Viva La Cola!

Founded in January 2009, PubliCola is a blog about Seattle written by journalists who are dedicated to non-partisan, original daily reporting that prioritizes a balanced approach to news. Started by longtime local editor and award-winning reporter Josh Feit, PubliCola is the first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol.

PubliCola was off and running. In June 2009, PubliCola hired another award-winning journalist, super-sourced Seattle city hall reporter Erica C. Barnett.

People were afraid that blogging would change journalism. Instead, we believe journalism can change blogging. Twenty-first century journalism may look and feel different, and yes Erica isn't afraid to get cranky, but we're committed to making sure online news still delivers independent, reliable, even-keeled coverage. And most of all, we're committed to making sure the coverage sparks honest civic debate.

Bringing you cola for the people, PubliCola is named after Publius Valerius PubliCola, the alias for the authors of the Federalist Papers—the original bloggers.

The first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol and Seattle city hall, PubliCola has been called a “must-read” by the Seattle Post Intelligencer and a hot “New Media Mover and Shaker” by Seattle Magazine—which also cited our own Erica C. Barnett as the city's No. 1 news nerd.

Gregoire Endorses Mallahan. It's the Tunnel, Stupid.

Joe Mallahan’s campaign released an endorsement statement from Governor Chris Gregoire late this morning.

Gregoire does not specifically mention the tunnel deal, but Mallahan’s support for the $4.2 billion waterfront tunnel (and more likely, Mike McGinn’s opposition) is laced throughout the press release.

We’ve linked the whole press release below the fold, but here’s an example of what I’m talking about:

“We took enormous steps in the last legislative session to invest in building a transportation system that will create thousands of new Seattle jobs, and help us emerge stronger from this recession” added Gregoire. “What we did was truly monumental – not just for Seattle, but for Washington’s economic future as a whole.  Joe understands the importance of this investment and the need to turn those dollars into jobs now.”

Governor Chris Gregoire endorses Joe Mallahan for Mayor of Seattle

Seattle, Wash. – The Mallahan for Mayor campaign is proud to announce Governor Chris Gregoire’s endorsement of Joe Mallahan to be Seattle’s next Mayor.  Gregoire highlighted Mallahan’s experience, his understanding of how transportation and job creation go hand in hand, and his determination to rebuild Seattle’s economy as reasons why he is the best candidate to lead Seattle forward.

“Seattle’s next mayor needs to be someone who understands that rebuilding Seattle’s economy and creating family wage jobs must be the top priority of their administration.  To do that, the mayor must be someone with proven experience and a willingness to work closely with Seattle’s diverse citizens, businesses, unions and state and local elected officials.  The candidate in this race who has those qualifications is Joe Mallahan,” Gregoire said.

“I am deeply honored to have the Governor’s endorsement,” Mallahan said.  “Governor Gregoire is right – voters have a clear choice in this race. We have an opportunity to move forward together to strengthen our economy, create new jobs, improve our transportation system and create safe neighborhoods. I will work effectively with the Governor to create jobs, make sure our transportation projects are built on time and on budget, and ensure Seattle city services work for all of us.”

“We took enormous steps in the last legislative session to invest in building a transportation system that will create thousands of new Seattle jobs, and help us emerge stronger from this recession” added Gregoire. “What we did was truly monumental – not just for Seattle, but for Washington’s economic future as a whole.  Joe understands the importance of this investment and the need to turn those dollars into jobs now.”

Mallahan added, “Governor Gregoire has shown principled leadership to lead the state through difficult economic times. She has had to deal with the harsh reality of how to lead when tough economic times cripple a budget and she knows the next mayor of Seattle is going to have to do the same thing. I appreciate the governor’s support and leadership and look forward to partnering with her to revitalize Seattle’s economy.”

Joe Mallahan has a history of finding innovative solutions to difficult problems and knows we need to learn how to do more with less.  Mallahan has a long track record of finding ways to trim the fat off budgets while still improving services.  He will use this experience to make sure Seattle’s budget has more resources available for our priorities. Joe is the only candidate in this race rated “Outstanding” by the Municipal League.  He has been endorsed by the King County Democrats, 36th, 37th and 46th District Democrats, Seattle Police and Fire Fighters, King County Labor Council, Alki Foundation, and received all “A” ratings from SEAMEC.  Mallahan’s list of group and individual supporters represent the diversity of Seattle.


  • Gidge

    Does “principled leadership” include bringing the state legislature back for an emergency session to reinstate Eyman’s initiative after the Supreme Court found it unconstitutional? You know, the initiative that had a huge role in crippling the County budget?

  • Gidge

    Does “principled leadership” include bringing the state legislature back for an emergency session to reinstate Eyman’s initiative after the Supreme Court found it unconstitutional? You know, the initiative that had a huge role in crippling the County budget?

  • Gidge

    Does “principled leadership” include bringing the state legislature back for an emergency session to reinstate Eyman’s initiative after the Supreme Court found it unconstitutional? You know, the initiative that had a huge role in crippling the County budget?

  • Gidge

    Does “principled leadership” include bringing the state legislature back for an emergency session to reinstate Eyman’s initiative after the Supreme Court found it unconstitutional? You know, the initiative that had a huge role in crippling the County budget?

  • Gidge

    Does “principled leadership” include bringing the state legislature back for an emergency session to reinstate Eyman’s initiative after the Supreme Court found it unconstitutional? You know, the initiative that had a huge role in crippling the County budget?

  • Gidge

    Does “principled leadership” include bringing the state legislature back for an emergency session to reinstate Eyman’s initiative after the Supreme Court found it unconstitutional? You know, the initiative that had a huge role in crippling the County budget?

  • Gidge

    Does “principled leadership” include bringing the state legislature back for an emergency session to reinstate Eyman’s initiative after the Supreme Court found it unconstitutional? You know, the initiative that had a huge role in crippling the County budget?

  • Gidge

    Does “principled leadership” include bringing the state legislature back for an emergency session to reinstate Eyman’s initiative after the Supreme Court found it unconstitutional? You know, the initiative that had a huge role in crippling the County budget?

  • Gidge

    Does “principled leadership” include bringing the state legislature back for an emergency session to reinstate Eyman’s initiative after the Supreme Court found it unconstitutional? You know, the initiative that had a huge role in crippling the County budget?

  • Gidge

    Does “principled leadership” include bringing the state legislature back for an emergency session to reinstate Eyman’s initiative after the Supreme Court found it unconstitutional? You know, the initiative that had a huge role in crippling the County budget?

  • http://peacetreefarm.org N in Seattle

    Is an endorsement from Governor channeling Rossi Gregoire a plus or a minus for Mallahan?

    She doesn’t vote in Seattle, FWIW.

  • http://peacetreefarm.org N in Seattle

    Is an endorsement from Governor channeling Rossi Gregoire a plus or a minus for Mallahan?

    She doesn’t vote in Seattle, FWIW.

  • http://peacetreefarm.org N in Seattle

    Is an endorsement from Governor channeling Rossi Gregoire a plus or a minus for Mallahan?

    She doesn’t vote in Seattle, FWIW.

  • http://peacetreefarm.org N in Seattle

    Is an endorsement from Governor channeling Rossi Gregoire a plus or a minus for Mallahan?

    She doesn’t vote in Seattle, FWIW.

  • http://peacetreefarm.org N in Seattle

    Is an endorsement from Governor channeling Rossi Gregoire a plus or a minus for Mallahan?

    She doesn’t vote in Seattle, FWIW.

  • http://peacetreefarm.org N in Seattle

    Is an endorsement from Governor channeling Rossi Gregoire a plus or a minus for Mallahan?

    She doesn’t vote in Seattle, FWIW.

  • http://peacetreefarm.org N in Seattle

    Is an endorsement from Governor channeling Rossi Gregoire a plus or a minus for Mallahan?

    She doesn’t vote in Seattle, FWIW.

  • http://peacetreefarm.org N in Seattle

    Is an endorsement from Governor channeling Rossi Gregoire a plus or a minus for Mallahan?

    She doesn’t vote in Seattle, FWIW.

  • http://peacetreefarm.org N in Seattle

    Is an endorsement from Governor channeling Rossi Gregoire a plus or a minus for Mallahan?

    She doesn’t vote in Seattle, FWIW.

  • http://peacetreefarm.org N in Seattle

    Is an endorsement from Governor channeling Rossi Gregoire a plus or a minus for Mallahan?

    She doesn’t vote in Seattle, FWIW.

  • http://peacetreefarm.org N in Seattle

    Is an endorsement from Governor channeling Rossi Gregoire a plus or a minus for Mallahan?

    She doesn’t vote in Seattle, FWIW.

  • Brian K

    @1 Gregoire also vetoed a provision that would have allowed a local funding option to save Metro service. This governor is no friend of Seattle.

  • Brian K

    @1 Gregoire also vetoed a provision that would have allowed a local funding option to save Metro service. This governor is no friend of Seattle.

  • Brian K

    @1 Gregoire also vetoed a provision that would have allowed a local funding option to save Metro service. This governor is no friend of Seattle.

  • Brian K

    @1 Gregoire also vetoed a provision that would have allowed a local funding option to save Metro service. This governor is no friend of Seattle.

  • Brian K

    @1 Gregoire also vetoed a provision that would have allowed a local funding option to save Metro service. This governor is no friend of Seattle.

  • Brian K

    @1 Gregoire also vetoed a provision that would have allowed a local funding option to save Metro service. This governor is no friend of Seattle.

  • Brian K

    @1 Gregoire also vetoed a provision that would have allowed a local funding option to save Metro service. This governor is no friend of Seattle.

  • Brian K

    @1 Gregoire also vetoed a provision that would have allowed a local funding option to save Metro service. This governor is no friend of Seattle.

  • Brian K

    @1 Gregoire also vetoed a provision that would have allowed a local funding option to save Metro service. This governor is no friend of Seattle.

  • Brian K

    @1 Gregoire also vetoed a provision that would have allowed a local funding option to save Metro service. This governor is no friend of Seattle.

  • Brian K

    @1 Gregoire also vetoed a provision that would have allowed a local funding option to save Metro service. This governor is no friend of Seattle.

  • Stacy, Stacey, Stacie

    @1 Gidge

    Wow. That was quite a reach.

    The momentum for Mallahan just keeps building.

  • Stacy, Stacey, Stacie

    @1 Gidge

    Wow. That was quite a reach.

    The momentum for Mallahan just keeps building.

  • Stacy, Stacey, Stacie

    @1 Gidge

    Wow. That was quite a reach.

    The momentum for Mallahan just keeps building.

  • Stacy, Stacey, Stacie

    @1 Gidge

    Wow. That was quite a reach.

    The momentum for Mallahan just keeps building.

  • Stacy, Stacey, Stacie

    @1 Gidge

    Wow. That was quite a reach.

    The momentum for Mallahan just keeps building.

  • Stacy, Stacey, Stacie

    @1 Gidge

    Wow. That was quite a reach.

    The momentum for Mallahan just keeps building.

  • Stacy, Stacey, Stacie

    @1 Gidge

    Wow. That was quite a reach.

    The momentum for Mallahan just keeps building.

  • Stacy, Stacey, Stacie

    @1 Gidge

    Wow. That was quite a reach.

    The momentum for Mallahan just keeps building.

  • Stacy, Stacey, Stacie

    @1 Gidge

    Wow. That was quite a reach.

    The momentum for Mallahan just keeps building.

