Viva La Cola!

Founded in January 2009, PubliCola is a blog about Seattle written by journalists who are dedicated to non-partisan, original daily reporting that prioritizes a balanced approach to news. Started by longtime local editor and award-winning reporter Josh Feit, PubliCola is the first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol.

PubliCola was off and running. In June 2009, PubliCola hired another award-winning journalist, super-sourced Seattle city hall reporter Erica C. Barnett.

People were afraid that blogging would change journalism. Instead, we believe journalism can change blogging. Twenty-first century journalism may look and feel different, and yes Erica isn't afraid to get cranky, but we're committed to making sure online news still delivers independent, reliable, even-keeled coverage. And most of all, we're committed to making sure the coverage sparks honest civic debate.

Bringing you cola for the people, PubliCola is named after Publius Valerius PubliCola, the alias for the authors of the Federalist Papers—the original bloggers.

The first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol and Seattle city hall, PubliCola has been called a “must-read” by the Seattle Post Intelligencer and a hot “New Media Mover and Shaker” by Seattle Magazine—which also cited our own Erica C. Barnett as the city's No. 1 news nerd.

Yesterday's Press Release Roundup

Michael Ennis, the transportation guru at the conservative think tank the Washington Policy Center, emailed me today to demand that I correct yesterday’s Press Release Roundup.

At issue: I reported that WPC’s  The Policy Guide for Washington deemed light rail “socialistic.” I was referring to this passage in the WPC’s book: “Manipulating transportation policies to force a particular behavior coerces people into abandoning their individual liberties in favor of a socialistic benefit where supposedly a greater collective good is created.”

Ennis wanted a correction, telling me: “Neither this sentence or the section in which it is found is about light rail…WPC has never said or implied that light rail is socialistic.”

But here’s a link to the book (which I also linked yesterday). WPC does use “socialistic” to describe light rail. Go to: Ch. 10 Transportation, Part 2 Freedom of Mobility.  This section focuses on three bullet point recommendations, including “Reduce spending on costly, ineffective fixed-route mass transit” defined as “expensive systems like light rail and the Sounder Commuter Train.”

WPC leads the section off with a “Background” synopsis writing, well, this:

Manipulating transportation policies to force a particular behavior coerces people into abandoning their individual liberties in favor of a socialistic benefit where supposedly a greater collective good is created.

NEWSWEEK FEB. 16 COVER


  • Jacob

    So Ennis corrects you with the inference of “Socialistic” and then you try and counter his claim by referring to the exact sentence you referred to last night? Am I going crazy here?

  • Jacob

    So Ennis corrects you with the inference of “Socialistic” and then you try and counter his claim by referring to the exact sentence you referred to last night? Am I going crazy here?

  • Jacob

    So Ennis corrects you with the inference of “Socialistic” and then you try and counter his claim by referring to the exact sentence you referred to last night? Am I going crazy here?

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @1

    Ennis says that WPC didn’t use the “socialistic” dig in the context of light rail.

    I’ve given the context here.

  • eddiew

    was not the second half of the 20th century in the US a story of social engineering: sprawl inducing limited access highways, cheap gas, mono-function zoning leading to auto-dependency? James Kunzler describes this well.

  • eddiew

    was not the second half of the 20th century in the US a story of social engineering: sprawl inducing limited access highways, cheap gas, mono-function zoning leading to auto-dependency? James Kunzler describes this well.

  • eddiew

    was not the second half of the 20th century in the US a story of social engineering: sprawl inducing limited access highways, cheap gas, mono-function zoning leading to auto-dependency? James Kunzler describes this well.

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @3,

    Don’t know Kunzler. What do you recommend reading?

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @3,

    Don’t know Kunzler. What do you recommend reading?

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @3,

    Don’t know Kunzler. What do you recommend reading?

  • sarah68

    It’s Kuntzler.

  • sarah68

    It’s Kuntzler.

  • sarah68

    It’s Kuntzler.

  • TerranceM

    I think it’s interesting that we’re arguing over something that was first claimed by Sandeep, who just happens to be the co-founder of this site with Josh. It’s no wonder Josh is defending this inanity. Journalistic integrity? I don’t think so.

  • TerranceM

    I think it’s interesting that we’re arguing over something that was first claimed by Sandeep, who just happens to be the co-founder of this site with Josh. It’s no wonder Josh is defending this inanity. Journalistic integrity? I don’t think so.

  • That’s what she said

    @6 I think it’s interesting that idiot’s are still whining about Sandeep’s role at Publicola, even after Josh posted very lengthy and tedious explanations when they had the primary endorsements. Does the fact that Sandeep had a start-up role with Publicola really have any bearing on what the washington policy center’s book says? Maybe you should take your tiresome conspiracy theory over to red county blog where it belongs. And it wasn’t claimed by Sandeep, it was claimed by Dow, Sandeep is just the campaign spokesperson. Kind of like how Susan was just a newsreader.

  • That’s what she said

    @6 I think it’s interesting that idiot’s are still whining about Sandeep’s role at Publicola, even after Josh posted very lengthy and tedious explanations when they had the primary endorsements. Does the fact that Sandeep had a start-up role with Publicola really have any bearing on what the washington policy center’s book says? Maybe you should take your tiresome conspiracy theory over to red county blog where it belongs. And it wasn’t claimed by Sandeep, it was claimed by Dow, Sandeep is just the campaign spokesperson. Kind of like how Susan was just a newsreader.

