Viva La Cola!

Founded in January 2009, PubliCola is a blog about Seattle written by journalists who are dedicated to non-partisan, original daily reporting that prioritizes a balanced approach to news. Started by longtime local editor and award-winning reporter Josh Feit, PubliCola is the first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol.

PubliCola was off and running. In June 2009, PubliCola hired another award-winning journalist, super-sourced Seattle city hall reporter Erica C. Barnett.

People were afraid that blogging would change journalism. Instead, we believe journalism can change blogging. Twenty-first century journalism may look and feel different, and yes Erica isn't afraid to get cranky, but we're committed to making sure online news still delivers independent, reliable, even-keeled coverage. And most of all, we're committed to making sure the coverage sparks honest civic debate.

Bringing you cola for the people, PubliCola is named after Publius Valerius PubliCola, the alias for the authors of the Federalist Papers—the original bloggers.

The first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol and Seattle city hall, PubliCola has been called a “must-read” by the Seattle Post Intelligencer and a hot “New Media Mover and Shaker” by Seattle Magazine—which also cited our own Erica C. Barnett as the city's No. 1 news nerd.

There's More to the Story

fizz

1. The “establishment” is far from dead.

It’s true: Greg Nickels’ defeat as mayor was a big blow for Seattle’s traditional “establishment”: Developers, business interests, and wealthy, influential political contributors.

However, that’s not the whole story. The establishment candidate won in many major races: city council member-elect Sally Bagshaw (endorsed by both the Seattle Chamber of Commerce’s political arm and The Seattle Times), King County Executive-elect Dow Constantine (a longtime government insider who raised nearly half a million more than his opponent, political neophyte Susan Hutchison), Port Commissioner-elect Tom Albro (a businessman and Republican who was opposed by the Reform the Port campaign), and City Council member Richard Conlin (a three-term incumbent deeply entrenched in the city’s political establishment).

In fact, even Mayor-elect McGinn isn’t exactly the unvarnished outsider he appears to be. As we’ve reported, McGinn has deep ties to the city’s biggest developers and law firms, many of which funded his Great City organization.

2. Yes, Mike McGinn was a savvy candidate, but there’s more to the story: Joe Mallahan was an atrocious one.

T-Mobile executive Mallahan began his campaign, logically enough, by arguing that he was more competent than Nickels. However, once Nickels lost in the primary, Mallahan needed to redefine himself. For a month, he failed to take that opportunity.

When he finally did settle on a new campaign strategy, it was underwhelming.  A political newbie, Mallahan took on the role of the experienced, safe incumbent— he was “Nickels without all the baggage”—an awful place to be when the actual incumbent was wildly unpopular.

Playing the role of the regal incumbnet, Mallahan compounded his problem: Perhaps most deadly to Mallahan’s campaign was his decision to sequester himself behind his spokeswoman, Charla Neuman.  In sharp contrast to McGinn, who answered his own cell phone right up to election day, Mallahan was rarely available to the public. When you’re trying to win votes, you can’t act like you take the public for granted. Mallahan—relying on soft insider support and money—did, and he lost.

3. Susan Hutchison is not Sarah Palin.

huthcnotpalin

Yes, she has a vagina, and yes, she’s attractive, but Susan Hutchison is not Sarah Palin. That’s the most misleading analogy of this campaign season.

Hutchison is not a Joe Six-Pack hockey mom populist. The executive director of the Charles Simonyi Fund—which supports artsy fartsy, elitist stuff like SAM, the downtown library, and Princeton University—she’s a country club, golf links Republican (also a former board member of the Seattle Symphony) who tied herself to elitist D.C.-like policy think tanks.

Hutchison ran as a “nonpartisan,” aggressively framing herself as an even-keeled deal maker. Palin ran as an authentic conservative out to reclaim the GOP for real Republicans and partisan hellraisers.

Yes, Hutchison has some socially conservative views, but she came out for R-71. Palin, in contrast, was unequivocally opposed to domestic partner rights for gays. She has said: “I believe spousal benefits are reserved for married citizens as defined in our constitution.”

Hutchison had zero political experience. And while that was the rap on Palin, she was actually a longtime political activist, a city council member, and a governor. (FWIW: “Experience” was also an “issue” for Obama.)

Hutchison’s appeal (and why she was tapped): She was well-known, someone voters were familiar with from television and trusted. Palin’s appeal (and why she was tapped): She was unknown—which was part of her “story,” charm and success on the 2008 campaign trail.

Yes, they were both TV anchors. Hutchison for over 20 years. Palin, briefly, as a sportscaster.

Morning Fizz understands the ploy—Democratic independent expenditures specifically linked Hutchison to Palin, and it worked—but we were annoyed at how shallow, misleading, and sexist Democrats were to go with it.

4. A lot has been made of the fact that the police and firefighters’ unions spent a ton of money this year backing losing campaigns (Carr, Mallahan, Jessie Israel, Robert Rosencrantz), but there was another major loser this year: The Washington Conservation Voters, the 100-pound gorilla of Seattle’s environmental community. WCV played it safe in both of this year’s big local races—failing to endorse anyone in the mayor’s race (even though McGinn is an out loud environmentalist), and only endorsing Constantine after the hard-fought primary election.

Moreover, WCV’s lobbyist, Cliff Traisman, made a high-profile endorsement of Mallahan ten days before the election. The endorsement read as an attempt to play it safe by endorsing a winner, but it came too late to have an influence on the result. Meanwhile, the Cascade chapter of the Sierra Club—locally, a far more radical group—endorsed winners Mike O’Brien and McGinn.

This morning’s Morning  Fizz is brought to you by state Sen. Jeanne Kohl-Welles.

