Viva La Cola!

Founded in January 2009, PubliCola is a blog about Seattle written by journalists who are dedicated to non-partisan, original daily reporting that prioritizes a balanced approach to news. Started by longtime local editor and award-winning reporter Josh Feit, PubliCola is the first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol.

PubliCola was off and running. In June 2009, PubliCola hired another award-winning journalist, super-sourced Seattle city hall reporter Erica C. Barnett.

People were afraid that blogging would change journalism. Instead, we believe journalism can change blogging. Twenty-first century journalism may look and feel different, and yes Erica isn't afraid to get cranky, but we're committed to making sure online news still delivers independent, reliable, even-keeled coverage. And most of all, we're committed to making sure the coverage sparks honest civic debate.

Bringing you cola for the people, PubliCola is named after Publius Valerius PubliCola, the alias for the authors of the Federalist Papers—the original bloggers.

The first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol and Seattle city hall, PubliCola has been called a “must-read” by the Seattle Post Intelligencer and a hot “New Media Mover and Shaker” by Seattle Magazine—which also cited our own Erica C. Barnett as the city's No. 1 news nerd.

McGinn Proposes Light Rail Vote in Two Years

[This story was originally posted at Noon.]

-3

Standing outside the Columbia City light rail station this morning, mayoral candidate Mike McGinn announced an ambitious, if less than fully formed, plan to expand light rail within two years to neighborhoods on the west side of Seattle, including Ballard, Queen Anne, and West Seattle. McGinn’s plan would require a Seattle-only vote for a local increase in sales or car-tab taxes.

“During the course of this campaign, I’ve talked a lot about what I’m against,” McGinn said, referring to the proposed $4.2 billion deep-bore tunnel on the waterfront. “I’m here to tell you what I’m for. … Within two years of taking office, I commit to bringing a plan before the voters of Seattle to bring expanded light rail service to neighborhoods.”

McGinn didn’t present a cost estimate or specific proposed routes, but said his plan would be a stripped-down proposal using “existing right-of-way” (i.e., streets) that would be built and operated by existing transit agencies like Sound Transit and Metro. Asked how—given that the tax would be Seattle-only, and would thus violate subarea equity rules requiring transit dollars to be evenly distributed throughout the region—his proposal would not require creating a separate agency a la the monorail, McGinn responded: “Much like Sound Transit contracts with Metro to operate light rail, we would work with Metro and Sound Transit to design, build, operate, and maintain the system.”

“The monorail had it right in a number of ways,” he added. “It served Seattle neighborhoods, it was separate from traffic. Where it fell apart was it didn’t have adequate funding and it didn’t integrate with other transit systems.”

However, it’s far from clear that Metro, which is facing its own funding shortfall, and Sound Transit, whose long-range plan already includes lines to Ballard and West Seattle, would be interested in cooperating with and contributing resources to a separate, Seattle-only transit system.

McGinn’s press conference was one of a relative handful of times the candidate has appeared in Southeast Seattle. A gaffe yesterday—in which he identified the location of the Columbia City station as “Edmunds and Empire Way” (it’s been Edmunds and Martin Luther King Jr. Way since 1983) has prompted some to question McGinn’s familiarity with neighborhoods south of the Ship Canal.

Asked how else he planned to reach out to Southeast Seattle voters, other than holding press conferences there, McGinn responded, “You just haven’t been following me. I was down here at the Columbia City parade—I’ve been coming down to Southeast Seattle as mich as I can. I’ve had breakfast at the wonderful Silver Fork diner on Rainier Avenue just the other day.”


  • joshuadf

    Wow, risky. Or maybe not, given the percentage that Prop 1/ST2 passed by in Seattle.

  • joshuadf

    Wow, risky. Or maybe not, given the percentage that Prop 1/ST2 passed by in Seattle.

  • joshuadf

    Wow, risky. Or maybe not, given the percentage that Prop 1/ST2 passed by in Seattle.

  • joshuadf

    Wow, risky. Or maybe not, given the percentage that Prop 1/ST2 passed by in Seattle.

  • joshuadf

    Wow, risky. Or maybe not, given the percentage that Prop 1/ST2 passed by in Seattle.

  • joshuadf

    Wow, risky. Or maybe not, given the percentage that Prop 1/ST2 passed by in Seattle.

  • joshuadf

    Wow, risky. Or maybe not, given the percentage that Prop 1/ST2 passed by in Seattle.

  • joshuadf

    Wow, risky. Or maybe not, given the percentage that Prop 1/ST2 passed by in Seattle.

  • joshuadf

    Wow, risky. Or maybe not, given the percentage that Prop 1/ST2 passed by in Seattle.

  • joshuadf

    Wow, risky. Or maybe not, given the percentage that Prop 1/ST2 passed by in Seattle.

  • joshuadf

    Wow, risky. Or maybe not, given the percentage that Prop 1/ST2 passed by in Seattle.

  • joshuadf

    Wow, risky. Or maybe not, given the percentage that Prop 1/ST2 passed by in Seattle.

  • joshuadf

    Wow, risky. Or maybe not, given the percentage that Prop 1/ST2 passed by in Seattle.

  • joshuadf

    Wow, risky. Or maybe not, given the percentage that Prop 1/ST2 passed by in Seattle.

  • joshuadf

    Wow, risky. Or maybe not, given the percentage that Prop 1/ST2 passed by in Seattle.

  • joshuadf

    Wow, risky. Or maybe not, given the percentage that Prop 1/ST2 passed by in Seattle.

  • joshuadf

    Wow, risky. Or maybe not, given the percentage that Prop 1/ST2 passed by in Seattle.

  • joshuadf
  • joshuadf
  • joshuadf
  • joshuadf
  • joshuadf
  • joshuadf
  • joshuadf
  • joshuadf
  • joshuadf
  • joshuadf
  • joshuadf
  • joshuadf
  • joshuadf
  • joshuadf
  • joshuadf
  • joshuadf
  • joshuadf
  • jkl

    Right on!

    I’ve been saying this for a long time: once Central Link opened and people rode it, they’d love it, and we’d ultimately get more light rail sooner – including light rail to replace the failed monorail.

    A Seattle-only funded line – at first – would likely become a regional west-side line. Just as BART required San Mateo and Santa Clara Counties to buy in later, taxpayers in the Sound Transit area outside of Seattle (ie. in Shoreline, Burien, etc.) could be asked later to buy in for line extensions to the south and north.

    There would have to be at least some tunneling, in Belltown and downtown, at a minimum to connect to the existing transit tunnel, and ideally for a second full tunnel under 2nd Ave, with a transfer station between the two tunnels. You’d probably want to tunnel at least some in West Seattle also, given the hills. It could run at grade and/or with elevated track for much of the distance.

    I’m not as interested in the politics of it, but obviously this sets up Mallahan as the candidate of freeways in freeway-hating Seattle.

  • jkl

    Right on!

    I’ve been saying this for a long time: once Central Link opened and people rode it, they’d love it, and we’d ultimately get more light rail sooner – including light rail to replace the failed monorail.

    A Seattle-only funded line – at first – would likely become a regional west-side line. Just as BART required San Mateo and Santa Clara Counties to buy in later, taxpayers in the Sound Transit area outside of Seattle (ie. in Shoreline, Burien, etc.) could be asked later to buy in for line extensions to the south and north.

    There would have to be at least some tunneling, in Belltown and downtown, at a minimum to connect to the existing transit tunnel, and ideally for a second full tunnel under 2nd Ave, with a transfer station between the two tunnels. You’d probably want to tunnel at least some in West Seattle also, given the hills. It could run at grade and/or with elevated track for much of the distance.

    I’m not as interested in the politics of it, but obviously this sets up Mallahan as the candidate of freeways in freeway-hating Seattle.

  • jkl

    Right on!

    I’ve been saying this for a long time: once Central Link opened and people rode it, they’d love it, and we’d ultimately get more light rail sooner – including light rail to replace the failed monorail.

    A Seattle-only funded line – at first – would likely become a regional west-side line. Just as BART required San Mateo and Santa Clara Counties to buy in later, taxpayers in the Sound Transit area outside of Seattle (ie. in Shoreline, Burien, etc.) could be asked later to buy in for line extensions to the south and north.

    There would have to be at least some tunneling, in Belltown and downtown, at a minimum to connect to the existing transit tunnel, and ideally for a second full tunnel under 2nd Ave, with a transfer station between the two tunnels. You’d probably want to tunnel at least some in West Seattle also, given the hills. It could run at grade and/or with elevated track for much of the distance.

