Viva La Cola!

Founded in January 2009, PubliCola is a blog about Seattle written by journalists who are dedicated to non-partisan, original daily reporting that prioritizes a balanced approach to news. Started by longtime local editor and award-winning reporter Josh Feit, PubliCola is the first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol.

PubliCola was off and running. In June 2009, PubliCola hired another award-winning journalist, super-sourced Seattle city hall reporter Erica C. Barnett.

People were afraid that blogging would change journalism. Instead, we believe journalism can change blogging. Twenty-first century journalism may look and feel different, and yes Erica isn't afraid to get cranky, but we're committed to making sure online news still delivers independent, reliable, even-keeled coverage. And most of all, we're committed to making sure the coverage sparks honest civic debate.

Bringing you cola for the people, PubliCola is named after Publius Valerius PubliCola, the alias for the authors of the Federalist Papers—the original bloggers.

The first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol and Seattle city hall, PubliCola has been called a “must-read” by the Seattle Post Intelligencer and a hot “New Media Mover and Shaker” by Seattle Magazine—which also cited our own Erica C. Barnett as the city's No. 1 news nerd.

McGinn Advisor Sealed Educational Records

My post on Chris Bushnell—the advisor to Mayor Mike McGinn who misrepresented his educational background to employers and the public while working at King County and as a political consultant—has been generating a lot of reader interest. I’m staying on the story. Stay tuned for updates.

Meanwhile, while sifting through the public records on Bushnell’s past, I discovered two odd footnotes about the $110,000-a-year McGinn advisor.

Bushnell has claimed that he graduated from the University of Washington with a B.A. in economics in 2004, and with a law degree in 1997. (Mayoral spokesman Mark Matassa says Bushnell got “within a couple of credits” of finishing his economics B.A., which is how he was able to attend law school without finishing his B.A. first.)

However, the truth about Bushnell’s degree(s) is impossible to verify, because he has requested that the university seal his records off from all outside inquiries. (A national database of student records was also sealed.) When I called the UW registrar’s office to ask when Bushnell had attended and whether he had graduated, I was told that I needed a written statement from Bushnell authorizing the release of his records. That’s a pretty unusual move—even public officials who graduated from UW, like Heidi Wills, Judy Nicastro, and, um, Mike McGinn have graduation records that are easily accessible online.

Another thing I found out when seeking out Bushnell’s academic records: Although he has said he changed his last name to Bushnell after marrying his wife, Megan Bushnell, King County court records show no indication that he ever changed his name to Bushnell. Moreover, he’s registered to vote in King County as “Chris Haugen,” a variation on his legal name, John Christopher Haugen.

I’ve put in a request to speak to Bushnell, who was not in the office today.




  • researcher

    http://dailyuw.com/2005/6/6/salute-to-grads/

    He’s listed there as Fall 2004 grad of Economics

  • researcher

    http://dailyuw.com/2005/6/6/salute-to-grads/

    He’s listed there as Fall 2004 grad of Economics

  • Mr. Mike

    Creepier and creepier…

  • Mr. Mike

    Creepier and creepier…

  • Mr. Mike

    I just sent an email to KUOW’s Weekday about bringing this up with their panel tomorrow morning. I said that Publicola was doing some great reporting on this news and I was wondering why no one else was picking up the story. I urge you all tom do the same.

  • Mr. Mike

    I just sent an email to KUOW’s Weekday about bringing this up with their panel tomorrow morning. I said that Publicola was doing some great reporting on this news and I was wondering why no one else was picking up the story. I urge you all tom do the same.

  • blacknoddy

    They’re not picking up the story because they got their asses kicked so they have to pretend it’s not a story. Keep up the good work, Publicola!

  • blacknoddy

    They’re not picking up the story because they got their asses kicked so they have to pretend it’s not a story. Keep up the good work, Publicola!

  • LEROY

    This is getting more and more bizarre. This guy sounds like a certified sociopath.

    I think the profiles match up well –

    http://www.mcafee.cc/Bin/sb.html

    I’m starting to wonder what he has on McGinn that seems to be sustaining this unwavering support.

  • LEROY

    This is getting more and more bizarre. This guy sounds like a certified sociopath.

    I think the profiles match up well –

    http://www.mcafee.cc/Bin/sb.html

    I’m starting to wonder what he has on McGinn that seems to be sustaining this unwavering support.

  • West Seattle Waiter

    Rule # 1 of all staffers…. Never ever become a news story.

    Rule # 2 if you violate Rule #1 — expect to be under the bus.

    Why Bushnell/Haugen hasn’t been thrown under the bus yet says something about McGinn. McGinn is not tough enough to be a big city Mayor. This is now about McGinn, not this weirdo. McGinn is losing all his credibility with political leadership and opinion leaders by keeping this weirdo in six figure salary job. Doesn’t really matter if the MSM isn’t picking it up.

    Keep up the good shoe leather… Follow the emails.

  • West Seattle Waiter

    Rule # 1 of all staffers…. Never ever become a news story.

    Rule # 2 if you violate Rule #1 — expect to be under the bus.

    Why Bushnell/Haugen hasn’t been thrown under the bus yet says something about McGinn. McGinn is not tough enough to be a big city Mayor. This is now about McGinn, not this weirdo. McGinn is losing all his credibility with political leadership and opinion leaders by keeping this weirdo in six figure salary job. Doesn’t really matter if the MSM isn’t picking it up.

