Viva La Cola!

Founded in January 2009, PubliCola is a blog about Seattle written by journalists who are dedicated to non-partisan, original daily reporting that prioritizes a balanced approach to news. Started by longtime local editor and award-winning reporter Josh Feit, PubliCola is the first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol.

PubliCola was off and running. In June 2009, PubliCola hired another award-winning journalist, super-sourced Seattle city hall reporter Erica C. Barnett.

People were afraid that blogging would change journalism. Instead, we believe journalism can change blogging. Twenty-first century journalism may look and feel different, and yes Erica isn't afraid to get cranky, but we're committed to making sure online news still delivers independent, reliable, even-keeled coverage. And most of all, we're committed to making sure the coverage sparks honest civic debate.

Bringing you cola for the people, PubliCola is named after Publius Valerius PubliCola, the alias for the authors of the Federalist Papers—the original bloggers.

The first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol and Seattle city hall, PubliCola has been called a “must-read” by the Seattle Post Intelligencer and a hot “New Media Mover and Shaker” by Seattle Magazine—which also cited our own Erica C. Barnett as the city's No. 1 news nerd.

PubliCola Poll: Mallahan Ahead in Mayor's Race

PubliCola commissioned a robopoll on the mayor’s race last night.

The results:

Joe Mallahan leads with 36.5 percent.

Mike McGinn is at 30.1 percent.

33.5 percent are undecided.

malpoll

We polled more than 700 likely voters; the poll has a margin of error of 3.7 percent. Obviously, while the numbers are close,  they’re better news for Mallahan—although, it’s not the comfortable 16-point lead his internal polling was reportedly showing.

Here are some bullet points from the crosstabs:

  • Mallahan leads among every age group except 50-64-year olds.  He has a commanding lead (19 percent) among 65 and older (seniors), and a 5 percent lead among 18-34 year olds.
  • Mallahan leads in the 11th, 34th, 36th, and 46th legislative districts (far Southeast Seattle, West Seattle, Ballard/Queen Anne, and North Seattle, respectively)
  • McGinn leads in the 37th and 43rd (Southeast Seattle and Capitol Hill/Wallingford/U District)
  • Mallahan leads among Nickels voters 41 percent to 22 percent, with 37 percent undecided
  • 35 percent of those who said they voted for Mallahan in the primary are now either undecided or voting for McGinn

There’s a red flag here for McGinn: The fact that he’s losing in tunnel turf like the 34th and particularly the 36th, where he’s down 41 to 28, shows that McGinn’s tunnel position may not be as effective as he’d hoped. The 36th is a flaming liberal district (McGinn does better among libs—35 to 33 according to our poll, and he’s winning the liberal 43rd), so the fact that he’s not winning a very liberal district where the tunnel is a practical  issue, shows that his tunnel position could actually be undermining him with voters who would otherwise be in his camp.

On a bad note for Mallahan (in comparison to McGinn): Mallahan’s not holding on to  his primary voters (keeping just 65 percent of them)—9 percent have shifted to McGinn, while 26 percent are now undecided. McGinn has retained 74 percent of his primary voters while only 5 percent have gone over to Mallahan. 21 percent are undecided.

Good Note for McGinn: He’s winning the 37th. As we’ve noted before, in a tight race like this, the minority vote (which Nickels won in his nail-biter with Mark Sidran in 2001) could make the difference, though right now McGinn’s lead here appears less significant given the votes he seems to be losing over the tunnel. (And footnote, he’s only up in the 37th by three points.)

And, in fact, the 37th (and the 43rd) are the only districts McGinn’s winning. If I were McGinn’s consultant, I’d tell him he has to push out to more conservative districts. Lucky for him he’s got the anti-tax message built in to his anti-tunnel rap. That may be his chance to break out into districts like the 46th in North Seattle.

