Viva La Cola!

Founded in January 2009, PubliCola is a blog about Seattle written by journalists who are dedicated to non-partisan, original daily reporting that prioritizes a balanced approach to news. Started by longtime local editor and award-winning reporter Josh Feit, PubliCola is the first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol.

PubliCola was off and running. In June 2009, PubliCola hired another award-winning journalist, super-sourced Seattle city hall reporter Erica C. Barnett.

People were afraid that blogging would change journalism. Instead, we believe journalism can change blogging. Twenty-first century journalism may look and feel different, and yes Erica isn't afraid to get cranky, but we're committed to making sure online news still delivers independent, reliable, even-keeled coverage. And most of all, we're committed to making sure the coverage sparks honest civic debate.

Bringing you cola for the people, PubliCola is named after Publius Valerius PubliCola, the alias for the authors of the Federalist Papers—the original bloggers.

The first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol and Seattle city hall, PubliCola has been called a “must-read” by the Seattle Post Intelligencer and a hot “New Media Mover and Shaker” by Seattle Magazine—which also cited our own Erica C. Barnett as the city's No. 1 news nerd.

PubliQuestion: Voters—Especially Young Voters—Shrug Off McGinn’s Bumpy Start

We’re excited to announce the introduction of PubliQuestion, a new—and we hope recurring—experiment in insta-polling. The idea is simple: Every couple of weeks, or when a issue of major civic interest is breaking, PubliCola, in partnership with the polling experts at Seattle’s EMC Research, will poll on the topic du jour and offer the results to our readers.

Do you have a favorable or unfavorable opinion of Mike McGinn?
Favorable:  33%
Unfavorable: 25%
Undecided: 43%

Do you approve or  disapprove of the job Mike McGinn is doing as Seattle Mayor?
Approve:   31%
Disapprove:   23%
Not sure:  45%

Do you approve or disapprove of the job the Seattle City Council is doing?
Approve: 33%
Disapprove: 26%
Not Sure: 41%

Read on, we also polled the three viaduct options head to head to head—tunnel, surface-transtit, elevated.

In addition, each poll will include several more in-depth questions for purchase. For example, today’s poll gives you the low-down on what voters in Seattle think of Mike McGinn. Weighted crosstabs and the responses to additional questions, like “Who would win if the Mayor’s race was today?” are available for a $5 fee.

PubliQuestion: Seattle Voters Split on Mayor Mike McGinn When it comes to how Seattle voters perceive Mayor Mike McGinn, the generation gap is more like a chasm.

That’s the conclusion we draw from our initial PubliQuestion poll, in which we measured public support for Mayor Mike McGinn.

As PubliCola readers are well aware, McGinn has been caught up in multiple battles in his first months in office, including a controversial proposal for a seawall ballot measure that has inflamed tensions with the City Council, an abortive (or at least delayed) effort to slash 200 strategic advisors from the city payroll that has provoked a noisy backlash from city employees, the departure of respected department heads like former Budget Director Dwight Dively (who decamped to play the same role at King County after McGinn demoted him), the failure to get his ballot in on time in a school levy election (after making a possible mayoral takeover of the Seattle schools an early campaign theme) and the high-profile resignation of McGinn campaign confidant and mayoral advisor Chris Bushnell, whom PubliCola caught inflating his academic resume.

So how is the public reacting to this storm of bad press? Apparently, mostly with a shrug. Our poll of 681 registered voters in Seattle found that the jury is mostly still out on our new mayor. Forty-three percent of Seattleites, a plurality, said they were undecided when asked if they had a favorable or unfavorable opinion of Mayor McGinn. Asked about the mayor’s job performance, 45 percent said they were unsure. Among those who have an opinion, 33 percent view the mayor favorably, while 25 percent give him the thumbs down.

