Viva La Cola!

Founded in January 2009, PubliCola is a blog about Seattle written by journalists who are dedicated to non-partisan, original daily reporting that prioritizes a balanced approach to news. Started by longtime local editor and award-winning reporter Josh Feit, PubliCola is the first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol.

PubliCola was off and running. In June 2009, PubliCola hired another award-winning journalist, super-sourced Seattle city hall reporter Erica C. Barnett.

People were afraid that blogging would change journalism. Instead, we believe journalism can change blogging. Twenty-first century journalism may look and feel different, and yes Erica isn't afraid to get cranky, but we're committed to making sure online news still delivers independent, reliable, even-keeled coverage. And most of all, we're committed to making sure the coverage sparks honest civic debate.

Bringing you cola for the people, PubliCola is named after Publius Valerius PubliCola, the alias for the authors of the Federalist Papers—the original bloggers.

The first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol and Seattle city hall, PubliCola has been called a “must-read” by the Seattle Post Intelligencer and a hot “New Media Mover and Shaker” by Seattle Magazine—which also cited our own Erica C. Barnett as the city's No. 1 news nerd.

McGinn's Victory Party

cymbal

Begin the McGinn. The Garfield High School marching band gives it up for the Mayor-Elect.

I have been covering Seattle politics for a long time, and I have to say: Mayor-Elect Mike McGinn’s victory party tonight was an unprecedented scene.

It was held at the New Holly Gathering Hall in Seattle’s Holly Park mixed-income development (seven blocks from the Othello light rail stop in the minority Southeast Seattle turf that probably made the difference for McGinn in the election). And none of the leaders from the consultant/political class that has been running this town for years showed. None of them.

Lefty state Sen. Adam Kline (D-37, South Seattle) was about as establishment as it got.

Who else was there? Well, for starters, Roberto Maestas, the longtime Latino community/social justice leader of El Centro De La Raza introduced McGinn with a gleeful speech. Otherwise, it was everyday people: White, black, Hispanic, and African immigrant taxi drivers (and longtime, fringe-ish activists from the Sierra Club, the Cascade Bicycle Club, past monorail campaigns, past anti-monorail campaigns, and North Seattle blond moms who took back their neighborhoods with McGinn from lesser-Seattle cranks to fight for density) noshing on fried chicken or veggie stir-fry with tofu, drinking beer and wine out of plastic cups.

maestas

Roberto Maestas after introducing McGinn

If that wasn’t enough to make it plain this wasn’t a Mayor Greg Nickels victory party or a Ron Sims victory party or a Dow Constantine (sorry) victory party, how about this? Rahwa Habte, co-owner of the Central District’s Hidmo Eritrean Cuisine, the ground zero of Seattle’s renaissance hip hop scene, was also there.

(If Habte was at Constantine’s establishment-heavy party at Kell’s in the Pike Place Market on Wednesday night along with Deputy Mayor Tim Ceis, Governor Gregoire staff, and downtown consultants, I apologize for not noticing. But I couldn’t miss Habte at McGinn’s where she was giving high fives.)

The Garfield High marching band upset the place (in a Sam Cooke and the Soul Stirrers way) with a few raucous numbers (see top), and McGinn himself held court in the hall by the beer and wine table, marveling along with his well wishers at the energy and the possibility of his pending administration.

newholly

McGinn

But McGinn’s speech—the highlight of the night—put the possibility for change in check by laying out the political lines. It was an unprecedented, rabble-rousey call from a soon-to-be-mayor of Seattle:

“The people who still think we have to do things the same old way, they’re still here. And they still have the money.” (Those are the people I mentioned earlier. The people who didn’t show tonight.)

To get things done McGinn said it would take more than just a new mayor. He said he needed all the people  in the room (the community center was packed like a subway car out to the glass doors in the hallway) to stay active and talk to their neighbors, talk to people they don’t know: “I’m a mayor who respects the power of people who organize,” he said to big cheers, noting that the “secret” to his surprise (ahem) win was standard Cesar Chavez organizing. There’s a Chavez quote on the wall of the Sierra Club offices where McGinn has run many of his recent initiative campaigns, he said. “There’s no secret,” McGinn explained, referencing Chavez’s apparent wisdom: “You talk to people. You talk to one person. And then you talk to another.”

Indeed, despite his earlier warning about the entrenched power structure, McGinn couldn’t contain his optimism. After Maestas introduced the Mayor-Elect, McGinn recounted the history of El Centro De La Raza and how Maestas simply got the keys to an abandoned school 37 years ago and invited the community inside to start the now landmark Beacon Hill Latino/Chicano(!) center.

“They gave us the keys in this election,” McGinn marveled, comparing the story to his own campaign victory.

Top photo by me. Maestas and McGinn photos be Erica C. Barnett.




  • ivan

    North Seattle blond moms who took back their neighborhoods with McGinn from lesser-Seattle cranks to fight for density)

    Yeah Josh, you have “been covering Seattle politics for a long time,” but it appears you haven’t leaned jack shit, and you’re still just a credulous fanboy twerp.

    You have no clue if those “North Seattle blond moms” — wow, talk about stereotyping — were fighting for your precious density. Can it be that they were there for SIDEWALKS?

    I’m not posting this to rain on McGinn’s party, but rather on your shallow, gee-whiz brand of “reporting” and anal-ysis. McGinn is the mayor of the entire city now, and not just the mayor of the urbanist cult.

    He will learn, even if you have not, that there are many, many grass-roots constituencies in a city this size, and that his job is to represent all them to some degree.

    If he truly practices what Cesar Chavez preached, he’ll represent his entire constituency successfully, and I’ll have his back. But he’ll have to throw a lot of financial elites under the bus to accomplish that, and THIS is what people will be watching for.

    We had two great field-dominated, volunteer-driven campaigns in this election: The McGinn campaign, and the Dow Constantine campaign, which — sorry, fanboys — dwarfed the McGinn campaign. The accomplishments of both campaigns are plenty to crow about without misrepresenting their meaning or their effect.

  • ivan

    North Seattle blond moms who took back their neighborhoods with McGinn from lesser-Seattle cranks to fight for density)

    Yeah Josh, you have “been covering Seattle politics for a long time,” but it appears you haven’t leaned jack shit, and you’re still just a credulous fanboy twerp.

    You have no clue if those “North Seattle blond moms” — wow, talk about stereotyping — were fighting for your precious density. Can it be that they were there for SIDEWALKS?

    I’m not posting this to rain on McGinn’s party, but rather on your shallow, gee-whiz brand of “reporting” and anal-ysis. McGinn is the mayor of the entire city now, and not just the mayor of the urbanist cult.

    He will learn, even if you have not, that there are many, many grass-roots constituencies in a city this size, and that his job is to represent all them to some degree.

    If he truly practices what Cesar Chavez preached, he’ll represent his entire constituency successfully, and I’ll have his back. But he’ll have to throw a lot of financial elites under the bus to accomplish that, and THIS is what people will be watching for.

    We had two great field-dominated, volunteer-driven campaigns in this election: The McGinn campaign, and the Dow Constantine campaign, which — sorry, fanboys — dwarfed the McGinn campaign. The accomplishments of both campaigns are plenty to crow about without misrepresenting their meaning or their effect.

  • ivan

    North Seattle blond moms who took back their neighborhoods with McGinn from lesser-Seattle cranks to fight for density)

    Yeah Josh, you have “been covering Seattle politics for a long time,” but it appears you haven’t leaned jack shit, and you’re still just a credulous fanboy twerp.

    You have no clue if those “North Seattle blond moms” — wow, talk about stereotyping — were fighting for your precious density. Can it be that they were there for SIDEWALKS?

    I’m not posting this to rain on McGinn’s party, but rather on your shallow, gee-whiz brand of “reporting” and anal-ysis. McGinn is the mayor of the entire city now, and not just the mayor of the urbanist cult.

    He will learn, even if you have not, that there are many, many grass-roots constituencies in a city this size, and that his job is to represent all them to some degree.

    If he truly practices what Cesar Chavez preached, he’ll represent his entire constituency successfully, and I’ll have his back. But he’ll have to throw a lot of financial elites under the bus to accomplish that, and THIS is what people will be watching for.

    We had two great field-dominated, volunteer-driven campaigns in this election: The McGinn campaign, and the Dow Constantine campaign, which — sorry, fanboys — dwarfed the McGinn campaign. The accomplishments of both campaigns are plenty to crow about without misrepresenting their meaning or their effect.

  • ivan

    North Seattle blond moms who took back their neighborhoods with McGinn from lesser-Seattle cranks to fight for density)

    Yeah Josh, you have “been covering Seattle politics for a long time,” but it appears you haven’t leaned jack shit, and you’re still just a credulous fanboy twerp.

    You have no clue if those “North Seattle blond moms” — wow, talk about stereotyping — were fighting for your precious density. Can it be that they were there for SIDEWALKS?

    I’m not posting this to rain on McGinn’s party, but rather on your shallow, gee-whiz brand of “reporting” and anal-ysis. McGinn is the mayor of the entire city now, and not just the mayor of the urbanist cult.

    He will learn, even if you have not, that there are many, many grass-roots constituencies in a city this size, and that his job is to represent all them to some degree.

    If he truly practices what Cesar Chavez preached, he’ll represent his entire constituency successfully, and I’ll have his back. But he’ll have to throw a lot of financial elites under the bus to accomplish that, and THIS is what people will be watching for.

    We had two great field-dominated, volunteer-driven campaigns in this election: The McGinn campaign, and the Dow Constantine campaign, which — sorry, fanboys — dwarfed the McGinn campaign. The accomplishments of both campaigns are plenty to crow about without misrepresenting their meaning or their effect.

  • Ryno M

    Yeah the Dow Constantine campaign.

    it was really fueled by volunteers and field organizing. Don’t pay any attention to the $1 million in mostly special interest money. That had nothing to do with his victory.

  • Ryno M

    Yeah the Dow Constantine campaign.

    it was really fueled by volunteers and field organizing. Don’t pay any attention to the $1 million in mostly special interest money. That had nothing to do with his victory.

  • Ryno M

    Yeah the Dow Constantine campaign.

    it was really fueled by volunteers and field organizing. Don’t pay any attention to the $1 million in mostly special interest money. That had nothing to do with his victory.

  • Ryno M

    Yeah the Dow Constantine campaign.

    it was really fueled by volunteers and field organizing. Don’t pay any attention to the $1 million in mostly special interest money. That had nothing to do with his victory.

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @1,

    The North Seattle blond mom I was talking to told me she met Mike McGinn back in the mid-2000s when she was organizing against the single-family zoning orthodoxy in North Seattle.

  • Sustainable Sam

    I was at both the Constantine and McGinn parties. How about that…

  • Sustainable Sam

    I was at both the Constantine and McGinn parties. How about that…

  • Sustainable Sam

    I was at both the Constantine and McGinn parties. How about that…

  • Sustainable Sam

    I was at both the Constantine and McGinn parties. How about that…

  • John

    I have a good feeling I know who Josh’s blond North Seattle mom is, and if I’m right he’s right on and @1 is just pushing his own agenda, as usual.

  • John

    I have a good feeling I know who Josh’s blond North Seattle mom is, and if I’m right he’s right on and @1 is just pushing his own agenda, as usual.

  • John

    I have a good feeling I know who Josh’s blond North Seattle mom is, and if I’m right he’s right on and @1 is just pushing his own agenda, as usual.

  • John

    I have a good feeling I know who Josh’s blond North Seattle mom is, and if I’m right he’s right on and @1 is just pushing his own agenda, as usual.

  • Good Grief

    So the “North Seattle blond moms” turns out to have been just one person I guess?

  • Good Grief

    So the “North Seattle blond moms” turns out to have been just one person I guess?

  • Good Grief

    So the “North Seattle blond moms” turns out to have been just one person I guess?

  • Good Grief

    So the “North Seattle blond moms” turns out to have been just one person I guess?

  • morning fizzy

    North Seattle blond moms who took back their neighborhoods with McGinn from lesser-Seattle cranks to fight for density

    They took back their neighborhoods that had been dense but lesser Seattle cranks had torn down the apartments and replaced them with SF homes – is that what you are saying? Please name the neighborhood groups that have fought for more town-home zoning.

    When you and the real Crank whined about losing a one story piece of crap building was that fighting for density?

  • morning fizzy

    North Seattle blond moms who took back their neighborhoods with McGinn from lesser-Seattle cranks to fight for density

    They took back their neighborhoods that had been dense but lesser Seattle cranks had torn down the apartments and replaced them with SF homes – is that what you are saying? Please name the neighborhood groups that have fought for more town-home zoning.

    When you and the real Crank whined about losing a one story piece of crap building was that fighting for density?

  • morning fizzy

    North Seattle blond moms who took back their neighborhoods with McGinn from lesser-Seattle cranks to fight for density

    They took back their neighborhoods that had been dense but lesser Seattle cranks had torn down the apartments and replaced them with SF homes – is that what you are saying? Please name the neighborhood groups that have fought for more town-home zoning.

    When you and the real Crank whined about losing a one story piece of crap building was that fighting for density?

  • morning fizzy

    North Seattle blond moms who took back their neighborhoods with McGinn from lesser-Seattle cranks to fight for density

    They took back their neighborhoods that had been dense but lesser Seattle cranks had torn down the apartments and replaced them with SF homes – is that what you are saying? Please name the neighborhood groups that have fought for more town-home zoning.

    When you and the real Crank whined about losing a one story piece of crap building was that fighting for density?

  • morning fizzy

    North Seattle blond moms who took back their neighborhoods with McGinn from lesser-Seattle cranks to fight for density

    They took back their neighborhoods that had been dense but lesser Seattle cranks had torn down the apartments and replaced them with SF homes – is that what you are saying? Please name the neighborhood groups that have fought for more town-home zoning.

    When you and the real Crank whined about losing a one story piece of crap building was that fighting for density?

  • morning fizzy

    North Seattle blond moms who took back their neighborhoods with McGinn from lesser-Seattle cranks to fight for density

    They took back their neighborhoods that had been dense but lesser Seattle cranks had torn down the apartments and replaced them with SF homes – is that what you are saying? Please name the neighborhood groups that have fought for more town-home zoning.

    When you and the real Crank whined about losing a one story piece of crap building was that fighting for density?

  • morning fizzy

    North Seattle blond moms who took back their neighborhoods with McGinn from lesser-Seattle cranks to fight for density

    They took back their neighborhoods that had been dense but lesser Seattle cranks had torn down the apartments and replaced them with SF homes – is that what you are saying? Please name the neighborhood groups that have fought for more town-home zoning.

    When you and the real Crank whined about losing a one story piece of crap building was that fighting for density?

  • Jane

    Josh, maybe the “establishment” didn’t come because they weren’t invited.

    Sometimes the simplest answer is the real one.

  • Jane

    Josh, maybe the “establishment” didn’t come because they weren’t invited.

    Sometimes the simplest answer is the real one.

  • Jane

    Josh, maybe the “establishment” didn’t come because they weren’t invited.

    Sometimes the simplest answer is the real one.

  • Jane

    Josh, maybe the “establishment” didn’t come because they weren’t invited.

    Sometimes the simplest answer is the real one.

  • Jane

    Josh, maybe the “establishment” didn’t come because they weren’t invited.

    Sometimes the simplest answer is the real one.

  • Jane

    Josh, maybe the “establishment” didn’t come because they weren’t invited.

    Sometimes the simplest answer is the real one.

  • Jane

    Josh, maybe the “establishment” didn’t come because they weren’t invited.

    Sometimes the simplest answer is the real one.

  • http://www.hidmo.org/ Rahwa Habte

    Wow thanks for the shout out Josh, it was good to finally meet you… and you’re right I wasn’t at Kell’s but I’m excited for Seattle and King County right now – HIGH FIVE!!!

  • http://www.hidmo.org/ Rahwa Habte

    Wow thanks for the shout out Josh, it was good to finally meet you… and you’re right I wasn’t at Kell’s but I’m excited for Seattle and King County right now – HIGH FIVE!!!

  • http://www.hidmo.org/ Rahwa Habte

    Wow thanks for the shout out Josh, it was good to finally meet you… and you’re right I wasn’t at Kell’s but I’m excited for Seattle and King County right now – HIGH FIVE!!!

  • http://www.hidmo.org/ Rahwa Habte

    Wow thanks for the shout out Josh, it was good to finally meet you… and you’re right I wasn’t at Kell’s but I’m excited for Seattle and King County right now – HIGH FIVE!!!

  • http://www.hidmo.org/ Rahwa Habte

    Wow thanks for the shout out Josh, it was good to finally meet you… and you’re right I wasn’t at Kell’s but I’m excited for Seattle and King County right now – HIGH FIVE!!!

  • http://www.hidmo.org/ Rahwa Habte

    Wow thanks for the shout out Josh, it was good to finally meet you… and you’re right I wasn’t at Kell’s but I’m excited for Seattle and King County right now – HIGH FIVE!!!

  • http://www.hidmo.org Rahwa Habte

    Wow thanks for the shout out Josh, it was good to finally meet you… and you’re right I wasn’t at Kell’s but I’m excited for Seattle and King County right now – HIGH FIVE!!!

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @7,

    I should have been clearer: They wrested the neighborhood movement away from the anti-density crowd. They haven’t won many policy battles re: SFZ, but the McGinn victory helps their cause, which blond mom said she’d been fighting for since around the time this article came out in 2004.

    And re: losing the one-story building on Pine (which is what I think you’re talking about.) That neighborhood is already dense. The strip that got torn down had retail, bars, and shops that catered to the surrounding non-SFZ density. It was part of the equation for density. (Gotta serve all the residents.)

    Arguing to save SFZ housing in Northgate is much different than arguing to save retail in a neighborhood that’s already dense.

    Would taller buildings on that strip (condos) bring more density? Sure. And ultimately, that’s fine.

    Funny though. They never built the condos. It’s an empty parking lot. I wish the retail was still there.

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @7,

    I should have been clearer: They wrested the neighborhood movement away from the anti-density crowd. They haven’t won many policy battles re: SFZ, but the McGinn victory helps their cause, which blond mom said she’d been fighting for since around the time this article came out in 2004.

    And re: losing the one-story building on Pine (which is what I think you’re talking about.) That neighborhood is already dense. The strip that got torn down had retail, bars, and shops that catered to the surrounding non-SFZ density. It was part of the equation for density. (Gotta serve all the residents.)

    Arguing to save SFZ housing in Northgate is much different than arguing to save retail in a neighborhood that’s already dense.

    Would taller buildings on that strip (condos) bring more density? Sure. And ultimately, that’s fine.

    Funny though. They never built the condos. It’s an empty parking lot. I wish the retail was still there.

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @7,

    I should have been clearer: They wrested the neighborhood movement away from the anti-density crowd. They haven’t won many policy battles re: SFZ, but the McGinn victory helps their cause, which blond mom said she’d been fighting for since around the time this article came out in 2004.

    And re: losing the one-story building on Pine (which is what I think you’re talking about.) That neighborhood is already dense. The strip that got torn down had retail, bars, and shops that catered to the surrounding non-SFZ density. It was part of the equation for density. (Gotta serve all the residents.)

    Arguing to save SFZ housing in Northgate is much different than arguing to save retail in a neighborhood that’s already dense.

    Would taller buildings on that strip (condos) bring more density? Sure. And ultimately, that’s fine.

    Funny though. They never built the condos. It’s an empty parking lot. I wish the retail was still there.

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @7,

    I should have been clearer: They wrested the neighborhood movement away from the anti-density crowd. They haven’t won many policy battles re: SFZ, but the McGinn victory helps their cause, which blond mom said she’d been fighting for since around the time this article came out in 2004.

    And re: losing the one-story building on Pine (which is what I think you’re talking about.) That neighborhood is already dense. The strip that got torn down had retail, bars, and shops that catered to the surrounding non-SFZ density. It was part of the equation for density. (Gotta serve all the residents.)

    Arguing to save SFZ housing in Northgate is much different than arguing to save retail in a neighborhood that’s already dense.

    Would taller buildings on that strip (condos) bring more density? Sure. And ultimately, that’s fine.

    Funny though. They never built the condos. It’s an empty parking lot. I wish the retail was still there.

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @7,

    I should have been clearer: They wrested the neighborhood movement away from the anti-density crowd. They haven’t won many policy battles re: SFZ, but the McGinn victory helps their cause, which blond mom said she’d been fighting for since around the time this article came out in 2004.

    And re: losing the one-story building on Pine (which is what I think you’re talking about.) That neighborhood is already dense. The strip that got torn down had retail, bars, and shops that catered to the surrounding non-SFZ density. It was part of the equation for density. (Gotta serve all the residents.)

    Arguing to save SFZ housing in Northgate is much different than arguing to save retail in a neighborhood that’s already dense.

    Would taller buildings on that strip (condos) bring more density? Sure. And ultimately, that’s fine.

    Funny though. They never built the condos. It’s an empty parking lot. I wish the retail was still there.

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @7,

    I should have been clearer: They wrested the neighborhood movement away from the anti-density crowd. They haven’t won many policy battles re: SFZ, but the McGinn victory helps their cause, which blond mom said she’d been fighting for since around the time this article came out in 2004.

    And re: losing the one-story building on Pine (which is what I think you’re talking about.) That neighborhood is already dense. The strip that got torn down had retail, bars, and shops that catered to the surrounding non-SFZ density. It was part of the equation for density. (Gotta serve all the residents.)

    Arguing to save SFZ housing in Northgate is much different than arguing to save retail in a neighborhood that’s already dense.

    Would taller buildings on that strip (condos) bring more density? Sure. And ultimately, that’s fine.

    Funny though. They never built the condos. It’s an empty parking lot. I wish the retail was still there.

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @7,

    I should have been clearer: They wrested the neighborhood movement away from the anti-density crowd. They haven’t won many policy battles re: SFZ, but the McGinn victory helps their cause, which blond mom said she’d been fighting for since around the time this article came out in 2004.

    And re: losing the one-story building on Pine (which is what I think you’re talking about.) That neighborhood is already dense. The strip that got torn down had retail, bars, and shops that catered to the surrounding non-SFZ density. It was part of the equation for density. (Gotta serve all the residents.)

    Arguing to save SFZ housing in Northgate is much different than arguing to save retail in a neighborhood that’s already dense.

    Would taller buildings on that strip (condos) bring more density? Sure. And ultimately, that’s fine.

    Funny though. They never built the condos. It’s an empty parking lot. I wish the retail was still there.

  • Wells

    “None of the leaders from the consultant/political class that have been running this town for years showed.”

    I got involved in Seattle politics because it became obvious that these political leaders have only one constituent group – the wealthy whose gains were gotten off the backs, sweat and labor of the less fortunate. I’m hoping Mike may show these well-dressed clowns just how poor they’ve actually made themselves in every way other than material crap. Let’s hope ugly Seattle Snootery becomes a mostly forgotten thing of the past.

  • Wells

    “None of the leaders from the consultant/political class that have been running this town for years showed.”

    I got involved in Seattle politics because it became obvious that these political leaders have only one constituent group – the wealthy whose gains were gotten off the backs, sweat and labor of the less fortunate. I’m hoping Mike may show these well-dressed clowns just how poor they’ve actually made themselves in every way other than material crap. Let’s hope ugly Seattle Snootery becomes a mostly forgotten thing of the past.

  • Wells

    “None of the leaders from the consultant/political class that have been running this town for years showed.”

    I got involved in Seattle politics because it became obvious that these political leaders have only one constituent group – the wealthy whose gains were gotten off the backs, sweat and labor of the less fortunate. I’m hoping Mike may show these well-dressed clowns just how poor they’ve actually made themselves in every way other than material crap. Let’s hope ugly Seattle Snootery becomes a mostly forgotten thing of the past.

  • Wells

    “None of the leaders from the consultant/political class that have been running this town for years showed.”

    I got involved in Seattle politics because it became obvious that these political leaders have only one constituent group – the wealthy whose gains were gotten off the backs, sweat and labor of the less fortunate. I’m hoping Mike may show these well-dressed clowns just how poor they’ve actually made themselves in every way other than material crap. Let’s hope ugly Seattle Snootery becomes a mostly forgotten thing of the past.

  • Wells

    “None of the leaders from the consultant/political class that have been running this town for years showed.”

    I got involved in Seattle politics because it became obvious that these political leaders have only one constituent group – the wealthy whose gains were gotten off the backs, sweat and labor of the less fortunate. I’m hoping Mike may show these well-dressed clowns just how poor they’ve actually made themselves in every way other than material crap. Let’s hope ugly Seattle Snootery becomes a mostly forgotten thing of the past.

  • Wells

    “None of the leaders from the consultant/political class that have been running this town for years showed.”

    I got involved in Seattle politics because it became obvious that these political leaders have only one constituent group – the wealthy whose gains were gotten off the backs, sweat and labor of the less fortunate. I’m hoping Mike may show these well-dressed clowns just how poor they’ve actually made themselves in every way other than material crap. Let’s hope ugly Seattle Snootery becomes a mostly forgotten thing of the past.

  • Wells

    “None of the leaders from the consultant/political class that have been running this town for years showed.”

    I got involved in Seattle politics because it became obvious that these political leaders have only one constituent group – the wealthy whose gains were gotten off the backs, sweat and labor of the less fortunate. I’m hoping Mike may show these well-dressed clowns just how poor they’ve actually made themselves in every way other than material crap. Let’s hope ugly Seattle Snootery becomes a mostly forgotten thing of the past.

  • gloomy gus

    Thanks so much for covering this!

    none of the leaders from the consultant/political class that has been running this town for years showed

    I can’t bring myself to blame them – most have been around long enough to have get burned in the internecine spats that have always ruled the voting blocs currently giving McGinn the benefit of the doubt. Yeah, McGinn united them as an electoral bloc for the purposes of winning his mayoralty, but don’t kid yourself about the difficulty he may have keeping it together.

    Stitching, then keeping together a bloc like this for a full term of office has been the failed dream of every politico/consultant/whathaveya of the last thirty years. Identity-politics pandering constantly works to pit one against the other until it unravels. Too many grudges held tightly still. (Oh, look, Benny begins center stage again, that always turns out so well…)

    Most everybody in the class you sneer at’s been around long enough, through enough cycles of hope and disillusionment, to have got burned trying more than once. Right now they’re on one of the six sides, and are keeping their heads down waiting to see what part of the new McGinn machine proves to have legs.

    I don’t think they wish McGinn ill. They just doubt both his ability to pull it off and his sincerity in trying. In the meantime, it’s fun to watch another honeymoon for another hero.

    Again, thanks for covering it.

  • gloomy gus

    Thanks so much for covering this!

    none of the leaders from the consultant/political class that has been running this town for years showed

    I can’t bring myself to blame them – most have been around long enough to have get burned in the internecine spats that have always ruled the voting blocs currently giving McGinn the benefit of the doubt. Yeah, McGinn united them as an electoral bloc for the purposes of winning his mayoralty, but don’t kid yourself about the difficulty he may have keeping it together.

    Stitching, then keeping together a bloc like this for a full term of office has been the failed dream of every politico/consultant/whathaveya of the last thirty years. Identity-politics pandering constantly works to pit one against the other until it unravels. Too many grudges held tightly still. (Oh, look, Benny begins center stage again, that always turns out so well…)

    Most everybody in the class you sneer at’s been around long enough, through enough cycles of hope and disillusionment, to have got burned trying more than once. Right now they’re on one of the six sides, and are keeping their heads down waiting to see what part of the new McGinn machine proves to have legs.

    I don’t think they wish McGinn ill. They just doubt both his ability to pull it off and his sincerity in trying. In the meantime, it’s fun to watch another honeymoon for another hero.

    Again, thanks for covering it.

  • gloomy gus

    Thanks so much for covering this!

    none of the leaders from the consultant/political class that has been running this town for years showed

    I can’t bring myself to blame them – most have been around long enough to have get burned in the internecine spats that have always ruled the voting blocs currently giving McGinn the benefit of the doubt. Yeah, McGinn united them as an electoral bloc for the purposes of winning his mayoralty, but don’t kid yourself about the difficulty he may have keeping it together.

    Stitching, then keeping together a bloc like this for a full term of office has been the failed dream of every politico/consultant/whathaveya of the last thirty years. Identity-politics pandering constantly works to pit one against the other until it unravels. Too many grudges held tightly still. (Oh, look, Benny begins center stage again, that always turns out so well…)

    Most everybody in the class you sneer at’s been around long enough, through enough cycles of hope and disillusionment, to have got burned trying more than once. Right now they’re on one of the six sides, and are keeping their heads down waiting to see what part of the new McGinn machine proves to have legs.

    I don’t think they wish McGinn ill. They just doubt both his ability to pull it off and his sincerity in trying. In the meantime, it’s fun to watch another honeymoon for another hero.

    Again, thanks for covering it.

  • gloomy gus

    Thanks so much for covering this!

    none of the leaders from the consultant/political class that has been running this town for years showed

    I can’t bring myself to blame them – most have been around long enough to have get burned in the internecine spats that have always ruled the voting blocs currently giving McGinn the benefit of the doubt. Yeah, McGinn united them as an electoral bloc for the purposes of winning his mayoralty, but don’t kid yourself about the difficulty he may have keeping it together.

    Stitching, then keeping together a bloc like this for a full term of office has been the failed dream of every politico/consultant/whathaveya of the last thirty years. Identity-politics pandering constantly works to pit one against the other until it unravels. Too many grudges held tightly still. (Oh, look, Benny begins center stage again, that always turns out so well…)

    Most everybody in the class you sneer at’s been around long enough, through enough cycles of hope and disillusionment, to have got burned trying more than once. Right now they’re on one of the six sides, and are keeping their heads down waiting to see what part of the new McGinn machine proves to have legs.

    I don’t think they wish McGinn ill. They just doubt both his ability to pull it off and his sincerity in trying. In the meantime, it’s fun to watch another honeymoon for another hero.

    Again, thanks for covering it.

  • gloomy gus

    Thanks so much for covering this!

    none of the leaders from the consultant/political class that has been running this town for years showed

    I can’t bring myself to blame them – most have been around long enough to have get burned in the internecine spats that have always ruled the voting blocs currently giving McGinn the benefit of the doubt. Yeah, McGinn united them as an electoral bloc for the purposes of winning his mayoralty, but don’t kid yourself about the difficulty he may have keeping it together.

    Stitching, then keeping together a bloc like this for a full term of office has been the failed dream of every politico/consultant/whathaveya of the last thirty years. Identity-politics pandering constantly works to pit one against the other until it unravels. Too many grudges held tightly still. (Oh, look, Benny begins center stage again, that always turns out so well…)

    Most everybody in the class you sneer at’s been around long enough, through enough cycles of hope and disillusionment, to have got burned trying more than once. Right now they’re on one of the six sides, and are keeping their heads down waiting to see what part of the new McGinn machine proves to have legs.

    I don’t think they wish McGinn ill. They just doubt both his ability to pull it off and his sincerity in trying. In the meantime, it’s fun to watch another honeymoon for another hero.

    Again, thanks for covering it.

  • gloomy gus

    Thanks so much for covering this!

    none of the leaders from the consultant/political class that has been running this town for years showed

    I can’t bring myself to blame them – most have been around long enough to have get burned in the internecine spats that have always ruled the voting blocs currently giving McGinn the benefit of the doubt. Yeah, McGinn united them as an electoral bloc for the purposes of winning his mayoralty, but don’t kid yourself about the difficulty he may have keeping it together.

    Stitching, then keeping together a bloc like this for a full term of office has been the failed dream of every politico/consultant/whathaveya of the last thirty years. Identity-politics pandering constantly works to pit one against the other until it unravels. Too many grudges held tightly still. (Oh, look, Benny begins center stage again, that always turns out so well…)

    Most everybody in the class you sneer at’s been around long enough, through enough cycles of hope and disillusionment, to have got burned trying more than once. Right now they’re on one of the six sides, and are keeping their heads down waiting to see what part of the new McGinn machine proves to have legs.

    I don’t think they wish McGinn ill. They just doubt both his ability to pull it off and his sincerity in trying. In the meantime, it’s fun to watch another honeymoon for another hero.

    Again, thanks for covering it.

  • gloomy gus

    Thanks so much for covering this!

    none of the leaders from the consultant/political class that has been running this town for years showed

    I can’t bring myself to blame them – most have been around long enough to have get burned in the internecine spats that have always ruled the voting blocs currently giving McGinn the benefit of the doubt. Yeah, McGinn united them as an electoral bloc for the purposes of winning his mayoralty, but don’t kid yourself about the difficulty he may have keeping it together.

    Stitching, then keeping together a bloc like this for a full term of office has been the failed dream of every politico/consultant/whathaveya of the last thirty years. Identity-politics pandering constantly works to pit one against the other until it unravels. Too many grudges held tightly still. (Oh, look, Benny begins center stage again, that always turns out so well…)

    Most everybody in the class you sneer at’s been around long enough, through enough cycles of hope and disillusionment, to have got burned trying more than once. Right now they’re on one of the six sides, and are keeping their heads down waiting to see what part of the new McGinn machine proves to have legs.

    I don’t think they wish McGinn ill. They just doubt both his ability to pull it off and his sincerity in trying. In the meantime, it’s fun to watch another honeymoon for another hero.

    Again, thanks for covering it.

  • Ummm

    @8…the party was open to the public…no one was invited

  • Ummm

    @8…the party was open to the public…no one was invited

  • Ummm

    @8…the party was open to the public…no one was invited

  • Ummm

    @8…the party was open to the public…no one was invited

  • Ummm

    @8…the party was open to the public…no one was invited

  • Ummm

    @8…the party was open to the public…no one was invited

  • Ummm

    @8…the party was open to the public…no one was invited

  • West Seattle Waiter

    The reason why you didn’t see any of the usual suspects is that they see a sinking ship when they see it. He has unfavorable numbers north of 60% and is an accidental mayor.

    And the nickname of “Mayor Moonbeam” is the phrase that most of the public is starting to call him. The IPhone debacle is something real people talk about.

    Do you really think Patty Murray running for re-election or any other person on the ballot in 2010 would want to be pictured next to him?

  • West Seattle Waiter

    The reason why you didn’t see any of the usual suspects is that they see a sinking ship when they see it. He has unfavorable numbers north of 60% and is an accidental mayor.

    And the nickname of “Mayor Moonbeam” is the phrase that most of the public is starting to call him. The IPhone debacle is something real people talk about.

    Do you really think Patty Murray running for re-election or any other person on the ballot in 2010 would want to be pictured next to him?

  • West Seattle Waiter

    The reason why you didn’t see any of the usual suspects is that they see a sinking ship when they see it. He has unfavorable numbers north of 60% and is an accidental mayor.

    And the nickname of “Mayor Moonbeam” is the phrase that most of the public is starting to call him. The IPhone debacle is something real people talk about.

    Do you really think Patty Murray running for re-election or any other person on the ballot in 2010 would want to be pictured next to him?

  • West Seattle Waiter

    The reason why you didn’t see any of the usual suspects is that they see a sinking ship when they see it. He has unfavorable numbers north of 60% and is an accidental mayor.

    And the nickname of “Mayor Moonbeam” is the phrase that most of the public is starting to call him. The IPhone debacle is something real people talk about.

    Do you really think Patty Murray running for re-election or any other person on the ballot in 2010 would want to be pictured next to him?

  • West Seattle Waiter

    The reason why you didn’t see any of the usual suspects is that they see a sinking ship when they see it. He has unfavorable numbers north of 60% and is an accidental mayor.

    And the nickname of “Mayor Moonbeam” is the phrase that most of the public is starting to call him. The IPhone debacle is something real people talk about.

    Do you really think Patty Murray running for re-election or any other person on the ballot in 2010 would want to be pictured next to him?

  • West Seattle Waiter

    The reason why you didn’t see any of the usual suspects is that they see a sinking ship when they see it. He has unfavorable numbers north of 60% and is an accidental mayor.

    And the nickname of “Mayor Moonbeam” is the phrase that most of the public is starting to call him. The IPhone debacle is something real people talk about.

    Do you really think Patty Murray running for re-election or any other person on the ballot in 2010 would want to be pictured next to him?

  • West Seattle Waiter

    The reason why you didn’t see any of the usual suspects is that they see a sinking ship when they see it. He has unfavorable numbers north of 60% and is an accidental mayor.

    And the nickname of “Mayor Moonbeam” is the phrase that most of the public is starting to call him. The IPhone debacle is something real people talk about.

    Do you really think Patty Murray running for re-election or any other person on the ballot in 2010 would want to be pictured next to him?

  • SpokaneJohnson

    Watching from the other side of the state, I can only say, “Wish I’d been at the party, best of luck Mr. McGinn, and unity, people, unity”.

  • SpokaneJohnson

    Watching from the other side of the state, I can only say, “Wish I’d been at the party, best of luck Mr. McGinn, and unity, people, unity”.

  • SpokaneJohnson

    Watching from the other side of the state, I can only say, “Wish I’d been at the party, best of luck Mr. McGinn, and unity, people, unity”.

  • SpokaneJohnson

    Watching from the other side of the state, I can only say, “Wish I’d been at the party, best of luck Mr. McGinn, and unity, people, unity”.

  • SpokaneJohnson

    Watching from the other side of the state, I can only say, “Wish I’d been at the party, best of luck Mr. McGinn, and unity, people, unity”.

  • SpokaneJohnson

    Watching from the other side of the state, I can only say, “Wish I’d been at the party, best of luck Mr. McGinn, and unity, people, unity”.

  • SpokaneJohnson

    Watching from the other side of the state, I can only say, “Wish I’d been at the party, best of luck Mr. McGinn, and unity, people, unity”.

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    Ivan @1,

    On thing that complicates your “urbanist cult” read on McGinn is this: That movement is supposed to be a white bourgeois movement that alienates minority blocs like the ones that came out in force last night at New Holly.

    Last night’s crowd shows that—at least in his campaign—McGinn has done a good job connecting and inspiring groups that have traditionally had trouble getting a footing in Seattle politics.

    And @13. Right you are. Or, another way to say it, everyone was invited.

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    Ivan @1,

    On thing that complicates your “urbanist cult” read on McGinn is this: That movement is supposed to be a white bourgeois movement that alienates minority blocs like the ones that came out in force last night at New Holly.

    Last night’s crowd shows that—at least in his campaign—McGinn has done a good job connecting and inspiring groups that have traditionally had trouble getting a footing in Seattle politics.

    And @13. Right you are. Or, another way to say it, everyone was invited.

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    Ivan @1,

    On thing that complicates your “urbanist cult” read on McGinn is this: That movement is supposed to be a white bourgeois movement that alienates minority blocs like the ones that came out in force last night at New Holly.

    Last night’s crowd shows that—at least in his campaign—McGinn has done a good job connecting and inspiring groups that have traditionally had trouble getting a footing in Seattle politics.

    And @13. Right you are. Or, another way to say it, everyone was invited.

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    Ivan @1,

    On thing that complicates your “urbanist cult” read on McGinn is this: That movement is supposed to be a white bourgeois movement that alienates minority blocs like the ones that came out in force last night at New Holly.

    Last night’s crowd shows that—at least in his campaign—McGinn has done a good job connecting and inspiring groups that have traditionally had trouble getting a footing in Seattle politics.

    And @13. Right you are. Or, another way to say it, everyone was invited.

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    Ivan @1,

    On thing that complicates your “urbanist cult” read on McGinn is this: That movement is supposed to be a white bourgeois movement that alienates minority blocs like the ones that came out in force last night at New Holly.

    Last night’s crowd shows that—at least in his campaign—McGinn has done a good job connecting and inspiring groups that have traditionally had trouble getting a footing in Seattle politics.

    And @13. Right you are. Or, another way to say it, everyone was invited.

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    Ivan @1,

    On thing that complicates your “urbanist cult” read on McGinn is this: That movement is supposed to be a white bourgeois movement that alienates minority blocs like the ones that came out in force last night at New Holly.

    Last night’s crowd shows that—at least in his campaign—McGinn has done a good job connecting and inspiring groups that have traditionally had trouble getting a footing in Seattle politics.

    And @13. Right you are. Or, another way to say it, everyone was invited.

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    Ivan @1,

    On thing that complicates your “urbanist cult” read on McGinn is this: That movement is supposed to be a white bourgeois movement that alienates minority blocs like the ones that came out in force last night at New Holly.

    Last night’s crowd shows that—at least in his campaign—McGinn has done a good job connecting and inspiring groups that have traditionally had trouble getting a footing in Seattle politics.

    And @13. Right you are. Or, another way to say it, everyone was invited.

  • Crumb

    @16 For the record, most urbanists – real urbanists (not silly futurists) – see McGinn as a naive dilettante with little understanding of what that word really means.

  • Crumb

    @16 For the record, most urbanists – real urbanists (not silly futurists) – see McGinn as a naive dilettante with little understanding of what that word really means.

  • Crumb

    @16 For the record, most urbanists – real urbanists (not silly futurists) – see McGinn as a naive dilettante with little understanding of what that word really means.

  • Crumb

    @16 For the record, most urbanists – real urbanists (not silly futurists) – see McGinn as a naive dilettante with little understanding of what that word really means.

  • Crumb

    @16 For the record, most urbanists – real urbanists (not silly futurists) – see McGinn as a naive dilettante with little understanding of what that word really means.

  • Crumb

    @16 For the record, most urbanists – real urbanists (not silly futurists) – see McGinn as a naive dilettante with little understanding of what that word really means.

  • Crumb

    @16 For the record, most urbanists – real urbanists (not silly futurists) – see McGinn as a naive dilettante with little understanding of what that word really means.

  • sarah68

    @14: “Most of the public” — do you know most of the public? The term moonbeam is stolen from former CA Gov. Jerry Brown’s nickname — I doubt if most of the public remember that. McGinn will be an accidental mayor due to the same reason that Nickels and Mallahan will be accidental nonmayors: a very non-accidental public vote. McGinn’s going to be mayor for the next 4 years but he hasn’t even taken office yet. Why don’t you wait to complain until you have something actual to complain about?

    And why would Patty Murray come to a mayor’s victory party anyway? I think she’s busy in DC.

  • sarah68

    @14: “Most of the public” — do you know most of the public? The term moonbeam is stolen from former CA Gov. Jerry Brown’s nickname — I doubt if most of the public remember that. McGinn will be an accidental mayor due to the same reason that Nickels and Mallahan will be accidental nonmayors: a very non-accidental public vote. McGinn’s going to be mayor for the next 4 years but he hasn’t even taken office yet. Why don’t you wait to complain until you have something actual to complain about?

    And why would Patty Murray come to a mayor’s victory party anyway? I think she’s busy in DC.

  • sarah68

    @14: “Most of the public” — do you know most of the public? The term moonbeam is stolen from former CA Gov. Jerry Brown’s nickname — I doubt if most of the public remember that. McGinn will be an accidental mayor due to the same reason that Nickels and Mallahan will be accidental nonmayors: a very non-accidental public vote. McGinn’s going to be mayor for the next 4 years but he hasn’t even taken office yet. Why don’t you wait to complain until you have something actual to complain about?

    And why would Patty Murray come to a mayor’s victory party anyway? I think she’s busy in DC.

  • sarah68

    @14: “Most of the public” — do you know most of the public? The term moonbeam is stolen from former CA Gov. Jerry Brown’s nickname — I doubt if most of the public remember that. McGinn will be an accidental mayor due to the same reason that Nickels and Mallahan will be accidental nonmayors: a very non-accidental public vote. McGinn’s going to be mayor for the next 4 years but he hasn’t even taken office yet. Why don’t you wait to complain until you have something actual to complain about?

    And why would Patty Murray come to a mayor’s victory party anyway? I think she’s busy in DC.

  • sarah68

    @14: “Most of the public” — do you know most of the public? The term moonbeam is stolen from former CA Gov. Jerry Brown’s nickname — I doubt if most of the public remember that. McGinn will be an accidental mayor due to the same reason that Nickels and Mallahan will be accidental nonmayors: a very non-accidental public vote. McGinn’s going to be mayor for the next 4 years but he hasn’t even taken office yet. Why don’t you wait to complain until you have something actual to complain about?

    And why would Patty Murray come to a mayor’s victory party anyway? I think she’s busy in DC.

  • sarah68

    @14: “Most of the public” — do you know most of the public? The term moonbeam is stolen from former CA Gov. Jerry Brown’s nickname — I doubt if most of the public remember that. McGinn will be an accidental mayor due to the same reason that Nickels and Mallahan will be accidental nonmayors: a very non-accidental public vote. McGinn’s going to be mayor for the next 4 years but he hasn’t even taken office yet. Why don’t you wait to complain until you have something actual to complain about?

    And why would Patty Murray come to a mayor’s victory party anyway? I think she’s busy in DC.

  • sarah68

    @14: “Most of the public” — do you know most of the public? The term moonbeam is stolen from former CA Gov. Jerry Brown’s nickname — I doubt if most of the public remember that. McGinn will be an accidental mayor due to the same reason that Nickels and Mallahan will be accidental nonmayors: a very non-accidental public vote. McGinn’s going to be mayor for the next 4 years but he hasn’t even taken office yet. Why don’t you wait to complain until you have something actual to complain about?

    And why would Patty Murray come to a mayor’s victory party anyway? I think she’s busy in DC.

  • Jane

    @18 Did city council members come? Current Mayor?

    @13 Who besides McGinn pals would know?

  • Jane

    @18 Did city council members come? Current Mayor?

    @13 Who besides McGinn pals would know?

  • Jane

    @18 Did city council members come? Current Mayor?

    @13 Who besides McGinn pals would know?

  • Jane

    @18 Did city council members come? Current Mayor?

    @13 Who besides McGinn pals would know?

  • Jane

    @18 Did city council members come? Current Mayor?

    @13 Who besides McGinn pals would know?

  • Jane

    @18 Did city council members come? Current Mayor?

    @13 Who besides McGinn pals would know?

  • Jane

    @18 Did city council members come? Current Mayor?

    @13 Who besides McGinn pals would know?

  • Jane

    @18 Did city council members come? Current Mayor?

    @13 Who besides McGinn pals would know?

  • Jane

    @18 Did city council members come? Current Mayor?

    @13 Who besides McGinn pals would know?

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @19,

    I did not see any current City Council Members, nor Mayor Nickels.

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @19,

    I did not see any current City Council Members, nor Mayor Nickels.

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @19,

    I did not see any current City Council Members, nor Mayor Nickels.

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @19,

    I did not see any current City Council Members, nor Mayor Nickels.

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @19,

    I did not see any current City Council Members, nor Mayor Nickels.

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @19,

    I did not see any current City Council Members, nor Mayor Nickels.

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @19,

    I did not see any current City Council Members, nor Mayor Nickels.

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @19,

    I did not see any current City Council Members, nor Mayor Nickels.

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @19,

    I did not see any current City Council Members, nor Mayor Nickels.

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @19,

    I did not see any current City Council Members, nor Mayor Nickels.

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @19,

    I did not see any current City Council Members, nor Mayor Nickels.

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @19,

    I did not see any current City Council Members, nor Mayor Nickels.

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @19,

    I did not see any current City Council Members, nor Mayor Nickels.

  • sarah68

    It could be viewed as a celebration for McGinn supporters, not something the whole city was expected to be interested in, and not an example of a boycott by the establishment. They’ll come in later and probably already have outside public view.

  • sarah68

    It could be viewed as a celebration for McGinn supporters, not something the whole city was expected to be interested in, and not an example of a boycott by the establishment. They’ll come in later and probably already have outside public view.

  • sarah68

    It could be viewed as a celebration for McGinn supporters, not something the whole city was expected to be interested in, and not an example of a boycott by the establishment. They’ll come in later and probably already have outside public view.

  • sarah68

    It could be viewed as a celebration for McGinn supporters, not something the whole city was expected to be interested in, and not an example of a boycott by the establishment. They’ll come in later and probably already have outside public view.

  • sarah68

    It could be viewed as a celebration for McGinn supporters, not something the whole city was expected to be interested in, and not an example of a boycott by the establishment. They’ll come in later and probably already have outside public view.

  • sarah68

    It could be viewed as a celebration for McGinn supporters, not something the whole city was expected to be interested in, and not an example of a boycott by the establishment. They’ll come in later and probably already have outside public view.

  • sarah68

    It could be viewed as a celebration for McGinn supporters, not something the whole city was expected to be interested in, and not an example of a boycott by the establishment. They’ll come in later and probably already have outside public view.

  • sarah68

    It could be viewed as a celebration for McGinn supporters, not something the whole city was expected to be interested in, and not an example of a boycott by the establishment. They’ll come in later and probably already have outside public view.

  • sarah68

    It could be viewed as a celebration for McGinn supporters, not something the whole city was expected to be interested in, and not an example of a boycott by the establishment. They’ll come in later and probably already have outside public view.

  • sarah68

    It could be viewed as a celebration for McGinn supporters, not something the whole city was expected to be interested in, and not an example of a boycott by the establishment. They’ll come in later and probably already have outside public view.

  • sarah68

    It could be viewed as a celebration for McGinn supporters, not something the whole city was expected to be interested in, and not an example of a boycott by the establishment. They’ll come in later and probably already have outside public view.

  • sarah68

    It could be viewed as a celebration for McGinn supporters, not something the whole city was expected to be interested in, and not an example of a boycott by the establishment. They’ll come in later and probably already have outside public view.

  • sarah68

    It could be viewed as a celebration for McGinn supporters, not something the whole city was expected to be interested in, and not an example of a boycott by the establishment. They’ll come in later and probably already have outside public view.

  • sarah68

    It could be viewed as a celebration for McGinn supporters, not something the whole city was expected to be interested in, and not an example of a boycott by the establishment. They’ll come in later and probably already have outside public view.

  • Dean Nielsen

    As someone who sometimes is part of that “class” of people, I actually had tickets to Taj Mahal last night.

    I would have loved to enjoy the party. It sounds like a good time. As a product of the Seattle public schools, I wish Mayor McGinn the best – his success will only make us a better place. And, if I can help in any small way, I’d love to do it.

  • Dean Nielsen

    As someone who sometimes is part of that “class” of people, I actually had tickets to Taj Mahal last night.

    I would have loved to enjoy the party. It sounds like a good time. As a product of the Seattle public schools, I wish Mayor McGinn the best – his success will only make us a better place. And, if I can help in any small way, I’d love to do it.

  • Dean Nielsen

    As someone who sometimes is part of that “class” of people, I actually had tickets to Taj Mahal last night.

    I would have loved to enjoy the party. It sounds like a good time. As a product of the Seattle public schools, I wish Mayor McGinn the best – his success will only make us a better place. And, if I can help in any small way, I’d love to do it.

  • Dean Nielsen

    As someone who sometimes is part of that “class” of people, I actually had tickets to Taj Mahal last night.

    I would have loved to enjoy the party. It sounds like a good time. As a product of the Seattle public schools, I wish Mayor McGinn the best – his success will only make us a better place. And, if I can help in any small way, I’d love to do it.

  • Dean Nielsen

    As someone who sometimes is part of that “class” of people, I actually had tickets to Taj Mahal last night.

    I would have loved to enjoy the party. It sounds like a good time. As a product of the Seattle public schools, I wish Mayor McGinn the best – his success will only make us a better place. And, if I can help in any small way, I’d love to do it.

  • Dean Nielsen

    As someone who sometimes is part of that “class” of people, I actually had tickets to Taj Mahal last night.

    I would have loved to enjoy the party. It sounds like a good time. As a product of the Seattle public schools, I wish Mayor McGinn the best – his success will only make us a better place. And, if I can help in any small way, I’d love to do it.

  • Dean Nielsen

    As someone who sometimes is part of that “class” of people, I actually had tickets to Taj Mahal last night.

    I would have loved to enjoy the party. It sounds like a good time. As a product of the Seattle public schools, I wish Mayor McGinn the best – his success will only make us a better place. And, if I can help in any small way, I’d love to do it.

  • Dean Nielsen

    As someone who sometimes is part of that “class” of people, I actually had tickets to Taj Mahal last night.

    I would have loved to enjoy the party. It sounds like a good time. As a product of the Seattle public schools, I wish Mayor McGinn the best – his success will only make us a better place. And, if I can help in any small way, I’d love to do it.

  • Dean Nielsen

    As someone who sometimes is part of that “class” of people, I actually had tickets to Taj Mahal last night.

    I would have loved to enjoy the party. It sounds like a good time. As a product of the Seattle public schools, I wish Mayor McGinn the best – his success will only make us a better place. And, if I can help in any small way, I’d love to do it.

  • Dean Nielsen

    As someone who sometimes is part of that “class” of people, I actually had tickets to Taj Mahal last night.

    I would have loved to enjoy the party. It sounds like a good time. As a product of the Seattle public schools, I wish Mayor McGinn the best – his success will only make us a better place. And, if I can help in any small way, I’d love to do it.

  • Dean Nielsen

    As someone who sometimes is part of that “class” of people, I actually had tickets to Taj Mahal last night.

    I would have loved to enjoy the party. It sounds like a good time. As a product of the Seattle public schools, I wish Mayor McGinn the best – his success will only make us a better place. And, if I can help in any small way, I’d love to do it.

  • Dean Nielsen

    As someone who sometimes is part of that “class” of people, I actually had tickets to Taj Mahal last night.

    I would have loved to enjoy the party. It sounds like a good time. As a product of the Seattle public schools, I wish Mayor McGinn the best – his success will only make us a better place. And, if I can help in any small way, I’d love to do it.

  • Dean Nielsen

    As someone who sometimes is part of that “class” of people, I actually had tickets to Taj Mahal last night.

    I would have loved to enjoy the party. It sounds like a good time. As a product of the Seattle public schools, I wish Mayor McGinn the best – his success will only make us a better place. And, if I can help in any small way, I’d love to do it.

  • Dean Nielsen

    As someone who sometimes is part of that “class” of people, I actually had tickets to Taj Mahal last night.

    I would have loved to enjoy the party. It sounds like a good time. As a product of the Seattle public schools, I wish Mayor McGinn the best – his success will only make us a better place. And, if I can help in any small way, I’d love to do it.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    And none of the leaders from the consultant/political class that has been running this town for years showed. None of them.

    Before any of you strain a shoulder patting yourselves on the back for subverting any dominant paradigms, here’s a novel idea as to why:

    They probably weren’t invited!

    People aren’t psychic and politicians don’t crash parties they’re not invited to.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    And none of the leaders from the consultant/political class that has been running this town for years showed. None of them.

    Before any of you strain a shoulder patting yourselves on the back for subverting any dominant paradigms, here’s a novel idea as to why:

    They probably weren’t invited!

    People aren’t psychic and politicians don’t crash parties they’re not invited to.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    And none of the leaders from the consultant/political class that has been running this town for years showed. None of them.

    Before any of you strain a shoulder patting yourselves on the back for subverting any dominant paradigms, here’s a novel idea as to why:

    They probably weren’t invited!

    People aren’t psychic and politicians don’t crash parties they’re not invited to.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    And none of the leaders from the consultant/political class that has been running this town for years showed. None of them.

    Before any of you strain a shoulder patting yourselves on the back for subverting any dominant paradigms, here’s a novel idea as to why:

    They probably weren’t invited!

    People aren’t psychic and politicians don’t crash parties they’re not invited to.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    And none of the leaders from the consultant/political class that has been running this town for years showed. None of them.

    Before any of you strain a shoulder patting yourselves on the back for subverting any dominant paradigms, here’s a novel idea as to why:

    They probably weren’t invited!

    People aren’t psychic and politicians don’t crash parties they’re not invited to.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    And none of the leaders from the consultant/political class that has been running this town for years showed. None of them.

    Before any of you strain a shoulder patting yourselves on the back for subverting any dominant paradigms, here’s a novel idea as to why:

    They probably weren’t invited!

    People aren’t psychic and politicians don’t crash parties they’re not invited to.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    And none of the leaders from the consultant/political class that has been running this town for years showed. None of them.

    Before any of you strain a shoulder patting yourselves on the back for subverting any dominant paradigms, here’s a novel idea as to why:

    They probably weren’t invited!

    People aren’t psychic and politicians don’t crash parties they’re not invited to.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    And none of the leaders from the consultant/political class that has been running this town for years showed. None of them.

    Before any of you strain a shoulder patting yourselves on the back for subverting any dominant paradigms, here’s a novel idea as to why:

    They probably weren’t invited!

    People aren’t psychic and politicians don’t crash parties they’re not invited to.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    And none of the leaders from the consultant/political class that has been running this town for years showed. None of them.

    Before any of you strain a shoulder patting yourselves on the back for subverting any dominant paradigms, here’s a novel idea as to why:

    They probably weren’t invited!

    People aren’t psychic and politicians don’t crash parties they’re not invited to.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    And none of the leaders from the consultant/political class that has been running this town for years showed. None of them.

    Before any of you strain a shoulder patting yourselves on the back for subverting any dominant paradigms, here’s a novel idea as to why:

    They probably weren’t invited!

    People aren’t psychic and politicians don’t crash parties they’re not invited to.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    And none of the leaders from the consultant/political class that has been running this town for years showed. None of them.

    Before any of you strain a shoulder patting yourselves on the back for subverting any dominant paradigms, here’s a novel idea as to why:

    They probably weren’t invited!

    People aren’t psychic and politicians don’t crash parties they’re not invited to.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    And none of the leaders from the consultant/political class that has been running this town for years showed. None of them.

    Before any of you strain a shoulder patting yourselves on the back for subverting any dominant paradigms, here’s a novel idea as to why:

    They probably weren’t invited!

    People aren’t psychic and politicians don’t crash parties they’re not invited to.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    And none of the leaders from the consultant/political class that has been running this town for years showed. None of them.

    Before any of you strain a shoulder patting yourselves on the back for subverting any dominant paradigms, here’s a novel idea as to why:

    They probably weren’t invited!

    People aren’t psychic and politicians don’t crash parties they’re not invited to.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    And none of the leaders from the consultant/political class that has been running this town for years showed. None of them.

    Before any of you strain a shoulder patting yourselves on the back for subverting any dominant paradigms, here’s a novel idea as to why:

    They probably weren’t invited!

    People aren’t psychic and politicians don’t crash parties they’re not invited to.

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @23,

    No invites. It was open to the public. There were 500 people there, at least.

    And even if it had been limited to just McGinn supporters… I’d be making the same conclusion: McGinn doesn’t seem to have any supporters among the insider class.

    Compare the McGinn event (open to the public) and the Constantine event (open to the public) and look who showed.

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @23,

    No invites. It was open to the public. There were 500 people there, at least.

    And even if it had been limited to just McGinn supporters… I’d be making the same conclusion: McGinn doesn’t seem to have any supporters among the insider class.

    Compare the McGinn event (open to the public) and the Constantine event (open to the public) and look who showed.

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @23,

    No invites. It was open to the public. There were 500 people there, at least.

    And even if it had been limited to just McGinn supporters… I’d be making the same conclusion: McGinn doesn’t seem to have any supporters among the insider class.

    Compare the McGinn event (open to the public) and the Constantine event (open to the public) and look who showed.

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @23,

    No invites. It was open to the public. There were 500 people there, at least.

    And even if it had been limited to just McGinn supporters… I’d be making the same conclusion: McGinn doesn’t seem to have any supporters among the insider class.

    Compare the McGinn event (open to the public) and the Constantine event (open to the public) and look who showed.

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @23,

    No invites. It was open to the public. There were 500 people there, at least.

    And even if it had been limited to just McGinn supporters… I’d be making the same conclusion: McGinn doesn’t seem to have any supporters among the insider class.

    Compare the McGinn event (open to the public) and the Constantine event (open to the public) and look who showed.

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @23,

    No invites. It was open to the public. There were 500 people there, at least.

    And even if it had been limited to just McGinn supporters… I’d be making the same conclusion: McGinn doesn’t seem to have any supporters among the insider class.

    Compare the McGinn event (open to the public) and the Constantine event (open to the public) and look who showed.

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @23,

    No invites. It was open to the public. There were 500 people there, at least.

    And even if it had been limited to just McGinn supporters… I’d be making the same conclusion: McGinn doesn’t seem to have any supporters among the insider class.

    Compare the McGinn event (open to the public) and the Constantine event (open to the public) and look who showed.

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @23,

    No invites. It was open to the public. There were 500 people there, at least.

    And even if it had been limited to just McGinn supporters… I’d be making the same conclusion: McGinn doesn’t seem to have any supporters among the insider class.

    Compare the McGinn event (open to the public) and the Constantine event (open to the public) and look who showed.

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @23,

    No invites. It was open to the public. There were 500 people there, at least.

    And even if it had been limited to just McGinn supporters… I’d be making the same conclusion: McGinn doesn’t seem to have any supporters among the insider class.

    Compare the McGinn event (open to the public) and the Constantine event (open to the public) and look who showed.

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @23,

    No invites. It was open to the public. There were 500 people there, at least.

    And even if it had been limited to just McGinn supporters… I’d be making the same conclusion: McGinn doesn’t seem to have any supporters among the insider class.

    Compare the McGinn event (open to the public) and the Constantine event (open to the public) and look who showed.

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @23,

    No invites. It was open to the public. There were 500 people there, at least.

    And even if it had been limited to just McGinn supporters… I’d be making the same conclusion: McGinn doesn’t seem to have any supporters among the insider class.

    Compare the McGinn event (open to the public) and the Constantine event (open to the public) and look who showed.

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @23,

    No invites. It was open to the public. There were 500 people there, at least.

    And even if it had been limited to just McGinn supporters… I’d be making the same conclusion: McGinn doesn’t seem to have any supporters among the insider class.

    Compare the McGinn event (open to the public) and the Constantine event (open to the public) and look who showed.

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @23,

    No invites. It was open to the public. There were 500 people there, at least.

    And even if it had been limited to just McGinn supporters… I’d be making the same conclusion: McGinn doesn’t seem to have any supporters among the insider class.

    Compare the McGinn event (open to the public) and the Constantine event (open to the public) and look who showed.

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @23,

    No invites. It was open to the public. There were 500 people there, at least.

    And even if it had been limited to just McGinn supporters… I’d be making the same conclusion: McGinn doesn’t seem to have any supporters among the insider class.

    Compare the McGinn event (open to the public) and the Constantine event (open to the public) and look who showed.

  • ratcityreprobate

    Yesterday’s Publicola

    “Profound and Accessible by Chris K., 11/20/2009, 3:07 PM
    “1. The Mike McGinn victory party is tonight in Southeast Seattle. I went to McGinn’s election night party at the War Room, and it was surprisingly fun. My conclusion: Team McGinn knows how to party.
    “The McGinn campaign would also like you to know that meeting is easily accessible by light rail (Othello station) and bus (the 106).
    “7 pm at the New Holly Gathering Hall, 7054 32nd Ave South.”

    From the Rainier Valley Post November 17, 2009
    “McGinn’s Having a Party & We’re All Invited!
    “November 17, 2009

    “From the McGinn for Mayor campaign:
    “Thank you for your support! This victory wouldn’t have been possible without the energy and spirit that you brought to the campaign.
    “As our way of saying thanks, please join the McGinn for Mayor campaign at our victory party this Friday, November 20th at 7:00pm at the New Holly Gathering Hall. The address is 7054 32nd Ave South, and it’s easily accessible by light rail and bus (you can use King County’s excellent Trip Planner to get door-to-door directions). The Gathering Hall is located in the Family Building at New Holly.
    “We’ll look forward to seeing as many of you there as possible–here’s to celebrating each other and the future of our city!”

    If your primary source of news is the Seattle Times you probably didn’t know about this party, but many of us did, even folks with no connection to the McGinn campaign. Don’t confuse your being uninformed with being uninvited.

  • ratcityreprobate

    Yesterday’s Publicola

    “Profound and Accessible by Chris K., 11/20/2009, 3:07 PM
    “1. The Mike McGinn victory party is tonight in Southeast Seattle. I went to McGinn’s election night party at the War Room, and it was surprisingly fun. My conclusion: Team McGinn knows how to party.
    “The McGinn campaign would also like you to know that meeting is easily accessible by light rail (Othello station) and bus (the 106).
    “7 pm at the New Holly Gathering Hall, 7054 32nd Ave South.”

    From the Rainier Valley Post November 17, 2009
    “McGinn’s Having a Party & We’re All Invited!
    “November 17, 2009

    “From the McGinn for Mayor campaign:
    “Thank you for your support! This victory wouldn’t have been possible without the energy and spirit that you brought to the campaign.
    “As our way of saying thanks, please join the McGinn for Mayor campaign at our victory party this Friday, November 20th at 7:00pm at the New Holly Gathering Hall. The address is 7054 32nd Ave South, and it’s easily accessible by light rail and bus (you can use King County’s excellent Trip Planner to get door-to-door directions). The Gathering Hall is located in the Family Building at New Holly.
    “We’ll look forward to seeing as many of you there as possible–here’s to celebrating each other and the future of our city!”

    If your primary source of news is the Seattle Times you probably didn’t know about this party, but many of us did, even folks with no connection to the McGinn campaign. Don’t confuse your being uninformed with being uninvited.

  • ratcityreprobate

    Yesterday’s Publicola

    “Profound and Accessible by Chris K., 11/20/2009, 3:07 PM
    “1. The Mike McGinn victory party is tonight in Southeast Seattle. I went to McGinn’s election night party at the War Room, and it was surprisingly fun. My conclusion: Team McGinn knows how to party.
    “The McGinn campaign would also like you to know that meeting is easily accessible by light rail (Othello station) and bus (the 106).
    “7 pm at the New Holly Gathering Hall, 7054 32nd Ave South.”

    From the Rainier Valley Post November 17, 2009
    “McGinn’s Having a Party & We’re All Invited!
    “November 17, 2009

    “From the McGinn for Mayor campaign:
    “Thank you for your support! This victory wouldn’t have been possible without the energy and spirit that you brought to the campaign.
    “As our way of saying thanks, please join the McGinn for Mayor campaign at our victory party this Friday, November 20th at 7:00pm at the New Holly Gathering Hall. The address is 7054 32nd Ave South, and it’s easily accessible by light rail and bus (you can use King County’s excellent Trip Planner to get door-to-door directions). The Gathering Hall is located in the Family Building at New Holly.
    “We’ll look forward to seeing as many of you there as possible–here’s to celebrating each other and the future of our city!”

    If your primary source of news is the Seattle Times you probably didn’t know about this party, but many of us did, even folks with no connection to the McGinn campaign. Don’t confuse your being uninformed with being uninvited.

  • ratcityreprobate

    Yesterday’s Publicola

    “Profound and Accessible by Chris K., 11/20/2009, 3:07 PM
    “1. The Mike McGinn victory party is tonight in Southeast Seattle. I went to McGinn’s election night party at the War Room, and it was surprisingly fun. My conclusion: Team McGinn knows how to party.
    “The McGinn campaign would also like you to know that meeting is easily accessible by light rail (Othello station) and bus (the 106).
    “7 pm at the New Holly Gathering Hall, 7054 32nd Ave South.”

    From the Rainier Valley Post November 17, 2009
    “McGinn’s Having a Party & We’re All Invited!
    “November 17, 2009

    “From the McGinn for Mayor campaign:
    “Thank you for your support! This victory wouldn’t have been possible without the energy and spirit that you brought to the campaign.
    “As our way of saying thanks, please join the McGinn for Mayor campaign at our victory party this Friday, November 20th at 7:00pm at the New Holly Gathering Hall. The address is 7054 32nd Ave South, and it’s easily accessible by light rail and bus (you can use King County’s excellent Trip Planner to get door-to-door directions). The Gathering Hall is located in the Family Building at New Holly.
    “We’ll look forward to seeing as many of you there as possible–here’s to celebrating each other and the future of our city!”

    If your primary source of news is the Seattle Times you probably didn’t know about this party, but many of us did, even folks with no connection to the McGinn campaign. Don’t confuse your being uninformed with being uninvited.

  • ratcityreprobate

    Yesterday’s Publicola

    “Profound and Accessible by Chris K., 11/20/2009, 3:07 PM
    “1. The Mike McGinn victory party is tonight in Southeast Seattle. I went to McGinn’s election night party at the War Room, and it was surprisingly fun. My conclusion: Team McGinn knows how to party.
    “The McGinn campaign would also like you to know that meeting is easily accessible by light rail (Othello station) and bus (the 106).
    “7 pm at the New Holly Gathering Hall, 7054 32nd Ave South.”

    From the Rainier Valley Post November 17, 2009
    “McGinn’s Having a Party & We’re All Invited!
    “November 17, 2009

    “From the McGinn for Mayor campaign:
    “Thank you for your support! This victory wouldn’t have been possible without the energy and spirit that you brought to the campaign.
    “As our way of saying thanks, please join the McGinn for Mayor campaign at our victory party this Friday, November 20th at 7:00pm at the New Holly Gathering Hall. The address is 7054 32nd Ave South, and it’s easily accessible by light rail and bus (you can use King County’s excellent Trip Planner to get door-to-door directions). The Gathering Hall is located in the Family Building at New Holly.
    “We’ll look forward to seeing as many of you there as possible–here’s to celebrating each other and the future of our city!”

    If your primary source of news is the Seattle Times you probably didn’t know about this party, but many of us did, even folks with no connection to the McGinn campaign. Don’t confuse your being uninformed with being uninvited.

  • ratcityreprobate

    Yesterday’s Publicola

    “Profound and Accessible by Chris K., 11/20/2009, 3:07 PM
    “1. The Mike McGinn victory party is tonight in Southeast Seattle. I went to McGinn’s election night party at the War Room, and it was surprisingly fun. My conclusion: Team McGinn knows how to party.
    “The McGinn campaign would also like you to know that meeting is easily accessible by light rail (Othello station) and bus (the 106).
    “7 pm at the New Holly Gathering Hall, 7054 32nd Ave South.”

    From the Rainier Valley Post November 17, 2009
    “McGinn’s Having a Party & We’re All Invited!
    “November 17, 2009

    “From the McGinn for Mayor campaign:
    “Thank you for your support! This victory wouldn’t have been possible without the energy and spirit that you brought to the campaign.
    “As our way of saying thanks, please join the McGinn for Mayor campaign at our victory party this Friday, November 20th at 7:00pm at the New Holly Gathering Hall. The address is 7054 32nd Ave South, and it’s easily accessible by light rail and bus (you can use King County’s excellent Trip Planner to get door-to-door directions). The Gathering Hall is located in the Family Building at New Holly.
    “We’ll look forward to seeing as many of you there as possible–here’s to celebrating each other and the future of our city!”

    If your primary source of news is the Seattle Times you probably didn’t know about this party, but many of us did, even folks with no connection to the McGinn campaign. Don’t confuse your being uninformed with being uninvited.

  • ratcityreprobate

    Yesterday’s Publicola

    “Profound and Accessible by Chris K., 11/20/2009, 3:07 PM
    “1. The Mike McGinn victory party is tonight in Southeast Seattle. I went to McGinn’s election night party at the War Room, and it was surprisingly fun. My conclusion: Team McGinn knows how to party.
    “The McGinn campaign would also like you to know that meeting is easily accessible by light rail (Othello station) and bus (the 106).
    “7 pm at the New Holly Gathering Hall, 7054 32nd Ave South.”

    From the Rainier Valley Post November 17, 2009
    “McGinn’s Having a Party & We’re All Invited!
    “November 17, 2009

    “From the McGinn for Mayor campaign:
    “Thank you for your support! This victory wouldn’t have been possible without the energy and spirit that you brought to the campaign.
    “As our way of saying thanks, please join the McGinn for Mayor campaign at our victory party this Friday, November 20th at 7:00pm at the New Holly Gathering Hall. The address is 7054 32nd Ave South, and it’s easily accessible by light rail and bus (you can use King County’s excellent Trip Planner to get door-to-door directions). The Gathering Hall is located in the Family Building at New Holly.
    “We’ll look forward to seeing as many of you there as possible–here’s to celebrating each other and the future of our city!”

    If your primary source of news is the Seattle Times you probably didn’t know about this party, but many of us did, even folks with no connection to the McGinn campaign. Don’t confuse your being uninformed with being uninvited.

  • ratcityreprobate

    Yesterday’s Publicola

    “Profound and Accessible by Chris K., 11/20/2009, 3:07 PM
    “1. The Mike McGinn victory party is tonight in Southeast Seattle. I went to McGinn’s election night party at the War Room, and it was surprisingly fun. My conclusion: Team McGinn knows how to party.
    “The McGinn campaign would also like you to know that meeting is easily accessible by light rail (Othello station) and bus (the 106).
    “7 pm at the New Holly Gathering Hall, 7054 32nd Ave South.”

    From the Rainier Valley Post November 17, 2009
    “McGinn’s Having a Party & We’re All Invited!
    “November 17, 2009

    “From the McGinn for Mayor campaign:
    “Thank you for your support! This victory wouldn’t have been possible without the energy and spirit that you brought to the campaign.
    “As our way of saying thanks, please join the McGinn for Mayor campaign at our victory party this Friday, November 20th at 7:00pm at the New Holly Gathering Hall. The address is 7054 32nd Ave South, and it’s easily accessible by light rail and bus (you can use King County’s excellent Trip Planner to get door-to-door directions). The Gathering Hall is located in the Family Building at New Holly.
    “We’ll look forward to seeing as many of you there as possible–here’s to celebrating each other and the future of our city!”

    If your primary source of news is the Seattle Times you probably didn’t know about this party, but many of us did, even folks with no connection to the McGinn campaign. Don’t confuse your being uninformed with being uninvited.

  • ratcityreprobate

    Yesterday’s Publicola

    “Profound and Accessible by Chris K., 11/20/2009, 3:07 PM
    “1. The Mike McGinn victory party is tonight in Southeast Seattle. I went to McGinn’s election night party at the War Room, and it was surprisingly fun. My conclusion: Team McGinn knows how to party.
    “The McGinn campaign would also like you to know that meeting is easily accessible by light rail (Othello station) and bus (the 106).
    “7 pm at the New Holly Gathering Hall, 7054 32nd Ave South.”

    From the Rainier Valley Post November 17, 2009
    “McGinn’s Having a Party & We’re All Invited!
    “November 17, 2009

    “From the McGinn for Mayor campaign:
    “Thank you for your support! This victory wouldn’t have been possible without the energy and spirit that you brought to the campaign.
    “As our way of saying thanks, please join the McGinn for Mayor campaign at our victory party this Friday, November 20th at 7:00pm at the New Holly Gathering Hall. The address is 7054 32nd Ave South, and it’s easily accessible by light rail and bus (you can use King County’s excellent Trip Planner to get door-to-door directions). The Gathering Hall is located in the Family Building at New Holly.
    “We’ll look forward to seeing as many of you there as possible–here’s to celebrating each other and the future of our city!”

    If your primary source of news is the Seattle Times you probably didn’t know about this party, but many of us did, even folks with no connection to the McGinn campaign. Don’t confuse your being uninformed with being uninvited.

  • ratcityreprobate

    Yesterday’s Publicola

    “Profound and Accessible by Chris K., 11/20/2009, 3:07 PM
    “1. The Mike McGinn victory party is tonight in Southeast Seattle. I went to McGinn’s election night party at the War Room, and it was surprisingly fun. My conclusion: Team McGinn knows how to party.
    “The McGinn campaign would also like you to know that meeting is easily accessible by light rail (Othello station) and bus (the 106).
    “7 pm at the New Holly Gathering Hall, 7054 32nd Ave South.”

    From the Rainier Valley Post November 17, 2009
    “McGinn’s Having a Party & We’re All Invited!
    “November 17, 2009

    “From the McGinn for Mayor campaign:
    “Thank you for your support! This victory wouldn’t have been possible without the energy and spirit that you brought to the campaign.
    “As our way of saying thanks, please join the McGinn for Mayor campaign at our victory party this Friday, November 20th at 7:00pm at the New Holly Gathering Hall. The address is 7054 32nd Ave South, and it’s easily accessible by light rail and bus (you can use King County’s excellent Trip Planner to get door-to-door directions). The Gathering Hall is located in the Family Building at New Holly.
    “We’ll look forward to seeing as many of you there as possible–here’s to celebrating each other and the future of our city!”

    If your primary source of news is the Seattle Times you probably didn’t know about this party, but many of us did, even folks with no connection to the McGinn campaign. Don’t confuse your being uninformed with being uninvited.

  • ratcityreprobate

    Yesterday’s Publicola

    “Profound and Accessible by Chris K., 11/20/2009, 3:07 PM
    “1. The Mike McGinn victory party is tonight in Southeast Seattle. I went to McGinn’s election night party at the War Room, and it was surprisingly fun. My conclusion: Team McGinn knows how to party.
    “The McGinn campaign would also like you to know that meeting is easily accessible by light rail (Othello station) and bus (the 106).
    “7 pm at the New Holly Gathering Hall, 7054 32nd Ave South.”

    From the Rainier Valley Post November 17, 2009
    “McGinn’s Having a Party & We’re All Invited!
    “November 17, 2009

    “From the McGinn for Mayor campaign:
    “Thank you for your support! This victory wouldn’t have been possible without the energy and spirit that you brought to the campaign.
    “As our way of saying thanks, please join the McGinn for Mayor campaign at our victory party this Friday, November 20th at 7:00pm at the New Holly Gathering Hall. The address is 7054 32nd Ave South, and it’s easily accessible by light rail and bus (you can use King County’s excellent Trip Planner to get door-to-door directions). The Gathering Hall is located in the Family Building at New Holly.
    “We’ll look forward to seeing as many of you there as possible–here’s to celebrating each other and the future of our city!”

    If your primary source of news is the Seattle Times you probably didn’t know about this party, but many of us did, even folks with no connection to the McGinn campaign. Don’t confuse your being uninformed with being uninvited.

  • ratcityreprobate

    Yesterday’s Publicola

    “Profound and Accessible by Chris K., 11/20/2009, 3:07 PM
    “1. The Mike McGinn victory party is tonight in Southeast Seattle. I went to McGinn’s election night party at the War Room, and it was surprisingly fun. My conclusion: Team McGinn knows how to party.
    “The McGinn campaign would also like you to know that meeting is easily accessible by light rail (Othello station) and bus (the 106).
    “7 pm at the New Holly Gathering Hall, 7054 32nd Ave South.”

    From the Rainier Valley Post November 17, 2009
    “McGinn’s Having a Party & We’re All Invited!
    “November 17, 2009

    “From the McGinn for Mayor campaign:
    “Thank you for your support! This victory wouldn’t have been possible without the energy and spirit that you brought to the campaign.
    “As our way of saying thanks, please join the McGinn for Mayor campaign at our victory party this Friday, November 20th at 7:00pm at the New Holly Gathering Hall. The address is 7054 32nd Ave South, and it’s easily accessible by light rail and bus (you can use King County’s excellent Trip Planner to get door-to-door directions). The Gathering Hall is located in the Family Building at New Holly.
    “We’ll look forward to seeing as many of you there as possible–here’s to celebrating each other and the future of our city!”

    If your primary source of news is the Seattle Times you probably didn’t know about this party, but many of us did, even folks with no connection to the McGinn campaign. Don’t confuse your being uninformed with being uninvited.

  • ratcityreprobate

    Yesterday’s Publicola

    “Profound and Accessible by Chris K., 11/20/2009, 3:07 PM
    “1. The Mike McGinn victory party is tonight in Southeast Seattle. I went to McGinn’s election night party at the War Room, and it was surprisingly fun. My conclusion: Team McGinn knows how to party.
    “The McGinn campaign would also like you to know that meeting is easily accessible by light rail (Othello station) and bus (the 106).
    “7 pm at the New Holly Gathering Hall, 7054 32nd Ave South.”

    From the Rainier Valley Post November 17, 2009
    “McGinn’s Having a Party & We’re All Invited!
    “November 17, 2009

    “From the McGinn for Mayor campaign:
    “Thank you for your support! This victory wouldn’t have been possible without the energy and spirit that you brought to the campaign.
    “As our way of saying thanks, please join the McGinn for Mayor campaign at our victory party this Friday, November 20th at 7:00pm at the New Holly Gathering Hall. The address is 7054 32nd Ave South, and it’s easily accessible by light rail and bus (you can use King County’s excellent Trip Planner to get door-to-door directions). The Gathering Hall is located in the Family Building at New Holly.
    “We’ll look forward to seeing as many of you there as possible–here’s to celebrating each other and the future of our city!”

    If your primary source of news is the Seattle Times you probably didn’t know about this party, but many of us did, even folks with no connection to the McGinn campaign. Don’t confuse your being uninformed with being uninvited.

  • ratcityreprobate

    Yesterday’s Publicola

    “Profound and Accessible by Chris K., 11/20/2009, 3:07 PM
    “1. The Mike McGinn victory party is tonight in Southeast Seattle. I went to McGinn’s election night party at the War Room, and it was surprisingly fun. My conclusion: Team McGinn knows how to party.
    “The McGinn campaign would also like you to know that meeting is easily accessible by light rail (Othello station) and bus (the 106).
    “7 pm at the New Holly Gathering Hall, 7054 32nd Ave South.”

    From the Rainier Valley Post November 17, 2009
    “McGinn’s Having a Party & We’re All Invited!
    “November 17, 2009

    “From the McGinn for Mayor campaign:
    “Thank you for your support! This victory wouldn’t have been possible without the energy and spirit that you brought to the campaign.
    “As our way of saying thanks, please join the McGinn for Mayor campaign at our victory party this Friday, November 20th at 7:00pm at the New Holly Gathering Hall. The address is 7054 32nd Ave South, and it’s easily accessible by light rail and bus (you can use King County’s excellent Trip Planner to get door-to-door directions). The Gathering Hall is located in the Family Building at New Holly.
    “We’ll look forward to seeing as many of you there as possible–here’s to celebrating each other and the future of our city!”

    If your primary source of news is the Seattle Times you probably didn’t know about this party, but many of us did, even folks with no connection to the McGinn campaign. Don’t confuse your being uninformed with being uninvited.

  • ratcityreprobate

    Yesterday’s Publicola

    “Profound and Accessible by Chris K., 11/20/2009, 3:07 PM
    “1. The Mike McGinn victory party is tonight in Southeast Seattle. I went to McGinn’s election night party at the War Room, and it was surprisingly fun. My conclusion: Team McGinn knows how to party.
    “The McGinn campaign would also like you to know that meeting is easily accessible by light rail (Othello station) and bus (the 106).
    “7 pm at the New Holly Gathering Hall, 7054 32nd Ave South.”

    From the Rainier Valley Post November 17, 2009
    “McGinn’s Having a Party & We’re All Invited!
    “November 17, 2009

    “From the McGinn for Mayor campaign:
    “Thank you for your support! This victory wouldn’t have been possible without the energy and spirit that you brought to the campaign.
    “As our way of saying thanks, please join the McGinn for Mayor campaign at our victory party this Friday, November 20th at 7:00pm at the New Holly Gathering Hall. The address is 7054 32nd Ave South, and it’s easily accessible by light rail and bus (you can use King County’s excellent Trip Planner to get door-to-door directions). The Gathering Hall is located in the Family Building at New Holly.
    “We’ll look forward to seeing as many of you there as possible–here’s to celebrating each other and the future of our city!”

    If your primary source of news is the Seattle Times you probably didn’t know about this party, but many of us did, even folks with no connection to the McGinn campaign. Don’t confuse your being uninformed with being uninvited.

  • ratcityreprobate

    Yesterday’s Publicola

    “Profound and Accessible by Chris K., 11/20/2009, 3:07 PM
    “1. The Mike McGinn victory party is tonight in Southeast Seattle. I went to McGinn’s election night party at the War Room, and it was surprisingly fun. My conclusion: Team McGinn knows how to party.
    “The McGinn campaign would also like you to know that meeting is easily accessible by light rail (Othello station) and bus (the 106).
    “7 pm at the New Holly Gathering Hall, 7054 32nd Ave South.”

    From the Rainier Valley Post November 17, 2009
    “McGinn’s Having a Party & We’re All Invited!
    “November 17, 2009

    “From the McGinn for Mayor campaign:
    “Thank you for your support! This victory wouldn’t have been possible without the energy and spirit that you brought to the campaign.
    “As our way of saying thanks, please join the McGinn for Mayor campaign at our victory party this Friday, November 20th at 7:00pm at the New Holly Gathering Hall. The address is 7054 32nd Ave South, and it’s easily accessible by light rail and bus (you can use King County’s excellent Trip Planner to get door-to-door directions). The Gathering Hall is located in the Family Building at New Holly.
    “We’ll look forward to seeing as many of you there as possible–here’s to celebrating each other and the future of our city!”

    If your primary source of news is the Seattle Times you probably didn’t know about this party, but many of us did, even folks with no connection to the McGinn campaign. Don’t confuse your being uninformed with being uninvited.

  • ratcityreprobate

    Yesterday’s Publicola

    “Profound and Accessible by Chris K., 11/20/2009, 3:07 PM
    “1. The Mike McGinn victory party is tonight in Southeast Seattle. I went to McGinn’s election night party at the War Room, and it was surprisingly fun. My conclusion: Team McGinn knows how to party.
    “The McGinn campaign would also like you to know that meeting is easily accessible by light rail (Othello station) and bus (the 106).
    “7 pm at the New Holly Gathering Hall, 7054 32nd Ave South.”

    From the Rainier Valley Post November 17, 2009
    “McGinn’s Having a Party & We’re All Invited!
    “November 17, 2009

    “From the McGinn for Mayor campaign:
    “Thank you for your support! This victory wouldn’t have been possible without the energy and spirit that you brought to the campaign.
    “As our way of saying thanks, please join the McGinn for Mayor campaign at our victory party this Friday, November 20th at 7:00pm at the New Holly Gathering Hall. The address is 7054 32nd Ave South, and it’s easily accessible by light rail and bus (you can use King County’s excellent Trip Planner to get door-to-door directions). The Gathering Hall is located in the Family Building at New Holly.
    “We’ll look forward to seeing as many of you there as possible–here’s to celebrating each other and the future of our city!”

    If your primary source of news is the Seattle Times you probably didn’t know about this party, but many of us did, even folks with no connection to the McGinn campaign. Don’t confuse your being uninformed with being uninvited.

  • ratcityreprobate

    Yesterday’s Publicola

    “Profound and Accessible by Chris K., 11/20/2009, 3:07 PM
    “1. The Mike McGinn victory party is tonight in Southeast Seattle. I went to McGinn’s election night party at the War Room, and it was surprisingly fun. My conclusion: Team McGinn knows how to party.
    “The McGinn campaign would also like you to know that meeting is easily accessible by light rail (Othello station) and bus (the 106).
    “7 pm at the New Holly Gathering Hall, 7054 32nd Ave South.”

    From the Rainier Valley Post November 17, 2009
    “McGinn’s Having a Party & We’re All Invited!
    “November 17, 2009

    “From the McGinn for Mayor campaign:
    “Thank you for your support! This victory wouldn’t have been possible without the energy and spirit that you brought to the campaign.
    “As our way of saying thanks, please join the McGinn for Mayor campaign at our victory party this Friday, November 20th at 7:00pm at the New Holly Gathering Hall. The address is 7054 32nd Ave South, and it’s easily accessible by light rail and bus (you can use King County’s excellent Trip Planner to get door-to-door directions). The Gathering Hall is located in the Family Building at New Holly.
    “We’ll look forward to seeing as many of you there as possible–here’s to celebrating each other and the future of our city!”

    If your primary source of news is the Seattle Times you probably didn’t know about this party, but many of us did, even folks with no connection to the McGinn campaign. Don’t confuse your being uninformed with being uninvited.

  • ratcityreprobate

    Yesterday’s Publicola

    “Profound and Accessible by Chris K., 11/20/2009, 3:07 PM
    “1. The Mike McGinn victory party is tonight in Southeast Seattle. I went to McGinn’s election night party at the War Room, and it was surprisingly fun. My conclusion: Team McGinn knows how to party.
    “The McGinn campaign would also like you to know that meeting is easily accessible by light rail (Othello station) and bus (the 106).
    “7 pm at the New Holly Gathering Hall, 7054 32nd Ave South.”

    From the Rainier Valley Post November 17, 2009
    “McGinn’s Having a Party & We’re All Invited!
    “November 17, 2009

    “From the McGinn for Mayor campaign:
    “Thank you for your support! This victory wouldn’t have been possible without the energy and spirit that you brought to the campaign.
    “As our way of saying thanks, please join the McGinn for Mayor campaign at our victory party this Friday, November 20th at 7:00pm at the New Holly Gathering Hall. The address is 7054 32nd Ave South, and it’s easily accessible by light rail and bus (you can use King County’s excellent Trip Planner to get door-to-door directions). The Gathering Hall is located in the Family Building at New Holly.
    “We’ll look forward to seeing as many of you there as possible–here’s to celebrating each other and the future of our city!”

    If your primary source of news is the Seattle Times you probably didn’t know about this party, but many of us did, even folks with no connection to the McGinn campaign. Don’t confuse your being uninformed with being uninvited.

  • ivan

    John @ 5:

    and @1 is just pushing his own agenda, as usual.

    And that makes me different from everybody else who posts here? What’s my agenda, Mr. Smart Guy?

  • ivan

    John @ 5:

    and @1 is just pushing his own agenda, as usual.

    And that makes me different from everybody else who posts here? What’s my agenda, Mr. Smart Guy?

  • ivan

    John @ 5:

    and @1 is just pushing his own agenda, as usual.

    And that makes me different from everybody else who posts here? What’s my agenda, Mr. Smart Guy?

  • ivan

    John @ 5:

    and @1 is just pushing his own agenda, as usual.

    And that makes me different from everybody else who posts here? What’s my agenda, Mr. Smart Guy?

  • ivan

    John @ 5:

    and @1 is just pushing his own agenda, as usual.

    And that makes me different from everybody else who posts here? What’s my agenda, Mr. Smart Guy?

  • ivan

    John @ 5:

    and @1 is just pushing his own agenda, as usual.

    And that makes me different from everybody else who posts here? What’s my agenda, Mr. Smart Guy?

  • ivan

    John @ 5:

    and @1 is just pushing his own agenda, as usual.

    And that makes me different from everybody else who posts here? What’s my agenda, Mr. Smart Guy?

  • ivan

    John @ 5:

    and @1 is just pushing his own agenda, as usual.

    And that makes me different from everybody else who posts here? What’s my agenda, Mr. Smart Guy?

  • ivan

    John @ 5:

    and @1 is just pushing his own agenda, as usual.

    And that makes me different from everybody else who posts here? What’s my agenda, Mr. Smart Guy?

  • ivan

    John @ 5:

    and @1 is just pushing his own agenda, as usual.

    And that makes me different from everybody else who posts here? What’s my agenda, Mr. Smart Guy?

  • ivan

    John @ 5:

    and @1 is just pushing his own agenda, as usual.

    And that makes me different from everybody else who posts here? What’s my agenda, Mr. Smart Guy?

  • ivan

    John @ 5:

    and @1 is just pushing his own agenda, as usual.

    And that makes me different from everybody else who posts here? What’s my agenda, Mr. Smart Guy?

  • ivan

    John @ 5:

    and @1 is just pushing his own agenda, as usual.

    And that makes me different from everybody else who posts here? What’s my agenda, Mr. Smart Guy?

  • ivan

    John @ 5:

    and @1 is just pushing his own agenda, as usual.

    And that makes me different from everybody else who posts here? What’s my agenda, Mr. Smart Guy?

  • ivan

    John @ 5:

    and @1 is just pushing his own agenda, as usual.

    And that makes me different from everybody else who posts here? What’s my agenda, Mr. Smart Guy?

  • ivan

    John @ 5:

    and @1 is just pushing his own agenda, as usual.

    And that makes me different from everybody else who posts here? What’s my agenda, Mr. Smart Guy?

  • ivan

    John @ 5:

    and @1 is just pushing his own agenda, as usual.

    And that makes me different from everybody else who posts here? What’s my agenda, Mr. Smart Guy?

  • ivan

    John @ 5:

    and @1 is just pushing his own agenda, as usual.

    And that makes me different from everybody else who posts here? What’s my agenda, Mr. Smart Guy?

  • ivan

    John @ 5:

    and @1 is just pushing his own agenda, as usual.

    And that makes me different from everybody else who posts here? What’s my agenda, Mr. Smart Guy?

  • rich

    @14: Joni, it’s the weekend. Take a nap, you need it.

  • rich

    @14: Joni, it’s the weekend. Take a nap, you need it.

  • rich

    @14: Joni, it’s the weekend. Take a nap, you need it.

  • rich

    @14: Joni, it’s the weekend. Take a nap, you need it.

  • rich

    @14: Joni, it’s the weekend. Take a nap, you need it.

  • rich

    @14: Joni, it’s the weekend. Take a nap, you need it.

  • rich

    @14: Joni, it’s the weekend. Take a nap, you need it.

  • rich

    @14: Joni, it’s the weekend. Take a nap, you need it.

  • rich

    @14: Joni, it’s the weekend. Take a nap, you need it.

  • rich

    @14: Joni, it’s the weekend. Take a nap, you need it.

  • rich

    @14: Joni, it’s the weekend. Take a nap, you need it.

  • rich

    @14: Joni, it’s the weekend. Take a nap, you need it.

  • rich

    @14: Joni, it’s the weekend. Take a nap, you need it.

  • rich

    @14: Joni, it’s the weekend. Take a nap, you need it.

  • rich

    @14: Joni, it’s the weekend. Take a nap, you need it.

  • rich

    @14: Joni, it’s the weekend. Take a nap, you need it.

  • rich

    @14: Joni, it’s the weekend. Take a nap, you need it.

  • rich

    @14: Joni, it’s the weekend. Take a nap, you need it.

  • rich

    @14: Joni, it’s the weekend. Take a nap, you need it.

  • hbk

    The McGinn event last night was the best political event I’ve been to in Seattle. Authentic, fun, good beer (free), lots of food and interesting people to talk with. Plenty of politicos there, just not the usual handful of suspects.

  • hbk

    The McGinn event last night was the best political event I’ve been to in Seattle. Authentic, fun, good beer (free), lots of food and interesting people to talk with. Plenty of politicos there, just not the usual handful of suspects.

  • hbk

    The McGinn event last night was the best political event I’ve been to in Seattle. Authentic, fun, good beer (free), lots of food and interesting people to talk with. Plenty of politicos there, just not the usual handful of suspects.

  • hbk

    The McGinn event last night was the best political event I’ve been to in Seattle. Authentic, fun, good beer (free), lots of food and interesting people to talk with. Plenty of politicos there, just not the usual handful of suspects.

  • hbk

    The McGinn event last night was the best political event I’ve been to in Seattle. Authentic, fun, good beer (free), lots of food and interesting people to talk with. Plenty of politicos there, just not the usual handful of suspects.

  • hbk

    The McGinn event last night was the best political event I’ve been to in Seattle. Authentic, fun, good beer (free), lots of food and interesting people to talk with. Plenty of politicos there, just not the usual handful of suspects.

  • hbk

    The McGinn event last night was the best political event I’ve been to in Seattle. Authentic, fun, good beer (free), lots of food and interesting people to talk with. Plenty of politicos there, just not the usual handful of suspects.

  • hbk

    The McGinn event last night was the best political event I’ve been to in Seattle. Authentic, fun, good beer (free), lots of food and interesting people to talk with. Plenty of politicos there, just not the usual handful of suspects.

  • hbk

    The McGinn event last night was the best political event I’ve been to in Seattle. Authentic, fun, good beer (free), lots of food and interesting people to talk with. Plenty of politicos there, just not the usual handful of suspects.

  • hbk

    The McGinn event last night was the best political event I’ve been to in Seattle. Authentic, fun, good beer (free), lots of food and interesting people to talk with. Plenty of politicos there, just not the usual handful of suspects.

  • hbk

    The McGinn event last night was the best political event I’ve been to in Seattle. Authentic, fun, good beer (free), lots of food and interesting people to talk with. Plenty of politicos there, just not the usual handful of suspects.

  • hbk

    The McGinn event last night was the best political event I’ve been to in Seattle. Authentic, fun, good beer (free), lots of food and interesting people to talk with. Plenty of politicos there, just not the usual handful of suspects.

  • hbk

    The McGinn event last night was the best political event I’ve been to in Seattle. Authentic, fun, good beer (free), lots of food and interesting people to talk with. Plenty of politicos there, just not the usual handful of suspects.

  • hbk

    The McGinn event last night was the best political event I’ve been to in Seattle. Authentic, fun, good beer (free), lots of food and interesting people to talk with. Plenty of politicos there, just not the usual handful of suspects.

  • hbk

    The McGinn event last night was the best political event I’ve been to in Seattle. Authentic, fun, good beer (free), lots of food and interesting people to talk with. Plenty of politicos there, just not the usual handful of suspects.

  • hbk

    The McGinn event last night was the best political event I’ve been to in Seattle. Authentic, fun, good beer (free), lots of food and interesting people to talk with. Plenty of politicos there, just not the usual handful of suspects.

  • hbk

    The McGinn event last night was the best political event I’ve been to in Seattle. Authentic, fun, good beer (free), lots of food and interesting people to talk with. Plenty of politicos there, just not the usual handful of suspects.

  • hbk

    The McGinn event last night was the best political event I’ve been to in Seattle. Authentic, fun, good beer (free), lots of food and interesting people to talk with. Plenty of politicos there, just not the usual handful of suspects.

  • hbk

    The McGinn event last night was the best political event I’ve been to in Seattle. Authentic, fun, good beer (free), lots of food and interesting people to talk with. Plenty of politicos there, just not the usual handful of suspects.

  • hbk

    The McGinn event last night was the best political event I’ve been to in Seattle. Authentic, fun, good beer (free), lots of food and interesting people to talk with. Plenty of politicos there, just not the usual handful of suspects.

  • hbk

    The McGinn event last night was the best political event I’ve been to in Seattle. Authentic, fun, good beer (free), lots of food and interesting people to talk with. Plenty of politicos there, just not the usual handful of suspects.

  • hbk

    The McGinn event last night was the best political event I’ve been to in Seattle. Authentic, fun, good beer (free), lots of food and interesting people to talk with. Plenty of politicos there, just not the usual handful of suspects.

  • hbk

    The McGinn event last night was the best political event I’ve been to in Seattle. Authentic, fun, good beer (free), lots of food and interesting people to talk with. Plenty of politicos there, just not the usual handful of suspects.

  • hbk

    The McGinn event last night was the best political event I’ve been to in Seattle. Authentic, fun, good beer (free), lots of food and interesting people to talk with. Plenty of politicos there, just not the usual handful of suspects.

  • hbk

    The McGinn event last night was the best political event I’ve been to in Seattle. Authentic, fun, good beer (free), lots of food and interesting people to talk with. Plenty of politicos there, just not the usual handful of suspects.

  • hbk

    The McGinn event last night was the best political event I’ve been to in Seattle. Authentic, fun, good beer (free), lots of food and interesting people to talk with. Plenty of politicos there, just not the usual handful of suspects.

  • hbk

    The McGinn event last night was the best political event I’ve been to in Seattle. Authentic, fun, good beer (free), lots of food and interesting people to talk with. Plenty of politicos there, just not the usual handful of suspects.

  • hbk

    The McGinn event last night was the best political event I’ve been to in Seattle. Authentic, fun, good beer (free), lots of food and interesting people to talk with. Plenty of politicos there, just not the usual handful of suspects.

  • hbk

    The McGinn event last night was the best political event I’ve been to in Seattle. Authentic, fun, good beer (free), lots of food and interesting people to talk with. Plenty of politicos there, just not the usual handful of suspects.

  • hbk

    The McGinn event last night was the best political event I’ve been to in Seattle. Authentic, fun, good beer (free), lots of food and interesting people to talk with. Plenty of politicos there, just not the usual handful of suspects.

  • hbk

    The McGinn event last night was the best political event I’ve been to in Seattle. Authentic, fun, good beer (free), lots of food and interesting people to talk with. Plenty of politicos there, just not the usual handful of suspects.

  • Kate Martin

    Well, the blond North Seattle mom was the “Renee” that made the recording for the robo-lies about guns I’m sure. Safe Walks and all are cool but lies? No thanks. And that robo-lie was very typical McPrick. Whatever it takes to win. Lies and all. I’ve even seen him do it to win in a community council council election. Hell, I’ve seen him do it just to control the chair position for the Pedestrian Master Plan Advisory Group.

    Please don’t for a moment think that all ped activists, all bike activists or all environmentalists support McPrick. Many of us has suffered his BS for years and years. He’s not new to us and we’re sick to death of his crap.

    And on top of it all we get Mike and Miker. Beer buddies like most of the supporters. Wonderful, huh?

    Mike is a prick. And an ineffective one at that.

    He’s real good at gimicks though and viral campaigns are his thing. He has no second act. Never has.

  • Kate Martin

    Well, the blond North Seattle mom was the “Renee” that made the recording for the robo-lies about guns I’m sure. Safe Walks and all are cool but lies? No thanks. And that robo-lie was very typical McPrick. Whatever it takes to win. Lies and all. I’ve even seen him do it to win in a community council council election. Hell, I’ve seen him do it just to control the chair position for the Pedestrian Master Plan Advisory Group.

    Please don’t for a moment think that all ped activists, all bike activists or all environmentalists support McPrick. Many of us has suffered his BS for years and years. He’s not new to us and we’re sick to death of his crap.

    And on top of it all we get Mike and Miker. Beer buddies like most of the supporters. Wonderful, huh?

    Mike is a prick. And an ineffective one at that.

    He’s real good at gimicks though and viral campaigns are his thing. He has no second act. Never has.

  • Kate Martin

    Well, the blond North Seattle mom was the “Renee” that made the recording for the robo-lies about guns I’m sure. Safe Walks and all are cool but lies? No thanks. And that robo-lie was very typical McPrick. Whatever it takes to win. Lies and all. I’ve even seen him do it to win in a community council council election. Hell, I’ve seen him do it just to control the chair position for the Pedestrian Master Plan Advisory Group.

    Please don’t for a moment think that all ped activists, all bike activists or all environmentalists support McPrick. Many of us has suffered his BS for years and years. He’s not new to us and we’re sick to death of his crap.

    And on top of it all we get Mike and Miker. Beer buddies like most of the supporters. Wonderful, huh?

    Mike is a prick. And an ineffective one at that.

    He’s real good at gimicks though and viral campaigns are his thing. He has no second act. Never has.

  • Kate Martin

    Well, the blond North Seattle mom was the “Renee” that made the recording for the robo-lies about guns I’m sure. Safe Walks and all are cool but lies? No thanks. And that robo-lie was very typical McPrick. Whatever it takes to win. Lies and all. I’ve even seen him do it to win in a community council council election. Hell, I’ve seen him do it just to control the chair position for the Pedestrian Master Plan Advisory Group.

    Please don’t for a moment think that all ped activists, all bike activists or all environmentalists support McPrick. Many of us has suffered his BS for years and years. He’s not new to us and we’re sick to death of his crap.

    And on top of it all we get Mike and Miker. Beer buddies like most of the supporters. Wonderful, huh?

    Mike is a prick. And an ineffective one at that.

    He’s real good at gimicks though and viral campaigns are his thing. He has no second act. Never has.

  • Kate Martin

    Well, the blond North Seattle mom was the “Renee” that made the recording for the robo-lies about guns I’m sure. Safe Walks and all are cool but lies? No thanks. And that robo-lie was very typical McPrick. Whatever it takes to win. Lies and all. I’ve even seen him do it to win in a community council council election. Hell, I’ve seen him do it just to control the chair position for the Pedestrian Master Plan Advisory Group.

    Please don’t for a moment think that all ped activists, all bike activists or all environmentalists support McPrick. Many of us has suffered his BS for years and years. He’s not new to us and we’re sick to death of his crap.

    And on top of it all we get Mike and Miker. Beer buddies like most of the supporters. Wonderful, huh?

    Mike is a prick. And an ineffective one at that.

    He’s real good at gimicks though and viral campaigns are his thing. He has no second act. Never has.

  • Kate Martin

    Well, the blond North Seattle mom was the “Renee” that made the recording for the robo-lies about guns I’m sure. Safe Walks and all are cool but lies? No thanks. And that robo-lie was very typical McPrick. Whatever it takes to win. Lies and all. I’ve even seen him do it to win in a community council council election. Hell, I’ve seen him do it just to control the chair position for the Pedestrian Master Plan Advisory Group.

