Viva La Cola!

Founded in January 2009, PubliCola is a blog about Seattle written by journalists who are dedicated to non-partisan, original daily reporting that prioritizes a balanced approach to news. Started by longtime local editor and award-winning reporter Josh Feit, PubliCola is the first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol.

PubliCola was off and running. In June 2009, PubliCola hired another award-winning journalist, super-sourced Seattle city hall reporter Erica C. Barnett.

People were afraid that blogging would change journalism. Instead, we believe journalism can change blogging. Twenty-first century journalism may look and feel different, and yes Erica isn't afraid to get cranky, but we're committed to making sure online news still delivers independent, reliable, even-keeled coverage. And most of all, we're committed to making sure the coverage sparks honest civic debate.

Bringing you cola for the people, PubliCola is named after Publius Valerius PubliCola, the alias for the authors of the Federalist Papers—the original bloggers.

The first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol and Seattle city hall, PubliCola has been called a “must-read” by the Seattle Post Intelligencer and a hot “New Media Mover and Shaker” by Seattle Magazine—which also cited our own Erica C. Barnett as the city's No. 1 news nerd.

Both Deserve Your Vote

1. Voters have two more days to mail in their ballots in this year’s school levy election. We strongly agree with last week’s superior court ruling that the state isn’t meeting its constitutional obligation to fully fund education. However, until that matter is resolved by the courts, schools still rely heavily on levies for basic stuff like textbooks, vocational training, and safe buildings. In Seattle, for example, levies fund about 23 percent of basic school operations.

Prop. 1, the capital levy, will raise $270 million for seismic improvements, roofs, energy efficiency improvements, and playgrounds, and Prop. 2, the operations levy, will raise $433 million for teacher pay, books, and reduced class sizes. Both are renewals of existing levies, and both deserve your vote.

2. Ted Inkley and Phil Brenneman, two controversial assistant city attorneys under Tom Carr who were asked to leave by new city attorney Pete Holmes, recently filed a massive public disclosure request with from Holmes’ office. According to Holmes’ spokeswoman Kathy Mulady, the  two attorneys have asked for copies of all communications between Holmes and members of his small transition team related to “staffing changes, reorganizations in the office, plans for increases and decreases of staff, and the salaries of proposed hires.” Holmes’ office is releasing the documents in batches, and Brennamen and Inkley are reviewing them in person at the city attorney’s office.

3. As he announced in his inauguration speech, Mayor Mike McGinn is launching a series of five group discussions focusing on youth and families. The first one will be at the Rainier Community Center, 4600 38th Ave. S., on February 22 from 7 to 8:30 pm.

4. Children’s Hospital and the Laurelhurst Community Club have “reached an agreement on some matters” related to the neighborhood group’s lawsuit challenging the hospital’s expansion plans, according to a letter from Sally Clark, chair of the council’s built environment committee. “Council does not have a copy of or know the specifics of the agreement,” Clark says in the letter.

Laurelhurst residents have spent several years fighting Children’s expansion plans, arguing that a bigger hospital will create excessive noise and traffic havoc in the neighborhood. The committee will hear oral arguments from both sides at its meeting this Wednesday at 9:30 am.


  • morning fizzy

    Have you done a PDR on Inkley’s PDR?

  • morning fizzy

    Have you done a PDR on Inkley’s PDR?

  • question

    wasn’t Inkley the one who said he was fired for his role in a high profile case? Maybe publicola should give him a call to say, hey what’s up?

    And Holmes could just take the stuff Inkley is asking for and post it on a public web site. In fact, why isn’t all city stuff just posted on a public web site. Going thru the rigamorole of public documents requests, staff time to respond, arguing back and forth, litigation time, attorney time, and sometimes court cases and fees and penalties … just doesn’t seem worth it when today 90% of all documents could simply be put on line when created.

    That is, if the government actually wanted to be transparent.

  • question

    wasn’t Inkley the one who said he was fired for his role in a high profile case? Maybe publicola should give him a call to say, hey what’s up?

    And Holmes could just take the stuff Inkley is asking for and post it on a public web site. In fact, why isn’t all city stuff just posted on a public web site. Going thru the rigamorole of public documents requests, staff time to respond, arguing back and forth, litigation time, attorney time, and sometimes court cases and fees and penalties … just doesn’t seem worth it when today 90% of all documents could simply be put on line when created.

    That is, if the government actually wanted to be transparent.

  • Dan Nolte

    The City Council’s Committee on the Built Environment starts at 9 a.m. this Wednesday, instead of its usual 9:30 start.

  • Dan Nolte

    The City Council’s Committee on the Built Environment starts at 9 a.m. this Wednesday, instead of its usual 9:30 start.

