Viva La Cola!

Founded in January 2009, PubliCola is a blog about Seattle written by journalists who are dedicated to non-partisan, original daily reporting that prioritizes a balanced approach to news. Started by longtime local editor and award-winning reporter Josh Feit, PubliCola is the first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol.

PubliCola was off and running. In June 2009, PubliCola hired another award-winning journalist, super-sourced Seattle city hall reporter Erica C. Barnett.

People were afraid that blogging would change journalism. Instead, we believe journalism can change blogging. Twenty-first century journalism may look and feel different, and yes Erica isn't afraid to get cranky, but we're committed to making sure online news still delivers independent, reliable, even-keeled coverage. And most of all, we're committed to making sure the coverage sparks honest civic debate.

Bringing you cola for the people, PubliCola is named after Publius Valerius PubliCola, the alias for the authors of the Federalist Papers—the original bloggers.

The first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol and Seattle city hall, PubliCola has been called a “must-read” by the Seattle Post Intelligencer and a hot “New Media Mover and Shaker” by Seattle Magazine—which also cited our own Erica C. Barnett as the city's No. 1 news nerd.

43rd District Town Hall Highlights 520 Lawsuit Option

Proof that the 43rd District—Capitol Hill, the U. District, Wallingford—exists in a happy liberal bubble? Yesterday’s town hall meeting at the First Baptist Church.

Rep Frank Chopp, Sen. Ed Murray, and Rep. Jamie Pedersen were subjected to a lovefest on Saturday, as opposed to the anti-incumbent free-for-alls we’ve come to expect from town halls in the Great Recession.

Constituents—about 200 people packed the Capitol Hill church—thanked, applauded, and even cheered the legislators. “To us, they’re heroes for what they’re doing, but I also wouldn’t expect anything less, this is the 43rd we’re talking about,” said community member Susan Kolinska.

L-R, Murray, Pedersen, and Chopp

Sure the legislature’s recent vote to overturn voter-approved 960 came up—but as a good thing. (Tim Eyman’s I-960, which requires a two thirds vote of the legislature to raise taxes, lost in the 43rd 76 to 24 back in 2007.)

One woman went as far as to say, “I want you to find a way to tax me more.”

Lining up at the mike to address the legislators—namechecking the Housing Trust Fund, Planned Parenthood (there was a crew of Planned Parenthood supporters in matching pink shirts), a medical interpreters program for ESL clients, and adult day care—43rd District Democratic members were preaching to the choir. Chopp, Murray, and Pedersen all nodded in agreement and plugged the idea of new taxes. (Both House and Senate Democrats will be showcasing their budgets Tuesday, both will most likely include tax increases.)

Constituents line up to speak at Saturday’s 43rd District Town Hall

Rather than big government, the pinata in the 43rd was Wall Street. Speaker Chopp gave a passionate speech about the destructive behavior of Wall Street—how companies such as AIG “ripped off” the American people. The focus, he said, needed to be on small businesses. Sen. Murray followed up by hyping legislation the group is working on to give tax credits and loans to small businesses.

The only other bad guy in the room was the 520 plan that the state Senate signed off on last week and that east side House reps are forcing on Speaker Chopp.

Jonathan Morris Dubman from the Coalition for a Sustainable 520 boiled down his group’s view on 520 with a simple description: Seattle is looking at “the worst option on the table.” The current plan—as Murray said in his Senate floor speech against the 520 bill last week before being just one of just three ‘Nay’ votes—lacks transit connections between 520 and the planned UW light rail hub. Also at issue—the offramps into Montlake (in the heart of the 43rd) will upend the neighborhood, they say.

The legislators took the opportunity to reiterate their own frustration with the 520 project and hint at what could ultimately be the only solution—a lawsuit. (Mayor Mike McGinn, who the 43rd district legislators have teamed up with to find an alterantive 520 plan, hinted at the same plan of attack when he met with the press on Friday.)

Speaker Frank Chopp described the current $4.6 billion proposal with only half of the funding accounted for as, “the height of insanity,” and explained the lawsuit strategy. “Sometimes the third option [litigation] has to be utilized in order to start winning on this thing,” he said.

Murray was in agreement, “I’ll be happy to work with you to raise money for a lawsuit.”


  • Wyatt

    There was also a large contingent from the UW. Huskies are hoping our representatives will remember that the UW is in their district and fight for us in Olympia. (The UW is, after all, the largest employer in Seattle)

  • Josh Feit

    Wyatt,

    Thanks for noting that. Rest assured: Teodora has a separate story coming about Chopp's meeting after the Town Hall with the UW contingent.

  • http://twitter.com/GlennF GlennF

    Take a look at today's Seattle Times op-ed page: a very sensible Sustainable op-ed explaining what's wrong with the plan, its submarine effort to put in 12 lanes, and how to fix it; and then the opposing view from the eastside, mostly, which says, 14 years of work have led to this one option and now it's time to build.

