Viva La Cola!

Founded in January 2009, PubliCola is a blog about Seattle written by journalists who are dedicated to non-partisan, original daily reporting that prioritizes a balanced approach to news. Started by longtime local editor and award-winning reporter Josh Feit, PubliCola is the first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol.

PubliCola was off and running. In June 2009, PubliCola hired another award-winning journalist, super-sourced Seattle city hall reporter Erica C. Barnett.

People were afraid that blogging would change journalism. Instead, we believe journalism can change blogging. Twenty-first century journalism may look and feel different, and yes Erica isn't afraid to get cranky, but we're committed to making sure online news still delivers independent, reliable, even-keeled coverage. And most of all, we're committed to making sure the coverage sparks honest civic debate.

Bringing you cola for the people, PubliCola is named after Publius Valerius PubliCola, the alias for the authors of the Federalist Papers—the original bloggers.

The first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol and Seattle city hall, PubliCola has been called a “must-read” by the Seattle Post Intelligencer and a hot “New Media Mover and Shaker” by Seattle Magazine—which also cited our own Erica C. Barnett as the city's No. 1 news nerd.

House Stays Away from Sales Tax, Goes After Loopholes and Exemptions.

This post has been updated with a response to the Democrats’ revenue plan from the the ranking Republican on the House Finance Committee, Rep. Ed Orcutt (R-Kalama). I’ve also added Democratic House Finance Chair Rep. Ross Hunter’s press statement.

State House Finance Chair, Ross Hunter (D-48)

After a week of what state Democratic House members have been calling earnest caucus debates about where to find the $857 million they earmarked in revenue to help close the state’s $2.8 billion budget shortfall, House Finance Committee chairman Ross Hunter (D-48) announced a plan today to raise the cigarette tax by one dollar and close tax loopholes and exemptions worth $650 million.  The $758 million revenue proposal plus lottery money and capital budget transfers worth about $100 million will fund current levels of service for things like the basic health plan, children’s health, student aid, and Medicaid.

The plan would eliminate tax exemptions for things like out-of-state businesses, private planes, corporate board compensation, bottled water, elective cosmetic surgery, candy and gum, investment earnings, and (in one ding against liberals) limits exemptions for renewable energy.

Here are the specifics.

The new revenue is coupled with $653 million in the cuts the House has already announced (including $149 million from K-12 funding, $202 million in human services such as adult day care, $24.2 million in corrections, and $22.5 million in environmental programs).

The House rounds out its budget with $641 million in federal money and $465 million in transfers from other funds, like the state rainy-day fund.

I have a call into the House Republican Caucus to get their take on the Democrats’ budget, which, by avoiding a sales tax increase, doesn’t seem to play into the GOP’s hands.  (The Senate has proposed raising the sales tax by .3 percent). Instead, the Democrats have gone after corporate tax loopholes and increased taxes on luxury items and “sin taxes.”

Here’s the GOP response from the ranking Republican on Rep. Hunter’s Finance Committee, Rep. Ed Orcutt (R-18, Kalama), which doesn’t address the bulk of Hunter’s war on exemptions and loopholes, but rather, singles out two items: The $1 increase in the cigarette tax and getting rid of the sales tax exemption for janitorial services. And Rep. Orcutt ultimately circles back to GOP red meat, criticizing the Senate Democrats for pitching a sales tax increase

“This is $850 million that our economy cannot afford.  This doesn’t make the task of economic recovery for our families and employers any easier.  These tax increases will lead to more layoffs and further delay employers from hiring back workers.  Also, it will further erode the ever-decreasing buying power of low- and middle-income families.

“I personally know an employer in my district that works in janitorial services.  This tax is the difference between her keeping her workers employed or being forced to go down the road of layoffs.

“And, adding another dollar to the price of cigarettes is only going to create an underground economy, or force people to go the tribal reservations or, in border areas like Southwest Washington, encourage folks to go across state lines to make their purchases.  The secondary affects of people leaving this state also needs to be considered.  The mom and pop convenience stores in our state are going to suffer because of these tax increases.

“The Senate Democrats want to increase the sales tax.  The governor wants to tax an assortment of items, similar to the House proposal.  While we don’t know exactly what the final tax package will look like, I can almost guarantee you it will only go in one direction – UP!  At the end of the day, it’s going to look ugly for taxpayers.”

In his own statement,  Hunter said:

“We’ve spent weeks analyzing all kinds of options, gathering feedback and making substantive changes in response to the concerns we’ve heard,” said Hunter. “Ultimately, in looking at the options, we had to ask what was more important—preserving a tax exemption for out of state food distributors that our in-state companies don’t get or preserving that funding to help thousands of Washington kids go to college?

“Our focus was on removing exemptions and closing loopholes. This approach makes sure everyone is doing their fair share in helping our state get back on its feet.”


  • klatu

    Hard decisions dodged! Whew! Yet another year can now go by without fixing the big, structural problems that cause our state budget to completely break during an economic downturn.

    Political expediency fistpound, Mr. Hunter.

  • http://twitter.com/fattailed fattailed

    I'm surprised they found so much money in exemptions and glad they went after money this way first… But they seem completely crazy to expect $641 million from a Federal government that can't even pass an almost universally popular (even among Republicans) extension of emergency unemployment benefits. It's hard to believe this money is coming in anything like that amount. What's the backup plan? Sales tax?

  • Chris

    they need to fix expenditures at sustainable levels based on historical trends in revenue growth, not bubble-level increases in growth. Spending is much easier to increase than decrease, so its not wonder spending jumps mirrored revenue jumps for the most part (w/ some relatively minor funding of rainy day contingency fund). I don't have a sense for whether the budget fixes have created a sustainable balance in revenues and expenditures

    http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_nSTO-vZpSgc/S4iB-woCx…

  • hans

    Josh: What happened to tax increase on hazardous substances? Not in senate proposal and not in the house proposal. Looks dead to me..

  • John

    Read the language on the alternative energy provision carefully. I read that as saying that manufacturers/retailers would lose their tax break if a non-Washington customer purchased the product…but products sold for use in Washington would still be exempt.

  • Josh Feit

    That's right—just for wind power. And there's another piece: The exemption for all renewables is going from a 100% exemption to a 75% exemption.

    Environmental advocates don't like either change because they dock the incentives for renewable energy. Adding insult to injury, the exemption—at 100%— just got extended last year.

  • http://yrihf.com/ jabailo

    I think WA state could increase revenue if it actually enforced the law once in a while. Example, when I cross a street downtown, it seems that cars want to turn into pedestrians even as I enter the crosswalk. There are so many violations of pedestrian safety downtown and elsewhere across Washington that police and state troopers could rescue us from the financial mess by writing up a lot of tickets for the offenders.

  • jim Boldt

    Hans,

    there is a .1 increase every year for four years, but oil guys get exemption on exported product.

  • klatu

    Chris – what you're saying sounds awesome but is totally divorced from reality. Without a stable revenue stream we will never have a sustainable budget. Ever. No matter how much we mess with expenditures. Don't avoid the hard problems! Fix revenue.

  • sarah68

    That ticket money doesn't go to the state. It goes to the municipality where the infraction occurred. Haven't you noticed that the cops downtown are Seattle City cops, not State troopers?

  • http://twitter.com/fattailed fattailed

    I've never understood why enviros were so in love with tax policy as a tool in this way. It's not nearly enough subsidy to make a big difference in affordability, so it really is just free money to those already doing the renewable thing. In other words, an unnecessary exemption that ought to be repealed.