Viva La Cola!

Founded in January 2009, PubliCola is a blog about Seattle written by journalists who are dedicated to non-partisan, original daily reporting that prioritizes a balanced approach to news. Started by longtime local editor and award-winning reporter Josh Feit, PubliCola is the first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol.

PubliCola was off and running. In June 2009, PubliCola hired another award-winning journalist, super-sourced Seattle city hall reporter Erica C. Barnett.

People were afraid that blogging would change journalism. Instead, we believe journalism can change blogging. Twenty-first century journalism may look and feel different, and yes Erica isn't afraid to get cranky, but we're committed to making sure online news still delivers independent, reliable, even-keeled coverage. And most of all, we're committed to making sure the coverage sparks honest civic debate.

Bringing you cola for the people, PubliCola is named after Publius Valerius PubliCola, the alias for the authors of the Federalist Papers—the original bloggers.

The first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol and Seattle city hall, PubliCola has been called a “must-read” by the Seattle Post Intelligencer and a hot “New Media Mover and Shaker” by Seattle Magazine—which also cited our own Erica C. Barnett as the city's No. 1 news nerd.

Transit Funding Bills May be on Last Legs

Two amendments that would allow Community Transit (in Snohomish County) and Pierce Transit (in Pierce County) to pass a temporary $20 vehicle-license fee, and to send a fee of up to $100 to voters, to help restore and preserve transit service seems likely to die in the state Senate, whose transportation committee chair, Mary Margaret Haugen, reportedly opposes them.

Rep. Marko Liias (D-21, above) tacked the amendments on to unrelated legislation sponsored by Sen. Chris Marr (D-6). Rep. Scott White (D-46) had proposed an amendment giving King County Metro the authority to pass a similar fee; however, White says he pulled the amendment at the request of Metro, whose representatives did not think they had the votes to pass it.

Now, Haugen is reportedly doing everything she can to stop the bill, by ensuring that the Senate doesn’t concur with the House version. (That would send it into a conference committee, where it will likely die). Haugen, transit advocates say, wants to keep transit proponents on board with a larger transportation package she plans to propose next year; if they get what they want now, the thinking goes, they might not support her proposal next year.

Bill LaBorde, policy director for the Transportation Choices Coalition, predicts Haugen will shoot for “as little [transit] as possible” in next year’s proposal—”whatever she perceives as the minimum required.”

White says he has been assured by Marr that Marr will support comprehensive funding for Metro next year; however, he was instrumental last year in getting legislation that would have imposed a similar license fee vetoed by Gov. Chris Gregoire.




  • Andrew Austin

    Tell your Senator to take action and step up for transit http://tinyurl.com/ybz8hcw

  • John

    Roads and Transit all over again? Mary Margaret will obviously push for as much road construction as she can; the Senator who “just wants to be able to drive through Seattle” seems only to care about transit projects in her own district.

  • Seattle_Steve

    I disagree with both LaBorde and John about Haugen. Transit advocates shouldn't fall for this sort of stuff. Transit needs much, much more than mini-RTID authority with time limits on it.

    Transit will require sustainable funding sources, not one offs like this.

    Haugen is not the anti-transit or anti-Seattle legislator described above. She's far more practical and savvy than that.

    And given the antics of some of transit's most blindly ardent activists, she might just benefit in her district from their silly bomb throwing.

  • car hater

    “Haugen is not the anti-transit or anti-Seattle legislator described above”… care to substantiate that? Can you point to anything she's ever done that wasn't both anti-transit and anti-Seattle?

    If I glimpse at a news article and happen to notice Haugen's name, I already know exactly what's coming (before reading the article): she's either standing in the way of transit, or sticking it to Seattle, or both.

    “…and given the antics of transit's most blindly ardent activists…” I assume that by this you mean people who suggest we shouldn't spend absolutely every single dime on the cars and highways that are destroying Puget Sound and the air we breathe, and our atmosphere.

    Snohomish County is being forced to discontinue all bus service on Sundays. Haugen's backwardness and stupidity is creating a lot of hardship for a lot of people who don't get to vote against her.