  • That’s what she said

    @6 I think it’s interesting that idiot’s are still whining about Sandeep’s role at Publicola, even after Josh posted very lengthy and tedious explanations when they had the primary endorsements. Does the fact that Sandeep had a start-up role with Publicola really have any bearing on what the washington policy center’s book says? Maybe you should take your tiresome conspiracy theory over to red county blog where it belongs. And it wasn’t claimed by Sandeep, it was claimed by Dow, Sandeep is just the campaign spokesperson. Kind of like how Susan was just a newsreader.

  • Brian K

    Josh- It’s Kunstler.com “Geography of Nowhere” was a good read but you can get the essence of it from his TED talk. http://www.ted.com/talks/james_howard_kunstler_dissects_suburbia.html

  • Brian K

    Josh- It’s Kunstler.com “Geography of Nowhere” was a good read but you can get the essence of it from his TED talk. http://www.ted.com/talks/james_howard_kunstler_dissects_suburbia.html

  • Brian K

    Josh- It’s Kunstler.com “Geography of Nowhere” was a good read but you can get the essence of it from his TED talk. http://www.ted.com/talks/james_howard_kunstler_dissects_suburbia.html

  • J.R.

    @6: We’re not arguing any more. Josh proved Ennis wrong–public transit is socialistic. At least it is in the world of Susan Hutchison.

  • J.R.

    @6: We’re not arguing any more. Josh proved Ennis wrong–public transit is socialistic. At least it is in the world of Susan Hutchison.

  • J.R.

    @6: We’re not arguing any more. Josh proved Ennis wrong–public transit is socialistic. At least it is in the world of Susan Hutchison.

  • Jason

    Kunstler is a pretentious old fuddy-duddy. Much of The Geography of Nowhere is like listening to your grandfather rant without facts or references.

    From page 49 of my edition: “One of the problems with cars is that all drivers are not highly skilled—often they are even drunk—and accidents happen.” Or from the following page, on life in 1869: “The many tasks of domestic life, such as cooking, had not been entirely reduced to shopping choices. If you wanted a meal, there was no rushing out to the “convenience” store for a microwaveable pizza.” (Get it? The quotation marks mean that to the true urbanite there can be nothing “convenient” about a convenience store.) And of course he despises Mies, Venturi, and all things modernist and postmodernist to the point that he can’t even discuss either without putting every associated term in ironic quotation marks.

    By all means, let’s fight auto-centric sprawl and big-boxes that hide behind a sea of parking on collector roads linked to cul-de-sacs. And let’s support rail, T.O.D., bike- and pedestrian-friendly communities, and “complete streets” planning, but Kunstler represents a regressive strain of new urbanist ideology we’re better off without.

  • Jason

    Kunstler is a pretentious old fuddy-duddy. Much of The Geography of Nowhere is like listening to your grandfather rant without facts or references.

    From page 49 of my edition: “One of the problems with cars is that all drivers are not highly skilled—often they are even drunk—and accidents happen.” Or from the following page, on life in 1869: “The many tasks of domestic life, such as cooking, had not been entirely reduced to shopping choices. If you wanted a meal, there was no rushing out to the “convenience” store for a microwaveable pizza.” (Get it? The quotation marks mean that to the true urbanite there can be nothing “convenient” about a convenience store.) And of course he despises Mies, Venturi, and all things modernist and postmodernist to the point that he can’t even discuss either without putting every associated term in ironic quotation marks.

    By all means, let’s fight auto-centric sprawl and big-boxes that hide behind a sea of parking on collector roads linked to cul-de-sacs. And let’s support rail, T.O.D., bike- and pedestrian-friendly communities, and “complete streets” planning, but Kunstler represents a regressive strain of new urbanist ideology we’re better off without.

  • Jason

    Kunstler is a pretentious old fuddy-duddy. Much of The Geography of Nowhere is like listening to your grandfather rant without facts or references.

    From page 49 of my edition: “One of the problems with cars is that all drivers are not highly skilled—often they are even drunk—and accidents happen.” Or from the following page, on life in 1869: “The many tasks of domestic life, such as cooking, had not been entirely reduced to shopping choices. If you wanted a meal, there was no rushing out to the “convenience” store for a microwaveable pizza.” (Get it? The quotation marks mean that to the true urbanite there can be nothing “convenient” about a convenience store.) And of course he despises Mies, Venturi, and all things modernist and postmodernist to the point that he can’t even discuss either without putting every associated term in ironic quotation marks.

    By all means, let’s fight auto-centric sprawl and big-boxes that hide behind a sea of parking on collector roads linked to cul-de-sacs. And let’s support rail, T.O.D., bike- and pedestrian-friendly communities, and “complete streets” planning, but Kunstler represents a regressive strain of new urbanist ideology we’re better off without.

  • That’s what she said

    C’mon Josh, show me the love, where’s my comment of the day!

  • That’s what she said

    C’mon Josh, show me the love, where’s my comment of the day!

  • That’s what she said

    C’mon Josh, show me the love, where’s my comment of the day!

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @1

    Ennis says that WPC didn't use the “socialistic” dig in the context of light rail.

    I've given the context here.