Viva La Cola!

Founded in January 2009, PubliCola is a blog about Seattle written by journalists who are dedicated to non-partisan, original daily reporting that prioritizes a balanced approach to news. Started by longtime local editor and award-winning reporter Josh Feit, PubliCola is the first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol.

PubliCola was off and running. In June 2009, PubliCola hired another award-winning journalist, super-sourced Seattle city hall reporter Erica C. Barnett.

People were afraid that blogging would change journalism. Instead, we believe journalism can change blogging. Twenty-first century journalism may look and feel different, and yes Erica isn't afraid to get cranky, but we're committed to making sure online news still delivers independent, reliable, even-keeled coverage. And most of all, we're committed to making sure the coverage sparks honest civic debate.

Bringing you cola for the people, PubliCola is named after Publius Valerius PubliCola, the alias for the authors of the Federalist Papers—the original bloggers.

The first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol and Seattle city hall, PubliCola has been called a “must-read” by the Seattle Post Intelligencer and a hot “New Media Mover and Shaker” by Seattle Magazine—which also cited our own Erica C. Barnett as the city's No. 1 news nerd.

County Council Deadlocked on Constantine Replacement

UPDATE 5: I wasn’t able to stick around (via live feed, anyway) until the end, but others report the meeting ended with the 4-4 deadlock intact. The selection will have to wait until 2010.

My quick reaction (more details, including info from behind the scenes, tomorrow): The county council’s inability to choose a replacement for Dow Constantine shows—in case there was any doubt—that “nonpartisanship” in county offices is a sham. The 4-4 split was along party lines; party members met, as they always have, in their respective caucuses to discuss what to do; and ultimately, the reason the council couldn’t come to a decision was because no party held a majority of five. I am a little surprised, however, that council members didn’t come to some sort of arrangement before the meeting (as is customary at city council meetings). Not having a final decision going into the meeting is one thing; (apparently) having never even discussed the alternatives prior to bringing them up in public is quite another.

UPDATE 4: West Seattle Blog reports (via Twitter) that council members have just asked McDermott to meet with them privately in council chambers.

UPDATE 3: Republican Pete Von Reichbauer just nominated state Rep. Zack Hudgins (D-11) in Jhaveri’s place, on the assumption that he “may” be willing to serve as a caretaker. Julia Patterson, a Democrat, responded that it didn’t make any sense for Hudgins to agree to serve as a caretaker, given that he would have to give up his seat in the House. My understanding, too, is that Hudgins would want to run for the position. Now they’re in recess again, trying to get Hudgins on the phone.

UPDATE 2: Reagan Dunn, a Republican, just appointed Arun Jhaveri of Burien, one of the original 11 folks who put their names forward to replace Constantine, as “a reasonable person to take up the spot” as a caretaker, given the deadlock on Drago and McDermott. And they are now in recess… again.

UPDATE: They just came back and deadlocked 4-4 on both Drago and McDermott, and now they’re in recess again, this time supposedly for ten minutes. Watch the hearing live here.

The King County Council, which is currently in recess, is deadlocked 4-4 on who will replace former Position 9 council member Dow Constantine, who was just elected King County Executive.

The council—putatively nonpartisan—is in reality split between four Republicans and four Democrats. (Ordinarily, the council has nine members—and most recently five Democrats—but Constantine’s departure leaves it split down the middle, allowing deadlocks like today’s.) The Democrats want Constantine’s replacement to be state Sen. Joe McDermott, who has said he will run for the seat next year whether or not he is chosen. The four Republicans want it to be former city council member Jan Drago, who has said she would serve only as a “caretaker” in the position until next November’s election.

Democrats remain hopeful that the Republicans will come around on McDermott, one of four finalists who made it to this point in the replacement process. (The others were state Rep. Zack Hudgins (D-11) and state Rep. Sharon Nelson (D-34), a longtime Constantine aide and confidante). Given that McDermott is going to run next year (and almost certainly win) even if Drago is appointed, the logic goes, why would the Republicans want to piss off the Democrats now by appointing someone else temporarily—especially given that, if McDermott wins, the Dems will be in the majority?

If McDermott is picked, Nelson will almost certainly be appointed to his current Senate seat. Then the question becomes: Who will replace Nelson? The names in circulation: Longtime Nelson aide Joe Fitzgibbons; Washington Bus co-founder Josh Johnston, a former aide to King County Council member Julia Patterson and US Rep. Norm Dicks (D-6), Washington Public Campaigns activist Marcie Stone, 34th District Democrats co-chair Kim Becklund (who has sought the seat before), and 34th District chair Tim Nuse.