JKW-Nov.-19th-Event-Invitation1-550x412




  • Stacy

    How can you call the Cascade Chapter of the Sierra Club a “radical” group when the voters have been completely aligned with the Chapter over the past few yeasrs? If by radical you mean not afraid to stand up to the political establishment, then sure, the Cascade Chapter is radical, but over the past few years on the controversial issues and races (see Roads and Transit, McGinn, Dow and more), the voters have consistently been completely in line with the Club. Does that mean that Seattle voters are radical?

  • Stacy

    How can you call the Cascade Chapter of the Sierra Club a “radical” group when the voters have been completely aligned with the Chapter over the past few yeasrs? If by radical you mean not afraid to stand up to the political establishment, then sure, the Cascade Chapter is radical, but over the past few years on the controversial issues and races (see Roads and Transit, McGinn, Dow and more), the voters have consistently been completely in line with the Club. Does that mean that Seattle voters are radical?

  • Giffy

    Agree completely on 2. Narrowly beating one of the boringest candidates for mayor we have had(who as you said ran a horrible campaign) is not exactly that amazing a feat. McGinn was able to get enough support to escape a crowded primary field against a rather unpopular incumbent, then ran an essentially tied campaign (the polls it seems had a Mallahan favoring bias) all the way to the end.

    An accomplishment sure, but not the unprecedented feat many seem to be portraying it as. Especially when you realize he had plenty of help from experienced consultants and stratagizers.

  • Giffy

    Agree completely on 2. Narrowly beating one of the boringest candidates for mayor we have had(who as you said ran a horrible campaign) is not exactly that amazing a feat. McGinn was able to get enough support to escape a crowded primary field against a rather unpopular incumbent, then ran an essentially tied campaign (the polls it seems had a Mallahan favoring bias) all the way to the end.

    An accomplishment sure, but not the unprecedented feat many seem to be portraying it as. Especially when you realize he had plenty of help from experienced consultants and stratagizers.

  • J.R.

    1. Yeah, the establishment lives.

    2. Yeah, Mallahan’s campaign sucked.

    3. Yeah, the Sarah Palin references hurt Susan Hutchison’s campaign and, yeah, we get that you Ross Hunter supporters didn’t approve.

    4. Yeah, the Firefighters and WCV suck.

    Any news today?

  • hbk

    A couple points:

    1) I don’t read the word “vagina” enough in political news. Should I suspect a conspiracy?

    2) It’s interesting that Mallahan’s news that he’s going right back to T-Mobile hasn’t drawn more analysis. Specifically, he spent a good part of the campaign trying to reposition himself as a activist, despite not even bothering to vote. Now that he lost the election, he’s going right back to his true sweet spot. If he was really the activist he claimed to be, wouldn’t he be doing something different?

  • J.R.

    1. Yeah, the establishment lives.

    2. Yeah, Mallahan’s campaign sucked.

    3. Yeah, the Sarah Palin references hurt Susan Hutchison’s campaign and, yeah, we get that you Ross Hunter supporters didn’t approve.

    4. Yeah, the Firefighters and WCV suck.

    Any news today?

  • hbk

    A couple points:

    1) I don’t read the word “vagina” enough in political news. Should I suspect a conspiracy?

    2) It’s interesting that Mallahan’s news that he’s going right back to T-Mobile hasn’t drawn more analysis. Specifically, he spent a good part of the campaign trying to reposition himself as a activist, despite not even bothering to vote. Now that he lost the election, he’s going right back to his true sweet spot. If he was really the activist he claimed to be, wouldn’t he be doing something different?

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    1. The Sierra Club itself is a fairly radical group.

    2. “An accomplishment sure, but not the unprecedented feat many seem to be portraying it as. Especially when you realize he had plenty of help from experienced consultants and stratagizers.”

    And a few media outlets who acted as campaign extensions while posing as journalists.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    1. The Sierra Club itself is a fairly radical group.

    2. “An accomplishment sure, but not the unprecedented feat many seem to be portraying it as. Especially when you realize he had plenty of help from experienced consultants and stratagizers.”

    And a few media outlets who acted as campaign extensions while posing as journalists.

  • http://www.movinglikewater.com/ Nicholas

    Speaking of Hutchison, how funny is that down-ticket Port Commission winners racked up more votes than her? Epic fail.

  • http://www.movinglikewater.com Nicholas

    Speaking of Hutchison, how funny is that down-ticket Port Commission winners racked up more votes than her? Epic fail.

  • Jason B

    I have sat quietly by while you gave these bullshit, self-serving summaries of the campaign and your views on the Mallahan strategy. You have never once picked up the phone to call me, your friend and travel buddy, to ask me our strategy or anything related to our post primary plan. I love you as a close friend of mine, Josh, but stop gloating. Your candidate won, and deservedly so, he and his team did run a smart campaign. They deserve congrats and affirmation of a smart grassroots campaign. You don’t need to kick us in the gut while you do it.

  • Jason B

    I have sat quietly by while you gave these bullshit, self-serving summaries of the campaign and your views on the Mallahan strategy. You have never once picked up the phone to call me, your friend and travel buddy, to ask me our strategy or anything related to our post primary plan. I love you as a close friend of mine, Josh, but stop gloating. Your candidate won, and deservedly so, he and his team did run a smart campaign. They deserve congrats and affirmation of a smart grassroots campaign. You don’t need to kick us in the gut while you do it.

  • Charity

    It wasn’t just some obscure, unnameable “elistist DC-like policy think tanks”, though. It was the Discovery Institute, the nation’s biggest engine of aggressive creationism. With an association like that, there was little chance that her framing would stick.

  • Charity

    It wasn’t just some obscure, unnameable “elistist DC-like policy think tanks”, though. It was the Discovery Institute, the nation’s biggest engine of aggressive creationism. With an association like that, there was little chance that her framing would stick.

  • ivan

    I thought the Hutchison-Palin comparison was the right one to make for the purposes of defeating her. If it worked for that, then so what? She sucked anyway.