    Keep up the good shoe leather… Follow the emails.

  • Concerned

    I think it is about time to hear from the Mayor himself about the credibility of his top advisor. This is not about whether McGinn likes him, it’s about public trust and accountability. This guy is being paid a lot of our tax dollars that are in short supply these days. If this story is true, McGinn should dismiss Bushnell immediately. If he doesn’t, he will also be responsible for violating the public’s trust. McGinn can’t justify firing anyone else in the city, Strategic Advisor or not, until he lets Bushnell go!
    Stick with it Eric. This needs to be blown wide open!

  • Concerned

    I think it is about time to hear from the Mayor himself about the credibility of his top advisor. This is not about whether McGinn likes him, it’s about public trust and accountability. This guy is being paid a lot of our tax dollars that are in short supply these days. If this story is true, McGinn should dismiss Bushnell immediately. If he doesn’t, he will also be responsible for violating the public’s trust. McGinn can’t justify firing anyone else in the city, Strategic Advisor or not, until he lets Bushnell go!
    Stick with it Eric. This needs to be blown wide open!

  • morning fizzy

    Prediction: Friday late afternoon email announcing that Bushnell is leaving to following other unannounced opportunities in the private sector and to spend more time with his family will be sent.

  • morning fizzy

    Prediction: Friday late afternoon email announcing that Bushnell is leaving to following other unannounced opportunities in the private sector and to spend more time with his family will be sent.

  • Outraged

    This makes no sense at all. How old was Haugen even in 1997?

    Doesn’t UW have a right and a responsibility to come forward and clarify this lying felon’s credentials? If UW has credible information that someone, especially someone in the public sector, has been lying about a degree, I would think it’s in the university’s interests to set the record straight, confidentiality request be damned!

    Please, if there are any UW administrators reading this, help us out.

  • Outraged

    This makes no sense at all. How old was Haugen even in 1997?

    Doesn’t UW have a right and a responsibility to come forward and clarify this lying felon’s credentials? If UW has credible information that someone, especially someone in the public sector, has been lying about a degree, I would think it’s in the university’s interests to set the record straight, confidentiality request be damned!

    Please, if there are any UW administrators reading this, help us out.

  • Not Surprised

    This is fast moving beyond “funny” to “scary”. I have never been a McGinn supporter, but I want the best for my city and therefore had to hope that he’d be less of a disaster than I feared. One month in, I don’t think he can pull this out. He lacks the fundamental leadership and management skills to do the job. City Council, it’s up to you.

  • Not Surprised

    This is fast moving beyond “funny” to “scary”. I have never been a McGinn supporter, but I want the best for my city and therefore had to hope that he’d be less of a disaster than I feared. One month in, I don’t think he can pull this out. He lacks the fundamental leadership and management skills to do the job. City Council, it’s up to you.

  • Soapboxin’

    I’m with on this one, fizzy. Announcement of his resignation goes out after the work week ends.
    -
    McGinn: Take your lumps and get over it. You wanted this job.

  • Soapboxin’

    I’m with on this one, fizzy. Announcement of his resignation goes out after the work week ends.
    -
    McGinn: Take your lumps and get over it. You wanted this job.

  • TrickyDick

    “certified sociopath” – You would be surprised at how many people like this there are in politics.

  • TrickyDick

    “certified sociopath” – You would be surprised at how many people like this there are in politics.

  • Outraged

    If the attached timeline is accurate, then Haugen was at most 22 when he claimed to have graduated law school?

    http://dailyuw.com/1997/6/5/asuw060597/

    And then 7 years later finally finished up that musty old BA?

    No sense at all.

  • Outraged

    If the attached timeline is accurate, then Haugen was at most 22 when he claimed to have graduated law school?

    http://dailyuw.com/1997/6/5/asuw060597/

    And then 7 years later finally finished up that musty old BA?

    No sense at all.

  • Soapboxin’

    My college roommate’s dad went to dental school w/out a BS. He just took all the pre-reqs. Of course that was 45 years ago. Don’t know about law school.

  • Soapboxin’

    My college roommate’s dad went to dental school w/out a BS. He just took all the pre-reqs. Of course that was 45 years ago. Don’t know about law school.

  • hmmmm

    All I can say is “wow”. I thought the McGinn administration would only be a disaster because of his lack of experience, his lack of understanding of larger economic issues in Seattle, and his tunnel vision when it comes to civic and economic development. But I never considered that his top person, who is giving much policy advice is apparently less the honest, and that his office would allow the issue to fester larger and larger into a media PR crisis; for this story is on its way to becoming one.

    Perhaps this is not terribly surprising, in that the tenor of the campaign was continually about perpetuating a crisis/dramatic mentality and theme, and continues to do so (e.g. OMG the Seawall!). In this sense, people got what they paid for.

    I cannot imagine, however, that this news was not around during the campaign. I have to ask: why were negative aspects of McGinn’s machine not so aggressively pursued by Publicola during the campaign, when we were actually empowered to make a decision in advance? Was it a matter of having more inside connection for story pitches, then say, under Nickels or Mallahan? Me things that there is an element of self interest as to why these facts were not pursued so aggressively sooner, endorsement notwithstanding. I’m not reading to give either JF or ECB a free pass for their continual softballs during the election.

