Viva La Cola!

Founded in January 2009, PubliCola is a blog about Seattle written by journalists who are dedicated to non-partisan, original daily reporting that prioritizes a balanced approach to news. Started by longtime local editor and award-winning reporter Josh Feit, PubliCola is the first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol.

PubliCola was off and running. In June 2009, PubliCola hired another award-winning journalist, super-sourced Seattle city hall reporter Erica C. Barnett.

People were afraid that blogging would change journalism. Instead, we believe journalism can change blogging. Twenty-first century journalism may look and feel different, and yes Erica isn't afraid to get cranky, but we're committed to making sure online news still delivers independent, reliable, even-keeled coverage. And most of all, we're committed to making sure the coverage sparks honest civic debate.

Bringing you cola for the people, PubliCola is named after Publius Valerius PubliCola, the alias for the authors of the Federalist Papers—the original bloggers.

The first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol and Seattle city hall, PubliCola has been called a “must-read” by the Seattle Post Intelligencer and a hot “New Media Mover and Shaker” by Seattle Magazine—which also cited our own Erica C. Barnett as the city's No. 1 news nerd.

Getting the Conversation Going

1. Fourteen state representatives have introduced a bill that would create a statewide version of the “complete streets” policy already adopted by Seattle. That policy effectively says that whenever a city is rebuilding a street, it has to accommodate pedestrians and cyclists, not just cars.

The bill wouldn’t go quite as far as Seattle’s law (which, by the way, was pushed by now-Mayor Mike McGinn when he was heading up his non-profit gr0up Great City), but it would create a grant program to fund complete streets programs at the local level; and it would require the state department of transportation to “consider the needs of all users,” not just cars, when retrofitting or repairing state highways that function as arterial streets (like Aurora) or “main streets” (like many state highways do in small towns).

Andrew Austin, lobbyist for the Transportation Choices Coalition, says he isn’t optimistic the bill will pass this year—when legislators are focused on fixing the budget—but says “getting the conversation going now will really set us up for success next year.”

2. Austin predicts more success for Senate Bill 6366, the bill that would severely limit cities’ control over major state transportation projects like the viaduct and 520. (The bill would exempt the state department of transportation from the requirement to get local government permits to build state highway projects, and would push all appeals of state permits directly to superior court, bypassing all local avenues of appeal). Austin says he expects the bill will make it out of the senate transportation committee, where most of the members have expressed support, and perhaps even out of the senate itself.

And although Gov. Chris Gregoire has told advocates her office will not be supporting the legislation, the only person testifying in favor was one of her representatives—WSDOT deputy director David Dye, who ticked off a long list of reasons the transportation department favored the bill.

Austin says “the precedent [the bill] sets is scary. The sponsors of the bill claim they’re not attacking or supporting any specific project, but it has huge implications, obviously, for 520.” Transportation leaders in the legislature want to build a six-lane bridge with two HOV lanes and a new drawbridge over the Montlake Cut—an option opposed by Seattle legislators and by Mayor Mike McGinn.

3. Yesterday, former city council member Peter Steinbrueck sent out an email to dozens of environmentalists and transportation advocates speculating that Mayor McGinn “wants a fall referendum on the [downtown waterfront] tunnel,” which McGinn does not support. Asked about the email, McGinn’s office said only, “We’re not responding to rumors.”

4. Exciting news about PubliCola’s anniversary party, at the Crocodile in Belltown on January 27: We’ve added a third band to the bill: 80s-dance-pop-gurus CMYK, of whom MusicNerd Anand Balasubrahmanyan wrote this:

The center of CMYK songs are drums, fussily constructed for maximum impact. The bass drum thuds and the claps slap the slapiest slap.

It serves the music well, always underscoring T-minus’, Shorty Circuit’s and Sex Brains’ ponderous vocals with an insistent beat. As is to be expected from a musician named Sex Brains, the songs are mostly concerned with nasty business time.

CMYK join Song Sparrow Research and THEE Satisfaction. More party details to come.

