Viva La Cola!

Founded in January 2009, PubliCola is a blog about Seattle written by journalists who are dedicated to non-partisan, original daily reporting that prioritizes a balanced approach to news. Started by longtime local editor and award-winning reporter Josh Feit, PubliCola is the first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol.

PubliCola was off and running. In June 2009, PubliCola hired another award-winning journalist, super-sourced Seattle city hall reporter Erica C. Barnett.

People were afraid that blogging would change journalism. Instead, we believe journalism can change blogging. Twenty-first century journalism may look and feel different, and yes Erica isn't afraid to get cranky, but we're committed to making sure online news still delivers independent, reliable, even-keeled coverage. And most of all, we're committed to making sure the coverage sparks honest civic debate.

Bringing you cola for the people, PubliCola is named after Publius Valerius PubliCola, the alias for the authors of the Federalist Papers—the original bloggers.

The first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol and Seattle city hall, PubliCola has been called a “must-read” by the Seattle Post Intelligencer and a hot “New Media Mover and Shaker” by Seattle Magazine—which also cited our own Erica C. Barnett as the city's No. 1 news nerd.

Burgess Damns McGinn’s Speech With Faint Praise

City Council member Tim Burgess put up a damning-with-faint-praise post on his blog yesterday afternoon about Mayor Mike McGinn’s State of the City Speech, which I (and many at city hall) described as disorganized and “a bummer.”

Praise because Burgess said McGinn “did a good job creating context for future initiatives he might propose” and gently dinged critics of the speech for expecting “detailed policy proposals” just six weeks into McGinn’s term. “For goodness sake, he’s only been in office for six weeks,” Burgess wrote. *

Faint because Burgess’ post is filled with thinly veiled jabs at McGinn, who “didn’t offer specific policy proposals,” spoke to a room in which “about a third of the seats were vacant,” and “continued his informal, conversational style of speaking” (read: Didn’t have a speech prepared).

More directly, Burgess also called McGinn out for “continu[ing] to misrepresent the city’s obligations related to removal of the Alaskan Way Viaduct” by suggesting that the city’s $930 million commitment to pay for tunnel costs puts the city at financial risk. “Even if the Mayor’s surface only option had been chosen, the City would still incur these costs,” Burgess wrote. “On the cost overruns challenge the Mayor continues to raise I would just remind everyone that this is a state highway, a state designed and managed project, a state selected contractor, and a state paid-for project. … The City of Seattle is not on the hook for any of the tunnel’s direct costs.”

Burgess is widely viewed as a potential mayoral contender in 2013.

* Fact check: McGinn’s predecessor, Greg Nickels, had also only been in office three weeks when he delivered his first State of the City address. Yet he proposed a number of specific policy proposals in that speech, including: The creation of an Economic Opportunity Task Force charged with specific goals for the creation of living-wage jobs; improving traffic and the condition of city streets by focusing on potholes and clearing accidents; improving funding for the city’s emergency preparedness plan and increasing police and firefighter training; and restoring funding for neighborhood streets projects, among many other specific proposals.


  • Ready to go in Bellevue

    I agree ECB, if you run for any office (council member, governor, mayor) you need to roll out policy initiatives from the very beginning. Using the excuse “it's only been six weeks” misses the mark.

    One should run for office because they have ideas and want to implement them to better serve the public and improve the community in which they live. If you run for office for the right reasons you will see a four year term as a sprint and not waste any time.

    Of course there is a learning curve and the reality of leading might take some time to be properly aligned with your perception, but going more than a month without saying anything useful is sad.

    McGinn is not alone here. Have you heard much from any other newly electeds…

    Oh, wait. Bellevue City Council…they ran on an agenda and have begun to act on it.

  • Nemo

    To be fair, Nickels came into office with the luxury of a much better economy, and he had the “machine” behind him. Hie did not take office in the midst of a huge budget and revenue decline. That happened a year later.