    Please don’t for a moment think that all ped activists, all bike activists or all environmentalists support McPrick. Many of us has suffered his BS for years and years. He’s not new to us and we’re sick to death of his crap.

    And on top of it all we get Mike and Miker. Beer buddies like most of the supporters. Wonderful, huh?

    Mike is a prick. And an ineffective one at that.

    He’s real good at gimicks though and viral campaigns are his thing. He has no second act. Never has.

  • Kate Martin

    Well, the blond North Seattle mom was the “Renee” that made the recording for the robo-lies about guns I’m sure. Safe Walks and all are cool but lies? No thanks. And that robo-lie was very typical McPrick. Whatever it takes to win. Lies and all. I’ve even seen him do it to win in a community council council election. Hell, I’ve seen him do it just to control the chair position for the Pedestrian Master Plan Advisory Group.

    Please don’t for a moment think that all ped activists, all bike activists or all environmentalists support McPrick. Many of us has suffered his BS for years and years. He’s not new to us and we’re sick to death of his crap.

    And on top of it all we get Mike and Miker. Beer buddies like most of the supporters. Wonderful, huh?

    Mike is a prick. And an ineffective one at that.

    He’s real good at gimicks though and viral campaigns are his thing. He has no second act. Never has.

  • Kate Martin

    Well, the blond North Seattle mom was the “Renee” that made the recording for the robo-lies about guns I’m sure. Safe Walks and all are cool but lies? No thanks. And that robo-lie was very typical McPrick. Whatever it takes to win. Lies and all. I’ve even seen him do it to win in a community council council election. Hell, I’ve seen him do it just to control the chair position for the Pedestrian Master Plan Advisory Group.

    Please don’t for a moment think that all ped activists, all bike activists or all environmentalists support McPrick. Many of us has suffered his BS for years and years. He’s not new to us and we’re sick to death of his crap.

    And on top of it all we get Mike and Miker. Beer buddies like most of the supporters. Wonderful, huh?

    Mike is a prick. And an ineffective one at that.

    He’s real good at gimicks though and viral campaigns are his thing. He has no second act. Never has.

  • Kate Martin

    Well, the blond North Seattle mom was the “Renee” that made the recording for the robo-lies about guns I’m sure. Safe Walks and all are cool but lies? No thanks. And that robo-lie was very typical McPrick. Whatever it takes to win. Lies and all. I’ve even seen him do it to win in a community council council election. Hell, I’ve seen him do it just to control the chair position for the Pedestrian Master Plan Advisory Group.

    Please don’t for a moment think that all ped activists, all bike activists or all environmentalists support McPrick. Many of us has suffered his BS for years and years. He’s not new to us and we’re sick to death of his crap.

    And on top of it all we get Mike and Miker. Beer buddies like most of the supporters. Wonderful, huh?

    Mike is a prick. And an ineffective one at that.

    He’s real good at gimicks though and viral campaigns are his thing. He has no second act. Never has.

  • Kate Martin

    Well, the blond North Seattle mom was the “Renee” that made the recording for the robo-lies about guns I’m sure. Safe Walks and all are cool but lies? No thanks. And that robo-lie was very typical McPrick. Whatever it takes to win. Lies and all. I’ve even seen him do it to win in a community council council election. Hell, I’ve seen him do it just to control the chair position for the Pedestrian Master Plan Advisory Group.

    Please don’t for a moment think that all ped activists, all bike activists or all environmentalists support McPrick. Many of us has suffered his BS for years and years. He’s not new to us and we’re sick to death of his crap.

    And on top of it all we get Mike and Miker. Beer buddies like most of the supporters. Wonderful, huh?

    Mike is a prick. And an ineffective one at that.

    He’s real good at gimicks though and viral campaigns are his thing. He has no second act. Never has.

  • Kate Martin

    Well, the blond North Seattle mom was the “Renee” that made the recording for the robo-lies about guns I’m sure. Safe Walks and all are cool but lies? No thanks. And that robo-lie was very typical McPrick. Whatever it takes to win. Lies and all. I’ve even seen him do it to win in a community council council election. Hell, I’ve seen him do it just to control the chair position for the Pedestrian Master Plan Advisory Group.

    Please don’t for a moment think that all ped activists, all bike activists or all environmentalists support McPrick. Many of us has suffered his BS for years and years. He’s not new to us and we’re sick to death of his crap.

    And on top of it all we get Mike and Miker. Beer buddies like most of the supporters. Wonderful, huh?

    Mike is a prick. And an ineffective one at that.

    He’s real good at gimicks though and viral campaigns are his thing. He has no second act. Never has.

  • Kate Martin

    Well, the blond North Seattle mom was the “Renee” that made the recording for the robo-lies about guns I’m sure. Safe Walks and all are cool but lies? No thanks. And that robo-lie was very typical McPrick. Whatever it takes to win. Lies and all. I’ve even seen him do it to win in a community council council election. Hell, I’ve seen him do it just to control the chair position for the Pedestrian Master Plan Advisory Group.

    Please don’t for a moment think that all ped activists, all bike activists or all environmentalists support McPrick. Many of us has suffered his BS for years and years. He’s not new to us and we’re sick to death of his crap.

    And on top of it all we get Mike and Miker. Beer buddies like most of the supporters. Wonderful, huh?

    Mike is a prick. And an ineffective one at that.

    He’s real good at gimicks though and viral campaigns are his thing. He has no second act. Never has.

  • Kate Martin

    Well, the blond North Seattle mom was the “Renee” that made the recording for the robo-lies about guns I’m sure. Safe Walks and all are cool but lies? No thanks. And that robo-lie was very typical McPrick. Whatever it takes to win. Lies and all. I’ve even seen him do it to win in a community council council election. Hell, I’ve seen him do it just to control the chair position for the Pedestrian Master Plan Advisory Group.

    Please don’t for a moment think that all ped activists, all bike activists or all environmentalists support McPrick. Many of us has suffered his BS for years and years. He’s not new to us and we’re sick to death of his crap.

    And on top of it all we get Mike and Miker. Beer buddies like most of the supporters. Wonderful, huh?

    Mike is a prick. And an ineffective one at that.

    He’s real good at gimicks though and viral campaigns are his thing. He has no second act. Never has.

  • Kate Martin

    Well, the blond North Seattle mom was the “Renee” that made the recording for the robo-lies about guns I’m sure. Safe Walks and all are cool but lies? No thanks. And that robo-lie was very typical McPrick. Whatever it takes to win. Lies and all. I’ve even seen him do it to win in a community council council election. Hell, I’ve seen him do it just to control the chair position for the Pedestrian Master Plan Advisory Group.

    Please don’t for a moment think that all ped activists, all bike activists or all environmentalists support McPrick. Many of us has suffered his BS for years and years. He’s not new to us and we’re sick to death of his crap.

    And on top of it all we get Mike and Miker. Beer buddies like most of the supporters. Wonderful, huh?

    Mike is a prick. And an ineffective one at that.

    He’s real good at gimicks though and viral campaigns are his thing. He has no second act. Never has.

  • Kate Martin

    Well, the blond North Seattle mom was the “Renee” that made the recording for the robo-lies about guns I’m sure. Safe Walks and all are cool but lies? No thanks. And that robo-lie was very typical McPrick. Whatever it takes to win. Lies and all. I’ve even seen him do it to win in a community council council election. Hell, I’ve seen him do it just to control the chair position for the Pedestrian Master Plan Advisory Group.

    Please don’t for a moment think that all ped activists, all bike activists or all environmentalists support McPrick. Many of us has suffered his BS for years and years. He’s not new to us and we’re sick to death of his crap.

    And on top of it all we get Mike and Miker. Beer buddies like most of the supporters. Wonderful, huh?

    Mike is a prick. And an ineffective one at that.

    He’s real good at gimicks though and viral campaigns are his thing. He has no second act. Never has.

  • Kate Martin

    Well, the blond North Seattle mom was the “Renee” that made the recording for the robo-lies about guns I’m sure. Safe Walks and all are cool but lies? No thanks. And that robo-lie was very typical McPrick. Whatever it takes to win. Lies and all. I’ve even seen him do it to win in a community council council election. Hell, I’ve seen him do it just to control the chair position for the Pedestrian Master Plan Advisory Group.

    Please don’t for a moment think that all ped activists, all bike activists or all environmentalists support McPrick. Many of us has suffered his BS for years and years. He’s not new to us and we’re sick to death of his crap.

    And on top of it all we get Mike and Miker. Beer buddies like most of the supporters. Wonderful, huh?

    Mike is a prick. And an ineffective one at that.

    He’s real good at gimicks though and viral campaigns are his thing. He has no second act. Never has.

  • Kate Martin

    Well, the blond North Seattle mom was the “Renee” that made the recording for the robo-lies about guns I’m sure. Safe Walks and all are cool but lies? No thanks. And that robo-lie was very typical McPrick. Whatever it takes to win. Lies and all. I’ve even seen him do it to win in a community council council election. Hell, I’ve seen him do it just to control the chair position for the Pedestrian Master Plan Advisory Group.

    Please don’t for a moment think that all ped activists, all bike activists or all environmentalists support McPrick. Many of us has suffered his BS for years and years. He’s not new to us and we’re sick to death of his crap.

    And on top of it all we get Mike and Miker. Beer buddies like most of the supporters. Wonderful, huh?

    Mike is a prick. And an ineffective one at that.

    He’s real good at gimicks though and viral campaigns are his thing. He has no second act. Never has.

  • Kate Martin

    Well, the blond North Seattle mom was the “Renee” that made the recording for the robo-lies about guns I’m sure. Safe Walks and all are cool but lies? No thanks. And that robo-lie was very typical McPrick. Whatever it takes to win. Lies and all. I’ve even seen him do it to win in a community council council election. Hell, I’ve seen him do it just to control the chair position for the Pedestrian Master Plan Advisory Group.

    Please don’t for a moment think that all ped activists, all bike activists or all environmentalists support McPrick. Many of us has suffered his BS for years and years. He’s not new to us and we’re sick to death of his crap.

    And on top of it all we get Mike and Miker. Beer buddies like most of the supporters. Wonderful, huh?

    Mike is a prick. And an ineffective one at that.

    He’s real good at gimicks though and viral campaigns are his thing. He has no second act. Never has.

  • Kate Martin

    Well, the blond North Seattle mom was the “Renee” that made the recording for the robo-lies about guns I’m sure. Safe Walks and all are cool but lies? No thanks. And that robo-lie was very typical McPrick. Whatever it takes to win. Lies and all. I’ve even seen him do it to win in a community council council election. Hell, I’ve seen him do it just to control the chair position for the Pedestrian Master Plan Advisory Group.

    Please don’t for a moment think that all ped activists, all bike activists or all environmentalists support McPrick. Many of us has suffered his BS for years and years. He’s not new to us and we’re sick to death of his crap.

    And on top of it all we get Mike and Miker. Beer buddies like most of the supporters. Wonderful, huh?

    Mike is a prick. And an ineffective one at that.

    He’s real good at gimicks though and viral campaigns are his thing. He has no second act. Never has.

  • Kate Martin

    Well, the blond North Seattle mom was the “Renee” that made the recording for the robo-lies about guns I’m sure. Safe Walks and all are cool but lies? No thanks. And that robo-lie was very typical McPrick. Whatever it takes to win. Lies and all. I’ve even seen him do it to win in a community council council election. Hell, I’ve seen him do it just to control the chair position for the Pedestrian Master Plan Advisory Group.

    Please don’t for a moment think that all ped activists, all bike activists or all environmentalists support McPrick. Many of us has suffered his BS for years and years. He’s not new to us and we’re sick to death of his crap.

    And on top of it all we get Mike and Miker. Beer buddies like most of the supporters. Wonderful, huh?

    Mike is a prick. And an ineffective one at that.

    He’s real good at gimicks though and viral campaigns are his thing. He has no second act. Never has.

  • Kate Martin

    Well, the blond North Seattle mom was the “Renee” that made the recording for the robo-lies about guns I’m sure. Safe Walks and all are cool but lies? No thanks. And that robo-lie was very typical McPrick. Whatever it takes to win. Lies and all. I’ve even seen him do it to win in a community council council election. Hell, I’ve seen him do it just to control the chair position for the Pedestrian Master Plan Advisory Group.

    Please don’t for a moment think that all ped activists, all bike activists or all environmentalists support McPrick. Many of us has suffered his BS for years and years. He’s not new to us and we’re sick to death of his crap.

    And on top of it all we get Mike and Miker. Beer buddies like most of the supporters. Wonderful, huh?

    Mike is a prick. And an ineffective one at that.

    He’s real good at gimicks though and viral campaigns are his thing. He has no second act. Never has.

  • Kate Martin

    Well, the blond North Seattle mom was the “Renee” that made the recording for the robo-lies about guns I’m sure. Safe Walks and all are cool but lies? No thanks. And that robo-lie was very typical McPrick. Whatever it takes to win. Lies and all. I’ve even seen him do it to win in a community council council election. Hell, I’ve seen him do it just to control the chair position for the Pedestrian Master Plan Advisory Group.

    Please don’t for a moment think that all ped activists, all bike activists or all environmentalists support McPrick. Many of us has suffered his BS for years and years. He’s not new to us and we’re sick to death of his crap.

    And on top of it all we get Mike and Miker. Beer buddies like most of the supporters. Wonderful, huh?

    Mike is a prick. And an ineffective one at that.

    He’s real good at gimicks though and viral campaigns are his thing. He has no second act. Never has.

  • Kate Martin

    Well, the blond North Seattle mom was the “Renee” that made the recording for the robo-lies about guns I’m sure. Safe Walks and all are cool but lies? No thanks. And that robo-lie was very typical McPrick. Whatever it takes to win. Lies and all. I’ve even seen him do it to win in a community council council election. Hell, I’ve seen him do it just to control the chair position for the Pedestrian Master Plan Advisory Group.

    Please don’t for a moment think that all ped activists, all bike activists or all environmentalists support McPrick. Many of us has suffered his BS for years and years. He’s not new to us and we’re sick to death of his crap.

    And on top of it all we get Mike and Miker. Beer buddies like most of the supporters. Wonderful, huh?

    Mike is a prick. And an ineffective one at that.

    He’s real good at gimicks though and viral campaigns are his thing. He has no second act. Never has.

  • Kate Martin

    Well, the blond North Seattle mom was the “Renee” that made the recording for the robo-lies about guns I’m sure. Safe Walks and all are cool but lies? No thanks. And that robo-lie was very typical McPrick. Whatever it takes to win. Lies and all. I’ve even seen him do it to win in a community council council election. Hell, I’ve seen him do it just to control the chair position for the Pedestrian Master Plan Advisory Group.

    Please don’t for a moment think that all ped activists, all bike activists or all environmentalists support McPrick. Many of us has suffered his BS for years and years. He’s not new to us and we’re sick to death of his crap.

    And on top of it all we get Mike and Miker. Beer buddies like most of the supporters. Wonderful, huh?

    Mike is a prick. And an ineffective one at that.

    He’s real good at gimicks though and viral campaigns are his thing. He has no second act. Never has.

  • Kate Martin

    Well, the blond North Seattle mom was the “Renee” that made the recording for the robo-lies about guns I’m sure. Safe Walks and all are cool but lies? No thanks. And that robo-lie was very typical McPrick. Whatever it takes to win. Lies and all. I’ve even seen him do it to win in a community council council election. Hell, I’ve seen him do it just to control the chair position for the Pedestrian Master Plan Advisory Group.

    Please don’t for a moment think that all ped activists, all bike activists or all environmentalists support McPrick. Many of us has suffered his BS for years and years. He’s not new to us and we’re sick to death of his crap.

    And on top of it all we get Mike and Miker. Beer buddies like most of the supporters. Wonderful, huh?

    Mike is a prick. And an ineffective one at that.

    He’s real good at gimicks though and viral campaigns are his thing. He has no second act. Never has.

  • Kate Martin

    Well, the blond North Seattle mom was the “Renee” that made the recording for the robo-lies about guns I’m sure. Safe Walks and all are cool but lies? No thanks. And that robo-lie was very typical McPrick. Whatever it takes to win. Lies and all. I’ve even seen him do it to win in a community council council election. Hell, I’ve seen him do it just to control the chair position for the Pedestrian Master Plan Advisory Group.

    Please don’t for a moment think that all ped activists, all bike activists or all environmentalists support McPrick. Many of us has suffered his BS for years and years. He’s not new to us and we’re sick to death of his crap.

    And on top of it all we get Mike and Miker. Beer buddies like most of the supporters. Wonderful, huh?

    Mike is a prick. And an ineffective one at that.

    He’s real good at gimicks though and viral campaigns are his thing. He has no second act. Never has.

  • Kate Martin

    Well, the blond North Seattle mom was the “Renee” that made the recording for the robo-lies about guns I’m sure. Safe Walks and all are cool but lies? No thanks. And that robo-lie was very typical McPrick. Whatever it takes to win. Lies and all. I’ve even seen him do it to win in a community council council election. Hell, I’ve seen him do it just to control the chair position for the Pedestrian Master Plan Advisory Group.

    Please don’t for a moment think that all ped activists, all bike activists or all environmentalists support McPrick. Many of us has suffered his BS for years and years. He’s not new to us and we’re sick to death of his crap.

    And on top of it all we get Mike and Miker. Beer buddies like most of the supporters. Wonderful, huh?

    Mike is a prick. And an ineffective one at that.

    He’s real good at gimicks though and viral campaigns are his thing. He has no second act. Never has.

  • Kate Martin

    Well, the blond North Seattle mom was the “Renee” that made the recording for the robo-lies about guns I’m sure. Safe Walks and all are cool but lies? No thanks. And that robo-lie was very typical McPrick. Whatever it takes to win. Lies and all. I’ve even seen him do it to win in a community council council election. Hell, I’ve seen him do it just to control the chair position for the Pedestrian Master Plan Advisory Group.

    Please don’t for a moment think that all ped activists, all bike activists or all environmentalists support McPrick. Many of us has suffered his BS for years and years. He’s not new to us and we’re sick to death of his crap.

    And on top of it all we get Mike and Miker. Beer buddies like most of the supporters. Wonderful, huh?

    Mike is a prick. And an ineffective one at that.

    He’s real good at gimicks though and viral campaigns are his thing. He has no second act. Never has.

  • Kate Martin

    Well, the blond North Seattle mom was the “Renee” that made the recording for the robo-lies about guns I’m sure. Safe Walks and all are cool but lies? No thanks. And that robo-lie was very typical McPrick. Whatever it takes to win. Lies and all. I’ve even seen him do it to win in a community council council election. Hell, I’ve seen him do it just to control the chair position for the Pedestrian Master Plan Advisory Group.

    Please don’t for a moment think that all ped activists, all bike activists or all environmentalists support McPrick. Many of us has suffered his BS for years and years. He’s not new to us and we’re sick to death of his crap.

    And on top of it all we get Mike and Miker. Beer buddies like most of the supporters. Wonderful, huh?

    Mike is a prick. And an ineffective one at that.

    He’s real good at gimicks though and viral campaigns are his thing. He has no second act. Never has.

  • Kate Martin

    Well, the blond North Seattle mom was the “Renee” that made the recording for the robo-lies about guns I’m sure. Safe Walks and all are cool but lies? No thanks. And that robo-lie was very typical McPrick. Whatever it takes to win. Lies and all. I’ve even seen him do it to win in a community council council election. Hell, I’ve seen him do it just to control the chair position for the Pedestrian Master Plan Advisory Group.

    Please don’t for a moment think that all ped activists, all bike activists or all environmentalists support McPrick. Many of us has suffered his BS for years and years. He’s not new to us and we’re sick to death of his crap.

    And on top of it all we get Mike and Miker. Beer buddies like most of the supporters. Wonderful, huh?

    Mike is a prick. And an ineffective one at that.

    He’s real good at gimicks though and viral campaigns are his thing. He has no second act. Never has.

  • Kate Martin

    Well, the blond North Seattle mom was the “Renee” that made the recording for the robo-lies about guns I’m sure. Safe Walks and all are cool but lies? No thanks. And that robo-lie was very typical McPrick. Whatever it takes to win. Lies and all. I’ve even seen him do it to win in a community council council election. Hell, I’ve seen him do it just to control the chair position for the Pedestrian Master Plan Advisory Group.

    Please don’t for a moment think that all ped activists, all bike activists or all environmentalists support McPrick. Many of us has suffered his BS for years and years. He’s not new to us and we’re sick to death of his crap.

    And on top of it all we get Mike and Miker. Beer buddies like most of the supporters. Wonderful, huh?

    Mike is a prick. And an ineffective one at that.

    He’s real good at gimicks though and viral campaigns are his thing. He has no second act. Never has.

  • Kate Martin

    Well, the blond North Seattle mom was the “Renee” that made the recording for the robo-lies about guns I’m sure. Safe Walks and all are cool but lies? No thanks. And that robo-lie was very typical McPrick. Whatever it takes to win. Lies and all. I’ve even seen him do it to win in a community council council election. Hell, I’ve seen him do it just to control the chair position for the Pedestrian Master Plan Advisory Group.

    Please don’t for a moment think that all ped activists, all bike activists or all environmentalists support McPrick. Many of us has suffered his BS for years and years. He’s not new to us and we’re sick to death of his crap.

    And on top of it all we get Mike and Miker. Beer buddies like most of the supporters. Wonderful, huh?

    Mike is a prick. And an ineffective one at that.

    He’s real good at gimicks though and viral campaigns are his thing. He has no second act. Never has.

  • Kate Martin

    Well, the blond North Seattle mom was the “Renee” that made the recording for the robo-lies about guns I’m sure. Safe Walks and all are cool but lies? No thanks. And that robo-lie was very typical McPrick. Whatever it takes to win. Lies and all. I’ve even seen him do it to win in a community council council election. Hell, I’ve seen him do it just to control the chair position for the Pedestrian Master Plan Advisory Group.

    Please don’t for a moment think that all ped activists, all bike activists or all environmentalists support McPrick. Many of us has suffered his BS for years and years. He’s not new to us and we’re sick to death of his crap.

    And on top of it all we get Mike and Miker. Beer buddies like most of the supporters. Wonderful, huh?

    Mike is a prick. And an ineffective one at that.

    He’s real good at gimicks though and viral campaigns are his thing. He has no second act. Never has.

  • Kate Martin

    Well, the blond North Seattle mom was the “Renee” that made the recording for the robo-lies about guns I’m sure. Safe Walks and all are cool but lies? No thanks. And that robo-lie was very typical McPrick. Whatever it takes to win. Lies and all. I’ve even seen him do it to win in a community council council election. Hell, I’ve seen him do it just to control the chair position for the Pedestrian Master Plan Advisory Group.

    Please don’t for a moment think that all ped activists, all bike activists or all environmentalists support McPrick. Many of us has suffered his BS for years and years. He’s not new to us and we’re sick to death of his crap.

    And on top of it all we get Mike and Miker. Beer buddies like most of the supporters. Wonderful, huh?

    Mike is a prick. And an ineffective one at that.

    He’s real good at gimicks though and viral campaigns are his thing. He has no second act. Never has.

  • Kate Martin

    Well, the blond North Seattle mom was the “Renee” that made the recording for the robo-lies about guns I’m sure. Safe Walks and all are cool but lies? No thanks. And that robo-lie was very typical McPrick. Whatever it takes to win. Lies and all. I’ve even seen him do it to win in a community council council election. Hell, I’ve seen him do it just to control the chair position for the Pedestrian Master Plan Advisory Group.

    Please don’t for a moment think that all ped activists, all bike activists or all environmentalists support McPrick. Many of us has suffered his BS for years and years. He’s not new to us and we’re sick to death of his crap.

    And on top of it all we get Mike and Miker. Beer buddies like most of the supporters. Wonderful, huh?

    Mike is a prick. And an ineffective one at that.

    He’s real good at gimicks though and viral campaigns are his thing. He has no second act. Never has.

  • sarah68

    @28: Rich, I’m not Joni–I assume you mean Balter. You must not have listened to/read Joni too much.

    Do we get moderated? I guess that’s a good idea. I wish #30 had been. Reading the “P” word is not pleasant.

  • sarah68

    @28: Rich, I’m not Joni–I assume you mean Balter. You must not have listened to/read Joni too much.

    Do we get moderated? I guess that’s a good idea. I wish #30 had been. Reading the “P” word is not pleasant.

  • sarah68

    @28: Rich, I’m not Joni–I assume you mean Balter. You must not have listened to/read Joni too much.

    Do we get moderated? I guess that’s a good idea. I wish #30 had been. Reading the “P” word is not pleasant.

  • sarah68

    @28: Rich, I’m not Joni–I assume you mean Balter. You must not have listened to/read Joni too much.

    Do we get moderated? I guess that’s a good idea. I wish #30 had been. Reading the “P” word is not pleasant.

  • sarah68

    @28: Rich, I’m not Joni–I assume you mean Balter. You must not have listened to/read Joni too much.

    Do we get moderated? I guess that’s a good idea. I wish #30 had been. Reading the “P” word is not pleasant.

  • sarah68

    @28: Rich, I’m not Joni–I assume you mean Balter. You must not have listened to/read Joni too much.

    Do we get moderated? I guess that’s a good idea. I wish #30 had been. Reading the “P” word is not pleasant.

  • sarah68

    @28: Rich, I’m not Joni–I assume you mean Balter. You must not have listened to/read Joni too much.

    Do we get moderated? I guess that’s a good idea. I wish #30 had been. Reading the “P” word is not pleasant.

  • sarah68

    @28: Rich, I’m not Joni–I assume you mean Balter. You must not have listened to/read Joni too much.

    Do we get moderated? I guess that’s a good idea. I wish #30 had been. Reading the “P” word is not pleasant.

  • sarah68

    @28: Rich, I’m not Joni–I assume you mean Balter. You must not have listened to/read Joni too much.

    Do we get moderated? I guess that’s a good idea. I wish #30 had been. Reading the “P” word is not pleasant.

  • sarah68

    @28: Rich, I’m not Joni–I assume you mean Balter. You must not have listened to/read Joni too much.

    Do we get moderated? I guess that’s a good idea. I wish #30 had been. Reading the “P” word is not pleasant.

  • sarah68

    @28: Rich, I’m not Joni–I assume you mean Balter. You must not have listened to/read Joni too much.

    Do we get moderated? I guess that’s a good idea. I wish #30 had been. Reading the “P” word is not pleasant.

  • sarah68

    @28: Rich, I’m not Joni–I assume you mean Balter. You must not have listened to/read Joni too much.

    Do we get moderated? I guess that’s a good idea. I wish #30 had been. Reading the “P” word is not pleasant.

  • sarah68

    @28: Rich, I’m not Joni–I assume you mean Balter. You must not have listened to/read Joni too much.

    Do we get moderated? I guess that’s a good idea. I wish #30 had been. Reading the “P” word is not pleasant.

  • sarah68

    @28: Rich, I’m not Joni–I assume you mean Balter. You must not have listened to/read Joni too much.

    Do we get moderated? I guess that’s a good idea. I wish #30 had been. Reading the “P” word is not pleasant.

  • sarah68

    @28: Rich, I’m not Joni–I assume you mean Balter. You must not have listened to/read Joni too much.

    Do we get moderated? I guess that’s a good idea. I wish #30 had been. Reading the “P” word is not pleasant.

  • sarah68

    @28: Rich, I’m not Joni–I assume you mean Balter. You must not have listened to/read Joni too much.

    Do we get moderated? I guess that’s a good idea. I wish #30 had been. Reading the “P” word is not pleasant.

  • sarah68

    @28: Rich, I’m not Joni–I assume you mean Balter. You must not have listened to/read Joni too much.

    Do we get moderated? I guess that’s a good idea. I wish #30 had been. Reading the “P” word is not pleasant.

  • sarah68

    @28: Rich, I’m not Joni–I assume you mean Balter. You must not have listened to/read Joni too much.

    Do we get moderated? I guess that’s a good idea. I wish #30 had been. Reading the “P” word is not pleasant.

  • sarah68

    @28: Rich, I’m not Joni–I assume you mean Balter. You must not have listened to/read Joni too much.

    Do we get moderated? I guess that’s a good idea. I wish #30 had been. Reading the “P” word is not pleasant.

  • sarah68

    @28: Rich, I’m not Joni–I assume you mean Balter. You must not have listened to/read Joni too much.

    Do we get moderated? I guess that’s a good idea. I wish #30 had been. Reading the “P” word is not pleasant.

  • sarah68

    @28: Rich, I’m not Joni–I assume you mean Balter. You must not have listened to/read Joni too much.

    Do we get moderated? I guess that’s a good idea. I wish #30 had been. Reading the “P” word is not pleasant.

  • sarah68

    @28: Rich, I’m not Joni–I assume you mean Balter. You must not have listened to/read Joni too much.

    Do we get moderated? I guess that’s a good idea. I wish #30 had been. Reading the “P” word is not pleasant.

  • sarah68

    @28: Rich, I’m not Joni–I assume you mean Balter. You must not have listened to/read Joni too much.

    Do we get moderated? I guess that’s a good idea. I wish #30 had been. Reading the “P” word is not pleasant.

  • sarah68

    @28: Rich, I’m not Joni–I assume you mean Balter. You must not have listened to/read Joni too much.

    Do we get moderated? I guess that’s a good idea. I wish #30 had been. Reading the “P” word is not pleasant.

  • sarah68

    @28: Rich, I’m not Joni–I assume you mean Balter. You must not have listened to/read Joni too much.

    Do we get moderated? I guess that’s a good idea. I wish #30 had been. Reading the “P” word is not pleasant.

  • sarah68

    @28: Rich, I’m not Joni–I assume you mean Balter. You must not have listened to/read Joni too much.

    Do we get moderated? I guess that’s a good idea. I wish #30 had been. Reading the “P” word is not pleasant.

  • sarah68

    @28: Rich, I’m not Joni–I assume you mean Balter. You must not have listened to/read Joni too much.

    Do we get moderated? I guess that’s a good idea. I wish #30 had been. Reading the “P” word is not pleasant.

  • sarah68

    @28: Rich, I’m not Joni–I assume you mean Balter. You must not have listened to/read Joni too much.

    Do we get moderated? I guess that’s a good idea. I wish #30 had been. Reading the “P” word is not pleasant.

  • sarah68

    @28: Rich, I’m not Joni–I assume you mean Balter. You must not have listened to/read Joni too much.

    Do we get moderated? I guess that’s a good idea. I wish #30 had been. Reading the “P” word is not pleasant.

  • sarah68

    @28: Rich, I’m not Joni–I assume you mean Balter. You must not have listened to/read Joni too much.

    Do we get moderated? I guess that’s a good idea. I wish #30 had been. Reading the “P” word is not pleasant.

  • sarah68

    @28: Rich, I’m not Joni–I assume you mean Balter. You must not have listened to/read Joni too much.

    Do we get moderated? I guess that’s a good idea. I wish #30 had been. Reading the “P” word is not pleasant.

  • sarah68

    @28: Rich, I’m not Joni–I assume you mean Balter. You must not have listened to/read Joni too much.

    Do we get moderated? I guess that’s a good idea. I wish #30 had been. Reading the “P” word is not pleasant.

  • sarah68

    @28: Rich, I’m not Joni–I assume you mean Balter. You must not have listened to/read Joni too much.

    Do we get moderated? I guess that’s a good idea. I wish #30 had been. Reading the “P” word is not pleasant.

  • sarah68

    @28: Rich, I’m not Joni–I assume you mean Balter. You must not have listened to/read Joni too much.

    Do we get moderated? I guess that’s a good idea. I wish #30 had been. Reading the “P” word is not pleasant.

  • sarah68

    @28: Rich, I’m not Joni–I assume you mean Balter. You must not have listened to/read Joni too much.

    Do we get moderated? I guess that’s a good idea. I wish #30 had been. Reading the “P” word is not pleasant.

  • African

    Well, McGinn has done the right thing by coming to South-End. He is smart and has alot of support from the progressive and the people of color.He will not be one time mayor but three times mayor. You establishment and Down Town Business Association– give credit to this guy and line behind him, becaues he is our new mayor. from peopl’s point of view– the days of abuse and bullying by the few is over. This is not about McGinn,it is about the people of seattle reclaiming their freedom. And do not understimate the grass-root.

  • African

    Well, McGinn has done the right thing by coming to South-End. He is smart and has alot of support from the progressive and the people of color.He will not be one time mayor but three times mayor. You establishment and Down Town Business Association– give credit to this guy and line behind him, becaues he is our new mayor. from peopl’s point of view– the days of abuse and bullying by the few is over. This is not about McGinn,it is about the people of seattle reclaiming their freedom. And do not understimate the grass-root.

  • African

    Well, McGinn has done the right thing by coming to South-End. He is smart and has alot of support from the progressive and the people of color.He will not be one time mayor but three times mayor. You establishment and Down Town Business Association– give credit to this guy and line behind him, becaues he is our new mayor. from peopl’s point of view– the days of abuse and bullying by the few is over. This is not about McGinn,it is about the people of seattle reclaiming their freedom. And do not understimate the grass-root.

  • African

    Well, McGinn has done the right thing by coming to South-End. He is smart and has alot of support from the progressive and the people of color.He will not be one time mayor but three times mayor. You establishment and Down Town Business Association– give credit to this guy and line behind him, becaues he is our new mayor. from peopl’s point of view– the days of abuse and bullying by the few is over. This is not about McGinn,it is about the people of seattle reclaiming their freedom. And do not understimate the grass-root.

  • African

    Well, McGinn has done the right thing by coming to South-End. He is smart and has alot of support from the progressive and the people of color.He will not be one time mayor but three times mayor. You establishment and Down Town Business Association– give credit to this guy and line behind him, becaues he is our new mayor. from peopl’s point of view– the days of abuse and bullying by the few is over. This is not about McGinn,it is about the people of seattle reclaiming their freedom. And do not understimate the grass-root.

  • African

    Well, McGinn has done the right thing by coming to South-End. He is smart and has alot of support from the progressive and the people of color.He will not be one time mayor but three times mayor. You establishment and Down Town Business Association– give credit to this guy and line behind him, becaues he is our new mayor. from peopl’s point of view– the days of abuse and bullying by the few is over. This is not about McGinn,it is about the people of seattle reclaiming their freedom. And do not understimate the grass-root.

  • African

    Well, McGinn has done the right thing by coming to South-End. He is smart and has alot of support from the progressive and the people of color.He will not be one time mayor but three times mayor. You establishment and Down Town Business Association– give credit to this guy and line behind him, becaues he is our new mayor. from peopl’s point of view– the days of abuse and bullying by the few is over. This is not about McGinn,it is about the people of seattle reclaiming their freedom. And do not understimate the grass-root.

  • African

    Well, McGinn has done the right thing by coming to South-End. He is smart and has alot of support from the progressive and the people of color.He will not be one time mayor but three times mayor. You establishment and Down Town Business Association– give credit to this guy and line behind him, becaues he is our new mayor. from peopl’s point of view– the days of abuse and bullying by the few is over. This is not about McGinn,it is about the people of seattle reclaiming their freedom. And do not understimate the grass-root.

  • African

    Well, McGinn has done the right thing by coming to South-End. He is smart and has alot of support from the progressive and the people of color.He will not be one time mayor but three times mayor. You establishment and Down Town Business Association– give credit to this guy and line behind him, becaues he is our new mayor. from peopl’s point of view– the days of abuse and bullying by the few is over. This is not about McGinn,it is about the people of seattle reclaiming their freedom. And do not understimate the grass-root.

  • African

    Well, McGinn has done the right thing by coming to South-End. He is smart and has alot of support from the progressive and the people of color.He will not be one time mayor but three times mayor. You establishment and Down Town Business Association– give credit to this guy and line behind him, becaues he is our new mayor. from peopl’s point of view– the days of abuse and bullying by the few is over. This is not about McGinn,it is about the people of seattle reclaiming their freedom. And do not understimate the grass-root.

  • African

    Well, McGinn has done the right thing by coming to South-End. He is smart and has alot of support from the progressive and the people of color.He will not be one time mayor but three times mayor. You establishment and Down Town Business Association– give credit to this guy and line behind him, becaues he is our new mayor. from peopl’s point of view– the days of abuse and bullying by the few is over. This is not about McGinn,it is about the people of seattle reclaiming their freedom. And do not understimate the grass-root.

  • African

    Well, McGinn has done the right thing by coming to South-End. He is smart and has alot of support from the progressive and the people of color.He will not be one time mayor but three times mayor. You establishment and Down Town Business Association– give credit to this guy and line behind him, becaues he is our new mayor. from peopl’s point of view– the days of abuse and bullying by the few is over. This is not about McGinn,it is about the people of seattle reclaiming their freedom. And do not understimate the grass-root.

  • African

    Well, McGinn has done the right thing by coming to South-End. He is smart and has alot of support from the progressive and the people of color.He will not be one time mayor but three times mayor. You establishment and Down Town Business Association– give credit to this guy and line behind him, becaues he is our new mayor. from peopl’s point of view– the days of abuse and bullying by the few is over. This is not about McGinn,it is about the people of seattle reclaiming their freedom. And do not understimate the grass-root.

  • African

    Well, McGinn has done the right thing by coming to South-End. He is smart and has alot of support from the progressive and the people of color.He will not be one time mayor but three times mayor. You establishment and Down Town Business Association– give credit to this guy and line behind him, becaues he is our new mayor. from peopl’s point of view– the days of abuse and bullying by the few is over. This is not about McGinn,it is about the people of seattle reclaiming their freedom. And do not understimate the grass-root.

  • African

    Well, McGinn has done the right thing by coming to South-End. He is smart and has alot of support from the progressive and the people of color.He will not be one time mayor but three times mayor. You establishment and Down Town Business Association– give credit to this guy and line behind him, becaues he is our new mayor. from peopl’s point of view– the days of abuse and bullying by the few is over. This is not about McGinn,it is about the people of seattle reclaiming their freedom. And do not understimate the grass-root.

  • African

    Well, McGinn has done the right thing by coming to South-End. He is smart and has alot of support from the progressive and the people of color.He will not be one time mayor but three times mayor. You establishment and Down Town Business Association– give credit to this guy and line behind him, becaues he is our new mayor. from peopl’s point of view– the days of abuse and bullying by the few is over. This is not about McGinn,it is about the people of seattle reclaiming their freedom. And do not understimate the grass-root.

  • African

    Well, McGinn has done the right thing by coming to South-End. He is smart and has alot of support from the progressive and the people of color.He will not be one time mayor but three times mayor. You establishment and Down Town Business Association– give credit to this guy and line behind him, becaues he is our new mayor. from peopl’s point of view– the days of abuse and bullying by the few is over. This is not about McGinn,it is about the people of seattle reclaiming their freedom. And do not understimate the grass-root.

  • African

    Well, McGinn has done the right thing by coming to South-End. He is smart and has alot of support from the progressive and the people of color.He will not be one time mayor but three times mayor. You establishment and Down Town Business Association– give credit to this guy and line behind him, becaues he is our new mayor. from peopl’s point of view– the days of abuse and bullying by the few is over. This is not about McGinn,it is about the people of seattle reclaiming their freedom. And do not understimate the grass-root.

  • African

    Well, McGinn has done the right thing by coming to South-End. He is smart and has alot of support from the progressive and the people of color.He will not be one time mayor but three times mayor. You establishment and Down Town Business Association– give credit to this guy and line behind him, becaues he is our new mayor. from peopl’s point of view– the days of abuse and bullying by the few is over. This is not about McGinn,it is about the people of seattle reclaiming their freedom. And do not understimate the grass-root.

  • African

    Well, McGinn has done the right thing by coming to South-End. He is smart and has alot of support from the progressive and the people of color.He will not be one time mayor but three times mayor. You establishment and Down Town Business Association– give credit to this guy and line behind him, becaues he is our new mayor. from peopl’s point of view– the days of abuse and bullying by the few is over. This is not about McGinn,it is about the people of seattle reclaiming their freedom. And do not understimate the grass-root.

  • African

    Well, McGinn has done the right thing by coming to South-End. He is smart and has alot of support from the progressive and the people of color.He will not be one time mayor but three times mayor. You establishment and Down Town Business Association– give credit to this guy and line behind him, becaues he is our new mayor. from peopl’s point of view– the days of abuse and bullying by the few is over. This is not about McGinn,it is about the people of seattle reclaiming their freedom. And do not understimate the grass-root.

  • African

    Well, McGinn has done the right thing by coming to South-End. He is smart and has alot of support from the progressive and the people of color.He will not be one time mayor but three times mayor. You establishment and Down Town Business Association– give credit to this guy and line behind him, becaues he is our new mayor. from peopl’s point of view– the days of abuse and bullying by the few is over. This is not about McGinn,it is about the people of seattle reclaiming their freedom. And do not understimate the grass-root.

  • African

    Well, McGinn has done the right thing by coming to South-End. He is smart and has alot of support from the progressive and the people of color.He will not be one time mayor but three times mayor. You establishment and Down Town Business Association– give credit to this guy and line behind him, becaues he is our new mayor. from peopl’s point of view– the days of abuse and bullying by the few is over. This is not about McGinn,it is about the people of seattle reclaiming their freedom. And do not understimate the grass-root.

  • African

    Well, McGinn has done the right thing by coming to South-End. He is smart and has alot of support from the progressive and the people of color.He will not be one time mayor but three times mayor. You establishment and Down Town Business Association– give credit to this guy and line behind him, becaues he is our new mayor. from peopl’s point of view– the days of abuse and bullying by the few is over. This is not about McGinn,it is about the people of seattle reclaiming their freedom. And do not understimate the grass-root.

  • African

    Well, McGinn has done the right thing by coming to South-End. He is smart and has alot of support from the progressive and the people of color.He will not be one time mayor but three times mayor. You establishment and Down Town Business Association– give credit to this guy and line behind him, becaues he is our new mayor. from peopl’s point of view– the days of abuse and bullying by the few is over. This is not about McGinn,it is about the people of seattle reclaiming their freedom. And do not understimate the grass-root.

  • African

    Well, McGinn has done the right thing by coming to South-End. He is smart and has alot of support from the progressive and the people of color.He will not be one time mayor but three times mayor. You establishment and Down Town Business Association– give credit to this guy and line behind him, becaues he is our new mayor. from peopl’s point of view– the days of abuse and bullying by the few is over. This is not about McGinn,it is about the people of seattle reclaiming their freedom. And do not understimate the grass-root.

  • African

    Well, McGinn has done the right thing by coming to South-End. He is smart and has alot of support from the progressive and the people of color.He will not be one time mayor but three times mayor. You establishment and Down Town Business Association– give credit to this guy and line behind him, becaues he is our new mayor. from peopl’s point of view– the days of abuse and bullying by the few is over. This is not about McGinn,it is about the people of seattle reclaiming their freedom. And do not understimate the grass-root.

  • African

    Well, McGinn has done the right thing by coming to South-End. He is smart and has alot of support from the progressive and the people of color.He will not be one time mayor but three times mayor. You establishment and Down Town Business Association– give credit to this guy and line behind him, becaues he is our new mayor. from peopl’s point of view– the days of abuse and bullying by the few is over. This is not about McGinn,it is about the people of seattle reclaiming their freedom. And do not understimate the grass-root.

  • African

    Well, McGinn has done the right thing by coming to South-End. He is smart and has alot of support from the progressive and the people of color.He will not be one time mayor but three times mayor. You establishment and Down Town Business Association– give credit to this guy and line behind him, becaues he is our new mayor. from peopl’s point of view– the days of abuse and bullying by the few is over. This is not about McGinn,it is about the people of seattle reclaiming their freedom. And do not understimate the grass-root.

  • African

    Well, McGinn has done the right thing by coming to South-End. He is smart and has alot of support from the progressive and the people of color.He will not be one time mayor but three times mayor. You establishment and Down Town Business Association– give credit to this guy and line behind him, becaues he is our new mayor. from peopl’s point of view– the days of abuse and bullying by the few is over. This is not about McGinn,it is about the people of seattle reclaiming their freedom. And do not understimate the grass-root.

  • African

    Well, McGinn has done the right thing by coming to South-End. He is smart and has alot of support from the progressive and the people of color.He will not be one time mayor but three times mayor. You establishment and Down Town Business Association– give credit to this guy and line behind him, becaues he is our new mayor. from peopl’s point of view– the days of abuse and bullying by the few is over. This is not about McGinn,it is about the people of seattle reclaiming their freedom. And do not understimate the grass-root.

  • African

    Well, McGinn has done the right thing by coming to South-End. He is smart and has alot of support from the progressive and the people of color.He will not be one time mayor but three times mayor. You establishment and Down Town Business Association– give credit to this guy and line behind him, becaues he is our new mayor. from peopl’s point of view– the days of abuse and bullying by the few is over. This is not about McGinn,it is about the people of seattle reclaiming their freedom. And do not understimate the grass-root.

  • African

    Well, McGinn has done the right thing by coming to South-End. He is smart and has alot of support from the progressive and the people of color.He will not be one time mayor but three times mayor. You establishment and Down Town Business Association– give credit to this guy and line behind him, becaues he is our new mayor. from peopl’s point of view– the days of abuse and bullying by the few is over. This is not about McGinn,it is about the people of seattle reclaiming their freedom. And do not understimate the grass-root.

  • African

    Well, McGinn has done the right thing by coming to South-End. He is smart and has alot of support from the progressive and the people of color.He will not be one time mayor but three times mayor. You establishment and Down Town Business Association– give credit to this guy and line behind him, becaues he is our new mayor. from peopl’s point of view– the days of abuse and bullying by the few is over. This is not about McGinn,it is about the people of seattle reclaiming their freedom. And do not understimate the grass-root.

  • African

    Well, McGinn has done the right thing by coming to South-End. He is smart and has alot of support from the progressive and the people of color.He will not be one time mayor but three times mayor. You establishment and Down Town Business Association– give credit to this guy and line behind him, becaues he is our new mayor. from peopl’s point of view– the days of abuse and bullying by the few is over. This is not about McGinn,it is about the people of seattle reclaiming their freedom. And do not understimate the grass-root.

  • elaineinballard

    I agree with @30. I hope we don’t have to put up with four years of this really distasteful commentary. There are other blogs where this style is tolerated, let’s keep Publicola a little more “pleasant.”

  • elaineinballard

    I agree with @30. I hope we don’t have to put up with four years of this really distasteful commentary. There are other blogs where this style is tolerated, let’s keep Publicola a little more “pleasant.”

  • elaineinballard

    I agree with @30. I hope we don’t have to put up with four years of this really distasteful commentary. There are other blogs where this style is tolerated, let’s keep Publicola a little more “pleasant.”

  • elaineinballard

    I agree with @30. I hope we don’t have to put up with four years of this really distasteful commentary. There are other blogs where this style is tolerated, let’s keep Publicola a little more “pleasant.”

  • elaineinballard

    I agree with @30. I hope we don’t have to put up with four years of this really distasteful commentary. There are other blogs where this style is tolerated, let’s keep Publicola a little more “pleasant.”

  • elaineinballard

    I agree with @30. I hope we don’t have to put up with four years of this really distasteful commentary. There are other blogs where this style is tolerated, let’s keep Publicola a little more “pleasant.”

  • elaineinballard

    I agree with @30. I hope we don’t have to put up with four years of this really distasteful commentary. There are other blogs where this style is tolerated, let’s keep Publicola a little more “pleasant.”

  • elaineinballard

    I agree with @30. I hope we don’t have to put up with four years of this really distasteful commentary. There are other blogs where this style is tolerated, let’s keep Publicola a little more “pleasant.”

  • elaineinballard

    I agree with @30. I hope we don’t have to put up with four years of this really distasteful commentary. There are other blogs where this style is tolerated, let’s keep Publicola a little more “pleasant.”

  • elaineinballard

    I agree with @30. I hope we don’t have to put up with four years of this really distasteful commentary. There are other blogs where this style is tolerated, let’s keep Publicola a little more “pleasant.”

  • elaineinballard

    I agree with @30. I hope we don’t have to put up with four years of this really distasteful commentary. There are other blogs where this style is tolerated, let’s keep Publicola a little more “pleasant.”

  • elaineinballard

    I agree with @30. I hope we don’t have to put up with four years of this really distasteful commentary. There are other blogs where this style is tolerated, let’s keep Publicola a little more “pleasant.”

  • elaineinballard

    I agree with @30. I hope we don’t have to put up with four years of this really distasteful commentary. There are other blogs where this style is tolerated, let’s keep Publicola a little more “pleasant.”

  • elaineinballard

    I agree with @30. I hope we don’t have to put up with four years of this really distasteful commentary. There are other blogs where this style is tolerated, let’s keep Publicola a little more “pleasant.”

  • elaineinballard

    I agree with @30. I hope we don’t have to put up with four years of this really distasteful commentary. There are other blogs where this style is tolerated, let’s keep Publicola a little more “pleasant.”

  • elaineinballard

    I agree with @30. I hope we don’t have to put up with four years of this really distasteful commentary. There are other blogs where this style is tolerated, let’s keep Publicola a little more “pleasant.”

  • elaineinballard

    I agree with @30. I hope we don’t have to put up with four years of this really distasteful commentary. There are other blogs where this style is tolerated, let’s keep Publicola a little more “pleasant.”

  • elaineinballard

    I agree with @30. I hope we don’t have to put up with four years of this really distasteful commentary. There are other blogs where this style is tolerated, let’s keep Publicola a little more “pleasant.”

  • elaineinballard

    I agree with @30. I hope we don’t have to put up with four years of this really distasteful commentary. There are other blogs where this style is tolerated, let’s keep Publicola a little more “pleasant.”

  • elaineinballard

    I agree with @30. I hope we don’t have to put up with four years of this really distasteful commentary. There are other blogs where this style is tolerated, let’s keep Publicola a little more “pleasant.”

  • elaineinballard

    I agree with @30. I hope we don’t have to put up with four years of this really distasteful commentary. There are other blogs where this style is tolerated, let’s keep Publicola a little more “pleasant.”

  • elaineinballard

    I agree with @30. I hope we don’t have to put up with four years of this really distasteful commentary. There are other blogs where this style is tolerated, let’s keep Publicola a little more “pleasant.”

  • elaineinballard

    I agree with @30. I hope we don’t have to put up with four years of this really distasteful commentary. There are other blogs where this style is tolerated, let’s keep Publicola a little more “pleasant.”

  • elaineinballard

    I agree with @30. I hope we don’t have to put up with four years of this really distasteful commentary. There are other blogs where this style is tolerated, let’s keep Publicola a little more “pleasant.”

  • elaineinballard

    I agree with @30. I hope we don’t have to put up with four years of this really distasteful commentary. There are other blogs where this style is tolerated, let’s keep Publicola a little more “pleasant.”

  • elaineinballard

    I agree with @30. I hope we don’t have to put up with four years of this really distasteful commentary. There are other blogs where this style is tolerated, let’s keep Publicola a little more “pleasant.”

  • elaineinballard

    I agree with @30. I hope we don’t have to put up with four years of this really distasteful commentary. There are other blogs where this style is tolerated, let’s keep Publicola a little more “pleasant.”

  • elaineinballard

    I agree with @30. I hope we don’t have to put up with four years of this really distasteful commentary. There are other blogs where this style is tolerated, let’s keep Publicola a little more “pleasant.”

  • elaineinballard

    I agree with @30. I hope we don’t have to put up with four years of this really distasteful commentary. There are other blogs where this style is tolerated, let’s keep Publicola a little more “pleasant.”

  • elaineinballard

    I agree with @30. I hope we don’t have to put up with four years of this really distasteful commentary. There are other blogs where this style is tolerated, let’s keep Publicola a little more “pleasant.”

  • elaineinballard

    I agree with @30. I hope we don’t have to put up with four years of this really distasteful commentary. There are other blogs where this style is tolerated, let’s keep Publicola a little more “pleasant.”

  • elaineinballard

    I agree with @30. I hope we don’t have to put up with four years of this really distasteful commentary. There are other blogs where this style is tolerated, let’s keep Publicola a little more “pleasant.”

  • elaineinballard

    I agree with @30. I hope we don’t have to put up with four years of this really distasteful commentary. There are other blogs where this style is tolerated, let’s keep Publicola a little more “pleasant.”

  • elaineinballard

    I agree with @30. I hope we don’t have to put up with four years of this really distasteful commentary. There are other blogs where this style is tolerated, let’s keep Publicola a little more “pleasant.”

  • elaineinballard

    I agree with @30. I hope we don’t have to put up with four years of this really distasteful commentary. There are other blogs where this style is tolerated, let’s keep Publicola a little more “pleasant.”

  • Kate Martin

    Accidental Candidate is right.

    If McGinn had not been at the top of the ballot in the primary, according to “top of the ballot advantage” statistics, he would not have made it through the primary. If he had not been at the top of the ballot in the general election, he would not be Mayor-elect.

    That’s a double accidental mayor. How unfortunate.

    Here’s the RCW…

    Order of candidates on the ballot
    (RCW 29A.36.131)
    After the close of business on the last day for candidates to file for office, the filing officer shall, from among those filings made in person and by mail, determine by lot the order in which the names of those candidates will appear on the primary ballot. The determination shall be done publicly and may be witnessed by the media and by any candidate.
    If no primary is required for any nonpartisan office under RCW 29A.52.011 or 29A.52.220, or if any independent or minor party candidate files a declaration of candidacy, the names shall appear on the general election ballot in the order determined by lot.

  • Kate Martin

    Accidental Candidate is right.

    If McGinn had not been at the top of the ballot in the primary, according to “top of the ballot advantage” statistics, he would not have made it through the primary. If he had not been at the top of the ballot in the general election, he would not be Mayor-elect.

    That’s a double accidental mayor. How unfortunate.

    Here’s the RCW…

    Order of candidates on the ballot
    (RCW 29A.36.131)
    After the close of business on the last day for candidates to file for office, the filing officer shall, from among those filings made in person and by mail, determine by lot the order in which the names of those candidates will appear on the primary ballot. The determination shall be done publicly and may be witnessed by the media and by any candidate.
    If no primary is required for any nonpartisan office under RCW 29A.52.011 or 29A.52.220, or if any independent or minor party candidate files a declaration of candidacy, the names shall appear on the general election ballot in the order determined by lot.

  • Kate Martin

    Accidental Candidate is right.

    If McGinn had not been at the top of the ballot in the primary, according to “top of the ballot advantage” statistics, he would not have made it through the primary. If he had not been at the top of the ballot in the general election, he would not be Mayor-elect.

    That’s a double accidental mayor. How unfortunate.

    Here’s the RCW…

    Order of candidates on the ballot
    (RCW 29A.36.131)
    After the close of business on the last day for candidates to file for office, the filing officer shall, from among those filings made in person and by mail, determine by lot the order in which the names of those candidates will appear on the primary ballot. The determination shall be done publicly and may be witnessed by the media and by any candidate.
    If no primary is required for any nonpartisan office under RCW 29A.52.011 or 29A.52.220, or if any independent or minor party candidate files a declaration of candidacy, the names shall appear on the general election ballot in the order determined by lot.

  • Kate Martin

    Accidental Candidate is right.

    If McGinn had not been at the top of the ballot in the primary, according to “top of the ballot advantage” statistics, he would not have made it through the primary. If he had not been at the top of the ballot in the general election, he would not be Mayor-elect.

    That’s a double accidental mayor. How unfortunate.

    Here’s the RCW…

    Order of candidates on the ballot
    (RCW 29A.36.131)
    After the close of business on the last day for candidates to file for office, the filing officer shall, from among those filings made in person and by mail, determine by lot the order in which the names of those candidates will appear on the primary ballot. The determination shall be done publicly and may be witnessed by the media and by any candidate.
    If no primary is required for any nonpartisan office under RCW 29A.52.011 or 29A.52.220, or if any independent or minor party candidate files a declaration of candidacy, the names shall appear on the general election ballot in the order determined by lot.

  • Kate Martin

    Accidental Candidate is right.

    If McGinn had not been at the top of the ballot in the primary, according to “top of the ballot advantage” statistics, he would not have made it through the primary. If he had not been at the top of the ballot in the general election, he would not be Mayor-elect.

    That’s a double accidental mayor. How unfortunate.

    Here’s the RCW…

    Order of candidates on the ballot
    (RCW 29A.36.131)
    After the close of business on the last day for candidates to file for office, the filing officer shall, from among those filings made in person and by mail, determine by lot the order in which the names of those candidates will appear on the primary ballot. The determination shall be done publicly and may be witnessed by the media and by any candidate.
    If no primary is required for any nonpartisan office under RCW 29A.52.011 or 29A.52.220, or if any independent or minor party candidate files a declaration of candidacy, the names shall appear on the general election ballot in the order determined by lot.

  • Kate Martin

    Accidental Candidate is right.

    If McGinn had not been at the top of the ballot in the primary, according to “top of the ballot advantage” statistics, he would not have made it through the primary. If he had not been at the top of the ballot in the general election, he would not be Mayor-elect.

    That’s a double accidental mayor. How unfortunate.

    Here’s the RCW…

    Order of candidates on the ballot
    (RCW 29A.36.131)
    After the close of business on the last day for candidates to file for office, the filing officer shall, from among those filings made in person and by mail, determine by lot the order in which the names of those candidates will appear on the primary ballot. The determination shall be done publicly and may be witnessed by the media and by any candidate.
    If no primary is required for any nonpartisan office under RCW 29A.52.011 or 29A.52.220, or if any independent or minor party candidate files a declaration of candidacy, the names shall appear on the general election ballot in the order determined by lot.

  • Kate Martin

    Accidental Candidate is right.

    If McGinn had not been at the top of the ballot in the primary, according to “top of the ballot advantage” statistics, he would not have made it through the primary. If he had not been at the top of the ballot in the general election, he would not be Mayor-elect.

    That’s a double accidental mayor. How unfortunate.

    Here’s the RCW…

    Order of candidates on the ballot
    (RCW 29A.36.131)
    After the close of business on the last day for candidates to file for office, the filing officer shall, from among those filings made in person and by mail, determine by lot the order in which the names of those candidates will appear on the primary ballot. The determination shall be done publicly and may be witnessed by the media and by any candidate.
    If no primary is required for any nonpartisan office under RCW 29A.52.011 or 29A.52.220, or if any independent or minor party candidate files a declaration of candidacy, the names shall appear on the general election ballot in the order determined by lot.

  • Kate Martin

    Accidental Candidate is right.

    If McGinn had not been at the top of the ballot in the primary, according to “top of the ballot advantage” statistics, he would not have made it through the primary. If he had not been at the top of the ballot in the general election, he would not be Mayor-elect.

    That’s a double accidental mayor. How unfortunate.

    Here’s the RCW…

    Order of candidates on the ballot
    (RCW 29A.36.131)
    After the close of business on the last day for candidates to file for office, the filing officer shall, from among those filings made in person and by mail, determine by lot the order in which the names of those candidates will appear on the primary ballot. The determination shall be done publicly and may be witnessed by the media and by any candidate.
    If no primary is required for any nonpartisan office under RCW 29A.52.011 or 29A.52.220, or if any independent or minor party candidate files a declaration of candidacy, the names shall appear on the general election ballot in the order determined by lot.

  • Kate Martin

    Accidental Candidate is right.

    If McGinn had not been at the top of the ballot in the primary, according to “top of the ballot advantage” statistics, he would not have made it through the primary. If he had not been at the top of the ballot in the general election, he would not be Mayor-elect.

    That’s a double accidental mayor. How unfortunate.

    Here’s the RCW…

    Order of candidates on the ballot
    (RCW 29A.36.131)
    After the close of business on the last day for candidates to file for office, the filing officer shall, from among those filings made in person and by mail, determine by lot the order in which the names of those candidates will appear on the primary ballot. The determination shall be done publicly and may be witnessed by the media and by any candidate.
    If no primary is required for any nonpartisan office under RCW 29A.52.011 or 29A.52.220, or if any independent or minor party candidate files a declaration of candidacy, the names shall appear on the general election ballot in the order determined by lot.

  • Kate Martin

    Accidental Candidate is right.

    If McGinn had not been at the top of the ballot in the primary, according to “top of the ballot advantage” statistics, he would not have made it through the primary. If he had not been at the top of the ballot in the general election, he would not be Mayor-elect.

    That’s a double accidental mayor. How unfortunate.

    Here’s the RCW…

    Order of candidates on the ballot
    (RCW 29A.36.131)
    After the close of business on the last day for candidates to file for office, the filing officer shall, from among those filings made in person and by mail, determine by lot the order in which the names of those candidates will appear on the primary ballot. The determination shall be done publicly and may be witnessed by the media and by any candidate.
    If no primary is required for any nonpartisan office under RCW 29A.52.011 or 29A.52.220, or if any independent or minor party candidate files a declaration of candidacy, the names shall appear on the general election ballot in the order determined by lot.

  • Kate Martin

    Accidental Candidate is right.

    If McGinn had not been at the top of the ballot in the primary, according to “top of the ballot advantage” statistics, he would not have made it through the primary. If he had not been at the top of the ballot in the general election, he would not be Mayor-elect.

    That’s a double accidental mayor. How unfortunate.

    Here’s the RCW…

    Order of candidates on the ballot
    (RCW 29A.36.131)
    After the close of business on the last day for candidates to file for office, the filing officer shall, from among those filings made in person and by mail, determine by lot the order in which the names of those candidates will appear on the primary ballot. The determination shall be done publicly and may be witnessed by the media and by any candidate.
    If no primary is required for any nonpartisan office under RCW 29A.52.011 or 29A.52.220, or if any independent or minor party candidate files a declaration of candidacy, the names shall appear on the general election ballot in the order determined by lot.

  • Kate Martin

    Accidental Candidate is right.

    If McGinn had not been at the top of the ballot in the primary, according to “top of the ballot advantage” statistics, he would not have made it through the primary. If he had not been at the top of the ballot in the general election, he would not be Mayor-elect.

    That’s a double accidental mayor. How unfortunate.

    Here’s the RCW…

    Order of candidates on the ballot
    (RCW 29A.36.131)
    After the close of business on the last day for candidates to file for office, the filing officer shall, from among those filings made in person and by mail, determine by lot the order in which the names of those candidates will appear on the primary ballot. The determination shall be done publicly and may be witnessed by the media and by any candidate.
    If no primary is required for any nonpartisan office under RCW 29A.52.011 or 29A.52.220, or if any independent or minor party candidate files a declaration of candidacy, the names shall appear on the general election ballot in the order determined by lot.

  • Kate Martin

    Accidental Candidate is right.

    If McGinn had not been at the top of the ballot in the primary, according to “top of the ballot advantage” statistics, he would not have made it through the primary. If he had not been at the top of the ballot in the general election, he would not be Mayor-elect.

    That’s a double accidental mayor. How unfortunate.

    Here’s the RCW…

    Order of candidates on the ballot
    (RCW 29A.36.131)
    After the close of business on the last day for candidates to file for office, the filing officer shall, from among those filings made in person and by mail, determine by lot the order in which the names of those candidates will appear on the primary ballot. The determination shall be done publicly and may be witnessed by the media and by any candidate.
    If no primary is required for any nonpartisan office under RCW 29A.52.011 or 29A.52.220, or if any independent or minor party candidate files a declaration of candidacy, the names shall appear on the general election ballot in the order determined by lot.

  • Kate Martin

    Accidental Candidate is right.

    If McGinn had not been at the top of the ballot in the primary, according to “top of the ballot advantage” statistics, he would not have made it through the primary. If he had not been at the top of the ballot in the general election, he would not be Mayor-elect.

    That’s a double accidental mayor. How unfortunate.

    Here’s the RCW…

    Order of candidates on the ballot
    (RCW 29A.36.131)
    After the close of business on the last day for candidates to file for office, the filing officer shall, from among those filings made in person and by mail, determine by lot the order in which the names of those candidates will appear on the primary ballot. The determination shall be done publicly and may be witnessed by the media and by any candidate.
    If no primary is required for any nonpartisan office under RCW 29A.52.011 or 29A.52.220, or if any independent or minor party candidate files a declaration of candidacy, the names shall appear on the general election ballot in the order determined by lot.

  • Kate Martin

    Accidental Candidate is right.

    If McGinn had not been at the top of the ballot in the primary, according to “top of the ballot advantage” statistics, he would not have made it through the primary. If he had not been at the top of the ballot in the general election, he would not be Mayor-elect.

    That’s a double accidental mayor. How unfortunate.

    Here’s the RCW…

    Order of candidates on the ballot
    (RCW 29A.36.131)
    After the close of business on the last day for candidates to file for office, the filing officer shall, from among those filings made in person and by mail, determine by lot the order in which the names of those candidates will appear on the primary ballot. The determination shall be done publicly and may be witnessed by the media and by any candidate.
    If no primary is required for any nonpartisan office under RCW 29A.52.011 or 29A.52.220, or if any independent or minor party candidate files a declaration of candidacy, the names shall appear on the general election ballot in the order determined by lot.

  • Kate Martin

    Accidental Candidate is right.

    If McGinn had not been at the top of the ballot in the primary, according to “top of the ballot advantage” statistics, he would not have made it through the primary. If he had not been at the top of the ballot in the general election, he would not be Mayor-elect.

    That’s a double accidental mayor. How unfortunate.

    Here’s the RCW…

    Order of candidates on the ballot
    (RCW 29A.36.131)
    After the close of business on the last day for candidates to file for office, the filing officer shall, from among those filings made in person and by mail, determine by lot the order in which the names of those candidates will appear on the primary ballot. The determination shall be done publicly and may be witnessed by the media and by any candidate.
    If no primary is required for any nonpartisan office under RCW 29A.52.011 or 29A.52.220, or if any independent or minor party candidate files a declaration of candidacy, the names shall appear on the general election ballot in the order determined by lot.

  • Kate Martin

    Accidental Candidate is right.

    If McGinn had not been at the top of the ballot in the primary, according to “top of the ballot advantage” statistics, he would not have made it through the primary. If he had not been at the top of the ballot in the general election, he would not be Mayor-elect.

    That’s a double accidental mayor. How unfortunate.

    Here’s the RCW…

    Order of candidates on the ballot
    (RCW 29A.36.131)
    After the close of business on the last day for candidates to file for office, the filing officer shall, from among those filings made in person and by mail, determine by lot the order in which the names of those candidates will appear on the primary ballot. The determination shall be done publicly and may be witnessed by the media and by any candidate.
    If no primary is required for any nonpartisan office under RCW 29A.52.011 or 29A.52.220, or if any independent or minor party candidate files a declaration of candidacy, the names shall appear on the general election ballot in the order determined by lot.

  • Kate Martin

    Accidental Candidate is right.

    If McGinn had not been at the top of the ballot in the primary, according to “top of the ballot advantage” statistics, he would not have made it through the primary. If he had not been at the top of the ballot in the general election, he would not be Mayor-elect.

    That’s a double accidental mayor. How unfortunate.

    Here’s the RCW…

    Order of candidates on the ballot
    (RCW 29A.36.131)
    After the close of business on the last day for candidates to file for office, the filing officer shall, from among those filings made in person and by mail, determine by lot the order in which the names of those candidates will appear on the primary ballot. The determination shall be done publicly and may be witnessed by the media and by any candidate.
    If no primary is required for any nonpartisan office under RCW 29A.52.011 or 29A.52.220, or if any independent or minor party candidate files a declaration of candidacy, the names shall appear on the general election ballot in the order determined by lot.

  • Kate Martin

    Accidental Candidate is right.

    If McGinn had not been at the top of the ballot in the primary, according to “top of the ballot advantage” statistics, he would not have made it through the primary. If he had not been at the top of the ballot in the general election, he would not be Mayor-elect.

    That’s a double accidental mayor. How unfortunate.

    Here’s the RCW…

    Order of candidates on the ballot
    (RCW 29A.36.131)
    After the close of business on the last day for candidates to file for office, the filing officer shall, from among those filings made in person and by mail, determine by lot the order in which the names of those candidates will appear on the primary ballot. The determination shall be done publicly and may be witnessed by the media and by any candidate.
    If no primary is required for any nonpartisan office under RCW 29A.52.011 or 29A.52.220, or if any independent or minor party candidate files a declaration of candidacy, the names shall appear on the general election ballot in the order determined by lot.

  • Kate Martin

    Accidental Candidate is right.

    If McGinn had not been at the top of the ballot in the primary, according to “top of the ballot advantage” statistics, he would not have made it through the primary. If he had not been at the top of the ballot in the general election, he would not be Mayor-elect.

    That’s a double accidental mayor. How unfortunate.

    Here’s the RCW…

    Order of candidates on the ballot
    (RCW 29A.36.131)
    After the close of business on the last day for candidates to file for office, the filing officer shall, from among those filings made in person and by mail, determine by lot the order in which the names of those candidates will appear on the primary ballot. The determination shall be done publicly and may be witnessed by the media and by any candidate.
    If no primary is required for any nonpartisan office under RCW 29A.52.011 or 29A.52.220, or if any independent or minor party candidate files a declaration of candidacy, the names shall appear on the general election ballot in the order determined by lot.

  • Kate Martin

    Accidental Candidate is right.

    If McGinn had not been at the top of the ballot in the primary, according to “top of the ballot advantage” statistics, he would not have made it through the primary. If he had not been at the top of the ballot in the general election, he would not be Mayor-elect.

    That’s a double accidental mayor. How unfortunate.

    Here’s the RCW…

    Order of candidates on the ballot
    (RCW 29A.36.131)
    After the close of business on the last day for candidates to file for office, the filing officer shall, from among those filings made in person and by mail, determine by lot the order in which the names of those candidates will appear on the primary ballot. The determination shall be done publicly and may be witnessed by the media and by any candidate.
    If no primary is required for any nonpartisan office under RCW 29A.52.011 or 29A.52.220, or if any independent or minor party candidate files a declaration of candidacy, the names shall appear on the general election ballot in the order determined by lot.

  • Kate Martin

    Accidental Candidate is right.

    If McGinn had not been at the top of the ballot in the primary, according to “top of the ballot advantage” statistics, he would not have made it through the primary. If he had not been at the top of the ballot in the general election, he would not be Mayor-elect.

    That’s a double accidental mayor. How unfortunate.

    Here’s the RCW…

    Order of candidates on the ballot
    (RCW 29A.36.131)
    After the close of business on the last day for candidates to file for office, the filing officer shall, from among those filings made in person and by mail, determine by lot the order in which the names of those candidates will appear on the primary ballot. The determination shall be done publicly and may be witnessed by the media and by any candidate.
    If no primary is required for any nonpartisan office under RCW 29A.52.011 or 29A.52.220, or if any independent or minor party candidate files a declaration of candidacy, the names shall appear on the general election ballot in the order determined by lot.

  • Kate Martin

    Accidental Candidate is right.

    If McGinn had not been at the top of the ballot in the primary, according to “top of the ballot advantage” statistics, he would not have made it through the primary. If he had not been at the top of the ballot in the general election, he would not be Mayor-elect.

    That’s a double accidental mayor. How unfortunate.

    Here’s the RCW…

    Order of candidates on the ballot
    (RCW 29A.36.131)
    After the close of business on the last day for candidates to file for office, the filing officer shall, from among those filings made in person and by mail, determine by lot the order in which the names of those candidates will appear on the primary ballot. The determination shall be done publicly and may be witnessed by the media and by any candidate.
    If no primary is required for any nonpartisan office under RCW 29A.52.011 or 29A.52.220, or if any independent or minor party candidate files a declaration of candidacy, the names shall appear on the general election ballot in the order determined by lot.

  • Kate Martin

    Accidental Candidate is right.

    If McGinn had not been at the top of the ballot in the primary, according to “top of the ballot advantage” statistics, he would not have made it through the primary. If he had not been at the top of the ballot in the general election, he would not be Mayor-elect.

    That’s a double accidental mayor. How unfortunate.

    Here’s the RCW…

    Order of candidates on the ballot
    (RCW 29A.36.131)
    After the close of business on the last day for candidates to file for office, the filing officer shall, from among those filings made in person and by mail, determine by lot the order in which the names of those candidates will appear on the primary ballot. The determination shall be done publicly and may be witnessed by the media and by any candidate.
    If no primary is required for any nonpartisan office under RCW 29A.52.011 or 29A.52.220, or if any independent or minor party candidate files a declaration of candidacy, the names shall appear on the general election ballot in the order determined by lot.

  • Kate Martin

    Accidental Candidate is right.

    If McGinn had not been at the top of the ballot in the primary, according to “top of the ballot advantage” statistics, he would not have made it through the primary. If he had not been at the top of the ballot in the general election, he would not be Mayor-elect.

    That’s a double accidental mayor. How unfortunate.

    Here’s the RCW…

    Order of candidates on the ballot
    (RCW 29A.36.131)
    After the close of business on the last day for candidates to file for office, the filing officer shall, from among those filings made in person and by mail, determine by lot the order in which the names of those candidates will appear on the primary ballot. The determination shall be done publicly and may be witnessed by the media and by any candidate.
    If no primary is required for any nonpartisan office under RCW 29A.52.011 or 29A.52.220, or if any independent or minor party candidate files a declaration of candidacy, the names shall appear on the general election ballot in the order determined by lot.

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @30 & 32,

    We do moderate. We like that PubliCola has grown up—raucous and smart—but still grown up comments threads.

    It’s a tricky task. While there’s some stuff (and trolls) that we send right to the trash, sometimes it’s a harder call.

    I delete the trash talk that borders on libel, and I try to jump in and remind people to keep it civil when I see stuff that’s over the line (and it helps when others chime in and back me up on that), but sometimes stuff gets by and sometimes I’m more lenient than other times.

    It’s a case by case thing without a hard and fast policy. (Sorry if that’s confusing.) Often, it depends on my mood or the overall conversation in the thread. A little random, I know.

    I agree that Kate’s comment (#29) is pushing it. I’m not even sure that’s really Kate Martin. I know she and McGinn have bad history from the Greenwood Community Council days, but I always thought she was a stand up advocate without relying on this “McPrick” stuff.

    Kate?

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @30 & 32,

    We do moderate. We like that PubliCola has grown up—raucous and smart—but still grown up comments threads.

    It’s a tricky task. While there’s some stuff (and trolls) that we send right to the trash, sometimes it’s a harder call.

    I delete the trash talk that borders on libel, and I try to jump in and remind people to keep it civil when I see stuff that’s over the line (and it helps when others chime in and back me up on that), but sometimes stuff gets by and sometimes I’m more lenient than other times.

    It’s a case by case thing without a hard and fast policy. (Sorry if that’s confusing.) Often, it depends on my mood or the overall conversation in the thread. A little random, I know.

    I agree that Kate’s comment (#29) is pushing it. I’m not even sure that’s really Kate Martin. I know she and McGinn have bad history from the Greenwood Community Council days, but I always thought she was a stand up advocate without relying on this “McPrick” stuff.

    Kate?

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @30 & 32,

    We do moderate. We like that PubliCola has grown up—raucous and smart—but still grown up comments threads.

    It’s a tricky task. While there’s some stuff (and trolls) that we send right to the trash, sometimes it’s a harder call.

    I delete the trash talk that borders on libel, and I try to jump in and remind people to keep it civil when I see stuff that’s over the line (and it helps when others chime in and back me up on that), but sometimes stuff gets by and sometimes I’m more lenient than other times.

    It’s a case by case thing without a hard and fast policy. (Sorry if that’s confusing.) Often, it depends on my mood or the overall conversation in the thread. A little random, I know.

    I agree that Kate’s comment (#29) is pushing it. I’m not even sure that’s really Kate Martin. I know she and McGinn have bad history from the Greenwood Community Council days, but I always thought she was a stand up advocate without relying on this “McPrick” stuff.

    Kate?

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @30 & 32,

    We do moderate. We like that PubliCola has grown up—raucous and smart—but still grown up comments threads.

    It’s a tricky task. While there’s some stuff (and trolls) that we send right to the trash, sometimes it’s a harder call.

    I delete the trash talk that borders on libel, and I try to jump in and remind people to keep it civil when I see stuff that’s over the line (and it helps when others chime in and back me up on that), but sometimes stuff gets by and sometimes I’m more lenient than other times.

    It’s a case by case thing without a hard and fast policy. (Sorry if that’s confusing.) Often, it depends on my mood or the overall conversation in the thread. A little random, I know.

    I agree that Kate’s comment (#29) is pushing it. I’m not even sure that’s really Kate Martin. I know she and McGinn have bad history from the Greenwood Community Council days, but I always thought she was a stand up advocate without relying on this “McPrick” stuff.

    Kate?

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @30 & 32,

    We do moderate. We like that PubliCola has grown up—raucous and smart—but still grown up comments threads.

    It’s a tricky task. While there’s some stuff (and trolls) that we send right to the trash, sometimes it’s a harder call.

    I delete the trash talk that borders on libel, and I try to jump in and remind people to keep it civil when I see stuff that’s over the line (and it helps when others chime in and back me up on that), but sometimes stuff gets by and sometimes I’m more lenient than other times.

    It’s a case by case thing without a hard and fast policy. (Sorry if that’s confusing.) Often, it depends on my mood or the overall conversation in the thread. A little random, I know.

    I agree that Kate’s comment (#29) is pushing it. I’m not even sure that’s really Kate Martin. I know she and McGinn have bad history from the Greenwood Community Council days, but I always thought she was a stand up advocate without relying on this “McPrick” stuff.

    Kate?

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @30 & 32,

    We do moderate. We like that PubliCola has grown up—raucous and smart—but still grown up comments threads.

    It’s a tricky task. While there’s some stuff (and trolls) that we send right to the trash, sometimes it’s a harder call.

    I delete the trash talk that borders on libel, and I try to jump in and remind people to keep it civil when I see stuff that’s over the line (and it helps when others chime in and back me up on that), but sometimes stuff gets by and sometimes I’m more lenient than other times.

    It’s a case by case thing without a hard and fast policy. (Sorry if that’s confusing.) Often, it depends on my mood or the overall conversation in the thread. A little random, I know.

    I agree that Kate’s comment (#29) is pushing it. I’m not even sure that’s really Kate Martin. I know she and McGinn have bad history from the Greenwood Community Council days, but I always thought she was a stand up advocate without relying on this “McPrick” stuff.

    Kate?

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @30 & 32,

    We do moderate. We like that PubliCola has grown up—raucous and smart—but still grown up comments threads.

    It’s a tricky task. While there’s some stuff (and trolls) that we send right to the trash, sometimes it’s a harder call.

    I delete the trash talk that borders on libel, and I try to jump in and remind people to keep it civil when I see stuff that’s over the line (and it helps when others chime in and back me up on that), but sometimes stuff gets by and sometimes I’m more lenient than other times.

    It’s a case by case thing without a hard and fast policy. (Sorry if that’s confusing.) Often, it depends on my mood or the overall conversation in the thread. A little random, I know.

    I agree that Kate’s comment (#29) is pushing it. I’m not even sure that’s really Kate Martin. I know she and McGinn have bad history from the Greenwood Community Council days, but I always thought she was a stand up advocate without relying on this “McPrick” stuff.

    Kate?

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @30 & 32,

    We do moderate. We like that PubliCola has grown up—raucous and smart—but still grown up comments threads.

    It’s a tricky task. While there’s some stuff (and trolls) that we send right to the trash, sometimes it’s a harder call.

    I delete the trash talk that borders on libel, and I try to jump in and remind people to keep it civil when I see stuff that’s over the line (and it helps when others chime in and back me up on that), but sometimes stuff gets by and sometimes I’m more lenient than other times.

    It’s a case by case thing without a hard and fast policy. (Sorry if that’s confusing.) Often, it depends on my mood or the overall conversation in the thread. A little random, I know.

    I agree that Kate’s comment (#29) is pushing it. I’m not even sure that’s really Kate Martin. I know she and McGinn have bad history from the Greenwood Community Council days, but I always thought she was a stand up advocate without relying on this “McPrick” stuff.

    Kate?

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @30 & 32,

    We do moderate. We like that PubliCola has grown up—raucous and smart—but still grown up comments threads.

    It’s a tricky task. While there’s some stuff (and trolls) that we send right to the trash, sometimes it’s a harder call.

    I delete the trash talk that borders on libel, and I try to jump in and remind people to keep it civil when I see stuff that’s over the line (and it helps when others chime in and back me up on that), but sometimes stuff gets by and sometimes I’m more lenient than other times.

    It’s a case by case thing without a hard and fast policy. (Sorry if that’s confusing.) Often, it depends on my mood or the overall conversation in the thread. A little random, I know.

    I agree that Kate’s comment (#29) is pushing it. I’m not even sure that’s really Kate Martin. I know she and McGinn have bad history from the Greenwood Community Council days, but I always thought she was a stand up advocate without relying on this “McPrick” stuff.

    Kate?

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @30 & 32,

    We do moderate. We like that PubliCola has grown up—raucous and smart—but still grown up comments threads.

    It’s a tricky task. While there’s some stuff (and trolls) that we send right to the trash, sometimes it’s a harder call.

    I delete the trash talk that borders on libel, and I try to jump in and remind people to keep it civil when I see stuff that’s over the line (and it helps when others chime in and back me up on that), but sometimes stuff gets by and sometimes I’m more lenient than other times.

    It’s a case by case thing without a hard and fast policy. (Sorry if that’s confusing.) Often, it depends on my mood or the overall conversation in the thread. A little random, I know.

    I agree that Kate’s comment (#29) is pushing it. I’m not even sure that’s really Kate Martin. I know she and McGinn have bad history from the Greenwood Community Council days, but I always thought she was a stand up advocate without relying on this “McPrick” stuff.

    Kate?

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @30 & 32,

    We do moderate. We like that PubliCola has grown up—raucous and smart—but still grown up comments threads.

    It’s a tricky task. While there’s some stuff (and trolls) that we send right to the trash, sometimes it’s a harder call.

    I delete the trash talk that borders on libel, and I try to jump in and remind people to keep it civil when I see stuff that’s over the line (and it helps when others chime in and back me up on that), but sometimes stuff gets by and sometimes I’m more lenient than other times.

    It’s a case by case thing without a hard and fast policy. (Sorry if that’s confusing.) Often, it depends on my mood or the overall conversation in the thread. A little random, I know.

    I agree that Kate’s comment (#29) is pushing it. I’m not even sure that’s really Kate Martin. I know she and McGinn have bad history from the Greenwood Community Council days, but I always thought she was a stand up advocate without relying on this “McPrick” stuff.

    Kate?

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @30 & 32,

    We do moderate. We like that PubliCola has grown up—raucous and smart—but still grown up comments threads.

    It’s a tricky task. While there’s some stuff (and trolls) that we send right to the trash, sometimes it’s a harder call.

    I delete the trash talk that borders on libel, and I try to jump in and remind people to keep it civil when I see stuff that’s over the line (and it helps when others chime in and back me up on that), but sometimes stuff gets by and sometimes I’m more lenient than other times.

    It’s a case by case thing without a hard and fast policy. (Sorry if that’s confusing.) Often, it depends on my mood or the overall conversation in the thread. A little random, I know.

    I agree that Kate’s comment (#29) is pushing it. I’m not even sure that’s really Kate Martin. I know she and McGinn have bad history from the Greenwood Community Council days, but I always thought she was a stand up advocate without relying on this “McPrick” stuff.

    Kate?

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @30 & 32,

    We do moderate. We like that PubliCola has grown up—raucous and smart—but still grown up comments threads.

    It’s a tricky task. While there’s some stuff (and trolls) that we send right to the trash, sometimes it’s a harder call.

    I delete the trash talk that borders on libel, and I try to jump in and remind people to keep it civil when I see stuff that’s over the line (and it helps when others chime in and back me up on that), but sometimes stuff gets by and sometimes I’m more lenient than other times.

    It’s a case by case thing without a hard and fast policy. (Sorry if that’s confusing.) Often, it depends on my mood or the overall conversation in the thread. A little random, I know.

    I agree that Kate’s comment (#29) is pushing it. I’m not even sure that’s really Kate Martin. I know she and McGinn have bad history from the Greenwood Community Council days, but I always thought she was a stand up advocate without relying on this “McPrick” stuff.

    Kate?

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @30 & 32,

    We do moderate. We like that PubliCola has grown up—raucous and smart—but still grown up comments threads.

    It’s a tricky task. While there’s some stuff (and trolls) that we send right to the trash, sometimes it’s a harder call.

    I delete the trash talk that borders on libel, and I try to jump in and remind people to keep it civil when I see stuff that’s over the line (and it helps when others chime in and back me up on that), but sometimes stuff gets by and sometimes I’m more lenient than other times.

    It’s a case by case thing without a hard and fast policy. (Sorry if that’s confusing.) Often, it depends on my mood or the overall conversation in the thread. A little random, I know.

    I agree that Kate’s comment (#29) is pushing it. I’m not even sure that’s really Kate Martin. I know she and McGinn have bad history from the Greenwood Community Council days, but I always thought she was a stand up advocate without relying on this “McPrick” stuff.

    Kate?

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @30 & 32,

    We do moderate. We like that PubliCola has grown up—raucous and smart—but still grown up comments threads.

    It’s a tricky task. While there’s some stuff (and trolls) that we send right to the trash, sometimes it’s a harder call.

    I delete the trash talk that borders on libel, and I try to jump in and remind people to keep it civil when I see stuff that’s over the line (and it helps when others chime in and back me up on that), but sometimes stuff gets by and sometimes I’m more lenient than other times.

    It’s a case by case thing without a hard and fast policy. (Sorry if that’s confusing.) Often, it depends on my mood or the overall conversation in the thread. A little random, I know.

    I agree that Kate’s comment (#29) is pushing it. I’m not even sure that’s really Kate Martin. I know she and McGinn have bad history from the Greenwood Community Council days, but I always thought she was a stand up advocate without relying on this “McPrick” stuff.

    Kate?

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @30 & 32,

    We do moderate. We like that PubliCola has grown up—raucous and smart—but still grown up comments threads.

    It’s a tricky task. While there’s some stuff (and trolls) that we send right to the trash, sometimes it’s a harder call.

    I delete the trash talk that borders on libel, and I try to jump in and remind people to keep it civil when I see stuff that’s over the line (and it helps when others chime in and back me up on that), but sometimes stuff gets by and sometimes I’m more lenient than other times.

    It’s a case by case thing without a hard and fast policy. (Sorry if that’s confusing.) Often, it depends on my mood or the overall conversation in the thread. A little random, I know.

    I agree that Kate’s comment (#29) is pushing it. I’m not even sure that’s really Kate Martin. I know she and McGinn have bad history from the Greenwood Community Council days, but I always thought she was a stand up advocate without relying on this “McPrick” stuff.

    Kate?

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @30 & 32,

    We do moderate. We like that PubliCola has grown up—raucous and smart—but still grown up comments threads.

    It’s a tricky task. While there’s some stuff (and trolls) that we send right to the trash, sometimes it’s a harder call.

    I delete the trash talk that borders on libel, and I try to jump in and remind people to keep it civil when I see stuff that’s over the line (and it helps when others chime in and back me up on that), but sometimes stuff gets by and sometimes I’m more lenient than other times.

    It’s a case by case thing without a hard and fast policy. (Sorry if that’s confusing.) Often, it depends on my mood or the overall conversation in the thread. A little random, I know.

    I agree that Kate’s comment (#29) is pushing it. I’m not even sure that’s really Kate Martin. I know she and McGinn have bad history from the Greenwood Community Council days, but I always thought she was a stand up advocate without relying on this “McPrick” stuff.

    Kate?

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @30 & 32,

    We do moderate. We like that PubliCola has grown up—raucous and smart—but still grown up comments threads.

    It’s a tricky task. While there’s some stuff (and trolls) that we send right to the trash, sometimes it’s a harder call.

    I delete the trash talk that borders on libel, and I try to jump in and remind people to keep it civil when I see stuff that’s over the line (and it helps when others chime in and back me up on that), but sometimes stuff gets by and sometimes I’m more lenient than other times.

    It’s a case by case thing without a hard and fast policy. (Sorry if that’s confusing.) Often, it depends on my mood or the overall conversation in the thread. A little random, I know.

    I agree that Kate’s comment (#29) is pushing it. I’m not even sure that’s really Kate Martin. I know she and McGinn have bad history from the Greenwood Community Council days, but I always thought she was a stand up advocate without relying on this “McPrick” stuff.

    Kate?

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @30 & 32,

    We do moderate. We like that PubliCola has grown up—raucous and smart—but still grown up comments threads.

    It’s a tricky task. While there’s some stuff (and trolls) that we send right to the trash, sometimes it’s a harder call.

    I delete the trash talk that borders on libel, and I try to jump in and remind people to keep it civil when I see stuff that’s over the line (and it helps when others chime in and back me up on that), but sometimes stuff gets by and sometimes I’m more lenient than other times.

    It’s a case by case thing without a hard and fast policy. (Sorry if that’s confusing.) Often, it depends on my mood or the overall conversation in the thread. A little random, I know.

    I agree that Kate’s comment (#29) is pushing it. I’m not even sure that’s really Kate Martin. I know she and McGinn have bad history from the Greenwood Community Council days, but I always thought she was a stand up advocate without relying on this “McPrick” stuff.

    Kate?

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @30 & 32,

    We do moderate. We like that PubliCola has grown up—raucous and smart—but still grown up comments threads.

    It’s a tricky task. While there’s some stuff (and trolls) that we send right to the trash, sometimes it’s a harder call.

    I delete the trash talk that borders on libel, and I try to jump in and remind people to keep it civil when I see stuff that’s over the line (and it helps when others chime in and back me up on that), but sometimes stuff gets by and sometimes I’m more lenient than other times.

    It’s a case by case thing without a hard and fast policy. (Sorry if that’s confusing.) Often, it depends on my mood or the overall conversation in the thread. A little random, I know.

    I agree that Kate’s comment (#29) is pushing it. I’m not even sure that’s really Kate Martin. I know she and McGinn have bad history from the Greenwood Community Council days, but I always thought she was a stand up advocate without relying on this “McPrick” stuff.

    Kate?

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @30 & 32,

    We do moderate. We like that PubliCola has grown up—raucous and smart—but still grown up comments threads.

    It’s a tricky task. While there’s some stuff (and trolls) that we send right to the trash, sometimes it’s a harder call.

    I delete the trash talk that borders on libel, and I try to jump in and remind people to keep it civil when I see stuff that’s over the line (and it helps when others chime in and back me up on that), but sometimes stuff gets by and sometimes I’m more lenient than other times.

    It’s a case by case thing without a hard and fast policy. (Sorry if that’s confusing.) Often, it depends on my mood or the overall conversation in the thread. A little random, I know.

    I agree that Kate’s comment (#29) is pushing it. I’m not even sure that’s really Kate Martin. I know she and McGinn have bad history from the Greenwood Community Council days, but I always thought she was a stand up advocate without relying on this “McPrick” stuff.

    Kate?

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @30 & 32,

    We do moderate. We like that PubliCola has grown up—raucous and smart—but still grown up comments threads.

    It’s a tricky task. While there’s some stuff (and trolls) that we send right to the trash, sometimes it’s a harder call.

    I delete the trash talk that borders on libel, and I try to jump in and remind people to keep it civil when I see stuff that’s over the line (and it helps when others chime in and back me up on that), but sometimes stuff gets by and sometimes I’m more lenient than other times.

    It’s a case by case thing without a hard and fast policy. (Sorry if that’s confusing.) Often, it depends on my mood or the overall conversation in the thread. A little random, I know.

    I agree that Kate’s comment (#29) is pushing it. I’m not even sure that’s really Kate Martin. I know she and McGinn have bad history from the Greenwood Community Council days, but I always thought she was a stand up advocate without relying on this “McPrick” stuff.

    Kate?

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @30 & 32,

    We do moderate. We like that PubliCola has grown up—raucous and smart—but still grown up comments threads.

    It’s a tricky task. While there’s some stuff (and trolls) that we send right to the trash, sometimes it’s a harder call.

    I delete the trash talk that borders on libel, and I try to jump in and remind people to keep it civil when I see stuff that’s over the line (and it helps when others chime in and back me up on that), but sometimes stuff gets by and sometimes I’m more lenient than other times.

    It’s a case by case thing without a hard and fast policy. (Sorry if that’s confusing.) Often, it depends on my mood or the overall conversation in the thread. A little random, I know.

    I agree that Kate’s comment (#29) is pushing it. I’m not even sure that’s really Kate Martin. I know she and McGinn have bad history from the Greenwood Community Council days, but I always thought she was a stand up advocate without relying on this “McPrick” stuff.

    Kate?

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @30 & 32,

    We do moderate. We like that PubliCola has grown up—raucous and smart—but still grown up comments threads.

    It’s a tricky task. While there’s some stuff (and trolls) that we send right to the trash, sometimes it’s a harder call.

    I delete the trash talk that borders on libel, and I try to jump in and remind people to keep it civil when I see stuff that’s over the line (and it helps when others chime in and back me up on that), but sometimes stuff gets by and sometimes I’m more lenient than other times.

    It’s a case by case thing without a hard and fast policy. (Sorry if that’s confusing.) Often, it depends on my mood or the overall conversation in the thread. A little random, I know.

    I agree that Kate’s comment (#29) is pushing it. I’m not even sure that’s really Kate Martin. I know she and McGinn have bad history from the Greenwood Community Council days, but I always thought she was a stand up advocate without relying on this “McPrick” stuff.

    Kate?

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @30 & 32,

    We do moderate. We like that PubliCola has grown up—raucous and smart—but still grown up comments threads.

    It’s a tricky task. While there’s some stuff (and trolls) that we send right to the trash, sometimes it’s a harder call.

    I delete the trash talk that borders on libel, and I try to jump in and remind people to keep it civil when I see stuff that’s over the line (and it helps when others chime in and back me up on that), but sometimes stuff gets by and sometimes I’m more lenient than other times.

    It’s a case by case thing without a hard and fast policy. (Sorry if that’s confusing.) Often, it depends on my mood or the overall conversation in the thread. A little random, I know.

    I agree that Kate’s comment (#29) is pushing it. I’m not even sure that’s really Kate Martin. I know she and McGinn have bad history from the Greenwood Community Council days, but I always thought she was a stand up advocate without relying on this “McPrick” stuff.

    Kate?

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @30 & 32,

    We do moderate. We like that PubliCola has grown up—raucous and smart—but still grown up comments threads.

    It’s a tricky task. While there’s some stuff (and trolls) that we send right to the trash, sometimes it’s a harder call.

    I delete the trash talk that borders on libel, and I try to jump in and remind people to keep it civil when I see stuff that’s over the line (and it helps when others chime in and back me up on that), but sometimes stuff gets by and sometimes I’m more lenient than other times.

    It’s a case by case thing without a hard and fast policy. (Sorry if that’s confusing.) Often, it depends on my mood or the overall conversation in the thread. A little random, I know.

    I agree that Kate’s comment (#29) is pushing it. I’m not even sure that’s really Kate Martin. I know she and McGinn have bad history from the Greenwood Community Council days, but I always thought she was a stand up advocate without relying on this “McPrick” stuff.

    Kate?

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @30 & 32,

    We do moderate. We like that PubliCola has grown up—raucous and smart—but still grown up comments threads.

    It’s a tricky task. While there’s some stuff (and trolls) that we send right to the trash, sometimes it’s a harder call.

    I delete the trash talk that borders on libel, and I try to jump in and remind people to keep it civil when I see stuff that’s over the line (and it helps when others chime in and back me up on that), but sometimes stuff gets by and sometimes I’m more lenient than other times.

    It’s a case by case thing without a hard and fast policy. (Sorry if that’s confusing.) Often, it depends on my mood or the overall conversation in the thread. A little random, I know.

    I agree that Kate’s comment (#29) is pushing it. I’m not even sure that’s really Kate Martin. I know she and McGinn have bad history from the Greenwood Community Council days, but I always thought she was a stand up advocate without relying on this “McPrick” stuff.

    Kate?

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @30 & 32,

    We do moderate. We like that PubliCola has grown up—raucous and smart—but still grown up comments threads.

    It’s a tricky task. While there’s some stuff (and trolls) that we send right to the trash, sometimes it’s a harder call.

    I delete the trash talk that borders on libel, and I try to jump in and remind people to keep it civil when I see stuff that’s over the line (and it helps when others chime in and back me up on that), but sometimes stuff gets by and sometimes I’m more lenient than other times.

    It’s a case by case thing without a hard and fast policy. (Sorry if that’s confusing.) Often, it depends on my mood or the overall conversation in the thread. A little random, I know.

    I agree that Kate’s comment (#29) is pushing it. I’m not even sure that’s really Kate Martin. I know she and McGinn have bad history from the Greenwood Community Council days, but I always thought she was a stand up advocate without relying on this “McPrick” stuff.

    Kate?

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @30 & 32,

    We do moderate. We like that PubliCola has grown up—raucous and smart—but still grown up comments threads.

    It’s a tricky task. While there’s some stuff (and trolls) that we send right to the trash, sometimes it’s a harder call.

    I delete the trash talk that borders on libel, and I try to jump in and remind people to keep it civil when I see stuff that’s over the line (and it helps when others chime in and back me up on that), but sometimes stuff gets by and sometimes I’m more lenient than other times.

    It’s a case by case thing without a hard and fast policy. (Sorry if that’s confusing.) Often, it depends on my mood or the overall conversation in the thread. A little random, I know.

    I agree that Kate’s comment (#29) is pushing it. I’m not even sure that’s really Kate Martin. I know she and McGinn have bad history from the Greenwood Community Council days, but I always thought she was a stand up advocate without relying on this “McPrick” stuff.

    Kate?

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @30 & 32,

    We do moderate. We like that PubliCola has grown up—raucous and smart—but still grown up comments threads.

    It’s a tricky task. While there’s some stuff (and trolls) that we send right to the trash, sometimes it’s a harder call.

    I delete the trash talk that borders on libel, and I try to jump in and remind people to keep it civil when I see stuff that’s over the line (and it helps when others chime in and back me up on that), but sometimes stuff gets by and sometimes I’m more lenient than other times.

    It’s a case by case thing without a hard and fast policy. (Sorry if that’s confusing.) Often, it depends on my mood or the overall conversation in the thread. A little random, I know.

    I agree that Kate’s comment (#29) is pushing it. I’m not even sure that’s really Kate Martin. I know she and McGinn have bad history from the Greenwood Community Council days, but I always thought she was a stand up advocate without relying on this “McPrick” stuff.

    Kate?

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @30 & 32,

    We do moderate. We like that PubliCola has grown up—raucous and smart—but still grown up comments threads.

    It’s a tricky task. While there’s some stuff (and trolls) that we send right to the trash, sometimes it’s a harder call.

    I delete the trash talk that borders on libel, and I try to jump in and remind people to keep it civil when I see stuff that’s over the line (and it helps when others chime in and back me up on that), but sometimes stuff gets by and sometimes I’m more lenient than other times.

    It’s a case by case thing without a hard and fast policy. (Sorry if that’s confusing.) Often, it depends on my mood or the overall conversation in the thread. A little random, I know.

    I agree that Kate’s comment (#29) is pushing it. I’m not even sure that’s really Kate Martin. I know she and McGinn have bad history from the Greenwood Community Council days, but I always thought she was a stand up advocate without relying on this “McPrick” stuff.

    Kate?

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @30 & 32,

    We do moderate. We like that PubliCola has grown up—raucous and smart—but still grown up comments threads.

    It’s a tricky task. While there’s some stuff (and trolls) that we send right to the trash, sometimes it’s a harder call.

    I delete the trash talk that borders on libel, and I try to jump in and remind people to keep it civil when I see stuff that’s over the line (and it helps when others chime in and back me up on that), but sometimes stuff gets by and sometimes I’m more lenient than other times.

    It’s a case by case thing without a hard and fast policy. (Sorry if that’s confusing.) Often, it depends on my mood or the overall conversation in the thread. A little random, I know.

    I agree that Kate’s comment (#29) is pushing it. I’m not even sure that’s really Kate Martin. I know she and McGinn have bad history from the Greenwood Community Council days, but I always thought she was a stand up advocate without relying on this “McPrick” stuff.

    Kate?

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @30 & 32,

    We do moderate. We like that PubliCola has grown up—raucous and smart—but still grown up comments threads.

    It’s a tricky task. While there’s some stuff (and trolls) that we send right to the trash, sometimes it’s a harder call.

    I delete the trash talk that borders on libel, and I try to jump in and remind people to keep it civil when I see stuff that’s over the line (and it helps when others chime in and back me up on that), but sometimes stuff gets by and sometimes I’m more lenient than other times.

    It’s a case by case thing without a hard and fast policy. (Sorry if that’s confusing.) Often, it depends on my mood or the overall conversation in the thread. A little random, I know.

    I agree that Kate’s comment (#29) is pushing it. I’m not even sure that’s really Kate Martin. I know she and McGinn have bad history from the Greenwood Community Council days, but I always thought she was a stand up advocate without relying on this “McPrick” stuff.

    Kate?

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @30 & 32,

    We do moderate. We like that PubliCola has grown up—raucous and smart—but still grown up comments threads.

    It’s a tricky task. While there’s some stuff (and trolls) that we send right to the trash, sometimes it’s a harder call.

    I delete the trash talk that borders on libel, and I try to jump in and remind people to keep it civil when I see stuff that’s over the line (and it helps when others chime in and back me up on that), but sometimes stuff gets by and sometimes I’m more lenient than other times.

    It’s a case by case thing without a hard and fast policy. (Sorry if that’s confusing.) Often, it depends on my mood or the overall conversation in the thread. A little random, I know.

    I agree that Kate’s comment (#29) is pushing it. I’m not even sure that’s really Kate Martin. I know she and McGinn have bad history from the Greenwood Community Council days, but I always thought she was a stand up advocate without relying on this “McPrick” stuff.

    Kate?

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @30 & 32,

    We do moderate. We like that PubliCola has grown up—raucous and smart—but still grown up comments threads.

    It’s a tricky task. While there’s some stuff (and trolls) that we send right to the trash, sometimes it’s a harder call.

    I delete the trash talk that borders on libel, and I try to jump in and remind people to keep it civil when I see stuff that’s over the line (and it helps when others chime in and back me up on that), but sometimes stuff gets by and sometimes I’m more lenient than other times.

    It’s a case by case thing without a hard and fast policy. (Sorry if that’s confusing.) Often, it depends on my mood or the overall conversation in the thread. A little random, I know.

    I agree that Kate’s comment (#29) is pushing it. I’m not even sure that’s really Kate Martin. I know she and McGinn have bad history from the Greenwood Community Council days, but I always thought she was a stand up advocate without relying on this “McPrick” stuff.

    Kate?

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @30 & 32,

    We do moderate. We like that PubliCola has grown up—raucous and smart—but still grown up comments threads.

    It’s a tricky task. While there’s some stuff (and trolls) that we send right to the trash, sometimes it’s a harder call.

    I delete the trash talk that borders on libel, and I try to jump in and remind people to keep it civil when I see stuff that’s over the line (and it helps when others chime in and back me up on that), but sometimes stuff gets by and sometimes I’m more lenient than other times.

    It’s a case by case thing without a hard and fast policy. (Sorry if that’s confusing.) Often, it depends on my mood or the overall conversation in the thread. A little random, I know.

    I agree that Kate’s comment (#29) is pushing it. I’m not even sure that’s really Kate Martin. I know she and McGinn have bad history from the Greenwood Community Council days, but I always thought she was a stand up advocate without relying on this “McPrick” stuff.

    Kate?

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @30 & 32,

    We do moderate. We like that PubliCola has grown up—raucous and smart—but still grown up comments threads.

    It’s a tricky task. While there’s some stuff (and trolls) that we send right to the trash, sometimes it’s a harder call.

    I delete the trash talk that borders on libel, and I try to jump in and remind people to keep it civil when I see stuff that’s over the line (and it helps when others chime in and back me up on that), but sometimes stuff gets by and sometimes I’m more lenient than other times.

    It’s a case by case thing without a hard and fast policy. (Sorry if that’s confusing.) Often, it depends on my mood or the overall conversation in the thread. A little random, I know.

    I agree that Kate’s comment (#29) is pushing it. I’m not even sure that’s really Kate Martin. I know she and McGinn have bad history from the Greenwood Community Council days, but I always thought she was a stand up advocate without relying on this “McPrick” stuff.

    Kate?