    But it was dishonest just the same. Whatever anyone says or thinks about Sarah Palin, at least she is out front about who she is and what she stands for. You don’t have to like that, and certainly *I* don’t, but she’s not hiding from her right-wing labeling.

    Hutchison, in comparison, lied about her right-wing ties, tried to hide them at every opportunity, tried to avoid all mention of them, tried to act as if they didn’t matter, and by and large ran the most dishonest campaign of the local cycle.

    I’m forced to conclude that the Hutchison-Palin comparison fails at the substantive level because Palin at least has some measure of integrity, and Hutchison is just a born liar.

  • ivan

    I thought the Hutchison-Palin comparison was the right one to make for the purposes of defeating her. If it worked for that, then so what? She sucked anyway.

    But it was dishonest just the same. Whatever anyone says or thinks about Sarah Palin, at least she is out front about who she is and what she stands for. You don’t have to like that, and certainly *I* don’t, but she’s not hiding from her right-wing labeling.

    Hutchison, in comparison, lied about her right-wing ties, tried to hide them at every opportunity, tried to avoid all mention of them, tried to act as if they didn’t matter, and by and large ran the most dishonest campaign of the local cycle.

    I’m forced to conclude that the Hutchison-Palin comparison fails at the substantive level because Palin at least has some measure of integrity, and Hutchison is just a born liar.

  • nindid

    The Palin reference was not about sexism, but simply smart politics considering the situation. The only rationale you have for the sexism charge is that Palin was a woman and so was Hutchinson so that is the only link.

    But a large part of Hutchinson’s play for KCE was based on her gender as well. Hutchinson had to lock down the Republicans vote while still convincing a large portion of the Democratic majority to vote for her.

    With an electorate that voted in huge margins for Gregoire, Murray and Cantwell, the fact that she was a woman is not incidental to her campaign, but a large part of how she tried to win over voters she had to have.

    The Sarah Palin reference was a fantastic way to show that Hutchinson was a Republican, inexperienced and a person who held views much more conservative than the electorate – but especially abhorrent to women voters.

    Is there any other message/figure that reinforces the negatives of a Hutchinson campaign nearly as well? I can’t think of anything close.

  • nindid

    The Palin reference was not about sexism, but simply smart politics considering the situation. The only rationale you have for the sexism charge is that Palin was a woman and so was Hutchinson so that is the only link.

    But a large part of Hutchinson’s play for KCE was based on her gender as well. Hutchinson had to lock down the Republicans vote while still convincing a large portion of the Democratic majority to vote for her.

    With an electorate that voted in huge margins for Gregoire, Murray and Cantwell, the fact that she was a woman is not incidental to her campaign, but a large part of how she tried to win over voters she had to have.

    The Sarah Palin reference was a fantastic way to show that Hutchinson was a Republican, inexperienced and a person who held views much more conservative than the electorate – but especially abhorrent to women voters.

    Is there any other message/figure that reinforces the negatives of a Hutchinson campaign nearly as well? I can’t think of anything close.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    Yes, logical fallacies are terrific arguments to make in campaign races.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/tag/2009+election Gomez

    Yes, logical fallacies are terrific arguments to make in campaign races.

  • Greg

    “…elitist stuff like… the downtown library…”

    An elitist library? Snobs reading free, publicly owned books…

  • Greg

    “…elitist stuff like… the downtown library…”

    An elitist library? Snobs reading free, publicly owned books…

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @12,

    Libraries aren’t elitist, but a Rem Koolhass library?

    Although, maybe it wasn’t the best example. How about: The Symphony, the met opera, and the Seattle opera.

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @12,

    Libraries aren’t elitist, but a Rem Koolhass library?

    Although, maybe it wasn’t the best example. How about: The Symphony, the met opera, and the Seattle opera.

  • http://peacetreefarm.org N in Seattle

    Hutchison had zero political experience. And while that was the rap on Palin, she was actually a longtime political activist, a city council member, and a governor. (FWIW: “Experience” was also an “issue” for Obama.)

    For me, that’s the chief difference between Palin and Hutchison. Compared to Susie, Sarah was a competent, dedicated, experienced public servant.

  • http://peacetreefarm.org N in Seattle

    Hutchison had zero political experience. And while that was the rap on Palin, she was actually a longtime political activist, a city council member, and a governor. (FWIW: “Experience” was also an “issue” for Obama.)

    For me, that’s the chief difference between Palin and Hutchison. Compared to Susie, Sarah was a competent, dedicated, experienced public servant.

  • http://www.calitics.com/ Robert Cruickshank

    This post confuses the issue. Hutchison was indeed not campaigning like Sarah Palin. However, there was ample evidence to suggest she would govern like Sarah Palin. That was the point of the ads. It was about showing voters that her “appeal” was a carefully crafted front to put someone whose politics are more appropriate to Wasilla in charge of liberal King County. Voters weren’t duped by Dem IEs, they understood perfectly well what the IEs were saying because voters put two and two together.

  • http://www.calitics.com Robert Cruickshank

    This post confuses the issue. Hutchison was indeed not campaigning like Sarah Palin. However, there was ample evidence to suggest she would govern like Sarah Palin. That was the point of the ads. It was about showing voters that her “appeal” was a carefully crafted front to put someone whose politics are more appropriate to Wasilla in charge of liberal King County. Voters weren’t duped by Dem IEs, they understood perfectly well what the IEs were saying because voters put two and two together.

  • jeff

    Susan Hutchison’s may really have supported R-71 and opposed I-1033. I don’t know. But not taking those positions would have immediately ended her chances of being elected. All her support of R-71 indicates is that she wanted to win.

  • jeff

    Susan Hutchison’s may really have supported R-71 and opposed I-1033. I don’t know. But not taking those positions would have immediately ended her chances of being elected. All her support of R-71 indicates is that she wanted to win.