  • knowssomething

    Nemo, you have that wrong. When Nickels came into office the city budget was $60 million out of whack. The dotcom bust was in full stride. He immediately had to reduce spending in all general fund departments. No luxury there. What he did have was a well thought out transition that prepared him to hit the ground running with a one hundred day agenda. It appears this administration is attempting an agenda based on how many things they can screw up in the first hundred days

  • WorriedforSeattlesFuture

    Gosh, too bad there weren't any more fake PhDs around to make all the decisions and write the speech for him. Poor, poor George W. Bush — er, I mean, McGinn — lets see what other excuses people come up with for his inadequacies!

  • http://twitter.com/fattailed fattailed

    The only thing that matters less than who said what at a state of the city address is who reacted how to the address. Are there more than a dozen people who don't work for the City who are even aware that there *is* a state of the city address? This just doesn't matter. Please report on actual initiatives rather than signals posed in response to suggestions of rumors of changes.

  • JCB

    I heard something similar from my State Rep. on the costs of the tunnel. The City Council needs to start playing hard ball by rebutting McGinn's showboating on costs.

  • Sunny South Seattle

    The Mayor sent an S.O.S. with his State of Seattle speech.
    Unfortunately he didn't suggest significant shifts or efforts to change course so we may all be aboard the SS Minnow.

  • sarah68

    Nickels had a lot of elective experience behind him when he became Mayor. McGinn is inexperienced and is going to act inexperienced. Unfortunately, that may not be the worst.

    I doubt if Bushnell's completely out of McGinn's world; he's just not on the payroll or in City Hall anymore.

    I sure wish we didn't have to uncheck the “Subscribe to all comments” each time we post a comment.

  • PAT

    Don't blame me I voted for Mallahan. We are getting what we deserve…Seattle talk, talk, talk….if Mallahan had run attack adds like McGoof did he would have won. Glad somebody ran on his own accomplishments and not on feel good bullshit and lies. Can anybody say impeach…can we get a do over?

    mc

    ginn

  • the emperor's new clothes

    McGinn's arrogant method of prescribing changes without any understanding of what is and isn't possible has already undermined his credibility with most city departments. He has already floated so many half-baked ideas (without asking anyone who knows better [arrogance]) that have been immediately swatted down by his “inferiors” that he's already practically whimpering in a corner. Six more weeks like this and the very people he has been pretending to control will be truly in control of the city.

    The lame performance in the SOC address just really underscores that he has NO CLUE what it takes to run even a small city even the major city Seattle purported to be. If he doesn't buckle down, but soon, and learn the reality of things and start valuing the input of experts he will relegate the city to a crash way faster and way more spectacular than any I can think of.

    Maybe I should petition to change the name of the city to Salton Seattle.

  • Wells

    I don't agree with Erica always. I try to consider tunnel vs surface AWV replacemet debate objectively, but conclude 'Tunnelite' is the best replacement option. If it's an inconvenience, so be it. The deep-bored tunnel is cheap and dirty engineering.

    Mayor Mike. The deep-bore is a terrible terrible mistake; not because it costs so much, but because it's engineering is woefully incompetent. WSDOT and SDOT are incompetent or worse. You're doing great, Mike. Thank you.

  • 1howieinseattle1

    Pat: I don't blame you. I blame the cheerleading and ass-kissing by The Stranger/SLOG and the comatose Seattle dailies for giving Mike a free pass to city hall.

  • ratcityreprobate

    500 teabaggers out in Asotin County called for lynching Patty Murray on Tuesday (See KOMO News or Huffington Post…No mention in the Seattle Times or PI) and 500 churls commenting on Publicola would like to lynch the Mayor. Hard to see much difference.

  • JW

    Wells, you don't understand the reality of public projects. SDOT and WSDOT may be incompetent but they both rely on contracted companies to carry out 90% of their work. The engineering for the tunnel is about 50% WSDOT. The design is in use in several similar situations so how is it bad engineering? What's your axe?

