Viva La Cola!

Founded in January 2009, PubliCola is a blog about Seattle written by journalists who are dedicated to non-partisan, original daily reporting that prioritizes a balanced approach to news. Started by longtime local editor and award-winning reporter Josh Feit, PubliCola is the first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol.

PubliCola was off and running. In June 2009, PubliCola hired another award-winning journalist, super-sourced Seattle city hall reporter Erica C. Barnett.

People were afraid that blogging would change journalism. Instead, we believe journalism can change blogging. Twenty-first century journalism may look and feel different, and yes Erica isn't afraid to get cranky, but we're committed to making sure online news still delivers independent, reliable, even-keeled coverage. And most of all, we're committed to making sure the coverage sparks honest civic debate.

Bringing you cola for the people, PubliCola is named after Publius Valerius PubliCola, the alias for the authors of the Federalist Papers—the original bloggers.

The first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol and Seattle city hall, PubliCola has been called a “must-read” by the Seattle Post Intelligencer and a hot “New Media Mover and Shaker” by Seattle Magazine—which also cited our own Erica C. Barnett as the city's No. 1 news nerd.

Reichert on Health-Care Reform

US Rep. Dave Reichert (R-8) has written what will apparently be a four-part (!) series on health-care reform for a group of Eastside papers, including the Auburn Reporter, the Bellevue Reporter, and the Issaquah Reporter. (Reichert was among four Washington State representatives who voted against health-care reform in the House; the others were Reps. Cathy McMorris-Rodgers (R-5), Doc Hastings (R-4), and Brian Baird (D-3).

Part 1, which ran last week, argues essentially that people should be encouraged to adopt healthier lifestyles—along the lines of King County’s employee wellness program, which gives county employees financial incentives (cheaper health care) in exchange for not smoking, eating better, and losing weight.

The county recognized that the lack of physical activity associated with office work increased risk factors for a variety of medical problems, and contracted with private companies, including Weight Watchers, to provide a number of resources including health assessments, counseling, education and fitness classes. Through a unique partnership with Aetna, employees are also educated about and encouraged to be smart health care consumers. According to the county, within the first year of offering access to these tools, 75 percent of people at moderate or high risk for developing a chronic disease eliminated at least one risk factor. Additionally, 12 out of 14 health measures including smoking, nutrition, weight loss and blood pressure among participating employees has shown marked improvement, and employees have lost more than 9,000 pounds.

Of course, that argument doesn’t address people whose illnesses aren’t lifestyle-related (or the fact that body-mass index, the standard measure used to determine whether someone is “overweight,” isn’t a good gauge of overall fitness).

Additionally, and perhaps most importantly, it’s too early to gauge exactly how successful the county’s three-year-old program is, in terms of cost savings and employee health. More than 85 percent of county workers have supposedly reached the highest level of fitness in the program, qualifying them for the lowest health-care premiums.

Call me cynical, but it’s hard to believe that some folks would low ball how much they drink and how often they smoke, and exaggerate how much they work out to save as much as $1,200 a year.

Hopefully, in the 2,400 or so words that are still outstanding, Reichert will shed more light on why (other than the obvious answer, partisanship) he voted against the health-care bill.


  • http://publicola.net/?cat=325 Sam M.

    We begin from the foundation that health care is about people. It is intensely personal and touches every American. It is not about bureaucratic “systems” and “payment flows” and complicated regulations in government jargon.

    When a four-part series starts with that, you may as well change the channel immediately. Really, Mr. Reichert? For most Americans, that IS what healthcare has become. By opening with that statement, Reichert proves he has no interest in owning up to the failures of private healthcare–no interest in calling them out one-by-one and assuring constituents that they can be dealt with in an alternative way. His screed about personal responsibility is classic, private-healthcare hogwash, using that rhetoric as a dust cloud to mask the failures of the system. I am an in-shape, make-my-own-food, athletic person, and yet it’s prohibitively expensive for me to see a doctor for even a basic physical. When I got the swine flu, I was probably more sick with panic than with symptoms. So what about me, Reichert? Where should I fax proof of my healthy lifestyle?

    And don’t get me started on Weight Watchers. A company that still allows HFCS in its packaged foods isn’t an authority on the art of eating.

  • http://publicola.net/?cat=325 Sam M.

    We begin from the foundation that health care is about people. It is intensely personal and touches every American. It is not about bureaucratic “systems” and “payment flows” and complicated regulations in government jargon.

    When a four-part series starts with that, you may as well change the channel immediately. Really, Mr. Reichert? For most Americans, that IS what healthcare has become. By opening with that statement, Reichert proves he has no interest in owning up to the failures of private healthcare–no interest in calling them out one-by-one and assuring constituents that they can be dealt with in an alternative way. His screed about personal responsibility is classic, private-healthcare hogwash, using that rhetoric as a dust cloud to mask the failures of the system. I am an in-shape, make-my-own-food, athletic person, and yet it’s prohibitively expensive for me to see a doctor for even a basic physical. When I got the swine flu, I was probably more sick with panic than with symptoms. So what about me, Reichert? Where should I fax proof of my healthy lifestyle?

    And don’t get me started on Weight Watchers. A company that still allows HFCS in its packaged foods isn’t an authority on the art of eating.

  • http://publicola.net/?cat=325 Sam M.

    We begin from the foundation that health care is about people. It is intensely personal and touches every American. It is not about bureaucratic “systems” and “payment flows” and complicated regulations in government jargon.

    When a four-part series starts with that, you may as well change the channel immediately. Really, Mr. Reichert? For most Americans, that IS what healthcare has become. By opening with that statement, Reichert proves he has no interest in owning up to the failures of private healthcare–no interest in calling them out one-by-one and assuring constituents that they can be dealt with in an alternative way. His screed about personal responsibility is classic, private-healthcare hogwash, using that rhetoric as a dust cloud to mask the failures of the system. I am an in-shape, make-my-own-food, athletic person, and yet it’s prohibitively expensive for me to see a doctor for even a basic physical. When I got the swine flu, I was probably more sick with panic than with symptoms. So what about me, Reichert? Where should I fax proof of my healthy lifestyle?

    And don’t get me started on Weight Watchers. A company that still allows HFCS in its packaged foods isn’t an authority on the art of eating.

  • http://publicola.net/?cat=325 Sam M.

    We begin from the foundation that health care is about people. It is intensely personal and touches every American. It is not about bureaucratic “systems” and “payment flows” and complicated regulations in government jargon.

    When a four-part series starts with that, you may as well change the channel immediately. Really, Mr. Reichert? For most Americans, that IS what healthcare has become. By opening with that statement, Reichert proves he has no interest in owning up to the failures of private healthcare–no interest in calling them out one-by-one and assuring constituents that they can be dealt with in an alternative way. His screed about personal responsibility is classic, private-healthcare hogwash, using that rhetoric as a dust cloud to mask the failures of the system. I am an in-shape, make-my-own-food, athletic person, and yet it’s prohibitively expensive for me to see a doctor for even a basic physical. When I got the swine flu, I was probably more sick with panic than with symptoms. So what about me, Reichert? Where should I fax proof of my healthy lifestyle?

    And don’t get me started on Weight Watchers. A company that still allows HFCS in its packaged foods isn’t an authority on the art of eating.

  • http://publicola.net/?cat=325 Sam M.

    We begin from the foundation that health care is about people. It is intensely personal and touches every American. It is not about bureaucratic “systems” and “payment flows” and complicated regulations in government jargon.

    When a four-part series starts with that, you may as well change the channel immediately. Really, Mr. Reichert? For most Americans, that IS what healthcare has become. By opening with that statement, Reichert proves he has no interest in owning up to the failures of private healthcare–no interest in calling them out one-by-one and assuring constituents that they can be dealt with in an alternative way. His screed about personal responsibility is classic, private-healthcare hogwash, using that rhetoric as a dust cloud to mask the failures of the system. I am an in-shape, make-my-own-food, athletic person, and yet it’s prohibitively expensive for me to see a doctor for even a basic physical. When I got the swine flu, I was probably more sick with panic than with symptoms. So what about me, Reichert? Where should I fax proof of my healthy lifestyle?

    And don’t get me started on Weight Watchers. A company that still allows HFCS in its packaged foods isn’t an authority on the art of eating.

  • http://publicola.net/?cat=325 Sam M.

    We begin from the foundation that health care is about people. It is intensely personal and touches every American. It is not about bureaucratic “systems” and “payment flows” and complicated regulations in government jargon.

    When a four-part series starts with that, you may as well change the channel immediately. Really, Mr. Reichert? For most Americans, that IS what healthcare has become. By opening with that statement, Reichert proves he has no interest in owning up to the failures of private healthcare–no interest in calling them out one-by-one and assuring constituents that they can be dealt with in an alternative way. His screed about personal responsibility is classic, private-healthcare hogwash, using that rhetoric as a dust cloud to mask the failures of the system. I am an in-shape, make-my-own-food, athletic person, and yet it’s prohibitively expensive for me to see a doctor for even a basic physical. When I got the swine flu, I was probably more sick with panic than with symptoms. So what about me, Reichert? Where should I fax proof of my healthy lifestyle?

    And don’t get me started on Weight Watchers. A company that still allows HFCS in its packaged foods isn’t an authority on the art of eating.

  • http://publicola.net/?cat=325 Sam M.

    We begin from the foundation that health care is about people. It is intensely personal and touches every American. It is not about bureaucratic “systems” and “payment flows” and complicated regulations in government jargon.

    When a four-part series starts with that, you may as well change the channel immediately. Really, Mr. Reichert? For most Americans, that IS what healthcare has become. By opening with that statement, Reichert proves he has no interest in owning up to the failures of private healthcare–no interest in calling them out one-by-one and assuring constituents that they can be dealt with in an alternative way. His screed about personal responsibility is classic, private-healthcare hogwash, using that rhetoric as a dust cloud to mask the failures of the system. I am an in-shape, make-my-own-food, athletic person, and yet it’s prohibitively expensive for me to see a doctor for even a basic physical. When I got the swine flu, I was probably more sick with panic than with symptoms. So what about me, Reichert? Where should I fax proof of my healthy lifestyle?

    And don’t get me started on Weight Watchers. A company that still allows HFCS in its packaged foods isn’t an authority on the art of eating.

  • http://publicola.net/?cat=325 Sam M.

    We begin from the foundation that health care is about people. It is intensely personal and touches every American. It is not about bureaucratic “systems” and “payment flows” and complicated regulations in government jargon.

