Viva La Cola!

Founded in January 2009, PubliCola is a blog about Seattle written by journalists who are dedicated to non-partisan, original daily reporting that prioritizes a balanced approach to news. Started by longtime local editor and award-winning reporter Josh Feit, PubliCola is the first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol.

PubliCola was off and running. In June 2009, PubliCola hired another award-winning journalist, super-sourced Seattle city hall reporter Erica C. Barnett.

People were afraid that blogging would change journalism. Instead, we believe journalism can change blogging. Twenty-first century journalism may look and feel different, and yes Erica isn't afraid to get cranky, but we're committed to making sure online news still delivers independent, reliable, even-keeled coverage. And most of all, we're committed to making sure the coverage sparks honest civic debate.

Bringing you cola for the people, PubliCola is named after Publius Valerius PubliCola, the alias for the authors of the Federalist Papers—the original bloggers.

The first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol and Seattle city hall, PubliCola has been called a “must-read” by the Seattle Post Intelligencer and a hot “New Media Mover and Shaker” by Seattle Magazine—which also cited our own Erica C. Barnett as the city's No. 1 news nerd.

Candid in Belltown

fizz

1. PubliCola’s standing room-only campaign postmortem—held at the Del Rey bar in Belltown last night—gave voters the unprecedented chance to hear directly from, and ask questions directly to, the strategists closest to this year’s competing mayoral campaigns.

jasonbennett

Mallahan consultant Jason Bennett gets candid in Belltown

We’ll have video of the event soon. In the meantime, both the PI (on this morning’s front page) and Seattle Times filed reports from the forum.

2. Mary’s Place, the city’s only day center for homeless women with children, received $250,000 in the King County budget adopted yesterday—enough to pay for a new building for the shelter.

The funding resolves a longstanding conflict between Mary’s Place and its former landlord, the downtown First United Methodist Church, which joined the shelter in advocating for funding from the county earlier this year.

3. Yesterday, we published a 4,000-word essay on the long term fallout from 1999′s WTO protests—the historic Battle in Seattle. The fallout? Your First Amendment rights have been eroded.

It’s a must-read.

4. Delaying the completion of the waterfront deep-bore tunnel by two years would cost the state about $37 million in tolling revenues, a memo from a tunnel consultant to state Department of Transportation (WSDOT) staff reveals.

The memo, dated September 16, “examines the impact of a two-year delay on completion of the Alaska [sic] Way Bored Tunnel, specifically the delay of revenue dedicated to the repayment of outstanding toll bonds.”

WSDOT urban corridors office deputy director Ron Paananen says the memo —prepared as part of the risk assessment process leading up to tunnel construction—doesn’t represent the full impact of putting off construction two years, because the state would also be saving money (by not building) during that time.

5. Chris Leman, the all-purpose city government gadfly (issues include: lobbyist disclosure; records disclosure; limits on growth, even in the center city) is back—this time, imploring incoming city council members Mike O’Brien and Sally Bagshaw in a PostGlobe op/ed to overturn revisions to the noise ordinance passed earlier this year. Leman also blasts council member Tim Burgess—a frequent Leman adversary—for taking noise out of the list of reasons the city can shut a “nuisance property” down. (The nuisance property law, which passed a council committee last week, is aimed at shutting down problem motels on Aurora.)

The changes to the noise ordinance Leman opposes simplified the process for agencies like Sound Transit and companies doing long-term construction projects to apply for variances to the city’s noise ordinance if, for example, their project is noisier than the ordinance allows. Under the old rules, a company might have to apply for dozens of two-week variances over the course of a long project; the new rules only require one application per year.


  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    If I were O’Brien and Bagshaw, I’d work on my self defense skills ;P Leman though, seriously, takes a sort of Tom Green, “Don’t tase me bro” style to his activism even when he isn’t taking shots at receptionists, passive aggressively trying to get in everyone’s way and be as obnoxious as possible until he gets people to melt down.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    If I were O’Brien and Bagshaw, I’d work on my self defense skills ;P Leman though, seriously, takes a sort of Tom Green, “Don’t tase me bro” style to his activism even when he isn’t taking shots at receptionists, passive aggressively trying to get in everyone’s way and be as obnoxious as possible until he gets people to melt down.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    If I were O’Brien and Bagshaw, I’d work on my self defense skills ;P Leman though, seriously, takes a sort of Tom Green, “Don’t tase me bro” style to his activism even when he isn’t taking shots at receptionists, passive aggressively trying to get in everyone’s way and be as obnoxious as possible until he gets people to melt down.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    If I were O’Brien and Bagshaw, I’d work on my self defense skills ;P Leman though, seriously, takes a sort of Tom Green, “Don’t tase me bro” style to his activism even when he isn’t taking shots at receptionists, passive aggressively trying to get in everyone’s way and be as obnoxious as possible until he gets people to melt down.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    If I were O’Brien and Bagshaw, I’d work on my self defense skills ;P Leman though, seriously, takes a sort of Tom Green, “Don’t tase me bro” style to his activism even when he isn’t taking shots at receptionists, passive aggressively trying to get in everyone’s way and be as obnoxious as possible until he gets people to melt down.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    If I were O’Brien and Bagshaw, I’d work on my self defense skills ;P Leman though, seriously, takes a sort of Tom Green, “Don’t tase me bro” style to his activism even when he isn’t taking shots at receptionists, passive aggressively trying to get in everyone’s way and be as obnoxious as possible until he gets people to melt down.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    If I were O’Brien and Bagshaw, I’d work on my self defense skills ;P Leman though, seriously, takes a sort of Tom Green, “Don’t tase me bro” style to his activism even when he isn’t taking shots at receptionists, passive aggressively trying to get in everyone’s way and be as obnoxious as possible until he gets people to melt down.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    If I were O’Brien and Bagshaw, I’d work on my self defense skills ;P Leman though, seriously, takes a sort of Tom Green, “Don’t tase me bro” style to his activism even when he isn’t taking shots at receptionists, passive aggressively trying to get in everyone’s way and be as obnoxious as possible until he gets people to melt down.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    If I were O’Brien and Bagshaw, I’d work on my self defense skills ;P Leman though, seriously, takes a sort of Tom Green, “Don’t tase me bro” style to his activism even when he isn’t taking shots at receptionists, passive aggressively trying to get in everyone’s way and be as obnoxious as possible until he gets people to melt down.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    If I were O’Brien and Bagshaw, I’d work on my self defense skills ;P Leman though, seriously, takes a sort of Tom Green, “Don’t tase me bro” style to his activism even when he isn’t taking shots at receptionists, passive aggressively trying to get in everyone’s way and be as obnoxious as possible until he gets people to melt down.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    If I were O’Brien and Bagshaw, I’d work on my self defense skills ;P Leman though, seriously, takes a sort of Tom Green, “Don’t tase me bro” style to his activism even when he isn’t taking shots at receptionists, passive aggressively trying to get in everyone’s way and be as obnoxious as possible until he gets people to melt down.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    If I were O’Brien and Bagshaw, I’d work on my self defense skills ;P Leman though, seriously, takes a sort of Tom Green, “Don’t tase me bro” style to his activism even when he isn’t taking shots at receptionists, passive aggressively trying to get in everyone’s way and be as obnoxious as possible until he gets people to melt down.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    If I were O’Brien and Bagshaw, I’d work on my self defense skills ;P Leman though, seriously, takes a sort of Tom Green, “Don’t tase me bro” style to his activism even when he isn’t taking shots at receptionists, passive aggressively trying to get in everyone’s way and be as obnoxious as possible until he gets people to melt down.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    If I were O’Brien and Bagshaw, I’d work on my self defense skills ;P Leman though, seriously, takes a sort of Tom Green, “Don’t tase me bro” style to his activism even when he isn’t taking shots at receptionists, passive aggressively trying to get in everyone’s way and be as obnoxious as possible until he gets people to melt down.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    If I were O’Brien and Bagshaw, I’d work on my self defense skills ;P Leman though, seriously, takes a sort of Tom Green, “Don’t tase me bro” style to his activism even when he isn’t taking shots at receptionists, passive aggressively trying to get in everyone’s way and be as obnoxious as possible until he gets people to melt down.

  • Hobgoblin

    The PI has a front page?

  • Hobgoblin

    The PI has a front page?

  • Hobgoblin

    The PI has a front page?

  • Hobgoblin

    The PI has a front page?

  • Hobgoblin

    The PI has a front page?

  • Hobgoblin

    The PI has a front page?

  • Hobgoblin

    The PI has a front page?

  • Hobgoblin

    The PI has a front page?

  • Hobgoblin

    The PI has a front page?

  • Hobgoblin

    The PI has a front page?

  • Hobgoblin

    The PI has a front page?

  • Hobgoblin

    The PI has a front page?

  • Hobgoblin

    The PI has a front page?

  • Hobgoblin

    The PI has a front page?

  • Hobgoblin

    The PI has a front page?

  • Josh C

    A nice addendum to the Seattle WTO story: Protesters from the 2000 IMF/World Bank protests in DC won 14 million in a class action lawsuit for wrongful arrests.

    http://www.democracynow.org/2009/11/24/headlines#8

  • Josh C

    A nice addendum to the Seattle WTO story: Protesters from the 2000 IMF/World Bank protests in DC won 14 million in a class action lawsuit for wrongful arrests.

    http://www.democracynow.org/2009/11/24/headlines#8

  • Josh C

    A nice addendum to the Seattle WTO story: Protesters from the 2000 IMF/World Bank protests in DC won 14 million in a class action lawsuit for wrongful arrests.

    http://www.democracynow.org/2009/11/24/headlines#8

  • Josh C

    A nice addendum to the Seattle WTO story: Protesters from the 2000 IMF/World Bank protests in DC won 14 million in a class action lawsuit for wrongful arrests.

    http://www.democracynow.org/2009/11/24/headlines#8

  • Josh C

    A nice addendum to the Seattle WTO story: Protesters from the 2000 IMF/World Bank protests in DC won 14 million in a class action lawsuit for wrongful arrests.

    http://www.democracynow.org/2009/11/24/headlines#8

  • Josh C

    A nice addendum to the Seattle WTO story: Protesters from the 2000 IMF/World Bank protests in DC won 14 million in a class action lawsuit for wrongful arrests.

    http://www.democracynow.org/2009/11/24/headlines#8

  • Josh C

    A nice addendum to the Seattle WTO story: Protesters from the 2000 IMF/World Bank protests in DC won 14 million in a class action lawsuit for wrongful arrests.

    http://www.democracynow.org/2009/11/24/headlines#8

  • Josh C

    A nice addendum to the Seattle WTO story: Protesters from the 2000 IMF/World Bank protests in DC won 14 million in a class action lawsuit for wrongful arrests.

    http://www.democracynow.org/2009/11/24/headlines#8

  • Josh C

    A nice addendum to the Seattle WTO story: Protesters from the 2000 IMF/World Bank protests in DC won 14 million in a class action lawsuit for wrongful arrests.

    http://www.democracynow.org/2009/11/24/headlines#8

  • Josh C

    A nice addendum to the Seattle WTO story: Protesters from the 2000 IMF/World Bank protests in DC won 14 million in a class action lawsuit for wrongful arrests.

    http://www.democracynow.org/2009/11/24/headlines#8

  • Josh C

    A nice addendum to the Seattle WTO story: Protesters from the 2000 IMF/World Bank protests in DC won 14 million in a class action lawsuit for wrongful arrests.

    http://www.democracynow.org/2009/11/24/headlines#8

  • Josh C

    A nice addendum to the Seattle WTO story: Protesters from the 2000 IMF/World Bank protests in DC won 14 million in a class action lawsuit for wrongful arrests.

    http://www.democracynow.org/2009/11/24/headlines#8

  • Josh C

    A nice addendum to the Seattle WTO story: Protesters from the 2000 IMF/World Bank protests in DC won 14 million in a class action lawsuit for wrongful arrests.

    http://www.democracynow.org/2009/11/24/headlines#8

  • Josh C

    A nice addendum to the Seattle WTO story: Protesters from the 2000 IMF/World Bank protests in DC won 14 million in a class action lawsuit for wrongful arrests.

    http://www.democracynow.org/2009/11/24/headlines#8

  • Josh C

    A nice addendum to the Seattle WTO story: Protesters from the 2000 IMF/World Bank protests in DC won 14 million in a class action lawsuit for wrongful arrests.

    http://www.democracynow.org/2009/11/24/headlines#8

  • B.S.

    I understand that Charla and Jason have to be able to woo clients in the future, but hats off to them throwing a good man under the bus. Everyone who worked hard on his campaign regularly said that he should be able to be out there with the public, and do what needed to be done when you’re a relative unknown in a Seattle race (yes, Charla, this isn’t Tacoma), and instead Charla, and apparently Jason, chose to hide him.

    Yes, Joe is quirky, and yes, he thinks out loud a bit more than he should sometimes. But guess what – that’s okay, as long as it shows he is thinking, and he is aware of what’s going on.

    I think this should be a note to everyone in Seattle – don’t hire Argo Strategies, and don’t hire Charla Neuman. Because, if they mess up your campaign, and you end up losing because they’re scared to let you be you, then they’ll be sure to make it sound as if they did everything right after the fact, and you didn’t listen to a thing they said.

    Classy.

  • B.S.

    I understand that Charla and Jason have to be able to woo clients in the future, but hats off to them throwing a good man under the bus. Everyone who worked hard on his campaign regularly said that he should be able to be out there with the public, and do what needed to be done when you’re a relative unknown in a Seattle race (yes, Charla, this isn’t Tacoma), and instead Charla, and apparently Jason, chose to hide him.

    Yes, Joe is quirky, and yes, he thinks out loud a bit more than he should sometimes. But guess what – that’s okay, as long as it shows he is thinking, and he is aware of what’s going on.

    I think this should be a note to everyone in Seattle – don’t hire Argo Strategies, and don’t hire Charla Neuman. Because, if they mess up your campaign, and you end up losing because they’re scared to let you be you, then they’ll be sure to make it sound as if they did everything right after the fact, and you didn’t listen to a thing they said.

    Classy.

  • B.S.

    I understand that Charla and Jason have to be able to woo clients in the future, but hats off to them throwing a good man under the bus. Everyone who worked hard on his campaign regularly said that he should be able to be out there with the public, and do what needed to be done when you’re a relative unknown in a Seattle race (yes, Charla, this isn’t Tacoma), and instead Charla, and apparently Jason, chose to hide him.

    Yes, Joe is quirky, and yes, he thinks out loud a bit more than he should sometimes. But guess what – that’s okay, as long as it shows he is thinking, and he is aware of what’s going on.

    I think this should be a note to everyone in Seattle – don’t hire Argo Strategies, and don’t hire Charla Neuman. Because, if they mess up your campaign, and you end up losing because they’re scared to let you be you, then they’ll be sure to make it sound as if they did everything right after the fact, and you didn’t listen to a thing they said.

    Classy.

  • B.S.

    I understand that Charla and Jason have to be able to woo clients in the future, but hats off to them throwing a good man under the bus. Everyone who worked hard on his campaign regularly said that he should be able to be out there with the public, and do what needed to be done when you’re a relative unknown in a Seattle race (yes, Charla, this isn’t Tacoma), and instead Charla, and apparently Jason, chose to hide him.

    Yes, Joe is quirky, and yes, he thinks out loud a bit more than he should sometimes. But guess what – that’s okay, as long as it shows he is thinking, and he is aware of what’s going on.

    I think this should be a note to everyone in Seattle – don’t hire Argo Strategies, and don’t hire Charla Neuman. Because, if they mess up your campaign, and you end up losing because they’re scared to let you be you, then they’ll be sure to make it sound as if they did everything right after the fact, and you didn’t listen to a thing they said.

    Classy.

  • B.S.

    I understand that Charla and Jason have to be able to woo clients in the future, but hats off to them throwing a good man under the bus. Everyone who worked hard on his campaign regularly said that he should be able to be out there with the public, and do what needed to be done when you’re a relative unknown in a Seattle race (yes, Charla, this isn’t Tacoma), and instead Charla, and apparently Jason, chose to hide him.

    Yes, Joe is quirky, and yes, he thinks out loud a bit more than he should sometimes. But guess what – that’s okay, as long as it shows he is thinking, and he is aware of what’s going on.

    I think this should be a note to everyone in Seattle – don’t hire Argo Strategies, and don’t hire Charla Neuman. Because, if they mess up your campaign, and you end up losing because they’re scared to let you be you, then they’ll be sure to make it sound as if they did everything right after the fact, and you didn’t listen to a thing they said.

    Classy.

  • B.S.

    I understand that Charla and Jason have to be able to woo clients in the future, but hats off to them throwing a good man under the bus. Everyone who worked hard on his campaign regularly said that he should be able to be out there with the public, and do what needed to be done when you’re a relative unknown in a Seattle race (yes, Charla, this isn’t Tacoma), and instead Charla, and apparently Jason, chose to hide him.

    Yes, Joe is quirky, and yes, he thinks out loud a bit more than he should sometimes. But guess what – that’s okay, as long as it shows he is thinking, and he is aware of what’s going on.

    I think this should be a note to everyone in Seattle – don’t hire Argo Strategies, and don’t hire Charla Neuman. Because, if they mess up your campaign, and you end up losing because they’re scared to let you be you, then they’ll be sure to make it sound as if they did everything right after the fact, and you didn’t listen to a thing they said.

    Classy.

  • B.S.

    I understand that Charla and Jason have to be able to woo clients in the future, but hats off to them throwing a good man under the bus. Everyone who worked hard on his campaign regularly said that he should be able to be out there with the public, and do what needed to be done when you’re a relative unknown in a Seattle race (yes, Charla, this isn’t Tacoma), and instead Charla, and apparently Jason, chose to hide him.

    Yes, Joe is quirky, and yes, he thinks out loud a bit more than he should sometimes. But guess what – that’s okay, as long as it shows he is thinking, and he is aware of what’s going on.

    I think this should be a note to everyone in Seattle – don’t hire Argo Strategies, and don’t hire Charla Neuman. Because, if they mess up your campaign, and you end up losing because they’re scared to let you be you, then they’ll be sure to make it sound as if they did everything right after the fact, and you didn’t listen to a thing they said.

    Classy.

  • B.S.

    I understand that Charla and Jason have to be able to woo clients in the future, but hats off to them throwing a good man under the bus. Everyone who worked hard on his campaign regularly said that he should be able to be out there with the public, and do what needed to be done when you’re a relative unknown in a Seattle race (yes, Charla, this isn’t Tacoma), and instead Charla, and apparently Jason, chose to hide him.

    Yes, Joe is quirky, and yes, he thinks out loud a bit more than he should sometimes. But guess what – that’s okay, as long as it shows he is thinking, and he is aware of what’s going on.

    I think this should be a note to everyone in Seattle – don’t hire Argo Strategies, and don’t hire Charla Neuman. Because, if they mess up your campaign, and you end up losing because they’re scared to let you be you, then they’ll be sure to make it sound as if they did everything right after the fact, and you didn’t listen to a thing they said.

    Classy.

  • B.S.