    I’m not as interested in the politics of it, but obviously this sets up Mallahan as the candidate of freeways in freeway-hating Seattle.

  • jkl

    Right on!

    I’ve been saying this for a long time: once Central Link opened and people rode it, they’d love it, and we’d ultimately get more light rail sooner – including light rail to replace the failed monorail.

    A Seattle-only funded line – at first – would likely become a regional west-side line. Just as BART required San Mateo and Santa Clara Counties to buy in later, taxpayers in the Sound Transit area outside of Seattle (ie. in Shoreline, Burien, etc.) could be asked later to buy in for line extensions to the south and north.

    There would have to be at least some tunneling, in Belltown and downtown, at a minimum to connect to the existing transit tunnel, and ideally for a second full tunnel under 2nd Ave, with a transfer station between the two tunnels. You’d probably want to tunnel at least some in West Seattle also, given the hills. It could run at grade and/or with elevated track for much of the distance.

    I’m not as interested in the politics of it, but obviously this sets up Mallahan as the candidate of freeways in freeway-hating Seattle.

  • jkl

    Right on!

    I’ve been saying this for a long time: once Central Link opened and people rode it, they’d love it, and we’d ultimately get more light rail sooner – including light rail to replace the failed monorail.

    A Seattle-only funded line – at first – would likely become a regional west-side line. Just as BART required San Mateo and Santa Clara Counties to buy in later, taxpayers in the Sound Transit area outside of Seattle (ie. in Shoreline, Burien, etc.) could be asked later to buy in for line extensions to the south and north.

    There would have to be at least some tunneling, in Belltown and downtown, at a minimum to connect to the existing transit tunnel, and ideally for a second full tunnel under 2nd Ave, with a transfer station between the two tunnels. You’d probably want to tunnel at least some in West Seattle also, given the hills. It could run at grade and/or with elevated track for much of the distance.

    I’m not as interested in the politics of it, but obviously this sets up Mallahan as the candidate of freeways in freeway-hating Seattle.

  • jkl

    Right on!

    I’ve been saying this for a long time: once Central Link opened and people rode it, they’d love it, and we’d ultimately get more light rail sooner – including light rail to replace the failed monorail.

    A Seattle-only funded line – at first – would likely become a regional west-side line. Just as BART required San Mateo and Santa Clara Counties to buy in later, taxpayers in the Sound Transit area outside of Seattle (ie. in Shoreline, Burien, etc.) could be asked later to buy in for line extensions to the south and north.

    There would have to be at least some tunneling, in Belltown and downtown, at a minimum to connect to the existing transit tunnel, and ideally for a second full tunnel under 2nd Ave, with a transfer station between the two tunnels. You’d probably want to tunnel at least some in West Seattle also, given the hills. It could run at grade and/or with elevated track for much of the distance.

    I’m not as interested in the politics of it, but obviously this sets up Mallahan as the candidate of freeways in freeway-hating Seattle.

  • jkl

    Right on!

    I’ve been saying this for a long time: once Central Link opened and people rode it, they’d love it, and we’d ultimately get more light rail sooner – including light rail to replace the failed monorail.

    A Seattle-only funded line – at first – would likely become a regional west-side line. Just as BART required San Mateo and Santa Clara Counties to buy in later, taxpayers in the Sound Transit area outside of Seattle (ie. in Shoreline, Burien, etc.) could be asked later to buy in for line extensions to the south and north.

    There would have to be at least some tunneling, in Belltown and downtown, at a minimum to connect to the existing transit tunnel, and ideally for a second full tunnel under 2nd Ave, with a transfer station between the two tunnels. You’d probably want to tunnel at least some in West Seattle also, given the hills. It could run at grade and/or with elevated track for much of the distance.

    I’m not as interested in the politics of it, but obviously this sets up Mallahan as the candidate of freeways in freeway-hating Seattle.

  • jkl

    Right on!

    I’ve been saying this for a long time: once Central Link opened and people rode it, they’d love it, and we’d ultimately get more light rail sooner – including light rail to replace the failed monorail.

    A Seattle-only funded line – at first – would likely become a regional west-side line. Just as BART required San Mateo and Santa Clara Counties to buy in later, taxpayers in the Sound Transit area outside of Seattle (ie. in Shoreline, Burien, etc.) could be asked later to buy in for line extensions to the south and north.

    There would have to be at least some tunneling, in Belltown and downtown, at a minimum to connect to the existing transit tunnel, and ideally for a second full tunnel under 2nd Ave, with a transfer station between the two tunnels. You’d probably want to tunnel at least some in West Seattle also, given the hills. It could run at grade and/or with elevated track for much of the distance.

    I’m not as interested in the politics of it, but obviously this sets up Mallahan as the candidate of freeways in freeway-hating Seattle.

  • jkl

    Right on!

    I’ve been saying this for a long time: once Central Link opened and people rode it, they’d love it, and we’d ultimately get more light rail sooner – including light rail to replace the failed monorail.

    A Seattle-only funded line – at first – would likely become a regional west-side line. Just as BART required San Mateo and Santa Clara Counties to buy in later, taxpayers in the Sound Transit area outside of Seattle (ie. in Shoreline, Burien, etc.) could be asked later to buy in for line extensions to the south and north.

    There would have to be at least some tunneling, in Belltown and downtown, at a minimum to connect to the existing transit tunnel, and ideally for a second full tunnel under 2nd Ave, with a transfer station between the two tunnels. You’d probably want to tunnel at least some in West Seattle also, given the hills. It could run at grade and/or with elevated track for much of the distance.

    I’m not as interested in the politics of it, but obviously this sets up Mallahan as the candidate of freeways in freeway-hating Seattle.

  • jkl

    Right on!

    I’ve been saying this for a long time: once Central Link opened and people rode it, they’d love it, and we’d ultimately get more light rail sooner – including light rail to replace the failed monorail.

    A Seattle-only funded line – at first – would likely become a regional west-side line. Just as BART required San Mateo and Santa Clara Counties to buy in later, taxpayers in the Sound Transit area outside of Seattle (ie. in Shoreline, Burien, etc.) could be asked later to buy in for line extensions to the south and north.

    There would have to be at least some tunneling, in Belltown and downtown, at a minimum to connect to the existing transit tunnel, and ideally for a second full tunnel under 2nd Ave, with a transfer station between the two tunnels. You’d probably want to tunnel at least some in West Seattle also, given the hills. It could run at grade and/or with elevated track for much of the distance.

    I’m not as interested in the politics of it, but obviously this sets up Mallahan as the candidate of freeways in freeway-hating Seattle.

  • jkl

    Right on!

    I’ve been saying this for a long time: once Central Link opened and people rode it, they’d love it, and we’d ultimately get more light rail sooner – including light rail to replace the failed monorail.

    A Seattle-only funded line – at first – would likely become a regional west-side line. Just as BART required San Mateo and Santa Clara Counties to buy in later, taxpayers in the Sound Transit area outside of Seattle (ie. in Shoreline, Burien, etc.) could be asked later to buy in for line extensions to the south and north.

    There would have to be at least some tunneling, in Belltown and downtown, at a minimum to connect to the existing transit tunnel, and ideally for a second full tunnel under 2nd Ave, with a transfer station between the two tunnels. You’d probably want to tunnel at least some in West Seattle also, given the hills. It could run at grade and/or with elevated track for much of the distance.

    I’m not as interested in the politics of it, but obviously this sets up Mallahan as the candidate of freeways in freeway-hating Seattle.

  • jkl

    Right on!

    I’ve been saying this for a long time: once Central Link opened and people rode it, they’d love it, and we’d ultimately get more light rail sooner – including light rail to replace the failed monorail.

    A Seattle-only funded line – at first – would likely become a regional west-side line. Just as BART required San Mateo and Santa Clara Counties to buy in later, taxpayers in the Sound Transit area outside of Seattle (ie. in Shoreline, Burien, etc.) could be asked later to buy in for line extensions to the south and north.

    There would have to be at least some tunneling, in Belltown and downtown, at a minimum to connect to the existing transit tunnel, and ideally for a second full tunnel under 2nd Ave, with a transfer station between the two tunnels. You’d probably want to tunnel at least some in West Seattle also, given the hills. It could run at grade and/or with elevated track for much of the distance.

    I’m not as interested in the politics of it, but obviously this sets up Mallahan as the candidate of freeways in freeway-hating Seattle.

  • jkl

    Right on!

    I’ve been saying this for a long time: once Central Link opened and people rode it, they’d love it, and we’d ultimately get more light rail sooner – including light rail to replace the failed monorail.