  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr.Baker

    They preventing partisan appointments, smart politics. If Republicans could influence open elections then there current position makes sense, though I am not so sure they have that much influence in those races.

    I have to wonder if they would also regret taking Drago, she has nothing to lose by pissing of Republicans, including on transit.

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr.Baker

    They preventing partisan appointments, smart politics. If Republicans could influence open elections then there current position makes sense, though I am not so sure they have that much influence in those races.

    I have to wonder if they would also regret taking Drago, she has nothing to lose by pissing of Republicans, including on transit.

  • history buff

    I suspect that Nelson will be the choice. Acceptable as a caretaker to Republicans and as a big time Dem to the Democrats.

  • history buff

    I suspect that Nelson will be the choice. Acceptable as a caretaker to Republicans and as a big time Dem to the Democrats.

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr.Baker

    Ya, I see they are going to call him to see if he just wants to be a “caretaker” and if he would give up his seat in the legislature.

    Channel 22, btw, that music, Muzak, smooth jazz-ish easy listening, audio Valium.

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr.Baker

    Ya, I see they are going to call him to see if he just wants to be a “caretaker” and if he would give up his seat in the legislature.

    Channel 22, btw, that music, Muzak, smooth jazz-ish easy listening, audio Valium.

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr.Baker

    He does not have to give up his seat, they would require that he did (that’s what it sounded like to me).

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr.Baker

    He does not have to give up his seat, they would require that he did (that’s what it sounded like to me).

  • http://www.seattleuntimely.com/ charlie

    Political appointment whack-a-mole.

  • http://www.seattleuntimely.com charlie

    Political appointment whack-a-mole.

  • Progressive Prism

    Why is Joe McDermott’s victory in the election portrayed as a near certainty? Sure, he’s the front runner. But he’s never had to compete for office. He’s received appointments (like this one) and campaigned unopposed. I think it’s a whole new world if he gets a veteran challenger. But if he gets the appointment and can run as the incumbent, then he’ll probably be unopposed again. Lame.

  • Progressive Prism

    Why is Joe McDermott’s victory in the election portrayed as a near certainty? Sure, he’s the front runner. But he’s never had to compete for office. He’s received appointments (like this one) and campaigned unopposed. I think it’s a whole new world if he gets a veteran challenger. But if he gets the appointment and can run as the incumbent, then he’ll probably be unopposed again. Lame.

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr.Baker

    @6, the seat filling after him involves just as much demcracy.

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr.Baker

    @6, the seat filling after him involves just as much demcracy.

  • PredictionKing

    I’m gonna go out on a limb and predict Shawn McEvoy as caretaker in a wildcard finish.

  • PredictionKing

    I’m gonna go out on a limb and predict Shawn McEvoy as caretaker in a wildcard finish.

  • 40-year Seattleite

    ECB, “Given that McDermott is going to run next year (and almost certainly win) even if Drago is appointed, the logic goes, why would the Republicans want to piss off the Democrats now by appointing someone else temporarily—especially given that, if McDermott wins, the Dems will be in the majority?”

    Why indeed? Because one should never underestimate the ability of local Republicans, esp. those on the county council, to do something really dumb.

  • 40-year Seattleite

    ECB, “Given that McDermott is going to run next year (and almost certainly win) even if Drago is appointed, the logic goes, why would the Republicans want to piss off the Democrats now by appointing someone else temporarily—especially given that, if McDermott wins, the Dems will be in the majority?”

    Why indeed? Because one should never underestimate the ability of local Republicans, esp. those on the county council, to do something really dumb.

  • 40-year Seattleite

    Not to mention, when it’s one of the suburban Republicans who move on…it will be payback time for the Democrats (donkeys have long memories….)

  • 40-year Seattleite

    Not to mention, when it’s one of the suburban Republicans who move on…it will be payback time for the Democrats (donkeys have long memories….)

  • Alice Roosevelt

    Aren’t there any others seeking the possible House seat? Guess that Kim Becklund would be my choice.

  • Alice Roosevelt

    Aren’t there any others seeking the possible House seat? Guess that Kim Becklund would be my choice.

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr.Baker

    Deadlocked.

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr.Baker

    Deadlocked.