  • hmmmm

    All I can say is “wow”. I thought the McGinn administration would only be a disaster because of his lack of experience, his lack of understanding of larger economic issues in Seattle, and his tunnel vision when it comes to civic and economic development. But I never considered that his top person, who is giving much policy advice is apparently less the honest, and that his office would allow the issue to fester larger and larger into a media PR crisis; for this story is on its way to becoming one.

    Perhaps this is not terribly surprising, in that the tenor of the campaign was continually about perpetuating a crisis/dramatic mentality and theme, and continues to do so (e.g. OMG the Seawall!). In this sense, people got what they paid for.

    I cannot imagine, however, that this news was not around during the campaign. I have to ask: why were negative aspects of McGinn’s machine not so aggressively pursued by Publicola during the campaign, when we were actually empowered to make a decision in advance? Was it a matter of having more inside connection for story pitches, then say, under Nickels or Mallahan? Me things that there is an element of self interest as to why these facts were not pursued so aggressively sooner, endorsement notwithstanding. I’m not reading to give either JF or ECB a free pass for their continual softballs during the election.

  • Good Grief

    What a useless sack of shit this guy is. What rock did McGinn and his Mercury cronies (not to mention Ron Sims) find this guy under?

    I would also be interested in a full acounting of the costs to the County while this guy was “telecommuting” from Hawaii…assuming those records haven’t been sealed, of course.

  • Good Grief

    What a useless sack of shit this guy is. What rock did McGinn and his Mercury cronies (not to mention Ron Sims) find this guy under?

    I would also be interested in a full acounting of the costs to the County while this guy was “telecommuting” from Hawaii…assuming those records haven’t been sealed, of course.

  • Outraged

    If the attached timeline is accurate, then Haugen was at most 22 when he claimed to have graduated law school?

    http://dailyuw.com/1997/6/5/asuw060597/

    And then 7 years later finally finished up that musty old BA?

    Furthermore, 4 months of that alleged law school time was spent incarcerated? I’m pretty sure law schools look down on incarcerated students. Maybe the law degree was his community service?

    And presumably the phantom PhD was being worked on simultaneous with the BA in the early ’00s?

    And according to Seattle Weekly, he started with King County in 2002? Before he finished the BA? While he was pursuing the phantom doctorate? http://www.seattleweekly.com/2008-09-10/news/county-budget-shortfall-bum-economy-or-overspending

    No sense at all.

    Lies upon lies upon lies.

  • Outraged

    If the attached timeline is accurate, then Haugen was at most 22 when he claimed to have graduated law school?

    http://dailyuw.com/1997/6/5/asuw060597/

    And then 7 years later finally finished up that musty old BA?

    Furthermore, 4 months of that alleged law school time was spent incarcerated? I’m pretty sure law schools look down on incarcerated students. Maybe the law degree was his community service?

    And presumably the phantom PhD was being worked on simultaneous with the BA in the early ’00s?

    And according to Seattle Weekly, he started with King County in 2002? Before he finished the BA? While he was pursuing the phantom doctorate? http://www.seattleweekly.com/2008-09-10/news/county-budget-shortfall-bum-economy-or-overspending

    No sense at all.

    Lies upon lies upon lies.

  • morning fizzy

    I with Hmmmm. I again ask why wasn’t this reported earlier? It is clear that people were aware of this for quite some time and I’m sure that ECB was fed this information well before the vote.

    If I’m wrong ECB, I apologize in advance, but if I’m right could you please explain why you held off on this story for so long. What else is there?

  • morning fizzy

    I with Hmmmm. I again ask why wasn’t this reported earlier? It is clear that people were aware of this for quite some time and I’m sure that ECB was fed this information well before the vote.

    If I’m wrong ECB, I apologize in advance, but if I’m right could you please explain why you held off on this story for so long. What else is there?

  • hmmmm

    The alternative to talking on Facebook instead of talking to real reporters:

    http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2010/02/04/mayor-mcginn-talks-about-the-bushnell-debacle

  • morning fizzy

    What was his relationship to the new Budget Director when they were together at King County?

  • hmmmm

    The alternative to talking on Facebook instead of talking to real reporters:

    http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2010/02/04/mayor-mcginn-talks-about-the-bushnell-debacle

  • morning fizzy

    What was his relationship to the new Budget Director when they were together at King County?

  • Soapboxin’

    From the SLOG: “I am not going to talk about personnel stuff right now,” he says. “I think there are bigger issues than just me here; there is a person here, too.”
    -
    Any SA’s out there care to respond to that horseshit? Hypocrite!
    -
    At least it sounds like he will, in fact, quietly resign. There was no stubbornness in Mike Bikes’ tone.

  • Soapboxin’

    From the SLOG: “I am not going to talk about personnel stuff right now,” he says. “I think there are bigger issues than just me here; there is a person here, too.”
    -
    Any SA’s out there care to respond to that horseshit? Hypocrite!
    -
    At least it sounds like he will, in fact, quietly resign. There was no stubbornness in Mike Bikes’ tone.

  • ding

    The timeline goes like this:
    – He graduates from high school in 1992.
    – He doesn’t quite finish his BA by 1996 (the normal 4 years).
    – But by 1997 he’s completed a law degree (which takes 3 years at UW like almost every law school).

    It simply doesn’t add.

