Viva La Cola!

Founded in January 2009, PubliCola is a blog about Seattle written by journalists who are dedicated to non-partisan, original daily reporting that prioritizes a balanced approach to news. Started by longtime local editor and award-winning reporter Josh Feit, PubliCola is the first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol.

PubliCola was off and running. In June 2009, PubliCola hired another award-winning journalist, super-sourced Seattle city hall reporter Erica C. Barnett.

People were afraid that blogging would change journalism. Instead, we believe journalism can change blogging. Twenty-first century journalism may look and feel different, and yes Erica isn't afraid to get cranky, but we're committed to making sure online news still delivers independent, reliable, even-keeled coverage. And most of all, we're committed to making sure the coverage sparks honest civic debate.

Bringing you cola for the people, PubliCola is named after Publius Valerius PubliCola, the alias for the authors of the Federalist Papers—the original bloggers.

The first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol and Seattle city hall, PubliCola has been called a “must-read” by the Seattle Post Intelligencer and a hot “New Media Mover and Shaker” by Seattle Magazine—which also cited our own Erica C. Barnett as the city's No. 1 news nerd.

Study: Transit Agencies Don’t Accommodate Women’s Safety Needs

As has been widely reported, in the wake of a brutal late-January beating of a teenage girl, both King County Metro and Mayor Mike McGinn have vowed to do more to improve safety in the downtown transit tunnel.

The story makes a new study of women’s perceptions of transit safety particularly timely. In many parts of the world, women rely on public transportation more than men do; yet study after study shows that women are far more likely than men to feel unsafe on public transit. (That finding tracks, incidentally, with this post from the BikePortland blog, about the reasons men are far more likely than women to ride bikes). And, it turns out, that fear is well founded (shocker, I know, for any woman who rides Metro transit buses): Harassment, in particular, is a huge problem for women transit riders across the age, race, sexual orientation, and disability spectrum.*

Some of the study’s findings:

• Two-thirds of the US transit riders surveyed believed that women have specific needs with regard to transit, but only one third believed that transit agencies should do anything about it. Meanwhile, just three percent of US transit agencies had any programs targeting women or addressing needs such as prevention of sexual harassment and groping. Related: Of the transit managers surveyed, 75 percent were men.

• Although women overwhelmingly said they were more afraid for their safety at transit stops than inside the bus or train itself, most transit safety resources are focused on the vehicles, not the stops. Women also believed that the cameras commonly installed at stops would help them only after an incident, not during the incident itself, and said they’d rather have more security officers than more technology. Yet most transit agencies are moving in the direction of more technology and fewer people. Eighty percent of transit agencies relied on CCTV cameras at buses and bus stops, compared to just 40 percent that used uniformed or nonuniformed security officers.

• Crime was far more common on the routes to bus stops and transit stations than at the stops themselves. Moreover, the study found that transit-related crimes against women are almost certainly underreported, because women are often reluctant to report things like sexual harassment and groping, out of the well-founded belief that not much can be done about it after the fact.

• Among the reasons respondents perceived women as more vulnerable: The fact that women frequently have more objects with them (purses, strollers, etc.), making it more difficult to get away from an assailant; the fact that women tend to be smaller and less physically strong than men; and because women are generally viewed as easier targets (and targeted more frequently) than men.

The report cites three programs targeted specifically at women’s safety on transit: RightRides in New York City, a nonprofit that offers free Saturday-night rides to women, transgender, and gender queer people; Atlanta’s Metropolitan Action Committee on Violence Against Women and Children (METRAC), which focuses on creating safer public spaces for women; and my favorite, HollaBackNYC, a web site where women post photos of and stories about people who harass them on transit.

A personal aside: A few months ago, as part of the process of consolidating stops on my route to improve reliability, Metro eliminated my stop—a well-lit stop, with a traffic light, at an intersection with several businesses that are open at night. Now, my choices are: Walk an extra four blocks out of my way at the end of every night, or use the stop closest to where I live—an unlit intersection, in front of a vacant parking lot, with no businesses around, no traffic light, and a bus stop across the street where people frequently congregate to buy and sell drugs.

Besides being a pedestrian-safety nightmare (cars whiz by at speeds upward of 50 mph because of the huge distances between lights on the main drag of my neighborhood), the intersection feels unsafe to me. Will it keep me from taking the bus? No. But would it deter someone who isn’t reliant on transit from riding again? I’m absolutely convinced it would.

