Viva La Cola!

Founded in January 2009, PubliCola is a blog about Seattle written by journalists who are dedicated to non-partisan, original daily reporting that prioritizes a balanced approach to news. Started by longtime local editor and award-winning reporter Josh Feit, PubliCola is the first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol.

PubliCola was off and running. In June 2009, PubliCola hired another award-winning journalist, super-sourced Seattle city hall reporter Erica C. Barnett.

People were afraid that blogging would change journalism. Instead, we believe journalism can change blogging. Twenty-first century journalism may look and feel different, and yes Erica isn't afraid to get cranky, but we're committed to making sure online news still delivers independent, reliable, even-keeled coverage. And most of all, we're committed to making sure the coverage sparks honest civic debate.

Bringing you cola for the people, PubliCola is named after Publius Valerius PubliCola, the alias for the authors of the Federalist Papers—the original bloggers.

The first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol and Seattle city hall, PubliCola has been called a “must-read” by the Seattle Post Intelligencer and a hot “New Media Mover and Shaker” by Seattle Magazine—which also cited our own Erica C. Barnett as the city's No. 1 news nerd.

They All Lost

This post has been updated with some budget details from Olympia.

1. As we’ve mentioned, public campaign financing activist Marcee Stone—running in the crowded field for Sharon Nelson’s open 34th District seat in the state House—has pledged not to take any corporate or PAC money. State legislature candidates who’ve taken that pledge in previous years (John Burbank, Gerry Pollet, and Dick Kelley, who also pledged not to take any contributions over $100) have one thing in common: They all lost.

Stone, who’s raised a little over $7,500 in contributions, says she isn’t worried. Former 36th District candidate John Burbank, she notes, “raised enough money to run a viable campaign” despite his no-corporate-money pledge, losing to Reuven Carlyle “more because of his messaging than money.” Stone says that by “taking as many individual contributions as I can and not limiting myself, in terms of what people can contribute, I think I can do just fine.”

2. Remeber all the huffing and puffing the Democrats did in late March about GOP Attorney General Rob McKenna’s decision to join the 13-state lawsuit against President Obama’s health care plan. One concrete thing the Democrats threatened to actually do was put a proviso in the state budget that would prohibit the AG’s office from spending any money on the lawsuit.

Wondering what became of that idea, we called Senate House Ways & Means Chair Rep. Kelli Linville (D-42, Western Whatcom County) yesterday. Looks like the Democrats are gonna let it slide. Linville, who told the Olympian back in March that McKenna did not have the right to spend state money counter to the wishes of the legislature, told us yesterday that the budget will not include a proviso to prevent McKenna from working on the lawsuit.

3. UPDATE: Some budget details here.

Speaking of the budget: The state legislature is getting closer to a budget deal. They will announce the details of a revenue package this morning.  The Senate’s original insistence on increasing the sales tax—first to 0.3 percent then to 0.2 percent and then to 0.1 percent—had caused the budget standoff. The House and the governor did not want any sales tax increase, and today’s proposal will not include one.

We are curious, however, to see how some other disagreements will be resolved: Will the House get its way on eliminating a $50 million exemption for big banks? Will the Senate get its way on keeping the sales tax exemption for out-of-state shoppers?

Will environmentalists get some big wins with an increase in the hazardous substance tax and Rep. Hans Dunshee’s (D-44, Southwest Snohomish County) green jobs bond?

And what about the tax on soda that the governor proposed over two months ago (which the House and Senate ignored all session). Did the legislature shake off threats from the soda industry and finally put that back in the mix?

4. If you don’t want to wait all week for the Slog to serial-publish the transcripts of the voice mails that Charles Alan Wilson—the Selah, Washington man arrested for threatening to kill Sen. Patty Murray—allegedly left for Murray, you’re in luck!

As Talking Points Memo, USA Today, Gawker, and others reported earlier this week, a transcript of all Wilson’s alleged ranting and raving is available in one court document (PDF) here.