    Postscript: There are very few law classes that can be waived with undergrad coursework. It would be virtually impossible to finish the program in less than 2 years — and even 2 years is almost unheard of owing to the numerous non-coursework requirements.

  • ding

    The timeline goes like this:
    – He graduates from high school in 1992.
    – He doesn’t quite finish his BA by 1996 (the normal 4 years).
    – But by 1997 he’s completed a law degree (which takes 3 years at UW like almost every law school).

    It simply doesn’t add.

    Postscript: There are very few law classes that can be waived with undergrad coursework. It would be virtually impossible to finish the program in less than 2 years — and even 2 years is almost unheard of owing to the numerous non-coursework requirements.

  • Giffy

    A BA is required for a JD. Not suggested, but required. I have a hard time believing UW would have allowed this and if they did the ABA should be having a serious look at them.

    And @researcher, that doesn’t really prove anything. You can apply for graduation and even walk despite being short credits.

    God, we have gone from pretty efficient and non-corrupt city government to this in what, a month?

  • Giffy

    A BA is required for a JD. Not suggested, but required. I have a hard time believing UW would have allowed this and if they did the ABA should be having a serious look at them.

    And @researcher, that doesn’t really prove anything. You can apply for graduation and even walk despite being short credits.

    God, we have gone from pretty efficient and non-corrupt city government to this in what, a month?

  • Slippery Pete

    UW Law website: In order to be considered for admission, applicants must . . . show that they have earned a baccalaureate degree from an accredited college or university prior to registering for the first academic quarter in the School of Law.

    That pokes another big hole in Chris’ story. Although, the ABA only requires completion of three-fourths of a bachelor’s degree. Let’s assume that UW followed the ABA minimum back then:

    Voter registration says Chris was born December 28, 1973. Let’s assume that is his birthday. That makes him 24 when he graduated law school, and when he entered.

    UW was the 25th ranked law school in 1994, when Chris would have been admitted. We are to believe that the 25th best law school in the country would admit a convicted felon and somebody who has yet to finish his bachelor’s? To quote Kevin McCallister: “I don’t think so.”

    Somebody should draw up a timeline of everything this kid has done and/or says he has done. It’s comical.

  • Slippery Pete

    UW Law website: In order to be considered for admission, applicants must . . . show that they have earned a baccalaureate degree from an accredited college or university prior to registering for the first academic quarter in the School of Law.

    That pokes another big hole in Chris’ story. Although, the ABA only requires completion of three-fourths of a bachelor’s degree. Let’s assume that UW followed the ABA minimum back then:

    Voter registration says Chris was born December 28, 1973. Let’s assume that is his birthday. That makes him 24 when he graduated law school, and when he entered.

    UW was the 25th ranked law school in 1994, when Chris would have been admitted. We are to believe that the 25th best law school in the country would admit a convicted felon and somebody who has yet to finish his bachelor’s? To quote Kevin McCallister: “I don’t think so.”

    Somebody should draw up a timeline of everything this kid has done and/or says he has done. It’s comical.

  • LCW

    Morning Fizzy –

    Q. “What was his relationship to the new Budget Director when they were together at King County?”
    A. Beth Goldberg and Chris Haugen (as he was known then) were definitely close. Beth, as was stated by some other posters in another publicola article, is a very tough cookie. I have posited before that she is a very good budget analyst and can manage the budget process of a large government entity, and I stand by that. However, her management style (how should I put this diplomatically) can be pretty rough. Thus, I think that many folks at KCOMB steered clear of her as best they could. She and Chris Huagen on the other hand definitely seemed to have a fairly close relationship as far as I can remember. This is not to lump Mr. Haugen and her together in the same ethical rowboat; please don’t take my comments in that direction. I’m just recalling my understanding of their relationship.

  • LCW

    Morning Fizzy –

    Q. “What was his relationship to the new Budget Director when they were together at King County?”
    A. Beth Goldberg and Chris Haugen (as he was known then) were definitely close. Beth, as was stated by some other posters in another publicola article, is a very tough cookie. I have posited before that she is a very good budget analyst and can manage the budget process of a large government entity, and I stand by that. However, her management style (how should I put this diplomatically) can be pretty rough. Thus, I think that many folks at KCOMB steered clear of her as best they could. She and Chris Huagen on the other hand definitely seemed to have a fairly close relationship as far as I can remember. This is not to lump Mr. Haugen and her together in the same ethical rowboat; please don’t take my comments in that direction. I’m just recalling my understanding of their relationship.

  • TrickyDick

    Based on that slog article, the mayor is in a holding pattern on this, and trending towards Chris. If he heads that way too long, it will make this about McGinn’s credibility, not Bushnell/Haugen’s.

  • TrickyDick

    Based on that slog article, the mayor is in a holding pattern on this, and trending towards Chris. If he heads that way too long, it will make this about McGinn’s credibility, not Bushnell/Haugen’s.

  • Outraged

    @ TrickyDick

    Too late.

  • Outraged

    @ TrickyDick

    Too late.

  • “Yeahhh! That’s the ticket!”

    Does anyone remember Tommy Flanagan, the Pathololgical Liar???

  • “Yeahhh! That’s the ticket!”

    Does anyone remember Tommy Flanagan, the Pathololgical Liar???