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @15,

    I disagree. It’s all about how Hutchison was campaigning … because that’s all the public really knows about Palin… a rabble rousing, populist campaigner. And that does not = Hutchison.

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @15,

    I disagree. It’s all about how Hutchison was campaigning … because that’s all the public really knows about Palin… a rabble rousing, populist campaigner. And that does not = Hutchison.

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @16,

    Proof?

    Also: Why doesn’t that hold for Palin? Polls nationwide show support for civil unions and domestic partnerships. Palin didn’t go there.

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @16,

    Proof?

    Also: Why doesn’t that hold for Palin? Polls nationwide show support for civil unions and domestic partnerships. Palin didn’t go there.

  • Stacy, Stacey, Stacie

    @4

    Does Mallahan (or anyone else) have to quit their day job to be “active” or “involved?” Your reasoning seems a bit narrow.

    @Josh

    I agree with Jason B. Your post in #2 isn’t particularly insightful and you have my phone number too.

  • Stacy, Stacey, Stacie

    @4

    Does Mallahan (or anyone else) have to quit their day job to be “active” or “involved?” Your reasoning seems a bit narrow.

    @Josh

    I agree with Jason B. Your post in #2 isn’t particularly insightful and you have my phone number too.

  • jeff

    The proof is that over two thirds of King County backed R-71 and opposed I-1033. Any candidate who bucked the vast majority on either one wouldn’t have stood a chance. She did what any sensible candidate who wanted to win would do.

    Such margins don’t exist (and weren’t on the ballot) in the rest of the country. Thus opposing domestic partnerships aren’t a death sentence for a national candidate.

  • jeff

    The proof is that over two thirds of King County backed R-71 and opposed I-1033. Any candidate who bucked the vast majority on either one wouldn’t have stood a chance. She did what any sensible candidate who wanted to win would do.

    Such margins don’t exist (and weren’t on the ballot) in the rest of the country. Thus opposing domestic partnerships aren’t a death sentence for a national candidate.

  • Trevor

    Thoughtful analysis, but not everyone who has power, however tenuously, should be considered equal, card-carrying members of “the establishment.” Power is wielded in coalitions that change over time. And not all coalition partners are equal.

    Nickels put together a strong coalition that lasted for a while. In that coalition, Vulcan got what it wanted pretty much all of the time, labor got some of its biggest priorities but was blocked on other issues, enviros got bike lanes but were stuck with the tunnel, communities of color got I’m not sure what (other than promises to undo institutionalized racism) but Nickels could ignore them completely on police accountability.

    The various members of the Nickels coalition (from LCV to CBC to labor to Vulcan) have been reorganizing themselves ever since his defeat. But there is no simple unity amongst them, and in some cases Nickels held together constituencies that generally oppose each other.

    So all those debates about whether or not Mallahan was part of the establishment really miss the point that there is no simple grassroots/ establishment equation to make sense of the change that’s happening right now. And left/ right is all convoluted in this moment of rampant greenwash and liberals who support corporate welfare. It’s not that “the establishment” was or was not defeated, but that power is being reorganized among different coalitions, very few if any of whom are true outsiders.

    However I do wonder if there’s anyone who can cross Vulcan and still get elected. Nick Licata, who benefited from incumbency, seems to be the exception that proves the rule.

  • Dean Willard

    re: @19

    Sorry. Stacy x3 was still on my mobile phone. The moniker was previously retired and its reuse was unintentional. I’m posting as me now.

  • Dean Willard

    re: @19

    Sorry. Stacy x3 was still on my mobile phone. The moniker was previously retired and its reuse was unintentional. I’m posting as me now.

  • Trevor

    Thoughtful analysis, but not everyone who has power, however tenuously, should be considered equal, card-carrying members of “the establishment.” Power is wielded in coalitions that change over time. And not all coalition partners are equal.

    Nickels put together a strong coalition that lasted for a while. In that coalition, Vulcan got what it wanted pretty much all of the time, labor got some of its biggest priorities but was blocked on other issues, enviros got bike lanes but were stuck with the tunnel, communities of color got I’m not sure what (other than promises to undo institutionalized racism) but Nickels could ignore them completely on police accountability.

    The various members of the Nickels coalition (from LCV to CBC to labor to Vulcan) have been reorganizing themselves ever since his defeat. But there is no simple unity amongst them, and in some cases Nickels held together constituencies that generally oppose each other.

    So all those debates about whether or not Mallahan was part of the establishment really miss the point that there is no simple grassroots/ establishment equation to make sense of the change that’s happening right now. And left/ right is all convoluted in this moment of rampant greenwash and liberals who support corporate welfare. It’s not that “the establishment” was or was not defeated, but that power is being reorganized among different coalitions, very few if any of whom are true outsiders.

    However I do wonder if there’s anyone who can cross Vulcan and still get elected. Nick Licata, who benefited from incumbency, seems to be the exception that proves the rule.

  • Dean Willard

    re: @19

    Sorry. Stacy x3 was still on my mobile phone. The moniker was previously retired and its reuse was unintentional. I’m posting as me now.

  • Dean Willard

    re: @19

    Sorry. Stacy x3 was still on my mobile phone. The moniker was previously retired and its reuse was unintentional. I’m posting as me now.

  • http://www.seattleuntimely.com/ charlie

    we were annoyed at how shallow, misleading, and sexist Democrats were to go with it.

    So is it also Erica’s opinion that this comparison was based purely on sexism? Just curious, because she did write this post,
    Susan Hutchison, Religious Wingnut. It doesn’t really sound like she was warning us about a secret ‘country club, golf links Republican’ there. In fact, considering the strike tag in the title, it sounds like she’s explicitly warning us that Hutchison is not just another ‘country club, golf links Republican’.