  • marceestone

    Erica,

    I believe I said that his loss may have been more about messaging than money raised in the Burbank campaign. I am certainly no expert on that particular campaign. You can bet that John Burbank and I would agree on most things and believe he has a very powerful message to impart. Thanks for your call yesterday.

  • Jeff

    Marcee is doing the right thing, regardless of strategy. All candidates should make a similar pledge.

    Still, Marcee is an impressive candidate with strong grassroots support and will have no problem raising the funds necessary for a competitive campaign from individual donors.

  • http://michaelmaddux.blogspot.com/ Michael M.

    I again repeat that I am so glad I don't live in the 34th. Marcee is an amazing person with great knowledge on a lot of issues. Mike is a good guy with amazing energy. Sabra is super rad, and really gets details down solid. I don't know this Fitzgibbon guy, but my boss tells me that he's the bees knees.

    Of course, with such a crowded field, I think Allen Ressler should jump into the race, just to liven things up a bit.

    As for the budget – take that, State Senate! More proof that the State Senate is kind of like the Canadian Senate…a place for politicians to go and…well, do whatever it is they do over there. And Val Stevens.

  • http://twitter.com/fattailed fattailed

    What exactly is the functional difference between a corporate or union PAC giving some number of $ — which Stone apparently thinks is unclean — and some individual affiliated with that same corporate or union PAC giving that same number of $ — which Stone apparently thinks is just peachy?

    I'm a 34th LD voter and I want a leg. like McDermott & Nelson, and I don't much care if they take a check from a union PAC or not. I'm against corporate money in politics, certainly, but it's hard to sympathize with a candidate running on what they *won't* do rather than on what they will do.

    Remind me again of what was so great and progressive about the days before big campaign contributions. What are we all so nostalgic for?

  • ivan

    I would hope you also would want a Representative like Eileen Cody, whose work as chair of the House Health Care Committee has been nothing short of heroic.

    To reinforce your point, Eileen takes contributions from damn near every physician and health insurance PAC in the state. Ask any of them if they think they have bought Eileen's vote with their contributions. The answer will be no, and her voting record and all her committee work reinforces that.

    Contributions don't always correlate with a legislator's voting record, and even when they do, correlation is not causation, and should not be inferred without a lot more data.

    The candidate in this race who IMO would be most like Sharon Nelson and Joe McDermott is Joe Fitzgibbon, whom Nelson has endorsed. Joe is also endorsed by Reps. Marko Liias, Dave Upthegrove, Brendan Williams, Tami Green, Geoff Simpson, Christine Rolfes, and Kevin Ven De Wege.

    If I thought Joe's vote even MIGHT be for sale, I wouldn't be supporting him. But I don't, and I am.

  • kenyonf

    Fattailed –

    What are we nostalgic for? The idea that an individual can make a meaningful difference in our political process.

    It seems like pie in the sky these days, but don't you wish your voice had just a little more influence then noise on a blog?

    Marcee has been very active and involved in the fight for public campaign financing for many years now – a cause that the entire 34th legislative delegation says that they support and is part of the platform of the 34th district democrats. After the Citizens United vs FEC ruling, it became clear to Marcee and many others that our system of campaign financing is broken. Marcee, felt that she needed to walk the talk on this issue; thats why she's taken the pedge and why she's reached out and asked the other candidates in this race to do the same.

    Marcee Stone's pledge, which has recieved coverage here, is just one small part of her platform of bringing economic development to the 34th, cleaning up the Duwamish, protecting women's health, campaign finance and disclosure reform, and reforming our state's broken tax system. I know it's early, but I hope you have the opportunity to meet and talk with her. I'm sure you'll find that your impression is wrong.

    In fact, the 34th district democrats are having a forum next Wednesday during their normal monthly meeting.

  • kenyonf

    And to clarify, Marcee isn't shy about reaching to groups and organizations in the district, thats why the first unions to endorse in this race – ILWU Local 52 and the Northwest Regional Council (ILWU+IBU) have endorsed her.

  • http://twitter.com/fattailed fattailed

    Kenyonf, your nostalgia is for a time that never existed.

