Viva La Cola!

Founded in January 2009, PubliCola is a blog about Seattle written by journalists who are dedicated to non-partisan, original daily reporting that prioritizes a balanced approach to news. Started by longtime local editor and award-winning reporter Josh Feit, PubliCola is the first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol.

PubliCola was off and running. In June 2009, PubliCola hired another award-winning journalist, super-sourced Seattle city hall reporter Erica C. Barnett.

People were afraid that blogging would change journalism. Instead, we believe journalism can change blogging. Twenty-first century journalism may look and feel different, and yes Erica isn't afraid to get cranky, but we're committed to making sure online news still delivers independent, reliable, even-keeled coverage. And most of all, we're committed to making sure the coverage sparks honest civic debate.

Bringing you cola for the people, PubliCola is named after Publius Valerius PubliCola, the alias for the authors of the Federalist Papers—the original bloggers.

The first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol and Seattle city hall, PubliCola has been called a “must-read” by the Seattle Post Intelligencer and a hot “New Media Mover and Shaker” by Seattle Magazine—which also cited our own Erica C. Barnett as the city's No. 1 news nerd.

Underwhelmed by the Hype

1. Oregon voters approved an income tax hike on people making more than $250,000 and an increase in the corporate tax rate yesterday. The Oregon state legislature originally passed the measures last year, but they were forced to go to a vote of the people this year by business groups that opposed it.

The taxes are expected to raise about $730 million for their current budget.

Gov. Chris Gregoire, who has said she may raise taxes to deal with Washington’s $2.6 billion budget shortfall, jumped on the news, releasing the following statement this morning:

“Oregon voters met the challenge of these difficult times and clearly said that schools, healthcare, public safety and other essential services cannot be forsaken. It is gratifying to see that the public understands the importance of preserving services to the most needy and providing education to the next generation—especially now when those efforts are most needed.”

Last night, the news from Oregon earned a Facebook shout out from Service Employees International Union 775 leader David Rolf, who proclaimed: “Hope Lives.”

Rolf’s union, which represents home care workers whose health care is getting slashed in this year’s budget, is financially backing a coalition of liberal groups that are lobbying the legislature to raise taxes this year to preserve things like higher education, low-income housing programs, senior health care, and the basic health plan.

[Full disclosure, PubliCola national politics opinion columnist Sandeep Kaushik, is the spokesperson for the pro taxes group. Kaushik co-founded PubliCola last January and has no editorial say in our news coverage.]

2. Children’s Hospital and residents of Laurelhurst may be nearing an agreement in the ongoing dispute about the hospital’s expansion plans in the neighborhood.

The Laurelhurst Community Club has spent much of the past three years fighting the hospital’s expansion plans, arguing that the hospital would create excessive noise and traffic havoc in the neighborhood, which is not designated an urban center or urban village. They’ve also claimed that the hospital has exaggerated the number of additional beds it needs. Last year, a city hearing examiner agreed with the neighborhood group’s claims, denying the hospital’s petition to expand. Children’s subsequently appealed that decision to the city council, which has the right to overturn hearing examiner decisions.

The council was supposed to take up the hospital’s appeal today. However, both LCC and Children’s asked for a two-week delay last week, indicating that they may be close to reaching a deal. Because the hearing is a quasi-judicial matter—meaning that the council will be acting as the equivalent of judges—council members can’t talk about what sort of discussions are taking place, and no public testimony will be allowed at the hearing, now scheduled for February 10.

3. Yesterday afternoon, we reported that Patricia Lee Smith, the Seattle Times’ VP of New Media—meaning their online stuff—announced she’s leaving to go work for AllRecipes.com.

Here’s the email that Seattle Times President and CEO Carolyn Kelly sent to staff about Smith’s departure:

Patricia Lee Smith has accepted a new position as Vice-President International with AllRecipes.com. Her last day with us will be February 12th. Plee has been at the Times for 12 years and has done a terrific job as VP New Media for the past 2 years; her ability to think strategically and tie tactics to the vision will be greatly missed. She leaves in place an outstanding team who I’m confident will carry on in the interim. Within the next few days we’ll figure out what that interim plan will look like..

In the moment, please join me in thanking Plee for the outstanding work she has done here and wishing her well in her new position. As I told her, we’ll miss her as a colleague but will think of her as an ambassador!

4. PubliCola’s Glenn Fleishman will be posting live today from Apple’s big announcement in San Francisco. Spoiler alert: He’s underwhelmed by all the tablet hype.

5. A group of anonymous city employees have started a web site to protest Mayor Mike McGinn’s plans to eliminate or reclassify 200 managerial and strategic advisor positions at the city. In an email, one of the employees said, “While the Mayor may have the weight of the office and a well worn political applause line as his justification for these proposed layoffs, we have the facts – and they don’t support his rationale or actions for this attack on dedicated civil servants.”