    A Seattle-only funded line – at first – would likely become a regional west-side line. Just as BART required San Mateo and Santa Clara Counties to buy in later, taxpayers in the Sound Transit area outside of Seattle (ie. in Shoreline, Burien, etc.) could be asked later to buy in for line extensions to the south and north.

    There would have to be at least some tunneling, in Belltown and downtown, at a minimum to connect to the existing transit tunnel, and ideally for a second full tunnel under 2nd Ave, with a transfer station between the two tunnels. You’d probably want to tunnel at least some in West Seattle also, given the hills. It could run at grade and/or with elevated track for much of the distance.

    I’m not as interested in the politics of it, but obviously this sets up Mallahan as the candidate of freeways in freeway-hating Seattle.

  • jkl

    Right on!

    I’ve been saying this for a long time: once Central Link opened and people rode it, they’d love it, and we’d ultimately get more light rail sooner – including light rail to replace the failed monorail.

    A Seattle-only funded line – at first – would likely become a regional west-side line. Just as BART required San Mateo and Santa Clara Counties to buy in later, taxpayers in the Sound Transit area outside of Seattle (ie. in Shoreline, Burien, etc.) could be asked later to buy in for line extensions to the south and north.

    There would have to be at least some tunneling, in Belltown and downtown, at a minimum to connect to the existing transit tunnel, and ideally for a second full tunnel under 2nd Ave, with a transfer station between the two tunnels. You’d probably want to tunnel at least some in West Seattle also, given the hills. It could run at grade and/or with elevated track for much of the distance.

    I’m not as interested in the politics of it, but obviously this sets up Mallahan as the candidate of freeways in freeway-hating Seattle.

  • jkl

    Right on!

    I’ve been saying this for a long time: once Central Link opened and people rode it, they’d love it, and we’d ultimately get more light rail sooner – including light rail to replace the failed monorail.

    A Seattle-only funded line – at first – would likely become a regional west-side line. Just as BART required San Mateo and Santa Clara Counties to buy in later, taxpayers in the Sound Transit area outside of Seattle (ie. in Shoreline, Burien, etc.) could be asked later to buy in for line extensions to the south and north.

    There would have to be at least some tunneling, in Belltown and downtown, at a minimum to connect to the existing transit tunnel, and ideally for a second full tunnel under 2nd Ave, with a transfer station between the two tunnels. You’d probably want to tunnel at least some in West Seattle also, given the hills. It could run at grade and/or with elevated track for much of the distance.

    I’m not as interested in the politics of it, but obviously this sets up Mallahan as the candidate of freeways in freeway-hating Seattle.

  • jkl

    Right on!

    I’ve been saying this for a long time: once Central Link opened and people rode it, they’d love it, and we’d ultimately get more light rail sooner – including light rail to replace the failed monorail.

    A Seattle-only funded line – at first – would likely become a regional west-side line. Just as BART required San Mateo and Santa Clara Counties to buy in later, taxpayers in the Sound Transit area outside of Seattle (ie. in Shoreline, Burien, etc.) could be asked later to buy in for line extensions to the south and north.

    There would have to be at least some tunneling, in Belltown and downtown, at a minimum to connect to the existing transit tunnel, and ideally for a second full tunnel under 2nd Ave, with a transfer station between the two tunnels. You’d probably want to tunnel at least some in West Seattle also, given the hills. It could run at grade and/or with elevated track for much of the distance.

    I’m not as interested in the politics of it, but obviously this sets up Mallahan as the candidate of freeways in freeway-hating Seattle.

  • jkl

    Right on!

    I’ve been saying this for a long time: once Central Link opened and people rode it, they’d love it, and we’d ultimately get more light rail sooner – including light rail to replace the failed monorail.

    A Seattle-only funded line – at first – would likely become a regional west-side line. Just as BART required San Mateo and Santa Clara Counties to buy in later, taxpayers in the Sound Transit area outside of Seattle (ie. in Shoreline, Burien, etc.) could be asked later to buy in for line extensions to the south and north.

    There would have to be at least some tunneling, in Belltown and downtown, at a minimum to connect to the existing transit tunnel, and ideally for a second full tunnel under 2nd Ave, with a transfer station between the two tunnels. You’d probably want to tunnel at least some in West Seattle also, given the hills. It could run at grade and/or with elevated track for much of the distance.

    I’m not as interested in the politics of it, but obviously this sets up Mallahan as the candidate of freeways in freeway-hating Seattle.

  • Louis

    Does McGinn know there is a difference between Southeast Seattle and South Seattle? And does he know that Southeast Seattle is more than Columbia City?

  • Transit Voter

    Erica, either Metro or Sound Transit would be happy to work with the City of Seattle on these projects, under a contract that guaranteed to cover their expenses. Just not a problem there.

    And by working with established transit agencies, the City would avoid some of the problems encountered by the infamous monorail project — which truly was a separate public agency that ran itself, without oversight.

    I think McGinn’s on to something here.

  • Transit Voter

    Erica, either Metro or Sound Transit would be happy to work with the City of Seattle on these projects, under a contract that guaranteed to cover their expenses. Just not a problem there.

    And by working with established transit agencies, the City would avoid some of the problems encountered by the infamous monorail project — which truly was a separate public agency that ran itself, without oversight.

    I think McGinn’s on to something here.

  • Transit Voter

    Erica, either Metro or Sound Transit would be happy to work with the City of Seattle on these projects, under a contract that guaranteed to cover their expenses. Just not a problem there.

    And by working with established transit agencies, the City would avoid some of the problems encountered by the infamous monorail project — which truly was a separate public agency that ran itself, without oversight.

    I think McGinn’s on to something here.

  • Transit Voter

    Erica, either Metro or Sound Transit would be happy to work with the City of Seattle on these projects, under a contract that guaranteed to cover their expenses. Just not a problem there.

    And by working with established transit agencies, the City would avoid some of the problems encountered by the infamous monorail project — which truly was a separate public agency that ran itself, without oversight.

    I think McGinn’s on to something here.

  • Transit Voter

    Erica, either Metro or Sound Transit would be happy to work with the City of Seattle on these projects, under a contract that guaranteed to cover their expenses. Just not a problem there.

    And by working with established transit agencies, the City would avoid some of the problems encountered by the infamous monorail project — which truly was a separate public agency that ran itself, without oversight.

    I think McGinn’s on to something here.

  • Transit Voter

    Erica, either Metro or Sound Transit would be happy to work with the City of Seattle on these projects, under a contract that guaranteed to cover their expenses. Just not a problem there.

    And by working with established transit agencies, the City would avoid some of the problems encountered by the infamous monorail project — which truly was a separate public agency that ran itself, without oversight.

    I think McGinn’s on to something here.

  • Transit Voter

    Erica, either Metro or Sound Transit would be happy to work with the City of Seattle on these projects, under a contract that guaranteed to cover their expenses. Just not a problem there.

    And by working with established transit agencies, the City would avoid some of the problems encountered by the infamous monorail project — which truly was a separate public agency that ran itself, without oversight.

    I think McGinn’s on to something here.

  • Transit Voter

    Erica, either Metro or Sound Transit would be happy to work with the City of Seattle on these projects, under a contract that guaranteed to cover their expenses. Just not a problem there.

    And by working with established transit agencies, the City would avoid some of the problems encountered by the infamous monorail project — which truly was a separate public agency that ran itself, without oversight.

    I think McGinn’s on to something here.

  • Transit Voter

    Erica, either Metro or Sound Transit would be happy to work with the City of Seattle on these projects, under a contract that guaranteed to cover their expenses. Just not a problem there.

    And by working with established transit agencies, the City would avoid some of the problems encountered by the infamous monorail project — which truly was a separate public agency that ran itself, without oversight.

    I think McGinn’s on to something here.

  • Transit Voter

    Erica, either Metro or Sound Transit would be happy to work with the City of Seattle on these projects, under a contract that guaranteed to cover their expenses. Just not a problem there.

    And by working with established transit agencies, the City would avoid some of the problems encountered by the infamous monorail project — which truly was a separate public agency that ran itself, without oversight.

    I think McGinn’s on to something here.

  • Transit Voter

    Erica, either Metro or Sound Transit would be happy to work with the City of Seattle on these projects, under a contract that guaranteed to cover their expenses. Just not a problem there.

    And by working with established transit agencies, the City would avoid some of the problems encountered by the infamous monorail project — which truly was a separate public agency that ran itself, without oversight.

    I think McGinn’s on to something here.

  • Transit Voter

    Erica, either Metro or Sound Transit would be happy to work with the City of Seattle on these projects, under a contract that guaranteed to cover their expenses. Just not a problem there.

