Viva La Cola!

Founded in January 2009, PubliCola is a blog about Seattle written by journalists who are dedicated to non-partisan, original daily reporting that prioritizes a balanced approach to news. Started by longtime local editor and award-winning reporter Josh Feit, PubliCola is the first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol.

PubliCola was off and running. In June 2009, PubliCola hired another award-winning journalist, super-sourced Seattle city hall reporter Erica C. Barnett.

People were afraid that blogging would change journalism. Instead, we believe journalism can change blogging. Twenty-first century journalism may look and feel different, and yes Erica isn't afraid to get cranky, but we're committed to making sure online news still delivers independent, reliable, even-keeled coverage. And most of all, we're committed to making sure the coverage sparks honest civic debate.

Bringing you cola for the people, PubliCola is named after Publius Valerius PubliCola, the alias for the authors of the Federalist Papers—the original bloggers.

The first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol and Seattle city hall, PubliCola has been called a “must-read” by the Seattle Post Intelligencer and a hot “New Media Mover and Shaker” by Seattle Magazine—which also cited our own Erica C. Barnett as the city's No. 1 news nerd.

Take Two Tablets and Text Me in the Morning

[Editor's Note: Glenn, aka TechNerd, will be posting live from Apple's big announcement in San Francisco this morning.]

Why the hell does anyone who doesn’t sell personal computing and consumer electronics products care what Apple is announcing tomorrow? Honestly.

I’ll be there, but I am a freaking technology reporter, paid to follow and write about this stuff. And even I’m already sick ahead of time of all the hype, misinformation, leaks, rumors, and nonsense surrounding the potential revelation of an Apple tablet. (I like the names Slablet and Applet, but I doubt either will be used.)

The Apple tablet will, if common sense and reports are accurate, have a 10-inch LCD screen, have no hardware keyboard, come with Wi-Fi built in but no cellular connection, and cost between $800 and $1,000. It’ll be like a big iPod touch. You’ll like watching video on it.

But, again, if you’re not an early adopter, a tech freak, or a business reporter, why do you care? Why should you care? What can the tablet bring to your life? More meaning? Happiness? Fulfillment? None of those. And yet, the promise of a great new thing still apparently makes hearts beat faster.

Apple has managed, through a combination of producing desirable products and restraining itself from talking about the next great thing, to create an incredible cult of mystique. And mint money.

Yesterday, the company announced that its revenue, earnings, and profit margins had leaped in the most recent fiscal quarter, which covers Christmas and a little of January. Apple didn’t just beat the year-ago quarter, when we thought the economy was in a global meltdown (a quarter that was great for Apple, anyway)— it blew past all its previous best numbers.

The only down spot was in the iPod market, which may be saturated. The company sold 8 percent fewer iPods (including iPod touch models) in the last quarter as it had in the same quarter one year earlier, but made just as much in sales dollars and more net profit: $162 per unit instead of $148.

As Joel Johnson wrote in a savvy Gizmodo essay a few days ago, Apple doesn’t show prototypes and concept designs of things it might someday make or not. The company only shows products it is shipping immediately or soon.

I suppose that’s the reverse of hype. The company leaks remarkably little information, with most tidbits emerging from partners who can’t keep their mouths shut.

That lack of information, coupled with previous success, apparently drives reporters, bloggers, and the general public mad with excitement. Everybody knows that a tablet might appear; everyone I speak to has read something about it, even if they don’t give two figs for technology.

If all goes well, I’ll be filing reports from the press-and-analyst-only private event in San Francisco starting at 10 am Pacific tomorrow here on PubliCola, and Twittering about it at twitter.com/glennf (@glennf).

Given that most of the audience will have iPhones and AT&T data cards, I’m using the opportunity to test a 3G loaner from T-Mobile. I suspect its network will hold up during the event.


  • Giffy

    I just can’t see the use for such a device. Its too big to be portable and to small to use in a house where most people have much larger screens at their disposal. I guess I could go sit on the patio with it, but a 1000 bucks seems a lot for that. Especially when I already have an iPhone that works just fine for such things.

    It also lacks a keyboard so it is not going to replace my laptop. Some kind of retractable keyboard would be cool and would help justify the price.

    Now if it were like a couple hundred bucks that would be something.

  • Giffy

    I just can’t see the use for such a device. Its too big to be portable and to small to use in a house where most people have much larger screens at their disposal. I guess I could go sit on the patio with it, but a 1000 bucks seems a lot for that. Especially when I already have an iPhone that works just fine for such things.

    It also lacks a keyboard so it is not going to replace my laptop. Some kind of retractable keyboard would be cool and would help justify the price.

    Now if it were like a couple hundred bucks that would be something.

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr. Baker

    Apple inverts the Osborne Effect.

    Deliver the next great thing, and people will accept what you are delivering is, indeed, great (or, at least, treated that way).

    How damaging was it for Apple and MicroSoft to keep postponing delivery of software 10 years ago? Worse yet, delivering something while admitting that the major flaws are being worked on, to be delivered in a different software set.

    Both companies have reduced projecting an image of expected future failure (where possible).

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr. Baker

    Apple inverts the Osborne Effect.

    Deliver the next great thing, and people will accept what you are delivering is, indeed, great (or, at least, treated that way).

    How damaging was it for Apple and MicroSoft to keep postponing delivery of software 10 years ago? Worse yet, delivering something while admitting that the major flaws are being worked on, to be delivered in a different software set.

    Both companies have reduced projecting an image of expected future failure (where possible).