    When a four-part series starts with that, you may as well change the channel immediately. Really, Mr. Reichert? For most Americans, that IS what healthcare has become. By opening with that statement, Reichert proves he has no interest in owning up to the failures of private healthcare–no interest in calling them out one-by-one and assuring constituents that they can be dealt with in an alternative way. His screed about personal responsibility is classic, private-healthcare hogwash, using that rhetoric as a dust cloud to mask the failures of the system. I am an in-shape, make-my-own-food, athletic person, and yet it’s prohibitively expensive for me to see a doctor for even a basic physical. When I got the swine flu, I was probably more sick with panic than with symptoms. So what about me, Reichert? Where should I fax proof of my healthy lifestyle?

    And don’t get me started on Weight Watchers. A company that still allows HFCS in its packaged foods isn’t an authority on the art of eating.

  • http://publicola.net/?cat=325 Sam M.

    We begin from the foundation that health care is about people. It is intensely personal and touches every American. It is not about bureaucratic “systems” and “payment flows” and complicated regulations in government jargon.

    When a four-part series starts with that, you may as well change the channel immediately. Really, Mr. Reichert? For most Americans, that IS what healthcare has become. By opening with that statement, Reichert proves he has no interest in owning up to the failures of private healthcare–no interest in calling them out one-by-one and assuring constituents that they can be dealt with in an alternative way. His screed about personal responsibility is classic, private-healthcare hogwash, using that rhetoric as a dust cloud to mask the failures of the system. I am an in-shape, make-my-own-food, athletic person, and yet it’s prohibitively expensive for me to see a doctor for even a basic physical. When I got the swine flu, I was probably more sick with panic than with symptoms. So what about me, Reichert? Where should I fax proof of my healthy lifestyle?

    And don’t get me started on Weight Watchers. A company that still allows HFCS in its packaged foods isn’t an authority on the art of eating.

  • http://publicola.net/?cat=325 Sam M.

    We begin from the foundation that health care is about people. It is intensely personal and touches every American. It is not about bureaucratic “systems” and “payment flows” and complicated regulations in government jargon.

    When a four-part series starts with that, you may as well change the channel immediately. Really, Mr. Reichert? For most Americans, that IS what healthcare has become. By opening with that statement, Reichert proves he has no interest in owning up to the failures of private healthcare–no interest in calling them out one-by-one and assuring constituents that they can be dealt with in an alternative way. His screed about personal responsibility is classic, private-healthcare hogwash, using that rhetoric as a dust cloud to mask the failures of the system. I am an in-shape, make-my-own-food, athletic person, and yet it’s prohibitively expensive for me to see a doctor for even a basic physical. When I got the swine flu, I was probably more sick with panic than with symptoms. So what about me, Reichert? Where should I fax proof of my healthy lifestyle?

    And don’t get me started on Weight Watchers. A company that still allows HFCS in its packaged foods isn’t an authority on the art of eating.

  • http://publicola.net/?cat=325 Sam M.

    We begin from the foundation that health care is about people. It is intensely personal and touches every American. It is not about bureaucratic “systems” and “payment flows” and complicated regulations in government jargon.

    When a four-part series starts with that, you may as well change the channel immediately. Really, Mr. Reichert? For most Americans, that IS what healthcare has become. By opening with that statement, Reichert proves he has no interest in owning up to the failures of private healthcare–no interest in calling them out one-by-one and assuring constituents that they can be dealt with in an alternative way. His screed about personal responsibility is classic, private-healthcare hogwash, using that rhetoric as a dust cloud to mask the failures of the system. I am an in-shape, make-my-own-food, athletic person, and yet it’s prohibitively expensive for me to see a doctor for even a basic physical. When I got the swine flu, I was probably more sick with panic than with symptoms. So what about me, Reichert? Where should I fax proof of my healthy lifestyle?

    And don’t get me started on Weight Watchers. A company that still allows HFCS in its packaged foods isn’t an authority on the art of eating.

  • http://publicola.net/?cat=325 Sam M.

    We begin from the foundation that health care is about people. It is intensely personal and touches every American. It is not about bureaucratic “systems” and “payment flows” and complicated regulations in government jargon.

    When a four-part series starts with that, you may as well change the channel immediately. Really, Mr. Reichert? For most Americans, that IS what healthcare has become. By opening with that statement, Reichert proves he has no interest in owning up to the failures of private healthcare–no interest in calling them out one-by-one and assuring constituents that they can be dealt with in an alternative way. His screed about personal responsibility is classic, private-healthcare hogwash, using that rhetoric as a dust cloud to mask the failures of the system. I am an in-shape, make-my-own-food, athletic person, and yet it’s prohibitively expensive for me to see a doctor for even a basic physical. When I got the swine flu, I was probably more sick with panic than with symptoms. So what about me, Reichert? Where should I fax proof of my healthy lifestyle?

    And don’t get me started on Weight Watchers. A company that still allows HFCS in its packaged foods isn’t an authority on the art of eating.

  • http://publicola.net/?cat=325 Sam M.

    We begin from the foundation that health care is about people. It is intensely personal and touches every American. It is not about bureaucratic “systems” and “payment flows” and complicated regulations in government jargon.

    When a four-part series starts with that, you may as well change the channel immediately. Really, Mr. Reichert? For most Americans, that IS what healthcare has become. By opening with that statement, Reichert proves he has no interest in owning up to the failures of private healthcare–no interest in calling them out one-by-one and assuring constituents that they can be dealt with in an alternative way. His screed about personal responsibility is classic, private-healthcare hogwash, using that rhetoric as a dust cloud to mask the failures of the system. I am an in-shape, make-my-own-food, athletic person, and yet it’s prohibitively expensive for me to see a doctor for even a basic physical. When I got the swine flu, I was probably more sick with panic than with symptoms. So what about me, Reichert? Where should I fax proof of my healthy lifestyle?

    And don’t get me started on Weight Watchers. A company that still allows HFCS in its packaged foods isn’t an authority on the art of eating.

  • http://publicola.net/?cat=325 Sam M.

    We begin from the foundation that health care is about people. It is intensely personal and touches every American. It is not about bureaucratic “systems” and “payment flows” and complicated regulations in government jargon.

    When a four-part series starts with that, you may as well change the channel immediately. Really, Mr. Reichert? For most Americans, that IS what healthcare has become. By opening with that statement, Reichert proves he has no interest in owning up to the failures of private healthcare–no interest in calling them out one-by-one and assuring constituents that they can be dealt with in an alternative way. His screed about personal responsibility is classic, private-healthcare hogwash, using that rhetoric as a dust cloud to mask the failures of the system. I am an in-shape, make-my-own-food, athletic person, and yet it’s prohibitively expensive for me to see a doctor for even a basic physical. When I got the swine flu, I was probably more sick with panic than with symptoms. So what about me, Reichert? Where should I fax proof of my healthy lifestyle?

    And don’t get me started on Weight Watchers. A company that still allows HFCS in its packaged foods isn’t an authority on the art of eating.

  • http://publicola.net/?cat=325 Sam M.

    We begin from the foundation that health care is about people. It is intensely personal and touches every American. It is not about bureaucratic “systems” and “payment flows” and complicated regulations in government jargon.

    When a four-part series starts with that, you may as well change the channel immediately. Really, Mr. Reichert? For most Americans, that IS what healthcare has become. By opening with that statement, Reichert proves he has no interest in owning up to the failures of private healthcare–no interest in calling them out one-by-one and assuring constituents that they can be dealt with in an alternative way. His screed about personal responsibility is classic, private-healthcare hogwash, using that rhetoric as a dust cloud to mask the failures of the system. I am an in-shape, make-my-own-food, athletic person, and yet it’s prohibitively expensive for me to see a doctor for even a basic physical. When I got the swine flu, I was probably more sick with panic than with symptoms. So what about me, Reichert? Where should I fax proof of my healthy lifestyle?

    And don’t get me started on Weight Watchers. A company that still allows HFCS in its packaged foods isn’t an authority on the art of eating.

  • http://publicola.net/?cat=325 Sam M.

    We begin from the foundation that health care is about people. It is intensely personal and touches every American. It is not about bureaucratic “systems” and “payment flows” and complicated regulations in government jargon.

    When a four-part series starts with that, you may as well change the channel immediately. Really, Mr. Reichert? For most Americans, that IS what healthcare has become. By opening with that statement, Reichert proves he has no interest in owning up to the failures of private healthcare–no interest in calling them out one-by-one and assuring constituents that they can be dealt with in an alternative way. His screed about personal responsibility is classic, private-healthcare hogwash, using that rhetoric as a dust cloud to mask the failures of the system. I am an in-shape, make-my-own-food, athletic person, and yet it’s prohibitively expensive for me to see a doctor for even a basic physical. When I got the swine flu, I was probably more sick with panic than with symptoms. So what about me, Reichert? Where should I fax proof of my healthy lifestyle?

    And don’t get me started on Weight Watchers. A company that still allows HFCS in its packaged foods isn’t an authority on the art of eating.

  • http://publicola.net/?cat=325 Sam M.

    We begin from the foundation that health care is about people. It is intensely personal and touches every American. It is not about bureaucratic “systems” and “payment flows” and complicated regulations in government jargon.

    When a four-part series starts with that, you may as well change the channel immediately. Really, Mr. Reichert? For most Americans, that IS what healthcare has become. By opening with that statement, Reichert proves he has no interest in owning up to the failures of private healthcare–no interest in calling them out one-by-one and assuring constituents that they can be dealt with in an alternative way. His screed about personal responsibility is classic, private-healthcare hogwash, using that rhetoric as a dust cloud to mask the failures of the system. I am an in-shape, make-my-own-food, athletic person, and yet it’s prohibitively expensive for me to see a doctor for even a basic physical. When I got the swine flu, I was probably more sick with panic than with symptoms. So what about me, Reichert? Where should I fax proof of my healthy lifestyle?

    And don’t get me started on Weight Watchers. A company that still allows HFCS in its packaged foods isn’t an authority on the art of eating.

  • http://publicola.net/?cat=325 Sam M.

    We begin from the foundation that health care is about people. It is intensely personal and touches every American. It is not about bureaucratic “systems” and “payment flows” and complicated regulations in government jargon.