    And by working with established transit agencies, the City would avoid some of the problems encountered by the infamous monorail project — which truly was a separate public agency that ran itself, without oversight.

    I think McGinn’s on to something here.

  • Transit Voter

    Erica, either Metro or Sound Transit would be happy to work with the City of Seattle on these projects, under a contract that guaranteed to cover their expenses. Just not a problem there.

    And by working with established transit agencies, the City would avoid some of the problems encountered by the infamous monorail project — which truly was a separate public agency that ran itself, without oversight.

    I think McGinn’s on to something here.

  • Transit Voter

    Erica, either Metro or Sound Transit would be happy to work with the City of Seattle on these projects, under a contract that guaranteed to cover their expenses. Just not a problem there.

    And by working with established transit agencies, the City would avoid some of the problems encountered by the infamous monorail project — which truly was a separate public agency that ran itself, without oversight.

    I think McGinn’s on to something here.

  • Transit Voter

    Erica, either Metro or Sound Transit would be happy to work with the City of Seattle on these projects, under a contract that guaranteed to cover their expenses. Just not a problem there.

    And by working with established transit agencies, the City would avoid some of the problems encountered by the infamous monorail project — which truly was a separate public agency that ran itself, without oversight.

    I think McGinn’s on to something here.

  • Transit Voter

    Erica, either Metro or Sound Transit would be happy to work with the City of Seattle on these projects, under a contract that guaranteed to cover their expenses. Just not a problem there.

    And by working with established transit agencies, the City would avoid some of the problems encountered by the infamous monorail project — which truly was a separate public agency that ran itself, without oversight.

    I think McGinn’s on to something here.

  • Transit Voter

    Erica, either Metro or Sound Transit would be happy to work with the City of Seattle on these projects, under a contract that guaranteed to cover their expenses. Just not a problem there.

    And by working with established transit agencies, the City would avoid some of the problems encountered by the infamous monorail project — which truly was a separate public agency that ran itself, without oversight.

    I think McGinn’s on to something here.

  • Transit Voter

    And with funding coming from Seattle-only tax sources, “subarea equity” doesn’t come into play. SE applies only to Sound Transit revenues generated by local Sound Transit taxes.

  • Transit Voter

    And with funding coming from Seattle-only tax sources, “subarea equity” doesn’t come into play. SE applies only to Sound Transit revenues generated by local Sound Transit taxes.

  • Transit Voter

    And with funding coming from Seattle-only tax sources, “subarea equity” doesn’t come into play. SE applies only to Sound Transit revenues generated by local Sound Transit taxes.

  • Transit Voter

    And with funding coming from Seattle-only tax sources, “subarea equity” doesn’t come into play. SE applies only to Sound Transit revenues generated by local Sound Transit taxes.

  • Transit Voter

    And with funding coming from Seattle-only tax sources, “subarea equity” doesn’t come into play. SE applies only to Sound Transit revenues generated by local Sound Transit taxes.

  • Transit Voter

    And with funding coming from Seattle-only tax sources, “subarea equity” doesn’t come into play. SE applies only to Sound Transit revenues generated by local Sound Transit taxes.

  • Transit Voter

    And with funding coming from Seattle-only tax sources, “subarea equity” doesn’t come into play. SE applies only to Sound Transit revenues generated by local Sound Transit taxes.

  • Transit Voter

    And with funding coming from Seattle-only tax sources, “subarea equity” doesn’t come into play. SE applies only to Sound Transit revenues generated by local Sound Transit taxes.

  • Transit Voter

    And with funding coming from Seattle-only tax sources, “subarea equity” doesn’t come into play. SE applies only to Sound Transit revenues generated by local Sound Transit taxes.

  • Transit Voter

    And with funding coming from Seattle-only tax sources, “subarea equity” doesn’t come into play. SE applies only to Sound Transit revenues generated by local Sound Transit taxes.

  • Transit Voter

    And with funding coming from Seattle-only tax sources, “subarea equity” doesn’t come into play. SE applies only to Sound Transit revenues generated by local Sound Transit taxes.

  • Transit Voter

    And with funding coming from Seattle-only tax sources, “subarea equity” doesn’t come into play. SE applies only to Sound Transit revenues generated by local Sound Transit taxes.

  • Transit Voter

    And with funding coming from Seattle-only tax sources, “subarea equity” doesn’t come into play. SE applies only to Sound Transit revenues generated by local Sound Transit taxes.

  • Transit Voter

    And with funding coming from Seattle-only tax sources, “subarea equity” doesn’t come into play. SE applies only to Sound Transit revenues generated by local Sound Transit taxes.

  • Transit Voter

    And with funding coming from Seattle-only tax sources, “subarea equity” doesn’t come into play. SE applies only to Sound Transit revenues generated by local Sound Transit taxes.

  • Transit Voter

    And with funding coming from Seattle-only tax sources, “subarea equity” doesn’t come into play. SE applies only to Sound Transit revenues generated by local Sound Transit taxes.

  • Transit Voter

    And with funding coming from Seattle-only tax sources, “subarea equity” doesn’t come into play. SE applies only to Sound Transit revenues generated by local Sound Transit taxes.

  • joanna

    FINALLY, Seattle gets to make some decisions on it’s own about transit. We need transit in the city that doesn’t get stuck in traffic, badly! Whatever we need to do, please!

  • joanna

    FINALLY, Seattle gets to make some decisions on it’s own about transit. We need transit in the city that doesn’t get stuck in traffic, badly! Whatever we need to do, please!

  • joanna

    FINALLY, Seattle gets to make some decisions on it’s own about transit. We need transit in the city that doesn’t get stuck in traffic, badly! Whatever we need to do, please!

  • joanna

    FINALLY, Seattle gets to make some decisions on it’s own about transit. We need transit in the city that doesn’t get stuck in traffic, badly! Whatever we need to do, please!

  • joanna

    FINALLY, Seattle gets to make some decisions on it’s own about transit. We need transit in the city that doesn’t get stuck in traffic, badly! Whatever we need to do, please!

  • joanna

    FINALLY, Seattle gets to make some decisions on it’s own about transit. We need transit in the city that doesn’t get stuck in traffic, badly! Whatever we need to do, please!

  • joanna

    FINALLY, Seattle gets to make some decisions on it’s own about transit. We need transit in the city that doesn’t get stuck in traffic, badly! Whatever we need to do, please!

  • joanna

    FINALLY, Seattle gets to make some decisions on it’s own about transit. We need transit in the city that doesn’t get stuck in traffic, badly! Whatever we need to do, please!

  • joanna

    FINALLY, Seattle gets to make some decisions on it’s own about transit. We need transit in the city that doesn’t get stuck in traffic, badly! Whatever we need to do, please!

  • joanna

    FINALLY, Seattle gets to make some decisions on it’s own about transit. We need transit in the city that doesn’t get stuck in traffic, badly! Whatever we need to do, please!

  • joanna

    FINALLY, Seattle gets to make some decisions on it’s own about transit. We need transit in the city that doesn’t get stuck in traffic, badly! Whatever we need to do, please!

  • joanna

    FINALLY, Seattle gets to make some decisions on it’s own about transit. We need transit in the city that doesn’t get stuck in traffic, badly! Whatever we need to do, please!

  • joanna

    FINALLY, Seattle gets to make some decisions on it’s own about transit. We need transit in the city that doesn’t get stuck in traffic, badly! Whatever we need to do, please!

  • joanna

    FINALLY, Seattle gets to make some decisions on it’s own about transit. We need transit in the city that doesn’t get stuck in traffic, badly! Whatever we need to do, please!

  • joanna

    FINALLY, Seattle gets to make some decisions on it’s own about transit. We need transit in the city that doesn’t get stuck in traffic, badly! Whatever we need to do, please!

  • joanna

    FINALLY, Seattle gets to make some decisions on it’s own about transit. We need transit in the city that doesn’t get stuck in traffic, badly! Whatever we need to do, please!

  • joanna

    FINALLY, Seattle gets to make some decisions on it’s own about transit. We need transit in the city that doesn’t get stuck in traffic, badly! Whatever we need to do, please!

  • http://seattletransitblog.com/ Martin H. Duke

    Erica,

    Subarea equity doesn’t require transit dollars to be spent evenly — it requires revenues collected in a subarea to be spent in that subarea. I’m no lawyer, but I don’t see any reason why it would stand in the way of this.

  • http://seattletransitblog.com/ Martin H. Duke

    Erica,

    Subarea equity doesn’t require transit dollars to be spent evenly — it requires revenues collected in a subarea to be spent in that subarea. I’m no lawyer, but I don’t see any reason why it would stand in the way of this.