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @30 & 32,

    We do moderate. We like that PubliCola has grown up—raucous and smart—but still grown up comments threads.

    It’s a tricky task. While there’s some stuff (and trolls) that we send right to the trash, sometimes it’s a harder call.

    I delete the trash talk that borders on libel, and I try to jump in and remind people to keep it civil when I see stuff that’s over the line (and it helps when others chime in and back me up on that), but sometimes stuff gets by and sometimes I’m more lenient than other times.

    It’s a case by case thing without a hard and fast policy. (Sorry if that’s confusing.) Often, it depends on my mood or the overall conversation in the thread. A little random, I know.

    I agree that Kate’s comment (#29) is pushing it. I’m not even sure that’s really Kate Martin. I know she and McGinn have bad history from the Greenwood Community Council days, but I always thought she was a stand up advocate without relying on this “McPrick” stuff.

    Kate?

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @30 & 32,

    We do moderate. We like that PubliCola has grown up—raucous and smart—but still grown up comments threads.

    It’s a tricky task. While there’s some stuff (and trolls) that we send right to the trash, sometimes it’s a harder call.

    I delete the trash talk that borders on libel, and I try to jump in and remind people to keep it civil when I see stuff that’s over the line (and it helps when others chime in and back me up on that), but sometimes stuff gets by and sometimes I’m more lenient than other times.

    It’s a case by case thing without a hard and fast policy. (Sorry if that’s confusing.) Often, it depends on my mood or the overall conversation in the thread. A little random, I know.

    I agree that Kate’s comment (#29) is pushing it. I’m not even sure that’s really Kate Martin. I know she and McGinn have bad history from the Greenwood Community Council days, but I always thought she was a stand up advocate without relying on this “McPrick” stuff.

    Kate?

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @30 & 32,

    We do moderate. We like that PubliCola has grown up—raucous and smart—but still grown up comments threads.

    It’s a tricky task. While there’s some stuff (and trolls) that we send right to the trash, sometimes it’s a harder call.

    I delete the trash talk that borders on libel, and I try to jump in and remind people to keep it civil when I see stuff that’s over the line (and it helps when others chime in and back me up on that), but sometimes stuff gets by and sometimes I’m more lenient than other times.

    It’s a case by case thing without a hard and fast policy. (Sorry if that’s confusing.) Often, it depends on my mood or the overall conversation in the thread. A little random, I know.

    I agree that Kate’s comment (#29) is pushing it. I’m not even sure that’s really Kate Martin. I know she and McGinn have bad history from the Greenwood Community Council days, but I always thought she was a stand up advocate without relying on this “McPrick” stuff.

    Kate?

  • Kate Martin

    There are few people I reserve the P word for, but Mike, absolutely. I don’t know what you mean by stand up advocate, Josh I call it like it is. I don’t lie.

    I emailed you about Mikes disastrous environmental record in Greenwood and I got no retraction even though some of your writing has errors which I attempted to alert you to retract.

    I certainly deserve to tell anyone and everyone what my experience has been for over 10 years with this guy. I speak first hand and I speak for myself.

    However, Greenwood was not gaga for Mike in this election by any stretch. No Town Halls in his own backyard. He said nothing to Greenwood in his viral campaign because he didn’t want to hear anything back. Especially in front of a crowd.

    I hope the guy sharpens his pencil and goes into SDOT and clears it out. Take a zero out of their budget for starters. He hasn’t said a damn thing about them. He coddles them. I’ve watched it.

    Love the way he isn’t talking about the problems we already have and is creating new material for us in open source. Just like him.

    Get to work, Mike.

  • Kate Martin

    There are few people I reserve the P word for, but Mike, absolutely. I don’t know what you mean by stand up advocate, Josh I call it like it is. I don’t lie.

    I emailed you about Mikes disastrous environmental record in Greenwood and I got no retraction even though some of your writing has errors which I attempted to alert you to retract.

    I certainly deserve to tell anyone and everyone what my experience has been for over 10 years with this guy. I speak first hand and I speak for myself.

    However, Greenwood was not gaga for Mike in this election by any stretch. No Town Halls in his own backyard. He said nothing to Greenwood in his viral campaign because he didn’t want to hear anything back. Especially in front of a crowd.

    I hope the guy sharpens his pencil and goes into SDOT and clears it out. Take a zero out of their budget for starters. He hasn’t said a damn thing about them. He coddles them. I’ve watched it.

    Love the way he isn’t talking about the problems we already have and is creating new material for us in open source. Just like him.

    Get to work, Mike.

  • Kate Martin

    There are few people I reserve the P word for, but Mike, absolutely. I don’t know what you mean by stand up advocate, Josh I call it like it is. I don’t lie.

    I emailed you about Mikes disastrous environmental record in Greenwood and I got no retraction even though some of your writing has errors which I attempted to alert you to retract.

    I certainly deserve to tell anyone and everyone what my experience has been for over 10 years with this guy. I speak first hand and I speak for myself.

    However, Greenwood was not gaga for Mike in this election by any stretch. No Town Halls in his own backyard. He said nothing to Greenwood in his viral campaign because he didn’t want to hear anything back. Especially in front of a crowd.

    I hope the guy sharpens his pencil and goes into SDOT and clears it out. Take a zero out of their budget for starters. He hasn’t said a damn thing about them. He coddles them. I’ve watched it.

    Love the way he isn’t talking about the problems we already have and is creating new material for us in open source. Just like him.

    Get to work, Mike.

  • Kate Martin

    There are few people I reserve the P word for, but Mike, absolutely. I don’t know what you mean by stand up advocate, Josh I call it like it is. I don’t lie.

    I emailed you about Mikes disastrous environmental record in Greenwood and I got no retraction even though some of your writing has errors which I attempted to alert you to retract.

    I certainly deserve to tell anyone and everyone what my experience has been for over 10 years with this guy. I speak first hand and I speak for myself.

    However, Greenwood was not gaga for Mike in this election by any stretch. No Town Halls in his own backyard. He said nothing to Greenwood in his viral campaign because he didn’t want to hear anything back. Especially in front of a crowd.

    I hope the guy sharpens his pencil and goes into SDOT and clears it out. Take a zero out of their budget for starters. He hasn’t said a damn thing about them. He coddles them. I’ve watched it.

    Love the way he isn’t talking about the problems we already have and is creating new material for us in open source. Just like him.

    Get to work, Mike.

  • Kate Martin

    There are few people I reserve the P word for, but Mike, absolutely. I don’t know what you mean by stand up advocate, Josh I call it like it is. I don’t lie.

    I emailed you about Mikes disastrous environmental record in Greenwood and I got no retraction even though some of your writing has errors which I attempted to alert you to retract.

    I certainly deserve to tell anyone and everyone what my experience has been for over 10 years with this guy. I speak first hand and I speak for myself.

    However, Greenwood was not gaga for Mike in this election by any stretch. No Town Halls in his own backyard. He said nothing to Greenwood in his viral campaign because he didn’t want to hear anything back. Especially in front of a crowd.

    I hope the guy sharpens his pencil and goes into SDOT and clears it out. Take a zero out of their budget for starters. He hasn’t said a damn thing about them. He coddles them. I’ve watched it.

    Love the way he isn’t talking about the problems we already have and is creating new material for us in open source. Just like him.

    Get to work, Mike.

  • Kate Martin

    There are few people I reserve the P word for, but Mike, absolutely. I don’t know what you mean by stand up advocate, Josh I call it like it is. I don’t lie.

    I emailed you about Mikes disastrous environmental record in Greenwood and I got no retraction even though some of your writing has errors which I attempted to alert you to retract.

    I certainly deserve to tell anyone and everyone what my experience has been for over 10 years with this guy. I speak first hand and I speak for myself.

    However, Greenwood was not gaga for Mike in this election by any stretch. No Town Halls in his own backyard. He said nothing to Greenwood in his viral campaign because he didn’t want to hear anything back. Especially in front of a crowd.

    I hope the guy sharpens his pencil and goes into SDOT and clears it out. Take a zero out of their budget for starters. He hasn’t said a damn thing about them. He coddles them. I’ve watched it.

    Love the way he isn’t talking about the problems we already have and is creating new material for us in open source. Just like him.

    Get to work, Mike.

  • Kate Martin

    There are few people I reserve the P word for, but Mike, absolutely. I don’t know what you mean by stand up advocate, Josh I call it like it is. I don’t lie.

    I emailed you about Mikes disastrous environmental record in Greenwood and I got no retraction even though some of your writing has errors which I attempted to alert you to retract.

    I certainly deserve to tell anyone and everyone what my experience has been for over 10 years with this guy. I speak first hand and I speak for myself.

    However, Greenwood was not gaga for Mike in this election by any stretch. No Town Halls in his own backyard. He said nothing to Greenwood in his viral campaign because he didn’t want to hear anything back. Especially in front of a crowd.

    I hope the guy sharpens his pencil and goes into SDOT and clears it out. Take a zero out of their budget for starters. He hasn’t said a damn thing about them. He coddles them. I’ve watched it.

    Love the way he isn’t talking about the problems we already have and is creating new material for us in open source. Just like him.

    Get to work, Mike.

  • Kate Martin

    There are few people I reserve the P word for, but Mike, absolutely. I don’t know what you mean by stand up advocate, Josh I call it like it is. I don’t lie.

    I emailed you about Mikes disastrous environmental record in Greenwood and I got no retraction even though some of your writing has errors which I attempted to alert you to retract.

    I certainly deserve to tell anyone and everyone what my experience has been for over 10 years with this guy. I speak first hand and I speak for myself.

    However, Greenwood was not gaga for Mike in this election by any stretch. No Town Halls in his own backyard. He said nothing to Greenwood in his viral campaign because he didn’t want to hear anything back. Especially in front of a crowd.

    I hope the guy sharpens his pencil and goes into SDOT and clears it out. Take a zero out of their budget for starters. He hasn’t said a damn thing about them. He coddles them. I’ve watched it.

    Love the way he isn’t talking about the problems we already have and is creating new material for us in open source. Just like him.

    Get to work, Mike.

  • Kate Martin

    There are few people I reserve the P word for, but Mike, absolutely. I don’t know what you mean by stand up advocate, Josh I call it like it is. I don’t lie.

    I emailed you about Mikes disastrous environmental record in Greenwood and I got no retraction even though some of your writing has errors which I attempted to alert you to retract.

    I certainly deserve to tell anyone and everyone what my experience has been for over 10 years with this guy. I speak first hand and I speak for myself.

    However, Greenwood was not gaga for Mike in this election by any stretch. No Town Halls in his own backyard. He said nothing to Greenwood in his viral campaign because he didn’t want to hear anything back. Especially in front of a crowd.

    I hope the guy sharpens his pencil and goes into SDOT and clears it out. Take a zero out of their budget for starters. He hasn’t said a damn thing about them. He coddles them. I’ve watched it.

    Love the way he isn’t talking about the problems we already have and is creating new material for us in open source. Just like him.

    Get to work, Mike.

  • Kate Martin

    There are few people I reserve the P word for, but Mike, absolutely. I don’t know what you mean by stand up advocate, Josh I call it like it is. I don’t lie.

    I emailed you about Mikes disastrous environmental record in Greenwood and I got no retraction even though some of your writing has errors which I attempted to alert you to retract.

    I certainly deserve to tell anyone and everyone what my experience has been for over 10 years with this guy. I speak first hand and I speak for myself.

    However, Greenwood was not gaga for Mike in this election by any stretch. No Town Halls in his own backyard. He said nothing to Greenwood in his viral campaign because he didn’t want to hear anything back. Especially in front of a crowd.

    I hope the guy sharpens his pencil and goes into SDOT and clears it out. Take a zero out of their budget for starters. He hasn’t said a damn thing about them. He coddles them. I’ve watched it.

    Love the way he isn’t talking about the problems we already have and is creating new material for us in open source. Just like him.

    Get to work, Mike.

  • Kate Martin

    There are few people I reserve the P word for, but Mike, absolutely. I don’t know what you mean by stand up advocate, Josh I call it like it is. I don’t lie.

    I emailed you about Mikes disastrous environmental record in Greenwood and I got no retraction even though some of your writing has errors which I attempted to alert you to retract.

    I certainly deserve to tell anyone and everyone what my experience has been for over 10 years with this guy. I speak first hand and I speak for myself.

    However, Greenwood was not gaga for Mike in this election by any stretch. No Town Halls in his own backyard. He said nothing to Greenwood in his viral campaign because he didn’t want to hear anything back. Especially in front of a crowd.

    I hope the guy sharpens his pencil and goes into SDOT and clears it out. Take a zero out of their budget for starters. He hasn’t said a damn thing about them. He coddles them. I’ve watched it.

    Love the way he isn’t talking about the problems we already have and is creating new material for us in open source. Just like him.

    Get to work, Mike.

  • Kate Martin

    There are few people I reserve the P word for, but Mike, absolutely. I don’t know what you mean by stand up advocate, Josh I call it like it is. I don’t lie.

    I emailed you about Mikes disastrous environmental record in Greenwood and I got no retraction even though some of your writing has errors which I attempted to alert you to retract.

    I certainly deserve to tell anyone and everyone what my experience has been for over 10 years with this guy. I speak first hand and I speak for myself.

    However, Greenwood was not gaga for Mike in this election by any stretch. No Town Halls in his own backyard. He said nothing to Greenwood in his viral campaign because he didn’t want to hear anything back. Especially in front of a crowd.

    I hope the guy sharpens his pencil and goes into SDOT and clears it out. Take a zero out of their budget for starters. He hasn’t said a damn thing about them. He coddles them. I’ve watched it.

    Love the way he isn’t talking about the problems we already have and is creating new material for us in open source. Just like him.

    Get to work, Mike.

  • Kate Martin

    There are few people I reserve the P word for, but Mike, absolutely. I don’t know what you mean by stand up advocate, Josh I call it like it is. I don’t lie.

    I emailed you about Mikes disastrous environmental record in Greenwood and I got no retraction even though some of your writing has errors which I attempted to alert you to retract.

    I certainly deserve to tell anyone and everyone what my experience has been for over 10 years with this guy. I speak first hand and I speak for myself.

    However, Greenwood was not gaga for Mike in this election by any stretch. No Town Halls in his own backyard. He said nothing to Greenwood in his viral campaign because he didn’t want to hear anything back. Especially in front of a crowd.

    I hope the guy sharpens his pencil and goes into SDOT and clears it out. Take a zero out of their budget for starters. He hasn’t said a damn thing about them. He coddles them. I’ve watched it.

    Love the way he isn’t talking about the problems we already have and is creating new material for us in open source. Just like him.

    Get to work, Mike.

  • Kate Martin

    There are few people I reserve the P word for, but Mike, absolutely. I don’t know what you mean by stand up advocate, Josh I call it like it is. I don’t lie.

    I emailed you about Mikes disastrous environmental record in Greenwood and I got no retraction even though some of your writing has errors which I attempted to alert you to retract.

    I certainly deserve to tell anyone and everyone what my experience has been for over 10 years with this guy. I speak first hand and I speak for myself.

    However, Greenwood was not gaga for Mike in this election by any stretch. No Town Halls in his own backyard. He said nothing to Greenwood in his viral campaign because he didn’t want to hear anything back. Especially in front of a crowd.

    I hope the guy sharpens his pencil and goes into SDOT and clears it out. Take a zero out of their budget for starters. He hasn’t said a damn thing about them. He coddles them. I’ve watched it.

    Love the way he isn’t talking about the problems we already have and is creating new material for us in open source. Just like him.

    Get to work, Mike.

  • Kate Martin

    There are few people I reserve the P word for, but Mike, absolutely. I don’t know what you mean by stand up advocate, Josh I call it like it is. I don’t lie.

    I emailed you about Mikes disastrous environmental record in Greenwood and I got no retraction even though some of your writing has errors which I attempted to alert you to retract.

    I certainly deserve to tell anyone and everyone what my experience has been for over 10 years with this guy. I speak first hand and I speak for myself.

    However, Greenwood was not gaga for Mike in this election by any stretch. No Town Halls in his own backyard. He said nothing to Greenwood in his viral campaign because he didn’t want to hear anything back. Especially in front of a crowd.

    I hope the guy sharpens his pencil and goes into SDOT and clears it out. Take a zero out of their budget for starters. He hasn’t said a damn thing about them. He coddles them. I’ve watched it.

    Love the way he isn’t talking about the problems we already have and is creating new material for us in open source. Just like him.

    Get to work, Mike.

  • Kate Martin

    There are few people I reserve the P word for, but Mike, absolutely. I don’t know what you mean by stand up advocate, Josh I call it like it is. I don’t lie.

    I emailed you about Mikes disastrous environmental record in Greenwood and I got no retraction even though some of your writing has errors which I attempted to alert you to retract.

    I certainly deserve to tell anyone and everyone what my experience has been for over 10 years with this guy. I speak first hand and I speak for myself.

    However, Greenwood was not gaga for Mike in this election by any stretch. No Town Halls in his own backyard. He said nothing to Greenwood in his viral campaign because he didn’t want to hear anything back. Especially in front of a crowd.

    I hope the guy sharpens his pencil and goes into SDOT and clears it out. Take a zero out of their budget for starters. He hasn’t said a damn thing about them. He coddles them. I’ve watched it.

    Love the way he isn’t talking about the problems we already have and is creating new material for us in open source. Just like him.

    Get to work, Mike.

  • Kate Martin

    There are few people I reserve the P word for, but Mike, absolutely. I don’t know what you mean by stand up advocate, Josh I call it like it is. I don’t lie.

    I emailed you about Mikes disastrous environmental record in Greenwood and I got no retraction even though some of your writing has errors which I attempted to alert you to retract.

    I certainly deserve to tell anyone and everyone what my experience has been for over 10 years with this guy. I speak first hand and I speak for myself.

    However, Greenwood was not gaga for Mike in this election by any stretch. No Town Halls in his own backyard. He said nothing to Greenwood in his viral campaign because he didn’t want to hear anything back. Especially in front of a crowd.

    I hope the guy sharpens his pencil and goes into SDOT and clears it out. Take a zero out of their budget for starters. He hasn’t said a damn thing about them. He coddles them. I’ve watched it.

    Love the way he isn’t talking about the problems we already have and is creating new material for us in open source. Just like him.

    Get to work, Mike.

  • Kate Martin

    There are few people I reserve the P word for, but Mike, absolutely. I don’t know what you mean by stand up advocate, Josh I call it like it is. I don’t lie.

    I emailed you about Mikes disastrous environmental record in Greenwood and I got no retraction even though some of your writing has errors which I attempted to alert you to retract.

    I certainly deserve to tell anyone and everyone what my experience has been for over 10 years with this guy. I speak first hand and I speak for myself.

    However, Greenwood was not gaga for Mike in this election by any stretch. No Town Halls in his own backyard. He said nothing to Greenwood in his viral campaign because he didn’t want to hear anything back. Especially in front of a crowd.

    I hope the guy sharpens his pencil and goes into SDOT and clears it out. Take a zero out of their budget for starters. He hasn’t said a damn thing about them. He coddles them. I’ve watched it.

    Love the way he isn’t talking about the problems we already have and is creating new material for us in open source. Just like him.

    Get to work, Mike.

  • Kate Martin

    There are few people I reserve the P word for, but Mike, absolutely. I don’t know what you mean by stand up advocate, Josh I call it like it is. I don’t lie.

    I emailed you about Mikes disastrous environmental record in Greenwood and I got no retraction even though some of your writing has errors which I attempted to alert you to retract.

    I certainly deserve to tell anyone and everyone what my experience has been for over 10 years with this guy. I speak first hand and I speak for myself.

    However, Greenwood was not gaga for Mike in this election by any stretch. No Town Halls in his own backyard. He said nothing to Greenwood in his viral campaign because he didn’t want to hear anything back. Especially in front of a crowd.

    I hope the guy sharpens his pencil and goes into SDOT and clears it out. Take a zero out of their budget for starters. He hasn’t said a damn thing about them. He coddles them. I’ve watched it.

    Love the way he isn’t talking about the problems we already have and is creating new material for us in open source. Just like him.

    Get to work, Mike.

  • Kate Martin

    There are few people I reserve the P word for, but Mike, absolutely. I don’t know what you mean by stand up advocate, Josh I call it like it is. I don’t lie.

    I emailed you about Mikes disastrous environmental record in Greenwood and I got no retraction even though some of your writing has errors which I attempted to alert you to retract.

    I certainly deserve to tell anyone and everyone what my experience has been for over 10 years with this guy. I speak first hand and I speak for myself.

    However, Greenwood was not gaga for Mike in this election by any stretch. No Town Halls in his own backyard. He said nothing to Greenwood in his viral campaign because he didn’t want to hear anything back. Especially in front of a crowd.

    I hope the guy sharpens his pencil and goes into SDOT and clears it out. Take a zero out of their budget for starters. He hasn’t said a damn thing about them. He coddles them. I’ve watched it.

    Love the way he isn’t talking about the problems we already have and is creating new material for us in open source. Just like him.

    Get to work, Mike.

  • Kate Martin

    There are few people I reserve the P word for, but Mike, absolutely. I don’t know what you mean by stand up advocate, Josh I call it like it is. I don’t lie.

    I emailed you about Mikes disastrous environmental record in Greenwood and I got no retraction even though some of your writing has errors which I attempted to alert you to retract.

    I certainly deserve to tell anyone and everyone what my experience has been for over 10 years with this guy. I speak first hand and I speak for myself.

    However, Greenwood was not gaga for Mike in this election by any stretch. No Town Halls in his own backyard. He said nothing to Greenwood in his viral campaign because he didn’t want to hear anything back. Especially in front of a crowd.

    I hope the guy sharpens his pencil and goes into SDOT and clears it out. Take a zero out of their budget for starters. He hasn’t said a damn thing about them. He coddles them. I’ve watched it.

    Love the way he isn’t talking about the problems we already have and is creating new material for us in open source. Just like him.

    Get to work, Mike.

  • Kate Martin

    There are few people I reserve the P word for, but Mike, absolutely. I don’t know what you mean by stand up advocate, Josh I call it like it is. I don’t lie.

    I emailed you about Mikes disastrous environmental record in Greenwood and I got no retraction even though some of your writing has errors which I attempted to alert you to retract.

    I certainly deserve to tell anyone and everyone what my experience has been for over 10 years with this guy. I speak first hand and I speak for myself.

    However, Greenwood was not gaga for Mike in this election by any stretch. No Town Halls in his own backyard. He said nothing to Greenwood in his viral campaign because he didn’t want to hear anything back. Especially in front of a crowd.

    I hope the guy sharpens his pencil and goes into SDOT and clears it out. Take a zero out of their budget for starters. He hasn’t said a damn thing about them. He coddles them. I’ve watched it.

    Love the way he isn’t talking about the problems we already have and is creating new material for us in open source. Just like him.

    Get to work, Mike.

  • Kate Martin

    There are few people I reserve the P word for, but Mike, absolutely. I don’t know what you mean by stand up advocate, Josh I call it like it is. I don’t lie.

    I emailed you about Mikes disastrous environmental record in Greenwood and I got no retraction even though some of your writing has errors which I attempted to alert you to retract.

    I certainly deserve to tell anyone and everyone what my experience has been for over 10 years with this guy. I speak first hand and I speak for myself.

    However, Greenwood was not gaga for Mike in this election by any stretch. No Town Halls in his own backyard. He said nothing to Greenwood in his viral campaign because he didn’t want to hear anything back. Especially in front of a crowd.

    I hope the guy sharpens his pencil and goes into SDOT and clears it out. Take a zero out of their budget for starters. He hasn’t said a damn thing about them. He coddles them. I’ve watched it.

    Love the way he isn’t talking about the problems we already have and is creating new material for us in open source. Just like him.

    Get to work, Mike.

  • Kate Martin

    There are few people I reserve the P word for, but Mike, absolutely. I don’t know what you mean by stand up advocate, Josh I call it like it is. I don’t lie.

    I emailed you about Mikes disastrous environmental record in Greenwood and I got no retraction even though some of your writing has errors which I attempted to alert you to retract.

    I certainly deserve to tell anyone and everyone what my experience has been for over 10 years with this guy. I speak first hand and I speak for myself.

    However, Greenwood was not gaga for Mike in this election by any stretch. No Town Halls in his own backyard. He said nothing to Greenwood in his viral campaign because he didn’t want to hear anything back. Especially in front of a crowd.

    I hope the guy sharpens his pencil and goes into SDOT and clears it out. Take a zero out of their budget for starters. He hasn’t said a damn thing about them. He coddles them. I’ve watched it.

    Love the way he isn’t talking about the problems we already have and is creating new material for us in open source. Just like him.

    Get to work, Mike.

  • Kate Martin

    There are few people I reserve the P word for, but Mike, absolutely. I don’t know what you mean by stand up advocate, Josh I call it like it is. I don’t lie.

    I emailed you about Mikes disastrous environmental record in Greenwood and I got no retraction even though some of your writing has errors which I attempted to alert you to retract.

    I certainly deserve to tell anyone and everyone what my experience has been for over 10 years with this guy. I speak first hand and I speak for myself.

    However, Greenwood was not gaga for Mike in this election by any stretch. No Town Halls in his own backyard. He said nothing to Greenwood in his viral campaign because he didn’t want to hear anything back. Especially in front of a crowd.

    I hope the guy sharpens his pencil and goes into SDOT and clears it out. Take a zero out of their budget for starters. He hasn’t said a damn thing about them. He coddles them. I’ve watched it.

    Love the way he isn’t talking about the problems we already have and is creating new material for us in open source. Just like him.

    Get to work, Mike.

  • Kate Martin

    There are few people I reserve the P word for, but Mike, absolutely. I don’t know what you mean by stand up advocate, Josh I call it like it is. I don’t lie.

    I emailed you about Mikes disastrous environmental record in Greenwood and I got no retraction even though some of your writing has errors which I attempted to alert you to retract.

    I certainly deserve to tell anyone and everyone what my experience has been for over 10 years with this guy. I speak first hand and I speak for myself.

    However, Greenwood was not gaga for Mike in this election by any stretch. No Town Halls in his own backyard. He said nothing to Greenwood in his viral campaign because he didn’t want to hear anything back. Especially in front of a crowd.

    I hope the guy sharpens his pencil and goes into SDOT and clears it out. Take a zero out of their budget for starters. He hasn’t said a damn thing about them. He coddles them. I’ve watched it.

    Love the way he isn’t talking about the problems we already have and is creating new material for us in open source. Just like him.

    Get to work, Mike.

  • Kate Martin

    There are few people I reserve the P word for, but Mike, absolutely. I don’t know what you mean by stand up advocate, Josh I call it like it is. I don’t lie.

    I emailed you about Mikes disastrous environmental record in Greenwood and I got no retraction even though some of your writing has errors which I attempted to alert you to retract.

    I certainly deserve to tell anyone and everyone what my experience has been for over 10 years with this guy. I speak first hand and I speak for myself.

    However, Greenwood was not gaga for Mike in this election by any stretch. No Town Halls in his own backyard. He said nothing to Greenwood in his viral campaign because he didn’t want to hear anything back. Especially in front of a crowd.

    I hope the guy sharpens his pencil and goes into SDOT and clears it out. Take a zero out of their budget for starters. He hasn’t said a damn thing about them. He coddles them. I’ve watched it.

    Love the way he isn’t talking about the problems we already have and is creating new material for us in open source. Just like him.

    Get to work, Mike.

  • Kate Martin

    There are few people I reserve the P word for, but Mike, absolutely. I don’t know what you mean by stand up advocate, Josh I call it like it is. I don’t lie.

    I emailed you about Mikes disastrous environmental record in Greenwood and I got no retraction even though some of your writing has errors which I attempted to alert you to retract.

    I certainly deserve to tell anyone and everyone what my experience has been for over 10 years with this guy. I speak first hand and I speak for myself.

    However, Greenwood was not gaga for Mike in this election by any stretch. No Town Halls in his own backyard. He said nothing to Greenwood in his viral campaign because he didn’t want to hear anything back. Especially in front of a crowd.

    I hope the guy sharpens his pencil and goes into SDOT and clears it out. Take a zero out of their budget for starters. He hasn’t said a damn thing about them. He coddles them. I’ve watched it.

    Love the way he isn’t talking about the problems we already have and is creating new material for us in open source. Just like him.

    Get to work, Mike.

  • Kate Martin

    There are few people I reserve the P word for, but Mike, absolutely. I don’t know what you mean by stand up advocate, Josh I call it like it is. I don’t lie.

    I emailed you about Mikes disastrous environmental record in Greenwood and I got no retraction even though some of your writing has errors which I attempted to alert you to retract.

    I certainly deserve to tell anyone and everyone what my experience has been for over 10 years with this guy. I speak first hand and I speak for myself.

    However, Greenwood was not gaga for Mike in this election by any stretch. No Town Halls in his own backyard. He said nothing to Greenwood in his viral campaign because he didn’t want to hear anything back. Especially in front of a crowd.

    I hope the guy sharpens his pencil and goes into SDOT and clears it out. Take a zero out of their budget for starters. He hasn’t said a damn thing about them. He coddles them. I’ve watched it.

    Love the way he isn’t talking about the problems we already have and is creating new material for us in open source. Just like him.

    Get to work, Mike.

  • Kate Martin

    There are few people I reserve the P word for, but Mike, absolutely. I don’t know what you mean by stand up advocate, Josh I call it like it is. I don’t lie.

    I emailed you about Mikes disastrous environmental record in Greenwood and I got no retraction even though some of your writing has errors which I attempted to alert you to retract.

    I certainly deserve to tell anyone and everyone what my experience has been for over 10 years with this guy. I speak first hand and I speak for myself.

    However, Greenwood was not gaga for Mike in this election by any stretch. No Town Halls in his own backyard. He said nothing to Greenwood in his viral campaign because he didn’t want to hear anything back. Especially in front of a crowd.

    I hope the guy sharpens his pencil and goes into SDOT and clears it out. Take a zero out of their budget for starters. He hasn’t said a damn thing about them. He coddles them. I’ve watched it.

    Love the way he isn’t talking about the problems we already have and is creating new material for us in open source. Just like him.

    Get to work, Mike.

  • Kate Martin

    There are few people I reserve the P word for, but Mike, absolutely. I don’t know what you mean by stand up advocate, Josh I call it like it is. I don’t lie.

    I emailed you about Mikes disastrous environmental record in Greenwood and I got no retraction even though some of your writing has errors which I attempted to alert you to retract.

    I certainly deserve to tell anyone and everyone what my experience has been for over 10 years with this guy. I speak first hand and I speak for myself.

    However, Greenwood was not gaga for Mike in this election by any stretch. No Town Halls in his own backyard. He said nothing to Greenwood in his viral campaign because he didn’t want to hear anything back. Especially in front of a crowd.

    I hope the guy sharpens his pencil and goes into SDOT and clears it out. Take a zero out of their budget for starters. He hasn’t said a damn thing about them. He coddles them. I’ve watched it.

    Love the way he isn’t talking about the problems we already have and is creating new material for us in open source. Just like him.

    Get to work, Mike.

  • Kate Martin

    There are few people I reserve the P word for, but Mike, absolutely. I don’t know what you mean by stand up advocate, Josh I call it like it is. I don’t lie.

    I emailed you about Mikes disastrous environmental record in Greenwood and I got no retraction even though some of your writing has errors which I attempted to alert you to retract.

    I certainly deserve to tell anyone and everyone what my experience has been for over 10 years with this guy. I speak first hand and I speak for myself.

    However, Greenwood was not gaga for Mike in this election by any stretch. No Town Halls in his own backyard. He said nothing to Greenwood in his viral campaign because he didn’t want to hear anything back. Especially in front of a crowd.

    I hope the guy sharpens his pencil and goes into SDOT and clears it out. Take a zero out of their budget for starters. He hasn’t said a damn thing about them. He coddles them. I’ve watched it.

    Love the way he isn’t talking about the problems we already have and is creating new material for us in open source. Just like him.

    Get to work, Mike.

  • Kate Martin

    There are few people I reserve the P word for, but Mike, absolutely. I don’t know what you mean by stand up advocate, Josh I call it like it is. I don’t lie.

    I emailed you about Mikes disastrous environmental record in Greenwood and I got no retraction even though some of your writing has errors which I attempted to alert you to retract.

    I certainly deserve to tell anyone and everyone what my experience has been for over 10 years with this guy. I speak first hand and I speak for myself.

    However, Greenwood was not gaga for Mike in this election by any stretch. No Town Halls in his own backyard. He said nothing to Greenwood in his viral campaign because he didn’t want to hear anything back. Especially in front of a crowd.

    I hope the guy sharpens his pencil and goes into SDOT and clears it out. Take a zero out of their budget for starters. He hasn’t said a damn thing about them. He coddles them. I’ve watched it.

    Love the way he isn’t talking about the problems we already have and is creating new material for us in open source. Just like him.

    Get to work, Mike.

  • Kate Martin

    There are few people I reserve the P word for, but Mike, absolutely. I don’t know what you mean by stand up advocate, Josh I call it like it is. I don’t lie.

    I emailed you about Mikes disastrous environmental record in Greenwood and I got no retraction even though some of your writing has errors which I attempted to alert you to retract.

    I certainly deserve to tell anyone and everyone what my experience has been for over 10 years with this guy. I speak first hand and I speak for myself.

    However, Greenwood was not gaga for Mike in this election by any stretch. No Town Halls in his own backyard. He said nothing to Greenwood in his viral campaign because he didn’t want to hear anything back. Especially in front of a crowd.

    I hope the guy sharpens his pencil and goes into SDOT and clears it out. Take a zero out of their budget for starters. He hasn’t said a damn thing about them. He coddles them. I’ve watched it.

    Love the way he isn’t talking about the problems we already have and is creating new material for us in open source. Just like him.

    Get to work, Mike.

  • Kate Martin

    There are few people I reserve the P word for, but Mike, absolutely. I don’t know what you mean by stand up advocate, Josh I call it like it is. I don’t lie.

    I emailed you about Mikes disastrous environmental record in Greenwood and I got no retraction even though some of your writing has errors which I attempted to alert you to retract.

    I certainly deserve to tell anyone and everyone what my experience has been for over 10 years with this guy. I speak first hand and I speak for myself.

    However, Greenwood was not gaga for Mike in this election by any stretch. No Town Halls in his own backyard. He said nothing to Greenwood in his viral campaign because he didn’t want to hear anything back. Especially in front of a crowd.

    I hope the guy sharpens his pencil and goes into SDOT and clears it out. Take a zero out of their budget for starters. He hasn’t said a damn thing about them. He coddles them. I’ve watched it.

    Love the way he isn’t talking about the problems we already have and is creating new material for us in open source. Just like him.

    Get to work, Mike.

  • Kate Martin

    There are few people I reserve the P word for, but Mike, absolutely. I don’t know what you mean by stand up advocate, Josh I call it like it is. I don’t lie.

    I emailed you about Mikes disastrous environmental record in Greenwood and I got no retraction even though some of your writing has errors which I attempted to alert you to retract.

    I certainly deserve to tell anyone and everyone what my experience has been for over 10 years with this guy. I speak first hand and I speak for myself.

    However, Greenwood was not gaga for Mike in this election by any stretch. No Town Halls in his own backyard. He said nothing to Greenwood in his viral campaign because he didn’t want to hear anything back. Especially in front of a crowd.

    I hope the guy sharpens his pencil and goes into SDOT and clears it out. Take a zero out of their budget for starters. He hasn’t said a damn thing about them. He coddles them. I’ve watched it.

    Love the way he isn’t talking about the problems we already have and is creating new material for us in open source. Just like him.

    Get to work, Mike.

  • Kate Martin

    There are few people I reserve the P word for, but Mike, absolutely. I don’t know what you mean by stand up advocate, Josh I call it like it is. I don’t lie.

    I emailed you about Mikes disastrous environmental record in Greenwood and I got no retraction even though some of your writing has errors which I attempted to alert you to retract.

    I certainly deserve to tell anyone and everyone what my experience has been for over 10 years with this guy. I speak first hand and I speak for myself.

    However, Greenwood was not gaga for Mike in this election by any stretch. No Town Halls in his own backyard. He said nothing to Greenwood in his viral campaign because he didn’t want to hear anything back. Especially in front of a crowd.

    I hope the guy sharpens his pencil and goes into SDOT and clears it out. Take a zero out of their budget for starters. He hasn’t said a damn thing about them. He coddles them. I’ve watched it.

    Love the way he isn’t talking about the problems we already have and is creating new material for us in open source. Just like him.

    Get to work, Mike.

  • Kate Martin

    There are few people I reserve the P word for, but Mike, absolutely. I don’t know what you mean by stand up advocate, Josh I call it like it is. I don’t lie.

    I emailed you about Mikes disastrous environmental record in Greenwood and I got no retraction even though some of your writing has errors which I attempted to alert you to retract.

    I certainly deserve to tell anyone and everyone what my experience has been for over 10 years with this guy. I speak first hand and I speak for myself.

    However, Greenwood was not gaga for Mike in this election by any stretch. No Town Halls in his own backyard. He said nothing to Greenwood in his viral campaign because he didn’t want to hear anything back. Especially in front of a crowd.

    I hope the guy sharpens his pencil and goes into SDOT and clears it out. Take a zero out of their budget for starters. He hasn’t said a damn thing about them. He coddles them. I’ve watched it.

    Love the way he isn’t talking about the problems we already have and is creating new material for us in open source. Just like him.

    Get to work, Mike.

  • Kate Martin

    There are few people I reserve the P word for, but Mike, absolutely. I don’t know what you mean by stand up advocate, Josh I call it like it is. I don’t lie.

    I emailed you about Mikes disastrous environmental record in Greenwood and I got no retraction even though some of your writing has errors which I attempted to alert you to retract.

    I certainly deserve to tell anyone and everyone what my experience has been for over 10 years with this guy. I speak first hand and I speak for myself.

    However, Greenwood was not gaga for Mike in this election by any stretch. No Town Halls in his own backyard. He said nothing to Greenwood in his viral campaign because he didn’t want to hear anything back. Especially in front of a crowd.

    I hope the guy sharpens his pencil and goes into SDOT and clears it out. Take a zero out of their budget for starters. He hasn’t said a damn thing about them. He coddles them. I’ve watched it.

    Love the way he isn’t talking about the problems we already have and is creating new material for us in open source. Just like him.

    Get to work, Mike.

  • Kate Martin

    There are few people I reserve the P word for, but Mike, absolutely. I don’t know what you mean by stand up advocate, Josh I call it like it is. I don’t lie.

    I emailed you about Mikes disastrous environmental record in Greenwood and I got no retraction even though some of your writing has errors which I attempted to alert you to retract.

    I certainly deserve to tell anyone and everyone what my experience has been for over 10 years with this guy. I speak first hand and I speak for myself.

    However, Greenwood was not gaga for Mike in this election by any stretch. No Town Halls in his own backyard. He said nothing to Greenwood in his viral campaign because he didn’t want to hear anything back. Especially in front of a crowd.

    I hope the guy sharpens his pencil and goes into SDOT and clears it out. Take a zero out of their budget for starters. He hasn’t said a damn thing about them. He coddles them. I’ve watched it.

    Love the way he isn’t talking about the problems we already have and is creating new material for us in open source. Just like him.

    Get to work, Mike.

  • PCO37

    Last night was a great event to celebrate the success of a new coalition and reflected the diversity of all of Seattle, but especially the 37th Legislative District, the first Democratic organization to endorse McGinn (and Mallahan). The venue was the scene of most of the forums for New Americans in the primary and the general election campaigns. It was there that Mike won the soul of the new majority of South Seattle.

  • PCO37

    Last night was a great event to celebrate the success of a new coalition and reflected the diversity of all of Seattle, but especially the 37th Legislative District, the first Democratic organization to endorse McGinn (and Mallahan). The venue was the scene of most of the forums for New Americans in the primary and the general election campaigns. It was there that Mike won the soul of the new majority of South Seattle.

  • PCO37

    Last night was a great event to celebrate the success of a new coalition and reflected the diversity of all of Seattle, but especially the 37th Legislative District, the first Democratic organization to endorse McGinn (and Mallahan). The venue was the scene of most of the forums for New Americans in the primary and the general election campaigns. It was there that Mike won the soul of the new majority of South Seattle.

  • PCO37

    Last night was a great event to celebrate the success of a new coalition and reflected the diversity of all of Seattle, but especially the 37th Legislative District, the first Democratic organization to endorse McGinn (and Mallahan). The venue was the scene of most of the forums for New Americans in the primary and the general election campaigns. It was there that Mike won the soul of the new majority of South Seattle.

  • PCO37

    Last night was a great event to celebrate the success of a new coalition and reflected the diversity of all of Seattle, but especially the 37th Legislative District, the first Democratic organization to endorse McGinn (and Mallahan). The venue was the scene of most of the forums for New Americans in the primary and the general election campaigns. It was there that Mike won the soul of the new majority of South Seattle.

  • PCO37

    Last night was a great event to celebrate the success of a new coalition and reflected the diversity of all of Seattle, but especially the 37th Legislative District, the first Democratic organization to endorse McGinn (and Mallahan). The venue was the scene of most of the forums for New Americans in the primary and the general election campaigns. It was there that Mike won the soul of the new majority of South Seattle.

  • PCO37

    Last night was a great event to celebrate the success of a new coalition and reflected the diversity of all of Seattle, but especially the 37th Legislative District, the first Democratic organization to endorse McGinn (and Mallahan). The venue was the scene of most of the forums for New Americans in the primary and the general election campaigns. It was there that Mike won the soul of the new majority of South Seattle.

  • PCO37

    Last night was a great event to celebrate the success of a new coalition and reflected the diversity of all of Seattle, but especially the 37th Legislative District, the first Democratic organization to endorse McGinn (and Mallahan). The venue was the scene of most of the forums for New Americans in the primary and the general election campaigns. It was there that Mike won the soul of the new majority of South Seattle.

  • PCO37

    Last night was a great event to celebrate the success of a new coalition and reflected the diversity of all of Seattle, but especially the 37th Legislative District, the first Democratic organization to endorse McGinn (and Mallahan). The venue was the scene of most of the forums for New Americans in the primary and the general election campaigns. It was there that Mike won the soul of the new majority of South Seattle.

  • PCO37

    Last night was a great event to celebrate the success of a new coalition and reflected the diversity of all of Seattle, but especially the 37th Legislative District, the first Democratic organization to endorse McGinn (and Mallahan). The venue was the scene of most of the forums for New Americans in the primary and the general election campaigns. It was there that Mike won the soul of the new majority of South Seattle.

  • PCO37

    Last night was a great event to celebrate the success of a new coalition and reflected the diversity of all of Seattle, but especially the 37th Legislative District, the first Democratic organization to endorse McGinn (and Mallahan). The venue was the scene of most of the forums for New Americans in the primary and the general election campaigns. It was there that Mike won the soul of the new majority of South Seattle.

  • PCO37

    Last night was a great event to celebrate the success of a new coalition and reflected the diversity of all of Seattle, but especially the 37th Legislative District, the first Democratic organization to endorse McGinn (and Mallahan). The venue was the scene of most of the forums for New Americans in the primary and the general election campaigns. It was there that Mike won the soul of the new majority of South Seattle.

  • PCO37

    Last night was a great event to celebrate the success of a new coalition and reflected the diversity of all of Seattle, but especially the 37th Legislative District, the first Democratic organization to endorse McGinn (and Mallahan). The venue was the scene of most of the forums for New Americans in the primary and the general election campaigns. It was there that Mike won the soul of the new majority of South Seattle.

  • PCO37

    Last night was a great event to celebrate the success of a new coalition and reflected the diversity of all of Seattle, but especially the 37th Legislative District, the first Democratic organization to endorse McGinn (and Mallahan). The venue was the scene of most of the forums for New Americans in the primary and the general election campaigns. It was there that Mike won the soul of the new majority of South Seattle.

  • PCO37

    Last night was a great event to celebrate the success of a new coalition and reflected the diversity of all of Seattle, but especially the 37th Legislative District, the first Democratic organization to endorse McGinn (and Mallahan). The venue was the scene of most of the forums for New Americans in the primary and the general election campaigns. It was there that Mike won the soul of the new majority of South Seattle.

  • PCO37

    Last night was a great event to celebrate the success of a new coalition and reflected the diversity of all of Seattle, but especially the 37th Legislative District, the first Democratic organization to endorse McGinn (and Mallahan). The venue was the scene of most of the forums for New Americans in the primary and the general election campaigns. It was there that Mike won the soul of the new majority of South Seattle.

  • PCO37

    Last night was a great event to celebrate the success of a new coalition and reflected the diversity of all of Seattle, but especially the 37th Legislative District, the first Democratic organization to endorse McGinn (and Mallahan). The venue was the scene of most of the forums for New Americans in the primary and the general election campaigns. It was there that Mike won the soul of the new majority of South Seattle.

  • PCO37

    Last night was a great event to celebrate the success of a new coalition and reflected the diversity of all of Seattle, but especially the 37th Legislative District, the first Democratic organization to endorse McGinn (and Mallahan). The venue was the scene of most of the forums for New Americans in the primary and the general election campaigns. It was there that Mike won the soul of the new majority of South Seattle.

  • PCO37

    Last night was a great event to celebrate the success of a new coalition and reflected the diversity of all of Seattle, but especially the 37th Legislative District, the first Democratic organization to endorse McGinn (and Mallahan). The venue was the scene of most of the forums for New Americans in the primary and the general election campaigns. It was there that Mike won the soul of the new majority of South Seattle.

  • PCO37

    Last night was a great event to celebrate the success of a new coalition and reflected the diversity of all of Seattle, but especially the 37th Legislative District, the first Democratic organization to endorse McGinn (and Mallahan). The venue was the scene of most of the forums for New Americans in the primary and the general election campaigns. It was there that Mike won the soul of the new majority of South Seattle.

  • PCO37

    Last night was a great event to celebrate the success of a new coalition and reflected the diversity of all of Seattle, but especially the 37th Legislative District, the first Democratic organization to endorse McGinn (and Mallahan). The venue was the scene of most of the forums for New Americans in the primary and the general election campaigns. It was there that Mike won the soul of the new majority of South Seattle.

  • PCO37

    Last night was a great event to celebrate the success of a new coalition and reflected the diversity of all of Seattle, but especially the 37th Legislative District, the first Democratic organization to endorse McGinn (and Mallahan). The venue was the scene of most of the forums for New Americans in the primary and the general election campaigns. It was there that Mike won the soul of the new majority of South Seattle.

  • PCO37

    Last night was a great event to celebrate the success of a new coalition and reflected the diversity of all of Seattle, but especially the 37th Legislative District, the first Democratic organization to endorse McGinn (and Mallahan). The venue was the scene of most of the forums for New Americans in the primary and the general election campaigns. It was there that Mike won the soul of the new majority of South Seattle.

  • PCO37

    Last night was a great event to celebrate the success of a new coalition and reflected the diversity of all of Seattle, but especially the 37th Legislative District, the first Democratic organization to endorse McGinn (and Mallahan). The venue was the scene of most of the forums for New Americans in the primary and the general election campaigns. It was there that Mike won the soul of the new majority of South Seattle.

  • PCO37

    Last night was a great event to celebrate the success of a new coalition and reflected the diversity of all of Seattle, but especially the 37th Legislative District, the first Democratic organization to endorse McGinn (and Mallahan). The venue was the scene of most of the forums for New Americans in the primary and the general election campaigns. It was there that Mike won the soul of the new majority of South Seattle.

  • PCO37

    Last night was a great event to celebrate the success of a new coalition and reflected the diversity of all of Seattle, but especially the 37th Legislative District, the first Democratic organization to endorse McGinn (and Mallahan). The venue was the scene of most of the forums for New Americans in the primary and the general election campaigns. It was there that Mike won the soul of the new majority of South Seattle.

  • PCO37

    Last night was a great event to celebrate the success of a new coalition and reflected the diversity of all of Seattle, but especially the 37th Legislative District, the first Democratic organization to endorse McGinn (and Mallahan). The venue was the scene of most of the forums for New Americans in the primary and the general election campaigns. It was there that Mike won the soul of the new majority of South Seattle.

  • PCO37

    Last night was a great event to celebrate the success of a new coalition and reflected the diversity of all of Seattle, but especially the 37th Legislative District, the first Democratic organization to endorse McGinn (and Mallahan). The venue was the scene of most of the forums for New Americans in the primary and the general election campaigns. It was there that Mike won the soul of the new majority of South Seattle.

  • PCO37

    Last night was a great event to celebrate the success of a new coalition and reflected the diversity of all of Seattle, but especially the 37th Legislative District, the first Democratic organization to endorse McGinn (and Mallahan). The venue was the scene of most of the forums for New Americans in the primary and the general election campaigns. It was there that Mike won the soul of the new majority of South Seattle.

  • PCO37

    Last night was a great event to celebrate the success of a new coalition and reflected the diversity of all of Seattle, but especially the 37th Legislative District, the first Democratic organization to endorse McGinn (and Mallahan). The venue was the scene of most of the forums for New Americans in the primary and the general election campaigns. It was there that Mike won the soul of the new majority of South Seattle.

  • PCO37

    Last night was a great event to celebrate the success of a new coalition and reflected the diversity of all of Seattle, but especially the 37th Legislative District, the first Democratic organization to endorse McGinn (and Mallahan). The venue was the scene of most of the forums for New Americans in the primary and the general election campaigns. It was there that Mike won the soul of the new majority of South Seattle.

  • PCO37

    Last night was a great event to celebrate the success of a new coalition and reflected the diversity of all of Seattle, but especially the 37th Legislative District, the first Democratic organization to endorse McGinn (and Mallahan). The venue was the scene of most of the forums for New Americans in the primary and the general election campaigns. It was there that Mike won the soul of the new majority of South Seattle.

  • PCO37

    Last night was a great event to celebrate the success of a new coalition and reflected the diversity of all of Seattle, but especially the 37th Legislative District, the first Democratic organization to endorse McGinn (and Mallahan). The venue was the scene of most of the forums for New Americans in the primary and the general election campaigns. It was there that Mike won the soul of the new majority of South Seattle.

  • PCO37

    Last night was a great event to celebrate the success of a new coalition and reflected the diversity of all of Seattle, but especially the 37th Legislative District, the first Democratic organization to endorse McGinn (and Mallahan). The venue was the scene of most of the forums for New Americans in the primary and the general election campaigns. It was there that Mike won the soul of the new majority of South Seattle.

  • PCO37

    Last night was a great event to celebrate the success of a new coalition and reflected the diversity of all of Seattle, but especially the 37th Legislative District, the first Democratic organization to endorse McGinn (and Mallahan). The venue was the scene of most of the forums for New Americans in the primary and the general election campaigns. It was there that Mike won the soul of the new majority of South Seattle.

  • PCO37

    Last night was a great event to celebrate the success of a new coalition and reflected the diversity of all of Seattle, but especially the 37th Legislative District, the first Democratic organization to endorse McGinn (and Mallahan). The venue was the scene of most of the forums for New Americans in the primary and the general election campaigns. It was there that Mike won the soul of the new majority of South Seattle.

  • PCO37

    Last night was a great event to celebrate the success of a new coalition and reflected the diversity of all of Seattle, but especially the 37th Legislative District, the first Democratic organization to endorse McGinn (and Mallahan). The venue was the scene of most of the forums for New Americans in the primary and the general election campaigns. It was there that Mike won the soul of the new majority of South Seattle.

  • PCO37

    Last night was a great event to celebrate the success of a new coalition and reflected the diversity of all of Seattle, but especially the 37th Legislative District, the first Democratic organization to endorse McGinn (and Mallahan). The venue was the scene of most of the forums for New Americans in the primary and the general election campaigns. It was there that Mike won the soul of the new majority of South Seattle.

  • PCO37

    Last night was a great event to celebrate the success of a new coalition and reflected the diversity of all of Seattle, but especially the 37th Legislative District, the first Democratic organization to endorse McGinn (and Mallahan). The venue was the scene of most of the forums for New Americans in the primary and the general election campaigns. It was there that Mike won the soul of the new majority of South Seattle.

  • PCO37

    Last night was a great event to celebrate the success of a new coalition and reflected the diversity of all of Seattle, but especially the 37th Legislative District, the first Democratic organization to endorse McGinn (and Mallahan). The venue was the scene of most of the forums for New Americans in the primary and the general election campaigns. It was there that Mike won the soul of the new majority of South Seattle.

  • Crumb

    What’s worse, being a little prick or a big prick?

    Seriously, I don’t think that word is particularily offensive. Merriam Webster definition #5: “a spiteful or contemptible man often having some authority”. I think that is exactly what Kate meant, even if it is a little harsh, it wasn’t used strictly as an insult with no meaning – which would be crossing the line.

  • Crumb

    What’s worse, being a little prick or a big prick?

    Seriously, I don’t think that word is particularily offensive. Merriam Webster definition #5: “a spiteful or contemptible man often having some authority”. I think that is exactly what Kate meant, even if it is a little harsh, it wasn’t used strictly as an insult with no meaning – which would be crossing the line.

  • Crumb

    What’s worse, being a little prick or a big prick?

    Seriously, I don’t think that word is particularily offensive. Merriam Webster definition #5: “a spiteful or contemptible man often having some authority”. I think that is exactly what Kate meant, even if it is a little harsh, it wasn’t used strictly as an insult with no meaning – which would be crossing the line.

  • Crumb

    What’s worse, being a little prick or a big prick?

    Seriously, I don’t think that word is particularily offensive. Merriam Webster definition #5: “a spiteful or contemptible man often having some authority”. I think that is exactly what Kate meant, even if it is a little harsh, it wasn’t used strictly as an insult with no meaning – which would be crossing the line.

  • Crumb

    What’s worse, being a little prick or a big prick?

    Seriously, I don’t think that word is particularily offensive. Merriam Webster definition #5: “a spiteful or contemptible man often having some authority”. I think that is exactly what Kate meant, even if it is a little harsh, it wasn’t used strictly as an insult with no meaning – which would be crossing the line.

  • Crumb

    What’s worse, being a little prick or a big prick?

    Seriously, I don’t think that word is particularily offensive. Merriam Webster definition #5: “a spiteful or contemptible man often having some authority”. I think that is exactly what Kate meant, even if it is a little harsh, it wasn’t used strictly as an insult with no meaning – which would be crossing the line.

  • Crumb

    What’s worse, being a little prick or a big prick?

    Seriously, I don’t think that word is particularily offensive. Merriam Webster definition #5: “a spiteful or contemptible man often having some authority”. I think that is exactly what Kate meant, even if it is a little harsh, it wasn’t used strictly as an insult with no meaning – which would be crossing the line.

  • Crumb

    What’s worse, being a little prick or a big prick?

    Seriously, I don’t think that word is particularily offensive. Merriam Webster definition #5: “a spiteful or contemptible man often having some authority”. I think that is exactly what Kate meant, even if it is a little harsh, it wasn’t used strictly as an insult with no meaning – which would be crossing the line.

  • Crumb

    What’s worse, being a little prick or a big prick?

    Seriously, I don’t think that word is particularily offensive. Merriam Webster definition #5: “a spiteful or contemptible man often having some authority”. I think that is exactly what Kate meant, even if it is a little harsh, it wasn’t used strictly as an insult with no meaning – which would be crossing the line.

  • Crumb

    What’s worse, being a little prick or a big prick?

    Seriously, I don’t think that word is particularily offensive. Merriam Webster definition #5: “a spiteful or contemptible man often having some authority”. I think that is exactly what Kate meant, even if it is a little harsh, it wasn’t used strictly as an insult with no meaning – which would be crossing the line.

  • Crumb

    What’s worse, being a little prick or a big prick?

    Seriously, I don’t think that word is particularily offensive. Merriam Webster definition #5: “a spiteful or contemptible man often having some authority”. I think that is exactly what Kate meant, even if it is a little harsh, it wasn’t used strictly as an insult with no meaning – which would be crossing the line.

  • Crumb

    What’s worse, being a little prick or a big prick?

    Seriously, I don’t think that word is particularily offensive. Merriam Webster definition #5: “a spiteful or contemptible man often having some authority”. I think that is exactly what Kate meant, even if it is a little harsh, it wasn’t used strictly as an insult with no meaning – which would be crossing the line.

  • Crumb

    What’s worse, being a little prick or a big prick?

    Seriously, I don’t think that word is particularily offensive. Merriam Webster definition #5: “a spiteful or contemptible man often having some authority”. I think that is exactly what Kate meant, even if it is a little harsh, it wasn’t used strictly as an insult with no meaning – which would be crossing the line.

  • Crumb

    What’s worse, being a little prick or a big prick?

    Seriously, I don’t think that word is particularily offensive. Merriam Webster definition #5: “a spiteful or contemptible man often having some authority”. I think that is exactly what Kate meant, even if it is a little harsh, it wasn’t used strictly as an insult with no meaning – which would be crossing the line.

  • Crumb

    What’s worse, being a little prick or a big prick?

    Seriously, I don’t think that word is particularily offensive. Merriam Webster definition #5: “a spiteful or contemptible man often having some authority”. I think that is exactly what Kate meant, even if it is a little harsh, it wasn’t used strictly as an insult with no meaning – which would be crossing the line.

  • Crumb

    What’s worse, being a little prick or a big prick?

    Seriously, I don’t think that word is particularily offensive. Merriam Webster definition #5: “a spiteful or contemptible man often having some authority”. I think that is exactly what Kate meant, even if it is a little harsh, it wasn’t used strictly as an insult with no meaning – which would be crossing the line.

  • Crumb

    What’s worse, being a little prick or a big prick?

    Seriously, I don’t think that word is particularily offensive. Merriam Webster definition #5: “a spiteful or contemptible man often having some authority”. I think that is exactly what Kate meant, even if it is a little harsh, it wasn’t used strictly as an insult with no meaning – which would be crossing the line.

  • Crumb

    What’s worse, being a little prick or a big prick?

    Seriously, I don’t think that word is particularily offensive. Merriam Webster definition #5: “a spiteful or contemptible man often having some authority”. I think that is exactly what Kate meant, even if it is a little harsh, it wasn’t used strictly as an insult with no meaning – which would be crossing the line.

  • Crumb

    What’s worse, being a little prick or a big prick?

    Seriously, I don’t think that word is particularily offensive. Merriam Webster definition #5: “a spiteful or contemptible man often having some authority”. I think that is exactly what Kate meant, even if it is a little harsh, it wasn’t used strictly as an insult with no meaning – which would be crossing the line.

  • Crumb

    What’s worse, being a little prick or a big prick?

    Seriously, I don’t think that word is particularily offensive. Merriam Webster definition #5: “a spiteful or contemptible man often having some authority”. I think that is exactly what Kate meant, even if it is a little harsh, it wasn’t used strictly as an insult with no meaning – which would be crossing the line.

  • Crumb

    What’s worse, being a little prick or a big prick?

    Seriously, I don’t think that word is particularily offensive. Merriam Webster definition #5: “a spiteful or contemptible man often having some authority”. I think that is exactly what Kate meant, even if it is a little harsh, it wasn’t used strictly as an insult with no meaning – which would be crossing the line.

  • Crumb

    What’s worse, being a little prick or a big prick?

    Seriously, I don’t think that word is particularily offensive. Merriam Webster definition #5: “a spiteful or contemptible man often having some authority”. I think that is exactly what Kate meant, even if it is a little harsh, it wasn’t used strictly as an insult with no meaning – which would be crossing the line.

  • Crumb

    What’s worse, being a little prick or a big prick?

    Seriously, I don’t think that word is particularily offensive. Merriam Webster definition #5: “a spiteful or contemptible man often having some authority”. I think that is exactly what Kate meant, even if it is a little harsh, it wasn’t used strictly as an insult with no meaning – which would be crossing the line.

  • Crumb

    What’s worse, being a little prick or a big prick?

    Seriously, I don’t think that word is particularily offensive. Merriam Webster definition #5: “a spiteful or contemptible man often having some authority”. I think that is exactly what Kate meant, even if it is a little harsh, it wasn’t used strictly as an insult with no meaning – which would be crossing the line.

  • Crumb

    What’s worse, being a little prick or a big prick?

    Seriously, I don’t think that word is particularily offensive. Merriam Webster definition #5: “a spiteful or contemptible man often having some authority”. I think that is exactly what Kate meant, even if it is a little harsh, it wasn’t used strictly as an insult with no meaning – which would be crossing the line.

  • Crumb

    What’s worse, being a little prick or a big prick?

    Seriously, I don’t think that word is particularily offensive. Merriam Webster definition #5: “a spiteful or contemptible man often having some authority”. I think that is exactly what Kate meant, even if it is a little harsh, it wasn’t used strictly as an insult with no meaning – which would be crossing the line.

  • Crumb

    What’s worse, being a little prick or a big prick?

    Seriously, I don’t think that word is particularily offensive. Merriam Webster definition #5: “a spiteful or contemptible man often having some authority”. I think that is exactly what Kate meant, even if it is a little harsh, it wasn’t used strictly as an insult with no meaning – which would be crossing the line.

  • Crumb

    What’s worse, being a little prick or a big prick?

    Seriously, I don’t think that word is particularily offensive. Merriam Webster definition #5: “a spiteful or contemptible man often having some authority”. I think that is exactly what Kate meant, even if it is a little harsh, it wasn’t used strictly as an insult with no meaning – which would be crossing the line.

  • Crumb

    What’s worse, being a little prick or a big prick?

    Seriously, I don’t think that word is particularily offensive. Merriam Webster definition #5: “a spiteful or contemptible man often having some authority”. I think that is exactly what Kate meant, even if it is a little harsh, it wasn’t used strictly as an insult with no meaning – which would be crossing the line.

  • Crumb

    What’s worse, being a little prick or a big prick?

    Seriously, I don’t think that word is particularily offensive. Merriam Webster definition #5: “a spiteful or contemptible man often having some authority”. I think that is exactly what Kate meant, even if it is a little harsh, it wasn’t used strictly as an insult with no meaning – which would be crossing the line.

  • Crumb

    What’s worse, being a little prick or a big prick?

    Seriously, I don’t think that word is particularily offensive. Merriam Webster definition #5: “a spiteful or contemptible man often having some authority”. I think that is exactly what Kate meant, even if it is a little harsh, it wasn’t used strictly as an insult with no meaning – which would be crossing the line.

  • Crumb

    What’s worse, being a little prick or a big prick?

    Seriously, I don’t think that word is particularily offensive. Merriam Webster definition #5: “a spiteful or contemptible man often having some authority”. I think that is exactly what Kate meant, even if it is a little harsh, it wasn’t used strictly as an insult with no meaning – which would be crossing the line.

  • Crumb

    What’s worse, being a little prick or a big prick?

    Seriously, I don’t think that word is particularily offensive. Merriam Webster definition #5: “a spiteful or contemptible man often having some authority”. I think that is exactly what Kate meant, even if it is a little harsh, it wasn’t used strictly as an insult with no meaning – which would be crossing the line.

  • Crumb

    What’s worse, being a little prick or a big prick?

    Seriously, I don’t think that word is particularily offensive. Merriam Webster definition #5: “a spiteful or contemptible man often having some authority”. I think that is exactly what Kate meant, even if it is a little harsh, it wasn’t used strictly as an insult with no meaning – which would be crossing the line.

  • Crumb

    What’s worse, being a little prick or a big prick?

    Seriously, I don’t think that word is particularily offensive. Merriam Webster definition #5: “a spiteful or contemptible man often having some authority”. I think that is exactly what Kate meant, even if it is a little harsh, it wasn’t used strictly as an insult with no meaning – which would be crossing the line.

  • Crumb

    What’s worse, being a little prick or a big prick?

    Seriously, I don’t think that word is particularily offensive. Merriam Webster definition #5: “a spiteful or contemptible man often having some authority”. I think that is exactly what Kate meant, even if it is a little harsh, it wasn’t used strictly as an insult with no meaning – which would be crossing the line.

  • Crumb

    What’s worse, being a little prick or a big prick?

    Seriously, I don’t think that word is particularily offensive. Merriam Webster definition #5: “a spiteful or contemptible man often having some authority”. I think that is exactly what Kate meant, even if it is a little harsh, it wasn’t used strictly as an insult with no meaning – which would be crossing the line.

  • Crumb

    What’s worse, being a little prick or a big prick?

    Seriously, I don’t think that word is particularily offensive. Merriam Webster definition #5: “a spiteful or contemptible man often having some authority”. I think that is exactly what Kate meant, even if it is a little harsh, it wasn’t used strictly as an insult with no meaning – which would be crossing the line.

  • Crumb

    What’s worse, being a little prick or a big prick?

    Seriously, I don’t think that word is particularily offensive. Merriam Webster definition #5: “a spiteful or contemptible man often having some authority”. I think that is exactly what Kate meant, even if it is a little harsh, it wasn’t used strictly as an insult with no meaning – which would be crossing the line.

  • Crumb

    What’s worse, being a little prick or a big prick?

    Seriously, I don’t think that word is particularily offensive. Merriam Webster definition #5: “a spiteful or contemptible man often having some authority”. I think that is exactly what Kate meant, even if it is a little harsh, it wasn’t used strictly as an insult with no meaning – which would be crossing the line.

  • African

    Some people have right to disagree, but the reality is that he will be our mayor for the coming 4 years and hopefully beyond. Either cry like little baby and shut yourself in a room, or join the crowd. Joining the crowd my be better option.

    The GaMe is OvEr.– if you can beat them–join them—…

  • African

    Some people have right to disagree, but the reality is that he will be our mayor for the coming 4 years and hopefully beyond. Either cry like little baby and shut yourself in a room, or join the crowd. Joining the crowd my be better option.

    The GaMe is OvEr.– if you can beat them–join them—…

  • African

    Some people have right to disagree, but the reality is that he will be our mayor for the coming 4 years and hopefully beyond. Either cry like little baby and shut yourself in a room, or join the crowd. Joining the crowd my be better option.

    The GaMe is OvEr.– if you can beat them–join them—…

  • African

    Some people have right to disagree, but the reality is that he will be our mayor for the coming 4 years and hopefully beyond. Either cry like little baby and shut yourself in a room, or join the crowd. Joining the crowd my be better option.

    The GaMe is OvEr.– if you can beat them–join them—…

  • African

    Some people have right to disagree, but the reality is that he will be our mayor for the coming 4 years and hopefully beyond. Either cry like little baby and shut yourself in a room, or join the crowd. Joining the crowd my be better option.

    The GaMe is OvEr.– if you can beat them–join them—…

  • African

    Some people have right to disagree, but the reality is that he will be our mayor for the coming 4 years and hopefully beyond. Either cry like little baby and shut yourself in a room, or join the crowd. Joining the crowd my be better option.

    The GaMe is OvEr.– if you can beat them–join them—…

  • African

    Some people have right to disagree, but the reality is that he will be our mayor for the coming 4 years and hopefully beyond. Either cry like little baby and shut yourself in a room, or join the crowd. Joining the crowd my be better option.

    The GaMe is OvEr.– if you can beat them–join them—…

  • African

    Some people have right to disagree, but the reality is that he will be our mayor for the coming 4 years and hopefully beyond. Either cry like little baby and shut yourself in a room, or join the crowd. Joining the crowd my be better option.

    The GaMe is OvEr.– if you can beat them–join them—…

  • African

    Some people have right to disagree, but the reality is that he will be our mayor for the coming 4 years and hopefully beyond. Either cry like little baby and shut yourself in a room, or join the crowd. Joining the crowd my be better option.

    The GaMe is OvEr.– if you can beat them–join them—…

  • African

    Some people have right to disagree, but the reality is that he will be our mayor for the coming 4 years and hopefully beyond. Either cry like little baby and shut yourself in a room, or join the crowd. Joining the crowd my be better option.

    The GaMe is OvEr.– if you can beat them–join them—…

  • African

    Some people have right to disagree, but the reality is that he will be our mayor for the coming 4 years and hopefully beyond. Either cry like little baby and shut yourself in a room, or join the crowd. Joining the crowd my be better option.

    The GaMe is OvEr.– if you can beat them–join them—…

  • African

    Some people have right to disagree, but the reality is that he will be our mayor for the coming 4 years and hopefully beyond. Either cry like little baby and shut yourself in a room, or join the crowd. Joining the crowd my be better option.

    The GaMe is OvEr.– if you can beat them–join them—…

  • African

    Some people have right to disagree, but the reality is that he will be our mayor for the coming 4 years and hopefully beyond. Either cry like little baby and shut yourself in a room, or join the crowd. Joining the crowd my be better option.

    The GaMe is OvEr.– if you can beat them–join them—…

  • African

    Some people have right to disagree, but the reality is that he will be our mayor for the coming 4 years and hopefully beyond. Either cry like little baby and shut yourself in a room, or join the crowd. Joining the crowd my be better option.

    The GaMe is OvEr.– if you can beat them–join them—…

  • African

    Some people have right to disagree, but the reality is that he will be our mayor for the coming 4 years and hopefully beyond. Either cry like little baby and shut yourself in a room, or join the crowd. Joining the crowd my be better option.

    The GaMe is OvEr.– if you can beat them–join them—…

  • African

    Some people have right to disagree, but the reality is that he will be our mayor for the coming 4 years and hopefully beyond. Either cry like little baby and shut yourself in a room, or join the crowd. Joining the crowd my be better option.

    The GaMe is OvEr.– if you can beat them–join them—…

  • African

    Some people have right to disagree, but the reality is that he will be our mayor for the coming 4 years and hopefully beyond. Either cry like little baby and shut yourself in a room, or join the crowd. Joining the crowd my be better option.

    The GaMe is OvEr.– if you can beat them–join them—…

  • African

    Some people have right to disagree, but the reality is that he will be our mayor for the coming 4 years and hopefully beyond. Either cry like little baby and shut yourself in a room, or join the crowd. Joining the crowd my be better option.

    The GaMe is OvEr.– if you can beat them–join them—…

  • African

    Some people have right to disagree, but the reality is that he will be our mayor for the coming 4 years and hopefully beyond. Either cry like little baby and shut yourself in a room, or join the crowd. Joining the crowd my be better option.

    The GaMe is OvEr.– if you can beat them–join them—…

  • African

    Some people have right to disagree, but the reality is that he will be our mayor for the coming 4 years and hopefully beyond. Either cry like little baby and shut yourself in a room, or join the crowd. Joining the crowd my be better option.

    The GaMe is OvEr.– if you can beat them–join them—…

  • African

    Some people have right to disagree, but the reality is that he will be our mayor for the coming 4 years and hopefully beyond. Either cry like little baby and shut yourself in a room, or join the crowd. Joining the crowd my be better option.

    The GaMe is OvEr.– if you can beat them–join them—…

  • African

    Some people have right to disagree, but the reality is that he will be our mayor for the coming 4 years and hopefully beyond. Either cry like little baby and shut yourself in a room, or join the crowd. Joining the crowd my be better option.

    The GaMe is OvEr.– if you can beat them–join them—…

  • African

    Some people have right to disagree, but the reality is that he will be our mayor for the coming 4 years and hopefully beyond. Either cry like little baby and shut yourself in a room, or join the crowd. Joining the crowd my be better option.

    The GaMe is OvEr.– if you can beat them–join them—…

  • African

    Some people have right to disagree, but the reality is that he will be our mayor for the coming 4 years and hopefully beyond. Either cry like little baby and shut yourself in a room, or join the crowd. Joining the crowd my be better option.

    The GaMe is OvEr.– if you can beat them–join them—…

  • African

    Some people have right to disagree, but the reality is that he will be our mayor for the coming 4 years and hopefully beyond. Either cry like little baby and shut yourself in a room, or join the crowd. Joining the crowd my be better option.

    The GaMe is OvEr.– if you can beat them–join them—…

  • African

    Some people have right to disagree, but the reality is that he will be our mayor for the coming 4 years and hopefully beyond. Either cry like little baby and shut yourself in a room, or join the crowd. Joining the crowd my be better option.

    The GaMe is OvEr.– if you can beat them–join them—…

  • African

    Some people have right to disagree, but the reality is that he will be our mayor for the coming 4 years and hopefully beyond. Either cry like little baby and shut yourself in a room, or join the crowd. Joining the crowd my be better option.

    The GaMe is OvEr.– if you can beat them–join them—…

  • African

    Some people have right to disagree, but the reality is that he will be our mayor for the coming 4 years and hopefully beyond. Either cry like little baby and shut yourself in a room, or join the crowd. Joining the crowd my be better option.

    The GaMe is OvEr.– if you can beat them–join them—…

  • African

    Some people have right to disagree, but the reality is that he will be our mayor for the coming 4 years and hopefully beyond. Either cry like little baby and shut yourself in a room, or join the crowd. Joining the crowd my be better option.

    The GaMe is OvEr.– if you can beat them–join them—…

  • African

    Some people have right to disagree, but the reality is that he will be our mayor for the coming 4 years and hopefully beyond. Either cry like little baby and shut yourself in a room, or join the crowd. Joining the crowd my be better option.

    The GaMe is OvEr.– if you can beat them–join them—…

  • African

    Some people have right to disagree, but the reality is that he will be our mayor for the coming 4 years and hopefully beyond. Either cry like little baby and shut yourself in a room, or join the crowd. Joining the crowd my be better option.

    The GaMe is OvEr.– if you can beat them–join them—…

  • African

    Some people have right to disagree, but the reality is that he will be our mayor for the coming 4 years and hopefully beyond. Either cry like little baby and shut yourself in a room, or join the crowd. Joining the crowd my be better option.

    The GaMe is OvEr.– if you can beat them–join them—…

  • African

    Some people have right to disagree, but the reality is that he will be our mayor for the coming 4 years and hopefully beyond. Either cry like little baby and shut yourself in a room, or join the crowd. Joining the crowd my be better option.

    The GaMe is OvEr.– if you can beat them–join them—…

  • African

    Some people have right to disagree, but the reality is that he will be our mayor for the coming 4 years and hopefully beyond. Either cry like little baby and shut yourself in a room, or join the crowd. Joining the crowd my be better option.

    The GaMe is OvEr.– if you can beat them–join them—…

  • African

    Some people have right to disagree, but the reality is that he will be our mayor for the coming 4 years and hopefully beyond. Either cry like little baby and shut yourself in a room, or join the crowd. Joining the crowd my be better option.

    The GaMe is OvEr.– if you can beat them–join them—…

  • African

    Some people have right to disagree, but the reality is that he will be our mayor for the coming 4 years and hopefully beyond. Either cry like little baby and shut yourself in a room, or join the crowd. Joining the crowd my be better option.

    The GaMe is OvEr.– if you can beat them–join them—…

  • African

    Some people have right to disagree, but the reality is that he will be our mayor for the coming 4 years and hopefully beyond. Either cry like little baby and shut yourself in a room, or join the crowd. Joining the crowd my be better option.

    The GaMe is OvEr.– if you can beat them–join them—…

  • African

    Some people have right to disagree, but the reality is that he will be our mayor for the coming 4 years and hopefully beyond. Either cry like little baby and shut yourself in a room, or join the crowd. Joining the crowd my be better option.

    The GaMe is OvEr.– if you can beat them–join them—…

  • African

    Some people have right to disagree, but the reality is that he will be our mayor for the coming 4 years and hopefully beyond. Either cry like little baby and shut yourself in a room, or join the crowd. Joining the crowd my be better option.

    The GaMe is OvEr.– if you can beat them–join them—…

  • African

    Some people have right to disagree, but the reality is that he will be our mayor for the coming 4 years and hopefully beyond. Either cry like little baby and shut yourself in a room, or join the crowd. Joining the crowd my be better option.

    The GaMe is OvEr.– if you can beat them–join them—…

  • African

    Some people have right to disagree, but the reality is that he will be our mayor for the coming 4 years and hopefully beyond. Either cry like little baby and shut yourself in a room, or join the crowd. Joining the crowd my be better option.

    The GaMe is OvEr.– if you can beat them–join them—…

  • sarah68

    Josh, it seems the posts aren’t matching up with the comments, number-wise. People are consistently saying “@3″ when it’s @4 — you have to track back and mentally adjust.

  • sarah68

    Josh, it seems the posts aren’t matching up with the comments, number-wise. People are consistently saying “@3″ when it’s @4 — you have to track back and mentally adjust.

  • sarah68

    Josh, it seems the posts aren’t matching up with the comments, number-wise. People are consistently saying “@3″ when it’s @4 — you have to track back and mentally adjust.

  • sarah68

    Josh, it seems the posts aren’t matching up with the comments, number-wise. People are consistently saying “@3″ when it’s @4 — you have to track back and mentally adjust.

  • sarah68

    Josh, it seems the posts aren’t matching up with the comments, number-wise. People are consistently saying “@3″ when it’s @4 — you have to track back and mentally adjust.

  • sarah68

    Josh, it seems the posts aren’t matching up with the comments, number-wise. People are consistently saying “@3″ when it’s @4 — you have to track back and mentally adjust.

  • sarah68

    Josh, it seems the posts aren’t matching up with the comments, number-wise. People are consistently saying “@3″ when it’s @4 — you have to track back and mentally adjust.

  • sarah68

    Josh, it seems the posts aren’t matching up with the comments, number-wise. People are consistently saying “@3″ when it’s @4 — you have to track back and mentally adjust.

  • sarah68

    Josh, it seems the posts aren’t matching up with the comments, number-wise. People are consistently saying “@3″ when it’s @4 — you have to track back and mentally adjust.

  • sarah68

    Josh, it seems the posts aren’t matching up with the comments, number-wise. People are consistently saying “@3″ when it’s @4 — you have to track back and mentally adjust.

  • sarah68

    Josh, it seems the posts aren’t matching up with the comments, number-wise. People are consistently saying “@3″ when it’s @4 — you have to track back and mentally adjust.

  • sarah68

    Josh, it seems the posts aren’t matching up with the comments, number-wise. People are consistently saying “@3″ when it’s @4 — you have to track back and mentally adjust.

  • sarah68

    Josh, it seems the posts aren’t matching up with the comments, number-wise. People are consistently saying “@3″ when it’s @4 — you have to track back and mentally adjust.

  • sarah68

    Josh, it seems the posts aren’t matching up with the comments, number-wise. People are consistently saying “@3″ when it’s @4 — you have to track back and mentally adjust.

  • sarah68

    Josh, it seems the posts aren’t matching up with the comments, number-wise. People are consistently saying “@3″ when it’s @4 — you have to track back and mentally adjust.

  • sarah68

    Josh, it seems the posts aren’t matching up with the comments, number-wise. People are consistently saying “@3″ when it’s @4 — you have to track back and mentally adjust.

  • sarah68

    Josh, it seems the posts aren’t matching up with the comments, number-wise. People are consistently saying “@3″ when it’s @4 — you have to track back and mentally adjust.

  • sarah68

    Josh, it seems the posts aren’t matching up with the comments, number-wise. People are consistently saying “@3″ when it’s @4 — you have to track back and mentally adjust.

  • sarah68

    Josh, it seems the posts aren’t matching up with the comments, number-wise. People are consistently saying “@3″ when it’s @4 — you have to track back and mentally adjust.

  • sarah68

    Josh, it seems the posts aren’t matching up with the comments, number-wise. People are consistently saying “@3″ when it’s @4 — you have to track back and mentally adjust.

  • sarah68

    Josh, it seems the posts aren’t matching up with the comments, number-wise. People are consistently saying “@3″ when it’s @4 — you have to track back and mentally adjust.

  • sarah68

    Josh, it seems the posts aren’t matching up with the comments, number-wise. People are consistently saying “@3″ when it’s @4 — you have to track back and mentally adjust.

  • sarah68

    Josh, it seems the posts aren’t matching up with the comments, number-wise. People are consistently saying “@3″ when it’s @4 — you have to track back and mentally adjust.

  • sarah68

    Josh, it seems the posts aren’t matching up with the comments, number-wise. People are consistently saying “@3″ when it’s @4 — you have to track back and mentally adjust.

  • sarah68

    Josh, it seems the posts aren’t matching up with the comments, number-wise. People are consistently saying “@3″ when it’s @4 — you have to track back and mentally adjust.

  • sarah68

    Josh, it seems the posts aren’t matching up with the comments, number-wise. People are consistently saying “@3″ when it’s @4 — you have to track back and mentally adjust.

  • sarah68

    Josh, it seems the posts aren’t matching up with the comments, number-wise. People are consistently saying “@3″ when it’s @4 — you have to track back and mentally adjust.

  • sarah68

    Josh, it seems the posts aren’t matching up with the comments, number-wise. People are consistently saying “@3″ when it’s @4 — you have to track back and mentally adjust.

  • sarah68

    Josh, it seems the posts aren’t matching up with the comments, number-wise. People are consistently saying “@3″ when it’s @4 — you have to track back and mentally adjust.

  • sarah68

    Josh, it seems the posts aren’t matching up with the comments, number-wise. People are consistently saying “@3″ when it’s @4 — you have to track back and mentally adjust.

  • sarah68

    Josh, it seems the posts aren’t matching up with the comments, number-wise. People are consistently saying “@3″ when it’s @4 — you have to track back and mentally adjust.

  • sarah68

    Josh, it seems the posts aren’t matching up with the comments, number-wise. People are consistently saying “@3″ when it’s @4 — you have to track back and mentally adjust.

  • sarah68

    Josh, it seems the posts aren’t matching up with the comments, number-wise. People are consistently saying “@3″ when it’s @4 — you have to track back and mentally adjust.

  • sarah68

    Josh, it seems the posts aren’t matching up with the comments, number-wise. People are consistently saying “@3″ when it’s @4 — you have to track back and mentally adjust.

  • sarah68

    Josh, it seems the posts aren’t matching up with the comments, number-wise. People are consistently saying “@3″ when it’s @4 — you have to track back and mentally adjust.

  • sarah68

    Josh, it seems the posts aren’t matching up with the comments, number-wise. People are consistently saying “@3″ when it’s @4 — you have to track back and mentally adjust.

  • sarah68

    Josh, it seems the posts aren’t matching up with the comments, number-wise. People are consistently saying “@3″ when it’s @4 — you have to track back and mentally adjust.

  • sarah68

    Josh, it seems the posts aren’t matching up with the comments, number-wise. People are consistently saying “@3″ when it’s @4 — you have to track back and mentally adjust.

  • sarah68

    Josh, it seems the posts aren’t matching up with the comments, number-wise. People are consistently saying “@3″ when it’s @4 — you have to track back and mentally adjust.

  • sarah68

    Josh, it seems the posts aren’t matching up with the comments, number-wise. People are consistently saying “@3″ when it’s @4 — you have to track back and mentally adjust.

  • sarah68

    Josh, it seems the posts aren’t matching up with the comments, number-wise. People are consistently saying “@3″ when it’s @4 — you have to track back and mentally adjust.

  • David

    Having known #29 Kate Martin for years, I know that she’s scared. She has a heart for this city that is just enormous, but a bitterness about losing that matches her often terrible collaboration skills.

    Despite all of her [misguided] contempt, Mike McGinn is now the very mayor she’s always actually wanted. When he starts doing things as mayor that make plain sense, it’s going to be painful for his detractors.

    For some people, its the hardest thing in the world to say “I was wrong.” They sooner become nasty than to smile, laugh at themselves, and adjust their outlook to reality. Note to all of you: It’s not about McGinn, it’s about this city!
    You know what? During the McGinn campaign, over and over I’ve been meeting the most wonderful people who like to laugh, drop their egos, and roll up their sleeves for the hard work. Friday was no exception. Thank you McGinn volunteers!!!

  • David

    Having known #29 Kate Martin for years, I know that she’s scared. She has a heart for this city that is just enormous, but a bitterness about losing that matches her often terrible collaboration skills.

    Despite all of her [misguided] contempt, Mike McGinn is now the very mayor she’s always actually wanted. When he starts doing things as mayor that make plain sense, it’s going to be painful for his detractors.

    For some people, its the hardest thing in the world to say “I was wrong.” They sooner become nasty than to smile, laugh at themselves, and adjust their outlook to reality. Note to all of you: It’s not about McGinn, it’s about this city!
    You know what? During the McGinn campaign, over and over I’ve been meeting the most wonderful people who like to laugh, drop their egos, and roll up their sleeves for the hard work. Friday was no exception. Thank you McGinn volunteers!!!

  • David

    Having known #29 Kate Martin for years, I know that she’s scared. She has a heart for this city that is just enormous, but a bitterness about losing that matches her often terrible collaboration skills.

    Despite all of her [misguided] contempt, Mike McGinn is now the very mayor she’s always actually wanted. When he starts doing things as mayor that make plain sense, it’s going to be painful for his detractors.

    For some people, its the hardest thing in the world to say “I was wrong.” They sooner become nasty than to smile, laugh at themselves, and adjust their outlook to reality. Note to all of you: It’s not about McGinn, it’s about this city!
    You know what? During the McGinn campaign, over and over I’ve been meeting the most wonderful people who like to laugh, drop their egos, and roll up their sleeves for the hard work. Friday was no exception. Thank you McGinn volunteers!!!

  • David

    Having known #29 Kate Martin for years, I know that she’s scared. She has a heart for this city that is just enormous, but a bitterness about losing that matches her often terrible collaboration skills.

    Despite all of her [misguided] contempt, Mike McGinn is now the very mayor she’s always actually wanted. When he starts doing things as mayor that make plain sense, it’s going to be painful for his detractors.

    For some people, its the hardest thing in the world to say “I was wrong.” They sooner become nasty than to smile, laugh at themselves, and adjust their outlook to reality. Note to all of you: It’s not about McGinn, it’s about this city!
    You know what? During the McGinn campaign, over and over I’ve been meeting the most wonderful people who like to laugh, drop their egos, and roll up their sleeves for the hard work. Friday was no exception. Thank you McGinn volunteers!!!

  • David

    Having known #29 Kate Martin for years, I know that she’s scared. She has a heart for this city that is just enormous, but a bitterness about losing that matches her often terrible collaboration skills.

    Despite all of her [misguided] contempt, Mike McGinn is now the very mayor she’s always actually wanted. When he starts doing things as mayor that make plain sense, it’s going to be painful for his detractors.

    For some people, its the hardest thing in the world to say “I was wrong.” They sooner become nasty than to smile, laugh at themselves, and adjust their outlook to reality. Note to all of you: It’s not about McGinn, it’s about this city!
    You know what? During the McGinn campaign, over and over I’ve been meeting the most wonderful people who like to laugh, drop their egos, and roll up their sleeves for the hard work. Friday was no exception. Thank you McGinn volunteers!!!

  • David

    Having known #29 Kate Martin for years, I know that she’s scared. She has a heart for this city that is just enormous, but a bitterness about losing that matches her often terrible collaboration skills.

    Despite all of her [misguided] contempt, Mike McGinn is now the very mayor she’s always actually wanted. When he starts doing things as mayor that make plain sense, it’s going to be painful for his detractors.

    For some people, its the hardest thing in the world to say “I was wrong.” They sooner become nasty than to smile, laugh at themselves, and adjust their outlook to reality. Note to all of you: It’s not about McGinn, it’s about this city!
    You know what? During the McGinn campaign, over and over I’ve been meeting the most wonderful people who like to laugh, drop their egos, and roll up their sleeves for the hard work. Friday was no exception. Thank you McGinn volunteers!!!

  • David

    Having known #29 Kate Martin for years, I know that she’s scared. She has a heart for this city that is just enormous, but a bitterness about losing that matches her often terrible collaboration skills.

    Despite all of her [misguided] contempt, Mike McGinn is now the very mayor she’s always actually wanted. When he starts doing things as mayor that make plain sense, it’s going to be painful for his detractors.

    For some people, its the hardest thing in the world to say “I was wrong.” They sooner become nasty than to smile, laugh at themselves, and adjust their outlook to reality. Note to all of you: It’s not about McGinn, it’s about this city!
    You know what? During the McGinn campaign, over and over I’ve been meeting the most wonderful people who like to laugh, drop their egos, and roll up their sleeves for the hard work. Friday was no exception. Thank you McGinn volunteers!!!

  • David

    Having known #29 Kate Martin for years, I know that she’s scared. She has a heart for this city that is just enormous, but a bitterness about losing that matches her often terrible collaboration skills.

    Despite all of her [misguided] contempt, Mike McGinn is now the very mayor she’s always actually wanted. When he starts doing things as mayor that make plain sense, it’s going to be painful for his detractors.

    For some people, its the hardest thing in the world to say “I was wrong.” They sooner become nasty than to smile, laugh at themselves, and adjust their outlook to reality. Note to all of you: It’s not about McGinn, it’s about this city!
    You know what? During the McGinn campaign, over and over I’ve been meeting the most wonderful people who like to laugh, drop their egos, and roll up their sleeves for the hard work. Friday was no exception. Thank you McGinn volunteers!!!

  • David

    Having known #29 Kate Martin for years, I know that she’s scared. She has a heart for this city that is just enormous, but a bitterness about losing that matches her often terrible collaboration skills.

    Despite all of her [misguided] contempt, Mike McGinn is now the very mayor she’s always actually wanted. When he starts doing things as mayor that make plain sense, it’s going to be painful for his detractors.

    For some people, its the hardest thing in the world to say “I was wrong.” They sooner become nasty than to smile, laugh at themselves, and adjust their outlook to reality. Note to all of you: It’s not about McGinn, it’s about this city!
    You know what? During the McGinn campaign, over and over I’ve been meeting the most wonderful people who like to laugh, drop their egos, and roll up their sleeves for the hard work. Friday was no exception. Thank you McGinn volunteers!!!

  • David

    Having known #29 Kate Martin for years, I know that she’s scared. She has a heart for this city that is just enormous, but a bitterness about losing that matches her often terrible collaboration skills.

    Despite all of her [misguided] contempt, Mike McGinn is now the very mayor she’s always actually wanted. When he starts doing things as mayor that make plain sense, it’s going to be painful for his detractors.

    For some people, its the hardest thing in the world to say “I was wrong.” They sooner become nasty than to smile, laugh at themselves, and adjust their outlook to reality. Note to all of you: It’s not about McGinn, it’s about this city!
    You know what? During the McGinn campaign, over and over I’ve been meeting the most wonderful people who like to laugh, drop their egos, and roll up their sleeves for the hard work. Friday was no exception. Thank you McGinn volunteers!!!

  • David

    Having known #29 Kate Martin for years, I know that she’s scared. She has a heart for this city that is just enormous, but a bitterness about losing that matches her often terrible collaboration skills.

    Despite all of her [misguided] contempt, Mike McGinn is now the very mayor she’s always actually wanted. When he starts doing things as mayor that make plain sense, it’s going to be painful for his detractors.

    For some people, its the hardest thing in the world to say “I was wrong.” They sooner become nasty than to smile, laugh at themselves, and adjust their outlook to reality. Note to all of you: It’s not about McGinn, it’s about this city!
    You know what? During the McGinn campaign, over and over I’ve been meeting the most wonderful people who like to laugh, drop their egos, and roll up their sleeves for the hard work. Friday was no exception. Thank you McGinn volunteers!!!

  • David

    Having known #29 Kate Martin for years, I know that she’s scared. She has a heart for this city that is just enormous, but a bitterness about losing that matches her often terrible collaboration skills.

    Despite all of her [misguided] contempt, Mike McGinn is now the very mayor she’s always actually wanted. When he starts doing things as mayor that make plain sense, it’s going to be painful for his detractors.

    For some people, its the hardest thing in the world to say “I was wrong.” They sooner become nasty than to smile, laugh at themselves, and adjust their outlook to reality. Note to all of you: It’s not about McGinn, it’s about this city!
    You know what? During the McGinn campaign, over and over I’ve been meeting the most wonderful people who like to laugh, drop their egos, and roll up their sleeves for the hard work. Friday was no exception. Thank you McGinn volunteers!!!

  • David

    Having known #29 Kate Martin for years, I know that she’s scared. She has a heart for this city that is just enormous, but a bitterness about losing that matches her often terrible collaboration skills.

    Despite all of her [misguided] contempt, Mike McGinn is now the very mayor she’s always actually wanted. When he starts doing things as mayor that make plain sense, it’s going to be painful for his detractors.

    For some people, its the hardest thing in the world to say “I was wrong.” They sooner become nasty than to smile, laugh at themselves, and adjust their outlook to reality. Note to all of you: It’s not about McGinn, it’s about this city!
    You know what? During the McGinn campaign, over and over I’ve been meeting the most wonderful people who like to laugh, drop their egos, and roll up their sleeves for the hard work. Friday was no exception. Thank you McGinn volunteers!!!

  • David

    Having known #29 Kate Martin for years, I know that she’s scared. She has a heart for this city that is just enormous, but a bitterness about losing that matches her often terrible collaboration skills.

    Despite all of her [misguided] contempt, Mike McGinn is now the very mayor she’s always actually wanted. When he starts doing things as mayor that make plain sense, it’s going to be painful for his detractors.

    For some people, its the hardest thing in the world to say “I was wrong.” They sooner become nasty than to smile, laugh at themselves, and adjust their outlook to reality. Note to all of you: It’s not about McGinn, it’s about this city!
    You know what? During the McGinn campaign, over and over I’ve been meeting the most wonderful people who like to laugh, drop their egos, and roll up their sleeves for the hard work. Friday was no exception. Thank you McGinn volunteers!!!

  • David

    Having known #29 Kate Martin for years, I know that she’s scared. She has a heart for this city that is just enormous, but a bitterness about losing that matches her often terrible collaboration skills.

    Despite all of her [misguided] contempt, Mike McGinn is now the very mayor she’s always actually wanted. When he starts doing things as mayor that make plain sense, it’s going to be painful for his detractors.

    For some people, its the hardest thing in the world to say “I was wrong.” They sooner become nasty than to smile, laugh at themselves, and adjust their outlook to reality. Note to all of you: It’s not about McGinn, it’s about this city!
    You know what? During the McGinn campaign, over and over I’ve been meeting the most wonderful people who like to laugh, drop their egos, and roll up their sleeves for the hard work. Friday was no exception. Thank you McGinn volunteers!!!

  • David

    Having known #29 Kate Martin for years, I know that she’s scared. She has a heart for this city that is just enormous, but a bitterness about losing that matches her often terrible collaboration skills.

    Despite all of her [misguided] contempt, Mike McGinn is now the very mayor she’s always actually wanted. When he starts doing things as mayor that make plain sense, it’s going to be painful for his detractors.

    For some people, its the hardest thing in the world to say “I was wrong.” They sooner become nasty than to smile, laugh at themselves, and adjust their outlook to reality. Note to all of you: It’s not about McGinn, it’s about this city!
    You know what? During the McGinn campaign, over and over I’ve been meeting the most wonderful people who like to laugh, drop their egos, and roll up their sleeves for the hard work. Friday was no exception. Thank you McGinn volunteers!!!

  • David

    Having known #29 Kate Martin for years, I know that she’s scared. She has a heart for this city that is just enormous, but a bitterness about losing that matches her often terrible collaboration skills.

    Despite all of her [misguided] contempt, Mike McGinn is now the very mayor she’s always actually wanted. When he starts doing things as mayor that make plain sense, it’s going to be painful for his detractors.

    For some people, its the hardest thing in the world to say “I was wrong.” They sooner become nasty than to smile, laugh at themselves, and adjust their outlook to reality. Note to all of you: It’s not about McGinn, it’s about this city!
    You know what? During the McGinn campaign, over and over I’ve been meeting the most wonderful people who like to laugh, drop their egos, and roll up their sleeves for the hard work. Friday was no exception. Thank you McGinn volunteers!!!

  • David

    Having known #29 Kate Martin for years, I know that she’s scared. She has a heart for this city that is just enormous, but a bitterness about losing that matches her often terrible collaboration skills.

    Despite all of her [misguided] contempt, Mike McGinn is now the very mayor she’s always actually wanted. When he starts doing things as mayor that make plain sense, it’s going to be painful for his detractors.

    For some people, its the hardest thing in the world to say “I was wrong.” They sooner become nasty than to smile, laugh at themselves, and adjust their outlook to reality. Note to all of you: It’s not about McGinn, it’s about this city!
    You know what? During the McGinn campaign, over and over I’ve been meeting the most wonderful people who like to laugh, drop their egos, and roll up their sleeves for the hard work. Friday was no exception. Thank you McGinn volunteers!!!

  • David

    Having known #29 Kate Martin for years, I know that she’s scared. She has a heart for this city that is just enormous, but a bitterness about losing that matches her often terrible collaboration skills.

    Despite all of her [misguided] contempt, Mike McGinn is now the very mayor she’s always actually wanted. When he starts doing things as mayor that make plain sense, it’s going to be painful for his detractors.

    For some people, its the hardest thing in the world to say “I was wrong.” They sooner become nasty than to smile, laugh at themselves, and adjust their outlook to reality. Note to all of you: It’s not about McGinn, it’s about this city!
    You know what? During the McGinn campaign, over and over I’ve been meeting the most wonderful people who like to laugh, drop their egos, and roll up their sleeves for the hard work. Friday was no exception. Thank you McGinn volunteers!!!

  • David

    Having known #29 Kate Martin for years, I know that she’s scared. She has a heart for this city that is just enormous, but a bitterness about losing that matches her often terrible collaboration skills.

    Despite all of her [misguided] contempt, Mike McGinn is now the very mayor she’s always actually wanted. When he starts doing things as mayor that make plain sense, it’s going to be painful for his detractors.

    For some people, its the hardest thing in the world to say “I was wrong.” They sooner become nasty than to smile, laugh at themselves, and adjust their outlook to reality. Note to all of you: It’s not about McGinn, it’s about this city!
    You know what? During the McGinn campaign, over and over I’ve been meeting the most wonderful people who like to laugh, drop their egos, and roll up their sleeves for the hard work. Friday was no exception. Thank you McGinn volunteers!!!

  • David

    Having known #29 Kate Martin for years, I know that she’s scared. She has a heart for this city that is just enormous, but a bitterness about losing that matches her often terrible collaboration skills.

    Despite all of her [misguided] contempt, Mike McGinn is now the very mayor she’s always actually wanted. When he starts doing things as mayor that make plain sense, it’s going to be painful for his detractors.

    For some people, its the hardest thing in the world to say “I was wrong.” They sooner become nasty than to smile, laugh at themselves, and adjust their outlook to reality. Note to all of you: It’s not about McGinn, it’s about this city!
    You know what? During the McGinn campaign, over and over I’ve been meeting the most wonderful people who like to laugh, drop their egos, and roll up their sleeves for the hard work. Friday was no exception. Thank you McGinn volunteers!!!

  • David

    Having known #29 Kate Martin for years, I know that she’s scared. She has a heart for this city that is just enormous, but a bitterness about losing that matches her often terrible collaboration skills.

    Despite all of her [misguided] contempt, Mike McGinn is now the very mayor she’s always actually wanted. When he starts doing things as mayor that make plain sense, it’s going to be painful for his detractors.

    For some people, its the hardest thing in the world to say “I was wrong.” They sooner become nasty than to smile, laugh at themselves, and adjust their outlook to reality. Note to all of you: It’s not about McGinn, it’s about this city!
    You know what? During the McGinn campaign, over and over I’ve been meeting the most wonderful people who like to laugh, drop their egos, and roll up their sleeves for the hard work. Friday was no exception. Thank you McGinn volunteers!!!

  • David

    Having known #29 Kate Martin for years, I know that she’s scared. She has a heart for this city that is just enormous, but a bitterness about losing that matches her often terrible collaboration skills.

    Despite all of her [misguided] contempt, Mike McGinn is now the very mayor she’s always actually wanted. When he starts doing things as mayor that make plain sense, it’s going to be painful for his detractors.

    For some people, its the hardest thing in the world to say “I was wrong.” They sooner become nasty than to smile, laugh at themselves, and adjust their outlook to reality. Note to all of you: It’s not about McGinn, it’s about this city!
    You know what? During the McGinn campaign, over and over I’ve been meeting the most wonderful people who like to laugh, drop their egos, and roll up their sleeves for the hard work. Friday was no exception. Thank you McGinn volunteers!!!

  • David

    Having known #29 Kate Martin for years, I know that she’s scared. She has a heart for this city that is just enormous, but a bitterness about losing that matches her often terrible collaboration skills.

    Despite all of her [misguided] contempt, Mike McGinn is now the very mayor she’s always actually wanted. When he starts doing things as mayor that make plain sense, it’s going to be painful for his detractors.

    For some people, its the hardest thing in the world to say “I was wrong.” They sooner become nasty than to smile, laugh at themselves, and adjust their outlook to reality. Note to all of you: It’s not about McGinn, it’s about this city!
    You know what? During the McGinn campaign, over and over I’ve been meeting the most wonderful people who like to laugh, drop their egos, and roll up their sleeves for the hard work. Friday was no exception. Thank you McGinn volunteers!!!

  • David

    Having known #29 Kate Martin for years, I know that she’s scared. She has a heart for this city that is just enormous, but a bitterness about losing that matches her often terrible collaboration skills.

    Despite all of her [misguided] contempt, Mike McGinn is now the very mayor she’s always actually wanted. When he starts doing things as mayor that make plain sense, it’s going to be painful for his detractors.

    For some people, its the hardest thing in the world to say “I was wrong.” They sooner become nasty than to smile, laugh at themselves, and adjust their outlook to reality. Note to all of you: It’s not about McGinn, it’s about this city!
    You know what? During the McGinn campaign, over and over I’ve been meeting the most wonderful people who like to laugh, drop their egos, and roll up their sleeves for the hard work. Friday was no exception. Thank you McGinn volunteers!!!

  • David

    Having known #29 Kate Martin for years, I know that she’s scared. She has a heart for this city that is just enormous, but a bitterness about losing that matches her often terrible collaboration skills.

    Despite all of her [misguided] contempt, Mike McGinn is now the very mayor she’s always actually wanted. When he starts doing things as mayor that make plain sense, it’s going to be painful for his detractors.

    For some people, its the hardest thing in the world to say “I was wrong.” They sooner become nasty than to smile, laugh at themselves, and adjust their outlook to reality. Note to all of you: It’s not about McGinn, it’s about this city!
    You know what? During the McGinn campaign, over and over I’ve been meeting the most wonderful people who like to laugh, drop their egos, and roll up their sleeves for the hard work. Friday was no exception. Thank you McGinn volunteers!!!

  • David

    Having known #29 Kate Martin for years, I know that she’s scared. She has a heart for this city that is just enormous, but a bitterness about losing that matches her often terrible collaboration skills.

    Despite all of her [misguided] contempt, Mike McGinn is now the very mayor she’s always actually wanted. When he starts doing things as mayor that make plain sense, it’s going to be painful for his detractors.

    For some people, its the hardest thing in the world to say “I was wrong.” They sooner become nasty than to smile, laugh at themselves, and adjust their outlook to reality. Note to all of you: It’s not about McGinn, it’s about this city!
    You know what? During the McGinn campaign, over and over I’ve been meeting the most wonderful people who like to laugh, drop their egos, and roll up their sleeves for the hard work. Friday was no exception. Thank you McGinn volunteers!!!

  • David

    Having known #29 Kate Martin for years, I know that she’s scared. She has a heart for this city that is just enormous, but a bitterness about losing that matches her often terrible collaboration skills.

    Despite all of her [misguided] contempt, Mike McGinn is now the very mayor she’s always actually wanted. When he starts doing things as mayor that make plain sense, it’s going to be painful for his detractors.

    For some people, its the hardest thing in the world to say “I was wrong.” They sooner become nasty than to smile, laugh at themselves, and adjust their outlook to reality. Note to all of you: It’s not about McGinn, it’s about this city!
    You know what? During the McGinn campaign, over and over I’ve been meeting the most wonderful people who like to laugh, drop their egos, and roll up their sleeves for the hard work. Friday was no exception. Thank you McGinn volunteers!!!

  • David

    Having known #29 Kate Martin for years, I know that she’s scared. She has a heart for this city that is just enormous, but a bitterness about losing that matches her often terrible collaboration skills.

    Despite all of her [misguided] contempt, Mike McGinn is now the very mayor she’s always actually wanted. When he starts doing things as mayor that make plain sense, it’s going to be painful for his detractors.

    For some people, its the hardest thing in the world to say “I was wrong.” They sooner become nasty than to smile, laugh at themselves, and adjust their outlook to reality. Note to all of you: It’s not about McGinn, it’s about this city!
    You know what? During the McGinn campaign, over and over I’ve been meeting the most wonderful people who like to laugh, drop their egos, and roll up their sleeves for the hard work. Friday was no exception. Thank you McGinn volunteers!!!