    I understand that Charla and Jason have to be able to woo clients in the future, but hats off to them throwing a good man under the bus. Everyone who worked hard on his campaign regularly said that he should be able to be out there with the public, and do what needed to be done when you’re a relative unknown in a Seattle race (yes, Charla, this isn’t Tacoma), and instead Charla, and apparently Jason, chose to hide him.

    Yes, Joe is quirky, and yes, he thinks out loud a bit more than he should sometimes. But guess what – that’s okay, as long as it shows he is thinking, and he is aware of what’s going on.

    I think this should be a note to everyone in Seattle – don’t hire Argo Strategies, and don’t hire Charla Neuman. Because, if they mess up your campaign, and you end up losing because they’re scared to let you be you, then they’ll be sure to make it sound as if they did everything right after the fact, and you didn’t listen to a thing they said.

    Classy.

  • B.S.

    I understand that Charla and Jason have to be able to woo clients in the future, but hats off to them throwing a good man under the bus. Everyone who worked hard on his campaign regularly said that he should be able to be out there with the public, and do what needed to be done when you’re a relative unknown in a Seattle race (yes, Charla, this isn’t Tacoma), and instead Charla, and apparently Jason, chose to hide him.

    Yes, Joe is quirky, and yes, he thinks out loud a bit more than he should sometimes. But guess what – that’s okay, as long as it shows he is thinking, and he is aware of what’s going on.

    I think this should be a note to everyone in Seattle – don’t hire Argo Strategies, and don’t hire Charla Neuman. Because, if they mess up your campaign, and you end up losing because they’re scared to let you be you, then they’ll be sure to make it sound as if they did everything right after the fact, and you didn’t listen to a thing they said.

    Classy.

  • B.S.

    I understand that Charla and Jason have to be able to woo clients in the future, but hats off to them throwing a good man under the bus. Everyone who worked hard on his campaign regularly said that he should be able to be out there with the public, and do what needed to be done when you’re a relative unknown in a Seattle race (yes, Charla, this isn’t Tacoma), and instead Charla, and apparently Jason, chose to hide him.

    Yes, Joe is quirky, and yes, he thinks out loud a bit more than he should sometimes. But guess what – that’s okay, as long as it shows he is thinking, and he is aware of what’s going on.

    I think this should be a note to everyone in Seattle – don’t hire Argo Strategies, and don’t hire Charla Neuman. Because, if they mess up your campaign, and you end up losing because they’re scared to let you be you, then they’ll be sure to make it sound as if they did everything right after the fact, and you didn’t listen to a thing they said.

    Classy.

  • B.S.

    I understand that Charla and Jason have to be able to woo clients in the future, but hats off to them throwing a good man under the bus. Everyone who worked hard on his campaign regularly said that he should be able to be out there with the public, and do what needed to be done when you’re a relative unknown in a Seattle race (yes, Charla, this isn’t Tacoma), and instead Charla, and apparently Jason, chose to hide him.

    Yes, Joe is quirky, and yes, he thinks out loud a bit more than he should sometimes. But guess what – that’s okay, as long as it shows he is thinking, and he is aware of what’s going on.

    I think this should be a note to everyone in Seattle – don’t hire Argo Strategies, and don’t hire Charla Neuman. Because, if they mess up your campaign, and you end up losing because they’re scared to let you be you, then they’ll be sure to make it sound as if they did everything right after the fact, and you didn’t listen to a thing they said.

    Classy.

  • B.S.

    I understand that Charla and Jason have to be able to woo clients in the future, but hats off to them throwing a good man under the bus. Everyone who worked hard on his campaign regularly said that he should be able to be out there with the public, and do what needed to be done when you’re a relative unknown in a Seattle race (yes, Charla, this isn’t Tacoma), and instead Charla, and apparently Jason, chose to hide him.

    Yes, Joe is quirky, and yes, he thinks out loud a bit more than he should sometimes. But guess what – that’s okay, as long as it shows he is thinking, and he is aware of what’s going on.

    I think this should be a note to everyone in Seattle – don’t hire Argo Strategies, and don’t hire Charla Neuman. Because, if they mess up your campaign, and you end up losing because they’re scared to let you be you, then they’ll be sure to make it sound as if they did everything right after the fact, and you didn’t listen to a thing they said.

    Classy.

  • B.S.

    I understand that Charla and Jason have to be able to woo clients in the future, but hats off to them throwing a good man under the bus. Everyone who worked hard on his campaign regularly said that he should be able to be out there with the public, and do what needed to be done when you’re a relative unknown in a Seattle race (yes, Charla, this isn’t Tacoma), and instead Charla, and apparently Jason, chose to hide him.

    Yes, Joe is quirky, and yes, he thinks out loud a bit more than he should sometimes. But guess what – that’s okay, as long as it shows he is thinking, and he is aware of what’s going on.

    I think this should be a note to everyone in Seattle – don’t hire Argo Strategies, and don’t hire Charla Neuman. Because, if they mess up your campaign, and you end up losing because they’re scared to let you be you, then they’ll be sure to make it sound as if they did everything right after the fact, and you didn’t listen to a thing they said.

    Classy.

  • B.S.

    I understand that Charla and Jason have to be able to woo clients in the future, but hats off to them throwing a good man under the bus. Everyone who worked hard on his campaign regularly said that he should be able to be out there with the public, and do what needed to be done when you’re a relative unknown in a Seattle race (yes, Charla, this isn’t Tacoma), and instead Charla, and apparently Jason, chose to hide him.

    Yes, Joe is quirky, and yes, he thinks out loud a bit more than he should sometimes. But guess what – that’s okay, as long as it shows he is thinking, and he is aware of what’s going on.

    I think this should be a note to everyone in Seattle – don’t hire Argo Strategies, and don’t hire Charla Neuman. Because, if they mess up your campaign, and you end up losing because they’re scared to let you be you, then they’ll be sure to make it sound as if they did everything right after the fact, and you didn’t listen to a thing they said.

    Classy.

  • wahuh

    Bennett really threw Joe under the bus at this. At one point he said something like, “I don’t want to be too mean to the candidate on video, so ask me questions after over drinks.” Nice.

    In general learned a lot, and it was candid. Broadhead starting out with how the tunnel wasn’t a flip, was kind of canned stuff, but after that he was great. His comment about Mallahan living a movie he didn’t want to be in was interesting.

  • wahuh

    Bennett really threw Joe under the bus at this. At one point he said something like, “I don’t want to be too mean to the candidate on video, so ask me questions after over drinks.” Nice.

    In general learned a lot, and it was candid. Broadhead starting out with how the tunnel wasn’t a flip, was kind of canned stuff, but after that he was great. His comment about Mallahan living a movie he didn’t want to be in was interesting.

  • wahuh

    Bennett really threw Joe under the bus at this. At one point he said something like, “I don’t want to be too mean to the candidate on video, so ask me questions after over drinks.” Nice.

    In general learned a lot, and it was candid. Broadhead starting out with how the tunnel wasn’t a flip, was kind of canned stuff, but after that he was great. His comment about Mallahan living a movie he didn’t want to be in was interesting.

  • wahuh

    Bennett really threw Joe under the bus at this. At one point he said something like, “I don’t want to be too mean to the candidate on video, so ask me questions after over drinks.” Nice.

    In general learned a lot, and it was candid. Broadhead starting out with how the tunnel wasn’t a flip, was kind of canned stuff, but after that he was great. His comment about Mallahan living a movie he didn’t want to be in was interesting.

  • wahuh

    Bennett really threw Joe under the bus at this. At one point he said something like, “I don’t want to be too mean to the candidate on video, so ask me questions after over drinks.” Nice.

    In general learned a lot, and it was candid. Broadhead starting out with how the tunnel wasn’t a flip, was kind of canned stuff, but after that he was great. His comment about Mallahan living a movie he didn’t want to be in was interesting.

  • wahuh

    Bennett really threw Joe under the bus at this. At one point he said something like, “I don’t want to be too mean to the candidate on video, so ask me questions after over drinks.” Nice.

    In general learned a lot, and it was candid. Broadhead starting out with how the tunnel wasn’t a flip, was kind of canned stuff, but after that he was great. His comment about Mallahan living a movie he didn’t want to be in was interesting.

  • wahuh

    Bennett really threw Joe under the bus at this. At one point he said something like, “I don’t want to be too mean to the candidate on video, so ask me questions after over drinks.” Nice.

    In general learned a lot, and it was candid. Broadhead starting out with how the tunnel wasn’t a flip, was kind of canned stuff, but after that he was great. His comment about Mallahan living a movie he didn’t want to be in was interesting.

  • wahuh

    Bennett really threw Joe under the bus at this. At one point he said something like, “I don’t want to be too mean to the candidate on video, so ask me questions after over drinks.” Nice.

    In general learned a lot, and it was candid. Broadhead starting out with how the tunnel wasn’t a flip, was kind of canned stuff, but after that he was great. His comment about Mallahan living a movie he didn’t want to be in was interesting.

  • wahuh

    Bennett really threw Joe under the bus at this. At one point he said something like, “I don’t want to be too mean to the candidate on video, so ask me questions after over drinks.” Nice.

    In general learned a lot, and it was candid. Broadhead starting out with how the tunnel wasn’t a flip, was kind of canned stuff, but after that he was great. His comment about Mallahan living a movie he didn’t want to be in was interesting.

  • wahuh

    Bennett really threw Joe under the bus at this. At one point he said something like, “I don’t want to be too mean to the candidate on video, so ask me questions after over drinks.” Nice.

    In general learned a lot, and it was candid. Broadhead starting out with how the tunnel wasn’t a flip, was kind of canned stuff, but after that he was great. His comment about Mallahan living a movie he didn’t want to be in was interesting.

  • wahuh

    Bennett really threw Joe under the bus at this. At one point he said something like, “I don’t want to be too mean to the candidate on video, so ask me questions after over drinks.” Nice.

    In general learned a lot, and it was candid. Broadhead starting out with how the tunnel wasn’t a flip, was kind of canned stuff, but after that he was great. His comment about Mallahan living a movie he didn’t want to be in was interesting.

  • wahuh

    Bennett really threw Joe under the bus at this. At one point he said something like, “I don’t want to be too mean to the candidate on video, so ask me questions after over drinks.” Nice.

    In general learned a lot, and it was candid. Broadhead starting out with how the tunnel wasn’t a flip, was kind of canned stuff, but after that he was great. His comment about Mallahan living a movie he didn’t want to be in was interesting.

  • wahuh

    Bennett really threw Joe under the bus at this. At one point he said something like, “I don’t want to be too mean to the candidate on video, so ask me questions after over drinks.” Nice.

    In general learned a lot, and it was candid. Broadhead starting out with how the tunnel wasn’t a flip, was kind of canned stuff, but after that he was great. His comment about Mallahan living a movie he didn’t want to be in was interesting.

  • wahuh

    Bennett really threw Joe under the bus at this. At one point he said something like, “I don’t want to be too mean to the candidate on video, so ask me questions after over drinks.” Nice.

    In general learned a lot, and it was candid. Broadhead starting out with how the tunnel wasn’t a flip, was kind of canned stuff, but after that he was great. His comment about Mallahan living a movie he didn’t want to be in was interesting.

  • wahuh

    Bennett really threw Joe under the bus at this. At one point he said something like, “I don’t want to be too mean to the candidate on video, so ask me questions after over drinks.” Nice.

    In general learned a lot, and it was candid. Broadhead starting out with how the tunnel wasn’t a flip, was kind of canned stuff, but after that he was great. His comment about Mallahan living a movie he didn’t want to be in was interesting.

  • tpn

    @3: these settlements are figured into city budgets as the cost of doing business. Let’s see one of these cases go all the way to trial, and then we will see some public squirming of officials who seem to think it’s alright to pull this kind of stuff. Settlements are basically hush money to compensate for the onerousness of going to trial.

  • tpn

    @3: these settlements are figured into city budgets as the cost of doing business. Let’s see one of these cases go all the way to trial, and then we will see some public squirming of officials who seem to think it’s alright to pull this kind of stuff. Settlements are basically hush money to compensate for the onerousness of going to trial.

  • tpn

    @3: these settlements are figured into city budgets as the cost of doing business. Let’s see one of these cases go all the way to trial, and then we will see some public squirming of officials who seem to think it’s alright to pull this kind of stuff. Settlements are basically hush money to compensate for the onerousness of going to trial.

  • tpn

    @3: these settlements are figured into city budgets as the cost of doing business. Let’s see one of these cases go all the way to trial, and then we will see some public squirming of officials who seem to think it’s alright to pull this kind of stuff. Settlements are basically hush money to compensate for the onerousness of going to trial.

  • tpn

    @3: these settlements are figured into city budgets as the cost of doing business. Let’s see one of these cases go all the way to trial, and then we will see some public squirming of officials who seem to think it’s alright to pull this kind of stuff. Settlements are basically hush money to compensate for the onerousness of going to trial.

  • tpn

    @3: these settlements are figured into city budgets as the cost of doing business. Let’s see one of these cases go all the way to trial, and then we will see some public squirming of officials who seem to think it’s alright to pull this kind of stuff. Settlements are basically hush money to compensate for the onerousness of going to trial.

  • tpn

    @3: these settlements are figured into city budgets as the cost of doing business. Let’s see one of these cases go all the way to trial, and then we will see some public squirming of officials who seem to think it’s alright to pull this kind of stuff. Settlements are basically hush money to compensate for the onerousness of going to trial.

  • tpn

    @3: these settlements are figured into city budgets as the cost of doing business. Let’s see one of these cases go all the way to trial, and then we will see some public squirming of officials who seem to think it’s alright to pull this kind of stuff. Settlements are basically hush money to compensate for the onerousness of going to trial.

  • tpn

    @3: these settlements are figured into city budgets as the cost of doing business. Let’s see one of these cases go all the way to trial, and then we will see some public squirming of officials who seem to think it’s alright to pull this kind of stuff. Settlements are basically hush money to compensate for the onerousness of going to trial.

  • tpn

    @3: these settlements are figured into city budgets as the cost of doing business. Let’s see one of these cases go all the way to trial, and then we will see some public squirming of officials who seem to think it’s alright to pull this kind of stuff. Settlements are basically hush money to compensate for the onerousness of going to trial.

  • tpn

    @3: these settlements are figured into city budgets as the cost of doing business. Let’s see one of these cases go all the way to trial, and then we will see some public squirming of officials who seem to think it’s alright to pull this kind of stuff. Settlements are basically hush money to compensate for the onerousness of going to trial.

  • tpn

    @3: these settlements are figured into city budgets as the cost of doing business. Let’s see one of these cases go all the way to trial, and then we will see some public squirming of officials who seem to think it’s alright to pull this kind of stuff. Settlements are basically hush money to compensate for the onerousness of going to trial.

  • tpn

    @3: these settlements are figured into city budgets as the cost of doing business. Let’s see one of these cases go all the way to trial, and then we will see some public squirming of officials who seem to think it’s alright to pull this kind of stuff. Settlements are basically hush money to compensate for the onerousness of going to trial.

  • tpn

    @3: these settlements are figured into city budgets as the cost of doing business. Let’s see one of these cases go all the way to trial, and then we will see some public squirming of officials who seem to think it’s alright to pull this kind of stuff. Settlements are basically hush money to compensate for the onerousness of going to trial.

  • tpn

    @3: these settlements are figured into city budgets as the cost of doing business. Let’s see one of these cases go all the way to trial, and then we will see some public squirming of officials who seem to think it’s alright to pull this kind of stuff. Settlements are basically hush money to compensate for the onerousness of going to trial.

  • http://www.dougunderground.com/ DOUG.

    Thanks for the event, Publicola. But maybe the next time you promote the hell out of something you should get a bigger venue!

  • http://www.dougunderground.com/ DOUG.

    Thanks for the event, Publicola. But maybe the next time you promote the hell out of something you should get a bigger venue!

  • http://www.dougunderground.com/ DOUG.

    Thanks for the event, Publicola. But maybe the next time you promote the hell out of something you should get a bigger venue!

  • http://www.dougunderground.com/ DOUG.

    Thanks for the event, Publicola. But maybe the next time you promote the hell out of something you should get a bigger venue!

  • http://www.dougunderground.com/ DOUG.

    Thanks for the event, Publicola. But maybe the next time you promote the hell out of something you should get a bigger venue!

  • http://www.dougunderground.com/ DOUG.

    Thanks for the event, Publicola. But maybe the next time you promote the hell out of something you should get a bigger venue!

  • http://www.dougunderground.com/ DOUG.

    Thanks for the event, Publicola. But maybe the next time you promote the hell out of something you should get a bigger venue!

  • http://www.dougunderground.com/ DOUG.

    Thanks for the event, Publicola. But maybe the next time you promote the hell out of something you should get a bigger venue!

  • http://www.dougunderground.com/ DOUG.

    Thanks for the event, Publicola. But maybe the next time you promote the hell out of something you should get a bigger venue!

  • http://www.dougunderground.com/ DOUG.

    Thanks for the event, Publicola. But maybe the next time you promote the hell out of something you should get a bigger venue!

  • http://www.dougunderground.com/ DOUG.

    Thanks for the event, Publicola. But maybe the next time you promote the hell out of something you should get a bigger venue!

  • http://www.dougunderground.com/ DOUG.

    Thanks for the event, Publicola. But maybe the next time you promote the hell out of something you should get a bigger venue!

  • http://www.dougunderground.com/ DOUG.

    Thanks for the event, Publicola. But maybe the next time you promote the hell out of something you should get a bigger venue!

  • http://www.dougunderground.com/ DOUG.

    Thanks for the event, Publicola. But maybe the next time you promote the hell out of something you should get a bigger venue!

  • http://www.dougunderground.com DOUG.

    Thanks for the event, Publicola. But maybe the next time you promote the hell out of something you should get a bigger venue!

  • ivan

    @ 4:

    Your post is a total crock of shit. Any candidate who lets any consultant have that much control isn’t even fit to run, much less hold office.

    I won’t speak for Charla, but Jason works quite well with candidates who take charge of their own campaigns, and always has.

    This particular candidate was in way over his head. Period. Now we’ll have four years to find out if the other guy is.

  • ivan

    @ 4:

    Your post is a total crock of shit. Any candidate who lets any consultant have that much control isn’t even fit to run, much less hold office.

    I won’t speak for Charla, but Jason works quite well with candidates who take charge of their own campaigns, and always has.

    This particular candidate was in way over his head. Period. Now we’ll have four years to find out if the other guy is.

  • ivan

    @ 4:

    Your post is a total crock of shit. Any candidate who lets any consultant have that much control isn’t even fit to run, much less hold office.

    I won’t speak for Charla, but Jason works quite well with candidates who take charge of their own campaigns, and always has.

    This particular candidate was in way over his head. Period. Now we’ll have four years to find out if the other guy is.

  • ivan

    @ 4:

    Your post is a total crock of shit. Any candidate who lets any consultant have that much control isn’t even fit to run, much less hold office.

    I won’t speak for Charla, but Jason works quite well with candidates who take charge of their own campaigns, and always has.

    This particular candidate was in way over his head. Period. Now we’ll have four years to find out if the other guy is.