    When a four-part series starts with that, you may as well change the channel immediately. Really, Mr. Reichert? For most Americans, that IS what healthcare has become. By opening with that statement, Reichert proves he has no interest in owning up to the failures of private healthcare–no interest in calling them out one-by-one and assuring constituents that they can be dealt with in an alternative way. His screed about personal responsibility is classic, private-healthcare hogwash, using that rhetoric as a dust cloud to mask the failures of the system. I am an in-shape, make-my-own-food, athletic person, and yet it’s prohibitively expensive for me to see a doctor for even a basic physical. When I got the swine flu, I was probably more sick with panic than with symptoms. So what about me, Reichert? Where should I fax proof of my healthy lifestyle?

    And don’t get me started on Weight Watchers. A company that still allows HFCS in its packaged foods isn’t an authority on the art of eating.

  • http://publicola.net/?cat=325 Sam M.

    We begin from the foundation that health care is about people. It is intensely personal and touches every American. It is not about bureaucratic “systems” and “payment flows” and complicated regulations in government jargon.

    When a four-part series starts with that, you may as well change the channel immediately. Really, Mr. Reichert? For most Americans, that IS what healthcare has become. By opening with that statement, Reichert proves he has no interest in owning up to the failures of private healthcare–no interest in calling them out one-by-one and assuring constituents that they can be dealt with in an alternative way. His screed about personal responsibility is classic, private-healthcare hogwash, using that rhetoric as a dust cloud to mask the failures of the system. I am an in-shape, make-my-own-food, athletic person, and yet it’s prohibitively expensive for me to see a doctor for even a basic physical. When I got the swine flu, I was probably more sick with panic than with symptoms. So what about me, Reichert? Where should I fax proof of my healthy lifestyle?

    And don’t get me started on Weight Watchers. A company that still allows HFCS in its packaged foods isn’t an authority on the art of eating.

  • LaborGoon

    Part I: Be healthy (and lift weights), like me!

    Part II: Get a government job with great health benefits, like me!

    Part III: Ensure your retirement security by advocating for corporate special interests, regardless of whether it conflicts with the will and needs of your constituents, like me!

    Part IV: Uh, that’s all I got. (Maybe I should triple-space Parts 1 through 3.)

  • LaborGoon

    Part I: Be healthy (and lift weights), like me!

    Part II: Get a government job with great health benefits, like me!

    Part III: Ensure your retirement security by advocating for corporate special interests, regardless of whether it conflicts with the will and needs of your constituents, like me!

    Part IV: Uh, that’s all I got. (Maybe I should triple-space Parts 1 through 3.)

  • LaborGoon

    Part I: Be healthy (and lift weights), like me!

    Part II: Get a government job with great health benefits, like me!

    Part III: Ensure your retirement security by advocating for corporate special interests, regardless of whether it conflicts with the will and needs of your constituents, like me!

    Part IV: Uh, that’s all I got. (Maybe I should triple-space Parts 1 through 3.)

  • LaborGoon

    Part I: Be healthy (and lift weights), like me!

    Part II: Get a government job with great health benefits, like me!

    Part III: Ensure your retirement security by advocating for corporate special interests, regardless of whether it conflicts with the will and needs of your constituents, like me!

    Part IV: Uh, that’s all I got. (Maybe I should triple-space Parts 1 through 3.)

  • LaborGoon

    Part I: Be healthy (and lift weights), like me!

    Part II: Get a government job with great health benefits, like me!

    Part III: Ensure your retirement security by advocating for corporate special interests, regardless of whether it conflicts with the will and needs of your constituents, like me!

    Part IV: Uh, that’s all I got. (Maybe I should triple-space Parts 1 through 3.)

  • LaborGoon

    Part I: Be healthy (and lift weights), like me!

    Part II: Get a government job with great health benefits, like me!

    Part III: Ensure your retirement security by advocating for corporate special interests, regardless of whether it conflicts with the will and needs of your constituents, like me!

    Part IV: Uh, that’s all I got. (Maybe I should triple-space Parts 1 through 3.)

  • LaborGoon

    Part I: Be healthy (and lift weights), like me!

    Part II: Get a government job with great health benefits, like me!

    Part III: Ensure your retirement security by advocating for corporate special interests, regardless of whether it conflicts with the will and needs of your constituents, like me!

    Part IV: Uh, that’s all I got. (Maybe I should triple-space Parts 1 through 3.)

  • LaborGoon

    Part I: Be healthy (and lift weights), like me!

    Part II: Get a government job with great health benefits, like me!

    Part III: Ensure your retirement security by advocating for corporate special interests, regardless of whether it conflicts with the will and needs of your constituents, like me!

    Part IV: Uh, that’s all I got. (Maybe I should triple-space Parts 1 through 3.)

  • LaborGoon

    Part I: Be healthy (and lift weights), like me!

    Part II: Get a government job with great health benefits, like me!

    Part III: Ensure your retirement security by advocating for corporate special interests, regardless of whether it conflicts with the will and needs of your constituents, like me!

    Part IV: Uh, that’s all I got. (Maybe I should triple-space Parts 1 through 3.)

  • LaborGoon

    Part I: Be healthy (and lift weights), like me!

    Part II: Get a government job with great health benefits, like me!

    Part III: Ensure your retirement security by advocating for corporate special interests, regardless of whether it conflicts with the will and needs of your constituents, like me!

    Part IV: Uh, that’s all I got. (Maybe I should triple-space Parts 1 through 3.)

  • LaborGoon

    Part I: Be healthy (and lift weights), like me!

    Part II: Get a government job with great health benefits, like me!

    Part III: Ensure your retirement security by advocating for corporate special interests, regardless of whether it conflicts with the will and needs of your constituents, like me!

    Part IV: Uh, that’s all I got. (Maybe I should triple-space Parts 1 through 3.)

  • LaborGoon

    Part I: Be healthy (and lift weights), like me!

    Part II: Get a government job with great health benefits, like me!

    Part III: Ensure your retirement security by advocating for corporate special interests, regardless of whether it conflicts with the will and needs of your constituents, like me!

    Part IV: Uh, that’s all I got. (Maybe I should triple-space Parts 1 through 3.)

  • LaborGoon

    Part I: Be healthy (and lift weights), like me!

    Part II: Get a government job with great health benefits, like me!

    Part III: Ensure your retirement security by advocating for corporate special interests, regardless of whether it conflicts with the will and needs of your constituents, like me!

    Part IV: Uh, that’s all I got. (Maybe I should triple-space Parts 1 through 3.)

  • LaborGoon

    Part I: Be healthy (and lift weights), like me!

    Part II: Get a government job with great health benefits, like me!

    Part III: Ensure your retirement security by advocating for corporate special interests, regardless of whether it conflicts with the will and needs of your constituents, like me!

    Part IV: Uh, that’s all I got. (Maybe I should triple-space Parts 1 through 3.)

  • LaborGoon

    Part I: Be healthy (and lift weights), like me!

    Part II: Get a government job with great health benefits, like me!

    Part III: Ensure your retirement security by advocating for corporate special interests, regardless of whether it conflicts with the will and needs of your constituents, like me!

    Part IV: Uh, that’s all I got. (Maybe I should triple-space Parts 1 through 3.)

  • LaborGoon

    Part I: Be healthy (and lift weights), like me!

    Part II: Get a government job with great health benefits, like me!

    Part III: Ensure your retirement security by advocating for corporate special interests, regardless of whether it conflicts with the will and needs of your constituents, like me!

    Part IV: Uh, that’s all I got. (Maybe I should triple-space Parts 1 through 3.)

  • LaborGoon

    Part I: Be healthy (and lift weights), like me!

    Part II: Get a government job with great health benefits, like me!

    Part III: Ensure your retirement security by advocating for corporate special interests, regardless of whether it conflicts with the will and needs of your constituents, like me!

    Part IV: Uh, that’s all I got. (Maybe I should triple-space Parts 1 through 3.)

  • LaborGoon

    Part I: Be healthy (and lift weights), like me!

    Part II: Get a government job with great health benefits, like me!

    Part III: Ensure your retirement security by advocating for corporate special interests, regardless of whether it conflicts with the will and needs of your constituents, like me!

    Part IV: Uh, that’s all I got. (Maybe I should triple-space Parts 1 through 3.)

  • LaborGoon

    Part I: Be healthy (and lift weights), like me!

    Part II: Get a government job with great health benefits, like me!

    Part III: Ensure your retirement security by advocating for corporate special interests, regardless of whether it conflicts with the will and needs of your constituents, like me!

    Part IV: Uh, that’s all I got. (Maybe I should triple-space Parts 1 through 3.)

  • http://samred.com/ Sam Machkovech

    We begin from the foundation that health care is about people. It is intensely personal and touches every American. It is not about bureaucratic “systems” and “payment flows” and complicated regulations in government jargon.

    When a four-part series starts with that, you may as well change the channel immediately. Really, Mr. Reichert? For most Americans, that IS what healthcare has become. By opening with that statement, Reichert proves he has no interest in owning up to the failures of private healthcare–no interest in calling them out one-by-one and assuring constituents that they can be dealt with in an alternative way. His screed about personal responsibility is classic, private-healthcare hogwash, using that rhetoric as a dust cloud to mask the failures of the system. I am an in-shape, make-my-own-food, athletic person, and yet it’s prohibitively expensive for me to see a doctor for even a basic physical. When I got the swine flu, I was probably more sick with panic than with symptoms. So what about me, Reichert? Where should I fax proof of my healthy lifestyle?

    And don’t get me started on Weight Watchers. A company that still allows HFCS in its packaged foods isn’t an authority on the art of eating.

  • http://samred.com/ Sam Machkovech

    We begin from the foundation that health care is about people. It is intensely personal and touches every American. It is not about bureaucratic “systems” and “payment flows” and complicated regulations in government jargon.

    When a four-part series starts with that, you may as well change the channel immediately. Really, Mr. Reichert? For most Americans, that IS what healthcare has become. By opening with that statement, Reichert proves he has no interest in owning up to the failures of private healthcare–no interest in calling them out one-by-one and assuring constituents that they can be dealt with in an alternative way. His screed about personal responsibility is classic, private-healthcare hogwash, using that rhetoric as a dust cloud to mask the failures of the system. I am an in-shape, make-my-own-food, athletic person, and yet it’s prohibitively expensive for me to see a doctor for even a basic physical. When I got the swine flu, I was probably more sick with panic than with symptoms. So what about me, Reichert? Where should I fax proof of my healthy lifestyle?

