Viva La Cola!

Founded in January 2009, PubliCola is a blog about Seattle written by journalists who are dedicated to non-partisan, original daily reporting that prioritizes a balanced approach to news. Started by longtime local editor and award-winning reporter Josh Feit, PubliCola is the first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol.

PubliCola was off and running. In June 2009, PubliCola hired another award-winning journalist, super-sourced Seattle city hall reporter Erica C. Barnett.

People were afraid that blogging would change journalism. Instead, we believe journalism can change blogging. Twenty-first century journalism may look and feel different, and yes Erica isn't afraid to get cranky, but we're committed to making sure online news still delivers independent, reliable, even-keeled coverage. And most of all, we're committed to making sure the coverage sparks honest civic debate.

Bringing you cola for the people, PubliCola is named after Publius Valerius PubliCola, the alias for the authors of the Federalist Papers—the original bloggers.

The first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol and Seattle city hall, PubliCola has been called a “must-read” by the Seattle Post Intelligencer and a hot “New Media Mover and Shaker” by Seattle Magazine—which also cited our own Erica C. Barnett as the city's No. 1 news nerd.

State Schools Superintendent Randy Dorn Pushes for Teacher Evaluation Amendments

This post has been updated with a response from Washington Education Association head Mary Lindquist.

Washington state’s school superintendent Randy Dorn sent out a letter to the state legislature today (signed by 36 district superintendents) calling for amendments to the education reform bill.

The state Senate passed the bill earlier this month, but two amendments about standardizing teacher evaluations and using student data in the evaluations—failed.

Dorn says, “the state needs to approve [those amendments] in order to compete for its share of the Obama Administration’s $4.35 billion Race to the Top grant.”

The Senate bill, currently in the House, calls for local control of teacher evaluations.

On Friday, we reported that Republican state House Rep. Skip Priest (R-30) was going to introduce the amendments in the House. (The failed Senate amendments were proposed by GOP Sen. Curtis King, R-14).

In an interview with state teachers’ union (WEA) leader Mary Lindquist at the beginning of the session, she told PubliCola, “one size doesn’t fit all when it comes to school districts” and the local stakeholders are the ones who have the best vantage point to evaluate teachers.

I forwarded Dorn’s letter to WEA spokesman Rich Wood for a response to Dorn’s push for less local control.

Dorn’s letter, which is signed by Seattle super Maria Goodloe-Johnson, is posted in full below the fold.

UPDATE: Teachers’ union leader Lindquist says uniform standards “fly in the face of all the research” that shows local accountability is best when it comes to schools. “Local districts have different needs,” she says, “and you need to able to adjust evaluations at the district level.”

She pointed out that the Clover Park district evaluation plan in South Tacoma is geared toward a lower socio-economic group of students who have troubled home lives and “classroom management” is a heavily weighted standard when evaluating teachers, while the Peninsula evaluation standards are more focused on engagement with parents. “One size does not fit all,” she repeated.


Dorn’s letter:
Washington State Superintendents Support Race to the Top Reforms

February 22, 2010

The Honorable Members of the Washington State Legislature:

As superintendents of school districts across the state charged with ensuring our students are prepared for college and careers, we are actively watching the Race to the Top legislation in the state Senate and House (SB 6696). We applaud the Governor, the Superintendent of Public Instruction, the State Board of Education, and the many legislators who are deeply committed to this effort. The goals of the Obama Administration’s $4.35 billion Race to the Top grant—effective teachers and principals, turning around low-performing schools, better data systems and higher standards –not only call for the right reforms at the right time, they will help us accelerate the achievement of every student.

Right now, across Washington state, districts not only lack the ability to adequately identify, evaluate and compensate their most effective teachers and leaders, we are unable to support a system where they are teaching the students who need them the most.

This legislative session, we have a chance to change things: Race to the Top provides states with an opportunity to drive and fund bold innovations that increase student performance and close the achievement gap.