  • chilly

    The support from the 8th is all over the map.
    West Seattle/Vashon for McDermott; South end neighborhoods for McEvoy; Tukwila/Beacon/Georgetown for Zach.
    Though I support Zach, I say put a seat filler in there and let these three slug it out over the spring/summer for the job.
    I love the democratc process!!!

  • chilly

    The support from the 8th is all over the map.
    West Seattle/Vashon for McDermott; South end neighborhoods for McEvoy; Tukwila/Beacon/Georgetown for Zach.
    Though I support Zach, I say put a seat filler in there and let these three slug it out over the spring/summer for the job.
    I love the democratc process!!!

  • Murgen

    What an unbelievable clusterfuck this has become. Non-partisanship my ass.

  • Murgen

    What an unbelievable clusterfuck this has become. Non-partisanship my ass.

  • EasyStreetDude

    I concur with choosing Kim Becklund!! We don’t need “glad-handers,” we need someone who will get the job done in Olympia! Becklund has gusto galore, has worked at a high level and exceeded expectations for over 20 years at the state, regional, non-profit, consulting, and local government levels. Plus, she has an established and esteemed network outside the 34th District, which will be beneficial to all of us….Think about it!

  • EasyStreetDude

    I concur with choosing Kim Becklund!! We don’t need “glad-handers,” we need someone who will get the job done in Olympia! Becklund has gusto galore, has worked at a high level and exceeded expectations for over 20 years at the state, regional, non-profit, consulting, and local government levels. Plus, she has an established and esteemed network outside the 34th District, which will be beneficial to all of us….Think about it!

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    Yeah, because holding an election for the seat would have been too inefficient.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    Yeah, because holding an election for the seat would have been too inefficient.

  • Sarge

    I’m not in a mood for any more capitulation to Republicans just because they hold their breath and stamp their feet.

    Stick with Joe. If the Republicans don’t cave, wait it out and kick it up to the Governor.

    There is no reason to let the Republicans make this decision.

  • Sarge

    I’m not in a mood for any more capitulation to Republicans just because they hold their breath and stamp their feet.

    Stick with Joe. If the Republicans don’t cave, wait it out and kick it up to the Governor.

    There is no reason to let the Republicans make this decision.

  • ivan

    Having stuck it out in the chambers with a floating group of 15-20 34th District Democrats from 1 PM till adjournment while Erica C. Barnett watched it on TV and called that “coverage,” I am totally with Sarge @ 17.

    Democrats who are constituents of Ferguson, Phillips, Gossett, and Patterson should call them or e-mail them or talk to them in person, congratulate them for holding firm, and tell them “Do not give one inch!”

    And chilly @ 13:

    You’re making shit up. Zack’s precincts in CD 8 are underpopulated compared to the rest of the District. They include industrial areas and Boeing Field, they are underrepresented by PCOs, and their voter turnout is lower than the rest of the District is.

    As for McEvoy, he’s a bonehead, and if he shows his face in the rest of the District, the rest of the District will find that out soon enough. West Seattle, North Highline, Burien, and Vashon comprise what, 80 percent of the District’s population?

    progressive prism @ 6:

    The only question about Joe’s vote-getting totals in November is will they be closer to 70 percent or 80 percent?

  • ivan

    Having stuck it out in the chambers with a floating group of 15-20 34th District Democrats from 1 PM till adjournment while Erica C. Barnett watched it on TV and called that “coverage,” I am totally with Sarge @ 17.

    Democrats who are constituents of Ferguson, Phillips, Gossett, and Patterson should call them or e-mail them or talk to them in person, congratulate them for holding firm, and tell them “Do not give one inch!”

    And chilly @ 13:

    You’re making shit up. Zack’s precincts in CD 8 are underpopulated compared to the rest of the District. They include industrial areas and Boeing Field, they are underrepresented by PCOs, and their voter turnout is lower than the rest of the District is.

    As for McEvoy, he’s a bonehead, and if he shows his face in the rest of the District, the rest of the District will find that out soon enough. West Seattle, North Highline, Burien, and Vashon comprise what, 80 percent of the District’s population?

    progressive prism @ 6:

    The only question about Joe’s vote-getting totals in November is will they be closer to 70 percent or 80 percent?

  • not ivan

    Methinks that the best solution to this deadlock is an interim appointment. Joe got appointed to his current spot on the Senate, it is about time he earned something. An interim appointment would also be a better deal for District 8 since that person would be focused on getting work done instead of the next election (in this case 2010 and 2011).