    P.S. I don’t think I’m a sexist, but I am an idiot. This is the third time I’ve tried to post this, first with strike tags, second time just using brackets. Needless to say any enthusiasm I had about this comment is gone. Oh, and I am inclined to agree with Jeff that her stance on R-71 was a strategic concession. I don’t have any proof though. Oh, and its four times now. Jesus.

  • http://www.seattleuntimely.com charlie

    we were annoyed at how shallow, misleading, and sexist Democrats were to go with it.

    So is it also Erica’s opinion that this comparison was based purely on sexism? Just curious, because she did write this post,
    Susan Hutchison, Religious Wingnut. It doesn’t really sound like she was warning us about a secret ‘country club, golf links Republican’ there. In fact, considering the strike tag in the title, it sounds like she’s explicitly warning us that Hutchison is not just another ‘country club, golf links Republican’.

    P.S. I don’t think I’m a sexist, but I am an idiot. This is the third time I’ve tried to post this, first with strike tags, second time just using brackets. Needless to say any enthusiasm I had about this comment is gone. Oh, and I am inclined to agree with Jeff that her stance on R-71 was a strategic concession. I don’t have any proof though. Oh, and its four times now. Jesus.

  • Winston Churchill

    1. Golly lighten up on the Palin Hutchison comparison. Just because someone is a news anchor for 20 years and chaired a symphony and left it in deep structural debt DOES NOT mean they have the basic level of qualifications to run the county. So BOTH Palin and Hutchison were unqualified. And making that comparison isn’t sexist. While we recognize Suzie’s success in athe male dominated world of news anchoring, that’s not the same as experience in civic affaits. And she was just as willing as Palin to talk in babbledegook menaingless trite formulations, just as willing to not have real solutions.

    Actually Palin was a governor 2 years before seeking higher office so in a sense Hutchison was more Palinesque than Sarah Palin. Hutchison was a joke.

    Now, perhaps, maybe lots of people are sexist when men are unqualified so when THAT happens and men don’t call a TV news anchor unqualified then call them on that sexism. But stop whining that the comparison is shallw and misleading and start talking about the actual points of comparison. MAKE your point, don’t just tell us what it is.

    2. McGinn:

    just up and move from that hi rise tower back to the Aurora Avenue location. Would be a great symbol of change. I fail to see why our city officers need to have the million dollar views. Or, upgrade to the vacant space in any one of a dozens of vancat first floors of mixed use buildings all over Seattle. Someplace with a glass front and front door where real live people don’t have to struggle to find your team.

  • Winston Churchill

    1. Golly lighten up on the Palin Hutchison comparison. Just because someone is a news anchor for 20 years and chaired a symphony and left it in deep structural debt DOES NOT mean they have the basic level of qualifications to run the county. So BOTH Palin and Hutchison were unqualified. And making that comparison isn’t sexist. While we recognize Suzie’s success in athe male dominated world of news anchoring, that’s not the same as experience in civic affaits. And she was just as willing as Palin to talk in babbledegook menaingless trite formulations, just as willing to not have real solutions.

    Actually Palin was a governor 2 years before seeking higher office so in a sense Hutchison was more Palinesque than Sarah Palin. Hutchison was a joke.

    Now, perhaps, maybe lots of people are sexist when men are unqualified so when THAT happens and men don’t call a TV news anchor unqualified then call them on that sexism. But stop whining that the comparison is shallw and misleading and start talking about the actual points of comparison. MAKE your point, don’t just tell us what it is.

    2. McGinn:

    just up and move from that hi rise tower back to the Aurora Avenue location. Would be a great symbol of change. I fail to see why our city officers need to have the million dollar views. Or, upgrade to the vacant space in any one of a dozens of vancat first floors of mixed use buildings all over Seattle. Someplace with a glass front and front door where real live people don’t have to struggle to find your team.

  • So Sea Resident

    Hutchinson may be from the country club, but she’s also from the evangelical megachurch. She has often spoken of her personal salvation by Jesus in terms that secular Seattlites miss(including those on her fancy boards), but are clear as bell to fellow born agains.
    See the videos of her speeches at prayer breakfasts and other evangelical events prior to this campaign. If you have to, get one of your friends who grew up in that background to explain what she’s talking about.

  • So Sea Resident

    Hutchinson may be from the country club, but she’s also from the evangelical megachurch. She has often spoken of her personal salvation by Jesus in terms that secular Seattlites miss(including those on her fancy boards), but are clear as bell to fellow born agains.
    See the videos of her speeches at prayer breakfasts and other evangelical events prior to this campaign. If you have to, get one of your friends who grew up in that background to explain what she’s talking about.

  • gloomy gus

    Awesome, Trevor.

  • gloomy gus

    Awesome, Trevor.

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @23,

    I wrote the item on Hutchison.

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @23,

    I wrote the item on Hutchison.

  • scotto

    Thoughtful analyses like these are why folks keep coming back to Publicola.

    I am not so sure, though, that the Sierra Club Cascade Chapter is all that radical. It’s true that it sometimes stands alone on environmental issues, but this is usually against an establishment that demonstrably lags behind the voters.

  • scotto

    Thoughtful analyses like these are why folks keep coming back to Publicola.

    I am not so sure, though, that the Sierra Club Cascade Chapter is all that radical. It’s true that it sometimes stands alone on environmental issues, but this is usually against an establishment that demonstrably lags behind the voters.

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr.Baker

    Giving Erica, the writer referenced by #23, Malkahan’s cell phone number would have made Poblicola’s coverage of him different in what way?
    Instant disdain? The “conservative candidate”, as Erica once called him, hired people to do tasks. They only had so much to work with, and they were only so talented. The constant alternative media in-kind contributions provided a sub-text that fed the activist backstory that proved difficult to overcome, as well. Lawyer lobbyist likely does not sell too many banner ads.