And If I were Mallahan’s consultant, I’d tell him to protect that turf (he’s currently beating McGinn by 10 points in the 46th) by continuing to stress the general “I’m a good manager” message—or better yet, make it about McGinn and attack McGinn’s tunnel position.

A bit about the poll: We used Precision Polling and their nifty new polling technology that allowed us to design our poll.  Poll weighting (meaning, we took into account the discrepancy between the number of, say, young voters vs. older voters we were able to reach) was provided by  WinPower Strategies. WinPower’s John Wyble and Chris McCullough also helped us sort through some of the analysis.

And by the way, (sorry Mike) Joe is more popular with the ladies, winning 35 to 31.


  • Timothy

    That’s an amazing number of undecideds.

  • Timothy

    That’s an amazing number of undecideds.

  • and that

    so many are undecided is remarkable, too.

    btw the tunnel position isn’t a ploy, it’s honestly held.

  • and that

    so many are undecided is remarkable, too.

    btw the tunnel position isn’t a ploy, it’s honestly held.

  • Ryno

    Who is precision polling? What’s their track record?

  • Ryno

    Who is precision polling? What’s their track record?

  • elaineinballard

    Would you mind posting the questions asked in the poll?
    And, btw, it’s “if I WERE so-and-so’s consultant..”

  • Ryno

    Oh, and is there a reason you aren’t posting the crosstabs or questionnaire?

  • elaineinballard

    Would you mind posting the questions asked in the poll?
    And, btw, it’s “if I WERE so-and-so’s consultant..”

  • Ryno

    Oh, and is there a reason you aren’t posting the crosstabs or questionnaire?

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @4,

    Thanks. Will fix my bad grammar.

    Questions were short and sweet.

    Are you likely to vote? Who are you voting for, McGinn or Mallahan?

    Who did you vote for in the primary?

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @4,

    Thanks. Will fix my bad grammar.

    Questions were short and sweet.

    Are you likely to vote? Who are you voting for, McGinn or Mallahan?

    Who did you vote for in the primary?

  • HuskyNerd

    Thanks for sharing this helpful poll. You made a difference today. Nice work, Publicola.

  • HuskyNerd

    Thanks for sharing this helpful poll. You made a difference today. Nice work, Publicola.

  • tpn

    large # undecideds = low voter turnout = Mallahan win

  • tpn

    large # undecideds = low voter turnout = Mallahan win

  • Michael M.

    Correct me if I’m wrong, but the highest voter turnout would be the 34th and 46th, and the 36th has the highest total amount of liberals. Historically, the 43rd and the 37th fight it out for lowest voter turnout, especially in non-presidential elections. It’s good to have a base, but the point that McGinn needs to branch out is very true.

    Of course, it does please me to see Mallahan up, even if both candidates are still below 40%.

  • Michael M.

    Correct me if I’m wrong, but the highest voter turnout would be the 34th and 46th, and the 36th has the highest total amount of liberals. Historically, the 43rd and the 37th fight it out for lowest voter turnout, especially in non-presidential elections. It’s good to have a base, but the point that McGinn needs to branch out is very true.

    Of course, it does please me to see Mallahan up, even if both candidates are still below 40%.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/1522367.html Gomez

    Neat sample of feedback, Josh. That’s a bigger number of undecideds than SurveyUSA had reported in their previous poll. Typically, you would expect the number of undecideds to either hang where it is or go down a bit as the election draws closer. Instead, we see a much higher number now. I’d like to say that’s just noise, but perhaps many casual voters aren’t too keen on either candidate right now?

    Also, are you sure you’ve got enough of a sample of minorities to draw any real conclusions from that data? Aside from Asians (11%), SurveyUSA only expected blacks and Hispanics to make up about 7% of likely voters combined. That’s not a huge chunk of the population for the latter two groups, such a small sample in SurveyUSA’s survey that they didn’t even itemize each group’s results. FTR their findings showed Asians were firmly pro-McGinn.