  • not ivan

    Methinks that the best solution to this deadlock is an interim appointment. Joe got appointed to his current spot on the Senate, it is about time he earned something. An interim appointment would also be a better deal for District 8 since that person would be focused on getting work done instead of the next election (in this case 2010 and 2011).

  • Barb from West Seattle

    This is bullshit! The Republicans are leaving 200,000 people unrepresented because they are playing politics. This is outlandish and they should be ashamed!!!

  • Barb from West Seattle

    This is bullshit! The Republicans are leaving 200,000 people unrepresented because they are playing politics. This is outlandish and they should be ashamed!!!

  • ivan

    @ 19:

    That’s rubbish. Most GOOD elected officials can take care of business while running for re-election at the same time. They do it all the time. Joe wouldn’t have to campaign that hard to win anyway, and any noise you hear to the contrary is just people making shit up.

    Joe is the people’s choice and should be appointed.

  • ivan

    @ 19:

    That’s rubbish. Most GOOD elected officials can take care of business while running for re-election at the same time. They do it all the time. Joe wouldn’t have to campaign that hard to win anyway, and any noise you hear to the contrary is just people making shit up.

    Joe is the people’s choice and should be appointed.

  • Thomas Kidinus

    Of those being considered for appointment to the House seat if it becomes available, Kim Becklund is head and shoulders above the rest. As noted by EasyStreetDude, she has 20 years experience crafting public policy. About the same number of years Nelson’s “longtime aide” FitzGibbon has been alive and much more than any of the others mentioned.

    Ms. Becklund has been able to work with elected officials around the region and across the political spectrum to get things done. A rare talent these days. She is well versed in transportation, environmental, health, labor, housing, and economic development policy.

    In short, Kim Becklund has the wisdom, competence and dedication to be the advocate the 34th district (and the region as a whole) needs. Let’s hope the 34th district D’s chose the candidate that will be the most effective rather than the one who is the pal of a few well-connected friends.

  • Thomas Kidinus

    Of those being considered for appointment to the House seat if it becomes available, Kim Becklund is head and shoulders above the rest. As noted by EasyStreetDude, she has 20 years experience crafting public policy. About the same number of years Nelson’s “longtime aide” FitzGibbon has been alive and much more than any of the others mentioned.

    Ms. Becklund has been able to work with elected officials around the region and across the political spectrum to get things done. A rare talent these days. She is well versed in transportation, environmental, health, labor, housing, and economic development policy.

    In short, Kim Becklund has the wisdom, competence and dedication to be the advocate the 34th district (and the region as a whole) needs. Let’s hope the 34th district D’s chose the candidate that will be the most effective rather than the one who is the pal of a few well-connected friends.

  • Mickymse

    I have to agree with Ivan, Erica… (And that doesn’t happen all the time ;-)

    You really should have been there in chambers for coverage — along with at least three other media outlets.

    There was plenty of political drama in chambers, with members shuffling back and forth between rooms, a sizeable group of 34th District members there to support Joe and our “nonpartisan” Democrats on the Council, and plenty of comments and jokes and Facebook and Twitter updating. Not to mention the “hunger strike” broken when staffers took pity on us and brought out candy. *L*

    Reporting by television might have cut it for The Stranger, but for a blog on politics, you really missed out on most of the actual politics playing out while the Seattle Channel played jazz interludes!

  • Mickymse

    I have to agree with Ivan, Erica… (And that doesn’t happen all the time ;-)

    You really should have been there in chambers for coverage — along with at least three other media outlets.

    There was plenty of political drama in chambers, with members shuffling back and forth between rooms, a sizeable group of 34th District members there to support Joe and our “nonpartisan” Democrats on the Council, and plenty of comments and jokes and Facebook and Twitter updating. Not to mention the “hunger strike” broken when staffers took pity on us and brought out candy. *L*

    Reporting by television might have cut it for The Stranger, but for a blog on politics, you really missed out on most of the actual politics playing out while the Seattle Channel played jazz interludes!

  • ivan

    @ 22:

    Can we please put this phony buzz for Kim Becklund to rest?

    Kim Becklund showed up at the 34th out of nowhere two years ago and stood for the last House appointment and presented well, but whereas nobody knew her and only one or two people had ever heard of her, she got three votes.

    I was the chairman of the District then, and I invited her to stick around and contribute, and build a following so that the next time something like this came up, she would be in a position to have proved her worth to the District, and would have built a following among the District’s PCOs, who, unlike readers of Publicola comment threads, are the ONLY constituency in an appointment process.