    As for McGinn there is little hope that he will be able to respond fast enough to any of this mess. Look closely at who is coming to visit him in Seattle. No DNC, no quick meeting with the VP when he was in town, limited interaction with the state government power brokers…He doesn't garner any respect from the people who have a chance to bail him out. Bridges have already been burned by the voters of the Seattle and now we are faced with a mayor that will continue to start fires with no way to put them out.

    Erica should write an article detailing the dismantling of the City's Departments and the exodus of highly trained staff. Now that is a scary, and bleak, reality that we are all facing.

  • gloomy gus

    If it's hard for you to see much difference, you need to open your eyes.

  • morning fizzy

    Does it give you confidence that the same engineering firm that co-managed the Big Dig and provided Sound Transit with it's 300% under cost estimate (1997 under $2B for 21 miles now estimated to be about $6B ) give you confidence in their tunnel work?

    Please tell us where a 54' TBM has been used in geology similar to ours going under office buildings.

    Parsons Brinckerhoff or as some call them Ripusoff underestimates the costs of projects then gets the contract to re-engineer when budgets can't be met. Great for them, not so good for us.e

  • Wells

    Listen please, JW et al, good engineering offers related “infrustructure” improvement with mega-projects. The Cut/cover rebuilds the seawall at the same time to its fullest possible measure. Throw in most stable Alaskan Way surface as bonus. Bad engineering turns steep 2-lane Mercer Place hill into a thru-corridor for at least 5,000 more cars AND trucks through Lower Queen Anne to access SR99 at Aurora, more traffic from there to I-5, unbelievable. The C/c has better exit, ventilation, light and sensible capacity. Good engineers don't ignore 40,000 vehicles added to Alaskan Way. Are you kidding me?

    Mayor Mike McGinn will go down in history as among Seattle greatest mayors, right out of the starting gate. Thank you, Mike. Thank you. Stop the Big Bore. It's wrong wrong wrong in so many ways. Thank you

  • concerned citizen

    Wells- the fallacy in your argument is that you assume McGinn will support a cut/cover tunnel. In fact McGinn supports the surface/transit option which will add not 40,000 but 100,000 vehicles to downtown streets. He has never publicly advocated for a tunnel of any kind.

  • xtevex

    “Mayor Mike McGinn will go down in history as among Seattle greatest mayors, right out of the starting gate. “

    Priceless. If you set the bar any lower, ants couldn't do the limbo.

  • soapboxin

    Agreed. 2 key things shown by anti-McGinn vitriol on this site:
    -
    1. Death of the news media + apathy = nobody knows or cares.
    2. People on this site who are paying attention REALLY don't like the way McGinn operates.
    -
    In that respect, we are similar to Teabaggers. We pay attention and there's a mix of anger and fear about the future. The difference is that we're over-educated and they're under-educated. A wide, sweeping generalization, I know. Anybody care to do better?

  • Wells

    I know McGinn supports Surface+Transit and I disagree with him on that. But, he's right about doing the seawall first, now. If studies show the 'forest' of pilings beneath Alaskan Way must be removed (to stabilize soils) then there's no avoiding a huge dig — perfect for a Cut/cover. Tunnelite really is a good compromise, especially for the strongest seawall and most stable Alaskan Way, duh.

  • Wells

    Don't kid yourself. McGinn is courageous taking on the establishment for people. If the D-Boor is stopped, (replaced with Cut/cover Tunnelite) you'll learn just how close Seattle came to making a terrible mistake and cheer Mayor McGinn, loudly, often. Thank you, Mike!

  • soapboxin

    And you're thanking him as a Portland resident, Wells, who cannot vote and does not contribute to WA state tax revenues. So your support means absolutely nothing.

  • Wells

    I've worked on transportation projects successfully in Colorado, Utah, Arizona, California. Washington has the worst engineers on the West Coast. Washington cannot allow its delay-study delay-study process drag down the rest of the West Coast. I've had it with you Seattle-'urh's or 'ayets' that don't know squat. Mayor Mike is already a great leader. Hurrah, Mike!!