    And don’t get me started on Weight Watchers. A company that still allows HFCS in its packaged foods isn’t an authority on the art of eating.

  • http://samred.com/ Sam Machkovech

    We begin from the foundation that health care is about people. It is intensely personal and touches every American. It is not about bureaucratic “systems” and “payment flows” and complicated regulations in government jargon.

    When a four-part series starts with that, you may as well change the channel immediately. Really, Mr. Reichert? For most Americans, that IS what healthcare has become. By opening with that statement, Reichert proves he has no interest in owning up to the failures of private healthcare–no interest in calling them out one-by-one and assuring constituents that they can be dealt with in an alternative way. His screed about personal responsibility is classic, private-healthcare hogwash, using that rhetoric as a dust cloud to mask the failures of the system. I am an in-shape, make-my-own-food, athletic person, and yet it’s prohibitively expensive for me to see a doctor for even a basic physical. When I got the swine flu, I was probably more sick with panic than with symptoms. So what about me, Reichert? Where should I fax proof of my healthy lifestyle?

    And don’t get me started on Weight Watchers. A company that still allows HFCS in its packaged foods isn’t an authority on the art of eating.

  • http://samred.com/ Sam Machkovech

    We begin from the foundation that health care is about people. It is intensely personal and touches every American. It is not about bureaucratic “systems” and “payment flows” and complicated regulations in government jargon.

    When a four-part series starts with that, you may as well change the channel immediately. Really, Mr. Reichert? For most Americans, that IS what healthcare has become. By opening with that statement, Reichert proves he has no interest in owning up to the failures of private healthcare–no interest in calling them out one-by-one and assuring constituents that they can be dealt with in an alternative way. His screed about personal responsibility is classic, private-healthcare hogwash, using that rhetoric as a dust cloud to mask the failures of the system. I am an in-shape, make-my-own-food, athletic person, and yet it’s prohibitively expensive for me to see a doctor for even a basic physical. When I got the swine flu, I was probably more sick with panic than with symptoms. So what about me, Reichert? Where should I fax proof of my healthy lifestyle?

    And don’t get me started on Weight Watchers. A company that still allows HFCS in its packaged foods isn’t an authority on the art of eating.

  • http://samred.com/ Sam Machkovech

    We begin from the foundation that health care is about people. It is intensely personal and touches every American. It is not about bureaucratic “systems” and “payment flows” and complicated regulations in government jargon.

    When a four-part series starts with that, you may as well change the channel immediately. Really, Mr. Reichert? For most Americans, that IS what healthcare has become. By opening with that statement, Reichert proves he has no interest in owning up to the failures of private healthcare–no interest in calling them out one-by-one and assuring constituents that they can be dealt with in an alternative way. His screed about personal responsibility is classic, private-healthcare hogwash, using that rhetoric as a dust cloud to mask the failures of the system. I am an in-shape, make-my-own-food, athletic person, and yet it’s prohibitively expensive for me to see a doctor for even a basic physical. When I got the swine flu, I was probably more sick with panic than with symptoms. So what about me, Reichert? Where should I fax proof of my healthy lifestyle?

    And don’t get me started on Weight Watchers. A company that still allows HFCS in its packaged foods isn’t an authority on the art of eating.

  • http://samred.com/ Sam Machkovech

    We begin from the foundation that health care is about people. It is intensely personal and touches every American. It is not about bureaucratic “systems” and “payment flows” and complicated regulations in government jargon.

    When a four-part series starts with that, you may as well change the channel immediately. Really, Mr. Reichert? For most Americans, that IS what healthcare has become. By opening with that statement, Reichert proves he has no interest in owning up to the failures of private healthcare–no interest in calling them out one-by-one and assuring constituents that they can be dealt with in an alternative way. His screed about personal responsibility is classic, private-healthcare hogwash, using that rhetoric as a dust cloud to mask the failures of the system. I am an in-shape, make-my-own-food, athletic person, and yet it’s prohibitively expensive for me to see a doctor for even a basic physical. When I got the swine flu, I was probably more sick with panic than with symptoms. So what about me, Reichert? Where should I fax proof of my healthy lifestyle?

    And don’t get me started on Weight Watchers. A company that still allows HFCS in its packaged foods isn’t an authority on the art of eating.

  • http://samred.com/ Sam Machkovech

    We begin from the foundation that health care is about people. It is intensely personal and touches every American. It is not about bureaucratic “systems” and “payment flows” and complicated regulations in government jargon.

    When a four-part series starts with that, you may as well change the channel immediately. Really, Mr. Reichert? For most Americans, that IS what healthcare has become. By opening with that statement, Reichert proves he has no interest in owning up to the failures of private healthcare–no interest in calling them out one-by-one and assuring constituents that they can be dealt with in an alternative way. His screed about personal responsibility is classic, private-healthcare hogwash, using that rhetoric as a dust cloud to mask the failures of the system. I am an in-shape, make-my-own-food, athletic person, and yet it’s prohibitively expensive for me to see a doctor for even a basic physical. When I got the swine flu, I was probably more sick with panic than with symptoms. So what about me, Reichert? Where should I fax proof of my healthy lifestyle?

    And don’t get me started on Weight Watchers. A company that still allows HFCS in its packaged foods isn’t an authority on the art of eating.

  • http://samred.com/ Sam Machkovech

    We begin from the foundation that health care is about people. It is intensely personal and touches every American. It is not about bureaucratic “systems” and “payment flows” and complicated regulations in government jargon.

    When a four-part series starts with that, you may as well change the channel immediately. Really, Mr. Reichert? For most Americans, that IS what healthcare has become. By opening with that statement, Reichert proves he has no interest in owning up to the failures of private healthcare–no interest in calling them out one-by-one and assuring constituents that they can be dealt with in an alternative way. His screed about personal responsibility is classic, private-healthcare hogwash, using that rhetoric as a dust cloud to mask the failures of the system. I am an in-shape, make-my-own-food, athletic person, and yet it’s prohibitively expensive for me to see a doctor for even a basic physical. When I got the swine flu, I was probably more sick with panic than with symptoms. So what about me, Reichert? Where should I fax proof of my healthy lifestyle?

    And don’t get me started on Weight Watchers. A company that still allows HFCS in its packaged foods isn’t an authority on the art of eating.

  • http://samred.com/ Sam Machkovech

    We begin from the foundation that health care is about people. It is intensely personal and touches every American. It is not about bureaucratic “systems” and “payment flows” and complicated regulations in government jargon.

    When a four-part series starts with that, you may as well change the channel immediately. Really, Mr. Reichert? For most Americans, that IS what healthcare has become. By opening with that statement, Reichert proves he has no interest in owning up to the failures of private healthcare–no interest in calling them out one-by-one and assuring constituents that they can be dealt with in an alternative way. His screed about personal responsibility is classic, private-healthcare hogwash, using that rhetoric as a dust cloud to mask the failures of the system. I am an in-shape, make-my-own-food, athletic person, and yet it’s prohibitively expensive for me to see a doctor for even a basic physical. When I got the swine flu, I was probably more sick with panic than with symptoms. So what about me, Reichert? Where should I fax proof of my healthy lifestyle?

    And don’t get me started on Weight Watchers. A company that still allows HFCS in its packaged foods isn’t an authority on the art of eating.

  • http://samred.com/ Sam Machkovech

    We begin from the foundation that health care is about people. It is intensely personal and touches every American. It is not about bureaucratic “systems” and “payment flows” and complicated regulations in government jargon.

    When a four-part series starts with that, you may as well change the channel immediately. Really, Mr. Reichert? For most Americans, that IS what healthcare has become. By opening with that statement, Reichert proves he has no interest in owning up to the failures of private healthcare–no interest in calling them out one-by-one and assuring constituents that they can be dealt with in an alternative way. His screed about personal responsibility is classic, private-healthcare hogwash, using that rhetoric as a dust cloud to mask the failures of the system. I am an in-shape, make-my-own-food, athletic person, and yet it’s prohibitively expensive for me to see a doctor for even a basic physical. When I got the swine flu, I was probably more sick with panic than with symptoms. So what about me, Reichert? Where should I fax proof of my healthy lifestyle?

    And don’t get me started on Weight Watchers. A company that still allows HFCS in its packaged foods isn’t an authority on the art of eating.

  • http://samred.com/ Sam Machkovech

    We begin from the foundation that health care is about people. It is intensely personal and touches every American. It is not about bureaucratic “systems” and “payment flows” and complicated regulations in government jargon.

    When a four-part series starts with that, you may as well change the channel immediately. Really, Mr. Reichert? For most Americans, that IS what healthcare has become. By opening with that statement, Reichert proves he has no interest in owning up to the failures of private healthcare–no interest in calling them out one-by-one and assuring constituents that they can be dealt with in an alternative way. His screed about personal responsibility is classic, private-healthcare hogwash, using that rhetoric as a dust cloud to mask the failures of the system. I am an in-shape, make-my-own-food, athletic person, and yet it’s prohibitively expensive for me to see a doctor for even a basic physical. When I got the swine flu, I was probably more sick with panic than with symptoms. So what about me, Reichert? Where should I fax proof of my healthy lifestyle?

    And don’t get me started on Weight Watchers. A company that still allows HFCS in its packaged foods isn’t an authority on the art of eating.

  • http://samred.com/ Sam Machkovech

    We begin from the foundation that health care is about people. It is intensely personal and touches every American. It is not about bureaucratic “systems” and “payment flows” and complicated regulations in government jargon.

    When a four-part series starts with that, you may as well change the channel immediately. Really, Mr. Reichert? For most Americans, that IS what healthcare has become. By opening with that statement, Reichert proves he has no interest in owning up to the failures of private healthcare–no interest in calling them out one-by-one and assuring constituents that they can be dealt with in an alternative way. His screed about personal responsibility is classic, private-healthcare hogwash, using that rhetoric as a dust cloud to mask the failures of the system. I am an in-shape, make-my-own-food, athletic person, and yet it’s prohibitively expensive for me to see a doctor for even a basic physical. When I got the swine flu, I was probably more sick with panic than with symptoms. So what about me, Reichert? Where should I fax proof of my healthy lifestyle?

    And don’t get me started on Weight Watchers. A company that still allows HFCS in its packaged foods isn’t an authority on the art of eating.

  • http://samred.com/ Sam Machkovech

    We begin from the foundation that health care is about people. It is intensely personal and touches every American. It is not about bureaucratic “systems” and “payment flows” and complicated regulations in government jargon.