    Kim’s response to all this was to disappear for a year and not even show up at meetings, despite my constantly urging her to be more involved.

    She resurfaced when our current chairman needed a “yes person” to run for First Vice Chair against another candidate whom he regarded as threatening to his comfort level. She was elected, and since then has performed at what I would regard as a bare minimum level.

    She has never within my earshot spoken about any policy issues except at the most superficial level, and many of us have yet to see her display any semblance of a work ethic.

    Whereas we are represented in the House by Eileen Cody and Sharon Nelson, whose work ethic and measurable performance ranks somewhere above Herculean, people should know that the PCOs in the 34th — the ONLY constituency in an appointment process — are not impressed by self-promoting slackers.

    So promote your pal Becklund all you want to. Those of us who work with her in the District are far less impressed with her. She’s a nice person, and I don’t dislike her, but she’s far from Legislative caliber.

  • ivan

    @ 22:

    Can we please put this phony buzz for Kim Becklund to rest?

    Kim Becklund showed up at the 34th out of nowhere two years ago and stood for the last House appointment and presented well, but whereas nobody knew her and only one or two people had ever heard of her, she got three votes.

    I was the chairman of the District then, and I invited her to stick around and contribute, and build a following so that the next time something like this came up, she would be in a position to have proved her worth to the District, and would have built a following among the District’s PCOs, who, unlike readers of Publicola comment threads, are the ONLY constituency in an appointment process.

    Kim’s response to all this was to disappear for a year and not even show up at meetings, despite my constantly urging her to be more involved.

    She resurfaced when our current chairman needed a “yes person” to run for First Vice Chair against another candidate whom he regarded as threatening to his comfort level. She was elected, and since then has performed at what I would regard as a bare minimum level.

    She has never within my earshot spoken about any policy issues except at the most superficial level, and many of us have yet to see her display any semblance of a work ethic.

    Whereas we are represented in the House by Eileen Cody and Sharon Nelson, whose work ethic and measurable performance ranks somewhere above Herculean, people should know that the PCOs in the 34th — the ONLY constituency in an appointment process — are not impressed by self-promoting slackers.

    So promote your pal Becklund all you want to. Those of us who work with her in the District are far less impressed with her. She’s a nice person, and I don’t dislike her, but she’s far from Legislative caliber.

  • Not4Ivan

    @22:

    Becklund is for real Ivan! Becklund is just like most 34DDs when Ivan reigned supreme: Becklund chose the correct path, by staying away from Mr. Weiss and all his vitriol and combative nature, as noted above. Nuse picked Becklund precisely because of all her fine political and policy performance that unfortunately, Ivan and his henchmen fail to recognize! The 34DDs are a better more pragmatic org because of Becklund, so I suspect there is some professional animus on Weiss’ part here readers should be aware of going fwd.

  • Not4Ivan

    @22:

    Becklund is for real Ivan! Becklund is just like most 34DDs when Ivan reigned supreme: Becklund chose the correct path, by staying away from Mr. Weiss and all his vitriol and combative nature, as noted above. Nuse picked Becklund precisely because of all her fine political and policy performance that unfortunately, Ivan and his henchmen fail to recognize! The 34DDs are a better more pragmatic org because of Becklund, so I suspect there is some professional animus on Weiss’ part here readers should be aware of going fwd.

  • ivan

    @ 25:

    The 34DDs are a better more pragmatic org because of Becklund,

    That statement awaits, perhaps for all eternity, even a smidgen of corroborating evidence.

  • ivan

    @ 25:

    The 34DDs are a better more pragmatic org because of Becklund,

    That statement awaits, perhaps for all eternity, even a smidgen of corroborating evidence.

  • Thomas Kidinus

    Two points for ivan the terribly obnoxious @26 and 24. One, the buzz for Kim Becklund is not phony. You might consider all the help and advice she has given Dow Constantine, Joe McDermott, Eileen Cody and Sharon Nelson before you continue to bloviate. Effective advice that was given quietly – characteristics that you don’t possess.

    Two, the fact that she hasn’t spoken to you about policy (or anything of substance) is a positive recommendation for her.

    Also, she did not “disappear” for a year. Ms. Becklund continued her leadership as a board member with the Delridge Neighborhood Development Assn., worked to help local candidates to get elected and made a difference in her community.