Many of the jobs McGinn is targeting as “political appointments” by former mayor Greg Nickels, the group says, were reclassifications of jobs that existed long before Nickels came into office. “This is … a campaign promise based on misinformation,” the web site claims.

6. This week marked PubliCola’s one-year anniversary. We’re celebrating with the Washington Bus at the Crocodile in Belltown tonight. Watch the State of the Union with us at 6, then check out live performances by CMYK, Song Sparrow Research, and THEESatisfaction.

See you tonight.


  • glimmer of hope

    #1 is VERY interesting. If we indeed live in an era of populist, direct democracy, fueled by new media and instant communication, this could be the path ahead for progressive majorities. Why should we cede the mantel of populism and/or dominance of the intitiative/referendum process to the likes of Eyman?

  • glimmer of hope

    #1 is VERY interesting. If we indeed live in an era of populist, direct democracy, fueled by new media and instant communication, this could be the path ahead for progressive majorities. Why should we cede the mantel of populism and/or dominance of the intitiative/referendum process to the likes of Eyman?

  • Morgan Fairadult

    This taxes the doers, the drivers, the earners.

    How about the idle people?

    How about a Progressive Asset Tax?

    http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/2007/02/14/what_about_progressive_propert/

    “As far as I can tell, nobody is talking about what may be the simplest and fairest solution, which also encourages individual home ownership: a progressive property tax system.”

  • Morgan Fairadult

    This taxes the doers, the drivers, the earners.

    How about the idle people?

    How about a Progressive Asset Tax?

    http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/2007/02/14/what_about_progressive_propert/

    “As far as I can tell, nobody is talking about what may be the simplest and fairest solution, which also encourages individual home ownership: a progressive property tax system.”

  • sarah68

    You’re damn right it taxes the earners. The high earners. Who else should you tax, Fairadult? What we’re doing now is taxing the person who cooks your food in a restaurant or makes your bed in your hotel room at a rate almost the same as yours. That’s “fair”?

    A progressive property tax system? What on earth would that do to “encourage” people who make $25,000/year to buy a home?

  • sarah68

    You’re damn right it taxes the earners. The high earners. Who else should you tax, Fairadult? What we’re doing now is taxing the person who cooks your food in a restaurant or makes your bed in your hotel room at a rate almost the same as yours. That’s “fair”?

    A progressive property tax system? What on earth would that do to “encourage” people who make $25,000/year to buy a home?

  • Daver

    Oregon result and the effect on the tax debate in Olympia predicted @15:

    http://www.publicola.net/2010/01/19/whats-the-local-angle-on-the-gop-win-in-ma-story/

    Nailed it.

  • Daver

    Oregon result and the effect on the tax debate in Olympia predicted @15:

    http://www.publicola.net/2010/01/19/whats-the-local-angle-on-the-gop-win-in-ma-story/

    Nailed it.

  • Adam Hyla

    Happy B-day Publicola! Love how you’re growing.

  • Adam Hyla

    Happy B-day Publicola! Love how you’re growing.

  • Morgan Fairadult

    sarah68:

    1) There are earners and there are people who hold high value assets. The latter are usually called “the rich”.

    2) Do you know the meaning of the word “progressive” when applied to tax?

  • Morgan Fairadult

    sarah68:

    1) There are earners and there are people who hold high value assets. The latter are usually called “the rich”.

    2) Do you know the meaning of the word “progressive” when applied to tax?

  • whut

    Where’s the full disclosure on item 1 about Sandeep flacking for the coalition?

  • whut

    Where’s the full disclosure on item 1 about Sandeep flacking for the coalition?

  • Josh Feit

    Whut,

    Good call. Added that in.

    It’d be great if you’d start commenting under your real name.

  • Josh Feit

    Whut,

    Good call. Added that in.

    It’d be great if you’d start commenting under your real name.

  • NickBob

    @Sarah, the cook pays higher taxes than the attorney, the executive, and those other suited ‘doers’ as a percentage of income.
    @Morgan, if the suits are the ‘doers’, what are the people who the directions of suits? Are the folks who make a very good living out of swapping capital assets ‘doers’ as well? How about those who live well off their Birth Bonus- I mean the Death Tax, as you’d no doubt call it. Are they ‘doers’?

    So, will our unpopular Gov decide to champion a state income tax to shift the tax burden from the many to the fortunate fewer? Save the budget and cut consumer taxes in a single stroke? Why don’t I see this coming anytime soon?