  • ivan

    @ 4:

    Your post is a total crock of shit. Any candidate who lets any consultant have that much control isn’t even fit to run, much less hold office.

    I won’t speak for Charla, but Jason works quite well with candidates who take charge of their own campaigns, and always has.

    This particular candidate was in way over his head. Period. Now we’ll have four years to find out if the other guy is.

  • ivan

    @ 4:

    Your post is a total crock of shit. Any candidate who lets any consultant have that much control isn’t even fit to run, much less hold office.

    I won’t speak for Charla, but Jason works quite well with candidates who take charge of their own campaigns, and always has.

    This particular candidate was in way over his head. Period. Now we’ll have four years to find out if the other guy is.

  • ivan

    @ 4:

    Your post is a total crock of shit. Any candidate who lets any consultant have that much control isn’t even fit to run, much less hold office.

    I won’t speak for Charla, but Jason works quite well with candidates who take charge of their own campaigns, and always has.

    This particular candidate was in way over his head. Period. Now we’ll have four years to find out if the other guy is.

  • ivan

    @ 4:

    Your post is a total crock of shit. Any candidate who lets any consultant have that much control isn’t even fit to run, much less hold office.

    I won’t speak for Charla, but Jason works quite well with candidates who take charge of their own campaigns, and always has.

    This particular candidate was in way over his head. Period. Now we’ll have four years to find out if the other guy is.

  • ivan

    @ 4:

    Your post is a total crock of shit. Any candidate who lets any consultant have that much control isn’t even fit to run, much less hold office.

    I won’t speak for Charla, but Jason works quite well with candidates who take charge of their own campaigns, and always has.

    This particular candidate was in way over his head. Period. Now we’ll have four years to find out if the other guy is.

  • ivan

    @ 4:

    Your post is a total crock of shit. Any candidate who lets any consultant have that much control isn’t even fit to run, much less hold office.

    I won’t speak for Charla, but Jason works quite well with candidates who take charge of their own campaigns, and always has.

    This particular candidate was in way over his head. Period. Now we’ll have four years to find out if the other guy is.

  • ivan

    @ 4:

    Your post is a total crock of shit. Any candidate who lets any consultant have that much control isn’t even fit to run, much less hold office.

    I won’t speak for Charla, but Jason works quite well with candidates who take charge of their own campaigns, and always has.

    This particular candidate was in way over his head. Period. Now we’ll have four years to find out if the other guy is.

  • ivan

    @ 4:

    Your post is a total crock of shit. Any candidate who lets any consultant have that much control isn’t even fit to run, much less hold office.

    I won’t speak for Charla, but Jason works quite well with candidates who take charge of their own campaigns, and always has.

    This particular candidate was in way over his head. Period. Now we’ll have four years to find out if the other guy is.

  • ivan

    @ 4:

    Your post is a total crock of shit. Any candidate who lets any consultant have that much control isn’t even fit to run, much less hold office.

    I won’t speak for Charla, but Jason works quite well with candidates who take charge of their own campaigns, and always has.

    This particular candidate was in way over his head. Period. Now we’ll have four years to find out if the other guy is.

  • ivan

    @ 4:

    Your post is a total crock of shit. Any candidate who lets any consultant have that much control isn’t even fit to run, much less hold office.

    I won’t speak for Charla, but Jason works quite well with candidates who take charge of their own campaigns, and always has.

    This particular candidate was in way over his head. Period. Now we’ll have four years to find out if the other guy is.

  • ivan

    @ 4:

    Your post is a total crock of shit. Any candidate who lets any consultant have that much control isn’t even fit to run, much less hold office.

    I won’t speak for Charla, but Jason works quite well with candidates who take charge of their own campaigns, and always has.

    This particular candidate was in way over his head. Period. Now we’ll have four years to find out if the other guy is.

  • Lew

    Favorite quote in the op/ed piece by Leman-

    Tolerance of disorder tends to breed further disorder.

    Isn’t his behavior the epitome of disorder?

  • Lew

    Favorite quote in the op/ed piece by Leman-

    Tolerance of disorder tends to breed further disorder.

    Isn’t his behavior the epitome of disorder?

  • Lew

    Favorite quote in the op/ed piece by Leman-

    Tolerance of disorder tends to breed further disorder.

    Isn’t his behavior the epitome of disorder?

  • Lew

    Favorite quote in the op/ed piece by Leman-

    Tolerance of disorder tends to breed further disorder.

    Isn’t his behavior the epitome of disorder?

  • Lew

    Favorite quote in the op/ed piece by Leman-

    Tolerance of disorder tends to breed further disorder.

    Isn’t his behavior the epitome of disorder?

  • Lew

    Favorite quote in the op/ed piece by Leman-

    Tolerance of disorder tends to breed further disorder.

    Isn’t his behavior the epitome of disorder?

  • Lew

    Favorite quote in the op/ed piece by Leman-

    Tolerance of disorder tends to breed further disorder.

    Isn’t his behavior the epitome of disorder?

  • Lew

    Favorite quote in the op/ed piece by Leman-

    Tolerance of disorder tends to breed further disorder.

    Isn’t his behavior the epitome of disorder?

  • Lew

    Favorite quote in the op/ed piece by Leman-

    Tolerance of disorder tends to breed further disorder.

    Isn’t his behavior the epitome of disorder?

  • Lew

    Favorite quote in the op/ed piece by Leman-

    Tolerance of disorder tends to breed further disorder.

    Isn’t his behavior the epitome of disorder?

  • Lew

    Favorite quote in the op/ed piece by Leman-

    Tolerance of disorder tends to breed further disorder.

    Isn’t his behavior the epitome of disorder?

  • Lew

    Favorite quote in the op/ed piece by Leman-

    Tolerance of disorder tends to breed further disorder.

    Isn’t his behavior the epitome of disorder?

  • Lew

    Favorite quote in the op/ed piece by Leman-

    Tolerance of disorder tends to breed further disorder.

    Isn’t his behavior the epitome of disorder?

  • Lew

    Favorite quote in the op/ed piece by Leman-

    Tolerance of disorder tends to breed further disorder.

    Isn’t his behavior the epitome of disorder?

  • Lew

    Favorite quote in the op/ed piece by Leman-

    Tolerance of disorder tends to breed further disorder.

    Isn’t his behavior the epitome of disorder?

  • Alice Roosevelt

    I wasn’t at the event, but know Jason well and he is a stand-up consultant and a great guy. He had concerns during the campaign – it wasn’t like this is new info.

  • Alice Roosevelt

    I wasn’t at the event, but know Jason well and he is a stand-up consultant and a great guy. He had concerns during the campaign – it wasn’t like this is new info.

  • Alice Roosevelt

    I wasn’t at the event, but know Jason well and he is a stand-up consultant and a great guy. He had concerns during the campaign – it wasn’t like this is new info.

  • Alice Roosevelt

    I wasn’t at the event, but know Jason well and he is a stand-up consultant and a great guy. He had concerns during the campaign – it wasn’t like this is new info.

  • Alice Roosevelt

    I wasn’t at the event, but know Jason well and he is a stand-up consultant and a great guy. He had concerns during the campaign – it wasn’t like this is new info.

  • Alice Roosevelt

    I wasn’t at the event, but know Jason well and he is a stand-up consultant and a great guy. He had concerns during the campaign – it wasn’t like this is new info.

  • Alice Roosevelt

    I wasn’t at the event, but know Jason well and he is a stand-up consultant and a great guy. He had concerns during the campaign – it wasn’t like this is new info.

  • Alice Roosevelt

    I wasn’t at the event, but know Jason well and he is a stand-up consultant and a great guy. He had concerns during the campaign – it wasn’t like this is new info.

  • Alice Roosevelt

    I wasn’t at the event, but know Jason well and he is a stand-up consultant and a great guy. He had concerns during the campaign – it wasn’t like this is new info.

  • Alice Roosevelt

    I wasn’t at the event, but know Jason well and he is a stand-up consultant and a great guy. He had concerns during the campaign – it wasn’t like this is new info.

  • Alice Roosevelt

    I wasn’t at the event, but know Jason well and he is a stand-up consultant and a great guy. He had concerns during the campaign – it wasn’t like this is new info.

  • Alice Roosevelt

    I wasn’t at the event, but know Jason well and he is a stand-up consultant and a great guy. He had concerns during the campaign – it wasn’t like this is new info.

  • Alice Roosevelt

    I wasn’t at the event, but know Jason well and he is a stand-up consultant and a great guy. He had concerns during the campaign – it wasn’t like this is new info.

  • Alice Roosevelt

    I wasn’t at the event, but know Jason well and he is a stand-up consultant and a great guy. He had concerns during the campaign – it wasn’t like this is new info.

  • Alice Roosevelt

    I wasn’t at the event, but know Jason well and he is a stand-up consultant and a great guy. He had concerns during the campaign – it wasn’t like this is new info.

  • Alice Roosevelt

    I wasn’t at the event, but know Jason well and he is a stand-up consultant and a great guy. He had concerns during the campaign – it wasn’t like this is new info.

  • Alice Roosevelt

    I wasn’t at the event, but know Jason well and he is a stand-up consultant and a great guy. He had concerns during the campaign – it wasn’t like this is new info.

  • Forum Attendee

    @4, @5. I was at the forum last night and have a totally different perspective. I didn’t think either one threw Joe under the bus. I thought they (Jason in particular) were honest, candid and they were fair in their criticisms about what went wrong/right, what Joe did wrong/right and what McGinn did correctly. Guess everyone walked away with something different. That says to me it was a good forum. Nice job, Publicola!

  • Forum Attendee

    @4, @5. I was at the forum last night and have a totally different perspective. I didn’t think either one threw Joe under the bus. I thought they (Jason in particular) were honest, candid and they were fair in their criticisms about what went wrong/right, what Joe did wrong/right and what McGinn did correctly. Guess everyone walked away with something different. That says to me it was a good forum. Nice job, Publicola!

  • Forum Attendee

    @4, @5. I was at the forum last night and have a totally different perspective. I didn’t think either one threw Joe under the bus. I thought they (Jason in particular) were honest, candid and they were fair in their criticisms about what went wrong/right, what Joe did wrong/right and what McGinn did correctly. Guess everyone walked away with something different. That says to me it was a good forum. Nice job, Publicola!

  • Forum Attendee

    @4, @5. I was at the forum last night and have a totally different perspective. I didn’t think either one threw Joe under the bus. I thought they (Jason in particular) were honest, candid and they were fair in their criticisms about what went wrong/right, what Joe did wrong/right and what McGinn did correctly. Guess everyone walked away with something different. That says to me it was a good forum. Nice job, Publicola!

  • Forum Attendee

    @4, @5. I was at the forum last night and have a totally different perspective. I didn’t think either one threw Joe under the bus. I thought they (Jason in particular) were honest, candid and they were fair in their criticisms about what went wrong/right, what Joe did wrong/right and what McGinn did correctly. Guess everyone walked away with something different. That says to me it was a good forum. Nice job, Publicola!

  • Forum Attendee

    @4, @5. I was at the forum last night and have a totally different perspective. I didn’t think either one threw Joe under the bus. I thought they (Jason in particular) were honest, candid and they were fair in their criticisms about what went wrong/right, what Joe did wrong/right and what McGinn did correctly. Guess everyone walked away with something different. That says to me it was a good forum. Nice job, Publicola!

  • Forum Attendee

    @4, @5. I was at the forum last night and have a totally different perspective. I didn’t think either one threw Joe under the bus. I thought they (Jason in particular) were honest, candid and they were fair in their criticisms about what went wrong/right, what Joe did wrong/right and what McGinn did correctly. Guess everyone walked away with something different. That says to me it was a good forum. Nice job, Publicola!

  • Forum Attendee

    @4, @5. I was at the forum last night and have a totally different perspective. I didn’t think either one threw Joe under the bus. I thought they (Jason in particular) were honest, candid and they were fair in their criticisms about what went wrong/right, what Joe did wrong/right and what McGinn did correctly. Guess everyone walked away with something different. That says to me it was a good forum. Nice job, Publicola!

  • Forum Attendee

    @4, @5. I was at the forum last night and have a totally different perspective. I didn’t think either one threw Joe under the bus. I thought they (Jason in particular) were honest, candid and they were fair in their criticisms about what went wrong/right, what Joe did wrong/right and what McGinn did correctly. Guess everyone walked away with something different. That says to me it was a good forum. Nice job, Publicola!

  • Forum Attendee

    @4, @5. I was at the forum last night and have a totally different perspective. I didn’t think either one threw Joe under the bus. I thought they (Jason in particular) were honest, candid and they were fair in their criticisms about what went wrong/right, what Joe did wrong/right and what McGinn did correctly. Guess everyone walked away with something different. That says to me it was a good forum. Nice job, Publicola!

  • Forum Attendee

    @4, @5. I was at the forum last night and have a totally different perspective. I didn’t think either one threw Joe under the bus. I thought they (Jason in particular) were honest, candid and they were fair in their criticisms about what went wrong/right, what Joe did wrong/right and what McGinn did correctly. Guess everyone walked away with something different. That says to me it was a good forum. Nice job, Publicola!

  • Forum Attendee

    @4, @5. I was at the forum last night and have a totally different perspective. I didn’t think either one threw Joe under the bus. I thought they (Jason in particular) were honest, candid and they were fair in their criticisms about what went wrong/right, what Joe did wrong/right and what McGinn did correctly. Guess everyone walked away with something different. That says to me it was a good forum. Nice job, Publicola!

  • Forum Attendee

    @4, @5. I was at the forum last night and have a totally different perspective. I didn’t think either one threw Joe under the bus. I thought they (Jason in particular) were honest, candid and they were fair in their criticisms about what went wrong/right, what Joe did wrong/right and what McGinn did correctly. Guess everyone walked away with something different. That says to me it was a good forum. Nice job, Publicola!

  • Forum Attendee

    @4, @5. I was at the forum last night and have a totally different perspective. I didn’t think either one threw Joe under the bus. I thought they (Jason in particular) were honest, candid and they were fair in their criticisms about what went wrong/right, what Joe did wrong/right and what McGinn did correctly. Guess everyone walked away with something different. That says to me it was a good forum. Nice job, Publicola!

  • Forum Attendee

    @4, @5. I was at the forum last night and have a totally different perspective. I didn’t think either one threw Joe under the bus. I thought they (Jason in particular) were honest, candid and they were fair in their criticisms about what went wrong/right, what Joe did wrong/right and what McGinn did correctly. Guess everyone walked away with something different. That says to me it was a good forum. Nice job, Publicola!

  • Forum Attendee

    @4, @5. I was at the forum last night and have a totally different perspective. I didn’t think either one threw Joe under the bus. I thought they (Jason in particular) were honest, candid and they were fair in their criticisms about what went wrong/right, what Joe did wrong/right and what McGinn did correctly. Guess everyone walked away with something different. That says to me it was a good forum. Nice job, Publicola!

  • Forum Attendee

    @4, @5. I was at the forum last night and have a totally different perspective. I didn’t think either one threw Joe under the bus. I thought they (Jason in particular) were honest, candid and they were fair in their criticisms about what went wrong/right, what Joe did wrong/right and what McGinn did correctly. Guess everyone walked away with something different. That says to me it was a good forum. Nice job, Publicola!

  • Crumb

    Erica: A point of fact: the “waterfront deep-bore tunnel” isn’t on the waterfront, you’ve been reading too many McGinn mistatements about the project. I realize it sounds way more scary that way, but it simply is not correct factually. The bored tunnel will be in native soil way uphill from the waterfront. The elections over, you can cover this issue accurately now.

  • Crumb

    Erica: A point of fact: the “waterfront deep-bore tunnel” isn’t on the waterfront, you’ve been reading too many McGinn mistatements about the project. I realize it sounds way more scary that way, but it simply is not correct factually. The bored tunnel will be in native soil way uphill from the waterfront. The elections over, you can cover this issue accurately now.

  • Crumb

    Erica: A point of fact: the “waterfront deep-bore tunnel” isn’t on the waterfront, you’ve been reading too many McGinn mistatements about the project. I realize it sounds way more scary that way, but it simply is not correct factually. The bored tunnel will be in native soil way uphill from the waterfront. The elections over, you can cover this issue accurately now.

  • Crumb

    Erica: A point of fact: the “waterfront deep-bore tunnel” isn’t on the waterfront, you’ve been reading too many McGinn mistatements about the project. I realize it sounds way more scary that way, but it simply is not correct factually. The bored tunnel will be in native soil way uphill from the waterfront. The elections over, you can cover this issue accurately now.

  • Crumb

    Erica: A point of fact: the “waterfront deep-bore tunnel” isn’t on the waterfront, you’ve been reading too many McGinn mistatements about the project. I realize it sounds way more scary that way, but it simply is not correct factually. The bored tunnel will be in native soil way uphill from the waterfront. The elections over, you can cover this issue accurately now.

  • Crumb

    Erica: A point of fact: the “waterfront deep-bore tunnel” isn’t on the waterfront, you’ve been reading too many McGinn mistatements about the project. I realize it sounds way more scary that way, but it simply is not correct factually. The bored tunnel will be in native soil way uphill from the waterfront. The elections over, you can cover this issue accurately now.

  • Crumb

    Erica: A point of fact: the “waterfront deep-bore tunnel” isn’t on the waterfront, you’ve been reading too many McGinn mistatements about the project. I realize it sounds way more scary that way, but it simply is not correct factually. The bored tunnel will be in native soil way uphill from the waterfront. The elections over, you can cover this issue accurately now.

  • Crumb

    Erica: A point of fact: the “waterfront deep-bore tunnel” isn’t on the waterfront, you’ve been reading too many McGinn mistatements about the project. I realize it sounds way more scary that way, but it simply is not correct factually. The bored tunnel will be in native soil way uphill from the waterfront. The elections over, you can cover this issue accurately now.

  • Crumb

    Erica: A point of fact: the “waterfront deep-bore tunnel” isn’t on the waterfront, you’ve been reading too many McGinn mistatements about the project. I realize it sounds way more scary that way, but it simply is not correct factually. The bored tunnel will be in native soil way uphill from the waterfront. The elections over, you can cover this issue accurately now.

  • Crumb

    Erica: A point of fact: the “waterfront deep-bore tunnel” isn’t on the waterfront, you’ve been reading too many McGinn mistatements about the project. I realize it sounds way more scary that way, but it simply is not correct factually. The bored tunnel will be in native soil way uphill from the waterfront. The elections over, you can cover this issue accurately now.

  • Crumb

    Erica: A point of fact: the “waterfront deep-bore tunnel” isn’t on the waterfront, you’ve been reading too many McGinn mistatements about the project. I realize it sounds way more scary that way, but it simply is not correct factually. The bored tunnel will be in native soil way uphill from the waterfront. The elections over, you can cover this issue accurately now.

  • Crumb

    Erica: A point of fact: the “waterfront deep-bore tunnel” isn’t on the waterfront, you’ve been reading too many McGinn mistatements about the project. I realize it sounds way more scary that way, but it simply is not correct factually. The bored tunnel will be in native soil way uphill from the waterfront. The elections over, you can cover this issue accurately now.