    I am left to wonder, do you dislike all strong and effective women? Or is it anyone who is strong and effective? Or is it anyone who doesn’t buy into your b.s.? Clearly, there is a reason you are the former chair.

  • Thomas Kidinus

    Two points for ivan the terribly obnoxious @26 and 24. One, the buzz for Kim Becklund is not phony. You might consider all the help and advice she has given Dow Constantine, Joe McDermott, Eileen Cody and Sharon Nelson before you continue to bloviate. Effective advice that was given quietly – characteristics that you don’t possess.

    Two, the fact that she hasn’t spoken to you about policy (or anything of substance) is a positive recommendation for her.

    Also, she did not “disappear” for a year. Ms. Becklund continued her leadership as a board member with the Delridge Neighborhood Development Assn., worked to help local candidates to get elected and made a difference in her community.

    I am left to wonder, do you dislike all strong and effective women? Or is it anyone who is strong and effective? Or is it anyone who doesn’t buy into your b.s.? Clearly, there is a reason you are the former chair.

  • chilly

    fact: only 4 of 9 candidates endorsed by the 34th won in the last election. I’m not counting “dual endorsed” candidates as how can you go wrong when you’re endorsing both candidates? One of the endorsed candidates that lost probably would have fared better if a number of high ranking 34th Dems hadn’t gone and publicly endorsed her opponent.

    fact: that 70% Democrat number is misleading. That figure is from the most recent presidential caucus. If you wanted to caucus for Obama or Clinton at the local precint level, you had to sign a statement that affirmed you were a Democrat. How many of those attendees actually indentify themselves as fulltime Dems?

    fact: over 25% of the registered voters in the 8th District live in the Burien/Normandy Park area. That is a voice that will be heard in the coming years.

    fact: the 34th Dems represent the views of their paid members, not the greater electorate.

  • chilly

    fact: only 4 of 9 candidates endorsed by the 34th won in the last election. I’m not counting “dual endorsed” candidates as how can you go wrong when you’re endorsing both candidates? One of the endorsed candidates that lost probably would have fared better if a number of high ranking 34th Dems hadn’t gone and publicly endorsed her opponent.

    fact: that 70% Democrat number is misleading. That figure is from the most recent presidential caucus. If you wanted to caucus for Obama or Clinton at the local precint level, you had to sign a statement that affirmed you were a Democrat. How many of those attendees actually indentify themselves as fulltime Dems?

    fact: over 25% of the registered voters in the 8th District live in the Burien/Normandy Park area. That is a voice that will be heard in the coming years.

    fact: the 34th Dems represent the views of their paid members, not the greater electorate.

  • Mickymse

    @ 28, The thing you’re missing about your final fact is the nature of the election. Most people don’t pay attention to County seats, and this isn’t going to get debates on KING or KONG.

    As a member of the Executive Board, I wouldn’t claim that the 34th District Dems are representative of all Dems in the 34th and certainly not in the 8th County Council District.

    However, we’re a very strong, active group that will put money into Joe’s election campaign for County, and our PCO’s will be picking any appointees for LD seats, and we will be putting boots on the ground in every precinct to see our choices get elected.

    That’s not something to dismiss…

  • Mickymse

    @ 28, The thing you’re missing about your final fact is the nature of the election. Most people don’t pay attention to County seats, and this isn’t going to get debates on KING or KONG.

    As a member of the Executive Board, I wouldn’t claim that the 34th District Dems are representative of all Dems in the 34th and certainly not in the 8th County Council District.

    However, we’re a very strong, active group that will put money into Joe’s election campaign for County, and our PCO’s will be picking any appointees for LD seats, and we will be putting boots on the ground in every precinct to see our choices get elected.

    That’s not something to dismiss…

  • ivan

    @ 27:

    I am the former chairman because — DUH! — I did not stand for re-election, after being elected twice without opposition.

    As for me “disliking all strong and effective women,” I hope you run that past Sharon Nelson, Eileen Cody, Susan Sheary, Margarita Prentice, Tina Orwall, etc., etc., etc.

  • ivan

    @ 27:

    I am the former chairman because — DUH! — I did not stand for re-election, after being elected twice without opposition.

    As for me “disliking all strong and effective women,” I hope you run that past Sharon Nelson, Eileen Cody, Susan Sheary, Margarita Prentice, Tina Orwall, etc., etc., etc.