    I’m not as sure the minority vote will have nearly as much impact as that teeming mass of undecideds, which I’m sure covers all demographics and races.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/1522367.html Gomez

    Neat sample of feedback, Josh. That’s a bigger number of undecideds than SurveyUSA had reported in their previous poll. Typically, you would expect the number of undecideds to either hang where it is or go down a bit as the election draws closer. Instead, we see a much higher number now. I’d like to say that’s just noise, but perhaps many casual voters aren’t too keen on either candidate right now?

    Also, are you sure you’ve got enough of a sample of minorities to draw any real conclusions from that data? Aside from Asians (11%), SurveyUSA only expected blacks and Hispanics to make up about 7% of likely voters combined. That’s not a huge chunk of the population for the latter two groups, such a small sample in SurveyUSA’s survey that they didn’t even itemize each group’s results. FTR their findings showed Asians were firmly pro-McGinn.

    I’m not as sure the minority vote will have nearly as much impact as that teeming mass of undecideds, which I’m sure covers all demographics and races.

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr.Baker

    Josh’s point about what Joe’s people should be telling him is what he has been hitting for mire than a week, the SeaTimes interview in particular.

    I have pointed this out a couple of times, much to the dismay of the McGinn supporters; Mallahan has McGinn trapped in a box of McGinn’s own making (from the Primary). Expect the election numbers to trend right up to the poll on the tunnel from 3 weeks ago, 51% are either for the tunnel, or against delay. That is Mallahan’s message, and it is presented as a negative for McGinn.

    If I were consulting McGinn I would have him positively promoting the surface option when attacked on him not supporting the tunnel. He gets sandbagged by his own arguments against the tunnel. Talking about the tunnel defensively, rather than your own option as the positive, is a loser.

    As for Mallahan, you are beating him with his own positions, making it about the negative aspects of McGinn’s positions. Don’t stop. I would bring to the front more of the positive and transformative aspects to the projects. I want positive things, he wants negative things.

    3 weeks to go.

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr.Baker

    Josh’s point about what Joe’s people should be telling him is what he has been hitting for mire than a week, the SeaTimes interview in particular.

    I have pointed this out a couple of times, much to the dismay of the McGinn supporters; Mallahan has McGinn trapped in a box of McGinn’s own making (from the Primary). Expect the election numbers to trend right up to the poll on the tunnel from 3 weeks ago, 51% are either for the tunnel, or against delay. That is Mallahan’s message, and it is presented as a negative for McGinn.

    If I were consulting McGinn I would have him positively promoting the surface option when attacked on him not supporting the tunnel. He gets sandbagged by his own arguments against the tunnel. Talking about the tunnel defensively, rather than your own option as the positive, is a loser.

    As for Mallahan, you are beating him with his own positions, making it about the negative aspects of McGinn’s positions. Don’t stop. I would bring to the front more of the positive and transformative aspects to the projects. I want positive things, he wants negative things.

    3 weeks to go.

  • Skipper

    The fact that Mallahan is leading is a reflection of McGinn’s weakness rather than any strength on the part of Mallahan. he has cornered himself with the same things that got him through the primary, like his asinine surface (non) solution for the viaduct.

    At this point it looks like the turtle is going to pass the rabbit in November. But let’s face it, whoever gets elected will be a one term mayor, each candidate is highly marginal in his own way and this city is in for a hard 4 years. We should be starting the discussion about the 2013 race, that is our only hope for a good leader, as distant as it is.

  • Skipper

    The fact that Mallahan is leading is a reflection of McGinn’s weakness rather than any strength on the part of Mallahan. he has cornered himself with the same things that got him through the primary, like his asinine surface (non) solution for the viaduct.

    At this point it looks like the turtle is going to pass the rabbit in November. But let’s face it, whoever gets elected will be a one term mayor, each candidate is highly marginal in his own way and this city is in for a hard 4 years. We should be starting the discussion about the 2013 race, that is our only hope for a good leader, as distant as it is.