  • Stacy, Stacey, Stacie

    @1 Gidge

    Wow. That was quite a reach.

    The momentum for Mallahan just keeps building.

  • Stacy, Stacey, Stacie

    @1 Gidge

    Wow. That was quite a reach.

    The momentum for Mallahan just keeps building.

  • Stacy, Stacey, Stacie

    @1 Gidge

    Wow. That was quite a reach.

    The momentum for Mallahan just keeps building.

  • Stacy, Stacey, Stacie

    So now the McGinnian strategy is to attack Governor Christine Gregoire. Please let me know after November 3rd how that worked out for you.

  • Stacy, Stacey, Stacie

    So now the McGinnian strategy is to attack Governor Christine Gregoire. Please let me know after November 3rd how that worked out for you.

  • Stacy, Stacey, Stacie

    So now the McGinnian strategy is to attack Governor Christine Gregoire. Please let me know after November 3rd how that worked out for you.

  • Stacy, Stacey, Stacie

    So now the McGinnian strategy is to attack Governor Christine Gregoire. Please let me know after November 3rd how that worked out for you.

  • Stacy, Stacey, Stacie

    So now the McGinnian strategy is to attack Governor Christine Gregoire. Please let me know after November 3rd how that worked out for you.

  • Stacy, Stacey, Stacie

    So now the McGinnian strategy is to attack Governor Christine Gregoire. Please let me know after November 3rd how that worked out for you.

  • Stacy, Stacey, Stacie

    So now the McGinnian strategy is to attack Governor Christine Gregoire. Please let me know after November 3rd how that worked out for you.

  • Stacy, Stacey, Stacie

    So now the McGinnian strategy is to attack Governor Christine Gregoire. Please let me know after November 3rd how that worked out for you.

  • Stacy, Stacey, Stacie

    So now the McGinnian strategy is to attack Governor Christine Gregoire. Please let me know after November 3rd how that worked out for you.

  • Stacy, Stacey, Stacie

    So now the McGinnian strategy is to attack Governor Christine Gregoire. Please let me know after November 3rd how that worked out for you.

  • Stacy, Stacey, Stacie

    So now the McGinnian strategy is to attack Governor Christine Gregoire. Please let me know after November 3rd how that worked out for you.

  • Stacy, Stacey, Stacie

    So now the McGinnian strategy is to attack Governor Christine Gregoire. Please let me know after November 3rd how that worked out for you.

  • Gidge

    @4–How is that a reach? I agree with Gregoire on a lot of things, but I think that move was the opposite of principled leadership and was instead an irresponsible response.

  • Gidge

    @4–How is that a reach? I agree with Gregoire on a lot of things, but I think that move was the opposite of principled leadership and was instead an irresponsible response.

  • Gidge

    @4–How is that a reach? I agree with Gregoire on a lot of things, but I think that move was the opposite of principled leadership and was instead an irresponsible response.

  • Gidge

    @4–How is that a reach? I agree with Gregoire on a lot of things, but I think that move was the opposite of principled leadership and was instead an irresponsible response.

  • Gidge

    @4–How is that a reach? I agree with Gregoire on a lot of things, but I think that move was the opposite of principled leadership and was instead an irresponsible response.

  • Gidge

    @4–How is that a reach? I agree with Gregoire on a lot of things, but I think that move was the opposite of principled leadership and was instead an irresponsible response.

  • Gidge

    @4–How is that a reach? I agree with Gregoire on a lot of things, but I think that move was the opposite of principled leadership and was instead an irresponsible response.

  • Gidge

    @4–How is that a reach? I agree with Gregoire on a lot of things, but I think that move was the opposite of principled leadership and was instead an irresponsible response.

  • Gidge

    @4–How is that a reach? I agree with Gregoire on a lot of things, but I think that move was the opposite of principled leadership and was instead an irresponsible response.

  • Gidge

    @4–How is that a reach? I agree with Gregoire on a lot of things, but I think that move was the opposite of principled leadership and was instead an irresponsible response.

  • Gidge

    @4–How is that a reach? I agree with Gregoire on a lot of things, but I think that move was the opposite of principled leadership and was instead an irresponsible response.

  • sigh

    How again does Gregoire intend to fulfill her pledge of reducing CO2 emissions to be 50% below 1990 levels by 2050? Oh, by building a four-lane single-occupancy vehicle tunnel for $2+ billion in our state’s most populated and dense city!

    Brilliant! Glad she’s inline with the mayoral candidate who drives six blocks (but it’s a Prius!!!) to his campaign office and who hasn’t proposed an original idea in this campaign, yet.

  • sigh

    How again does Gregoire intend to fulfill her pledge of reducing CO2 emissions to be 50% below 1990 levels by 2050? Oh, by building a four-lane single-occupancy vehicle tunnel for $2+ billion in our state’s most populated and dense city!

    Brilliant! Glad she’s inline with the mayoral candidate who drives six blocks (but it’s a Prius!!!) to his campaign office and who hasn’t proposed an original idea in this campaign, yet.

  • sigh

    How again does Gregoire intend to fulfill her pledge of reducing CO2 emissions to be 50% below 1990 levels by 2050? Oh, by building a four-lane single-occupancy vehicle tunnel for $2+ billion in our state’s most populated and dense city!

    Brilliant! Glad she’s inline with the mayoral candidate who drives six blocks (but it’s a Prius!!!) to his campaign office and who hasn’t proposed an original idea in this campaign, yet.

  • sigh

    How again does Gregoire intend to fulfill her pledge of reducing CO2 emissions to be 50% below 1990 levels by 2050? Oh, by building a four-lane single-occupancy vehicle tunnel for $2+ billion in our state’s most populated and dense city!

    Brilliant! Glad she’s inline with the mayoral candidate who drives six blocks (but it’s a Prius!!!) to his campaign office and who hasn’t proposed an original idea in this campaign, yet.

  • sigh

    How again does Gregoire intend to fulfill her pledge of reducing CO2 emissions to be 50% below 1990 levels by 2050? Oh, by building a four-lane single-occupancy vehicle tunnel for $2+ billion in our state’s most populated and dense city!

    Brilliant! Glad she’s inline with the mayoral candidate who drives six blocks (but it’s a Prius!!!) to his campaign office and who hasn’t proposed an original idea in this campaign, yet.

  • sigh

    How again does Gregoire intend to fulfill her pledge of reducing CO2 emissions to be 50% below 1990 levels by 2050? Oh, by building a four-lane single-occupancy vehicle tunnel for $2+ billion in our state’s most populated and dense city!

    Brilliant! Glad she’s inline with the mayoral candidate who drives six blocks (but it’s a Prius!!!) to his campaign office and who hasn’t proposed an original idea in this campaign, yet.

  • sigh

    How again does Gregoire intend to fulfill her pledge of reducing CO2 emissions to be 50% below 1990 levels by 2050? Oh, by building a four-lane single-occupancy vehicle tunnel for $2+ billion in our state’s most populated and dense city!

    Brilliant! Glad she’s inline with the mayoral candidate who drives six blocks (but it’s a Prius!!!) to his campaign office and who hasn’t proposed an original idea in this campaign, yet.

  • sigh

    How again does Gregoire intend to fulfill her pledge of reducing CO2 emissions to be 50% below 1990 levels by 2050? Oh, by building a four-lane single-occupancy vehicle tunnel for $2+ billion in our state’s most populated and dense city!

    Brilliant! Glad she’s inline with the mayoral candidate who drives six blocks (but it’s a Prius!!!) to his campaign office and who hasn’t proposed an original idea in this campaign, yet.

  • sigh

    How again does Gregoire intend to fulfill her pledge of reducing CO2 emissions to be 50% below 1990 levels by 2050? Oh, by building a four-lane single-occupancy vehicle tunnel for $2+ billion in our state’s most populated and dense city!

    Brilliant! Glad she’s inline with the mayoral candidate who drives six blocks (but it’s a Prius!!!) to his campaign office and who hasn’t proposed an original idea in this campaign, yet.

  • sigh

    How again does Gregoire intend to fulfill her pledge of reducing CO2 emissions to be 50% below 1990 levels by 2050? Oh, by building a four-lane single-occupancy vehicle tunnel for $2+ billion in our state’s most populated and dense city!

    Brilliant! Glad she’s inline with the mayoral candidate who drives six blocks (but it’s a Prius!!!) to his campaign office and who hasn’t proposed an original idea in this campaign, yet.

  • sigh

    How again does Gregoire intend to fulfill her pledge of reducing CO2 emissions to be 50% below 1990 levels by 2050? Oh, by building a four-lane single-occupancy vehicle tunnel for $2+ billion in our state’s most populated and dense city!

    Brilliant! Glad she’s inline with the mayoral candidate who drives six blocks (but it’s a Prius!!!) to his campaign office and who hasn’t proposed an original idea in this campaign, yet.

  • sigh

    How again does Gregoire intend to fulfill her pledge of reducing CO2 emissions to be 50% below 1990 levels by 2050? Oh, by building a four-lane single-occupancy vehicle tunnel for $2+ billion in our state’s most populated and dense city!

    Brilliant! Glad she’s inline with the mayoral candidate who drives six blocks (but it’s a Prius!!!) to his campaign office and who hasn’t proposed an original idea in this campaign, yet.

  • Michael M.

    @7 -

    The tunnel will “scrub” exhaust. The tunnel will not lead to 65,000 hours per day of additional vehicle pollution (using the anti-tunnel folks best numbers) throughout the city, like the surface street plan would. The tunnel will reconnect downtown with the waterfront. The tunnel will create jobs to build it, and save jobs at the port. The tunnel is good for the environment, and good for jobs in Seattle.

    And perhaps you missed it, but that 6 blocks thing has been dis-proven time and time again. 2 miles, not six blocks.

  • Michael M.

    @7 -

    The tunnel will “scrub” exhaust. The tunnel will not lead to 65,000 hours per day of additional vehicle pollution (using the anti-tunnel folks best numbers) throughout the city, like the surface street plan would. The tunnel will reconnect downtown with the waterfront. The tunnel will create jobs to build it, and save jobs at the port. The tunnel is good for the environment, and good for jobs in Seattle.

    And perhaps you missed it, but that 6 blocks thing has been dis-proven time and time again. 2 miles, not six blocks.

  • Michael M.

    @7 -

    The tunnel will “scrub” exhaust. The tunnel will not lead to 65,000 hours per day of additional vehicle pollution (using the anti-tunnel folks best numbers) throughout the city, like the surface street plan would. The tunnel will reconnect downtown with the waterfront. The tunnel will create jobs to build it, and save jobs at the port. The tunnel is good for the environment, and good for jobs in Seattle.

    And perhaps you missed it, but that 6 blocks thing has been dis-proven time and time again. 2 miles, not six blocks.

  • Michael M.

    @7 -

    The tunnel will “scrub” exhaust. The tunnel will not lead to 65,000 hours per day of additional vehicle pollution (using the anti-tunnel folks best numbers) throughout the city, like the surface street plan would. The tunnel will reconnect downtown with the waterfront. The tunnel will create jobs to build it, and save jobs at the port. The tunnel is good for the environment, and good for jobs in Seattle.

    And perhaps you missed it, but that 6 blocks thing has been dis-proven time and time again. 2 miles, not six blocks.

  • Michael M.