  • Burienman

    Kim is good, but I have also heard Sabra Schneider might jump in. She’s a long time teacher at South Seattle Community College, a current PCO in the 34th and a Communications and Tech guru for King County. She’d be promising too.

  • Burienman

    Kim is good, but I have also heard Sabra Schneider might jump in. She’s a long time teacher at South Seattle Community College, a current PCO in the 34th and a Communications and Tech guru for King County. She’d be promising too.

  • Alice Roosevelt

    I just heard about Sabra, as well. She would be interesting.

    While I supported Sharon Nelson last time, I was impressed by Kim Becklund and am interested in hearing more from her. I like that she has a strong background in transportation issues and is pretty well-respected in the local government world.

    While it is true that Josh Johnston worked for Dicks, some current and former Congressional staff, who don’t have a dog in this fight, seem to remember that he was there for the briefest of times and did not make much of an impression. I am waiting to see more

    Joe Fitzgibbons is a great guy and I would be interested in seeing him run in about 5 years when he has more experience.

    Any other names out there?

  • Alice Roosevelt

    I just heard about Sabra, as well. She would be interesting.

    While I supported Sharon Nelson last time, I was impressed by Kim Becklund and am interested in hearing more from her. I like that she has a strong background in transportation issues and is pretty well-respected in the local government world.

    While it is true that Josh Johnston worked for Dicks, some current and former Congressional staff, who don’t have a dog in this fight, seem to remember that he was there for the briefest of times and did not make much of an impression. I am waiting to see more

    Joe Fitzgibbons is a great guy and I would be interested in seeing him run in about 5 years when he has more experience.

    Any other names out there?

  • not ivan

    Ivan: Why don’t you stop being such a goon and tell us something useful, like where you buried Jimmy Hoffa? It’s time you came clean with us on your past.

    Kim Becklund is a bright spot in the mob-like 34th Dems that you helped despoil. Personally I’m looking forward to a brighter future when the organization is cleaned up even further.

  • not ivan

    Ivan: Why don’t you stop being such a goon and tell us something useful, like where you buried Jimmy Hoffa? It’s time you came clean with us on your past.

    Kim Becklund is a bright spot in the mob-like 34th Dems that you helped despoil. Personally I’m looking forward to a brighter future when the organization is cleaned up even further.

  • ivan

    @ 33:

    Despoil, is it? Haha, you’re pathetic. During my tenure and under my leadership the 34th District Democrats:

    1. Helped the District to an 85.6 percent turnout in the 2008 election.

    2. Increased paid membership from 400-plus to more than 1,100 — No. 1 in the state.

    3. Filled a higher percentage of precincts with PCOs than any LD in the state — No. 1 in the state.

    4. Had more than 10,000 attendees at our 2008 precinct caucuses — No. 4 in the state.

    5. Raised more money at those precinct caucuses (more than $30K) and disbursed more money to Democratic candidates than any LD — No. 1 in the state.

    6. Doubled our contribution to the King County Democratic Central Committee and issued a challenge to other King County LDs to do the same, which quite a few did.

    7. Put more boots on the ground, according to the Coordinated Campaign, than any LD organization in the state during the 2008 campaign — No. 1 in the state.

    8. Established a “sister district” relationship with Democrats in the 15th LD, in the lower Yakima Valley, and raised money for Democratic candidates there.

    9. Increased our citizen lobbying presence in Olympia through our active support of, and participation in, the King County Dems’ Legislative Action Committee, which I co-chaired for a time, through which we introduced rank and file Dems to their legislators and County Council members, and helped build relationships as a means of getting better public policy.

    10. Increased our profile in our communities and created hundreds of new active Democrats with our active support of the West Seattle and White Center Food Banks, the White Center Community Development Association, the Delridge Neighborhood Development Association, Southwest Youth and Family Services, Washington Public Campaigns, Preserve Our Islands on Vashon, the Backbone Campaign, the Highland Park Action Committee, the efforts in Burien to save the Lora Lake Apartments, our efforts in support of homeless people in the Nickelsville tent cities, and many, many more.

    So that’s MY past, Mr. Smart Guy, and all of it is easily verifiable. That’s what *I* do, and I’m damn good at it. That’s the kind of political action that is possible at the local level. Now tell us please, what do *you* do?