    Which is garbage. The 14 years of work led to a set of options all of which would work and which all the stakeholders were committed to. The legislature went outside of the guidelines for the plan and betrayed all this work by choosing a plan that's expedient but is not beneficial for Seattle.

    As noted many times before, there's no sensible interchange for transit, bus stops are removed (including the Montlake Flyer), the notion that rail could go over the bridge later are laughable, and it adds a second bascule, which means longer delays; surface street capacity isn't improved at all, so more cars will funnel in causing longer delays on 520 than we have today.

    I live in Montlake, but could cope with a plan that improved the bridge option if it had an impact on the neighborhood. Instead, we get a plan that is guaranteed to be worse than what we have today, while screwing Montlake.

  • gloomy gus

    I just don't think Montlake will ever allow any plan to move forward. And Montlake has always been the key, the mouse that roared if you will. I'm positive that over their years of riding herd on 520 designs Chopp and Murray figured there was maybe a 10% at best chance their constituents wouldn't force them to play stopper at this point no matter which option was in the lead.

    Maybe it's time to admit the game is over. The legislature needs to drop the bridge replacement and let the Governor do the same. Two more years of EIS process would come to nothing anyway, for Montlake would lie in wait to kill whatever got hatched from that too.

    We still need to plan for pontoon replacement and disaster recovery on the bridge, but let sleeping 43rd dogs lie – we'll need the energy and support of those folks and their state reps on much more do-or-die issues facing the state in the next couple of years.

  • http://twitter.com/GlennF GlennF

    “just don't think Montlake will ever allow any plan to move forward. “

    That's frankly garbage. Montlake has limited control and we know it. But Montlake representatives along with dozens of other neighorhood, city, and state stakeholders worked for years to come with plans that were acceptable to all parties.

    Those were thrown out. The A+ option is an expedient cutout of the worst aspects of a bunch of acceptable options.

    There's a canard that Montlake could stop anything. I doubt we can stop this. The fact that you have Chopp, the mayor, etc., all coming together to oppose a plan that will not improve congestion, traffic flow, and multi-modal public transit shows this isn't a Montlake issue.

    If everyone else said, fine, and Montlake squawked, we'd be ignored, and rightly so.

    The problem with 520 all along is that funding sources were never well identified, and it's still ridiculously underfunded for the crappy plan that will likely be litigated into a halt. If the legislature had approved any of the good options, you'd have local, state, and national Washington leaders trying to put together the financing.

    The tunnel, as horrible and impractical as it is, wound up being approved with relatively little interest in cost, sense, etc., and that's one of the reasons McGinn was elected. I have my doubts either the tunnel nor the option A+ 520 will be built as they are currently proposed.

  • ratcityreprobate

    Joel Connelly has posted his annual paean to the automobile. He takes a swat at Erica. Don't know if it is supposed to be funny, it isn't, but it is such seriously bad writing it is embarrassing to read. Made me cringe for him. Poor Joel can't find his way home to the barn anymore.

  • eapnow

    Wait… Pedersen was in favor of a lawsuit? No?! Could it be that he supports legislation that only benefits lawyers (or himself)? He had no problem pushing through his “pay surrogates” bill — oh, that's right, because he refuses to adopt a child, and would rather buy his own from someone else. He shot down a bill that would have eliminated legalized land theft (oh, that would have seriously hurt his lawyer-friends incomes), so he didn't have the moral courage to let that bill be heard. What else is he hiding?

  • mathewrenndawgrenner

    I don't under stand the quote ” I want you to find ways to tax me more.” If you want to pay more in taxes then pay more. No one is stopping you. If that is how you want to spend your money then it is none of my business. However, I don't want to pay more so leave MY money alone.

  • Seriously?

    Seems like A+ could have more reliable transit connections if the bascule bridge(s) wouldn't open so often. The Coast Guard controls this, as it is a historic maritime shipping channel. There should be more restrictions on when the bridge opens.
    There are no options that anyone has developed that effectively connect Husky Stadium to SR-520 HOV lanes. Even Sound Transit thought Option M (with the tunnel that Chopp wants), would not work well for transit as busses would have to share lanes with cars in the tunnel. If the bascule bridge opening times were more limited, and HOV direct access lanes connected busses from the 520 bridge onto Montlake Blvd, transit would have an efficient connection from Bellevue and the UW.

  • sustainability

    Does anyone realize that sustainability means….sustainability. The capacity to continue doing what is now being done. Building ever-more expensive bridges and freeways are only temporary alleviations of gridlock without seriously addressing mostly-immigration driven population growth.

  • gloomy gus

    I'm guessing you don't know what the topic of this post is, where the 43rd is, or even what you're doing here.

  • sustainability

    Guessing may be what causes you to be so gloomy, Gus. I can only request you give more thought to the sustainability of “building more transit” or freeways, or anything that only provideds temporary alleviation of problems created by too rapid population growth. And then throw in the fact that since what is happening in the 43rd is a microcosim of federal reserve now having one hand print money and the other lending it to the government. If you give much thought to these factors you may truly be gloomy gus.