On the job performance question, the split is similar: Thirty-one percent approve of the job McGinn is doing, while 23 percent disapprove, the same eight-point margin. Those aren’t great numbers, but they’re not as bad as one might have expected, given the intensity of the anti-McGinn sentiment in certain corners of the press. And in case you were wondering McGinn’s numbers are almost exactly the same as those for the Seattle City Council—33 percent approve of the job the council is doing, while 26 percent disapprove.

It’s when you dig into the numbers that things get interesting. First, there is a gender divide, with men more skeptical and women more supportive of the mayor (at least among those who have formed an opinion). Men are almost evenly split on job performance (31 approve-28 disapprove) while women solidly approve of his performance (32 approve-19 disapprove). Mayor McGinn garners strong support from Democrats and Independents; both groups give him a net favorable job approval (+10 among Dems, +15 among Independents), while as might be expected of the green former Sierra Club leader, Republicans (a tiny fraction of the Seattle electorate) heartily disapprove (-41 net job approval).

But the biggest split is generational. Voters under 35 are the bedrock of McGinn’s support. They are the only demographic group where he gets majority favorable and job approval ratings. Under-35s have a high opinion of McGinn and like the job he is doing by a more than three to one margin (57-17 favorable). In contrast, middle-aged voters (45-59 years old) tend to think poorly of how the mayor is doing (24 percent approve, 30 percent disapprove), while the 60+ crowd is close to evenly split. The City Council, on the other hand, barely breaks even with the under-35 set (29-28 job approval) while posting strong job approval numbers with middle-aged voters.

Based on these results, PubliQuestion has two advice points for our civic Commander-in-Chief:

• Keep on truckin’. McGinn’s early controversies may have caught the attention of the city’s hypercivic types, but they haven’t had much impact with less engaged voters (another data point: perfect voters, who tend to pay more attention to day to day developments in politics and civic affairs, are generally down on the mayor, -7 net job approval, while those who voted in fewer than two of the last four elections, and presumably don’t pay much attention to political news, remain very positive at +33 net job approval). And as we mentioned, a plurality of voters has yet to form an opinion on the McGinn administration. That means that McGinn, whatever his early missteps, still has a real opportunity to shape his image in a positive direction, and all that talk in the blog comment threads (you know who you are) about his inevitability as a one-termer is premature at best.

• Stay cool. The support of those green urbanist younger voters, who don’t have much connection to the city’s established centers of power and don’t much care what the Seattle Times editorial page thinks, are McGinn’s political lifeline, and are probably more influenced by his image as a eco-urban outsider than they are by the print (or web) headlines. The next mayoral election is years away, but if McGinn ever loses the support of New Seattle, or begin to seem like just another conventional politician, he is going to be in a world of political hurt.

More on our PubliQuestion poll tomorrow, including surprising details about how McGinn’s preferred surface-transit viaduct replacement option stands up against the deep-bore tunnel and a viaduct rebuild in a head-to-head vote. But in the meantime, are you curious how McGinn would fare against Greg Nickels and Joe Mallahan if a primary were held today? To learn more about our poll results (including complete crosstabs), click here.

Our process worked like this: We pick the topics and brainstorm interesting (and we hope revealing) questions, and EMC writes the poll to make sure the wording is neutral and analyzes and interprets the results. Aristotle provides our calling sample through their VoterListsOnline tool. The poll is fielded using cutting-edge robo-polling technology developed by Precision Polling, another Seattle-based firm whose polling technology is reducing the cost of professional polling.


  • tpn

    In other words, a 33% approval rating, no matter how it's packaged. I think those numbers are pretty close to George Bush's toward the end of his term.

  • Cook

    ahahah that's just sad. i could easily say “only 25 percent of seattleites view him unfavorably! those are JFK-post-assassination numbers!” but i'm not a douche who screws with statistics to make them match my beliefs.

  • http://www.politickling.com/ poliTICKLING

    Favorability with the young in polls is great, but the problem is that most of them don't vote. The average voter age in Seattle is over 50. McGinn's lack of solid favorability from the middle-aged and seniors suggests that he may may have problems passing his seawall and transit measures in the near term.