  • ivan

    @ 33:

    Despoil, is it? Haha, you’re pathetic. During my tenure and under my leadership the 34th District Democrats:

    1. Helped the District to an 85.6 percent turnout in the 2008 election.

    2. Increased paid membership from 400-plus to more than 1,100 — No. 1 in the state.

    3. Filled a higher percentage of precincts with PCOs than any LD in the state — No. 1 in the state.

    4. Had more than 10,000 attendees at our 2008 precinct caucuses — No. 4 in the state.

    5. Raised more money at those precinct caucuses (more than $30K) and disbursed more money to Democratic candidates than any LD — No. 1 in the state.

    6. Doubled our contribution to the King County Democratic Central Committee and issued a challenge to other King County LDs to do the same, which quite a few did.

    7. Put more boots on the ground, according to the Coordinated Campaign, than any LD organization in the state during the 2008 campaign — No. 1 in the state.

    8. Established a “sister district” relationship with Democrats in the 15th LD, in the lower Yakima Valley, and raised money for Democratic candidates there.

    9. Increased our citizen lobbying presence in Olympia through our active support of, and participation in, the King County Dems’ Legislative Action Committee, which I co-chaired for a time, through which we introduced rank and file Dems to their legislators and County Council members, and helped build relationships as a means of getting better public policy.

    10. Increased our profile in our communities and created hundreds of new active Democrats with our active support of the West Seattle and White Center Food Banks, the White Center Community Development Association, the Delridge Neighborhood Development Association, Southwest Youth and Family Services, Washington Public Campaigns, Preserve Our Islands on Vashon, the Backbone Campaign, the Highland Park Action Committee, the efforts in Burien to save the Lora Lake Apartments, our efforts in support of homeless people in the Nickelsville tent cities, and many, many more.

    So that’s MY past, Mr. Smart Guy, and all of it is easily verifiable. That’s what *I* do, and I’m damn good at it. That’s the kind of political action that is possible at the local level. Now tell us please, what do *you* do?

  • not ivan

    Ivan, loud chuckle. Obama is the reason 2008 was such an active year, it was that way across the whole country. How can you make such ridiculous claims? The local result of the Obama age is saying bye bye to Ivan. Intimidation is no longer an acceptable political medium my friend, you need to learn to be a good fellow instead of a goodfella.

  • not ivan

    Ivan, loud chuckle. Obama is the reason 2008 was such an active year, it was that way across the whole country. How can you make such ridiculous claims? The local result of the Obama age is saying bye bye to Ivan. Intimidation is no longer an acceptable political medium my friend, you need to learn to be a good fellow instead of a goodfella.

  • Ramones4ever

    Great debate by all here, eventhough Ivan IS terrible! Becklund is the real deal and its so very unfortunate that Mr. Weiss can realize the truth! Go Becklund!!

  • Ramones4ever

    Great debate by all here, eventhough Ivan IS terrible! Becklund is the real deal and its so very unfortunate that Mr. Weiss can realize the truth! Go Becklund!!

  • ivan

    @ 35:

    3, 8, 9, and 10 had nothing to do with Obama or with the 2008 campaign. Building our relationships with community groups and adding to our reach is where the rubber meets the road, and that happens between presidential election cycles.

    As for the other points, other LDs benefited from the presidential camaigns, and they still didn’t match what we accomplished. That doesn’t happen through intimidation. So quit being silly. You can say goodbye all you want to, but I’ll still be here. I’m not asking you to like it.

  • ivan

    @ 35:

    3, 8, 9, and 10 had nothing to do with Obama or with the 2008 campaign. Building our relationships with community groups and adding to our reach is where the rubber meets the road, and that happens between presidential election cycles.

    As for the other points, other LDs benefited from the presidential camaigns, and they still didn’t match what we accomplished. That doesn’t happen through intimidation. So quit being silly. You can say goodbye all you want to, but I’ll still be here. I’m not asking you to like it.

  • Murgen

    Ivan, I take it that the shameless self-promotion is because you will be seeking the seat when Joe gets his deserved appointment or election to Dow’s Council seat? Or am I missing something — is there another candidate you are supporting?

  • Murgen

    Ivan, I take it that the shameless self-promotion is because you will be seeking the seat when Joe gets his deserved appointment or election to Dow’s Council seat? Or am I missing something — is there another candidate you are supporting?

  • ivan

    @ 38:

    I am not seeking any legislative appointment. And I am not engaging in shameless self-promotion, I am just stating what is a matter of record.

  • ivan

    @ 38:

    I am not seeking any legislative appointment. And I am not engaging in shameless self-promotion, I am just stating what is a matter of record.