  • Slippery Pete

    @ding: Until very recently, the ABA required at least three years of law school study. Now the requirement is the program last at least “24 months.” But the school still has to adopt that standard. Most schools, including UW, stick to the three-year requirement. There’s no way to “fast-forward” it. And as far as I know, there are now UW Law classes which can be “waived” based on prior coursework, only classes which cannot be taken because of prior coursework (e.g., you cannot take Accounting for Lawyers if you were an Accounting major in undergrad).

    @Giffy: That’s what I thought, but apparently the ABA standard for accredited law schools is only completion of three-fourths of a bachelor’s (and even that can be waived under extreme circumstances). You can find it here: http://www.abanet.org/legaled/standards/standards.html, click on “Chapter Five.” But like I mentioned above, UW now requires a B.A. I have a hard time believing they’d waive that requirement.

    Also, there is a “character and fitness” portion of the bar exam. They look at, among other things, any felony convictions one may have. From what I understand, fraud is looked down upon more than any other crime. Assaults, deweys, and the like can be chalked up to youthful indiscretion or momentary lapses of judgment. Fraud signifies a pathology. Because a law school graduate’s bar admission can depend upon their felony history, and the law school’s ranking depends upon their bar admission rate, law schools require you disclose this sort of information during the admissions process. As difficult as it is to gain entry into law school with a felony conviction, I imagine it’s even more difficult to gain entry into law school with a felony fraud conviction. I can almost guarantee you that nee Haugen would not pass the C&F portion of the bar as a 24 year old lacking a bachelor’s degree and only 7 years removed from a felony fraud conviction.

  • Slippery Pete

    @ding: Until very recently, the ABA required at least three years of law school study. Now the requirement is the program last at least “24 months.” But the school still has to adopt that standard. Most schools, including UW, stick to the three-year requirement. There’s no way to “fast-forward” it. And as far as I know, there are now UW Law classes which can be “waived” based on prior coursework, only classes which cannot be taken because of prior coursework (e.g., you cannot take Accounting for Lawyers if you were an Accounting major in undergrad).

    @Giffy: That’s what I thought, but apparently the ABA standard for accredited law schools is only completion of three-fourths of a bachelor’s (and even that can be waived under extreme circumstances). You can find it here: http://www.abanet.org/legaled/standards/standards.html, click on “Chapter Five.” But like I mentioned above, UW now requires a B.A. I have a hard time believing they’d waive that requirement.

    Also, there is a “character and fitness” portion of the bar exam. They look at, among other things, any felony convictions one may have. From what I understand, fraud is looked down upon more than any other crime. Assaults, deweys, and the like can be chalked up to youthful indiscretion or momentary lapses of judgment. Fraud signifies a pathology. Because a law school graduate’s bar admission can depend upon their felony history, and the law school’s ranking depends upon their bar admission rate, law schools require you disclose this sort of information during the admissions process. As difficult as it is to gain entry into law school with a felony conviction, I imagine it’s even more difficult to gain entry into law school with a felony fraud conviction. I can almost guarantee you that nee Haugen would not pass the C&F portion of the bar as a 24 year old lacking a bachelor’s degree and only 7 years removed from a felony fraud conviction.

  • Giffy

    @Slippery Pete,
    -
    Huh, good to know. I always assumed it was required. I know when I was in law school and had not submitted proof of my BA I got a hold slapped on my registration until I did that, as the school I was at required it. It was not at UW though, but I cannot imagine they operate all that differently.
    -
    And yeah, it is pretty hard to beleive, given how competitive UW is that he would have been admitted.

  • Giffy

    @Slippery Pete,
    -
    Huh, good to know. I always assumed it was required. I know when I was in law school and had not submitted proof of my BA I got a hold slapped on my registration until I did that, as the school I was at required it. It was not at UW though, but I cannot imagine they operate all that differently.
    -
    And yeah, it is pretty hard to beleive, given how competitive UW is that he would have been admitted.

  • morning fizzy

    LCW – thanks so much for a straightforward answer.

  • morning fizzy

    LCW – thanks so much for a straightforward answer.

  • Soapboxin’

    You know, it must be painful for Bushnell to have his character deconstructed so publicly. I wouldn’t want to go through this. It’s serious punishment.
    -
    I have much less to hide than everything I’ve heard about this dude, but it’s enough to make me never want to be in the position to be publicly scrutinized. But he has to own the decisions he’s made. And accept the consequences.
    -
    I both enjoy the political theater of this AND think it’s a serious situation that needs to be resolved. I’ve had my fun with picking on the guy. Now he just needs to go away and deal with himself.

  • Soapboxin’

    You know, it must be painful for Bushnell to have his character deconstructed so publicly. I wouldn’t want to go through this. It’s serious punishment.
    -
    I have much less to hide than everything I’ve heard about this dude, but it’s enough to make me never want to be in the position to be publicly scrutinized. But he has to own the decisions he’s made. And accept the consequences.
    -
    I both enjoy the political theater of this AND think it’s a serious situation that needs to be resolved. I’ve had my fun with picking on the guy. Now he just needs to go away and deal with himself.

  • ya betcha

    @Giffy — “God, we have gone from pretty efficient and non-corrupt city government to this in what, a month?”

    The Nickels government non-corrupt?

  • ya betcha

    @Giffy — “God, we have gone from pretty efficient and non-corrupt city government to this in what, a month?”