  • http://seattletransitblog.com/ Martin H. Duke

    Erica,

    Subarea equity doesn’t require transit dollars to be spent evenly — it requires revenues collected in a subarea to be spent in that subarea. I’m no lawyer, but I don’t see any reason why it would stand in the way of this.

  • http://seattletransitblog.com/ Martin H. Duke

    Erica,

    Subarea equity doesn’t require transit dollars to be spent evenly — it requires revenues collected in a subarea to be spent in that subarea. I’m no lawyer, but I don’t see any reason why it would stand in the way of this.

  • http://seattletransitblog.com/ Martin H. Duke

    Erica,

    Subarea equity doesn’t require transit dollars to be spent evenly — it requires revenues collected in a subarea to be spent in that subarea. I’m no lawyer, but I don’t see any reason why it would stand in the way of this.

  • http://seattletransitblog.com/ Martin H. Duke

    Erica,

    Subarea equity doesn’t require transit dollars to be spent evenly — it requires revenues collected in a subarea to be spent in that subarea. I’m no lawyer, but I don’t see any reason why it would stand in the way of this.

  • http://seattletransitblog.com/ Martin H. Duke

    Erica,

    Subarea equity doesn’t require transit dollars to be spent evenly — it requires revenues collected in a subarea to be spent in that subarea. I’m no lawyer, but I don’t see any reason why it would stand in the way of this.

  • http://seattletransitblog.com/ Martin H. Duke

    Erica,

    Subarea equity doesn’t require transit dollars to be spent evenly — it requires revenues collected in a subarea to be spent in that subarea. I’m no lawyer, but I don’t see any reason why it would stand in the way of this.

  • http://seattletransitblog.com/ Martin H. Duke

    Erica,

    Subarea equity doesn’t require transit dollars to be spent evenly — it requires revenues collected in a subarea to be spent in that subarea. I’m no lawyer, but I don’t see any reason why it would stand in the way of this.

  • http://seattletransitblog.com/ Martin H. Duke

    Erica,

    Subarea equity doesn’t require transit dollars to be spent evenly — it requires revenues collected in a subarea to be spent in that subarea. I’m no lawyer, but I don’t see any reason why it would stand in the way of this.

  • http://seattletransitblog.com/ Martin H. Duke

    Erica,

    Subarea equity doesn’t require transit dollars to be spent evenly — it requires revenues collected in a subarea to be spent in that subarea. I’m no lawyer, but I don’t see any reason why it would stand in the way of this.

  • http://seattletransitblog.com/ Martin H. Duke

    Erica,

    Subarea equity doesn’t require transit dollars to be spent evenly — it requires revenues collected in a subarea to be spent in that subarea. I’m no lawyer, but I don’t see any reason why it would stand in the way of this.

  • http://seattletransitblog.com/ Martin H. Duke

    Erica,

    Subarea equity doesn’t require transit dollars to be spent evenly — it requires revenues collected in a subarea to be spent in that subarea. I’m no lawyer, but I don’t see any reason why it would stand in the way of this.

  • http://seattletransitblog.com/ Martin H. Duke

    Erica,

    Subarea equity doesn’t require transit dollars to be spent evenly — it requires revenues collected in a subarea to be spent in that subarea. I’m no lawyer, but I don’t see any reason why it would stand in the way of this.

  • http://seattletransitblog.com/ Martin H. Duke

    Erica,

    Subarea equity doesn’t require transit dollars to be spent evenly — it requires revenues collected in a subarea to be spent in that subarea. I’m no lawyer, but I don’t see any reason why it would stand in the way of this.

  • http://seattletransitblog.com/ Martin H. Duke

    Erica,

    Subarea equity doesn’t require transit dollars to be spent evenly — it requires revenues collected in a subarea to be spent in that subarea. I’m no lawyer, but I don’t see any reason why it would stand in the way of this.

  • http://seattletransitblog.com Martin H. Duke

    Erica,

    Subarea equity doesn’t require transit dollars to be spent evenly — it requires revenues collected in a subarea to be spent in that subarea. I’m no lawyer, but I don’t see any reason why it would stand in the way of this.

  • dacoach

    on the face i like it–bold and big.

    but it is pure political pandering. in a city where the dollars flow north, this seems to expand and extend that adage. does ballard and QA not get enough of the city’s resources? really?

    also, does this kill the totally ill-conceived streetcar to Ballard? one can only hope

  • dacoach

    on the face i like it–bold and big.

    but it is pure political pandering. in a city where the dollars flow north, this seems to expand and extend that adage. does ballard and QA not get enough of the city’s resources? really?

    also, does this kill the totally ill-conceived streetcar to Ballard? one can only hope

  • dacoach

    on the face i like it–bold and big.

    but it is pure political pandering. in a city where the dollars flow north, this seems to expand and extend that adage. does ballard and QA not get enough of the city’s resources? really?

    also, does this kill the totally ill-conceived streetcar to Ballard? one can only hope

  • dacoach

    on the face i like it–bold and big.

    but it is pure political pandering. in a city where the dollars flow north, this seems to expand and extend that adage. does ballard and QA not get enough of the city’s resources? really?

    also, does this kill the totally ill-conceived streetcar to Ballard? one can only hope

  • dacoach

    on the face i like it–bold and big.

    but it is pure political pandering. in a city where the dollars flow north, this seems to expand and extend that adage. does ballard and QA not get enough of the city’s resources? really?

    also, does this kill the totally ill-conceived streetcar to Ballard? one can only hope

  • dacoach

    on the face i like it–bold and big.

    but it is pure political pandering. in a city where the dollars flow north, this seems to expand and extend that adage. does ballard and QA not get enough of the city’s resources? really?

    also, does this kill the totally ill-conceived streetcar to Ballard? one can only hope

  • dacoach

    on the face i like it–bold and big.

    but it is pure political pandering. in a city where the dollars flow north, this seems to expand and extend that adage. does ballard and QA not get enough of the city’s resources? really?

    also, does this kill the totally ill-conceived streetcar to Ballard? one can only hope

  • dacoach

    on the face i like it–bold and big.

    but it is pure political pandering. in a city where the dollars flow north, this seems to expand and extend that adage. does ballard and QA not get enough of the city’s resources? really?

    also, does this kill the totally ill-conceived streetcar to Ballard? one can only hope

  • dacoach

    on the face i like it–bold and big.

    but it is pure political pandering. in a city where the dollars flow north, this seems to expand and extend that adage. does ballard and QA not get enough of the city’s resources? really?

    also, does this kill the totally ill-conceived streetcar to Ballard? one can only hope

  • dacoach

    on the face i like it–bold and big.

    but it is pure political pandering. in a city where the dollars flow north, this seems to expand and extend that adage. does ballard and QA not get enough of the city’s resources? really?

    also, does this kill the totally ill-conceived streetcar to Ballard? one can only hope

  • dacoach

    on the face i like it–bold and big.

    but it is pure political pandering. in a city where the dollars flow north, this seems to expand and extend that adage. does ballard and QA not get enough of the city’s resources? really?

    also, does this kill the totally ill-conceived streetcar to Ballard? one can only hope

  • dacoach

    on the face i like it–bold and big.

    but it is pure political pandering. in a city where the dollars flow north, this seems to expand and extend that adage. does ballard and QA not get enough of the city’s resources? really?

    also, does this kill the totally ill-conceived streetcar to Ballard? one can only hope

  • dacoach

    on the face i like it–bold and big.

    but it is pure political pandering. in a city where the dollars flow north, this seems to expand and extend that adage. does ballard and QA not get enough of the city’s resources? really?

    also, does this kill the totally ill-conceived streetcar to Ballard? one can only hope

  • dacoach

    on the face i like it–bold and big.

    but it is pure political pandering. in a city where the dollars flow north, this seems to expand and extend that adage. does ballard and QA not get enough of the city’s resources? really?

    also, does this kill the totally ill-conceived streetcar to Ballard? one can only hope

  • dacoach

    on the face i like it–bold and big.

    but it is pure political pandering. in a city where the dollars flow north, this seems to expand and extend that adage. does ballard and QA not get enough of the city’s resources? really?

    also, does this kill the totally ill-conceived streetcar to Ballard? one can only hope

  • dacoach

    on the face i like it–bold and big.

    but it is pure political pandering. in a city where the dollars flow north, this seems to expand and extend that adage. does ballard and QA not get enough of the city’s resources? really?

    also, does this kill the totally ill-conceived streetcar to Ballard? one can only hope

  • dacoach

    on the face i like it–bold and big.

    but it is pure political pandering. in a city where the dollars flow north, this seems to expand and extend that adage. does ballard and QA not get enough of the city’s resources? really?

    also, does this kill the totally ill-conceived streetcar to Ballard? one can only hope

  • http://seattletransitblog.com/ Adam Parast

    Can we not overreact to the fact that someone on this volunteer staff used the wrong street name.