  • David

    Having known #29 Kate Martin for years, I know that she’s scared. She has a heart for this city that is just enormous, but a bitterness about losing that matches her often terrible collaboration skills.

    Despite all of her [misguided] contempt, Mike McGinn is now the very mayor she’s always actually wanted. When he starts doing things as mayor that make plain sense, it’s going to be painful for his detractors.

    For some people, its the hardest thing in the world to say “I was wrong.” They sooner become nasty than to smile, laugh at themselves, and adjust their outlook to reality. Note to all of you: It’s not about McGinn, it’s about this city!
    You know what? During the McGinn campaign, over and over I’ve been meeting the most wonderful people who like to laugh, drop their egos, and roll up their sleeves for the hard work. Friday was no exception. Thank you McGinn volunteers!!!

  • David

    Having known #29 Kate Martin for years, I know that she’s scared. She has a heart for this city that is just enormous, but a bitterness about losing that matches her often terrible collaboration skills.

    Despite all of her [misguided] contempt, Mike McGinn is now the very mayor she’s always actually wanted. When he starts doing things as mayor that make plain sense, it’s going to be painful for his detractors.

    For some people, its the hardest thing in the world to say “I was wrong.” They sooner become nasty than to smile, laugh at themselves, and adjust their outlook to reality. Note to all of you: It’s not about McGinn, it’s about this city!
    You know what? During the McGinn campaign, over and over I’ve been meeting the most wonderful people who like to laugh, drop their egos, and roll up their sleeves for the hard work. Friday was no exception. Thank you McGinn volunteers!!!

  • David

    Having known #29 Kate Martin for years, I know that she’s scared. She has a heart for this city that is just enormous, but a bitterness about losing that matches her often terrible collaboration skills.

    Despite all of her [misguided] contempt, Mike McGinn is now the very mayor she’s always actually wanted. When he starts doing things as mayor that make plain sense, it’s going to be painful for his detractors.

    For some people, its the hardest thing in the world to say “I was wrong.” They sooner become nasty than to smile, laugh at themselves, and adjust their outlook to reality. Note to all of you: It’s not about McGinn, it’s about this city!
    You know what? During the McGinn campaign, over and over I’ve been meeting the most wonderful people who like to laugh, drop their egos, and roll up their sleeves for the hard work. Friday was no exception. Thank you McGinn volunteers!!!

  • David

    Having known #29 Kate Martin for years, I know that she’s scared. She has a heart for this city that is just enormous, but a bitterness about losing that matches her often terrible collaboration skills.

    Despite all of her [misguided] contempt, Mike McGinn is now the very mayor she’s always actually wanted. When he starts doing things as mayor that make plain sense, it’s going to be painful for his detractors.

    For some people, its the hardest thing in the world to say “I was wrong.” They sooner become nasty than to smile, laugh at themselves, and adjust their outlook to reality. Note to all of you: It’s not about McGinn, it’s about this city!
    You know what? During the McGinn campaign, over and over I’ve been meeting the most wonderful people who like to laugh, drop their egos, and roll up their sleeves for the hard work. Friday was no exception. Thank you McGinn volunteers!!!

  • David

    Having known #29 Kate Martin for years, I know that she’s scared. She has a heart for this city that is just enormous, but a bitterness about losing that matches her often terrible collaboration skills.

    Despite all of her [misguided] contempt, Mike McGinn is now the very mayor she’s always actually wanted. When he starts doing things as mayor that make plain sense, it’s going to be painful for his detractors.

    For some people, its the hardest thing in the world to say “I was wrong.” They sooner become nasty than to smile, laugh at themselves, and adjust their outlook to reality. Note to all of you: It’s not about McGinn, it’s about this city!
    You know what? During the McGinn campaign, over and over I’ve been meeting the most wonderful people who like to laugh, drop their egos, and roll up their sleeves for the hard work. Friday was no exception. Thank you McGinn volunteers!!!

  • David

    Having known #29 Kate Martin for years, I know that she’s scared. She has a heart for this city that is just enormous, but a bitterness about losing that matches her often terrible collaboration skills.

    Despite all of her [misguided] contempt, Mike McGinn is now the very mayor she’s always actually wanted. When he starts doing things as mayor that make plain sense, it’s going to be painful for his detractors.

    For some people, its the hardest thing in the world to say “I was wrong.” They sooner become nasty than to smile, laugh at themselves, and adjust their outlook to reality. Note to all of you: It’s not about McGinn, it’s about this city!
    You know what? During the McGinn campaign, over and over I’ve been meeting the most wonderful people who like to laugh, drop their egos, and roll up their sleeves for the hard work. Friday was no exception. Thank you McGinn volunteers!!!

  • David

    Having known #29 Kate Martin for years, I know that she’s scared. She has a heart for this city that is just enormous, but a bitterness about losing that matches her often terrible collaboration skills.

    Despite all of her [misguided] contempt, Mike McGinn is now the very mayor she’s always actually wanted. When he starts doing things as mayor that make plain sense, it’s going to be painful for his detractors.

    For some people, its the hardest thing in the world to say “I was wrong.” They sooner become nasty than to smile, laugh at themselves, and adjust their outlook to reality. Note to all of you: It’s not about McGinn, it’s about this city!
    You know what? During the McGinn campaign, over and over I’ve been meeting the most wonderful people who like to laugh, drop their egos, and roll up their sleeves for the hard work. Friday was no exception. Thank you McGinn volunteers!!!

  • David

    Having known #29 Kate Martin for years, I know that she’s scared. She has a heart for this city that is just enormous, but a bitterness about losing that matches her often terrible collaboration skills.

    Despite all of her [misguided] contempt, Mike McGinn is now the very mayor she’s always actually wanted. When he starts doing things as mayor that make plain sense, it’s going to be painful for his detractors.

    For some people, its the hardest thing in the world to say “I was wrong.” They sooner become nasty than to smile, laugh at themselves, and adjust their outlook to reality. Note to all of you: It’s not about McGinn, it’s about this city!
    You know what? During the McGinn campaign, over and over I’ve been meeting the most wonderful people who like to laugh, drop their egos, and roll up their sleeves for the hard work. Friday was no exception. Thank you McGinn volunteers!!!

  • David

    Having known #29 Kate Martin for years, I know that she’s scared. She has a heart for this city that is just enormous, but a bitterness about losing that matches her often terrible collaboration skills.

    Despite all of her [misguided] contempt, Mike McGinn is now the very mayor she’s always actually wanted. When he starts doing things as mayor that make plain sense, it’s going to be painful for his detractors.

    For some people, its the hardest thing in the world to say “I was wrong.” They sooner become nasty than to smile, laugh at themselves, and adjust their outlook to reality. Note to all of you: It’s not about McGinn, it’s about this city!
    You know what? During the McGinn campaign, over and over I’ve been meeting the most wonderful people who like to laugh, drop their egos, and roll up their sleeves for the hard work. Friday was no exception. Thank you McGinn volunteers!!!

  • David

    Having known #29 Kate Martin for years, I know that she’s scared. She has a heart for this city that is just enormous, but a bitterness about losing that matches her often terrible collaboration skills.

    Despite all of her [misguided] contempt, Mike McGinn is now the very mayor she’s always actually wanted. When he starts doing things as mayor that make plain sense, it’s going to be painful for his detractors.

    For some people, its the hardest thing in the world to say “I was wrong.” They sooner become nasty than to smile, laugh at themselves, and adjust their outlook to reality. Note to all of you: It’s not about McGinn, it’s about this city!
    You know what? During the McGinn campaign, over and over I’ve been meeting the most wonderful people who like to laugh, drop their egos, and roll up their sleeves for the hard work. Friday was no exception. Thank you McGinn volunteers!!!

  • David

    Having known #29 Kate Martin for years, I know that she’s scared. She has a heart for this city that is just enormous, but a bitterness about losing that matches her often terrible collaboration skills.

    Despite all of her [misguided] contempt, Mike McGinn is now the very mayor she’s always actually wanted. When he starts doing things as mayor that make plain sense, it’s going to be painful for his detractors.

    For some people, its the hardest thing in the world to say “I was wrong.” They sooner become nasty than to smile, laugh at themselves, and adjust their outlook to reality. Note to all of you: It’s not about McGinn, it’s about this city!
    You know what? During the McGinn campaign, over and over I’ve been meeting the most wonderful people who like to laugh, drop their egos, and roll up their sleeves for the hard work. Friday was no exception. Thank you McGinn volunteers!!!

  • David

    Having known #29 Kate Martin for years, I know that she’s scared. She has a heart for this city that is just enormous, but a bitterness about losing that matches her often terrible collaboration skills.

    Despite all of her [misguided] contempt, Mike McGinn is now the very mayor she’s always actually wanted. When he starts doing things as mayor that make plain sense, it’s going to be painful for his detractors.

    For some people, its the hardest thing in the world to say “I was wrong.” They sooner become nasty than to smile, laugh at themselves, and adjust their outlook to reality. Note to all of you: It’s not about McGinn, it’s about this city!
    You know what? During the McGinn campaign, over and over I’ve been meeting the most wonderful people who like to laugh, drop their egos, and roll up their sleeves for the hard work. Friday was no exception. Thank you McGinn volunteers!!!

  • David

    Having known #29 Kate Martin for years, I know that she’s scared. She has a heart for this city that is just enormous, but a bitterness about losing that matches her often terrible collaboration skills.

    Despite all of her [misguided] contempt, Mike McGinn is now the very mayor she’s always actually wanted. When he starts doing things as mayor that make plain sense, it’s going to be painful for his detractors.

    For some people, its the hardest thing in the world to say “I was wrong.” They sooner become nasty than to smile, laugh at themselves, and adjust their outlook to reality. Note to all of you: It’s not about McGinn, it’s about this city!
    You know what? During the McGinn campaign, over and over I’ve been meeting the most wonderful people who like to laugh, drop their egos, and roll up their sleeves for the hard work. Friday was no exception. Thank you McGinn volunteers!!!

  • David

    Having known #29 Kate Martin for years, I know that she’s scared. She has a heart for this city that is just enormous, but a bitterness about losing that matches her often terrible collaboration skills.

    Despite all of her [misguided] contempt, Mike McGinn is now the very mayor she’s always actually wanted. When he starts doing things as mayor that make plain sense, it’s going to be painful for his detractors.

    For some people, its the hardest thing in the world to say “I was wrong.” They sooner become nasty than to smile, laugh at themselves, and adjust their outlook to reality. Note to all of you: It’s not about McGinn, it’s about this city!
    You know what? During the McGinn campaign, over and over I’ve been meeting the most wonderful people who like to laugh, drop their egos, and roll up their sleeves for the hard work. Friday was no exception. Thank you McGinn volunteers!!!

  • David

    Having known #29 Kate Martin for years, I know that she’s scared. She has a heart for this city that is just enormous, but a bitterness about losing that matches her often terrible collaboration skills.

    Despite all of her [misguided] contempt, Mike McGinn is now the very mayor she’s always actually wanted. When he starts doing things as mayor that make plain sense, it’s going to be painful for his detractors.

    For some people, its the hardest thing in the world to say “I was wrong.” They sooner become nasty than to smile, laugh at themselves, and adjust their outlook to reality. Note to all of you: It’s not about McGinn, it’s about this city!
    You know what? During the McGinn campaign, over and over I’ve been meeting the most wonderful people who like to laugh, drop their egos, and roll up their sleeves for the hard work. Friday was no exception. Thank you McGinn volunteers!!!

  • David

    Having known #29 Kate Martin for years, I know that she’s scared. She has a heart for this city that is just enormous, but a bitterness about losing that matches her often terrible collaboration skills.

    Despite all of her [misguided] contempt, Mike McGinn is now the very mayor she’s always actually wanted. When he starts doing things as mayor that make plain sense, it’s going to be painful for his detractors.

    For some people, its the hardest thing in the world to say “I was wrong.” They sooner become nasty than to smile, laugh at themselves, and adjust their outlook to reality. Note to all of you: It’s not about McGinn, it’s about this city!

    You know what? During the McGinn campaign, over and over I’ve been meeting the most wonderful people who like to laugh, drop their egos, and roll up their sleeves for the hard work. Friday was no exception. Thank you McGinn volunteers!!!

  • rich

    sarah68: you misread the number on my post re Joni. It referred to west seattle waiter’s comment@14, not yours @18.

  • rich

    sarah68: you misread the number on my post re Joni. It referred to west seattle waiter’s comment@14, not yours @18.

  • rich

    sarah68: you misread the number on my post re Joni. It referred to west seattle waiter’s comment@14, not yours @18.

  • rich

    sarah68: you misread the number on my post re Joni. It referred to west seattle waiter’s comment@14, not yours @18.

  • rich

    sarah68: you misread the number on my post re Joni. It referred to west seattle waiter’s comment@14, not yours @18.

  • rich

    sarah68: you misread the number on my post re Joni. It referred to west seattle waiter’s comment@14, not yours @18.

  • rich

    sarah68: you misread the number on my post re Joni. It referred to west seattle waiter’s comment@14, not yours @18.

  • rich

    sarah68: you misread the number on my post re Joni. It referred to west seattle waiter’s comment@14, not yours @18.

  • rich

    sarah68: you misread the number on my post re Joni. It referred to west seattle waiter’s comment@14, not yours @18.

  • rich

    sarah68: you misread the number on my post re Joni. It referred to west seattle waiter’s comment@14, not yours @18.

  • rich

    sarah68: you misread the number on my post re Joni. It referred to west seattle waiter’s comment@14, not yours @18.

  • rich

    sarah68: you misread the number on my post re Joni. It referred to west seattle waiter’s comment@14, not yours @18.

  • rich

    sarah68: you misread the number on my post re Joni. It referred to west seattle waiter’s comment@14, not yours @18.

  • rich

    sarah68: you misread the number on my post re Joni. It referred to west seattle waiter’s comment@14, not yours @18.

  • rich

    sarah68: you misread the number on my post re Joni. It referred to west seattle waiter’s comment@14, not yours @18.

  • rich

    sarah68: you misread the number on my post re Joni. It referred to west seattle waiter’s comment@14, not yours @18.

  • rich

    sarah68: you misread the number on my post re Joni. It referred to west seattle waiter’s comment@14, not yours @18.

  • rich

    sarah68: you misread the number on my post re Joni. It referred to west seattle waiter’s comment@14, not yours @18.

  • rich

    sarah68: you misread the number on my post re Joni. It referred to west seattle waiter’s comment@14, not yours @18.

  • rich

    sarah68: you misread the number on my post re Joni. It referred to west seattle waiter’s comment@14, not yours @18.

  • rich

    sarah68: you misread the number on my post re Joni. It referred to west seattle waiter’s comment@14, not yours @18.

  • rich

    sarah68: you misread the number on my post re Joni. It referred to west seattle waiter’s comment@14, not yours @18.

  • rich

    sarah68: you misread the number on my post re Joni. It referred to west seattle waiter’s comment@14, not yours @18.

  • rich

    sarah68: you misread the number on my post re Joni. It referred to west seattle waiter’s comment@14, not yours @18.

  • rich

    sarah68: you misread the number on my post re Joni. It referred to west seattle waiter’s comment@14, not yours @18.

  • rich

    sarah68: you misread the number on my post re Joni. It referred to west seattle waiter’s comment@14, not yours @18.

  • rich

    sarah68: you misread the number on my post re Joni. It referred to west seattle waiter’s comment@14, not yours @18.

  • rich

    sarah68: you misread the number on my post re Joni. It referred to west seattle waiter’s comment@14, not yours @18.

  • rich

    sarah68: you misread the number on my post re Joni. It referred to west seattle waiter’s comment@14, not yours @18.

  • rich

    sarah68: you misread the number on my post re Joni. It referred to west seattle waiter’s comment@14, not yours @18.

  • rich

    sarah68: you misread the number on my post re Joni. It referred to west seattle waiter’s comment@14, not yours @18.

  • rich

    sarah68: you misread the number on my post re Joni. It referred to west seattle waiter’s comment@14, not yours @18.

  • rich

    sarah68: you misread the number on my post re Joni. It referred to west seattle waiter’s comment@14, not yours @18.

  • rich

    sarah68: you misread the number on my post re Joni. It referred to west seattle waiter’s comment@14, not yours @18.

  • rich

    sarah68: you misread the number on my post re Joni. It referred to west seattle waiter’s comment@14, not yours @18.

  • rich

    sarah68: you misread the number on my post re Joni. It referred to west seattle waiter’s comment@14, not yours @18.

  • rich

    sarah68: you misread the number on my post re Joni. It referred to west seattle waiter’s comment@14, not yours @18.

  • rich

    sarah68: you misread the number on my post re Joni. It referred to west seattle waiter’s comment@14, not yours @18.

  • rich

    sarah68: you misread the number on my post re Joni. It referred to west seattle waiter’s comment@14, not yours @18.

  • rich

    sarah68: you misread the number on my post re Joni. It referred to west seattle waiter’s comment@14, not yours @18.

  • rich

    sarah68: you misread the number on my post re Joni. It referred to west seattle waiter’s comment@14, not yours @18.

  • rich

    sarah68: you misread the number on my post re Joni. It referred to west seattle waiter’s comment@14, not yours @18.

  • rich

    sarah68: you misread the number on my post re Joni. It referred to west seattle waiter’s comment@14, not yours @18.

  • rich

    sarah68: you misread the number on my post re Joni. It referred to west seattle waiter’s comment@14, not yours @18.

  • rich

    sarah68: you misread the number on my post re Joni. It referred to west seattle waiter’s comment@14, not yours @18.

  • gloomy gus

    @40 – I’ll drop my ego when McGinn drops his. A bunch of my friends are his volunteers, and they’re not really the hope-infused worker drones you describe. They know full well how much he’s asked them to take on faith. Working for the agenda doesn’t mean they’re turning a blind eye to his personal ambition. They’re watching for problems as much as any of us.

    But some of us will always be the loyal opposition. Less respectful of high office, etc. Woulda been the same if the suit guy had won.

    And also please revise your strategy for bolding and italicizing. Thank you.

  • gloomy gus

    @40 – I’ll drop my ego when McGinn drops his. A bunch of my friends are his volunteers, and they’re not really the hope-infused worker drones you describe. They know full well how much he’s asked them to take on faith. Working for the agenda doesn’t mean they’re turning a blind eye to his personal ambition. They’re watching for problems as much as any of us.

    But some of us will always be the loyal opposition. Less respectful of high office, etc. Woulda been the same if the suit guy had won.

    And also please revise your strategy for bolding and italicizing. Thank you.

  • gloomy gus

    @40 – I’ll drop my ego when McGinn drops his. A bunch of my friends are his volunteers, and they’re not really the hope-infused worker drones you describe. They know full well how much he’s asked them to take on faith. Working for the agenda doesn’t mean they’re turning a blind eye to his personal ambition. They’re watching for problems as much as any of us.

    But some of us will always be the loyal opposition. Less respectful of high office, etc. Woulda been the same if the suit guy had won.

    And also please revise your strategy for bolding and italicizing. Thank you.

  • gloomy gus

    @40 – I’ll drop my ego when McGinn drops his. A bunch of my friends are his volunteers, and they’re not really the hope-infused worker drones you describe. They know full well how much he’s asked them to take on faith. Working for the agenda doesn’t mean they’re turning a blind eye to his personal ambition. They’re watching for problems as much as any of us.

    But some of us will always be the loyal opposition. Less respectful of high office, etc. Woulda been the same if the suit guy had won.

    And also please revise your strategy for bolding and italicizing. Thank you.

  • gloomy gus

    @40 – I’ll drop my ego when McGinn drops his. A bunch of my friends are his volunteers, and they’re not really the hope-infused worker drones you describe. They know full well how much he’s asked them to take on faith. Working for the agenda doesn’t mean they’re turning a blind eye to his personal ambition. They’re watching for problems as much as any of us.

    But some of us will always be the loyal opposition. Less respectful of high office, etc. Woulda been the same if the suit guy had won.

    And also please revise your strategy for bolding and italicizing. Thank you.

  • gloomy gus

    @40 – I’ll drop my ego when McGinn drops his. A bunch of my friends are his volunteers, and they’re not really the hope-infused worker drones you describe. They know full well how much he’s asked them to take on faith. Working for the agenda doesn’t mean they’re turning a blind eye to his personal ambition. They’re watching for problems as much as any of us.

    But some of us will always be the loyal opposition. Less respectful of high office, etc. Woulda been the same if the suit guy had won.

    And also please revise your strategy for bolding and italicizing. Thank you.

  • gloomy gus

    @40 – I’ll drop my ego when McGinn drops his. A bunch of my friends are his volunteers, and they’re not really the hope-infused worker drones you describe. They know full well how much he’s asked them to take on faith. Working for the agenda doesn’t mean they’re turning a blind eye to his personal ambition. They’re watching for problems as much as any of us.

    But some of us will always be the loyal opposition. Less respectful of high office, etc. Woulda been the same if the suit guy had won.

    And also please revise your strategy for bolding and italicizing. Thank you.

  • gloomy gus

    @40 – I’ll drop my ego when McGinn drops his. A bunch of my friends are his volunteers, and they’re not really the hope-infused worker drones you describe. They know full well how much he’s asked them to take on faith. Working for the agenda doesn’t mean they’re turning a blind eye to his personal ambition. They’re watching for problems as much as any of us.

    But some of us will always be the loyal opposition. Less respectful of high office, etc. Woulda been the same if the suit guy had won.

    And also please revise your strategy for bolding and italicizing. Thank you.

  • gloomy gus

    @40 – I’ll drop my ego when McGinn drops his. A bunch of my friends are his volunteers, and they’re not really the hope-infused worker drones you describe. They know full well how much he’s asked them to take on faith. Working for the agenda doesn’t mean they’re turning a blind eye to his personal ambition. They’re watching for problems as much as any of us.

    But some of us will always be the loyal opposition. Less respectful of high office, etc. Woulda been the same if the suit guy had won.

    And also please revise your strategy for bolding and italicizing. Thank you.

  • gloomy gus

    @40 – I’ll drop my ego when McGinn drops his. A bunch of my friends are his volunteers, and they’re not really the hope-infused worker drones you describe. They know full well how much he’s asked them to take on faith. Working for the agenda doesn’t mean they’re turning a blind eye to his personal ambition. They’re watching for problems as much as any of us.

    But some of us will always be the loyal opposition. Less respectful of high office, etc. Woulda been the same if the suit guy had won.

    And also please revise your strategy for bolding and italicizing. Thank you.

  • gloomy gus

    @40 – I’ll drop my ego when McGinn drops his. A bunch of my friends are his volunteers, and they’re not really the hope-infused worker drones you describe. They know full well how much he’s asked them to take on faith. Working for the agenda doesn’t mean they’re turning a blind eye to his personal ambition. They’re watching for problems as much as any of us.

    But some of us will always be the loyal opposition. Less respectful of high office, etc. Woulda been the same if the suit guy had won.

    And also please revise your strategy for bolding and italicizing. Thank you.

  • gloomy gus

    @40 – I’ll drop my ego when McGinn drops his. A bunch of my friends are his volunteers, and they’re not really the hope-infused worker drones you describe. They know full well how much he’s asked them to take on faith. Working for the agenda doesn’t mean they’re turning a blind eye to his personal ambition. They’re watching for problems as much as any of us.

    But some of us will always be the loyal opposition. Less respectful of high office, etc. Woulda been the same if the suit guy had won.

    And also please revise your strategy for bolding and italicizing. Thank you.

  • gloomy gus

    @40 – I’ll drop my ego when McGinn drops his. A bunch of my friends are his volunteers, and they’re not really the hope-infused worker drones you describe. They know full well how much he’s asked them to take on faith. Working for the agenda doesn’t mean they’re turning a blind eye to his personal ambition. They’re watching for problems as much as any of us.

    But some of us will always be the loyal opposition. Less respectful of high office, etc. Woulda been the same if the suit guy had won.

    And also please revise your strategy for bolding and italicizing. Thank you.

  • gloomy gus

    @40 – I’ll drop my ego when McGinn drops his. A bunch of my friends are his volunteers, and they’re not really the hope-infused worker drones you describe. They know full well how much he’s asked them to take on faith. Working for the agenda doesn’t mean they’re turning a blind eye to his personal ambition. They’re watching for problems as much as any of us.

    But some of us will always be the loyal opposition. Less respectful of high office, etc. Woulda been the same if the suit guy had won.

    And also please revise your strategy for bolding and italicizing. Thank you.

  • gloomy gus

    @40 – I’ll drop my ego when McGinn drops his. A bunch of my friends are his volunteers, and they’re not really the hope-infused worker drones you describe. They know full well how much he’s asked them to take on faith. Working for the agenda doesn’t mean they’re turning a blind eye to his personal ambition. They’re watching for problems as much as any of us.

    But some of us will always be the loyal opposition. Less respectful of high office, etc. Woulda been the same if the suit guy had won.

    And also please revise your strategy for bolding and italicizing. Thank you.

  • gloomy gus

    @40 – I’ll drop my ego when McGinn drops his. A bunch of my friends are his volunteers, and they’re not really the hope-infused worker drones you describe. They know full well how much he’s asked them to take on faith. Working for the agenda doesn’t mean they’re turning a blind eye to his personal ambition. They’re watching for problems as much as any of us.

    But some of us will always be the loyal opposition. Less respectful of high office, etc. Woulda been the same if the suit guy had won.

    And also please revise your strategy for bolding and italicizing. Thank you.

  • gloomy gus

    @40 – I’ll drop my ego when McGinn drops his. A bunch of my friends are his volunteers, and they’re not really the hope-infused worker drones you describe. They know full well how much he’s asked them to take on faith. Working for the agenda doesn’t mean they’re turning a blind eye to his personal ambition. They’re watching for problems as much as any of us.

    But some of us will always be the loyal opposition. Less respectful of high office, etc. Woulda been the same if the suit guy had won.

    And also please revise your strategy for bolding and italicizing. Thank you.

  • gloomy gus

    @40 – I’ll drop my ego when McGinn drops his. A bunch of my friends are his volunteers, and they’re not really the hope-infused worker drones you describe. They know full well how much he’s asked them to take on faith. Working for the agenda doesn’t mean they’re turning a blind eye to his personal ambition. They’re watching for problems as much as any of us.

    But some of us will always be the loyal opposition. Less respectful of high office, etc. Woulda been the same if the suit guy had won.

    And also please revise your strategy for bolding and italicizing. Thank you.

  • gloomy gus

    @40 – I’ll drop my ego when McGinn drops his. A bunch of my friends are his volunteers, and they’re not really the hope-infused worker drones you describe. They know full well how much he’s asked them to take on faith. Working for the agenda doesn’t mean they’re turning a blind eye to his personal ambition. They’re watching for problems as much as any of us.

    But some of us will always be the loyal opposition. Less respectful of high office, etc. Woulda been the same if the suit guy had won.

    And also please revise your strategy for bolding and italicizing. Thank you.

  • gloomy gus

    @40 – I’ll drop my ego when McGinn drops his. A bunch of my friends are his volunteers, and they’re not really the hope-infused worker drones you describe. They know full well how much he’s asked them to take on faith. Working for the agenda doesn’t mean they’re turning a blind eye to his personal ambition. They’re watching for problems as much as any of us.

    But some of us will always be the loyal opposition. Less respectful of high office, etc. Woulda been the same if the suit guy had won.

    And also please revise your strategy for bolding and italicizing. Thank you.

  • gloomy gus

    @40 – I’ll drop my ego when McGinn drops his. A bunch of my friends are his volunteers, and they’re not really the hope-infused worker drones you describe. They know full well how much he’s asked them to take on faith. Working for the agenda doesn’t mean they’re turning a blind eye to his personal ambition. They’re watching for problems as much as any of us.

    But some of us will always be the loyal opposition. Less respectful of high office, etc. Woulda been the same if the suit guy had won.

    And also please revise your strategy for bolding and italicizing. Thank you.

  • gloomy gus

    @40 – I’ll drop my ego when McGinn drops his. A bunch of my friends are his volunteers, and they’re not really the hope-infused worker drones you describe. They know full well how much he’s asked them to take on faith. Working for the agenda doesn’t mean they’re turning a blind eye to his personal ambition. They’re watching for problems as much as any of us.

    But some of us will always be the loyal opposition. Less respectful of high office, etc. Woulda been the same if the suit guy had won.

    And also please revise your strategy for bolding and italicizing. Thank you.

  • gloomy gus

    @40 – I’ll drop my ego when McGinn drops his. A bunch of my friends are his volunteers, and they’re not really the hope-infused worker drones you describe. They know full well how much he’s asked them to take on faith. Working for the agenda doesn’t mean they’re turning a blind eye to his personal ambition. They’re watching for problems as much as any of us.

    But some of us will always be the loyal opposition. Less respectful of high office, etc. Woulda been the same if the suit guy had won.

    And also please revise your strategy for bolding and italicizing. Thank you.

  • gloomy gus

    @40 – I’ll drop my ego when McGinn drops his. A bunch of my friends are his volunteers, and they’re not really the hope-infused worker drones you describe. They know full well how much he’s asked them to take on faith. Working for the agenda doesn’t mean they’re turning a blind eye to his personal ambition. They’re watching for problems as much as any of us.

    But some of us will always be the loyal opposition. Less respectful of high office, etc. Woulda been the same if the suit guy had won.

    And also please revise your strategy for bolding and italicizing. Thank you.

  • gloomy gus

    @40 – I’ll drop my ego when McGinn drops his. A bunch of my friends are his volunteers, and they’re not really the hope-infused worker drones you describe. They know full well how much he’s asked them to take on faith. Working for the agenda doesn’t mean they’re turning a blind eye to his personal ambition. They’re watching for problems as much as any of us.

    But some of us will always be the loyal opposition. Less respectful of high office, etc. Woulda been the same if the suit guy had won.

    And also please revise your strategy for bolding and italicizing. Thank you.

  • gloomy gus

    @40 – I’ll drop my ego when McGinn drops his. A bunch of my friends are his volunteers, and they’re not really the hope-infused worker drones you describe. They know full well how much he’s asked them to take on faith. Working for the agenda doesn’t mean they’re turning a blind eye to his personal ambition. They’re watching for problems as much as any of us.

    But some of us will always be the loyal opposition. Less respectful of high office, etc. Woulda been the same if the suit guy had won.

    And also please revise your strategy for bolding and italicizing. Thank you.

  • gloomy gus

    @40 – I’ll drop my ego when McGinn drops his. A bunch of my friends are his volunteers, and they’re not really the hope-infused worker drones you describe. They know full well how much he’s asked them to take on faith. Working for the agenda doesn’t mean they’re turning a blind eye to his personal ambition. They’re watching for problems as much as any of us.

    But some of us will always be the loyal opposition. Less respectful of high office, etc. Woulda been the same if the suit guy had won.

    And also please revise your strategy for bolding and italicizing. Thank you.

  • gloomy gus

    @40 – I’ll drop my ego when McGinn drops his. A bunch of my friends are his volunteers, and they’re not really the hope-infused worker drones you describe. They know full well how much he’s asked them to take on faith. Working for the agenda doesn’t mean they’re turning a blind eye to his personal ambition. They’re watching for problems as much as any of us.

    But some of us will always be the loyal opposition. Less respectful of high office, etc. Woulda been the same if the suit guy had won.

    And also please revise your strategy for bolding and italicizing. Thank you.

  • gloomy gus

    @40 – I’ll drop my ego when McGinn drops his. A bunch of my friends are his volunteers, and they’re not really the hope-infused worker drones you describe. They know full well how much he’s asked them to take on faith. Working for the agenda doesn’t mean they’re turning a blind eye to his personal ambition. They’re watching for problems as much as any of us.

    But some of us will always be the loyal opposition. Less respectful of high office, etc. Woulda been the same if the suit guy had won.

    And also please revise your strategy for bolding and italicizing. Thank you.

  • gloomy gus

    @40 – I’ll drop my ego when McGinn drops his. A bunch of my friends are his volunteers, and they’re not really the hope-infused worker drones you describe. They know full well how much he’s asked them to take on faith. Working for the agenda doesn’t mean they’re turning a blind eye to his personal ambition. They’re watching for problems as much as any of us.

    But some of us will always be the loyal opposition. Less respectful of high office, etc. Woulda been the same if the suit guy had won.

    And also please revise your strategy for bolding and italicizing. Thank you.

  • gloomy gus

    @40 – I’ll drop my ego when McGinn drops his. A bunch of my friends are his volunteers, and they’re not really the hope-infused worker drones you describe. They know full well how much he’s asked them to take on faith. Working for the agenda doesn’t mean they’re turning a blind eye to his personal ambition. They’re watching for problems as much as any of us.

    But some of us will always be the loyal opposition. Less respectful of high office, etc. Woulda been the same if the suit guy had won.

    And also please revise your strategy for bolding and italicizing. Thank you.

  • gloomy gus

    @40 – I’ll drop my ego when McGinn drops his. A bunch of my friends are his volunteers, and they’re not really the hope-infused worker drones you describe. They know full well how much he’s asked them to take on faith. Working for the agenda doesn’t mean they’re turning a blind eye to his personal ambition. They’re watching for problems as much as any of us.

    But some of us will always be the loyal opposition. Less respectful of high office, etc. Woulda been the same if the suit guy had won.

    And also please revise your strategy for bolding and italicizing. Thank you.

  • gloomy gus

    @40 – I’ll drop my ego when McGinn drops his. A bunch of my friends are his volunteers, and they’re not really the hope-infused worker drones you describe. They know full well how much he’s asked them to take on faith. Working for the agenda doesn’t mean they’re turning a blind eye to his personal ambition. They’re watching for problems as much as any of us.

    But some of us will always be the loyal opposition. Less respectful of high office, etc. Woulda been the same if the suit guy had won.

    And also please revise your strategy for bolding and italicizing. Thank you.

  • gloomy gus

    @40 – I’ll drop my ego when McGinn drops his. A bunch of my friends are his volunteers, and they’re not really the hope-infused worker drones you describe. They know full well how much he’s asked them to take on faith. Working for the agenda doesn’t mean they’re turning a blind eye to his personal ambition. They’re watching for problems as much as any of us.

    But some of us will always be the loyal opposition. Less respectful of high office, etc. Woulda been the same if the suit guy had won.

    And also please revise your strategy for bolding and italicizing. Thank you.

  • gloomy gus

    @40 – I’ll drop my ego when McGinn drops his. A bunch of my friends are his volunteers, and they’re not really the hope-infused worker drones you describe. They know full well how much he’s asked them to take on faith. Working for the agenda doesn’t mean they’re turning a blind eye to his personal ambition. They’re watching for problems as much as any of us.

    But some of us will always be the loyal opposition. Less respectful of high office, etc. Woulda been the same if the suit guy had won.

    And also please revise your strategy for bolding and italicizing. Thank you.

  • gloomy gus

    @40 – I’ll drop my ego when McGinn drops his. A bunch of my friends are his volunteers, and they’re not really the hope-infused worker drones you describe. They know full well how much he’s asked them to take on faith. Working for the agenda doesn’t mean they’re turning a blind eye to his personal ambition. They’re watching for problems as much as any of us.

    But some of us will always be the loyal opposition. Less respectful of high office, etc. Woulda been the same if the suit guy had won.

    And also please revise your strategy for bolding and italicizing. Thank you.

  • gloomy gus

    @40 – I’ll drop my ego when McGinn drops his. A bunch of my friends are his volunteers, and they’re not really the hope-infused worker drones you describe. They know full well how much he’s asked them to take on faith. Working for the agenda doesn’t mean they’re turning a blind eye to his personal ambition. They’re watching for problems as much as any of us.

    But some of us will always be the loyal opposition. Less respectful of high office, etc. Woulda been the same if the suit guy had won.

    And also please revise your strategy for bolding and italicizing. Thank you.

  • gloomy gus

    @40 – I’ll drop my ego when McGinn drops his. A bunch of my friends are his volunteers, and they’re not really the hope-infused worker drones you describe. They know full well how much he’s asked them to take on faith. Working for the agenda doesn’t mean they’re turning a blind eye to his personal ambition. They’re watching for problems as much as any of us.

    But some of us will always be the loyal opposition. Less respectful of high office, etc. Woulda been the same if the suit guy had won.

    And also please revise your strategy for bolding and italicizing. Thank you.

  • gloomy gus

    @40 – I’ll drop my ego when McGinn drops his. A bunch of my friends are his volunteers, and they’re not really the hope-infused worker drones you describe. They know full well how much he’s asked them to take on faith. Working for the agenda doesn’t mean they’re turning a blind eye to his personal ambition. They’re watching for problems as much as any of us.

    But some of us will always be the loyal opposition. Less respectful of high office, etc. Woulda been the same if the suit guy had won.

    And also please revise your strategy for bolding and italicizing. Thank you.

  • gloomy gus

    @40 – I’ll drop my ego when McGinn drops his. A bunch of my friends are his volunteers, and they’re not really the hope-infused worker drones you describe. They know full well how much he’s asked them to take on faith. Working for the agenda doesn’t mean they’re turning a blind eye to his personal ambition. They’re watching for problems as much as any of us.

    But some of us will always be the loyal opposition. Less respectful of high office, etc. Woulda been the same if the suit guy had won.

    And also please revise your strategy for bolding and italicizing. Thank you.

  • gloomy gus

    @40 – I’ll drop my ego when McGinn drops his. A bunch of my friends are his volunteers, and they’re not really the hope-infused worker drones you describe. They know full well how much he’s asked them to take on faith. Working for the agenda doesn’t mean they’re turning a blind eye to his personal ambition. They’re watching for problems as much as any of us.

    But some of us will always be the loyal opposition. Less respectful of high office, etc. Woulda been the same if the suit guy had won.

    And also please revise your strategy for bolding and italicizing. Thank you.

  • gloomy gus

    @40 – I’ll drop my ego when McGinn drops his. A bunch of my friends are his volunteers, and they’re not really the hope-infused worker drones you describe. They know full well how much he’s asked them to take on faith. Working for the agenda doesn’t mean they’re turning a blind eye to his personal ambition. They’re watching for problems as much as any of us.

    But some of us will always be the loyal opposition. Less respectful of high office, etc. Woulda been the same if the suit guy had won.

    And also please revise your strategy for bolding and italicizing. Thank you.

  • gloomy gus

    @40 – I’ll drop my ego when McGinn drops his. A bunch of my friends are his volunteers, and they’re not really the hope-infused worker drones you describe. They know full well how much he’s asked them to take on faith. Working for the agenda doesn’t mean they’re turning a blind eye to his personal ambition. They’re watching for problems as much as any of us.

    But some of us will always be the loyal opposition. Less respectful of high office, etc. Woulda been the same if the suit guy had won.

    And also please revise your strategy for bolding and italicizing. Thank you.

  • gloomy gus

    @40 – I’ll drop my ego when McGinn drops his. A bunch of my friends are his volunteers, and they’re not really the hope-infused worker drones you describe. They know full well how much he’s asked them to take on faith. Working for the agenda doesn’t mean they’re turning a blind eye to his personal ambition. They’re watching for problems as much as any of us.

    But some of us will always be the loyal opposition. Less respectful of high office, etc. Woulda been the same if the suit guy had won.

    And also please revise your strategy for bolding and italicizing. Thank you.

  • gloomy gus

    @40 – I’ll drop my ego when McGinn drops his. A bunch of my friends are his volunteers, and they’re not really the hope-infused worker drones you describe. They know full well how much he’s asked them to take on faith. Working for the agenda doesn’t mean they’re turning a blind eye to his personal ambition. They’re watching for problems as much as any of us.

    But some of us will always be the loyal opposition. Less respectful of high office, etc. Woulda been the same if the suit guy had won.

    And also please revise your strategy for bolding and italicizing. Thank you.

  • sarah68

    OK, Rich, but the numbers are still weird — I didn’t post at #18.

  • sarah68

    OK, Rich, but the numbers are still weird — I didn’t post at #18.

  • sarah68

    OK, Rich, but the numbers are still weird — I didn’t post at #18.

  • sarah68

    OK, Rich, but the numbers are still weird — I didn’t post at #18.

  • sarah68

    OK, Rich, but the numbers are still weird — I didn’t post at #18.

  • sarah68

    OK, Rich, but the numbers are still weird — I didn’t post at #18.

  • sarah68

    OK, Rich, but the numbers are still weird — I didn’t post at #18.

  • sarah68

    OK, Rich, but the numbers are still weird — I didn’t post at #18.

  • sarah68

    OK, Rich, but the numbers are still weird — I didn’t post at #18.

  • sarah68

    OK, Rich, but the numbers are still weird — I didn’t post at #18.

  • sarah68

    OK, Rich, but the numbers are still weird — I didn’t post at #18.

  • sarah68

    OK, Rich, but the numbers are still weird — I didn’t post at #18.

  • sarah68

    OK, Rich, but the numbers are still weird — I didn’t post at #18.

  • sarah68

    OK, Rich, but the numbers are still weird — I didn’t post at #18.

  • sarah68

    OK, Rich, but the numbers are still weird — I didn’t post at #18.

  • sarah68

    OK, Rich, but the numbers are still weird — I didn’t post at #18.

  • sarah68

    OK, Rich, but the numbers are still weird — I didn’t post at #18.

  • sarah68

    OK, Rich, but the numbers are still weird — I didn’t post at #18.

  • sarah68

    OK, Rich, but the numbers are still weird — I didn’t post at #18.

  • sarah68

    OK, Rich, but the numbers are still weird — I didn’t post at #18.

  • sarah68

    OK, Rich, but the numbers are still weird — I didn’t post at #18.

  • sarah68

    OK, Rich, but the numbers are still weird — I didn’t post at #18.

  • sarah68

    OK, Rich, but the numbers are still weird — I didn’t post at #18.

  • sarah68

    OK, Rich, but the numbers are still weird — I didn’t post at #18.

  • sarah68

    OK, Rich, but the numbers are still weird — I didn’t post at #18.

  • sarah68

    OK, Rich, but the numbers are still weird — I didn’t post at #18.

  • sarah68

    OK, Rich, but the numbers are still weird — I didn’t post at #18.

  • sarah68

    OK, Rich, but the numbers are still weird — I didn’t post at #18.

  • sarah68

    OK, Rich, but the numbers are still weird — I didn’t post at #18.

  • sarah68

    OK, Rich, but the numbers are still weird — I didn’t post at #18.

  • sarah68

    OK, Rich, but the numbers are still weird — I didn’t post at #18.

  • sarah68

    OK, Rich, but the numbers are still weird — I didn’t post at #18.

  • sarah68

    OK, Rich, but the numbers are still weird — I didn’t post at #18.

  • sarah68

    OK, Rich, but the numbers are still weird — I didn’t post at #18.

  • sarah68

    OK, Rich, but the numbers are still weird — I didn’t post at #18.

  • sarah68

    OK, Rich, but the numbers are still weird — I didn’t post at #18.

  • sarah68

    OK, Rich, but the numbers are still weird — I didn’t post at #18.

  • sarah68

    OK, Rich, but the numbers are still weird — I didn’t post at #18.

  • sarah68

    OK, Rich, but the numbers are still weird — I didn’t post at #18.

  • sarah68

    OK, Rich, but the numbers are still weird — I didn’t post at #18.

  • sarah68

    OK, Rich, but the numbers are still weird — I didn’t post at #18.

  • sarah68

    OK, Rich, but the numbers are still weird — I didn’t post at #18.

  • sarah68

    OK, Rich, but the numbers are still weird — I didn’t post at #18.

  • sarah68

    OK, Rich, but the numbers are still weird — I didn’t post at #18.

  • sarah68

    OK, Rich, but the numbers are still weird — I didn’t post at #18.

  • http://www.jasonosgood.com/ Jason Osgood

    About moderating forums…

    Clay Shirky’s Group As User: Flaming and the Design of Social Software is the long and short of it.

    In brief, flaming is performance art and “who watches the watchers” is hard to resolve.

    Lacking a moderation system (e.g. slashdot, reddit, stackoverflow), I prefer a strong hand keeping the comments clean. Publicola has been pretty good that way.

  • http://www.jasonosgood.com/ Jason Osgood

    About moderating forums…

    Clay Shirky’s Group As User: Flaming and the Design of Social Software is the long and short of it.

    In brief, flaming is performance art and “who watches the watchers” is hard to resolve.

    Lacking a moderation system (e.g. slashdot, reddit, stackoverflow), I prefer a strong hand keeping the comments clean. Publicola has been pretty good that way.

  • http://www.jasonosgood.com/ Jason Osgood

    About moderating forums…

    Clay Shirky’s Group As User: Flaming and the Design of Social Software is the long and short of it.

    In brief, flaming is performance art and “who watches the watchers” is hard to resolve.

    Lacking a moderation system (e.g. slashdot, reddit, stackoverflow), I prefer a strong hand keeping the comments clean. Publicola has been pretty good that way.

  • http://www.jasonosgood.com/ Jason Osgood

    About moderating forums…

    Clay Shirky’s Group As User: Flaming and the Design of Social Software is the long and short of it.

    In brief, flaming is performance art and “who watches the watchers” is hard to resolve.

    Lacking a moderation system (e.g. slashdot, reddit, stackoverflow), I prefer a strong hand keeping the comments clean. Publicola has been pretty good that way.

  • http://www.jasonosgood.com/ Jason Osgood

    About moderating forums…

    Clay Shirky’s Group As User: Flaming and the Design of Social Software is the long and short of it.

    In brief, flaming is performance art and “who watches the watchers” is hard to resolve.

    Lacking a moderation system (e.g. slashdot, reddit, stackoverflow), I prefer a strong hand keeping the comments clean. Publicola has been pretty good that way.

  • http://www.jasonosgood.com/ Jason Osgood

    About moderating forums…

    Clay Shirky’s Group As User: Flaming and the Design of Social Software is the long and short of it.

    In brief, flaming is performance art and “who watches the watchers” is hard to resolve.

    Lacking a moderation system (e.g. slashdot, reddit, stackoverflow), I prefer a strong hand keeping the comments clean. Publicola has been pretty good that way.

  • http://www.jasonosgood.com/ Jason Osgood

    About moderating forums…

    Clay Shirky’s Group As User: Flaming and the Design of Social Software is the long and short of it.

    In brief, flaming is performance art and “who watches the watchers” is hard to resolve.

    Lacking a moderation system (e.g. slashdot, reddit, stackoverflow), I prefer a strong hand keeping the comments clean. Publicola has been pretty good that way.

  • http://www.jasonosgood.com/ Jason Osgood

    About moderating forums…

    Clay Shirky’s Group As User: Flaming and the Design of Social Software is the long and short of it.

    In brief, flaming is performance art and “who watches the watchers” is hard to resolve.

    Lacking a moderation system (e.g. slashdot, reddit, stackoverflow), I prefer a strong hand keeping the comments clean. Publicola has been pretty good that way.

  • http://www.jasonosgood.com/ Jason Osgood

    About moderating forums…

    Clay Shirky’s Group As User: Flaming and the Design of Social Software is the long and short of it.

    In brief, flaming is performance art and “who watches the watchers” is hard to resolve.

    Lacking a moderation system (e.g. slashdot, reddit, stackoverflow), I prefer a strong hand keeping the comments clean. Publicola has been pretty good that way.

  • http://www.jasonosgood.com/ Jason Osgood

    About moderating forums…

    Clay Shirky’s Group As User: Flaming and the Design of Social Software is the long and short of it.

    In brief, flaming is performance art and “who watches the watchers” is hard to resolve.

    Lacking a moderation system (e.g. slashdot, reddit, stackoverflow), I prefer a strong hand keeping the comments clean. Publicola has been pretty good that way.

  • http://www.jasonosgood.com/ Jason Osgood

    About moderating forums…

    Clay Shirky’s Group As User: Flaming and the Design of Social Software is the long and short of it.

    In brief, flaming is performance art and “who watches the watchers” is hard to resolve.

    Lacking a moderation system (e.g. slashdot, reddit, stackoverflow), I prefer a strong hand keeping the comments clean. Publicola has been pretty good that way.

  • http://www.jasonosgood.com/ Jason Osgood

    About moderating forums…

    Clay Shirky’s Group As User: Flaming and the Design of Social Software is the long and short of it.

    In brief, flaming is performance art and “who watches the watchers” is hard to resolve.

    Lacking a moderation system (e.g. slashdot, reddit, stackoverflow), I prefer a strong hand keeping the comments clean. Publicola has been pretty good that way.

  • http://www.jasonosgood.com/ Jason Osgood

    About moderating forums…

    Clay Shirky’s Group As User: Flaming and the Design of Social Software is the long and short of it.

    In brief, flaming is performance art and “who watches the watchers” is hard to resolve.

    Lacking a moderation system (e.g. slashdot, reddit, stackoverflow), I prefer a strong hand keeping the comments clean. Publicola has been pretty good that way.

  • http://www.jasonosgood.com/ Jason Osgood

    About moderating forums…

    Clay Shirky’s Group As User: Flaming and the Design of Social Software is the long and short of it.

    In brief, flaming is performance art and “who watches the watchers” is hard to resolve.

    Lacking a moderation system (e.g. slashdot, reddit, stackoverflow), I prefer a strong hand keeping the comments clean. Publicola has been pretty good that way.

  • http://www.jasonosgood.com/ Jason Osgood

    About moderating forums…

    Clay Shirky’s Group As User: Flaming and the Design of Social Software is the long and short of it.

    In brief, flaming is performance art and “who watches the watchers” is hard to resolve.

    Lacking a moderation system (e.g. slashdot, reddit, stackoverflow), I prefer a strong hand keeping the comments clean. Publicola has been pretty good that way.

  • http://www.jasonosgood.com/ Jason Osgood

    About moderating forums…

    Clay Shirky’s Group As User: Flaming and the Design of Social Software is the long and short of it.

    In brief, flaming is performance art and “who watches the watchers” is hard to resolve.

    Lacking a moderation system (e.g. slashdot, reddit, stackoverflow), I prefer a strong hand keeping the comments clean. Publicola has been pretty good that way.

  • http://www.jasonosgood.com/ Jason Osgood

    About moderating forums…

    Clay Shirky’s Group As User: Flaming and the Design of Social Software is the long and short of it.

    In brief, flaming is performance art and “who watches the watchers” is hard to resolve.

    Lacking a moderation system (e.g. slashdot, reddit, stackoverflow), I prefer a strong hand keeping the comments clean. Publicola has been pretty good that way.

  • http://www.jasonosgood.com/ Jason Osgood

    About moderating forums…

    Clay Shirky’s Group As User: Flaming and the Design of Social Software is the long and short of it.

    In brief, flaming is performance art and “who watches the watchers” is hard to resolve.

    Lacking a moderation system (e.g. slashdot, reddit, stackoverflow), I prefer a strong hand keeping the comments clean. Publicola has been pretty good that way.

  • http://www.jasonosgood.com/ Jason Osgood

    About moderating forums…

    Clay Shirky’s Group As User: Flaming and the Design of Social Software is the long and short of it.

    In brief, flaming is performance art and “who watches the watchers” is hard to resolve.

    Lacking a moderation system (e.g. slashdot, reddit, stackoverflow), I prefer a strong hand keeping the comments clean. Publicola has been pretty good that way.

  • http://www.jasonosgood.com/ Jason Osgood

    About moderating forums…

    Clay Shirky’s Group As User: Flaming and the Design of Social Software is the long and short of it.

    In brief, flaming is performance art and “who watches the watchers” is hard to resolve.

    Lacking a moderation system (e.g. slashdot, reddit, stackoverflow), I prefer a strong hand keeping the comments clean. Publicola has been pretty good that way.

  • http://www.jasonosgood.com/ Jason Osgood

    About moderating forums…

    Clay Shirky’s Group As User: Flaming and the Design of Social Software is the long and short of it.

    In brief, flaming is performance art and “who watches the watchers” is hard to resolve.

    Lacking a moderation system (e.g. slashdot, reddit, stackoverflow), I prefer a strong hand keeping the comments clean. Publicola has been pretty good that way.

  • http://www.jasonosgood.com/ Jason Osgood

    About moderating forums…

    Clay Shirky’s Group As User: Flaming and the Design of Social Software is the long and short of it.

    In brief, flaming is performance art and “who watches the watchers” is hard to resolve.

    Lacking a moderation system (e.g. slashdot, reddit, stackoverflow), I prefer a strong hand keeping the comments clean. Publicola has been pretty good that way.

  • http://www.jasonosgood.com/ Jason Osgood

    About moderating forums…

    Clay Shirky’s Group As User: Flaming and the Design of Social Software is the long and short of it.

    In brief, flaming is performance art and “who watches the watchers” is hard to resolve.

    Lacking a moderation system (e.g. slashdot, reddit, stackoverflow), I prefer a strong hand keeping the comments clean. Publicola has been pretty good that way.

  • http://www.jasonosgood.com/ Jason Osgood

    About moderating forums…

    Clay Shirky’s Group As User: Flaming and the Design of Social Software is the long and short of it.

    In brief, flaming is performance art and “who watches the watchers” is hard to resolve.

    Lacking a moderation system (e.g. slashdot, reddit, stackoverflow), I prefer a strong hand keeping the comments clean. Publicola has been pretty good that way.

  • http://www.jasonosgood.com/ Jason Osgood

    About moderating forums…

    Clay Shirky’s Group As User: Flaming and the Design of Social Software is the long and short of it.

    In brief, flaming is performance art and “who watches the watchers” is hard to resolve.

    Lacking a moderation system (e.g. slashdot, reddit, stackoverflow), I prefer a strong hand keeping the comments clean. Publicola has been pretty good that way.

  • http://www.jasonosgood.com/ Jason Osgood

    About moderating forums…

    Clay Shirky’s Group As User: Flaming and the Design of Social Software is the long and short of it.

    In brief, flaming is performance art and “who watches the watchers” is hard to resolve.

    Lacking a moderation system (e.g. slashdot, reddit, stackoverflow), I prefer a strong hand keeping the comments clean. Publicola has been pretty good that way.

  • http://www.jasonosgood.com/ Jason Osgood

    About moderating forums…

    Clay Shirky’s Group As User: Flaming and the Design of Social Software is the long and short of it.

    In brief, flaming is performance art and “who watches the watchers” is hard to resolve.

    Lacking a moderation system (e.g. slashdot, reddit, stackoverflow), I prefer a strong hand keeping the comments clean. Publicola has been pretty good that way.

  • http://www.jasonosgood.com/ Jason Osgood

    About moderating forums…

    Clay Shirky’s Group As User: Flaming and the Design of Social Software is the long and short of it.

    In brief, flaming is performance art and “who watches the watchers” is hard to resolve.

    Lacking a moderation system (e.g. slashdot, reddit, stackoverflow), I prefer a strong hand keeping the comments clean. Publicola has been pretty good that way.

  • http://www.jasonosgood.com/ Jason Osgood

    About moderating forums…

    Clay Shirky’s Group As User: Flaming and the Design of Social Software is the long and short of it.

    In brief, flaming is performance art and “who watches the watchers” is hard to resolve.

    Lacking a moderation system (e.g. slashdot, reddit, stackoverflow), I prefer a strong hand keeping the comments clean. Publicola has been pretty good that way.

  • http://www.jasonosgood.com/ Jason Osgood

    About moderating forums…

    Clay Shirky’s Group As User: Flaming and the Design of Social Software is the long and short of it.

    In brief, flaming is performance art and “who watches the watchers” is hard to resolve.

    Lacking a moderation system (e.g. slashdot, reddit, stackoverflow), I prefer a strong hand keeping the comments clean. Publicola has been pretty good that way.

  • http://www.jasonosgood.com/ Jason Osgood

    About moderating forums…

    Clay Shirky’s Group As User: Flaming and the Design of Social Software is the long and short of it.

    In brief, flaming is performance art and “who watches the watchers” is hard to resolve.

    Lacking a moderation system (e.g. slashdot, reddit, stackoverflow), I prefer a strong hand keeping the comments clean. Publicola has been pretty good that way.

  • http://www.jasonosgood.com/ Jason Osgood

    About moderating forums…

    Clay Shirky’s Group As User: Flaming and the Design of Social Software is the long and short of it.

    In brief, flaming is performance art and “who watches the watchers” is hard to resolve.

    Lacking a moderation system (e.g. slashdot, reddit, stackoverflow), I prefer a strong hand keeping the comments clean. Publicola has been pretty good that way.

  • http://www.jasonosgood.com/ Jason Osgood

    About moderating forums…

    Clay Shirky’s Group As User: Flaming and the Design of Social Software is the long and short of it.

    In brief, flaming is performance art and “who watches the watchers” is hard to resolve.

    Lacking a moderation system (e.g. slashdot, reddit, stackoverflow), I prefer a strong hand keeping the comments clean. Publicola has been pretty good that way.

  • http://www.jasonosgood.com/ Jason Osgood

    About moderating forums…

    Clay Shirky’s Group As User: Flaming and the Design of Social Software is the long and short of it.

    In brief, flaming is performance art and “who watches the watchers” is hard to resolve.

    Lacking a moderation system (e.g. slashdot, reddit, stackoverflow), I prefer a strong hand keeping the comments clean. Publicola has been pretty good that way.

  • http://www.jasonosgood.com/ Jason Osgood

    About moderating forums…

    Clay Shirky’s Group As User: Flaming and the Design of Social Software is the long and short of it.

    In brief, flaming is performance art and “who watches the watchers” is hard to resolve.

    Lacking a moderation system (e.g. slashdot, reddit, stackoverflow), I prefer a strong hand keeping the comments clean. Publicola has been pretty good that way.

  • http://www.jasonosgood.com/ Jason Osgood

    About moderating forums…

    Clay Shirky’s Group As User: Flaming and the Design of Social Software is the long and short of it.

    In brief, flaming is performance art and “who watches the watchers” is hard to resolve.

    Lacking a moderation system (e.g. slashdot, reddit, stackoverflow), I prefer a strong hand keeping the comments clean. Publicola has been pretty good that way.

  • http://www.jasonosgood.com/ Jason Osgood

    About moderating forums…

    Clay Shirky’s Group As User: Flaming and the Design of Social Software is the long and short of it.

    In brief, flaming is performance art and “who watches the watchers” is hard to resolve.

    Lacking a moderation system (e.g. slashdot, reddit, stackoverflow), I prefer a strong hand keeping the comments clean. Publicola has been pretty good that way.

  • http://www.jasonosgood.com/ Jason Osgood

    About moderating forums…

    Clay Shirky’s Group As User: Flaming and the Design of Social Software is the long and short of it.

    In brief, flaming is performance art and “who watches the watchers” is hard to resolve.

    Lacking a moderation system (e.g. slashdot, reddit, stackoverflow), I prefer a strong hand keeping the comments clean. Publicola has been pretty good that way.

  • http://www.jasonosgood.com/ Jason Osgood

    About moderating forums…

    Clay Shirky’s Group As User: Flaming and the Design of Social Software is the long and short of it.

    In brief, flaming is performance art and “who watches the watchers” is hard to resolve.

    Lacking a moderation system (e.g. slashdot, reddit, stackoverflow), I prefer a strong hand keeping the comments clean. Publicola has been pretty good that way.

  • http://www.jasonosgood.com/ Jason Osgood

    About moderating forums…

    Clay Shirky’s Group As User: Flaming and the Design of Social Software is the long and short of it.

    In brief, flaming is performance art and “who watches the watchers” is hard to resolve.

    Lacking a moderation system (e.g. slashdot, reddit, stackoverflow), I prefer a strong hand keeping the comments clean. Publicola has been pretty good that way.

  • http://www.jasonosgood.com/ Jason Osgood

    About moderating forums…

    Clay Shirky’s Group As User: Flaming and the Design of Social Software is the long and short of it.

    In brief, flaming is performance art and “who watches the watchers” is hard to resolve.

    Lacking a moderation system (e.g. slashdot, reddit, stackoverflow), I prefer a strong hand keeping the comments clean. Publicola has been pretty good that way.

  • http://www.jasonosgood.com/ Jason Osgood

    About moderating forums…

    Clay Shirky’s Group As User: Flaming and the Design of Social Software is the long and short of it.

    In brief, flaming is performance art and “who watches the watchers” is hard to resolve.

    Lacking a moderation system (e.g. slashdot, reddit, stackoverflow), I prefer a strong hand keeping the comments clean. Publicola has been pretty good that way.

  • http://www.jasonosgood.com/ Jason Osgood

    About moderating forums…

    Clay Shirky’s Group As User: Flaming and the Design of Social Software is the long and short of it.

    In brief, flaming is performance art and “who watches the watchers” is hard to resolve.

    Lacking a moderation system (e.g. slashdot, reddit, stackoverflow), I prefer a strong hand keeping the comments clean. Publicola has been pretty good that way.

  • http://www.jasonosgood.com/ Jason Osgood

    About moderating forums…

    Clay Shirky’s Group As User: Flaming and the Design of Social Software is the long and short of it.

    In brief, flaming is performance art and “who watches the watchers” is hard to resolve.

    Lacking a moderation system (e.g. slashdot, reddit, stackoverflow), I prefer a strong hand keeping the comments clean. Publicola has been pretty good that way.

  • http://www.jasonosgood.com/ Jason Osgood

    About moderating forums…

    Clay Shirky’s Group As User: Flaming and the Design of Social Software is the long and short of it.

    In brief, flaming is performance art and “who watches the watchers” is hard to resolve.

    Lacking a moderation system (e.g. slashdot, reddit, stackoverflow), I prefer a strong hand keeping the comments clean. Publicola has been pretty good that way.

  • http://www.jasonosgood.com Jason Osgood

    About moderating forums…

    Clay Shirky’s Group As User: Flaming and the Design of Social Software is the long and short of it.

    In brief, flaming is performance art and “who watches the watchers” is hard to resolve.

    Lacking a moderation system (e.g. slashdot, reddit, stackoverflow), I prefer a strong hand keeping the comments clean. Publicola has been pretty good that way.

  • http://www.jasonosgood.com/ Jason Osgood

    sarah68, the comment numbers likely change when Josh deletes a comment. Bad software. No cookie.

  • http://www.jasonosgood.com/ Jason Osgood

    sarah68, the comment numbers likely change when Josh deletes a comment. Bad software. No cookie.

  • http://www.jasonosgood.com/ Jason Osgood

    sarah68, the comment numbers likely change when Josh deletes a comment. Bad software. No cookie.

  • http://www.jasonosgood.com/ Jason Osgood

    sarah68, the comment numbers likely change when Josh deletes a comment. Bad software. No cookie.

  • http://www.jasonosgood.com/ Jason Osgood

    sarah68, the comment numbers likely change when Josh deletes a comment. Bad software. No cookie.

  • http://www.jasonosgood.com/ Jason Osgood

    sarah68, the comment numbers likely change when Josh deletes a comment. Bad software. No cookie.

  • http://www.jasonosgood.com/ Jason Osgood

    sarah68, the comment numbers likely change when Josh deletes a comment. Bad software. No cookie.

  • http://www.jasonosgood.com/ Jason Osgood

    sarah68, the comment numbers likely change when Josh deletes a comment. Bad software. No cookie.

  • http://www.jasonosgood.com/ Jason Osgood

    sarah68, the comment numbers likely change when Josh deletes a comment. Bad software. No cookie.

  • http://www.jasonosgood.com/ Jason Osgood

    sarah68, the comment numbers likely change when Josh deletes a comment. Bad software. No cookie.

  • http://www.jasonosgood.com/ Jason Osgood

    sarah68, the comment numbers likely change when Josh deletes a comment. Bad software. No cookie.

  • http://www.jasonosgood.com/ Jason Osgood

    sarah68, the comment numbers likely change when Josh deletes a comment. Bad software. No cookie.

  • http://www.jasonosgood.com/ Jason Osgood

    sarah68, the comment numbers likely change when Josh deletes a comment. Bad software. No cookie.

  • http://www.jasonosgood.com/ Jason Osgood

    sarah68, the comment numbers likely change when Josh deletes a comment. Bad software. No cookie.

  • http://www.jasonosgood.com/ Jason Osgood

    sarah68, the comment numbers likely change when Josh deletes a comment. Bad software. No cookie.

  • http://www.jasonosgood.com/ Jason Osgood

    sarah68, the comment numbers likely change when Josh deletes a comment. Bad software. No cookie.

  • http://www.jasonosgood.com/ Jason Osgood

    sarah68, the comment numbers likely change when Josh deletes a comment. Bad software. No cookie.

  • http://www.jasonosgood.com/ Jason Osgood

    sarah68, the comment numbers likely change when Josh deletes a comment. Bad software. No cookie.

  • http://www.jasonosgood.com/ Jason Osgood

    sarah68, the comment numbers likely change when Josh deletes a comment. Bad software. No cookie.

  • http://www.jasonosgood.com/ Jason Osgood

    sarah68, the comment numbers likely change when Josh deletes a comment. Bad software. No cookie.

  • http://www.jasonosgood.com/ Jason Osgood

    sarah68, the comment numbers likely change when Josh deletes a comment. Bad software. No cookie.

  • http://www.jasonosgood.com/ Jason Osgood

    sarah68, the comment numbers likely change when Josh deletes a comment. Bad software. No cookie.

  • http://www.jasonosgood.com/ Jason Osgood

    sarah68, the comment numbers likely change when Josh deletes a comment. Bad software. No cookie.

  • http://www.jasonosgood.com/ Jason Osgood

    sarah68, the comment numbers likely change when Josh deletes a comment. Bad software. No cookie.

  • http://www.jasonosgood.com/ Jason Osgood

    sarah68, the comment numbers likely change when Josh deletes a comment. Bad software. No cookie.

  • http://www.jasonosgood.com/ Jason Osgood

    sarah68, the comment numbers likely change when Josh deletes a comment. Bad software. No cookie.

  • http://www.jasonosgood.com/ Jason Osgood

    sarah68, the comment numbers likely change when Josh deletes a comment. Bad software. No cookie.

  • http://www.jasonosgood.com/ Jason Osgood

    sarah68, the comment numbers likely change when Josh deletes a comment. Bad software. No cookie.

  • http://www.jasonosgood.com/ Jason Osgood

    sarah68, the comment numbers likely change when Josh deletes a comment. Bad software. No cookie.

  • http://www.jasonosgood.com/ Jason Osgood

    sarah68, the comment numbers likely change when Josh deletes a comment. Bad software. No cookie.

  • http://www.jasonosgood.com/ Jason Osgood

    sarah68, the comment numbers likely change when Josh deletes a comment. Bad software. No cookie.

  • http://www.jasonosgood.com/ Jason Osgood

    sarah68, the comment numbers likely change when Josh deletes a comment. Bad software. No cookie.

  • http://www.jasonosgood.com/ Jason Osgood

    sarah68, the comment numbers likely change when Josh deletes a comment. Bad software. No cookie.

  • http://www.jasonosgood.com/ Jason Osgood

    sarah68, the comment numbers likely change when Josh deletes a comment. Bad software. No cookie.

  • http://www.jasonosgood.com/ Jason Osgood

    sarah68, the comment numbers likely change when Josh deletes a comment. Bad software. No cookie.

  • http://www.jasonosgood.com/ Jason Osgood

    sarah68, the comment numbers likely change when Josh deletes a comment. Bad software. No cookie.

  • http://www.jasonosgood.com/ Jason Osgood

    sarah68, the comment numbers likely change when Josh deletes a comment. Bad software. No cookie.

  • http://www.jasonosgood.com/ Jason Osgood

    sarah68, the comment numbers likely change when Josh deletes a comment. Bad software. No cookie.

  • http://www.jasonosgood.com/ Jason Osgood

    sarah68, the comment numbers likely change when Josh deletes a comment. Bad software. No cookie.

  • http://www.jasonosgood.com/ Jason Osgood

    sarah68, the comment numbers likely change when Josh deletes a comment. Bad software. No cookie.

  • http://www.jasonosgood.com/ Jason Osgood

    sarah68, the comment numbers likely change when Josh deletes a comment. Bad software. No cookie.

  • http://www.jasonosgood.com/ Jason Osgood

    sarah68, the comment numbers likely change when Josh deletes a comment. Bad software. No cookie.

  • http://www.jasonosgood.com/ Jason Osgood

    sarah68, the comment numbers likely change when Josh deletes a comment. Bad software. No cookie.

  • http://www.jasonosgood.com/ Jason Osgood

    sarah68, the comment numbers likely change when Josh deletes a comment. Bad software. No cookie.

  • http://www.jasonosgood.com/ Jason Osgood

    sarah68, the comment numbers likely change when Josh deletes a comment. Bad software. No cookie.

  • http://www.jasonosgood.com Jason Osgood

    sarah68, the comment numbers likely change when Josh deletes a comment. Bad software. No cookie.

  • Seattle Resident

    It’s sad that a hard-working activist like Ms. Martin has chosen name-calling as a way to express her anger at Mayor-Elect McGinn. Dumb. It ensures that her effectiveness as an advocate will suffer. (Then again, is she really reprsenting Greenwood or just herself?)

    However, McGinn’s enthusiasm for the South End, which is currently receiving the kind of political attention usually reserved for the North End, we have not heard the last of the name-calling. If this continues, I suspect we’ll see some serious ugly coming out of the mouths of neighbors who have been used to a level of access comiserate with their class status.

    McGinn appears to be looking at Seattle as a whole, not a collection of individual neighborhoods, which is what we need. Not downtown vs. neighborhoods, but a 50-neighborhood strategy, if you will. Seems like a winner to me.

  • Seattle Resident

    It’s sad that a hard-working activist like Ms. Martin has chosen name-calling as a way to express her anger at Mayor-Elect McGinn. Dumb. It ensures that her effectiveness as an advocate will suffer. (Then again, is she really reprsenting Greenwood or just herself?)

    However, McGinn’s enthusiasm for the South End, which is currently receiving the kind of political attention usually reserved for the North End, we have not heard the last of the name-calling. If this continues, I suspect we’ll see some serious ugly coming out of the mouths of neighbors who have been used to a level of access comiserate with their class status.

    McGinn appears to be looking at Seattle as a whole, not a collection of individual neighborhoods, which is what we need. Not downtown vs. neighborhoods, but a 50-neighborhood strategy, if you will. Seems like a winner to me.

  • Seattle Resident

    It’s sad that a hard-working activist like Ms. Martin has chosen name-calling as a way to express her anger at Mayor-Elect McGinn. Dumb. It ensures that her effectiveness as an advocate will suffer. (Then again, is she really reprsenting Greenwood or just herself?)

    However, McGinn’s enthusiasm for the South End, which is currently receiving the kind of political attention usually reserved for the North End, we have not heard the last of the name-calling. If this continues, I suspect we’ll see some serious ugly coming out of the mouths of neighbors who have been used to a level of access comiserate with their class status.

    McGinn appears to be looking at Seattle as a whole, not a collection of individual neighborhoods, which is what we need. Not downtown vs. neighborhoods, but a 50-neighborhood strategy, if you will. Seems like a winner to me.

  • Seattle Resident

    It’s sad that a hard-working activist like Ms. Martin has chosen name-calling as a way to express her anger at Mayor-Elect McGinn. Dumb. It ensures that her effectiveness as an advocate will suffer. (Then again, is she really reprsenting Greenwood or just herself?)

    However, McGinn’s enthusiasm for the South End, which is currently receiving the kind of political attention usually reserved for the North End, we have not heard the last of the name-calling. If this continues, I suspect we’ll see some serious ugly coming out of the mouths of neighbors who have been used to a level of access comiserate with their class status.

    McGinn appears to be looking at Seattle as a whole, not a collection of individual neighborhoods, which is what we need. Not downtown vs. neighborhoods, but a 50-neighborhood strategy, if you will. Seems like a winner to me.

  • Seattle Resident

    It’s sad that a hard-working activist like Ms. Martin has chosen name-calling as a way to express her anger at Mayor-Elect McGinn. Dumb. It ensures that her effectiveness as an advocate will suffer. (Then again, is she really reprsenting Greenwood or just herself?)

    However, McGinn’s enthusiasm for the South End, which is currently receiving the kind of political attention usually reserved for the North End, we have not heard the last of the name-calling. If this continues, I suspect we’ll see some serious ugly coming out of the mouths of neighbors who have been used to a level of access comiserate with their class status.

    McGinn appears to be looking at Seattle as a whole, not a collection of individual neighborhoods, which is what we need. Not downtown vs. neighborhoods, but a 50-neighborhood strategy, if you will. Seems like a winner to me.

  • Seattle Resident

    It’s sad that a hard-working activist like Ms. Martin has chosen name-calling as a way to express her anger at Mayor-Elect McGinn. Dumb. It ensures that her effectiveness as an advocate will suffer. (Then again, is she really reprsenting Greenwood or just herself?)

    However, McGinn’s enthusiasm for the South End, which is currently receiving the kind of political attention usually reserved for the North End, we have not heard the last of the name-calling. If this continues, I suspect we’ll see some serious ugly coming out of the mouths of neighbors who have been used to a level of access comiserate with their class status.

    McGinn appears to be looking at Seattle as a whole, not a collection of individual neighborhoods, which is what we need. Not downtown vs. neighborhoods, but a 50-neighborhood strategy, if you will. Seems like a winner to me.

  • Seattle Resident

    It’s sad that a hard-working activist like Ms. Martin has chosen name-calling as a way to express her anger at Mayor-Elect McGinn. Dumb. It ensures that her effectiveness as an advocate will suffer. (Then again, is she really reprsenting Greenwood or just herself?)

    However, McGinn’s enthusiasm for the South End, which is currently receiving the kind of political attention usually reserved for the North End, we have not heard the last of the name-calling. If this continues, I suspect we’ll see some serious ugly coming out of the mouths of neighbors who have been used to a level of access comiserate with their class status.

    McGinn appears to be looking at Seattle as a whole, not a collection of individual neighborhoods, which is what we need. Not downtown vs. neighborhoods, but a 50-neighborhood strategy, if you will. Seems like a winner to me.

  • Seattle Resident

    It’s sad that a hard-working activist like Ms. Martin has chosen name-calling as a way to express her anger at Mayor-Elect McGinn. Dumb. It ensures that her effectiveness as an advocate will suffer. (Then again, is she really reprsenting Greenwood or just herself?)

    However, McGinn’s enthusiasm for the South End, which is currently receiving the kind of political attention usually reserved for the North End, we have not heard the last of the name-calling. If this continues, I suspect we’ll see some serious ugly coming out of the mouths of neighbors who have been used to a level of access comiserate with their class status.

    McGinn appears to be looking at Seattle as a whole, not a collection of individual neighborhoods, which is what we need. Not downtown vs. neighborhoods, but a 50-neighborhood strategy, if you will. Seems like a winner to me.

  • Seattle Resident

    It’s sad that a hard-working activist like Ms. Martin has chosen name-calling as a way to express her anger at Mayor-Elect McGinn. Dumb. It ensures that her effectiveness as an advocate will suffer. (Then again, is she really reprsenting Greenwood or just herself?)

    However, McGinn’s enthusiasm for the South End, which is currently receiving the kind of political attention usually reserved for the North End, we have not heard the last of the name-calling. If this continues, I suspect we’ll see some serious ugly coming out of the mouths of neighbors who have been used to a level of access comiserate with their class status.

    McGinn appears to be looking at Seattle as a whole, not a collection of individual neighborhoods, which is what we need. Not downtown vs. neighborhoods, but a 50-neighborhood strategy, if you will. Seems like a winner to me.

  • Seattle Resident

    It’s sad that a hard-working activist like Ms. Martin has chosen name-calling as a way to express her anger at Mayor-Elect McGinn. Dumb. It ensures that her effectiveness as an advocate will suffer. (Then again, is she really reprsenting Greenwood or just herself?)

    However, McGinn’s enthusiasm for the South End, which is currently receiving the kind of political attention usually reserved for the North End, we have not heard the last of the name-calling. If this continues, I suspect we’ll see some serious ugly coming out of the mouths of neighbors who have been used to a level of access comiserate with their class status.

    McGinn appears to be looking at Seattle as a whole, not a collection of individual neighborhoods, which is what we need. Not downtown vs. neighborhoods, but a 50-neighborhood strategy, if you will. Seems like a winner to me.

  • Seattle Resident

    It’s sad that a hard-working activist like Ms. Martin has chosen name-calling as a way to express her anger at Mayor-Elect McGinn. Dumb. It ensures that her effectiveness as an advocate will suffer. (Then again, is she really reprsenting Greenwood or just herself?)

    However, McGinn’s enthusiasm for the South End, which is currently receiving the kind of political attention usually reserved for the North End, we have not heard the last of the name-calling. If this continues, I suspect we’ll see some serious ugly coming out of the mouths of neighbors who have been used to a level of access comiserate with their class status.

    McGinn appears to be looking at Seattle as a whole, not a collection of individual neighborhoods, which is what we need. Not downtown vs. neighborhoods, but a 50-neighborhood strategy, if you will. Seems like a winner to me.

  • Seattle Resident

    It’s sad that a hard-working activist like Ms. Martin has chosen name-calling as a way to express her anger at Mayor-Elect McGinn. Dumb. It ensures that her effectiveness as an advocate will suffer. (Then again, is she really reprsenting Greenwood or just herself?)

    However, McGinn’s enthusiasm for the South End, which is currently receiving the kind of political attention usually reserved for the North End, we have not heard the last of the name-calling. If this continues, I suspect we’ll see some serious ugly coming out of the mouths of neighbors who have been used to a level of access comiserate with their class status.

    McGinn appears to be looking at Seattle as a whole, not a collection of individual neighborhoods, which is what we need. Not downtown vs. neighborhoods, but a 50-neighborhood strategy, if you will. Seems like a winner to me.

  • Seattle Resident

    It’s sad that a hard-working activist like Ms. Martin has chosen name-calling as a way to express her anger at Mayor-Elect McGinn. Dumb. It ensures that her effectiveness as an advocate will suffer. (Then again, is she really reprsenting Greenwood or just herself?)

    However, McGinn’s enthusiasm for the South End, which is currently receiving the kind of political attention usually reserved for the North End, we have not heard the last of the name-calling. If this continues, I suspect we’ll see some serious ugly coming out of the mouths of neighbors who have been used to a level of access comiserate with their class status.

    McGinn appears to be looking at Seattle as a whole, not a collection of individual neighborhoods, which is what we need. Not downtown vs. neighborhoods, but a 50-neighborhood strategy, if you will. Seems like a winner to me.

  • Seattle Resident

    It’s sad that a hard-working activist like Ms. Martin has chosen name-calling as a way to express her anger at Mayor-Elect McGinn. Dumb. It ensures that her effectiveness as an advocate will suffer. (Then again, is she really reprsenting Greenwood or just herself?)

    However, McGinn’s enthusiasm for the South End, which is currently receiving the kind of political attention usually reserved for the North End, we have not heard the last of the name-calling. If this continues, I suspect we’ll see some serious ugly coming out of the mouths of neighbors who have been used to a level of access comiserate with their class status.

    McGinn appears to be looking at Seattle as a whole, not a collection of individual neighborhoods, which is what we need. Not downtown vs. neighborhoods, but a 50-neighborhood strategy, if you will. Seems like a winner to me.

  • Seattle Resident

    It’s sad that a hard-working activist like Ms. Martin has chosen name-calling as a way to express her anger at Mayor-Elect McGinn. Dumb. It ensures that her effectiveness as an advocate will suffer. (Then again, is she really reprsenting Greenwood or just herself?)

    However, McGinn’s enthusiasm for the South End, which is currently receiving the kind of political attention usually reserved for the North End, we have not heard the last of the name-calling. If this continues, I suspect we’ll see some serious ugly coming out of the mouths of neighbors who have been used to a level of access comiserate with their class status.

    McGinn appears to be looking at Seattle as a whole, not a collection of individual neighborhoods, which is what we need. Not downtown vs. neighborhoods, but a 50-neighborhood strategy, if you will. Seems like a winner to me.

  • Seattle Resident

    It’s sad that a hard-working activist like Ms. Martin has chosen name-calling as a way to express her anger at Mayor-Elect McGinn. Dumb. It ensures that her effectiveness as an advocate will suffer. (Then again, is she really reprsenting Greenwood or just herself?)

    However, McGinn’s enthusiasm for the South End, which is currently receiving the kind of political attention usually reserved for the North End, we have not heard the last of the name-calling. If this continues, I suspect we’ll see some serious ugly coming out of the mouths of neighbors who have been used to a level of access comiserate with their class status.

    McGinn appears to be looking at Seattle as a whole, not a collection of individual neighborhoods, which is what we need. Not downtown vs. neighborhoods, but a 50-neighborhood strategy, if you will. Seems like a winner to me.

  • Seattle Resident

    It’s sad that a hard-working activist like Ms. Martin has chosen name-calling as a way to express her anger at Mayor-Elect McGinn. Dumb. It ensures that her effectiveness as an advocate will suffer. (Then again, is she really reprsenting Greenwood or just herself?)

    However, McGinn’s enthusiasm for the South End, which is currently receiving the kind of political attention usually reserved for the North End, we have not heard the last of the name-calling. If this continues, I suspect we’ll see some serious ugly coming out of the mouths of neighbors who have been used to a level of access comiserate with their class status.

    McGinn appears to be looking at Seattle as a whole, not a collection of individual neighborhoods, which is what we need. Not downtown vs. neighborhoods, but a 50-neighborhood strategy, if you will. Seems like a winner to me.

  • Seattle Resident

    It’s sad that a hard-working activist like Ms. Martin has chosen name-calling as a way to express her anger at Mayor-Elect McGinn. Dumb. It ensures that her effectiveness as an advocate will suffer. (Then again, is she really reprsenting Greenwood or just herself?)

    However, McGinn’s enthusiasm for the South End, which is currently receiving the kind of political attention usually reserved for the North End, we have not heard the last of the name-calling. If this continues, I suspect we’ll see some serious ugly coming out of the mouths of neighbors who have been used to a level of access comiserate with their class status.

    McGinn appears to be looking at Seattle as a whole, not a collection of individual neighborhoods, which is what we need. Not downtown vs. neighborhoods, but a 50-neighborhood strategy, if you will. Seems like a winner to me.

  • Seattle Resident

    It’s sad that a hard-working activist like Ms. Martin has chosen name-calling as a way to express her anger at Mayor-Elect McGinn. Dumb. It ensures that her effectiveness as an advocate will suffer. (Then again, is she really reprsenting Greenwood or just herself?)

    However, McGinn’s enthusiasm for the South End, which is currently receiving the kind of political attention usually reserved for the North End, we have not heard the last of the name-calling. If this continues, I suspect we’ll see some serious ugly coming out of the mouths of neighbors who have been used to a level of access comiserate with their class status.

    McGinn appears to be looking at Seattle as a whole, not a collection of individual neighborhoods, which is what we need. Not downtown vs. neighborhoods, but a 50-neighborhood strategy, if you will. Seems like a winner to me.

  • Seattle Resident

    It’s sad that a hard-working activist like Ms. Martin has chosen name-calling as a way to express her anger at Mayor-Elect McGinn. Dumb. It ensures that her effectiveness as an advocate will suffer. (Then again, is she really reprsenting Greenwood or just herself?)

    However, McGinn’s enthusiasm for the South End, which is currently receiving the kind of political attention usually reserved for the North End, we have not heard the last of the name-calling. If this continues, I suspect we’ll see some serious ugly coming out of the mouths of neighbors who have been used to a level of access comiserate with their class status.

    McGinn appears to be looking at Seattle as a whole, not a collection of individual neighborhoods, which is what we need. Not downtown vs. neighborhoods, but a 50-neighborhood strategy, if you will. Seems like a winner to me.

  • Seattle Resident

    It’s sad that a hard-working activist like Ms. Martin has chosen name-calling as a way to express her anger at Mayor-Elect McGinn. Dumb. It ensures that her effectiveness as an advocate will suffer. (Then again, is she really reprsenting Greenwood or just herself?)

    However, McGinn’s enthusiasm for the South End, which is currently receiving the kind of political attention usually reserved for the North End, we have not heard the last of the name-calling. If this continues, I suspect we’ll see some serious ugly coming out of the mouths of neighbors who have been used to a level of access comiserate with their class status.

    McGinn appears to be looking at Seattle as a whole, not a collection of individual neighborhoods, which is what we need. Not downtown vs. neighborhoods, but a 50-neighborhood strategy, if you will. Seems like a winner to me.

  • Seattle Resident

    It’s sad that a hard-working activist like Ms. Martin has chosen name-calling as a way to express her anger at Mayor-Elect McGinn. Dumb. It ensures that her effectiveness as an advocate will suffer. (Then again, is she really reprsenting Greenwood or just herself?)

    However, McGinn’s enthusiasm for the South End, which is currently receiving the kind of political attention usually reserved for the North End, we have not heard the last of the name-calling. If this continues, I suspect we’ll see some serious ugly coming out of the mouths of neighbors who have been used to a level of access comiserate with their class status.

    McGinn appears to be looking at Seattle as a whole, not a collection of individual neighborhoods, which is what we need. Not downtown vs. neighborhoods, but a 50-neighborhood strategy, if you will. Seems like a winner to me.

  • Seattle Resident

    It’s sad that a hard-working activist like Ms. Martin has chosen name-calling as a way to express her anger at Mayor-Elect McGinn. Dumb. It ensures that her effectiveness as an advocate will suffer. (Then again, is she really reprsenting Greenwood or just herself?)

    However, McGinn’s enthusiasm for the South End, which is currently receiving the kind of political attention usually reserved for the North End, we have not heard the last of the name-calling. If this continues, I suspect we’ll see some serious ugly coming out of the mouths of neighbors who have been used to a level of access comiserate with their class status.

    McGinn appears to be looking at Seattle as a whole, not a collection of individual neighborhoods, which is what we need. Not downtown vs. neighborhoods, but a 50-neighborhood strategy, if you will. Seems like a winner to me.

  • Seattle Resident

    It’s sad that a hard-working activist like Ms. Martin has chosen name-calling as a way to express her anger at Mayor-Elect McGinn. Dumb. It ensures that her effectiveness as an advocate will suffer. (Then again, is she really reprsenting Greenwood or just herself?)

    However, McGinn’s enthusiasm for the South End, which is currently receiving the kind of political attention usually reserved for the North End, we have not heard the last of the name-calling. If this continues, I suspect we’ll see some serious ugly coming out of the mouths of neighbors who have been used to a level of access comiserate with their class status.

    McGinn appears to be looking at Seattle as a whole, not a collection of individual neighborhoods, which is what we need. Not downtown vs. neighborhoods, but a 50-neighborhood strategy, if you will. Seems like a winner to me.

  • Seattle Resident

    It’s sad that a hard-working activist like Ms. Martin has chosen name-calling as a way to express her anger at Mayor-Elect McGinn. Dumb. It ensures that her effectiveness as an advocate will suffer. (Then again, is she really reprsenting Greenwood or just herself?)

    However, McGinn’s enthusiasm for the South End, which is currently receiving the kind of political attention usually reserved for the North End, we have not heard the last of the name-calling. If this continues, I suspect we’ll see some serious ugly coming out of the mouths of neighbors who have been used to a level of access comiserate with their class status.

    McGinn appears to be looking at Seattle as a whole, not a collection of individual neighborhoods, which is what we need. Not downtown vs. neighborhoods, but a 50-neighborhood strategy, if you will. Seems like a winner to me.

  • Seattle Resident

    It’s sad that a hard-working activist like Ms. Martin has chosen name-calling as a way to express her anger at Mayor-Elect McGinn. Dumb. It ensures that her effectiveness as an advocate will suffer. (Then again, is she really reprsenting Greenwood or just herself?)

    However, McGinn’s enthusiasm for the South End, which is currently receiving the kind of political attention usually reserved for the North End, we have not heard the last of the name-calling. If this continues, I suspect we’ll see some serious ugly coming out of the mouths of neighbors who have been used to a level of access comiserate with their class status.

    McGinn appears to be looking at Seattle as a whole, not a collection of individual neighborhoods, which is what we need. Not downtown vs. neighborhoods, but a 50-neighborhood strategy, if you will. Seems like a winner to me.

  • Seattle Resident

    It’s sad that a hard-working activist like Ms. Martin has chosen name-calling as a way to express her anger at Mayor-Elect McGinn. Dumb. It ensures that her effectiveness as an advocate will suffer. (Then again, is she really reprsenting Greenwood or just herself?)

    However, McGinn’s enthusiasm for the South End, which is currently receiving the kind of political attention usually reserved for the North End, we have not heard the last of the name-calling. If this continues, I suspect we’ll see some serious ugly coming out of the mouths of neighbors who have been used to a level of access comiserate with their class status.

    McGinn appears to be looking at Seattle as a whole, not a collection of individual neighborhoods, which is what we need. Not downtown vs. neighborhoods, but a 50-neighborhood strategy, if you will. Seems like a winner to me.

  • Seattle Resident

    It’s sad that a hard-working activist like Ms. Martin has chosen name-calling as a way to express her anger at Mayor-Elect McGinn. Dumb. It ensures that her effectiveness as an advocate will suffer. (Then again, is she really reprsenting Greenwood or just herself?)

    However, McGinn’s enthusiasm for the South End, which is currently receiving the kind of political attention usually reserved for the North End, we have not heard the last of the name-calling. If this continues, I suspect we’ll see some serious ugly coming out of the mouths of neighbors who have been used to a level of access comiserate with their class status.

    McGinn appears to be looking at Seattle as a whole, not a collection of individual neighborhoods, which is what we need. Not downtown vs. neighborhoods, but a 50-neighborhood strategy, if you will. Seems like a winner to me.

  • Seattle Resident

    It’s sad that a hard-working activist like Ms. Martin has chosen name-calling as a way to express her anger at Mayor-Elect McGinn. Dumb. It ensures that her effectiveness as an advocate will suffer. (Then again, is she really reprsenting Greenwood or just herself?)

    However, McGinn’s enthusiasm for the South End, which is currently receiving the kind of political attention usually reserved for the North End, we have not heard the last of the name-calling. If this continues, I suspect we’ll see some serious ugly coming out of the mouths of neighbors who have been used to a level of access comiserate with their class status.

    McGinn appears to be looking at Seattle as a whole, not a collection of individual neighborhoods, which is what we need. Not downtown vs. neighborhoods, but a 50-neighborhood strategy, if you will. Seems like a winner to me.

  • Seattle Resident

    It’s sad that a hard-working activist like Ms. Martin has chosen name-calling as a way to express her anger at Mayor-Elect McGinn. Dumb. It ensures that her effectiveness as an advocate will suffer. (Then again, is she really reprsenting Greenwood or just herself?)

    However, McGinn’s enthusiasm for the South End, which is currently receiving the kind of political attention usually reserved for the North End, we have not heard the last of the name-calling. If this continues, I suspect we’ll see some serious ugly coming out of the mouths of neighbors who have been used to a level of access comiserate with their class status.

    McGinn appears to be looking at Seattle as a whole, not a collection of individual neighborhoods, which is what we need. Not downtown vs. neighborhoods, but a 50-neighborhood strategy, if you will. Seems like a winner to me.

  • Seattle Resident

    It’s sad that a hard-working activist like Ms. Martin has chosen name-calling as a way to express her anger at Mayor-Elect McGinn. Dumb. It ensures that her effectiveness as an advocate will suffer. (Then again, is she really reprsenting Greenwood or just herself?)

    However, McGinn’s enthusiasm for the South End, which is currently receiving the kind of political attention usually reserved for the North End, we have not heard the last of the name-calling. If this continues, I suspect we’ll see some serious ugly coming out of the mouths of neighbors who have been used to a level of access comiserate with their class status.

    McGinn appears to be looking at Seattle as a whole, not a collection of individual neighborhoods, which is what we need. Not downtown vs. neighborhoods, but a 50-neighborhood strategy, if you will. Seems like a winner to me.

  • Seattle Resident

    It’s sad that a hard-working activist like Ms. Martin has chosen name-calling as a way to express her anger at Mayor-Elect McGinn. Dumb. It ensures that her effectiveness as an advocate will suffer. (Then again, is she really reprsenting Greenwood or just herself?)

    However, McGinn’s enthusiasm for the South End, which is currently receiving the kind of political attention usually reserved for the North End, we have not heard the last of the name-calling. If this continues, I suspect we’ll see some serious ugly coming out of the mouths of neighbors who have been used to a level of access comiserate with their class status.

    McGinn appears to be looking at Seattle as a whole, not a collection of individual neighborhoods, which is what we need. Not downtown vs. neighborhoods, but a 50-neighborhood strategy, if you will. Seems like a winner to me.

  • Seattle Resident

    It’s sad that a hard-working activist like Ms. Martin has chosen name-calling as a way to express her anger at Mayor-Elect McGinn. Dumb. It ensures that her effectiveness as an advocate will suffer. (Then again, is she really reprsenting Greenwood or just herself?)

    However, McGinn’s enthusiasm for the South End, which is currently receiving the kind of political attention usually reserved for the North End, we have not heard the last of the name-calling. If this continues, I suspect we’ll see some serious ugly coming out of the mouths of neighbors who have been used to a level of access comiserate with their class status.

    McGinn appears to be looking at Seattle as a whole, not a collection of individual neighborhoods, which is what we need. Not downtown vs. neighborhoods, but a 50-neighborhood strategy, if you will. Seems like a winner to me.

  • Seattle Resident

    It’s sad that a hard-working activist like Ms. Martin has chosen name-calling as a way to express her anger at Mayor-Elect McGinn. Dumb. It ensures that her effectiveness as an advocate will suffer. (Then again, is she really reprsenting Greenwood or just herself?)

    However, McGinn’s enthusiasm for the South End, which is currently receiving the kind of political attention usually reserved for the North End, we have not heard the last of the name-calling. If this continues, I suspect we’ll see some serious ugly coming out of the mouths of neighbors who have been used to a level of access comiserate with their class status.

    McGinn appears to be looking at Seattle as a whole, not a collection of individual neighborhoods, which is what we need. Not downtown vs. neighborhoods, but a 50-neighborhood strategy, if you will. Seems like a winner to me.

  • Seattle Resident

    It’s sad that a hard-working activist like Ms. Martin has chosen name-calling as a way to express her anger at Mayor-Elect McGinn. Dumb. It ensures that her effectiveness as an advocate will suffer. (Then again, is she really reprsenting Greenwood or just herself?)

    However, McGinn’s enthusiasm for the South End, which is currently receiving the kind of political attention usually reserved for the North End, we have not heard the last of the name-calling. If this continues, I suspect we’ll see some serious ugly coming out of the mouths of neighbors who have been used to a level of access comiserate with their class status.

    McGinn appears to be looking at Seattle as a whole, not a collection of individual neighborhoods, which is what we need. Not downtown vs. neighborhoods, but a 50-neighborhood strategy, if you will. Seems like a winner to me.

  • Seattle Resident

    It’s sad that a hard-working activist like Ms. Martin has chosen name-calling as a way to express her anger at Mayor-Elect McGinn. Dumb. It ensures that her effectiveness as an advocate will suffer. (Then again, is she really reprsenting Greenwood or just herself?)

    However, McGinn’s enthusiasm for the South End, which is currently receiving the kind of political attention usually reserved for the North End, we have not heard the last of the name-calling. If this continues, I suspect we’ll see some serious ugly coming out of the mouths of neighbors who have been used to a level of access comiserate with their class status.

    McGinn appears to be looking at Seattle as a whole, not a collection of individual neighborhoods, which is what we need. Not downtown vs. neighborhoods, but a 50-neighborhood strategy, if you will. Seems like a winner to me.

  • Seattle Resident

    It’s sad that a hard-working activist like Ms. Martin has chosen name-calling as a way to express her anger at Mayor-Elect McGinn. Dumb. It ensures that her effectiveness as an advocate will suffer. (Then again, is she really reprsenting Greenwood or just herself?)

    However, McGinn’s enthusiasm for the South End, which is currently receiving the kind of political attention usually reserved for the North End, we have not heard the last of the name-calling. If this continues, I suspect we’ll see some serious ugly coming out of the mouths of neighbors who have been used to a level of access comiserate with their class status.

    McGinn appears to be looking at Seattle as a whole, not a collection of individual neighborhoods, which is what we need. Not downtown vs. neighborhoods, but a 50-neighborhood strategy, if you will. Seems like a winner to me.

  • Seattle Resident

    It’s sad that a hard-working activist like Ms. Martin has chosen name-calling as a way to express her anger at Mayor-Elect McGinn. Dumb. It ensures that her effectiveness as an advocate will suffer. (Then again, is she really reprsenting Greenwood or just herself?)

    However, McGinn’s enthusiasm for the South End, which is currently receiving the kind of political attention usually reserved for the North End, we have not heard the last of the name-calling. If this continues, I suspect we’ll see some serious ugly coming out of the mouths of neighbors who have been used to a level of access comiserate with their class status.

    McGinn appears to be looking at Seattle as a whole, not a collection of individual neighborhoods, which is what we need. Not downtown vs. neighborhoods, but a 50-neighborhood strategy, if you will. Seems like a winner to me.

  • Seattle Resident

    It’s sad that a hard-working activist like Ms. Martin has chosen name-calling as a way to express her anger at Mayor-Elect McGinn. Dumb. It ensures that her effectiveness as an advocate will suffer. (Then again, is she really reprsenting Greenwood or just herself?)

    However, McGinn’s enthusiasm for the South End, which is currently receiving the kind of political attention usually reserved for the North End, we have not heard the last of the name-calling. If this continues, I suspect we’ll see some serious ugly coming out of the mouths of neighbors who have been used to a level of access comiserate with their class status.

    McGinn appears to be looking at Seattle as a whole, not a collection of individual neighborhoods, which is what we need. Not downtown vs. neighborhoods, but a 50-neighborhood strategy, if you will. Seems like a winner to me.

  • Seattle Resident

    It’s sad that a hard-working activist like Ms. Martin has chosen name-calling as a way to express her anger at Mayor-Elect McGinn. Dumb. It ensures that her effectiveness as an advocate will suffer. (Then again, is she really reprsenting Greenwood or just herself?)

    However, McGinn’s enthusiasm for the South End, which is currently receiving the kind of political attention usually reserved for the North End, we have not heard the last of the name-calling. If this continues, I suspect we’ll see some serious ugly coming out of the mouths of neighbors who have been used to a level of access comiserate with their class status.

    McGinn appears to be looking at Seattle as a whole, not a collection of individual neighborhoods, which is what we need. Not downtown vs. neighborhoods, but a 50-neighborhood strategy, if you will. Seems like a winner to me.

  • Seattle Resident

    It’s sad that a hard-working activist like Ms. Martin has chosen name-calling as a way to express her anger at Mayor-Elect McGinn. Dumb. It ensures that her effectiveness as an advocate will suffer. (Then again, is she really reprsenting Greenwood or just herself?)

    However, McGinn’s enthusiasm for the South End, which is currently receiving the kind of political attention usually reserved for the North End, we have not heard the last of the name-calling. If this continues, I suspect we’ll see some serious ugly coming out of the mouths of neighbors who have been used to a level of access comiserate with their class status.

    McGinn appears to be looking at Seattle as a whole, not a collection of individual neighborhoods, which is what we need. Not downtown vs. neighborhoods, but a 50-neighborhood strategy, if you will. Seems like a winner to me.

  • Seattle Resident

    It’s sad that a hard-working activist like Ms. Martin has chosen name-calling as a way to express her anger at Mayor-Elect McGinn. Dumb. It ensures that her effectiveness as an advocate will suffer. (Then again, is she really reprsenting Greenwood or just herself?)

    However, McGinn’s enthusiasm for the South End, which is currently receiving the kind of political attention usually reserved for the North End, we have not heard the last of the name-calling. If this continues, I suspect we’ll see some serious ugly coming out of the mouths of neighbors who have been used to a level of access comiserate with their class status.

    McGinn appears to be looking at Seattle as a whole, not a collection of individual neighborhoods, which is what we need. Not downtown vs. neighborhoods, but a 50-neighborhood strategy, if you will. Seems like a winner to me.

  • Seattle Resident

    It’s sad that a hard-working activist like Ms. Martin has chosen name-calling as a way to express her anger at Mayor-Elect McGinn. Dumb. It ensures that her effectiveness as an advocate will suffer. (Then again, is she really reprsenting Greenwood or just herself?)

    However, McGinn’s enthusiasm for the South End, which is currently receiving the kind of political attention usually reserved for the North End, we have not heard the last of the name-calling. If this continues, I suspect we’ll see some serious ugly coming out of the mouths of neighbors who have been used to a level of access comiserate with their class status.

    McGinn appears to be looking at Seattle as a whole, not a collection of individual neighborhoods, which is what we need. Not downtown vs. neighborhoods, but a 50-neighborhood strategy, if you will. Seems like a winner to me.

  • Seattle Resident

    It’s sad that a hard-working activist like Ms. Martin has chosen name-calling as a way to express her anger at Mayor-Elect McGinn. Dumb. It ensures that her effectiveness as an advocate will suffer. (Then again, is she really reprsenting Greenwood or just herself?)

    However, McGinn’s enthusiasm for the South End, which is currently receiving the kind of political attention usually reserved for the North End, we have not heard the last of the name-calling. If this continues, I suspect we’ll see some serious ugly coming out of the mouths of neighbors who have been used to a level of access comiserate with their class status.

    McGinn appears to be looking at Seattle as a whole, not a collection of individual neighborhoods, which is what we need. Not downtown vs. neighborhoods, but a 50-neighborhood strategy, if you will. Seems like a winner to me.

  • Seattle Resident

    It’s sad that a hard-working activist like Ms. Martin has chosen name-calling as a way to express her anger at Mayor-Elect McGinn. Dumb. It ensures that her effectiveness as an advocate will suffer. (Then again, is she really reprsenting Greenwood or just herself?)

    However, McGinn’s enthusiasm for the South End, which is currently receiving the kind of political attention usually reserved for the North End, we have not heard the last of the name-calling. If this continues, I suspect we’ll see some serious ugly coming out of the mouths of neighbors who have been used to a level of access comiserate with their class status.

    McGinn appears to be looking at Seattle as a whole, not a collection of individual neighborhoods, which is what we need. Not downtown vs. neighborhoods, but a 50-neighborhood strategy, if you will. Seems like a winner to me.

  • Seattle Resident

    It’s sad that a hard-working activist like Ms. Martin has chosen name-calling as a way to express her anger at Mayor-Elect McGinn. Dumb. It ensures that her effectiveness as an advocate will suffer. (Then again, is she really reprsenting Greenwood or just herself?)

    However, McGinn’s enthusiasm for the South End, which is currently receiving the kind of political attention usually reserved for the North End, we have not heard the last of the name-calling. If this continues, I suspect we’ll see some serious ugly coming out of the mouths of neighbors who have been used to a level of access comiserate with their class status.

    McGinn appears to be looking at Seattle as a whole, not a collection of individual neighborhoods, which is what we need. Not downtown vs. neighborhoods, but a 50-neighborhood strategy, if you will. Seems like a winner to me.

  • sarah68

    Of course McGinn has a large ego and a lot of ambition. How else could you be driven to run for an office this important in a city this screwed up? “Ambitious” shouldn’t be considered an insult. Those who seek the position of PCO in a political district have ego and ambition also, just on a smaller scale (sometimes). What you do with those attributes is what matters, and it matters after you get into office, not until. However many preliminary advisers McGinn has chosen to listen to and however many residents of Seattle he’s solicited opinions from, and what they’ve all said to him, we won’t see how that plays out until he sits in the chair. I’ve never seen such criticism for someone who isn’t even in office yet.

  • sarah68

    Of course McGinn has a large ego and a lot of ambition. How else could you be driven to run for an office this important in a city this screwed up? “Ambitious” shouldn’t be considered an insult. Those who seek the position of PCO in a political district have ego and ambition also, just on a smaller scale (sometimes). What you do with those attributes is what matters, and it matters after you get into office, not until. However many preliminary advisers McGinn has chosen to listen to and however many residents of Seattle he’s solicited opinions from, and what they’ve all said to him, we won’t see how that plays out until he sits in the chair. I’ve never seen such criticism for someone who isn’t even in office yet.