We know Washington is starting behind many other states, but we are up to the task the Obama Administration has set before us and believe that, with the political will and several critical reforms, our state could lead the nation with an education system that prepares all its students for the challenges of tomorrow.  In order to meet this challenge, our state’s Race to the Top legislation must include the following critical elements:

  • The Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction must work collaboratively with the Washington Education Association and the Association of Washington School Principals to develop a common, required system for effective teacher and principal evaluation, including measures of student growth. Washington must agree on a common definition of an effective teacher, an effective principal and how to measure student growth statewide.
  • A significant portion of the teacher and principal evaluation system must include multiple measures of student academic growth. If we are serious about closing the achievement gap, we need to make sure teachers and principals are first, supported to address the diverse learning needs in our schools and classrooms, and then, evaluated and held accountable for the academic growth of every student.
  • Once the new evaluation system is implemented, teachers and principals who receive unsatisfactory evaluations must be given professional development and support to improve. If these interventions do not impact a teacher’s or principal’s effectiveness for two consecutive years, the teacher should be placed back on provisional status and, after a third year of support that still results in unsatisfactory performance, the teacher or principal should lose his/her contract. Every student deserves an excellent teacher, and every school, an excellent principal. We need to make sure we are giving all teachers and principals the opportunity to grow and providing those who do not, an expedient way out of our schools.
If the state passes strong Race to the Top legislation, is successful in getting federal funds, and works together on a statewide system, we will be able to transform our present evaluation systems and create one that provides teachers and principals with support for effective professional development and meaningful feedback focused on increasing student achievement.

As a state, Washington must support educators who help our children learn, grow and succeed. It is the key to our future.

Thank you for your leadership on this critical issue.

Sincerely,

State Superintendent of Public Instruction Randy Dorn
Anacortes Superintendent Chris Borgen
Auburn Superintendent Kip Herren
Bainbridge Island Superintendent Faith Chapel
Bellevue Superintendent Amalia Cudeiro
Bethel Superintendent Tom Siegel
Clover Park Superintendent Debbie LeBeau
Dieringer Superintendent Judy Neumeier-Martinson
Eatonville Superintendent Ray Arment
Educational Service District 105 Superintendent Jane Gutting
Educational Service District 112 Superintendent Twyla Barnes
Enumclaw Superintendent Mike Nelson
Fife Superintendent Steve McCammon
Highline Superintendent John Welch
Kennewick School District Superintendent Dave Bond
Kent Superintendent Lee Vargas
Lake Washington Superintendent Chip Kimball
Mercer Island Superintendent Gary Plano
Nooksack Superintendent Mark Johnson
Northshore Superintendent Larry Francois
Northwest Educational Service District 189 Superintendent Jerry Jenkins
Odessa Superintendent Suellen White
Orting Superintendent Michelle Curry
Peninsula Superintendent Terry Bouck
Puget Sound Educational Service District Superintendent Monte Bridges
Renton Superintendent Mary Alice Heuschel
Seattle Superintendent Maria Goodloe-Johnson
Shoreline Superintendent Sue Walker
Skykomish Superintendent Jeff Long
Snoqualmie Valley Superintendent Joel Aune

Sumner Superintendent Gil Mendoza
Tacoma Superintendent Art Jarvis
Tukwila Superintendent Ethelda Burke
University Place Superintendent Patti Banks
Vashon Superintendent Michael Soltman
West Valley School District Polly Crowley
White River Superintendent Tom Lockyer




  • seabos84

    How come we don't have standardized evaluations of the effectiveness of the people making the decisions?
    How come we don't have standardized evaluations of the effectiveness of any of the incessant deluge of programs?

    I really don't see a problem with standard teacher evaluations – as much as many teachers like to pretend we're some kind of einstein on the frontiers of learning & teaching … we're not. There are appx. 4,000,000 9th graders, how do we make things work to get the most for the most? Most of the teachers I know are trying to get all our kids AT LEAST to a functioning skill set so the kids can grow into adults with AT LEAST some options on how to participate – and we'd sure like to accomplish a lot more than than just “AT LEAST”.

    Blaming teachers does have an elegance to it:

    there are certainly problems with effectiveness all through the system,
    systemic change is very costly,
    there are certainly problems with effectiveness all through the system,
    who knows what changes would work the best,
    there are certainly problems with effectiveness all through the system,
    so let's hire a bunch of powerpoint jockeys to dump it all on the teachers!

