Viva La Cola!

Founded in January 2009, PubliCola is a blog about Seattle written by journalists who are dedicated to non-partisan, original daily reporting that prioritizes a balanced approach to news. Started by longtime local editor and award-winning reporter Josh Feit, PubliCola is the first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol.

PubliCola was off and running. In June 2009, PubliCola hired another award-winning journalist, super-sourced Seattle city hall reporter Erica C. Barnett.

People were afraid that blogging would change journalism. Instead, we believe journalism can change blogging. Twenty-first century journalism may look and feel different, and yes Erica isn't afraid to get cranky, but we're committed to making sure online news still delivers independent, reliable, even-keeled coverage. And most of all, we're committed to making sure the coverage sparks honest civic debate.

Bringing you cola for the people, PubliCola is named after Publius Valerius PubliCola, the alias for the authors of the Federalist Papers—the original bloggers.

The first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol and Seattle city hall, PubliCola has been called a “must-read” by the Seattle Post Intelligencer and a hot “New Media Mover and Shaker” by Seattle Magazine—which also cited our own Erica C. Barnett as the city's No. 1 news nerd.

No Reprieve for the Unemployed. Protections Against Foreclosure Gutted in Olympia.

It was cut off week in Olympia this week—yesterday was the last chance for bills to make it out of committee. Those lucky bills now have until February 16th (next Tuesday) to come to a vote on the House or Senate floor. (Teo will have a status check on  all the bills we’ve reported on later this week.)

But here’s an update on one of the most germane policy bills being considered this session—a bill that would have prevented banks from foreclosing on people who had good history of making their house payments, but were suddenly unemployed thanks to the Great Recession.

It’s still alive. But in a “neutered” form, according to do-gooder advocates.

Advocates for the bill, like the Washington Low Income Housing Alliance, were pushing to give unemployed people a one-year reprieve, while—under pressure from community banks who feared for their own financial well being—reluctant legislators suggested scaling back the foreclosure moratorium to three to six months.

However, the banks—the Washington banking PAC has donated $91,000 to local races since the last legislative election cycle in 2008—ended up killing the idea of a reprieve altogether.

As it stands now, the bill,  has been turned into a study.

I have a call in to Seattle Rep. Jamie Pedersen (D-43), Chair of the House Judiciary Committee— where the bill was downgraded to a study.

It’s hard to resist pointing out the irony that unemployment has spiked—10 percent on average—thanks to the financial meltdown on Wall Street in September 2008 which was caused largely by the banking industry.


  • Dean_Nielsen

    Any record of who made that change?

  • gloomy gus

    Aargh. The Washington banking PAC can now wave around Cantwell's and Murray's support of the proposed national community bank bailout to make legislators think a fed rescue is on the way, so let us foreclose tout de suite in the meantime. It makes no policy sense.

  • Perfect Voter

    And this happens with supposed Democrats in Charge? How could the Republicans have been any worse? I'm embarrassed to be a D.

  • LEFTisRIGHT

    Only $91,000? That sounds reasonably cheap. I know the people affected by this bill (by definition) don't have alot of resources, but lets start up a collection to “buy” this back.

    Our number one problem is that fact that money has so much influence in our lawmaking process to begin with.

  • http://twitter.com/fattailed fattailed

    Passing this would have been a vote winner worth far more than $91,000, so I don't think the bankers bought this for their money. Rather, it seems the Dems (and Repubs of course) are just ideologically in line with the bankers, and the money is just some fun on the side.
    .
    If there was going to be one year in world history when someone would split from alignment with banks, it would be this year — an election year when banks are wildly unpopular in a very tough economy caused in no small part by asshole banks. But even that millennial convergence of forces was not enough to get Dems to extract even a small concession from banks. Pathetic.

  • sarah68

    Unemployment is much higher than that when you factor in the people who no longer qualify for unemployment and the people who are underemployed, neither of which group can afford house payments (or sometimes even rent)any more. Someone several weeks ago estimated the actual unemployment figure in WA to be somewhere around 16%.

  • housing voter

    Money in politics is part of the problem of course, but as long since that's still reality, there is a collection that's been started: Voters for Affordable Housing: http://www.votersforaffordablehousing.org/

    (Not to be confused with BIAW's so-called Affordable Housing Council, which is anything but what the name suggests.)

  • http://www.politickling.com/ poliTICKLING

    Looks like Rep. Pederson proposed that change: http://bit.ly/dhYnsS

  • http://twitter.com/EAPNOW EndAdversePossession

    When you call Pedersen, ask him why he also let HB 1479 die in committee. This was the bill that MANY people supported in Washington. It would have eliminated adverse possession (legalized land theft).

    Seems to me, Pedersen would rather protect his lawyer and finance lobbyists than listen to the will of the people.

    Here are his campaign donors: http://www.followthemoney.org/database/StateGla…

    Unless you're a lawyer, Pedersen is not going to help you.

    But, on the bright side, at least he's consistent in doing nothing about laws that would actually help everyone else!