Viva La Cola!

Founded in January 2009, PubliCola is a blog about Seattle written by journalists who are dedicated to non-partisan, original daily reporting that prioritizes a balanced approach to news. Started by longtime local editor and award-winning reporter Josh Feit, PubliCola is the first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol.

PubliCola was off and running. In June 2009, PubliCola hired another award-winning journalist, super-sourced Seattle city hall reporter Erica C. Barnett.

People were afraid that blogging would change journalism. Instead, we believe journalism can change blogging. Twenty-first century journalism may look and feel different, and yes Erica isn't afraid to get cranky, but we're committed to making sure online news still delivers independent, reliable, even-keeled coverage. And most of all, we're committed to making sure the coverage sparks honest civic debate.

Bringing you cola for the people, PubliCola is named after Publius Valerius PubliCola, the alias for the authors of the Federalist Papers—the original bloggers.

The first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol and Seattle city hall, PubliCola has been called a “must-read” by the Seattle Post Intelligencer and a hot “New Media Mover and Shaker” by Seattle Magazine—which also cited our own Erica C. Barnett as the city's No. 1 news nerd.

Revenue Bill Moves Forward; SEIU Local Says No

As we reported yesterday, House Finance Committee chairman Ross Hunter (D-48) has introduced a bill to create $857 million in revenue to help maintain current funding levels for state services like education, the basic health plan, children’s health, and Medicaid by removing tax exemptions on things like out-of-state businesses, private planes, corporate board compensation, bottled water, elective cosmetic surgery, and candy and gum. The House Finance Committee held a packed public hearing for HB 3191 this morning before voting it out committee, six to five.

As expected, the bulk of the testimony was from business advocates citing the damning impact that getting rid of certain exemptions would have for small businesses or from health, education, and low-income advocates who praised the representatives for working to preserve social services.

There was, however, some less predictable testimony—including a Seattle businessman praising the removal of tax exemptions and SEIU Local 6 linking arms with the Republicans and business advocates in opposition to the removal of the tax exemption on janitorial services, worth about $19 million in revenue to the state this biennium.

SEIU Local 6 represents around 3,000 janitors in King, Pierce, Snohomish, and Spokane counties. Emily Sokoliski, a representative for Local 6, testified that the removal of the sales tax increase on janitorial services will disproportionately affect union janitors.

“This bill threatens our members’ living wage and benefits,” said Sokoliski.

According to Scott Freeman of Pacific Building Services, a janitorial company that only hires unionized workers, companies will be forced to pass the 9.5 percent sales tax increase to their customers, who will, in-turn, move to non-union janitorial services—leading to job loss.

Kalama Rep. Ed Orcutt (R-18), the Finance Committee’s ranking Republican, made a similar argument to Publicola yesterday, saying the bill will be the difference between laying off employees or not for an employer in his district.

Other SEIU branches, including SEIU Healthcare 1199NW and 775NW and Local 925, are members of the Rebuilding our Economic Coalition—the group of Washington organizations that has pushed for a revenue solution all session—which voiced support for Rep. Hunter’s revenue plan. Though it makes sense for the interests of their members, it’s nonetheless noteworthy that the union testified against a revenue-raising bill.

Paul Purcell, President of Beacon Development Group, a 14-employee business in Seattle, also eschewed the standard line when he testified in support of increased revenue.

“I support this bill and applaud [the representatives] courage in supporting essential state services,” said Purcell.


  • http://twitter.com/fattailed fattailed

    This is very very very sad. The tax is on all janitorial services, not just union janitorial services, so it would make not one iota of difference on the competitiveness of various firms against each other. So it is not at all true in even the narrowest sense that this serves the interests of SEIU 6 members. It *does* however serve the interests of SEIU 6 employers, who might not have the pricing power to pass on a cost increase. But member interests and employer interests are not the same.

    I'm a strong union guy, but god, it's stuff like this that makes labor seem an irrelevant narrow-minded special interest group unable to see anything beyond the carrots and sticks the boss is putting in front of them that day. On top of everything else, it's transparent that state-funded services benefit janitors, their families, and their communities.

    Thanks for reporting on this, but god this is painfully sad.

    This is pathetic, and painful

  • vonb

    Is Local 6 “branching out” from the other SEIU locals? It doesn't appear Local 6 is part of the Rebuilding Economy Coalition.

    It's sort of like who's going to go “out on a limb” for a janitor, or pull a “helen sommers” on it all.

  • vonb

    Not to say an h sommers move is a bad one. It's a bold one, just the kind needed in a janitorial group. More bold than diffusing–watering down acct.ability of decisionmaking among a coalition. Standing boldly in good times & bad–typical L6.

  • http://www.greatjanitor.com/ Janitorial Services

    Business can not afford any new taxes. New taxes kill jobs. They call it revenue. Why sugar coat it and not just say what you mean. We want more of your money.