  • Giffy

    Laurelhurst has pretty quickly become my least favorite neighborhood in Seattle and the head of the LCC is an evil evil woman. Do you know that thanks to her whining they can’t use helicopters to transfer sick children, but have to take them by ambulance at greater time and discomfort? Yeah she put the minor annoyance of some noise over sick kids.

    The LCC is example one of how dysfunctional and bad for the city many neighborhood groups are.

  • Giffy

    Laurelhurst has pretty quickly become my least favorite neighborhood in Seattle and the head of the LCC is an evil evil woman. Do you know that thanks to her whining they can’t use helicopters to transfer sick children, but have to take them by ambulance at greater time and discomfort? Yeah she put the minor annoyance of some noise over sick kids.

    The LCC is example one of how dysfunctional and bad for the city many neighborhood groups are.

  • bob

    Hmmm seems Mr. Inkley had a different concern for employees at another time.

    From Ethics and Elections:

    By his assertions, Inkley conveyed to the affected employees that their exercise of rights under the collective bargaining statute could adversely affect them. Such threats could reasonably be expected to interfere with the exercise of employee rights guaranteed by statute, and therefore violated RCW 41.56.140(1).

    http://www.perc.wa.gov/Databases/ULP/5391-B.htm

  • bob

    Hmmm seems Mr. Inkley had a different concern for employees at another time.

    From Ethics and Elections:

    By his assertions, Inkley conveyed to the affected employees that their exercise of rights under the collective bargaining statute could adversely affect them. Such threats could reasonably be expected to interfere with the exercise of employee rights guaranteed by statute, and therefore violated RCW 41.56.140(1).

    http://www.perc.wa.gov/Databases/ULP/5391-B.htm

  • ben e trovato

    Dear Giffy;

    A helicopter is a scarce and expensive resource which should be used for a life-threatening emergency, not for ordinary transport. And as far as I know, life-threatening emergencies are treated at Harborview.

    Hitler and Stalin were evil evil. Nixon was evil. The head of the Laurelhurst Community Council couldn’t possibly be worse than annoying. Get a grip.

  • ben e trovato

    Dear Giffy;

    A helicopter is a scarce and expensive resource which should be used for a life-threatening emergency, not for ordinary transport. And as far as I know, life-threatening emergencies are treated at Harborview.

    Hitler and Stalin were evil evil. Nixon was evil. The head of the Laurelhurst Community Council couldn’t possibly be worse than annoying. Get a grip.

  • johnmocha

    It would make a heck of a lot of sense to move Childrens down to the Mt Baker station area in Rainier Valley. It would bring well paying jobs, stop the LCC whining (although they’d probably whine when Childrens left!), take advantage of Light Rail, be much closer to all arterials, etc……

  • johnmocha

    It would make a heck of a lot of sense to move Childrens down to the Mt Baker station area in Rainier Valley. It would bring well paying jobs, stop the LCC whining (although they’d probably whine when Childrens left!), take advantage of Light Rail, be much closer to all arterials, etc……

  • Joshua Daniel Franklin

    Life-threatening emergencies are treated wherever the needed specialists are. In some cases this is Seattle Children’s Hospital.

    The most ridiculous aspect of Hale’s opposition is that the hospital is along a state highway just outside the U-District Urban Center. Construction will no doubt be disruptive, but University Village generates far more traffic along Sand Point Way than the hospital.

  • Joshua Daniel Franklin

    Life-threatening emergencies are treated wherever the needed specialists are. In some cases this is Seattle Children’s Hospital.

    The most ridiculous aspect of Hale’s opposition is that the hospital is along a state highway just outside the U-District Urban Center. Construction will no doubt be disruptive, but University Village generates far more traffic along Sand Point Way than the hospital.

  • Giffy

    ben,
    -
    I think the decisions on patient transport should be left up to medical professionals not NIMBY busybodies.
    -
    And yes, she is not Stalin, but she has and is causing sick children to suffer for her own selfishness and that is evil.
    -
    johnmocha,
    -
    Except for the building a whole new hospital part of it.

  • Giffy

    ben,
    -
    I think the decisions on patient transport should be left up to medical professionals not NIMBY busybodies.
    -
    And yes, she is not Stalin, but she has and is causing sick children to suffer for her own selfishness and that is evil.
    -
    johnmocha,
    -
    Except for the building a whole new hospital part of it.

  • ahem

    the media needs to stop atlking about “Laurelhurst residents” and start talking about “Jeannie Hale and small gorup of 20 others”.

    Andif you’re the child who dies because there’s no hospital, you will agree this approach of LCC is evil.

    Evil. Selfish. Arrogant. Mean. Also, stupid, vacuous, arrotant and mean, and also nimby, stupid, arrogant and mean.

    “Oh it will create too much traffic, I’ll have to wait another 20 seconds at the light at Sand Point way on my way to the salon” boo hoo.

  • ahem

    the media needs to stop atlking about “Laurelhurst residents” and start talking about “Jeannie Hale and small gorup of 20 others”.