    When a four-part series starts with that, you may as well change the channel immediately. Really, Mr. Reichert? For most Americans, that IS what healthcare has become. By opening with that statement, Reichert proves he has no interest in owning up to the failures of private healthcare–no interest in calling them out one-by-one and assuring constituents that they can be dealt with in an alternative way. His screed about personal responsibility is classic, private-healthcare hogwash, using that rhetoric as a dust cloud to mask the failures of the system. I am an in-shape, make-my-own-food, athletic person, and yet it’s prohibitively expensive for me to see a doctor for even a basic physical. When I got the swine flu, I was probably more sick with panic than with symptoms. So what about me, Reichert? Where should I fax proof of my healthy lifestyle?

    And don’t get me started on Weight Watchers. A company that still allows HFCS in its packaged foods isn’t an authority on the art of eating.

  • http://samred.com/ Sam Machkovech

    We begin from the foundation that health care is about people. It is intensely personal and touches every American. It is not about bureaucratic “systems” and “payment flows” and complicated regulations in government jargon.

    When a four-part series starts with that, you may as well change the channel immediately. Really, Mr. Reichert? For most Americans, that IS what healthcare has become. By opening with that statement, Reichert proves he has no interest in owning up to the failures of private healthcare–no interest in calling them out one-by-one and assuring constituents that they can be dealt with in an alternative way. His screed about personal responsibility is classic, private-healthcare hogwash, using that rhetoric as a dust cloud to mask the failures of the system. I am an in-shape, make-my-own-food, athletic person, and yet it’s prohibitively expensive for me to see a doctor for even a basic physical. When I got the swine flu, I was probably more sick with panic than with symptoms. So what about me, Reichert? Where should I fax proof of my healthy lifestyle?

    And don’t get me started on Weight Watchers. A company that still allows HFCS in its packaged foods isn’t an authority on the art of eating.

  • http://samred.com/ Sam Machkovech

    We begin from the foundation that health care is about people. It is intensely personal and touches every American. It is not about bureaucratic “systems” and “payment flows” and complicated regulations in government jargon.

    When a four-part series starts with that, you may as well change the channel immediately. Really, Mr. Reichert? For most Americans, that IS what healthcare has become. By opening with that statement, Reichert proves he has no interest in owning up to the failures of private healthcare–no interest in calling them out one-by-one and assuring constituents that they can be dealt with in an alternative way. His screed about personal responsibility is classic, private-healthcare hogwash, using that rhetoric as a dust cloud to mask the failures of the system. I am an in-shape, make-my-own-food, athletic person, and yet it’s prohibitively expensive for me to see a doctor for even a basic physical. When I got the swine flu, I was probably more sick with panic than with symptoms. So what about me, Reichert? Where should I fax proof of my healthy lifestyle?

    And don’t get me started on Weight Watchers. A company that still allows HFCS in its packaged foods isn’t an authority on the art of eating.

  • http://samred.com/ Sam Machkovech

    We begin from the foundation that health care is about people. It is intensely personal and touches every American. It is not about bureaucratic “systems” and “payment flows” and complicated regulations in government jargon.

    When a four-part series starts with that, you may as well change the channel immediately. Really, Mr. Reichert? For most Americans, that IS what healthcare has become. By opening with that statement, Reichert proves he has no interest in owning up to the failures of private healthcare–no interest in calling them out one-by-one and assuring constituents that they can be dealt with in an alternative way. His screed about personal responsibility is classic, private-healthcare hogwash, using that rhetoric as a dust cloud to mask the failures of the system. I am an in-shape, make-my-own-food, athletic person, and yet it’s prohibitively expensive for me to see a doctor for even a basic physical. When I got the swine flu, I was probably more sick with panic than with symptoms. So what about me, Reichert? Where should I fax proof of my healthy lifestyle?

    And don’t get me started on Weight Watchers. A company that still allows HFCS in its packaged foods isn’t an authority on the art of eating.

  • http://samred.com/ Sam Machkovech

    We begin from the foundation that health care is about people. It is intensely personal and touches every American. It is not about bureaucratic “systems” and “payment flows” and complicated regulations in government jargon.

    When a four-part series starts with that, you may as well change the channel immediately. Really, Mr. Reichert? For most Americans, that IS what healthcare has become. By opening with that statement, Reichert proves he has no interest in owning up to the failures of private healthcare–no interest in calling them out one-by-one and assuring constituents that they can be dealt with in an alternative way. His screed about personal responsibility is classic, private-healthcare hogwash, using that rhetoric as a dust cloud to mask the failures of the system. I am an in-shape, make-my-own-food, athletic person, and yet it’s prohibitively expensive for me to see a doctor for even a basic physical. When I got the swine flu, I was probably more sick with panic than with symptoms. So what about me, Reichert? Where should I fax proof of my healthy lifestyle?

    And don’t get me started on Weight Watchers. A company that still allows HFCS in its packaged foods isn’t an authority on the art of eating.

  • http://samred.com/ Sam Machkovech

    We begin from the foundation that health care is about people. It is intensely personal and touches every American. It is not about bureaucratic “systems” and “payment flows” and complicated regulations in government jargon.

    When a four-part series starts with that, you may as well change the channel immediately. Really, Mr. Reichert? For most Americans, that IS what healthcare has become. By opening with that statement, Reichert proves he has no interest in owning up to the failures of private healthcare–no interest in calling them out one-by-one and assuring constituents that they can be dealt with in an alternative way. His screed about personal responsibility is classic, private-healthcare hogwash, using that rhetoric as a dust cloud to mask the failures of the system. I am an in-shape, make-my-own-food, athletic person, and yet it’s prohibitively expensive for me to see a doctor for even a basic physical. When I got the swine flu, I was probably more sick with panic than with symptoms. So what about me, Reichert? Where should I fax proof of my healthy lifestyle?

    And don’t get me started on Weight Watchers. A company that still allows HFCS in its packaged foods isn’t an authority on the art of eating.

  • http://samred.com Sam Machkovech

    We begin from the foundation that health care is about people. It is intensely personal and touches every American. It is not about bureaucratic “systems” and “payment flows” and complicated regulations in government jargon.

    When a four-part series starts with that, you may as well change the channel immediately. Really, Mr. Reichert? For most Americans, that IS what healthcare has become. By opening with that statement, Reichert proves he has no interest in owning up to the failures of private healthcare–no interest in calling them out one-by-one and assuring constituents that they can be dealt with in an alternative way. His screed about personal responsibility is classic, private-healthcare hogwash, using that rhetoric as a dust cloud to mask the failures of the system. I am an in-shape, make-my-own-food, athletic person, and yet it’s prohibitively expensive for me to see a doctor for even a basic physical. When I got the swine flu, I was probably more sick with panic than with symptoms. So what about me, Reichert? Where should I fax proof of my healthy lifestyle?

    And don’t get me started on Weight Watchers. A company that still allows HFCS in its packaged foods isn’t an authority on the art of eating.

  • sarah68

    #1 should be comment of the day.

  • sarah68

    #1 should be comment of the day.

  • sarah68

    #1 should be comment of the day.

  • sarah68

    #1 should be comment of the day.

  • sarah68

    #1 should be comment of the day.

  • sarah68

    #1 should be comment of the day.

  • sarah68

    #1 should be comment of the day.

  • sarah68

    #1 should be comment of the day.

  • sarah68

    #1 should be comment of the day.

  • sarah68

    #1 should be comment of the day.

  • sarah68

    #1 should be comment of the day.

  • sarah68

    #1 should be comment of the day.

  • sarah68

    #1 should be comment of the day.

  • sarah68

    #1 should be comment of the day.

  • sarah68

    #1 should be comment of the day.

  • sarah68

    #1 should be comment of the day.

  • sarah68

    #1 should be comment of the day.

  • sarah68

    #1 should be comment of the day.

  • sarah68

    #1 should be comment of the day.

  • fredster

    Suzanne DelBene needs to publicly respond to this series and draw a contrast between her and Reichert’s views.

  • fredster

    Suzanne DelBene needs to publicly respond to this series and draw a contrast between her and Reichert’s views.

  • fredster

    Suzanne DelBene needs to publicly respond to this series and draw a contrast between her and Reichert’s views.

  • fredster

    Suzanne DelBene needs to publicly respond to this series and draw a contrast between her and Reichert’s views.

  • fredster

    Suzanne DelBene needs to publicly respond to this series and draw a contrast between her and Reichert’s views.

  • fredster

    Suzanne DelBene needs to publicly respond to this series and draw a contrast between her and Reichert’s views.

  • fredster

    Suzanne DelBene needs to publicly respond to this series and draw a contrast between her and Reichert’s views.

  • fredster

    Suzanne DelBene needs to publicly respond to this series and draw a contrast between her and Reichert’s views.

  • fredster

    Suzanne DelBene needs to publicly respond to this series and draw a contrast between her and Reichert’s views.

  • fredster

    Suzanne DelBene needs to publicly respond to this series and draw a contrast between her and Reichert’s views.

  • fredster

    Suzanne DelBene needs to publicly respond to this series and draw a contrast between her and Reichert’s views.

  • fredster

    Suzanne DelBene needs to publicly respond to this series and draw a contrast between her and Reichert’s views.

  • fredster

    Suzanne DelBene needs to publicly respond to this series and draw a contrast between her and Reichert’s views.

  • fredster

    Suzanne DelBene needs to publicly respond to this series and draw a contrast between her and Reichert’s views.

  • fredster

    Suzanne DelBene needs to publicly respond to this series and draw a contrast between her and Reichert’s views.

  • fredster

    Suzanne DelBene needs to publicly respond to this series and draw a contrast between her and Reichert’s views.

  • fredster

    Suzanne DelBene needs to publicly respond to this series and draw a contrast between her and Reichert’s views.

  • fredster

    Suzanne DelBene needs to publicly respond to this series and draw a contrast between her and Reichert’s views.

  • fredster

    Suzanne DelBene needs to publicly respond to this series and draw a contrast between her and Reichert’s views.

  • lol

    Part 1: Sick people should’ve known better than to be lazy.
    Part 2: Sick people should’ve known better than to get sick.
    Part 3: Sick people should’ve known better than to be poor.
    Part 4: Sick people should pull themselves up by their bootstraps. PS: Vote Republican!

  • lol

    Part 1: Sick people should’ve known better than to be lazy.
    Part 2: Sick people should’ve known better than to get sick.
    Part 3: Sick people should’ve known better than to be poor.
    Part 4: Sick people should pull themselves up by their bootstraps. PS: Vote Republican!