  • Crumb

    Erica: A point of fact: the “waterfront deep-bore tunnel” isn’t on the waterfront, you’ve been reading too many McGinn mistatements about the project. I realize it sounds way more scary that way, but it simply is not correct factually. The bored tunnel will be in native soil way uphill from the waterfront. The elections over, you can cover this issue accurately now.

  • Crumb

    Erica: A point of fact: the “waterfront deep-bore tunnel” isn’t on the waterfront, you’ve been reading too many McGinn mistatements about the project. I realize it sounds way more scary that way, but it simply is not correct factually. The bored tunnel will be in native soil way uphill from the waterfront. The elections over, you can cover this issue accurately now.

  • Crumb

    Erica: A point of fact: the “waterfront deep-bore tunnel” isn’t on the waterfront, you’ve been reading too many McGinn mistatements about the project. I realize it sounds way more scary that way, but it simply is not correct factually. The bored tunnel will be in native soil way uphill from the waterfront. The elections over, you can cover this issue accurately now.

  • Crumb

    Erica: A point of fact: the “waterfront deep-bore tunnel” isn’t on the waterfront, you’ve been reading too many McGinn mistatements about the project. I realize it sounds way more scary that way, but it simply is not correct factually. The bored tunnel will be in native soil way uphill from the waterfront. The elections over, you can cover this issue accurately now.

  • Crumb

    Erica: A point of fact: the “waterfront deep-bore tunnel” isn’t on the waterfront, you’ve been reading too many McGinn mistatements about the project. I realize it sounds way more scary that way, but it simply is not correct factually. The bored tunnel will be in native soil way uphill from the waterfront. The elections over, you can cover this issue accurately now.

  • Forum Attendee

    oh, and also (!) props to McGinn team for smart strategy. I really enjoyed what Broadhead had to say.

  • Forum Attendee

    oh, and also (!) props to McGinn team for smart strategy. I really enjoyed what Broadhead had to say.

  • Forum Attendee

    oh, and also (!) props to McGinn team for smart strategy. I really enjoyed what Broadhead had to say.

  • Forum Attendee

    oh, and also (!) props to McGinn team for smart strategy. I really enjoyed what Broadhead had to say.

  • Forum Attendee

    oh, and also (!) props to McGinn team for smart strategy. I really enjoyed what Broadhead had to say.

  • Forum Attendee

    oh, and also (!) props to McGinn team for smart strategy. I really enjoyed what Broadhead had to say.

  • Forum Attendee

    oh, and also (!) props to McGinn team for smart strategy. I really enjoyed what Broadhead had to say.

  • Forum Attendee

    oh, and also (!) props to McGinn team for smart strategy. I really enjoyed what Broadhead had to say.

  • Forum Attendee

    oh, and also (!) props to McGinn team for smart strategy. I really enjoyed what Broadhead had to say.

  • Forum Attendee

    oh, and also (!) props to McGinn team for smart strategy. I really enjoyed what Broadhead had to say.

  • Forum Attendee

    oh, and also (!) props to McGinn team for smart strategy. I really enjoyed what Broadhead had to say.

  • Forum Attendee

    oh, and also (!) props to McGinn team for smart strategy. I really enjoyed what Broadhead had to say.

  • Forum Attendee

    oh, and also (!) props to McGinn team for smart strategy. I really enjoyed what Broadhead had to say.

  • Forum Attendee

    oh, and also (!) props to McGinn team for smart strategy. I really enjoyed what Broadhead had to say.

  • Forum Attendee

    oh, and also (!) props to McGinn team for smart strategy. I really enjoyed what Broadhead had to say.

  • Forum Attendee

    oh, and also (!) props to McGinn team for smart strategy. I really enjoyed what Broadhead had to say.

  • B.S.

    @11/13

    Exactly. Different perspectives as we leave. And maybe I’m a bit harsh on Jason, but some of what I heard him say, and what was reported, was lame.

    re: 13 – exactly. I didn’t support the man in the election, but damn if he and his team didn’t run a solid campaign.

  • B.S.

    @11/13

    Exactly. Different perspectives as we leave. And maybe I’m a bit harsh on Jason, but some of what I heard him say, and what was reported, was lame.

    re: 13 – exactly. I didn’t support the man in the election, but damn if he and his team didn’t run a solid campaign.

  • B.S.

    @11/13

    Exactly. Different perspectives as we leave. And maybe I’m a bit harsh on Jason, but some of what I heard him say, and what was reported, was lame.

    re: 13 – exactly. I didn’t support the man in the election, but damn if he and his team didn’t run a solid campaign.

  • B.S.

    @11/13

    Exactly. Different perspectives as we leave. And maybe I’m a bit harsh on Jason, but some of what I heard him say, and what was reported, was lame.

    re: 13 – exactly. I didn’t support the man in the election, but damn if he and his team didn’t run a solid campaign.

  • B.S.

    @11/13

    Exactly. Different perspectives as we leave. And maybe I’m a bit harsh on Jason, but some of what I heard him say, and what was reported, was lame.

    re: 13 – exactly. I didn’t support the man in the election, but damn if he and his team didn’t run a solid campaign.

  • B.S.

    @11/13

    Exactly. Different perspectives as we leave. And maybe I’m a bit harsh on Jason, but some of what I heard him say, and what was reported, was lame.

    re: 13 – exactly. I didn’t support the man in the election, but damn if he and his team didn’t run a solid campaign.

  • B.S.

    @11/13

    Exactly. Different perspectives as we leave. And maybe I’m a bit harsh on Jason, but some of what I heard him say, and what was reported, was lame.

    re: 13 – exactly. I didn’t support the man in the election, but damn if he and his team didn’t run a solid campaign.

  • B.S.

    @11/13

    Exactly. Different perspectives as we leave. And maybe I’m a bit harsh on Jason, but some of what I heard him say, and what was reported, was lame.

    re: 13 – exactly. I didn’t support the man in the election, but damn if he and his team didn’t run a solid campaign.

  • B.S.

    @11/13

    Exactly. Different perspectives as we leave. And maybe I’m a bit harsh on Jason, but some of what I heard him say, and what was reported, was lame.

    re: 13 – exactly. I didn’t support the man in the election, but damn if he and his team didn’t run a solid campaign.

  • B.S.

    @11/13

    Exactly. Different perspectives as we leave. And maybe I’m a bit harsh on Jason, but some of what I heard him say, and what was reported, was lame.

    re: 13 – exactly. I didn’t support the man in the election, but damn if he and his team didn’t run a solid campaign.

  • B.S.

    @11/13

    Exactly. Different perspectives as we leave. And maybe I’m a bit harsh on Jason, but some of what I heard him say, and what was reported, was lame.

    re: 13 – exactly. I didn’t support the man in the election, but damn if he and his team didn’t run a solid campaign.

  • B.S.

    @11/13

    Exactly. Different perspectives as we leave. And maybe I’m a bit harsh on Jason, but some of what I heard him say, and what was reported, was lame.

    re: 13 – exactly. I didn’t support the man in the election, but damn if he and his team didn’t run a solid campaign.

  • B.S.

    @11/13

    Exactly. Different perspectives as we leave. And maybe I’m a bit harsh on Jason, but some of what I heard him say, and what was reported, was lame.

    re: 13 – exactly. I didn’t support the man in the election, but damn if he and his team didn’t run a solid campaign.

  • B.S.

    @11/13

    Exactly. Different perspectives as we leave. And maybe I’m a bit harsh on Jason, but some of what I heard him say, and what was reported, was lame.

    re: 13 – exactly. I didn’t support the man in the election, but damn if he and his team didn’t run a solid campaign.

  • B.S.

    @11/13

    Exactly. Different perspectives as we leave. And maybe I’m a bit harsh on Jason, but some of what I heard him say, and what was reported, was lame.

    re: 13 – exactly. I didn’t support the man in the election, but damn if he and his team didn’t run a solid campaign.

  • B.S.

    @11/13

    Exactly. Different perspectives as we leave. And maybe I’m a bit harsh on Jason, but some of what I heard him say, and what was reported, was lame.

    re: 13 – exactly. I didn’t support the man in the election, but damn if he and his team didn’t run a solid campaign.

  • B.S.

    @11/13

    Exactly. Different perspectives as we leave. And maybe I’m a bit harsh on Jason, but some of what I heard him say, and what was reported, was lame.

    re: 13 – exactly. I didn’t support the man in the election, but damn if he and his team didn’t run a solid campaign.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    12. McGinn gets his info from the same place as ECB: The People’s Waterfront Coalition, which has lobbied since before day one to remove the SR 99 viaduct and not replace it at all.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    12. McGinn gets his info from the same place as ECB: The People’s Waterfront Coalition, which has lobbied since before day one to remove the SR 99 viaduct and not replace it at all.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    12. McGinn gets his info from the same place as ECB: The People’s Waterfront Coalition, which has lobbied since before day one to remove the SR 99 viaduct and not replace it at all.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    12. McGinn gets his info from the same place as ECB: The People’s Waterfront Coalition, which has lobbied since before day one to remove the SR 99 viaduct and not replace it at all.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    12. McGinn gets his info from the same place as ECB: The People’s Waterfront Coalition, which has lobbied since before day one to remove the SR 99 viaduct and not replace it at all.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    12. McGinn gets his info from the same place as ECB: The People’s Waterfront Coalition, which has lobbied since before day one to remove the SR 99 viaduct and not replace it at all.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    12. McGinn gets his info from the same place as ECB: The People’s Waterfront Coalition, which has lobbied since before day one to remove the SR 99 viaduct and not replace it at all.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    12. McGinn gets his info from the same place as ECB: The People’s Waterfront Coalition, which has lobbied since before day one to remove the SR 99 viaduct and not replace it at all.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    12. McGinn gets his info from the same place as ECB: The People’s Waterfront Coalition, which has lobbied since before day one to remove the SR 99 viaduct and not replace it at all.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    12. McGinn gets his info from the same place as ECB: The People’s Waterfront Coalition, which has lobbied since before day one to remove the SR 99 viaduct and not replace it at all.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    12. McGinn gets his info from the same place as ECB: The People’s Waterfront Coalition, which has lobbied since before day one to remove the SR 99 viaduct and not replace it at all.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    12. McGinn gets his info from the same place as ECB: The People’s Waterfront Coalition, which has lobbied since before day one to remove the SR 99 viaduct and not replace it at all.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    12. McGinn gets his info from the same place as ECB: The People’s Waterfront Coalition, which has lobbied since before day one to remove the SR 99 viaduct and not replace it at all.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    12. McGinn gets his info from the same place as ECB: The People’s Waterfront Coalition, which has lobbied since before day one to remove the SR 99 viaduct and not replace it at all.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    12. McGinn gets his info from the same place as ECB: The People’s Waterfront Coalition, which has lobbied since before day one to remove the SR 99 viaduct and not replace it at all.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    12. McGinn gets his info from the same place as ECB: The People’s Waterfront Coalition, which has lobbied since before day one to remove the SR 99 viaduct and not replace it at all.

  • Forum Attendee

    @14. A little harsh…and in my opinion not an accurate reflection of the evening. Hopefully the video will be more accurate. I talked with several people afterward and felt it was honest without being mean-spirited. I didn’t see throwing Joe under the bus AT ALL. And I was a Mallahan supporter (although I only phonebanked twice, my bad). I don’t really know why Jason or Charla agreed to do this – you can’t lose a campaign, give an honest assessment and NOT reveal something that looks like a liability. You’re sort of f*cked both ways. However, I think they walked the line pretty well. Maybe you have a different perspective because you invested a lot more than I did and it’s more personal for you…which is understandable. I just think it’s important to note that many folks who mingled afterward thought it was great and that Bennett was by far the most entertaining and candid.

  • Forum Attendee

    @14. A little harsh…and in my opinion not an accurate reflection of the evening. Hopefully the video will be more accurate. I talked with several people afterward and felt it was honest without being mean-spirited. I didn’t see throwing Joe under the bus AT ALL. And I was a Mallahan supporter (although I only phonebanked twice, my bad). I don’t really know why Jason or Charla agreed to do this – you can’t lose a campaign, give an honest assessment and NOT reveal something that looks like a liability. You’re sort of f*cked both ways. However, I think they walked the line pretty well. Maybe you have a different perspective because you invested a lot more than I did and it’s more personal for you…which is understandable. I just think it’s important to note that many folks who mingled afterward thought it was great and that Bennett was by far the most entertaining and candid.

  • Forum Attendee

    @14. A little harsh…and in my opinion not an accurate reflection of the evening. Hopefully the video will be more accurate. I talked with several people afterward and felt it was honest without being mean-spirited. I didn’t see throwing Joe under the bus AT ALL. And I was a Mallahan supporter (although I only phonebanked twice, my bad). I don’t really know why Jason or Charla agreed to do this – you can’t lose a campaign, give an honest assessment and NOT reveal something that looks like a liability. You’re sort of f*cked both ways. However, I think they walked the line pretty well. Maybe you have a different perspective because you invested a lot more than I did and it’s more personal for you…which is understandable. I just think it’s important to note that many folks who mingled afterward thought it was great and that Bennett was by far the most entertaining and candid.

  • Forum Attendee

    @14. A little harsh…and in my opinion not an accurate reflection of the evening. Hopefully the video will be more accurate. I talked with several people afterward and felt it was honest without being mean-spirited. I didn’t see throwing Joe under the bus AT ALL. And I was a Mallahan supporter (although I only phonebanked twice, my bad). I don’t really know why Jason or Charla agreed to do this – you can’t lose a campaign, give an honest assessment and NOT reveal something that looks like a liability. You’re sort of f*cked both ways. However, I think they walked the line pretty well. Maybe you have a different perspective because you invested a lot more than I did and it’s more personal for you…which is understandable. I just think it’s important to note that many folks who mingled afterward thought it was great and that Bennett was by far the most entertaining and candid.

  • Forum Attendee

    @14. A little harsh…and in my opinion not an accurate reflection of the evening. Hopefully the video will be more accurate. I talked with several people afterward and felt it was honest without being mean-spirited. I didn’t see throwing Joe under the bus AT ALL. And I was a Mallahan supporter (although I only phonebanked twice, my bad). I don’t really know why Jason or Charla agreed to do this – you can’t lose a campaign, give an honest assessment and NOT reveal something that looks like a liability. You’re sort of f*cked both ways. However, I think they walked the line pretty well. Maybe you have a different perspective because you invested a lot more than I did and it’s more personal for you…which is understandable. I just think it’s important to note that many folks who mingled afterward thought it was great and that Bennett was by far the most entertaining and candid.

  • Forum Attendee

    @14. A little harsh…and in my opinion not an accurate reflection of the evening. Hopefully the video will be more accurate. I talked with several people afterward and felt it was honest without being mean-spirited. I didn’t see throwing Joe under the bus AT ALL. And I was a Mallahan supporter (although I only phonebanked twice, my bad). I don’t really know why Jason or Charla agreed to do this – you can’t lose a campaign, give an honest assessment and NOT reveal something that looks like a liability. You’re sort of f*cked both ways. However, I think they walked the line pretty well. Maybe you have a different perspective because you invested a lot more than I did and it’s more personal for you…which is understandable. I just think it’s important to note that many folks who mingled afterward thought it was great and that Bennett was by far the most entertaining and candid.

  • Forum Attendee

    @14. A little harsh…and in my opinion not an accurate reflection of the evening. Hopefully the video will be more accurate. I talked with several people afterward and felt it was honest without being mean-spirited. I didn’t see throwing Joe under the bus AT ALL. And I was a Mallahan supporter (although I only phonebanked twice, my bad). I don’t really know why Jason or Charla agreed to do this – you can’t lose a campaign, give an honest assessment and NOT reveal something that looks like a liability. You’re sort of f*cked both ways. However, I think they walked the line pretty well. Maybe you have a different perspective because you invested a lot more than I did and it’s more personal for you…which is understandable. I just think it’s important to note that many folks who mingled afterward thought it was great and that Bennett was by far the most entertaining and candid.

  • Forum Attendee

    @14. A little harsh…and in my opinion not an accurate reflection of the evening. Hopefully the video will be more accurate. I talked with several people afterward and felt it was honest without being mean-spirited. I didn’t see throwing Joe under the bus AT ALL. And I was a Mallahan supporter (although I only phonebanked twice, my bad). I don’t really know why Jason or Charla agreed to do this – you can’t lose a campaign, give an honest assessment and NOT reveal something that looks like a liability. You’re sort of f*cked both ways. However, I think they walked the line pretty well. Maybe you have a different perspective because you invested a lot more than I did and it’s more personal for you…which is understandable. I just think it’s important to note that many folks who mingled afterward thought it was great and that Bennett was by far the most entertaining and candid.

  • Forum Attendee

    @14. A little harsh…and in my opinion not an accurate reflection of the evening. Hopefully the video will be more accurate. I talked with several people afterward and felt it was honest without being mean-spirited. I didn’t see throwing Joe under the bus AT ALL. And I was a Mallahan supporter (although I only phonebanked twice, my bad). I don’t really know why Jason or Charla agreed to do this – you can’t lose a campaign, give an honest assessment and NOT reveal something that looks like a liability. You’re sort of f*cked both ways. However, I think they walked the line pretty well. Maybe you have a different perspective because you invested a lot more than I did and it’s more personal for you…which is understandable. I just think it’s important to note that many folks who mingled afterward thought it was great and that Bennett was by far the most entertaining and candid.

  • Forum Attendee

    @14. A little harsh…and in my opinion not an accurate reflection of the evening. Hopefully the video will be more accurate. I talked with several people afterward and felt it was honest without being mean-spirited. I didn’t see throwing Joe under the bus AT ALL. And I was a Mallahan supporter (although I only phonebanked twice, my bad). I don’t really know why Jason or Charla agreed to do this – you can’t lose a campaign, give an honest assessment and NOT reveal something that looks like a liability. You’re sort of f*cked both ways. However, I think they walked the line pretty well. Maybe you have a different perspective because you invested a lot more than I did and it’s more personal for you…which is understandable. I just think it’s important to note that many folks who mingled afterward thought it was great and that Bennett was by far the most entertaining and candid.

  • Forum Attendee

    @14. A little harsh…and in my opinion not an accurate reflection of the evening. Hopefully the video will be more accurate. I talked with several people afterward and felt it was honest without being mean-spirited. I didn’t see throwing Joe under the bus AT ALL. And I was a Mallahan supporter (although I only phonebanked twice, my bad). I don’t really know why Jason or Charla agreed to do this – you can’t lose a campaign, give an honest assessment and NOT reveal something that looks like a liability. You’re sort of f*cked both ways. However, I think they walked the line pretty well. Maybe you have a different perspective because you invested a lot more than I did and it’s more personal for you…which is understandable. I just think it’s important to note that many folks who mingled afterward thought it was great and that Bennett was by far the most entertaining and candid.

