cutting long term experienced families out of UW admissions will cut the bulk of the knowledge and leadership, donations and volunteers hours which keep the UW healthy and flourishing. This is a terrible idea. A better solution in lieu of ending legacy admisions, would be to increase the number of schools so the have nots stop bothering us haves. Of course, I have no funding for that expensive proposal and no interest in doing it, but it sounds good.

  • Morning Fizzy

    A less than majority vote can't be vetoed because it wouldn't have passed.

  • Morning Fizzy

    A less than majority vote can't be vetoed because it wouldn't have passed.

  • Scott

    Have you spent hundreds (or thousands) of dollars and hundreds (or thousands) of hours developing community and building support for your local p-patch? If not, imagine you had. Then imagine that your leadership, donations and involvement were all cast aside and you were kicked out of the program simply for being involved for too long. That's not a great system to build and maintain community or community gardens.

  • Scott

    Have you spent hundreds (or thousands) of dollars and hundreds (or thousands) of hours developing community and building support for your local p-patch? If not, imagine you had. Then imagine that your leadership, donations and involvement were all cast aside and you were kicked out of the program simply for being involved for too long. That's not a great system to build and maintain community or community gardens.

  • Sally

    To Scott,
    You sound like someone who's got theirs and just wants to keep it. If you've had it for years, isn't it time to let someone have a chance?

  • Sally

    To Scott,
    You sound like someone who's got theirs and just wants to keep it. If you've had it for years, isn't it time to let someone have a chance?

  • Scott

    Like most returning p-patchers, this is an important component of community involvement for me. How would you feel to be cut off from your favorite hobby, your supply of healthy produce, an important volunteer activity, a significant source of recreation and exercise, and a major connection to your neighborhood and community? And gardening isn't something you just do for a year or two – it takes a long time to build up soils, build infrastructure, etc. Successful gardening – community or otherwise – is a multi-year commitment.

  • Scott

    Like most returning p-patchers, this is an important component of community involvement for me. How would you feel to be cut off from your favorite hobby, your supply of healthy produce, an important volunteer activity, a significant source of recreation and exercise, and a major connection to your neighborhood and community? And gardening isn't something you just do for a year or two – it takes a long time to build up soils, build infrastructure, etc. Successful gardening – community or otherwise – is a multi-year commitment.

  • Anc

    Here's an idea I just had.

    Okay so I think everyone can agree that we need to streamline the process for turning unused city land into P-Patches. So for the sake of arguement lets assume that happens.

    Now to answer some of the problems raised by the Parks and Sally above, instead of kicking old farts… uh I mean old P-Patchers out after 5 years, if instead when a new P-Patch opens in a neighborhood some of those that have been at the old one the longest get moved to the new one. This would not only open up spots at what some see as 'closed' P-Patches, but would also help spread the wealth of knowledge around and provide experienced mentors at new plots.

    Thoughts?

  • Anc

    Here's an idea I just had.

    Okay so I think everyone can agree that we need to streamline the process for turning unused city land into P-Patches. So for the sake of arguement lets assume that happens.

    Now to answer some of the problems raised by the Parks and Sally above, instead of kicking old farts… uh I mean old P-Patchers out after 5 years, if instead when a new P-Patch opens in a neighborhood some of those that have been at the old one the longest get moved to the new one. This would not only open up spots at what some see as 'closed' P-Patches, but would also help spread the wealth of knowledge around and provide experienced mentors at new plots.

    Thoughts?

  • Scott

    Why not put the new gardeners at the new p-patches? Moving established gardeners from the communities and gardens they have used for years (and in many cases built with their own hands) would still be disruptive, whereas new gardeners wouldn't have a pre-existing connection to a specific garden. Also, many/most gardeners garden at the closest garden, often the next nearest garden is blocks or miles away (and probably full). That means the established gardener would have to commute to a new garden outside their neighborhood. Again, that's not great for building community, one of the p-patch main goals.

  • Scott

    Why not put the new gardeners at the new p-patches? Moving established gardeners from the communities and gardens they have used for years (and in many cases built with their own hands) would still be disruptive, whereas new gardeners wouldn't have a pre-existing connection to a specific garden. Also, many/most gardeners garden at the closest garden, often the next nearest garden is blocks or miles away (and probably full). That means the established gardener would have to commute to a new garden outside their neighborhood. Again, that's not great for building community, one of the p-patch main goals.

  • Anc

    Well most of the people in the new P-Patch would be new. You'd just move a few. And notice I started out by saying that the whole idea is predicated on new P-Patches being built in the neighborhood so the long commutes would be out.

    Why would you do it? Same reason the Army moves people around every couple of years. Keeps units (or P-Patches) from becoming insular and clichish, to bring people with different backgrounds and experiences to new units (or P-Patches). Wouldn't it be good if new P-Patches had some old salts who had experience building up a P-Patch and getting those in the immediate area involved? Who had the skills that comes from years of community gardening? Instead of keeping all that knowledge and experience in the same old gardens where such skills and knowledge are not so in demand b/c it is already established and somewhat wasted by so many other old salts being there.

    Seems like a good compromise between 'throw out the bums' and 'don't go changin.'

  • Anc

    Well most of the people in the new P-Patch would be new. You'd just move a few. And notice I started out by saying that the whole idea is predicated on new P-Patches being built in the neighborhood so the long commutes would be out.

    Why would you do it? Same reason the Army moves people around every couple of years. Keeps units (or P-Patches) from becoming insular and clichish, to bring people with different backgrounds and experiences to new units (or P-Patches). Wouldn't it be good if new P-Patches had some old salts who had experience building up a P-Patch and getting those in the immediate area involved? Who had the skills that comes from years of community gardening? Instead of keeping all that knowledge and experience in the same old gardens where such skills and knowledge are not so in demand b/c it is already established and somewhat wasted by so many other old salts being there.

    Seems like a good compromise between 'throw out the bums' and 'don't go changin.'

  • Anc

    Huh… the post I just made starting out with 'Well most of…' was supposed to go under Scotts last post but somehow it ended up on top of my earlier reply… Interesting…

  • Anc

    Huh… the post I just made starting out with 'Well most of…' was supposed to go under Scotts last post but somehow it ended up on top of my earlier reply… Interesting…

  • Long-term Seattleite

    This is MY community dammit and nobody else is going to join it until one of us dies!
    -Scott-

  • Long-term Seattleite

    This is MY community dammit and nobody else is going to join it until one of us dies!
    -Scott-