    Is 1984 required reading in any education programs? The doublethink on these issues is … fascinating? intriguing? appalling?

    O'Brien

  • Mikos

    Linking student achievement ot teacher pay is not blaming teachers. It's trying to improve our education system. The people making decisions (by that I gather you mean lawmakers) can be voted out on a regular basis. That doesn't seem like a practical system for teachers.

    By the way, a close reading of the RTT guidelines also rewards states that link student achievement to principle evaluations. It's not just teachers. The goal is to make schools and the adults in schools — not just the kids — accountable in some measureable form. Why is that unreasonable?

  • seabos84

    Apparently your theology prevents you from questioning why the leaders keep blaming the teachers.

    Why aren't the leaders evaluated?
    Why aren't the incessantly changing programs of the leaders evaluated?

    I either accept your world view, or, I'm some union troglodyte obstructionist.

    Oh well.

    O'Brien.

  • seabos84

    Do YOU work in a school, or have you ever worked in a school, and has it been for your primary paycheck – not as a visiting pooh-bah or drop in professor?
    Principals are in about the same boat as teachers – we're dealing with the cards we're dealt, minute by minute. We're not off in some office issuing edicts, piddling with power points, pretending like we're great strategerists.
    Arne Duncan pointed out in a speech that there are 1450 schools, departments and colleges of education in the United States. IF all the people in those places who make over $75,000 / year were fired – including and especially Duncan – how much time could be saved by us not having to play cover our tails all the time from edict issuers?

    O'Brien.

  • sorrytony

    I feel for Mary Lindquist and the WEA. They're trying to cite research (that local determination of teacher and school standards produces the best results and the best learning), when no one wants to know what is actually true, in the rush to join up with the church of accountability and standardization. It is remarkable how unmoored the current discussions of education “reform” are from any research or facts.

    Randy Dorn has wasted a tremendous opportunity to be a research-based leader, in partnership with teachers, in moving away from the standards gospel and toward true high quality public education.

  • Marie

    Lindquist's statement horrifies me. Is she actually arguing for different educational standards, essentially saying that socio-economically disadvantaged kids can only strive to sit in their seats quietly & therefore that is all their teachers should be held accountable for? Isn't that exactly the kind of low expectation that standards-based reform is attempting to counter?

  • TheStreets

    @Marie – I felt the same thing reading her statement.

  • ratcityreprobate

    We already have a very hard time attracting the best teachers to schools that are socio-economically disadvantaged. If the folks teaching in those schools are going to be judged by a standard that compares their student achievement with those on Mercer Island nobody will be willing to teach in disadvantaged schools. It would be a one way ticket to a very short teaching career.

  • ratcityreprobate

    If you think “teaching to the test” is a great idea, then you will think Randy Dorn, Maria Goodloe-Johnson, Arne Duncan and Barack Obama are education whizzes. But if you think well-educated students are what is important, then maybe not. These statewide and nationwide teacher evaluation standards, enforced by threatening to withhold money, are a simplistic and faulty remedy to a serious problem. They are but one facet of a push to corporatize and privatize public education pushed mostly by people such as Duncan and Obama with no expertise in education. Dorn and Goodloe-Johnson have jumped on the bandwagon because it serves them personally as evidenced by Goodloe-Johnson's membership on the Board of a non-profit producing the tests and her and Duncan's membership on the Board of the Broad Education Foundation.

  • ivan

    Agreed. And what's more, MGJ, Dorn, Duncan, and yeah, YOU, Obama, don't get that it will be impossible to attract good, dedicated teachers to low-income neighborhoods and school districts when their job security and bargaining power are being eroded.

    Or maybe they DO get it. Maybe their aim is to make all our teachers into good little corporate suckup ass-kissing drones, just like they'd like to do with the rest of the workforce. Just like it'll do to your kids eventually.

    Well, I'm not having it. And if you're a parent who cares about your kid's education, YOU shouldn't be having it either. WA should reject the money if these are the terms. I don't want the Goodloe-Johnsons of the world skimming it off the top. I am PROUD to stand with our state's teachers.

  • westello

    Education in action – it's principal, not principle.