  • Chris Stefan

    @11
    Also McGinn needs to take advantage of that volunteer army. Don’t just use them to phone bank, get out there and walk some more precincts. Furthermore make damn sure your voters mail their ballots in on time.

  • Chris Stefan

    @11
    Also McGinn needs to take advantage of that volunteer army. Don’t just use them to phone bank, get out there and walk some more precincts. Furthermore make damn sure your voters mail their ballots in on time.

  • Chris Stefan

    BTW one wildcard in all races (Seattle Mayor, King County Executive, I-1033, R-71) is to what extent R-71 will drive turnout and how will those voters vote in other races. While the anti R-71 forces won’t likely be a factor in Seattle they may have an effect on the KCE race and the I-1033 race.

  • Chris Stefan

    BTW one wildcard in all races (Seattle Mayor, King County Executive, I-1033, R-71) is to what extent R-71 will drive turnout and how will those voters vote in other races. While the anti R-71 forces won’t likely be a factor in Seattle they may have an effect on the KCE race and the I-1033 race.

  • Mikos

    Clearly the televised debates are critical for McGinn. It’s the only TV he will get and he needs big wins. Mallahan is sitting pretty right now but he needs to make a good showing in the debates and then seal the deal with his TV adds. All those undecideds will be watching.

  • Mikos

    Clearly the televised debates are critical for McGinn. It’s the only TV he will get and he needs big wins. Mallahan is sitting pretty right now but he needs to make a good showing in the debates and then seal the deal with his TV adds. All those undecideds will be watching.

  • Sarajane46th

    Great polling work. It is amazing/alarming that “undecided” is comeing in second. While there is literally three weeks to go, the ballots will be here before this weekend. In the primary, 53% were mailed by 8 days before the election day. I predict the most popular time to fill out ballots will be Saturday, October 24th. Many of the campaigns were late delivering their literature to the 46th. Now it’s a ground game. How many people can we get to walk a precinct and engage voters? How much phone banking? How many GOTV calls? Any efforts after 10/24 lose half their value. Do it now!

  • Sarajane46th

    Great polling work. It is amazing/alarming that “undecided” is comeing in second. While there is literally three weeks to go, the ballots will be here before this weekend. In the primary, 53% were mailed by 8 days before the election day. I predict the most popular time to fill out ballots will be Saturday, October 24th. Many of the campaigns were late delivering their literature to the 46th. Now it’s a ground game. How many people can we get to walk a precinct and engage voters? How much phone banking? How many GOTV calls? Any efforts after 10/24 lose half their value. Do it now!

  • Sarajane46th

    Josh, we need a preview button here. I hate my own typos.

  • Sarajane46th

    Josh, we need a preview button here. I hate my own typos.

  • Jacob

    Speaking of polling…Let’s hear Sandeep talk himself out of this one!

    http://www.king5.com/news/specials/politics/stories/NW_101309POB-king-county-executive-poll-TP.212ae01d6.html

  • Jacob

    Speaking of polling…Let’s hear Sandeep talk himself out of this one!

    http://www.king5.com/news/specials/politics/stories/NW_101309POB-king-county-executive-poll-TP.212ae01d6.html

  • Susanneston

    @15 I hope somebody in the debates asks Mallahan for some concrete examples to back up his ubiquitous claims to have experience “driving efficiencies” at T-Mobile

    So far he’s been unable to tell us why we should believe him when he says this and instead tells the story of the controversial FlexPay plan he claims responsibility for at T-Mobile (so far a money loser).

  • Susanneston

    @15 I hope somebody in the debates asks Mallahan for some concrete examples to back up his ubiquitous claims to have experience “driving efficiencies” at T-Mobile

    So far he’s been unable to tell us why we should believe him when he says this and instead tells the story of the controversial FlexPay plan he claims responsibility for at T-Mobile (so far a money loser).

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr.Baker

    I agree with 17, just not that funky thing Goldy uses.

    Btw, I think the king5 debate is right before that Oct 24 weekend.