  • Forum Attendee

    @14. A little harsh…and in my opinion not an accurate reflection of the evening. Hopefully the video will be more accurate. I talked with several people afterward and felt it was honest without being mean-spirited. I didn’t see throwing Joe under the bus AT ALL. And I was a Mallahan supporter (although I only phonebanked twice, my bad). I don’t really know why Jason or Charla agreed to do this – you can’t lose a campaign, give an honest assessment and NOT reveal something that looks like a liability. You’re sort of f*cked both ways. However, I think they walked the line pretty well. Maybe you have a different perspective because you invested a lot more than I did and it’s more personal for you…which is understandable. I just think it’s important to note that many folks who mingled afterward thought it was great and that Bennett was by far the most entertaining and candid.

  • Forum Attendee

    @14. A little harsh…and in my opinion not an accurate reflection of the evening. Hopefully the video will be more accurate. I talked with several people afterward and felt it was honest without being mean-spirited. I didn’t see throwing Joe under the bus AT ALL. And I was a Mallahan supporter (although I only phonebanked twice, my bad). I don’t really know why Jason or Charla agreed to do this – you can’t lose a campaign, give an honest assessment and NOT reveal something that looks like a liability. You’re sort of f*cked both ways. However, I think they walked the line pretty well. Maybe you have a different perspective because you invested a lot more than I did and it’s more personal for you…which is understandable. I just think it’s important to note that many folks who mingled afterward thought it was great and that Bennett was by far the most entertaining and candid.

  • Forum Attendee

    @14. A little harsh…and in my opinion not an accurate reflection of the evening. Hopefully the video will be more accurate. I talked with several people afterward and felt it was honest without being mean-spirited. I didn’t see throwing Joe under the bus AT ALL. And I was a Mallahan supporter (although I only phonebanked twice, my bad). I don’t really know why Jason or Charla agreed to do this – you can’t lose a campaign, give an honest assessment and NOT reveal something that looks like a liability. You’re sort of f*cked both ways. However, I think they walked the line pretty well. Maybe you have a different perspective because you invested a lot more than I did and it’s more personal for you…which is understandable. I just think it’s important to note that many folks who mingled afterward thought it was great and that Bennett was by far the most entertaining and candid.

  • Forum Attendee

    @14. A little harsh…and in my opinion not an accurate reflection of the evening. Hopefully the video will be more accurate. I talked with several people afterward and felt it was honest without being mean-spirited. I didn’t see throwing Joe under the bus AT ALL. And I was a Mallahan supporter (although I only phonebanked twice, my bad). I don’t really know why Jason or Charla agreed to do this – you can’t lose a campaign, give an honest assessment and NOT reveal something that looks like a liability. You’re sort of f*cked both ways. However, I think they walked the line pretty well. Maybe you have a different perspective because you invested a lot more than I did and it’s more personal for you…which is understandable. I just think it’s important to note that many folks who mingled afterward thought it was great and that Bennett was by far the most entertaining and candid.

  • Forum Attendee

    @14. A little harsh…and in my opinion not an accurate reflection of the evening. Hopefully the video will be more accurate. I talked with several people afterward and felt it was honest without being mean-spirited. I didn’t see throwing Joe under the bus AT ALL. And I was a Mallahan supporter (although I only phonebanked twice, my bad). I don’t really know why Jason or Charla agreed to do this – you can’t lose a campaign, give an honest assessment and NOT reveal something that looks like a liability. You’re sort of f*cked both ways. However, I think they walked the line pretty well. Maybe you have a different perspective because you invested a lot more than I did and it’s more personal for you…which is understandable. I just think it’s important to note that many folks who mingled afterward thought it was great and that Bennett was by far the most entertaining and candid.

  • B.S.

    @16 – But you hit the point on the head. The only reason for Charla and Jason to do this is to make themselves look better. The only way to do that is to throw someone else under the bus. For the life of me, I don’t know why anyone would ever jump on board for such an event. What went wrong should be left to pundits to hash out.

    I could definitely see a conversation with people from McGinn’s team on what they felt they did right in their campaign, but dragging the people in who’s camp didn’t win serves one purpose, and that is throwing the candidate under the bus.

  • B.S.

    @16 – But you hit the point on the head. The only reason for Charla and Jason to do this is to make themselves look better. The only way to do that is to throw someone else under the bus. For the life of me, I don’t know why anyone would ever jump on board for such an event. What went wrong should be left to pundits to hash out.

    I could definitely see a conversation with people from McGinn’s team on what they felt they did right in their campaign, but dragging the people in who’s camp didn’t win serves one purpose, and that is throwing the candidate under the bus.

  • B.S.

    @16 – But you hit the point on the head. The only reason for Charla and Jason to do this is to make themselves look better. The only way to do that is to throw someone else under the bus. For the life of me, I don’t know why anyone would ever jump on board for such an event. What went wrong should be left to pundits to hash out.

    I could definitely see a conversation with people from McGinn’s team on what they felt they did right in their campaign, but dragging the people in who’s camp didn’t win serves one purpose, and that is throwing the candidate under the bus.

  • B.S.

    @16 – But you hit the point on the head. The only reason for Charla and Jason to do this is to make themselves look better. The only way to do that is to throw someone else under the bus. For the life of me, I don’t know why anyone would ever jump on board for such an event. What went wrong should be left to pundits to hash out.

    I could definitely see a conversation with people from McGinn’s team on what they felt they did right in their campaign, but dragging the people in who’s camp didn’t win serves one purpose, and that is throwing the candidate under the bus.

  • B.S.

    @16 – But you hit the point on the head. The only reason for Charla and Jason to do this is to make themselves look better. The only way to do that is to throw someone else under the bus. For the life of me, I don’t know why anyone would ever jump on board for such an event. What went wrong should be left to pundits to hash out.

    I could definitely see a conversation with people from McGinn’s team on what they felt they did right in their campaign, but dragging the people in who’s camp didn’t win serves one purpose, and that is throwing the candidate under the bus.

  • B.S.

    @16 – But you hit the point on the head. The only reason for Charla and Jason to do this is to make themselves look better. The only way to do that is to throw someone else under the bus. For the life of me, I don’t know why anyone would ever jump on board for such an event. What went wrong should be left to pundits to hash out.

    I could definitely see a conversation with people from McGinn’s team on what they felt they did right in their campaign, but dragging the people in who’s camp didn’t win serves one purpose, and that is throwing the candidate under the bus.

  • B.S.

    @16 – But you hit the point on the head. The only reason for Charla and Jason to do this is to make themselves look better. The only way to do that is to throw someone else under the bus. For the life of me, I don’t know why anyone would ever jump on board for such an event. What went wrong should be left to pundits to hash out.

    I could definitely see a conversation with people from McGinn’s team on what they felt they did right in their campaign, but dragging the people in who’s camp didn’t win serves one purpose, and that is throwing the candidate under the bus.

  • B.S.

    @16 – But you hit the point on the head. The only reason for Charla and Jason to do this is to make themselves look better. The only way to do that is to throw someone else under the bus. For the life of me, I don’t know why anyone would ever jump on board for such an event. What went wrong should be left to pundits to hash out.

    I could definitely see a conversation with people from McGinn’s team on what they felt they did right in their campaign, but dragging the people in who’s camp didn’t win serves one purpose, and that is throwing the candidate under the bus.

  • B.S.

    @16 – But you hit the point on the head. The only reason for Charla and Jason to do this is to make themselves look better. The only way to do that is to throw someone else under the bus. For the life of me, I don’t know why anyone would ever jump on board for such an event. What went wrong should be left to pundits to hash out.

    I could definitely see a conversation with people from McGinn’s team on what they felt they did right in their campaign, but dragging the people in who’s camp didn’t win serves one purpose, and that is throwing the candidate under the bus.

  • B.S.

    @16 – But you hit the point on the head. The only reason for Charla and Jason to do this is to make themselves look better. The only way to do that is to throw someone else under the bus. For the life of me, I don’t know why anyone would ever jump on board for such an event. What went wrong should be left to pundits to hash out.

    I could definitely see a conversation with people from McGinn’s team on what they felt they did right in their campaign, but dragging the people in who’s camp didn’t win serves one purpose, and that is throwing the candidate under the bus.

  • B.S.

    @16 – But you hit the point on the head. The only reason for Charla and Jason to do this is to make themselves look better. The only way to do that is to throw someone else under the bus. For the life of me, I don’t know why anyone would ever jump on board for such an event. What went wrong should be left to pundits to hash out.

    I could definitely see a conversation with people from McGinn’s team on what they felt they did right in their campaign, but dragging the people in who’s camp didn’t win serves one purpose, and that is throwing the candidate under the bus.

  • B.S.

    @16 – But you hit the point on the head. The only reason for Charla and Jason to do this is to make themselves look better. The only way to do that is to throw someone else under the bus. For the life of me, I don’t know why anyone would ever jump on board for such an event. What went wrong should be left to pundits to hash out.

    I could definitely see a conversation with people from McGinn’s team on what they felt they did right in their campaign, but dragging the people in who’s camp didn’t win serves one purpose, and that is throwing the candidate under the bus.

  • B.S.

    @16 – But you hit the point on the head. The only reason for Charla and Jason to do this is to make themselves look better. The only way to do that is to throw someone else under the bus. For the life of me, I don’t know why anyone would ever jump on board for such an event. What went wrong should be left to pundits to hash out.

    I could definitely see a conversation with people from McGinn’s team on what they felt they did right in their campaign, but dragging the people in who’s camp didn’t win serves one purpose, and that is throwing the candidate under the bus.

  • B.S.

    @16 – But you hit the point on the head. The only reason for Charla and Jason to do this is to make themselves look better. The only way to do that is to throw someone else under the bus. For the life of me, I don’t know why anyone would ever jump on board for such an event. What went wrong should be left to pundits to hash out.

    I could definitely see a conversation with people from McGinn’s team on what they felt they did right in their campaign, but dragging the people in who’s camp didn’t win serves one purpose, and that is throwing the candidate under the bus.

  • B.S.

    @16 – But you hit the point on the head. The only reason for Charla and Jason to do this is to make themselves look better. The only way to do that is to throw someone else under the bus. For the life of me, I don’t know why anyone would ever jump on board for such an event. What went wrong should be left to pundits to hash out.

    I could definitely see a conversation with people from McGinn’s team on what they felt they did right in their campaign, but dragging the people in who’s camp didn’t win serves one purpose, and that is throwing the candidate under the bus.

  • B.S.

    @16 – But you hit the point on the head. The only reason for Charla and Jason to do this is to make themselves look better. The only way to do that is to throw someone else under the bus. For the life of me, I don’t know why anyone would ever jump on board for such an event. What went wrong should be left to pundits to hash out.

    I could definitely see a conversation with people from McGinn’s team on what they felt they did right in their campaign, but dragging the people in who’s camp didn’t win serves one purpose, and that is throwing the candidate under the bus.

  • B.S.

    @16 – But you hit the point on the head. The only reason for Charla and Jason to do this is to make themselves look better. The only way to do that is to throw someone else under the bus. For the life of me, I don’t know why anyone would ever jump on board for such an event. What went wrong should be left to pundits to hash out.

    I could definitely see a conversation with people from McGinn’s team on what they felt they did right in their campaign, but dragging the people in who’s camp didn’t win serves one purpose, and that is throwing the candidate under the bus.

  • Mikos

    Hate to change the topic, but it’s interesting how WSDOT is estimating a loss of revenue from tolling when the agency (in theory) has yet to release the report that says how much tolling can earn on the viaduct/tunnel. It suggests that the study will show the tunnel can earn the needed $400M in revenue. But what happen when it doesn’t? Will Seattle taxpayers have to pick up the extra?

  • Mikos

    Hate to change the topic, but it’s interesting how WSDOT is estimating a loss of revenue from tolling when the agency (in theory) has yet to release the report that says how much tolling can earn on the viaduct/tunnel. It suggests that the study will show the tunnel can earn the needed $400M in revenue. But what happen when it doesn’t? Will Seattle taxpayers have to pick up the extra?

  • Mikos

    Hate to change the topic, but it’s interesting how WSDOT is estimating a loss of revenue from tolling when the agency (in theory) has yet to release the report that says how much tolling can earn on the viaduct/tunnel. It suggests that the study will show the tunnel can earn the needed $400M in revenue. But what happen when it doesn’t? Will Seattle taxpayers have to pick up the extra?

  • Mikos

    Hate to change the topic, but it’s interesting how WSDOT is estimating a loss of revenue from tolling when the agency (in theory) has yet to release the report that says how much tolling can earn on the viaduct/tunnel. It suggests that the study will show the tunnel can earn the needed $400M in revenue. But what happen when it doesn’t? Will Seattle taxpayers have to pick up the extra?

  • Mikos

    Hate to change the topic, but it’s interesting how WSDOT is estimating a loss of revenue from tolling when the agency (in theory) has yet to release the report that says how much tolling can earn on the viaduct/tunnel. It suggests that the study will show the tunnel can earn the needed $400M in revenue. But what happen when it doesn’t? Will Seattle taxpayers have to pick up the extra?

  • Mikos

    Hate to change the topic, but it’s interesting how WSDOT is estimating a loss of revenue from tolling when the agency (in theory) has yet to release the report that says how much tolling can earn on the viaduct/tunnel. It suggests that the study will show the tunnel can earn the needed $400M in revenue. But what happen when it doesn’t? Will Seattle taxpayers have to pick up the extra?

  • Mikos

    Hate to change the topic, but it’s interesting how WSDOT is estimating a loss of revenue from tolling when the agency (in theory) has yet to release the report that says how much tolling can earn on the viaduct/tunnel. It suggests that the study will show the tunnel can earn the needed $400M in revenue. But what happen when it doesn’t? Will Seattle taxpayers have to pick up the extra?

  • Mikos

    Hate to change the topic, but it’s interesting how WSDOT is estimating a loss of revenue from tolling when the agency (in theory) has yet to release the report that says how much tolling can earn on the viaduct/tunnel. It suggests that the study will show the tunnel can earn the needed $400M in revenue. But what happen when it doesn’t? Will Seattle taxpayers have to pick up the extra?

  • Mikos

    Hate to change the topic, but it’s interesting how WSDOT is estimating a loss of revenue from tolling when the agency (in theory) has yet to release the report that says how much tolling can earn on the viaduct/tunnel. It suggests that the study will show the tunnel can earn the needed $400M in revenue. But what happen when it doesn’t? Will Seattle taxpayers have to pick up the extra?

  • Mikos

    Hate to change the topic, but it’s interesting how WSDOT is estimating a loss of revenue from tolling when the agency (in theory) has yet to release the report that says how much tolling can earn on the viaduct/tunnel. It suggests that the study will show the tunnel can earn the needed $400M in revenue. But what happen when it doesn’t? Will Seattle taxpayers have to pick up the extra?

  • Mikos

    Hate to change the topic, but it’s interesting how WSDOT is estimating a loss of revenue from tolling when the agency (in theory) has yet to release the report that says how much tolling can earn on the viaduct/tunnel. It suggests that the study will show the tunnel can earn the needed $400M in revenue. But what happen when it doesn’t? Will Seattle taxpayers have to pick up the extra?

  • Mikos

    Hate to change the topic, but it’s interesting how WSDOT is estimating a loss of revenue from tolling when the agency (in theory) has yet to release the report that says how much tolling can earn on the viaduct/tunnel. It suggests that the study will show the tunnel can earn the needed $400M in revenue. But what happen when it doesn’t? Will Seattle taxpayers have to pick up the extra?

  • Mikos

    Hate to change the topic, but it’s interesting how WSDOT is estimating a loss of revenue from tolling when the agency (in theory) has yet to release the report that says how much tolling can earn on the viaduct/tunnel. It suggests that the study will show the tunnel can earn the needed $400M in revenue. But what happen when it doesn’t? Will Seattle taxpayers have to pick up the extra?

  • Mikos

    Hate to change the topic, but it’s interesting how WSDOT is estimating a loss of revenue from tolling when the agency (in theory) has yet to release the report that says how much tolling can earn on the viaduct/tunnel. It suggests that the study will show the tunnel can earn the needed $400M in revenue. But what happen when it doesn’t? Will Seattle taxpayers have to pick up the extra?

  • Mikos

    Hate to change the topic, but it’s interesting how WSDOT is estimating a loss of revenue from tolling when the agency (in theory) has yet to release the report that says how much tolling can earn on the viaduct/tunnel. It suggests that the study will show the tunnel can earn the needed $400M in revenue. But what happen when it doesn’t? Will Seattle taxpayers have to pick up the extra?

  • Mikos

    Hate to change the topic, but it’s interesting how WSDOT is estimating a loss of revenue from tolling when the agency (in theory) has yet to release the report that says how much tolling can earn on the viaduct/tunnel. It suggests that the study will show the tunnel can earn the needed $400M in revenue. But what happen when it doesn’t? Will Seattle taxpayers have to pick up the extra?

  • Forum Attendee

    @17. I am sure it was some of that. But maybe it was also to not let McGinn’s team only tell their side of the story. In all honesty, I thought Joe came across as way more human and likable after last night. Several McGinn supporters who I mingled with afterward noted that. I will also say that someone said last night that Bennett did NOT want to do the event but only did it when it was billed as a Charla vs McGinn team fireworks event. Can anyone confirm that? Josh? Erica? If so, thank god he did it because Charla alone wouldn’t have worked out nearly as well.

  • Forum Attendee

    @17. I am sure it was some of that. But maybe it was also to not let McGinn’s team only tell their side of the story. In all honesty, I thought Joe came across as way more human and likable after last night. Several McGinn supporters who I mingled with afterward noted that. I will also say that someone said last night that Bennett did NOT want to do the event but only did it when it was billed as a Charla vs McGinn team fireworks event. Can anyone confirm that? Josh? Erica? If so, thank god he did it because Charla alone wouldn’t have worked out nearly as well.

  • Forum Attendee

    @17. I am sure it was some of that. But maybe it was also to not let McGinn’s team only tell their side of the story. In all honesty, I thought Joe came across as way more human and likable after last night. Several McGinn supporters who I mingled with afterward noted that. I will also say that someone said last night that Bennett did NOT want to do the event but only did it when it was billed as a Charla vs McGinn team fireworks event. Can anyone confirm that? Josh? Erica? If so, thank god he did it because Charla alone wouldn’t have worked out nearly as well.

  • Forum Attendee

    @17. I am sure it was some of that. But maybe it was also to not let McGinn’s team only tell their side of the story. In all honesty, I thought Joe came across as way more human and likable after last night. Several McGinn supporters who I mingled with afterward noted that. I will also say that someone said last night that Bennett did NOT want to do the event but only did it when it was billed as a Charla vs McGinn team fireworks event. Can anyone confirm that? Josh? Erica? If so, thank god he did it because Charla alone wouldn’t have worked out nearly as well.

  • Forum Attendee

    @17. I am sure it was some of that. But maybe it was also to not let McGinn’s team only tell their side of the story. In all honesty, I thought Joe came across as way more human and likable after last night. Several McGinn supporters who I mingled with afterward noted that. I will also say that someone said last night that Bennett did NOT want to do the event but only did it when it was billed as a Charla vs McGinn team fireworks event. Can anyone confirm that? Josh? Erica? If so, thank god he did it because Charla alone wouldn’t have worked out nearly as well.