    I also think these numbers give some clues to others (who may be on the City Council and may want to run for Mayor) who want challenge him. If these numbers hold true, someone may be able to disregard youth issues/viewpoints, focus entirely on the 45 and older crowd and defeat him or his issues.

  • Matt_the_Engineer

    “The average voter age in Seattle is over 50″ I wonder what the average voting age was in the last Mayoral election. Something got McGinn in, and I doubt it's the over-50 crowd.

  • David

    Phone based surveys have had falling reach to younger populations in recent years due to people ditching landlines and going cell-only. How do you account for this shift in your targeted demographic?

  • David

    Just noticed that the 35-44 band is not listed either. What were the numbers for this group?

  • Willy

    Well, I HAVE SOME CONCERNs OF THE CREDIBILITY OF THIS POLL. No race or class survey break down on Sundeep's poll. We certainly know that the last mayoral election was a battle between middle class against the wealthy establishment.

  • morning fizzy

    I'd go after the under 45 yo vote and figure the disapproval voters will vote for the other guy no matter what. Pick 3 favorite youth issues and throw-in a dash of fiscal responsibility, a pinch of experience and a good suit, for the victory.

  • 8Years

    McGinn is a very popular with the majority of democrat,Progressive, liberal, and environmentalist. add also women as Sandep mentioned. you have 75% of Seattlities. That is a decisive victory in 2013.

  • Policy-Researcher

    Youth voted last time, and will vote again. Seattle is also expecting about 15000 to 20000 new voters in 2013 ( ie people reaching 18, and new American- immigrant and refugees). both those two groups tend to be progressive and very democratic who will undoutedly vote for McGinn. 8 years of McGinn seems inevitable

  • marymaryquitecontrary

    This under 35, female, Democratic progressive, liberal, environmentally conscious educated voter thinks that McGinn is a terrible joke. I don't think he's particularly “green”. I don't think he's visionary. I don't think he's a good leader for our city. Didn't vote for him in the primary, didn't vote for him in the general, and hope that Seattle wakes up in time for the next election. I wonder how many Stranger readers this poll hit?

  • http://twitter.com/fattailed fattailed

    Who is the “we” at Publicola doing the questioning? Given the frequently acknowledged potential conflicts with Sandeep's day job (he consulted in the mayoral race last time, after all, and so very well could do the same next time around), it would be nice to have some specific disclosure in this area. I'm sure you guys have a policy on this, right?

  • S-Ender

    given the the condition of our economy. 33% today is very high indeed. If the economy bounce back, his approval rate will skyrocket to 66%. The indication is that the economy will bounce back at the end of 2012. I could not agree more — 8 years of McGinn is certain

  • Cook

    that's silly. sandeep said that they have the crosstabs available for $5. i would expect to find both race and income breakdowns there. if they aren't there, however, then i take back what i said.

  • tpn

    The economy is not going to bounce back in the next 3 years to bubble like levels, and correlating McGinn's approval with it, rather then his performance, is kind of silly. What benchmark are we using? The Dow? GDP? The housing market? Employment participation rate? Baltic Dry Index futures? LIBOR? If McGinn's approval was stock I would not be buying.

  • Silent Voice

    Publicola is becoming a joke site. –are you guys kidding me. I am very familiar with a pollingprocess , and there are many unaswered questions. I don't want to put Sandeep on the spot, but i don't buy this poll.
    McGinn has been engaging Seattle population through townhall meeting (Youth and Family Inititaves). last two , Vanessal ,and G-field– the number of people attended each were over 350 ordinary people. that seems to me more than 33% approval rate. I would probably say 55 to 60% approavl rate.

  • J.R.

    At this exact moment, eight years of McGinn seems highly unlikely, but thanks for cheerleading.

  • tpn

    Anecdotal figures are way more reliable then polls?

  • inside some baseball

    Pay the $5 and get the crosstabs. You support Publicola and will have all the data at your fingertips.

  • Bad Cop

    Most of your comments and debate can be answered by pouring over the weighted cross tabs, available for $4.99. Check them out, and then join the debate as the smartest person on the thread!