    @7 -

    The tunnel will “scrub” exhaust. The tunnel will not lead to 65,000 hours per day of additional vehicle pollution (using the anti-tunnel folks best numbers) throughout the city, like the surface street plan would. The tunnel will reconnect downtown with the waterfront. The tunnel will create jobs to build it, and save jobs at the port. The tunnel is good for the environment, and good for jobs in Seattle.

    And perhaps you missed it, but that 6 blocks thing has been dis-proven time and time again. 2 miles, not six blocks.

  • Michael M.

    @7 -

    The tunnel will “scrub” exhaust. The tunnel will not lead to 65,000 hours per day of additional vehicle pollution (using the anti-tunnel folks best numbers) throughout the city, like the surface street plan would. The tunnel will reconnect downtown with the waterfront. The tunnel will create jobs to build it, and save jobs at the port. The tunnel is good for the environment, and good for jobs in Seattle.

    And perhaps you missed it, but that 6 blocks thing has been dis-proven time and time again. 2 miles, not six blocks.

  • Michael M.

    @7 -

    The tunnel will “scrub” exhaust. The tunnel will not lead to 65,000 hours per day of additional vehicle pollution (using the anti-tunnel folks best numbers) throughout the city, like the surface street plan would. The tunnel will reconnect downtown with the waterfront. The tunnel will create jobs to build it, and save jobs at the port. The tunnel is good for the environment, and good for jobs in Seattle.

    And perhaps you missed it, but that 6 blocks thing has been dis-proven time and time again. 2 miles, not six blocks.

  • Michael M.

    @7 -

    The tunnel will “scrub” exhaust. The tunnel will not lead to 65,000 hours per day of additional vehicle pollution (using the anti-tunnel folks best numbers) throughout the city, like the surface street plan would. The tunnel will reconnect downtown with the waterfront. The tunnel will create jobs to build it, and save jobs at the port. The tunnel is good for the environment, and good for jobs in Seattle.

    And perhaps you missed it, but that 6 blocks thing has been dis-proven time and time again. 2 miles, not six blocks.

  • Michael M.

    @7 -

    The tunnel will “scrub” exhaust. The tunnel will not lead to 65,000 hours per day of additional vehicle pollution (using the anti-tunnel folks best numbers) throughout the city, like the surface street plan would. The tunnel will reconnect downtown with the waterfront. The tunnel will create jobs to build it, and save jobs at the port. The tunnel is good for the environment, and good for jobs in Seattle.

    And perhaps you missed it, but that 6 blocks thing has been dis-proven time and time again. 2 miles, not six blocks.

  • Michael M.

    @7 -

    The tunnel will “scrub” exhaust. The tunnel will not lead to 65,000 hours per day of additional vehicle pollution (using the anti-tunnel folks best numbers) throughout the city, like the surface street plan would. The tunnel will reconnect downtown with the waterfront. The tunnel will create jobs to build it, and save jobs at the port. The tunnel is good for the environment, and good for jobs in Seattle.

    And perhaps you missed it, but that 6 blocks thing has been dis-proven time and time again. 2 miles, not six blocks.

  • Michael M.

    @7 -

    The tunnel will “scrub” exhaust. The tunnel will not lead to 65,000 hours per day of additional vehicle pollution (using the anti-tunnel folks best numbers) throughout the city, like the surface street plan would. The tunnel will reconnect downtown with the waterfront. The tunnel will create jobs to build it, and save jobs at the port. The tunnel is good for the environment, and good for jobs in Seattle.

    And perhaps you missed it, but that 6 blocks thing has been dis-proven time and time again. 2 miles, not six blocks.

  • Michael M.

    @7 -

    The tunnel will “scrub” exhaust. The tunnel will not lead to 65,000 hours per day of additional vehicle pollution (using the anti-tunnel folks best numbers) throughout the city, like the surface street plan would. The tunnel will reconnect downtown with the waterfront. The tunnel will create jobs to build it, and save jobs at the port. The tunnel is good for the environment, and good for jobs in Seattle.

    And perhaps you missed it, but that 6 blocks thing has been dis-proven time and time again. 2 miles, not six blocks.

  • Stop All of Your Sobbing

    The great thing is that other than Stacy, Stacey, Stacie and Michael M. here in Publicola, most comments in the rest of the sites are mocking Gregoire & Mallahan for this endorsement.

  • Stop All of Your Sobbing

    The great thing is that other than Stacy, Stacey, Stacie and Michael M. here in Publicola, most comments in the rest of the sites are mocking Gregoire & Mallahan for this endorsement.

  • Stop All of Your Sobbing

    The great thing is that other than Stacy, Stacey, Stacie and Michael M. here in Publicola, most comments in the rest of the sites are mocking Gregoire & Mallahan for this endorsement.

  • Stop All of Your Sobbing

    The great thing is that other than Stacy, Stacey, Stacie and Michael M. here in Publicola, most comments in the rest of the sites are mocking Gregoire & Mallahan for this endorsement.

  • Stop All of Your Sobbing

    The great thing is that other than Stacy, Stacey, Stacie and Michael M. here in Publicola, most comments in the rest of the sites are mocking Gregoire & Mallahan for this endorsement.

  • Stop All of Your Sobbing

    The great thing is that other than Stacy, Stacey, Stacie and Michael M. here in Publicola, most comments in the rest of the sites are mocking Gregoire & Mallahan for this endorsement.

  • Stop All of Your Sobbing

    The great thing is that other than Stacy, Stacey, Stacie and Michael M. here in Publicola, most comments in the rest of the sites are mocking Gregoire & Mallahan for this endorsement.

  • Stop All of Your Sobbing

    The great thing is that other than Stacy, Stacey, Stacie and Michael M. here in Publicola, most comments in the rest of the sites are mocking Gregoire & Mallahan for this endorsement.

  • Stop All of Your Sobbing

    The great thing is that other than Stacy, Stacey, Stacie and Michael M. here in Publicola, most comments in the rest of the sites are mocking Gregoire & Mallahan for this endorsement.

  • Stop All of Your Sobbing

    The great thing is that other than Stacy, Stacey, Stacie and Michael M. here in Publicola, most comments in the rest of the sites are mocking Gregoire & Mallahan for this endorsement.

  • Stop All of Your Sobbing

    The great thing is that other than Stacy, Stacey, Stacie and Michael M. here in Publicola, most comments in the rest of the sites are mocking Gregoire & Mallahan for this endorsement.

  • Stop All of Your Sobbing

    The great thing is that other than Stacy, Stacey, Stacie and Michael M. here in Publicola, most comments in the rest of the sites are mocking Gregoire & Mallahan for this endorsement.

  • Chris Stefan

    Stacy, Stacey, Stacie,
    Gregiore isn’t exactly the most popular elected official right now in case you haven’t noticed. An endorsement could be a bit of a mixed blessing for Mallahan.

    Calling a special session to enact the 1% per year levy maximum wasn’t great for local governments and is one source of King County’s fiscal problems. Vetoing the MVET that was supposed to pay for King County’s portion of the tunnel deal and fill the hole in Metro’s budget wasn’t exactly friendly to the City either.

    In fact for anyone who is really hot for some sort of solution for the Alaska Way Viaduct remember that both Gregiore and Nickles are part of why it took 8 years to come to some sort of an agreement. In fact I fully expect the Governor to find a way to really screw the city before the whole thing is over.

  • Chris Stefan

    Stacy, Stacey, Stacie,
    Gregiore isn’t exactly the most popular elected official right now in case you haven’t noticed. An endorsement could be a bit of a mixed blessing for Mallahan.

    Calling a special session to enact the 1% per year levy maximum wasn’t great for local governments and is one source of King County’s fiscal problems. Vetoing the MVET that was supposed to pay for King County’s portion of the tunnel deal and fill the hole in Metro’s budget wasn’t exactly friendly to the City either.

    In fact for anyone who is really hot for some sort of solution for the Alaska Way Viaduct remember that both Gregiore and Nickles are part of why it took 8 years to come to some sort of an agreement. In fact I fully expect the Governor to find a way to really screw the city before the whole thing is over.

  • Chris Stefan

    Stacy, Stacey, Stacie,
    Gregiore isn’t exactly the most popular elected official right now in case you haven’t noticed. An endorsement could be a bit of a mixed blessing for Mallahan.

    Calling a special session to enact the 1% per year levy maximum wasn’t great for local governments and is one source of King County’s fiscal problems. Vetoing the MVET that was supposed to pay for King County’s portion of the tunnel deal and fill the hole in Metro’s budget wasn’t exactly friendly to the City either.

    In fact for anyone who is really hot for some sort of solution for the Alaska Way Viaduct remember that both Gregiore and Nickles are part of why it took 8 years to come to some sort of an agreement. In fact I fully expect the Governor to find a way to really screw the city before the whole thing is over.

  • Chris Stefan

    Stacy, Stacey, Stacie,
    Gregiore isn’t exactly the most popular elected official right now in case you haven’t noticed. An endorsement could be a bit of a mixed blessing for Mallahan.

    Calling a special session to enact the 1% per year levy maximum wasn’t great for local governments and is one source of King County’s fiscal problems. Vetoing the MVET that was supposed to pay for King County’s portion of the tunnel deal and fill the hole in Metro’s budget wasn’t exactly friendly to the City either.

    In fact for anyone who is really hot for some sort of solution for the Alaska Way Viaduct remember that both Gregiore and Nickles are part of why it took 8 years to come to some sort of an agreement. In fact I fully expect the Governor to find a way to really screw the city before the whole thing is over.

  • Chris Stefan

    Stacy, Stacey, Stacie,
    Gregiore isn’t exactly the most popular elected official right now in case you haven’t noticed. An endorsement could be a bit of a mixed blessing for Mallahan.

    Calling a special session to enact the 1% per year levy maximum wasn’t great for local governments and is one source of King County’s fiscal problems. Vetoing the MVET that was supposed to pay for King County’s portion of the tunnel deal and fill the hole in Metro’s budget wasn’t exactly friendly to the City either.

    In fact for anyone who is really hot for some sort of solution for the Alaska Way Viaduct remember that both Gregiore and Nickles are part of why it took 8 years to come to some sort of an agreement. In fact I fully expect the Governor to find a way to really screw the city before the whole thing is over.

  • Chris Stefan

    Stacy, Stacey, Stacie,
    Gregiore isn’t exactly the most popular elected official right now in case you haven’t noticed. An endorsement could be a bit of a mixed blessing for Mallahan.

    Calling a special session to enact the 1% per year levy maximum wasn’t great for local governments and is one source of King County’s fiscal problems. Vetoing the MVET that was supposed to pay for King County’s portion of the tunnel deal and fill the hole in Metro’s budget wasn’t exactly friendly to the City either.

    In fact for anyone who is really hot for some sort of solution for the Alaska Way Viaduct remember that both Gregiore and Nickles are part of why it took 8 years to come to some sort of an agreement. In fact I fully expect the Governor to find a way to really screw the city before the whole thing is over.

  • Chris Stefan

    Stacy, Stacey, Stacie,
    Gregiore isn’t exactly the most popular elected official right now in case you haven’t noticed. An endorsement could be a bit of a mixed blessing for Mallahan.

    Calling a special session to enact the 1% per year levy maximum wasn’t great for local governments and is one source of King County’s fiscal problems. Vetoing the MVET that was supposed to pay for King County’s portion of the tunnel deal and fill the hole in Metro’s budget wasn’t exactly friendly to the City either.

    In fact for anyone who is really hot for some sort of solution for the Alaska Way Viaduct remember that both Gregiore and Nickles are part of why it took 8 years to come to some sort of an agreement. In fact I fully expect the Governor to find a way to really screw the city before the whole thing is over.