    Andif you’re the child who dies because there’s no hospital, you will agree this approach of LCC is evil.

    Evil. Selfish. Arrogant. Mean. Also, stupid, vacuous, arrotant and mean, and also nimby, stupid, arrogant and mean.

    “Oh it will create too much traffic, I’ll have to wait another 20 seconds at the light at Sand Point way on my way to the salon” boo hoo.

  • Michael J. Maddux

    @Question:
    -
    It would make no financial sense, or practical sense, to put all information subject to disclosure on the internet, readily available for everyone.
    -
    For one, each request is handled to first determine if the documents requested can be disclosed, what needs to be redacted, and only the specific items produced. There are a LOT of documents produced by departments that are potentially subject to disclosure, and going through every document all of the time would be excessively time constraining, and require considerably more staff to handle.
    -
    Also, different levels of redaction exist for different items subject to disclosure. The easiest area to look at for this are traffic collision reports, which only can be given un-redacted to parties involved for insurance purposes. The general public doesn’t get all of the information. There are plenty of other items that require nearly full redaction for the public, and varying degrees for parties involved, and posting everything to the internet would require double review, or more than double, which, again, would create additional cost.
    -
    Finally, posting everything on the internet creates a situation where you have people trolling through everything, and running the risk of creating scandals that aren’t actually scandals.
    -
    The public disclosure laws are good the way they are, and very permissive in this state. While it’s all public information, it is in the best interest of all people involved that it is disseminated on request by request basis.

  • Michael J. Maddux

    @Question:
    -
    It would make no financial sense, or practical sense, to put all information subject to disclosure on the internet, readily available for everyone.
    -
    For one, each request is handled to first determine if the documents requested can be disclosed, what needs to be redacted, and only the specific items produced. There are a LOT of documents produced by departments that are potentially subject to disclosure, and going through every document all of the time would be excessively time constraining, and require considerably more staff to handle.
    -
    Also, different levels of redaction exist for different items subject to disclosure. The easiest area to look at for this are traffic collision reports, which only can be given un-redacted to parties involved for insurance purposes. The general public doesn’t get all of the information. There are plenty of other items that require nearly full redaction for the public, and varying degrees for parties involved, and posting everything to the internet would require double review, or more than double, which, again, would create additional cost.
    -
    Finally, posting everything on the internet creates a situation where you have people trolling through everything, and running the risk of creating scandals that aren’t actually scandals.
    -
    The public disclosure laws are good the way they are, and very permissive in this state. While it’s all public information, it is in the best interest of all people involved that it is disseminated on request by request basis.

  • mathewrenndawgrenner

    Well, I only get to vote on a school levy and the King county Library. I voted no on both. Let explain why. Yes I support schools and libraries. However, I hate property taxes more. I believe that property taxes are the most unjust form of taxes we use. Asking me to support property taxes wouyld be like asking Samuel Adams to support the tax on tea. I know that if get rid of property taxes we will need another revnue source. That means other taxes will increase. I am fine with this.

  • http://saveseattleschools.blogspot.com/ Melissa Westbrook

    I find it amusing that Publicola wants to taken seriously when they have done very little coverage of the levies. Actually, they wasted a lot of my time having me explain (to an intern yet) why Seattle Public Schools has a $500M maintenance backlog which Prop 1 would barely make a dent in. Why they have underfunded basic maintenance for the last 15 years and yet expect taxpayers to pay more for projects than if they had done them upfront. Why about $68M of the $270M is going to just 6 buildings. Why it's a short term fix for a long-term problem. I guess that's what you would expect from people struggling to get their journalistic legs.

  • Tugboat_Mike

    Too bad King County closed the neighborhood ballot drop box locations. There was line of confused people at our Southeast Seattle neighborhood center this morning all reading the signs in various languages. How many of them will take the bus downtown to drop it off downtown or go buy a stamp today to get the ballot postmarked by midnight… not many from what I gathered.

    This from the King County Elections website… “King County Elections, like all departments, was asked by the Council and Executive's Office to look closely at our operations. We identified opportunities to reduce non-mandated services, that would not jeopardize the integrity of the elections process. The County Council had to carefully weigh the benefits and costs of many services that citizens want and depend on and, as a result, the decision to eliminate most ballot drop boxes was made… “

    The integrity of the elections process may not be jeopardized, but the number of “if its convenient” voters and voters that live in the neighborhood around the old drop boxes will be reduced.

    At a time when voter apathy is so high, the county makes harder to vote.

  • Charlie Mas

    I think it would have been appropriate for Publicola to disclose that it took advertising revenue from the “Yes On School Levies” campaign concurrent with the endorsement of the levies.

  • dltooley

    @Fizzy – Have you done a PDR on everyone who has done a PDR?

  • dltooley

    This a great specific suggestion for a general strategy that Children's should consider, the decentralizing of many routine services.