    The fact of the matter is that no other politician is calling for anything close to this. Lets focus on the real news here.

  • http://seattletransitblog.com/ Adam Parast

    Can we not overreact to the fact that someone on this volunteer staff used the wrong street name.

    The fact of the matter is that no other politician is calling for anything close to this. Lets focus on the real news here.

  • http://seattletransitblog.com/ Adam Parast

    Can we not overreact to the fact that someone on this volunteer staff used the wrong street name.

    The fact of the matter is that no other politician is calling for anything close to this. Lets focus on the real news here.

  • http://seattletransitblog.com/ Adam Parast

    Can we not overreact to the fact that someone on this volunteer staff used the wrong street name.

    The fact of the matter is that no other politician is calling for anything close to this. Lets focus on the real news here.

  • http://seattletransitblog.com/ Adam Parast

    Can we not overreact to the fact that someone on this volunteer staff used the wrong street name.

    The fact of the matter is that no other politician is calling for anything close to this. Lets focus on the real news here.

  • http://seattletransitblog.com/ Adam Parast

    Can we not overreact to the fact that someone on this volunteer staff used the wrong street name.

    The fact of the matter is that no other politician is calling for anything close to this. Lets focus on the real news here.

  • http://seattletransitblog.com/ Adam Parast

    Can we not overreact to the fact that someone on this volunteer staff used the wrong street name.

    The fact of the matter is that no other politician is calling for anything close to this. Lets focus on the real news here.

  • http://seattletransitblog.com/ Adam Parast

    Can we not overreact to the fact that someone on this volunteer staff used the wrong street name.

    The fact of the matter is that no other politician is calling for anything close to this. Lets focus on the real news here.

  • http://seattletransitblog.com/ Adam Parast

    Can we not overreact to the fact that someone on this volunteer staff used the wrong street name.

    The fact of the matter is that no other politician is calling for anything close to this. Lets focus on the real news here.

  • http://seattletransitblog.com/ Adam Parast

    Can we not overreact to the fact that someone on this volunteer staff used the wrong street name.

    The fact of the matter is that no other politician is calling for anything close to this. Lets focus on the real news here.

  • http://seattletransitblog.com/ Adam Parast

    Can we not overreact to the fact that someone on this volunteer staff used the wrong street name.

    The fact of the matter is that no other politician is calling for anything close to this. Lets focus on the real news here.

  • http://seattletransitblog.com/ Adam Parast

    Can we not overreact to the fact that someone on this volunteer staff used the wrong street name.

    The fact of the matter is that no other politician is calling for anything close to this. Lets focus on the real news here.

  • http://seattletransitblog.com/ Adam Parast

    Can we not overreact to the fact that someone on this volunteer staff used the wrong street name.

    The fact of the matter is that no other politician is calling for anything close to this. Lets focus on the real news here.

  • http://seattletransitblog.com/ Adam Parast

    Can we not overreact to the fact that someone on this volunteer staff used the wrong street name.

    The fact of the matter is that no other politician is calling for anything close to this. Lets focus on the real news here.

  • http://seattletransitblog.com/ Adam Parast

    Can we not overreact to the fact that someone on this volunteer staff used the wrong street name.

    The fact of the matter is that no other politician is calling for anything close to this. Lets focus on the real news here.

  • http://seattletransitblog.com/ Adam Parast

    Can we not overreact to the fact that someone on this volunteer staff used the wrong street name.

    The fact of the matter is that no other politician is calling for anything close to this. Lets focus on the real news here.

  • http://seattletransitblog.com/ Adam Parast

    Can we not overreact to the fact that someone on this volunteer staff used the wrong street name.

    The fact of the matter is that no other politician is calling for anything close to this. Lets focus on the real news here.

  • skeptic

    Seeing that the Governor on Weekday (KUOW) came out and said the tunnel is the plan and the state is moving forward regardless of the whomever the Mayor is, may be a factor…

  • skeptic

    Seeing that the Governor on Weekday (KUOW) came out and said the tunnel is the plan and the state is moving forward regardless of the whomever the Mayor is, may be a factor…

  • skeptic

    Seeing that the Governor on Weekday (KUOW) came out and said the tunnel is the plan and the state is moving forward regardless of the whomever the Mayor is, may be a factor…

  • skeptic

    Seeing that the Governor on Weekday (KUOW) came out and said the tunnel is the plan and the state is moving forward regardless of the whomever the Mayor is, may be a factor…

  • skeptic

    Seeing that the Governor on Weekday (KUOW) came out and said the tunnel is the plan and the state is moving forward regardless of the whomever the Mayor is, may be a factor…

  • skeptic

    Seeing that the Governor on Weekday (KUOW) came out and said the tunnel is the plan and the state is moving forward regardless of the whomever the Mayor is, may be a factor…

  • skeptic

    Seeing that the Governor on Weekday (KUOW) came out and said the tunnel is the plan and the state is moving forward regardless of the whomever the Mayor is, may be a factor…

  • skeptic

    Seeing that the Governor on Weekday (KUOW) came out and said the tunnel is the plan and the state is moving forward regardless of the whomever the Mayor is, may be a factor…

  • skeptic

    Seeing that the Governor on Weekday (KUOW) came out and said the tunnel is the plan and the state is moving forward regardless of the whomever the Mayor is, may be a factor…

  • skeptic

    Seeing that the Governor on Weekday (KUOW) came out and said the tunnel is the plan and the state is moving forward regardless of the whomever the Mayor is, may be a factor…

  • skeptic

    Seeing that the Governor on Weekday (KUOW) came out and said the tunnel is the plan and the state is moving forward regardless of the whomever the Mayor is, may be a factor…

  • skeptic

    Seeing that the Governor on Weekday (KUOW) came out and said the tunnel is the plan and the state is moving forward regardless of the whomever the Mayor is, may be a factor…

  • skeptic

    Seeing that the Governor on Weekday (KUOW) came out and said the tunnel is the plan and the state is moving forward regardless of the whomever the Mayor is, may be a factor…

  • skeptic

    Seeing that the Governor on Weekday (KUOW) came out and said the tunnel is the plan and the state is moving forward regardless of the whomever the Mayor is, may be a factor…

  • skeptic

    Seeing that the Governor on Weekday (KUOW) came out and said the tunnel is the plan and the state is moving forward regardless of the whomever the Mayor is, may be a factor…

  • skeptic

    Seeing that the Governor on Weekday (KUOW) came out and said the tunnel is the plan and the state is moving forward regardless of the whomever the Mayor is, may be a factor…

  • skeptic

    Seeing that the Governor on Weekday (KUOW) came out and said the tunnel is the plan and the state is moving forward regardless of the whomever the Mayor is, may be a factor…

  • abc

    has prompted some to question McGinn’s familiarity with neighborhoods south of the Ship Canal.

    Did you hire someone from Fox news?

  • abc

    has prompted some to question McGinn’s familiarity with neighborhoods south of the Ship Canal.

    Did you hire someone from Fox news?

  • abc

    has prompted some to question McGinn’s familiarity with neighborhoods south of the Ship Canal.

    Did you hire someone from Fox news?

  • abc

    has prompted some to question McGinn’s familiarity with neighborhoods south of the Ship Canal.

    Did you hire someone from Fox news?

  • abc

    has prompted some to question McGinn’s familiarity with neighborhoods south of the Ship Canal.

    Did you hire someone from Fox news?

  • abc

    has prompted some to question McGinn’s familiarity with neighborhoods south of the Ship Canal.

    Did you hire someone from Fox news?

  • abc

    has prompted some to question McGinn’s familiarity with neighborhoods south of the Ship Canal.

    Did you hire someone from Fox news?

  • abc

    has prompted some to question McGinn’s familiarity with neighborhoods south of the Ship Canal.

    Did you hire someone from Fox news?

  • abc

    has prompted some to question McGinn’s familiarity with neighborhoods south of the Ship Canal.

    Did you hire someone from Fox news?

  • abc

    has prompted some to question McGinn’s familiarity with neighborhoods south of the Ship Canal.

    Did you hire someone from Fox news?

  • abc

    has prompted some to question McGinn’s familiarity with neighborhoods south of the Ship Canal.

    Did you hire someone from Fox news?

  • abc

    has prompted some to question McGinn’s familiarity with neighborhoods south of the Ship Canal.