  • Chris Stefan

    Stacy, Stacey, Stacie,
    Gregiore isn’t exactly the most popular elected official right now in case you haven’t noticed. An endorsement could be a bit of a mixed blessing for Mallahan.

    Calling a special session to enact the 1% per year levy maximum wasn’t great for local governments and is one source of King County’s fiscal problems. Vetoing the MVET that was supposed to pay for King County’s portion of the tunnel deal and fill the hole in Metro’s budget wasn’t exactly friendly to the City either.

    In fact for anyone who is really hot for some sort of solution for the Alaska Way Viaduct remember that both Gregiore and Nickles are part of why it took 8 years to come to some sort of an agreement. In fact I fully expect the Governor to find a way to really screw the city before the whole thing is over.

  • Chris Stefan

    Stacy, Stacey, Stacie,
    Gregiore isn’t exactly the most popular elected official right now in case you haven’t noticed. An endorsement could be a bit of a mixed blessing for Mallahan.

    Calling a special session to enact the 1% per year levy maximum wasn’t great for local governments and is one source of King County’s fiscal problems. Vetoing the MVET that was supposed to pay for King County’s portion of the tunnel deal and fill the hole in Metro’s budget wasn’t exactly friendly to the City either.

    In fact for anyone who is really hot for some sort of solution for the Alaska Way Viaduct remember that both Gregiore and Nickles are part of why it took 8 years to come to some sort of an agreement. In fact I fully expect the Governor to find a way to really screw the city before the whole thing is over.

  • Chris Stefan

    Stacy, Stacey, Stacie,
    Gregiore isn’t exactly the most popular elected official right now in case you haven’t noticed. An endorsement could be a bit of a mixed blessing for Mallahan.

    Calling a special session to enact the 1% per year levy maximum wasn’t great for local governments and is one source of King County’s fiscal problems. Vetoing the MVET that was supposed to pay for King County’s portion of the tunnel deal and fill the hole in Metro’s budget wasn’t exactly friendly to the City either.

    In fact for anyone who is really hot for some sort of solution for the Alaska Way Viaduct remember that both Gregiore and Nickles are part of why it took 8 years to come to some sort of an agreement. In fact I fully expect the Governor to find a way to really screw the city before the whole thing is over.

  • Chris Stefan

    Stacy, Stacey, Stacie,
    Gregiore isn’t exactly the most popular elected official right now in case you haven’t noticed. An endorsement could be a bit of a mixed blessing for Mallahan.

    Calling a special session to enact the 1% per year levy maximum wasn’t great for local governments and is one source of King County’s fiscal problems. Vetoing the MVET that was supposed to pay for King County’s portion of the tunnel deal and fill the hole in Metro’s budget wasn’t exactly friendly to the City either.

    In fact for anyone who is really hot for some sort of solution for the Alaska Way Viaduct remember that both Gregiore and Nickles are part of why it took 8 years to come to some sort of an agreement. In fact I fully expect the Governor to find a way to really screw the city before the whole thing is over.

  • Chris Stefan

    Stacy, Stacey, Stacie,
    Gregiore isn’t exactly the most popular elected official right now in case you haven’t noticed. An endorsement could be a bit of a mixed blessing for Mallahan.

    Calling a special session to enact the 1% per year levy maximum wasn’t great for local governments and is one source of King County’s fiscal problems. Vetoing the MVET that was supposed to pay for King County’s portion of the tunnel deal and fill the hole in Metro’s budget wasn’t exactly friendly to the City either.

    In fact for anyone who is really hot for some sort of solution for the Alaska Way Viaduct remember that both Gregiore and Nickles are part of why it took 8 years to come to some sort of an agreement. In fact I fully expect the Governor to find a way to really screw the city before the whole thing is over.

  • Brian K

    @8 I didn’t know that pollution was measured in hours, Tayloe?

  • Brian K

    @8 I didn’t know that pollution was measured in hours, Tayloe?

  • Brian K

    @8 I didn’t know that pollution was measured in hours, Tayloe?

  • Brian K

    @8 I didn’t know that pollution was measured in hours, Tayloe?

  • Brian K

    @8 I didn’t know that pollution was measured in hours, Tayloe?

  • Brian K

    @8 I didn’t know that pollution was measured in hours, Tayloe?

  • Brian K

    @8 I didn’t know that pollution was measured in hours, Tayloe?

  • Brian K

    @8 I didn’t know that pollution was measured in hours, Tayloe?

  • Brian K

    @8 I didn’t know that pollution was measured in hours, Tayloe?

  • Brian K

    @8 I didn’t know that pollution was measured in hours, Tayloe?

  • Brian K

    @8 I didn’t know that pollution was measured in hours, Tayloe?

  • Brian K

    @8 I didn’t know that pollution was measured in hours, Tayloe?

  • Stop All of Your Sobbing

    @ 11 – How are you sure it isn’t Nyhus?

  • Stop All of Your Sobbing

    @ 11 – How are you sure it isn’t Nyhus?

  • Stop All of Your Sobbing

    @ 11 – How are you sure it isn’t Nyhus?

  • Stop All of Your Sobbing

    @ 11 – How are you sure it isn’t Nyhus?

  • Stop All of Your Sobbing

    @ 11 – How are you sure it isn’t Nyhus?

  • Stop All of Your Sobbing

    @ 11 – How are you sure it isn’t Nyhus?

  • Stop All of Your Sobbing

    @ 11 – How are you sure it isn’t Nyhus?

  • Stop All of Your Sobbing

    @ 11 – How are you sure it isn’t Nyhus?

  • Stop All of Your Sobbing

    @ 11 – How are you sure it isn’t Nyhus?

  • Stop All of Your Sobbing

    @ 11 – How are you sure it isn’t Nyhus?

  • Stop All of Your Sobbing

    @ 11 – How are you sure it isn’t Nyhus?

  • Stop All of Your Sobbing

    @ 11 – How are you sure it isn’t Nyhus?

  • jeff

    @8 yes the claim that Joe drives six blocks to work is false. But he has nobody but himself to blame for the rumor because he started it. I was there at the 43rd district dems meeting when he said it.

  • jeff

    @8 yes the claim that Joe drives six blocks to work is false. But he has nobody but himself to blame for the rumor because he started it. I was there at the 43rd district dems meeting when he said it.

  • jeff

    @8 yes the claim that Joe drives six blocks to work is false. But he has nobody but himself to blame for the rumor because he started it. I was there at the 43rd district dems meeting when he said it.

  • jeff

    @8 yes the claim that Joe drives six blocks to work is false. But he has nobody but himself to blame for the rumor because he started it. I was there at the 43rd district dems meeting when he said it.

  • jeff

    @8 yes the claim that Joe drives six blocks to work is false. But he has nobody but himself to blame for the rumor because he started it. I was there at the 43rd district dems meeting when he said it.

  • jeff

    @8 yes the claim that Joe drives six blocks to work is false. But he has nobody but himself to blame for the rumor because he started it. I was there at the 43rd district dems meeting when he said it.

  • jeff

    @8 yes the claim that Joe drives six blocks to work is false. But he has nobody but himself to blame for the rumor because he started it. I was there at the 43rd district dems meeting when he said it.

  • jeff

    @8 yes the claim that Joe drives six blocks to work is false. But he has nobody but himself to blame for the rumor because he started it. I was there at the 43rd district dems meeting when he said it.

  • jeff

    @8 yes the claim that Joe drives six blocks to work is false. But he has nobody but himself to blame for the rumor because he started it. I was there at the 43rd district dems meeting when he said it.

  • jeff

    @8 yes the claim that Joe drives six blocks to work is false. But he has nobody but himself to blame for the rumor because he started it. I was there at the 43rd district dems meeting when he said it.

  • jeff

    @8 yes the claim that Joe drives six blocks to work is false. But he has nobody but himself to blame for the rumor because he started it. I was there at the 43rd district dems meeting when he said it.

  • Giffy

    I’m still writing in Nickels.

  • Giffy

    I’m still writing in Nickels.

  • Giffy

    I’m still writing in Nickels.

  • Giffy

    I’m still writing in Nickels.

  • Giffy

    I’m still writing in Nickels.

  • Giffy

    I’m still writing in Nickels.

  • Giffy

    I’m still writing in Nickels.

  • Giffy

    I’m still writing in Nickels.

  • Giffy

    I’m still writing in Nickels.

  • Giffy

    I’m still writing in Nickels.

  • Giffy

    I’m still writing in Nickels.

  • jeff

    @8 yes the claim that Joe drives six blocks to work is false. But he has nobody but himself to blame for the rumor because he started it. I was there at the 43rd district dems meeting when he said it.

  • Giffy

    I’m still writing in Nickels.

  • Brian K

    @12 I dunno but whoever it is they don’t understand that building more vehicle infrastructure will lead to more vehicles. We need investments in transit and walkable neighborhoods to allow people to access it. The tunnel plan, putting cost overruns on the city, will not allow us to make that happen.

  • Brian K

    @12 I dunno but whoever it is they don’t understand that building more vehicle infrastructure will lead to more vehicles. We need investments in transit and walkable neighborhoods to allow people to access it. The tunnel plan, putting cost overruns on the city, will not allow us to make that happen.

  • Brian K

    @12 I dunno but whoever it is they don’t understand that building more vehicle infrastructure will lead to more vehicles. We need investments in transit and walkable neighborhoods to allow people to access it. The tunnel plan, putting cost overruns on the city, will not allow us to make that happen.

  • Brian K

    @12 I dunno but whoever it is they don’t understand that building more vehicle infrastructure will lead to more vehicles. We need investments in transit and walkable neighborhoods to allow people to access it. The tunnel plan, putting cost overruns on the city, will not allow us to make that happen.

  • Brian K

    @12 I dunno but whoever it is they don’t understand that building more vehicle infrastructure will lead to more vehicles. We need investments in transit and walkable neighborhoods to allow people to access it. The tunnel plan, putting cost overruns on the city, will not allow us to make that happen.

  • Brian K

    @12 I dunno but whoever it is they don’t understand that building more vehicle infrastructure will lead to more vehicles. We need investments in transit and walkable neighborhoods to allow people to access it. The tunnel plan, putting cost overruns on the city, will not allow us to make that happen.

  • Brian K

    @12 I dunno but whoever it is they don’t understand that building more vehicle infrastructure will lead to more vehicles. We need investments in transit and walkable neighborhoods to allow people to access it. The tunnel plan, putting cost overruns on the city, will not allow us to make that happen.

  • Brian K

    @12 I dunno but whoever it is they don’t understand that building more vehicle infrastructure will lead to more vehicles. We need investments in transit and walkable neighborhoods to allow people to access it. The tunnel plan, putting cost overruns on the city, will not allow us to make that happen.

  • Brian K

    @12 I dunno but whoever it is they don’t understand that building more vehicle infrastructure will lead to more vehicles. We need investments in transit and walkable neighborhoods to allow people to access it. The tunnel plan, putting cost overruns on the city, will not allow us to make that happen.

  • Brian K

    @12 I dunno but whoever it is they don’t understand that building more vehicle infrastructure will lead to more vehicles. We need investments in transit and walkable neighborhoods to allow people to access it. The tunnel plan, putting cost overruns on the city, will not allow us to make that happen.