  • http://michaelmaddux.blogspot.com/ Michael M.

    You're confusing “net positive” with “popular”. Since Publicola is withholding the crosstabs unless there's a $5 payment, it's not clear exactly what the “don't know/no opinion” percentage is of those groups. It could be 10% of indies don't like him, 25% do, and 65% don't know, or 20% of Dems don't like him, 30% do, and 50% don't know. That isn't a decisive victory.

  • http://michaelmaddux.blogspot.com/ Michael M.

    Duh

  • Kathryn

    Not even remotely interested in seeing the results from 681 registered voters. It is insignificant.

  • bgtothen

    “New Seattle”

    I like. It's a good response to the Lesser Seattle crowd.

  • tpn

    Portland is calling your name.

  • http://spifflines.blogspot.com/ John Bailo

    It's interesting that McGinn has the support of Youngsters…a more interesting topic would be…WHY?

  • cosmopolis

    Ditto, marymary, on everything except the fact that I did vote for him in the general simply for lack of a better option (or so I thought).

  • danadb

    I hope people come around to see McGinn for what he is. McGinn is wasting the office of mayor to declare a pointless war on cars, his only issue, and seems to care very little about much else. He is also willing to lie or whatever else might be required to pursue his agenda. So much for his statements that he will not stand in the way of the tunnel or that his seawall plan has nothing to do with the proposed tunnel, both lies.

  • Seattle_Steve

    Of course McGinn has a chance to course correct. But his start has dug a pretty deep hole amazingly quickly. Perhaps he'll recover by beating extremely low expectations eventually.

    The guy is likable enough if he'd learn to quit insulting people who disagree with him. And if he ever accomplishes anything, he'll gain a measure of respect he doesn't enjoy now.

    In the meantime he'll be treated as a walking campaign brochure full of promises but lacking in any ability to deliver. That just might be good enough for 33%.

  • Old Seattle

    Tunnel?
    To pretect tax payer's $

    That is why we elected him.

  • CC

    Buy for $5. Are you out of your mind.
    Take your fricking poll to E-Pay

  • danadb

    Young votes like McGinn because he is anti establishment. They liked the monorail for the same reason (i.e. Sound Transit was the “establishment”). McGinn as mayor makes about as much sense as the monorail plan did. Perhaps we should raise the voting age.

  • danadb

    What's good for the quality of life and economic vitality of the region, is ultimately good for you as a tax payer as it grows the tax base. Creating a beautiful downtown waterfront, one that would be the envy of cities around the world while ensuring freight mobility for the most trade dependent region in the country, will facilitate that. This is what the tunnel does. McGinn doesn't care about your tax dollars, his West Seattle to Ballard light rail proposal would require the largest tax increase in Seattle history. McGinn simply cares about his doctrinaire view on automobiles.

  • danadb

    The why is easy. Young votes tend to be anti establishment and McGinn ran on that platform. Young voters probably know or care little about the viaduct or tunnel. They just want to be against it because the establishment if for it. Much like their support for the monorail.

  • danadb

    He's not a leader at all. He is a single issue activist driven by his dogmatic belief in the need to minimize the use of automobiles.

  • danadb

    The best we can hope for is that he makes the city a little more bicycle and pedestrian friendly and is relatively benigh elsewhere. The worst would going down his current path and having a serious negative impact on the region's quality of life and economic vitality.

  • misha

    Young people (and women, and minorities) tend to be more progressive. Older people (and men, and white people) tend to be more conservative. It's pretty simple. It's the same in every political poll.

  • Timothy

    This poll tells one thing that should be obvious to both Publicola and Joni Balter, and to others who've wasted hours commenting on the baiting therein:

    It's way too early to be making these judgements.

    Unless, of course, you have motivation for doing so.

  • Obama Lover

    They like him because he is someone who will not shy away from the truth. And he is for the people not for the few. Got it!!!