* If you’re inclined to think, “Well, groping isn’t really sexual assault or anything, so CALM DOWN” I encourage you to read this conversation between blogger Sady Doyle and the Washington City Paper‘s Amanda Hess on that very subject.




  • http://twitter.com/misslyndseyp Lyndsey Patterson

    I've been riding Joe Metro in Downtown Seattle since I was about 14, and the findings in this article really ring true for me. I feel a lot less safe at stops than on buses. It's like being a fish in a barrel: I'm obviously not going anywhere for 15-30 min, I have my purse on me, and this handy bus shelter could obscure an assault from general view. But the reality is that bus drivers often can't (or won't) do anything about crime on the bus either because they're occupied with the wheel and don't want to be victims themselves. The attitude of harassers, drunks and criminals seems to be “oh yeah, watch while no one does anything about THIS.” And they're usually right. The best you can do as a rider is look out for yourself, don't make yourself remotely approachable, and don't look or act like a victim.
    It would be nice if bus stops received some type special designation: that they were a part of the neighborhood watch system, had a label designating them as part of a regular specific police patrol, or if penalties for crimes committed at bus stops against riders were somehow stiffer. The way it stands riders are more vulnerable than others on the street, but their protections aren't better.

    Also – I find it really disturbing that some don't consider groping sexual assault. Gross.

  • Cook

    This is a great article. This is what I like to read PubliCola for, not the McGinn bashing that seems all too common as of late. Thanks for writing this, Erica.

  • http://yrihf.com/ jabailo

    I ride the Sounder from Kent to Seattle, and I'm surprised at the high percentage of women in the cars.

  • westside

    Good post, Erica. You should let Metro know about the unsafe situation at your stop. They eliminated many stops with low ridership to improve on time performance for buses, but they can put them back with good reason.

  • downbythefreeway

    The groping conversation is excellent and I highly recommend it. And great article Erica, this is why I started reading you back in the Stranger days.

  • http://www.google.com/profiles/106207652321616246395 Joey

    I appreciate the article as well though I hope for some discussion to address some of the “where we go from here” questions.

    Metro really only started taking a hard look at security and safety at park n rides and transit centers within the last 7 years and I think that their assessment of individual shelters and stops is far behind that. I would like to see more thought in the placement of shelters (visibility, lighting, pedestrian accessibility, other CPTED principles).

    How about the lights that Metro has been installing inside bus shelters over the last few years? Does that make you feel safer?

    I'd also love to see more implementation of the MyBus system which tells how long before the next bus. This can drastically reduce how long you have to be at the stop alone.

  • http://www.blirpit.com/ Scott

    Some students and I just created a new system in Burlington, Vermont called Blirp It. We are trying to make it safer and more convenient to use buses. It is very important that people feel safe walking to or waiting for a bus. Its amazing that public transit companies have not done more to make their riders feel safe. At Blirp It we can track the buses and we have some great features that can help keep you safe when waiting for the bus. Some of the features include text messaging to get arrival times, alerts – that let you know when the bus will be in a certain area and a trip planner. This way you can plan to get where you need to go safely and efficiently. The text messaging service is free and the “premium” features only require $2.50 a month. Call your transit company and ask them for Blirp it.

    We have implemented the system at the University of Vermont and we have been able to help make the students feel a lot safer on campus as well as off campus. If you have any questions I would be happy to discuss them.

  • http://twitter.com/misslyndseyp Lyndsey Patterson

    The headline of this article changed in a way that makes me rethink my earlier post. As a rider, I'm undecided as to whether I think Metro is 100% responsible for rider safety. Bus stops are on city streets, patrolled by police, riders have a responsibility to behave appropriately in public and keep themselves out of harms way, Metro has a responsibility to plan wisely for stop locations, and local businesses need to be aware of what happens outside their storefronts. By no means an exhaustive list of parties at play, but I don't think all of the onus rests on Metro.

  • Ira Sacharoff

    Metro used to have a program called the Public Safety Partnership, where selected bus drivers would go out into the community, make presentations get feedback, and dispense advise on how to best remain safe on the bus. Problems on certain routes would be brought to their attention, and action would be taken quickly to resolve problems. It was a very responsive program, and people liked it. But like a lot of other good things, it was decided that the money was better spent on increasing service on bus routes that went from nowhere and went nowhere.

  • misha

    I agree with everything you wrote. One of the problems with Metro/Sound Transit is that they don't appear to take ANY consideration of safety when planning stops or even massive projects.

