Viva La Cola!

Founded in January 2009, PubliCola is a blog about Seattle written by journalists who are dedicated to non-partisan, original daily reporting that prioritizes a balanced approach to news. Started by longtime local editor and award-winning reporter Josh Feit, PubliCola is the first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol.

PubliCola was off and running. In June 2009, PubliCola hired another award-winning journalist, super-sourced Seattle city hall reporter Erica C. Barnett.

People were afraid that blogging would change journalism. Instead, we believe journalism can change blogging. Twenty-first century journalism may look and feel different, and yes Erica isn't afraid to get cranky, but we're committed to making sure online news still delivers independent, reliable, even-keeled coverage. And most of all, we're committed to making sure the coverage sparks honest civic debate.

Bringing you cola for the people, PubliCola is named after Publius Valerius PubliCola, the alias for the authors of the Federalist Papers—the original bloggers.

The first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol and Seattle city hall, PubliCola has been called a “must-read” by the Seattle Post Intelligencer and a hot “New Media Mover and Shaker” by Seattle Magazine—which also cited our own Erica C. Barnett as the city's No. 1 news nerd.

Bill Would Allow Private Vans and Buses in Transit-Only Lanes, Park and Rides

Editor’s note: This post has been updated.

As several bills that would have helped cyclists and transit riders were allowed to die this week, senate transportation leaders pushed through a bill that would allow private bus and vanpool companies unlimited access to facilities, like bus-rapid-transit lanes and public park-and-rides, currently reserved for public transit.

The bill, sponsored by Senate transportation chair Mary Margaret Haugen (D-10), would allow any vehicle with the capacity to carry eight or more passengers (except stretch limos and stretch SUVs) onto bus-only lanes, even if the vehicle has no passengers.

The bill, ostensibly aimed at encouraging private transit services like Microsoft’s Connector buses to Redmond, would also open up bus lanes to charter vans, airport shuttles, and unspecified “private nonprofit transportation provider vehicles.”

It would also allow those vehicles to park in park-and-rides at all hours. The bill stipulates that private vehicles could only park in park-and-rides that are less than 90 percent full during off-peak hours (i.e., at night); however, because park-and-rides are usually empty at night, that provision lacks teeth. “We have 29 lots that are at 90 percent of capacity or more during peak hours” already, says Doug Hodson, a spokesman for the King County Department of Transportation. “If that provision doesn’t apply during the peak periods, we’re going to have an overflow situation.”

If the legislation passes, it would impact the dedicated E3 busway south of downtown, Third Avenue downtown, which is bus-only during morning and evening rush hours, and all of Metro’s five planned RapidRide dedicated bus lanes, which are supposed to provide service as fast and reliable as light rail. It could also allow private shuttles into the downtown bus tunnel, unless Metro and Sound Transit can prove they pose a safety risk.

The original version of the bill would  have also allowed limo drivers to drive alone in bus lanes on their way back to the airport.

“I had big concerns [with the bill] because, if you go to Third Avenue at 4:00 on a Friday, you cannot fit one more vehicle on there because there’s so many buses,” says Andrew Austin, lobbyist for the Transportation Choices Coalition. Austin says lobbyists for transit agencies are hammering out a compromise that would have less of a detrimental impact on public transportation.

However, Sen. Ed Murray (D-43), the only senator to vote against the bill, says it was pushed through so quickly that he’s not sure legislators know what’s in it. And he says he’s concerned that the bill doesn’t include a “trigger,” such as a certain level of congestion, to exclude private vans and buses from transit lanes. “If the HOV lanes get full, I think they should primarily and first be for public transit,” Murray says. “I was concerned that there wasn’t a [provision] where, if you reach a certain capacity, those [private transit providers] could be pushed out of there.”

Hodson says Metro and other transit agencies will continue to push for such a provision, along with additional restrictions on the ability of private transportation operators to use public park-and-rides. “If traffic slows to a halt and it starts impacting the efficiency and reliability of our public transportation system, there is [currently] no provision for us to say [private companies] could not use” those transit lanes, Hodson says.

Hodson says Metro has “no idea” how many private charter bus companies, airport shuttle vehicles, and employer shuttles there are in King County.




  • giffy

    This seems like something worth considering. Companies should be encouraged to offer transit like services, especially since Metro is not exactly stellar.

  • Anc

    On the surface, I don't really see a problem, back in the day a large sector of mass transit market was private. I'll be interested to read what more knowledgeable people have to say on the subject though.

    And if it gets overly congested, just take a GP lane and convert it to HOV. I'm sure all those voting for this bill would have no problem with this right?

    ….right?

  • jeff

    I am surprised that the state has the power to do this. Can it also dictate that a city street must be transit only? Does it have the power to set speed limits?

  • NoSpin

    Haugen is one of those rural dinosaurs who only pays lip service to mass transit – it's not at all surprising that she'd sponsor a bill that throws public transit users “under the bus” in order to make inroads for private providers.

    There's a very clear difference between HOV lanes and Transit Lanes – if Haugen actually used mass transit for something besides an occasional photo-op, she'd know that.

    And it's no accident that bicycle-friendly bills didn't move – the chairs of the transportation committees were both born before the bicycle was invented.