  • Forum Attendee

    @17. I am sure it was some of that. But maybe it was also to not let McGinn’s team only tell their side of the story. In all honesty, I thought Joe came across as way more human and likable after last night. Several McGinn supporters who I mingled with afterward noted that. I will also say that someone said last night that Bennett did NOT want to do the event but only did it when it was billed as a Charla vs McGinn team fireworks event. Can anyone confirm that? Josh? Erica? If so, thank god he did it because Charla alone wouldn’t have worked out nearly as well.

  • Forum Attendee

    @17. I am sure it was some of that. But maybe it was also to not let McGinn’s team only tell their side of the story. In all honesty, I thought Joe came across as way more human and likable after last night. Several McGinn supporters who I mingled with afterward noted that. I will also say that someone said last night that Bennett did NOT want to do the event but only did it when it was billed as a Charla vs McGinn team fireworks event. Can anyone confirm that? Josh? Erica? If so, thank god he did it because Charla alone wouldn’t have worked out nearly as well.

  • Forum Attendee

    @17. I am sure it was some of that. But maybe it was also to not let McGinn’s team only tell their side of the story. In all honesty, I thought Joe came across as way more human and likable after last night. Several McGinn supporters who I mingled with afterward noted that. I will also say that someone said last night that Bennett did NOT want to do the event but only did it when it was billed as a Charla vs McGinn team fireworks event. Can anyone confirm that? Josh? Erica? If so, thank god he did it because Charla alone wouldn’t have worked out nearly as well.

  • Forum Attendee

    @17. I am sure it was some of that. But maybe it was also to not let McGinn’s team only tell their side of the story. In all honesty, I thought Joe came across as way more human and likable after last night. Several McGinn supporters who I mingled with afterward noted that. I will also say that someone said last night that Bennett did NOT want to do the event but only did it when it was billed as a Charla vs McGinn team fireworks event. Can anyone confirm that? Josh? Erica? If so, thank god he did it because Charla alone wouldn’t have worked out nearly as well.

  • Forum Attendee

    @17. I am sure it was some of that. But maybe it was also to not let McGinn’s team only tell their side of the story. In all honesty, I thought Joe came across as way more human and likable after last night. Several McGinn supporters who I mingled with afterward noted that. I will also say that someone said last night that Bennett did NOT want to do the event but only did it when it was billed as a Charla vs McGinn team fireworks event. Can anyone confirm that? Josh? Erica? If so, thank god he did it because Charla alone wouldn’t have worked out nearly as well.

  • Forum Attendee

    @17. I am sure it was some of that. But maybe it was also to not let McGinn’s team only tell their side of the story. In all honesty, I thought Joe came across as way more human and likable after last night. Several McGinn supporters who I mingled with afterward noted that. I will also say that someone said last night that Bennett did NOT want to do the event but only did it when it was billed as a Charla vs McGinn team fireworks event. Can anyone confirm that? Josh? Erica? If so, thank god he did it because Charla alone wouldn’t have worked out nearly as well.

  • Forum Attendee

    @17. I am sure it was some of that. But maybe it was also to not let McGinn’s team only tell their side of the story. In all honesty, I thought Joe came across as way more human and likable after last night. Several McGinn supporters who I mingled with afterward noted that. I will also say that someone said last night that Bennett did NOT want to do the event but only did it when it was billed as a Charla vs McGinn team fireworks event. Can anyone confirm that? Josh? Erica? If so, thank god he did it because Charla alone wouldn’t have worked out nearly as well.

  • Forum Attendee

    @17. I am sure it was some of that. But maybe it was also to not let McGinn’s team only tell their side of the story. In all honesty, I thought Joe came across as way more human and likable after last night. Several McGinn supporters who I mingled with afterward noted that. I will also say that someone said last night that Bennett did NOT want to do the event but only did it when it was billed as a Charla vs McGinn team fireworks event. Can anyone confirm that? Josh? Erica? If so, thank god he did it because Charla alone wouldn’t have worked out nearly as well.

  • Forum Attendee

    @17. I am sure it was some of that. But maybe it was also to not let McGinn’s team only tell their side of the story. In all honesty, I thought Joe came across as way more human and likable after last night. Several McGinn supporters who I mingled with afterward noted that. I will also say that someone said last night that Bennett did NOT want to do the event but only did it when it was billed as a Charla vs McGinn team fireworks event. Can anyone confirm that? Josh? Erica? If so, thank god he did it because Charla alone wouldn’t have worked out nearly as well.

  • Forum Attendee

    @17. I am sure it was some of that. But maybe it was also to not let McGinn’s team only tell their side of the story. In all honesty, I thought Joe came across as way more human and likable after last night. Several McGinn supporters who I mingled with afterward noted that. I will also say that someone said last night that Bennett did NOT want to do the event but only did it when it was billed as a Charla vs McGinn team fireworks event. Can anyone confirm that? Josh? Erica? If so, thank god he did it because Charla alone wouldn’t have worked out nearly as well.

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr.Baker

    @12, why start now?
    The campaign against the tunnel did not begin or end with the campaign to elect McGinn.

    The feed of partial facts from SCAT, and the other crap is not gonna stop anytime soon.

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr.Baker

    @12, why start now?
    The campaign against the tunnel did not begin or end with the campaign to elect McGinn.

    The feed of partial facts from SCAT, and the other crap is not gonna stop anytime soon.

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr.Baker

    @12, why start now?
    The campaign against the tunnel did not begin or end with the campaign to elect McGinn.

    The feed of partial facts from SCAT, and the other crap is not gonna stop anytime soon.

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr.Baker

    @12, why start now?
    The campaign against the tunnel did not begin or end with the campaign to elect McGinn.

    The feed of partial facts from SCAT, and the other crap is not gonna stop anytime soon.

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr.Baker

    @12, why start now?
    The campaign against the tunnel did not begin or end with the campaign to elect McGinn.

    The feed of partial facts from SCAT, and the other crap is not gonna stop anytime soon.

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr.Baker

    @12, why start now?
    The campaign against the tunnel did not begin or end with the campaign to elect McGinn.

    The feed of partial facts from SCAT, and the other crap is not gonna stop anytime soon.

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr.Baker

    @12, why start now?
    The campaign against the tunnel did not begin or end with the campaign to elect McGinn.

    The feed of partial facts from SCAT, and the other crap is not gonna stop anytime soon.

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr.Baker

    @12, why start now?
    The campaign against the tunnel did not begin or end with the campaign to elect McGinn.

    The feed of partial facts from SCAT, and the other crap is not gonna stop anytime soon.

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr.Baker

    @12, why start now?
    The campaign against the tunnel did not begin or end with the campaign to elect McGinn.

    The feed of partial facts from SCAT, and the other crap is not gonna stop anytime soon.

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr.Baker

    @12, why start now?
    The campaign against the tunnel did not begin or end with the campaign to elect McGinn.

    The feed of partial facts from SCAT, and the other crap is not gonna stop anytime soon.

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr.Baker

    @12, why start now?
    The campaign against the tunnel did not begin or end with the campaign to elect McGinn.

    The feed of partial facts from SCAT, and the other crap is not gonna stop anytime soon.

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr.Baker

    @12, why start now?
    The campaign against the tunnel did not begin or end with the campaign to elect McGinn.

    The feed of partial facts from SCAT, and the other crap is not gonna stop anytime soon.

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr.Baker

    @12, why start now?
    The campaign against the tunnel did not begin or end with the campaign to elect McGinn.

    The feed of partial facts from SCAT, and the other crap is not gonna stop anytime soon.

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr.Baker

    @12, why start now?
    The campaign against the tunnel did not begin or end with the campaign to elect McGinn.

    The feed of partial facts from SCAT, and the other crap is not gonna stop anytime soon.

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr.Baker

    @12, why start now?
    The campaign against the tunnel did not begin or end with the campaign to elect McGinn.

    The feed of partial facts from SCAT, and the other crap is not gonna stop anytime soon.

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr.Baker

    @12, why start now?
    The campaign against the tunnel did not begin or end with the campaign to elect McGinn.

    The feed of partial facts from SCAT, and the other crap is not gonna stop anytime soon.

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr.Baker

    @12, why start now?
    The campaign against the tunnel did not begin or end with the campaign to elect McGinn.

    The feed of partial facts from SCAT, and the other crap is not gonna stop anytime soon.

  • sarah68

    I can’t imagine why Mallahan’s consultants agreed to do this. The poster above said Bennett “was by far the most entertaining and candid.” But is that person going to be in a position to hire Bennett? Who will? Are campaign strategies (or lack thereof) nothing but entertainment, along with the campaigns? Obvious answer: yes. Except, of course, for the huge demographic which didn’t go to the Del Rey, mostly “suburban” (anywhere but Capitol Hill) and older than 40. I couldn’t go; they wouldn’t have gone. They’d probably be stunned to hear campaign managers talked about in those terms.

    But the fact that the world is basically composed of electronic toys and their users aside, the right guy (of these two) won, in my suburban, older-than-40 perspective.

  • sarah68

    I can’t imagine why Mallahan’s consultants agreed to do this. The poster above said Bennett “was by far the most entertaining and candid.” But is that person going to be in a position to hire Bennett? Who will? Are campaign strategies (or lack thereof) nothing but entertainment, along with the campaigns? Obvious answer: yes. Except, of course, for the huge demographic which didn’t go to the Del Rey, mostly “suburban” (anywhere but Capitol Hill) and older than 40. I couldn’t go; they wouldn’t have gone. They’d probably be stunned to hear campaign managers talked about in those terms.

    But the fact that the world is basically composed of electronic toys and their users aside, the right guy (of these two) won, in my suburban, older-than-40 perspective.

  • sarah68

    I can’t imagine why Mallahan’s consultants agreed to do this. The poster above said Bennett “was by far the most entertaining and candid.” But is that person going to be in a position to hire Bennett? Who will? Are campaign strategies (or lack thereof) nothing but entertainment, along with the campaigns? Obvious answer: yes. Except, of course, for the huge demographic which didn’t go to the Del Rey, mostly “suburban” (anywhere but Capitol Hill) and older than 40. I couldn’t go; they wouldn’t have gone. They’d probably be stunned to hear campaign managers talked about in those terms.

    But the fact that the world is basically composed of electronic toys and their users aside, the right guy (of these two) won, in my suburban, older-than-40 perspective.

  • sarah68

    I can’t imagine why Mallahan’s consultants agreed to do this. The poster above said Bennett “was by far the most entertaining and candid.” But is that person going to be in a position to hire Bennett? Who will? Are campaign strategies (or lack thereof) nothing but entertainment, along with the campaigns? Obvious answer: yes. Except, of course, for the huge demographic which didn’t go to the Del Rey, mostly “suburban” (anywhere but Capitol Hill) and older than 40. I couldn’t go; they wouldn’t have gone. They’d probably be stunned to hear campaign managers talked about in those terms.

    But the fact that the world is basically composed of electronic toys and their users aside, the right guy (of these two) won, in my suburban, older-than-40 perspective.

  • sarah68

    I can’t imagine why Mallahan’s consultants agreed to do this. The poster above said Bennett “was by far the most entertaining and candid.” But is that person going to be in a position to hire Bennett? Who will? Are campaign strategies (or lack thereof) nothing but entertainment, along with the campaigns? Obvious answer: yes. Except, of course, for the huge demographic which didn’t go to the Del Rey, mostly “suburban” (anywhere but Capitol Hill) and older than 40. I couldn’t go; they wouldn’t have gone. They’d probably be stunned to hear campaign managers talked about in those terms.

    But the fact that the world is basically composed of electronic toys and their users aside, the right guy (of these two) won, in my suburban, older-than-40 perspective.

  • sarah68

    I can’t imagine why Mallahan’s consultants agreed to do this. The poster above said Bennett “was by far the most entertaining and candid.” But is that person going to be in a position to hire Bennett? Who will? Are campaign strategies (or lack thereof) nothing but entertainment, along with the campaigns? Obvious answer: yes. Except, of course, for the huge demographic which didn’t go to the Del Rey, mostly “suburban” (anywhere but Capitol Hill) and older than 40. I couldn’t go; they wouldn’t have gone. They’d probably be stunned to hear campaign managers talked about in those terms.

    But the fact that the world is basically composed of electronic toys and their users aside, the right guy (of these two) won, in my suburban, older-than-40 perspective.

  • sarah68

    I can’t imagine why Mallahan’s consultants agreed to do this. The poster above said Bennett “was by far the most entertaining and candid.” But is that person going to be in a position to hire Bennett? Who will? Are campaign strategies (or lack thereof) nothing but entertainment, along with the campaigns? Obvious answer: yes. Except, of course, for the huge demographic which didn’t go to the Del Rey, mostly “suburban” (anywhere but Capitol Hill) and older than 40. I couldn’t go; they wouldn’t have gone. They’d probably be stunned to hear campaign managers talked about in those terms.

    But the fact that the world is basically composed of electronic toys and their users aside, the right guy (of these two) won, in my suburban, older-than-40 perspective.

  • sarah68

    I can’t imagine why Mallahan’s consultants agreed to do this. The poster above said Bennett “was by far the most entertaining and candid.” But is that person going to be in a position to hire Bennett? Who will? Are campaign strategies (or lack thereof) nothing but entertainment, along with the campaigns? Obvious answer: yes. Except, of course, for the huge demographic which didn’t go to the Del Rey, mostly “suburban” (anywhere but Capitol Hill) and older than 40. I couldn’t go; they wouldn’t have gone. They’d probably be stunned to hear campaign managers talked about in those terms.

    But the fact that the world is basically composed of electronic toys and their users aside, the right guy (of these two) won, in my suburban, older-than-40 perspective.

  • sarah68

    I can’t imagine why Mallahan’s consultants agreed to do this. The poster above said Bennett “was by far the most entertaining and candid.” But is that person going to be in a position to hire Bennett? Who will? Are campaign strategies (or lack thereof) nothing but entertainment, along with the campaigns? Obvious answer: yes. Except, of course, for the huge demographic which didn’t go to the Del Rey, mostly “suburban” (anywhere but Capitol Hill) and older than 40. I couldn’t go; they wouldn’t have gone. They’d probably be stunned to hear campaign managers talked about in those terms.

    But the fact that the world is basically composed of electronic toys and their users aside, the right guy (of these two) won, in my suburban, older-than-40 perspective.

  • sarah68

    I can’t imagine why Mallahan’s consultants agreed to do this. The poster above said Bennett “was by far the most entertaining and candid.” But is that person going to be in a position to hire Bennett? Who will? Are campaign strategies (or lack thereof) nothing but entertainment, along with the campaigns? Obvious answer: yes. Except, of course, for the huge demographic which didn’t go to the Del Rey, mostly “suburban” (anywhere but Capitol Hill) and older than 40. I couldn’t go; they wouldn’t have gone. They’d probably be stunned to hear campaign managers talked about in those terms.

    But the fact that the world is basically composed of electronic toys and their users aside, the right guy (of these two) won, in my suburban, older-than-40 perspective.

  • sarah68

    I can’t imagine why Mallahan’s consultants agreed to do this. The poster above said Bennett “was by far the most entertaining and candid.” But is that person going to be in a position to hire Bennett? Who will? Are campaign strategies (or lack thereof) nothing but entertainment, along with the campaigns? Obvious answer: yes. Except, of course, for the huge demographic which didn’t go to the Del Rey, mostly “suburban” (anywhere but Capitol Hill) and older than 40. I couldn’t go; they wouldn’t have gone. They’d probably be stunned to hear campaign managers talked about in those terms.

    But the fact that the world is basically composed of electronic toys and their users aside, the right guy (of these two) won, in my suburban, older-than-40 perspective.

  • sarah68

    I can’t imagine why Mallahan’s consultants agreed to do this. The poster above said Bennett “was by far the most entertaining and candid.” But is that person going to be in a position to hire Bennett? Who will? Are campaign strategies (or lack thereof) nothing but entertainment, along with the campaigns? Obvious answer: yes. Except, of course, for the huge demographic which didn’t go to the Del Rey, mostly “suburban” (anywhere but Capitol Hill) and older than 40. I couldn’t go; they wouldn’t have gone. They’d probably be stunned to hear campaign managers talked about in those terms.

    But the fact that the world is basically composed of electronic toys and their users aside, the right guy (of these two) won, in my suburban, older-than-40 perspective.

  • sarah68

    I can’t imagine why Mallahan’s consultants agreed to do this. The poster above said Bennett “was by far the most entertaining and candid.” But is that person going to be in a position to hire Bennett? Who will? Are campaign strategies (or lack thereof) nothing but entertainment, along with the campaigns? Obvious answer: yes. Except, of course, for the huge demographic which didn’t go to the Del Rey, mostly “suburban” (anywhere but Capitol Hill) and older than 40. I couldn’t go; they wouldn’t have gone. They’d probably be stunned to hear campaign managers talked about in those terms.

    But the fact that the world is basically composed of electronic toys and their users aside, the right guy (of these two) won, in my suburban, older-than-40 perspective.

  • sarah68

    I can’t imagine why Mallahan’s consultants agreed to do this. The poster above said Bennett “was by far the most entertaining and candid.” But is that person going to be in a position to hire Bennett? Who will? Are campaign strategies (or lack thereof) nothing but entertainment, along with the campaigns? Obvious answer: yes. Except, of course, for the huge demographic which didn’t go to the Del Rey, mostly “suburban” (anywhere but Capitol Hill) and older than 40. I couldn’t go; they wouldn’t have gone. They’d probably be stunned to hear campaign managers talked about in those terms.

    But the fact that the world is basically composed of electronic toys and their users aside, the right guy (of these two) won, in my suburban, older-than-40 perspective.

  • sarah68

    I can’t imagine why Mallahan’s consultants agreed to do this. The poster above said Bennett “was by far the most entertaining and candid.” But is that person going to be in a position to hire Bennett? Who will? Are campaign strategies (or lack thereof) nothing but entertainment, along with the campaigns? Obvious answer: yes. Except, of course, for the huge demographic which didn’t go to the Del Rey, mostly “suburban” (anywhere but Capitol Hill) and older than 40. I couldn’t go; they wouldn’t have gone. They’d probably be stunned to hear campaign managers talked about in those terms.

    But the fact that the world is basically composed of electronic toys and their users aside, the right guy (of these two) won, in my suburban, older-than-40 perspective.

  • sarah68

    I can’t imagine why Mallahan’s consultants agreed to do this. The poster above said Bennett “was by far the most entertaining and candid.” But is that person going to be in a position to hire Bennett? Who will? Are campaign strategies (or lack thereof) nothing but entertainment, along with the campaigns? Obvious answer: yes. Except, of course, for the huge demographic which didn’t go to the Del Rey, mostly “suburban” (anywhere but Capitol Hill) and older than 40. I couldn’t go; they wouldn’t have gone. They’d probably be stunned to hear campaign managers talked about in those terms.

    But the fact that the world is basically composed of electronic toys and their users aside, the right guy (of these two) won, in my suburban, older-than-40 perspective.

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr.Baker

    Was Mayor Conlin at the event?

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr.Baker

    Was Mayor Conlin at the event?