  • Brian K

    @12 I dunno but whoever it is they don’t understand that building more vehicle infrastructure will lead to more vehicles. We need investments in transit and walkable neighborhoods to allow people to access it. The tunnel plan, putting cost overruns on the city, will not allow us to make that happen.

  • Brian K

    @12 I dunno but whoever it is they don’t understand that building more vehicle infrastructure will lead to more vehicles. We need investments in transit and walkable neighborhoods to allow people to access it. The tunnel plan, putting cost overruns on the city, will not allow us to make that happen.

  • Michael M.

    @11 – I use hours because it’s the easiest measurement. According to the anti-tunnel folks, each person will “only” have a 6 minute addition, each way, to their commute with the surface street plan. I have also read that the amount of cars that would still be in use would go down to about 75k per day (that normally use the viaduct). Add that to the 250k per day that use I-5, then by 6, then by 2, then divide by 60, and it comes out to 65k hours. Per day.

    It would be very difficult to measure it out into any type of pollution, because of all of the unknown factors (types of cars, how much they emit, how much brake dust and what type of brakes they use, how many have what type and how much of car fluid leaks, etc, etc). So, hours is the easiest way to calculate it. I’m sure if I had all of the necessary information, I could throw out all of weight figures, but, alas, I don’t.

  • Michael M.

    @11 – I use hours because it’s the easiest measurement. According to the anti-tunnel folks, each person will “only” have a 6 minute addition, each way, to their commute with the surface street plan. I have also read that the amount of cars that would still be in use would go down to about 75k per day (that normally use the viaduct). Add that to the 250k per day that use I-5, then by 6, then by 2, then divide by 60, and it comes out to 65k hours. Per day.

    It would be very difficult to measure it out into any type of pollution, because of all of the unknown factors (types of cars, how much they emit, how much brake dust and what type of brakes they use, how many have what type and how much of car fluid leaks, etc, etc). So, hours is the easiest way to calculate it. I’m sure if I had all of the necessary information, I could throw out all of weight figures, but, alas, I don’t.

  • Michael M.

    @11 – I use hours because it’s the easiest measurement. According to the anti-tunnel folks, each person will “only” have a 6 minute addition, each way, to their commute with the surface street plan. I have also read that the amount of cars that would still be in use would go down to about 75k per day (that normally use the viaduct). Add that to the 250k per day that use I-5, then by 6, then by 2, then divide by 60, and it comes out to 65k hours. Per day.

    It would be very difficult to measure it out into any type of pollution, because of all of the unknown factors (types of cars, how much they emit, how much brake dust and what type of brakes they use, how many have what type and how much of car fluid leaks, etc, etc). So, hours is the easiest way to calculate it. I’m sure if I had all of the necessary information, I could throw out all of weight figures, but, alas, I don’t.

  • Michael M.

    @11 – I use hours because it’s the easiest measurement. According to the anti-tunnel folks, each person will “only” have a 6 minute addition, each way, to their commute with the surface street plan. I have also read that the amount of cars that would still be in use would go down to about 75k per day (that normally use the viaduct). Add that to the 250k per day that use I-5, then by 6, then by 2, then divide by 60, and it comes out to 65k hours. Per day.

    It would be very difficult to measure it out into any type of pollution, because of all of the unknown factors (types of cars, how much they emit, how much brake dust and what type of brakes they use, how many have what type and how much of car fluid leaks, etc, etc). So, hours is the easiest way to calculate it. I’m sure if I had all of the necessary information, I could throw out all of weight figures, but, alas, I don’t.

  • Michael M.

    @11 – I use hours because it’s the easiest measurement. According to the anti-tunnel folks, each person will “only” have a 6 minute addition, each way, to their commute with the surface street plan. I have also read that the amount of cars that would still be in use would go down to about 75k per day (that normally use the viaduct). Add that to the 250k per day that use I-5, then by 6, then by 2, then divide by 60, and it comes out to 65k hours. Per day.

    It would be very difficult to measure it out into any type of pollution, because of all of the unknown factors (types of cars, how much they emit, how much brake dust and what type of brakes they use, how many have what type and how much of car fluid leaks, etc, etc). So, hours is the easiest way to calculate it. I’m sure if I had all of the necessary information, I could throw out all of weight figures, but, alas, I don’t.

  • Michael M.

    @11 – I use hours because it’s the easiest measurement. According to the anti-tunnel folks, each person will “only” have a 6 minute addition, each way, to their commute with the surface street plan. I have also read that the amount of cars that would still be in use would go down to about 75k per day (that normally use the viaduct). Add that to the 250k per day that use I-5, then by 6, then by 2, then divide by 60, and it comes out to 65k hours. Per day.

    It would be very difficult to measure it out into any type of pollution, because of all of the unknown factors (types of cars, how much they emit, how much brake dust and what type of brakes they use, how many have what type and how much of car fluid leaks, etc, etc). So, hours is the easiest way to calculate it. I’m sure if I had all of the necessary information, I could throw out all of weight figures, but, alas, I don’t.

  • Michael M.

    @11 – I use hours because it’s the easiest measurement. According to the anti-tunnel folks, each person will “only” have a 6 minute addition, each way, to their commute with the surface street plan. I have also read that the amount of cars that would still be in use would go down to about 75k per day (that normally use the viaduct). Add that to the 250k per day that use I-5, then by 6, then by 2, then divide by 60, and it comes out to 65k hours. Per day.

    It would be very difficult to measure it out into any type of pollution, because of all of the unknown factors (types of cars, how much they emit, how much brake dust and what type of brakes they use, how many have what type and how much of car fluid leaks, etc, etc). So, hours is the easiest way to calculate it. I’m sure if I had all of the necessary information, I could throw out all of weight figures, but, alas, I don’t.

  • Michael M.

    @11 – I use hours because it’s the easiest measurement. According to the anti-tunnel folks, each person will “only” have a 6 minute addition, each way, to their commute with the surface street plan. I have also read that the amount of cars that would still be in use would go down to about 75k per day (that normally use the viaduct). Add that to the 250k per day that use I-5, then by 6, then by 2, then divide by 60, and it comes out to 65k hours. Per day.

    It would be very difficult to measure it out into any type of pollution, because of all of the unknown factors (types of cars, how much they emit, how much brake dust and what type of brakes they use, how many have what type and how much of car fluid leaks, etc, etc). So, hours is the easiest way to calculate it. I’m sure if I had all of the necessary information, I could throw out all of weight figures, but, alas, I don’t.

  • Michael M.

    @11 – I use hours because it’s the easiest measurement. According to the anti-tunnel folks, each person will “only” have a 6 minute addition, each way, to their commute with the surface street plan. I have also read that the amount of cars that would still be in use would go down to about 75k per day (that normally use the viaduct). Add that to the 250k per day that use I-5, then by 6, then by 2, then divide by 60, and it comes out to 65k hours. Per day.

    It would be very difficult to measure it out into any type of pollution, because of all of the unknown factors (types of cars, how much they emit, how much brake dust and what type of brakes they use, how many have what type and how much of car fluid leaks, etc, etc). So, hours is the easiest way to calculate it. I’m sure if I had all of the necessary information, I could throw out all of weight figures, but, alas, I don’t.

  • Michael M.

    @11 – I use hours because it’s the easiest measurement. According to the anti-tunnel folks, each person will “only” have a 6 minute addition, each way, to their commute with the surface street plan. I have also read that the amount of cars that would still be in use would go down to about 75k per day (that normally use the viaduct). Add that to the 250k per day that use I-5, then by 6, then by 2, then divide by 60, and it comes out to 65k hours. Per day.

    It would be very difficult to measure it out into any type of pollution, because of all of the unknown factors (types of cars, how much they emit, how much brake dust and what type of brakes they use, how many have what type and how much of car fluid leaks, etc, etc). So, hours is the easiest way to calculate it. I’m sure if I had all of the necessary information, I could throw out all of weight figures, but, alas, I don’t.

  • Michael M.

    @11 – I use hours because it’s the easiest measurement. According to the anti-tunnel folks, each person will “only” have a 6 minute addition, each way, to their commute with the surface street plan. I have also read that the amount of cars that would still be in use would go down to about 75k per day (that normally use the viaduct). Add that to the 250k per day that use I-5, then by 6, then by 2, then divide by 60, and it comes out to 65k hours. Per day.

    It would be very difficult to measure it out into any type of pollution, because of all of the unknown factors (types of cars, how much they emit, how much brake dust and what type of brakes they use, how many have what type and how much of car fluid leaks, etc, etc). So, hours is the easiest way to calculate it. I’m sure if I had all of the necessary information, I could throw out all of weight figures, but, alas, I don’t.

  • Michael M.

    @11 – I use hours because it’s the easiest measurement. According to the anti-tunnel folks, each person will “only” have a 6 minute addition, each way, to their commute with the surface street plan. I have also read that the amount of cars that would still be in use would go down to about 75k per day (that normally use the viaduct). Add that to the 250k per day that use I-5, then by 6, then by 2, then divide by 60, and it comes out to 65k hours. Per day.

    It would be very difficult to measure it out into any type of pollution, because of all of the unknown factors (types of cars, how much they emit, how much brake dust and what type of brakes they use, how many have what type and how much of car fluid leaks, etc, etc). So, hours is the easiest way to calculate it. I’m sure if I had all of the necessary information, I could throw out all of weight figures, but, alas, I don’t.

  • Michael M.

    Oh, and @15 -

    the tunnel plan doesn’t increase vehicle infrastructure, just maintains (and actually decreases a bit) what is already there. Plus it includes the surface street plan.

    Can’t pay for all that walking/bicycling stuff without commerce rolling through, and can’t do the walking/bicycling with all sorts of extra exhaust. People drive. It’s a fact. Getting them to stop isn’t going to happen. Instead, they’ll move, and the owners of businesses will follow, and the tax base will get smaller and smaller.

  • Michael M.

    Oh, and @15 -

    the tunnel plan doesn’t increase vehicle infrastructure, just maintains (and actually decreases a bit) what is already there. Plus it includes the surface street plan.

    Can’t pay for all that walking/bicycling stuff without commerce rolling through, and can’t do the walking/bicycling with all sorts of extra exhaust. People drive. It’s a fact. Getting them to stop isn’t going to happen. Instead, they’ll move, and the owners of businesses will follow, and the tax base will get smaller and smaller.

  • Michael M.

    Oh, and @15 -

    the tunnel plan doesn’t increase vehicle infrastructure, just maintains (and actually decreases a bit) what is already there. Plus it includes the surface street plan.

    Can’t pay for all that walking/bicycling stuff without commerce rolling through, and can’t do the walking/bicycling with all sorts of extra exhaust. People drive. It’s a fact. Getting them to stop isn’t going to happen. Instead, they’ll move, and the owners of businesses will follow, and the tax base will get smaller and smaller.

  • Michael M.

    Oh, and @15 -

    the tunnel plan doesn’t increase vehicle infrastructure, just maintains (and actually decreases a bit) what is already there. Plus it includes the surface street plan.

    Can’t pay for all that walking/bicycling stuff without commerce rolling through, and can’t do the walking/bicycling with all sorts of extra exhaust. People drive. It’s a fact. Getting them to stop isn’t going to happen. Instead, they’ll move, and the owners of businesses will follow, and the tax base will get smaller and smaller.

  • Michael M.

    Oh, and @15 -

    the tunnel plan doesn’t increase vehicle infrastructure, just maintains (and actually decreases a bit) what is already there. Plus it includes the surface street plan.