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr.Baker

    I agree with 17, just not that funky thing Goldy uses.

    Btw, I think the king5 debate is right before that Oct 24 weekend.

  • Jarvis

    This is still anyone’s race, but the high number of undecideds likely indicates a lack of enthusiasm/comfort with both nominees. As Skipper noted, whoever wins is likely to be a one-termer. Peter Steinbrueck should be kicking himself about now.

  • Jarvis

    This is still anyone’s race, but the high number of undecideds likely indicates a lack of enthusiasm/comfort with both nominees. As Skipper noted, whoever wins is likely to be a one-termer. Peter Steinbrueck should be kicking himself about now.

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @17,

    In the process of upgrading the site. Will do.
    I hate my typos too!

  • Chris Stefan

    @21
    If they do a good job I’d say they have a good shot at getting re-elected.

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @17,

    In the process of upgrading the site. Will do.
    I hate my typos too!

  • Chris Stefan

    @21
    If they do a good job I’d say they have a good shot at getting re-elected.

  • Chris Stefan

    @21
    Also I suspect Peter isn’t the only one kicking themselves right now. Add to the list Tim Burgess, Ed Murray, and probably Larry Phillips too.

  • Chris Stefan

    @21
    Also I suspect Peter isn’t the only one kicking themselves right now. Add to the list Tim Burgess, Ed Murray, and probably Larry Phillips too.

  • Mikos

    @21 It’s silly to suggest that the winner will be a one termer simply because voter enthusiasm is so low. You’re confusing perception with performance — and nether has had a chance to perform yet.

  • Mikos

    @21 It’s silly to suggest that the winner will be a one termer simply because voter enthusiasm is so low. You’re confusing perception with performance — and nether has had a chance to perform yet.

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @24,

    …or Tina Podlodowski.

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @24,

    …or Tina Podlodowski.

  • more insight

    @26 – Josh, do you have some insight into Tina’s career choices? Sounds like a good article if you do, if not, what makes you speculate she’s even interested in being mayor?

  • more insight

    @26 – Josh, do you have some insight into Tina’s career choices? Sounds like a good article if you do, if not, what makes you speculate she’s even interested in being mayor?

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @27,

    Just grousing that we haven’t had a strong female candidate in a while.

    I didn’t start covering City Hall until the final months of Tina’s term, so I don’t have much insight into her politics.

    But she’s remained engaged in the city (Lifelong and Big Brothers) and she’s admired as far as I can tell.

    Mainly, though, she’s stepped in to help with media on Mallahan’s campaign (something he’s not good at), and I can imagine her thinking to herself, “Man, I’d be much better at this than the guy I’m trying to bring up to speed.”

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @27,

    Just grousing that we haven’t had a strong female candidate in a while.

    I didn’t start covering City Hall until the final months of Tina’s term, so I don’t have much insight into her politics.

    But she’s remained engaged in the city (Lifelong and Big Brothers) and she’s admired as far as I can tell.

    Mainly, though, she’s stepped in to help with media on Mallahan’s campaign (something he’s not good at), and I can imagine her thinking to herself, “Man, I’d be much better at this than the guy I’m trying to bring up to speed.”

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr.Baker

    @28, I thought she was brought in for that, and wondered if she is going to be deputy mayor.
    I do not know her, just speckin’

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr.Baker

    @28, I thought she was brought in for that, and wondered if she is going to be deputy mayor.
    I do not know her, just speckin’

  • Good Grief

    @28: What’s the story with Sally Clark?

    I don’t go and camp at council meetings so I can’t judge in person, but on the Seattle Channel programming she comes across as very strong and competent both in Commitee/Council meeting coverage and on City Inside Out…

  • Good Grief

    @28: What’s the story with Sally Clark?