    Take the Beacon Hill Link station (which cost $400 million). It takes you hundreds of feet underground to a small room where there is no cell phone service. You have to wait up to 15 minutes for the next train in a neighborhood that already feels unsafe.

    It's like we told Sound Transit to build a light rail station that no female, gay, transgendered, or disabled person would ever want to use.

  • Lara

    Lyndsey, you're right; Metro isn't the only party responsible for rider safety. However, Metro does want to maximize their number of riders and minimize their bad press. To me, this means they have an strong interest in ensuring rider safety, and as a county entity, has some influence to exert in policy and programs that can help. As a young woman who rides the bus alone every day, I'm happy to do my part by putting my nose in a book to ward off approaches from other passengers and to plan my trips as safely as possible. This hasn't kept me from being harassed, licked, and followed home by other passengers, so I'm willing to consider any and all options for more macro-level changes.

  • Barb

    Great article, thanks!

  • giffy

    I'm not sure the solution to this is any different than any other crime or safety issue. Women may be more likely to be victims of crime, but preventing crime is the same whether the victim is male or female. Metro needs more security, more ability to remove disruptive people, and more significant penalties for people who do commit crimes on a bus.

    Most of the crimes that make people feel unsafe are considered minor, not that they are actually minor, but law enforcement and security simply do take them seriously nor punish people all that much for engaging in them.

  • Grover

    Security is expensive, if it means hiring a lot of people (vs cameras).

    How much more would you be willing to pay to ride a bus or light rail in order to increase security? People who use transit are already very highly subsidized by taxpayers. Are you willing to pay for more security, or do you just want more service without paying for it?

    As far as I can tell, Metro is already spending all the revenues they receive. I don't believe they have any “extra” money they could use to increase security.

    Sound Transit, on the other hand, is rolling in dough, and could increase their spending on security immensely, if they wanted to.

  • Kathryn

    Why I drive. Or walk to nearby places in daylight. Put less than 2K miles a year on the car, but still drive.

    It was not much safer when I was young, I just have no more tolerance.

    When living in DC, I took Metro and rode the bus the three blocks home instead of walking. Walking around was the problem there. Bus stops often seem to be the problem here.

  • Cindi Laws

    Erica, great article. You are the consummate user of transit, and it shows in your own experience with the elimination of your Metro stop as much as your dedication to the needed improvement of this vital commodity.

    I live in far-south, SE Seattle. The two most dangerous Metro routes(#7 and #106, by number of assaults ON the bus) happen to be the ones serving my residence. The 106 is 0.6 miles away; the 7 is 0.8 miles away. During the 3 years I regularly rode Metro downtown (and only during daylight hours), I never witnessed more than 4 white people on these routes, counting the bus driver.

    The closest Link Light Rail station is 2.4 miles away — the Henderson Station — between Rainier Beach and Beacon Hill. The City of Seattle, in its hostility to park & rides, bans parking within 1/2 a mile of the station, even thought it is NOT in a residential neighborhood. Those who do brave parking must walk past at least 3 drug markets to reach the free parking zone. It's no wonder so few people are riding light rail in these conditions.

    In the past year, Rainier Beach has had dozens of robberies and assaults, and that's just the few blocks around and between RBHS and McDonalds. 6 teens and young men were shot dead in a 12 month period. Several pedestrians have been run down and killed. And Beacon Hill was the neighborhood where a score of elderly Asian woman were stalked and assaulted for nearly a year before the perp was finally nailed. Although most of Seattle is very safe, not all neighborhoods enjoy that dynamic. And unfortunately, we females are most at risk every time we attempt to use transit.

    These areas have extraordinarily high percentages of immigrants and poor people — those most dependent upon transit, and those who have little option. That so many neighbors have rejected transit in favor of the single-occupancy-vehicle is due to the lack of safety, perceived as well as documented.

  • MisterGomez

    At the very least, we need closed circuit cameras that are closely monitored inside the tunnel stations.

    As for the individual stops, there's only so much you can do: Stationing a camera or a cop at every potentially dangerous stop is cost prohibitive.

    Learn to defend yourselves, ladies. It won't nearly stop all violent crime, but it can't hurt your chances.

  • melinda

    Did you even READ the article? This comment is not helpful.

  • MisterGomez

    Uh, yes I did read the article. And the point stands: Erica's pointing out the problems but doesn't have a lot of ideas for solutions, and nobody else really does either because the problem goes beyond the transit system.

  • deme08

    To be sure there should be a specific seat designation for men and women. By the way, this personal safety devices for women like us might interest you. Thanks and more power!