    He ran a poor campaign, his messaging was simplistic and repetitive, the Dem messaging version of Dino Rossi.

    The $15,000 hyperbole from McGinn late in the race was not counter-messaged very well (using McGinn’s own words about not being the guy to ask about adding up columns of numbers came way late, and was not directly connected to McGinn’s specific claim), and I will claim was the difference in the end of the race.

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr.Baker

    Giving Erica, the writer referenced by #23, Malkahan’s cell phone number would have made Poblicola’s coverage of him different in what way?
    Instant disdain? The “conservative candidate”, as Erica once called him, hired people to do tasks. They only had so much to work with, and they were only so talented. The constant alternative media in-kind contributions provided a sub-text that fed the activist backstory that proved difficult to overcome, as well. Lawyer lobbyist likely does not sell too many banner ads.

    He ran a poor campaign, his messaging was simplistic and repetitive, the Dem messaging version of Dino Rossi.

    The $15,000 hyperbole from McGinn late in the race was not counter-messaged very well (using McGinn’s own words about not being the guy to ask about adding up columns of numbers came way late, and was not directly connected to McGinn’s specific claim), and I will claim was the difference in the end of the race.

  • http://theartspolitic.com/ arts for all

    elitist stuff like SAM, the downtown library, and … the Seattle Symphony

    +1 @12.

    People need to stop throwing arts and culture under the bus as elitist. It’s a huge turnoff to me, and to other arts constituents who clamor for public officials to be more involved with harnessing arts in communities. I am progressive who voted for progressive candidates. I would never vote for Hutchinson; she’s a Republican, she was a horrible candidate, and she had a passionless platform. But let’s give credit where credit is due. In this age when funding for arts education and infrastructure is the first to be cut–when Seattle’s City Council is threatening to further reduce library hours–it is admirable for public officials to support the arts.

  • http://theartspolitic.com arts for all

    elitist stuff like SAM, the downtown library, and … the Seattle Symphony

    +1 @12.

    People need to stop throwing arts and culture under the bus as elitist. It’s a huge turnoff to me, and to other arts constituents who clamor for public officials to be more involved with harnessing arts in communities. I am progressive who voted for progressive candidates. I would never vote for Hutchinson; she’s a Republican, she was a horrible candidate, and she had a passionless platform. But let’s give credit where credit is due. In this age when funding for arts education and infrastructure is the first to be cut–when Seattle’s City Council is threatening to further reduce library hours–it is admirable for public officials to support the arts.

  • Hobgoblin

    @31 – The elitist tag on arts & culture, fair or unfair, will probably have legs as long as names like McCaw continue to be engraved in granite in front of opera houses but never in front of say… homeless shelters.

    Plus, again it may be fair or unfair, but Arts & Culture has another branding problem – at least in this city. The live performances I and many others want to see typically fall under the heading of “Nightlife” in this city. And “Nightlife” is rarely at the public trough asking for subsidies. The live performances for the syrah and tuxedo crowd are always called “Arts & Culture” and are frequently putting the strong arm on electeds to pony up more public resources as a subsidy.

    As long as that distinction remains, A&C will get “thrown under the bus” by a lot of folks. But don’t worry about the public perception. The dollars still roll into 4Culture from the City of Seattle and King County. Just take the $ and be happy with it.

  • Hobgoblin

    @31 – The elitist tag on arts & culture, fair or unfair, will probably have legs as long as names like McCaw continue to be engraved in granite in front of opera houses but never in front of say… homeless shelters.

    Plus, again it may be fair or unfair, but Arts & Culture has another branding problem – at least in this city. The live performances I and many others want to see typically fall under the heading of “Nightlife” in this city. And “Nightlife” is rarely at the public trough asking for subsidies. The live performances for the syrah and tuxedo crowd are always called “Arts & Culture” and are frequently putting the strong arm on electeds to pony up more public resources as a subsidy.

    As long as that distinction remains, A&C will get “thrown under the bus” by a lot of folks. But don’t worry about the public perception. The dollars still roll into 4Culture from the City of Seattle and King County. Just take the $ and be happy with it.

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @29,

    If we had had better access to Mallahan it would have helped him.

    For example, when Mallahan did a clever tv hit on McGinn, I was able to call McGinn and get his response, which stopped the piece from just being a replay of Mallahan’s message. http://publicola.net/?p=17463

    However, when I called Mallahan for a response to a McGinn attack, very often, we got nothing.

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @29,

    If we had had better access to Mallahan it would have helped him.

    For example, when Mallahan did a clever tv hit on McGinn, I was able to call McGinn and get his response, which stopped the piece from just being a replay of Mallahan’s message. http://publicola.net/?p=17463

    However, when I called Mallahan for a response to a McGinn attack, very often, we got nothing.

  • that’s what she said…

    Josh, you want proof that Slusan secretly was against R-71? She spent the summer hemming and hawing about it at candidate’s forums before it became clear she had to whore out her true beliefs if she wanted a chance in liberal king county.

    She is not exactly the same person as palin though. They have different dna and do not occupy the exact same spot in spacetime, nor are they composed of the exact same physical particles. So your right, she is not sarah palin. Still, has anyone ever seen them in the same room together?

  • that’s what she said…

    Josh, you want proof that Slusan secretly was against R-71? She spent the summer hemming and hawing about it at candidate’s forums before it became clear she had to whore out her true beliefs if she wanted a chance in liberal king county.

    She is not exactly the same person as palin though. They have different dna and do not occupy the exact same spot in spacetime, nor are they composed of the exact same physical particles. So your right, she is not sarah palin. Still, has anyone ever seen them in the same room together?

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @33,

    Probably at a Washington Policy Center breakfast.

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @33,

    Probably at a Washington Policy Center breakfast.