  • Democrat1

    I don't think McGinn is anti-establishment. He is anti Polshittttt.

  • http://www.google.com/profiles/Communicate.with.Mike Mr. Baker

    I went to the first one at Northgate, I did not vote for him, plenty of people did not vote for him were there watching the “word cloud” focus group bullshit.
    I don't mean to put you on the spot, it just worked out that way.

  • Selma

    One of my favorite Internet commenting trends is that every poll-based story includes someone pointing out — like it's a unique, amazing insight — that people don't have landlines anymore.

    Perhaps there should be a standard disclaimer on every poll story — “YES, WE KNOW. PEOPLE ONLY HAVE CELL PHONES. THANKS.”

  • http://www.google.com/profiles/Communicate.with.Mike Mr. Baker

    He is the human sandbag.

  • http://www.google.com/profiles/Communicate.with.Mike Mr. Baker

    I'll bet you five bucks that this is a terrible marketing idea.

  • West Seattle Waiter

    I like this idea Publicola Polling.
    I think Publicola opinion about the 'strength' of the mayor position is wrong. You should be saying that a guy who was sworn in less than 3 months ago has a favorable rating of only 31% — in only a couple of months has lost nearly half of the people who voted for him. He is down to his base. All pols have a base — even George Bush and Nixon and Marion Barry and Blago….. but when you are only at your base, you can't govern. The only good news for McGinn is that people don't pay attention to a lot of City Hall news. But in only a short period of time losing half your supporters is actually a real bad position to be in.

  • ben trovato

    What conclusions would you draw from a poll story that had such a disclaimer?

  • sarah68

    This over 35, female, Democratic progressive, liberal, environmentally conscious educated voter thinks that McGinn is a terrible joke also, and I DID vote for him so I'm quite disappointed, to say the least.

  • sarah68

    You're stereotyping. Why would we over-50s people like Mallahan any better? Have you forgotten who ran against McGinn?

  • sarah68

    McGinn isn't proving himself “progressive”, and we don't know who will be running against him in 2012 (if indeed he runs again, and you can't count on that).

  • http://spifflines.blogspot.com/ John Bailo

    Ok, but what is progressive about McGinn?

    A Seawall proposal?

  • http://spifflines.blogspot.com/ John Bailo

    And yet, when pressed, McGinn caved in on the tunnel.

    What “young person” would respect a quitter?

  • sarah68

    Well, you're not going to get what you voted for, because the mayor doesn't have say-so over the tunnel. Which McGinn admitted. Maybe you could vote for the next mayor to stop the tunnel, because it won't be built by then, if ever. Then you can say, “See? My vote did it!”

  • sarah68

    “Likable enough if he'd learn to quit insulting people who disagree with him.” That's the funniest thing I've read today.

  • sarah68

    What McGinn is constantly doing is “We're going to blahblahblah”, then realizing he's pissed people off, and then he's “We'll wait a while before we blahblahblah.” It doesn't matter how many town halls he holds; the decisions he makes–or the backtracking he does–matter. If people make the time to go to a town hall and then feel like they've been disregarded, it's worse than what Nickels did, which was simply not ask anyone to begin with.

  • Wells

    The high 'undecided' figure is an indibtment of polls, media whores and know-it-all pundits. It's comforting to believe the younger generation has a functional BS meter. Mike McGinn is a good mayor. The old political regime and its minnions have a problem with that.

  • Entitled Hipster

    People who are not amongst the 200 Senior Advisors and their immediate families, evidently a core segment of the Publicola commentariat, don't care about their imminent layoffs? And are more concerned about broader issues the city need to address?. Who would guess?

  • sarah68

    I actually want him to be a good mayor. Who wants a bad mayor? But I don't see any signs of him being a good mayor yet. And I sure am not a “minnion” of the old regime.