5. The state Senate is fast tracking South Seattle State Sen. Margarita Prentice’s (D-11) furlough bill. The bill, which had a public hearing yesterday and is expected to get sent to the Senate floor asap, would require state agencies to close one day per month for the next 16 months (excluding essential services like the state patrol).

It would affect about 40,000 employess and save about $75 million.


  • Andrew Austin

    HB 2911, the complete streets legislation, will be heard on Jan. 28th, which is TCC’s transportation advocacy. Also on that day HB 2855 which is a temporary transit funding measure that TCC is supporting will be hearing in House Transportation.

    If you would like to attend our Advocacy Day, sign up ASAP at
    http://www.transportationchoices.org/advocacydaysignup.asp

  • Andrew Austin

    HB 2911, the complete streets legislation, will be heard on Jan. 28th, which is TCC’s transportation advocacy. Also on that day HB 2855 which is a temporary transit funding measure that TCC is supporting will be hearing in House Transportation.

    If you would like to attend our Advocacy Day, sign up ASAP at
    http://www.transportationchoices.org/advocacydaysignup.asp

  • Curious

    Any chance you can post Steinbrueck’s email?

  • Curious

    Any chance you can post Steinbrueck’s email?

  • http://www.worldchanging.com/ Alex Steffen

    “Transportation leaders in the legislature want to build a six-lane bridge with two HOV lanes and a new drawbridge over the Montlake Cut….”

    I find this a strange definition of the word “leader.”

  • http://www.worldchanging.com Alex Steffen

    “Transportation leaders in the legislature want to build a six-lane bridge with two HOV lanes and a new drawbridge over the Montlake Cut….”

    I find this a strange definition of the word “leader.”

  • morning fizzy

    Building 520 in the first place was a huge error. Expanding it is an even bigger one.

    It is so strange that 3/4 of mile of what has always been a gritty waterfront gets so much love from the city beautiful people but doubling the width to 120′ and ruining Portage Bay even more is not a issue for the environmentalists. They only care about putting some transit on it.

    How about we double the size of the AW Viaduct and put some transit on it?

  • morning fizzy

    Building 520 in the first place was a huge error. Expanding it is an even bigger one.

    It is so strange that 3/4 of mile of what has always been a gritty waterfront gets so much love from the city beautiful people but doubling the width to 120′ and ruining Portage Bay even more is not a issue for the environmentalists. They only care about putting some transit on it.

    How about we double the size of the AW Viaduct and put some transit on it?

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr. Baker

    What, no Tunnel of Love comment?

    the tunnel estimate grew 60 million from last year, as did the tunnel by 640 feet.

    http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/NR/rdonlyres/3FBD89BD-FCE8-4769-BF4A-5C4CB95C7FD9/0/SR99_Cost_Tolling_Summary_Jan10.pdf

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr. Baker

    What, no Tunnel of Love comment?

    the tunnel estimate grew 60 million from last year, as did the tunnel by 640 feet.

    http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/NR/rdonlyres/3FBD89BD-FCE8-4769-BF4A-5C4CB95C7FD9/0/SR99_Cost_Tolling_Summary_Jan10.pdf

  • spineless

    here’s to wishing your obsession with peter would go away when he did….i guess not.

  • spineless

    here’s to wishing your obsession with peter would go away when he did….i guess not.

  • PCO37

    So what time is the Publicola party?

  • PCO37

    So what time is the Publicola party?

  • feeder

    Where’s today’s Morning Fizz. I NEED MY FIZZ!!!

  • feeder

    Where’s today’s Morning Fizz. I NEED MY FIZZ!!!

  • Erin O’Connor

    The Legislative Workgroup (with NO votes from Speaker Frank Chopp and Rep. Jamie Pedersen) and our King County Council have endorsed Option A+. It would have seven lanes on the Portage Bay Bridge. In addition to being more than twice as wide as the present Portage Bay Bridge and 10 to 20 feet higher, with 8 to 12 feet noise walls on top of that, the bridge would also be shifted north into tiny Portage Bay cheek to jowl with the John Graham, Sr., NOAA brick and terra cotta Fisheries Building and in front of homes in Roanoke Park and Portage Bay.