  • http://www.seattleuntimely.com/ charlie

    @34 +1

  • http://www.seattleuntimely.com charlie

    @34 +1

  • RossB

    Item 3: I agree completely. That was a sexist, superficial comparison. Would the comparison have been made if Hutchison was a good looking male anchor? I doubt it. Or how about a good looking sports star? How many people compared James Donaldson (a good looking sports star) to Sarah Palin? Yes, ideologically, there are some similarities between Palin and Huchison (they are both from the whacko wing of the Republican Party), but as you pointed out, they are different in so many ways. Palin was qualified, Huchison was not. Palin was rural, while Hutchison, if she was a Democrat, would have been called an elitist. One of her key quotes of the campaign was that she worked for the largest cultural organization in the Northwest. This, of course, will be news to the Mariners. Oh, I guess sports doesn’t count as culture (she must have meant high culture).

    Item 2) Mallahan’s campaign wasn’t that bad, they just had bad luck and a bad candidate (no offense). Seriously, if you miss more than half (Good God, more than half!) of your voting opportunities, then you aren’t a really strong candidate. Mallahan himself didn’t do well in the debates (and not for lack of coaching, I assume). He really didn’t seem to pick up on the issues very quickly. He did do a great job in surrounding himself with smart people, but it became clear to many that as mayor, he would govern the same way (not know all the details, but trust other smart folks to make the right decision). There is nothing inherently wrong with that, but McGinn (for all his faults) seemed to provide more (McGinn seemed to get much smarter and knowledgeable as the campaign wore on).

    Mallahan had good fliers for the primaries (the key quote “the candidate who is most likely to beat Nickels”) but couldn’t edge out McGinn. He would have fared much better in a Nickels/Mallahan race, but the votes just didn’t go that way. McGinn, on the other hand, didn’t need to change his message after the primary. He always was the far left candidate.

    If anyone ran a poor campaign, it was Nickels. I think he assumed he was going to make it through the primary and didn’t campaign until it was too late.

  • RossB

    Item 3: I agree completely. That was a sexist, superficial comparison. Would the comparison have been made if Hutchison was a good looking male anchor? I doubt it. Or how about a good looking sports star? How many people compared James Donaldson (a good looking sports star) to Sarah Palin? Yes, ideologically, there are some similarities between Palin and Huchison (they are both from the whacko wing of the Republican Party), but as you pointed out, they are different in so many ways. Palin was qualified, Huchison was not. Palin was rural, while Hutchison, if she was a Democrat, would have been called an elitist. One of her key quotes of the campaign was that she worked for the largest cultural organization in the Northwest. This, of course, will be news to the Mariners. Oh, I guess sports doesn’t count as culture (she must have meant high culture).

    Item 2) Mallahan’s campaign wasn’t that bad, they just had bad luck and a bad candidate (no offense). Seriously, if you miss more than half (Good God, more than half!) of your voting opportunities, then you aren’t a really strong candidate. Mallahan himself didn’t do well in the debates (and not for lack of coaching, I assume). He really didn’t seem to pick up on the issues very quickly. He did do a great job in surrounding himself with smart people, but it became clear to many that as mayor, he would govern the same way (not know all the details, but trust other smart folks to make the right decision). There is nothing inherently wrong with that, but McGinn (for all his faults) seemed to provide more (McGinn seemed to get much smarter and knowledgeable as the campaign wore on).

    Mallahan had good fliers for the primaries (the key quote “the candidate who is most likely to beat Nickels”) but couldn’t edge out McGinn. He would have fared much better in a Nickels/Mallahan race, but the votes just didn’t go that way. McGinn, on the other hand, didn’t need to change his message after the primary. He always was the far left candidate.

    If anyone ran a poor campaign, it was Nickels. I think he assumed he was going to make it through the primary and didn’t campaign until it was too late.

  • Seattle Greg

    For me, Hutch = Palin was code for not not always truthful, a hypocrite and / or a lier.

    How do you call a popular anchor out for “Stretching the truth” in a way that pragmatic independents might understand?

    Constantly hiding links to actions vs. her words…

    Susan supports Dems and GOPPERS, but no one can find a donation to a single Dem. Sarah’s America First, but then the videos of her involvement in her successionist Alaska First movement.

    Sarah’s Pro Family Values, but let me introduct the kid who knocke up my daughter and WILL (NOT) marry shortly, and Susan with her I wrote a check for a friend, but oops, theres VIDEO of me introducing Huckabee and LAUDING his political and religious stands.

    Susan claiming Success of the SSO Funding and Sarah Bankrupting Wassila and calling IT a successful term.

    They were different in many ways, but the comparision was a key signal that It may not be as it appears in the mirror….

  • Seattle Greg

    For me, Hutch = Palin was code for not not always truthful, a hypocrite and / or a lier.

    How do you call a popular anchor out for “Stretching the truth” in a way that pragmatic independents might understand?

    Constantly hiding links to actions vs. her words…

    Susan supports Dems and GOPPERS, but no one can find a donation to a single Dem. Sarah’s America First, but then the videos of her involvement in her successionist Alaska First movement.

    Sarah’s Pro Family Values, but let me introduct the kid who knocke up my daughter and WILL (NOT) marry shortly, and Susan with her I wrote a check for a friend, but oops, theres VIDEO of me introducing Huckabee and LAUDING his political and religious stands.

    Susan claiming Success of the SSO Funding and Sarah Bankrupting Wassila and calling IT a successful term.

    They were different in many ways, but the comparision was a key signal that It may not be as it appears in the mirror….

  • sarah68

    @4: Re Mallahan going right back to T-Mobile: He probably needs a job. Most of us do. In particular, he needs to replenish his bank account for the $220,000 he spent on his campaign.