  • sarah68

    Of course McGinn has a large ego and a lot of ambition. How else could you be driven to run for an office this important in a city this screwed up? “Ambitious” shouldn’t be considered an insult. Those who seek the position of PCO in a political district have ego and ambition also, just on a smaller scale (sometimes). What you do with those attributes is what matters, and it matters after you get into office, not until. However many preliminary advisers McGinn has chosen to listen to and however many residents of Seattle he’s solicited opinions from, and what they’ve all said to him, we won’t see how that plays out until he sits in the chair. I’ve never seen such criticism for someone who isn’t even in office yet.

  • sarah68

    Of course McGinn has a large ego and a lot of ambition. How else could you be driven to run for an office this important in a city this screwed up? “Ambitious” shouldn’t be considered an insult. Those who seek the position of PCO in a political district have ego and ambition also, just on a smaller scale (sometimes). What you do with those attributes is what matters, and it matters after you get into office, not until. However many preliminary advisers McGinn has chosen to listen to and however many residents of Seattle he’s solicited opinions from, and what they’ve all said to him, we won’t see how that plays out until he sits in the chair. I’ve never seen such criticism for someone who isn’t even in office yet.

  • sarah68

    Of course McGinn has a large ego and a lot of ambition. How else could you be driven to run for an office this important in a city this screwed up? “Ambitious” shouldn’t be considered an insult. Those who seek the position of PCO in a political district have ego and ambition also, just on a smaller scale (sometimes). What you do with those attributes is what matters, and it matters after you get into office, not until. However many preliminary advisers McGinn has chosen to listen to and however many residents of Seattle he’s solicited opinions from, and what they’ve all said to him, we won’t see how that plays out until he sits in the chair. I’ve never seen such criticism for someone who isn’t even in office yet.

  • sarah68

    Of course McGinn has a large ego and a lot of ambition. How else could you be driven to run for an office this important in a city this screwed up? “Ambitious” shouldn’t be considered an insult. Those who seek the position of PCO in a political district have ego and ambition also, just on a smaller scale (sometimes). What you do with those attributes is what matters, and it matters after you get into office, not until. However many preliminary advisers McGinn has chosen to listen to and however many residents of Seattle he’s solicited opinions from, and what they’ve all said to him, we won’t see how that plays out until he sits in the chair. I’ve never seen such criticism for someone who isn’t even in office yet.

  • sarah68

    Of course McGinn has a large ego and a lot of ambition. How else could you be driven to run for an office this important in a city this screwed up? “Ambitious” shouldn’t be considered an insult. Those who seek the position of PCO in a political district have ego and ambition also, just on a smaller scale (sometimes). What you do with those attributes is what matters, and it matters after you get into office, not until. However many preliminary advisers McGinn has chosen to listen to and however many residents of Seattle he’s solicited opinions from, and what they’ve all said to him, we won’t see how that plays out until he sits in the chair. I’ve never seen such criticism for someone who isn’t even in office yet.

  • sarah68

    Of course McGinn has a large ego and a lot of ambition. How else could you be driven to run for an office this important in a city this screwed up? “Ambitious” shouldn’t be considered an insult. Those who seek the position of PCO in a political district have ego and ambition also, just on a smaller scale (sometimes). What you do with those attributes is what matters, and it matters after you get into office, not until. However many preliminary advisers McGinn has chosen to listen to and however many residents of Seattle he’s solicited opinions from, and what they’ve all said to him, we won’t see how that plays out until he sits in the chair. I’ve never seen such criticism for someone who isn’t even in office yet.

  • sarah68

    Of course McGinn has a large ego and a lot of ambition. How else could you be driven to run for an office this important in a city this screwed up? “Ambitious” shouldn’t be considered an insult. Those who seek the position of PCO in a political district have ego and ambition also, just on a smaller scale (sometimes). What you do with those attributes is what matters, and it matters after you get into office, not until. However many preliminary advisers McGinn has chosen to listen to and however many residents of Seattle he’s solicited opinions from, and what they’ve all said to him, we won’t see how that plays out until he sits in the chair. I’ve never seen such criticism for someone who isn’t even in office yet.

  • sarah68

    Of course McGinn has a large ego and a lot of ambition. How else could you be driven to run for an office this important in a city this screwed up? “Ambitious” shouldn’t be considered an insult. Those who seek the position of PCO in a political district have ego and ambition also, just on a smaller scale (sometimes). What you do with those attributes is what matters, and it matters after you get into office, not until. However many preliminary advisers McGinn has chosen to listen to and however many residents of Seattle he’s solicited opinions from, and what they’ve all said to him, we won’t see how that plays out until he sits in the chair. I’ve never seen such criticism for someone who isn’t even in office yet.

  • sarah68

    Of course McGinn has a large ego and a lot of ambition. How else could you be driven to run for an office this important in a city this screwed up? “Ambitious” shouldn’t be considered an insult. Those who seek the position of PCO in a political district have ego and ambition also, just on a smaller scale (sometimes). What you do with those attributes is what matters, and it matters after you get into office, not until. However many preliminary advisers McGinn has chosen to listen to and however many residents of Seattle he’s solicited opinions from, and what they’ve all said to him, we won’t see how that plays out until he sits in the chair. I’ve never seen such criticism for someone who isn’t even in office yet.

  • sarah68

    Of course McGinn has a large ego and a lot of ambition. How else could you be driven to run for an office this important in a city this screwed up? “Ambitious” shouldn’t be considered an insult. Those who seek the position of PCO in a political district have ego and ambition also, just on a smaller scale (sometimes). What you do with those attributes is what matters, and it matters after you get into office, not until. However many preliminary advisers McGinn has chosen to listen to and however many residents of Seattle he’s solicited opinions from, and what they’ve all said to him, we won’t see how that plays out until he sits in the chair. I’ve never seen such criticism for someone who isn’t even in office yet.

  • sarah68

    Of course McGinn has a large ego and a lot of ambition. How else could you be driven to run for an office this important in a city this screwed up? “Ambitious” shouldn’t be considered an insult. Those who seek the position of PCO in a political district have ego and ambition also, just on a smaller scale (sometimes). What you do with those attributes is what matters, and it matters after you get into office, not until. However many preliminary advisers McGinn has chosen to listen to and however many residents of Seattle he’s solicited opinions from, and what they’ve all said to him, we won’t see how that plays out until he sits in the chair. I’ve never seen such criticism for someone who isn’t even in office yet.

  • sarah68

    Of course McGinn has a large ego and a lot of ambition. How else could you be driven to run for an office this important in a city this screwed up? “Ambitious” shouldn’t be considered an insult. Those who seek the position of PCO in a political district have ego and ambition also, just on a smaller scale (sometimes). What you do with those attributes is what matters, and it matters after you get into office, not until. However many preliminary advisers McGinn has chosen to listen to and however many residents of Seattle he’s solicited opinions from, and what they’ve all said to him, we won’t see how that plays out until he sits in the chair. I’ve never seen such criticism for someone who isn’t even in office yet.

  • sarah68

    Of course McGinn has a large ego and a lot of ambition. How else could you be driven to run for an office this important in a city this screwed up? “Ambitious” shouldn’t be considered an insult. Those who seek the position of PCO in a political district have ego and ambition also, just on a smaller scale (sometimes). What you do with those attributes is what matters, and it matters after you get into office, not until. However many preliminary advisers McGinn has chosen to listen to and however many residents of Seattle he’s solicited opinions from, and what they’ve all said to him, we won’t see how that plays out until he sits in the chair. I’ve never seen such criticism for someone who isn’t even in office yet.

  • sarah68

    Of course McGinn has a large ego and a lot of ambition. How else could you be driven to run for an office this important in a city this screwed up? “Ambitious” shouldn’t be considered an insult. Those who seek the position of PCO in a political district have ego and ambition also, just on a smaller scale (sometimes). What you do with those attributes is what matters, and it matters after you get into office, not until. However many preliminary advisers McGinn has chosen to listen to and however many residents of Seattle he’s solicited opinions from, and what they’ve all said to him, we won’t see how that plays out until he sits in the chair. I’ve never seen such criticism for someone who isn’t even in office yet.

  • sarah68

    Of course McGinn has a large ego and a lot of ambition. How else could you be driven to run for an office this important in a city this screwed up? “Ambitious” shouldn’t be considered an insult. Those who seek the position of PCO in a political district have ego and ambition also, just on a smaller scale (sometimes). What you do with those attributes is what matters, and it matters after you get into office, not until. However many preliminary advisers McGinn has chosen to listen to and however many residents of Seattle he’s solicited opinions from, and what they’ve all said to him, we won’t see how that plays out until he sits in the chair. I’ve never seen such criticism for someone who isn’t even in office yet.

  • sarah68

    Of course McGinn has a large ego and a lot of ambition. How else could you be driven to run for an office this important in a city this screwed up? “Ambitious” shouldn’t be considered an insult. Those who seek the position of PCO in a political district have ego and ambition also, just on a smaller scale (sometimes). What you do with those attributes is what matters, and it matters after you get into office, not until. However many preliminary advisers McGinn has chosen to listen to and however many residents of Seattle he’s solicited opinions from, and what they’ve all said to him, we won’t see how that plays out until he sits in the chair. I’ve never seen such criticism for someone who isn’t even in office yet.

  • sarah68

    Of course McGinn has a large ego and a lot of ambition. How else could you be driven to run for an office this important in a city this screwed up? “Ambitious” shouldn’t be considered an insult. Those who seek the position of PCO in a political district have ego and ambition also, just on a smaller scale (sometimes). What you do with those attributes is what matters, and it matters after you get into office, not until. However many preliminary advisers McGinn has chosen to listen to and however many residents of Seattle he’s solicited opinions from, and what they’ve all said to him, we won’t see how that plays out until he sits in the chair. I’ve never seen such criticism for someone who isn’t even in office yet.

  • sarah68

    Of course McGinn has a large ego and a lot of ambition. How else could you be driven to run for an office this important in a city this screwed up? “Ambitious” shouldn’t be considered an insult. Those who seek the position of PCO in a political district have ego and ambition also, just on a smaller scale (sometimes). What you do with those attributes is what matters, and it matters after you get into office, not until. However many preliminary advisers McGinn has chosen to listen to and however many residents of Seattle he’s solicited opinions from, and what they’ve all said to him, we won’t see how that plays out until he sits in the chair. I’ve never seen such criticism for someone who isn’t even in office yet.

  • sarah68

    Of course McGinn has a large ego and a lot of ambition. How else could you be driven to run for an office this important in a city this screwed up? “Ambitious” shouldn’t be considered an insult. Those who seek the position of PCO in a political district have ego and ambition also, just on a smaller scale (sometimes). What you do with those attributes is what matters, and it matters after you get into office, not until. However many preliminary advisers McGinn has chosen to listen to and however many residents of Seattle he’s solicited opinions from, and what they’ve all said to him, we won’t see how that plays out until he sits in the chair. I’ve never seen such criticism for someone who isn’t even in office yet.

  • sarah68

    Of course McGinn has a large ego and a lot of ambition. How else could you be driven to run for an office this important in a city this screwed up? “Ambitious” shouldn’t be considered an insult. Those who seek the position of PCO in a political district have ego and ambition also, just on a smaller scale (sometimes). What you do with those attributes is what matters, and it matters after you get into office, not until. However many preliminary advisers McGinn has chosen to listen to and however many residents of Seattle he’s solicited opinions from, and what they’ve all said to him, we won’t see how that plays out until he sits in the chair. I’ve never seen such criticism for someone who isn’t even in office yet.

  • sarah68

    Of course McGinn has a large ego and a lot of ambition. How else could you be driven to run for an office this important in a city this screwed up? “Ambitious” shouldn’t be considered an insult. Those who seek the position of PCO in a political district have ego and ambition also, just on a smaller scale (sometimes). What you do with those attributes is what matters, and it matters after you get into office, not until. However many preliminary advisers McGinn has chosen to listen to and however many residents of Seattle he’s solicited opinions from, and what they’ve all said to him, we won’t see how that plays out until he sits in the chair. I’ve never seen such criticism for someone who isn’t even in office yet.

  • sarah68

    Of course McGinn has a large ego and a lot of ambition. How else could you be driven to run for an office this important in a city this screwed up? “Ambitious” shouldn’t be considered an insult. Those who seek the position of PCO in a political district have ego and ambition also, just on a smaller scale (sometimes). What you do with those attributes is what matters, and it matters after you get into office, not until. However many preliminary advisers McGinn has chosen to listen to and however many residents of Seattle he’s solicited opinions from, and what they’ve all said to him, we won’t see how that plays out until he sits in the chair. I’ve never seen such criticism for someone who isn’t even in office yet.

  • sarah68

    Of course McGinn has a large ego and a lot of ambition. How else could you be driven to run for an office this important in a city this screwed up? “Ambitious” shouldn’t be considered an insult. Those who seek the position of PCO in a political district have ego and ambition also, just on a smaller scale (sometimes). What you do with those attributes is what matters, and it matters after you get into office, not until. However many preliminary advisers McGinn has chosen to listen to and however many residents of Seattle he’s solicited opinions from, and what they’ve all said to him, we won’t see how that plays out until he sits in the chair. I’ve never seen such criticism for someone who isn’t even in office yet.

  • sarah68

    Of course McGinn has a large ego and a lot of ambition. How else could you be driven to run for an office this important in a city this screwed up? “Ambitious” shouldn’t be considered an insult. Those who seek the position of PCO in a political district have ego and ambition also, just on a smaller scale (sometimes). What you do with those attributes is what matters, and it matters after you get into office, not until. However many preliminary advisers McGinn has chosen to listen to and however many residents of Seattle he’s solicited opinions from, and what they’ve all said to him, we won’t see how that plays out until he sits in the chair. I’ve never seen such criticism for someone who isn’t even in office yet.

  • sarah68

    Of course McGinn has a large ego and a lot of ambition. How else could you be driven to run for an office this important in a city this screwed up? “Ambitious” shouldn’t be considered an insult. Those who seek the position of PCO in a political district have ego and ambition also, just on a smaller scale (sometimes). What you do with those attributes is what matters, and it matters after you get into office, not until. However many preliminary advisers McGinn has chosen to listen to and however many residents of Seattle he’s solicited opinions from, and what they’ve all said to him, we won’t see how that plays out until he sits in the chair. I’ve never seen such criticism for someone who isn’t even in office yet.

  • sarah68

    Of course McGinn has a large ego and a lot of ambition. How else could you be driven to run for an office this important in a city this screwed up? “Ambitious” shouldn’t be considered an insult. Those who seek the position of PCO in a political district have ego and ambition also, just on a smaller scale (sometimes). What you do with those attributes is what matters, and it matters after you get into office, not until. However many preliminary advisers McGinn has chosen to listen to and however many residents of Seattle he’s solicited opinions from, and what they’ve all said to him, we won’t see how that plays out until he sits in the chair. I’ve never seen such criticism for someone who isn’t even in office yet.

  • sarah68

    Of course McGinn has a large ego and a lot of ambition. How else could you be driven to run for an office this important in a city this screwed up? “Ambitious” shouldn’t be considered an insult. Those who seek the position of PCO in a political district have ego and ambition also, just on a smaller scale (sometimes). What you do with those attributes is what matters, and it matters after you get into office, not until. However many preliminary advisers McGinn has chosen to listen to and however many residents of Seattle he’s solicited opinions from, and what they’ve all said to him, we won’t see how that plays out until he sits in the chair. I’ve never seen such criticism for someone who isn’t even in office yet.

  • sarah68

    Of course McGinn has a large ego and a lot of ambition. How else could you be driven to run for an office this important in a city this screwed up? “Ambitious” shouldn’t be considered an insult. Those who seek the position of PCO in a political district have ego and ambition also, just on a smaller scale (sometimes). What you do with those attributes is what matters, and it matters after you get into office, not until. However many preliminary advisers McGinn has chosen to listen to and however many residents of Seattle he’s solicited opinions from, and what they’ve all said to him, we won’t see how that plays out until he sits in the chair. I’ve never seen such criticism for someone who isn’t even in office yet.

  • sarah68

    Of course McGinn has a large ego and a lot of ambition. How else could you be driven to run for an office this important in a city this screwed up? “Ambitious” shouldn’t be considered an insult. Those who seek the position of PCO in a political district have ego and ambition also, just on a smaller scale (sometimes). What you do with those attributes is what matters, and it matters after you get into office, not until. However many preliminary advisers McGinn has chosen to listen to and however many residents of Seattle he’s solicited opinions from, and what they’ve all said to him, we won’t see how that plays out until he sits in the chair. I’ve never seen such criticism for someone who isn’t even in office yet.

  • sarah68

    Of course McGinn has a large ego and a lot of ambition. How else could you be driven to run for an office this important in a city this screwed up? “Ambitious” shouldn’t be considered an insult. Those who seek the position of PCO in a political district have ego and ambition also, just on a smaller scale (sometimes). What you do with those attributes is what matters, and it matters after you get into office, not until. However many preliminary advisers McGinn has chosen to listen to and however many residents of Seattle he’s solicited opinions from, and what they’ve all said to him, we won’t see how that plays out until he sits in the chair. I’ve never seen such criticism for someone who isn’t even in office yet.

  • sarah68

    Of course McGinn has a large ego and a lot of ambition. How else could you be driven to run for an office this important in a city this screwed up? “Ambitious” shouldn’t be considered an insult. Those who seek the position of PCO in a political district have ego and ambition also, just on a smaller scale (sometimes). What you do with those attributes is what matters, and it matters after you get into office, not until. However many preliminary advisers McGinn has chosen to listen to and however many residents of Seattle he’s solicited opinions from, and what they’ve all said to him, we won’t see how that plays out until he sits in the chair. I’ve never seen such criticism for someone who isn’t even in office yet.

  • sarah68

    Of course McGinn has a large ego and a lot of ambition. How else could you be driven to run for an office this important in a city this screwed up? “Ambitious” shouldn’t be considered an insult. Those who seek the position of PCO in a political district have ego and ambition also, just on a smaller scale (sometimes). What you do with those attributes is what matters, and it matters after you get into office, not until. However many preliminary advisers McGinn has chosen to listen to and however many residents of Seattle he’s solicited opinions from, and what they’ve all said to him, we won’t see how that plays out until he sits in the chair. I’ve never seen such criticism for someone who isn’t even in office yet.

  • sarah68

    Of course McGinn has a large ego and a lot of ambition. How else could you be driven to run for an office this important in a city this screwed up? “Ambitious” shouldn’t be considered an insult. Those who seek the position of PCO in a political district have ego and ambition also, just on a smaller scale (sometimes). What you do with those attributes is what matters, and it matters after you get into office, not until. However many preliminary advisers McGinn has chosen to listen to and however many residents of Seattle he’s solicited opinions from, and what they’ve all said to him, we won’t see how that plays out until he sits in the chair. I’ve never seen such criticism for someone who isn’t even in office yet.

  • sarah68

    Of course McGinn has a large ego and a lot of ambition. How else could you be driven to run for an office this important in a city this screwed up? “Ambitious” shouldn’t be considered an insult. Those who seek the position of PCO in a political district have ego and ambition also, just on a smaller scale (sometimes). What you do with those attributes is what matters, and it matters after you get into office, not until. However many preliminary advisers McGinn has chosen to listen to and however many residents of Seattle he’s solicited opinions from, and what they’ve all said to him, we won’t see how that plays out until he sits in the chair. I’ve never seen such criticism for someone who isn’t even in office yet.

  • sarah68

    Of course McGinn has a large ego and a lot of ambition. How else could you be driven to run for an office this important in a city this screwed up? “Ambitious” shouldn’t be considered an insult. Those who seek the position of PCO in a political district have ego and ambition also, just on a smaller scale (sometimes). What you do with those attributes is what matters, and it matters after you get into office, not until. However many preliminary advisers McGinn has chosen to listen to and however many residents of Seattle he’s solicited opinions from, and what they’ve all said to him, we won’t see how that plays out until he sits in the chair. I’ve never seen such criticism for someone who isn’t even in office yet.

  • sarah68

    Of course McGinn has a large ego and a lot of ambition. How else could you be driven to run for an office this important in a city this screwed up? “Ambitious” shouldn’t be considered an insult. Those who seek the position of PCO in a political district have ego and ambition also, just on a smaller scale (sometimes). What you do with those attributes is what matters, and it matters after you get into office, not until. However many preliminary advisers McGinn has chosen to listen to and however many residents of Seattle he’s solicited opinions from, and what they’ve all said to him, we won’t see how that plays out until he sits in the chair. I’ve never seen such criticism for someone who isn’t even in office yet.

  • sarah68

    Of course McGinn has a large ego and a lot of ambition. How else could you be driven to run for an office this important in a city this screwed up? “Ambitious” shouldn’t be considered an insult. Those who seek the position of PCO in a political district have ego and ambition also, just on a smaller scale (sometimes). What you do with those attributes is what matters, and it matters after you get into office, not until. However many preliminary advisers McGinn has chosen to listen to and however many residents of Seattle he’s solicited opinions from, and what they’ve all said to him, we won’t see how that plays out until he sits in the chair. I’ve never seen such criticism for someone who isn’t even in office yet.

  • sarah68

    Of course McGinn has a large ego and a lot of ambition. How else could you be driven to run for an office this important in a city this screwed up? “Ambitious” shouldn’t be considered an insult. Those who seek the position of PCO in a political district have ego and ambition also, just on a smaller scale (sometimes). What you do with those attributes is what matters, and it matters after you get into office, not until. However many preliminary advisers McGinn has chosen to listen to and however many residents of Seattle he’s solicited opinions from, and what they’ve all said to him, we won’t see how that plays out until he sits in the chair. I’ve never seen such criticism for someone who isn’t even in office yet.

  • sarah68

    Of course McGinn has a large ego and a lot of ambition. How else could you be driven to run for an office this important in a city this screwed up? “Ambitious” shouldn’t be considered an insult. Those who seek the position of PCO in a political district have ego and ambition also, just on a smaller scale (sometimes). What you do with those attributes is what matters, and it matters after you get into office, not until. However many preliminary advisers McGinn has chosen to listen to and however many residents of Seattle he’s solicited opinions from, and what they’ve all said to him, we won’t see how that plays out until he sits in the chair. I’ve never seen such criticism for someone who isn’t even in office yet.

  • sarah68

    Of course McGinn has a large ego and a lot of ambition. How else could you be driven to run for an office this important in a city this screwed up? “Ambitious” shouldn’t be considered an insult. Those who seek the position of PCO in a political district have ego and ambition also, just on a smaller scale (sometimes). What you do with those attributes is what matters, and it matters after you get into office, not until. However many preliminary advisers McGinn has chosen to listen to and however many residents of Seattle he’s solicited opinions from, and what they’ve all said to him, we won’t see how that plays out until he sits in the chair. I’ve never seen such criticism for someone who isn’t even in office yet.

  • sarah68

    Of course McGinn has a large ego and a lot of ambition. How else could you be driven to run for an office this important in a city this screwed up? “Ambitious” shouldn’t be considered an insult. Those who seek the position of PCO in a political district have ego and ambition also, just on a smaller scale (sometimes). What you do with those attributes is what matters, and it matters after you get into office, not until. However many preliminary advisers McGinn has chosen to listen to and however many residents of Seattle he’s solicited opinions from, and what they’ve all said to him, we won’t see how that plays out until he sits in the chair. I’ve never seen such criticism for someone who isn’t even in office yet.

  • sarah68

    Of course McGinn has a large ego and a lot of ambition. How else could you be driven to run for an office this important in a city this screwed up? “Ambitious” shouldn’t be considered an insult. Those who seek the position of PCO in a political district have ego and ambition also, just on a smaller scale (sometimes). What you do with those attributes is what matters, and it matters after you get into office, not until. However many preliminary advisers McGinn has chosen to listen to and however many residents of Seattle he’s solicited opinions from, and what they’ve all said to him, we won’t see how that plays out until he sits in the chair. I’ve never seen such criticism for someone who isn’t even in office yet.

  • sarah68

    Of course McGinn has a large ego and a lot of ambition. How else could you be driven to run for an office this important in a city this screwed up? “Ambitious” shouldn’t be considered an insult. Those who seek the position of PCO in a political district have ego and ambition also, just on a smaller scale (sometimes). What you do with those attributes is what matters, and it matters after you get into office, not until. However many preliminary advisers McGinn has chosen to listen to and however many residents of Seattle he’s solicited opinions from, and what they’ve all said to him, we won’t see how that plays out until he sits in the chair. I’ve never seen such criticism for someone who isn’t even in office yet.

  • sarah68

    Of course McGinn has a large ego and a lot of ambition. How else could you be driven to run for an office this important in a city this screwed up? “Ambitious” shouldn’t be considered an insult. Those who seek the position of PCO in a political district have ego and ambition also, just on a smaller scale (sometimes). What you do with those attributes is what matters, and it matters after you get into office, not until. However many preliminary advisers McGinn has chosen to listen to and however many residents of Seattle he’s solicited opinions from, and what they’ve all said to him, we won’t see how that plays out until he sits in the chair. I’ve never seen such criticism for someone who isn’t even in office yet.

  • Kate Martin

    During the campaign Mike pulled out his Pinnochio card and resorted to lies. That’s a deal breaker for me and certainly something I’ve seen him do before.

    In addition to that problem, his arrogant, dismissive, ineffective and polarizing habits block progress. His need to create viral campaigns for his cause du jour usurps the opportunities for perspective and progress.

    And if you have no mission, vision, or goals well then you’re not accountable to any review process that would see how you did compared to what you said you’d do. That was his MO in Greenwood. During the time he was a community disorganizer in Greenwood, he refused to do any of the above. The Mike and Miker issue doesn’t surprise me because drinking beers with his cronies is his idea of committee work. I find his claims to open gov’t and transparency hard to believe since we couldn’t ever get him to do that in Greenwood. No plans, no notes, no committees, no problem.

    His biggest interest was election time forums where he blew his hot air around for the issues he was related to either pro or con…Roads & Transit, Prop 1, BTG, etc. Hardly anything the LWV would approve of in terms of forum or debate process & protocol. He never disclosed his connection to those issues and felt perfectly at ease “moderating” the forum.

    He’s the most power hungry politically motivated person I have ever met. I’m sure he’s working on his re-election campaign already. That ought to assure he basically gets nothing done.

    I’ve never found him able to lift his head above the issues high enough to gain a perspective and I’ve never seen him follow a logical process ever. Planning Hell v4.

    Call me whatever you want. I’m just calling it like it’s been for the last dozen or so years I’ve worked around him.

    And I’m not shy to say that I think it would be nice to think he might consider attending to the existing systems in Seattle that need attention.

    Particularly it would be good to think he could integrate his pet issues into a context that communicates a “hierarchy of needs” and a clear definition of the basic responsibilities of government which I sense he loses sight of on a regular basis.

    Mike and from what I can see most of his people are very much oriented toward a few issues that don’t add up to comprehensive solutions or strategies.

    I’ll certainly avoid the P word. I didn’t realize it was such an offensive term.

    I’d appreciate it if dismissing the truth about his history and marginalizing me for saying it could be avoided.

    I didn’t just wake up after the election and make a clean slate for this guy. Why would I?

    If you’re going to attack the messenger here, why don’t you try disproving what I’m saying instead of skewering me. I’ve always called it like it is and I don’t lie. If that’s unpalatable, by all means rely on smoke and mirrors and “grassroots” which in this case may mean you’re either promised a job or have no idea who this guy is.

  • Kate Martin

    During the campaign Mike pulled out his Pinnochio card and resorted to lies. That’s a deal breaker for me and certainly something I’ve seen him do before.

    In addition to that problem, his arrogant, dismissive, ineffective and polarizing habits block progress. His need to create viral campaigns for his cause du jour usurps the opportunities for perspective and progress.

    And if you have no mission, vision, or goals well then you’re not accountable to any review process that would see how you did compared to what you said you’d do. That was his MO in Greenwood. During the time he was a community disorganizer in Greenwood, he refused to do any of the above. The Mike and Miker issue doesn’t surprise me because drinking beers with his cronies is his idea of committee work. I find his claims to open gov’t and transparency hard to believe since we couldn’t ever get him to do that in Greenwood. No plans, no notes, no committees, no problem.

    His biggest interest was election time forums where he blew his hot air around for the issues he was related to either pro or con…Roads & Transit, Prop 1, BTG, etc. Hardly anything the LWV would approve of in terms of forum or debate process & protocol. He never disclosed his connection to those issues and felt perfectly at ease “moderating” the forum.

    He’s the most power hungry politically motivated person I have ever met. I’m sure he’s working on his re-election campaign already. That ought to assure he basically gets nothing done.

    I’ve never found him able to lift his head above the issues high enough to gain a perspective and I’ve never seen him follow a logical process ever. Planning Hell v4.

    Call me whatever you want. I’m just calling it like it’s been for the last dozen or so years I’ve worked around him.

    And I’m not shy to say that I think it would be nice to think he might consider attending to the existing systems in Seattle that need attention.

    Particularly it would be good to think he could integrate his pet issues into a context that communicates a “hierarchy of needs” and a clear definition of the basic responsibilities of government which I sense he loses sight of on a regular basis.

    Mike and from what I can see most of his people are very much oriented toward a few issues that don’t add up to comprehensive solutions or strategies.

    I’ll certainly avoid the P word. I didn’t realize it was such an offensive term.

    I’d appreciate it if dismissing the truth about his history and marginalizing me for saying it could be avoided.

    I didn’t just wake up after the election and make a clean slate for this guy. Why would I?

    If you’re going to attack the messenger here, why don’t you try disproving what I’m saying instead of skewering me. I’ve always called it like it is and I don’t lie. If that’s unpalatable, by all means rely on smoke and mirrors and “grassroots” which in this case may mean you’re either promised a job or have no idea who this guy is.

  • Kate Martin

    During the campaign Mike pulled out his Pinnochio card and resorted to lies. That’s a deal breaker for me and certainly something I’ve seen him do before.

    In addition to that problem, his arrogant, dismissive, ineffective and polarizing habits block progress. His need to create viral campaigns for his cause du jour usurps the opportunities for perspective and progress.

    And if you have no mission, vision, or goals well then you’re not accountable to any review process that would see how you did compared to what you said you’d do. That was his MO in Greenwood. During the time he was a community disorganizer in Greenwood, he refused to do any of the above. The Mike and Miker issue doesn’t surprise me because drinking beers with his cronies is his idea of committee work. I find his claims to open gov’t and transparency hard to believe since we couldn’t ever get him to do that in Greenwood. No plans, no notes, no committees, no problem.

    His biggest interest was election time forums where he blew his hot air around for the issues he was related to either pro or con…Roads & Transit, Prop 1, BTG, etc. Hardly anything the LWV would approve of in terms of forum or debate process & protocol. He never disclosed his connection to those issues and felt perfectly at ease “moderating” the forum.

    He’s the most power hungry politically motivated person I have ever met. I’m sure he’s working on his re-election campaign already. That ought to assure he basically gets nothing done.

    I’ve never found him able to lift his head above the issues high enough to gain a perspective and I’ve never seen him follow a logical process ever. Planning Hell v4.

    Call me whatever you want. I’m just calling it like it’s been for the last dozen or so years I’ve worked around him.

    And I’m not shy to say that I think it would be nice to think he might consider attending to the existing systems in Seattle that need attention.

    Particularly it would be good to think he could integrate his pet issues into a context that communicates a “hierarchy of needs” and a clear definition of the basic responsibilities of government which I sense he loses sight of on a regular basis.

    Mike and from what I can see most of his people are very much oriented toward a few issues that don’t add up to comprehensive solutions or strategies.

    I’ll certainly avoid the P word. I didn’t realize it was such an offensive term.

    I’d appreciate it if dismissing the truth about his history and marginalizing me for saying it could be avoided.

    I didn’t just wake up after the election and make a clean slate for this guy. Why would I?

    If you’re going to attack the messenger here, why don’t you try disproving what I’m saying instead of skewering me. I’ve always called it like it is and I don’t lie. If that’s unpalatable, by all means rely on smoke and mirrors and “grassroots” which in this case may mean you’re either promised a job or have no idea who this guy is.

  • Kate Martin

    During the campaign Mike pulled out his Pinnochio card and resorted to lies. That’s a deal breaker for me and certainly something I’ve seen him do before.

    In addition to that problem, his arrogant, dismissive, ineffective and polarizing habits block progress. His need to create viral campaigns for his cause du jour usurps the opportunities for perspective and progress.

    And if you have no mission, vision, or goals well then you’re not accountable to any review process that would see how you did compared to what you said you’d do. That was his MO in Greenwood. During the time he was a community disorganizer in Greenwood, he refused to do any of the above. The Mike and Miker issue doesn’t surprise me because drinking beers with his cronies is his idea of committee work. I find his claims to open gov’t and transparency hard to believe since we couldn’t ever get him to do that in Greenwood. No plans, no notes, no committees, no problem.

    His biggest interest was election time forums where he blew his hot air around for the issues he was related to either pro or con…Roads & Transit, Prop 1, BTG, etc. Hardly anything the LWV would approve of in terms of forum or debate process & protocol. He never disclosed his connection to those issues and felt perfectly at ease “moderating” the forum.

    He’s the most power hungry politically motivated person I have ever met. I’m sure he’s working on his re-election campaign already. That ought to assure he basically gets nothing done.

    I’ve never found him able to lift his head above the issues high enough to gain a perspective and I’ve never seen him follow a logical process ever. Planning Hell v4.

    Call me whatever you want. I’m just calling it like it’s been for the last dozen or so years I’ve worked around him.

    And I’m not shy to say that I think it would be nice to think he might consider attending to the existing systems in Seattle that need attention.

    Particularly it would be good to think he could integrate his pet issues into a context that communicates a “hierarchy of needs” and a clear definition of the basic responsibilities of government which I sense he loses sight of on a regular basis.

    Mike and from what I can see most of his people are very much oriented toward a few issues that don’t add up to comprehensive solutions or strategies.

    I’ll certainly avoid the P word. I didn’t realize it was such an offensive term.

    I’d appreciate it if dismissing the truth about his history and marginalizing me for saying it could be avoided.

    I didn’t just wake up after the election and make a clean slate for this guy. Why would I?

    If you’re going to attack the messenger here, why don’t you try disproving what I’m saying instead of skewering me. I’ve always called it like it is and I don’t lie. If that’s unpalatable, by all means rely on smoke and mirrors and “grassroots” which in this case may mean you’re either promised a job or have no idea who this guy is.

  • Kate Martin

    During the campaign Mike pulled out his Pinnochio card and resorted to lies. That’s a deal breaker for me and certainly something I’ve seen him do before.

    In addition to that problem, his arrogant, dismissive, ineffective and polarizing habits block progress. His need to create viral campaigns for his cause du jour usurps the opportunities for perspective and progress.

    And if you have no mission, vision, or goals well then you’re not accountable to any review process that would see how you did compared to what you said you’d do. That was his MO in Greenwood. During the time he was a community disorganizer in Greenwood, he refused to do any of the above. The Mike and Miker issue doesn’t surprise me because drinking beers with his cronies is his idea of committee work. I find his claims to open gov’t and transparency hard to believe since we couldn’t ever get him to do that in Greenwood. No plans, no notes, no committees, no problem.

    His biggest interest was election time forums where he blew his hot air around for the issues he was related to either pro or con…Roads & Transit, Prop 1, BTG, etc. Hardly anything the LWV would approve of in terms of forum or debate process & protocol. He never disclosed his connection to those issues and felt perfectly at ease “moderating” the forum.

    He’s the most power hungry politically motivated person I have ever met. I’m sure he’s working on his re-election campaign already. That ought to assure he basically gets nothing done.

    I’ve never found him able to lift his head above the issues high enough to gain a perspective and I’ve never seen him follow a logical process ever. Planning Hell v4.

    Call me whatever you want. I’m just calling it like it’s been for the last dozen or so years I’ve worked around him.

    And I’m not shy to say that I think it would be nice to think he might consider attending to the existing systems in Seattle that need attention.

    Particularly it would be good to think he could integrate his pet issues into a context that communicates a “hierarchy of needs” and a clear definition of the basic responsibilities of government which I sense he loses sight of on a regular basis.

    Mike and from what I can see most of his people are very much oriented toward a few issues that don’t add up to comprehensive solutions or strategies.

    I’ll certainly avoid the P word. I didn’t realize it was such an offensive term.

    I’d appreciate it if dismissing the truth about his history and marginalizing me for saying it could be avoided.

    I didn’t just wake up after the election and make a clean slate for this guy. Why would I?

    If you’re going to attack the messenger here, why don’t you try disproving what I’m saying instead of skewering me. I’ve always called it like it is and I don’t lie. If that’s unpalatable, by all means rely on smoke and mirrors and “grassroots” which in this case may mean you’re either promised a job or have no idea who this guy is.

  • Kate Martin

    During the campaign Mike pulled out his Pinnochio card and resorted to lies. That’s a deal breaker for me and certainly something I’ve seen him do before.

    In addition to that problem, his arrogant, dismissive, ineffective and polarizing habits block progress. His need to create viral campaigns for his cause du jour usurps the opportunities for perspective and progress.

    And if you have no mission, vision, or goals well then you’re not accountable to any review process that would see how you did compared to what you said you’d do. That was his MO in Greenwood. During the time he was a community disorganizer in Greenwood, he refused to do any of the above. The Mike and Miker issue doesn’t surprise me because drinking beers with his cronies is his idea of committee work. I find his claims to open gov’t and transparency hard to believe since we couldn’t ever get him to do that in Greenwood. No plans, no notes, no committees, no problem.

    His biggest interest was election time forums where he blew his hot air around for the issues he was related to either pro or con…Roads & Transit, Prop 1, BTG, etc. Hardly anything the LWV would approve of in terms of forum or debate process & protocol. He never disclosed his connection to those issues and felt perfectly at ease “moderating” the forum.

    He’s the most power hungry politically motivated person I have ever met. I’m sure he’s working on his re-election campaign already. That ought to assure he basically gets nothing done.

    I’ve never found him able to lift his head above the issues high enough to gain a perspective and I’ve never seen him follow a logical process ever. Planning Hell v4.

    Call me whatever you want. I’m just calling it like it’s been for the last dozen or so years I’ve worked around him.

    And I’m not shy to say that I think it would be nice to think he might consider attending to the existing systems in Seattle that need attention.

    Particularly it would be good to think he could integrate his pet issues into a context that communicates a “hierarchy of needs” and a clear definition of the basic responsibilities of government which I sense he loses sight of on a regular basis.

    Mike and from what I can see most of his people are very much oriented toward a few issues that don’t add up to comprehensive solutions or strategies.

    I’ll certainly avoid the P word. I didn’t realize it was such an offensive term.

    I’d appreciate it if dismissing the truth about his history and marginalizing me for saying it could be avoided.

    I didn’t just wake up after the election and make a clean slate for this guy. Why would I?

    If you’re going to attack the messenger here, why don’t you try disproving what I’m saying instead of skewering me. I’ve always called it like it is and I don’t lie. If that’s unpalatable, by all means rely on smoke and mirrors and “grassroots” which in this case may mean you’re either promised a job or have no idea who this guy is.

  • Kate Martin

    During the campaign Mike pulled out his Pinnochio card and resorted to lies. That’s a deal breaker for me and certainly something I’ve seen him do before.

    In addition to that problem, his arrogant, dismissive, ineffective and polarizing habits block progress. His need to create viral campaigns for his cause du jour usurps the opportunities for perspective and progress.

    And if you have no mission, vision, or goals well then you’re not accountable to any review process that would see how you did compared to what you said you’d do. That was his MO in Greenwood. During the time he was a community disorganizer in Greenwood, he refused to do any of the above. The Mike and Miker issue doesn’t surprise me because drinking beers with his cronies is his idea of committee work. I find his claims to open gov’t and transparency hard to believe since we couldn’t ever get him to do that in Greenwood. No plans, no notes, no committees, no problem.

    His biggest interest was election time forums where he blew his hot air around for the issues he was related to either pro or con…Roads & Transit, Prop 1, BTG, etc. Hardly anything the LWV would approve of in terms of forum or debate process & protocol. He never disclosed his connection to those issues and felt perfectly at ease “moderating” the forum.

    He’s the most power hungry politically motivated person I have ever met. I’m sure he’s working on his re-election campaign already. That ought to assure he basically gets nothing done.

    I’ve never found him able to lift his head above the issues high enough to gain a perspective and I’ve never seen him follow a logical process ever. Planning Hell v4.

    Call me whatever you want. I’m just calling it like it’s been for the last dozen or so years I’ve worked around him.

    And I’m not shy to say that I think it would be nice to think he might consider attending to the existing systems in Seattle that need attention.

    Particularly it would be good to think he could integrate his pet issues into a context that communicates a “hierarchy of needs” and a clear definition of the basic responsibilities of government which I sense he loses sight of on a regular basis.

    Mike and from what I can see most of his people are very much oriented toward a few issues that don’t add up to comprehensive solutions or strategies.

    I’ll certainly avoid the P word. I didn’t realize it was such an offensive term.

    I’d appreciate it if dismissing the truth about his history and marginalizing me for saying it could be avoided.

    I didn’t just wake up after the election and make a clean slate for this guy. Why would I?

    If you’re going to attack the messenger here, why don’t you try disproving what I’m saying instead of skewering me. I’ve always called it like it is and I don’t lie. If that’s unpalatable, by all means rely on smoke and mirrors and “grassroots” which in this case may mean you’re either promised a job or have no idea who this guy is.

  • Kate Martin

    During the campaign Mike pulled out his Pinnochio card and resorted to lies. That’s a deal breaker for me and certainly something I’ve seen him do before.

    In addition to that problem, his arrogant, dismissive, ineffective and polarizing habits block progress. His need to create viral campaigns for his cause du jour usurps the opportunities for perspective and progress.

    And if you have no mission, vision, or goals well then you’re not accountable to any review process that would see how you did compared to what you said you’d do. That was his MO in Greenwood. During the time he was a community disorganizer in Greenwood, he refused to do any of the above. The Mike and Miker issue doesn’t surprise me because drinking beers with his cronies is his idea of committee work. I find his claims to open gov’t and transparency hard to believe since we couldn’t ever get him to do that in Greenwood. No plans, no notes, no committees, no problem.

    His biggest interest was election time forums where he blew his hot air around for the issues he was related to either pro or con…Roads & Transit, Prop 1, BTG, etc. Hardly anything the LWV would approve of in terms of forum or debate process & protocol. He never disclosed his connection to those issues and felt perfectly at ease “moderating” the forum.

    He’s the most power hungry politically motivated person I have ever met. I’m sure he’s working on his re-election campaign already. That ought to assure he basically gets nothing done.

    I’ve never found him able to lift his head above the issues high enough to gain a perspective and I’ve never seen him follow a logical process ever. Planning Hell v4.

    Call me whatever you want. I’m just calling it like it’s been for the last dozen or so years I’ve worked around him.

    And I’m not shy to say that I think it would be nice to think he might consider attending to the existing systems in Seattle that need attention.

    Particularly it would be good to think he could integrate his pet issues into a context that communicates a “hierarchy of needs” and a clear definition of the basic responsibilities of government which I sense he loses sight of on a regular basis.

    Mike and from what I can see most of his people are very much oriented toward a few issues that don’t add up to comprehensive solutions or strategies.

    I’ll certainly avoid the P word. I didn’t realize it was such an offensive term.

    I’d appreciate it if dismissing the truth about his history and marginalizing me for saying it could be avoided.

    I didn’t just wake up after the election and make a clean slate for this guy. Why would I?

    If you’re going to attack the messenger here, why don’t you try disproving what I’m saying instead of skewering me. I’ve always called it like it is and I don’t lie. If that’s unpalatable, by all means rely on smoke and mirrors and “grassroots” which in this case may mean you’re either promised a job or have no idea who this guy is.

  • Kate Martin

    During the campaign Mike pulled out his Pinnochio card and resorted to lies. That’s a deal breaker for me and certainly something I’ve seen him do before.

    In addition to that problem, his arrogant, dismissive, ineffective and polarizing habits block progress. His need to create viral campaigns for his cause du jour usurps the opportunities for perspective and progress.

    And if you have no mission, vision, or goals well then you’re not accountable to any review process that would see how you did compared to what you said you’d do. That was his MO in Greenwood. During the time he was a community disorganizer in Greenwood, he refused to do any of the above. The Mike and Miker issue doesn’t surprise me because drinking beers with his cronies is his idea of committee work. I find his claims to open gov’t and transparency hard to believe since we couldn’t ever get him to do that in Greenwood. No plans, no notes, no committees, no problem.

    His biggest interest was election time forums where he blew his hot air around for the issues he was related to either pro or con…Roads & Transit, Prop 1, BTG, etc. Hardly anything the LWV would approve of in terms of forum or debate process & protocol. He never disclosed his connection to those issues and felt perfectly at ease “moderating” the forum.

    He’s the most power hungry politically motivated person I have ever met. I’m sure he’s working on his re-election campaign already. That ought to assure he basically gets nothing done.

    I’ve never found him able to lift his head above the issues high enough to gain a perspective and I’ve never seen him follow a logical process ever. Planning Hell v4.

    Call me whatever you want. I’m just calling it like it’s been for the last dozen or so years I’ve worked around him.

    And I’m not shy to say that I think it would be nice to think he might consider attending to the existing systems in Seattle that need attention.

    Particularly it would be good to think he could integrate his pet issues into a context that communicates a “hierarchy of needs” and a clear definition of the basic responsibilities of government which I sense he loses sight of on a regular basis.

    Mike and from what I can see most of his people are very much oriented toward a few issues that don’t add up to comprehensive solutions or strategies.

    I’ll certainly avoid the P word. I didn’t realize it was such an offensive term.

    I’d appreciate it if dismissing the truth about his history and marginalizing me for saying it could be avoided.

    I didn’t just wake up after the election and make a clean slate for this guy. Why would I?

    If you’re going to attack the messenger here, why don’t you try disproving what I’m saying instead of skewering me. I’ve always called it like it is and I don’t lie. If that’s unpalatable, by all means rely on smoke and mirrors and “grassroots” which in this case may mean you’re either promised a job or have no idea who this guy is.

  • Kate Martin

    During the campaign Mike pulled out his Pinnochio card and resorted to lies. That’s a deal breaker for me and certainly something I’ve seen him do before.

    In addition to that problem, his arrogant, dismissive, ineffective and polarizing habits block progress. His need to create viral campaigns for his cause du jour usurps the opportunities for perspective and progress.

    And if you have no mission, vision, or goals well then you’re not accountable to any review process that would see how you did compared to what you said you’d do. That was his MO in Greenwood. During the time he was a community disorganizer in Greenwood, he refused to do any of the above. The Mike and Miker issue doesn’t surprise me because drinking beers with his cronies is his idea of committee work. I find his claims to open gov’t and transparency hard to believe since we couldn’t ever get him to do that in Greenwood. No plans, no notes, no committees, no problem.

    His biggest interest was election time forums where he blew his hot air around for the issues he was related to either pro or con…Roads & Transit, Prop 1, BTG, etc. Hardly anything the LWV would approve of in terms of forum or debate process & protocol. He never disclosed his connection to those issues and felt perfectly at ease “moderating” the forum.

    He’s the most power hungry politically motivated person I have ever met. I’m sure he’s working on his re-election campaign already. That ought to assure he basically gets nothing done.

    I’ve never found him able to lift his head above the issues high enough to gain a perspective and I’ve never seen him follow a logical process ever. Planning Hell v4.

    Call me whatever you want. I’m just calling it like it’s been for the last dozen or so years I’ve worked around him.

    And I’m not shy to say that I think it would be nice to think he might consider attending to the existing systems in Seattle that need attention.

    Particularly it would be good to think he could integrate his pet issues into a context that communicates a “hierarchy of needs” and a clear definition of the basic responsibilities of government which I sense he loses sight of on a regular basis.

    Mike and from what I can see most of his people are very much oriented toward a few issues that don’t add up to comprehensive solutions or strategies.

    I’ll certainly avoid the P word. I didn’t realize it was such an offensive term.

    I’d appreciate it if dismissing the truth about his history and marginalizing me for saying it could be avoided.

    I didn’t just wake up after the election and make a clean slate for this guy. Why would I?

    If you’re going to attack the messenger here, why don’t you try disproving what I’m saying instead of skewering me. I’ve always called it like it is and I don’t lie. If that’s unpalatable, by all means rely on smoke and mirrors and “grassroots” which in this case may mean you’re either promised a job or have no idea who this guy is.

  • Kate Martin

    During the campaign Mike pulled out his Pinnochio card and resorted to lies. That’s a deal breaker for me and certainly something I’ve seen him do before.

    In addition to that problem, his arrogant, dismissive, ineffective and polarizing habits block progress. His need to create viral campaigns for his cause du jour usurps the opportunities for perspective and progress.

    And if you have no mission, vision, or goals well then you’re not accountable to any review process that would see how you did compared to what you said you’d do. That was his MO in Greenwood. During the time he was a community disorganizer in Greenwood, he refused to do any of the above. The Mike and Miker issue doesn’t surprise me because drinking beers with his cronies is his idea of committee work. I find his claims to open gov’t and transparency hard to believe since we couldn’t ever get him to do that in Greenwood. No plans, no notes, no committees, no problem.

    His biggest interest was election time forums where he blew his hot air around for the issues he was related to either pro or con…Roads & Transit, Prop 1, BTG, etc. Hardly anything the LWV would approve of in terms of forum or debate process & protocol. He never disclosed his connection to those issues and felt perfectly at ease “moderating” the forum.

    He’s the most power hungry politically motivated person I have ever met. I’m sure he’s working on his re-election campaign already. That ought to assure he basically gets nothing done.

    I’ve never found him able to lift his head above the issues high enough to gain a perspective and I’ve never seen him follow a logical process ever. Planning Hell v4.

    Call me whatever you want. I’m just calling it like it’s been for the last dozen or so years I’ve worked around him.

    And I’m not shy to say that I think it would be nice to think he might consider attending to the existing systems in Seattle that need attention.

    Particularly it would be good to think he could integrate his pet issues into a context that communicates a “hierarchy of needs” and a clear definition of the basic responsibilities of government which I sense he loses sight of on a regular basis.

    Mike and from what I can see most of his people are very much oriented toward a few issues that don’t add up to comprehensive solutions or strategies.

    I’ll certainly avoid the P word. I didn’t realize it was such an offensive term.

    I’d appreciate it if dismissing the truth about his history and marginalizing me for saying it could be avoided.

    I didn’t just wake up after the election and make a clean slate for this guy. Why would I?

    If you’re going to attack the messenger here, why don’t you try disproving what I’m saying instead of skewering me. I’ve always called it like it is and I don’t lie. If that’s unpalatable, by all means rely on smoke and mirrors and “grassroots” which in this case may mean you’re either promised a job or have no idea who this guy is.

  • Kate Martin

    During the campaign Mike pulled out his Pinnochio card and resorted to lies. That’s a deal breaker for me and certainly something I’ve seen him do before.

    In addition to that problem, his arrogant, dismissive, ineffective and polarizing habits block progress. His need to create viral campaigns for his cause du jour usurps the opportunities for perspective and progress.

    And if you have no mission, vision, or goals well then you’re not accountable to any review process that would see how you did compared to what you said you’d do. That was his MO in Greenwood. During the time he was a community disorganizer in Greenwood, he refused to do any of the above. The Mike and Miker issue doesn’t surprise me because drinking beers with his cronies is his idea of committee work. I find his claims to open gov’t and transparency hard to believe since we couldn’t ever get him to do that in Greenwood. No plans, no notes, no committees, no problem.

    His biggest interest was election time forums where he blew his hot air around for the issues he was related to either pro or con…Roads & Transit, Prop 1, BTG, etc. Hardly anything the LWV would approve of in terms of forum or debate process & protocol. He never disclosed his connection to those issues and felt perfectly at ease “moderating” the forum.

    He’s the most power hungry politically motivated person I have ever met. I’m sure he’s working on his re-election campaign already. That ought to assure he basically gets nothing done.

    I’ve never found him able to lift his head above the issues high enough to gain a perspective and I’ve never seen him follow a logical process ever. Planning Hell v4.

    Call me whatever you want. I’m just calling it like it’s been for the last dozen or so years I’ve worked around him.

    And I’m not shy to say that I think it would be nice to think he might consider attending to the existing systems in Seattle that need attention.

    Particularly it would be good to think he could integrate his pet issues into a context that communicates a “hierarchy of needs” and a clear definition of the basic responsibilities of government which I sense he loses sight of on a regular basis.

    Mike and from what I can see most of his people are very much oriented toward a few issues that don’t add up to comprehensive solutions or strategies.

    I’ll certainly avoid the P word. I didn’t realize it was such an offensive term.

    I’d appreciate it if dismissing the truth about his history and marginalizing me for saying it could be avoided.

    I didn’t just wake up after the election and make a clean slate for this guy. Why would I?

    If you’re going to attack the messenger here, why don’t you try disproving what I’m saying instead of skewering me. I’ve always called it like it is and I don’t lie. If that’s unpalatable, by all means rely on smoke and mirrors and “grassroots” which in this case may mean you’re either promised a job or have no idea who this guy is.

  • Kate Martin

    During the campaign Mike pulled out his Pinnochio card and resorted to lies. That’s a deal breaker for me and certainly something I’ve seen him do before.

    In addition to that problem, his arrogant, dismissive, ineffective and polarizing habits block progress. His need to create viral campaigns for his cause du jour usurps the opportunities for perspective and progress.

    And if you have no mission, vision, or goals well then you’re not accountable to any review process that would see how you did compared to what you said you’d do. That was his MO in Greenwood. During the time he was a community disorganizer in Greenwood, he refused to do any of the above. The Mike and Miker issue doesn’t surprise me because drinking beers with his cronies is his idea of committee work. I find his claims to open gov’t and transparency hard to believe since we couldn’t ever get him to do that in Greenwood. No plans, no notes, no committees, no problem.

    His biggest interest was election time forums where he blew his hot air around for the issues he was related to either pro or con…Roads & Transit, Prop 1, BTG, etc. Hardly anything the LWV would approve of in terms of forum or debate process & protocol. He never disclosed his connection to those issues and felt perfectly at ease “moderating” the forum.

    He’s the most power hungry politically motivated person I have ever met. I’m sure he’s working on his re-election campaign already. That ought to assure he basically gets nothing done.

    I’ve never found him able to lift his head above the issues high enough to gain a perspective and I’ve never seen him follow a logical process ever. Planning Hell v4.

    Call me whatever you want. I’m just calling it like it’s been for the last dozen or so years I’ve worked around him.

    And I’m not shy to say that I think it would be nice to think he might consider attending to the existing systems in Seattle that need attention.

    Particularly it would be good to think he could integrate his pet issues into a context that communicates a “hierarchy of needs” and a clear definition of the basic responsibilities of government which I sense he loses sight of on a regular basis.

    Mike and from what I can see most of his people are very much oriented toward a few issues that don’t add up to comprehensive solutions or strategies.

    I’ll certainly avoid the P word. I didn’t realize it was such an offensive term.

    I’d appreciate it if dismissing the truth about his history and marginalizing me for saying it could be avoided.

    I didn’t just wake up after the election and make a clean slate for this guy. Why would I?

    If you’re going to attack the messenger here, why don’t you try disproving what I’m saying instead of skewering me. I’ve always called it like it is and I don’t lie. If that’s unpalatable, by all means rely on smoke and mirrors and “grassroots” which in this case may mean you’re either promised a job or have no idea who this guy is.

  • Kate Martin

    During the campaign Mike pulled out his Pinnochio card and resorted to lies. That’s a deal breaker for me and certainly something I’ve seen him do before.

    In addition to that problem, his arrogant, dismissive, ineffective and polarizing habits block progress. His need to create viral campaigns for his cause du jour usurps the opportunities for perspective and progress.

    And if you have no mission, vision, or goals well then you’re not accountable to any review process that would see how you did compared to what you said you’d do. That was his MO in Greenwood. During the time he was a community disorganizer in Greenwood, he refused to do any of the above. The Mike and Miker issue doesn’t surprise me because drinking beers with his cronies is his idea of committee work. I find his claims to open gov’t and transparency hard to believe since we couldn’t ever get him to do that in Greenwood. No plans, no notes, no committees, no problem.

    His biggest interest was election time forums where he blew his hot air around for the issues he was related to either pro or con…Roads & Transit, Prop 1, BTG, etc. Hardly anything the LWV would approve of in terms of forum or debate process & protocol. He never disclosed his connection to those issues and felt perfectly at ease “moderating” the forum.

    He’s the most power hungry politically motivated person I have ever met. I’m sure he’s working on his re-election campaign already. That ought to assure he basically gets nothing done.

    I’ve never found him able to lift his head above the issues high enough to gain a perspective and I’ve never seen him follow a logical process ever. Planning Hell v4.

    Call me whatever you want. I’m just calling it like it’s been for the last dozen or so years I’ve worked around him.

    And I’m not shy to say that I think it would be nice to think he might consider attending to the existing systems in Seattle that need attention.

    Particularly it would be good to think he could integrate his pet issues into a context that communicates a “hierarchy of needs” and a clear definition of the basic responsibilities of government which I sense he loses sight of on a regular basis.

    Mike and from what I can see most of his people are very much oriented toward a few issues that don’t add up to comprehensive solutions or strategies.

    I’ll certainly avoid the P word. I didn’t realize it was such an offensive term.

    I’d appreciate it if dismissing the truth about his history and marginalizing me for saying it could be avoided.

    I didn’t just wake up after the election and make a clean slate for this guy. Why would I?

    If you’re going to attack the messenger here, why don’t you try disproving what I’m saying instead of skewering me. I’ve always called it like it is and I don’t lie. If that’s unpalatable, by all means rely on smoke and mirrors and “grassroots” which in this case may mean you’re either promised a job or have no idea who this guy is.

  • Kate Martin

    During the campaign Mike pulled out his Pinnochio card and resorted to lies. That’s a deal breaker for me and certainly something I’ve seen him do before.

    In addition to that problem, his arrogant, dismissive, ineffective and polarizing habits block progress. His need to create viral campaigns for his cause du jour usurps the opportunities for perspective and progress.

    And if you have no mission, vision, or goals well then you’re not accountable to any review process that would see how you did compared to what you said you’d do. That was his MO in Greenwood. During the time he was a community disorganizer in Greenwood, he refused to do any of the above. The Mike and Miker issue doesn’t surprise me because drinking beers with his cronies is his idea of committee work. I find his claims to open gov’t and transparency hard to believe since we couldn’t ever get him to do that in Greenwood. No plans, no notes, no committees, no problem.

    His biggest interest was election time forums where he blew his hot air around for the issues he was related to either pro or con…Roads & Transit, Prop 1, BTG, etc. Hardly anything the LWV would approve of in terms of forum or debate process & protocol. He never disclosed his connection to those issues and felt perfectly at ease “moderating” the forum.

    He’s the most power hungry politically motivated person I have ever met. I’m sure he’s working on his re-election campaign already. That ought to assure he basically gets nothing done.

    I’ve never found him able to lift his head above the issues high enough to gain a perspective and I’ve never seen him follow a logical process ever. Planning Hell v4.

    Call me whatever you want. I’m just calling it like it’s been for the last dozen or so years I’ve worked around him.

    And I’m not shy to say that I think it would be nice to think he might consider attending to the existing systems in Seattle that need attention.

    Particularly it would be good to think he could integrate his pet issues into a context that communicates a “hierarchy of needs” and a clear definition of the basic responsibilities of government which I sense he loses sight of on a regular basis.

    Mike and from what I can see most of his people are very much oriented toward a few issues that don’t add up to comprehensive solutions or strategies.

    I’ll certainly avoid the P word. I didn’t realize it was such an offensive term.

    I’d appreciate it if dismissing the truth about his history and marginalizing me for saying it could be avoided.

    I didn’t just wake up after the election and make a clean slate for this guy. Why would I?

    If you’re going to attack the messenger here, why don’t you try disproving what I’m saying instead of skewering me. I’ve always called it like it is and I don’t lie. If that’s unpalatable, by all means rely on smoke and mirrors and “grassroots” which in this case may mean you’re either promised a job or have no idea who this guy is.

  • Kate Martin

    During the campaign Mike pulled out his Pinnochio card and resorted to lies. That’s a deal breaker for me and certainly something I’ve seen him do before.

    In addition to that problem, his arrogant, dismissive, ineffective and polarizing habits block progress. His need to create viral campaigns for his cause du jour usurps the opportunities for perspective and progress.

    And if you have no mission, vision, or goals well then you’re not accountable to any review process that would see how you did compared to what you said you’d do. That was his MO in Greenwood. During the time he was a community disorganizer in Greenwood, he refused to do any of the above. The Mike and Miker issue doesn’t surprise me because drinking beers with his cronies is his idea of committee work. I find his claims to open gov’t and transparency hard to believe since we couldn’t ever get him to do that in Greenwood. No plans, no notes, no committees, no problem.

    His biggest interest was election time forums where he blew his hot air around for the issues he was related to either pro or con…Roads & Transit, Prop 1, BTG, etc. Hardly anything the LWV would approve of in terms of forum or debate process & protocol. He never disclosed his connection to those issues and felt perfectly at ease “moderating” the forum.

    He’s the most power hungry politically motivated person I have ever met. I’m sure he’s working on his re-election campaign already. That ought to assure he basically gets nothing done.

    I’ve never found him able to lift his head above the issues high enough to gain a perspective and I’ve never seen him follow a logical process ever. Planning Hell v4.

    Call me whatever you want. I’m just calling it like it’s been for the last dozen or so years I’ve worked around him.

    And I’m not shy to say that I think it would be nice to think he might consider attending to the existing systems in Seattle that need attention.

    Particularly it would be good to think he could integrate his pet issues into a context that communicates a “hierarchy of needs” and a clear definition of the basic responsibilities of government which I sense he loses sight of on a regular basis.

    Mike and from what I can see most of his people are very much oriented toward a few issues that don’t add up to comprehensive solutions or strategies.

    I’ll certainly avoid the P word. I didn’t realize it was such an offensive term.

    I’d appreciate it if dismissing the truth about his history and marginalizing me for saying it could be avoided.

    I didn’t just wake up after the election and make a clean slate for this guy. Why would I?

    If you’re going to attack the messenger here, why don’t you try disproving what I’m saying instead of skewering me. I’ve always called it like it is and I don’t lie. If that’s unpalatable, by all means rely on smoke and mirrors and “grassroots” which in this case may mean you’re either promised a job or have no idea who this guy is.

  • Kate Martin

    During the campaign Mike pulled out his Pinnochio card and resorted to lies. That’s a deal breaker for me and certainly something I’ve seen him do before.

    In addition to that problem, his arrogant, dismissive, ineffective and polarizing habits block progress. His need to create viral campaigns for his cause du jour usurps the opportunities for perspective and progress.

    And if you have no mission, vision, or goals well then you’re not accountable to any review process that would see how you did compared to what you said you’d do. That was his MO in Greenwood. During the time he was a community disorganizer in Greenwood, he refused to do any of the above. The Mike and Miker issue doesn’t surprise me because drinking beers with his cronies is his idea of committee work. I find his claims to open gov’t and transparency hard to believe since we couldn’t ever get him to do that in Greenwood. No plans, no notes, no committees, no problem.

    His biggest interest was election time forums where he blew his hot air around for the issues he was related to either pro or con…Roads & Transit, Prop 1, BTG, etc. Hardly anything the LWV would approve of in terms of forum or debate process & protocol. He never disclosed his connection to those issues and felt perfectly at ease “moderating” the forum.

    He’s the most power hungry politically motivated person I have ever met. I’m sure he’s working on his re-election campaign already. That ought to assure he basically gets nothing done.

    I’ve never found him able to lift his head above the issues high enough to gain a perspective and I’ve never seen him follow a logical process ever. Planning Hell v4.

    Call me whatever you want. I’m just calling it like it’s been for the last dozen or so years I’ve worked around him.

    And I’m not shy to say that I think it would be nice to think he might consider attending to the existing systems in Seattle that need attention.

    Particularly it would be good to think he could integrate his pet issues into a context that communicates a “hierarchy of needs” and a clear definition of the basic responsibilities of government which I sense he loses sight of on a regular basis.

    Mike and from what I can see most of his people are very much oriented toward a few issues that don’t add up to comprehensive solutions or strategies.

    I’ll certainly avoid the P word. I didn’t realize it was such an offensive term.

    I’d appreciate it if dismissing the truth about his history and marginalizing me for saying it could be avoided.

    I didn’t just wake up after the election and make a clean slate for this guy. Why would I?

    If you’re going to attack the messenger here, why don’t you try disproving what I’m saying instead of skewering me. I’ve always called it like it is and I don’t lie. If that’s unpalatable, by all means rely on smoke and mirrors and “grassroots” which in this case may mean you’re either promised a job or have no idea who this guy is.

  • Kate Martin

    During the campaign Mike pulled out his Pinnochio card and resorted to lies. That’s a deal breaker for me and certainly something I’ve seen him do before.

    In addition to that problem, his arrogant, dismissive, ineffective and polarizing habits block progress. His need to create viral campaigns for his cause du jour usurps the opportunities for perspective and progress.

    And if you have no mission, vision, or goals well then you’re not accountable to any review process that would see how you did compared to what you said you’d do. That was his MO in Greenwood. During the time he was a community disorganizer in Greenwood, he refused to do any of the above. The Mike and Miker issue doesn’t surprise me because drinking beers with his cronies is his idea of committee work. I find his claims to open gov’t and transparency hard to believe since we couldn’t ever get him to do that in Greenwood. No plans, no notes, no committees, no problem.

    His biggest interest was election time forums where he blew his hot air around for the issues he was related to either pro or con…Roads & Transit, Prop 1, BTG, etc. Hardly anything the LWV would approve of in terms of forum or debate process & protocol. He never disclosed his connection to those issues and felt perfectly at ease “moderating” the forum.

    He’s the most power hungry politically motivated person I have ever met. I’m sure he’s working on his re-election campaign already. That ought to assure he basically gets nothing done.

    I’ve never found him able to lift his head above the issues high enough to gain a perspective and I’ve never seen him follow a logical process ever. Planning Hell v4.

    Call me whatever you want. I’m just calling it like it’s been for the last dozen or so years I’ve worked around him.

    And I’m not shy to say that I think it would be nice to think he might consider attending to the existing systems in Seattle that need attention.

    Particularly it would be good to think he could integrate his pet issues into a context that communicates a “hierarchy of needs” and a clear definition of the basic responsibilities of government which I sense he loses sight of on a regular basis.

    Mike and from what I can see most of his people are very much oriented toward a few issues that don’t add up to comprehensive solutions or strategies.

    I’ll certainly avoid the P word. I didn’t realize it was such an offensive term.

    I’d appreciate it if dismissing the truth about his history and marginalizing me for saying it could be avoided.

    I didn’t just wake up after the election and make a clean slate for this guy. Why would I?

    If you’re going to attack the messenger here, why don’t you try disproving what I’m saying instead of skewering me. I’ve always called it like it is and I don’t lie. If that’s unpalatable, by all means rely on smoke and mirrors and “grassroots” which in this case may mean you’re either promised a job or have no idea who this guy is.

  • Kate Martin

    During the campaign Mike pulled out his Pinnochio card and resorted to lies. That’s a deal breaker for me and certainly something I’ve seen him do before.

    In addition to that problem, his arrogant, dismissive, ineffective and polarizing habits block progress. His need to create viral campaigns for his cause du jour usurps the opportunities for perspective and progress.

    And if you have no mission, vision, or goals well then you’re not accountable to any review process that would see how you did compared to what you said you’d do. That was his MO in Greenwood. During the time he was a community disorganizer in Greenwood, he refused to do any of the above. The Mike and Miker issue doesn’t surprise me because drinking beers with his cronies is his idea of committee work. I find his claims to open gov’t and transparency hard to believe since we couldn’t ever get him to do that in Greenwood. No plans, no notes, no committees, no problem.

    His biggest interest was election time forums where he blew his hot air around for the issues he was related to either pro or con…Roads & Transit, Prop 1, BTG, etc. Hardly anything the LWV would approve of in terms of forum or debate process & protocol. He never disclosed his connection to those issues and felt perfectly at ease “moderating” the forum.

    He’s the most power hungry politically motivated person I have ever met. I’m sure he’s working on his re-election campaign already. That ought to assure he basically gets nothing done.

    I’ve never found him able to lift his head above the issues high enough to gain a perspective and I’ve never seen him follow a logical process ever. Planning Hell v4.

    Call me whatever you want. I’m just calling it like it’s been for the last dozen or so years I’ve worked around him.

    And I’m not shy to say that I think it would be nice to think he might consider attending to the existing systems in Seattle that need attention.

    Particularly it would be good to think he could integrate his pet issues into a context that communicates a “hierarchy of needs” and a clear definition of the basic responsibilities of government which I sense he loses sight of on a regular basis.

    Mike and from what I can see most of his people are very much oriented toward a few issues that don’t add up to comprehensive solutions or strategies.

    I’ll certainly avoid the P word. I didn’t realize it was such an offensive term.

    I’d appreciate it if dismissing the truth about his history and marginalizing me for saying it could be avoided.

    I didn’t just wake up after the election and make a clean slate for this guy. Why would I?

    If you’re going to attack the messenger here, why don’t you try disproving what I’m saying instead of skewering me. I’ve always called it like it is and I don’t lie. If that’s unpalatable, by all means rely on smoke and mirrors and “grassroots” which in this case may mean you’re either promised a job or have no idea who this guy is.

  • Kate Martin

    During the campaign Mike pulled out his Pinnochio card and resorted to lies. That’s a deal breaker for me and certainly something I’ve seen him do before.

    In addition to that problem, his arrogant, dismissive, ineffective and polarizing habits block progress. His need to create viral campaigns for his cause du jour usurps the opportunities for perspective and progress.

    And if you have no mission, vision, or goals well then you’re not accountable to any review process that would see how you did compared to what you said you’d do. That was his MO in Greenwood. During the time he was a community disorganizer in Greenwood, he refused to do any of the above. The Mike and Miker issue doesn’t surprise me because drinking beers with his cronies is his idea of committee work. I find his claims to open gov’t and transparency hard to believe since we couldn’t ever get him to do that in Greenwood. No plans, no notes, no committees, no problem.

    His biggest interest was election time forums where he blew his hot air around for the issues he was related to either pro or con…Roads & Transit, Prop 1, BTG, etc. Hardly anything the LWV would approve of in terms of forum or debate process & protocol. He never disclosed his connection to those issues and felt perfectly at ease “moderating” the forum.

    He’s the most power hungry politically motivated person I have ever met. I’m sure he’s working on his re-election campaign already. That ought to assure he basically gets nothing done.

    I’ve never found him able to lift his head above the issues high enough to gain a perspective and I’ve never seen him follow a logical process ever. Planning Hell v4.

    Call me whatever you want. I’m just calling it like it’s been for the last dozen or so years I’ve worked around him.

    And I’m not shy to say that I think it would be nice to think he might consider attending to the existing systems in Seattle that need attention.

    Particularly it would be good to think he could integrate his pet issues into a context that communicates a “hierarchy of needs” and a clear definition of the basic responsibilities of government which I sense he loses sight of on a regular basis.

    Mike and from what I can see most of his people are very much oriented toward a few issues that don’t add up to comprehensive solutions or strategies.

    I’ll certainly avoid the P word. I didn’t realize it was such an offensive term.

    I’d appreciate it if dismissing the truth about his history and marginalizing me for saying it could be avoided.

    I didn’t just wake up after the election and make a clean slate for this guy. Why would I?

    If you’re going to attack the messenger here, why don’t you try disproving what I’m saying instead of skewering me. I’ve always called it like it is and I don’t lie. If that’s unpalatable, by all means rely on smoke and mirrors and “grassroots” which in this case may mean you’re either promised a job or have no idea who this guy is.

  • Kate Martin

    During the campaign Mike pulled out his Pinnochio card and resorted to lies. That’s a deal breaker for me and certainly something I’ve seen him do before.

    In addition to that problem, his arrogant, dismissive, ineffective and polarizing habits block progress. His need to create viral campaigns for his cause du jour usurps the opportunities for perspective and progress.

    And if you have no mission, vision, or goals well then you’re not accountable to any review process that would see how you did compared to what you said you’d do. That was his MO in Greenwood. During the time he was a community disorganizer in Greenwood, he refused to do any of the above. The Mike and Miker issue doesn’t surprise me because drinking beers with his cronies is his idea of committee work. I find his claims to open gov’t and transparency hard to believe since we couldn’t ever get him to do that in Greenwood. No plans, no notes, no committees, no problem.

    His biggest interest was election time forums where he blew his hot air around for the issues he was related to either pro or con…Roads & Transit, Prop 1, BTG, etc. Hardly anything the LWV would approve of in terms of forum or debate process & protocol. He never disclosed his connection to those issues and felt perfectly at ease “moderating” the forum.

    He’s the most power hungry politically motivated person I have ever met. I’m sure he’s working on his re-election campaign already. That ought to assure he basically gets nothing done.

    I’ve never found him able to lift his head above the issues high enough to gain a perspective and I’ve never seen him follow a logical process ever. Planning Hell v4.

    Call me whatever you want. I’m just calling it like it’s been for the last dozen or so years I’ve worked around him.

    And I’m not shy to say that I think it would be nice to think he might consider attending to the existing systems in Seattle that need attention.

    Particularly it would be good to think he could integrate his pet issues into a context that communicates a “hierarchy of needs” and a clear definition of the basic responsibilities of government which I sense he loses sight of on a regular basis.

    Mike and from what I can see most of his people are very much oriented toward a few issues that don’t add up to comprehensive solutions or strategies.

    I’ll certainly avoid the P word. I didn’t realize it was such an offensive term.

    I’d appreciate it if dismissing the truth about his history and marginalizing me for saying it could be avoided.

    I didn’t just wake up after the election and make a clean slate for this guy. Why would I?

    If you’re going to attack the messenger here, why don’t you try disproving what I’m saying instead of skewering me. I’ve always called it like it is and I don’t lie. If that’s unpalatable, by all means rely on smoke and mirrors and “grassroots” which in this case may mean you’re either promised a job or have no idea who this guy is.

  • Kate Martin

    During the campaign Mike pulled out his Pinnochio card and resorted to lies. That’s a deal breaker for me and certainly something I’ve seen him do before.

    In addition to that problem, his arrogant, dismissive, ineffective and polarizing habits block progress. His need to create viral campaigns for his cause du jour usurps the opportunities for perspective and progress.

    And if you have no mission, vision, or goals well then you’re not accountable to any review process that would see how you did compared to what you said you’d do. That was his MO in Greenwood. During the time he was a community disorganizer in Greenwood, he refused to do any of the above. The Mike and Miker issue doesn’t surprise me because drinking beers with his cronies is his idea of committee work. I find his claims to open gov’t and transparency hard to believe since we couldn’t ever get him to do that in Greenwood. No plans, no notes, no committees, no problem.

    His biggest interest was election time forums where he blew his hot air around for the issues he was related to either pro or con…Roads & Transit, Prop 1, BTG, etc. Hardly anything the LWV would approve of in terms of forum or debate process & protocol. He never disclosed his connection to those issues and felt perfectly at ease “moderating” the forum.

    He’s the most power hungry politically motivated person I have ever met. I’m sure he’s working on his re-election campaign already. That ought to assure he basically gets nothing done.

    I’ve never found him able to lift his head above the issues high enough to gain a perspective and I’ve never seen him follow a logical process ever. Planning Hell v4.

    Call me whatever you want. I’m just calling it like it’s been for the last dozen or so years I’ve worked around him.

    And I’m not shy to say that I think it would be nice to think he might consider attending to the existing systems in Seattle that need attention.

    Particularly it would be good to think he could integrate his pet issues into a context that communicates a “hierarchy of needs” and a clear definition of the basic responsibilities of government which I sense he loses sight of on a regular basis.

    Mike and from what I can see most of his people are very much oriented toward a few issues that don’t add up to comprehensive solutions or strategies.

    I’ll certainly avoid the P word. I didn’t realize it was such an offensive term.

    I’d appreciate it if dismissing the truth about his history and marginalizing me for saying it could be avoided.

    I didn’t just wake up after the election and make a clean slate for this guy. Why would I?

    If you’re going to attack the messenger here, why don’t you try disproving what I’m saying instead of skewering me. I’ve always called it like it is and I don’t lie. If that’s unpalatable, by all means rely on smoke and mirrors and “grassroots” which in this case may mean you’re either promised a job or have no idea who this guy is.

  • Kate Martin

    During the campaign Mike pulled out his Pinnochio card and resorted to lies. That’s a deal breaker for me and certainly something I’ve seen him do before.

    In addition to that problem, his arrogant, dismissive, ineffective and polarizing habits block progress. His need to create viral campaigns for his cause du jour usurps the opportunities for perspective and progress.

    And if you have no mission, vision, or goals well then you’re not accountable to any review process that would see how you did compared to what you said you’d do. That was his MO in Greenwood. During the time he was a community disorganizer in Greenwood, he refused to do any of the above. The Mike and Miker issue doesn’t surprise me because drinking beers with his cronies is his idea of committee work. I find his claims to open gov’t and transparency hard to believe since we couldn’t ever get him to do that in Greenwood. No plans, no notes, no committees, no problem.

    His biggest interest was election time forums where he blew his hot air around for the issues he was related to either pro or con…Roads & Transit, Prop 1, BTG, etc. Hardly anything the LWV would approve of in terms of forum or debate process & protocol. He never disclosed his connection to those issues and felt perfectly at ease “moderating” the forum.

    He’s the most power hungry politically motivated person I have ever met. I’m sure he’s working on his re-election campaign already. That ought to assure he basically gets nothing done.

    I’ve never found him able to lift his head above the issues high enough to gain a perspective and I’ve never seen him follow a logical process ever. Planning Hell v4.

    Call me whatever you want. I’m just calling it like it’s been for the last dozen or so years I’ve worked around him.

    And I’m not shy to say that I think it would be nice to think he might consider attending to the existing systems in Seattle that need attention.

    Particularly it would be good to think he could integrate his pet issues into a context that communicates a “hierarchy of needs” and a clear definition of the basic responsibilities of government which I sense he loses sight of on a regular basis.

    Mike and from what I can see most of his people are very much oriented toward a few issues that don’t add up to comprehensive solutions or strategies.

    I’ll certainly avoid the P word. I didn’t realize it was such an offensive term.

    I’d appreciate it if dismissing the truth about his history and marginalizing me for saying it could be avoided.

    I didn’t just wake up after the election and make a clean slate for this guy. Why would I?

    If you’re going to attack the messenger here, why don’t you try disproving what I’m saying instead of skewering me. I’ve always called it like it is and I don’t lie. If that’s unpalatable, by all means rely on smoke and mirrors and “grassroots” which in this case may mean you’re either promised a job or have no idea who this guy is.

  • Kate Martin

    During the campaign Mike pulled out his Pinnochio card and resorted to lies. That’s a deal breaker for me and certainly something I’ve seen him do before.

    In addition to that problem, his arrogant, dismissive, ineffective and polarizing habits block progress. His need to create viral campaigns for his cause du jour usurps the opportunities for perspective and progress.

    And if you have no mission, vision, or goals well then you’re not accountable to any review process that would see how you did compared to what you said you’d do. That was his MO in Greenwood. During the time he was a community disorganizer in Greenwood, he refused to do any of the above. The Mike and Miker issue doesn’t surprise me because drinking beers with his cronies is his idea of committee work. I find his claims to open gov’t and transparency hard to believe since we couldn’t ever get him to do that in Greenwood. No plans, no notes, no committees, no problem.

    His biggest interest was election time forums where he blew his hot air around for the issues he was related to either pro or con…Roads & Transit, Prop 1, BTG, etc. Hardly anything the LWV would approve of in terms of forum or debate process & protocol. He never disclosed his connection to those issues and felt perfectly at ease “moderating” the forum.

    He’s the most power hungry politically motivated person I have ever met. I’m sure he’s working on his re-election campaign already. That ought to assure he basically gets nothing done.

    I’ve never found him able to lift his head above the issues high enough to gain a perspective and I’ve never seen him follow a logical process ever. Planning Hell v4.

    Call me whatever you want. I’m just calling it like it’s been for the last dozen or so years I’ve worked around him.

    And I’m not shy to say that I think it would be nice to think he might consider attending to the existing systems in Seattle that need attention.

    Particularly it would be good to think he could integrate his pet issues into a context that communicates a “hierarchy of needs” and a clear definition of the basic responsibilities of government which I sense he loses sight of on a regular basis.

    Mike and from what I can see most of his people are very much oriented toward a few issues that don’t add up to comprehensive solutions or strategies.

    I’ll certainly avoid the P word. I didn’t realize it was such an offensive term.

    I’d appreciate it if dismissing the truth about his history and marginalizing me for saying it could be avoided.

    I didn’t just wake up after the election and make a clean slate for this guy. Why would I?

    If you’re going to attack the messenger here, why don’t you try disproving what I’m saying instead of skewering me. I’ve always called it like it is and I don’t lie. If that’s unpalatable, by all means rely on smoke and mirrors and “grassroots” which in this case may mean you’re either promised a job or have no idea who this guy is.

  • Kate Martin

    During the campaign Mike pulled out his Pinnochio card and resorted to lies. That’s a deal breaker for me and certainly something I’ve seen him do before.

    In addition to that problem, his arrogant, dismissive, ineffective and polarizing habits block progress. His need to create viral campaigns for his cause du jour usurps the opportunities for perspective and progress.

    And if you have no mission, vision, or goals well then you’re not accountable to any review process that would see how you did compared to what you said you’d do. That was his MO in Greenwood. During the time he was a community disorganizer in Greenwood, he refused to do any of the above. The Mike and Miker issue doesn’t surprise me because drinking beers with his cronies is his idea of committee work. I find his claims to open gov’t and transparency hard to believe since we couldn’t ever get him to do that in Greenwood. No plans, no notes, no committees, no problem.

    His biggest interest was election time forums where he blew his hot air around for the issues he was related to either pro or con…Roads & Transit, Prop 1, BTG, etc. Hardly anything the LWV would approve of in terms of forum or debate process & protocol. He never disclosed his connection to those issues and felt perfectly at ease “moderating” the forum.

    He’s the most power hungry politically motivated person I have ever met. I’m sure he’s working on his re-election campaign already. That ought to assure he basically gets nothing done.

    I’ve never found him able to lift his head above the issues high enough to gain a perspective and I’ve never seen him follow a logical process ever. Planning Hell v4.

    Call me whatever you want. I’m just calling it like it’s been for the last dozen or so years I’ve worked around him.

    And I’m not shy to say that I think it would be nice to think he might consider attending to the existing systems in Seattle that need attention.

    Particularly it would be good to think he could integrate his pet issues into a context that communicates a “hierarchy of needs” and a clear definition of the basic responsibilities of government which I sense he loses sight of on a regular basis.

    Mike and from what I can see most of his people are very much oriented toward a few issues that don’t add up to comprehensive solutions or strategies.

    I’ll certainly avoid the P word. I didn’t realize it was such an offensive term.

    I’d appreciate it if dismissing the truth about his history and marginalizing me for saying it could be avoided.

    I didn’t just wake up after the election and make a clean slate for this guy. Why would I?

    If you’re going to attack the messenger here, why don’t you try disproving what I’m saying instead of skewering me. I’ve always called it like it is and I don’t lie. If that’s unpalatable, by all means rely on smoke and mirrors and “grassroots” which in this case may mean you’re either promised a job or have no idea who this guy is.

  • Kate Martin

    During the campaign Mike pulled out his Pinnochio card and resorted to lies. That’s a deal breaker for me and certainly something I’ve seen him do before.

    In addition to that problem, his arrogant, dismissive, ineffective and polarizing habits block progress. His need to create viral campaigns for his cause du jour usurps the opportunities for perspective and progress.

    And if you have no mission, vision, or goals well then you’re not accountable to any review process that would see how you did compared to what you said you’d do. That was his MO in Greenwood. During the time he was a community disorganizer in Greenwood, he refused to do any of the above. The Mike and Miker issue doesn’t surprise me because drinking beers with his cronies is his idea of committee work. I find his claims to open gov’t and transparency hard to believe since we couldn’t ever get him to do that in Greenwood. No plans, no notes, no committees, no problem.

    His biggest interest was election time forums where he blew his hot air around for the issues he was related to either pro or con…Roads & Transit, Prop 1, BTG, etc. Hardly anything the LWV would approve of in terms of forum or debate process & protocol. He never disclosed his connection to those issues and felt perfectly at ease “moderating” the forum.

    He’s the most power hungry politically motivated person I have ever met. I’m sure he’s working on his re-election campaign already. That ought to assure he basically gets nothing done.

    I’ve never found him able to lift his head above the issues high enough to gain a perspective and I’ve never seen him follow a logical process ever. Planning Hell v4.

    Call me whatever you want. I’m just calling it like it’s been for the last dozen or so years I’ve worked around him.

    And I’m not shy to say that I think it would be nice to think he might consider attending to the existing systems in Seattle that need attention.

    Particularly it would be good to think he could integrate his pet issues into a context that communicates a “hierarchy of needs” and a clear definition of the basic responsibilities of government which I sense he loses sight of on a regular basis.

    Mike and from what I can see most of his people are very much oriented toward a few issues that don’t add up to comprehensive solutions or strategies.

    I’ll certainly avoid the P word. I didn’t realize it was such an offensive term.

    I’d appreciate it if dismissing the truth about his history and marginalizing me for saying it could be avoided.

    I didn’t just wake up after the election and make a clean slate for this guy. Why would I?

    If you’re going to attack the messenger here, why don’t you try disproving what I’m saying instead of skewering me. I’ve always called it like it is and I don’t lie. If that’s unpalatable, by all means rely on smoke and mirrors and “grassroots” which in this case may mean you’re either promised a job or have no idea who this guy is.

  • Kate Martin

    During the campaign Mike pulled out his Pinnochio card and resorted to lies. That’s a deal breaker for me and certainly something I’ve seen him do before.

    In addition to that problem, his arrogant, dismissive, ineffective and polarizing habits block progress. His need to create viral campaigns for his cause du jour usurps the opportunities for perspective and progress.

    And if you have no mission, vision, or goals well then you’re not accountable to any review process that would see how you did compared to what you said you’d do. That was his MO in Greenwood. During the time he was a community disorganizer in Greenwood, he refused to do any of the above. The Mike and Miker issue doesn’t surprise me because drinking beers with his cronies is his idea of committee work. I find his claims to open gov’t and transparency hard to believe since we couldn’t ever get him to do that in Greenwood. No plans, no notes, no committees, no problem.

    His biggest interest was election time forums where he blew his hot air around for the issues he was related to either pro or con…Roads & Transit, Prop 1, BTG, etc. Hardly anything the LWV would approve of in terms of forum or debate process & protocol. He never disclosed his connection to those issues and felt perfectly at ease “moderating” the forum.

    He’s the most power hungry politically motivated person I have ever met. I’m sure he’s working on his re-election campaign already. That ought to assure he basically gets nothing done.

    I’ve never found him able to lift his head above the issues high enough to gain a perspective and I’ve never seen him follow a logical process ever. Planning Hell v4.

    Call me whatever you want. I’m just calling it like it’s been for the last dozen or so years I’ve worked around him.

    And I’m not shy to say that I think it would be nice to think he might consider attending to the existing systems in Seattle that need attention.

    Particularly it would be good to think he could integrate his pet issues into a context that communicates a “hierarchy of needs” and a clear definition of the basic responsibilities of government which I sense he loses sight of on a regular basis.

    Mike and from what I can see most of his people are very much oriented toward a few issues that don’t add up to comprehensive solutions or strategies.

    I’ll certainly avoid the P word. I didn’t realize it was such an offensive term.

    I’d appreciate it if dismissing the truth about his history and marginalizing me for saying it could be avoided.

    I didn’t just wake up after the election and make a clean slate for this guy. Why would I?

    If you’re going to attack the messenger here, why don’t you try disproving what I’m saying instead of skewering me. I’ve always called it like it is and I don’t lie. If that’s unpalatable, by all means rely on smoke and mirrors and “grassroots” which in this case may mean you’re either promised a job or have no idea who this guy is.

  • Kate Martin

    During the campaign Mike pulled out his Pinnochio card and resorted to lies. That’s a deal breaker for me and certainly something I’ve seen him do before.

    In addition to that problem, his arrogant, dismissive, ineffective and polarizing habits block progress. His need to create viral campaigns for his cause du jour usurps the opportunities for perspective and progress.

    And if you have no mission, vision, or goals well then you’re not accountable to any review process that would see how you did compared to what you said you’d do. That was his MO in Greenwood. During the time he was a community disorganizer in Greenwood, he refused to do any of the above. The Mike and Miker issue doesn’t surprise me because drinking beers with his cronies is his idea of committee work. I find his claims to open gov’t and transparency hard to believe since we couldn’t ever get him to do that in Greenwood. No plans, no notes, no committees, no problem.

    His biggest interest was election time forums where he blew his hot air around for the issues he was related to either pro or con…Roads & Transit, Prop 1, BTG, etc. Hardly anything the LWV would approve of in terms of forum or debate process & protocol. He never disclosed his connection to those issues and felt perfectly at ease “moderating” the forum.

    He’s the most power hungry politically motivated person I have ever met. I’m sure he’s working on his re-election campaign already. That ought to assure he basically gets nothing done.

    I’ve never found him able to lift his head above the issues high enough to gain a perspective and I’ve never seen him follow a logical process ever. Planning Hell v4.

    Call me whatever you want. I’m just calling it like it’s been for the last dozen or so years I’ve worked around him.

    And I’m not shy to say that I think it would be nice to think he might consider attending to the existing systems in Seattle that need attention.

    Particularly it would be good to think he could integrate his pet issues into a context that communicates a “hierarchy of needs” and a clear definition of the basic responsibilities of government which I sense he loses sight of on a regular basis.

    Mike and from what I can see most of his people are very much oriented toward a few issues that don’t add up to comprehensive solutions or strategies.

    I’ll certainly avoid the P word. I didn’t realize it was such an offensive term.

    I’d appreciate it if dismissing the truth about his history and marginalizing me for saying it could be avoided.

    I didn’t just wake up after the election and make a clean slate for this guy. Why would I?

    If you’re going to attack the messenger here, why don’t you try disproving what I’m saying instead of skewering me. I’ve always called it like it is and I don’t lie. If that’s unpalatable, by all means rely on smoke and mirrors and “grassroots” which in this case may mean you’re either promised a job or have no idea who this guy is.

  • Kate Martin

    During the campaign Mike pulled out his Pinnochio card and resorted to lies. That’s a deal breaker for me and certainly something I’ve seen him do before.

    In addition to that problem, his arrogant, dismissive, ineffective and polarizing habits block progress. His need to create viral campaigns for his cause du jour usurps the opportunities for perspective and progress.

    And if you have no mission, vision, or goals well then you’re not accountable to any review process that would see how you did compared to what you said you’d do. That was his MO in Greenwood. During the time he was a community disorganizer in Greenwood, he refused to do any of the above. The Mike and Miker issue doesn’t surprise me because drinking beers with his cronies is his idea of committee work. I find his claims to open gov’t and transparency hard to believe since we couldn’t ever get him to do that in Greenwood. No plans, no notes, no committees, no problem.

    His biggest interest was election time forums where he blew his hot air around for the issues he was related to either pro or con…Roads & Transit, Prop 1, BTG, etc. Hardly anything the LWV would approve of in terms of forum or debate process & protocol. He never disclosed his connection to those issues and felt perfectly at ease “moderating” the forum.

    He’s the most power hungry politically motivated person I have ever met. I’m sure he’s working on his re-election campaign already. That ought to assure he basically gets nothing done.

    I’ve never found him able to lift his head above the issues high enough to gain a perspective and I’ve never seen him follow a logical process ever. Planning Hell v4.

    Call me whatever you want. I’m just calling it like it’s been for the last dozen or so years I’ve worked around him.

    And I’m not shy to say that I think it would be nice to think he might consider attending to the existing systems in Seattle that need attention.

    Particularly it would be good to think he could integrate his pet issues into a context that communicates a “hierarchy of needs” and a clear definition of the basic responsibilities of government which I sense he loses sight of on a regular basis.

    Mike and from what I can see most of his people are very much oriented toward a few issues that don’t add up to comprehensive solutions or strategies.

    I’ll certainly avoid the P word. I didn’t realize it was such an offensive term.

    I’d appreciate it if dismissing the truth about his history and marginalizing me for saying it could be avoided.

    I didn’t just wake up after the election and make a clean slate for this guy. Why would I?

    If you’re going to attack the messenger here, why don’t you try disproving what I’m saying instead of skewering me. I’ve always called it like it is and I don’t lie. If that’s unpalatable, by all means rely on smoke and mirrors and “grassroots” which in this case may mean you’re either promised a job or have no idea who this guy is.

  • Kate Martin

    During the campaign Mike pulled out his Pinnochio card and resorted to lies. That’s a deal breaker for me and certainly something I’ve seen him do before.

    In addition to that problem, his arrogant, dismissive, ineffective and polarizing habits block progress. His need to create viral campaigns for his cause du jour usurps the opportunities for perspective and progress.

    And if you have no mission, vision, or goals well then you’re not accountable to any review process that would see how you did compared to what you said you’d do. That was his MO in Greenwood. During the time he was a community disorganizer in Greenwood, he refused to do any of the above. The Mike and Miker issue doesn’t surprise me because drinking beers with his cronies is his idea of committee work. I find his claims to open gov’t and transparency hard to believe since we couldn’t ever get him to do that in Greenwood. No plans, no notes, no committees, no problem.

    His biggest interest was election time forums where he blew his hot air around for the issues he was related to either pro or con…Roads & Transit, Prop 1, BTG, etc. Hardly anything the LWV would approve of in terms of forum or debate process & protocol. He never disclosed his connection to those issues and felt perfectly at ease “moderating” the forum.

    He’s the most power hungry politically motivated person I have ever met. I’m sure he’s working on his re-election campaign already. That ought to assure he basically gets nothing done.

    I’ve never found him able to lift his head above the issues high enough to gain a perspective and I’ve never seen him follow a logical process ever. Planning Hell v4.

    Call me whatever you want. I’m just calling it like it’s been for the last dozen or so years I’ve worked around him.

    And I’m not shy to say that I think it would be nice to think he might consider attending to the existing systems in Seattle that need attention.

    Particularly it would be good to think he could integrate his pet issues into a context that communicates a “hierarchy of needs” and a clear definition of the basic responsibilities of government which I sense he loses sight of on a regular basis.

    Mike and from what I can see most of his people are very much oriented toward a few issues that don’t add up to comprehensive solutions or strategies.

    I’ll certainly avoid the P word. I didn’t realize it was such an offensive term.

    I’d appreciate it if dismissing the truth about his history and marginalizing me for saying it could be avoided.

    I didn’t just wake up after the election and make a clean slate for this guy. Why would I?

    If you’re going to attack the messenger here, why don’t you try disproving what I’m saying instead of skewering me. I’ve always called it like it is and I don’t lie. If that’s unpalatable, by all means rely on smoke and mirrors and “grassroots” which in this case may mean you’re either promised a job or have no idea who this guy is.

  • Kate Martin

    During the campaign Mike pulled out his Pinnochio card and resorted to lies. That’s a deal breaker for me and certainly something I’ve seen him do before.

    In addition to that problem, his arrogant, dismissive, ineffective and polarizing habits block progress. His need to create viral campaigns for his cause du jour usurps the opportunities for perspective and progress.

    And if you have no mission, vision, or goals well then you’re not accountable to any review process that would see how you did compared to what you said you’d do. That was his MO in Greenwood. During the time he was a community disorganizer in Greenwood, he refused to do any of the above. The Mike and Miker issue doesn’t surprise me because drinking beers with his cronies is his idea of committee work. I find his claims to open gov’t and transparency hard to believe since we couldn’t ever get him to do that in Greenwood. No plans, no notes, no committees, no problem.

    His biggest interest was election time forums where he blew his hot air around for the issues he was related to either pro or con…Roads & Transit, Prop 1, BTG, etc. Hardly anything the LWV would approve of in terms of forum or debate process & protocol. He never disclosed his connection to those issues and felt perfectly at ease “moderating” the forum.

    He’s the most power hungry politically motivated person I have ever met. I’m sure he’s working on his re-election campaign already. That ought to assure he basically gets nothing done.

    I’ve never found him able to lift his head above the issues high enough to gain a perspective and I’ve never seen him follow a logical process ever. Planning Hell v4.

    Call me whatever you want. I’m just calling it like it’s been for the last dozen or so years I’ve worked around him.

    And I’m not shy to say that I think it would be nice to think he might consider attending to the existing systems in Seattle that need attention.

    Particularly it would be good to think he could integrate his pet issues into a context that communicates a “hierarchy of needs” and a clear definition of the basic responsibilities of government which I sense he loses sight of on a regular basis.

    Mike and from what I can see most of his people are very much oriented toward a few issues that don’t add up to comprehensive solutions or strategies.

    I’ll certainly avoid the P word. I didn’t realize it was such an offensive term.

    I’d appreciate it if dismissing the truth about his history and marginalizing me for saying it could be avoided.

    I didn’t just wake up after the election and make a clean slate for this guy. Why would I?

    If you’re going to attack the messenger here, why don’t you try disproving what I’m saying instead of skewering me. I’ve always called it like it is and I don’t lie. If that’s unpalatable, by all means rely on smoke and mirrors and “grassroots” which in this case may mean you’re either promised a job or have no idea who this guy is.

  • Kate Martin

    During the campaign Mike pulled out his Pinnochio card and resorted to lies. That’s a deal breaker for me and certainly something I’ve seen him do before.

    In addition to that problem, his arrogant, dismissive, ineffective and polarizing habits block progress. His need to create viral campaigns for his cause du jour usurps the opportunities for perspective and progress.

    And if you have no mission, vision, or goals well then you’re not accountable to any review process that would see how you did compared to what you said you’d do. That was his MO in Greenwood. During the time he was a community disorganizer in Greenwood, he refused to do any of the above. The Mike and Miker issue doesn’t surprise me because drinking beers with his cronies is his idea of committee work. I find his claims to open gov’t and transparency hard to believe since we couldn’t ever get him to do that in Greenwood. No plans, no notes, no committees, no problem.

    His biggest interest was election time forums where he blew his hot air around for the issues he was related to either pro or con…Roads & Transit, Prop 1, BTG, etc. Hardly anything the LWV would approve of in terms of forum or debate process & protocol. He never disclosed his connection to those issues and felt perfectly at ease “moderating” the forum.

    He’s the most power hungry politically motivated person I have ever met. I’m sure he’s working on his re-election campaign already. That ought to assure he basically gets nothing done.

    I’ve never found him able to lift his head above the issues high enough to gain a perspective and I’ve never seen him follow a logical process ever. Planning Hell v4.

    Call me whatever you want. I’m just calling it like it’s been for the last dozen or so years I’ve worked around him.

    And I’m not shy to say that I think it would be nice to think he might consider attending to the existing systems in Seattle that need attention.

    Particularly it would be good to think he could integrate his pet issues into a context that communicates a “hierarchy of needs” and a clear definition of the basic responsibilities of government which I sense he loses sight of on a regular basis.

    Mike and from what I can see most of his people are very much oriented toward a few issues that don’t add up to comprehensive solutions or strategies.

    I’ll certainly avoid the P word. I didn’t realize it was such an offensive term.

    I’d appreciate it if dismissing the truth about his history and marginalizing me for saying it could be avoided.

    I didn’t just wake up after the election and make a clean slate for this guy. Why would I?

    If you’re going to attack the messenger here, why don’t you try disproving what I’m saying instead of skewering me. I’ve always called it like it is and I don’t lie. If that’s unpalatable, by all means rely on smoke and mirrors and “grassroots” which in this case may mean you’re either promised a job or have no idea who this guy is.

  • Kate Martin

    During the campaign Mike pulled out his Pinnochio card and resorted to lies. That’s a deal breaker for me and certainly something I’ve seen him do before.

    In addition to that problem, his arrogant, dismissive, ineffective and polarizing habits block progress. His need to create viral campaigns for his cause du jour usurps the opportunities for perspective and progress.

    And if you have no mission, vision, or goals well then you’re not accountable to any review process that would see how you did compared to what you said you’d do. That was his MO in Greenwood. During the time he was a community disorganizer in Greenwood, he refused to do any of the above. The Mike and Miker issue doesn’t surprise me because drinking beers with his cronies is his idea of committee work. I find his claims to open gov’t and transparency hard to believe since we couldn’t ever get him to do that in Greenwood. No plans, no notes, no committees, no problem.

    His biggest interest was election time forums where he blew his hot air around for the issues he was related to either pro or con…Roads & Transit, Prop 1, BTG, etc. Hardly anything the LWV would approve of in terms of forum or debate process & protocol. He never disclosed his connection to those issues and felt perfectly at ease “moderating” the forum.

    He’s the most power hungry politically motivated person I have ever met. I’m sure he’s working on his re-election campaign already. That ought to assure he basically gets nothing done.

    I’ve never found him able to lift his head above the issues high enough to gain a perspective and I’ve never seen him follow a logical process ever. Planning Hell v4.

    Call me whatever you want. I’m just calling it like it’s been for the last dozen or so years I’ve worked around him.

    And I’m not shy to say that I think it would be nice to think he might consider attending to the existing systems in Seattle that need attention.

    Particularly it would be good to think he could integrate his pet issues into a context that communicates a “hierarchy of needs” and a clear definition of the basic responsibilities of government which I sense he loses sight of on a regular basis.

    Mike and from what I can see most of his people are very much oriented toward a few issues that don’t add up to comprehensive solutions or strategies.

    I’ll certainly avoid the P word. I didn’t realize it was such an offensive term.

    I’d appreciate it if dismissing the truth about his history and marginalizing me for saying it could be avoided.

    I didn’t just wake up after the election and make a clean slate for this guy. Why would I?

    If you’re going to attack the messenger here, why don’t you try disproving what I’m saying instead of skewering me. I’ve always called it like it is and I don’t lie. If that’s unpalatable, by all means rely on smoke and mirrors and “grassroots” which in this case may mean you’re either promised a job or have no idea who this guy is.

  • Kate Martin

    During the campaign Mike pulled out his Pinnochio card and resorted to lies. That’s a deal breaker for me and certainly something I’ve seen him do before.

    In addition to that problem, his arrogant, dismissive, ineffective and polarizing habits block progress. His need to create viral campaigns for his cause du jour usurps the opportunities for perspective and progress.

    And if you have no mission, vision, or goals well then you’re not accountable to any review process that would see how you did compared to what you said you’d do. That was his MO in Greenwood. During the time he was a community disorganizer in Greenwood, he refused to do any of the above. The Mike and Miker issue doesn’t surprise me because drinking beers with his cronies is his idea of committee work. I find his claims to open gov’t and transparency hard to believe since we couldn’t ever get him to do that in Greenwood. No plans, no notes, no committees, no problem.

    His biggest interest was election time forums where he blew his hot air around for the issues he was related to either pro or con…Roads & Transit, Prop 1, BTG, etc. Hardly anything the LWV would approve of in terms of forum or debate process & protocol. He never disclosed his connection to those issues and felt perfectly at ease “moderating” the forum.

    He’s the most power hungry politically motivated person I have ever met. I’m sure he’s working on his re-election campaign already. That ought to assure he basically gets nothing done.

    I’ve never found him able to lift his head above the issues high enough to gain a perspective and I’ve never seen him follow a logical process ever. Planning Hell v4.

    Call me whatever you want. I’m just calling it like it’s been for the last dozen or so years I’ve worked around him.

    And I’m not shy to say that I think it would be nice to think he might consider attending to the existing systems in Seattle that need attention.

    Particularly it would be good to think he could integrate his pet issues into a context that communicates a “hierarchy of needs” and a clear definition of the basic responsibilities of government which I sense he loses sight of on a regular basis.

    Mike and from what I can see most of his people are very much oriented toward a few issues that don’t add up to comprehensive solutions or strategies.

    I’ll certainly avoid the P word. I didn’t realize it was such an offensive term.