  • westello

    I can support using student growth data (you mean tests?) to evaluate teachers. BUT not in a primary or significant way. Teaching has too many variables to say that a snapshot picture of how a student performs on one day fully shows a teacher's abilities. That's nonsense. But put student growth data in with other factors like a principal review, peer review, value-added data (meaning is the teacher in a class with many students with challenges like special ed, low income, immigrant), etc., then fine. But that's not what I'm hearing and so it isn't fair. Likewise, hold principals as accountable as you feel teachers should be. And then, of course, there is the wild card, the third rail which is parent responsibility.

    RttT money is just Gates Foundation money done federally. It is not sustainable money, it's starter money but to do what?

  • Marie

    The goal here, lest we forget, is not teacher job security– it's helping ALL kids be successful adults with the essential skills & tools to lead economically, socially productive lives. While I'm not a big fan of No Child Left Behind, it was trying to eliminate the soft racism & classism that have plagued our schools for decades. Teacher evaluation needs to focus on student achievement over time– if a kid started out three years behind and moved up so that they were only one year behind over the course of a year, that is an absolute measure of teacher success. We want to make sure that all of our kids are learning and all of our teachers are teaching effectively. Holding teachers accountable primarily for classroom management goals is at best cynical. As a former teacher, I can tell you that what I most wanted was to know that I was making a substantive difference in my students' lives. I wanted to be professionally challenged and measured. I wanted to know how I was doing & how I could improve. I think that the evaluation debate is getting sidetracked by blind panic &, yes, soft racism. We need to start walking the talk– unless we actually don't believe that all children can learn.

  • marianpeters

    Nope — it's not about low expectations. It's the reality that different schools have different challenges. Not higher or lower, just different. And therefore the teachers in those buildings need skill sets that match the student population and community with high expectations for all students.

  • wseadawg

    Great Point, Westello! Sustainability! Nobody is talking about that at all. This is a one shot gun-to-the-head deal worth about $75 per student at most, in exchange for a huge new bureacratic nightmare, outside consultant contracts, and all kinds of cottage industries popping up to suck even more dollars from the classrooms. Haliburtonesque. Even Texas said no to RTTT. Didya hear that, TEXAS said NO!!

  • http://seattle-ed.blogspot.com/ Dora Taylor

    Sometimes I think people's common sense has gone out of the window with all of this talk about Race to the Top money. For basically about $75 per student if we receive any funds at all, we are to make teachers and now principals responsible for not only what happens in the school but what also happens in their student's homes and communities. The school systems that don't have enough money now to function are to somehow not only to manage the education of a child but to ensure their mental, physical and emotional well-being so that they can pay attention in class and learn and of course at the same time, be responsible for their behavior.

    Children come to school well fed or hungry, happy or depressed, well loved or abused. That has nothing to do with the teacher and yet they are to be held fully responsible for the education of their students. These classes are also larger in size than manageable usually and also have students who are being mainstreamed in from special ed programs. The students have varying degrees of ability and yet the teacher is responsible for each students academic growth.

    If you keep this up you won't have any teachers at all let alone the ones we have now who for the most part are dedicated and care about our children.

  • Bobbie

    Very well stated, Dora. This is the current discussion at my school. We have classes jammed with very young students, which are very unevenly placed. Unless someone is in education, they are probably unaware of the huge inequalities that currently exist.

    I have always been happy to work in a building with students who need me the most. However, many of these students come to kindergarten well behind age mates in other schools and districts. I was always proud when I could move these students one or one-and-a-half years in the course of a 180 day school year. However, now I am being required to move many of them 2 to 3 years if I don't want to be labeled a “failing” teacher. In addition, if I am not able to move them 2 or 3 years, I will lose my job of 14 years. Now mind you, I have never had a poor evaluation, and I have always been an involved, highly dedicated teacher. I believe my only failure was that I didn't move to a more affluent school where test scores are not as important and teaching is not scrutinized because they don't take or need federal dollars.

    Who will want to teach at schools of poverty when the system is so broken?

  • http://www.onlinedegreetalk.org Affordable Online Degree

    Amendments really changes life of professionals, but it should be for good.