Viva La Cola!

Founded in January 2009, PubliCola is a blog about Seattle written by journalists who are dedicated to non-partisan, original daily reporting that prioritizes a balanced approach to news. Started by longtime local editor and award-winning reporter Josh Feit, PubliCola is the first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol.

PubliCola was off and running. In June 2009, PubliCola hired another award-winning journalist, super-sourced Seattle city hall reporter Erica C. Barnett.

People were afraid that blogging would change journalism. Instead, we believe journalism can change blogging. Twenty-first century journalism may look and feel different, and yes Erica isn't afraid to get cranky, but we're committed to making sure online news still delivers independent, reliable, even-keeled coverage. And most of all, we're committed to making sure the coverage sparks honest civic debate.

Bringing you cola for the people, PubliCola is named after Publius Valerius PubliCola, the alias for the authors of the Federalist Papers—the original bloggers.

The first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol and Seattle city hall, PubliCola has been called a “must-read” by the Seattle Post Intelligencer and a hot “New Media Mover and Shaker” by Seattle Magazine—which also cited our own Erica C. Barnett as the city's No. 1 news nerd.

Sound Transit Reaches Agreement With State on I-90 Rail

Sound Transit has reached a tentative agreement with the state department of transportation (WSDOT) to run light rail across I-90 to Bellevue, a move that could throw a wrench in a lawsuit to prevent the agency from putting rail on the highway.

The agreement, called a “term sheet,” will the basis for a formal agreement that the Sound Transit board will ratify in the next the months. It places the value of the bridge itself at an inflation-adjusted $135 million. That cost, under the agreement, will be offset by construction of light rail and two new HOV lanes on I-90, valued at $153 million. (The $18 million difference will go into Sound Transit’s “land bank,” a special fund that pays for things like state right-of-way when Sound Transit needs to use freeway lanes for rail) .

Opponents of light rail sued the state last July, arguing that because the express lanes where Sound Transit will run its trains were built using funds from the state gas tax, which is limited to road construction, Sound Transit doesn’t have the authority to build light rail there. “Their argument is that the state doesn’t have the authority to enter into an agreement with us,” says Sound Transit policy and planning director Ric Ilgenfritz. “Our argument is that we do.”

Today’s tentative agreement, which will be the basis for a formal agreement to be approved by the Sound Transit board in the next few months, bolsters Sound Transit’s case.




  • morning fizzy

    The I-90 bridge is valued at $135MM? Are you sure it’s not $1.35 billion?

    ECB ask WSDOT when the bridge is scheduled to be obsolete without considering the addition of the rail to it? Hint: the answer is 2065. Perhaps, there should be a plan for what happens a short 45 years after building across the lake when both the road and the rail need their bridge replaced.

  • morning fizzy

    The I-90 bridge is valued at $135MM? Are you sure it’s not $1.35 billion?

    ECB ask WSDOT when the bridge is scheduled to be obsolete without considering the addition of the rail to it? Hint: the answer is 2065. Perhaps, there should be a plan for what happens a short 45 years after building across the lake when both the road and the rail need their bridge replaced.

  • http://www.joeszilagyi.com/ Joe Szilagyi

    How does this short circuit the lawsuit?

  • http://joeszilagyi.com Joe Szilagyi

    How does this short circuit the lawsuit?

  • Giffy

    @ fizzy, probably the same thing that happens anytime a major route is replaced.You close and replace one part at a time. So you build as much of the westbound side you can while keeping it open, then move traffic to the eastbound side solely while you quickly move the new westbound side into place.

    Its going to be a bitch, but the presence of rail won’t change that.

    And Joe is right, this has no barring on the lawsuit. The issue is not whether the State can enter into a agreement in the sense of simply doing it, but whether that it is legal. It almost certainly is legal, but this has no barring on that.

  • Giffy

    @ fizzy, probably the same thing that happens anytime a major route is replaced.You close and replace one part at a time. So you build as much of the westbound side you can while keeping it open, then move traffic to the eastbound side solely while you quickly move the new westbound side into place.

    Its going to be a bitch, but the presence of rail won’t change that.

    And Joe is right, this has no barring on the lawsuit. The issue is not whether the State can enter into a agreement in the sense of simply doing it, but whether that it is legal. It almost certainly is legal, but this has no barring on that.

  • havinfun

    We could use some further reporting on this subject. More info and insight needed.

  • havinfun

    We could use some further reporting on this subject. More info and insight needed.

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr. Baker
  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr. Baker