    I’d appreciate it if dismissing the truth about his history and marginalizing me for saying it could be avoided.

    I didn’t just wake up after the election and make a clean slate for this guy. Why would I?

    If you’re going to attack the messenger here, why don’t you try disproving what I’m saying instead of skewering me. I’ve always called it like it is and I don’t lie. If that’s unpalatable, by all means rely on smoke and mirrors and “grassroots” which in this case may mean you’re either promised a job or have no idea who this guy is.

  • Kate Martin

    During the campaign Mike pulled out his Pinnochio card and resorted to lies. That’s a deal breaker for me and certainly something I’ve seen him do before.

    In addition to that problem, his arrogant, dismissive, ineffective and polarizing habits block progress. His need to create viral campaigns for his cause du jour usurps the opportunities for perspective and progress.

    And if you have no mission, vision, or goals well then you’re not accountable to any review process that would see how you did compared to what you said you’d do. That was his MO in Greenwood. During the time he was a community disorganizer in Greenwood, he refused to do any of the above. The Mike and Miker issue doesn’t surprise me because drinking beers with his cronies is his idea of committee work. I find his claims to open gov’t and transparency hard to believe since we couldn’t ever get him to do that in Greenwood. No plans, no notes, no committees, no problem.

    His biggest interest was election time forums where he blew his hot air around for the issues he was related to either pro or con…Roads & Transit, Prop 1, BTG, etc. Hardly anything the LWV would approve of in terms of forum or debate process & protocol. He never disclosed his connection to those issues and felt perfectly at ease “moderating” the forum.

    He’s the most power hungry politically motivated person I have ever met. I’m sure he’s working on his re-election campaign already. That ought to assure he basically gets nothing done.

    I’ve never found him able to lift his head above the issues high enough to gain a perspective and I’ve never seen him follow a logical process ever. Planning Hell v4.

    Call me whatever you want. I’m just calling it like it’s been for the last dozen or so years I’ve worked around him.

    And I’m not shy to say that I think it would be nice to think he might consider attending to the existing systems in Seattle that need attention.

    Particularly it would be good to think he could integrate his pet issues into a context that communicates a “hierarchy of needs” and a clear definition of the basic responsibilities of government which I sense he loses sight of on a regular basis.

    Mike and from what I can see most of his people are very much oriented toward a few issues that don’t add up to comprehensive solutions or strategies.

    I’ll certainly avoid the P word. I didn’t realize it was such an offensive term.

    I’d appreciate it if dismissing the truth about his history and marginalizing me for saying it could be avoided.

    I didn’t just wake up after the election and make a clean slate for this guy. Why would I?

    If you’re going to attack the messenger here, why don’t you try disproving what I’m saying instead of skewering me. I’ve always called it like it is and I don’t lie. If that’s unpalatable, by all means rely on smoke and mirrors and “grassroots” which in this case may mean you’re either promised a job or have no idea who this guy is.

  • Kate Martin

    During the campaign Mike pulled out his Pinnochio card and resorted to lies. That’s a deal breaker for me and certainly something I’ve seen him do before.

    In addition to that problem, his arrogant, dismissive, ineffective and polarizing habits block progress. His need to create viral campaigns for his cause du jour usurps the opportunities for perspective and progress.

    And if you have no mission, vision, or goals well then you’re not accountable to any review process that would see how you did compared to what you said you’d do. That was his MO in Greenwood. During the time he was a community disorganizer in Greenwood, he refused to do any of the above. The Mike and Miker issue doesn’t surprise me because drinking beers with his cronies is his idea of committee work. I find his claims to open gov’t and transparency hard to believe since we couldn’t ever get him to do that in Greenwood. No plans, no notes, no committees, no problem.

    His biggest interest was election time forums where he blew his hot air around for the issues he was related to either pro or con…Roads & Transit, Prop 1, BTG, etc. Hardly anything the LWV would approve of in terms of forum or debate process & protocol. He never disclosed his connection to those issues and felt perfectly at ease “moderating” the forum.

    He’s the most power hungry politically motivated person I have ever met. I’m sure he’s working on his re-election campaign already. That ought to assure he basically gets nothing done.

    I’ve never found him able to lift his head above the issues high enough to gain a perspective and I’ve never seen him follow a logical process ever. Planning Hell v4.

    Call me whatever you want. I’m just calling it like it’s been for the last dozen or so years I’ve worked around him.

    And I’m not shy to say that I think it would be nice to think he might consider attending to the existing systems in Seattle that need attention.

    Particularly it would be good to think he could integrate his pet issues into a context that communicates a “hierarchy of needs” and a clear definition of the basic responsibilities of government which I sense he loses sight of on a regular basis.

    Mike and from what I can see most of his people are very much oriented toward a few issues that don’t add up to comprehensive solutions or strategies.

    I’ll certainly avoid the P word. I didn’t realize it was such an offensive term.

    I’d appreciate it if dismissing the truth about his history and marginalizing me for saying it could be avoided.

    I didn’t just wake up after the election and make a clean slate for this guy. Why would I?

    If you’re going to attack the messenger here, why don’t you try disproving what I’m saying instead of skewering me. I’ve always called it like it is and I don’t lie. If that’s unpalatable, by all means rely on smoke and mirrors and “grassroots” which in this case may mean you’re either promised a job or have no idea who this guy is.

  • Kate Martin

    During the campaign Mike pulled out his Pinnochio card and resorted to lies. That’s a deal breaker for me and certainly something I’ve seen him do before.

    In addition to that problem, his arrogant, dismissive, ineffective and polarizing habits block progress. His need to create viral campaigns for his cause du jour usurps the opportunities for perspective and progress.

    And if you have no mission, vision, or goals well then you’re not accountable to any review process that would see how you did compared to what you said you’d do. That was his MO in Greenwood. During the time he was a community disorganizer in Greenwood, he refused to do any of the above. The Mike and Miker issue doesn’t surprise me because drinking beers with his cronies is his idea of committee work. I find his claims to open gov’t and transparency hard to believe since we couldn’t ever get him to do that in Greenwood. No plans, no notes, no committees, no problem.

    His biggest interest was election time forums where he blew his hot air around for the issues he was related to either pro or con…Roads & Transit, Prop 1, BTG, etc. Hardly anything the LWV would approve of in terms of forum or debate process & protocol. He never disclosed his connection to those issues and felt perfectly at ease “moderating” the forum.

    He’s the most power hungry politically motivated person I have ever met. I’m sure he’s working on his re-election campaign already. That ought to assure he basically gets nothing done.

    I’ve never found him able to lift his head above the issues high enough to gain a perspective and I’ve never seen him follow a logical process ever. Planning Hell v4.

    Call me whatever you want. I’m just calling it like it’s been for the last dozen or so years I’ve worked around him.

    And I’m not shy to say that I think it would be nice to think he might consider attending to the existing systems in Seattle that need attention.

    Particularly it would be good to think he could integrate his pet issues into a context that communicates a “hierarchy of needs” and a clear definition of the basic responsibilities of government which I sense he loses sight of on a regular basis.

    Mike and from what I can see most of his people are very much oriented toward a few issues that don’t add up to comprehensive solutions or strategies.

    I’ll certainly avoid the P word. I didn’t realize it was such an offensive term.

    I’d appreciate it if dismissing the truth about his history and marginalizing me for saying it could be avoided.

    I didn’t just wake up after the election and make a clean slate for this guy. Why would I?

    If you’re going to attack the messenger here, why don’t you try disproving what I’m saying instead of skewering me. I’ve always called it like it is and I don’t lie. If that’s unpalatable, by all means rely on smoke and mirrors and “grassroots” which in this case may mean you’re either promised a job or have no idea who this guy is.

  • Kate Martin

    During the campaign Mike pulled out his Pinnochio card and resorted to lies. That’s a deal breaker for me and certainly something I’ve seen him do before.

    In addition to that problem, his arrogant, dismissive, ineffective and polarizing habits block progress. His need to create viral campaigns for his cause du jour usurps the opportunities for perspective and progress.

    And if you have no mission, vision, or goals well then you’re not accountable to any review process that would see how you did compared to what you said you’d do. That was his MO in Greenwood. During the time he was a community disorganizer in Greenwood, he refused to do any of the above. The Mike and Miker issue doesn’t surprise me because drinking beers with his cronies is his idea of committee work. I find his claims to open gov’t and transparency hard to believe since we couldn’t ever get him to do that in Greenwood. No plans, no notes, no committees, no problem.

    His biggest interest was election time forums where he blew his hot air around for the issues he was related to either pro or con…Roads & Transit, Prop 1, BTG, etc. Hardly anything the LWV would approve of in terms of forum or debate process & protocol. He never disclosed his connection to those issues and felt perfectly at ease “moderating” the forum.

    He’s the most power hungry politically motivated person I have ever met. I’m sure he’s working on his re-election campaign already. That ought to assure he basically gets nothing done.

    I’ve never found him able to lift his head above the issues high enough to gain a perspective and I’ve never seen him follow a logical process ever. Planning Hell v4.

    Call me whatever you want. I’m just calling it like it’s been for the last dozen or so years I’ve worked around him.

    And I’m not shy to say that I think it would be nice to think he might consider attending to the existing systems in Seattle that need attention.

    Particularly it would be good to think he could integrate his pet issues into a context that communicates a “hierarchy of needs” and a clear definition of the basic responsibilities of government which I sense he loses sight of on a regular basis.

    Mike and from what I can see most of his people are very much oriented toward a few issues that don’t add up to comprehensive solutions or strategies.

    I’ll certainly avoid the P word. I didn’t realize it was such an offensive term.

    I’d appreciate it if dismissing the truth about his history and marginalizing me for saying it could be avoided.

    I didn’t just wake up after the election and make a clean slate for this guy. Why would I?

    If you’re going to attack the messenger here, why don’t you try disproving what I’m saying instead of skewering me. I’ve always called it like it is and I don’t lie. If that’s unpalatable, by all means rely on smoke and mirrors and “grassroots” which in this case may mean you’re either promised a job or have no idea who this guy is.

  • Kate Martin

    During the campaign Mike pulled out his Pinnochio card and resorted to lies. That’s a deal breaker for me and certainly something I’ve seen him do before.

    In addition to that problem, his arrogant, dismissive, ineffective and polarizing habits block progress. His need to create viral campaigns for his cause du jour usurps the opportunities for perspective and progress.

    And if you have no mission, vision, or goals well then you’re not accountable to any review process that would see how you did compared to what you said you’d do. That was his MO in Greenwood. During the time he was a community disorganizer in Greenwood, he refused to do any of the above. The Mike and Miker issue doesn’t surprise me because drinking beers with his cronies is his idea of committee work. I find his claims to open gov’t and transparency hard to believe since we couldn’t ever get him to do that in Greenwood. No plans, no notes, no committees, no problem.

    His biggest interest was election time forums where he blew his hot air around for the issues he was related to either pro or con…Roads & Transit, Prop 1, BTG, etc. Hardly anything the LWV would approve of in terms of forum or debate process & protocol. He never disclosed his connection to those issues and felt perfectly at ease “moderating” the forum.

    He’s the most power hungry politically motivated person I have ever met. I’m sure he’s working on his re-election campaign already. That ought to assure he basically gets nothing done.

    I’ve never found him able to lift his head above the issues high enough to gain a perspective and I’ve never seen him follow a logical process ever. Planning Hell v4.

    Call me whatever you want. I’m just calling it like it’s been for the last dozen or so years I’ve worked around him.

    And I’m not shy to say that I think it would be nice to think he might consider attending to the existing systems in Seattle that need attention.

    Particularly it would be good to think he could integrate his pet issues into a context that communicates a “hierarchy of needs” and a clear definition of the basic responsibilities of government which I sense he loses sight of on a regular basis.

    Mike and from what I can see most of his people are very much oriented toward a few issues that don’t add up to comprehensive solutions or strategies.

    I’ll certainly avoid the P word. I didn’t realize it was such an offensive term.

    I’d appreciate it if dismissing the truth about his history and marginalizing me for saying it could be avoided.

    I didn’t just wake up after the election and make a clean slate for this guy. Why would I?

    If you’re going to attack the messenger here, why don’t you try disproving what I’m saying instead of skewering me. I’ve always called it like it is and I don’t lie. If that’s unpalatable, by all means rely on smoke and mirrors and “grassroots” which in this case may mean you’re either promised a job or have no idea who this guy is.

  • Kate Martin

    During the campaign Mike pulled out his Pinnochio card and resorted to lies. That’s a deal breaker for me and certainly something I’ve seen him do before.

    In addition to that problem, his arrogant, dismissive, ineffective and polarizing habits block progress. His need to create viral campaigns for his cause du jour usurps the opportunities for perspective and progress.

    And if you have no mission, vision, or goals well then you’re not accountable to any review process that would see how you did compared to what you said you’d do. That was his MO in Greenwood. During the time he was a community disorganizer in Greenwood, he refused to do any of the above. The Mike and Miker issue doesn’t surprise me because drinking beers with his cronies is his idea of committee work. I find his claims to open gov’t and transparency hard to believe since we couldn’t ever get him to do that in Greenwood. No plans, no notes, no committees, no problem.

    His biggest interest was election time forums where he blew his hot air around for the issues he was related to either pro or con…Roads & Transit, Prop 1, BTG, etc. Hardly anything the LWV would approve of in terms of forum or debate process & protocol. He never disclosed his connection to those issues and felt perfectly at ease “moderating” the forum.

    He’s the most power hungry politically motivated person I have ever met. I’m sure he’s working on his re-election campaign already. That ought to assure he basically gets nothing done.

    I’ve never found him able to lift his head above the issues high enough to gain a perspective and I’ve never seen him follow a logical process ever. Planning Hell v4.

    Call me whatever you want. I’m just calling it like it’s been for the last dozen or so years I’ve worked around him.

    And I’m not shy to say that I think it would be nice to think he might consider attending to the existing systems in Seattle that need attention.

    Particularly it would be good to think he could integrate his pet issues into a context that communicates a “hierarchy of needs” and a clear definition of the basic responsibilities of government which I sense he loses sight of on a regular basis.

    Mike and from what I can see most of his people are very much oriented toward a few issues that don’t add up to comprehensive solutions or strategies.

    I’ll certainly avoid the P word. I didn’t realize it was such an offensive term.

    I’d appreciate it if dismissing the truth about his history and marginalizing me for saying it could be avoided.

    I didn’t just wake up after the election and make a clean slate for this guy. Why would I?

    If you’re going to attack the messenger here, why don’t you try disproving what I’m saying instead of skewering me. I’ve always called it like it is and I don’t lie. If that’s unpalatable, by all means rely on smoke and mirrors and “grassroots” which in this case may mean you’re either promised a job or have no idea who this guy is.

  • Kate Martin

    During the campaign Mike pulled out his Pinnochio card and resorted to lies. That’s a deal breaker for me and certainly something I’ve seen him do before.

    In addition to that problem, his arrogant, dismissive, ineffective and polarizing habits block progress. His need to create viral campaigns for his cause du jour usurps the opportunities for perspective and progress.

    And if you have no mission, vision, or goals well then you’re not accountable to any review process that would see how you did compared to what you said you’d do. That was his MO in Greenwood. During the time he was a community disorganizer in Greenwood, he refused to do any of the above. The Mike and Miker issue doesn’t surprise me because drinking beers with his cronies is his idea of committee work. I find his claims to open gov’t and transparency hard to believe since we couldn’t ever get him to do that in Greenwood. No plans, no notes, no committees, no problem.

    His biggest interest was election time forums where he blew his hot air around for the issues he was related to either pro or con…Roads & Transit, Prop 1, BTG, etc. Hardly anything the LWV would approve of in terms of forum or debate process & protocol. He never disclosed his connection to those issues and felt perfectly at ease “moderating” the forum.

    He’s the most power hungry politically motivated person I have ever met. I’m sure he’s working on his re-election campaign already. That ought to assure he basically gets nothing done.

    I’ve never found him able to lift his head above the issues high enough to gain a perspective and I’ve never seen him follow a logical process ever. Planning Hell v4.

    Call me whatever you want. I’m just calling it like it’s been for the last dozen or so years I’ve worked around him.

    And I’m not shy to say that I think it would be nice to think he might consider attending to the existing systems in Seattle that need attention.

    Particularly it would be good to think he could integrate his pet issues into a context that communicates a “hierarchy of needs” and a clear definition of the basic responsibilities of government which I sense he loses sight of on a regular basis.

    Mike and from what I can see most of his people are very much oriented toward a few issues that don’t add up to comprehensive solutions or strategies.

    I’ll certainly avoid the P word. I didn’t realize it was such an offensive term.

    I’d appreciate it if dismissing the truth about his history and marginalizing me for saying it could be avoided.

    I didn’t just wake up after the election and make a clean slate for this guy. Why would I?

    If you’re going to attack the messenger here, why don’t you try disproving what I’m saying instead of skewering me. I’ve always called it like it is and I don’t lie. If that’s unpalatable, by all means rely on smoke and mirrors and “grassroots” which in this case may mean you’re either promised a job or have no idea who this guy is.

  • Kate Martin

    During the campaign Mike pulled out his Pinnochio card and resorted to lies. That’s a deal breaker for me and certainly something I’ve seen him do before.

    In addition to that problem, his arrogant, dismissive, ineffective and polarizing habits block progress. His need to create viral campaigns for his cause du jour usurps the opportunities for perspective and progress.

    And if you have no mission, vision, or goals well then you’re not accountable to any review process that would see how you did compared to what you said you’d do. That was his MO in Greenwood. During the time he was a community disorganizer in Greenwood, he refused to do any of the above. The Mike and Miker issue doesn’t surprise me because drinking beers with his cronies is his idea of committee work. I find his claims to open gov’t and transparency hard to believe since we couldn’t ever get him to do that in Greenwood. No plans, no notes, no committees, no problem.

    His biggest interest was election time forums where he blew his hot air around for the issues he was related to either pro or con…Roads & Transit, Prop 1, BTG, etc. Hardly anything the LWV would approve of in terms of forum or debate process & protocol. He never disclosed his connection to those issues and felt perfectly at ease “moderating” the forum.

    He’s the most power hungry politically motivated person I have ever met. I’m sure he’s working on his re-election campaign already. That ought to assure he basically gets nothing done.

    I’ve never found him able to lift his head above the issues high enough to gain a perspective and I’ve never seen him follow a logical process ever. Planning Hell v4.

    Call me whatever you want. I’m just calling it like it’s been for the last dozen or so years I’ve worked around him.

    And I’m not shy to say that I think it would be nice to think he might consider attending to the existing systems in Seattle that need attention.

    Particularly it would be good to think he could integrate his pet issues into a context that communicates a “hierarchy of needs” and a clear definition of the basic responsibilities of government which I sense he loses sight of on a regular basis.

    Mike and from what I can see most of his people are very much oriented toward a few issues that don’t add up to comprehensive solutions or strategies.

    I’ll certainly avoid the P word. I didn’t realize it was such an offensive term.

    I’d appreciate it if dismissing the truth about his history and marginalizing me for saying it could be avoided.

    I didn’t just wake up after the election and make a clean slate for this guy. Why would I?

    If you’re going to attack the messenger here, why don’t you try disproving what I’m saying instead of skewering me. I’ve always called it like it is and I don’t lie. If that’s unpalatable, by all means rely on smoke and mirrors and “grassroots” which in this case may mean you’re either promised a job or have no idea who this guy is.

  • Kate Martin

    During the campaign Mike pulled out his Pinnochio card and resorted to lies. That’s a deal breaker for me and certainly something I’ve seen him do before.

    In addition to that problem, his arrogant, dismissive, ineffective and polarizing habits block progress. His need to create viral campaigns for his cause du jour usurps the opportunities for perspective and progress.

    And if you have no mission, vision, or goals well then you’re not accountable to any review process that would see how you did compared to what you said you’d do. That was his MO in Greenwood. During the time he was a community disorganizer in Greenwood, he refused to do any of the above. The Mike and Miker issue doesn’t surprise me because drinking beers with his cronies is his idea of committee work. I find his claims to open gov’t and transparency hard to believe since we couldn’t ever get him to do that in Greenwood. No plans, no notes, no committees, no problem.

    His biggest interest was election time forums where he blew his hot air around for the issues he was related to either pro or con…Roads & Transit, Prop 1, BTG, etc. Hardly anything the LWV would approve of in terms of forum or debate process & protocol. He never disclosed his connection to those issues and felt perfectly at ease “moderating” the forum.

    He’s the most power hungry politically motivated person I have ever met. I’m sure he’s working on his re-election campaign already. That ought to assure he basically gets nothing done.

    I’ve never found him able to lift his head above the issues high enough to gain a perspective and I’ve never seen him follow a logical process ever. Planning Hell v4.

    Call me whatever you want. I’m just calling it like it’s been for the last dozen or so years I’ve worked around him.

    And I’m not shy to say that I think it would be nice to think he might consider attending to the existing systems in Seattle that need attention.

    Particularly it would be good to think he could integrate his pet issues into a context that communicates a “hierarchy of needs” and a clear definition of the basic responsibilities of government which I sense he loses sight of on a regular basis.

    Mike and from what I can see most of his people are very much oriented toward a few issues that don’t add up to comprehensive solutions or strategies.

    I’ll certainly avoid the P word. I didn’t realize it was such an offensive term.

    I’d appreciate it if dismissing the truth about his history and marginalizing me for saying it could be avoided.

    I didn’t just wake up after the election and make a clean slate for this guy. Why would I?

    If you’re going to attack the messenger here, why don’t you try disproving what I’m saying instead of skewering me. I’ve always called it like it is and I don’t lie. If that’s unpalatable, by all means rely on smoke and mirrors and “grassroots” which in this case may mean you’re either promised a job or have no idea who this guy is.

  • Kate Martin

    During the campaign Mike pulled out his Pinnochio card and resorted to lies. That’s a deal breaker for me and certainly something I’ve seen him do before.

    In addition to that problem, his arrogant, dismissive, ineffective and polarizing habits block progress. His need to create viral campaigns for his cause du jour usurps the opportunities for perspective and progress.

    And if you have no mission, vision, or goals well then you’re not accountable to any review process that would see how you did compared to what you said you’d do. That was his MO in Greenwood. During the time he was a community disorganizer in Greenwood, he refused to do any of the above. The Mike and Miker issue doesn’t surprise me because drinking beers with his cronies is his idea of committee work. I find his claims to open gov’t and transparency hard to believe since we couldn’t ever get him to do that in Greenwood. No plans, no notes, no committees, no problem.

    His biggest interest was election time forums where he blew his hot air around for the issues he was related to either pro or con…Roads & Transit, Prop 1, BTG, etc. Hardly anything the LWV would approve of in terms of forum or debate process & protocol. He never disclosed his connection to those issues and felt perfectly at ease “moderating” the forum.

    He’s the most power hungry politically motivated person I have ever met. I’m sure he’s working on his re-election campaign already. That ought to assure he basically gets nothing done.

    I’ve never found him able to lift his head above the issues high enough to gain a perspective and I’ve never seen him follow a logical process ever. Planning Hell v4.

    Call me whatever you want. I’m just calling it like it’s been for the last dozen or so years I’ve worked around him.

    And I’m not shy to say that I think it would be nice to think he might consider attending to the existing systems in Seattle that need attention.

    Particularly it would be good to think he could integrate his pet issues into a context that communicates a “hierarchy of needs” and a clear definition of the basic responsibilities of government which I sense he loses sight of on a regular basis.

    Mike and from what I can see most of his people are very much oriented toward a few issues that don’t add up to comprehensive solutions or strategies.

    I’ll certainly avoid the P word. I didn’t realize it was such an offensive term.

    I’d appreciate it if dismissing the truth about his history and marginalizing me for saying it could be avoided.

    I didn’t just wake up after the election and make a clean slate for this guy. Why would I?

    If you’re going to attack the messenger here, why don’t you try disproving what I’m saying instead of skewering me. I’ve always called it like it is and I don’t lie. If that’s unpalatable, by all means rely on smoke and mirrors and “grassroots” which in this case may mean you’re either promised a job or have no idea who this guy is.

  • Kate Martin

    During the campaign Mike pulled out his Pinnochio card and resorted to lies. That’s a deal breaker for me and certainly something I’ve seen him do before.

    In addition to that problem, his arrogant, dismissive, ineffective and polarizing habits block progress. His need to create viral campaigns for his cause du jour usurps the opportunities for perspective and progress.

    And if you have no mission, vision, or goals well then you’re not accountable to any review process that would see how you did compared to what you said you’d do. That was his MO in Greenwood. During the time he was a community disorganizer in Greenwood, he refused to do any of the above. The Mike and Miker issue doesn’t surprise me because drinking beers with his cronies is his idea of committee work. I find his claims to open gov’t and transparency hard to believe since we couldn’t ever get him to do that in Greenwood. No plans, no notes, no committees, no problem.

    His biggest interest was election time forums where he blew his hot air around for the issues he was related to either pro or con…Roads & Transit, Prop 1, BTG, etc. Hardly anything the LWV would approve of in terms of forum or debate process & protocol. He never disclosed his connection to those issues and felt perfectly at ease “moderating” the forum.

    He’s the most power hungry politically motivated person I have ever met. I’m sure he’s working on his re-election campaign already. That ought to assure he basically gets nothing done.

    I’ve never found him able to lift his head above the issues high enough to gain a perspective and I’ve never seen him follow a logical process ever. Planning Hell v4.

    Call me whatever you want. I’m just calling it like it’s been for the last dozen or so years I’ve worked around him.

    And I’m not shy to say that I think it would be nice to think he might consider attending to the existing systems in Seattle that need attention.

    Particularly it would be good to think he could integrate his pet issues into a context that communicates a “hierarchy of needs” and a clear definition of the basic responsibilities of government which I sense he loses sight of on a regular basis.

    Mike and from what I can see most of his people are very much oriented toward a few issues that don’t add up to comprehensive solutions or strategies.

    I’ll certainly avoid the P word. I didn’t realize it was such an offensive term.

    I’d appreciate it if dismissing the truth about his history and marginalizing me for saying it could be avoided.

    I didn’t just wake up after the election and make a clean slate for this guy. Why would I?

    If you’re going to attack the messenger here, why don’t you try disproving what I’m saying instead of skewering me. I’ve always called it like it is and I don’t lie. If that’s unpalatable, by all means rely on smoke and mirrors and “grassroots” which in this case may mean you’re either promised a job or have no idea who this guy is.

  • Kate Martin

    During the campaign Mike pulled out his Pinnochio card and resorted to lies. That’s a deal breaker for me and certainly something I’ve seen him do before.

    In addition to that problem, his arrogant, dismissive, ineffective and polarizing habits block progress. His need to create viral campaigns for his cause du jour usurps the opportunities for perspective and progress.

    And if you have no mission, vision, or goals well then you’re not accountable to any review process that would see how you did compared to what you said you’d do. That was his MO in Greenwood. During the time he was a community disorganizer in Greenwood, he refused to do any of the above. The Mike and Miker issue doesn’t surprise me because drinking beers with his cronies is his idea of committee work. I find his claims to open gov’t and transparency hard to believe since we couldn’t ever get him to do that in Greenwood. No plans, no notes, no committees, no problem.

    His biggest interest was election time forums where he blew his hot air around for the issues he was related to either pro or con…Roads & Transit, Prop 1, BTG, etc. Hardly anything the LWV would approve of in terms of forum or debate process & protocol. He never disclosed his connection to those issues and felt perfectly at ease “moderating” the forum.

    He’s the most power hungry politically motivated person I have ever met. I’m sure he’s working on his re-election campaign already. That ought to assure he basically gets nothing done.

    I’ve never found him able to lift his head above the issues high enough to gain a perspective and I’ve never seen him follow a logical process ever. Planning Hell v4.

    Call me whatever you want. I’m just calling it like it’s been for the last dozen or so years I’ve worked around him.

    And I’m not shy to say that I think it would be nice to think he might consider attending to the existing systems in Seattle that need attention.

    Particularly it would be good to think he could integrate his pet issues into a context that communicates a “hierarchy of needs” and a clear definition of the basic responsibilities of government which I sense he loses sight of on a regular basis.

    Mike and from what I can see most of his people are very much oriented toward a few issues that don’t add up to comprehensive solutions or strategies.

    I’ll certainly avoid the P word. I didn’t realize it was such an offensive term.

    I’d appreciate it if dismissing the truth about his history and marginalizing me for saying it could be avoided.

    I didn’t just wake up after the election and make a clean slate for this guy. Why would I?

    If you’re going to attack the messenger here, why don’t you try disproving what I’m saying instead of skewering me. I’ve always called it like it is and I don’t lie. If that’s unpalatable, by all means rely on smoke and mirrors and “grassroots” which in this case may mean you’re either promised a job or have no idea who this guy is.

  • Kate Martin

    During the campaign Mike pulled out his Pinnochio card and resorted to lies. That’s a deal breaker for me and certainly something I’ve seen him do before.

    In addition to that problem, his arrogant, dismissive, ineffective and polarizing habits block progress. His need to create viral campaigns for his cause du jour usurps the opportunities for perspective and progress.

    And if you have no mission, vision, or goals well then you’re not accountable to any review process that would see how you did compared to what you said you’d do. That was his MO in Greenwood. During the time he was a community disorganizer in Greenwood, he refused to do any of the above. The Mike and Miker issue doesn’t surprise me because drinking beers with his cronies is his idea of committee work. I find his claims to open gov’t and transparency hard to believe since we couldn’t ever get him to do that in Greenwood. No plans, no notes, no committees, no problem.

    His biggest interest was election time forums where he blew his hot air around for the issues he was related to either pro or con…Roads & Transit, Prop 1, BTG, etc. Hardly anything the LWV would approve of in terms of forum or debate process & protocol. He never disclosed his connection to those issues and felt perfectly at ease “moderating” the forum.

    He’s the most power hungry politically motivated person I have ever met. I’m sure he’s working on his re-election campaign already. That ought to assure he basically gets nothing done.

    I’ve never found him able to lift his head above the issues high enough to gain a perspective and I’ve never seen him follow a logical process ever. Planning Hell v4.

    Call me whatever you want. I’m just calling it like it’s been for the last dozen or so years I’ve worked around him.

    And I’m not shy to say that I think it would be nice to think he might consider attending to the existing systems in Seattle that need attention.

    Particularly it would be good to think he could integrate his pet issues into a context that communicates a “hierarchy of needs” and a clear definition of the basic responsibilities of government which I sense he loses sight of on a regular basis.

    Mike and from what I can see most of his people are very much oriented toward a few issues that don’t add up to comprehensive solutions or strategies.

    I’ll certainly avoid the P word. I didn’t realize it was such an offensive term.

    I’d appreciate it if dismissing the truth about his history and marginalizing me for saying it could be avoided.

    I didn’t just wake up after the election and make a clean slate for this guy. Why would I?

    If you’re going to attack the messenger here, why don’t you try disproving what I’m saying instead of skewering me. I’ve always called it like it is and I don’t lie. If that’s unpalatable, by all means rely on smoke and mirrors and “grassroots” which in this case may mean you’re either promised a job or have no idea who this guy is.

  • Kate Martin

    During the campaign Mike pulled out his Pinnochio card and resorted to lies. That’s a deal breaker for me and certainly something I’ve seen him do before.

    In addition to that problem, his arrogant, dismissive, ineffective and polarizing habits block progress. His need to create viral campaigns for his cause du jour usurps the opportunities for perspective and progress.

    And if you have no mission, vision, or goals well then you’re not accountable to any review process that would see how you did compared to what you said you’d do. That was his MO in Greenwood. During the time he was a community disorganizer in Greenwood, he refused to do any of the above. The Mike and Miker issue doesn’t surprise me because drinking beers with his cronies is his idea of committee work. I find his claims to open gov’t and transparency hard to believe since we couldn’t ever get him to do that in Greenwood. No plans, no notes, no committees, no problem.

    His biggest interest was election time forums where he blew his hot air around for the issues he was related to either pro or con…Roads & Transit, Prop 1, BTG, etc. Hardly anything the LWV would approve of in terms of forum or debate process & protocol. He never disclosed his connection to those issues and felt perfectly at ease “moderating” the forum.

    He’s the most power hungry politically motivated person I have ever met. I’m sure he’s working on his re-election campaign already. That ought to assure he basically gets nothing done.

    I’ve never found him able to lift his head above the issues high enough to gain a perspective and I’ve never seen him follow a logical process ever. Planning Hell v4.

    Call me whatever you want. I’m just calling it like it’s been for the last dozen or so years I’ve worked around him.

    And I’m not shy to say that I think it would be nice to think he might consider attending to the existing systems in Seattle that need attention.

    Particularly it would be good to think he could integrate his pet issues into a context that communicates a “hierarchy of needs” and a clear definition of the basic responsibilities of government which I sense he loses sight of on a regular basis.

    Mike and from what I can see most of his people are very much oriented toward a few issues that don’t add up to comprehensive solutions or strategies.

    I’ll certainly avoid the P word. I didn’t realize it was such an offensive term.

    I’d appreciate it if dismissing the truth about his history and marginalizing me for saying it could be avoided.

    I didn’t just wake up after the election and make a clean slate for this guy. Why would I?

    If you’re going to attack the messenger here, why don’t you try disproving what I’m saying instead of skewering me. I’ve always called it like it is and I don’t lie. If that’s unpalatable, by all means rely on smoke and mirrors and “grassroots” which in this case may mean you’re either promised a job or have no idea who this guy is.

  • Kate Martin

    During the campaign Mike pulled out his Pinnochio card and resorted to lies. That’s a deal breaker for me and certainly something I’ve seen him do before.

    In addition to that problem, his arrogant, dismissive, ineffective and polarizing habits block progress. His need to create viral campaigns for his cause du jour usurps the opportunities for perspective and progress.

    And if you have no mission, vision, or goals well then you’re not accountable to any review process that would see how you did compared to what you said you’d do. That was his MO in Greenwood. During the time he was a community disorganizer in Greenwood, he refused to do any of the above. The Mike and Miker issue doesn’t surprise me because drinking beers with his cronies is his idea of committee work. I find his claims to open gov’t and transparency hard to believe since we couldn’t ever get him to do that in Greenwood. No plans, no notes, no committees, no problem.

    His biggest interest was election time forums where he blew his hot air around for the issues he was related to either pro or con…Roads & Transit, Prop 1, BTG, etc. Hardly anything the LWV would approve of in terms of forum or debate process & protocol. He never disclosed his connection to those issues and felt perfectly at ease “moderating” the forum.

    He’s the most power hungry politically motivated person I have ever met. I’m sure he’s working on his re-election campaign already. That ought to assure he basically gets nothing done.

    I’ve never found him able to lift his head above the issues high enough to gain a perspective and I’ve never seen him follow a logical process ever. Planning Hell v4.

    Call me whatever you want. I’m just calling it like it’s been for the last dozen or so years I’ve worked around him.

    And I’m not shy to say that I think it would be nice to think he might consider attending to the existing systems in Seattle that need attention.

    Particularly it would be good to think he could integrate his pet issues into a context that communicates a “hierarchy of needs” and a clear definition of the basic responsibilities of government which I sense he loses sight of on a regular basis.

    Mike and from what I can see most of his people are very much oriented toward a few issues that don’t add up to comprehensive solutions or strategies.

    I’ll certainly avoid the P word. I didn’t realize it was such an offensive term.

    I’d appreciate it if dismissing the truth about his history and marginalizing me for saying it could be avoided.

    I didn’t just wake up after the election and make a clean slate for this guy. Why would I?

    If you’re going to attack the messenger here, why don’t you try disproving what I’m saying instead of skewering me. I’ve always called it like it is and I don’t lie. If that’s unpalatable, by all means rely on smoke and mirrors and “grassroots” which in this case may mean you’re either promised a job or have no idea who this guy is.

  • Kate Martin

    During the campaign Mike pulled out his Pinnochio card and resorted to lies. That’s a deal breaker for me and certainly something I’ve seen him do before.

    In addition to that problem, his arrogant, dismissive, ineffective and polarizing habits block progress. His need to create viral campaigns for his cause du jour usurps the opportunities for perspective and progress.

    And if you have no mission, vision, or goals well then you’re not accountable to any review process that would see how you did compared to what you said you’d do. That was his MO in Greenwood. During the time he was a community disorganizer in Greenwood, he refused to do any of the above. The Mike and Miker issue doesn’t surprise me because drinking beers with his cronies is his idea of committee work. I find his claims to open gov’t and transparency hard to believe since we couldn’t ever get him to do that in Greenwood. No plans, no notes, no committees, no problem.

    His biggest interest was election time forums where he blew his hot air around for the issues he was related to either pro or con…Roads & Transit, Prop 1, BTG, etc. Hardly anything the LWV would approve of in terms of forum or debate process & protocol. He never disclosed his connection to those issues and felt perfectly at ease “moderating” the forum.

    He’s the most power hungry politically motivated person I have ever met. I’m sure he’s working on his re-election campaign already. That ought to assure he basically gets nothing done.

    I’ve never found him able to lift his head above the issues high enough to gain a perspective and I’ve never seen him follow a logical process ever. Planning Hell v4.

    Call me whatever you want. I’m just calling it like it’s been for the last dozen or so years I’ve worked around him.

    And I’m not shy to say that I think it would be nice to think he might consider attending to the existing systems in Seattle that need attention.

    Particularly it would be good to think he could integrate his pet issues into a context that communicates a “hierarchy of needs” and a clear definition of the basic responsibilities of government which I sense he loses sight of on a regular basis.

    Mike and from what I can see most of his people are very much oriented toward a few issues that don’t add up to comprehensive solutions or strategies.

    I’ll certainly avoid the P word. I didn’t realize it was such an offensive term.

    I’d appreciate it if dismissing the truth about his history and marginalizing me for saying it could be avoided.

    I didn’t just wake up after the election and make a clean slate for this guy. Why would I?

    If you’re going to attack the messenger here, why don’t you try disproving what I’m saying instead of skewering me. I’ve always called it like it is and I don’t lie. If that’s unpalatable, by all means rely on smoke and mirrors and “grassroots” which in this case may mean you’re either promised a job or have no idea who this guy is.

  • raincity calling

    Ignore Kate. She divides us rather than unites. We have too much of that already.

  • raincity calling

    Ignore Kate. She divides us rather than unites. We have too much of that already.

  • raincity calling

    Ignore Kate. She divides us rather than unites. We have too much of that already.

  • raincity calling

    Ignore Kate. She divides us rather than unites. We have too much of that already.

  • raincity calling

    Ignore Kate. She divides us rather than unites. We have too much of that already.

  • raincity calling

    Ignore Kate. She divides us rather than unites. We have too much of that already.

  • raincity calling

    Ignore Kate. She divides us rather than unites. We have too much of that already.

  • raincity calling

    Ignore Kate. She divides us rather than unites. We have too much of that already.

  • raincity calling

    Ignore Kate. She divides us rather than unites. We have too much of that already.

  • raincity calling

    Ignore Kate. She divides us rather than unites. We have too much of that already.

  • raincity calling

    Ignore Kate. She divides us rather than unites. We have too much of that already.

  • raincity calling

    Ignore Kate. She divides us rather than unites. We have too much of that already.

  • raincity calling

    Ignore Kate. She divides us rather than unites. We have too much of that already.

  • raincity calling

    Ignore Kate. She divides us rather than unites. We have too much of that already.

  • raincity calling

    Ignore Kate. She divides us rather than unites. We have too much of that already.

  • raincity calling

    Ignore Kate. She divides us rather than unites. We have too much of that already.

  • raincity calling

    Ignore Kate. She divides us rather than unites. We have too much of that already.

  • raincity calling

    Ignore Kate. She divides us rather than unites. We have too much of that already.

  • raincity calling

    Ignore Kate. She divides us rather than unites. We have too much of that already.

  • raincity calling

    Ignore Kate. She divides us rather than unites. We have too much of that already.

  • raincity calling

    Ignore Kate. She divides us rather than unites. We have too much of that already.

  • raincity calling

    Ignore Kate. She divides us rather than unites. We have too much of that already.

  • raincity calling

    Ignore Kate. She divides us rather than unites. We have too much of that already.

  • raincity calling

    Ignore Kate. She divides us rather than unites. We have too much of that already.

  • raincity calling

    Ignore Kate. She divides us rather than unites. We have too much of that already.

  • raincity calling

    Ignore Kate. She divides us rather than unites. We have too much of that already.

  • raincity calling

    Ignore Kate. She divides us rather than unites. We have too much of that already.

  • raincity calling

    Ignore Kate. She divides us rather than unites. We have too much of that already.

  • raincity calling

    Ignore Kate. She divides us rather than unites. We have too much of that already.

  • raincity calling

    Ignore Kate. She divides us rather than unites. We have too much of that already.

  • raincity calling

    Ignore Kate. She divides us rather than unites. We have too much of that already.

  • raincity calling

    Ignore Kate. She divides us rather than unites. We have too much of that already.

  • raincity calling

    Ignore Kate. She divides us rather than unites. We have too much of that already.

  • raincity calling

    Ignore Kate. She divides us rather than unites. We have too much of that already.

  • raincity calling

    Ignore Kate. She divides us rather than unites. We have too much of that already.

  • raincity calling

    Ignore Kate. She divides us rather than unites. We have too much of that already.

  • raincity calling

    Ignore Kate. She divides us rather than unites. We have too much of that already.

  • raincity calling

    Ignore Kate. She divides us rather than unites. We have too much of that already.

  • raincity calling

    Ignore Kate. She divides us rather than unites. We have too much of that already.

  • raincity calling

    Ignore Kate. She divides us rather than unites. We have too much of that already.

  • raincity calling

    Ignore Kate. She divides us rather than unites. We have too much of that already.

  • raincity calling

    Ignore Kate. She divides us rather than unites. We have too much of that already.

  • raincity calling

    Ignore Kate. She divides us rather than unites. We have too much of that already.

  • raincity calling

    Ignore Kate. She divides us rather than unites. We have too much of that already.

  • raincity calling

    Ignore Kate. She divides us rather than unites. We have too much of that already.

  • raincity calling

    Ignore Kate. She divides us rather than unites. We have too much of that already.

  • raincity calling

    Ignore Kate. She divides us rather than unites. We have too much of that already.

  • raincity calling

    Ignore Kate. She divides us rather than unites. We have too much of that already.

  • raincity calling

    Ignore Kate. She divides us rather than unites. We have too much of that already.

  • raincity calling

    Ignore Kate. She divides us rather than unites. We have too much of that already.

  • raincity calling

    Ignore Kate. She divides us rather than unites. We have too much of that already.

  • raincity calling

    Ignore Kate. She divides us rather than unites. We have too much of that already.

  • raincity calling

    Ignore Kate. She divides us rather than unites. We have too much of that already.

  • clyde

    I appreciate what Kate is saying and that she’s willing to stand up and say it instead of going with the flow. (Of course my admiration of what she says may have something to do with the fact that her Mike experience mirrors my Mike experience.)

    I would love to be proven wrong about Mike’s capabilities over the next couple of years.

  • clyde

    I appreciate what Kate is saying and that she’s willing to stand up and say it instead of going with the flow. (Of course my admiration of what she says may have something to do with the fact that her Mike experience mirrors my Mike experience.)

    I would love to be proven wrong about Mike’s capabilities over the next couple of years.

  • clyde

    I appreciate what Kate is saying and that she’s willing to stand up and say it instead of going with the flow. (Of course my admiration of what she says may have something to do with the fact that her Mike experience mirrors my Mike experience.)

    I would love to be proven wrong about Mike’s capabilities over the next couple of years.

  • clyde

    I appreciate what Kate is saying and that she’s willing to stand up and say it instead of going with the flow. (Of course my admiration of what she says may have something to do with the fact that her Mike experience mirrors my Mike experience.)

    I would love to be proven wrong about Mike’s capabilities over the next couple of years.

  • clyde

    I appreciate what Kate is saying and that she’s willing to stand up and say it instead of going with the flow. (Of course my admiration of what she says may have something to do with the fact that her Mike experience mirrors my Mike experience.)

    I would love to be proven wrong about Mike’s capabilities over the next couple of years.

  • clyde

    I appreciate what Kate is saying and that she’s willing to stand up and say it instead of going with the flow. (Of course my admiration of what she says may have something to do with the fact that her Mike experience mirrors my Mike experience.)

    I would love to be proven wrong about Mike’s capabilities over the next couple of years.

  • clyde

    I appreciate what Kate is saying and that she’s willing to stand up and say it instead of going with the flow. (Of course my admiration of what she says may have something to do with the fact that her Mike experience mirrors my Mike experience.)

    I would love to be proven wrong about Mike’s capabilities over the next couple of years.

  • clyde

    I appreciate what Kate is saying and that she’s willing to stand up and say it instead of going with the flow. (Of course my admiration of what she says may have something to do with the fact that her Mike experience mirrors my Mike experience.)

    I would love to be proven wrong about Mike’s capabilities over the next couple of years.

  • clyde

    I appreciate what Kate is saying and that she’s willing to stand up and say it instead of going with the flow. (Of course my admiration of what she says may have something to do with the fact that her Mike experience mirrors my Mike experience.)

    I would love to be proven wrong about Mike’s capabilities over the next couple of years.

  • clyde

    I appreciate what Kate is saying and that she’s willing to stand up and say it instead of going with the flow. (Of course my admiration of what she says may have something to do with the fact that her Mike experience mirrors my Mike experience.)

    I would love to be proven wrong about Mike’s capabilities over the next couple of years.

  • clyde

    I appreciate what Kate is saying and that she’s willing to stand up and say it instead of going with the flow. (Of course my admiration of what she says may have something to do with the fact that her Mike experience mirrors my Mike experience.)

    I would love to be proven wrong about Mike’s capabilities over the next couple of years.

  • clyde

    I appreciate what Kate is saying and that she’s willing to stand up and say it instead of going with the flow. (Of course my admiration of what she says may have something to do with the fact that her Mike experience mirrors my Mike experience.)

    I would love to be proven wrong about Mike’s capabilities over the next couple of years.

  • clyde

    I appreciate what Kate is saying and that she’s willing to stand up and say it instead of going with the flow. (Of course my admiration of what she says may have something to do with the fact that her Mike experience mirrors my Mike experience.)

    I would love to be proven wrong about Mike’s capabilities over the next couple of years.

  • clyde

    I appreciate what Kate is saying and that she’s willing to stand up and say it instead of going with the flow. (Of course my admiration of what she says may have something to do with the fact that her Mike experience mirrors my Mike experience.)

    I would love to be proven wrong about Mike’s capabilities over the next couple of years.

  • clyde

    I appreciate what Kate is saying and that she’s willing to stand up and say it instead of going with the flow. (Of course my admiration of what she says may have something to do with the fact that her Mike experience mirrors my Mike experience.)

    I would love to be proven wrong about Mike’s capabilities over the next couple of years.

  • clyde

    I appreciate what Kate is saying and that she’s willing to stand up and say it instead of going with the flow. (Of course my admiration of what she says may have something to do with the fact that her Mike experience mirrors my Mike experience.)

    I would love to be proven wrong about Mike’s capabilities over the next couple of years.

  • clyde

    I appreciate what Kate is saying and that she’s willing to stand up and say it instead of going with the flow. (Of course my admiration of what she says may have something to do with the fact that her Mike experience mirrors my Mike experience.)

    I would love to be proven wrong about Mike’s capabilities over the next couple of years.

  • clyde

    I appreciate what Kate is saying and that she’s willing to stand up and say it instead of going with the flow. (Of course my admiration of what she says may have something to do with the fact that her Mike experience mirrors my Mike experience.)

    I would love to be proven wrong about Mike’s capabilities over the next couple of years.

  • clyde

    I appreciate what Kate is saying and that she’s willing to stand up and say it instead of going with the flow. (Of course my admiration of what she says may have something to do with the fact that her Mike experience mirrors my Mike experience.)

    I would love to be proven wrong about Mike’s capabilities over the next couple of years.

  • clyde

    I appreciate what Kate is saying and that she’s willing to stand up and say it instead of going with the flow. (Of course my admiration of what she says may have something to do with the fact that her Mike experience mirrors my Mike experience.)

    I would love to be proven wrong about Mike’s capabilities over the next couple of years.

  • clyde

    I appreciate what Kate is saying and that she’s willing to stand up and say it instead of going with the flow. (Of course my admiration of what she says may have something to do with the fact that her Mike experience mirrors my Mike experience.)

    I would love to be proven wrong about Mike’s capabilities over the next couple of years.

  • clyde

    I appreciate what Kate is saying and that she’s willing to stand up and say it instead of going with the flow. (Of course my admiration of what she says may have something to do with the fact that her Mike experience mirrors my Mike experience.)

    I would love to be proven wrong about Mike’s capabilities over the next couple of years.

  • clyde

    I appreciate what Kate is saying and that she’s willing to stand up and say it instead of going with the flow. (Of course my admiration of what she says may have something to do with the fact that her Mike experience mirrors my Mike experience.)

    I would love to be proven wrong about Mike’s capabilities over the next couple of years.

  • clyde

    I appreciate what Kate is saying and that she’s willing to stand up and say it instead of going with the flow. (Of course my admiration of what she says may have something to do with the fact that her Mike experience mirrors my Mike experience.)

    I would love to be proven wrong about Mike’s capabilities over the next couple of years.

  • clyde

    I appreciate what Kate is saying and that she’s willing to stand up and say it instead of going with the flow. (Of course my admiration of what she says may have something to do with the fact that her Mike experience mirrors my Mike experience.)

    I would love to be proven wrong about Mike’s capabilities over the next couple of years.

  • clyde

    I appreciate what Kate is saying and that she’s willing to stand up and say it instead of going with the flow. (Of course my admiration of what she says may have something to do with the fact that her Mike experience mirrors my Mike experience.)

    I would love to be proven wrong about Mike’s capabilities over the next couple of years.

  • clyde

    I appreciate what Kate is saying and that she’s willing to stand up and say it instead of going with the flow. (Of course my admiration of what she says may have something to do with the fact that her Mike experience mirrors my Mike experience.)

    I would love to be proven wrong about Mike’s capabilities over the next couple of years.

  • clyde

    I appreciate what Kate is saying and that she’s willing to stand up and say it instead of going with the flow. (Of course my admiration of what she says may have something to do with the fact that her Mike experience mirrors my Mike experience.)

    I would love to be proven wrong about Mike’s capabilities over the next couple of years.

  • clyde

    I appreciate what Kate is saying and that she’s willing to stand up and say it instead of going with the flow. (Of course my admiration of what she says may have something to do with the fact that her Mike experience mirrors my Mike experience.)

    I would love to be proven wrong about Mike’s capabilities over the next couple of years.

  • clyde

    I appreciate what Kate is saying and that she’s willing to stand up and say it instead of going with the flow. (Of course my admiration of what she says may have something to do with the fact that her Mike experience mirrors my Mike experience.)

    I would love to be proven wrong about Mike’s capabilities over the next couple of years.

  • clyde

    I appreciate what Kate is saying and that she’s willing to stand up and say it instead of going with the flow. (Of course my admiration of what she says may have something to do with the fact that her Mike experience mirrors my Mike experience.)

    I would love to be proven wrong about Mike’s capabilities over the next couple of years.

  • clyde

    I appreciate what Kate is saying and that she’s willing to stand up and say it instead of going with the flow. (Of course my admiration of what she says may have something to do with the fact that her Mike experience mirrors my Mike experience.)

    I would love to be proven wrong about Mike’s capabilities over the next couple of years.

  • clyde

    I appreciate what Kate is saying and that she’s willing to stand up and say it instead of going with the flow. (Of course my admiration of what she says may have something to do with the fact that her Mike experience mirrors my Mike experience.)

    I would love to be proven wrong about Mike’s capabilities over the next couple of years.

  • clyde

    I appreciate what Kate is saying and that she’s willing to stand up and say it instead of going with the flow. (Of course my admiration of what she says may have something to do with the fact that her Mike experience mirrors my Mike experience.)

    I would love to be proven wrong about Mike’s capabilities over the next couple of years.

  • clyde

    I appreciate what Kate is saying and that she’s willing to stand up and say it instead of going with the flow. (Of course my admiration of what she says may have something to do with the fact that her Mike experience mirrors my Mike experience.)

    I would love to be proven wrong about Mike’s capabilities over the next couple of years.

  • clyde

    I appreciate what Kate is saying and that she’s willing to stand up and say it instead of going with the flow. (Of course my admiration of what she says may have something to do with the fact that her Mike experience mirrors my Mike experience.)

    I would love to be proven wrong about Mike’s capabilities over the next couple of years.

  • clyde

    I appreciate what Kate is saying and that she’s willing to stand up and say it instead of going with the flow. (Of course my admiration of what she says may have something to do with the fact that her Mike experience mirrors my Mike experience.)

    I would love to be proven wrong about Mike’s capabilities over the next couple of years.

  • clyde

    I appreciate what Kate is saying and that she’s willing to stand up and say it instead of going with the flow. (Of course my admiration of what she says may have something to do with the fact that her Mike experience mirrors my Mike experience.)

    I would love to be proven wrong about Mike’s capabilities over the next couple of years.

  • clyde

    I appreciate what Kate is saying and that she’s willing to stand up and say it instead of going with the flow. (Of course my admiration of what she says may have something to do with the fact that her Mike experience mirrors my Mike experience.)

    I would love to be proven wrong about Mike’s capabilities over the next couple of years.

  • clyde

    I appreciate what Kate is saying and that she’s willing to stand up and say it instead of going with the flow. (Of course my admiration of what she says may have something to do with the fact that her Mike experience mirrors my Mike experience.)

    I would love to be proven wrong about Mike’s capabilities over the next couple of years.

  • clyde

    I appreciate what Kate is saying and that she’s willing to stand up and say it instead of going with the flow. (Of course my admiration of what she says may have something to do with the fact that her Mike experience mirrors my Mike experience.)

    I would love to be proven wrong about Mike’s capabilities over the next couple of years.

  • clyde

    I appreciate what Kate is saying and that she’s willing to stand up and say it instead of going with the flow. (Of course my admiration of what she says may have something to do with the fact that her Mike experience mirrors my Mike experience.)

    I would love to be proven wrong about Mike’s capabilities over the next couple of years.

  • clyde

    I appreciate what Kate is saying and that she’s willing to stand up and say it instead of going with the flow. (Of course my admiration of what she says may have something to do with the fact that her Mike experience mirrors my Mike experience.)

    I would love to be proven wrong about Mike’s capabilities over the next couple of years.

  • clyde

    I appreciate what Kate is saying and that she’s willing to stand up and say it instead of going with the flow. (Of course my admiration of what she says may have something to do with the fact that her Mike experience mirrors my Mike experience.)

    I would love to be proven wrong about Mike’s capabilities over the next couple of years.

  • clyde

    I appreciate what Kate is saying and that she’s willing to stand up and say it instead of going with the flow. (Of course my admiration of what she says may have something to do with the fact that her Mike experience mirrors my Mike experience.)

    I would love to be proven wrong about Mike’s capabilities over the next couple of years.

  • clyde

    I appreciate what Kate is saying and that she’s willing to stand up and say it instead of going with the flow. (Of course my admiration of what she says may have something to do with the fact that her Mike experience mirrors my Mike experience.)

    I would love to be proven wrong about Mike’s capabilities over the next couple of years.

  • clyde

    I appreciate what Kate is saying and that she’s willing to stand up and say it instead of going with the flow. (Of course my admiration of what she says may have something to do with the fact that her Mike experience mirrors my Mike experience.)

    I would love to be proven wrong about Mike’s capabilities over the next couple of years.

  • clyde

    I appreciate what Kate is saying and that she’s willing to stand up and say it instead of going with the flow. (Of course my admiration of what she says may have something to do with the fact that her Mike experience mirrors my Mike experience.)

    I would love to be proven wrong about Mike’s capabilities over the next couple of years.

  • clyde

    I appreciate what Kate is saying and that she’s willing to stand up and say it instead of going with the flow. (Of course my admiration of what she says may have something to do with the fact that her Mike experience mirrors my Mike experience.)

    I would love to be proven wrong about Mike’s capabilities over the next couple of years.

  • clyde

    I appreciate what Kate is saying and that she’s willing to stand up and say it instead of going with the flow. (Of course my admiration of what she says may have something to do with the fact that her Mike experience mirrors my Mike experience.)

    I would love to be proven wrong about Mike’s capabilities over the next couple of years.

  • clyde

    I appreciate what Kate is saying and that she’s willing to stand up and say it instead of going with the flow. (Of course my admiration of what she says may have something to do with the fact that her Mike experience mirrors my Mike experience.)

    I would love to be proven wrong about Mike’s capabilities over the next couple of years.

  • clyde

    I appreciate what Kate is saying and that she’s willing to stand up and say it instead of going with the flow. (Of course my admiration of what she says may have something to do with the fact that her Mike experience mirrors my Mike experience.)

    I would love to be proven wrong about Mike’s capabilities over the next couple of years.

  • clyde

    I appreciate what Kate is saying and that she’s willing to stand up and say it instead of going with the flow. (Of course my admiration of what she says may have something to do with the fact that her Mike experience mirrors my Mike experience.)

    I would love to be proven wrong about Mike’s capabilities over the next couple of years.

  • sarah68

    Kate, I don’t remember you posting during the campaign. I may be wrong and just missed your posts, although a post like the last one would be hard to miss. If you are only speaking up on Publicola now, why not before he was elected?

  • sarah68

    Kate, I don’t remember you posting during the campaign. I may be wrong and just missed your posts, although a post like the last one would be hard to miss. If you are only speaking up on Publicola now, why not before he was elected?

  • sarah68

    Kate, I don’t remember you posting during the campaign. I may be wrong and just missed your posts, although a post like the last one would be hard to miss. If you are only speaking up on Publicola now, why not before he was elected?

  • sarah68

    Kate, I don’t remember you posting during the campaign. I may be wrong and just missed your posts, although a post like the last one would be hard to miss. If you are only speaking up on Publicola now, why not before he was elected?

  • sarah68

    Kate, I don’t remember you posting during the campaign. I may be wrong and just missed your posts, although a post like the last one would be hard to miss. If you are only speaking up on Publicola now, why not before he was elected?

  • sarah68

    Kate, I don’t remember you posting during the campaign. I may be wrong and just missed your posts, although a post like the last one would be hard to miss. If you are only speaking up on Publicola now, why not before he was elected?

  • sarah68

    Kate, I don’t remember you posting during the campaign. I may be wrong and just missed your posts, although a post like the last one would be hard to miss. If you are only speaking up on Publicola now, why not before he was elected?

  • sarah68

    Kate, I don’t remember you posting during the campaign. I may be wrong and just missed your posts, although a post like the last one would be hard to miss. If you are only speaking up on Publicola now, why not before he was elected?

  • sarah68

    Kate, I don’t remember you posting during the campaign. I may be wrong and just missed your posts, although a post like the last one would be hard to miss. If you are only speaking up on Publicola now, why not before he was elected?

  • sarah68

    Kate, I don’t remember you posting during the campaign. I may be wrong and just missed your posts, although a post like the last one would be hard to miss. If you are only speaking up on Publicola now, why not before he was elected?

  • sarah68

    Kate, I don’t remember you posting during the campaign. I may be wrong and just missed your posts, although a post like the last one would be hard to miss. If you are only speaking up on Publicola now, why not before he was elected?

  • sarah68

    Kate, I don’t remember you posting during the campaign. I may be wrong and just missed your posts, although a post like the last one would be hard to miss. If you are only speaking up on Publicola now, why not before he was elected?

  • sarah68

    Kate, I don’t remember you posting during the campaign. I may be wrong and just missed your posts, although a post like the last one would be hard to miss. If you are only speaking up on Publicola now, why not before he was elected?

  • sarah68

    Kate, I don’t remember you posting during the campaign. I may be wrong and just missed your posts, although a post like the last one would be hard to miss. If you are only speaking up on Publicola now, why not before he was elected?

  • sarah68

    Kate, I don’t remember you posting during the campaign. I may be wrong and just missed your posts, although a post like the last one would be hard to miss. If you are only speaking up on Publicola now, why not before he was elected?

  • sarah68

    Kate, I don’t remember you posting during the campaign. I may be wrong and just missed your posts, although a post like the last one would be hard to miss. If you are only speaking up on Publicola now, why not before he was elected?

  • sarah68

    Kate, I don’t remember you posting during the campaign. I may be wrong and just missed your posts, although a post like the last one would be hard to miss. If you are only speaking up on Publicola now, why not before he was elected?

  • sarah68

    Kate, I don’t remember you posting during the campaign. I may be wrong and just missed your posts, although a post like the last one would be hard to miss. If you are only speaking up on Publicola now, why not before he was elected?

  • sarah68

    Kate, I don’t remember you posting during the campaign. I may be wrong and just missed your posts, although a post like the last one would be hard to miss. If you are only speaking up on Publicola now, why not before he was elected?

  • sarah68

    Kate, I don’t remember you posting during the campaign. I may be wrong and just missed your posts, although a post like the last one would be hard to miss. If you are only speaking up on Publicola now, why not before he was elected?

  • sarah68

    Kate, I don’t remember you posting during the campaign. I may be wrong and just missed your posts, although a post like the last one would be hard to miss. If you are only speaking up on Publicola now, why not before he was elected?

  • sarah68

    Kate, I don’t remember you posting during the campaign. I may be wrong and just missed your posts, although a post like the last one would be hard to miss. If you are only speaking up on Publicola now, why not before he was elected?

  • sarah68

    Kate, I don’t remember you posting during the campaign. I may be wrong and just missed your posts, although a post like the last one would be hard to miss. If you are only speaking up on Publicola now, why not before he was elected?

  • sarah68

    Kate, I don’t remember you posting during the campaign. I may be wrong and just missed your posts, although a post like the last one would be hard to miss. If you are only speaking up on Publicola now, why not before he was elected?

  • sarah68

    Kate, I don’t remember you posting during the campaign. I may be wrong and just missed your posts, although a post like the last one would be hard to miss. If you are only speaking up on Publicola now, why not before he was elected?

  • sarah68

    Kate, I don’t remember you posting during the campaign. I may be wrong and just missed your posts, although a post like the last one would be hard to miss. If you are only speaking up on Publicola now, why not before he was elected?

  • sarah68

    Kate, I don’t remember you posting during the campaign. I may be wrong and just missed your posts, although a post like the last one would be hard to miss. If you are only speaking up on Publicola now, why not before he was elected?

  • sarah68

    Kate, I don’t remember you posting during the campaign. I may be wrong and just missed your posts, although a post like the last one would be hard to miss. If you are only speaking up on Publicola now, why not before he was elected?

  • sarah68

    Kate, I don’t remember you posting during the campaign. I may be wrong and just missed your posts, although a post like the last one would be hard to miss. If you are only speaking up on Publicola now, why not before he was elected?

  • sarah68

    Kate, I don’t remember you posting during the campaign. I may be wrong and just missed your posts, although a post like the last one would be hard to miss. If you are only speaking up on Publicola now, why not before he was elected?

  • sarah68

    Kate, I don’t remember you posting during the campaign. I may be wrong and just missed your posts, although a post like the last one would be hard to miss. If you are only speaking up on Publicola now, why not before he was elected?

  • sarah68

    Kate, I don’t remember you posting during the campaign. I may be wrong and just missed your posts, although a post like the last one would be hard to miss. If you are only speaking up on Publicola now, why not before he was elected?

  • sarah68

    Kate, I don’t remember you posting during the campaign. I may be wrong and just missed your posts, although a post like the last one would be hard to miss. If you are only speaking up on Publicola now, why not before he was elected?

  • sarah68

    Kate, I don’t remember you posting during the campaign. I may be wrong and just missed your posts, although a post like the last one would be hard to miss. If you are only speaking up on Publicola now, why not before he was elected?

  • sarah68

    Kate, I don’t remember you posting during the campaign. I may be wrong and just missed your posts, although a post like the last one would be hard to miss. If you are only speaking up on Publicola now, why not before he was elected?

  • sarah68

    Kate, I don’t remember you posting during the campaign. I may be wrong and just missed your posts, although a post like the last one would be hard to miss. If you are only speaking up on Publicola now, why not before he was elected?

  • sarah68

    Kate, I don’t remember you posting during the campaign. I may be wrong and just missed your posts, although a post like the last one would be hard to miss. If you are only speaking up on Publicola now, why not before he was elected?

  • sarah68

    Kate, I don’t remember you posting during the campaign. I may be wrong and just missed your posts, although a post like the last one would be hard to miss. If you are only speaking up on Publicola now, why not before he was elected?

  • sarah68

    Kate, I don’t remember you posting during the campaign. I may be wrong and just missed your posts, although a post like the last one would be hard to miss. If you are only speaking up on Publicola now, why not before he was elected?

  • sarah68

    Kate, I don’t remember you posting during the campaign. I may be wrong and just missed your posts, although a post like the last one would be hard to miss. If you are only speaking up on Publicola now, why not before he was elected?

  • sarah68

    Kate, I don’t remember you posting during the campaign. I may be wrong and just missed your posts, although a post like the last one would be hard to miss. If you are only speaking up on Publicola now, why not before he was elected?

  • sarah68

    Kate, I don’t remember you posting during the campaign. I may be wrong and just missed your posts, although a post like the last one would be hard to miss. If you are only speaking up on Publicola now, why not before he was elected?

  • sarah68

    Kate, I don’t remember you posting during the campaign. I may be wrong and just missed your posts, although a post like the last one would be hard to miss. If you are only speaking up on Publicola now, why not before he was elected?

  • sarah68

    Kate, I don’t remember you posting during the campaign. I may be wrong and just missed your posts, although a post like the last one would be hard to miss. If you are only speaking up on Publicola now, why not before he was elected?

  • sarah68

    Kate, I don’t remember you posting during the campaign. I may be wrong and just missed your posts, although a post like the last one would be hard to miss. If you are only speaking up on Publicola now, why not before he was elected?

  • sarah68

    Kate, I don’t remember you posting during the campaign. I may be wrong and just missed your posts, although a post like the last one would be hard to miss. If you are only speaking up on Publicola now, why not before he was elected?

  • sarah68

    Kate, I don’t remember you posting during the campaign. I may be wrong and just missed your posts, although a post like the last one would be hard to miss. If you are only speaking up on Publicola now, why not before he was elected?

  • sarah68

    Kate, I don’t remember you posting during the campaign. I may be wrong and just missed your posts, although a post like the last one would be hard to miss. If you are only speaking up on Publicola now, why not before he was elected?

  • sarah68

    Kate, I don’t remember you posting during the campaign. I may be wrong and just missed your posts, although a post like the last one would be hard to miss. If you are only speaking up on Publicola now, why not before he was elected?

  • sarah68

    Kate, I don’t remember you posting during the campaign. I may be wrong and just missed your posts, although a post like the last one would be hard to miss. If you are only speaking up on Publicola now, why not before he was elected?

  • sarah68

    Kate, I don’t remember you posting during the campaign. I may be wrong and just missed your posts, although a post like the last one would be hard to miss. If you are only speaking up on Publicola now, why not before he was elected?

  • sarah68

    Kate, I don’t remember you posting during the campaign. I may be wrong and just missed your posts, although a post like the last one would be hard to miss. If you are only speaking up on Publicola now, why not before he was elected?

  • sarah68

    Kate, I don’t remember you posting during the campaign. I may be wrong and just missed your posts, although a post like the last one would be hard to miss. If you are only speaking up on Publicola now, why not before he was elected?

  • Kate Martin

    I posted here, seattlepi.com, postglobe, seattle times, sableverity.com, myballard, slog, crosscut, and more regularly. I never post anonymously. I always post as Kate Martin or Walkable Greenwood. It’s not hard to find out that Walkable Greenwood is a pen name I use.

    On behalf of the democracy, I’d like to note that unity is not part of the picture. That’s a dictatorship you’re referring to. I’m not disagreeing to disagree. I have 12 years of personal experience with this guy. I’m speaking from first hand experience and it’s not limited to the Greenwood Community Council years.

  • Kate Martin

    I posted here, seattlepi.com, postglobe, seattle times, sableverity.com, myballard, slog, crosscut, and more regularly. I never post anonymously. I always post as Kate Martin or Walkable Greenwood. It’s not hard to find out that Walkable Greenwood is a pen name I use.

    On behalf of the democracy, I’d like to note that unity is not part of the picture. That’s a dictatorship you’re referring to. I’m not disagreeing to disagree. I have 12 years of personal experience with this guy. I’m speaking from first hand experience and it’s not limited to the Greenwood Community Council years.

  • Kate Martin

    I posted here, seattlepi.com, postglobe, seattle times, sableverity.com, myballard, slog, crosscut, and more regularly. I never post anonymously. I always post as Kate Martin or Walkable Greenwood. It’s not hard to find out that Walkable Greenwood is a pen name I use.

    On behalf of the democracy, I’d like to note that unity is not part of the picture. That’s a dictatorship you’re referring to. I’m not disagreeing to disagree. I have 12 years of personal experience with this guy. I’m speaking from first hand experience and it’s not limited to the Greenwood Community Council years.

  • Kate Martin

    I posted here, seattlepi.com, postglobe, seattle times, sableverity.com, myballard, slog, crosscut, and more regularly. I never post anonymously. I always post as Kate Martin or Walkable Greenwood. It’s not hard to find out that Walkable Greenwood is a pen name I use.

    On behalf of the democracy, I’d like to note that unity is not part of the picture. That’s a dictatorship you’re referring to. I’m not disagreeing to disagree. I have 12 years of personal experience with this guy. I’m speaking from first hand experience and it’s not limited to the Greenwood Community Council years.

  • Kate Martin

    I posted here, seattlepi.com, postglobe, seattle times, sableverity.com, myballard, slog, crosscut, and more regularly. I never post anonymously. I always post as Kate Martin or Walkable Greenwood. It’s not hard to find out that Walkable Greenwood is a pen name I use.

    On behalf of the democracy, I’d like to note that unity is not part of the picture. That’s a dictatorship you’re referring to. I’m not disagreeing to disagree. I have 12 years of personal experience with this guy. I’m speaking from first hand experience and it’s not limited to the Greenwood Community Council years.

  • Kate Martin

    I posted here, seattlepi.com, postglobe, seattle times, sableverity.com, myballard, slog, crosscut, and more regularly. I never post anonymously. I always post as Kate Martin or Walkable Greenwood. It’s not hard to find out that Walkable Greenwood is a pen name I use.

    On behalf of the democracy, I’d like to note that unity is not part of the picture. That’s a dictatorship you’re referring to. I’m not disagreeing to disagree. I have 12 years of personal experience with this guy. I’m speaking from first hand experience and it’s not limited to the Greenwood Community Council years.

  • Kate Martin

    I posted here, seattlepi.com, postglobe, seattle times, sableverity.com, myballard, slog, crosscut, and more regularly. I never post anonymously. I always post as Kate Martin or Walkable Greenwood. It’s not hard to find out that Walkable Greenwood is a pen name I use.

    On behalf of the democracy, I’d like to note that unity is not part of the picture. That’s a dictatorship you’re referring to. I’m not disagreeing to disagree. I have 12 years of personal experience with this guy. I’m speaking from first hand experience and it’s not limited to the Greenwood Community Council years.

  • Kate Martin

    I posted here, seattlepi.com, postglobe, seattle times, sableverity.com, myballard, slog, crosscut, and more regularly. I never post anonymously. I always post as Kate Martin or Walkable Greenwood. It’s not hard to find out that Walkable Greenwood is a pen name I use.

    On behalf of the democracy, I’d like to note that unity is not part of the picture. That’s a dictatorship you’re referring to. I’m not disagreeing to disagree. I have 12 years of personal experience with this guy. I’m speaking from first hand experience and it’s not limited to the Greenwood Community Council years.

  • Kate Martin

    I posted here, seattlepi.com, postglobe, seattle times, sableverity.com, myballard, slog, crosscut, and more regularly. I never post anonymously. I always post as Kate Martin or Walkable Greenwood. It’s not hard to find out that Walkable Greenwood is a pen name I use.

    On behalf of the democracy, I’d like to note that unity is not part of the picture. That’s a dictatorship you’re referring to. I’m not disagreeing to disagree. I have 12 years of personal experience with this guy. I’m speaking from first hand experience and it’s not limited to the Greenwood Community Council years.

  • Kate Martin

    I posted here, seattlepi.com, postglobe, seattle times, sableverity.com, myballard, slog, crosscut, and more regularly. I never post anonymously. I always post as Kate Martin or Walkable Greenwood. It’s not hard to find out that Walkable Greenwood is a pen name I use.

    On behalf of the democracy, I’d like to note that unity is not part of the picture. That’s a dictatorship you’re referring to. I’m not disagreeing to disagree. I have 12 years of personal experience with this guy. I’m speaking from first hand experience and it’s not limited to the Greenwood Community Council years.

  • Kate Martin

    I posted here, seattlepi.com, postglobe, seattle times, sableverity.com, myballard, slog, crosscut, and more regularly. I never post anonymously. I always post as Kate Martin or Walkable Greenwood. It’s not hard to find out that Walkable Greenwood is a pen name I use.

    On behalf of the democracy, I’d like to note that unity is not part of the picture. That’s a dictatorship you’re referring to. I’m not disagreeing to disagree. I have 12 years of personal experience with this guy. I’m speaking from first hand experience and it’s not limited to the Greenwood Community Council years.

  • Kate Martin

    I posted here, seattlepi.com, postglobe, seattle times, sableverity.com, myballard, slog, crosscut, and more regularly. I never post anonymously. I always post as Kate Martin or Walkable Greenwood. It’s not hard to find out that Walkable Greenwood is a pen name I use.

    On behalf of the democracy, I’d like to note that unity is not part of the picture. That’s a dictatorship you’re referring to. I’m not disagreeing to disagree. I have 12 years of personal experience with this guy. I’m speaking from first hand experience and it’s not limited to the Greenwood Community Council years.

  • Kate Martin

    I posted here, seattlepi.com, postglobe, seattle times, sableverity.com, myballard, slog, crosscut, and more regularly. I never post anonymously. I always post as Kate Martin or Walkable Greenwood. It’s not hard to find out that Walkable Greenwood is a pen name I use.

    On behalf of the democracy, I’d like to note that unity is not part of the picture. That’s a dictatorship you’re referring to. I’m not disagreeing to disagree. I have 12 years of personal experience with this guy. I’m speaking from first hand experience and it’s not limited to the Greenwood Community Council years.

  • Kate Martin

    I posted here, seattlepi.com, postglobe, seattle times, sableverity.com, myballard, slog, crosscut, and more regularly. I never post anonymously. I always post as Kate Martin or Walkable Greenwood. It’s not hard to find out that Walkable Greenwood is a pen name I use.

    On behalf of the democracy, I’d like to note that unity is not part of the picture. That’s a dictatorship you’re referring to. I’m not disagreeing to disagree. I have 12 years of personal experience with this guy. I’m speaking from first hand experience and it’s not limited to the Greenwood Community Council years.

  • Kate Martin

    I posted here, seattlepi.com, postglobe, seattle times, sableverity.com, myballard, slog, crosscut, and more regularly. I never post anonymously. I always post as Kate Martin or Walkable Greenwood. It’s not hard to find out that Walkable Greenwood is a pen name I use.

    On behalf of the democracy, I’d like to note that unity is not part of the picture. That’s a dictatorship you’re referring to. I’m not disagreeing to disagree. I have 12 years of personal experience with this guy. I’m speaking from first hand experience and it’s not limited to the Greenwood Community Council years.

  • Kate Martin

    I posted here, seattlepi.com, postglobe, seattle times, sableverity.com, myballard, slog, crosscut, and more regularly. I never post anonymously. I always post as Kate Martin or Walkable Greenwood. It’s not hard to find out that Walkable Greenwood is a pen name I use.

    On behalf of the democracy, I’d like to note that unity is not part of the picture. That’s a dictatorship you’re referring to. I’m not disagreeing to disagree. I have 12 years of personal experience with this guy. I’m speaking from first hand experience and it’s not limited to the Greenwood Community Council years.

  • Kate Martin

    I posted here, seattlepi.com, postglobe, seattle times, sableverity.com, myballard, slog, crosscut, and more regularly. I never post anonymously. I always post as Kate Martin or Walkable Greenwood. It’s not hard to find out that Walkable Greenwood is a pen name I use.

    On behalf of the democracy, I’d like to note that unity is not part of the picture. That’s a dictatorship you’re referring to. I’m not disagreeing to disagree. I have 12 years of personal experience with this guy. I’m speaking from first hand experience and it’s not limited to the Greenwood Community Council years.

  • Kate Martin

    I posted here, seattlepi.com, postglobe, seattle times, sableverity.com, myballard, slog, crosscut, and more regularly. I never post anonymously. I always post as Kate Martin or Walkable Greenwood. It’s not hard to find out that Walkable Greenwood is a pen name I use.

    On behalf of the democracy, I’d like to note that unity is not part of the picture. That’s a dictatorship you’re referring to. I’m not disagreeing to disagree. I have 12 years of personal experience with this guy. I’m speaking from first hand experience and it’s not limited to the Greenwood Community Council years.

  • Kate Martin

    I posted here, seattlepi.com, postglobe, seattle times, sableverity.com, myballard, slog, crosscut, and more regularly. I never post anonymously. I always post as Kate Martin or Walkable Greenwood. It’s not hard to find out that Walkable Greenwood is a pen name I use.

    On behalf of the democracy, I’d like to note that unity is not part of the picture. That’s a dictatorship you’re referring to. I’m not disagreeing to disagree. I have 12 years of personal experience with this guy. I’m speaking from first hand experience and it’s not limited to the Greenwood Community Council years.

  • Kate Martin

    I posted here, seattlepi.com, postglobe, seattle times, sableverity.com, myballard, slog, crosscut, and more regularly. I never post anonymously. I always post as Kate Martin or Walkable Greenwood. It’s not hard to find out that Walkable Greenwood is a pen name I use.

    On behalf of the democracy, I’d like to note that unity is not part of the picture. That’s a dictatorship you’re referring to. I’m not disagreeing to disagree. I have 12 years of personal experience with this guy. I’m speaking from first hand experience and it’s not limited to the Greenwood Community Council years.

  • Kate Martin

    I posted here, seattlepi.com, postglobe, seattle times, sableverity.com, myballard, slog, crosscut, and more regularly. I never post anonymously. I always post as Kate Martin or Walkable Greenwood. It’s not hard to find out that Walkable Greenwood is a pen name I use.

    On behalf of the democracy, I’d like to note that unity is not part of the picture. That’s a dictatorship you’re referring to. I’m not disagreeing to disagree. I have 12 years of personal experience with this guy. I’m speaking from first hand experience and it’s not limited to the Greenwood Community Council years.

  • Kate Martin

    I posted here, seattlepi.com, postglobe, seattle times, sableverity.com, myballard, slog, crosscut, and more regularly. I never post anonymously. I always post as Kate Martin or Walkable Greenwood. It’s not hard to find out that Walkable Greenwood is a pen name I use.

    On behalf of the democracy, I’d like to note that unity is not part of the picture. That’s a dictatorship you’re referring to. I’m not disagreeing to disagree. I have 12 years of personal experience with this guy. I’m speaking from first hand experience and it’s not limited to the Greenwood Community Council years.

  • Kate Martin

    I posted here, seattlepi.com, postglobe, seattle times, sableverity.com, myballard, slog, crosscut, and more regularly. I never post anonymously. I always post as Kate Martin or Walkable Greenwood. It’s not hard to find out that Walkable Greenwood is a pen name I use.

    On behalf of the democracy, I’d like to note that unity is not part of the picture. That’s a dictatorship you’re referring to. I’m not disagreeing to disagree. I have 12 years of personal experience with this guy. I’m speaking from first hand experience and it’s not limited to the Greenwood Community Council years.

  • Kate Martin

    I posted here, seattlepi.com, postglobe, seattle times, sableverity.com, myballard, slog, crosscut, and more regularly. I never post anonymously. I always post as Kate Martin or Walkable Greenwood. It’s not hard to find out that Walkable Greenwood is a pen name I use.

    On behalf of the democracy, I’d like to note that unity is not part of the picture. That’s a dictatorship you’re referring to. I’m not disagreeing to disagree. I have 12 years of personal experience with this guy. I’m speaking from first hand experience and it’s not limited to the Greenwood Community Council years.

  • Kate Martin

    I posted here, seattlepi.com, postglobe, seattle times, sableverity.com, myballard, slog, crosscut, and more regularly. I never post anonymously. I always post as Kate Martin or Walkable Greenwood. It’s not hard to find out that Walkable Greenwood is a pen name I use.

    On behalf of the democracy, I’d like to note that unity is not part of the picture. That’s a dictatorship you’re referring to. I’m not disagreeing to disagree. I have 12 years of personal experience with this guy. I’m speaking from first hand experience and it’s not limited to the Greenwood Community Council years.

  • Kate Martin

    I posted here, seattlepi.com, postglobe, seattle times, sableverity.com, myballard, slog, crosscut, and more regularly. I never post anonymously. I always post as Kate Martin or Walkable Greenwood. It’s not hard to find out that Walkable Greenwood is a pen name I use.

    On behalf of the democracy, I’d like to note that unity is not part of the picture. That’s a dictatorship you’re referring to. I’m not disagreeing to disagree. I have 12 years of personal experience with this guy. I’m speaking from first hand experience and it’s not limited to the Greenwood Community Council years.

  • Kate Martin

    I posted here, seattlepi.com, postglobe, seattle times, sableverity.com, myballard, slog, crosscut, and more regularly. I never post anonymously. I always post as Kate Martin or Walkable Greenwood. It’s not hard to find out that Walkable Greenwood is a pen name I use.

    On behalf of the democracy, I’d like to note that unity is not part of the picture. That’s a dictatorship you’re referring to. I’m not disagreeing to disagree. I have 12 years of personal experience with this guy. I’m speaking from first hand experience and it’s not limited to the Greenwood Community Council years.

  • Kate Martin

    I posted here, seattlepi.com, postglobe, seattle times, sableverity.com, myballard, slog, crosscut, and more regularly. I never post anonymously. I always post as Kate Martin or Walkable Greenwood. It’s not hard to find out that Walkable Greenwood is a pen name I use.

    On behalf of the democracy, I’d like to note that unity is not part of the picture. That’s a dictatorship you’re referring to. I’m not disagreeing to disagree. I have 12 years of personal experience with this guy. I’m speaking from first hand experience and it’s not limited to the Greenwood Community Council years.

  • Kate Martin

    I posted here, seattlepi.com, postglobe, seattle times, sableverity.com, myballard, slog, crosscut, and more regularly. I never post anonymously. I always post as Kate Martin or Walkable Greenwood. It’s not hard to find out that Walkable Greenwood is a pen name I use.

    On behalf of the democracy, I’d like to note that unity is not part of the picture. That’s a dictatorship you’re referring to. I’m not disagreeing to disagree. I have 12 years of personal experience with this guy. I’m speaking from first hand experience and it’s not limited to the Greenwood Community Council years.

  • Kate Martin

    I posted here, seattlepi.com, postglobe, seattle times, sableverity.com, myballard, slog, crosscut, and more regularly. I never post anonymously. I always post as Kate Martin or Walkable Greenwood. It’s not hard to find out that Walkable Greenwood is a pen name I use.

    On behalf of the democracy, I’d like to note that unity is not part of the picture. That’s a dictatorship you’re referring to. I’m not disagreeing to disagree. I have 12 years of personal experience with this guy. I’m speaking from first hand experience and it’s not limited to the Greenwood Community Council years.

  • Kate Martin

    I posted here, seattlepi.com, postglobe, seattle times, sableverity.com, myballard, slog, crosscut, and more regularly. I never post anonymously. I always post as Kate Martin or Walkable Greenwood. It’s not hard to find out that Walkable Greenwood is a pen name I use.

    On behalf of the democracy, I’d like to note that unity is not part of the picture. That’s a dictatorship you’re referring to. I’m not disagreeing to disagree. I have 12 years of personal experience with this guy. I’m speaking from first hand experience and it’s not limited to the Greenwood Community Council years.

  • Kate Martin

    I posted here, seattlepi.com, postglobe, seattle times, sableverity.com, myballard, slog, crosscut, and more regularly. I never post anonymously. I always post as Kate Martin or Walkable Greenwood. It’s not hard to find out that Walkable Greenwood is a pen name I use.

    On behalf of the democracy, I’d like to note that unity is not part of the picture. That’s a dictatorship you’re referring to. I’m not disagreeing to disagree. I have 12 years of personal experience with this guy. I’m speaking from first hand experience and it’s not limited to the Greenwood Community Council years.

  • Kate Martin

    I posted here, seattlepi.com, postglobe, seattle times, sableverity.com, myballard, slog, crosscut, and more regularly. I never post anonymously. I always post as Kate Martin or Walkable Greenwood. It’s not hard to find out that Walkable Greenwood is a pen name I use.

    On behalf of the democracy, I’d like to note that unity is not part of the picture. That’s a dictatorship you’re referring to. I’m not disagreeing to disagree. I have 12 years of personal experience with this guy. I’m speaking from first hand experience and it’s not limited to the Greenwood Community Council years.

  • Kate Martin

    I posted here, seattlepi.com, postglobe, seattle times, sableverity.com, myballard, slog, crosscut, and more regularly. I never post anonymously. I always post as Kate Martin or Walkable Greenwood. It’s not hard to find out that Walkable Greenwood is a pen name I use.

    On behalf of the democracy, I’d like to note that unity is not part of the picture. That’s a dictatorship you’re referring to. I’m not disagreeing to disagree. I have 12 years of personal experience with this guy. I’m speaking from first hand experience and it’s not limited to the Greenwood Community Council years.

  • Kate Martin

    I posted here, seattlepi.com, postglobe, seattle times, sableverity.com, myballard, slog, crosscut, and more regularly. I never post anonymously. I always post as Kate Martin or Walkable Greenwood. It’s not hard to find out that Walkable Greenwood is a pen name I use.

    On behalf of the democracy, I’d like to note that unity is not part of the picture. That’s a dictatorship you’re referring to. I’m not disagreeing to disagree. I have 12 years of personal experience with this guy. I’m speaking from first hand experience and it’s not limited to the Greenwood Community Council years.

  • Kate Martin

    I posted here, seattlepi.com, postglobe, seattle times, sableverity.com, myballard, slog, crosscut, and more regularly. I never post anonymously. I always post as Kate Martin or Walkable Greenwood. It’s not hard to find out that Walkable Greenwood is a pen name I use.

    On behalf of the democracy, I’d like to note that unity is not part of the picture. That’s a dictatorship you’re referring to. I’m not disagreeing to disagree. I have 12 years of personal experience with this guy. I’m speaking from first hand experience and it’s not limited to the Greenwood Community Council years.

  • Kate Martin

    I posted here, seattlepi.com, postglobe, seattle times, sableverity.com, myballard, slog, crosscut, and more regularly. I never post anonymously. I always post as Kate Martin or Walkable Greenwood. It’s not hard to find out that Walkable Greenwood is a pen name I use.

    On behalf of the democracy, I’d like to note that unity is not part of the picture. That’s a dictatorship you’re referring to. I’m not disagreeing to disagree. I have 12 years of personal experience with this guy. I’m speaking from first hand experience and it’s not limited to the Greenwood Community Council years.

  • Kate Martin

    I posted here, seattlepi.com, postglobe, seattle times, sableverity.com, myballard, slog, crosscut, and more regularly. I never post anonymously. I always post as Kate Martin or Walkable Greenwood. It’s not hard to find out that Walkable Greenwood is a pen name I use.

    On behalf of the democracy, I’d like to note that unity is not part of the picture. That’s a dictatorship you’re referring to. I’m not disagreeing to disagree. I have 12 years of personal experience with this guy. I’m speaking from first hand experience and it’s not limited to the Greenwood Community Council years.

  • Kate Martin

    I posted here, seattlepi.com, postglobe, seattle times, sableverity.com, myballard, slog, crosscut, and more regularly. I never post anonymously. I always post as Kate Martin or Walkable Greenwood. It’s not hard to find out that Walkable Greenwood is a pen name I use.

    On behalf of the democracy, I’d like to note that unity is not part of the picture. That’s a dictatorship you’re referring to. I’m not disagreeing to disagree. I have 12 years of personal experience with this guy. I’m speaking from first hand experience and it’s not limited to the Greenwood Community Council years.

  • Kate Martin

    I posted here, seattlepi.com, postglobe, seattle times, sableverity.com, myballard, slog, crosscut, and more regularly. I never post anonymously. I always post as Kate Martin or Walkable Greenwood. It’s not hard to find out that Walkable Greenwood is a pen name I use.

    On behalf of the democracy, I’d like to note that unity is not part of the picture. That’s a dictatorship you’re referring to. I’m not disagreeing to disagree. I have 12 years of personal experience with this guy. I’m speaking from first hand experience and it’s not limited to the Greenwood Community Council years.

  • Kate Martin

    I posted here, seattlepi.com, postglobe, seattle times, sableverity.com, myballard, slog, crosscut, and more regularly. I never post anonymously. I always post as Kate Martin or Walkable Greenwood. It’s not hard to find out that Walkable Greenwood is a pen name I use.

    On behalf of the democracy, I’d like to note that unity is not part of the picture. That’s a dictatorship you’re referring to. I’m not disagreeing to disagree. I have 12 years of personal experience with this guy. I’m speaking from first hand experience and it’s not limited to the Greenwood Community Council years.

  • Kate Martin

    I posted here, seattlepi.com, postglobe, seattle times, sableverity.com, myballard, slog, crosscut, and more regularly. I never post anonymously. I always post as Kate Martin or Walkable Greenwood. It’s not hard to find out that Walkable Greenwood is a pen name I use.

    On behalf of the democracy, I’d like to note that unity is not part of the picture. That’s a dictatorship you’re referring to. I’m not disagreeing to disagree. I have 12 years of personal experience with this guy. I’m speaking from first hand experience and it’s not limited to the Greenwood Community Council years.

  • Kate Martin

    I posted here, seattlepi.com, postglobe, seattle times, sableverity.com, myballard, slog, crosscut, and more regularly. I never post anonymously. I always post as Kate Martin or Walkable Greenwood. It’s not hard to find out that Walkable Greenwood is a pen name I use.

    On behalf of the democracy, I’d like to note that unity is not part of the picture. That’s a dictatorship you’re referring to. I’m not disagreeing to disagree. I have 12 years of personal experience with this guy. I’m speaking from first hand experience and it’s not limited to the Greenwood Community Council years.

  • Kate Martin

    I posted here, seattlepi.com, postglobe, seattle times, sableverity.com, myballard, slog, crosscut, and more regularly. I never post anonymously. I always post as Kate Martin or Walkable Greenwood. It’s not hard to find out that Walkable Greenwood is a pen name I use.

    On behalf of the democracy, I’d like to note that unity is not part of the picture. That’s a dictatorship you’re referring to. I’m not disagreeing to disagree. I have 12 years of personal experience with this guy. I’m speaking from first hand experience and it’s not limited to the Greenwood Community Council years.

  • Kate Martin

    I posted here, seattlepi.com, postglobe, seattle times, sableverity.com, myballard, slog, crosscut, and more regularly. I never post anonymously. I always post as Kate Martin or Walkable Greenwood. It’s not hard to find out that Walkable Greenwood is a pen name I use.

    On behalf of the democracy, I’d like to note that unity is not part of the picture. That’s a dictatorship you’re referring to. I’m not disagreeing to disagree. I have 12 years of personal experience with this guy. I’m speaking from first hand experience and it’s not limited to the Greenwood Community Council years.

  • Kate Martin

    I posted here, seattlepi.com, postglobe, seattle times, sableverity.com, myballard, slog, crosscut, and more regularly. I never post anonymously. I always post as Kate Martin or Walkable Greenwood. It’s not hard to find out that Walkable Greenwood is a pen name I use.

    On behalf of the democracy, I’d like to note that unity is not part of the picture. That’s a dictatorship you’re referring to. I’m not disagreeing to disagree. I have 12 years of personal experience with this guy. I’m speaking from first hand experience and it’s not limited to the Greenwood Community Council years.

  • Kate Martin

    I posted here, seattlepi.com, postglobe, seattle times, sableverity.com, myballard, slog, crosscut, and more regularly. I never post anonymously. I always post as Kate Martin or Walkable Greenwood. It’s not hard to find out that Walkable Greenwood is a pen name I use.

    On behalf of the democracy, I’d like to note that unity is not part of the picture. That’s a dictatorship you’re referring to. I’m not disagreeing to disagree. I have 12 years of personal experience with this guy. I’m speaking from first hand experience and it’s not limited to the Greenwood Community Council years.

  • Kate Martin

    I posted here, seattlepi.com, postglobe, seattle times, sableverity.com, myballard, slog, crosscut, and more regularly. I never post anonymously. I always post as Kate Martin or Walkable Greenwood. It’s not hard to find out that Walkable Greenwood is a pen name I use.

    On behalf of the democracy, I’d like to note that unity is not part of the picture. That’s a dictatorship you’re referring to. I’m not disagreeing to disagree. I have 12 years of personal experience with this guy. I’m speaking from first hand experience and it’s not limited to the Greenwood Community Council years.

  • Kate Martin

    I posted here, seattlepi.com, postglobe, seattle times, sableverity.com, myballard, slog, crosscut, and more regularly. I never post anonymously. I always post as Kate Martin or Walkable Greenwood. It’s not hard to find out that Walkable Greenwood is a pen name I use.

    On behalf of the democracy, I’d like to note that unity is not part of the picture. That’s a dictatorship you’re referring to. I’m not disagreeing to disagree. I have 12 years of personal experience with this guy. I’m speaking from first hand experience and it’s not limited to the Greenwood Community Council years.

  • Kate Martin

    I posted here, seattlepi.com, postglobe, seattle times, sableverity.com, myballard, slog, crosscut, and more regularly. I never post anonymously. I always post as Kate Martin or Walkable Greenwood. It’s not hard to find out that Walkable Greenwood is a pen name I use.

    On behalf of the democracy, I’d like to note that unity is not part of the picture. That’s a dictatorship you’re referring to. I’m not disagreeing to disagree. I have 12 years of personal experience with this guy. I’m speaking from first hand experience and it’s not limited to the Greenwood Community Council years.

  • Kate Martin

    I posted here, seattlepi.com, postglobe, seattle times, sableverity.com, myballard, slog, crosscut, and more regularly. I never post anonymously. I always post as Kate Martin or Walkable Greenwood. It’s not hard to find out that Walkable Greenwood is a pen name I use.

    On behalf of the democracy, I’d like to note that unity is not part of the picture. That’s a dictatorship you’re referring to. I’m not disagreeing to disagree. I have 12 years of personal experience with this guy. I’m speaking from first hand experience and it’s not limited to the Greenwood Community Council years.

  • Kate Martin

    I posted here, seattlepi.com, postglobe, seattle times, sableverity.com, myballard, slog, crosscut, and more regularly. I never post anonymously. I always post as Kate Martin or Walkable Greenwood. It’s not hard to find out that Walkable Greenwood is a pen name I use.

    On behalf of the democracy, I’d like to note that unity is not part of the picture. That’s a dictatorship you’re referring to. I’m not disagreeing to disagree. I have 12 years of personal experience with this guy. I’m speaking from first hand experience and it’s not limited to the Greenwood Community Council years.

  • Kate Martin

    I posted here, seattlepi.com, postglobe, seattle times, sableverity.com, myballard, slog, crosscut, and more regularly. I never post anonymously. I always post as Kate Martin or Walkable Greenwood. It’s not hard to find out that Walkable Greenwood is a pen name I use.

    On behalf of the democracy, I’d like to note that unity is not part of the picture. That’s a dictatorship you’re referring to. I’m not disagreeing to disagree. I have 12 years of personal experience with this guy. I’m speaking from first hand experience and it’s not limited to the Greenwood Community Council years.

  • Crumb

    Kate, I for one appreciate your comments, thank you for providing us with some insight on McGinn in Greenwood. I’ve been heavily involved in community issues for a decade, and never met or heard of him before the election.

  • Crumb

    Kate, I for one appreciate your comments, thank you for providing us with some insight on McGinn in Greenwood. I’ve been heavily involved in community issues for a decade, and never met or heard of him before the election.

  • Crumb

    Kate, I for one appreciate your comments, thank you for providing us with some insight on McGinn in Greenwood. I’ve been heavily involved in community issues for a decade, and never met or heard of him before the election.

  • Crumb

    Kate, I for one appreciate your comments, thank you for providing us with some insight on McGinn in Greenwood. I’ve been heavily involved in community issues for a decade, and never met or heard of him before the election.

  • Crumb

    Kate, I for one appreciate your comments, thank you for providing us with some insight on McGinn in Greenwood. I’ve been heavily involved in community issues for a decade, and never met or heard of him before the election.

  • Crumb

    Kate, I for one appreciate your comments, thank you for providing us with some insight on McGinn in Greenwood. I’ve been heavily involved in community issues for a decade, and never met or heard of him before the election.

  • Crumb

    Kate, I for one appreciate your comments, thank you for providing us with some insight on McGinn in Greenwood. I’ve been heavily involved in community issues for a decade, and never met or heard of him before the election.

  • Crumb

    Kate, I for one appreciate your comments, thank you for providing us with some insight on McGinn in Greenwood. I’ve been heavily involved in community issues for a decade, and never met or heard of him before the election.

  • Crumb

    Kate, I for one appreciate your comments, thank you for providing us with some insight on McGinn in Greenwood. I’ve been heavily involved in community issues for a decade, and never met or heard of him before the election.

  • Crumb

    Kate, I for one appreciate your comments, thank you for providing us with some insight on McGinn in Greenwood. I’ve been heavily involved in community issues for a decade, and never met or heard of him before the election.

  • Crumb

    Kate, I for one appreciate your comments, thank you for providing us with some insight on McGinn in Greenwood. I’ve been heavily involved in community issues for a decade, and never met or heard of him before the election.

  • Crumb

    Kate, I for one appreciate your comments, thank you for providing us with some insight on McGinn in Greenwood. I’ve been heavily involved in community issues for a decade, and never met or heard of him before the election.

  • Crumb

    Kate, I for one appreciate your comments, thank you for providing us with some insight on McGinn in Greenwood. I’ve been heavily involved in community issues for a decade, and never met or heard of him before the election.

  • Crumb

    Kate, I for one appreciate your comments, thank you for providing us with some insight on McGinn in Greenwood. I’ve been heavily involved in community issues for a decade, and never met or heard of him before the election.

  • Crumb

    Kate, I for one appreciate your comments, thank you for providing us with some insight on McGinn in Greenwood. I’ve been heavily involved in community issues for a decade, and never met or heard of him before the election.

  • Crumb

    Kate, I for one appreciate your comments, thank you for providing us with some insight on McGinn in Greenwood. I’ve been heavily involved in community issues for a decade, and never met or heard of him before the election.

  • Crumb

    Kate, I for one appreciate your comments, thank you for providing us with some insight on McGinn in Greenwood. I’ve been heavily involved in community issues for a decade, and never met or heard of him before the election.

  • Crumb

    Kate, I for one appreciate your comments, thank you for providing us with some insight on McGinn in Greenwood. I’ve been heavily involved in community issues for a decade, and never met or heard of him before the election.

  • Crumb

    Kate, I for one appreciate your comments, thank you for providing us with some insight on McGinn in Greenwood. I’ve been heavily involved in community issues for a decade, and never met or heard of him before the election.

  • Crumb

    Kate, I for one appreciate your comments, thank you for providing us with some insight on McGinn in Greenwood. I’ve been heavily involved in community issues for a decade, and never met or heard of him before the election.

  • Crumb

    Kate, I for one appreciate your comments, thank you for providing us with some insight on McGinn in Greenwood. I’ve been heavily involved in community issues for a decade, and never met or heard of him before the election.

  • Crumb

    Kate, I for one appreciate your comments, thank you for providing us with some insight on McGinn in Greenwood. I’ve been heavily involved in community issues for a decade, and never met or heard of him before the election.

  • Crumb

    Kate, I for one appreciate your comments, thank you for providing us with some insight on McGinn in Greenwood. I’ve been heavily involved in community issues for a decade, and never met or heard of him before the election.

  • Crumb

    Kate, I for one appreciate your comments, thank you for providing us with some insight on McGinn in Greenwood. I’ve been heavily involved in community issues for a decade, and never met or heard of him before the election.

  • Crumb

    Kate, I for one appreciate your comments, thank you for providing us with some insight on McGinn in Greenwood. I’ve been heavily involved in community issues for a decade, and never met or heard of him before the election.

  • Crumb

    Kate, I for one appreciate your comments, thank you for providing us with some insight on McGinn in Greenwood. I’ve been heavily involved in community issues for a decade, and never met or heard of him before the election.

  • Crumb

    Kate, I for one appreciate your comments, thank you for providing us with some insight on McGinn in Greenwood. I’ve been heavily involved in community issues for a decade, and never met or heard of him before the election.

  • Crumb

    Kate, I for one appreciate your comments, thank you for providing us with some insight on McGinn in Greenwood. I’ve been heavily involved in community issues for a decade, and never met or heard of him before the election.

  • Crumb

    Kate, I for one appreciate your comments, thank you for providing us with some insight on McGinn in Greenwood. I’ve been heavily involved in community issues for a decade, and never met or heard of him before the election.

  • Crumb

    Kate, I for one appreciate your comments, thank you for providing us with some insight on McGinn in Greenwood. I’ve been heavily involved in community issues for a decade, and never met or heard of him before the election.

  • Crumb

    Kate, I for one appreciate your comments, thank you for providing us with some insight on McGinn in Greenwood. I’ve been heavily involved in community issues for a decade, and never met or heard of him before the election.

  • Crumb

    Kate, I for one appreciate your comments, thank you for providing us with some insight on McGinn in Greenwood. I’ve been heavily involved in community issues for a decade, and never met or heard of him before the election.

  • Crumb

    Kate, I for one appreciate your comments, thank you for providing us with some insight on McGinn in Greenwood. I’ve been heavily involved in community issues for a decade, and never met or heard of him before the election.

  • Crumb

    Kate, I for one appreciate your comments, thank you for providing us with some insight on McGinn in Greenwood. I’ve been heavily involved in community issues for a decade, and never met or heard of him before the election.

  • Crumb

    Kate, I for one appreciate your comments, thank you for providing us with some insight on McGinn in Greenwood. I’ve been heavily involved in community issues for a decade, and never met or heard of him before the election.

  • Crumb

    Kate, I for one appreciate your comments, thank you for providing us with some insight on McGinn in Greenwood. I’ve been heavily involved in community issues for a decade, and never met or heard of him before the election.

  • Crumb

    Kate, I for one appreciate your comments, thank you for providing us with some insight on McGinn in Greenwood. I’ve been heavily involved in community issues for a decade, and never met or heard of him before the election.

  • Crumb

    Kate, I for one appreciate your comments, thank you for providing us with some insight on McGinn in Greenwood. I’ve been heavily involved in community issues for a decade, and never met or heard of him before the election.

  • Crumb

    Kate, I for one appreciate your comments, thank you for providing us with some insight on McGinn in Greenwood. I’ve been heavily involved in community issues for a decade, and never met or heard of him before the election.

  • Crumb

    Kate, I for one appreciate your comments, thank you for providing us with some insight on McGinn in Greenwood. I’ve been heavily involved in community issues for a decade, and never met or heard of him before the election.

  • Crumb

    Kate, I for one appreciate your comments, thank you for providing us with some insight on McGinn in Greenwood. I’ve been heavily involved in community issues for a decade, and never met or heard of him before the election.

  • Crumb

    Kate, I for one appreciate your comments, thank you for providing us with some insight on McGinn in Greenwood. I’ve been heavily involved in community issues for a decade, and never met or heard of him before the election.

  • Crumb

    Kate, I for one appreciate your comments, thank you for providing us with some insight on McGinn in Greenwood. I’ve been heavily involved in community issues for a decade, and never met or heard of him before the election.

  • Crumb

    Kate, I for one appreciate your comments, thank you for providing us with some insight on McGinn in Greenwood. I’ve been heavily involved in community issues for a decade, and never met or heard of him before the election.

  • Crumb

    Kate, I for one appreciate your comments, thank you for providing us with some insight on McGinn in Greenwood. I’ve been heavily involved in community issues for a decade, and never met or heard of him before the election.