    Can’t pay for all that walking/bicycling stuff without commerce rolling through, and can’t do the walking/bicycling with all sorts of extra exhaust. People drive. It’s a fact. Getting them to stop isn’t going to happen. Instead, they’ll move, and the owners of businesses will follow, and the tax base will get smaller and smaller.

  • Michael M.

    Oh, and @15 -

    the tunnel plan doesn’t increase vehicle infrastructure, just maintains (and actually decreases a bit) what is already there. Plus it includes the surface street plan.

    Can’t pay for all that walking/bicycling stuff without commerce rolling through, and can’t do the walking/bicycling with all sorts of extra exhaust. People drive. It’s a fact. Getting them to stop isn’t going to happen. Instead, they’ll move, and the owners of businesses will follow, and the tax base will get smaller and smaller.

  • Michael M.

    Oh, and @15 -

    the tunnel plan doesn’t increase vehicle infrastructure, just maintains (and actually decreases a bit) what is already there. Plus it includes the surface street plan.

    Can’t pay for all that walking/bicycling stuff without commerce rolling through, and can’t do the walking/bicycling with all sorts of extra exhaust. People drive. It’s a fact. Getting them to stop isn’t going to happen. Instead, they’ll move, and the owners of businesses will follow, and the tax base will get smaller and smaller.

  • Michael M.

    Oh, and @15 -

    the tunnel plan doesn’t increase vehicle infrastructure, just maintains (and actually decreases a bit) what is already there. Plus it includes the surface street plan.

    Can’t pay for all that walking/bicycling stuff without commerce rolling through, and can’t do the walking/bicycling with all sorts of extra exhaust. People drive. It’s a fact. Getting them to stop isn’t going to happen. Instead, they’ll move, and the owners of businesses will follow, and the tax base will get smaller and smaller.

  • Michael M.

    Oh, and @15 -

    the tunnel plan doesn’t increase vehicle infrastructure, just maintains (and actually decreases a bit) what is already there. Plus it includes the surface street plan.

    Can’t pay for all that walking/bicycling stuff without commerce rolling through, and can’t do the walking/bicycling with all sorts of extra exhaust. People drive. It’s a fact. Getting them to stop isn’t going to happen. Instead, they’ll move, and the owners of businesses will follow, and the tax base will get smaller and smaller.

  • Michael M.

    Oh, and @15 -

    the tunnel plan doesn’t increase vehicle infrastructure, just maintains (and actually decreases a bit) what is already there. Plus it includes the surface street plan.

    Can’t pay for all that walking/bicycling stuff without commerce rolling through, and can’t do the walking/bicycling with all sorts of extra exhaust. People drive. It’s a fact. Getting them to stop isn’t going to happen. Instead, they’ll move, and the owners of businesses will follow, and the tax base will get smaller and smaller.

  • Michael M.

    Oh, and @15 -

    the tunnel plan doesn’t increase vehicle infrastructure, just maintains (and actually decreases a bit) what is already there. Plus it includes the surface street plan.

    Can’t pay for all that walking/bicycling stuff without commerce rolling through, and can’t do the walking/bicycling with all sorts of extra exhaust. People drive. It’s a fact. Getting them to stop isn’t going to happen. Instead, they’ll move, and the owners of businesses will follow, and the tax base will get smaller and smaller.

  • Michael M.

    Oh, and @15 -

    the tunnel plan doesn’t increase vehicle infrastructure, just maintains (and actually decreases a bit) what is already there. Plus it includes the surface street plan.

    Can’t pay for all that walking/bicycling stuff without commerce rolling through, and can’t do the walking/bicycling with all sorts of extra exhaust. People drive. It’s a fact. Getting them to stop isn’t going to happen. Instead, they’ll move, and the owners of businesses will follow, and the tax base will get smaller and smaller.

  • dacoach

    i love how anybody wanting to build more roads is a heretic.

    the fact is we need transit, we need density, AND we need roads. shit, surface street option isn’t going to stop building roads; rather, it’ll build more.

  • dacoach

    i love how anybody wanting to build more roads is a heretic.

    the fact is we need transit, we need density, AND we need roads. shit, surface street option isn’t going to stop building roads; rather, it’ll build more.

  • dacoach

    i love how anybody wanting to build more roads is a heretic.

    the fact is we need transit, we need density, AND we need roads. shit, surface street option isn’t going to stop building roads; rather, it’ll build more.

  • dacoach

    i love how anybody wanting to build more roads is a heretic.

    the fact is we need transit, we need density, AND we need roads. shit, surface street option isn’t going to stop building roads; rather, it’ll build more.

  • dacoach

    i love how anybody wanting to build more roads is a heretic.

    the fact is we need transit, we need density, AND we need roads. shit, surface street option isn’t going to stop building roads; rather, it’ll build more.

  • dacoach

    i love how anybody wanting to build more roads is a heretic.

    the fact is we need transit, we need density, AND we need roads. shit, surface street option isn’t going to stop building roads; rather, it’ll build more.

  • dacoach

    i love how anybody wanting to build more roads is a heretic.

    the fact is we need transit, we need density, AND we need roads. shit, surface street option isn’t going to stop building roads; rather, it’ll build more.

  • dacoach

    i love how anybody wanting to build more roads is a heretic.

    the fact is we need transit, we need density, AND we need roads. shit, surface street option isn’t going to stop building roads; rather, it’ll build more.

  • dacoach

    i love how anybody wanting to build more roads is a heretic.

    the fact is we need transit, we need density, AND we need roads. shit, surface street option isn’t going to stop building roads; rather, it’ll build more.

  • dacoach

    i love how anybody wanting to build more roads is a heretic.

    the fact is we need transit, we need density, AND we need roads. shit, surface street option isn’t going to stop building roads; rather, it’ll build more.

  • dacoach

    i love how anybody wanting to build more roads is a heretic.

    the fact is we need transit, we need density, AND we need roads. shit, surface street option isn’t going to stop building roads; rather, it’ll build more.

  • dacoach

    i love how anybody wanting to build more roads is a heretic.

    the fact is we need transit, we need density, AND we need roads. shit, surface street option isn’t going to stop building roads; rather, it’ll build more.

  • Gregoire to Seattle

    you WILL be responsible for all cost overruns.

    for a state project. and a tunnel.

    bwahahahahah!

  • Gregoire to Seattle

    you WILL be responsible for all cost overruns.

    for a state project. and a tunnel.

    bwahahahahah!

  • Gregoire to Seattle

    you WILL be responsible for all cost overruns.

    for a state project. and a tunnel.

    bwahahahahah!

  • Gregoire to Seattle

    you WILL be responsible for all cost overruns.

    for a state project. and a tunnel.

    bwahahahahah!

  • Gregoire to Seattle

    you WILL be responsible for all cost overruns.

    for a state project. and a tunnel.

    bwahahahahah!

  • Gregoire to Seattle

    you WILL be responsible for all cost overruns.

    for a state project. and a tunnel.

    bwahahahahah!

  • Gregoire to Seattle

    you WILL be responsible for all cost overruns.

    for a state project. and a tunnel.

    bwahahahahah!

  • Gregoire to Seattle

    you WILL be responsible for all cost overruns.

    for a state project. and a tunnel.

    bwahahahahah!

  • Gregoire to Seattle

    you WILL be responsible for all cost overruns.

    for a state project. and a tunnel.

    bwahahahahah!

  • Gregoire to Seattle

    you WILL be responsible for all cost overruns.

    for a state project. and a tunnel.

    bwahahahahah!

  • Gregoire to Seattle

    you WILL be responsible for all cost overruns.

    for a state project. and a tunnel.

    bwahahahahah!

  • Gregoire to Seattle

    you WILL be responsible for all cost overruns.

    for a state project. and a tunnel.

    bwahahahahah!

  • ap

    does the governor generally endorse candidates for mayor, when neither is an incumbent? for instance, has she endorsed someone for tacoma yet? or vancouver where there is an incumbent? or i guess, where both candidates are democrats, that’s the real issue.

    and sure, vancouver and tacoma are no seattle. but vancouver has a huge mega project as well – the columbia crossing bridge. and its a wedge issue between those two candidates… so has the governor picked a fave there?

  • ap

    does the governor generally endorse candidates for mayor, when neither is an incumbent? for instance, has she endorsed someone for tacoma yet? or vancouver where there is an incumbent? or i guess, where both candidates are democrats, that’s the real issue.

    and sure, vancouver and tacoma are no seattle. but vancouver has a huge mega project as well – the columbia crossing bridge. and its a wedge issue between those two candidates… so has the governor picked a fave there?

  • ap

    does the governor generally endorse candidates for mayor, when neither is an incumbent? for instance, has she endorsed someone for tacoma yet? or vancouver where there is an incumbent? or i guess, where both candidates are democrats, that’s the real issue.

    and sure, vancouver and tacoma are no seattle. but vancouver has a huge mega project as well – the columbia crossing bridge. and its a wedge issue between those two candidates… so has the governor picked a fave there?

  • ap

    does the governor generally endorse candidates for mayor, when neither is an incumbent? for instance, has she endorsed someone for tacoma yet? or vancouver where there is an incumbent? or i guess, where both candidates are democrats, that’s the real issue.

    and sure, vancouver and tacoma are no seattle. but vancouver has a huge mega project as well – the columbia crossing bridge. and its a wedge issue between those two candidates… so has the governor picked a fave there?

  • ap

    does the governor generally endorse candidates for mayor, when neither is an incumbent? for instance, has she endorsed someone for tacoma yet? or vancouver where there is an incumbent? or i guess, where both candidates are democrats, that’s the real issue.

    and sure, vancouver and tacoma are no seattle. but vancouver has a huge mega project as well – the columbia crossing bridge. and its a wedge issue between those two candidates… so has the governor picked a fave there?

  • ap

    does the governor generally endorse candidates for mayor, when neither is an incumbent? for instance, has she endorsed someone for tacoma yet? or vancouver where there is an incumbent? or i guess, where both candidates are democrats, that’s the real issue.

    and sure, vancouver and tacoma are no seattle. but vancouver has a huge mega project as well – the columbia crossing bridge. and its a wedge issue between those two candidates… so has the governor picked a fave there?

  • ap

    does the governor generally endorse candidates for mayor, when neither is an incumbent? for instance, has she endorsed someone for tacoma yet? or vancouver where there is an incumbent? or i guess, where both candidates are democrats, that’s the real issue.

    and sure, vancouver and tacoma are no seattle. but vancouver has a huge mega project as well – the columbia crossing bridge. and its a wedge issue between those two candidates… so has the governor picked a fave there?

  • ap

    does the governor generally endorse candidates for mayor, when neither is an incumbent? for instance, has she endorsed someone for tacoma yet? or vancouver where there is an incumbent? or i guess, where both candidates are democrats, that’s the real issue.

    and sure, vancouver and tacoma are no seattle. but vancouver has a huge mega project as well – the columbia crossing bridge. and its a wedge issue between those two candidates… so has the governor picked a fave there?

  • ap

    does the governor generally endorse candidates for mayor, when neither is an incumbent? for instance, has she endorsed someone for tacoma yet? or vancouver where there is an incumbent? or i guess, where both candidates are democrats, that’s the real issue.

    and sure, vancouver and tacoma are no seattle. but vancouver has a huge mega project as well – the columbia crossing bridge. and its a wedge issue between those two candidates… so has the governor picked a fave there?