    @36: Mallahan didn’t have bad luck. He had money; he had professional staff, he had backing from most of the big guys (both genders) in the community. What else would you need but an actual issue-driven agenda, an effective presentation, and a willingness to talk to people? Well, those he didn’t have, but it didn’t have anything to do with lack of luck.

  • sarah68

    @4: Re Mallahan going right back to T-Mobile: He probably needs a job. Most of us do. In particular, he needs to replenish his bank account for the $220,000 he spent on his campaign.

    @36: Mallahan didn’t have bad luck. He had money; he had professional staff, he had backing from most of the big guys (both genders) in the community. What else would you need but an actual issue-driven agenda, an effective presentation, and a willingness to talk to people? Well, those he didn’t have, but it didn’t have anything to do with lack of luck.

  • wsoutsider

    I believe you could add “faux” environmentalist to the description of Tom Albro also. But somehow he got the WCV endorsement. A total “downtown” inside job.

  • wsoutsider

    I believe you could add “faux” environmentalist to the description of Tom Albro also. But somehow he got the WCV endorsement. A total “downtown” inside job.

  • Foul Fowl

    Regarding 4; Oh Please! I don’t live in Seattle, but have always been amused by the local punditocracy. There is rarely a significant difference between mayoral candidates on environmental issues. As I see it the choice has most always been green vs greener and this year was not that much different. The council will be green, the mayor will be green and differences are at the margins.
    That changed for me with the election of Nickels. He looked beyond Seattle and used the position to become a national leader on climate policy. The Sierra Club gave him a national award. Then dumped him.
    In a bold move the Sierra club proclaimed, “I endorse me!”, by endorsing their own apparatchik, McGinn. Wow, how courageous, how radical!
    WCV stayed out of the mayors race, but did endorse O’Brien, by your measure does that make them 1/2 radical?
    Regarding the county exec, you had 4 candidates with great environmental credentials, all of whom with previous WCV endorsements. One so good that Dow has hired him as his deputy. Could it be possible that an organization with a statewide outlook might not want to sour relationships with friends they hope to work with in the future? I’d say this was sound strategic thinking.

  • Foul Fowl

    Regarding 4; Oh Please! I don’t live in Seattle, but have always been amused by the local punditocracy. There is rarely a significant difference between mayoral candidates on environmental issues. As I see it the choice has most always been green vs greener and this year was not that much different. The council will be green, the mayor will be green and differences are at the margins.
    That changed for me with the election of Nickels. He looked beyond Seattle and used the position to become a national leader on climate policy. The Sierra Club gave him a national award. Then dumped him.
    In a bold move the Sierra club proclaimed, “I endorse me!”, by endorsing their own apparatchik, McGinn. Wow, how courageous, how radical!
    WCV stayed out of the mayors race, but did endorse O’Brien, by your measure does that make them 1/2 radical?
    Regarding the county exec, you had 4 candidates with great environmental credentials, all of whom with previous WCV endorsements. One so good that Dow has hired him as his deputy. Could it be possible that an organization with a statewide outlook might not want to sour relationships with friends they hope to work with in the future? I’d say this was sound strategic thinking.

  • RossB

    @38: I agree with you that most of the blame for Mallahan’s loss lies with Mallahan himself, but in a race this close, luck plays a part. Imagine, if you will, that Jan Drago dropped out (or didn’t run). Now imagine that about half of her votes went to Nickels* and about half went to Mallahan**. That leaves McGinn in third place. This is just one of many ways that a race this close could have played out.

    * The “He is the only guy who is qualified left in the race” vote.
    ** The “I hate Nickels (damn snow!) and I don’t want that radical lefty” vote.

  • RossB

    @38: I agree with you that most of the blame for Mallahan’s loss lies with Mallahan himself, but in a race this close, luck plays a part. Imagine, if you will, that Jan Drago dropped out (or didn’t run). Now imagine that about half of her votes went to Nickels* and about half went to Mallahan**. That leaves McGinn in third place. This is just one of many ways that a race this close could have played out.

    * The “He is the only guy who is qualified left in the race” vote.
    ** The “I hate Nickels (damn snow!) and I don’t want that radical lefty” vote.

  • johnmocha

    Tend to disagree on the #3 – she is attractive. I saw her at opening of Light Rail and thought Halloween was early this year. Botox gone wild.

  • johnmocha

    Tend to disagree on the #3 – she is attractive. I saw her at opening of Light Rail and thought Halloween was early this year. Botox gone wild.

  • Cathy Allen

    Anyone looking to hook up?

  • Cathy Allen

    Anyone looking to hook up?

  • Bill

    Suzie’s thumping by King County voters probably means that no one with anything to lose will run against Patty Murray next year.
    Who would want to self finance (the oft-mentioned Stantons and Herbolds, etc) in the face of those numbers?
    And why would any incumbent sacrifice their seat for a certain beating?
    The R’s are likely to be left with a no-name candidate or a county commissioner elected in odd – numbered years or maybe a state senator who’s term isn’t up until 2012.
    Murray’s going to be doling out cash to other Dems under any of these scenarios.

  • Bill

    Suzie’s thumping by King County voters probably means that no one with anything to lose will run against Patty Murray next year.
    Who would want to self finance (the oft-mentioned Stantons and Herbolds, etc) in the face of those numbers?
    And why would any incumbent sacrifice their seat for a certain beating?
    The R’s are likely to be left with a no-name candidate or a county commissioner elected in odd – numbered years or maybe a state senator who’s term isn’t up until 2012.
    Murray’s going to be doling out cash to other Dems under any of these scenarios.

  • J.R.

    Sarah Palin was woefully underqualified to serve as Vice President of the United States.

    Susan Hutchison was woefully underqualified to serve as King County Executive.

    Get the picture?

  • J.R.

    Sarah Palin was woefully underqualified to serve as Vice President of the United States.

    Susan Hutchison was woefully underqualified to serve as King County Executive.

    Get the picture?