    I don’t go and camp at council meetings so I can’t judge in person, but on the Seattle Channel programming she comes across as very strong and competent both in Commitee/Council meeting coverage and on City Inside Out…

  • sarah68

    @21: Steinbrueck I would imagine is glad not to deal with the budget cuts the City will groan under the next 4 years. When the new Mayor doesn’t run again or is kicked out of office because of the mess, Peter can run as the prophet to lead the people out of the wilderness. By then, the financial recovery should have started anyway, and he’ll eventually be credited with it.

  • sarah68

    @21: Steinbrueck I would imagine is glad not to deal with the budget cuts the City will groan under the next 4 years. When the new Mayor doesn’t run again or is kicked out of office because of the mess, Peter can run as the prophet to lead the people out of the wilderness. By then, the financial recovery should have started anyway, and he’ll eventually be credited with it.

  • ksea

    Josh, Thanks for going to this trouble and expense. But to be useful to anyone familiar with polling, please provide your actual questions (you said they were short, so not much typing required) and especially how you determined “likely to vote”. If you are serious about this, you should also gather demographic data to adjust for subpopulation bias. Thanks again, but finish your paperwork.

  • ksea

    Josh, Thanks for going to this trouble and expense. But to be useful to anyone familiar with polling, please provide your actual questions (you said they were short, so not much typing required) and especially how you determined “likely to vote”. If you are serious about this, you should also gather demographic data to adjust for subpopulation bias. Thanks again, but finish your paperwork.

  • Marge

    If I were McGinn I’d quit with the farce about the tunnel driving the biggest tax increase in history. No one believes that. It makes him look sleazy. Maybe he is a little sleazy? He doesn’t seem bothered by the truth.

    People do believe that McGinn supports the sprawl inducing head tax on employers who provide people with jobs in Seattle. We need more jobs in Seattle now, not taxes on jobs that drive people to Issaquah and beyond.

    Looks like Mallahan is going to win this one. Lots of undecideds. But if they are paying any attention at all, all they really hear from McGinn is “no tunnel” and it is not working for him beyond 30%. Which was pretty much the story in the primary.

  • Marge

    If I were McGinn I’d quit with the farce about the tunnel driving the biggest tax increase in history. No one believes that. It makes him look sleazy. Maybe he is a little sleazy? He doesn’t seem bothered by the truth.

    People do believe that McGinn supports the sprawl inducing head tax on employers who provide people with jobs in Seattle. We need more jobs in Seattle now, not taxes on jobs that drive people to Issaquah and beyond.

    Looks like Mallahan is going to win this one. Lots of undecideds. But if they are paying any attention at all, all they really hear from McGinn is “no tunnel” and it is not working for him beyond 30%. Which was pretty much the story in the primary.

  • Trevor

    @31: What is that financial recovery going to be based upon?

    http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/12/business/12change.html

  • Trevor

    @31: What is that financial recovery going to be based upon?

    http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/12/business/12change.html

  • What the Puck?

    You need a PollNerd. The lead here and the single most important analytical point is the undecideds. Neither candidate is close to winning this race and everything will depend on how the undecideds break. When there’s an incumbent in the race, undecideds typically break pretty heavily for the challenger, but in this smorgasbord of bad ideas, massive lack of relevant experience, and extreme disinterest, it’s much much harder to predict. This is an incredibly fluid race.

    That’s why you need to take an in depth look at who the undecided are. While it’s true (and fun) to say that this candidate is leading with this subgroup, if a third or more of the people in that subgroup are undecided, that lead is very tenuous. Late deciding old people may be very different from early deciding old people.

    Also did you push undecided voters to see if they leaned towards one candidate or the other? We tend to make subconscious decisions long before we consciously admit them to ourselves (we love to see ourselves as responsibly weighing the information and still open to new data long after we have, for all intents and purposes, made our choice).

    And out of curiosity, what vote history profile did you weight to? Turnout was up significantly in Seattle in the primary and is likely to be higher than the 2005 general election this time around.

  • What the Puck?