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr.Baker

    Was Mayor Conlin at the event?

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr.Baker

    Was Mayor Conlin at the event?

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr.Baker

    Was Mayor Conlin at the event?

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr.Baker

    Was Mayor Conlin at the event?

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr.Baker

    Was Mayor Conlin at the event?

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr.Baker

    Was Mayor Conlin at the event?

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr.Baker

    Was Mayor Conlin at the event?

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr.Baker

    Was Mayor Conlin at the event?

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr.Baker

    Was Mayor Conlin at the event?

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr.Baker

    Was Mayor Conlin at the event?

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr.Baker

    Was Mayor Conlin at the event?

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr.Baker

    Was Mayor Conlin at the event?

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr.Baker

    Was Mayor Conlin at the event?

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr.Baker

    Was Mayor Conlin at the event?

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr.Baker

    Was Mayor Conlin at the event?

  • Forum Attendee

    @21. I never to plan to run for office, but in this hypothetical, sure. Why wouldn’t you? He took a candidate from nowhere (who was Joe Mallahan before this campaign) and made him a contender. I don’t think making a crack or two about the campaign undoes that reality.

  • Forum Attendee

    @21. I never to plan to run for office, but in this hypothetical, sure. Why wouldn’t you? He took a candidate from nowhere (who was Joe Mallahan before this campaign) and made him a contender. I don’t think making a crack or two about the campaign undoes that reality.

  • Forum Attendee

    @21. I never to plan to run for office, but in this hypothetical, sure. Why wouldn’t you? He took a candidate from nowhere (who was Joe Mallahan before this campaign) and made him a contender. I don’t think making a crack or two about the campaign undoes that reality.

  • Forum Attendee

    @21. I never to plan to run for office, but in this hypothetical, sure. Why wouldn’t you? He took a candidate from nowhere (who was Joe Mallahan before this campaign) and made him a contender. I don’t think making a crack or two about the campaign undoes that reality.

  • Forum Attendee

    @21. I never to plan to run for office, but in this hypothetical, sure. Why wouldn’t you? He took a candidate from nowhere (who was Joe Mallahan before this campaign) and made him a contender. I don’t think making a crack or two about the campaign undoes that reality.

  • Forum Attendee

    @21. I never to plan to run for office, but in this hypothetical, sure. Why wouldn’t you? He took a candidate from nowhere (who was Joe Mallahan before this campaign) and made him a contender. I don’t think making a crack or two about the campaign undoes that reality.

  • Forum Attendee

    @21. I never to plan to run for office, but in this hypothetical, sure. Why wouldn’t you? He took a candidate from nowhere (who was Joe Mallahan before this campaign) and made him a contender. I don’t think making a crack or two about the campaign undoes that reality.

  • Forum Attendee

    @21. I never to plan to run for office, but in this hypothetical, sure. Why wouldn’t you? He took a candidate from nowhere (who was Joe Mallahan before this campaign) and made him a contender. I don’t think making a crack or two about the campaign undoes that reality.

  • Forum Attendee

    @21. I never to plan to run for office, but in this hypothetical, sure. Why wouldn’t you? He took a candidate from nowhere (who was Joe Mallahan before this campaign) and made him a contender. I don’t think making a crack or two about the campaign undoes that reality.

  • Forum Attendee

    @21. I never to plan to run for office, but in this hypothetical, sure. Why wouldn’t you? He took a candidate from nowhere (who was Joe Mallahan before this campaign) and made him a contender. I don’t think making a crack or two about the campaign undoes that reality.

  • Forum Attendee

    @21. I never to plan to run for office, but in this hypothetical, sure. Why wouldn’t you? He took a candidate from nowhere (who was Joe Mallahan before this campaign) and made him a contender. I don’t think making a crack or two about the campaign undoes that reality.

  • Forum Attendee

    @21. I never to plan to run for office, but in this hypothetical, sure. Why wouldn’t you? He took a candidate from nowhere (who was Joe Mallahan before this campaign) and made him a contender. I don’t think making a crack or two about the campaign undoes that reality.

  • Forum Attendee

    @21. I never to plan to run for office, but in this hypothetical, sure. Why wouldn’t you? He took a candidate from nowhere (who was Joe Mallahan before this campaign) and made him a contender. I don’t think making a crack or two about the campaign undoes that reality.

  • Forum Attendee

    @21. I never to plan to run for office, but in this hypothetical, sure. Why wouldn’t you? He took a candidate from nowhere (who was Joe Mallahan before this campaign) and made him a contender. I don’t think making a crack or two about the campaign undoes that reality.

  • Forum Attendee

    @21. I never to plan to run for office, but in this hypothetical, sure. Why wouldn’t you? He took a candidate from nowhere (who was Joe Mallahan before this campaign) and made him a contender. I don’t think making a crack or two about the campaign undoes that reality.

  • Forum Attendee

    @21. I never to plan to run for office, but in this hypothetical, sure. Why wouldn’t you? He took a candidate from nowhere (who was Joe Mallahan before this campaign) and made him a contender. I don’t think making a crack or two about the campaign undoes that reality.

  • Forum Attendee

    @21. I never to plan to run for office, but in this hypothetical, sure. Why wouldn’t you? He took a candidate from nowhere (who was Joe Mallahan before this campaign) and made him a contender. I don’t think making a crack or two about the campaign undoes that reality.

  • sarah68

    @23: He took a candidate who was immediately, out of the gate after the primary, a contender because the most powerful people in the City got behind him (an obvious choice for them over McGinn). But Mallahan–with all that money and all those powerful advisers and facing a candidate just as unknown as Mallahan was who could be rightly characterized as a one-issue candidate–Mallahan ran a crappy campaign in which only at the very last weeks did he actually got out into the neighborhoods, and he lost. I guess the line between realistic criticism and making cracks is thin, but results are results.

  • sarah68

    @23: He took a candidate who was immediately, out of the gate after the primary, a contender because the most powerful people in the City got behind him (an obvious choice for them over McGinn). But Mallahan–with all that money and all those powerful advisers and facing a candidate just as unknown as Mallahan was who could be rightly characterized as a one-issue candidate–Mallahan ran a crappy campaign in which only at the very last weeks did he actually got out into the neighborhoods, and he lost. I guess the line between realistic criticism and making cracks is thin, but results are results.

  • sarah68

    @23: He took a candidate who was immediately, out of the gate after the primary, a contender because the most powerful people in the City got behind him (an obvious choice for them over McGinn). But Mallahan–with all that money and all those powerful advisers and facing a candidate just as unknown as Mallahan was who could be rightly characterized as a one-issue candidate–Mallahan ran a crappy campaign in which only at the very last weeks did he actually got out into the neighborhoods, and he lost. I guess the line between realistic criticism and making cracks is thin, but results are results.

  • sarah68

    @23: He took a candidate who was immediately, out of the gate after the primary, a contender because the most powerful people in the City got behind him (an obvious choice for them over McGinn). But Mallahan–with all that money and all those powerful advisers and facing a candidate just as unknown as Mallahan was who could be rightly characterized as a one-issue candidate–Mallahan ran a crappy campaign in which only at the very last weeks did he actually got out into the neighborhoods, and he lost. I guess the line between realistic criticism and making cracks is thin, but results are results.

  • sarah68

    @23: He took a candidate who was immediately, out of the gate after the primary, a contender because the most powerful people in the City got behind him (an obvious choice for them over McGinn). But Mallahan–with all that money and all those powerful advisers and facing a candidate just as unknown as Mallahan was who could be rightly characterized as a one-issue candidate–Mallahan ran a crappy campaign in which only at the very last weeks did he actually got out into the neighborhoods, and he lost. I guess the line between realistic criticism and making cracks is thin, but results are results.

  • sarah68

    @23: He took a candidate who was immediately, out of the gate after the primary, a contender because the most powerful people in the City got behind him (an obvious choice for them over McGinn). But Mallahan–with all that money and all those powerful advisers and facing a candidate just as unknown as Mallahan was who could be rightly characterized as a one-issue candidate–Mallahan ran a crappy campaign in which only at the very last weeks did he actually got out into the neighborhoods, and he lost. I guess the line between realistic criticism and making cracks is thin, but results are results.

  • sarah68

    @23: He took a candidate who was immediately, out of the gate after the primary, a contender because the most powerful people in the City got behind him (an obvious choice for them over McGinn). But Mallahan–with all that money and all those powerful advisers and facing a candidate just as unknown as Mallahan was who could be rightly characterized as a one-issue candidate–Mallahan ran a crappy campaign in which only at the very last weeks did he actually got out into the neighborhoods, and he lost. I guess the line between realistic criticism and making cracks is thin, but results are results.

  • sarah68

    @23: He took a candidate who was immediately, out of the gate after the primary, a contender because the most powerful people in the City got behind him (an obvious choice for them over McGinn). But Mallahan–with all that money and all those powerful advisers and facing a candidate just as unknown as Mallahan was who could be rightly characterized as a one-issue candidate–Mallahan ran a crappy campaign in which only at the very last weeks did he actually got out into the neighborhoods, and he lost. I guess the line between realistic criticism and making cracks is thin, but results are results.

  • sarah68

    @23: He took a candidate who was immediately, out of the gate after the primary, a contender because the most powerful people in the City got behind him (an obvious choice for them over McGinn). But Mallahan–with all that money and all those powerful advisers and facing a candidate just as unknown as Mallahan was who could be rightly characterized as a one-issue candidate–Mallahan ran a crappy campaign in which only at the very last weeks did he actually got out into the neighborhoods, and he lost. I guess the line between realistic criticism and making cracks is thin, but results are results.

  • sarah68

    @23: He took a candidate who was immediately, out of the gate after the primary, a contender because the most powerful people in the City got behind him (an obvious choice for them over McGinn). But Mallahan–with all that money and all those powerful advisers and facing a candidate just as unknown as Mallahan was who could be rightly characterized as a one-issue candidate–Mallahan ran a crappy campaign in which only at the very last weeks did he actually got out into the neighborhoods, and he lost. I guess the line between realistic criticism and making cracks is thin, but results are results.

  • sarah68

    @23: He took a candidate who was immediately, out of the gate after the primary, a contender because the most powerful people in the City got behind him (an obvious choice for them over McGinn). But Mallahan–with all that money and all those powerful advisers and facing a candidate just as unknown as Mallahan was who could be rightly characterized as a one-issue candidate–Mallahan ran a crappy campaign in which only at the very last weeks did he actually got out into the neighborhoods, and he lost. I guess the line between realistic criticism and making cracks is thin, but results are results.

  • sarah68

    @23: He took a candidate who was immediately, out of the gate after the primary, a contender because the most powerful people in the City got behind him (an obvious choice for them over McGinn). But Mallahan–with all that money and all those powerful advisers and facing a candidate just as unknown as Mallahan was who could be rightly characterized as a one-issue candidate–Mallahan ran a crappy campaign in which only at the very last weeks did he actually got out into the neighborhoods, and he lost. I guess the line between realistic criticism and making cracks is thin, but results are results.

  • sarah68

    @23: He took a candidate who was immediately, out of the gate after the primary, a contender because the most powerful people in the City got behind him (an obvious choice for them over McGinn). But Mallahan–with all that money and all those powerful advisers and facing a candidate just as unknown as Mallahan was who could be rightly characterized as a one-issue candidate–Mallahan ran a crappy campaign in which only at the very last weeks did he actually got out into the neighborhoods, and he lost. I guess the line between realistic criticism and making cracks is thin, but results are results.

  • sarah68

    @23: He took a candidate who was immediately, out of the gate after the primary, a contender because the most powerful people in the City got behind him (an obvious choice for them over McGinn). But Mallahan–with all that money and all those powerful advisers and facing a candidate just as unknown as Mallahan was who could be rightly characterized as a one-issue candidate–Mallahan ran a crappy campaign in which only at the very last weeks did he actually got out into the neighborhoods, and he lost. I guess the line between realistic criticism and making cracks is thin, but results are results.

  • sarah68

    @23: He took a candidate who was immediately, out of the gate after the primary, a contender because the most powerful people in the City got behind him (an obvious choice for them over McGinn). But Mallahan–with all that money and all those powerful advisers and facing a candidate just as unknown as Mallahan was who could be rightly characterized as a one-issue candidate–Mallahan ran a crappy campaign in which only at the very last weeks did he actually got out into the neighborhoods, and he lost. I guess the line between realistic criticism and making cracks is thin, but results are results.

  • sarah68

    @23: He took a candidate who was immediately, out of the gate after the primary, a contender because the most powerful people in the City got behind him (an obvious choice for them over McGinn). But Mallahan–with all that money and all those powerful advisers and facing a candidate just as unknown as Mallahan was who could be rightly characterized as a one-issue candidate–Mallahan ran a crappy campaign in which only at the very last weeks did he actually got out into the neighborhoods, and he lost. I guess the line between realistic criticism and making cracks is thin, but results are results.

  • John

    I’d love to see the video. I came to Del Rey last night just after 6, but could only stand in the hallway by the bathrooms and refrigerators where I couldn’t hear. So I left. :( Bigger venue next time plz!

  • John

    I’d love to see the video. I came to Del Rey last night just after 6, but could only stand in the hallway by the bathrooms and refrigerators where I couldn’t hear. So I left. :( Bigger venue next time plz!

  • John

    I’d love to see the video. I came to Del Rey last night just after 6, but could only stand in the hallway by the bathrooms and refrigerators where I couldn’t hear. So I left. :( Bigger venue next time plz!

  • John

    I’d love to see the video. I came to Del Rey last night just after 6, but could only stand in the hallway by the bathrooms and refrigerators where I couldn’t hear. So I left. :( Bigger venue next time plz!

  • John

    I’d love to see the video. I came to Del Rey last night just after 6, but could only stand in the hallway by the bathrooms and refrigerators where I couldn’t hear. So I left. :( Bigger venue next time plz!

  • John

    I’d love to see the video. I came to Del Rey last night just after 6, but could only stand in the hallway by the bathrooms and refrigerators where I couldn’t hear. So I left. :( Bigger venue next time plz!

  • John

    I’d love to see the video. I came to Del Rey last night just after 6, but could only stand in the hallway by the bathrooms and refrigerators where I couldn’t hear. So I left. :( Bigger venue next time plz!

  • John

    I’d love to see the video. I came to Del Rey last night just after 6, but could only stand in the hallway by the bathrooms and refrigerators where I couldn’t hear. So I left. :( Bigger venue next time plz!

  • John

    I’d love to see the video. I came to Del Rey last night just after 6, but could only stand in the hallway by the bathrooms and refrigerators where I couldn’t hear. So I left. :( Bigger venue next time plz!

  • John

    I’d love to see the video. I came to Del Rey last night just after 6, but could only stand in the hallway by the bathrooms and refrigerators where I couldn’t hear. So I left. :( Bigger venue next time plz!

  • John

    I’d love to see the video. I came to Del Rey last night just after 6, but could only stand in the hallway by the bathrooms and refrigerators where I couldn’t hear. So I left. :( Bigger venue next time plz!

  • John

    I’d love to see the video. I came to Del Rey last night just after 6, but could only stand in the hallway by the bathrooms and refrigerators where I couldn’t hear. So I left. :( Bigger venue next time plz!

  • John

    I’d love to see the video. I came to Del Rey last night just after 6, but could only stand in the hallway by the bathrooms and refrigerators where I couldn’t hear. So I left. :( Bigger venue next time plz!

  • John

    I’d love to see the video. I came to Del Rey last night just after 6, but could only stand in the hallway by the bathrooms and refrigerators where I couldn’t hear. So I left. :( Bigger venue next time plz!

  • John

    I’d love to see the video. I came to Del Rey last night just after 6, but could only stand in the hallway by the bathrooms and refrigerators where I couldn’t hear. So I left. :( Bigger venue next time plz!

  • John

    I’d love to see the video. I came to Del Rey last night just after 6, but could only stand in the hallway by the bathrooms and refrigerators where I couldn’t hear. So I left. :( Bigger venue next time plz!

  • John

    I’d love to see the video. I came to Del Rey last night just after 6, but could only stand in the hallway by the bathrooms and refrigerators where I couldn’t hear. So I left. :( Bigger venue next time plz!

  • Heh

    @ 21. sarah68
    Watch the video, before making generalization.

    Make themselves look good? Hardly. Bill played it
    smart. He was cagey and paranoid, which he should be, but he relaxed near the end.

    Charla: She must have done some tequila shots or something. She was decompressing.
    Best comment:
    Chicken Shits (my paraphrasing). She basically
    called out the folks who were thinking about
    running against Nickels, but chickened out at the end.
    She said that they must be kicking themselves for
    not running. I laughed but folks around me turned gray.
    Strictly verboten in this small world of politicos,
    but what the hell, it was refreshing.
    Overall, well done, publicola.

  • Heh

    @ 21. sarah68
    Watch the video, before making generalization.

    Make themselves look good? Hardly. Bill played it
    smart. He was cagey and paranoid, which he should be, but he relaxed near the end.

    Charla: She must have done some tequila shots or something. She was decompressing.
    Best comment:
    Chicken Shits (my paraphrasing). She basically
    called out the folks who were thinking about
    running against Nickels, but chickened out at the end.
    She said that they must be kicking themselves for
    not running. I laughed but folks around me turned gray.
    Strictly verboten in this small world of politicos,
    but what the hell, it was refreshing.
    Overall, well done, publicola.

  • Heh

    @ 21. sarah68
    Watch the video, before making generalization.

    Make themselves look good? Hardly. Bill played it
    smart. He was cagey and paranoid, which he should be, but he relaxed near the end.

    Charla: She must have done some tequila shots or something. She was decompressing.
    Best comment:
    Chicken Shits (my paraphrasing). She basically
    called out the folks who were thinking about
    running against Nickels, but chickened out at the end.
    She said that they must be kicking themselves for
    not running. I laughed but folks around me turned gray.
    Strictly verboten in this small world of politicos,
    but what the hell, it was refreshing.
    Overall, well done, publicola.

  • Heh

    @ 21. sarah68
    Watch the video, before making generalization.

    Make themselves look good? Hardly. Bill played it
    smart. He was cagey and paranoid, which he should be, but he relaxed near the end.

    Charla: She must have done some tequila shots or something. She was decompressing.
    Best comment:
    Chicken Shits (my paraphrasing). She basically
    called out the folks who were thinking about
    running against Nickels, but chickened out at the end.
    She said that they must be kicking themselves for
    not running. I laughed but folks around me turned gray.
    Strictly verboten in this small world of politicos,
    but what the hell, it was refreshing.
    Overall, well done, publicola.

  • Heh

    @ 21. sarah68
    Watch the video, before making generalization.

    Make themselves look good? Hardly. Bill played it
    smart. He was cagey and paranoid, which he should be, but he relaxed near the end.

    Charla: She must have done some tequila shots or something. She was decompressing.
    Best comment:
    Chicken Shits (my paraphrasing). She basically
    called out the folks who were thinking about
    running against Nickels, but chickened out at the end.
    She said that they must be kicking themselves for
    not running. I laughed but folks around me turned gray.
    Strictly verboten in this small world of politicos,
    but what the hell, it was refreshing.
    Overall, well done, publicola.