    Did you hire someone from Fox news?

  • abc

    has prompted some to question McGinn’s familiarity with neighborhoods south of the Ship Canal.

    Did you hire someone from Fox news?

  • abc

    has prompted some to question McGinn’s familiarity with neighborhoods south of the Ship Canal.

    Did you hire someone from Fox news?

  • abc

    has prompted some to question McGinn’s familiarity with neighborhoods south of the Ship Canal.

    Did you hire someone from Fox news?

  • abc

    has prompted some to question McGinn’s familiarity with neighborhoods south of the Ship Canal.

    Did you hire someone from Fox news?

  • klatu

    Did he ride his bike to this conference? If not then he is a TOTAL HYPOCRITE!!!11!!one!!!

  • klatu

    Did he ride his bike to this conference? If not then he is a TOTAL HYPOCRITE!!!11!!one!!!

  • klatu

    Did he ride his bike to this conference? If not then he is a TOTAL HYPOCRITE!!!11!!one!!!

  • klatu

    Did he ride his bike to this conference? If not then he is a TOTAL HYPOCRITE!!!11!!one!!!

  • klatu

    Did he ride his bike to this conference? If not then he is a TOTAL HYPOCRITE!!!11!!one!!!

  • klatu

    Did he ride his bike to this conference? If not then he is a TOTAL HYPOCRITE!!!11!!one!!!

  • klatu

    Did he ride his bike to this conference? If not then he is a TOTAL HYPOCRITE!!!11!!one!!!

  • klatu

    Did he ride his bike to this conference? If not then he is a TOTAL HYPOCRITE!!!11!!one!!!

  • klatu

    Did he ride his bike to this conference? If not then he is a TOTAL HYPOCRITE!!!11!!one!!!

  • klatu

    Did he ride his bike to this conference? If not then he is a TOTAL HYPOCRITE!!!11!!one!!!

  • klatu

    Did he ride his bike to this conference? If not then he is a TOTAL HYPOCRITE!!!11!!one!!!

  • klatu

    Did he ride his bike to this conference? If not then he is a TOTAL HYPOCRITE!!!11!!one!!!

  • klatu

    Did he ride his bike to this conference? If not then he is a TOTAL HYPOCRITE!!!11!!one!!!

  • klatu

    Did he ride his bike to this conference? If not then he is a TOTAL HYPOCRITE!!!11!!one!!!

  • klatu

    Did he ride his bike to this conference? If not then he is a TOTAL HYPOCRITE!!!11!!one!!!

  • klatu

    Did he ride his bike to this conference? If not then he is a TOTAL HYPOCRITE!!!11!!one!!!

  • abc

    has prompted some to question McGinn’s familiarity with neighborhoods south of the Ship Canal.

    Did you hire someone from Fox news?

  • klatu

    Did he ride his bike to this conference? If not then he is a TOTAL HYPOCRITE!!!11!!one!!!

  • BS

    In two years? So…in two years these agencies can have a plan and costs estimates and a vote on huge extensions to Sound Transit? Oh I don’t see any complications here….

    AND he is taking over Seattle Schools. . . Is he also planning to END homelessness, poverty and crime in 1.25 years? And all in a down economy!!

    Mark my words, empty promises.

  • BS

    In two years? So…in two years these agencies can have a plan and costs estimates and a vote on huge extensions to Sound Transit? Oh I don’t see any complications here….

    AND he is taking over Seattle Schools. . . Is he also planning to END homelessness, poverty and crime in 1.25 years? And all in a down economy!!

    Mark my words, empty promises.

  • BS

    In two years? So…in two years these agencies can have a plan and costs estimates and a vote on huge extensions to Sound Transit? Oh I don’t see any complications here….

    AND he is taking over Seattle Schools. . . Is he also planning to END homelessness, poverty and crime in 1.25 years? And all in a down economy!!

    Mark my words, empty promises.

  • BS

    In two years? So…in two years these agencies can have a plan and costs estimates and a vote on huge extensions to Sound Transit? Oh I don’t see any complications here….

    AND he is taking over Seattle Schools. . . Is he also planning to END homelessness, poverty and crime in 1.25 years? And all in a down economy!!

    Mark my words, empty promises.

  • BS

    In two years? So…in two years these agencies can have a plan and costs estimates and a vote on huge extensions to Sound Transit? Oh I don’t see any complications here….

    AND he is taking over Seattle Schools. . . Is he also planning to END homelessness, poverty and crime in 1.25 years? And all in a down economy!!

    Mark my words, empty promises.

  • BS

    In two years? So…in two years these agencies can have a plan and costs estimates and a vote on huge extensions to Sound Transit? Oh I don’t see any complications here….

    AND he is taking over Seattle Schools. . . Is he also planning to END homelessness, poverty and crime in 1.25 years? And all in a down economy!!

    Mark my words, empty promises.

  • BS

    In two years? So…in two years these agencies can have a plan and costs estimates and a vote on huge extensions to Sound Transit? Oh I don’t see any complications here….

    AND he is taking over Seattle Schools. . . Is he also planning to END homelessness, poverty and crime in 1.25 years? And all in a down economy!!

    Mark my words, empty promises.

  • BS

    In two years? So…in two years these agencies can have a plan and costs estimates and a vote on huge extensions to Sound Transit? Oh I don’t see any complications here….

    AND he is taking over Seattle Schools. . . Is he also planning to END homelessness, poverty and crime in 1.25 years? And all in a down economy!!

    Mark my words, empty promises.

  • BS

    In two years? So…in two years these agencies can have a plan and costs estimates and a vote on huge extensions to Sound Transit? Oh I don’t see any complications here….

    AND he is taking over Seattle Schools. . . Is he also planning to END homelessness, poverty and crime in 1.25 years? And all in a down economy!!

    Mark my words, empty promises.

  • BS

    In two years? So…in two years these agencies can have a plan and costs estimates and a vote on huge extensions to Sound Transit? Oh I don’t see any complications here….

    AND he is taking over Seattle Schools. . . Is he also planning to END homelessness, poverty and crime in 1.25 years? And all in a down economy!!

    Mark my words, empty promises.

  • BS

    In two years? So…in two years these agencies can have a plan and costs estimates and a vote on huge extensions to Sound Transit? Oh I don’t see any complications here….

    AND he is taking over Seattle Schools. . . Is he also planning to END homelessness, poverty and crime in 1.25 years? And all in a down economy!!

    Mark my words, empty promises.

  • BS

    In two years? So…in two years these agencies can have a plan and costs estimates and a vote on huge extensions to Sound Transit? Oh I don’t see any complications here….

    AND he is taking over Seattle Schools. . . Is he also planning to END homelessness, poverty and crime in 1.25 years? And all in a down economy!!

    Mark my words, empty promises.

  • BS

    In two years? So…in two years these agencies can have a plan and costs estimates and a vote on huge extensions to Sound Transit? Oh I don’t see any complications here….

    AND he is taking over Seattle Schools. . . Is he also planning to END homelessness, poverty and crime in 1.25 years? And all in a down economy!!

    Mark my words, empty promises.

  • BS

    In two years? So…in two years these agencies can have a plan and costs estimates and a vote on huge extensions to Sound Transit? Oh I don’t see any complications here….

    AND he is taking over Seattle Schools. . . Is he also planning to END homelessness, poverty and crime in 1.25 years? And all in a down economy!!

    Mark my words, empty promises.

  • BS

    In two years? So…in two years these agencies can have a plan and costs estimates and a vote on huge extensions to Sound Transit? Oh I don’t see any complications here….

    AND he is taking over Seattle Schools. . . Is he also planning to END homelessness, poverty and crime in 1.25 years? And all in a down economy!!

    Mark my words, empty promises.

  • BS

    In two years? So…in two years these agencies can have a plan and costs estimates and a vote on huge extensions to Sound Transit? Oh I don’t see any complications here….

    AND he is taking over Seattle Schools. . . Is he also planning to END homelessness, poverty and crime in 1.25 years? And all in a down economy!!

    Mark my words, empty promises.

  • SP

    So within his first two years in office, McGinn would have a vote on light rail AND take over schools if they didn’t show improvement?

  • SP

    So within his first two years in office, McGinn would have a vote on light rail AND take over schools if they didn’t show improvement?

  • SP

    So within his first two years in office, McGinn would have a vote on light rail AND take over schools if they didn’t show improvement?

  • SP

    So within his first two years in office, McGinn would have a vote on light rail AND take over schools if they didn’t show improvement?

  • SP

    So within his first two years in office, McGinn would have a vote on light rail AND take over schools if they didn’t show improvement?