  • ap

    does the governor generally endorse candidates for mayor, when neither is an incumbent? for instance, has she endorsed someone for tacoma yet? or vancouver where there is an incumbent? or i guess, where both candidates are democrats, that’s the real issue.

    and sure, vancouver and tacoma are no seattle. but vancouver has a huge mega project as well – the columbia crossing bridge. and its a wedge issue between those two candidates… so has the governor picked a fave there?

  • ap

    does the governor generally endorse candidates for mayor, when neither is an incumbent? for instance, has she endorsed someone for tacoma yet? or vancouver where there is an incumbent? or i guess, where both candidates are democrats, that’s the real issue.

    and sure, vancouver and tacoma are no seattle. but vancouver has a huge mega project as well – the columbia crossing bridge. and its a wedge issue between those two candidates… so has the governor picked a fave there?

  • ap

    does the governor generally endorse candidates for mayor, when neither is an incumbent? for instance, has she endorsed someone for tacoma yet? or vancouver where there is an incumbent? or i guess, where both candidates are democrats, that’s the real issue.

    and sure, vancouver and tacoma are no seattle. but vancouver has a huge mega project as well – the columbia crossing bridge. and its a wedge issue between those two candidates… so has the governor picked a fave there?

  • Hobgoblin

    There’s an odd symmetry between Gregoire’s endorsement of Mallahan.

    She can’t vote in his election, he couldn’t be bothered to vote in two of her elections.

  • Hobgoblin

    There’s an odd symmetry between Gregoire’s endorsement of Mallahan.

    She can’t vote in his election, he couldn’t be bothered to vote in two of her elections.

  • Hobgoblin

    There’s an odd symmetry between Gregoire’s endorsement of Mallahan.

    She can’t vote in his election, he couldn’t be bothered to vote in two of her elections.

  • Hobgoblin

    There’s an odd symmetry between Gregoire’s endorsement of Mallahan.

    She can’t vote in his election, he couldn’t be bothered to vote in two of her elections.

  • Hobgoblin

    There’s an odd symmetry between Gregoire’s endorsement of Mallahan.

    She can’t vote in his election, he couldn’t be bothered to vote in two of her elections.

  • Hobgoblin

    There’s an odd symmetry between Gregoire’s endorsement of Mallahan.

    She can’t vote in his election, he couldn’t be bothered to vote in two of her elections.

  • Hobgoblin

    There’s an odd symmetry between Gregoire’s endorsement of Mallahan.

    She can’t vote in his election, he couldn’t be bothered to vote in two of her elections.

  • Hobgoblin

    There’s an odd symmetry between Gregoire’s endorsement of Mallahan.

    She can’t vote in his election, he couldn’t be bothered to vote in two of her elections.

  • Hobgoblin

    There’s an odd symmetry between Gregoire’s endorsement of Mallahan.

    She can’t vote in his election, he couldn’t be bothered to vote in two of her elections.

  • Hobgoblin

    There’s an odd symmetry between Gregoire’s endorsement of Mallahan.

    She can’t vote in his election, he couldn’t be bothered to vote in two of her elections.

  • Hobgoblin

    There’s an odd symmetry between Gregoire’s endorsement of Mallahan.

    She can’t vote in his election, he couldn’t be bothered to vote in two of her elections.

  • Hobgoblin

    There’s an odd symmetry between Gregoire’s endorsement of Mallahan.

    She can’t vote in his election, he couldn’t be bothered to vote in two of her elections.

  • Stop All of Your Sobbing

    @ 21 – FTW

  • Stop All of Your Sobbing

    @ 21 – FTW

  • Stop All of Your Sobbing

    @ 21 – FTW

  • Stop All of Your Sobbing

    @ 21 – FTW

  • Stop All of Your Sobbing

    @ 21 – FTW

  • Stop All of Your Sobbing

    @ 21 – FTW

  • Stop All of Your Sobbing

    @ 21 – FTW

  • Stop All of Your Sobbing

    @ 21 – FTW

  • Stop All of Your Sobbing

    @ 21 – FTW

  • Stop All of Your Sobbing

    @ 21 – FTW

  • Stop All of Your Sobbing

    @ 21 – FTW

  • Andrew Smith

    The worst governor in the history of the world endorses MAllahan?

    Definitely voting for the other guy.

  • Andrew Smith

    The worst governor in the history of the world endorses MAllahan?

    Definitely voting for the other guy.

  • Andrew Smith

    The worst governor in the history of the world endorses MAllahan?

    Definitely voting for the other guy.

  • Andrew Smith

    The worst governor in the history of the world endorses MAllahan?

    Definitely voting for the other guy.

  • Andrew Smith

    The worst governor in the history of the world endorses MAllahan?

    Definitely voting for the other guy.

  • Andrew Smith

    The worst governor in the history of the world endorses MAllahan?

    Definitely voting for the other guy.

  • Andrew Smith

    The worst governor in the history of the world endorses MAllahan?

    Definitely voting for the other guy.

  • Andrew Smith

    The worst governor in the history of the world endorses MAllahan?

    Definitely voting for the other guy.

  • Andrew Smith

    The worst governor in the history of the world endorses MAllahan?

    Definitely voting for the other guy.

  • Andrew Smith

    The worst governor in the history of the world endorses MAllahan?

    Definitely voting for the other guy.

  • Andrew Smith

    The worst governor in the history of the world endorses MAllahan?

    Definitely voting for the other guy.

  • Stop All of Your Sobbing

    @ 21 – FTW

  • Andrew Smith

    The worst governor in the history of the world endorses MAllahan?

    Definitely voting for the other guy.

  • Brian K

    “Instead, they’ll move, and the owners of businesses will follow, and the tax base will get smaller and smaller.”

    Better have a big tax base so you can find some way to pay for the tunnel.

  • Brian K

    “Instead, they’ll move, and the owners of businesses will follow, and the tax base will get smaller and smaller.”

    Better have a big tax base so you can find some way to pay for the tunnel.

  • Brian K

    “Instead, they’ll move, and the owners of businesses will follow, and the tax base will get smaller and smaller.”

    Better have a big tax base so you can find some way to pay for the tunnel.

  • Brian K

    “Instead, they’ll move, and the owners of businesses will follow, and the tax base will get smaller and smaller.”

    Better have a big tax base so you can find some way to pay for the tunnel.

  • Brian K

    “Instead, they’ll move, and the owners of businesses will follow, and the tax base will get smaller and smaller.”

    Better have a big tax base so you can find some way to pay for the tunnel.

  • Brian K

    “Instead, they’ll move, and the owners of businesses will follow, and the tax base will get smaller and smaller.”

    Better have a big tax base so you can find some way to pay for the tunnel.

  • Brian K

    “Instead, they’ll move, and the owners of businesses will follow, and the tax base will get smaller and smaller.”

    Better have a big tax base so you can find some way to pay for the tunnel.

  • Brian K

    “Instead, they’ll move, and the owners of businesses will follow, and the tax base will get smaller and smaller.”

    Better have a big tax base so you can find some way to pay for the tunnel.

  • Brian K

    “Instead, they’ll move, and the owners of businesses will follow, and the tax base will get smaller and smaller.”

    Better have a big tax base so you can find some way to pay for the tunnel.

  • Brian K

    “Instead, they’ll move, and the owners of businesses will follow, and the tax base will get smaller and smaller.”

    Better have a big tax base so you can find some way to pay for the tunnel.

  • Brian K

    “Instead, they’ll move, and the owners of businesses will follow, and the tax base will get smaller and smaller.”

    Better have a big tax base so you can find some way to pay for the tunnel.

  • Brian K

    “Instead, they’ll move, and the owners of businesses will follow, and the tax base will get smaller and smaller.”

    Better have a big tax base so you can find some way to pay for the tunnel.

  • seabos84

    whew! this helps seal the deal for McGinn for me.

    first – I can’t stand McGinn’s tunnel crap. I have a magnetic refrig thingy that is a FREE ticket for a monorail ride – Opening Day, Dec. 15, 2007. I am FED up with the dithering fools of this wandering backwards state. the viaduct is coming down – it might be in 25 minutes or 25 years, but, it will fall apart and who is gonna get killed cuz thumb twiddlers needed ANOTHER goddam study? I no longer care what they replace the f’king with – donkey carts or quadruple stacked 6 lanes – just get it done.

    HOWEVER, Governor Afraid-Of-RayGun-EyeMan,

    During a GREAT RECESSION caused by the RayGun-Eyeman thieving pigs,

    is now endorsing Corporate Khaki Joe!

    Wooo-hooo.

    While McGinn frosts me on that stupid tunnel-unviable-duct, at least he doesn’t support a whole bunch of loser policies supported by the pathetics posing as opponents of the right wing.

    rmm.

  • seabos84

    whew! this helps seal the deal for McGinn for me.

    first – I can’t stand McGinn’s tunnel crap. I have a magnetic refrig thingy that is a FREE ticket for a monorail ride – Opening Day, Dec. 15, 2007. I am FED up with the dithering fools of this wandering backwards state. the viaduct is coming down – it might be in 25 minutes or 25 years, but, it will fall apart and who is gonna get killed cuz thumb twiddlers needed ANOTHER goddam study? I no longer care what they replace the f’king with – donkey carts or quadruple stacked 6 lanes – just get it done.

    HOWEVER, Governor Afraid-Of-RayGun-EyeMan,

    During a GREAT RECESSION caused by the RayGun-Eyeman thieving pigs,

    is now endorsing Corporate Khaki Joe!

    Wooo-hooo.

    While McGinn frosts me on that stupid tunnel-unviable-duct, at least he doesn’t support a whole bunch of loser policies supported by the pathetics posing as opponents of the right wing.

    rmm.

  • seabos84

    whew! this helps seal the deal for McGinn for me.

    first – I can’t stand McGinn’s tunnel crap. I have a magnetic refrig thingy that is a FREE ticket for a monorail ride – Opening Day, Dec. 15, 2007. I am FED up with the dithering fools of this wandering backwards state. the viaduct is coming down – it might be in 25 minutes or 25 years, but, it will fall apart and who is gonna get killed cuz thumb twiddlers needed ANOTHER goddam study? I no longer care what they replace the f’king with – donkey carts or quadruple stacked 6 lanes – just get it done.

    HOWEVER, Governor Afraid-Of-RayGun-EyeMan,

    During a GREAT RECESSION caused by the RayGun-Eyeman thieving pigs,

    is now endorsing Corporate Khaki Joe!

    Wooo-hooo.

    While McGinn frosts me on that stupid tunnel-unviable-duct, at least he doesn’t support a whole bunch of loser policies supported by the pathetics posing as opponents of the right wing.

    rmm.

  • seabos84

    whew! this helps seal the deal for McGinn for me.

    first – I can’t stand McGinn’s tunnel crap. I have a magnetic refrig thingy that is a FREE ticket for a monorail ride – Opening Day, Dec. 15, 2007. I am FED up with the dithering fools of this wandering backwards state. the viaduct is coming down – it might be in 25 minutes or 25 years, but, it will fall apart and who is gonna get killed cuz thumb twiddlers needed ANOTHER goddam study? I no longer care what they replace the f’king with – donkey carts or quadruple stacked 6 lanes – just get it done.

    HOWEVER, Governor Afraid-Of-RayGun-EyeMan,

    During a GREAT RECESSION caused by the RayGun-Eyeman thieving pigs,

    is now endorsing Corporate Khaki Joe!

    Wooo-hooo.

