Viva La Cola!

Founded in January 2009, PubliCola is a blog about Seattle written by journalists who are dedicated to non-partisan, original daily reporting that prioritizes a balanced approach to news. Started by longtime local editor and award-winning reporter Josh Feit, PubliCola is the first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol.

PubliCola was off and running. In June 2009, PubliCola hired another award-winning journalist, super-sourced Seattle city hall reporter Erica C. Barnett.

People were afraid that blogging would change journalism. Instead, we believe journalism can change blogging. Twenty-first century journalism may look and feel different, and yes Erica isn't afraid to get cranky, but we're committed to making sure online news still delivers independent, reliable, even-keeled coverage. And most of all, we're committed to making sure the coverage sparks honest civic debate.

Bringing you cola for the people, PubliCola is named after Publius Valerius PubliCola, the alias for the authors of the Federalist Papers—the original bloggers.

The first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol and Seattle city hall, PubliCola has been called a “must-read” by the Seattle Post Intelligencer and a hot “New Media Mover and Shaker” by Seattle Magazine—which also cited our own Erica C. Barnett as the city's No. 1 news nerd.

Where Sea Level Rise Matters Big Time

Seattle, like every waterfront human settlement on the planet, is at risk from sea level rise caused by global warming. In recent months it has become increasingly clear that a 2007 estimate by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) of a 1.9-foot SLR by 2100 was far too conservative. According to more recent studies, the midrange estimate is now closer to five feet.

As I wrote previously, sea level rise is a complicating factor in the design of a new seawall for Seattle’s central waterfront. Earlier this week, the city  selected a team led by Tetra Tech to explore design alternatives for the seawall. It will be interesting to see how the threat of sea level rise will be accounted for in the proposed designs.

Fortunately, even in the worst-case scenario, most of Seattle is at a high enough elevation that it won’t affected. Not so where I am right now in sunny Florida, the most at-risk state in the U.S.

As shown in the map below, large swaths of coastal Florida would be underwater if sea level rose by by two meters (6.5 ft.). Scientists who have modeled climate change’s impact on Florida estimate that with just a 27-inch rise in sea level, the state would lose ten percent of its land and 1.5 million people would lose their homes.

Being a climate change “enthusiast,” as a visitor here in Clearwater Beach (just north of St. Petersburg), I can’t help obsessing over what might happen to this place in 50 or 100 years if current trends continue. Though I guess the answer’s pretty simple: it will be gone.

The photo below shows a clump of new high-rise residential buildings sitting right on the beach in Clearwater. I’m guessing that climate change was not a frequent topic of discussion in the condo sales offices.


Mandalay Beach Club and SandPearl on Clearwater Beach, FL (click image to enlarge)

Those buildings are concrete frame construction atop ~60-foot piles, so even if they’re inundated with water, they’ll probably stay standing, even empty, for a very long time. It’s all so Waterworldian.

But that apocalyptic future is not a foregone conclusion. We still have the opportunity to abate climate change and its potentially catastrophic impacts if we start taking aggressive action now to reduce CO2 emissions.


  • http://twitter.com/joeszilagyi Joe Szilagyi

    You forgot to mention for your readers:

    http://flood.firetree.net/

    So they can see the fun that is the future now as the water levels rise.

  • http://spifflines.blogspot.com/ John Bailo

    Unfortunately for Alarmists, a review of the past 6 years data shows sea levels are falling:

    STUDY: Sea levels falling 2004-2010 data
    http://briefingroom.typepad.com/the_briefing_ro…

  • http://www.publicola.net/category/column/hugeasscity/ Dan Bertolet

    John Bailo, you can't be serious. Can you? From the comments in your link:

    “Have you not got eyes to see with? Or do you choose to believe shonky stats despite your eyes. Statistically – how significant do you think that slope is? I duplicated this guy's measurements)as much as I could from the description I get an R^2 value of 0.0049! In other words that slope is not significantly different from zero! The data does not show any change at all. And before you crow that it is not showing an increase – obviously the time period and/or data (number of measurement sites)is insufficient to determine any changes.This is the problem of idiots getting hold of data and trying to tell lies with it.”

    This might help:
    http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2…

  • Cascadian

    This is typical cherry-picking. For one thing, ARGO measures ocean pressure and temperature to calculate volume, not sea level proper. The data in that study are incorporated in the more thorough review of evidence discussed at http://www.skepticalscience.com/Visual-depictio…. That review indicates that there's a steady increase in sea level that averages 1.7 mm/year through the 20th century, and even more recently (at least 2.83 mm/year since 1992).

    Since 2004, sea level has gone up roughly 18mm. This rise exceeds the IPCC estimates, indicating that the global consensus for future sea level rise is probably too low.

  • Wells

    The strongest seawall and most stable Alaskan Way surface streets and sidewalks are ONLY possible with a Cut-n-cover tunnel.
    -
    Oh, I'm sorry. I forgot Seattle 'deciders' already made their decision to build a huge 54' diameter bored tunnel directly beneath Seattle tower foundations. Say, I hear Sound Transit is filling more 'voids' above the Beacon Hill Link tunnels that are causing sinkholes big enough to… Oh well.
    -
    And don't forget the deep-bore portal on Aurora, combined with SDOT's malevolent “Mercer West” project will redirect some percentage of 40,000 vehicles that now access the AWV via Western/Elliott, through the high-density residential neighborhood of Lower Queen Anne. And some percentage of that traffic will truck on through to I-5 where that side of Mercer Street is already overwhelmed with traffic.

    The percentage of traffic diverted to the deep-bore north portal via “Mercer West” can be guess-timated by the number of stoplights motorists must cross along that route, (5 or 6), versus the number of stoplights through Lower Belltown and Alaskan Way (23-28). Hmmm, that's a hard one. I don't want to think about it. 5000 – 10,000 – 15,000 – 20,000 more vehicles through Lower Queen Anne? Why can't a tunnel be built along the waterfront to maintain the current travel pattern? Oh I'm sorry. I forgot again. Seattle done did thuh deciderin' to do what they decided already and so them deciderers must know what theys a'doin.