Viva La Cola!

Founded in January 2009, PubliCola is a blog about Seattle written by journalists who are dedicated to non-partisan, original daily reporting that prioritizes a balanced approach to news. Started by longtime local editor and award-winning reporter Josh Feit, PubliCola is the first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol.

PubliCola was off and running. In June 2009, PubliCola hired another award-winning journalist, super-sourced Seattle city hall reporter Erica C. Barnett.

People were afraid that blogging would change journalism. Instead, we believe journalism can change blogging. Twenty-first century journalism may look and feel different, and yes Erica isn't afraid to get cranky, but we're committed to making sure online news still delivers independent, reliable, even-keeled coverage. And most of all, we're committed to making sure the coverage sparks honest civic debate.

Bringing you cola for the people, PubliCola is named after Publius Valerius PubliCola, the alias for the authors of the Federalist Papers—the original bloggers.

The first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol and Seattle city hall, PubliCola has been called a “must-read” by the Seattle Post Intelligencer and a hot “New Media Mover and Shaker” by Seattle Magazine—which also cited our own Erica C. Barnett as the city's No. 1 news nerd.

A Scintillating Rant About Small Flashing Lights

When you’ve spent significant time riding a bike in traffic, you become acutely attuned to the cars moving around you. And because as a biker your life is literally on the line out there, you tend to become highly sensitive to careless, sloppy drivers.

For example, I’m a calm guy—even-keeled to a fault.  But there’s one thing that never fails to make me want to go postal, and that’s when I’m on my commute through the city and I see a car not using turn signals. And it is pretty much a guaranteed daily occurrence.

And so, I humbly ask:

PEOPLE, WHY, OH WHY IN THE NAME OF THE MERCIFUL GOD OR GODS OR YOUR CHOICE, WON’T YOU USE YOUR FUCKING TURN SIGNALS?!?!?!?!?

Pardon my French. But really, it’s such an easy thing to do. And the fact that so many don’t is rich with meaning.

It’s a behavior that crosses all social boundaries. SUV drivers, Prius drivers, cab drivers, truck drivers—they all seem about equally inclined to blow off using their turn signals. With all the stopping Metro buses do, you might expect consistent signaling from them. But you’d be wrong. Even the police don’t always signal.

And then there are the ones who wait to the last second to click it on, as if they feel some need to minimize the amount of time they have the signal running, while still begrudgingly obeying the law. But hello folks, the whole reason you signal is so that others know what you’re going to do in advance.

And then there are those who don’t signal when they think no one else is around. But those are exactly the circumstances in which accidents happen—when drivers are wrong in their assumptions about what’s happening around them.

And yes, sometimes people simply space out and forget. I know, because I drive a car (gasp!) and I’ve done it. (Though there’s no doubt in my mind that being a cyclist has made me a more attentive driver.)

Compared to signaling at normal turns, signal use is even less consistent when people change lanes, pull in or out of parking spaces, or pull over to stop. But the law says you must signal in all those situations—pretty much any time you do something other then go straight down the road. Not that the police enforce those laws. The average person would be seriously pissed if they got ticketed for not signaling.

But it doesn’t have to be this way. I once spent two months driving around central Europe and whether it was the Autobahn or a country road in Hungary, people used their turn signals religiously.

As a cyclist in the city I know have to ride defensively, and that drivers may not be able to see me. All I ask is that they make the tiniest effort and use turn signals to let me know what they’re going to do so I can stay out of their way.

But this isn’t a bikes versus cars issue. Because when drivers use turn signals, they are helping themselves and other drivers more than anyone else. Consistent turn signal use makes travel by car both safer and more efficient.

Driving a car is the most dangerous activity in the average person’s daily life—more than 40,000 Americans are killed in car accidents every year. In a society that tends to be risk averse to the extreme, how can there be such a psychological disconnect about the risks associated with careless driving?

And what is it about Americans and their wacked aversion to using turn signals?

Part of it is likely a manifestation of our cult of individualism, as in, “Why should I do anyone else any favors by signaling when it’s every man for himself out there in the jungle of urban traffic?”

And part of it is likely caused by the dehumanzing influence of powerful machines like cars. Put normal, decent human beings inside the isolating, protective cocoon of a car and watch how they devolve into sociopaths.