    The Nickels government non-corrupt?

  • morning fizzy

    Soap – these are all public facts – this isn’t digging into dark hidden secrets.

  • morning fizzy

    Soap – these are all public facts – this isn’t digging into dark hidden secrets.

  • Guest
  • Fred

    Publicola – you are like crack to me now.

  • hmmmm

    If McGinn cuts Bushnell loose, he will save a ton of money– he won’t have to redo the bidding process for the sea wall–no more conflict of interest (that we know of).

  • hmmmm

    If McGinn cuts Bushnell loose, he will save a ton of money– he won’t have to redo the bidding process for the sea wall–no more conflict of interest (that we know of).

  • Jesse
  • Jesse
  • hmmmm

    The money quote: “McGinn spokesman Mark Matassa said the mayor tried to discourage Bushnell from leaving and “very reluctantly accepted his resignation.” ‘

  • hmmmm

    The money quote: “McGinn spokesman Mark Matassa said the mayor tried to discourage Bushnell from leaving and “very reluctantly accepted his resignation.” ‘

  • Anonymous

    I’d expect this resignation should help prevent the Mayor’s office from becoming completely bogged down in scandal. Bushnell may in fact be brilliant, but his record of poor judgement would have limited both his and the mayor’s effectiveness. Good call to get him out the door.

    I was never clear on the claimed law degree though. The article says he claimed to have earned one in 1997. When did he make this claim?

  • JW

    I’d expect this resignation should help prevent the Mayor’s office from becoming completely bogged down in scandal. Bushnell may in fact be brilliant, but his record of poor judgement would have limited both his and the mayor’s effectiveness. Good call to get him out the door.

    I was never clear on the claimed law degree though. The article says he claimed to have earned one in 1997. When did he make this claim?

  • EDR

    What’s the big deal if he misrepresented about having a Phd or whatever? He paid his dues for his crimes and worked his way up and beyond them in a way we all should find commendable. If only more young felons could do the same, we’d be an awful lot better off. He worked for King County for 6 years (wasn’t fired) and earned a reputation as a numbers genius. He had a significant role in helping McGinn (a relative unknown with no previous public office experience) to get elected. That to me says this guy is seriously smart, and would have been an asset to the city administration.

    All the ranting here says more about the self-rightous holier than thou nit wits that Seattle is suffocating from than anyting about Bushnell.

    Ye’re all just jealuous that Bushnell earned his way into McGinn’s insider circle and made a decent salary in doing so. So much for Seattle’s meritocricy.

  • EDR

    What’s the big deal if he misrepresented about having a Phd or whatever? He paid his dues for his crimes and worked his way up and beyond them in a way we all should find commendable. If only more young felons could do the same, we’d be an awful lot better off. He worked for King County for 6 years (wasn’t fired) and earned a reputation as a numbers genius. He had a significant role in helping McGinn (a relative unknown with no previous public office experience) to get elected. That to me says this guy is seriously smart, and would have been an asset to the city administration.

    All the ranting here says more about the self-rightous holier than thou nit wits that Seattle is suffocating from than anyting about Bushnell.

    Ye’re all just jealuous that Bushnell earned his way into McGinn’s insider circle and made a decent salary in doing so. So much for Seattle’s meritocricy.

  • Gomez

    “I think it is about time to hear from the Mayor himself about the credibility of his top advisor.”

    Yeah, like we’re going to get an honest, unbiased statement out of Mike McGinn about his adviser and, in turn, his administration getting caught with their pants down.

  • Gomez

    “I think it is about time to hear from the Mayor himself about the credibility of his top advisor.”

    Yeah, like we’re going to get an honest, unbiased statement out of Mike McGinn about his adviser and, in turn, his administration getting caught with their pants down.

  • Jane

    So, if Bushnell goes back to work for either Broadhead, or Gogerty, he still has the same access to the Mayor and probably MORE money for the job working for a private company.

    It isn’t over folks – it’s just beginning.

    McGinn, Bushnell, Gogerty, Broadhead, McCoy, Goldberg – same old mob, just a different set of names.

  • Jane

    So, if Bushnell goes back to work for either Broadhead, or Gogerty, he still has the same access to the Mayor and probably MORE money for the job working for a private company.

    It isn’t over folks – it’s just beginning.

    McGinn, Bushnell, Gogerty, Broadhead, McCoy, Goldberg – same old mob, just a different set of names.

  • Not EDR

    EDR, it’s spelled meritocracy, not “meritocricy.”

  • Not EDR

    EDR, it’s spelled meritocracy, not “meritocricy.”

  • Info please

    so Jane, we don’t know what you are talking about.

    WHAT connection between Bushnell and Gogerty and Broadhead and McCoy and Goldberg ?

    Esp. that Bushnell Broadhead thing. what are you alluding to?

  • Info please

    so Jane, we don’t know what you are talking about.

    WHAT connection between Bushnell and Gogerty and Broadhead and McCoy and Goldberg ?

    Esp. that Bushnell Broadhead thing. what are you alluding to?

  • Mikos

    Well he’s gone now. It’s one thing to do your time and then try to move on. But when you falsely represent yourself and your felony convictions are for bank fraud and counterfeiting, it doesn’t sound like you’ve really moved on.

