Viva La Cola!

Founded in January 2009, PubliCola is a blog about Seattle written by journalists who are dedicated to non-partisan, original daily reporting that prioritizes a balanced approach to news. Started by longtime local editor and award-winning reporter Josh Feit, PubliCola is the first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol.

PubliCola was off and running. In June 2009, PubliCola hired another award-winning journalist, super-sourced Seattle city hall reporter Erica C. Barnett.

People were afraid that blogging would change journalism. Instead, we believe journalism can change blogging. Twenty-first century journalism may look and feel different, and yes Erica isn't afraid to get cranky, but we're committed to making sure online news still delivers independent, reliable, even-keeled coverage. And most of all, we're committed to making sure the coverage sparks honest civic debate.

Bringing you cola for the people, PubliCola is named after Publius Valerius PubliCola, the alias for the authors of the Federalist Papers—the original bloggers.

The first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol and Seattle city hall, PubliCola has been called a “must-read” by the Seattle Post Intelligencer and a hot “New Media Mover and Shaker” by Seattle Magazine—which also cited our own Erica C. Barnett as the city's No. 1 news nerd.

Ape Shit

This week marks the beginning of FilmNerd Friday Roundups:  Every week, I’ll give you one or two must-see films, plus this fun assignment: “Totally Agree” and “Totally Disagree”— where I weigh in on other people’s (opinions, reviews, essays, decisions) from the week in movies.

(This week, for example, I Totally Disagree with Northwest Film Forum’s decision to back down from its cinematic standoff with SIFF Cinema.)

This week’s must-see film is a no-brainer:  Austrian director Michael Haneke’s latest film, winner of the Palme D’Or at Cannes 2009, opens at the Harvard Exit tonight.  The White Ribbon is the best film I have seen in 2010, and I wouldn’t be surprised if I’m still saying that in December.

In the age of Avatar, digital tricks and special effects seem increasingly necessary to keep films interesting.  Haneke’s somber portrait of an early 20th century German village is an edge-of-your-seat thriller sans CGI, sans explosions, without even a score or color film.  It’s a film in which nearly every deeply emotional action—sobbing over a wife’s death, being beaten by an angry father—happens just off-screen, while you sit there and listen, your eyes deprived of the cathartic experience.

Haneke takes up the age-old (and particularly Germanic) theme of terrifying children.  The kids in The White Ribbon live a childhood of repression and abuse in a Lutheran village, and ultimately begin to perpetuate what they have learned, often on the weakest members of their own micro-society.

Sparse voice-over  by an elderly narrator looking back at the events, gives just enough advance information about approaching disaster to keep the audience gritting teeth and clenching fists in dreadful anticipation.

Beyond its brilliant plot construction, this film is a catalog of cinematographic genius.  There’s something about the best black and white movies (I feel this way about Salesman too) that feels like flipping through a giant book of stunning photographs from an otherworldly place.  The stark black and white images from The White Ribbon, its dusky shadows and unspeakable cruelty, are engraved on the insides of my eyelids—and I hope they stay there.

And now, a rave and a rant:

I Totally Agree with Slate film critic Dana Stevens’ take on biopics, which she outlines in this week’s Culture Gabfest, one of my favorite podcasts.  Stevens argues that Creation, the new Darwin biopic, suffers from a common biopic problem: Namely, it talks down to its audience.  Instead of engaging the drama of Darwin’s thought—a revolutionary thought if ever there was one—this film takes up his family drama, not believing that the general audience could possibly be interested in the most hotly debated scientific question of our time.  I agree with Stevens that biopics often miss the mark, choosing the schlock from a fascinating life instead of the important achievements.

I Totally Disagree with the Northwest Film Forum and SIFF’s decision to cancel the duelling versions of Planet of the Apes (NWFF’s 35 mm vs. SIFF’s digital Blu Ray screening) “in the spirit of community.”

That’s all I know about how the decision was made, but it seems symptomatic to me of the cliched Northwestern fear of confrontation.  As a friend said to me this week, “Confrontation creates dialogue, and dialogue is what creates community.  So in the spirit of community, let them duke it out.”  Not to mention that I really wanted to see Planet of the Apes on film—color me disappointed.




  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr. Baker

    Mmmm, yes, you might be disappointed. I saw the first 3 Apes movies as a triple feature when the third came out, at the long closed Lynn-Twin movie theater.

    Beneath the Planet of the Apes was awesome, starring James Franciscus

    Escape from the Planet of the Apes, not so awesome.

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr. Baker

    Mmmm, yes, you might be disappointed. I saw the first 3 Apes movies as a triple feature when the third came out, at the long closed Lynn-Twin movie theater.

    Beneath the Planet of the Apes was awesome, starring James Franciscus

    Escape from the Planet of the Apes, not so awesome.

  • Erik

    From what I can tell there hasn’t been any NWFF versus SIFF since SIFF finally capitulated and included a NWFF- sponsored film in the festival about 8 years ago.
    NWFF used to be the scruffy upstarts who had a weird HQ on the side of a ledge, now they’ve got their own building. Their repetoire is better than ever, they serve the city very well. But they’re not scruffy anymore, and I think avoiding conflict with the big boys is part of the tradeoff. Especially in this econonic climate. I thought the NWFF plan to actually show the FILM instead of a stupid blu-ray DVD in the theater was more, um, theatrical, but I see where they’re coming from in letting SIFF have the ball.

  • Erik

    From what I can tell there hasn’t been any NWFF versus SIFF since SIFF finally capitulated and included a NWFF- sponsored film in the festival about 8 years ago.
    NWFF used to be the scruffy upstarts who had a weird HQ on the side of a ledge, now they’ve got their own building. Their repetoire is better than ever, they serve the city very well. But they’re not scruffy anymore, and I think avoiding conflict with the big boys is part of the tradeoff. Especially in this econonic climate. I thought the NWFF plan to actually show the FILM instead of a stupid blu-ray DVD in the theater was more, um, theatrical, but I see where they’re coming from in letting SIFF have the ball.

  • toobad

    ms. film nerd, why don't you just totally disagree with siff's program in the first place? I imagine NWFF pulled this stunt in an effort to do something the press in this town seems uninterested in doing, ask some good questions of its arts community.