  • lol

    Part 1: Sick people should’ve known better than to be lazy.
    Part 2: Sick people should’ve known better than to get sick.
    Part 3: Sick people should’ve known better than to be poor.
    Part 4: Sick people should pull themselves up by their bootstraps. PS: Vote Republican!

  • lol

    Part 1: Sick people should’ve known better than to be lazy.
    Part 2: Sick people should’ve known better than to get sick.
    Part 3: Sick people should’ve known better than to be poor.
    Part 4: Sick people should pull themselves up by their bootstraps. PS: Vote Republican!

  • lol

    Part 1: Sick people should’ve known better than to be lazy.
    Part 2: Sick people should’ve known better than to get sick.
    Part 3: Sick people should’ve known better than to be poor.
    Part 4: Sick people should pull themselves up by their bootstraps. PS: Vote Republican!

  • lol

    Part 1: Sick people should’ve known better than to be lazy.
    Part 2: Sick people should’ve known better than to get sick.
    Part 3: Sick people should’ve known better than to be poor.
    Part 4: Sick people should pull themselves up by their bootstraps. PS: Vote Republican!

  • lol

    Part 1: Sick people should’ve known better than to be lazy.
    Part 2: Sick people should’ve known better than to get sick.
    Part 3: Sick people should’ve known better than to be poor.
    Part 4: Sick people should pull themselves up by their bootstraps. PS: Vote Republican!

  • lol

    Part 1: Sick people should’ve known better than to be lazy.
    Part 2: Sick people should’ve known better than to get sick.
    Part 3: Sick people should’ve known better than to be poor.
    Part 4: Sick people should pull themselves up by their bootstraps. PS: Vote Republican!

  • lol

    Part 1: Sick people should’ve known better than to be lazy.
    Part 2: Sick people should’ve known better than to get sick.
    Part 3: Sick people should’ve known better than to be poor.
    Part 4: Sick people should pull themselves up by their bootstraps. PS: Vote Republican!

  • lol

    Part 1: Sick people should’ve known better than to be lazy.
    Part 2: Sick people should’ve known better than to get sick.
    Part 3: Sick people should’ve known better than to be poor.
    Part 4: Sick people should pull themselves up by their bootstraps. PS: Vote Republican!

  • lol

    Part 1: Sick people should’ve known better than to be lazy.
    Part 2: Sick people should’ve known better than to get sick.
    Part 3: Sick people should’ve known better than to be poor.
    Part 4: Sick people should pull themselves up by their bootstraps. PS: Vote Republican!

  • lol

    Part 1: Sick people should’ve known better than to be lazy.
    Part 2: Sick people should’ve known better than to get sick.
    Part 3: Sick people should’ve known better than to be poor.
    Part 4: Sick people should pull themselves up by their bootstraps. PS: Vote Republican!

  • lol

    Part 1: Sick people should’ve known better than to be lazy.
    Part 2: Sick people should’ve known better than to get sick.
    Part 3: Sick people should’ve known better than to be poor.
    Part 4: Sick people should pull themselves up by their bootstraps. PS: Vote Republican!

  • lol

    Part 1: Sick people should’ve known better than to be lazy.
    Part 2: Sick people should’ve known better than to get sick.
    Part 3: Sick people should’ve known better than to be poor.
    Part 4: Sick people should pull themselves up by their bootstraps. PS: Vote Republican!

  • lol

    Part 1: Sick people should’ve known better than to be lazy.
    Part 2: Sick people should’ve known better than to get sick.
    Part 3: Sick people should’ve known better than to be poor.
    Part 4: Sick people should pull themselves up by their bootstraps. PS: Vote Republican!

  • lol

    Part 1: Sick people should’ve known better than to be lazy.
    Part 2: Sick people should’ve known better than to get sick.
    Part 3: Sick people should’ve known better than to be poor.
    Part 4: Sick people should pull themselves up by their bootstraps. PS: Vote Republican!

  • lol

    Part 1: Sick people should’ve known better than to be lazy.
    Part 2: Sick people should’ve known better than to get sick.
    Part 3: Sick people should’ve known better than to be poor.
    Part 4: Sick people should pull themselves up by their bootstraps. PS: Vote Republican!

  • lol

    Part 1: Sick people should’ve known better than to be lazy.
    Part 2: Sick people should’ve known better than to get sick.
    Part 3: Sick people should’ve known better than to be poor.
    Part 4: Sick people should pull themselves up by their bootstraps. PS: Vote Republican!

  • lol

    Part 1: Sick people should’ve known better than to be lazy.
    Part 2: Sick people should’ve known better than to get sick.
    Part 3: Sick people should’ve known better than to be poor.
    Part 4: Sick people should pull themselves up by their bootstraps. PS: Vote Republican!

  • T.Chen

    We DO need to take better care of ourselves as a people.

    That being said, the Republicans won’t even let the government pay for counseling about planning for end of life decisions (to save money, partly) so can we really believe they want to impose some serious financial penalties for unhealthy lifestyles?

    Our health care system is the worst of all worlds. There are two sensible options to dealing with spiraling costs.

    Option 1: We could keep the cost low by denying coverage to people who can’t pay; but we don’t. We just make the poor go to clinics and emergency rooms, which are required by law to treat people even if they are drug addicts from Pioneer Square who obviously have no ability to pay for care and have been into the hospital for heroin overdoses before.

    Option 2: We could cover everyone, and ration care to fit within a reasonable budget.

    Either option would keep costs down, but we (understandably) don’t like to see poor, pathetic people dying on the streets outside hospitals so we don’t choose option 1.

    We don’t choose option 2 because our politicians treat us like babies, and we let them get away with it. We nod our heads to platitudes about “no rationing!” “That’s socialism!”

    So instead we have nightmare system where everyone has access to health care, but only if they beg at a clinic or show up at an emergency room and submit to being hounded by debt collectors for the rest of their lives. And the system costs more than anywhere else in the world! By far!

    WTF is wrong with so many people in this country who are apparently pleased with the status quo?

  • T.Chen

    We DO need to take better care of ourselves as a people.

    That being said, the Republicans won’t even let the government pay for counseling about planning for end of life decisions (to save money, partly) so can we really believe they want to impose some serious financial penalties for unhealthy lifestyles?

    Our health care system is the worst of all worlds. There are two sensible options to dealing with spiraling costs.

    Option 1: We could keep the cost low by denying coverage to people who can’t pay; but we don’t. We just make the poor go to clinics and emergency rooms, which are required by law to treat people even if they are drug addicts from Pioneer Square who obviously have no ability to pay for care and have been into the hospital for heroin overdoses before.

    Option 2: We could cover everyone, and ration care to fit within a reasonable budget.

    Either option would keep costs down, but we (understandably) don’t like to see poor, pathetic people dying on the streets outside hospitals so we don’t choose option 1.

    We don’t choose option 2 because our politicians treat us like babies, and we let them get away with it. We nod our heads to platitudes about “no rationing!” “That’s socialism!”

    So instead we have nightmare system where everyone has access to health care, but only if they beg at a clinic or show up at an emergency room and submit to being hounded by debt collectors for the rest of their lives. And the system costs more than anywhere else in the world! By far!

    WTF is wrong with so many people in this country who are apparently pleased with the status quo?

  • T.Chen

    We DO need to take better care of ourselves as a people.

    That being said, the Republicans won’t even let the government pay for counseling about planning for end of life decisions (to save money, partly) so can we really believe they want to impose some serious financial penalties for unhealthy lifestyles?

    Our health care system is the worst of all worlds. There are two sensible options to dealing with spiraling costs.

    Option 1: We could keep the cost low by denying coverage to people who can’t pay; but we don’t. We just make the poor go to clinics and emergency rooms, which are required by law to treat people even if they are drug addicts from Pioneer Square who obviously have no ability to pay for care and have been into the hospital for heroin overdoses before.

    Option 2: We could cover everyone, and ration care to fit within a reasonable budget.

    Either option would keep costs down, but we (understandably) don’t like to see poor, pathetic people dying on the streets outside hospitals so we don’t choose option 1.

    We don’t choose option 2 because our politicians treat us like babies, and we let them get away with it. We nod our heads to platitudes about “no rationing!” “That’s socialism!”

    So instead we have nightmare system where everyone has access to health care, but only if they beg at a clinic or show up at an emergency room and submit to being hounded by debt collectors for the rest of their lives. And the system costs more than anywhere else in the world! By far!

    WTF is wrong with so many people in this country who are apparently pleased with the status quo?

  • T.Chen

    We DO need to take better care of ourselves as a people.

    That being said, the Republicans won’t even let the government pay for counseling about planning for end of life decisions (to save money, partly) so can we really believe they want to impose some serious financial penalties for unhealthy lifestyles?

    Our health care system is the worst of all worlds. There are two sensible options to dealing with spiraling costs.

    Option 1: We could keep the cost low by denying coverage to people who can’t pay; but we don’t. We just make the poor go to clinics and emergency rooms, which are required by law to treat people even if they are drug addicts from Pioneer Square who obviously have no ability to pay for care and have been into the hospital for heroin overdoses before.

    Option 2: We could cover everyone, and ration care to fit within a reasonable budget.

    Either option would keep costs down, but we (understandably) don’t like to see poor, pathetic people dying on the streets outside hospitals so we don’t choose option 1.

    We don’t choose option 2 because our politicians treat us like babies, and we let them get away with it. We nod our heads to platitudes about “no rationing!” “That’s socialism!”

    So instead we have nightmare system where everyone has access to health care, but only if they beg at a clinic or show up at an emergency room and submit to being hounded by debt collectors for the rest of their lives. And the system costs more than anywhere else in the world! By far!

    WTF is wrong with so many people in this country who are apparently pleased with the status quo?

  • T.Chen

    We DO need to take better care of ourselves as a people.

    That being said, the Republicans won’t even let the government pay for counseling about planning for end of life decisions (to save money, partly) so can we really believe they want to impose some serious financial penalties for unhealthy lifestyles?

    Our health care system is the worst of all worlds. There are two sensible options to dealing with spiraling costs.

    Option 1: We could keep the cost low by denying coverage to people who can’t pay; but we don’t. We just make the poor go to clinics and emergency rooms, which are required by law to treat people even if they are drug addicts from Pioneer Square who obviously have no ability to pay for care and have been into the hospital for heroin overdoses before.