And no doubt, part of it is just plain old ordinary human laziness, combined with the competing, hectic demands of everyday life.

Whatever the cause, surely it is one of the great ironies of the world that the most car-dependent culture on the planet is overrun with such shitty drivers.

Oh, I’m sorry. Was that provocative?


  • hobgoblin

    One more peeve to add to the pile: the false signal. Nothing quite like a car signaling a turn and then just going straight forward through an intersection.

  • J.R.

    It's a regional problem, Dan. People in other parts of the country use turn signals routinely.

  • giffy

    This bothers me to. It is not that hard to do it and it lets everyone now what you are going to do.

    It also bothers me when bicyclists don't signal as I don't really want to hit one.

  • http://sustainableseattle.blogspot.com/ eldan

    seattlelikesbikes.org recently posted a great video about how cycling in traffic is a dance that we have to lead ( http://vimeo.com/9827254 ). It's a great illustration of how we as cyclists can help drivers to not crash into us, and drivers signalling is just the other side of the coin – it's a simple way each driver can help everyone else to not kill them.

    I don't think it's at all surprising that a heavily car-dependent culture should have shitty drivers though – it's the logical conclusion of the assumption that driving is a right, not a privilege, and that's an assumption on which car-dependency rests.

  • 40-year Seattleite

    Why do motorists routinely fail to use turn signals? Probably for the same reason that so many bicyclists blow through red lights and stop signs, and ride at night with no visible light(s) — fucking stupidity and/or terminal lazyness.

  • Mikos

    @40-year-old No doubt cyclists are just as stupid as car drivers — but their stupidity kills themselves. When a driver screws up other people are likely to be injured or die. So despite the rhetorical similarities, the realities are much different.

  • Jason_Mitchell

    +1. Great post, but you don't have to go all the way to Europe to see people using their turn signals—east of the Mississippi will do. This is my +1 peeve about biking in Seattle. It makes intersections not only dangerous, but supremely annoying. If a car will just throw on that turn signal, I can usually safely move to its left at a red and everyone (right-turning vehicle, cyclist, and vehicles to the cyclist's left proceeding forward) can move promptly and happily on the green without any confusion or concern. Happy fish in a happy stream heading to happy destinations.

  • biliruben

    In NYC signaling is considered a sign of weakness. If you signal, you are prey. The small gap in traffic your were trying to ease quietly into immediately closes if you are fool enough to alert those around you to your nefarious intentions.

    In Seattle, how can you signal if you have a Latte in one hand and a celly in the other? Sheesh. Dumb question.

  • 40-year Seattleite

    Oh, and the motorist that's driving lawfully when the stupid red-light-running bicyclist crashes into him feels nothing as a result? Boy, you have a lot to learn about life.

  • morning fizzy

    ECB's rants not withstanding, the vast majority of drivers do not want to hurt bikers. All bikes should be required to have bright flashing front headlights on 24/7.

  • morning fizzy

    And Dan because of this post I will try to remember to use my turn signal every time I leave a spot.

    I hope you will advocate for light requirements for bikes, 24/7.

  • Some Dude

    My biggest pet peeve in this city is metro buses and their use of hazards/turn signals. Every time a metro bus makes a stop they put on their hazard lights. However when you are in traffic, or there is a line of buses, you can only see the left side of the bus. That means it is impossible to tell if the blinking lights are a turn signal or just the hazard lights. The idea, I imagine, of the hazard lights is to make it clear that the bus is stopping, but it makes things less safe because it renders a turn signal almost meaningless in many cases.

    The solution: change the policy to not use hazards when stopping, or reprogram the lights to blink at different intervals. Give me a single slow blink for hazard lights, and a quick double blink for turning. Both bikers and cars can agree on that.

    btw, dude, this thing is really foaming at the mouth hyperventilation. The cult of individualism and the dehumanizing influence of powerful machines? Is this an undergrad essay or something? You're one buzz word short of a Sociology 210 term paper.