  • Heh

    @ 21. sarah68
    Watch the video, before making generalization.

    Make themselves look good? Hardly. Bill played it
    smart. He was cagey and paranoid, which he should be, but he relaxed near the end.

    Charla: She must have done some tequila shots or something. She was decompressing.
    Best comment:
    Chicken Shits (my paraphrasing). She basically
    called out the folks who were thinking about
    running against Nickels, but chickened out at the end.
    She said that they must be kicking themselves for
    not running. I laughed but folks around me turned gray.
    Strictly verboten in this small world of politicos,
    but what the hell, it was refreshing.
    Overall, well done, publicola.

  • Heh

    @ 21. sarah68
    Watch the video, before making generalization.

    Make themselves look good? Hardly. Bill played it
    smart. He was cagey and paranoid, which he should be, but he relaxed near the end.

    Charla: She must have done some tequila shots or something. She was decompressing.
    Best comment:
    Chicken Shits (my paraphrasing). She basically
    called out the folks who were thinking about
    running against Nickels, but chickened out at the end.
    She said that they must be kicking themselves for
    not running. I laughed but folks around me turned gray.
    Strictly verboten in this small world of politicos,
    but what the hell, it was refreshing.
    Overall, well done, publicola.

  • Heh

    @ 21. sarah68
    Watch the video, before making generalization.

    Make themselves look good? Hardly. Bill played it
    smart. He was cagey and paranoid, which he should be, but he relaxed near the end.

    Charla: She must have done some tequila shots or something. She was decompressing.
    Best comment:
    Chicken Shits (my paraphrasing). She basically
    called out the folks who were thinking about
    running against Nickels, but chickened out at the end.
    She said that they must be kicking themselves for
    not running. I laughed but folks around me turned gray.
    Strictly verboten in this small world of politicos,
    but what the hell, it was refreshing.
    Overall, well done, publicola.

  • Heh

    @ 21. sarah68
    Watch the video, before making generalization.

    Make themselves look good? Hardly. Bill played it
    smart. He was cagey and paranoid, which he should be, but he relaxed near the end.

    Charla: She must have done some tequila shots or something. She was decompressing.
    Best comment:
    Chicken Shits (my paraphrasing). She basically
    called out the folks who were thinking about
    running against Nickels, but chickened out at the end.
    She said that they must be kicking themselves for
    not running. I laughed but folks around me turned gray.
    Strictly verboten in this small world of politicos,
    but what the hell, it was refreshing.
    Overall, well done, publicola.

  • Heh

    @ 21. sarah68
    Watch the video, before making generalization.

    Make themselves look good? Hardly. Bill played it
    smart. He was cagey and paranoid, which he should be, but he relaxed near the end.

    Charla: She must have done some tequila shots or something. She was decompressing.
    Best comment:
    Chicken Shits (my paraphrasing). She basically
    called out the folks who were thinking about
    running against Nickels, but chickened out at the end.
    She said that they must be kicking themselves for
    not running. I laughed but folks around me turned gray.
    Strictly verboten in this small world of politicos,
    but what the hell, it was refreshing.
    Overall, well done, publicola.

  • Heh

    @ 21. sarah68
    Watch the video, before making generalization.

    Make themselves look good? Hardly. Bill played it
    smart. He was cagey and paranoid, which he should be, but he relaxed near the end.

    Charla: She must have done some tequila shots or something. She was decompressing.
    Best comment:
    Chicken Shits (my paraphrasing). She basically
    called out the folks who were thinking about
    running against Nickels, but chickened out at the end.
    She said that they must be kicking themselves for
    not running. I laughed but folks around me turned gray.
    Strictly verboten in this small world of politicos,
    but what the hell, it was refreshing.
    Overall, well done, publicola.

  • Heh

    @ 21. sarah68
    Watch the video, before making generalization.

    Make themselves look good? Hardly. Bill played it
    smart. He was cagey and paranoid, which he should be, but he relaxed near the end.

    Charla: She must have done some tequila shots or something. She was decompressing.
    Best comment:
    Chicken Shits (my paraphrasing). She basically
    called out the folks who were thinking about
    running against Nickels, but chickened out at the end.
    She said that they must be kicking themselves for
    not running. I laughed but folks around me turned gray.
    Strictly verboten in this small world of politicos,
    but what the hell, it was refreshing.
    Overall, well done, publicola.

  • Heh

    @ 21. sarah68
    Watch the video, before making generalization.

    Make themselves look good? Hardly. Bill played it
    smart. He was cagey and paranoid, which he should be, but he relaxed near the end.

    Charla: She must have done some tequila shots or something. She was decompressing.
    Best comment:
    Chicken Shits (my paraphrasing). She basically
    called out the folks who were thinking about
    running against Nickels, but chickened out at the end.
    She said that they must be kicking themselves for
    not running. I laughed but folks around me turned gray.
    Strictly verboten in this small world of politicos,
    but what the hell, it was refreshing.
    Overall, well done, publicola.

  • Heh

    @ 21. sarah68
    Watch the video, before making generalization.

    Make themselves look good? Hardly. Bill played it
    smart. He was cagey and paranoid, which he should be, but he relaxed near the end.

    Charla: She must have done some tequila shots or something. She was decompressing.
    Best comment:
    Chicken Shits (my paraphrasing). She basically
    called out the folks who were thinking about
    running against Nickels, but chickened out at the end.
    She said that they must be kicking themselves for
    not running. I laughed but folks around me turned gray.
    Strictly verboten in this small world of politicos,
    but what the hell, it was refreshing.
    Overall, well done, publicola.

  • Heh

    @ 21. sarah68
    Watch the video, before making generalization.

    Make themselves look good? Hardly. Bill played it
    smart. He was cagey and paranoid, which he should be, but he relaxed near the end.

    Charla: She must have done some tequila shots or something. She was decompressing.
    Best comment:
    Chicken Shits (my paraphrasing). She basically
    called out the folks who were thinking about
    running against Nickels, but chickened out at the end.
    She said that they must be kicking themselves for
    not running. I laughed but folks around me turned gray.
    Strictly verboten in this small world of politicos,
    but what the hell, it was refreshing.
    Overall, well done, publicola.

  • Heh

    @ 21. sarah68
    Watch the video, before making generalization.

    Make themselves look good? Hardly. Bill played it
    smart. He was cagey and paranoid, which he should be, but he relaxed near the end.

    Charla: She must have done some tequila shots or something. She was decompressing.
    Best comment:
    Chicken Shits (my paraphrasing). She basically
    called out the folks who were thinking about
    running against Nickels, but chickened out at the end.
    She said that they must be kicking themselves for
    not running. I laughed but folks around me turned gray.
    Strictly verboten in this small world of politicos,
    but what the hell, it was refreshing.
    Overall, well done, publicola.

  • Heh

    @ 21. sarah68
    Watch the video, before making generalization.

    Make themselves look good? Hardly. Bill played it
    smart. He was cagey and paranoid, which he should be, but he relaxed near the end.

    Charla: She must have done some tequila shots or something. She was decompressing.
    Best comment:
    Chicken Shits (my paraphrasing). She basically
    called out the folks who were thinking about
    running against Nickels, but chickened out at the end.
    She said that they must be kicking themselves for
    not running. I laughed but folks around me turned gray.
    Strictly verboten in this small world of politicos,
    but what the hell, it was refreshing.
    Overall, well done, publicola.

  • Joanie Repose

    I went last night (agree w/bigger venue comments!). I didn’t see any throwing under the bus either. Actually, I thought Charla and Jayson were fairly complimentary of Mallahan. It was pretty obvious they cared about Joe enough to protect him and keep him from embarrassing himself.

    I guess some people have axes to grind or are sucking on some sour grapes.

  • Joanie Repose

    I went last night (agree w/bigger venue comments!). I didn’t see any throwing under the bus either. Actually, I thought Charla and Jayson were fairly complimentary of Mallahan. It was pretty obvious they cared about Joe enough to protect him and keep him from embarrassing himself.

    I guess some people have axes to grind or are sucking on some sour grapes.

  • Joanie Repose

    I went last night (agree w/bigger venue comments!). I didn’t see any throwing under the bus either. Actually, I thought Charla and Jayson were fairly complimentary of Mallahan. It was pretty obvious they cared about Joe enough to protect him and keep him from embarrassing himself.

    I guess some people have axes to grind or are sucking on some sour grapes.

  • Joanie Repose

    I went last night (agree w/bigger venue comments!). I didn’t see any throwing under the bus either. Actually, I thought Charla and Jayson were fairly complimentary of Mallahan. It was pretty obvious they cared about Joe enough to protect him and keep him from embarrassing himself.

    I guess some people have axes to grind or are sucking on some sour grapes.

  • Joanie Repose

    I went last night (agree w/bigger venue comments!). I didn’t see any throwing under the bus either. Actually, I thought Charla and Jayson were fairly complimentary of Mallahan. It was pretty obvious they cared about Joe enough to protect him and keep him from embarrassing himself.

    I guess some people have axes to grind or are sucking on some sour grapes.

  • Joanie Repose

    I went last night (agree w/bigger venue comments!). I didn’t see any throwing under the bus either. Actually, I thought Charla and Jayson were fairly complimentary of Mallahan. It was pretty obvious they cared about Joe enough to protect him and keep him from embarrassing himself.

    I guess some people have axes to grind or are sucking on some sour grapes.

  • Joanie Repose

    I went last night (agree w/bigger venue comments!). I didn’t see any throwing under the bus either. Actually, I thought Charla and Jayson were fairly complimentary of Mallahan. It was pretty obvious they cared about Joe enough to protect him and keep him from embarrassing himself.

    I guess some people have axes to grind or are sucking on some sour grapes.

  • Joanie Repose

    I went last night (agree w/bigger venue comments!). I didn’t see any throwing under the bus either. Actually, I thought Charla and Jayson were fairly complimentary of Mallahan. It was pretty obvious they cared about Joe enough to protect him and keep him from embarrassing himself.

    I guess some people have axes to grind or are sucking on some sour grapes.

  • Joanie Repose

    I went last night (agree w/bigger venue comments!). I didn’t see any throwing under the bus either. Actually, I thought Charla and Jayson were fairly complimentary of Mallahan. It was pretty obvious they cared about Joe enough to protect him and keep him from embarrassing himself.

    I guess some people have axes to grind or are sucking on some sour grapes.

  • Joanie Repose

    I went last night (agree w/bigger venue comments!). I didn’t see any throwing under the bus either. Actually, I thought Charla and Jayson were fairly complimentary of Mallahan. It was pretty obvious they cared about Joe enough to protect him and keep him from embarrassing himself.

    I guess some people have axes to grind or are sucking on some sour grapes.

  • Joanie Repose

    I went last night (agree w/bigger venue comments!). I didn’t see any throwing under the bus either. Actually, I thought Charla and Jayson were fairly complimentary of Mallahan. It was pretty obvious they cared about Joe enough to protect him and keep him from embarrassing himself.

    I guess some people have axes to grind or are sucking on some sour grapes.

  • Joanie Repose

    I went last night (agree w/bigger venue comments!). I didn’t see any throwing under the bus either. Actually, I thought Charla and Jayson were fairly complimentary of Mallahan. It was pretty obvious they cared about Joe enough to protect him and keep him from embarrassing himself.

    I guess some people have axes to grind or are sucking on some sour grapes.

  • Joanie Repose

    I went last night (agree w/bigger venue comments!). I didn’t see any throwing under the bus either. Actually, I thought Charla and Jayson were fairly complimentary of Mallahan. It was pretty obvious they cared about Joe enough to protect him and keep him from embarrassing himself.

    I guess some people have axes to grind or are sucking on some sour grapes.

  • Joanie Repose

    I went last night (agree w/bigger venue comments!). I didn’t see any throwing under the bus either. Actually, I thought Charla and Jayson were fairly complimentary of Mallahan. It was pretty obvious they cared about Joe enough to protect him and keep him from embarrassing himself.

    I guess some people have axes to grind or are sucking on some sour grapes.

  • Joanie Repose

    I went last night (agree w/bigger venue comments!). I didn’t see any throwing under the bus either. Actually, I thought Charla and Jayson were fairly complimentary of Mallahan. It was pretty obvious they cared about Joe enough to protect him and keep him from embarrassing himself.

    I guess some people have axes to grind or are sucking on some sour grapes.

  • Joanie Repose

    I went last night (agree w/bigger venue comments!). I didn’t see any throwing under the bus either. Actually, I thought Charla and Jayson were fairly complimentary of Mallahan. It was pretty obvious they cared about Joe enough to protect him and keep him from embarrassing himself.

    I guess some people have axes to grind or are sucking on some sour grapes.

  • Joanie Repose

    I went last night (agree w/bigger venue comments!). I didn’t see any throwing under the bus either. Actually, I thought Charla and Jayson were fairly complimentary of Mallahan. It was pretty obvious they cared about Joe enough to protect him and keep him from embarrassing himself.

    I guess some people have axes to grind or are sucking on some sour grapes.

  • Chris Stefan

    @26
    I loved the “chicken” comment from Charla, so very true.
    I was also amused by how many in the room acted shocked when she said it.

  • Chris Stefan

    @26
    I loved the “chicken” comment from Charla, so very true.
    I was also amused by how many in the room acted shocked when she said it.

  • Chris Stefan

    @26
    I loved the “chicken” comment from Charla, so very true.
    I was also amused by how many in the room acted shocked when she said it.

  • Chris Stefan

    @26
    I loved the “chicken” comment from Charla, so very true.
    I was also amused by how many in the room acted shocked when she said it.

  • Chris Stefan

    @26
    I loved the “chicken” comment from Charla, so very true.
    I was also amused by how many in the room acted shocked when she said it.

  • Chris Stefan

    @26
    I loved the “chicken” comment from Charla, so very true.
    I was also amused by how many in the room acted shocked when she said it.

  • Chris Stefan

    @26
    I loved the “chicken” comment from Charla, so very true.
    I was also amused by how many in the room acted shocked when she said it.

  • Chris Stefan

    @26
    I loved the “chicken” comment from Charla, so very true.
    I was also amused by how many in the room acted shocked when she said it.

  • Chris Stefan

    @26
    I loved the “chicken” comment from Charla, so very true.
    I was also amused by how many in the room acted shocked when she said it.

  • Chris Stefan

    @26
    I loved the “chicken” comment from Charla, so very true.
    I was also amused by how many in the room acted shocked when she said it.

  • Chris Stefan

    @26
    I loved the “chicken” comment from Charla, so very true.
    I was also amused by how many in the room acted shocked when she said it.

  • Chris Stefan

    @26
    I loved the “chicken” comment from Charla, so very true.
    I was also amused by how many in the room acted shocked when she said it.

  • Chris Stefan

    @26
    I loved the “chicken” comment from Charla, so very true.
    I was also amused by how many in the room acted shocked when she said it.

  • Chris Stefan

    @26
    I loved the “chicken” comment from Charla, so very true.
    I was also amused by how many in the room acted shocked when she said it.

  • Chris Stefan

    @26
    I loved the “chicken” comment from Charla, so very true.
    I was also amused by how many in the room acted shocked when she said it.

  • Chris Stefan

    @26
    I loved the “chicken” comment from Charla, so very true.
    I was also amused by how many in the room acted shocked when she said it.

  • Chris Stefan

    @26
    I loved the “chicken” comment from Charla, so very true.
    I was also amused by how many in the room acted shocked when she said it.

  • Chris Stefan

    @26
    I loved the “chicken” comment from Charla, so very true.
    I was also amused by how many in the room acted shocked when she said it.

  • Chris Stefan

    @26
    I loved the “chicken” comment from Charla, so very true.
    I was also amused by how many in the room acted shocked when she said it.

  • Felf

    Jason was chief strategist? I’d heard he’d been pretty much pushed to the sidelines during the primary and that Rory Steele was calling the shots. Maybe there is no way of knowing.

  • Felf

    Jason was chief strategist? I’d heard he’d been pretty much pushed to the sidelines during the primary and that Rory Steele was calling the shots. Maybe there is no way of knowing.

  • Felf

    Jason was chief strategist? I’d heard he’d been pretty much pushed to the sidelines during the primary and that Rory Steele was calling the shots. Maybe there is no way of knowing.

  • Felf

    Jason was chief strategist? I’d heard he’d been pretty much pushed to the sidelines during the primary and that Rory Steele was calling the shots. Maybe there is no way of knowing.

  • Felf

    Jason was chief strategist? I’d heard he’d been pretty much pushed to the sidelines during the primary and that Rory Steele was calling the shots. Maybe there is no way of knowing.

  • Felf

    Jason was chief strategist? I’d heard he’d been pretty much pushed to the sidelines during the primary and that Rory Steele was calling the shots. Maybe there is no way of knowing.

  • Felf

    Jason was chief strategist? I’d heard he’d been pretty much pushed to the sidelines during the primary and that Rory Steele was calling the shots. Maybe there is no way of knowing.

  • Felf

    Jason was chief strategist? I’d heard he’d been pretty much pushed to the sidelines during the primary and that Rory Steele was calling the shots. Maybe there is no way of knowing.

  • Felf

    Jason was chief strategist? I’d heard he’d been pretty much pushed to the sidelines during the primary and that Rory Steele was calling the shots. Maybe there is no way of knowing.

  • Felf

    Jason was chief strategist? I’d heard he’d been pretty much pushed to the sidelines during the primary and that Rory Steele was calling the shots. Maybe there is no way of knowing.

  • Felf

    Jason was chief strategist? I’d heard he’d been pretty much pushed to the sidelines during the primary and that Rory Steele was calling the shots. Maybe there is no way of knowing.

  • Felf

    Jason was chief strategist? I’d heard he’d been pretty much pushed to the sidelines during the primary and that Rory Steele was calling the shots. Maybe there is no way of knowing.

  • Felf

    Jason was chief strategist? I’d heard he’d been pretty much pushed to the sidelines during the primary and that Rory Steele was calling the shots. Maybe there is no way of knowing.

  • Felf

    Jason was chief strategist? I’d heard he’d been pretty much pushed to the sidelines during the primary and that Rory Steele was calling the shots. Maybe there is no way of knowing.

  • Felf

    Jason was chief strategist? I’d heard he’d been pretty much pushed to the sidelines during the primary and that Rory Steele was calling the shots. Maybe there is no way of knowing.

  • Felf

    Jason was chief strategist? I’d heard he’d been pretty much pushed to the sidelines during the primary and that Rory Steele was calling the shots. Maybe there is no way of knowing.

  • Felf

    Jason was chief strategist? I’d heard he’d been pretty much pushed to the sidelines during the primary and that Rory Steele was calling the shots. Maybe there is no way of knowing.

  • Felf

    Jason was chief strategist? I’d heard he’d been pretty much pushed to the sidelines during the primary and that Rory Steele was calling the shots. Maybe there is no way of knowing.

  • Felf

    Jason was chief strategist? I’d heard he’d been pretty much pushed to the sidelines during the primary and that Rory Steele was calling the shots. Maybe there is no way of knowing.