    You need a PollNerd. The lead here and the single most important analytical point is the undecideds. Neither candidate is close to winning this race and everything will depend on how the undecideds break. When there’s an incumbent in the race, undecideds typically break pretty heavily for the challenger, but in this smorgasbord of bad ideas, massive lack of relevant experience, and extreme disinterest, it’s much much harder to predict. This is an incredibly fluid race.

    That’s why you need to take an in depth look at who the undecided are. While it’s true (and fun) to say that this candidate is leading with this subgroup, if a third or more of the people in that subgroup are undecided, that lead is very tenuous. Late deciding old people may be very different from early deciding old people.

    Also did you push undecided voters to see if they leaned towards one candidate or the other? We tend to make subconscious decisions long before we consciously admit them to ourselves (we love to see ourselves as responsibly weighing the information and still open to new data long after we have, for all intents and purposes, made our choice).

    And out of curiosity, what vote history profile did you weight to? Turnout was up significantly in Seattle in the primary and is likely to be higher than the 2005 general election this time around.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/1522367.html Gomez

    34. One thing to note is that the stimulus breaks haven’t expired yet, and will eventually need to if the Federal Government doesn’t want to collapse since the whole thing is being propped up by bonds, loans and other IOU-type financing. The notion of this current ‘recovery’ is predicated on artificially inflated market conditions that can’t be maintained. The nation’s current ‘recovery’ is basically the status quo living on borrowed time.

    35. A PollNerd would only have a job once or twice a year, and then go back to the mothballs between elections, save for the handful of benign approval polls that come out every so often.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/1522367.html Gomez

    34. One thing to note is that the stimulus breaks haven’t expired yet, and will eventually need to if the Federal Government doesn’t want to collapse since the whole thing is being propped up by bonds, loans and other IOU-type financing. The notion of this current ‘recovery’ is predicated on artificially inflated market conditions that can’t be maintained. The nation’s current ‘recovery’ is basically the status quo living on borrowed time.

    35. A PollNerd would only have a job once or twice a year, and then go back to the mothballs between elections, save for the handful of benign approval polls that come out every so often.

  • Don McDonough

    The highest turnout and the highest registration, the Legislative Districts where city-wide elections are won or lost(the Big Three)are the 43rd, the 36th, and the 46th. Approximately 80% of the city-wide turnout will come from those three Leg Districts.

    The 34th and the 11th are only partially in the city and turn out in the 37th always lags behind the “Big Three”. Whoever wins two of three of the 43rd, 36th and the 46th will be the next Mayor.

  • Don McDonough

    The highest turnout and the highest registration, the Legislative Districts where city-wide elections are won or lost(the Big Three)are the 43rd, the 36th, and the 46th. Approximately 80% of the city-wide turnout will come from those three Leg Districts.

    The 34th and the 11th are only partially in the city and turn out in the 37th always lags behind the “Big Three”. Whoever wins two of three of the 43rd, 36th and the 46th will be the next Mayor.

  • Chris Stefan

    @16
    I’m really amazed at how little attention the 46th has gotten from any of the campaigns both in the primary and in the general.

  • Chris Stefan

    @16
    I’m really amazed at how little attention the 46th has gotten from any of the campaigns both in the primary and in the general.

  • Mike Phillips

    Agree strongly w/ the comments made by @35…

    Also, what screen did you guys use?

    And will you post the cross tabs and sample data please?

  • Mike Phillips

    Agree strongly w/ the comments made by @35…

    Also, what screen did you guys use?

    And will you post the cross tabs and sample data please?

  • misha

    Thank you for conducting the poll and reporting it. I know a lot of people are complaining, but that last sentence is weird. Women are half of voters, why point out women but not men? You say women are voting for mallahan, but aren’t even a larger percentage of men decided for Mallahan?

  • misha

    Thank you for conducting the poll and reporting it. I know a lot of people are complaining, but that last sentence is weird. Women are half of voters, why point out women but not men? You say women are voting for mallahan, but aren’t even a larger percentage of men decided for Mallahan?