  • NickBob

    @Sarah, the cook pays higher taxes than the attorney, the executive, and those other suited ‘doers’ as a percentage of income.
    @Morgan, if the suits are the ‘doers’, what are the people who the directions of suits? Are the folks who make a very good living out of swapping capital assets ‘doers’ as well? How about those who live well off their Birth Bonus- I mean the Death Tax, as you’d no doubt call it. Are they ‘doers’?

    So, will our unpopular Gov decide to champion a state income tax to shift the tax burden from the many to the fortunate fewer? Save the budget and cut consumer taxes in a single stroke? Why don’t I see this coming anytime soon?

  • Morgan Fairadult

    NickBob,

    Look, I am really trying hard to believe that not everyone in the NW has an extra chromosome, but seriously…that’s the whole point of an asset tax!

  • Morgan Fairadult

    NickBob,

    Look, I am really trying hard to believe that not everyone in the NW has an extra chromosome, but seriously…that’s the whole point of an asset tax!

  • NickBob

    @Morgan, you might well convince me on the merits of an asset tax, but you won’t get much headway by starting off with personal attacks. Certainly my tone is less than friendly but I haven’t called your gene pool into question, or your geographical heritage for that matter. Just your vocabulary and the underlying assumptions that inform it.

  • NickBob

    @Morgan, you might well convince me on the merits of an asset tax, but you won’t get much headway by starting off with personal attacks. Certainly my tone is less than friendly but I haven’t called your gene pool into question, or your geographical heritage for that matter. Just your vocabulary and the underlying assumptions that inform it.

  • Dorothy Parker

    The rich should be taxed for being alive.

    And if you’re wealthy, and don’t like it, you have the resources to leave. Bye bye!

  • Dorothy Parker

    The rich should be taxed for being alive.

    And if you’re wealthy, and don’t like it, you have the resources to leave. Bye bye!

  • RossB

    @Morgan — Taxing wealth makes sense, the devil is in the details. The problem is that such taxation quickly becomes complicated and leads to unintended consequences. How do you count wealth? Do you count monetary assets (stocks, bonds, bank accounts, etc)? What about jewelry, clothing and furniture? What about boats?

    The progressive property tax is a good place to start, but there are problems with it. I already commented at the source of the info (http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/2007/02/14/what_about_progressive_propert/ and search for Ross123). As I suggest, such a tax might penalize renters. It might encourage property owners to convert to condos. If provisions are made (taxing per unit) then it might penalize folks who share a house. Plus, what does it do to commercial property? If we tax it a higher rate, we may push out the small restaurant. You can see how this gets pretty complicated pretty quickly.

    I understand your point, and it is worth looking at, but things aren’t always that simple. In general there is a correlation between earnings and wealth (which is why a progressive income tax is fairly fair). Bill Gates is extremely rich, he doesn’t have to work another day in his life. But he probably paid a huge amount in income taxes. The problem is, this state got none of it. A simple tax starting at, say, one million dollars (and including capital gains) would gather a huge amount of money from the “idle” (although a huge amount of those were once “doers and drivers”). Combine that with an estate tax and you pretty much grab all you can from the very wealthy.

  • RossB

    @Morgan — Taxing wealth makes sense, the devil is in the details. The problem is that such taxation quickly becomes complicated and leads to unintended consequences. How do you count wealth? Do you count monetary assets (stocks, bonds, bank accounts, etc)? What about jewelry, clothing and furniture? What about boats?

    The progressive property tax is a good place to start, but there are problems with it. I already commented at the source of the info (http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/2007/02/14/what_about_progressive_propert/ and search for Ross123). As I suggest, such a tax might penalize renters. It might encourage property owners to convert to condos. If provisions are made (taxing per unit) then it might penalize folks who share a house. Plus, what does it do to commercial property? If we tax it a higher rate, we may push out the small restaurant. You can see how this gets pretty complicated pretty quickly.

    I understand your point, and it is worth looking at, but things aren’t always that simple. In general there is a correlation between earnings and wealth (which is why a progressive income tax is fairly fair). Bill Gates is extremely rich, he doesn’t have to work another day in his life. But he probably paid a huge amount in income taxes. The problem is, this state got none of it. A simple tax starting at, say, one million dollars (and including capital gains) would gather a huge amount of money from the “idle” (although a huge amount of those were once “doers and drivers”). Combine that with an estate tax and you pretty much grab all you can from the very wealthy.

  • sarah68

    Fairadult: Yes, I know what a progressive tax system is. Washington State, as you must know, has the most regressive system in the country. I was being a bit sarcastic since you apparently think your proposal would correct that, and I definitely don’t.

  • sarah68

    Fairadult: Yes, I know what a progressive tax system is. Washington State, as you must know, has the most regressive system in the country. I was being a bit sarcastic since you apparently think your proposal would correct that, and I definitely don’t.