  • Stephen F

    In all fairness, people in Washington use their turn signals far more than most places in America. Good luck finding anyone in California or New York. It's considered a transgression in those places to even use one. Now as for your Europe comment, I don't know when you last came here, but nobody uses their turn signals in France, UK, Spain, Italy, or Ireland. I know the Germans are nazis about following the law and I'm sure their brethren in Switzerland and Austria are much the same. I can't say anything for Central Europe. But my point is, I wouldn't make general statements like that. But having lived in Washington most my life and only leaving in the recent past, Washingtonians are quite good about using turn signals (comparably anyway).

  • robotslave

    I'd bet that for 99% of the not-signalling drivers you see, the problem with the driver isn't some big sociological mindset involving individualism or power dynamics, but rather simple distraction.

    You admit you've “spaced out” while driving and failed to signal– and those were the times you *noticed* your failure to signal.

    Drivers in Seattle (and other places) just don't view driving as a primary activity that requires full attention– all too often they're eating, talking on the phone or to passengers in the car, fiddling or singing along with the stereo, unscrewing the cap on a bottle of water, etc.

    And they're all above-average drivers! Personally, I don't even listen to music in the car– I know I'm a crappy driver, so I need to make sure there's nothing distracting me from driving.

  • Mikos

    @ 40-year-old
    That's funny.

  • Pete

    Having lived and driven in the UK for years I have to disagree with you. Most unlighted intersections are traffic circles where signaling is essential to efficient flow of traffic and drivers know it.

  • hmmmm

    Good to hear that bike riders never make mistakes while on the road. Oh wait, that's not part of the discussion.

  • Stephen F

    Well sure, I can't speak for all the UK I suppose, but the times I've driven in Leeds, Liverpool, and dear God, London, there was a marked lack of signaling. I won't say it's as bad as California. But still quite awful. I do disagree with the roundabout thing certainly, it's merely an issue of nudging your way in and getting the heck out. It's a cat and mouse game just as much in the UK as it is here in Ireland.

  • Ex Unge Leonem

    My favorite: people that go by you on a more or less empty highway at twice your speed, and then signal when they move over a half mile ahead of you. As if to say “I'm seriously breaking the law, so I'll make it better by remembering to do a small something that is in line with the vehicle code”. This is made especially delicious when they're passing on a divided road…
    @ 40-year-old: if it's going to make you cranky when a cyclist “blows a red” (I mean, hey, it's so unfair–you have to lift your big toe off the brake and put it on the gas to get going again), maybe you could spend one whole day signaling and driving the speed limit, etc. That'd elevate you to the appropriate soapbox.

  • Stephen F

    Heh, yeah, that irks me alright. I'm less concerned with cyclists blowing red lights, but they really can put themselves in danger if they do.

  • C_juris

    As a cyclist (oh hi, “giffy”!) I always try to signal, because 1) it's common courtesy and 2) it makes cars pay attention to the fact I'm there. But there are a lot of situations where it's less safe of me to signal as a cyclist – drivers can flick their index finger and they're set, I have to take a hand off the bars and balance with an arm out in the breeze and hold it that way. It's why it's not legally required in Seattle for bikes to signal (SMC 11.44.140); because it isn't always safe. I always, always try to signal when my actions will alter or impede the flow of traffic (mostly left hand turns in busy intersections), but I guess the point I'm getting at is exactly that – bikes don't always signal, or even need to, because taking a right turn on a bike can be done safely without slowing down, and usually when stopping other cars are around and also stopping, so everyone's seeing brake lights – while cars have to signal because virtually every time they change behavior (turning, stopping, etc) they do alter the flow of traffic. Cars that already see a cyclist in front of them aren't going to have to slam on the breaks when that cyclist turns in front of them, whereas with the roles reversed serious damage could happen if the car didn't signal intentions.

    Anyway, I'm splitting hairs and causing controversy where there's consensus – if everybody, bikes included, signaled to keep themselves and everyone else safe, it'd be better for all parties involved!

    also… WE ARE THE GREEN…! (com'on… com'on…)

  • jefe

    Hmmm….suddenly a car v. bike thread appears on Publicola….I guess those page views are down now that Bushnell is long gone from the news……

  • 40-year Seattleite

    Yes, it's so unfair for a cyclist to have to stop at a stop signal. Their moral superiority should elevate them above mere traffic code, shouldn't it?