  • Mikos

    Well he’s gone now. It’s one thing to do your time and then try to move on. But when you falsely represent yourself and your felony convictions are for bank fraud and counterfeiting, it doesn’t sound like you’ve really moved on.

  • WOW!!

    It’s fine for the mayor to believe in redemption but this guy was passing around papers fraudulently identifying himself as having a PhD last December on McGinn’s transition.

    How is this okay for the mayor? How can he continue to rely on any aspect of the Broadhead/McCoy/Bushnell misguided, intemperant, arrogant advice to run the city?

  • WOW!!

    It’s fine for the mayor to believe in redemption but this guy was passing around papers fraudulently identifying himself as having a PhD last December on McGinn’s transition.

    How is this okay for the mayor? How can he continue to rely on any aspect of the Broadhead/McCoy/Bushnell misguided, intemperant, arrogant advice to run the city?

  • Jane

    @info please

    Keep up. Read posts at previous threads.

  • Jane

    @info please

    Keep up. Read posts at previous threads.

  • Anonymous

    @ Jane: Same old mob? The alarmism over the “Mercury Connection” is not making any sense to me. Why is it inappropriate for McGinn to work with the people he worked with during his campaign? They seem to be people he knew and worked with in varying ways prior to becoming mayor. Is it normal for public officials to stop speaking to former friends and associates after taking office?

    I’m puzzled by the insinuations by some on this forum that there is something sinister about this. Please, enlighten me.

  • JW

    @ Jane: Same old mob? The alarmism over the “Mercury Connection” is not making any sense to me. Why is it inappropriate for McGinn to work with the people he worked with during his campaign? They seem to be people he knew and worked with in varying ways prior to becoming mayor. Is it normal for public officials to stop speaking to former friends and associates after taking office?

    I’m puzzled by the insinuations by some on this forum that there is something sinister about this. Please, enlighten me.

  • Slippery Pete

    @Giffy: I assumed it was required too. I went to the ABA website planning to quote their standard as proof that Bushnell couldn’t have gotten into law school without a bachelor’s. So I was quite surprised to see that 3/4 minimum.

  • Slippery Pete

    @Giffy: I assumed it was required too. I went to the ABA website planning to quote their standard as proof that Bushnell couldn’t have gotten into law school without a bachelor’s. So I was quite surprised to see that 3/4 minimum.

  • Zander

    EDR-

    Even Bushnell admitted what he did was wrong and that he had to resign. You should totally call him a self rightious nit-wit.

    Wah-wah-waah

  • Zander

    EDR-

    Even Bushnell admitted what he did was wrong and that he had to resign. You should totally call him a self rightious nit-wit.

    Wah-wah-waah

  • Soapboxin’

    Again, let’s recognize BOTH sides of this. It was delicious political theater and he had to go. I don’t doubt for a second that he’s really smart, that he’ll land safely w/his friends in the private sector, and that he’ll still have the Mayor’s ear. But he shouldn’t be on the city payroll and he shouldn’t be setting policy.
    -
    And he paid dearly for all of this. His public service career is ruined, for now, and he’s been publicly eviscerated.
    -
    Pour yourself a stiff one, Chris. Tomorrow’s another day.

  • Soapboxin’

    Again, let’s recognize BOTH sides of this. It was delicious political theater and he had to go. I don’t doubt for a second that he’s really smart, that he’ll land safely w/his friends in the private sector, and that he’ll still have the Mayor’s ear. But he shouldn’t be on the city payroll and he shouldn’t be setting policy.
    -
    And he paid dearly for all of this. His public service career is ruined, for now, and he’s been publicly eviscerated.
    -
    Pour yourself a stiff one, Chris. Tomorrow’s another day.

  • jm

    He received his BA in Economics in 2004, yet worked for the County as its Chief Economist from 2002-2008? This guy is amazing!

  • jm

    He received his BA in Economics in 2004, yet worked for the County as its Chief Economist from 2002-2008? This guy is amazing!

  • http://bad.bounder.fleetwood.net/ Dick Ellingson

    Quote from The Seattle Times: “I’m very aware that what I did was wrong, and inappropriate, and I don’t really have a defense for it,” Bushnell said.

    It sounds like he was seen at a political gala wearing socks that clashed with his shirt. How inappropriate.

    But he does have the perfect defense for being a thief and liar – he’s a politician.

  • http://bad.bounder.fleetwood.net Dick Ellingson

    Quote from The Seattle Times: “I’m very aware that what I did was wrong, and inappropriate, and I don’t really have a defense for it,” Bushnell said.

    It sounds like he was seen at a political gala wearing socks that clashed with his shirt. How inappropriate.

    But he does have the perfect defense for being a thief and liar – he’s a politician.

  • Scared for Seattle

    However, it should be noted that the little BS artist succeeded in undermining credible, competent public servants of 20+ years of public service before he left. They were thrown under the bus and Mayor McGoo owes them an apology if he listened to one minute of the crap the Bushnell sack of $hit was spewing before they were pushed aside.

  • Scared for Seattle

    However, it should be noted that the little BS artist succeeded in undermining credible, competent public servants of 20+ years of public service before he left. They were thrown under the bus and Mayor McGoo owes them an apology if he listened to one minute of the crap the Bushnell sack of $hit was spewing before they were pushed aside.