  • http://www.google.com/profiles/Communicate.with.Mike Mr. Baker

    I'm surprise it took them this long.

  • Nancy

    “Back in the day” all mass transit was private. And it all went bankrupt. That's why we have Amtrak – once the railroads lost their lavish postal subsidy, they couldn't break even on the trains.

  • anotherneighborhoodactivist

    Private mass transit went bankrupt because govt subsidies were shifted to roads and airports. And because the oil, rubber (tire) and auto corporations colluded to destroy America's urban light rail and street car systems.

    The railroads ditched passengers because all the tax money had shifted to freeways, and Amtrak still has trouble for similar reasons, and because they have to share the tracks with freight (which still makes tons of money for RR corporations). (Between 35 and 45% of all North American freight rail is pure carbon–coal–on the way to an atmosphere near you.)

  • chrisvandyk

    What's the big deal about buses in the buses lane? Isn't that what you're advocating for, mass transit? Who cares who owns the bus—I just wanna take a bus…

  • Tony the Economist

    Yes. States have plenary power. All municipal corporations (cities) and all counties are chartered by the State and exercise only the power that the state gives to them, and those powers can be revoked at any time.

    If Olympia wanted to, it could revoke Seattle's charter and taxing authority and completely dissolve all City government. You bet they can dictate local street uses.

  • http://yrihf.com/ jabailo

    I would go further and allow any taxi service to use the lanes as well.

  • John Roberts

    If corporations are now actual people, shouldn't the ones on wheels be considered SOV drivers?

  • nwbedbuilder

    Transit went private, when GM bought it all from the cities. Right?

    At which point they tore up all the trolley tracks and sold the cities buses, right?

    I wish I could get on a train and be in New York tomorrow…

  • Seattle_Steve

    The whole purpose of an HOV lanes is to move more people on a road than you would otherwise. So why not encourage companies to run private vans and buses? As long as they are moving more people more efficiently than the SOV alternative? And as long as their performance isn't being degraded?

    Seems like there is some hyperventilating over the wrong things on this bill and a that a reasonable solution ought to be pretty easy to find by getting the right people around a single table.

  • morning fizzy

    generally streetcars were built by developers to help sell their lots and houses. over the years they became old and required more maintenance. since the owners didn't have any interest in the streetcars except to make money running them, when they weren't making money they were turned over to the municipality or electric company. then came the brand new shiny buses. just as today streetcars are new and shiny and don't have the undesirables on them, that was the story for buses back then. the death of streetcar by car is mostly myth.

    take a look at a 1928 streetcar in action:

    http://clerk.ci.seattle.wa.us/~scripts/nph-brs….

  • J.R.

    I thought ridesharing was green.

  • Matt_the_Engineer

    I think this can work if done well. My two concerns:
    1. Traffic on 3rd. It's already packed with buses.
    2. This encourages people to drive large gas guzzlers! If someone want to get from Redmond to Seattle via 520 and they own a prius and a minivan (8 passengers), they can now take their minvan to work and zip past all of those sucker commuters with smaller cars.

  • Matt_the_Engineer

    I wonder if someone with a minivan can now legally drive in the bus tunnel.

  • Incadescent

    The way I read the bill, ordinary drivers can't use the transit lanes just because they have an 8 passenger van. They would have to be a regulated transportation service or an employer shuttle.

  • Matt_the_Engineer

    That's good news, though I can still think of loopholes.

    What does it mean to be a “regulated transportation service”? Is MS Connector an RTS?

    Can someone be self-employed and run an employer shuttle?

  • jeff

    Having the power of the greater does not necessarily imply the power of the lesser.

  • http://michaelmaddux.blogspot.com/ Michael M.

    I don't believe the bill applies to individuals, only companies.

  • eddiew

    ECB: “If the legislation passes, it would impact the dedicated E3 busway south of downtown, Third Avenue downtown, which is bus-only during morning and evening rush hours, and all of Metro’s five planned RapidRide dedicated bus lanes, which are supposed to provide service as fast and reliable as light rail”.

    the first half of Erica's sentence is valid re 3rd Avenue and the SODO busway, the the second half is confused and overstated.

    A sixth RR line is scheduled; the F Line would improve Route 140 between Renton and Burien via Tukwila.

    The first five do not have many, if any, dedicated bus lanes planned or funded. Nor are they promised to provide the same speed and reliability as LRT. They will be more like routes 98B and 99B in Vancouver. Three are planned to use the 3rd Avenue transit spine.

  • anotherneighborhoodactivist

    I did not say “death by car,” I said death at the hands of corporations. “nwbedbuilder” is correct: GM primarily. There is lots of documented history readily available. It is not a myth, any more than America's continued slide into corporatism is a myth.

    e.g. http://www.lovearth.net/gmdeliberatelydestroyed…
    http://www.newday.com/reviews.lasso?filmid=FrBt…
    etc

    p.s. “Fascism should more properly be called corporatism since it is the merger of state and corporate power.”–Benito Mussolini. Checked out Supreme Court lately, like last ten years?

  • Chetan

    The problem is that if we privatize the high ridership parts of metro's business, it will not be able to sustain it's more local buses, killing the transit system.

  • phil

    Anyone can start a company, it's not that hard or expensive.