    While McGinn frosts me on that stupid tunnel-unviable-duct, at least he doesn’t support a whole bunch of loser policies supported by the pathetics posing as opponents of the right wing.

    rmm.

  • seabos84

    whew! this helps seal the deal for McGinn for me.

    first – I can’t stand McGinn’s tunnel crap. I have a magnetic refrig thingy that is a FREE ticket for a monorail ride – Opening Day, Dec. 15, 2007. I am FED up with the dithering fools of this wandering backwards state. the viaduct is coming down – it might be in 25 minutes or 25 years, but, it will fall apart and who is gonna get killed cuz thumb twiddlers needed ANOTHER goddam study? I no longer care what they replace the f’king with – donkey carts or quadruple stacked 6 lanes – just get it done.

    HOWEVER, Governor Afraid-Of-RayGun-EyeMan,

    During a GREAT RECESSION caused by the RayGun-Eyeman thieving pigs,

    is now endorsing Corporate Khaki Joe!

    Wooo-hooo.

    While McGinn frosts me on that stupid tunnel-unviable-duct, at least he doesn’t support a whole bunch of loser policies supported by the pathetics posing as opponents of the right wing.

    rmm.

  • seabos84

    whew! this helps seal the deal for McGinn for me.

    first – I can’t stand McGinn’s tunnel crap. I have a magnetic refrig thingy that is a FREE ticket for a monorail ride – Opening Day, Dec. 15, 2007. I am FED up with the dithering fools of this wandering backwards state. the viaduct is coming down – it might be in 25 minutes or 25 years, but, it will fall apart and who is gonna get killed cuz thumb twiddlers needed ANOTHER goddam study? I no longer care what they replace the f’king with – donkey carts or quadruple stacked 6 lanes – just get it done.

    HOWEVER, Governor Afraid-Of-RayGun-EyeMan,

    During a GREAT RECESSION caused by the RayGun-Eyeman thieving pigs,

    is now endorsing Corporate Khaki Joe!

    Wooo-hooo.

    While McGinn frosts me on that stupid tunnel-unviable-duct, at least he doesn’t support a whole bunch of loser policies supported by the pathetics posing as opponents of the right wing.

    rmm.

  • seabos84

    whew! this helps seal the deal for McGinn for me.

    first – I can’t stand McGinn’s tunnel crap. I have a magnetic refrig thingy that is a FREE ticket for a monorail ride – Opening Day, Dec. 15, 2007. I am FED up with the dithering fools of this wandering backwards state. the viaduct is coming down – it might be in 25 minutes or 25 years, but, it will fall apart and who is gonna get killed cuz thumb twiddlers needed ANOTHER goddam study? I no longer care what they replace the f’king with – donkey carts or quadruple stacked 6 lanes – just get it done.

    HOWEVER, Governor Afraid-Of-RayGun-EyeMan,

    During a GREAT RECESSION caused by the RayGun-Eyeman thieving pigs,

    is now endorsing Corporate Khaki Joe!

    Wooo-hooo.

    While McGinn frosts me on that stupid tunnel-unviable-duct, at least he doesn’t support a whole bunch of loser policies supported by the pathetics posing as opponents of the right wing.

    rmm.

  • seabos84

    whew! this helps seal the deal for McGinn for me.

    first – I can’t stand McGinn’s tunnel crap. I have a magnetic refrig thingy that is a FREE ticket for a monorail ride – Opening Day, Dec. 15, 2007. I am FED up with the dithering fools of this wandering backwards state. the viaduct is coming down – it might be in 25 minutes or 25 years, but, it will fall apart and who is gonna get killed cuz thumb twiddlers needed ANOTHER goddam study? I no longer care what they replace the f’king with – donkey carts or quadruple stacked 6 lanes – just get it done.

    HOWEVER, Governor Afraid-Of-RayGun-EyeMan,

    During a GREAT RECESSION caused by the RayGun-Eyeman thieving pigs,

    is now endorsing Corporate Khaki Joe!

    Wooo-hooo.

    While McGinn frosts me on that stupid tunnel-unviable-duct, at least he doesn’t support a whole bunch of loser policies supported by the pathetics posing as opponents of the right wing.

    rmm.

  • seabos84

    whew! this helps seal the deal for McGinn for me.

    first – I can’t stand McGinn’s tunnel crap. I have a magnetic refrig thingy that is a FREE ticket for a monorail ride – Opening Day, Dec. 15, 2007. I am FED up with the dithering fools of this wandering backwards state. the viaduct is coming down – it might be in 25 minutes or 25 years, but, it will fall apart and who is gonna get killed cuz thumb twiddlers needed ANOTHER goddam study? I no longer care what they replace the f’king with – donkey carts or quadruple stacked 6 lanes – just get it done.

    HOWEVER, Governor Afraid-Of-RayGun-EyeMan,

    During a GREAT RECESSION caused by the RayGun-Eyeman thieving pigs,

    is now endorsing Corporate Khaki Joe!

    Wooo-hooo.

    While McGinn frosts me on that stupid tunnel-unviable-duct, at least he doesn’t support a whole bunch of loser policies supported by the pathetics posing as opponents of the right wing.

    rmm.

  • seabos84

    whew! this helps seal the deal for McGinn for me.

    first – I can’t stand McGinn’s tunnel crap. I have a magnetic refrig thingy that is a FREE ticket for a monorail ride – Opening Day, Dec. 15, 2007. I am FED up with the dithering fools of this wandering backwards state. the viaduct is coming down – it might be in 25 minutes or 25 years, but, it will fall apart and who is gonna get killed cuz thumb twiddlers needed ANOTHER goddam study? I no longer care what they replace the f’king with – donkey carts or quadruple stacked 6 lanes – just get it done.

    HOWEVER, Governor Afraid-Of-RayGun-EyeMan,

    During a GREAT RECESSION caused by the RayGun-Eyeman thieving pigs,

    is now endorsing Corporate Khaki Joe!

    Wooo-hooo.

    While McGinn frosts me on that stupid tunnel-unviable-duct, at least he doesn’t support a whole bunch of loser policies supported by the pathetics posing as opponents of the right wing.

    rmm.

  • seabos84

    whew! this helps seal the deal for McGinn for me.

    first – I can’t stand McGinn’s tunnel crap. I have a magnetic refrig thingy that is a FREE ticket for a monorail ride – Opening Day, Dec. 15, 2007. I am FED up with the dithering fools of this wandering backwards state. the viaduct is coming down – it might be in 25 minutes or 25 years, but, it will fall apart and who is gonna get killed cuz thumb twiddlers needed ANOTHER goddam study? I no longer care what they replace the f’king with – donkey carts or quadruple stacked 6 lanes – just get it done.

    HOWEVER, Governor Afraid-Of-RayGun-EyeMan,

    During a GREAT RECESSION caused by the RayGun-Eyeman thieving pigs,

    is now endorsing Corporate Khaki Joe!

    Wooo-hooo.

    While McGinn frosts me on that stupid tunnel-unviable-duct, at least he doesn’t support a whole bunch of loser policies supported by the pathetics posing as opponents of the right wing.

    rmm.

  • seabos84

    whew! this helps seal the deal for McGinn for me.

    first – I can’t stand McGinn’s tunnel crap. I have a magnetic refrig thingy that is a FREE ticket for a monorail ride – Opening Day, Dec. 15, 2007. I am FED up with the dithering fools of this wandering backwards state. the viaduct is coming down – it might be in 25 minutes or 25 years, but, it will fall apart and who is gonna get killed cuz thumb twiddlers needed ANOTHER goddam study? I no longer care what they replace the f’king with – donkey carts or quadruple stacked 6 lanes – just get it done.

    HOWEVER, Governor Afraid-Of-RayGun-EyeMan,

    During a GREAT RECESSION caused by the RayGun-Eyeman thieving pigs,

    is now endorsing Corporate Khaki Joe!

    Wooo-hooo.

    While McGinn frosts me on that stupid tunnel-unviable-duct, at least he doesn’t support a whole bunch of loser policies supported by the pathetics posing as opponents of the right wing.

    rmm.

  • http://fusewashington.org/ Cheryl

    Let’s not take our lead from Chris on this one….if you are progressive in your politics, get The Progressive Voters Guide and check your ballot accordingly. http://www.ProgressiveVotersGuide.org
    (The guide leans toward McGinn but actually doesn’t call this one)

  • http://fusewashington.org/ Cheryl

    Let’s not take our lead from Chris on this one….if you are progressive in your politics, get The Progressive Voters Guide and check your ballot accordingly. http://www.ProgressiveVotersGuide.org
    (The guide leans toward McGinn but actually doesn’t call this one)

  • http://fusewashington.org/ Cheryl

    Let’s not take our lead from Chris on this one….if you are progressive in your politics, get The Progressive Voters Guide and check your ballot accordingly. http://www.ProgressiveVotersGuide.org
    (The guide leans toward McGinn but actually doesn’t call this one)

  • http://fusewashington.org/ Cheryl

    Let’s not take our lead from Chris on this one….if you are progressive in your politics, get The Progressive Voters Guide and check your ballot accordingly. http://www.ProgressiveVotersGuide.org
    (The guide leans toward McGinn but actually doesn’t call this one)

  • http://fusewashington.org/ Cheryl

    Let’s not take our lead from Chris on this one….if you are progressive in your politics, get The Progressive Voters Guide and check your ballot accordingly. http://www.ProgressiveVotersGuide.org
    (The guide leans toward McGinn but actually doesn’t call this one)

  • http://fusewashington.org/ Cheryl

    Let’s not take our lead from Chris on this one….if you are progressive in your politics, get The Progressive Voters Guide and check your ballot accordingly. http://www.ProgressiveVotersGuide.org
    (The guide leans toward McGinn but actually doesn’t call this one)

  • http://fusewashington.org/ Cheryl

    Let’s not take our lead from Chris on this one….if you are progressive in your politics, get The Progressive Voters Guide and check your ballot accordingly. http://www.ProgressiveVotersGuide.org
    (The guide leans toward McGinn but actually doesn’t call this one)

  • http://fusewashington.org/ Cheryl

    Let’s not take our lead from Chris on this one….if you are progressive in your politics, get The Progressive Voters Guide and check your ballot accordingly. http://www.ProgressiveVotersGuide.org
    (The guide leans toward McGinn but actually doesn’t call this one)

  • http://fusewashington.org/ Cheryl

    Let’s not take our lead from Chris on this one….if you are progressive in your politics, get The Progressive Voters Guide and check your ballot accordingly. http://www.ProgressiveVotersGuide.org
    (The guide leans toward McGinn but actually doesn’t call this one)

  • http://fusewashington.org/ Cheryl

    Let’s not take our lead from Chris on this one….if you are progressive in your politics, get The Progressive Voters Guide and check your ballot accordingly. http://www.ProgressiveVotersGuide.org
    (The guide leans toward McGinn but actually doesn’t call this one)

  • http://fusewashington.org/ Cheryl

    Let’s not take our lead from Chris on this one….if you are progressive in your politics, get The Progressive Voters Guide and check your ballot accordingly. http://www.ProgressiveVotersGuide.org
    (The guide leans toward McGinn but actually doesn’t call this one)

  • http://fusewashington.org/ Cheryl

    Let’s not take our lead from Chris on this one….if you are progressive in your politics, get The Progressive Voters Guide and check your ballot accordingly. http://www.ProgressiveVotersGuide.org
    (The guide leans toward McGinn but actually doesn’t call this one)