  • Crumb

    Kate, I for one appreciate your comments, thank you for providing us with some insight on McGinn in Greenwood. I’ve been heavily involved in community issues for a decade, and never met or heard of him before the election.

  • Crumb

    Kate, I for one appreciate your comments, thank you for providing us with some insight on McGinn in Greenwood. I’ve been heavily involved in community issues for a decade, and never met or heard of him before the election.

  • Crumb

    Kate, I for one appreciate your comments, thank you for providing us with some insight on McGinn in Greenwood. I’ve been heavily involved in community issues for a decade, and never met or heard of him before the election.

  • Crumb

    Kate, I for one appreciate your comments, thank you for providing us with some insight on McGinn in Greenwood. I’ve been heavily involved in community issues for a decade, and never met or heard of him before the election.

  • Crumb

    Kate, I for one appreciate your comments, thank you for providing us with some insight on McGinn in Greenwood. I’ve been heavily involved in community issues for a decade, and never met or heard of him before the election.

  • Crumb

    Kate, I for one appreciate your comments, thank you for providing us with some insight on McGinn in Greenwood. I’ve been heavily involved in community issues for a decade, and never met or heard of him before the election.

  • Crumb

    Kate, I for one appreciate your comments, thank you for providing us with some insight on McGinn in Greenwood. I’ve been heavily involved in community issues for a decade, and never met or heard of him before the election.

  • Crumb

    Kate, I for one appreciate your comments, thank you for providing us with some insight on McGinn in Greenwood. I’ve been heavily involved in community issues for a decade, and never met or heard of him before the election.

  • Greenwood Parent

    I’m assuming this is the same Kate Martin that approached the PTA at Greenwood Elementary a year ago and tried to get us to support kicking three classrooms of special needs kindergarten students out of the school.

    Of course we didn’t.

    The “funny” thing is that her kids don’t even go to the school.

    Wow. Just wow.

  • Greenwood Parent

    I’m assuming this is the same Kate Martin that approached the PTA at Greenwood Elementary a year ago and tried to get us to support kicking three classrooms of special needs kindergarten students out of the school.

    Of course we didn’t.

    The “funny” thing is that her kids don’t even go to the school.

    Wow. Just wow.

  • Greenwood Parent

    I’m assuming this is the same Kate Martin that approached the PTA at Greenwood Elementary a year ago and tried to get us to support kicking three classrooms of special needs kindergarten students out of the school.

    Of course we didn’t.

    The “funny” thing is that her kids don’t even go to the school.

    Wow. Just wow.

  • Greenwood Parent

    I’m assuming this is the same Kate Martin that approached the PTA at Greenwood Elementary a year ago and tried to get us to support kicking three classrooms of special needs kindergarten students out of the school.

    Of course we didn’t.

    The “funny” thing is that her kids don’t even go to the school.

    Wow. Just wow.

  • Greenwood Parent

    I’m assuming this is the same Kate Martin that approached the PTA at Greenwood Elementary a year ago and tried to get us to support kicking three classrooms of special needs kindergarten students out of the school.

    Of course we didn’t.

    The “funny” thing is that her kids don’t even go to the school.

    Wow. Just wow.

  • Greenwood Parent

    I’m assuming this is the same Kate Martin that approached the PTA at Greenwood Elementary a year ago and tried to get us to support kicking three classrooms of special needs kindergarten students out of the school.

    Of course we didn’t.

    The “funny” thing is that her kids don’t even go to the school.

    Wow. Just wow.

  • Greenwood Parent

    I’m assuming this is the same Kate Martin that approached the PTA at Greenwood Elementary a year ago and tried to get us to support kicking three classrooms of special needs kindergarten students out of the school.

    Of course we didn’t.

    The “funny” thing is that her kids don’t even go to the school.

    Wow. Just wow.

  • Greenwood Parent

    I’m assuming this is the same Kate Martin that approached the PTA at Greenwood Elementary a year ago and tried to get us to support kicking three classrooms of special needs kindergarten students out of the school.

    Of course we didn’t.

    The “funny” thing is that her kids don’t even go to the school.

    Wow. Just wow.

  • Greenwood Parent

    I’m assuming this is the same Kate Martin that approached the PTA at Greenwood Elementary a year ago and tried to get us to support kicking three classrooms of special needs kindergarten students out of the school.

    Of course we didn’t.

    The “funny” thing is that her kids don’t even go to the school.

    Wow. Just wow.

  • Greenwood Parent

    I’m assuming this is the same Kate Martin that approached the PTA at Greenwood Elementary a year ago and tried to get us to support kicking three classrooms of special needs kindergarten students out of the school.

    Of course we didn’t.

    The “funny” thing is that her kids don’t even go to the school.

    Wow. Just wow.

  • Greenwood Parent

    I’m assuming this is the same Kate Martin that approached the PTA at Greenwood Elementary a year ago and tried to get us to support kicking three classrooms of special needs kindergarten students out of the school.

    Of course we didn’t.

    The “funny” thing is that her kids don’t even go to the school.

    Wow. Just wow.

  • Greenwood Parent

    I’m assuming this is the same Kate Martin that approached the PTA at Greenwood Elementary a year ago and tried to get us to support kicking three classrooms of special needs kindergarten students out of the school.

    Of course we didn’t.

    The “funny” thing is that her kids don’t even go to the school.

    Wow. Just wow.

  • Greenwood Parent

    I’m assuming this is the same Kate Martin that approached the PTA at Greenwood Elementary a year ago and tried to get us to support kicking three classrooms of special needs kindergarten students out of the school.

    Of course we didn’t.

    The “funny” thing is that her kids don’t even go to the school.

    Wow. Just wow.

  • Greenwood Parent

    I’m assuming this is the same Kate Martin that approached the PTA at Greenwood Elementary a year ago and tried to get us to support kicking three classrooms of special needs kindergarten students out of the school.

    Of course we didn’t.

    The “funny” thing is that her kids don’t even go to the school.

    Wow. Just wow.

  • Greenwood Parent

    I’m assuming this is the same Kate Martin that approached the PTA at Greenwood Elementary a year ago and tried to get us to support kicking three classrooms of special needs kindergarten students out of the school.

    Of course we didn’t.

    The “funny” thing is that her kids don’t even go to the school.

    Wow. Just wow.

  • Greenwood Parent

    I’m assuming this is the same Kate Martin that approached the PTA at Greenwood Elementary a year ago and tried to get us to support kicking three classrooms of special needs kindergarten students out of the school.

    Of course we didn’t.

    The “funny” thing is that her kids don’t even go to the school.

    Wow. Just wow.

  • Greenwood Parent

    I’m assuming this is the same Kate Martin that approached the PTA at Greenwood Elementary a year ago and tried to get us to support kicking three classrooms of special needs kindergarten students out of the school.

    Of course we didn’t.

    The “funny” thing is that her kids don’t even go to the school.

    Wow. Just wow.

  • Greenwood Parent

    I’m assuming this is the same Kate Martin that approached the PTA at Greenwood Elementary a year ago and tried to get us to support kicking three classrooms of special needs kindergarten students out of the school.

    Of course we didn’t.

    The “funny” thing is that her kids don’t even go to the school.

    Wow. Just wow.

  • Greenwood Parent

    I’m assuming this is the same Kate Martin that approached the PTA at Greenwood Elementary a year ago and tried to get us to support kicking three classrooms of special needs kindergarten students out of the school.

    Of course we didn’t.

    The “funny” thing is that her kids don’t even go to the school.

    Wow. Just wow.

  • Greenwood Parent

    I’m assuming this is the same Kate Martin that approached the PTA at Greenwood Elementary a year ago and tried to get us to support kicking three classrooms of special needs kindergarten students out of the school.

    Of course we didn’t.

    The “funny” thing is that her kids don’t even go to the school.

    Wow. Just wow.

  • Greenwood Parent

    I’m assuming this is the same Kate Martin that approached the PTA at Greenwood Elementary a year ago and tried to get us to support kicking three classrooms of special needs kindergarten students out of the school.

    Of course we didn’t.

    The “funny” thing is that her kids don’t even go to the school.

    Wow. Just wow.

  • Greenwood Parent

    I’m assuming this is the same Kate Martin that approached the PTA at Greenwood Elementary a year ago and tried to get us to support kicking three classrooms of special needs kindergarten students out of the school.

    Of course we didn’t.

    The “funny” thing is that her kids don’t even go to the school.

    Wow. Just wow.

  • Greenwood Parent

    I’m assuming this is the same Kate Martin that approached the PTA at Greenwood Elementary a year ago and tried to get us to support kicking three classrooms of special needs kindergarten students out of the school.

    Of course we didn’t.

    The “funny” thing is that her kids don’t even go to the school.

    Wow. Just wow.

  • Greenwood Parent

    I’m assuming this is the same Kate Martin that approached the PTA at Greenwood Elementary a year ago and tried to get us to support kicking three classrooms of special needs kindergarten students out of the school.

    Of course we didn’t.

    The “funny” thing is that her kids don’t even go to the school.

    Wow. Just wow.

  • Greenwood Parent

    I’m assuming this is the same Kate Martin that approached the PTA at Greenwood Elementary a year ago and tried to get us to support kicking three classrooms of special needs kindergarten students out of the school.

    Of course we didn’t.

    The “funny” thing is that her kids don’t even go to the school.

    Wow. Just wow.

  • Greenwood Parent

    I’m assuming this is the same Kate Martin that approached the PTA at Greenwood Elementary a year ago and tried to get us to support kicking three classrooms of special needs kindergarten students out of the school.

    Of course we didn’t.

    The “funny” thing is that her kids don’t even go to the school.

    Wow. Just wow.

  • Greenwood Parent

    I’m assuming this is the same Kate Martin that approached the PTA at Greenwood Elementary a year ago and tried to get us to support kicking three classrooms of special needs kindergarten students out of the school.

    Of course we didn’t.

    The “funny” thing is that her kids don’t even go to the school.

    Wow. Just wow.

  • Greenwood Parent

    I’m assuming this is the same Kate Martin that approached the PTA at Greenwood Elementary a year ago and tried to get us to support kicking three classrooms of special needs kindergarten students out of the school.

    Of course we didn’t.

    The “funny” thing is that her kids don’t even go to the school.

    Wow. Just wow.

  • Greenwood Parent

    I’m assuming this is the same Kate Martin that approached the PTA at Greenwood Elementary a year ago and tried to get us to support kicking three classrooms of special needs kindergarten students out of the school.

    Of course we didn’t.

    The “funny” thing is that her kids don’t even go to the school.

    Wow. Just wow.

  • Greenwood Parent

    I’m assuming this is the same Kate Martin that approached the PTA at Greenwood Elementary a year ago and tried to get us to support kicking three classrooms of special needs kindergarten students out of the school.

    Of course we didn’t.

    The “funny” thing is that her kids don’t even go to the school.

    Wow. Just wow.

  • Greenwood Parent

    I’m assuming this is the same Kate Martin that approached the PTA at Greenwood Elementary a year ago and tried to get us to support kicking three classrooms of special needs kindergarten students out of the school.

    Of course we didn’t.

    The “funny” thing is that her kids don’t even go to the school.

    Wow. Just wow.

  • Greenwood Parent

    I’m assuming this is the same Kate Martin that approached the PTA at Greenwood Elementary a year ago and tried to get us to support kicking three classrooms of special needs kindergarten students out of the school.

    Of course we didn’t.

    The “funny” thing is that her kids don’t even go to the school.

    Wow. Just wow.

  • Greenwood Parent

    I’m assuming this is the same Kate Martin that approached the PTA at Greenwood Elementary a year ago and tried to get us to support kicking three classrooms of special needs kindergarten students out of the school.

    Of course we didn’t.

    The “funny” thing is that her kids don’t even go to the school.

    Wow. Just wow.

  • Greenwood Parent

    I’m assuming this is the same Kate Martin that approached the PTA at Greenwood Elementary a year ago and tried to get us to support kicking three classrooms of special needs kindergarten students out of the school.

    Of course we didn’t.

    The “funny” thing is that her kids don’t even go to the school.

    Wow. Just wow.

  • Greenwood Parent

    I’m assuming this is the same Kate Martin that approached the PTA at Greenwood Elementary a year ago and tried to get us to support kicking three classrooms of special needs kindergarten students out of the school.

    Of course we didn’t.

    The “funny” thing is that her kids don’t even go to the school.

    Wow. Just wow.

  • Greenwood Parent

    I’m assuming this is the same Kate Martin that approached the PTA at Greenwood Elementary a year ago and tried to get us to support kicking three classrooms of special needs kindergarten students out of the school.

    Of course we didn’t.

    The “funny” thing is that her kids don’t even go to the school.

    Wow. Just wow.

  • Greenwood Parent

    I’m assuming this is the same Kate Martin that approached the PTA at Greenwood Elementary a year ago and tried to get us to support kicking three classrooms of special needs kindergarten students out of the school.

    Of course we didn’t.

    The “funny” thing is that her kids don’t even go to the school.

    Wow. Just wow.

  • Greenwood Parent

    I’m assuming this is the same Kate Martin that approached the PTA at Greenwood Elementary a year ago and tried to get us to support kicking three classrooms of special needs kindergarten students out of the school.

    Of course we didn’t.

    The “funny” thing is that her kids don’t even go to the school.

    Wow. Just wow.

  • Greenwood Parent

    I’m assuming this is the same Kate Martin that approached the PTA at Greenwood Elementary a year ago and tried to get us to support kicking three classrooms of special needs kindergarten students out of the school.

    Of course we didn’t.

    The “funny” thing is that her kids don’t even go to the school.

    Wow. Just wow.

  • Greenwood Parent

    I’m assuming this is the same Kate Martin that approached the PTA at Greenwood Elementary a year ago and tried to get us to support kicking three classrooms of special needs kindergarten students out of the school.

    Of course we didn’t.

    The “funny” thing is that her kids don’t even go to the school.

    Wow. Just wow.

  • Greenwood Parent

    I’m assuming this is the same Kate Martin that approached the PTA at Greenwood Elementary a year ago and tried to get us to support kicking three classrooms of special needs kindergarten students out of the school.

    Of course we didn’t.

    The “funny” thing is that her kids don’t even go to the school.

    Wow. Just wow.

  • Greenwood Parent

    I’m assuming this is the same Kate Martin that approached the PTA at Greenwood Elementary a year ago and tried to get us to support kicking three classrooms of special needs kindergarten students out of the school.

    Of course we didn’t.

    The “funny” thing is that her kids don’t even go to the school.

    Wow. Just wow.

  • Greenwood Parent

    I’m assuming this is the same Kate Martin that approached the PTA at Greenwood Elementary a year ago and tried to get us to support kicking three classrooms of special needs kindergarten students out of the school.

    Of course we didn’t.

    The “funny” thing is that her kids don’t even go to the school.

    Wow. Just wow.

  • Greenwood Parent

    I’m assuming this is the same Kate Martin that approached the PTA at Greenwood Elementary a year ago and tried to get us to support kicking three classrooms of special needs kindergarten students out of the school.

    Of course we didn’t.

    The “funny” thing is that her kids don’t even go to the school.

    Wow. Just wow.

  • Greenwood Parent

    I’m assuming this is the same Kate Martin that approached the PTA at Greenwood Elementary a year ago and tried to get us to support kicking three classrooms of special needs kindergarten students out of the school.

    Of course we didn’t.

    The “funny” thing is that her kids don’t even go to the school.

    Wow. Just wow.

  • Greenwood Parent

    I’m assuming this is the same Kate Martin that approached the PTA at Greenwood Elementary a year ago and tried to get us to support kicking three classrooms of special needs kindergarten students out of the school.

    Of course we didn’t.

    The “funny” thing is that her kids don’t even go to the school.

    Wow. Just wow.

  • Greenwood Parent

    I’m assuming this is the same Kate Martin that approached the PTA at Greenwood Elementary a year ago and tried to get us to support kicking three classrooms of special needs kindergarten students out of the school.

    Of course we didn’t.

    The “funny” thing is that her kids don’t even go to the school.

    Wow. Just wow.

  • Greenwood Parent

    I’m assuming this is the same Kate Martin that approached the PTA at Greenwood Elementary a year ago and tried to get us to support kicking three classrooms of special needs kindergarten students out of the school.

    Of course we didn’t.

    The “funny” thing is that her kids don’t even go to the school.

    Wow. Just wow.

  • Greenwood Parent

    I’m assuming this is the same Kate Martin that approached the PTA at Greenwood Elementary a year ago and tried to get us to support kicking three classrooms of special needs kindergarten students out of the school.

    Of course we didn’t.

    The “funny” thing is that her kids don’t even go to the school.

    Wow. Just wow.

  • Greenwood Parent

    I’m assuming this is the same Kate Martin that approached the PTA at Greenwood Elementary a year ago and tried to get us to support kicking three classrooms of special needs kindergarten students out of the school.

    Of course we didn’t.

    The “funny” thing is that her kids don’t even go to the school.

    Wow. Just wow.

  • Greenwood Parent

    I’m assuming this is the same Kate Martin that approached the PTA at Greenwood Elementary a year ago and tried to get us to support kicking three classrooms of special needs kindergarten students out of the school.

    Of course we didn’t.

    The “funny” thing is that her kids don’t even go to the school.

    Wow. Just wow.

  • Greenwood Parent

    I’m assuming this is the same Kate Martin that approached the PTA at Greenwood Elementary a year ago and tried to get us to support kicking three classrooms of special needs kindergarten students out of the school.

    Of course we didn’t.

    The “funny” thing is that her kids don’t even go to the school.

    Wow. Just wow.

  • Greenwood Parent

    I’m assuming this is the same Kate Martin that approached the PTA at Greenwood Elementary a year ago and tried to get us to support kicking three classrooms of special needs kindergarten students out of the school.

    Of course we didn’t.

    The “funny” thing is that her kids don’t even go to the school.

    Wow. Just wow.

  • Greenwood Parent

    I’m assuming this is the same Kate Martin that approached the PTA at Greenwood Elementary a year ago and tried to get us to support kicking three classrooms of special needs kindergarten students out of the school.

    Of course we didn’t.

    The “funny” thing is that her kids don’t even go to the school.

    Wow. Just wow.

  • Stacy

    Kate, what exactly are you trying to accomplish with these nasty personal attacks? Other than losing the respect of pretty much everyone who reads Publicola, you’re not helping improve the lives of anyone in this City. This is very sad, you should be ashamed of yourself.

    Do you want people to start speaking about their experiences working with you (because I don’t think you’d like what you’d hear if people were as crude as you)?

  • Stacy

    Kate, what exactly are you trying to accomplish with these nasty personal attacks? Other than losing the respect of pretty much everyone who reads Publicola, you’re not helping improve the lives of anyone in this City. This is very sad, you should be ashamed of yourself.

    Do you want people to start speaking about their experiences working with you (because I don’t think you’d like what you’d hear if people were as crude as you)?

  • Stacy

    Kate, what exactly are you trying to accomplish with these nasty personal attacks? Other than losing the respect of pretty much everyone who reads Publicola, you’re not helping improve the lives of anyone in this City. This is very sad, you should be ashamed of yourself.

    Do you want people to start speaking about their experiences working with you (because I don’t think you’d like what you’d hear if people were as crude as you)?

  • Stacy

    Kate, what exactly are you trying to accomplish with these nasty personal attacks? Other than losing the respect of pretty much everyone who reads Publicola, you’re not helping improve the lives of anyone in this City. This is very sad, you should be ashamed of yourself.

    Do you want people to start speaking about their experiences working with you (because I don’t think you’d like what you’d hear if people were as crude as you)?

  • Stacy

    Kate, what exactly are you trying to accomplish with these nasty personal attacks? Other than losing the respect of pretty much everyone who reads Publicola, you’re not helping improve the lives of anyone in this City. This is very sad, you should be ashamed of yourself.

    Do you want people to start speaking about their experiences working with you (because I don’t think you’d like what you’d hear if people were as crude as you)?

  • Stacy

    Kate, what exactly are you trying to accomplish with these nasty personal attacks? Other than losing the respect of pretty much everyone who reads Publicola, you’re not helping improve the lives of anyone in this City. This is very sad, you should be ashamed of yourself.

    Do you want people to start speaking about their experiences working with you (because I don’t think you’d like what you’d hear if people were as crude as you)?

  • Stacy

    Kate, what exactly are you trying to accomplish with these nasty personal attacks? Other than losing the respect of pretty much everyone who reads Publicola, you’re not helping improve the lives of anyone in this City. This is very sad, you should be ashamed of yourself.

    Do you want people to start speaking about their experiences working with you (because I don’t think you’d like what you’d hear if people were as crude as you)?

  • Stacy

    Kate, what exactly are you trying to accomplish with these nasty personal attacks? Other than losing the respect of pretty much everyone who reads Publicola, you’re not helping improve the lives of anyone in this City. This is very sad, you should be ashamed of yourself.

    Do you want people to start speaking about their experiences working with you (because I don’t think you’d like what you’d hear if people were as crude as you)?

  • Stacy

    Kate, what exactly are you trying to accomplish with these nasty personal attacks? Other than losing the respect of pretty much everyone who reads Publicola, you’re not helping improve the lives of anyone in this City. This is very sad, you should be ashamed of yourself.

    Do you want people to start speaking about their experiences working with you (because I don’t think you’d like what you’d hear if people were as crude as you)?

  • Stacy

    Kate, what exactly are you trying to accomplish with these nasty personal attacks? Other than losing the respect of pretty much everyone who reads Publicola, you’re not helping improve the lives of anyone in this City. This is very sad, you should be ashamed of yourself.

    Do you want people to start speaking about their experiences working with you (because I don’t think you’d like what you’d hear if people were as crude as you)?

  • Stacy

    Kate, what exactly are you trying to accomplish with these nasty personal attacks? Other than losing the respect of pretty much everyone who reads Publicola, you’re not helping improve the lives of anyone in this City. This is very sad, you should be ashamed of yourself.

    Do you want people to start speaking about their experiences working with you (because I don’t think you’d like what you’d hear if people were as crude as you)?

  • Stacy

    Kate, what exactly are you trying to accomplish with these nasty personal attacks? Other than losing the respect of pretty much everyone who reads Publicola, you’re not helping improve the lives of anyone in this City. This is very sad, you should be ashamed of yourself.

    Do you want people to start speaking about their experiences working with you (because I don’t think you’d like what you’d hear if people were as crude as you)?

  • Stacy

    Kate, what exactly are you trying to accomplish with these nasty personal attacks? Other than losing the respect of pretty much everyone who reads Publicola, you’re not helping improve the lives of anyone in this City. This is very sad, you should be ashamed of yourself.

    Do you want people to start speaking about their experiences working with you (because I don’t think you’d like what you’d hear if people were as crude as you)?

  • Stacy

    Kate, what exactly are you trying to accomplish with these nasty personal attacks? Other than losing the respect of pretty much everyone who reads Publicola, you’re not helping improve the lives of anyone in this City. This is very sad, you should be ashamed of yourself.

    Do you want people to start speaking about their experiences working with you (because I don’t think you’d like what you’d hear if people were as crude as you)?

  • Stacy

    Kate, what exactly are you trying to accomplish with these nasty personal attacks? Other than losing the respect of pretty much everyone who reads Publicola, you’re not helping improve the lives of anyone in this City. This is very sad, you should be ashamed of yourself.

    Do you want people to start speaking about their experiences working with you (because I don’t think you’d like what you’d hear if people were as crude as you)?

  • Stacy

    Kate, what exactly are you trying to accomplish with these nasty personal attacks? Other than losing the respect of pretty much everyone who reads Publicola, you’re not helping improve the lives of anyone in this City. This is very sad, you should be ashamed of yourself.

    Do you want people to start speaking about their experiences working with you (because I don’t think you’d like what you’d hear if people were as crude as you)?

  • Stacy

    Kate, what exactly are you trying to accomplish with these nasty personal attacks? Other than losing the respect of pretty much everyone who reads Publicola, you’re not helping improve the lives of anyone in this City. This is very sad, you should be ashamed of yourself.

    Do you want people to start speaking about their experiences working with you (because I don’t think you’d like what you’d hear if people were as crude as you)?

  • Stacy

    Kate, what exactly are you trying to accomplish with these nasty personal attacks? Other than losing the respect of pretty much everyone who reads Publicola, you’re not helping improve the lives of anyone in this City. This is very sad, you should be ashamed of yourself.

    Do you want people to start speaking about their experiences working with you (because I don’t think you’d like what you’d hear if people were as crude as you)?

  • Stacy

    Kate, what exactly are you trying to accomplish with these nasty personal attacks? Other than losing the respect of pretty much everyone who reads Publicola, you’re not helping improve the lives of anyone in this City. This is very sad, you should be ashamed of yourself.

    Do you want people to start speaking about their experiences working with you (because I don’t think you’d like what you’d hear if people were as crude as you)?

  • Stacy

    Kate, what exactly are you trying to accomplish with these nasty personal attacks? Other than losing the respect of pretty much everyone who reads Publicola, you’re not helping improve the lives of anyone in this City. This is very sad, you should be ashamed of yourself.

    Do you want people to start speaking about their experiences working with you (because I don’t think you’d like what you’d hear if people were as crude as you)?

  • Stacy

    Kate, what exactly are you trying to accomplish with these nasty personal attacks? Other than losing the respect of pretty much everyone who reads Publicola, you’re not helping improve the lives of anyone in this City. This is very sad, you should be ashamed of yourself.

    Do you want people to start speaking about their experiences working with you (because I don’t think you’d like what you’d hear if people were as crude as you)?

  • Stacy

    Kate, what exactly are you trying to accomplish with these nasty personal attacks? Other than losing the respect of pretty much everyone who reads Publicola, you’re not helping improve the lives of anyone in this City. This is very sad, you should be ashamed of yourself.

    Do you want people to start speaking about their experiences working with you (because I don’t think you’d like what you’d hear if people were as crude as you)?

  • Stacy

    Kate, what exactly are you trying to accomplish with these nasty personal attacks? Other than losing the respect of pretty much everyone who reads Publicola, you’re not helping improve the lives of anyone in this City. This is very sad, you should be ashamed of yourself.

    Do you want people to start speaking about their experiences working with you (because I don’t think you’d like what you’d hear if people were as crude as you)?

  • Stacy

    Kate, what exactly are you trying to accomplish with these nasty personal attacks? Other than losing the respect of pretty much everyone who reads Publicola, you’re not helping improve the lives of anyone in this City. This is very sad, you should be ashamed of yourself.

    Do you want people to start speaking about their experiences working with you (because I don’t think you’d like what you’d hear if people were as crude as you)?

  • Stacy

    Kate, what exactly are you trying to accomplish with these nasty personal attacks? Other than losing the respect of pretty much everyone who reads Publicola, you’re not helping improve the lives of anyone in this City. This is very sad, you should be ashamed of yourself.

    Do you want people to start speaking about their experiences working with you (because I don’t think you’d like what you’d hear if people were as crude as you)?

  • Stacy

    Kate, what exactly are you trying to accomplish with these nasty personal attacks? Other than losing the respect of pretty much everyone who reads Publicola, you’re not helping improve the lives of anyone in this City. This is very sad, you should be ashamed of yourself.

    Do you want people to start speaking about their experiences working with you (because I don’t think you’d like what you’d hear if people were as crude as you)?

  • Stacy

    Kate, what exactly are you trying to accomplish with these nasty personal attacks? Other than losing the respect of pretty much everyone who reads Publicola, you’re not helping improve the lives of anyone in this City. This is very sad, you should be ashamed of yourself.

    Do you want people to start speaking about their experiences working with you (because I don’t think you’d like what you’d hear if people were as crude as you)?

  • Stacy

    Kate, what exactly are you trying to accomplish with these nasty personal attacks? Other than losing the respect of pretty much everyone who reads Publicola, you’re not helping improve the lives of anyone in this City. This is very sad, you should be ashamed of yourself.

    Do you want people to start speaking about their experiences working with you (because I don’t think you’d like what you’d hear if people were as crude as you)?

  • Stacy

    Kate, what exactly are you trying to accomplish with these nasty personal attacks? Other than losing the respect of pretty much everyone who reads Publicola, you’re not helping improve the lives of anyone in this City. This is very sad, you should be ashamed of yourself.

    Do you want people to start speaking about their experiences working with you (because I don’t think you’d like what you’d hear if people were as crude as you)?

  • Stacy

    Kate, what exactly are you trying to accomplish with these nasty personal attacks? Other than losing the respect of pretty much everyone who reads Publicola, you’re not helping improve the lives of anyone in this City. This is very sad, you should be ashamed of yourself.

    Do you want people to start speaking about their experiences working with you (because I don’t think you’d like what you’d hear if people were as crude as you)?

  • Stacy

    Kate, what exactly are you trying to accomplish with these nasty personal attacks? Other than losing the respect of pretty much everyone who reads Publicola, you’re not helping improve the lives of anyone in this City. This is very sad, you should be ashamed of yourself.

    Do you want people to start speaking about their experiences working with you (because I don’t think you’d like what you’d hear if people were as crude as you)?

  • Stacy

    Kate, what exactly are you trying to accomplish with these nasty personal attacks? Other than losing the respect of pretty much everyone who reads Publicola, you’re not helping improve the lives of anyone in this City. This is very sad, you should be ashamed of yourself.

    Do you want people to start speaking about their experiences working with you (because I don’t think you’d like what you’d hear if people were as crude as you)?

  • Stacy

    Kate, what exactly are you trying to accomplish with these nasty personal attacks? Other than losing the respect of pretty much everyone who reads Publicola, you’re not helping improve the lives of anyone in this City. This is very sad, you should be ashamed of yourself.

    Do you want people to start speaking about their experiences working with you (because I don’t think you’d like what you’d hear if people were as crude as you)?

  • Stacy

    Kate, what exactly are you trying to accomplish with these nasty personal attacks? Other than losing the respect of pretty much everyone who reads Publicola, you’re not helping improve the lives of anyone in this City. This is very sad, you should be ashamed of yourself.

    Do you want people to start speaking about their experiences working with you (because I don’t think you’d like what you’d hear if people were as crude as you)?

  • Stacy

    Kate, what exactly are you trying to accomplish with these nasty personal attacks? Other than losing the respect of pretty much everyone who reads Publicola, you’re not helping improve the lives of anyone in this City. This is very sad, you should be ashamed of yourself.

    Do you want people to start speaking about their experiences working with you (because I don’t think you’d like what you’d hear if people were as crude as you)?

  • Stacy

    Kate, what exactly are you trying to accomplish with these nasty personal attacks? Other than losing the respect of pretty much everyone who reads Publicola, you’re not helping improve the lives of anyone in this City. This is very sad, you should be ashamed of yourself.

    Do you want people to start speaking about their experiences working with you (because I don’t think you’d like what you’d hear if people were as crude as you)?

  • Stacy

    Kate, what exactly are you trying to accomplish with these nasty personal attacks? Other than losing the respect of pretty much everyone who reads Publicola, you’re not helping improve the lives of anyone in this City. This is very sad, you should be ashamed of yourself.

    Do you want people to start speaking about their experiences working with you (because I don’t think you’d like what you’d hear if people were as crude as you)?

  • Stacy

    Kate, what exactly are you trying to accomplish with these nasty personal attacks? Other than losing the respect of pretty much everyone who reads Publicola, you’re not helping improve the lives of anyone in this City. This is very sad, you should be ashamed of yourself.

    Do you want people to start speaking about their experiences working with you (because I don’t think you’d like what you’d hear if people were as crude as you)?

  • Stacy

    Kate, what exactly are you trying to accomplish with these nasty personal attacks? Other than losing the respect of pretty much everyone who reads Publicola, you’re not helping improve the lives of anyone in this City. This is very sad, you should be ashamed of yourself.

    Do you want people to start speaking about their experiences working with you (because I don’t think you’d like what you’d hear if people were as crude as you)?

  • Stacy

    Kate, what exactly are you trying to accomplish with these nasty personal attacks? Other than losing the respect of pretty much everyone who reads Publicola, you’re not helping improve the lives of anyone in this City. This is very sad, you should be ashamed of yourself.

    Do you want people to start speaking about their experiences working with you (because I don’t think you’d like what you’d hear if people were as crude as you)?

  • Stacy

    Kate, what exactly are you trying to accomplish with these nasty personal attacks? Other than losing the respect of pretty much everyone who reads Publicola, you’re not helping improve the lives of anyone in this City. This is very sad, you should be ashamed of yourself.

    Do you want people to start speaking about their experiences working with you (because I don’t think you’d like what you’d hear if people were as crude as you)?

  • Stacy

    Kate, what exactly are you trying to accomplish with these nasty personal attacks? Other than losing the respect of pretty much everyone who reads Publicola, you’re not helping improve the lives of anyone in this City. This is very sad, you should be ashamed of yourself.

    Do you want people to start speaking about their experiences working with you (because I don’t think you’d like what you’d hear if people were as crude as you)?

  • Stacy

    Kate, what exactly are you trying to accomplish with these nasty personal attacks? Other than losing the respect of pretty much everyone who reads Publicola, you’re not helping improve the lives of anyone in this City. This is very sad, you should be ashamed of yourself.

    Do you want people to start speaking about their experiences working with you (because I don’t think you’d like what you’d hear if people were as crude as you)?

  • Stacy

    Kate, what exactly are you trying to accomplish with these nasty personal attacks? Other than losing the respect of pretty much everyone who reads Publicola, you’re not helping improve the lives of anyone in this City. This is very sad, you should be ashamed of yourself.

    Do you want people to start speaking about their experiences working with you (because I don’t think you’d like what you’d hear if people were as crude as you)?

  • Stacy

    Kate, what exactly are you trying to accomplish with these nasty personal attacks? Other than losing the respect of pretty much everyone who reads Publicola, you’re not helping improve the lives of anyone in this City. This is very sad, you should be ashamed of yourself.

    Do you want people to start speaking about their experiences working with you (because I don’t think you’d like what you’d hear if people were as crude as you)?

  • Stacy

    Kate, what exactly are you trying to accomplish with these nasty personal attacks? Other than losing the respect of pretty much everyone who reads Publicola, you’re not helping improve the lives of anyone in this City. This is very sad, you should be ashamed of yourself.

    Do you want people to start speaking about their experiences working with you (because I don’t think you’d like what you’d hear if people were as crude as you)?

  • Stacy

    Kate, what exactly are you trying to accomplish with these nasty personal attacks? Other than losing the respect of pretty much everyone who reads Publicola, you’re not helping improve the lives of anyone in this City. This is very sad, you should be ashamed of yourself.

    Do you want people to start speaking about their experiences working with you (because I don’t think you’d like what you’d hear if people were as crude as you)?

  • Stacy

    Kate, what exactly are you trying to accomplish with these nasty personal attacks? Other than losing the respect of pretty much everyone who reads Publicola, you’re not helping improve the lives of anyone in this City. This is very sad, you should be ashamed of yourself.

    Do you want people to start speaking about their experiences working with you (because I don’t think you’d like what you’d hear if people were as crude as you)?

  • Stacy

    Kate, what exactly are you trying to accomplish with these nasty personal attacks? Other than losing the respect of pretty much everyone who reads Publicola, you’re not helping improve the lives of anyone in this City. This is very sad, you should be ashamed of yourself.

    Do you want people to start speaking about their experiences working with you (because I don’t think you’d like what you’d hear if people were as crude as you)?

  • Stacy

    Kate, what exactly are you trying to accomplish with these nasty personal attacks? Other than losing the respect of pretty much everyone who reads Publicola, you’re not helping improve the lives of anyone in this City. This is very sad, you should be ashamed of yourself.

    Do you want people to start speaking about their experiences working with you (because I don’t think you’d like what you’d hear if people were as crude as you)?

  • Stacy

    Kate, what exactly are you trying to accomplish with these nasty personal attacks? Other than losing the respect of pretty much everyone who reads Publicola, you’re not helping improve the lives of anyone in this City. This is very sad, you should be ashamed of yourself.

    Do you want people to start speaking about their experiences working with you (because I don’t think you’d like what you’d hear if people were as crude as you)?

  • Stacy

    Kate, what exactly are you trying to accomplish with these nasty personal attacks? Other than losing the respect of pretty much everyone who reads Publicola, you’re not helping improve the lives of anyone in this City. This is very sad, you should be ashamed of yourself.

    Do you want people to start speaking about their experiences working with you (because I don’t think you’d like what you’d hear if people were as crude as you)?

  • Stacy

    Kate, what exactly are you trying to accomplish with these nasty personal attacks? Other than losing the respect of pretty much everyone who reads Publicola, you’re not helping improve the lives of anyone in this City. This is very sad, you should be ashamed of yourself.

    Do you want people to start speaking about their experiences working with you (because I don’t think you’d like what you’d hear if people were as crude as you)?

  • Stacy

    Kate, what exactly are you trying to accomplish with these nasty personal attacks? Other than losing the respect of pretty much everyone who reads Publicola, you’re not helping improve the lives of anyone in this City. This is very sad, you should be ashamed of yourself.

    Do you want people to start speaking about their experiences working with you (because I don’t think you’d like what you’d hear if people were as crude as you)?

  • Kate Martin

    Alright, I’m not a deflector. @ Greenwood Parent I only say that you might not know me very well.

    I have been an advocate for Greenwood Elementary for a long, long time. The school has had a disastrous history with principals each at $125K or more with lackluster performance. Joanna Hill – disaster and transferred how many times? Dr. Radford? That’s when McGinn did his failed coup to get Radford out of there when his kids were there and emptied the school while he was at it. Six or seven years ago?

    Then they had excess capacity. But why? Instead of asking why and holding SPS responsible for poor leadership, programs, and the fact that they had white flight. They had and have a disproportionate number of students from socio-economically disadvantaged backgrounds with horrible achievement statistics coming from The Cate Apartments, Denise Hunt, and scattered Section 8 and in part due to inadequate intervention on the SPS part by de facto enrollment by families who don’t advocate for which school, but who take whatever comes. Bagley and Whittier are not taking their fair load.

    I questioned closing Viewlands (because data said we wouldn’t have capacity and we don’t) when their enrollment was on the upswing, their achievement was on the upswing, and they had a great inclusion autism program.

    Instead of asking questions, they quickly filled Greenwood with a special ed program. SPS considers programs something you move whenever the whim suits them. Remember you don’t want your kid in a Seattle program or something like Summit at Jane Addams because the @ means your days are numbered.

    Anyway, they finally got rid of Radford and replaced him with Walter Trotter. I confronted Walter about what the heck he was going to do to help these disadvantaged kids who were being spit out of Greenwood, flunking at Whitman & Hamilton, and dropping out of Ingraham, Roosevelt, Hale, and Ballard.

    He sent me some email that he recalled. Thanks, Walter. Meanwhile he hadn’t heard of 826 Seattle (a free writing workshop 6 blocks from the school).

    I am used to being accused of a lot and I reiterate that this accusation is no different than the others.

    Why wouldn’t you just ask instead of harboring unfounded accusations?

    Greenwood Elementary? I’m happy to go toe to toe with anyone who defends how SPS manages Greenwood Elementary.

  • Kate Martin

    Alright, I’m not a deflector. @ Greenwood Parent I only say that you might not know me very well.

    I have been an advocate for Greenwood Elementary for a long, long time. The school has had a disastrous history with principals each at $125K or more with lackluster performance. Joanna Hill – disaster and transferred how many times? Dr. Radford? That’s when McGinn did his failed coup to get Radford out of there when his kids were there and emptied the school while he was at it. Six or seven years ago?

    Then they had excess capacity. But why? Instead of asking why and holding SPS responsible for poor leadership, programs, and the fact that they had white flight. They had and have a disproportionate number of students from socio-economically disadvantaged backgrounds with horrible achievement statistics coming from The Cate Apartments, Denise Hunt, and scattered Section 8 and in part due to inadequate intervention on the SPS part by de facto enrollment by families who don’t advocate for which school, but who take whatever comes. Bagley and Whittier are not taking their fair load.

    I questioned closing Viewlands (because data said we wouldn’t have capacity and we don’t) when their enrollment was on the upswing, their achievement was on the upswing, and they had a great inclusion autism program.

    Instead of asking questions, they quickly filled Greenwood with a special ed program. SPS considers programs something you move whenever the whim suits them. Remember you don’t want your kid in a Seattle program or something like Summit at Jane Addams because the @ means your days are numbered.

    Anyway, they finally got rid of Radford and replaced him with Walter Trotter. I confronted Walter about what the heck he was going to do to help these disadvantaged kids who were being spit out of Greenwood, flunking at Whitman & Hamilton, and dropping out of Ingraham, Roosevelt, Hale, and Ballard.

    He sent me some email that he recalled. Thanks, Walter. Meanwhile he hadn’t heard of 826 Seattle (a free writing workshop 6 blocks from the school).

    I am used to being accused of a lot and I reiterate that this accusation is no different than the others.

    Why wouldn’t you just ask instead of harboring unfounded accusations?

    Greenwood Elementary? I’m happy to go toe to toe with anyone who defends how SPS manages Greenwood Elementary.

  • Kate Martin

    Alright, I’m not a deflector. @ Greenwood Parent I only say that you might not know me very well.

    I have been an advocate for Greenwood Elementary for a long, long time. The school has had a disastrous history with principals each at $125K or more with lackluster performance. Joanna Hill – disaster and transferred how many times? Dr. Radford? That’s when McGinn did his failed coup to get Radford out of there when his kids were there and emptied the school while he was at it. Six or seven years ago?

    Then they had excess capacity. But why? Instead of asking why and holding SPS responsible for poor leadership, programs, and the fact that they had white flight. They had and have a disproportionate number of students from socio-economically disadvantaged backgrounds with horrible achievement statistics coming from The Cate Apartments, Denise Hunt, and scattered Section 8 and in part due to inadequate intervention on the SPS part by de facto enrollment by families who don’t advocate for which school, but who take whatever comes. Bagley and Whittier are not taking their fair load.

    I questioned closing Viewlands (because data said we wouldn’t have capacity and we don’t) when their enrollment was on the upswing, their achievement was on the upswing, and they had a great inclusion autism program.

    Instead of asking questions, they quickly filled Greenwood with a special ed program. SPS considers programs something you move whenever the whim suits them. Remember you don’t want your kid in a Seattle program or something like Summit at Jane Addams because the @ means your days are numbered.

    Anyway, they finally got rid of Radford and replaced him with Walter Trotter. I confronted Walter about what the heck he was going to do to help these disadvantaged kids who were being spit out of Greenwood, flunking at Whitman & Hamilton, and dropping out of Ingraham, Roosevelt, Hale, and Ballard.

    He sent me some email that he recalled. Thanks, Walter. Meanwhile he hadn’t heard of 826 Seattle (a free writing workshop 6 blocks from the school).

    I am used to being accused of a lot and I reiterate that this accusation is no different than the others.

    Why wouldn’t you just ask instead of harboring unfounded accusations?

    Greenwood Elementary? I’m happy to go toe to toe with anyone who defends how SPS manages Greenwood Elementary.

  • Kate Martin

    Alright, I’m not a deflector. @ Greenwood Parent I only say that you might not know me very well.

    I have been an advocate for Greenwood Elementary for a long, long time. The school has had a disastrous history with principals each at $125K or more with lackluster performance. Joanna Hill – disaster and transferred how many times? Dr. Radford? That’s when McGinn did his failed coup to get Radford out of there when his kids were there and emptied the school while he was at it. Six or seven years ago?

    Then they had excess capacity. But why? Instead of asking why and holding SPS responsible for poor leadership, programs, and the fact that they had white flight. They had and have a disproportionate number of students from socio-economically disadvantaged backgrounds with horrible achievement statistics coming from The Cate Apartments, Denise Hunt, and scattered Section 8 and in part due to inadequate intervention on the SPS part by de facto enrollment by families who don’t advocate for which school, but who take whatever comes. Bagley and Whittier are not taking their fair load.

    I questioned closing Viewlands (because data said we wouldn’t have capacity and we don’t) when their enrollment was on the upswing, their achievement was on the upswing, and they had a great inclusion autism program.

    Instead of asking questions, they quickly filled Greenwood with a special ed program. SPS considers programs something you move whenever the whim suits them. Remember you don’t want your kid in a Seattle program or something like Summit at Jane Addams because the @ means your days are numbered.

    Anyway, they finally got rid of Radford and replaced him with Walter Trotter. I confronted Walter about what the heck he was going to do to help these disadvantaged kids who were being spit out of Greenwood, flunking at Whitman & Hamilton, and dropping out of Ingraham, Roosevelt, Hale, and Ballard.

    He sent me some email that he recalled. Thanks, Walter. Meanwhile he hadn’t heard of 826 Seattle (a free writing workshop 6 blocks from the school).

    I am used to being accused of a lot and I reiterate that this accusation is no different than the others.

    Why wouldn’t you just ask instead of harboring unfounded accusations?

    Greenwood Elementary? I’m happy to go toe to toe with anyone who defends how SPS manages Greenwood Elementary.

  • Kate Martin

    Alright, I’m not a deflector. @ Greenwood Parent I only say that you might not know me very well.

    I have been an advocate for Greenwood Elementary for a long, long time. The school has had a disastrous history with principals each at $125K or more with lackluster performance. Joanna Hill – disaster and transferred how many times? Dr. Radford? That’s when McGinn did his failed coup to get Radford out of there when his kids were there and emptied the school while he was at it. Six or seven years ago?

    Then they had excess capacity. But why? Instead of asking why and holding SPS responsible for poor leadership, programs, and the fact that they had white flight. They had and have a disproportionate number of students from socio-economically disadvantaged backgrounds with horrible achievement statistics coming from The Cate Apartments, Denise Hunt, and scattered Section 8 and in part due to inadequate intervention on the SPS part by de facto enrollment by families who don’t advocate for which school, but who take whatever comes. Bagley and Whittier are not taking their fair load.

    I questioned closing Viewlands (because data said we wouldn’t have capacity and we don’t) when their enrollment was on the upswing, their achievement was on the upswing, and they had a great inclusion autism program.

    Instead of asking questions, they quickly filled Greenwood with a special ed program. SPS considers programs something you move whenever the whim suits them. Remember you don’t want your kid in a Seattle program or something like Summit at Jane Addams because the @ means your days are numbered.

    Anyway, they finally got rid of Radford and replaced him with Walter Trotter. I confronted Walter about what the heck he was going to do to help these disadvantaged kids who were being spit out of Greenwood, flunking at Whitman & Hamilton, and dropping out of Ingraham, Roosevelt, Hale, and Ballard.

    He sent me some email that he recalled. Thanks, Walter. Meanwhile he hadn’t heard of 826 Seattle (a free writing workshop 6 blocks from the school).

    I am used to being accused of a lot and I reiterate that this accusation is no different than the others.

    Why wouldn’t you just ask instead of harboring unfounded accusations?

    Greenwood Elementary? I’m happy to go toe to toe with anyone who defends how SPS manages Greenwood Elementary.

  • Kate Martin

    Alright, I’m not a deflector. @ Greenwood Parent I only say that you might not know me very well.

    I have been an advocate for Greenwood Elementary for a long, long time. The school has had a disastrous history with principals each at $125K or more with lackluster performance. Joanna Hill – disaster and transferred how many times? Dr. Radford? That’s when McGinn did his failed coup to get Radford out of there when his kids were there and emptied the school while he was at it. Six or seven years ago?

    Then they had excess capacity. But why? Instead of asking why and holding SPS responsible for poor leadership, programs, and the fact that they had white flight. They had and have a disproportionate number of students from socio-economically disadvantaged backgrounds with horrible achievement statistics coming from The Cate Apartments, Denise Hunt, and scattered Section 8 and in part due to inadequate intervention on the SPS part by de facto enrollment by families who don’t advocate for which school, but who take whatever comes. Bagley and Whittier are not taking their fair load.

    I questioned closing Viewlands (because data said we wouldn’t have capacity and we don’t) when their enrollment was on the upswing, their achievement was on the upswing, and they had a great inclusion autism program.

    Instead of asking questions, they quickly filled Greenwood with a special ed program. SPS considers programs something you move whenever the whim suits them. Remember you don’t want your kid in a Seattle program or something like Summit at Jane Addams because the @ means your days are numbered.

    Anyway, they finally got rid of Radford and replaced him with Walter Trotter. I confronted Walter about what the heck he was going to do to help these disadvantaged kids who were being spit out of Greenwood, flunking at Whitman & Hamilton, and dropping out of Ingraham, Roosevelt, Hale, and Ballard.

    He sent me some email that he recalled. Thanks, Walter. Meanwhile he hadn’t heard of 826 Seattle (a free writing workshop 6 blocks from the school).

    I am used to being accused of a lot and I reiterate that this accusation is no different than the others.

    Why wouldn’t you just ask instead of harboring unfounded accusations?

    Greenwood Elementary? I’m happy to go toe to toe with anyone who defends how SPS manages Greenwood Elementary.

  • Kate Martin

    Alright, I’m not a deflector. @ Greenwood Parent I only say that you might not know me very well.

    I have been an advocate for Greenwood Elementary for a long, long time. The school has had a disastrous history with principals each at $125K or more with lackluster performance. Joanna Hill – disaster and transferred how many times? Dr. Radford? That’s when McGinn did his failed coup to get Radford out of there when his kids were there and emptied the school while he was at it. Six or seven years ago?

    Then they had excess capacity. But why? Instead of asking why and holding SPS responsible for poor leadership, programs, and the fact that they had white flight. They had and have a disproportionate number of students from socio-economically disadvantaged backgrounds with horrible achievement statistics coming from The Cate Apartments, Denise Hunt, and scattered Section 8 and in part due to inadequate intervention on the SPS part by de facto enrollment by families who don’t advocate for which school, but who take whatever comes. Bagley and Whittier are not taking their fair load.

    I questioned closing Viewlands (because data said we wouldn’t have capacity and we don’t) when their enrollment was on the upswing, their achievement was on the upswing, and they had a great inclusion autism program.

    Instead of asking questions, they quickly filled Greenwood with a special ed program. SPS considers programs something you move whenever the whim suits them. Remember you don’t want your kid in a Seattle program or something like Summit at Jane Addams because the @ means your days are numbered.

    Anyway, they finally got rid of Radford and replaced him with Walter Trotter. I confronted Walter about what the heck he was going to do to help these disadvantaged kids who were being spit out of Greenwood, flunking at Whitman & Hamilton, and dropping out of Ingraham, Roosevelt, Hale, and Ballard.

    He sent me some email that he recalled. Thanks, Walter. Meanwhile he hadn’t heard of 826 Seattle (a free writing workshop 6 blocks from the school).

    I am used to being accused of a lot and I reiterate that this accusation is no different than the others.

    Why wouldn’t you just ask instead of harboring unfounded accusations?

    Greenwood Elementary? I’m happy to go toe to toe with anyone who defends how SPS manages Greenwood Elementary.

  • Kate Martin

    Alright, I’m not a deflector. @ Greenwood Parent I only say that you might not know me very well.

    I have been an advocate for Greenwood Elementary for a long, long time. The school has had a disastrous history with principals each at $125K or more with lackluster performance. Joanna Hill – disaster and transferred how many times? Dr. Radford? That’s when McGinn did his failed coup to get Radford out of there when his kids were there and emptied the school while he was at it. Six or seven years ago?

    Then they had excess capacity. But why? Instead of asking why and holding SPS responsible for poor leadership, programs, and the fact that they had white flight. They had and have a disproportionate number of students from socio-economically disadvantaged backgrounds with horrible achievement statistics coming from The Cate Apartments, Denise Hunt, and scattered Section 8 and in part due to inadequate intervention on the SPS part by de facto enrollment by families who don’t advocate for which school, but who take whatever comes. Bagley and Whittier are not taking their fair load.

    I questioned closing Viewlands (because data said we wouldn’t have capacity and we don’t) when their enrollment was on the upswing, their achievement was on the upswing, and they had a great inclusion autism program.

    Instead of asking questions, they quickly filled Greenwood with a special ed program. SPS considers programs something you move whenever the whim suits them. Remember you don’t want your kid in a Seattle program or something like Summit at Jane Addams because the @ means your days are numbered.

    Anyway, they finally got rid of Radford and replaced him with Walter Trotter. I confronted Walter about what the heck he was going to do to help these disadvantaged kids who were being spit out of Greenwood, flunking at Whitman & Hamilton, and dropping out of Ingraham, Roosevelt, Hale, and Ballard.

    He sent me some email that he recalled. Thanks, Walter. Meanwhile he hadn’t heard of 826 Seattle (a free writing workshop 6 blocks from the school).

    I am used to being accused of a lot and I reiterate that this accusation is no different than the others.

    Why wouldn’t you just ask instead of harboring unfounded accusations?

    Greenwood Elementary? I’m happy to go toe to toe with anyone who defends how SPS manages Greenwood Elementary.

  • Kate Martin

    Alright, I’m not a deflector. @ Greenwood Parent I only say that you might not know me very well.

    I have been an advocate for Greenwood Elementary for a long, long time. The school has had a disastrous history with principals each at $125K or more with lackluster performance. Joanna Hill – disaster and transferred how many times? Dr. Radford? That’s when McGinn did his failed coup to get Radford out of there when his kids were there and emptied the school while he was at it. Six or seven years ago?

    Then they had excess capacity. But why? Instead of asking why and holding SPS responsible for poor leadership, programs, and the fact that they had white flight. They had and have a disproportionate number of students from socio-economically disadvantaged backgrounds with horrible achievement statistics coming from The Cate Apartments, Denise Hunt, and scattered Section 8 and in part due to inadequate intervention on the SPS part by de facto enrollment by families who don’t advocate for which school, but who take whatever comes. Bagley and Whittier are not taking their fair load.

    I questioned closing Viewlands (because data said we wouldn’t have capacity and we don’t) when their enrollment was on the upswing, their achievement was on the upswing, and they had a great inclusion autism program.

    Instead of asking questions, they quickly filled Greenwood with a special ed program. SPS considers programs something you move whenever the whim suits them. Remember you don’t want your kid in a Seattle program or something like Summit at Jane Addams because the @ means your days are numbered.

    Anyway, they finally got rid of Radford and replaced him with Walter Trotter. I confronted Walter about what the heck he was going to do to help these disadvantaged kids who were being spit out of Greenwood, flunking at Whitman & Hamilton, and dropping out of Ingraham, Roosevelt, Hale, and Ballard.

    He sent me some email that he recalled. Thanks, Walter. Meanwhile he hadn’t heard of 826 Seattle (a free writing workshop 6 blocks from the school).

    I am used to being accused of a lot and I reiterate that this accusation is no different than the others.

    Why wouldn’t you just ask instead of harboring unfounded accusations?

    Greenwood Elementary? I’m happy to go toe to toe with anyone who defends how SPS manages Greenwood Elementary.

  • Kate Martin

    Alright, I’m not a deflector. @ Greenwood Parent I only say that you might not know me very well.

    I have been an advocate for Greenwood Elementary for a long, long time. The school has had a disastrous history with principals each at $125K or more with lackluster performance. Joanna Hill – disaster and transferred how many times? Dr. Radford? That’s when McGinn did his failed coup to get Radford out of there when his kids were there and emptied the school while he was at it. Six or seven years ago?

    Then they had excess capacity. But why? Instead of asking why and holding SPS responsible for poor leadership, programs, and the fact that they had white flight. They had and have a disproportionate number of students from socio-economically disadvantaged backgrounds with horrible achievement statistics coming from The Cate Apartments, Denise Hunt, and scattered Section 8 and in part due to inadequate intervention on the SPS part by de facto enrollment by families who don’t advocate for which school, but who take whatever comes. Bagley and Whittier are not taking their fair load.

    I questioned closing Viewlands (because data said we wouldn’t have capacity and we don’t) when their enrollment was on the upswing, their achievement was on the upswing, and they had a great inclusion autism program.

    Instead of asking questions, they quickly filled Greenwood with a special ed program. SPS considers programs something you move whenever the whim suits them. Remember you don’t want your kid in a Seattle program or something like Summit at Jane Addams because the @ means your days are numbered.

    Anyway, they finally got rid of Radford and replaced him with Walter Trotter. I confronted Walter about what the heck he was going to do to help these disadvantaged kids who were being spit out of Greenwood, flunking at Whitman & Hamilton, and dropping out of Ingraham, Roosevelt, Hale, and Ballard.

    He sent me some email that he recalled. Thanks, Walter. Meanwhile he hadn’t heard of 826 Seattle (a free writing workshop 6 blocks from the school).

    I am used to being accused of a lot and I reiterate that this accusation is no different than the others.

    Why wouldn’t you just ask instead of harboring unfounded accusations?

    Greenwood Elementary? I’m happy to go toe to toe with anyone who defends how SPS manages Greenwood Elementary.

  • Kate Martin

    Alright, I’m not a deflector. @ Greenwood Parent I only say that you might not know me very well.

    I have been an advocate for Greenwood Elementary for a long, long time. The school has had a disastrous history with principals each at $125K or more with lackluster performance. Joanna Hill – disaster and transferred how many times? Dr. Radford? That’s when McGinn did his failed coup to get Radford out of there when his kids were there and emptied the school while he was at it. Six or seven years ago?

    Then they had excess capacity. But why? Instead of asking why and holding SPS responsible for poor leadership, programs, and the fact that they had white flight. They had and have a disproportionate number of students from socio-economically disadvantaged backgrounds with horrible achievement statistics coming from The Cate Apartments, Denise Hunt, and scattered Section 8 and in part due to inadequate intervention on the SPS part by de facto enrollment by families who don’t advocate for which school, but who take whatever comes. Bagley and Whittier are not taking their fair load.

    I questioned closing Viewlands (because data said we wouldn’t have capacity and we don’t) when their enrollment was on the upswing, their achievement was on the upswing, and they had a great inclusion autism program.

    Instead of asking questions, they quickly filled Greenwood with a special ed program. SPS considers programs something you move whenever the whim suits them. Remember you don’t want your kid in a Seattle program or something like Summit at Jane Addams because the @ means your days are numbered.

    Anyway, they finally got rid of Radford and replaced him with Walter Trotter. I confronted Walter about what the heck he was going to do to help these disadvantaged kids who were being spit out of Greenwood, flunking at Whitman & Hamilton, and dropping out of Ingraham, Roosevelt, Hale, and Ballard.

    He sent me some email that he recalled. Thanks, Walter. Meanwhile he hadn’t heard of 826 Seattle (a free writing workshop 6 blocks from the school).

    I am used to being accused of a lot and I reiterate that this accusation is no different than the others.

    Why wouldn’t you just ask instead of harboring unfounded accusations?

    Greenwood Elementary? I’m happy to go toe to toe with anyone who defends how SPS manages Greenwood Elementary.

  • Kate Martin

    Alright, I’m not a deflector. @ Greenwood Parent I only say that you might not know me very well.

    I have been an advocate for Greenwood Elementary for a long, long time. The school has had a disastrous history with principals each at $125K or more with lackluster performance. Joanna Hill – disaster and transferred how many times? Dr. Radford? That’s when McGinn did his failed coup to get Radford out of there when his kids were there and emptied the school while he was at it. Six or seven years ago?

    Then they had excess capacity. But why? Instead of asking why and holding SPS responsible for poor leadership, programs, and the fact that they had white flight. They had and have a disproportionate number of students from socio-economically disadvantaged backgrounds with horrible achievement statistics coming from The Cate Apartments, Denise Hunt, and scattered Section 8 and in part due to inadequate intervention on the SPS part by de facto enrollment by families who don’t advocate for which school, but who take whatever comes. Bagley and Whittier are not taking their fair load.

    I questioned closing Viewlands (because data said we wouldn’t have capacity and we don’t) when their enrollment was on the upswing, their achievement was on the upswing, and they had a great inclusion autism program.

    Instead of asking questions, they quickly filled Greenwood with a special ed program. SPS considers programs something you move whenever the whim suits them. Remember you don’t want your kid in a Seattle program or something like Summit at Jane Addams because the @ means your days are numbered.

    Anyway, they finally got rid of Radford and replaced him with Walter Trotter. I confronted Walter about what the heck he was going to do to help these disadvantaged kids who were being spit out of Greenwood, flunking at Whitman & Hamilton, and dropping out of Ingraham, Roosevelt, Hale, and Ballard.

    He sent me some email that he recalled. Thanks, Walter. Meanwhile he hadn’t heard of 826 Seattle (a free writing workshop 6 blocks from the school).

    I am used to being accused of a lot and I reiterate that this accusation is no different than the others.

    Why wouldn’t you just ask instead of harboring unfounded accusations?

    Greenwood Elementary? I’m happy to go toe to toe with anyone who defends how SPS manages Greenwood Elementary.

  • Kate Martin

    Alright, I’m not a deflector. @ Greenwood Parent I only say that you might not know me very well.

    I have been an advocate for Greenwood Elementary for a long, long time. The school has had a disastrous history with principals each at $125K or more with lackluster performance. Joanna Hill – disaster and transferred how many times? Dr. Radford? That’s when McGinn did his failed coup to get Radford out of there when his kids were there and emptied the school while he was at it. Six or seven years ago?

    Then they had excess capacity. But why? Instead of asking why and holding SPS responsible for poor leadership, programs, and the fact that they had white flight. They had and have a disproportionate number of students from socio-economically disadvantaged backgrounds with horrible achievement statistics coming from The Cate Apartments, Denise Hunt, and scattered Section 8 and in part due to inadequate intervention on the SPS part by de facto enrollment by families who don’t advocate for which school, but who take whatever comes. Bagley and Whittier are not taking their fair load.

    I questioned closing Viewlands (because data said we wouldn’t have capacity and we don’t) when their enrollment was on the upswing, their achievement was on the upswing, and they had a great inclusion autism program.

    Instead of asking questions, they quickly filled Greenwood with a special ed program. SPS considers programs something you move whenever the whim suits them. Remember you don’t want your kid in a Seattle program or something like Summit at Jane Addams because the @ means your days are numbered.

    Anyway, they finally got rid of Radford and replaced him with Walter Trotter. I confronted Walter about what the heck he was going to do to help these disadvantaged kids who were being spit out of Greenwood, flunking at Whitman & Hamilton, and dropping out of Ingraham, Roosevelt, Hale, and Ballard.

    He sent me some email that he recalled. Thanks, Walter. Meanwhile he hadn’t heard of 826 Seattle (a free writing workshop 6 blocks from the school).

    I am used to being accused of a lot and I reiterate that this accusation is no different than the others.

    Why wouldn’t you just ask instead of harboring unfounded accusations?

    Greenwood Elementary? I’m happy to go toe to toe with anyone who defends how SPS manages Greenwood Elementary.

  • Kate Martin

    Alright, I’m not a deflector. @ Greenwood Parent I only say that you might not know me very well.

    I have been an advocate for Greenwood Elementary for a long, long time. The school has had a disastrous history with principals each at $125K or more with lackluster performance. Joanna Hill – disaster and transferred how many times? Dr. Radford? That’s when McGinn did his failed coup to get Radford out of there when his kids were there and emptied the school while he was at it. Six or seven years ago?

    Then they had excess capacity. But why? Instead of asking why and holding SPS responsible for poor leadership, programs, and the fact that they had white flight. They had and have a disproportionate number of students from socio-economically disadvantaged backgrounds with horrible achievement statistics coming from The Cate Apartments, Denise Hunt, and scattered Section 8 and in part due to inadequate intervention on the SPS part by de facto enrollment by families who don’t advocate for which school, but who take whatever comes. Bagley and Whittier are not taking their fair load.

    I questioned closing Viewlands (because data said we wouldn’t have capacity and we don’t) when their enrollment was on the upswing, their achievement was on the upswing, and they had a great inclusion autism program.

    Instead of asking questions, they quickly filled Greenwood with a special ed program. SPS considers programs something you move whenever the whim suits them. Remember you don’t want your kid in a Seattle program or something like Summit at Jane Addams because the @ means your days are numbered.

    Anyway, they finally got rid of Radford and replaced him with Walter Trotter. I confronted Walter about what the heck he was going to do to help these disadvantaged kids who were being spit out of Greenwood, flunking at Whitman & Hamilton, and dropping out of Ingraham, Roosevelt, Hale, and Ballard.

    He sent me some email that he recalled. Thanks, Walter. Meanwhile he hadn’t heard of 826 Seattle (a free writing workshop 6 blocks from the school).

    I am used to being accused of a lot and I reiterate that this accusation is no different than the others.

    Why wouldn’t you just ask instead of harboring unfounded accusations?

    Greenwood Elementary? I’m happy to go toe to toe with anyone who defends how SPS manages Greenwood Elementary.

  • Kate Martin

    Alright, I’m not a deflector. @ Greenwood Parent I only say that you might not know me very well.

    I have been an advocate for Greenwood Elementary for a long, long time. The school has had a disastrous history with principals each at $125K or more with lackluster performance. Joanna Hill – disaster and transferred how many times? Dr. Radford? That’s when McGinn did his failed coup to get Radford out of there when his kids were there and emptied the school while he was at it. Six or seven years ago?

    Then they had excess capacity. But why? Instead of asking why and holding SPS responsible for poor leadership, programs, and the fact that they had white flight. They had and have a disproportionate number of students from socio-economically disadvantaged backgrounds with horrible achievement statistics coming from The Cate Apartments, Denise Hunt, and scattered Section 8 and in part due to inadequate intervention on the SPS part by de facto enrollment by families who don’t advocate for which school, but who take whatever comes. Bagley and Whittier are not taking their fair load.

    I questioned closing Viewlands (because data said we wouldn’t have capacity and we don’t) when their enrollment was on the upswing, their achievement was on the upswing, and they had a great inclusion autism program.

    Instead of asking questions, they quickly filled Greenwood with a special ed program. SPS considers programs something you move whenever the whim suits them. Remember you don’t want your kid in a Seattle program or something like Summit at Jane Addams because the @ means your days are numbered.

    Anyway, they finally got rid of Radford and replaced him with Walter Trotter. I confronted Walter about what the heck he was going to do to help these disadvantaged kids who were being spit out of Greenwood, flunking at Whitman & Hamilton, and dropping out of Ingraham, Roosevelt, Hale, and Ballard.

    He sent me some email that he recalled. Thanks, Walter. Meanwhile he hadn’t heard of 826 Seattle (a free writing workshop 6 blocks from the school).

    I am used to being accused of a lot and I reiterate that this accusation is no different than the others.

    Why wouldn’t you just ask instead of harboring unfounded accusations?

    Greenwood Elementary? I’m happy to go toe to toe with anyone who defends how SPS manages Greenwood Elementary.

  • Kate Martin

    Alright, I’m not a deflector. @ Greenwood Parent I only say that you might not know me very well.

    I have been an advocate for Greenwood Elementary for a long, long time. The school has had a disastrous history with principals each at $125K or more with lackluster performance. Joanna Hill – disaster and transferred how many times? Dr. Radford? That’s when McGinn did his failed coup to get Radford out of there when his kids were there and emptied the school while he was at it. Six or seven years ago?

    Then they had excess capacity. But why? Instead of asking why and holding SPS responsible for poor leadership, programs, and the fact that they had white flight. They had and have a disproportionate number of students from socio-economically disadvantaged backgrounds with horrible achievement statistics coming from The Cate Apartments, Denise Hunt, and scattered Section 8 and in part due to inadequate intervention on the SPS part by de facto enrollment by families who don’t advocate for which school, but who take whatever comes. Bagley and Whittier are not taking their fair load.

    I questioned closing Viewlands (because data said we wouldn’t have capacity and we don’t) when their enrollment was on the upswing, their achievement was on the upswing, and they had a great inclusion autism program.

    Instead of asking questions, they quickly filled Greenwood with a special ed program. SPS considers programs something you move whenever the whim suits them. Remember you don’t want your kid in a Seattle program or something like Summit at Jane Addams because the @ means your days are numbered.

    Anyway, they finally got rid of Radford and replaced him with Walter Trotter. I confronted Walter about what the heck he was going to do to help these disadvantaged kids who were being spit out of Greenwood, flunking at Whitman & Hamilton, and dropping out of Ingraham, Roosevelt, Hale, and Ballard.

    He sent me some email that he recalled. Thanks, Walter. Meanwhile he hadn’t heard of 826 Seattle (a free writing workshop 6 blocks from the school).

    I am used to being accused of a lot and I reiterate that this accusation is no different than the others.

    Why wouldn’t you just ask instead of harboring unfounded accusations?

    Greenwood Elementary? I’m happy to go toe to toe with anyone who defends how SPS manages Greenwood Elementary.

  • Kate Martin

    Alright, I’m not a deflector. @ Greenwood Parent I only say that you might not know me very well.

    I have been an advocate for Greenwood Elementary for a long, long time. The school has had a disastrous history with principals each at $125K or more with lackluster performance. Joanna Hill – disaster and transferred how many times? Dr. Radford? That’s when McGinn did his failed coup to get Radford out of there when his kids were there and emptied the school while he was at it. Six or seven years ago?

    Then they had excess capacity. But why? Instead of asking why and holding SPS responsible for poor leadership, programs, and the fact that they had white flight. They had and have a disproportionate number of students from socio-economically disadvantaged backgrounds with horrible achievement statistics coming from The Cate Apartments, Denise Hunt, and scattered Section 8 and in part due to inadequate intervention on the SPS part by de facto enrollment by families who don’t advocate for which school, but who take whatever comes. Bagley and Whittier are not taking their fair load.

    I questioned closing Viewlands (because data said we wouldn’t have capacity and we don’t) when their enrollment was on the upswing, their achievement was on the upswing, and they had a great inclusion autism program.

    Instead of asking questions, they quickly filled Greenwood with a special ed program. SPS considers programs something you move whenever the whim suits them. Remember you don’t want your kid in a Seattle program or something like Summit at Jane Addams because the @ means your days are numbered.

    Anyway, they finally got rid of Radford and replaced him with Walter Trotter. I confronted Walter about what the heck he was going to do to help these disadvantaged kids who were being spit out of Greenwood, flunking at Whitman & Hamilton, and dropping out of Ingraham, Roosevelt, Hale, and Ballard.

    He sent me some email that he recalled. Thanks, Walter. Meanwhile he hadn’t heard of 826 Seattle (a free writing workshop 6 blocks from the school).

    I am used to being accused of a lot and I reiterate that this accusation is no different than the others.

    Why wouldn’t you just ask instead of harboring unfounded accusations?

    Greenwood Elementary? I’m happy to go toe to toe with anyone who defends how SPS manages Greenwood Elementary.

  • Kate Martin

    Alright, I’m not a deflector. @ Greenwood Parent I only say that you might not know me very well.

    I have been an advocate for Greenwood Elementary for a long, long time. The school has had a disastrous history with principals each at $125K or more with lackluster performance. Joanna Hill – disaster and transferred how many times? Dr. Radford? That’s when McGinn did his failed coup to get Radford out of there when his kids were there and emptied the school while he was at it. Six or seven years ago?

    Then they had excess capacity. But why? Instead of asking why and holding SPS responsible for poor leadership, programs, and the fact that they had white flight. They had and have a disproportionate number of students from socio-economically disadvantaged backgrounds with horrible achievement statistics coming from The Cate Apartments, Denise Hunt, and scattered Section 8 and in part due to inadequate intervention on the SPS part by de facto enrollment by families who don’t advocate for which school, but who take whatever comes. Bagley and Whittier are not taking their fair load.

    I questioned closing Viewlands (because data said we wouldn’t have capacity and we don’t) when their enrollment was on the upswing, their achievement was on the upswing, and they had a great inclusion autism program.

    Instead of asking questions, they quickly filled Greenwood with a special ed program. SPS considers programs something you move whenever the whim suits them. Remember you don’t want your kid in a Seattle program or something like Summit at Jane Addams because the @ means your days are numbered.

    Anyway, they finally got rid of Radford and replaced him with Walter Trotter. I confronted Walter about what the heck he was going to do to help these disadvantaged kids who were being spit out of Greenwood, flunking at Whitman & Hamilton, and dropping out of Ingraham, Roosevelt, Hale, and Ballard.

    He sent me some email that he recalled. Thanks, Walter. Meanwhile he hadn’t heard of 826 Seattle (a free writing workshop 6 blocks from the school).

    I am used to being accused of a lot and I reiterate that this accusation is no different than the others.

    Why wouldn’t you just ask instead of harboring unfounded accusations?

    Greenwood Elementary? I’m happy to go toe to toe with anyone who defends how SPS manages Greenwood Elementary.

  • Kate Martin

    Alright, I’m not a deflector. @ Greenwood Parent I only say that you might not know me very well.

    I have been an advocate for Greenwood Elementary for a long, long time. The school has had a disastrous history with principals each at $125K or more with lackluster performance. Joanna Hill – disaster and transferred how many times? Dr. Radford? That’s when McGinn did his failed coup to get Radford out of there when his kids were there and emptied the school while he was at it. Six or seven years ago?

    Then they had excess capacity. But why? Instead of asking why and holding SPS responsible for poor leadership, programs, and the fact that they had white flight. They had and have a disproportionate number of students from socio-economically disadvantaged backgrounds with horrible achievement statistics coming from The Cate Apartments, Denise Hunt, and scattered Section 8 and in part due to inadequate intervention on the SPS part by de facto enrollment by families who don’t advocate for which school, but who take whatever comes. Bagley and Whittier are not taking their fair load.

    I questioned closing Viewlands (because data said we wouldn’t have capacity and we don’t) when their enrollment was on the upswing, their achievement was on the upswing, and they had a great inclusion autism program.

    Instead of asking questions, they quickly filled Greenwood with a special ed program. SPS considers programs something you move whenever the whim suits them. Remember you don’t want your kid in a Seattle program or something like Summit at Jane Addams because the @ means your days are numbered.

    Anyway, they finally got rid of Radford and replaced him with Walter Trotter. I confronted Walter about what the heck he was going to do to help these disadvantaged kids who were being spit out of Greenwood, flunking at Whitman & Hamilton, and dropping out of Ingraham, Roosevelt, Hale, and Ballard.

    He sent me some email that he recalled. Thanks, Walter. Meanwhile he hadn’t heard of 826 Seattle (a free writing workshop 6 blocks from the school).

    I am used to being accused of a lot and I reiterate that this accusation is no different than the others.

    Why wouldn’t you just ask instead of harboring unfounded accusations?

    Greenwood Elementary? I’m happy to go toe to toe with anyone who defends how SPS manages Greenwood Elementary.

  • Kate Martin

    Alright, I’m not a deflector. @ Greenwood Parent I only say that you might not know me very well.

    I have been an advocate for Greenwood Elementary for a long, long time. The school has had a disastrous history with principals each at $125K or more with lackluster performance. Joanna Hill – disaster and transferred how many times? Dr. Radford? That’s when McGinn did his failed coup to get Radford out of there when his kids were there and emptied the school while he was at it. Six or seven years ago?

    Then they had excess capacity. But why? Instead of asking why and holding SPS responsible for poor leadership, programs, and the fact that they had white flight. They had and have a disproportionate number of students from socio-economically disadvantaged backgrounds with horrible achievement statistics coming from The Cate Apartments, Denise Hunt, and scattered Section 8 and in part due to inadequate intervention on the SPS part by de facto enrollment by families who don’t advocate for which school, but who take whatever comes. Bagley and Whittier are not taking their fair load.

    I questioned closing Viewlands (because data said we wouldn’t have capacity and we don’t) when their enrollment was on the upswing, their achievement was on the upswing, and they had a great inclusion autism program.

    Instead of asking questions, they quickly filled Greenwood with a special ed program. SPS considers programs something you move whenever the whim suits them. Remember you don’t want your kid in a Seattle program or something like Summit at Jane Addams because the @ means your days are numbered.

    Anyway, they finally got rid of Radford and replaced him with Walter Trotter. I confronted Walter about what the heck he was going to do to help these disadvantaged kids who were being spit out of Greenwood, flunking at Whitman & Hamilton, and dropping out of Ingraham, Roosevelt, Hale, and Ballard.

    He sent me some email that he recalled. Thanks, Walter. Meanwhile he hadn’t heard of 826 Seattle (a free writing workshop 6 blocks from the school).

    I am used to being accused of a lot and I reiterate that this accusation is no different than the others.

    Why wouldn’t you just ask instead of harboring unfounded accusations?

    Greenwood Elementary? I’m happy to go toe to toe with anyone who defends how SPS manages Greenwood Elementary.

  • Kate Martin

    Alright, I’m not a deflector. @ Greenwood Parent I only say that you might not know me very well.

    I have been an advocate for Greenwood Elementary for a long, long time. The school has had a disastrous history with principals each at $125K or more with lackluster performance. Joanna Hill – disaster and transferred how many times? Dr. Radford? That’s when McGinn did his failed coup to get Radford out of there when his kids were there and emptied the school while he was at it. Six or seven years ago?

    Then they had excess capacity. But why? Instead of asking why and holding SPS responsible for poor leadership, programs, and the fact that they had white flight. They had and have a disproportionate number of students from socio-economically disadvantaged backgrounds with horrible achievement statistics coming from The Cate Apartments, Denise Hunt, and scattered Section 8 and in part due to inadequate intervention on the SPS part by de facto enrollment by families who don’t advocate for which school, but who take whatever comes. Bagley and Whittier are not taking their fair load.

    I questioned closing Viewlands (because data said we wouldn’t have capacity and we don’t) when their enrollment was on the upswing, their achievement was on the upswing, and they had a great inclusion autism program.

    Instead of asking questions, they quickly filled Greenwood with a special ed program. SPS considers programs something you move whenever the whim suits them. Remember you don’t want your kid in a Seattle program or something like Summit at Jane Addams because the @ means your days are numbered.

    Anyway, they finally got rid of Radford and replaced him with Walter Trotter. I confronted Walter about what the heck he was going to do to help these disadvantaged kids who were being spit out of Greenwood, flunking at Whitman & Hamilton, and dropping out of Ingraham, Roosevelt, Hale, and Ballard.

    He sent me some email that he recalled. Thanks, Walter. Meanwhile he hadn’t heard of 826 Seattle (a free writing workshop 6 blocks from the school).

    I am used to being accused of a lot and I reiterate that this accusation is no different than the others.

    Why wouldn’t you just ask instead of harboring unfounded accusations?

    Greenwood Elementary? I’m happy to go toe to toe with anyone who defends how SPS manages Greenwood Elementary.

  • Kate Martin

    Alright, I’m not a deflector. @ Greenwood Parent I only say that you might not know me very well.

    I have been an advocate for Greenwood Elementary for a long, long time. The school has had a disastrous history with principals each at $125K or more with lackluster performance. Joanna Hill – disaster and transferred how many times? Dr. Radford? That’s when McGinn did his failed coup to get Radford out of there when his kids were there and emptied the school while he was at it. Six or seven years ago?

    Then they had excess capacity. But why? Instead of asking why and holding SPS responsible for poor leadership, programs, and the fact that they had white flight. They had and have a disproportionate number of students from socio-economically disadvantaged backgrounds with horrible achievement statistics coming from The Cate Apartments, Denise Hunt, and scattered Section 8 and in part due to inadequate intervention on the SPS part by de facto enrollment by families who don’t advocate for which school, but who take whatever comes. Bagley and Whittier are not taking their fair load.

    I questioned closing Viewlands (because data said we wouldn’t have capacity and we don’t) when their enrollment was on the upswing, their achievement was on the upswing, and they had a great inclusion autism program.

    Instead of asking questions, they quickly filled Greenwood with a special ed program. SPS considers programs something you move whenever the whim suits them. Remember you don’t want your kid in a Seattle program or something like Summit at Jane Addams because the @ means your days are numbered.

    Anyway, they finally got rid of Radford and replaced him with Walter Trotter. I confronted Walter about what the heck he was going to do to help these disadvantaged kids who were being spit out of Greenwood, flunking at Whitman & Hamilton, and dropping out of Ingraham, Roosevelt, Hale, and Ballard.

    He sent me some email that he recalled. Thanks, Walter. Meanwhile he hadn’t heard of 826 Seattle (a free writing workshop 6 blocks from the school).

    I am used to being accused of a lot and I reiterate that this accusation is no different than the others.

    Why wouldn’t you just ask instead of harboring unfounded accusations?

    Greenwood Elementary? I’m happy to go toe to toe with anyone who defends how SPS manages Greenwood Elementary.

  • Kate Martin

    Alright, I’m not a deflector. @ Greenwood Parent I only say that you might not know me very well.

    I have been an advocate for Greenwood Elementary for a long, long time. The school has had a disastrous history with principals each at $125K or more with lackluster performance. Joanna Hill – disaster and transferred how many times? Dr. Radford? That’s when McGinn did his failed coup to get Radford out of there when his kids were there and emptied the school while he was at it. Six or seven years ago?

    Then they had excess capacity. But why? Instead of asking why and holding SPS responsible for poor leadership, programs, and the fact that they had white flight. They had and have a disproportionate number of students from socio-economically disadvantaged backgrounds with horrible achievement statistics coming from The Cate Apartments, Denise Hunt, and scattered Section 8 and in part due to inadequate intervention on the SPS part by de facto enrollment by families who don’t advocate for which school, but who take whatever comes. Bagley and Whittier are not taking their fair load.

    I questioned closing Viewlands (because data said we wouldn’t have capacity and we don’t) when their enrollment was on the upswing, their achievement was on the upswing, and they had a great inclusion autism program.

    Instead of asking questions, they quickly filled Greenwood with a special ed program. SPS considers programs something you move whenever the whim suits them. Remember you don’t want your kid in a Seattle program or something like Summit at Jane Addams because the @ means your days are numbered.

    Anyway, they finally got rid of Radford and replaced him with Walter Trotter. I confronted Walter about what the heck he was going to do to help these disadvantaged kids who were being spit out of Greenwood, flunking at Whitman & Hamilton, and dropping out of Ingraham, Roosevelt, Hale, and Ballard.

    He sent me some email that he recalled. Thanks, Walter. Meanwhile he hadn’t heard of 826 Seattle (a free writing workshop 6 blocks from the school).

    I am used to being accused of a lot and I reiterate that this accusation is no different than the others.

    Why wouldn’t you just ask instead of harboring unfounded accusations?

    Greenwood Elementary? I’m happy to go toe to toe with anyone who defends how SPS manages Greenwood Elementary.

  • Kate Martin

    Alright, I’m not a deflector. @ Greenwood Parent I only say that you might not know me very well.

    I have been an advocate for Greenwood Elementary for a long, long time. The school has had a disastrous history with principals each at $125K or more with lackluster performance. Joanna Hill – disaster and transferred how many times? Dr. Radford? That’s when McGinn did his failed coup to get Radford out of there when his kids were there and emptied the school while he was at it. Six or seven years ago?

    Then they had excess capacity. But why? Instead of asking why and holding SPS responsible for poor leadership, programs, and the fact that they had white flight. They had and have a disproportionate number of students from socio-economically disadvantaged backgrounds with horrible achievement statistics coming from The Cate Apartments, Denise Hunt, and scattered Section 8 and in part due to inadequate intervention on the SPS part by de facto enrollment by families who don’t advocate for which school, but who take whatever comes. Bagley and Whittier are not taking their fair load.

    I questioned closing Viewlands (because data said we wouldn’t have capacity and we don’t) when their enrollment was on the upswing, their achievement was on the upswing, and they had a great inclusion autism program.

    Instead of asking questions, they quickly filled Greenwood with a special ed program. SPS considers programs something you move whenever the whim suits them. Remember you don’t want your kid in a Seattle program or something like Summit at Jane Addams because the @ means your days are numbered.

    Anyway, they finally got rid of Radford and replaced him with Walter Trotter. I confronted Walter about what the heck he was going to do to help these disadvantaged kids who were being spit out of Greenwood, flunking at Whitman & Hamilton, and dropping out of Ingraham, Roosevelt, Hale, and Ballard.

    He sent me some email that he recalled. Thanks, Walter. Meanwhile he hadn’t heard of 826 Seattle (a free writing workshop 6 blocks from the school).

    I am used to being accused of a lot and I reiterate that this accusation is no different than the others.

    Why wouldn’t you just ask instead of harboring unfounded accusations?

    Greenwood Elementary? I’m happy to go toe to toe with anyone who defends how SPS manages Greenwood Elementary.

  • Kate Martin

    Alright, I’m not a deflector. @ Greenwood Parent I only say that you might not know me very well.

    I have been an advocate for Greenwood Elementary for a long, long time. The school has had a disastrous history with principals each at $125K or more with lackluster performance. Joanna Hill – disaster and transferred how many times? Dr. Radford? That’s when McGinn did his failed coup to get Radford out of there when his kids were there and emptied the school while he was at it. Six or seven years ago?

    Then they had excess capacity. But why? Instead of asking why and holding SPS responsible for poor leadership, programs, and the fact that they had white flight. They had and have a disproportionate number of students from socio-economically disadvantaged backgrounds with horrible achievement statistics coming from The Cate Apartments, Denise Hunt, and scattered Section 8 and in part due to inadequate intervention on the SPS part by de facto enrollment by families who don’t advocate for which school, but who take whatever comes. Bagley and Whittier are not taking their fair load.

    I questioned closing Viewlands (because data said we wouldn’t have capacity and we don’t) when their enrollment was on the upswing, their achievement was on the upswing, and they had a great inclusion autism program.

    Instead of asking questions, they quickly filled Greenwood with a special ed program. SPS considers programs something you move whenever the whim suits them. Remember you don’t want your kid in a Seattle program or something like Summit at Jane Addams because the @ means your days are numbered.

    Anyway, they finally got rid of Radford and replaced him with Walter Trotter. I confronted Walter about what the heck he was going to do to help these disadvantaged kids who were being spit out of Greenwood, flunking at Whitman & Hamilton, and dropping out of Ingraham, Roosevelt, Hale, and Ballard.

    He sent me some email that he recalled. Thanks, Walter. Meanwhile he hadn’t heard of 826 Seattle (a free writing workshop 6 blocks from the school).

    I am used to being accused of a lot and I reiterate that this accusation is no different than the others.

    Why wouldn’t you just ask instead of harboring unfounded accusations?

    Greenwood Elementary? I’m happy to go toe to toe with anyone who defends how SPS manages Greenwood Elementary.

  • Kate Martin

    Alright, I’m not a deflector. @ Greenwood Parent I only say that you might not know me very well.

    I have been an advocate for Greenwood Elementary for a long, long time. The school has had a disastrous history with principals each at $125K or more with lackluster performance. Joanna Hill – disaster and transferred how many times? Dr. Radford? That’s when McGinn did his failed coup to get Radford out of there when his kids were there and emptied the school while he was at it. Six or seven years ago?

    Then they had excess capacity. But why? Instead of asking why and holding SPS responsible for poor leadership, programs, and the fact that they had white flight. They had and have a disproportionate number of students from socio-economically disadvantaged backgrounds with horrible achievement statistics coming from The Cate Apartments, Denise Hunt, and scattered Section 8 and in part due to inadequate intervention on the SPS part by de facto enrollment by families who don’t advocate for which school, but who take whatever comes. Bagley and Whittier are not taking their fair load.

    I questioned closing Viewlands (because data said we wouldn’t have capacity and we don’t) when their enrollment was on the upswing, their achievement was on the upswing, and they had a great inclusion autism program.

    Instead of asking questions, they quickly filled Greenwood with a special ed program. SPS considers programs something you move whenever the whim suits them. Remember you don’t want your kid in a Seattle program or something like Summit at Jane Addams because the @ means your days are numbered.

    Anyway, they finally got rid of Radford and replaced him with Walter Trotter. I confronted Walter about what the heck he was going to do to help these disadvantaged kids who were being spit out of Greenwood, flunking at Whitman & Hamilton, and dropping out of Ingraham, Roosevelt, Hale, and Ballard.

    He sent me some email that he recalled. Thanks, Walter. Meanwhile he hadn’t heard of 826 Seattle (a free writing workshop 6 blocks from the school).

    I am used to being accused of a lot and I reiterate that this accusation is no different than the others.

    Why wouldn’t you just ask instead of harboring unfounded accusations?

    Greenwood Elementary? I’m happy to go toe to toe with anyone who defends how SPS manages Greenwood Elementary.

  • Kate Martin

    Alright, I’m not a deflector. @ Greenwood Parent I only say that you might not know me very well.

    I have been an advocate for Greenwood Elementary for a long, long time. The school has had a disastrous history with principals each at $125K or more with lackluster performance. Joanna Hill – disaster and transferred how many times? Dr. Radford? That’s when McGinn did his failed coup to get Radford out of there when his kids were there and emptied the school while he was at it. Six or seven years ago?

    Then they had excess capacity. But why? Instead of asking why and holding SPS responsible for poor leadership, programs, and the fact that they had white flight. They had and have a disproportionate number of students from socio-economically disadvantaged backgrounds with horrible achievement statistics coming from The Cate Apartments, Denise Hunt, and scattered Section 8 and in part due to inadequate intervention on the SPS part by de facto enrollment by families who don’t advocate for which school, but who take whatever comes. Bagley and Whittier are not taking their fair load.

    I questioned closing Viewlands (because data said we wouldn’t have capacity and we don’t) when their enrollment was on the upswing, their achievement was on the upswing, and they had a great inclusion autism program.

    Instead of asking questions, they quickly filled Greenwood with a special ed program. SPS considers programs something you move whenever the whim suits them. Remember you don’t want your kid in a Seattle program or something like Summit at Jane Addams because the @ means your days are numbered.

    Anyway, they finally got rid of Radford and replaced him with Walter Trotter. I confronted Walter about what the heck he was going to do to help these disadvantaged kids who were being spit out of Greenwood, flunking at Whitman & Hamilton, and dropping out of Ingraham, Roosevelt, Hale, and Ballard.

    He sent me some email that he recalled. Thanks, Walter. Meanwhile he hadn’t heard of 826 Seattle (a free writing workshop 6 blocks from the school).

    I am used to being accused of a lot and I reiterate that this accusation is no different than the others.

    Why wouldn’t you just ask instead of harboring unfounded accusations?

    Greenwood Elementary? I’m happy to go toe to toe with anyone who defends how SPS manages Greenwood Elementary.

  • Kate Martin

    Alright, I’m not a deflector. @ Greenwood Parent I only say that you might not know me very well.

    I have been an advocate for Greenwood Elementary for a long, long time. The school has had a disastrous history with principals each at $125K or more with lackluster performance. Joanna Hill – disaster and transferred how many times? Dr. Radford? That’s when McGinn did his failed coup to get Radford out of there when his kids were there and emptied the school while he was at it. Six or seven years ago?

    Then they had excess capacity. But why? Instead of asking why and holding SPS responsible for poor leadership, programs, and the fact that they had white flight. They had and have a disproportionate number of students from socio-economically disadvantaged backgrounds with horrible achievement statistics coming from The Cate Apartments, Denise Hunt, and scattered Section 8 and in part due to inadequate intervention on the SPS part by de facto enrollment by families who don’t advocate for which school, but who take whatever comes. Bagley and Whittier are not taking their fair load.

    I questioned closing Viewlands (because data said we wouldn’t have capacity and we don’t) when their enrollment was on the upswing, their achievement was on the upswing, and they had a great inclusion autism program.

    Instead of asking questions, they quickly filled Greenwood with a special ed program. SPS considers programs something you move whenever the whim suits them. Remember you don’t want your kid in a Seattle program or something like Summit at Jane Addams because the @ means your days are numbered.

    Anyway, they finally got rid of Radford and replaced him with Walter Trotter. I confronted Walter about what the heck he was going to do to help these disadvantaged kids who were being spit out of Greenwood, flunking at Whitman & Hamilton, and dropping out of Ingraham, Roosevelt, Hale, and Ballard.

    He sent me some email that he recalled. Thanks, Walter. Meanwhile he hadn’t heard of 826 Seattle (a free writing workshop 6 blocks from the school).

    I am used to being accused of a lot and I reiterate that this accusation is no different than the others.

    Why wouldn’t you just ask instead of harboring unfounded accusations?

    Greenwood Elementary? I’m happy to go toe to toe with anyone who defends how SPS manages Greenwood Elementary.

  • Kate Martin

    Alright, I’m not a deflector. @ Greenwood Parent I only say that you might not know me very well.

    I have been an advocate for Greenwood Elementary for a long, long time. The school has had a disastrous history with principals each at $125K or more with lackluster performance. Joanna Hill – disaster and transferred how many times? Dr. Radford? That’s when McGinn did his failed coup to get Radford out of there when his kids were there and emptied the school while he was at it. Six or seven years ago?

    Then they had excess capacity. But why? Instead of asking why and holding SPS responsible for poor leadership, programs, and the fact that they had white flight. They had and have a disproportionate number of students from socio-economically disadvantaged backgrounds with horrible achievement statistics coming from The Cate Apartments, Denise Hunt, and scattered Section 8 and in part due to inadequate intervention on the SPS part by de facto enrollment by families who don’t advocate for which school, but who take whatever comes. Bagley and Whittier are not taking their fair load.

    I questioned closing Viewlands (because data said we wouldn’t have capacity and we don’t) when their enrollment was on the upswing, their achievement was on the upswing, and they had a great inclusion autism program.

    Instead of asking questions, they quickly filled Greenwood with a special ed program. SPS considers programs something you move whenever the whim suits them. Remember you don’t want your kid in a Seattle program or something like Summit at Jane Addams because the @ means your days are numbered.

    Anyway, they finally got rid of Radford and replaced him with Walter Trotter. I confronted Walter about what the heck he was going to do to help these disadvantaged kids who were being spit out of Greenwood, flunking at Whitman & Hamilton, and dropping out of Ingraham, Roosevelt, Hale, and Ballard.

    He sent me some email that he recalled. Thanks, Walter. Meanwhile he hadn’t heard of 826 Seattle (a free writing workshop 6 blocks from the school).

    I am used to being accused of a lot and I reiterate that this accusation is no different than the others.

    Why wouldn’t you just ask instead of harboring unfounded accusations?

    Greenwood Elementary? I’m happy to go toe to toe with anyone who defends how SPS manages Greenwood Elementary.

  • Kate Martin

    Alright, I’m not a deflector. @ Greenwood Parent I only say that you might not know me very well.

    I have been an advocate for Greenwood Elementary for a long, long time. The school has had a disastrous history with principals each at $125K or more with lackluster performance. Joanna Hill – disaster and transferred how many times? Dr. Radford? That’s when McGinn did his failed coup to get Radford out of there when his kids were there and emptied the school while he was at it. Six or seven years ago?

    Then they had excess capacity. But why? Instead of asking why and holding SPS responsible for poor leadership, programs, and the fact that they had white flight. They had and have a disproportionate number of students from socio-economically disadvantaged backgrounds with horrible achievement statistics coming from The Cate Apartments, Denise Hunt, and scattered Section 8 and in part due to inadequate intervention on the SPS part by de facto enrollment by families who don’t advocate for which school, but who take whatever comes. Bagley and Whittier are not taking their fair load.

    I questioned closing Viewlands (because data said we wouldn’t have capacity and we don’t) when their enrollment was on the upswing, their achievement was on the upswing, and they had a great inclusion autism program.

    Instead of asking questions, they quickly filled Greenwood with a special ed program. SPS considers programs something you move whenever the whim suits them. Remember you don’t want your kid in a Seattle program or something like Summit at Jane Addams because the @ means your days are numbered.

    Anyway, they finally got rid of Radford and replaced him with Walter Trotter. I confronted Walter about what the heck he was going to do to help these disadvantaged kids who were being spit out of Greenwood, flunking at Whitman & Hamilton, and dropping out of Ingraham, Roosevelt, Hale, and Ballard.

    He sent me some email that he recalled. Thanks, Walter. Meanwhile he hadn’t heard of 826 Seattle (a free writing workshop 6 blocks from the school).

    I am used to being accused of a lot and I reiterate that this accusation is no different than the others.

    Why wouldn’t you just ask instead of harboring unfounded accusations?

    Greenwood Elementary? I’m happy to go toe to toe with anyone who defends how SPS manages Greenwood Elementary.

  • Kate Martin

    Alright, I’m not a deflector. @ Greenwood Parent I only say that you might not know me very well.

    I have been an advocate for Greenwood Elementary for a long, long time. The school has had a disastrous history with principals each at $125K or more with lackluster performance. Joanna Hill – disaster and transferred how many times? Dr. Radford? That’s when McGinn did his failed coup to get Radford out of there when his kids were there and emptied the school while he was at it. Six or seven years ago?

    Then they had excess capacity. But why? Instead of asking why and holding SPS responsible for poor leadership, programs, and the fact that they had white flight. They had and have a disproportionate number of students from socio-economically disadvantaged backgrounds with horrible achievement statistics coming from The Cate Apartments, Denise Hunt, and scattered Section 8 and in part due to inadequate intervention on the SPS part by de facto enrollment by families who don’t advocate for which school, but who take whatever comes. Bagley and Whittier are not taking their fair load.

    I questioned closing Viewlands (because data said we wouldn’t have capacity and we don’t) when their enrollment was on the upswing, their achievement was on the upswing, and they had a great inclusion autism program.

    Instead of asking questions, they quickly filled Greenwood with a special ed program. SPS considers programs something you move whenever the whim suits them. Remember you don’t want your kid in a Seattle program or something like Summit at Jane Addams because the @ means your days are numbered.

    Anyway, they finally got rid of Radford and replaced him with Walter Trotter. I confronted Walter about what the heck he was going to do to help these disadvantaged kids who were being spit out of Greenwood, flunking at Whitman & Hamilton, and dropping out of Ingraham, Roosevelt, Hale, and Ballard.

    He sent me some email that he recalled. Thanks, Walter. Meanwhile he hadn’t heard of 826 Seattle (a free writing workshop 6 blocks from the school).

    I am used to being accused of a lot and I reiterate that this accusation is no different than the others.

    Why wouldn’t you just ask instead of harboring unfounded accusations?

    Greenwood Elementary? I’m happy to go toe to toe with anyone who defends how SPS manages Greenwood Elementary.

  • Kate Martin

    Alright, I’m not a deflector. @ Greenwood Parent I only say that you might not know me very well.

    I have been an advocate for Greenwood Elementary for a long, long time. The school has had a disastrous history with principals each at $125K or more with lackluster performance. Joanna Hill – disaster and transferred how many times? Dr. Radford? That’s when McGinn did his failed coup to get Radford out of there when his kids were there and emptied the school while he was at it. Six or seven years ago?

    Then they had excess capacity. But why? Instead of asking why and holding SPS responsible for poor leadership, programs, and the fact that they had white flight. They had and have a disproportionate number of students from socio-economically disadvantaged backgrounds with horrible achievement statistics coming from The Cate Apartments, Denise Hunt, and scattered Section 8 and in part due to inadequate intervention on the SPS part by de facto enrollment by families who don’t advocate for which school, but who take whatever comes. Bagley and Whittier are not taking their fair load.

    I questioned closing Viewlands (because data said we wouldn’t have capacity and we don’t) when their enrollment was on the upswing, their achievement was on the upswing, and they had a great inclusion autism program.

    Instead of asking questions, they quickly filled Greenwood with a special ed program. SPS considers programs something you move whenever the whim suits them. Remember you don’t want your kid in a Seattle program or something like Summit at Jane Addams because the @ means your days are numbered.

    Anyway, they finally got rid of Radford and replaced him with Walter Trotter. I confronted Walter about what the heck he was going to do to help these disadvantaged kids who were being spit out of Greenwood, flunking at Whitman & Hamilton, and dropping out of Ingraham, Roosevelt, Hale, and Ballard.

    He sent me some email that he recalled. Thanks, Walter. Meanwhile he hadn’t heard of 826 Seattle (a free writing workshop 6 blocks from the school).

    I am used to being accused of a lot and I reiterate that this accusation is no different than the others.

    Why wouldn’t you just ask instead of harboring unfounded accusations?

    Greenwood Elementary? I’m happy to go toe to toe with anyone who defends how SPS manages Greenwood Elementary.

  • Kate Martin

    Alright, I’m not a deflector. @ Greenwood Parent I only say that you might not know me very well.

    I have been an advocate for Greenwood Elementary for a long, long time. The school has had a disastrous history with principals each at $125K or more with lackluster performance. Joanna Hill – disaster and transferred how many times? Dr. Radford? That’s when McGinn did his failed coup to get Radford out of there when his kids were there and emptied the school while he was at it. Six or seven years ago?

    Then they had excess capacity. But why? Instead of asking why and holding SPS responsible for poor leadership, programs, and the fact that they had white flight. They had and have a disproportionate number of students from socio-economically disadvantaged backgrounds with horrible achievement statistics coming from The Cate Apartments, Denise Hunt, and scattered Section 8 and in part due to inadequate intervention on the SPS part by de facto enrollment by families who don’t advocate for which school, but who take whatever comes. Bagley and Whittier are not taking their fair load.

    I questioned closing Viewlands (because data said we wouldn’t have capacity and we don’t) when their enrollment was on the upswing, their achievement was on the upswing, and they had a great inclusion autism program.

    Instead of asking questions, they quickly filled Greenwood with a special ed program. SPS considers programs something you move whenever the whim suits them. Remember you don’t want your kid in a Seattle program or something like Summit at Jane Addams because the @ means your days are numbered.

    Anyway, they finally got rid of Radford and replaced him with Walter Trotter. I confronted Walter about what the heck he was going to do to help these disadvantaged kids who were being spit out of Greenwood, flunking at Whitman & Hamilton, and dropping out of Ingraham, Roosevelt, Hale, and Ballard.

    He sent me some email that he recalled. Thanks, Walter. Meanwhile he hadn’t heard of 826 Seattle (a free writing workshop 6 blocks from the school).

    I am used to being accused of a lot and I reiterate that this accusation is no different than the others.

    Why wouldn’t you just ask instead of harboring unfounded accusations?

    Greenwood Elementary? I’m happy to go toe to toe with anyone who defends how SPS manages Greenwood Elementary.

  • Kate Martin

    Alright, I’m not a deflector. @ Greenwood Parent I only say that you might not know me very well.

    I have been an advocate for Greenwood Elementary for a long, long time. The school has had a disastrous history with principals each at $125K or more with lackluster performance. Joanna Hill – disaster and transferred how many times? Dr. Radford? That’s when McGinn did his failed coup to get Radford out of there when his kids were there and emptied the school while he was at it. Six or seven years ago?

    Then they had excess capacity. But why? Instead of asking why and holding SPS responsible for poor leadership, programs, and the fact that they had white flight. They had and have a disproportionate number of students from socio-economically disadvantaged backgrounds with horrible achievement statistics coming from The Cate Apartments, Denise Hunt, and scattered Section 8 and in part due to inadequate intervention on the SPS part by de facto enrollment by families who don’t advocate for which school, but who take whatever comes. Bagley and Whittier are not taking their fair load.

    I questioned closing Viewlands (because data said we wouldn’t have capacity and we don’t) when their enrollment was on the upswing, their achievement was on the upswing, and they had a great inclusion autism program.

    Instead of asking questions, they quickly filled Greenwood with a special ed program. SPS considers programs something you move whenever the whim suits them. Remember you don’t want your kid in a Seattle program or something like Summit at Jane Addams because the @ means your days are numbered.

    Anyway, they finally got rid of Radford and replaced him with Walter Trotter. I confronted Walter about what the heck he was going to do to help these disadvantaged kids who were being spit out of Greenwood, flunking at Whitman & Hamilton, and dropping out of Ingraham, Roosevelt, Hale, and Ballard.

    He sent me some email that he recalled. Thanks, Walter. Meanwhile he hadn’t heard of 826 Seattle (a free writing workshop 6 blocks from the school).

    I am used to being accused of a lot and I reiterate that this accusation is no different than the others.

    Why wouldn’t you just ask instead of harboring unfounded accusations?

    Greenwood Elementary? I’m happy to go toe to toe with anyone who defends how SPS manages Greenwood Elementary.

  • Kate Martin

    Alright, I’m not a deflector. @ Greenwood Parent I only say that you might not know me very well.

    I have been an advocate for Greenwood Elementary for a long, long time. The school has had a disastrous history with principals each at $125K or more with lackluster performance. Joanna Hill – disaster and transferred how many times? Dr. Radford? That’s when McGinn did his failed coup to get Radford out of there when his kids were there and emptied the school while he was at it. Six or seven years ago?