  • Wells

    Sarah. I coin the term “Deep-bore tunnel travesty-fiasco” seriously. It's a crime, as is WSDOT's latest design for SR520 floating bridge and SDOT's designs for Alaskan Way boulevard and Mercer West. Don't take my word for it. A fair assessment of the engineering aspects about these major transportation projects should outrage anyone. Tunnelite really is the only sensible tunnel option, probably the only sensible SR99 AWV replacement option. Mike will kill the Deep-bore tunnel after the guilty parties fess up. And some (including Grace Crunican) may face criminal prosecution.

  • Seattle Voter

    If only Papa Greg and Saint Dwight were here to save us from this awful, awful man…..Saint Dwight could make any budget balance, and Papa Greg was so kindly. Everybody at the Rainier Club thought he was just wonderful.

    WE MISS YOU PAPA GREG AND SAINT DWIGHT!!!!

  • Mike T

    There were just no real options for mayor in the last election. I wish there were a third option on the ballot: “I reject both these options, where are the real candidates”

  • David

    Selma,

    I made no claim that this the cell phone v. land line problem was some sort of “unique, amazing insight.” On the contrary, as you point out so well, this has been a known challenge for pollsters for a while. My question is an honest one to the polling team as I would like to know how poll designers (both Publicola and in general) are addressing this problem, particularly with the <35 age range is highlighted in the summary results as particularly significant. The assumption is that the problem _is_ being addressed rather than sticking our heads in the sand or…I dunno…flaming folks on comment boards for pointing out a potential elephant in the room.

  • not really an elephant

    David –

    I am betting that they are using phone numbers from the voter registration records. For people who register using their cell phone numbers (because that is their only phone number), they will get calls on their cell phones.

  • Matt_the_Engineer

    I'm definitely stereotyping. But then I don't have real data. Mallahan was a grown-up business man. McGinn rides a bike, and had a staff of college kids.

  • David

    Thanks for the feedback. Using the voter registration records regardless of the type of number on the books would be a good approach. I'm not sure this is what was used though. The light research I've done on this shows a very mixed bag with many firms avoiding cell phone users when doing their sampling. Most of the articles on this are dated around the '08 election cycle, so I'm not sure if they're still applicable, but one good summary is available at <http://www.factcheck.org/askfactcheck/are_polls…>.

  • Johnyy

    Too early to tell. And for sure it will not be Burges. He dug his own hall by promoting unpopular panhandling stuff.

  • inside some baseball

    They used good voter registration data. Follow the links to their data source: http://www.aristotle.com/content/view/35/119/

  • Pop

    It amazes me how Sarah and her folks are so impatient. the guy has been in power for 3 months. give a time and let us talk two years later.

  • danadb

    What truth? That he will not stand in the way of the tunnel? The truth is that “Mayor” McGinn is a dogmatic single issue activist who is wasting his position on waging a war against private automobiles.

  • danadb

    Nickels was a good option but did not make his way to the ballot. What we were left with was the choice between an imbecile and a single issue activist.

  • Time4Change

    Does anyone know the mechanism or process for a recall election in Seattle? Our city is facing serious problems and McGinn just doesn’t understand the bread and butter issues our neighbors confront daily. We’ve seen enough grandstanding on 520, the Viaduct, and degrading city employees.

    We need a leader who can work with labor to create middle class jobs, a leader who will appoint a tough as nails police chief to clean up the streets, and a leader who will work with Olympia to solve problems, not create new infighting. We need these things, and much more NOW.

    Seattle we must take control of this situation. We have strong leaders who can attend to the needs and everyday problems each of us face: Ed Murray, Frank Chopp, Tina Podlodowski, and Tim Burgess come to mind and I’m not even being that creative. These are proven leaders who know how to working collectively with stakeholders to find solutions and get results.

    Our play date with McGinn needs to be over. It’s time for a real relationship with a grownup.

  • tpn

    This is the problem with wet-noodle politicians like McGinn getting into office by handful of votes; the popularity for “get things under control at any cost” sentiments spikes. That is a dangerous predicament. And Burgess is not a proven leader. He's barely been in office more then a year.