    It may come as a shock to you but those of us who've reached a “certain age” no longer find it necessary to get where we're going faster than everybody else. I DO drive the speed limit, partly because keeping to modest speeds increases the fuel mileage in my Prius even more than it is already. And I do use my turn signal religiously, to the point my kids think I'm nuts.

    Safe, lawful driving CAN be done, and its probably the reason I don't get tickets and my auto insurance is so low. And I haven't had a collision in 32 years.

    But cyclists don't have to worry about tickets because SPD won't write them up, and of course they have no insurance to worry about. And accidents, well, they're always the motorists fault, aren't they?

    BTW, ExUL and MIkos, I'd dearly love to be a mere 40 years old again. Forty is just the number of years I've been around this burg.

  • giffy

    WE ARE THE GREEN!

    Isn't it only not required when both hands are required to operate the bike?

    But regardless, I only really care when it affects me. ;) We all break traffic laws, but I think it is incumbent upon the person breaking the law, or not doing things which are common courtesy to make sure they are not negatively impacting others. So I could care less if a bike runs a red light in the middle of the night because the weight of the bike won't trigger the signal. I do care when I have to slam on my breaks to avoid hitting them. Same with signaling. If there is no need for me to know what the cyclist is doing then I can't say I care, but when a cyclists swerves from the bike lane across my lane and makes a left turn without signalling forcing me to break quickly, well thats not very nice. If they signal I am pretty apt to slow down and let them move out into the main lane and turn.

    So why don't bikes have signals? It seems like it would be pretty easy to have some basic indicator lights powered by the movement of the bike.

  • giffy

    This has been a peeve of mine for some time. We're supposed to yield to buses, and I am more than happy to do so, but in many cases I cannot tell if the bus is just stopped or about to head out.

    They really need separate signals.

  • Ex Unge Leonem

    The “moral superiority” must be in the eye of the beholder, because cyclists are at best second class citizens on the road. And yes, when I ride I do obey the traffic laws. So we're both firmly on the moral high ground. I have been hit twice, no fault of my own–and about once a month I get a coke can thrown at me, brushed with a mirror for fun, or have someone go out of their way to drive through a big puddle to soak me. And on a couple occasions, police were present but did nothing. “Moral superiority” doesn't cross my mind, but I like not having to take meds for my asthma, and the combination of humility and strength fits my way of life.

    Congrats on making it 40 years around this burg. I keep wondering if I'd like Portand better.

  • Kathryn

    Thank you. I agree. I admit I space out sometimes and don't turn the signal on. I also forget to turn it off after an obtuse turn or a merge. Yep I was raised better and will do better.

    Here are some of the things I have seen that are the result of the rampant individualism where people don't regularly use a turn signal, and because of that, others ignore when a turn signal is used.

    I've seen people cut really fast across 3-4 lanes of traffic as the light turns green, either to turn right from the left lane or left from the right lane. No sense turning the signal on and hoping to negotiate with others, and driving another block or so. Nope — just jump out hell bent for leather and figure other people do not want to be hit.

    I've had cyclists run past me on the right at high speeds when I HAD my right turn signal on and was moving to turn. As I had my turn signal on, it is they who are not following the rules and I will not be sorry if they suffer the consequences.

    All in all, it helps everyone to share the road if we communicate our intent, STFD and are willing to drive around the block or to the next exit.

  • http://sustainableseattle.blogspot.com/ eldan

    Do you really mean to imply equivalence between emotional distress and dying in a tangle of flesh and metal on the road? Because that's what it sounds like whenever someone pulls this particular rhetorical trick.

  • A.S. Seattle WA

    A law is a law. 40 year old has a good point shared by many; as do you. Part of the problem these days is rather than people obeying the laws one side or the other tries to justify the action by pointing out the limited risk on the other side…..it doesn't matter, either a law is broken or it is not, either you obey them or not. It's a tragedy either way. Similarities are crap.

    I had a biker once cut me off (I was going through a green light) and then have the gall to flip me the bird….amazing.

  • Mikos

    Kathryn–

    As glib as your comment — “I will not be sorry if they suffer the consequences” — is I would like to think you are not so amoral as to think that people should die for not heeding your turn signal. Get a grip.

  • 40-year Seattleite

    I implied no such thing, but it's a free country and you can infer what you wish, no matter how absurd.