    The wider floating bridge itself would rest on taller pontoons, which would support a “service deck” with 22 feet columns in turn supporting the traffic deck, which would have noise walls making it even taller. At Robert Fishman’s lecture last night on Jane Jacobs and Rachel Carson, a slide showed Robert Moses’s wide freeway leading in great swaths of concrete to the Verrazano Bridge and dwarfing all around it. The SR 520 plan is equally out of scale and even uglier. Fishman remarked that all of the adjacent, modest, existing development, what looked like homes, had disappeared in a matter of a few years.

    The state Senate bill preempting the City’s permitting authority would assure the destruction of Portage Bay and Union Bay and all of the neighborhoods west, north, and south of the bay along with the Arboretum’s setting. The City Council, which in its last resolution on the bridge project was critical of WSDOT’s more modest plan for 520, is contemplating whether it should endorse this much more massive monstrosity. We can only hope that they speak loudly, with one voice, against the state’s imposition of this ugly project on one of the most beautiful parts of our city and that they do it in the name of retaining jurisdiction over what goes on inside city limits–not that our Department of Planning and Development is without fault.

    We are too slowly realizing that transporation needs to change and change swiftly to other modes. More lanes to move more cars into our neighborhoods to sit waiting to get onto I-5–can its widening be far behind?–is a retrograde solution. WSDOT’s perfunctory execution of “transit-friendly design” is akin to its current fad for “native plants” near freeways, where conditions are nothing like the conditions in which natives thrived 160 years ago. WSDOT needs to move off its 1960s spot, and the City needs to tell it that.
    Erin O’Connor

  • Erin O’Connor

    The Legislative Workgroup (with NO votes from Speaker Frank Chopp and Rep. Jamie Pedersen) and our King County Council have endorsed Option A+. It would have seven lanes on the Portage Bay Bridge. In addition to being more than twice as wide as the present Portage Bay Bridge and 10 to 20 feet higher, with 8 to 12 feet noise walls on top of that, the bridge would also be shifted north into tiny Portage Bay cheek to jowl with the John Graham, Sr., NOAA brick and terra cotta Fisheries Building and in front of homes in Roanoke Park and Portage Bay.

    The wider floating bridge itself would rest on taller pontoons, which would support a “service deck” with 22 feet columns in turn supporting the traffic deck, which would have noise walls making it even taller. At Robert Fishman’s lecture last night on Jane Jacobs and Rachel Carson, a slide showed Robert Moses’s wide freeway leading in great swaths of concrete to the Verrazano Bridge and dwarfing all around it. The SR 520 plan is equally out of scale and even uglier. Fishman remarked that all of the adjacent, modest, existing development, what looked like homes, had disappeared in a matter of a few years.

    The state Senate bill preempting the City’s permitting authority would assure the destruction of Portage Bay and Union Bay and all of the neighborhoods west, north, and south of the bay along with the Arboretum’s setting. The City Council, which in its last resolution on the bridge project was critical of WSDOT’s more modest plan for 520, is contemplating whether it should endorse this much more massive monstrosity. We can only hope that they speak loudly, with one voice, against the state’s imposition of this ugly project on one of the most beautiful parts of our city and that they do it in the name of retaining jurisdiction over what goes on inside city limits–not that our Department of Planning and Development is without fault.

    We are too slowly realizing that transporation needs to change and change swiftly to other modes. More lanes to move more cars into our neighborhoods to sit waiting to get onto I-5–can its widening be far behind?–is a retrograde solution. WSDOT’s perfunctory execution of “transit-friendly design” is akin to its current fad for “native plants” near freeways, where conditions are nothing like the conditions in which natives thrived 160 years ago. WSDOT needs to move off its 1960s spot, and the City needs to tell it that.
    Erin O’Connor