  • Edog

    While this data is interesting in that it shows how people think of McGinn after the first few months, using a poll like this to figure out the next election is absurd. Extrapolate at your own peril.

    A few things I'll mention for those thinking about the future, bad moral in an organization travels down from the top much faster than good news and can be downright poisonous. McGinn's gloomy forecasts and predictions for the city, while accurate, are ruining the atmosphere for him in ways I don't think he fully comprehends. I don't see how someone with an abrasive I'm right your wrong style, carries the water the way he has thus far and succeeds in this situation. I mean, the snark at Dwight after his departure speaks of a man who has no “friends” and does not know how to make them. Further compounding his problems are the many false starts on programs over the last few months, its not that he won't be forgiven for these, as I believe people will forget, its that he is so inexperienced that we can expect well see more of these governing problems in the future.

    As for my forecast, it will be very easy to brand him as the a*shole messenger of doom and gloom with an inability to manage or play nice. Until recently, I think the counsel has suffered him for the benefit of the city as well as for their own political expedience. Now that McGinn is more of a known quantity, I suspect things are going to get rougher for McGinn.

  • AAA+

    Burges is Republican, and he makes no secret of his dislike of the poor. If he is your proven leader, than Bush is your saint.

  • I'M SO SCARED

    OMG WHERE CAN I SIGN? I HAVEN'T FELT SAFE SINCE MCGINN CAME IN AND WHEN HE LET DWIGHT GO I NEARLY KILT MYSELF HE COULD MAKE ANY BUDGET LOOK BALANCED. THESE LAST THREE MONTHS HAVE BEEN HORRIBLE FOR THE CITY I CAN'T EVEN BELIEVE WE'VE SUNK THIS LOW I FEAR FOR OUR FUTURE.

    RECALL MCGINN B4 IT IS TOO LATE!!!!

  • sarah68

    Burgess is a proven autocrat, not a leader. His proposed aggressive panhandling ordinance that panders to downtown merchants is an example of what kind of mayor he would be. That isn't what we need. We have McGinn for the next 3.7 years; Uhlman survived a recall, and McGinn probably would also. Noting the number of mistakes he's made isn't being impatient; it's being critical. Hopefully he'll notice the criticism coming from many directions and make some strategy changes. What worries me is that if he doesn't, Burgess will definitely be our next mayor. He's acting as though he were already.

  • notafiree

    It is probably already too late… for us, for satire, and your capslock key. I suggest eliminating the office of mayor entirely. It's well within the charter and has been done profitably in other municipalities. Just think of the savings!

  • Justice-for-all

    Seattle is very progressive, and i don't think Burges will be our next mayor, and i even doubt if he will survive for the in-coming city council contest.

    He made a big mistake by being a strong ally of the specail interest– realy realy a bad move. I don't know if he still realized that.

  • city-council-analyst

    I know Burges very well. He try to come across confident and “I know everything kinna dude”. But he is very unsure man.

  • Wells

    Mike McGinn is fated to become one of Seattle's greatest mayors. City Hall needed a shake-up starting with SDOT. WSDOT needs an independent investigation to root out corruption. Stop the Deep-bore tunnel travesty. Stop “Mercer West” and present a credible design for Alaskan Way. You have no idea how close that bitch Grace Crunican came to ruining Seattle's future.

  • Wells

    Hooray for Mike McGinn!

    That's what you'll be saying soon, you clueless boob.

  • David

    Awesome. Thanks for pointing out the link!

  • beaverhousin

    No thank you. It is highly suspicious that in order to analyze this story, I have pay to analyze the poll. This is a sham.

  • cosmopolis

    Wells, you continue to claim all of this here (and on the Seattle Times, Crosscut, etc.), that we all “have no idea” the destructive path Grace Crunican, Nickels, WSDOT, et al, were leading us down…but why should any of us believe that you “have any idea” what you're talking about? Especially if you do in fact live in Portland…?

  • morganba

    “weighted crosstabs” on just 681 voters? What's the margin of error? I don't consider it responsible reporting without the error margin's.