    Option 2: We could cover everyone, and ration care to fit within a reasonable budget.

    Either option would keep costs down, but we (understandably) don’t like to see poor, pathetic people dying on the streets outside hospitals so we don’t choose option 1.

    We don’t choose option 2 because our politicians treat us like babies, and we let them get away with it. We nod our heads to platitudes about “no rationing!” “That’s socialism!”

    So instead we have nightmare system where everyone has access to health care, but only if they beg at a clinic or show up at an emergency room and submit to being hounded by debt collectors for the rest of their lives. And the system costs more than anywhere else in the world! By far!

    WTF is wrong with so many people in this country who are apparently pleased with the status quo?

  • T.Chen

    We DO need to take better care of ourselves as a people.

    That being said, the Republicans won’t even let the government pay for counseling about planning for end of life decisions (to save money, partly) so can we really believe they want to impose some serious financial penalties for unhealthy lifestyles?

    Our health care system is the worst of all worlds. There are two sensible options to dealing with spiraling costs.

    Option 1: We could keep the cost low by denying coverage to people who can’t pay; but we don’t. We just make the poor go to clinics and emergency rooms, which are required by law to treat people even if they are drug addicts from Pioneer Square who obviously have no ability to pay for care and have been into the hospital for heroin overdoses before.

    Option 2: We could cover everyone, and ration care to fit within a reasonable budget.

    Either option would keep costs down, but we (understandably) don’t like to see poor, pathetic people dying on the streets outside hospitals so we don’t choose option 1.

    We don’t choose option 2 because our politicians treat us like babies, and we let them get away with it. We nod our heads to platitudes about “no rationing!” “That’s socialism!”

    So instead we have nightmare system where everyone has access to health care, but only if they beg at a clinic or show up at an emergency room and submit to being hounded by debt collectors for the rest of their lives. And the system costs more than anywhere else in the world! By far!

    WTF is wrong with so many people in this country who are apparently pleased with the status quo?

  • T.Chen

    We DO need to take better care of ourselves as a people.

    That being said, the Republicans won’t even let the government pay for counseling about planning for end of life decisions (to save money, partly) so can we really believe they want to impose some serious financial penalties for unhealthy lifestyles?

    Our health care system is the worst of all worlds. There are two sensible options to dealing with spiraling costs.

    Option 1: We could keep the cost low by denying coverage to people who can’t pay; but we don’t. We just make the poor go to clinics and emergency rooms, which are required by law to treat people even if they are drug addicts from Pioneer Square who obviously have no ability to pay for care and have been into the hospital for heroin overdoses before.

    Option 2: We could cover everyone, and ration care to fit within a reasonable budget.

    Either option would keep costs down, but we (understandably) don’t like to see poor, pathetic people dying on the streets outside hospitals so we don’t choose option 1.

    We don’t choose option 2 because our politicians treat us like babies, and we let them get away with it. We nod our heads to platitudes about “no rationing!” “That’s socialism!”

    So instead we have nightmare system where everyone has access to health care, but only if they beg at a clinic or show up at an emergency room and submit to being hounded by debt collectors for the rest of their lives. And the system costs more than anywhere else in the world! By far!

    WTF is wrong with so many people in this country who are apparently pleased with the status quo?

  • T.Chen

    We DO need to take better care of ourselves as a people.

    That being said, the Republicans won’t even let the government pay for counseling about planning for end of life decisions (to save money, partly) so can we really believe they want to impose some serious financial penalties for unhealthy lifestyles?

    Our health care system is the worst of all worlds. There are two sensible options to dealing with spiraling costs.

    Option 1: We could keep the cost low by denying coverage to people who can’t pay; but we don’t. We just make the poor go to clinics and emergency rooms, which are required by law to treat people even if they are drug addicts from Pioneer Square who obviously have no ability to pay for care and have been into the hospital for heroin overdoses before.

    Option 2: We could cover everyone, and ration care to fit within a reasonable budget.

    Either option would keep costs down, but we (understandably) don’t like to see poor, pathetic people dying on the streets outside hospitals so we don’t choose option 1.

    We don’t choose option 2 because our politicians treat us like babies, and we let them get away with it. We nod our heads to platitudes about “no rationing!” “That’s socialism!”

    So instead we have nightmare system where everyone has access to health care, but only if they beg at a clinic or show up at an emergency room and submit to being hounded by debt collectors for the rest of their lives. And the system costs more than anywhere else in the world! By far!

    WTF is wrong with so many people in this country who are apparently pleased with the status quo?

  • T.Chen

    We DO need to take better care of ourselves as a people.

    That being said, the Republicans won’t even let the government pay for counseling about planning for end of life decisions (to save money, partly) so can we really believe they want to impose some serious financial penalties for unhealthy lifestyles?

    Our health care system is the worst of all worlds. There are two sensible options to dealing with spiraling costs.

    Option 1: We could keep the cost low by denying coverage to people who can’t pay; but we don’t. We just make the poor go to clinics and emergency rooms, which are required by law to treat people even if they are drug addicts from Pioneer Square who obviously have no ability to pay for care and have been into the hospital for heroin overdoses before.

    Option 2: We could cover everyone, and ration care to fit within a reasonable budget.

    Either option would keep costs down, but we (understandably) don’t like to see poor, pathetic people dying on the streets outside hospitals so we don’t choose option 1.

    We don’t choose option 2 because our politicians treat us like babies, and we let them get away with it. We nod our heads to platitudes about “no rationing!” “That’s socialism!”

    So instead we have nightmare system where everyone has access to health care, but only if they beg at a clinic or show up at an emergency room and submit to being hounded by debt collectors for the rest of their lives. And the system costs more than anywhere else in the world! By far!

    WTF is wrong with so many people in this country who are apparently pleased with the status quo?

  • T.Chen

    We DO need to take better care of ourselves as a people.

    That being said, the Republicans won’t even let the government pay for counseling about planning for end of life decisions (to save money, partly) so can we really believe they want to impose some serious financial penalties for unhealthy lifestyles?

    Our health care system is the worst of all worlds. There are two sensible options to dealing with spiraling costs.

    Option 1: We could keep the cost low by denying coverage to people who can’t pay; but we don’t. We just make the poor go to clinics and emergency rooms, which are required by law to treat people even if they are drug addicts from Pioneer Square who obviously have no ability to pay for care and have been into the hospital for heroin overdoses before.

    Option 2: We could cover everyone, and ration care to fit within a reasonable budget.

    Either option would keep costs down, but we (understandably) don’t like to see poor, pathetic people dying on the streets outside hospitals so we don’t choose option 1.

    We don’t choose option 2 because our politicians treat us like babies, and we let them get away with it. We nod our heads to platitudes about “no rationing!” “That’s socialism!”

    So instead we have nightmare system where everyone has access to health care, but only if they beg at a clinic or show up at an emergency room and submit to being hounded by debt collectors for the rest of their lives. And the system costs more than anywhere else in the world! By far!

    WTF is wrong with so many people in this country who are apparently pleased with the status quo?

  • T.Chen

    We DO need to take better care of ourselves as a people.

    That being said, the Republicans won’t even let the government pay for counseling about planning for end of life decisions (to save money, partly) so can we really believe they want to impose some serious financial penalties for unhealthy lifestyles?

    Our health care system is the worst of all worlds. There are two sensible options to dealing with spiraling costs.

    Option 1: We could keep the cost low by denying coverage to people who can’t pay; but we don’t. We just make the poor go to clinics and emergency rooms, which are required by law to treat people even if they are drug addicts from Pioneer Square who obviously have no ability to pay for care and have been into the hospital for heroin overdoses before.

    Option 2: We could cover everyone, and ration care to fit within a reasonable budget.

    Either option would keep costs down, but we (understandably) don’t like to see poor, pathetic people dying on the streets outside hospitals so we don’t choose option 1.

    We don’t choose option 2 because our politicians treat us like babies, and we let them get away with it. We nod our heads to platitudes about “no rationing!” “That’s socialism!”

    So instead we have nightmare system where everyone has access to health care, but only if they beg at a clinic or show up at an emergency room and submit to being hounded by debt collectors for the rest of their lives. And the system costs more than anywhere else in the world! By far!

    WTF is wrong with so many people in this country who are apparently pleased with the status quo?

  • T.Chen

    We DO need to take better care of ourselves as a people.

    That being said, the Republicans won’t even let the government pay for counseling about planning for end of life decisions (to save money, partly) so can we really believe they want to impose some serious financial penalties for unhealthy lifestyles?

    Our health care system is the worst of all worlds. There are two sensible options to dealing with spiraling costs.

    Option 1: We could keep the cost low by denying coverage to people who can’t pay; but we don’t. We just make the poor go to clinics and emergency rooms, which are required by law to treat people even if they are drug addicts from Pioneer Square who obviously have no ability to pay for care and have been into the hospital for heroin overdoses before.

    Option 2: We could cover everyone, and ration care to fit within a reasonable budget.

    Either option would keep costs down, but we (understandably) don’t like to see poor, pathetic people dying on the streets outside hospitals so we don’t choose option 1.

    We don’t choose option 2 because our politicians treat us like babies, and we let them get away with it. We nod our heads to platitudes about “no rationing!” “That’s socialism!”

    So instead we have nightmare system where everyone has access to health care, but only if they beg at a clinic or show up at an emergency room and submit to being hounded by debt collectors for the rest of their lives. And the system costs more than anywhere else in the world! By far!

    WTF is wrong with so many people in this country who are apparently pleased with the status quo?

  • T.Chen

    We DO need to take better care of ourselves as a people.

    That being said, the Republicans won’t even let the government pay for counseling about planning for end of life decisions (to save money, partly) so can we really believe they want to impose some serious financial penalties for unhealthy lifestyles?

    Our health care system is the worst of all worlds. There are two sensible options to dealing with spiraling costs.

    Option 1: We could keep the cost low by denying coverage to people who can’t pay; but we don’t. We just make the poor go to clinics and emergency rooms, which are required by law to treat people even if they are drug addicts from Pioneer Square who obviously have no ability to pay for care and have been into the hospital for heroin overdoses before.

    Option 2: We could cover everyone, and ration care to fit within a reasonable budget.

    Either option would keep costs down, but we (understandably) don’t like to see poor, pathetic people dying on the streets outside hospitals so we don’t choose option 1.

    We don’t choose option 2 because our politicians treat us like babies, and we let them get away with it. We nod our heads to platitudes about “no rationing!” “That’s socialism!”