  • The Great Pretender

    This isn’t @ John Christopher haugen ska chris bushnell maybe ba not JD not phd but definately bs, it is about a mayor who pretends to listen, looks at you condescendingly and strokes is chubby chin. It is about a mayor who doesn’t care about the views, experience or hard work of anyone else. He has no respect for anyone outside his circle of flab. He doesn’t owe anyone anything so he can ignore the advice of everyone in this town, trash city employees, insult the city council, the governor and the legislature. What a bum.

  • The Great Pretender

    This isn’t @ John Christopher haugen ska chris bushnell maybe ba not JD not phd but definately bs, it is about a mayor who pretends to listen, looks at you condescendingly and strokes is chubby chin. It is about a mayor who doesn’t care about the views, experience or hard work of anyone else. He has no respect for anyone outside his circle of flab. He doesn’t owe anyone anything so he can ignore the advice of everyone in this town, trash city employees, insult the city council, the governor and the legislature. What a bum.

  • Les

    Don’t you mean Mayor McIdiot?

  • Les

    Don’t you mean Mayor McIdiot?

  • Drew

    Most alarming is what this appointment reveals about McGinn’s political naivete. Bushnell/Haugen/Whatever may be a great guy, he may have paid his dues, he may be a math genius. I don’t know him.
    But for a politician (leader of a major city) to appoint someone with a criminal record and a history of falsifying credentials to a position of high responsibility in his inner circle….and to assume that somehow it will be OK…or that no one will find out…is delusional to the point of idiocy.
    The new Mayor still has most of 4 years to turn this around, but his first 35 days have opened a HUGE credibility that he will have to work like hell to bridge first.

  • Drew

    Most alarming is what this appointment reveals about McGinn’s political naivete. Bushnell/Haugen/Whatever may be a great guy, he may have paid his dues, he may be a math genius. I don’t know him.
    But for a politician (leader of a major city) to appoint someone with a criminal record and a history of falsifying credentials to a position of high responsibility in his inner circle….and to assume that somehow it will be OK…or that no one will find out…is delusional to the point of idiocy.
    The new Mayor still has most of 4 years to turn this around, but his first 35 days have opened a HUGE credibility that he will have to work like hell to bridge first.

  • irongal

    Sorry if someone already pointed this out, but UW has a really weird system for releasing your records. To give them permission to verify your graduation means you also have to give them permission to release your home address, phone number, birthday, email, etc. I’m sorry, but that’s just plain creepy, which means lots of students (esp. young women) choose to seal the records. As ECB points out, records can still be released with written permission which most people will do for a job, grad school, etc but not any old reporter.

    http://www.washington.edu/students/reg/ferpa.html#Q1

  • irongal

    Sorry if someone already pointed this out, but UW has a really weird system for releasing your records. To give them permission to verify your graduation means you also have to give them permission to release your home address, phone number, birthday, email, etc. I’m sorry, but that’s just plain creepy, which means lots of students (esp. young women) choose to seal the records. As ECB points out, records can still be released with written permission which most people will do for a job, grad school, etc but not any old reporter.

    http://www.washington.edu/students/reg/ferpa.html#Q1

  • http://klopt.wordpress.com Mike Weisman

    Thank you Irongal. You are correct; many, probably most student opt to seal their records. The UW has terrible privacy security and if you agree to post your info you will be inundated with spam, junk mail, etc. Even more than the many people who hack the UW database already. I just pinged myself and found out that I am sealed, even though I never actually did anything to cause this to happen. OTOH, many people, who WANT to be pestered, like Heidi Wills, gladly expose their data in the hope that they will be contacted.

  • http://klopt.wordpress.com/ Mike Weisman

    Thank you Irongal. You are correct; many, probably most student opt to seal their records. The UW has terrible privacy security and if you agree to post your info you will be inundated with spam, junk mail, etc. Even more than the many people who hack the UW database already. I just pinged myself and found out that I am sealed, even though I never actually did anything to cause this to happen. OTOH, many people, who WANT to be pestered, like Heidi Wills, gladly expose their data in the hope that they will be contacted.

  • John

    Good detective work! Expose the crook
    Any dirt on McGrinn himself?

  • John

    Good detective work! Expose the crook
    Any dirt on McGrinn himself?

  • Johnniegreen

    According to the UW Law School admission criteria (see below), there is no way Bushnell could have received a law degree in 1997 and a bachelor’s in 2004.

    Matassa is full of crap.

    UW Law School Admissions:

    “In order to be considered for admission, applicants must follow the procedures outlined in the J.D. Application Procedures, take the LSAT and register with LSDAS, and show that they have earned a baccalaureate degree from an accredited college or university prior to registering for the first academic quarter in the School of Law. Foreign applicants who have earned a baccalaureate degree and are proficient in English are eligible to apply.”

  • Johnniegreen

    According to the UW Law School admission criteria (see below), there is no way Bushnell could have received a law degree in 1997 and a bachelor’s in 2004.

    Matassa is full of crap.

    UW Law School Admissions:

    “In order to be considered for admission, applicants must follow the procedures outlined in the J.D. Application Procedures, take the LSAT and register with LSDAS, and show that they have earned a baccalaureate degree from an accredited college or university prior to registering for the first academic quarter in the School of Law. Foreign applicants who have earned a baccalaureate degree and are proficient in English are eligible to apply.”

  • whoops

    dailyuw.com/1997/6/5/asuw060597