    Then they had excess capacity. But why? Instead of asking why and holding SPS responsible for poor leadership, programs, and the fact that they had white flight. They had and have a disproportionate number of students from socio-economically disadvantaged backgrounds with horrible achievement statistics coming from The Cate Apartments, Denise Hunt, and scattered Section 8 and in part due to inadequate intervention on the SPS part by de facto enrollment by families who don’t advocate for which school, but who take whatever comes. Bagley and Whittier are not taking their fair load.

    I questioned closing Viewlands (because data said we wouldn’t have capacity and we don’t) when their enrollment was on the upswing, their achievement was on the upswing, and they had a great inclusion autism program.

    Instead of asking questions, they quickly filled Greenwood with a special ed program. SPS considers programs something you move whenever the whim suits them. Remember you don’t want your kid in a Seattle program or something like Summit at Jane Addams because the @ means your days are numbered.

    Anyway, they finally got rid of Radford and replaced him with Walter Trotter. I confronted Walter about what the heck he was going to do to help these disadvantaged kids who were being spit out of Greenwood, flunking at Whitman & Hamilton, and dropping out of Ingraham, Roosevelt, Hale, and Ballard.

    He sent me some email that he recalled. Thanks, Walter. Meanwhile he hadn’t heard of 826 Seattle (a free writing workshop 6 blocks from the school).

    I am used to being accused of a lot and I reiterate that this accusation is no different than the others.

    Why wouldn’t you just ask instead of harboring unfounded accusations?

    Greenwood Elementary? I’m happy to go toe to toe with anyone who defends how SPS manages Greenwood Elementary.

  • Kate Martin

    Alright, I’m not a deflector. @ Greenwood Parent I only say that you might not know me very well.

    I have been an advocate for Greenwood Elementary for a long, long time. The school has had a disastrous history with principals each at $125K or more with lackluster performance. Joanna Hill – disaster and transferred how many times? Dr. Radford? That’s when McGinn did his failed coup to get Radford out of there when his kids were there and emptied the school while he was at it. Six or seven years ago?

    Then they had excess capacity. But why? Instead of asking why and holding SPS responsible for poor leadership, programs, and the fact that they had white flight. They had and have a disproportionate number of students from socio-economically disadvantaged backgrounds with horrible achievement statistics coming from The Cate Apartments, Denise Hunt, and scattered Section 8 and in part due to inadequate intervention on the SPS part by de facto enrollment by families who don’t advocate for which school, but who take whatever comes. Bagley and Whittier are not taking their fair load.

    I questioned closing Viewlands (because data said we wouldn’t have capacity and we don’t) when their enrollment was on the upswing, their achievement was on the upswing, and they had a great inclusion autism program.

    Instead of asking questions, they quickly filled Greenwood with a special ed program. SPS considers programs something you move whenever the whim suits them. Remember you don’t want your kid in a Seattle program or something like Summit at Jane Addams because the @ means your days are numbered.

    Anyway, they finally got rid of Radford and replaced him with Walter Trotter. I confronted Walter about what the heck he was going to do to help these disadvantaged kids who were being spit out of Greenwood, flunking at Whitman & Hamilton, and dropping out of Ingraham, Roosevelt, Hale, and Ballard.

    He sent me some email that he recalled. Thanks, Walter. Meanwhile he hadn’t heard of 826 Seattle (a free writing workshop 6 blocks from the school).

    I am used to being accused of a lot and I reiterate that this accusation is no different than the others.

    Why wouldn’t you just ask instead of harboring unfounded accusations?

    Greenwood Elementary? I’m happy to go toe to toe with anyone who defends how SPS manages Greenwood Elementary.

  • Kate Martin

    Alright, I’m not a deflector. @ Greenwood Parent I only say that you might not know me very well.

    I have been an advocate for Greenwood Elementary for a long, long time. The school has had a disastrous history with principals each at $125K or more with lackluster performance. Joanna Hill – disaster and transferred how many times? Dr. Radford? That’s when McGinn did his failed coup to get Radford out of there when his kids were there and emptied the school while he was at it. Six or seven years ago?

    Then they had excess capacity. But why? Instead of asking why and holding SPS responsible for poor leadership, programs, and the fact that they had white flight. They had and have a disproportionate number of students from socio-economically disadvantaged backgrounds with horrible achievement statistics coming from The Cate Apartments, Denise Hunt, and scattered Section 8 and in part due to inadequate intervention on the SPS part by de facto enrollment by families who don’t advocate for which school, but who take whatever comes. Bagley and Whittier are not taking their fair load.

    I questioned closing Viewlands (because data said we wouldn’t have capacity and we don’t) when their enrollment was on the upswing, their achievement was on the upswing, and they had a great inclusion autism program.

    Instead of asking questions, they quickly filled Greenwood with a special ed program. SPS considers programs something you move whenever the whim suits them. Remember you don’t want your kid in a Seattle program or something like Summit at Jane Addams because the @ means your days are numbered.

    Anyway, they finally got rid of Radford and replaced him with Walter Trotter. I confronted Walter about what the heck he was going to do to help these disadvantaged kids who were being spit out of Greenwood, flunking at Whitman & Hamilton, and dropping out of Ingraham, Roosevelt, Hale, and Ballard.

    He sent me some email that he recalled. Thanks, Walter. Meanwhile he hadn’t heard of 826 Seattle (a free writing workshop 6 blocks from the school).

    I am used to being accused of a lot and I reiterate that this accusation is no different than the others.

    Why wouldn’t you just ask instead of harboring unfounded accusations?

    Greenwood Elementary? I’m happy to go toe to toe with anyone who defends how SPS manages Greenwood Elementary.

  • Kate Martin

    Alright, I’m not a deflector. @ Greenwood Parent I only say that you might not know me very well.

    I have been an advocate for Greenwood Elementary for a long, long time. The school has had a disastrous history with principals each at $125K or more with lackluster performance. Joanna Hill – disaster and transferred how many times? Dr. Radford? That’s when McGinn did his failed coup to get Radford out of there when his kids were there and emptied the school while he was at it. Six or seven years ago?

    Then they had excess capacity. But why? Instead of asking why and holding SPS responsible for poor leadership, programs, and the fact that they had white flight. They had and have a disproportionate number of students from socio-economically disadvantaged backgrounds with horrible achievement statistics coming from The Cate Apartments, Denise Hunt, and scattered Section 8 and in part due to inadequate intervention on the SPS part by de facto enrollment by families who don’t advocate for which school, but who take whatever comes. Bagley and Whittier are not taking their fair load.

    I questioned closing Viewlands (because data said we wouldn’t have capacity and we don’t) when their enrollment was on the upswing, their achievement was on the upswing, and they had a great inclusion autism program.

    Instead of asking questions, they quickly filled Greenwood with a special ed program. SPS considers programs something you move whenever the whim suits them. Remember you don’t want your kid in a Seattle program or something like Summit at Jane Addams because the @ means your days are numbered.

    Anyway, they finally got rid of Radford and replaced him with Walter Trotter. I confronted Walter about what the heck he was going to do to help these disadvantaged kids who were being spit out of Greenwood, flunking at Whitman & Hamilton, and dropping out of Ingraham, Roosevelt, Hale, and Ballard.

    He sent me some email that he recalled. Thanks, Walter. Meanwhile he hadn’t heard of 826 Seattle (a free writing workshop 6 blocks from the school).

    I am used to being accused of a lot and I reiterate that this accusation is no different than the others.

    Why wouldn’t you just ask instead of harboring unfounded accusations?

    Greenwood Elementary? I’m happy to go toe to toe with anyone who defends how SPS manages Greenwood Elementary.

  • Kate Martin

    Alright, I’m not a deflector. @ Greenwood Parent I only say that you might not know me very well.

    I have been an advocate for Greenwood Elementary for a long, long time. The school has had a disastrous history with principals each at $125K or more with lackluster performance. Joanna Hill – disaster and transferred how many times? Dr. Radford? That’s when McGinn did his failed coup to get Radford out of there when his kids were there and emptied the school while he was at it. Six or seven years ago?

    Then they had excess capacity. But why? Instead of asking why and holding SPS responsible for poor leadership, programs, and the fact that they had white flight. They had and have a disproportionate number of students from socio-economically disadvantaged backgrounds with horrible achievement statistics coming from The Cate Apartments, Denise Hunt, and scattered Section 8 and in part due to inadequate intervention on the SPS part by de facto enrollment by families who don’t advocate for which school, but who take whatever comes. Bagley and Whittier are not taking their fair load.

    I questioned closing Viewlands (because data said we wouldn’t have capacity and we don’t) when their enrollment was on the upswing, their achievement was on the upswing, and they had a great inclusion autism program.

    Instead of asking questions, they quickly filled Greenwood with a special ed program. SPS considers programs something you move whenever the whim suits them. Remember you don’t want your kid in a Seattle program or something like Summit at Jane Addams because the @ means your days are numbered.

    Anyway, they finally got rid of Radford and replaced him with Walter Trotter. I confronted Walter about what the heck he was going to do to help these disadvantaged kids who were being spit out of Greenwood, flunking at Whitman & Hamilton, and dropping out of Ingraham, Roosevelt, Hale, and Ballard.

    He sent me some email that he recalled. Thanks, Walter. Meanwhile he hadn’t heard of 826 Seattle (a free writing workshop 6 blocks from the school).

    I am used to being accused of a lot and I reiterate that this accusation is no different than the others.

    Why wouldn’t you just ask instead of harboring unfounded accusations?

    Greenwood Elementary? I’m happy to go toe to toe with anyone who defends how SPS manages Greenwood Elementary.

  • Kate Martin

    Alright, I’m not a deflector. @ Greenwood Parent I only say that you might not know me very well.

    I have been an advocate for Greenwood Elementary for a long, long time. The school has had a disastrous history with principals each at $125K or more with lackluster performance. Joanna Hill – disaster and transferred how many times? Dr. Radford? That’s when McGinn did his failed coup to get Radford out of there when his kids were there and emptied the school while he was at it. Six or seven years ago?

    Then they had excess capacity. But why? Instead of asking why and holding SPS responsible for poor leadership, programs, and the fact that they had white flight. They had and have a disproportionate number of students from socio-economically disadvantaged backgrounds with horrible achievement statistics coming from The Cate Apartments, Denise Hunt, and scattered Section 8 and in part due to inadequate intervention on the SPS part by de facto enrollment by families who don’t advocate for which school, but who take whatever comes. Bagley and Whittier are not taking their fair load.

    I questioned closing Viewlands (because data said we wouldn’t have capacity and we don’t) when their enrollment was on the upswing, their achievement was on the upswing, and they had a great inclusion autism program.

    Instead of asking questions, they quickly filled Greenwood with a special ed program. SPS considers programs something you move whenever the whim suits them. Remember you don’t want your kid in a Seattle program or something like Summit at Jane Addams because the @ means your days are numbered.

    Anyway, they finally got rid of Radford and replaced him with Walter Trotter. I confronted Walter about what the heck he was going to do to help these disadvantaged kids who were being spit out of Greenwood, flunking at Whitman & Hamilton, and dropping out of Ingraham, Roosevelt, Hale, and Ballard.

    He sent me some email that he recalled. Thanks, Walter. Meanwhile he hadn’t heard of 826 Seattle (a free writing workshop 6 blocks from the school).

    I am used to being accused of a lot and I reiterate that this accusation is no different than the others.

    Why wouldn’t you just ask instead of harboring unfounded accusations?

    Greenwood Elementary? I’m happy to go toe to toe with anyone who defends how SPS manages Greenwood Elementary.

  • Kate Martin

    Alright, I’m not a deflector. @ Greenwood Parent I only say that you might not know me very well.

    I have been an advocate for Greenwood Elementary for a long, long time. The school has had a disastrous history with principals each at $125K or more with lackluster performance. Joanna Hill – disaster and transferred how many times? Dr. Radford? That’s when McGinn did his failed coup to get Radford out of there when his kids were there and emptied the school while he was at it. Six or seven years ago?

    Then they had excess capacity. But why? Instead of asking why and holding SPS responsible for poor leadership, programs, and the fact that they had white flight. They had and have a disproportionate number of students from socio-economically disadvantaged backgrounds with horrible achievement statistics coming from The Cate Apartments, Denise Hunt, and scattered Section 8 and in part due to inadequate intervention on the SPS part by de facto enrollment by families who don’t advocate for which school, but who take whatever comes. Bagley and Whittier are not taking their fair load.

    I questioned closing Viewlands (because data said we wouldn’t have capacity and we don’t) when their enrollment was on the upswing, their achievement was on the upswing, and they had a great inclusion autism program.

    Instead of asking questions, they quickly filled Greenwood with a special ed program. SPS considers programs something you move whenever the whim suits them. Remember you don’t want your kid in a Seattle program or something like Summit at Jane Addams because the @ means your days are numbered.

    Anyway, they finally got rid of Radford and replaced him with Walter Trotter. I confronted Walter about what the heck he was going to do to help these disadvantaged kids who were being spit out of Greenwood, flunking at Whitman & Hamilton, and dropping out of Ingraham, Roosevelt, Hale, and Ballard.

    He sent me some email that he recalled. Thanks, Walter. Meanwhile he hadn’t heard of 826 Seattle (a free writing workshop 6 blocks from the school).

    I am used to being accused of a lot and I reiterate that this accusation is no different than the others.

    Why wouldn’t you just ask instead of harboring unfounded accusations?

    Greenwood Elementary? I’m happy to go toe to toe with anyone who defends how SPS manages Greenwood Elementary.

  • Kate Martin

    Alright, I’m not a deflector. @ Greenwood Parent I only say that you might not know me very well.

    I have been an advocate for Greenwood Elementary for a long, long time. The school has had a disastrous history with principals each at $125K or more with lackluster performance. Joanna Hill – disaster and transferred how many times? Dr. Radford? That’s when McGinn did his failed coup to get Radford out of there when his kids were there and emptied the school while he was at it. Six or seven years ago?

    Then they had excess capacity. But why? Instead of asking why and holding SPS responsible for poor leadership, programs, and the fact that they had white flight. They had and have a disproportionate number of students from socio-economically disadvantaged backgrounds with horrible achievement statistics coming from The Cate Apartments, Denise Hunt, and scattered Section 8 and in part due to inadequate intervention on the SPS part by de facto enrollment by families who don’t advocate for which school, but who take whatever comes. Bagley and Whittier are not taking their fair load.

    I questioned closing Viewlands (because data said we wouldn’t have capacity and we don’t) when their enrollment was on the upswing, their achievement was on the upswing, and they had a great inclusion autism program.

    Instead of asking questions, they quickly filled Greenwood with a special ed program. SPS considers programs something you move whenever the whim suits them. Remember you don’t want your kid in a Seattle program or something like Summit at Jane Addams because the @ means your days are numbered.

    Anyway, they finally got rid of Radford and replaced him with Walter Trotter. I confronted Walter about what the heck he was going to do to help these disadvantaged kids who were being spit out of Greenwood, flunking at Whitman & Hamilton, and dropping out of Ingraham, Roosevelt, Hale, and Ballard.

    He sent me some email that he recalled. Thanks, Walter. Meanwhile he hadn’t heard of 826 Seattle (a free writing workshop 6 blocks from the school).

    I am used to being accused of a lot and I reiterate that this accusation is no different than the others.

    Why wouldn’t you just ask instead of harboring unfounded accusations?

    Greenwood Elementary? I’m happy to go toe to toe with anyone who defends how SPS manages Greenwood Elementary.

  • Kate Martin

    Alright, I’m not a deflector. @ Greenwood Parent I only say that you might not know me very well.

    I have been an advocate for Greenwood Elementary for a long, long time. The school has had a disastrous history with principals each at $125K or more with lackluster performance. Joanna Hill – disaster and transferred how many times? Dr. Radford? That’s when McGinn did his failed coup to get Radford out of there when his kids were there and emptied the school while he was at it. Six or seven years ago?

    Then they had excess capacity. But why? Instead of asking why and holding SPS responsible for poor leadership, programs, and the fact that they had white flight. They had and have a disproportionate number of students from socio-economically disadvantaged backgrounds with horrible achievement statistics coming from The Cate Apartments, Denise Hunt, and scattered Section 8 and in part due to inadequate intervention on the SPS part by de facto enrollment by families who don’t advocate for which school, but who take whatever comes. Bagley and Whittier are not taking their fair load.

    I questioned closing Viewlands (because data said we wouldn’t have capacity and we don’t) when their enrollment was on the upswing, their achievement was on the upswing, and they had a great inclusion autism program.

    Instead of asking questions, they quickly filled Greenwood with a special ed program. SPS considers programs something you move whenever the whim suits them. Remember you don’t want your kid in a Seattle program or something like Summit at Jane Addams because the @ means your days are numbered.

    Anyway, they finally got rid of Radford and replaced him with Walter Trotter. I confronted Walter about what the heck he was going to do to help these disadvantaged kids who were being spit out of Greenwood, flunking at Whitman & Hamilton, and dropping out of Ingraham, Roosevelt, Hale, and Ballard.

    He sent me some email that he recalled. Thanks, Walter. Meanwhile he hadn’t heard of 826 Seattle (a free writing workshop 6 blocks from the school).

    I am used to being accused of a lot and I reiterate that this accusation is no different than the others.

    Why wouldn’t you just ask instead of harboring unfounded accusations?

    Greenwood Elementary? I’m happy to go toe to toe with anyone who defends how SPS manages Greenwood Elementary.

  • Kate Martin

    Alright, I’m not a deflector. @ Greenwood Parent I only say that you might not know me very well.

    I have been an advocate for Greenwood Elementary for a long, long time. The school has had a disastrous history with principals each at $125K or more with lackluster performance. Joanna Hill – disaster and transferred how many times? Dr. Radford? That’s when McGinn did his failed coup to get Radford out of there when his kids were there and emptied the school while he was at it. Six or seven years ago?

    Then they had excess capacity. But why? Instead of asking why and holding SPS responsible for poor leadership, programs, and the fact that they had white flight. They had and have a disproportionate number of students from socio-economically disadvantaged backgrounds with horrible achievement statistics coming from The Cate Apartments, Denise Hunt, and scattered Section 8 and in part due to inadequate intervention on the SPS part by de facto enrollment by families who don’t advocate for which school, but who take whatever comes. Bagley and Whittier are not taking their fair load.

    I questioned closing Viewlands (because data said we wouldn’t have capacity and we don’t) when their enrollment was on the upswing, their achievement was on the upswing, and they had a great inclusion autism program.

    Instead of asking questions, they quickly filled Greenwood with a special ed program. SPS considers programs something you move whenever the whim suits them. Remember you don’t want your kid in a Seattle program or something like Summit at Jane Addams because the @ means your days are numbered.

    Anyway, they finally got rid of Radford and replaced him with Walter Trotter. I confronted Walter about what the heck he was going to do to help these disadvantaged kids who were being spit out of Greenwood, flunking at Whitman & Hamilton, and dropping out of Ingraham, Roosevelt, Hale, and Ballard.

    He sent me some email that he recalled. Thanks, Walter. Meanwhile he hadn’t heard of 826 Seattle (a free writing workshop 6 blocks from the school).

    I am used to being accused of a lot and I reiterate that this accusation is no different than the others.

    Why wouldn’t you just ask instead of harboring unfounded accusations?

    Greenwood Elementary? I’m happy to go toe to toe with anyone who defends how SPS manages Greenwood Elementary.

  • Kate Martin

    Alright, I’m not a deflector. @ Greenwood Parent I only say that you might not know me very well.

    I have been an advocate for Greenwood Elementary for a long, long time. The school has had a disastrous history with principals each at $125K or more with lackluster performance. Joanna Hill – disaster and transferred how many times? Dr. Radford? That’s when McGinn did his failed coup to get Radford out of there when his kids were there and emptied the school while he was at it. Six or seven years ago?

    Then they had excess capacity. But why? Instead of asking why and holding SPS responsible for poor leadership, programs, and the fact that they had white flight. They had and have a disproportionate number of students from socio-economically disadvantaged backgrounds with horrible achievement statistics coming from The Cate Apartments, Denise Hunt, and scattered Section 8 and in part due to inadequate intervention on the SPS part by de facto enrollment by families who don’t advocate for which school, but who take whatever comes. Bagley and Whittier are not taking their fair load.

    I questioned closing Viewlands (because data said we wouldn’t have capacity and we don’t) when their enrollment was on the upswing, their achievement was on the upswing, and they had a great inclusion autism program.

    Instead of asking questions, they quickly filled Greenwood with a special ed program. SPS considers programs something you move whenever the whim suits them. Remember you don’t want your kid in a Seattle program or something like Summit at Jane Addams because the @ means your days are numbered.

    Anyway, they finally got rid of Radford and replaced him with Walter Trotter. I confronted Walter about what the heck he was going to do to help these disadvantaged kids who were being spit out of Greenwood, flunking at Whitman & Hamilton, and dropping out of Ingraham, Roosevelt, Hale, and Ballard.

    He sent me some email that he recalled. Thanks, Walter. Meanwhile he hadn’t heard of 826 Seattle (a free writing workshop 6 blocks from the school).

    I am used to being accused of a lot and I reiterate that this accusation is no different than the others.

    Why wouldn’t you just ask instead of harboring unfounded accusations?

    Greenwood Elementary? I’m happy to go toe to toe with anyone who defends how SPS manages Greenwood Elementary.

  • Kate Martin

    Alright, I’m not a deflector. @ Greenwood Parent I only say that you might not know me very well.

    I have been an advocate for Greenwood Elementary for a long, long time. The school has had a disastrous history with principals each at $125K or more with lackluster performance. Joanna Hill – disaster and transferred how many times? Dr. Radford? That’s when McGinn did his failed coup to get Radford out of there when his kids were there and emptied the school while he was at it. Six or seven years ago?

    Then they had excess capacity. But why? Instead of asking why and holding SPS responsible for poor leadership, programs, and the fact that they had white flight. They had and have a disproportionate number of students from socio-economically disadvantaged backgrounds with horrible achievement statistics coming from The Cate Apartments, Denise Hunt, and scattered Section 8 and in part due to inadequate intervention on the SPS part by de facto enrollment by families who don’t advocate for which school, but who take whatever comes. Bagley and Whittier are not taking their fair load.

    I questioned closing Viewlands (because data said we wouldn’t have capacity and we don’t) when their enrollment was on the upswing, their achievement was on the upswing, and they had a great inclusion autism program.

    Instead of asking questions, they quickly filled Greenwood with a special ed program. SPS considers programs something you move whenever the whim suits them. Remember you don’t want your kid in a Seattle program or something like Summit at Jane Addams because the @ means your days are numbered.

    Anyway, they finally got rid of Radford and replaced him with Walter Trotter. I confronted Walter about what the heck he was going to do to help these disadvantaged kids who were being spit out of Greenwood, flunking at Whitman & Hamilton, and dropping out of Ingraham, Roosevelt, Hale, and Ballard.

    He sent me some email that he recalled. Thanks, Walter. Meanwhile he hadn’t heard of 826 Seattle (a free writing workshop 6 blocks from the school).

    I am used to being accused of a lot and I reiterate that this accusation is no different than the others.

    Why wouldn’t you just ask instead of harboring unfounded accusations?

    Greenwood Elementary? I’m happy to go toe to toe with anyone who defends how SPS manages Greenwood Elementary.

  • Kate Martin

    Alright, I’m not a deflector. @ Greenwood Parent I only say that you might not know me very well.

    I have been an advocate for Greenwood Elementary for a long, long time. The school has had a disastrous history with principals each at $125K or more with lackluster performance. Joanna Hill – disaster and transferred how many times? Dr. Radford? That’s when McGinn did his failed coup to get Radford out of there when his kids were there and emptied the school while he was at it. Six or seven years ago?

    Then they had excess capacity. But why? Instead of asking why and holding SPS responsible for poor leadership, programs, and the fact that they had white flight. They had and have a disproportionate number of students from socio-economically disadvantaged backgrounds with horrible achievement statistics coming from The Cate Apartments, Denise Hunt, and scattered Section 8 and in part due to inadequate intervention on the SPS part by de facto enrollment by families who don’t advocate for which school, but who take whatever comes. Bagley and Whittier are not taking their fair load.

    I questioned closing Viewlands (because data said we wouldn’t have capacity and we don’t) when their enrollment was on the upswing, their achievement was on the upswing, and they had a great inclusion autism program.

    Instead of asking questions, they quickly filled Greenwood with a special ed program. SPS considers programs something you move whenever the whim suits them. Remember you don’t want your kid in a Seattle program or something like Summit at Jane Addams because the @ means your days are numbered.

    Anyway, they finally got rid of Radford and replaced him with Walter Trotter. I confronted Walter about what the heck he was going to do to help these disadvantaged kids who were being spit out of Greenwood, flunking at Whitman & Hamilton, and dropping out of Ingraham, Roosevelt, Hale, and Ballard.

    He sent me some email that he recalled. Thanks, Walter. Meanwhile he hadn’t heard of 826 Seattle (a free writing workshop 6 blocks from the school).

    I am used to being accused of a lot and I reiterate that this accusation is no different than the others.

    Why wouldn’t you just ask instead of harboring unfounded accusations?

    Greenwood Elementary? I’m happy to go toe to toe with anyone who defends how SPS manages Greenwood Elementary.

  • Kate Martin

    Alright, I’m not a deflector. @ Greenwood Parent I only say that you might not know me very well.

    I have been an advocate for Greenwood Elementary for a long, long time. The school has had a disastrous history with principals each at $125K or more with lackluster performance. Joanna Hill – disaster and transferred how many times? Dr. Radford? That’s when McGinn did his failed coup to get Radford out of there when his kids were there and emptied the school while he was at it. Six or seven years ago?

    Then they had excess capacity. But why? Instead of asking why and holding SPS responsible for poor leadership, programs, and the fact that they had white flight. They had and have a disproportionate number of students from socio-economically disadvantaged backgrounds with horrible achievement statistics coming from The Cate Apartments, Denise Hunt, and scattered Section 8 and in part due to inadequate intervention on the SPS part by de facto enrollment by families who don’t advocate for which school, but who take whatever comes. Bagley and Whittier are not taking their fair load.

    I questioned closing Viewlands (because data said we wouldn’t have capacity and we don’t) when their enrollment was on the upswing, their achievement was on the upswing, and they had a great inclusion autism program.

    Instead of asking questions, they quickly filled Greenwood with a special ed program. SPS considers programs something you move whenever the whim suits them. Remember you don’t want your kid in a Seattle program or something like Summit at Jane Addams because the @ means your days are numbered.

    Anyway, they finally got rid of Radford and replaced him with Walter Trotter. I confronted Walter about what the heck he was going to do to help these disadvantaged kids who were being spit out of Greenwood, flunking at Whitman & Hamilton, and dropping out of Ingraham, Roosevelt, Hale, and Ballard.

    He sent me some email that he recalled. Thanks, Walter. Meanwhile he hadn’t heard of 826 Seattle (a free writing workshop 6 blocks from the school).

    I am used to being accused of a lot and I reiterate that this accusation is no different than the others.

    Why wouldn’t you just ask instead of harboring unfounded accusations?

    Greenwood Elementary? I’m happy to go toe to toe with anyone who defends how SPS manages Greenwood Elementary.

  • Kate Martin

    Alright, I’m not a deflector. @ Greenwood Parent I only say that you might not know me very well.

    I have been an advocate for Greenwood Elementary for a long, long time. The school has had a disastrous history with principals each at $125K or more with lackluster performance. Joanna Hill – disaster and transferred how many times? Dr. Radford? That’s when McGinn did his failed coup to get Radford out of there when his kids were there and emptied the school while he was at it. Six or seven years ago?

    Then they had excess capacity. But why? Instead of asking why and holding SPS responsible for poor leadership, programs, and the fact that they had white flight. They had and have a disproportionate number of students from socio-economically disadvantaged backgrounds with horrible achievement statistics coming from The Cate Apartments, Denise Hunt, and scattered Section 8 and in part due to inadequate intervention on the SPS part by de facto enrollment by families who don’t advocate for which school, but who take whatever comes. Bagley and Whittier are not taking their fair load.

    I questioned closing Viewlands (because data said we wouldn’t have capacity and we don’t) when their enrollment was on the upswing, their achievement was on the upswing, and they had a great inclusion autism program.

    Instead of asking questions, they quickly filled Greenwood with a special ed program. SPS considers programs something you move whenever the whim suits them. Remember you don’t want your kid in a Seattle program or something like Summit at Jane Addams because the @ means your days are numbered.

    Anyway, they finally got rid of Radford and replaced him with Walter Trotter. I confronted Walter about what the heck he was going to do to help these disadvantaged kids who were being spit out of Greenwood, flunking at Whitman & Hamilton, and dropping out of Ingraham, Roosevelt, Hale, and Ballard.

    He sent me some email that he recalled. Thanks, Walter. Meanwhile he hadn’t heard of 826 Seattle (a free writing workshop 6 blocks from the school).

    I am used to being accused of a lot and I reiterate that this accusation is no different than the others.

    Why wouldn’t you just ask instead of harboring unfounded accusations?

    Greenwood Elementary? I’m happy to go toe to toe with anyone who defends how SPS manages Greenwood Elementary.

  • Kate Martin

    Alright, I’m not a deflector. @ Greenwood Parent I only say that you might not know me very well.

    I have been an advocate for Greenwood Elementary for a long, long time. The school has had a disastrous history with principals each at $125K or more with lackluster performance. Joanna Hill – disaster and transferred how many times? Dr. Radford? That’s when McGinn did his failed coup to get Radford out of there when his kids were there and emptied the school while he was at it. Six or seven years ago?

    Then they had excess capacity. But why? Instead of asking why and holding SPS responsible for poor leadership, programs, and the fact that they had white flight. They had and have a disproportionate number of students from socio-economically disadvantaged backgrounds with horrible achievement statistics coming from The Cate Apartments, Denise Hunt, and scattered Section 8 and in part due to inadequate intervention on the SPS part by de facto enrollment by families who don’t advocate for which school, but who take whatever comes. Bagley and Whittier are not taking their fair load.

    I questioned closing Viewlands (because data said we wouldn’t have capacity and we don’t) when their enrollment was on the upswing, their achievement was on the upswing, and they had a great inclusion autism program.

    Instead of asking questions, they quickly filled Greenwood with a special ed program. SPS considers programs something you move whenever the whim suits them. Remember you don’t want your kid in a Seattle program or something like Summit at Jane Addams because the @ means your days are numbered.

    Anyway, they finally got rid of Radford and replaced him with Walter Trotter. I confronted Walter about what the heck he was going to do to help these disadvantaged kids who were being spit out of Greenwood, flunking at Whitman & Hamilton, and dropping out of Ingraham, Roosevelt, Hale, and Ballard.

    He sent me some email that he recalled. Thanks, Walter. Meanwhile he hadn’t heard of 826 Seattle (a free writing workshop 6 blocks from the school).

    I am used to being accused of a lot and I reiterate that this accusation is no different than the others.

    Why wouldn’t you just ask instead of harboring unfounded accusations?

    Greenwood Elementary? I’m happy to go toe to toe with anyone who defends how SPS manages Greenwood Elementary.

  • Kate Martin

    Alright, I’m not a deflector. @ Greenwood Parent I only say that you might not know me very well.

    I have been an advocate for Greenwood Elementary for a long, long time. The school has had a disastrous history with principals each at $125K or more with lackluster performance. Joanna Hill – disaster and transferred how many times? Dr. Radford? That’s when McGinn did his failed coup to get Radford out of there when his kids were there and emptied the school while he was at it. Six or seven years ago?

    Then they had excess capacity. But why? Instead of asking why and holding SPS responsible for poor leadership, programs, and the fact that they had white flight. They had and have a disproportionate number of students from socio-economically disadvantaged backgrounds with horrible achievement statistics coming from The Cate Apartments, Denise Hunt, and scattered Section 8 and in part due to inadequate intervention on the SPS part by de facto enrollment by families who don’t advocate for which school, but who take whatever comes. Bagley and Whittier are not taking their fair load.

    I questioned closing Viewlands (because data said we wouldn’t have capacity and we don’t) when their enrollment was on the upswing, their achievement was on the upswing, and they had a great inclusion autism program.

    Instead of asking questions, they quickly filled Greenwood with a special ed program. SPS considers programs something you move whenever the whim suits them. Remember you don’t want your kid in a Seattle program or something like Summit at Jane Addams because the @ means your days are numbered.

    Anyway, they finally got rid of Radford and replaced him with Walter Trotter. I confronted Walter about what the heck he was going to do to help these disadvantaged kids who were being spit out of Greenwood, flunking at Whitman & Hamilton, and dropping out of Ingraham, Roosevelt, Hale, and Ballard.

    He sent me some email that he recalled. Thanks, Walter. Meanwhile he hadn’t heard of 826 Seattle (a free writing workshop 6 blocks from the school).

    I am used to being accused of a lot and I reiterate that this accusation is no different than the others.

    Why wouldn’t you just ask instead of harboring unfounded accusations?

    Greenwood Elementary? I’m happy to go toe to toe with anyone who defends how SPS manages Greenwood Elementary.

  • Kate Martin

    Alright, I’m not a deflector. @ Greenwood Parent I only say that you might not know me very well.

    I have been an advocate for Greenwood Elementary for a long, long time. The school has had a disastrous history with principals each at $125K or more with lackluster performance. Joanna Hill – disaster and transferred how many times? Dr. Radford? That’s when McGinn did his failed coup to get Radford out of there when his kids were there and emptied the school while he was at it. Six or seven years ago?

    Then they had excess capacity. But why? Instead of asking why and holding SPS responsible for poor leadership, programs, and the fact that they had white flight. They had and have a disproportionate number of students from socio-economically disadvantaged backgrounds with horrible achievement statistics coming from The Cate Apartments, Denise Hunt, and scattered Section 8 and in part due to inadequate intervention on the SPS part by de facto enrollment by families who don’t advocate for which school, but who take whatever comes. Bagley and Whittier are not taking their fair load.

    I questioned closing Viewlands (because data said we wouldn’t have capacity and we don’t) when their enrollment was on the upswing, their achievement was on the upswing, and they had a great inclusion autism program.

    Instead of asking questions, they quickly filled Greenwood with a special ed program. SPS considers programs something you move whenever the whim suits them. Remember you don’t want your kid in a Seattle program or something like Summit at Jane Addams because the @ means your days are numbered.

    Anyway, they finally got rid of Radford and replaced him with Walter Trotter. I confronted Walter about what the heck he was going to do to help these disadvantaged kids who were being spit out of Greenwood, flunking at Whitman & Hamilton, and dropping out of Ingraham, Roosevelt, Hale, and Ballard.

    He sent me some email that he recalled. Thanks, Walter. Meanwhile he hadn’t heard of 826 Seattle (a free writing workshop 6 blocks from the school).

    I am used to being accused of a lot and I reiterate that this accusation is no different than the others.

    Why wouldn’t you just ask instead of harboring unfounded accusations?

    Greenwood Elementary? I’m happy to go toe to toe with anyone who defends how SPS manages Greenwood Elementary.

  • Kate Martin

    Alright, I’m not a deflector. @ Greenwood Parent I only say that you might not know me very well.

    I have been an advocate for Greenwood Elementary for a long, long time. The school has had a disastrous history with principals each at $125K or more with lackluster performance. Joanna Hill – disaster and transferred how many times? Dr. Radford? That’s when McGinn did his failed coup to get Radford out of there when his kids were there and emptied the school while he was at it. Six or seven years ago?

    Then they had excess capacity. But why? Instead of asking why and holding SPS responsible for poor leadership, programs, and the fact that they had white flight. They had and have a disproportionate number of students from socio-economically disadvantaged backgrounds with horrible achievement statistics coming from The Cate Apartments, Denise Hunt, and scattered Section 8 and in part due to inadequate intervention on the SPS part by de facto enrollment by families who don’t advocate for which school, but who take whatever comes. Bagley and Whittier are not taking their fair load.

    I questioned closing Viewlands (because data said we wouldn’t have capacity and we don’t) when their enrollment was on the upswing, their achievement was on the upswing, and they had a great inclusion autism program.

    Instead of asking questions, they quickly filled Greenwood with a special ed program. SPS considers programs something you move whenever the whim suits them. Remember you don’t want your kid in a Seattle program or something like Summit at Jane Addams because the @ means your days are numbered.

    Anyway, they finally got rid of Radford and replaced him with Walter Trotter. I confronted Walter about what the heck he was going to do to help these disadvantaged kids who were being spit out of Greenwood, flunking at Whitman & Hamilton, and dropping out of Ingraham, Roosevelt, Hale, and Ballard.

    He sent me some email that he recalled. Thanks, Walter. Meanwhile he hadn’t heard of 826 Seattle (a free writing workshop 6 blocks from the school).

    I am used to being accused of a lot and I reiterate that this accusation is no different than the others.

    Why wouldn’t you just ask instead of harboring unfounded accusations?

    Greenwood Elementary? I’m happy to go toe to toe with anyone who defends how SPS manages Greenwood Elementary.

  • Kate Martin

    Alright, I’m not a deflector. @ Greenwood Parent I only say that you might not know me very well.

    I have been an advocate for Greenwood Elementary for a long, long time. The school has had a disastrous history with principals each at $125K or more with lackluster performance. Joanna Hill – disaster and transferred how many times? Dr. Radford? That’s when McGinn did his failed coup to get Radford out of there when his kids were there and emptied the school while he was at it. Six or seven years ago?

    Then they had excess capacity. But why? Instead of asking why and holding SPS responsible for poor leadership, programs, and the fact that they had white flight. They had and have a disproportionate number of students from socio-economically disadvantaged backgrounds with horrible achievement statistics coming from The Cate Apartments, Denise Hunt, and scattered Section 8 and in part due to inadequate intervention on the SPS part by de facto enrollment by families who don’t advocate for which school, but who take whatever comes. Bagley and Whittier are not taking their fair load.

    I questioned closing Viewlands (because data said we wouldn’t have capacity and we don’t) when their enrollment was on the upswing, their achievement was on the upswing, and they had a great inclusion autism program.

    Instead of asking questions, they quickly filled Greenwood with a special ed program. SPS considers programs something you move whenever the whim suits them. Remember you don’t want your kid in a Seattle program or something like Summit at Jane Addams because the @ means your days are numbered.

    Anyway, they finally got rid of Radford and replaced him with Walter Trotter. I confronted Walter about what the heck he was going to do to help these disadvantaged kids who were being spit out of Greenwood, flunking at Whitman & Hamilton, and dropping out of Ingraham, Roosevelt, Hale, and Ballard.

    He sent me some email that he recalled. Thanks, Walter. Meanwhile he hadn’t heard of 826 Seattle (a free writing workshop 6 blocks from the school).

    I am used to being accused of a lot and I reiterate that this accusation is no different than the others.

    Why wouldn’t you just ask instead of harboring unfounded accusations?

    Greenwood Elementary? I’m happy to go toe to toe with anyone who defends how SPS manages Greenwood Elementary.

  • Kate Martin

    Stacy -

    Why on earth do you think these are nasty personal attacks?

    Other than a person being what I’m talking about, these are not personal attacks they are performance reviews and we have quite a bit to worry about.

    If these things are not your concern, by all means avoid me and Mike’s record, but if you’re going to attack me, disprove something I say.

  • Kate Martin

    Stacy -

    Why on earth do you think these are nasty personal attacks?

    Other than a person being what I’m talking about, these are not personal attacks they are performance reviews and we have quite a bit to worry about.

    If these things are not your concern, by all means avoid me and Mike’s record, but if you’re going to attack me, disprove something I say.

  • Kate Martin

    Stacy -

    Why on earth do you think these are nasty personal attacks?

    Other than a person being what I’m talking about, these are not personal attacks they are performance reviews and we have quite a bit to worry about.

    If these things are not your concern, by all means avoid me and Mike’s record, but if you’re going to attack me, disprove something I say.

  • Kate Martin

    Stacy -

    Why on earth do you think these are nasty personal attacks?

    Other than a person being what I’m talking about, these are not personal attacks they are performance reviews and we have quite a bit to worry about.

    If these things are not your concern, by all means avoid me and Mike’s record, but if you’re going to attack me, disprove something I say.

  • Kate Martin

    Stacy -

    Why on earth do you think these are nasty personal attacks?

    Other than a person being what I’m talking about, these are not personal attacks they are performance reviews and we have quite a bit to worry about.

    If these things are not your concern, by all means avoid me and Mike’s record, but if you’re going to attack me, disprove something I say.

  • Kate Martin

    Stacy -

    Why on earth do you think these are nasty personal attacks?

    Other than a person being what I’m talking about, these are not personal attacks they are performance reviews and we have quite a bit to worry about.

    If these things are not your concern, by all means avoid me and Mike’s record, but if you’re going to attack me, disprove something I say.

  • Kate Martin

    Stacy -

    Why on earth do you think these are nasty personal attacks?

    Other than a person being what I’m talking about, these are not personal attacks they are performance reviews and we have quite a bit to worry about.

    If these things are not your concern, by all means avoid me and Mike’s record, but if you’re going to attack me, disprove something I say.

  • Kate Martin

    Stacy -

    Why on earth do you think these are nasty personal attacks?

    Other than a person being what I’m talking about, these are not personal attacks they are performance reviews and we have quite a bit to worry about.

    If these things are not your concern, by all means avoid me and Mike’s record, but if you’re going to attack me, disprove something I say.

  • Kate Martin

    Stacy -

    Why on earth do you think these are nasty personal attacks?

    Other than a person being what I’m talking about, these are not personal attacks they are performance reviews and we have quite a bit to worry about.

    If these things are not your concern, by all means avoid me and Mike’s record, but if you’re going to attack me, disprove something I say.

  • Kate Martin

    Stacy -

    Why on earth do you think these are nasty personal attacks?

    Other than a person being what I’m talking about, these are not personal attacks they are performance reviews and we have quite a bit to worry about.

    If these things are not your concern, by all means avoid me and Mike’s record, but if you’re going to attack me, disprove something I say.

  • Kate Martin

    Stacy -

    Why on earth do you think these are nasty personal attacks?

    Other than a person being what I’m talking about, these are not personal attacks they are performance reviews and we have quite a bit to worry about.

    If these things are not your concern, by all means avoid me and Mike’s record, but if you’re going to attack me, disprove something I say.

  • Kate Martin

    Stacy -

    Why on earth do you think these are nasty personal attacks?

    Other than a person being what I’m talking about, these are not personal attacks they are performance reviews and we have quite a bit to worry about.

    If these things are not your concern, by all means avoid me and Mike’s record, but if you’re going to attack me, disprove something I say.

  • Kate Martin

    Stacy -

    Why on earth do you think these are nasty personal attacks?

    Other than a person being what I’m talking about, these are not personal attacks they are performance reviews and we have quite a bit to worry about.

    If these things are not your concern, by all means avoid me and Mike’s record, but if you’re going to attack me, disprove something I say.

  • Kate Martin

    Stacy -

    Why on earth do you think these are nasty personal attacks?

    Other than a person being what I’m talking about, these are not personal attacks they are performance reviews and we have quite a bit to worry about.

    If these things are not your concern, by all means avoid me and Mike’s record, but if you’re going to attack me, disprove something I say.

  • Kate Martin

    Stacy -

    Why on earth do you think these are nasty personal attacks?

    Other than a person being what I’m talking about, these are not personal attacks they are performance reviews and we have quite a bit to worry about.

    If these things are not your concern, by all means avoid me and Mike’s record, but if you’re going to attack me, disprove something I say.

  • Kate Martin

    Stacy -

    Why on earth do you think these are nasty personal attacks?

    Other than a person being what I’m talking about, these are not personal attacks they are performance reviews and we have quite a bit to worry about.

    If these things are not your concern, by all means avoid me and Mike’s record, but if you’re going to attack me, disprove something I say.

  • Kate Martin

    Stacy -

    Why on earth do you think these are nasty personal attacks?

    Other than a person being what I’m talking about, these are not personal attacks they are performance reviews and we have quite a bit to worry about.

    If these things are not your concern, by all means avoid me and Mike’s record, but if you’re going to attack me, disprove something I say.

  • Kate Martin

    Stacy -

    Why on earth do you think these are nasty personal attacks?

    Other than a person being what I’m talking about, these are not personal attacks they are performance reviews and we have quite a bit to worry about.

    If these things are not your concern, by all means avoid me and Mike’s record, but if you’re going to attack me, disprove something I say.

  • Kate Martin

    Stacy -

    Why on earth do you think these are nasty personal attacks?

    Other than a person being what I’m talking about, these are not personal attacks they are performance reviews and we have quite a bit to worry about.

    If these things are not your concern, by all means avoid me and Mike’s record, but if you’re going to attack me, disprove something I say.

  • Kate Martin

    Stacy -

    Why on earth do you think these are nasty personal attacks?

    Other than a person being what I’m talking about, these are not personal attacks they are performance reviews and we have quite a bit to worry about.

    If these things are not your concern, by all means avoid me and Mike’s record, but if you’re going to attack me, disprove something I say.

  • Kate Martin

    Stacy -

    Why on earth do you think these are nasty personal attacks?

    Other than a person being what I’m talking about, these are not personal attacks they are performance reviews and we have quite a bit to worry about.

    If these things are not your concern, by all means avoid me and Mike’s record, but if you’re going to attack me, disprove something I say.

  • Kate Martin

    Stacy -

    Why on earth do you think these are nasty personal attacks?

    Other than a person being what I’m talking about, these are not personal attacks they are performance reviews and we have quite a bit to worry about.

    If these things are not your concern, by all means avoid me and Mike’s record, but if you’re going to attack me, disprove something I say.

  • Kate Martin

    Stacy -

    Why on earth do you think these are nasty personal attacks?

    Other than a person being what I’m talking about, these are not personal attacks they are performance reviews and we have quite a bit to worry about.

    If these things are not your concern, by all means avoid me and Mike’s record, but if you’re going to attack me, disprove something I say.

  • Kate Martin

    Stacy -

    Why on earth do you think these are nasty personal attacks?

    Other than a person being what I’m talking about, these are not personal attacks they are performance reviews and we have quite a bit to worry about.

    If these things are not your concern, by all means avoid me and Mike’s record, but if you’re going to attack me, disprove something I say.

  • Kate Martin

    Stacy -

    Why on earth do you think these are nasty personal attacks?

    Other than a person being what I’m talking about, these are not personal attacks they are performance reviews and we have quite a bit to worry about.

    If these things are not your concern, by all means avoid me and Mike’s record, but if you’re going to attack me, disprove something I say.

  • Kate Martin

    Stacy -

    Why on earth do you think these are nasty personal attacks?

    Other than a person being what I’m talking about, these are not personal attacks they are performance reviews and we have quite a bit to worry about.

    If these things are not your concern, by all means avoid me and Mike’s record, but if you’re going to attack me, disprove something I say.

  • Kate Martin

    Stacy -

    Why on earth do you think these are nasty personal attacks?

    Other than a person being what I’m talking about, these are not personal attacks they are performance reviews and we have quite a bit to worry about.

    If these things are not your concern, by all means avoid me and Mike’s record, but if you’re going to attack me, disprove something I say.

  • Kate Martin

    Stacy -

    Why on earth do you think these are nasty personal attacks?

    Other than a person being what I’m talking about, these are not personal attacks they are performance reviews and we have quite a bit to worry about.

    If these things are not your concern, by all means avoid me and Mike’s record, but if you’re going to attack me, disprove something I say.

  • Kate Martin

    Stacy -

    Why on earth do you think these are nasty personal attacks?

    Other than a person being what I’m talking about, these are not personal attacks they are performance reviews and we have quite a bit to worry about.

    If these things are not your concern, by all means avoid me and Mike’s record, but if you’re going to attack me, disprove something I say.

  • Kate Martin

    Stacy -

    Why on earth do you think these are nasty personal attacks?

    Other than a person being what I’m talking about, these are not personal attacks they are performance reviews and we have quite a bit to worry about.

    If these things are not your concern, by all means avoid me and Mike’s record, but if you’re going to attack me, disprove something I say.

  • Kate Martin

    Stacy -

    Why on earth do you think these are nasty personal attacks?

    Other than a person being what I’m talking about, these are not personal attacks they are performance reviews and we have quite a bit to worry about.

    If these things are not your concern, by all means avoid me and Mike’s record, but if you’re going to attack me, disprove something I say.

  • Kate Martin

    Stacy -

    Why on earth do you think these are nasty personal attacks?

    Other than a person being what I’m talking about, these are not personal attacks they are performance reviews and we have quite a bit to worry about.

    If these things are not your concern, by all means avoid me and Mike’s record, but if you’re going to attack me, disprove something I say.

  • Kate Martin

    Stacy -

    Why on earth do you think these are nasty personal attacks?

    Other than a person being what I’m talking about, these are not personal attacks they are performance reviews and we have quite a bit to worry about.

    If these things are not your concern, by all means avoid me and Mike’s record, but if you’re going to attack me, disprove something I say.

  • Kate Martin

    Stacy -

    Why on earth do you think these are nasty personal attacks?

    Other than a person being what I’m talking about, these are not personal attacks they are performance reviews and we have quite a bit to worry about.

    If these things are not your concern, by all means avoid me and Mike’s record, but if you’re going to attack me, disprove something I say.

  • Kate Martin

    Stacy -

    Why on earth do you think these are nasty personal attacks?

    Other than a person being what I’m talking about, these are not personal attacks they are performance reviews and we have quite a bit to worry about.

    If these things are not your concern, by all means avoid me and Mike’s record, but if you’re going to attack me, disprove something I say.

  • Kate Martin

    Stacy -

    Why on earth do you think these are nasty personal attacks?

    Other than a person being what I’m talking about, these are not personal attacks they are performance reviews and we have quite a bit to worry about.

    If these things are not your concern, by all means avoid me and Mike’s record, but if you’re going to attack me, disprove something I say.

  • Kate Martin

    Stacy -

    Why on earth do you think these are nasty personal attacks?

    Other than a person being what I’m talking about, these are not personal attacks they are performance reviews and we have quite a bit to worry about.

    If these things are not your concern, by all means avoid me and Mike’s record, but if you’re going to attack me, disprove something I say.

  • Kate Martin

    Stacy -

    Why on earth do you think these are nasty personal attacks?

    Other than a person being what I’m talking about, these are not personal attacks they are performance reviews and we have quite a bit to worry about.

    If these things are not your concern, by all means avoid me and Mike’s record, but if you’re going to attack me, disprove something I say.

  • Kate Martin

    Stacy -

    Why on earth do you think these are nasty personal attacks?

    Other than a person being what I’m talking about, these are not personal attacks they are performance reviews and we have quite a bit to worry about.

    If these things are not your concern, by all means avoid me and Mike’s record, but if you’re going to attack me, disprove something I say.

  • Kate Martin

    Stacy -

    Why on earth do you think these are nasty personal attacks?

    Other than a person being what I’m talking about, these are not personal attacks they are performance reviews and we have quite a bit to worry about.

    If these things are not your concern, by all means avoid me and Mike’s record, but if you’re going to attack me, disprove something I say.

  • Kate Martin

    Stacy -

    Why on earth do you think these are nasty personal attacks?

    Other than a person being what I’m talking about, these are not personal attacks they are performance reviews and we have quite a bit to worry about.

    If these things are not your concern, by all means avoid me and Mike’s record, but if you’re going to attack me, disprove something I say.

  • Kate Martin

    Stacy -

    Why on earth do you think these are nasty personal attacks?

    Other than a person being what I’m talking about, these are not personal attacks they are performance reviews and we have quite a bit to worry about.

    If these things are not your concern, by all means avoid me and Mike’s record, but if you’re going to attack me, disprove something I say.

  • Kate Martin

    Stacy -

    Why on earth do you think these are nasty personal attacks?

    Other than a person being what I’m talking about, these are not personal attacks they are performance reviews and we have quite a bit to worry about.

    If these things are not your concern, by all means avoid me and Mike’s record, but if you’re going to attack me, disprove something I say.

  • Kate Martin

    Stacy -

    Why on earth do you think these are nasty personal attacks?

    Other than a person being what I’m talking about, these are not personal attacks they are performance reviews and we have quite a bit to worry about.

    If these things are not your concern, by all means avoid me and Mike’s record, but if you’re going to attack me, disprove something I say.

  • Kate Martin

    Stacy -

    Why on earth do you think these are nasty personal attacks?

    Other than a person being what I’m talking about, these are not personal attacks they are performance reviews and we have quite a bit to worry about.

    If these things are not your concern, by all means avoid me and Mike’s record, but if you’re going to attack me, disprove something I say.

  • Kate Martin

    Stacy -

    Why on earth do you think these are nasty personal attacks?

    Other than a person being what I’m talking about, these are not personal attacks they are performance reviews and we have quite a bit to worry about.

    If these things are not your concern, by all means avoid me and Mike’s record, but if you’re going to attack me, disprove something I say.

  • Kate Martin

    Stacy -

    Why on earth do you think these are nasty personal attacks?

    Other than a person being what I’m talking about, these are not personal attacks they are performance reviews and we have quite a bit to worry about.

    If these things are not your concern, by all means avoid me and Mike’s record, but if you’re going to attack me, disprove something I say.

  • Kate Martin

    Stacy -

    Why on earth do you think these are nasty personal attacks?

    Other than a person being what I’m talking about, these are not personal attacks they are performance reviews and we have quite a bit to worry about.

    If these things are not your concern, by all means avoid me and Mike’s record, but if you’re going to attack me, disprove something I say.

  • Kate Martin

    Stacy -

    Why on earth do you think these are nasty personal attacks?

    Other than a person being what I’m talking about, these are not personal attacks they are performance reviews and we have quite a bit to worry about.

    If these things are not your concern, by all means avoid me and Mike’s record, but if you’re going to attack me, disprove something I say.

  • Kate Martin

    Stacy -

    Why on earth do you think these are nasty personal attacks?

    Other than a person being what I’m talking about, these are not personal attacks they are performance reviews and we have quite a bit to worry about.

    If these things are not your concern, by all means avoid me and Mike’s record, but if you’re going to attack me, disprove something I say.

  • Kate Martin

    Stacy -

    Why on earth do you think these are nasty personal attacks?

    Other than a person being what I’m talking about, these are not personal attacks they are performance reviews and we have quite a bit to worry about.

    If these things are not your concern, by all means avoid me and Mike’s record, but if you’re going to attack me, disprove something I say.

  • Kate Martin

    Stacy -

    Why on earth do you think these are nasty personal attacks?

    Other than a person being what I’m talking about, these are not personal attacks they are performance reviews and we have quite a bit to worry about.

    If these things are not your concern, by all means avoid me and Mike’s record, but if you’re going to attack me, disprove something I say.

  • Kate Martin

    Stacy -

    Why on earth do you think these are nasty personal attacks?

    Other than a person being what I’m talking about, these are not personal attacks they are performance reviews and we have quite a bit to worry about.

    If these things are not your concern, by all means avoid me and Mike’s record, but if you’re going to attack me, disprove something I say.

  • Kate Martin

    Stacy -

    Why on earth do you think these are nasty personal attacks?

    Other than a person being what I’m talking about, these are not personal attacks they are performance reviews and we have quite a bit to worry about.

    If these things are not your concern, by all means avoid me and Mike’s record, but if you’re going to attack me, disprove something I say.

  • Greenwood Parent

    Dr. Trotter not knowing about 826? That’s simply not true Kate. Greenwood does a ton of cooperative programs with 826.

    White flight? Oh please, Kate. It’s a very diverse school and a lot of us parents like that about Greenwood. And a lot of us parents are working our butts off to make it as good a school as possible. For everyone. Even those kids from the Cate Apartments and Section 8 housing.

    You don’t send your kids to Greenwood. Fine. Your decision. But for the love of god please stop inflicting yourself on those of us that are working to make it a better school.

  • Greenwood Parent

    Dr. Trotter not knowing about 826? That’s simply not true Kate. Greenwood does a ton of cooperative programs with 826.

    White flight? Oh please, Kate. It’s a very diverse school and a lot of us parents like that about Greenwood. And a lot of us parents are working our butts off to make it as good a school as possible. For everyone. Even those kids from the Cate Apartments and Section 8 housing.

    You don’t send your kids to Greenwood. Fine. Your decision. But for the love of god please stop inflicting yourself on those of us that are working to make it a better school.

  • Greenwood Parent

    Dr. Trotter not knowing about 826? That’s simply not true Kate. Greenwood does a ton of cooperative programs with 826.

    White flight? Oh please, Kate. It’s a very diverse school and a lot of us parents like that about Greenwood. And a lot of us parents are working our butts off to make it as good a school as possible. For everyone. Even those kids from the Cate Apartments and Section 8 housing.

    You don’t send your kids to Greenwood. Fine. Your decision. But for the love of god please stop inflicting yourself on those of us that are working to make it a better school.

  • Greenwood Parent

    Dr. Trotter not knowing about 826? That’s simply not true Kate. Greenwood does a ton of cooperative programs with 826.

    White flight? Oh please, Kate. It’s a very diverse school and a lot of us parents like that about Greenwood. And a lot of us parents are working our butts off to make it as good a school as possible. For everyone. Even those kids from the Cate Apartments and Section 8 housing.

    You don’t send your kids to Greenwood. Fine. Your decision. But for the love of god please stop inflicting yourself on those of us that are working to make it a better school.

  • Greenwood Parent

    Dr. Trotter not knowing about 826? That’s simply not true Kate. Greenwood does a ton of cooperative programs with 826.

    White flight? Oh please, Kate. It’s a very diverse school and a lot of us parents like that about Greenwood. And a lot of us parents are working our butts off to make it as good a school as possible. For everyone. Even those kids from the Cate Apartments and Section 8 housing.

    You don’t send your kids to Greenwood. Fine. Your decision. But for the love of god please stop inflicting yourself on those of us that are working to make it a better school.

  • Greenwood Parent

    Dr. Trotter not knowing about 826? That’s simply not true Kate. Greenwood does a ton of cooperative programs with 826.

    White flight? Oh please, Kate. It’s a very diverse school and a lot of us parents like that about Greenwood. And a lot of us parents are working our butts off to make it as good a school as possible. For everyone. Even those kids from the Cate Apartments and Section 8 housing.

    You don’t send your kids to Greenwood. Fine. Your decision. But for the love of god please stop inflicting yourself on those of us that are working to make it a better school.

  • Greenwood Parent

    Dr. Trotter not knowing about 826? That’s simply not true Kate. Greenwood does a ton of cooperative programs with 826.

    White flight? Oh please, Kate. It’s a very diverse school and a lot of us parents like that about Greenwood. And a lot of us parents are working our butts off to make it as good a school as possible. For everyone. Even those kids from the Cate Apartments and Section 8 housing.

    You don’t send your kids to Greenwood. Fine. Your decision. But for the love of god please stop inflicting yourself on those of us that are working to make it a better school.

  • Greenwood Parent

    Dr. Trotter not knowing about 826? That’s simply not true Kate. Greenwood does a ton of cooperative programs with 826.

    White flight? Oh please, Kate. It’s a very diverse school and a lot of us parents like that about Greenwood. And a lot of us parents are working our butts off to make it as good a school as possible. For everyone. Even those kids from the Cate Apartments and Section 8 housing.

    You don’t send your kids to Greenwood. Fine. Your decision. But for the love of god please stop inflicting yourself on those of us that are working to make it a better school.

  • Greenwood Parent

    Dr. Trotter not knowing about 826? That’s simply not true Kate. Greenwood does a ton of cooperative programs with 826.

    White flight? Oh please, Kate. It’s a very diverse school and a lot of us parents like that about Greenwood. And a lot of us parents are working our butts off to make it as good a school as possible. For everyone. Even those kids from the Cate Apartments and Section 8 housing.

    You don’t send your kids to Greenwood. Fine. Your decision. But for the love of god please stop inflicting yourself on those of us that are working to make it a better school.

  • Greenwood Parent

    Dr. Trotter not knowing about 826? That’s simply not true Kate. Greenwood does a ton of cooperative programs with 826.

    White flight? Oh please, Kate. It’s a very diverse school and a lot of us parents like that about Greenwood. And a lot of us parents are working our butts off to make it as good a school as possible. For everyone. Even those kids from the Cate Apartments and Section 8 housing.

    You don’t send your kids to Greenwood. Fine. Your decision. But for the love of god please stop inflicting yourself on those of us that are working to make it a better school.

  • Greenwood Parent

    Dr. Trotter not knowing about 826? That’s simply not true Kate. Greenwood does a ton of cooperative programs with 826.

    White flight? Oh please, Kate. It’s a very diverse school and a lot of us parents like that about Greenwood. And a lot of us parents are working our butts off to make it as good a school as possible. For everyone. Even those kids from the Cate Apartments and Section 8 housing.

    You don’t send your kids to Greenwood. Fine. Your decision. But for the love of god please stop inflicting yourself on those of us that are working to make it a better school.

  • Greenwood Parent

    Dr. Trotter not knowing about 826? That’s simply not true Kate. Greenwood does a ton of cooperative programs with 826.

    White flight? Oh please, Kate. It’s a very diverse school and a lot of us parents like that about Greenwood. And a lot of us parents are working our butts off to make it as good a school as possible. For everyone. Even those kids from the Cate Apartments and Section 8 housing.

    You don’t send your kids to Greenwood. Fine. Your decision. But for the love of god please stop inflicting yourself on those of us that are working to make it a better school.

  • Greenwood Parent

    Dr. Trotter not knowing about 826? That’s simply not true Kate. Greenwood does a ton of cooperative programs with 826.

    White flight? Oh please, Kate. It’s a very diverse school and a lot of us parents like that about Greenwood. And a lot of us parents are working our butts off to make it as good a school as possible. For everyone. Even those kids from the Cate Apartments and Section 8 housing.

    You don’t send your kids to Greenwood. Fine. Your decision. But for the love of god please stop inflicting yourself on those of us that are working to make it a better school.

  • Greenwood Parent

    Dr. Trotter not knowing about 826? That’s simply not true Kate. Greenwood does a ton of cooperative programs with 826.

    White flight? Oh please, Kate. It’s a very diverse school and a lot of us parents like that about Greenwood. And a lot of us parents are working our butts off to make it as good a school as possible. For everyone. Even those kids from the Cate Apartments and Section 8 housing.

    You don’t send your kids to Greenwood. Fine. Your decision. But for the love of god please stop inflicting yourself on those of us that are working to make it a better school.

  • Greenwood Parent

    Dr. Trotter not knowing about 826? That’s simply not true Kate. Greenwood does a ton of cooperative programs with 826.

    White flight? Oh please, Kate. It’s a very diverse school and a lot of us parents like that about Greenwood. And a lot of us parents are working our butts off to make it as good a school as possible. For everyone. Even those kids from the Cate Apartments and Section 8 housing.

    You don’t send your kids to Greenwood. Fine. Your decision. But for the love of god please stop inflicting yourself on those of us that are working to make it a better school.

  • Greenwood Parent

    Dr. Trotter not knowing about 826? That’s simply not true Kate. Greenwood does a ton of cooperative programs with 826.

    White flight? Oh please, Kate. It’s a very diverse school and a lot of us parents like that about Greenwood. And a lot of us parents are working our butts off to make it as good a school as possible. For everyone. Even those kids from the Cate Apartments and Section 8 housing.

    You don’t send your kids to Greenwood. Fine. Your decision. But for the love of god please stop inflicting yourself on those of us that are working to make it a better school.

  • Greenwood Parent

    Dr. Trotter not knowing about 826? That’s simply not true Kate. Greenwood does a ton of cooperative programs with 826.

    White flight? Oh please, Kate. It’s a very diverse school and a lot of us parents like that about Greenwood. And a lot of us parents are working our butts off to make it as good a school as possible. For everyone. Even those kids from the Cate Apartments and Section 8 housing.

    You don’t send your kids to Greenwood. Fine. Your decision. But for the love of god please stop inflicting yourself on those of us that are working to make it a better school.

  • Greenwood Parent

    Dr. Trotter not knowing about 826? That’s simply not true Kate. Greenwood does a ton of cooperative programs with 826.

    White flight? Oh please, Kate. It’s a very diverse school and a lot of us parents like that about Greenwood. And a lot of us parents are working our butts off to make it as good a school as possible. For everyone. Even those kids from the Cate Apartments and Section 8 housing.

    You don’t send your kids to Greenwood. Fine. Your decision. But for the love of god please stop inflicting yourself on those of us that are working to make it a better school.

  • Greenwood Parent

    Dr. Trotter not knowing about 826? That’s simply not true Kate. Greenwood does a ton of cooperative programs with 826.

    White flight? Oh please, Kate. It’s a very diverse school and a lot of us parents like that about Greenwood. And a lot of us parents are working our butts off to make it as good a school as possible. For everyone. Even those kids from the Cate Apartments and Section 8 housing.

    You don’t send your kids to Greenwood. Fine. Your decision. But for the love of god please stop inflicting yourself on those of us that are working to make it a better school.

  • Greenwood Parent

    Dr. Trotter not knowing about 826? That’s simply not true Kate. Greenwood does a ton of cooperative programs with 826.

    White flight? Oh please, Kate. It’s a very diverse school and a lot of us parents like that about Greenwood. And a lot of us parents are working our butts off to make it as good a school as possible. For everyone. Even those kids from the Cate Apartments and Section 8 housing.

    You don’t send your kids to Greenwood. Fine. Your decision. But for the love of god please stop inflicting yourself on those of us that are working to make it a better school.

  • Greenwood Parent

    Dr. Trotter not knowing about 826? That’s simply not true Kate. Greenwood does a ton of cooperative programs with 826.

    White flight? Oh please, Kate. It’s a very diverse school and a lot of us parents like that about Greenwood. And a lot of us parents are working our butts off to make it as good a school as possible. For everyone. Even those kids from the Cate Apartments and Section 8 housing.

    You don’t send your kids to Greenwood. Fine. Your decision. But for the love of god please stop inflicting yourself on those of us that are working to make it a better school.

  • Greenwood Parent

    Dr. Trotter not knowing about 826? That’s simply not true Kate. Greenwood does a ton of cooperative programs with 826.

    White flight? Oh please, Kate. It’s a very diverse school and a lot of us parents like that about Greenwood. And a lot of us parents are working our butts off to make it as good a school as possible. For everyone. Even those kids from the Cate Apartments and Section 8 housing.

    You don’t send your kids to Greenwood. Fine. Your decision. But for the love of god please stop inflicting yourself on those of us that are working to make it a better school.

  • Greenwood Parent

    Dr. Trotter not knowing about 826? That’s simply not true Kate. Greenwood does a ton of cooperative programs with 826.

    White flight? Oh please, Kate. It’s a very diverse school and a lot of us parents like that about Greenwood. And a lot of us parents are working our butts off to make it as good a school as possible. For everyone. Even those kids from the Cate Apartments and Section 8 housing.

    You don’t send your kids to Greenwood. Fine. Your decision. But for the love of god please stop inflicting yourself on those of us that are working to make it a better school.

  • Greenwood Parent

    Dr. Trotter not knowing about 826? That’s simply not true Kate. Greenwood does a ton of cooperative programs with 826.

    White flight? Oh please, Kate. It’s a very diverse school and a lot of us parents like that about Greenwood. And a lot of us parents are working our butts off to make it as good a school as possible. For everyone. Even those kids from the Cate Apartments and Section 8 housing.

    You don’t send your kids to Greenwood. Fine. Your decision. But for the love of god please stop inflicting yourself on those of us that are working to make it a better school.

  • Greenwood Parent

    Dr. Trotter not knowing about 826? That’s simply not true Kate. Greenwood does a ton of cooperative programs with 826.

    White flight? Oh please, Kate. It’s a very diverse school and a lot of us parents like that about Greenwood. And a lot of us parents are working our butts off to make it as good a school as possible. For everyone. Even those kids from the Cate Apartments and Section 8 housing.

    You don’t send your kids to Greenwood. Fine. Your decision. But for the love of god please stop inflicting yourself on those of us that are working to make it a better school.

  • Greenwood Parent

    Dr. Trotter not knowing about 826? That’s simply not true Kate. Greenwood does a ton of cooperative programs with 826.

    White flight? Oh please, Kate. It’s a very diverse school and a lot of us parents like that about Greenwood. And a lot of us parents are working our butts off to make it as good a school as possible. For everyone. Even those kids from the Cate Apartments and Section 8 housing.

    You don’t send your kids to Greenwood. Fine. Your decision. But for the love of god please stop inflicting yourself on those of us that are working to make it a better school.

  • Greenwood Parent

    Dr. Trotter not knowing about 826? That’s simply not true Kate. Greenwood does a ton of cooperative programs with 826.

    White flight? Oh please, Kate. It’s a very diverse school and a lot of us parents like that about Greenwood. And a lot of us parents are working our butts off to make it as good a school as possible. For everyone. Even those kids from the Cate Apartments and Section 8 housing.

    You don’t send your kids to Greenwood. Fine. Your decision. But for the love of god please stop inflicting yourself on those of us that are working to make it a better school.

  • Greenwood Parent

    Dr. Trotter not knowing about 826? That’s simply not true Kate. Greenwood does a ton of cooperative programs with 826.

    White flight? Oh please, Kate. It’s a very diverse school and a lot of us parents like that about Greenwood. And a lot of us parents are working our butts off to make it as good a school as possible. For everyone. Even those kids from the Cate Apartments and Section 8 housing.

    You don’t send your kids to Greenwood. Fine. Your decision. But for the love of god please stop inflicting yourself on those of us that are working to make it a better school.

  • Greenwood Parent

    Dr. Trotter not knowing about 826? That’s simply not true Kate. Greenwood does a ton of cooperative programs with 826.

    White flight? Oh please, Kate. It’s a very diverse school and a lot of us parents like that about Greenwood. And a lot of us parents are working our butts off to make it as good a school as possible. For everyone. Even those kids from the Cate Apartments and Section 8 housing.

    You don’t send your kids to Greenwood. Fine. Your decision. But for the love of god please stop inflicting yourself on those of us that are working to make it a better school.

  • Greenwood Parent

    Dr. Trotter not knowing about 826? That’s simply not true Kate. Greenwood does a ton of cooperative programs with 826.

    White flight? Oh please, Kate. It’s a very diverse school and a lot of us parents like that about Greenwood. And a lot of us parents are working our butts off to make it as good a school as possible. For everyone. Even those kids from the Cate Apartments and Section 8 housing.

    You don’t send your kids to Greenwood. Fine. Your decision. But for the love of god please stop inflicting yourself on those of us that are working to make it a better school.

  • Greenwood Parent

    Dr. Trotter not knowing about 826? That’s simply not true Kate. Greenwood does a ton of cooperative programs with 826.

    White flight? Oh please, Kate. It’s a very diverse school and a lot of us parents like that about Greenwood. And a lot of us parents are working our butts off to make it as good a school as possible. For everyone. Even those kids from the Cate Apartments and Section 8 housing.

    You don’t send your kids to Greenwood. Fine. Your decision. But for the love of god please stop inflicting yourself on those of us that are working to make it a better school.

  • Greenwood Parent

    Dr. Trotter not knowing about 826? That’s simply not true Kate. Greenwood does a ton of cooperative programs with 826.

    White flight? Oh please, Kate. It’s a very diverse school and a lot of us parents like that about Greenwood. And a lot of us parents are working our butts off to make it as good a school as possible. For everyone. Even those kids from the Cate Apartments and Section 8 housing.

    You don’t send your kids to Greenwood. Fine. Your decision. But for the love of god please stop inflicting yourself on those of us that are working to make it a better school.

  • Greenwood Parent

    Dr. Trotter not knowing about 826? That’s simply not true Kate. Greenwood does a ton of cooperative programs with 826.

    White flight? Oh please, Kate. It’s a very diverse school and a lot of us parents like that about Greenwood. And a lot of us parents are working our butts off to make it as good a school as possible. For everyone. Even those kids from the Cate Apartments and Section 8 housing.

    You don’t send your kids to Greenwood. Fine. Your decision. But for the love of god please stop inflicting yourself on those of us that are working to make it a better school.

  • Greenwood Parent

    Dr. Trotter not knowing about 826? That’s simply not true Kate. Greenwood does a ton of cooperative programs with 826.

    White flight? Oh please, Kate. It’s a very diverse school and a lot of us parents like that about Greenwood. And a lot of us parents are working our butts off to make it as good a school as possible. For everyone. Even those kids from the Cate Apartments and Section 8 housing.

    You don’t send your kids to Greenwood. Fine. Your decision. But for the love of god please stop inflicting yourself on those of us that are working to make it a better school.

  • Greenwood Parent

    Dr. Trotter not knowing about 826? That’s simply not true Kate. Greenwood does a ton of cooperative programs with 826.

    White flight? Oh please, Kate. It’s a very diverse school and a lot of us parents like that about Greenwood. And a lot of us parents are working our butts off to make it as good a school as possible. For everyone. Even those kids from the Cate Apartments and Section 8 housing.

    You don’t send your kids to Greenwood. Fine. Your decision. But for the love of god please stop inflicting yourself on those of us that are working to make it a better school.

  • Greenwood Parent

    Dr. Trotter not knowing about 826? That’s simply not true Kate. Greenwood does a ton of cooperative programs with 826.

    White flight? Oh please, Kate. It’s a very diverse school and a lot of us parents like that about Greenwood. And a lot of us parents are working our butts off to make it as good a school as possible. For everyone. Even those kids from the Cate Apartments and Section 8 housing.

    You don’t send your kids to Greenwood. Fine. Your decision. But for the love of god please stop inflicting yourself on those of us that are working to make it a better school.

  • Greenwood Parent

    Dr. Trotter not knowing about 826? That’s simply not true Kate. Greenwood does a ton of cooperative programs with 826.

    White flight? Oh please, Kate. It’s a very diverse school and a lot of us parents like that about Greenwood. And a lot of us parents are working our butts off to make it as good a school as possible. For everyone. Even those kids from the Cate Apartments and Section 8 housing.

    You don’t send your kids to Greenwood. Fine. Your decision. But for the love of god please stop inflicting yourself on those of us that are working to make it a better school.

  • Greenwood Parent

    Dr. Trotter not knowing about 826? That’s simply not true Kate. Greenwood does a ton of cooperative programs with 826.

    White flight? Oh please, Kate. It’s a very diverse school and a lot of us parents like that about Greenwood. And a lot of us parents are working our butts off to make it as good a school as possible. For everyone. Even those kids from the Cate Apartments and Section 8 housing.

    You don’t send your kids to Greenwood. Fine. Your decision. But for the love of god please stop inflicting yourself on those of us that are working to make it a better school.

  • Greenwood Parent

    Dr. Trotter not knowing about 826? That’s simply not true Kate. Greenwood does a ton of cooperative programs with 826.

    White flight? Oh please, Kate. It’s a very diverse school and a lot of us parents like that about Greenwood. And a lot of us parents are working our butts off to make it as good a school as possible. For everyone. Even those kids from the Cate Apartments and Section 8 housing.

    You don’t send your kids to Greenwood. Fine. Your decision. But for the love of god please stop inflicting yourself on those of us that are working to make it a better school.

  • Greenwood Parent

    Dr. Trotter not knowing about 826? That’s simply not true Kate. Greenwood does a ton of cooperative programs with 826.

    White flight? Oh please, Kate. It’s a very diverse school and a lot of us parents like that about Greenwood. And a lot of us parents are working our butts off to make it as good a school as possible. For everyone. Even those kids from the Cate Apartments and Section 8 housing.

    You don’t send your kids to Greenwood. Fine. Your decision. But for the love of god please stop inflicting yourself on those of us that are working to make it a better school.

  • Greenwood Parent

    Dr. Trotter not knowing about 826? That’s simply not true Kate. Greenwood does a ton of cooperative programs with 826.

    White flight? Oh please, Kate. It’s a very diverse school and a lot of us parents like that about Greenwood. And a lot of us parents are working our butts off to make it as good a school as possible. For everyone. Even those kids from the Cate Apartments and Section 8 housing.

    You don’t send your kids to Greenwood. Fine. Your decision. But for the love of god please stop inflicting yourself on those of us that are working to make it a better school.

  • Greenwood Parent

    Dr. Trotter not knowing about 826? That’s simply not true Kate. Greenwood does a ton of cooperative programs with 826.

    White flight? Oh please, Kate. It’s a very diverse school and a lot of us parents like that about Greenwood. And a lot of us parents are working our butts off to make it as good a school as possible. For everyone. Even those kids from the Cate Apartments and Section 8 housing.

    You don’t send your kids to Greenwood. Fine. Your decision. But for the love of god please stop inflicting yourself on those of us that are working to make it a better school.

  • Greenwood Parent

    Dr. Trotter not knowing about 826? That’s simply not true Kate. Greenwood does a ton of cooperative programs with 826.

    White flight? Oh please, Kate. It’s a very diverse school and a lot of us parents like that about Greenwood. And a lot of us parents are working our butts off to make it as good a school as possible. For everyone. Even those kids from the Cate Apartments and Section 8 housing.

    You don’t send your kids to Greenwood. Fine. Your decision. But for the love of god please stop inflicting yourself on those of us that are working to make it a better school.

  • Greenwood Parent

    Dr. Trotter not knowing about 826? That’s simply not true Kate. Greenwood does a ton of cooperative programs with 826.

    White flight? Oh please, Kate. It’s a very diverse school and a lot of us parents like that about Greenwood. And a lot of us parents are working our butts off to make it as good a school as possible. For everyone. Even those kids from the Cate Apartments and Section 8 housing.

    You don’t send your kids to Greenwood. Fine. Your decision. But for the love of god please stop inflicting yourself on those of us that are working to make it a better school.

  • Greenwood Parent

    Dr. Trotter not knowing about 826? That’s simply not true Kate. Greenwood does a ton of cooperative programs with 826.

    White flight? Oh please, Kate. It’s a very diverse school and a lot of us parents like that about Greenwood. And a lot of us parents are working our butts off to make it as good a school as possible. For everyone. Even those kids from the Cate Apartments and Section 8 housing.

    You don’t send your kids to Greenwood. Fine. Your decision. But for the love of god please stop inflicting yourself on those of us that are working to make it a better school.

  • Greenwood Parent

    Dr. Trotter not knowing about 826? That’s simply not true Kate. Greenwood does a ton of cooperative programs with 826.

    White flight? Oh please, Kate. It’s a very diverse school and a lot of us parents like that about Greenwood. And a lot of us parents are working our butts off to make it as good a school as possible. For everyone. Even those kids from the Cate Apartments and Section 8 housing.

    You don’t send your kids to Greenwood. Fine. Your decision. But for the love of god please stop inflicting yourself on those of us that are working to make it a better school.

  • Greenwood Parent

    Dr. Trotter not knowing about 826? That’s simply not true Kate. Greenwood does a ton of cooperative programs with 826.

    White flight? Oh please, Kate. It’s a very diverse school and a lot of us parents like that about Greenwood. And a lot of us parents are working our butts off to make it as good a school as possible. For everyone. Even those kids from the Cate Apartments and Section 8 housing.

    You don’t send your kids to Greenwood. Fine. Your decision. But for the love of god please stop inflicting yourself on those of us that are working to make it a better school.

  • Greenwood Parent

    Dr. Trotter not knowing about 826? That’s simply not true Kate. Greenwood does a ton of cooperative programs with 826.

    White flight? Oh please, Kate. It’s a very diverse school and a lot of us parents like that about Greenwood. And a lot of us parents are working our butts off to make it as good a school as possible. For everyone. Even those kids from the Cate Apartments and Section 8 housing.

    You don’t send your kids to Greenwood. Fine. Your decision. But for the love of god please stop inflicting yourself on those of us that are working to make it a better school.

  • Greenwood Parent

    Dr. Trotter not knowing about 826? That’s simply not true Kate. Greenwood does a ton of cooperative programs with 826.

    White flight? Oh please, Kate. It’s a very diverse school and a lot of us parents like that about Greenwood. And a lot of us parents are working our butts off to make it as good a school as possible. For everyone. Even those kids from the Cate Apartments and Section 8 housing.

    You don’t send your kids to Greenwood. Fine. Your decision. But for the love of god please stop inflicting yourself on those of us that are working to make it a better school.

  • Greenwood Parent

    Dr. Trotter not knowing about 826? That’s simply not true Kate. Greenwood does a ton of cooperative programs with 826.

    White flight? Oh please, Kate. It’s a very diverse school and a lot of us parents like that about Greenwood. And a lot of us parents are working our butts off to make it as good a school as possible. For everyone. Even those kids from the Cate Apartments and Section 8 housing.

    You don’t send your kids to Greenwood. Fine. Your decision. But for the love of god please stop inflicting yourself on those of us that are working to make it a better school.

  • Greenwood Parent

    Dr. Trotter not knowing about 826? That’s simply not true Kate. Greenwood does a ton of cooperative programs with 826.

    White flight? Oh please, Kate. It’s a very diverse school and a lot of us parents like that about Greenwood. And a lot of us parents are working our butts off to make it as good a school as possible. For everyone. Even those kids from the Cate Apartments and Section 8 housing.

    You don’t send your kids to Greenwood. Fine. Your decision. But for the love of god please stop inflicting yourself on those of us that are working to make it a better school.

  • Greenwood Parent

    Dr. Trotter not knowing about 826? That’s simply not true Kate. Greenwood does a ton of cooperative programs with 826.

    White flight? Oh please, Kate. It’s a very diverse school and a lot of us parents like that about Greenwood. And a lot of us parents are working our butts off to make it as good a school as possible. For everyone. Even those kids from the Cate Apartments and Section 8 housing.

    You don’t send your kids to Greenwood. Fine. Your decision. But for the love of god please stop inflicting yourself on those of us that are working to make it a better school.

  • Greenwood Parent

    Dr. Trotter not knowing about 826? That’s simply not true Kate. Greenwood does a ton of cooperative programs with 826.

    White flight? Oh please, Kate. It’s a very diverse school and a lot of us parents like that about Greenwood. And a lot of us parents are working our butts off to make it as good a school as possible. For everyone. Even those kids from the Cate Apartments and Section 8 housing.

    You don’t send your kids to Greenwood. Fine. Your decision. But for the love of god please stop inflicting yourself on those of us that are working to make it a better school.

  • Greenwood Parent

    Dr. Trotter not knowing about 826? That’s simply not true Kate. Greenwood does a ton of cooperative programs with 826.

    White flight? Oh please, Kate. It’s a very diverse school and a lot of us parents like that about Greenwood. And a lot of us parents are working our butts off to make it as good a school as possible. For everyone. Even those kids from the Cate Apartments and Section 8 housing.

    You don’t send your kids to Greenwood. Fine. Your decision. But for the love of god please stop inflicting yourself on those of us that are working to make it a better school.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    24. That’s not exactly what I meant. Were any “establishment” directly notified that there was an event? These people don’t exactly scour calendars for parties to squeeze into their busy schedules.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    24. That’s not exactly what I meant. Were any “establishment” directly notified that there was an event? These people don’t exactly scour calendars for parties to squeeze into their busy schedules.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    24. That’s not exactly what I meant. Were any “establishment” directly notified that there was an event? These people don’t exactly scour calendars for parties to squeeze into their busy schedules.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    24. That’s not exactly what I meant. Were any “establishment” directly notified that there was an event? These people don’t exactly scour calendars for parties to squeeze into their busy schedules.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    24. That’s not exactly what I meant. Were any “establishment” directly notified that there was an event? These people don’t exactly scour calendars for parties to squeeze into their busy schedules.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    24. That’s not exactly what I meant. Were any “establishment” directly notified that there was an event? These people don’t exactly scour calendars for parties to squeeze into their busy schedules.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    24. That’s not exactly what I meant. Were any “establishment” directly notified that there was an event? These people don’t exactly scour calendars for parties to squeeze into their busy schedules.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    24. That’s not exactly what I meant. Were any “establishment” directly notified that there was an event? These people don’t exactly scour calendars for parties to squeeze into their busy schedules.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    24. That’s not exactly what I meant. Were any “establishment” directly notified that there was an event? These people don’t exactly scour calendars for parties to squeeze into their busy schedules.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    24. That’s not exactly what I meant. Were any “establishment” directly notified that there was an event? These people don’t exactly scour calendars for parties to squeeze into their busy schedules.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    24. That’s not exactly what I meant. Were any “establishment” directly notified that there was an event? These people don’t exactly scour calendars for parties to squeeze into their busy schedules.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    24. That’s not exactly what I meant. Were any “establishment” directly notified that there was an event? These people don’t exactly scour calendars for parties to squeeze into their busy schedules.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    24. That’s not exactly what I meant. Were any “establishment” directly notified that there was an event? These people don’t exactly scour calendars for parties to squeeze into their busy schedules.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    24. That’s not exactly what I meant. Were any “establishment” directly notified that there was an event? These people don’t exactly scour calendars for parties to squeeze into their busy schedules.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    24. That’s not exactly what I meant. Were any “establishment” directly notified that there was an event? These people don’t exactly scour calendars for parties to squeeze into their busy schedules.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    24. That’s not exactly what I meant. Were any “establishment” directly notified that there was an event? These people don’t exactly scour calendars for parties to squeeze into their busy schedules.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    24. That’s not exactly what I meant. Were any “establishment” directly notified that there was an event? These people don’t exactly scour calendars for parties to squeeze into their busy schedules.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    24. That’s not exactly what I meant. Were any “establishment” directly notified that there was an event? These people don’t exactly scour calendars for parties to squeeze into their busy schedules.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    24. That’s not exactly what I meant. Were any “establishment” directly notified that there was an event? These people don’t exactly scour calendars for parties to squeeze into their busy schedules.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    24. That’s not exactly what I meant. Were any “establishment” directly notified that there was an event? These people don’t exactly scour calendars for parties to squeeze into their busy schedules.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    24. That’s not exactly what I meant. Were any “establishment” directly notified that there was an event? These people don’t exactly scour calendars for parties to squeeze into their busy schedules.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    24. That’s not exactly what I meant. Were any “establishment” directly notified that there was an event? These people don’t exactly scour calendars for parties to squeeze into their busy schedules.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    24. That’s not exactly what I meant. Were any “establishment” directly notified that there was an event? These people don’t exactly scour calendars for parties to squeeze into their busy schedules.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    24. That’s not exactly what I meant. Were any “establishment” directly notified that there was an event? These people don’t exactly scour calendars for parties to squeeze into their busy schedules.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    24. That’s not exactly what I meant. Were any “establishment” directly notified that there was an event? These people don’t exactly scour calendars for parties to squeeze into their busy schedules.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    24. That’s not exactly what I meant. Were any “establishment” directly notified that there was an event? These people don’t exactly scour calendars for parties to squeeze into their busy schedules.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    24. That’s not exactly what I meant. Were any “establishment” directly notified that there was an event? These people don’t exactly scour calendars for parties to squeeze into their busy schedules.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    24. That’s not exactly what I meant. Were any “establishment” directly notified that there was an event? These people don’t exactly scour calendars for parties to squeeze into their busy schedules.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    24. That’s not exactly what I meant. Were any “establishment” directly notified that there was an event? These people don’t exactly scour calendars for parties to squeeze into their busy schedules.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    24. That’s not exactly what I meant. Were any “establishment” directly notified that there was an event? These people don’t exactly scour calendars for parties to squeeze into their busy schedules.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    24. That’s not exactly what I meant. Were any “establishment” directly notified that there was an event? These people don’t exactly scour calendars for parties to squeeze into their busy schedules.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    24. That’s not exactly what I meant. Were any “establishment” directly notified that there was an event? These people don’t exactly scour calendars for parties to squeeze into their busy schedules.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    24. That’s not exactly what I meant. Were any “establishment” directly notified that there was an event? These people don’t exactly scour calendars for parties to squeeze into their busy schedules.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    24. That’s not exactly what I meant. Were any “establishment” directly notified that there was an event? These people don’t exactly scour calendars for parties to squeeze into their busy schedules.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    24. That’s not exactly what I meant. Were any “establishment” directly notified that there was an event? These people don’t exactly scour calendars for parties to squeeze into their busy schedules.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    24. That’s not exactly what I meant. Were any “establishment” directly notified that there was an event? These people don’t exactly scour calendars for parties to squeeze into their busy schedules.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    24. That’s not exactly what I meant. Were any “establishment” directly notified that there was an event? These people don’t exactly scour calendars for parties to squeeze into their busy schedules.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    24. That’s not exactly what I meant. Were any “establishment” directly notified that there was an event? These people don’t exactly scour calendars for parties to squeeze into their busy schedules.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    24. That’s not exactly what I meant. Were any “establishment” directly notified that there was an event? These people don’t exactly scour calendars for parties to squeeze into their busy schedules.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    24. That’s not exactly what I meant. Were any “establishment” directly notified that there was an event? These people don’t exactly scour calendars for parties to squeeze into their busy schedules.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    24. That’s not exactly what I meant. Were any “establishment” directly notified that there was an event? These people don’t exactly scour calendars for parties to squeeze into their busy schedules.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    24. That’s not exactly what I meant. Were any “establishment” directly notified that there was an event? These people don’t exactly scour calendars for parties to squeeze into their busy schedules.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    24. That’s not exactly what I meant. Were any “establishment” directly notified that there was an event? These people don’t exactly scour calendars for parties to squeeze into their busy schedules.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    24. That’s not exactly what I meant. Were any “establishment” directly notified that there was an event? These people don’t exactly scour calendars for parties to squeeze into their busy schedules.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    24. That’s not exactly what I meant. Were any “establishment” directly notified that there was an event? These people don’t exactly scour calendars for parties to squeeze into their busy schedules.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    24. That’s not exactly what I meant. Were any “establishment” directly notified that there was an event? These people don’t exactly scour calendars for parties to squeeze into their busy schedules.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    24. That’s not exactly what I meant. Were any “establishment” directly notified that there was an event? These people don’t exactly scour calendars for parties to squeeze into their busy schedules.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    24. That’s not exactly what I meant. Were any “establishment” directly notified that there was an event? These people don’t exactly scour calendars for parties to squeeze into their busy schedules.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    24. That’s not exactly what I meant. Were any “establishment” directly notified that there was an event? These people don’t exactly scour calendars for parties to squeeze into their busy schedules.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    24. That’s not exactly what I meant. Were any “establishment” directly notified that there was an event? These people don’t exactly scour calendars for parties to squeeze into their busy schedules.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    24. That’s not exactly what I meant. Were any “establishment” directly notified that there was an event? These people don’t exactly scour calendars for parties to squeeze into their busy schedules.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    24. That’s not exactly what I meant. Were any “establishment” directly notified that there was an event? These people don’t exactly scour calendars for parties to squeeze into their busy schedules.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    24. That’s not exactly what I meant. Were any “establishment” directly notified that there was an event? These people don’t exactly scour calendars for parties to squeeze into their busy schedules.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    24. That’s not exactly what I meant. Were any “establishment” directly notified that there was an event? These people don’t exactly scour calendars for parties to squeeze into their busy schedules.

  • Guest

    Gomez @ 59 -

    Yes, many establishment folks were personally invited and declined to attend for various reasons.

  • Guest

    Gomez @ 59 -

    Yes, many establishment folks were personally invited and declined to attend for various reasons.

  • Guest

    Gomez @ 59 -

    Yes, many establishment folks were personally invited and declined to attend for various reasons.

  • Guest

    Gomez @ 59 -

    Yes, many establishment folks were personally invited and declined to attend for various reasons.

  • Guest

    Gomez @ 59 -

    Yes, many establishment folks were personally invited and declined to attend for various reasons.

  • Guest

    Gomez @ 59 -

    Yes, many establishment folks were personally invited and declined to attend for various reasons.

  • Guest

    Gomez @ 59 -

    Yes, many establishment folks were personally invited and declined to attend for various reasons.

  • Guest

    Gomez @ 59 -

    Yes, many establishment folks were personally invited and declined to attend for various reasons.

  • Guest

    Gomez @ 59 -

    Yes, many establishment folks were personally invited and declined to attend for various reasons.

  • Guest

    Gomez @ 59 -

    Yes, many establishment folks were personally invited and declined to attend for various reasons.

  • Guest

    Gomez @ 59 -

    Yes, many establishment folks were personally invited and declined to attend for various reasons.

  • Guest

    Gomez @ 59 -

    Yes, many establishment folks were personally invited and declined to attend for various reasons.

  • Guest

    Gomez @ 59 -

    Yes, many establishment folks were personally invited and declined to attend for various reasons.

  • Guest

    Gomez @ 59 -

    Yes, many establishment folks were personally invited and declined to attend for various reasons.

  • Guest

    Gomez @ 59 -

    Yes, many establishment folks were personally invited and declined to attend for various reasons.

  • Guest

    Gomez @ 59 -

    Yes, many establishment folks were personally invited and declined to attend for various reasons.

  • Guest

    Gomez @ 59 -

    Yes, many establishment folks were personally invited and declined to attend for various reasons.

  • Guest

    Gomez @ 59 -

    Yes, many establishment folks were personally invited and declined to attend for various reasons.

  • Guest

    Gomez @ 59 -

    Yes, many establishment folks were personally invited and declined to attend for various reasons.

  • Guest

    Gomez @ 59 -

    Yes, many establishment folks were personally invited and declined to attend for various reasons.

  • Guest

    Gomez @ 59 -

    Yes, many establishment folks were personally invited and declined to attend for various reasons.

  • Guest

    Gomez @ 59 -

    Yes, many establishment folks were personally invited and declined to attend for various reasons.

  • Guest

    Gomez @ 59 -

    Yes, many establishment folks were personally invited and declined to attend for various reasons.

  • Guest

    Gomez @ 59 -

    Yes, many establishment folks were personally invited and declined to attend for various reasons.

  • Guest

    Gomez @ 59 -

    Yes, many establishment folks were personally invited and declined to attend for various reasons.

  • Guest

    Gomez @ 59 -

    Yes, many establishment folks were personally invited and declined to attend for various reasons.

  • Guest

    Gomez @ 59 -

    Yes, many establishment folks were personally invited and declined to attend for various reasons.

  • Guest

    Gomez @ 59 -

    Yes, many establishment folks were personally invited and declined to attend for various reasons.

  • Guest

    Gomez @ 59 -

    Yes, many establishment folks were personally invited and declined to attend for various reasons.

  • Guest

    Gomez @ 59 -

    Yes, many establishment folks were personally invited and declined to attend for various reasons.

  • Guest

    Gomez @ 59 -

    Yes, many establishment folks were personally invited and declined to attend for various reasons.

  • Guest

    Gomez @ 59 -

    Yes, many establishment folks were personally invited and declined to attend for various reasons.

  • Guest

    Gomez @ 59 -

    Yes, many establishment folks were personally invited and declined to attend for various reasons.

  • Guest

    Gomez @ 59 -

    Yes, many establishment folks were personally invited and declined to attend for various reasons.

  • Guest

    Gomez @ 59 -

    Yes, many establishment folks were personally invited and declined to attend for various reasons.

  • Guest

    Gomez @ 59 -

    Yes, many establishment folks were personally invited and declined to attend for various reasons.

  • Guest

    Gomez @ 59 -

    Yes, many establishment folks were personally invited and declined to attend for various reasons.

  • Guest

    Gomez @ 59 -

    Yes, many establishment folks were personally invited and declined to attend for various reasons.

  • Guest

    Gomez @ 59 -

    Yes, many establishment folks were personally invited and declined to attend for various reasons.

  • Guest

    Gomez @ 59 -

    Yes, many establishment folks were personally invited and declined to attend for various reasons.

  • Guest

    Gomez @ 59 -

    Yes, many establishment folks were personally invited and declined to attend for various reasons.

  • Guest

    Gomez @ 59 -

    Yes, many establishment folks were personally invited and declined to attend for various reasons.

  • Guest

    Gomez @ 59 -

    Yes, many establishment folks were personally invited and declined to attend for various reasons.

  • Guest

    Gomez @ 59 -

    Yes, many establishment folks were personally invited and declined to attend for various reasons.

  • Guest

    Gomez @ 59 -

    Yes, many establishment folks were personally invited and declined to attend for various reasons.

  • Guest

    Gomez @ 59 -

    Yes, many establishment folks were personally invited and declined to attend for various reasons.

  • Guest

    Gomez @ 59 -

    Yes, many establishment folks were personally invited and declined to attend for various reasons.

  • Guest

    Gomez @ 59 -

    Yes, many establishment folks were personally invited and declined to attend for various reasons.

  • Guest

    Gomez @ 59 -

    Yes, many establishment folks were personally invited and declined to attend for various reasons.

  • Guest

    Gomez @ 59 -

    Yes, many establishment folks were personally invited and declined to attend for various reasons.

  • Guest

    Gomez @ 59 -

    Yes, many establishment folks were personally invited and declined to attend for various reasons.

  • Guest

    Gomez @ 59 -

    Yes, many establishment folks were personally invited and declined to attend for various reasons.

  • Guest

    Gomez @ 59 -

    Yes, many establishment folks were personally invited and declined to attend for various reasons.

  • Guest

    Gomez @ 59 -

    Yes, many establishment folks were personally invited and declined to attend for various reasons.

  • Guest

    Gomez @ 59 -

    Yes, many establishment folks were personally invited and declined to attend for various reasons.

  • Guest

    Gomez @ 59 -

    Yes, many establishment folks were personally invited and declined to attend for various reasons.

  • Guest

    Gomez @ 59 -

    Yes, many establishment folks were personally invited and declined to attend for various reasons.

  • Guest

    Gomez @ 59 -

    Yes, many establishment folks were personally invited and declined to attend for various reasons.

  • Guest

    Gomez @ 59 -

    Yes, many establishment folks were personally invited and declined to attend for various reasons.

  • Guest

    Gomez @ 59 -

    Yes, many establishment folks were personally invited and declined to attend for various reasons.

  • inside some baseball

    Gomez @ 59 -

    Yes, many establishment folks were personally invited and declined to attend for various reasons.

  • ratcityreprobate

    Concern Troll @60 You wish.

    @59 Why would the “establishment” be invited to a community party. No reason to invite them.

  • ratcityreprobate

    Concern Troll @60 You wish.

    @59 Why would the “establishment” be invited to a community party. No reason to invite them.

  • ratcityreprobate

    Concern Troll @60 You wish.

    @59 Why would the “establishment” be invited to a community party. No reason to invite them.

  • ratcityreprobate

    Concern Troll @60 You wish.

    @59 Why would the “establishment” be invited to a community party. No reason to invite them.

  • ratcityreprobate

    Concern Troll @60 You wish.

    @59 Why would the “establishment” be invited to a community party. No reason to invite them.

  • ratcityreprobate

    Concern Troll @60 You wish.

    @59 Why would the “establishment” be invited to a community party. No reason to invite them.

  • ratcityreprobate

    Concern Troll @60 You wish.

    @59 Why would the “establishment” be invited to a community party. No reason to invite them.

  • ratcityreprobate

    Concern Troll @60 You wish.

    @59 Why would the “establishment” be invited to a community party. No reason to invite them.

  • ratcityreprobate

    Concern Troll @60 You wish.

    @59 Why would the “establishment” be invited to a community party. No reason to invite them.

  • ratcityreprobate

    Concern Troll @60 You wish.

    @59 Why would the “establishment” be invited to a community party. No reason to invite them.

  • ratcityreprobate

    Concern Troll @60 You wish.

    @59 Why would the “establishment” be invited to a community party. No reason to invite them.

  • ratcityreprobate

    Concern Troll @60 You wish.

    @59 Why would the “establishment” be invited to a community party. No reason to invite them.

  • ratcityreprobate

    Concern Troll @60 You wish.

    @59 Why would the “establishment” be invited to a community party. No reason to invite them.

  • ratcityreprobate

    Concern Troll @60 You wish.

    @59 Why would the “establishment” be invited to a community party. No reason to invite them.

  • ratcityreprobate

    Concern Troll @60 You wish.

    @59 Why would the “establishment” be invited to a community party. No reason to invite them.

  • ratcityreprobate

    Concern Troll @60 You wish.

    @59 Why would the “establishment” be invited to a community party. No reason to invite them.

  • ratcityreprobate

    Concern Troll @60 You wish.

    @59 Why would the “establishment” be invited to a community party. No reason to invite them.

  • ratcityreprobate

    Concern Troll @60 You wish.

    @59 Why would the “establishment” be invited to a community party. No reason to invite them.

  • ratcityreprobate

    Concern Troll @60 You wish.

    @59 Why would the “establishment” be invited to a community party. No reason to invite them.

  • ratcityreprobate

    Concern Troll @60 You wish.

    @59 Why would the “establishment” be invited to a community party. No reason to invite them.

  • ratcityreprobate

    Concern Troll @60 You wish.

    @59 Why would the “establishment” be invited to a community party. No reason to invite them.

  • ratcityreprobate

    Concern Troll @60 You wish.

    @59 Why would the “establishment” be invited to a community party. No reason to invite them.

  • ratcityreprobate

    Concern Troll @60 You wish.

    @59 Why would the “establishment” be invited to a community party. No reason to invite them.

  • ratcityreprobate

    Concern Troll @60 You wish.

    @59 Why would the “establishment” be invited to a community party. No reason to invite them.

  • ratcityreprobate

    Concern Troll @60 You wish.

    @59 Why would the “establishment” be invited to a community party. No reason to invite them.

  • ratcityreprobate

    Concern Troll @60 You wish.

    @59 Why would the “establishment” be invited to a community party. No reason to invite them.

  • ratcityreprobate

    Concern Troll @60 You wish.

    @59 Why would the “establishment” be invited to a community party. No reason to invite them.

  • ratcityreprobate

    Concern Troll @60 You wish.

    @59 Why would the “establishment” be invited to a community party. No reason to invite them.

  • ratcityreprobate

    Concern Troll @60 You wish.

    @59 Why would the “establishment” be invited to a community party. No reason to invite them.

  • ratcityreprobate

    Concern Troll @60 You wish.

    @59 Why would the “establishment” be invited to a community party. No reason to invite them.

  • ratcityreprobate

    Concern Troll @60 You wish.

    @59 Why would the “establishment” be invited to a community party. No reason to invite them.

  • ratcityreprobate

    Concern Troll @60 You wish.

    @59 Why would the “establishment” be invited to a community party. No reason to invite them.

  • ratcityreprobate

    Concern Troll @60 You wish.

    @59 Why would the “establishment” be invited to a community party. No reason to invite them.

  • ratcityreprobate

    Concern Troll @60 You wish.

    @59 Why would the “establishment” be invited to a community party. No reason to invite them.

  • ratcityreprobate

    Concern Troll @60 You wish.

    @59 Why would the “establishment” be invited to a community party. No reason to invite them.

  • ratcityreprobate

    Concern Troll @60 You wish.

    @59 Why would the “establishment” be invited to a community party. No reason to invite them.

  • ratcityreprobate

    Concern Troll @60 You wish.

    @59 Why would the “establishment” be invited to a community party. No reason to invite them.

  • ratcityreprobate

    Concern Troll @60 You wish.

    @59 Why would the “establishment” be invited to a community party. No reason to invite them.

  • ratcityreprobate

    Concern Troll @60 You wish.

    @59 Why would the “establishment” be invited to a community party. No reason to invite them.

  • ratcityreprobate

    Concern Troll @60 You wish.

    @59 Why would the “establishment” be invited to a community party. No reason to invite them.

  • ratcityreprobate

    Concern Troll @60 You wish.

    @59 Why would the “establishment” be invited to a community party. No reason to invite them.

  • ratcityreprobate

    Concern Troll @60 You wish.

    @59 Why would the “establishment” be invited to a community party. No reason to invite them.

  • ratcityreprobate

    Concern Troll @60 You wish.

    @59 Why would the “establishment” be invited to a community party. No reason to invite them.

  • ratcityreprobate

    Concern Troll @60 You wish.

    @59 Why would the “establishment” be invited to a community party. No reason to invite them.

  • ratcityreprobate

    Concern Troll @60 You wish.

    @59 Why would the “establishment” be invited to a community party. No reason to invite them.

  • ratcityreprobate

    Concern Troll @60 You wish.

    @59 Why would the “establishment” be invited to a community party. No reason to invite them.

  • ratcityreprobate

    Concern Troll @60 You wish.

    @59 Why would the “establishment” be invited to a community party. No reason to invite them.

  • ratcityreprobate

    Concern T