    So instead we have nightmare system where everyone has access to health care, but only if they beg at a clinic or show up at an emergency room and submit to being hounded by debt collectors for the rest of their lives. And the system costs more than anywhere else in the world! By far!

    WTF is wrong with so many people in this country who are apparently pleased with the status quo?

  • T.Chen

    We DO need to take better care of ourselves as a people.

    That being said, the Republicans won’t even let the government pay for counseling about planning for end of life decisions (to save money, partly) so can we really believe they want to impose some serious financial penalties for unhealthy lifestyles?

    Our health care system is the worst of all worlds. There are two sensible options to dealing with spiraling costs.

    Option 1: We could keep the cost low by denying coverage to people who can’t pay; but we don’t. We just make the poor go to clinics and emergency rooms, which are required by law to treat people even if they are drug addicts from Pioneer Square who obviously have no ability to pay for care and have been into the hospital for heroin overdoses before.

    Option 2: We could cover everyone, and ration care to fit within a reasonable budget.

    Either option would keep costs down, but we (understandably) don’t like to see poor, pathetic people dying on the streets outside hospitals so we don’t choose option 1.

    We don’t choose option 2 because our politicians treat us like babies, and we let them get away with it. We nod our heads to platitudes about “no rationing!” “That’s socialism!”

    So instead we have nightmare system where everyone has access to health care, but only if they beg at a clinic or show up at an emergency room and submit to being hounded by debt collectors for the rest of their lives. And the system costs more than anywhere else in the world! By far!

    WTF is wrong with so many people in this country who are apparently pleased with the status quo?

  • T.Chen

    We DO need to take better care of ourselves as a people.

    That being said, the Republicans won’t even let the government pay for counseling about planning for end of life decisions (to save money, partly) so can we really believe they want to impose some serious financial penalties for unhealthy lifestyles?

    Our health care system is the worst of all worlds. There are two sensible options to dealing with spiraling costs.

    Option 1: We could keep the cost low by denying coverage to people who can’t pay; but we don’t. We just make the poor go to clinics and emergency rooms, which are required by law to treat people even if they are drug addicts from Pioneer Square who obviously have no ability to pay for care and have been into the hospital for heroin overdoses before.

    Option 2: We could cover everyone, and ration care to fit within a reasonable budget.

    Either option would keep costs down, but we (understandably) don’t like to see poor, pathetic people dying on the streets outside hospitals so we don’t choose option 1.

    We don’t choose option 2 because our politicians treat us like babies, and we let them get away with it. We nod our heads to platitudes about “no rationing!” “That’s socialism!”

    So instead we have nightmare system where everyone has access to health care, but only if they beg at a clinic or show up at an emergency room and submit to being hounded by debt collectors for the rest of their lives. And the system costs more than anywhere else in the world! By far!

    WTF is wrong with so many people in this country who are apparently pleased with the status quo?

  • T.Chen

    We DO need to take better care of ourselves as a people.

    That being said, the Republicans won’t even let the government pay for counseling about planning for end of life decisions (to save money, partly) so can we really believe they want to impose some serious financial penalties for unhealthy lifestyles?

    Our health care system is the worst of all worlds. There are two sensible options to dealing with spiraling costs.

    Option 1: We could keep the cost low by denying coverage to people who can’t pay; but we don’t. We just make the poor go to clinics and emergency rooms, which are required by law to treat people even if they are drug addicts from Pioneer Square who obviously have no ability to pay for care and have been into the hospital for heroin overdoses before.

    Option 2: We could cover everyone, and ration care to fit within a reasonable budget.

    Either option would keep costs down, but we (understandably) don’t like to see poor, pathetic people dying on the streets outside hospitals so we don’t choose option 1.

    We don’t choose option 2 because our politicians treat us like babies, and we let them get away with it. We nod our heads to platitudes about “no rationing!” “That’s socialism!”

    So instead we have nightmare system where everyone has access to health care, but only if they beg at a clinic or show up at an emergency room and submit to being hounded by debt collectors for the rest of their lives. And the system costs more than anywhere else in the world! By far!

    WTF is wrong with so many people in this country who are apparently pleased with the status quo?

  • T.Chen

    We DO need to take better care of ourselves as a people.

    That being said, the Republicans won’t even let the government pay for counseling about planning for end of life decisions (to save money, partly) so can we really believe they want to impose some serious financial penalties for unhealthy lifestyles?

    Our health care system is the worst of all worlds. There are two sensible options to dealing with spiraling costs.

    Option 1: We could keep the cost low by denying coverage to people who can’t pay; but we don’t. We just make the poor go to clinics and emergency rooms, which are required by law to treat people even if they are drug addicts from Pioneer Square who obviously have no ability to pay for care and have been into the hospital for heroin overdoses before.

    Option 2: We could cover everyone, and ration care to fit within a reasonable budget.

    Either option would keep costs down, but we (understandably) don’t like to see poor, pathetic people dying on the streets outside hospitals so we don’t choose option 1.

    We don’t choose option 2 because our politicians treat us like babies, and we let them get away with it. We nod our heads to platitudes about “no rationing!” “That’s socialism!”

    So instead we have nightmare system where everyone has access to health care, but only if they beg at a clinic or show up at an emergency room and submit to being hounded by debt collectors for the rest of their lives. And the system costs more than anywhere else in the world! By far!

    WTF is wrong with so many people in this country who are apparently pleased with the status quo?

  • T.Chen

    We DO need to take better care of ourselves as a people.

    That being said, the Republicans won’t even let the government pay for counseling about planning for end of life decisions (to save money, partly) so can we really believe they want to impose some serious financial penalties for unhealthy lifestyles?

    Our health care system is the worst of all worlds. There are two sensible options to dealing with spiraling costs.

    Option 1: We could keep the cost low by denying coverage to people who can’t pay; but we don’t. We just make the poor go to clinics and emergency rooms, which are required by law to treat people even if they are drug addicts from Pioneer Square who obviously have no ability to pay for care and have been into the hospital for heroin overdoses before.

    Option 2: We could cover everyone, and ration care to fit within a reasonable budget.

    Either option would keep costs down, but we (understandably) don’t like to see poor, pathetic people dying on the streets outside hospitals so we don’t choose option 1.

    We don’t choose option 2 because our politicians treat us like babies, and we let them get away with it. We nod our heads to platitudes about “no rationing!” “That’s socialism!”

    So instead we have nightmare system where everyone has access to health care, but only if they beg at a clinic or show up at an emergency room and submit to being hounded by debt collectors for the rest of their lives. And the system costs more than anywhere else in the world! By far!

    WTF is wrong with so many people in this country who are apparently pleased with the status quo?

  • T.Chen

    We DO need to take better care of ourselves as a people.

    That being said, the Republicans won’t even let the government pay for counseling about planning for end of life decisions (to save money, partly) so can we really believe they want to impose some serious financial penalties for unhealthy lifestyles?

    Our health care system is the worst of all worlds. There are two sensible options to dealing with spiraling costs.

    Option 1: We could keep the cost low by denying coverage to people who can’t pay; but we don’t. We just make the poor go to clinics and emergency rooms, which are required by law to treat people even if they are drug addicts from Pioneer Square who obviously have no ability to pay for care and have been into the hospital for heroin overdoses before.

    Option 2: We could cover everyone, and ration care to fit within a reasonable budget.

    Either option would keep costs down, but we (understandably) don’t like to see poor, pathetic people dying on the streets outside hospitals so we don’t choose option 1.

    We don’t choose option 2 because our politicians treat us like babies, and we let them get away with it. We nod our heads to platitudes about “no rationing!” “That’s socialism!”

    So instead we have nightmare system where everyone has access to health care, but only if they beg at a clinic or show up at an emergency room and submit to being hounded by debt collectors for the rest of their lives. And the system costs more than anywhere else in the world! By far!

    WTF is wrong with so many people in this country who are apparently pleased with the status quo?

  • T.Chen

    We DO need to take better care of ourselves as a people.

    That being said, the Republicans won’t even let the government pay for counseling about planning for end of life decisions (to save money, partly) so can we really believe they want to impose some serious financial penalties for unhealthy lifestyles?

    Our health care system is the worst of all worlds. There are two sensible options to dealing with spiraling costs.

    Option 1: We could keep the cost low by denying coverage to people who can’t pay; but we don’t. We just make the poor go to clinics and emergency rooms, which are required by law to treat people even if they are drug addicts from Pioneer Square who obviously have no ability to pay for care and have been into the hospital for heroin overdoses before.

    Option 2: We could cover everyone, and ration care to fit within a reasonable budget.

    Either option would keep costs down, but we (understandably) don’t like to see poor, pathetic people dying on the streets outside hospitals so we don’t choose option 1.

    We don’t choose option 2 because our politicians treat us like babies, and we let them get away with it. We nod our heads to platitudes about “no rationing!” “That’s socialism!”

    So instead we have nightmare system where everyone has access to health care, but only if they beg at a clinic or show up at an emergency room and submit to being hounded by debt collectors for the rest of their lives. And the system costs more than anywhere else in the world! By far!

    WTF is wrong with so many people in this country who are apparently pleased with the status quo?

  • T.Chen

    We DO need to take better care of ourselves as a people.

    That being said, the Republicans won’t even let the government pay for counseling about planning for end of life decisions (to save money, partly) so can we really believe they want to impose some serious financial penalties for unhealthy lifestyles?

    Our health care system is the worst of all worlds. There are two sensible options to dealing with spiraling costs.

    Option 1: We could keep the cost low by denying coverage to people who can’t pay; but we don’t. We just make the poor go to clinics and emergency rooms, which are required by law to treat people even if they are drug addicts from Pioneer Square who obviously have no ability to pay for care and have been into the hospital for heroin overdoses before.

    Option 2: We could cover everyone, and ration care to fit within a reasonable budget.

    Either option would keep costs down, but we (understandably) don’t like to see poor, pathetic people dying on the streets outside hospitals so we don’t choose option 1.

    We don’t choose option 2 because our politicians treat us like babies, and we let them get away with it. We nod our heads to platitudes about “no rationing!” “That’s socialism!”

    So instead we have nightmare system where everyone has access to health care, but only if they beg at a clinic or show up at an emergency room and submit to being hounded by debt collectors for the rest of their lives. And the system costs more than anywhere else in the world! By far!

    WTF is wrong with so many people in this country who are apparently pleased with the status quo?