    When was it again that “individual voices” had more influence in the political process. Was that back in the 1910s or before? Oops, women couldn't vote then. Back in the 1950s? Oops, millions voters of color were effectively disenfranchised pre-Civil Rights Act. Back in the 1960s & 1970s? Oops, Watergate showed there was sure corruption then. In the 1980s? But, uh, that's when Reagan got elected. And now we're getting creepily close to the present, when we know there's nothing to be nostalgic about. Maybe you're just hearkening back to the British Parliament in the olde days, except that was limited to property owning men… Funny how nostalgia in place of analysis leads to wrong conclusions.

    Your intro perfectly reveals what I think is mistaken about a single-minded drive towards campaign finance reform as the silver bullet to fix politics. I think financing is less important than ideology & accountability. And I think individual voices are vastly important than collective power. And I think $ from collectively organized enviros or unions are quite different from $ from corporations — but Stone doesn't seem to make a distinction there.

    I want someone who recognizes the value of mobilization, and who lives in the present instead of daydreaming about an imaginary past. Maybe Stone is it — though I'm skeptical based on her rhetorical priorities and those of her early supporters.

    But yes, I hope to be there on Wed. for the forum. And I hope to hear her talk about something else besides her purity of heart, and flesh out any of those other issues to any extent.

  • http://twitter.com/fattailed fattailed

    No slight on Rep. Cody intended. She's not a superstar in my particular areas of passion as are Nelson & McDermott, but she too sets a high bar for the other candidates for office in the 34th.

  • http://twitter.com/fattailed fattailed

    For the record, ILWU Local 52 has a grand total of 156 members as of their last report to the Dept. of Labor.

  • http://michaelmaddux.blogspot.com/ Michael M.

    My understanding is that Marcee would prefer that we had publicly funded campaigns, which would take down a lot of the barriers that many potentially good candidates face when wanting to run for public office.

    At the same time, she's not an idiot, and knows you have to raise money to run a successful or competitive campaign. I think she struck a good balance here with respect to her beliefs and the reality of campaign financing today.

  • kenyonf

    Fattailed –

    Nostalgia was your word, not mine. With the Supreme Court willing and able to grant corporate person-hood rights, Marcee's pledge is a reflection on the ideals we have for this country, not necessarily the reality of the past (checkered as it is).

    Your right though, public campaign financing isn't a silver bullet that magically fixes all problems, but without real reform, we will continue to struggle to change the status quo. Even a cursory look at the health care debate over the last year shows the need for reform. If you want to go a little deeper, there's a coal mine owner in West Virginia who's been in the news recently – he bought himself a judge. Public campaign financing is about giving candidates the option not to have to get cozy with the moneyed interests to be competitive, then leaving it up to the voters to decide who best represents them.

  • http://twitter.com/fattailed fattailed

    Now that, that I like. Finance reform as opening up new possibilities for the future. Much better than evoking a past time when things were swell.

    More of that please!

  • wsvoter

    Local 52 is to my knowledge the only Union Hiring Hall in the 34th LD.
    A good portion of the membership live and work in the 34th.
    An early endorsement in a legislative race never hurts and Marcee Stone
    has that. That is a Union Local that values good paying jobs -part of the Marcee Stone message.

  • maxvekich

    Marcee, thanks for making this race! I like a candidate who sets the bar high for herself. It has the tendency to raise it for the whole field. Having been a legislator, I recognize what your pledge means- more doorbelling, more individual contact, more effort on your part. That is what I want in a new 34th District Legislator, more energy. I think that is what the people want, too.

  • just wondering

    Max, is Marcee still your significant other (partner/girlfriend, whatever the kids are calling it these days)? Seems like you forgot to include that in your glowing endorsement of her.

  • http://twitter.com/fattailed fattailed

    If Marcee Stone can run a campaign as well as she can salt an online discussion, she might be onto something. How many of the posters here are related to her or on her staff?

  • maxvekich

    Actually, Marcee Stone does have my unconditional endorsement.
    I am attracted to her politics!