  • SP

    So within his first two years in office, McGinn would have a vote on light rail AND take over schools if they didn’t show improvement?

  • SP

    So within his first two years in office, McGinn would have a vote on light rail AND take over schools if they didn’t show improvement?

  • SP

    So within his first two years in office, McGinn would have a vote on light rail AND take over schools if they didn’t show improvement?

  • SP

    So within his first two years in office, McGinn would have a vote on light rail AND take over schools if they didn’t show improvement?

  • SP

    So within his first two years in office, McGinn would have a vote on light rail AND take over schools if they didn’t show improvement?

  • SP

    So within his first two years in office, McGinn would have a vote on light rail AND take over schools if they didn’t show improvement?

  • SP

    So within his first two years in office, McGinn would have a vote on light rail AND take over schools if they didn’t show improvement?

  • SP

    So within his first two years in office, McGinn would have a vote on light rail AND take over schools if they didn’t show improvement?

  • SP

    So within his first two years in office, McGinn would have a vote on light rail AND take over schools if they didn’t show improvement?

  • SP

    So within his first two years in office, McGinn would have a vote on light rail AND take over schools if they didn’t show improvement?

  • SP

    So within his first two years in office, McGinn would have a vote on light rail AND take over schools if they didn’t show improvement?

  • BS

    In two years? So…in two years these agencies can have a plan and costs estimates and a vote on huge extensions to Sound Transit? Oh I don’t see any complications here….

    AND he is taking over Seattle Schools. . . Is he also planning to END homelessness, poverty and crime in 1.25 years? And all in a down economy!!

    Mark my words, empty promises.

  • SP

    So within his first two years in office, McGinn would have a vote on light rail AND take over schools if they didn’t show improvement?

  • abc

    It will cost at least $5 billion to build the green line’s 14 miles – if a 1.4% MVET wasn’t enough for funding the monorail that would mean at least a 5% MVET.

    How much sales tax? I’m guessing about 1.5%

  • abc

    It will cost at least $5 billion to build the green line’s 14 miles – if a 1.4% MVET wasn’t enough for funding the monorail that would mean at least a 5% MVET.

    How much sales tax? I’m guessing about 1.5%

  • abc

    It will cost at least $5 billion to build the green line’s 14 miles – if a 1.4% MVET wasn’t enough for funding the monorail that would mean at least a 5% MVET.

    How much sales tax? I’m guessing about 1.5%

  • abc

    It will cost at least $5 billion to build the green line’s 14 miles – if a 1.4% MVET wasn’t enough for funding the monorail that would mean at least a 5% MVET.

    How much sales tax? I’m guessing about 1.5%

  • abc

    It will cost at least $5 billion to build the green line’s 14 miles – if a 1.4% MVET wasn’t enough for funding the monorail that would mean at least a 5% MVET.

    How much sales tax? I’m guessing about 1.5%

  • abc

    It will cost at least $5 billion to build the green line’s 14 miles – if a 1.4% MVET wasn’t enough for funding the monorail that would mean at least a 5% MVET.

    How much sales tax? I’m guessing about 1.5%

  • abc

    It will cost at least $5 billion to build the green line’s 14 miles – if a 1.4% MVET wasn’t enough for funding the monorail that would mean at least a 5% MVET.

    How much sales tax? I’m guessing about 1.5%

  • abc

    It will cost at least $5 billion to build the green line’s 14 miles – if a 1.4% MVET wasn’t enough for funding the monorail that would mean at least a 5% MVET.

    How much sales tax? I’m guessing about 1.5%

  • abc

    It will cost at least $5 billion to build the green line’s 14 miles – if a 1.4% MVET wasn’t enough for funding the monorail that would mean at least a 5% MVET.

    How much sales tax? I’m guessing about 1.5%

  • abc

    It will cost at least $5 billion to build the green line’s 14 miles – if a 1.4% MVET wasn’t enough for funding the monorail that would mean at least a 5% MVET.

    How much sales tax? I’m guessing about 1.5%

  • abc

    It will cost at least $5 billion to build the green line’s 14 miles – if a 1.4% MVET wasn’t enough for funding the monorail that would mean at least a 5% MVET.

    How much sales tax? I’m guessing about 1.5%

  • abc

    It will cost at least $5 billion to build the green line’s 14 miles – if a 1.4% MVET wasn’t enough for funding the monorail that would mean at least a 5% MVET.

    How much sales tax? I’m guessing about 1.5%

  • abc

    It will cost at least $5 billion to build the green line’s 14 miles – if a 1.4% MVET wasn’t enough for funding the monorail that would mean at least a 5% MVET.

    How much sales tax? I’m guessing about 1.5%

  • abc

    It will cost at least $5 billion to build the green line’s 14 miles – if a 1.4% MVET wasn’t enough for funding the monorail that would mean at least a 5% MVET.

    How much sales tax? I’m guessing about 1.5%

  • abc

    It will cost at least $5 billion to build the green line’s 14 miles – if a 1.4% MVET wasn’t enough for funding the monorail that would mean at least a 5% MVET.

    How much sales tax? I’m guessing about 1.5%

  • abc

    It will cost at least $5 billion to build the green line’s 14 miles – if a 1.4% MVET wasn’t enough for funding the monorail that would mean at least a 5% MVET.

    How much sales tax? I’m guessing about 1.5%

  • Mmkos

    Um… I do think it’s a big deal that the two remaining candidates are seemingly unfamiliar with a vital part of Seattle, that has the most diversity and it’s own unique issues. It’s baffling that these candidates are so ignorant. But of course the northerners here won’t care.

  • Mmkos

    Um… I do think it’s a big deal that the two remaining candidates are seemingly unfamiliar with a vital part of Seattle, that has the most diversity and it’s own unique issues. It’s baffling that these candidates are so ignorant. But of course the northerners here won’t care.

  • Mmkos

    Um… I do think it’s a big deal that the two remaining candidates are seemingly unfamiliar with a vital part of Seattle, that has the most diversity and it’s own unique issues. It’s baffling that these candidates are so ignorant. But of course the northerners here won’t care.

  • Mmkos

    Um… I do think it’s a big deal that the two remaining candidates are seemingly unfamiliar with a vital part of Seattle, that has the most diversity and it’s own unique issues. It’s baffling that these candidates are so ignorant. But of course the northerners here won’t care.

  • Mmkos

    Um… I do think it’s a big deal that the two remaining candidates are seemingly unfamiliar with a vital part of Seattle, that has the most diversity and it’s own unique issues. It’s baffling that these candidates are so ignorant. But of course the northerners here won’t care.

  • Mmkos

    Um… I do think it’s a big deal that the two remaining candidates are seemingly unfamiliar with a vital part of Seattle, that has the most diversity and it’s own unique issues. It’s baffling that these candidates are so ignorant. But of course the northerners here won’t care.

  • Mmkos

    Um… I do think it’s a big deal that the two remaining candidates are seemingly unfamiliar with a vital part of Seattle, that has the most diversity and it’s own unique issues. It’s baffling that these candidates are so ignorant. But of course the northerners here won’t care.

  • Mmkos

    Um… I do think it’s a big deal that the two remaining candidates are seemingly unfamiliar with a vital part of Seattle, that has the most diversity and it’s own unique issues. It’s baffling that these candidates are so ignorant. But of course the northerners here won’t care.

  • Mmkos

    Um… I do think it’s a big deal that the two remaining candidates are seemingly unfamiliar with a vital part of Seattle, that has the most diversity and it’s own unique issues. It’s baffling that these candidates are so ignorant. But of course the northerners here won’t care.

  • Mmkos

    Um… I do think it’s a big deal that the two remaining candidates are seemingly unfamiliar with a vital part of Seattle, that has the most diversity and it’s own unique issues. It’s baffling that these candidates are so ignorant. But of course the northerners here won’t care.

  • Mmkos

    Um… I do think it’s a big deal that the two remaining candidates are seemingly unfamiliar with a vital part of Seattle, that has the most diversity and it’s own unique issues. It’s baffling that these candidates are so ignorant. But of course the northerners here won’t care.

  • Mmkos

    Um… I do think it’s a big deal that the two remaining candidates are seemingly unfamiliar with a vital part of Seattle, that has the most diversity and it’s own unique issues. It’s baffling that these candidates are so ignorant. But of course the northerners here won’t care.

  • Mmkos

    Um… I do think it’s a big deal that the two remaining candidates are seemingly unfamiliar with a vital part of Seattle, that has the most diversity and it’s own unique issues. It’s baffling that these candidates are so ignorant. But of course the northerners here won’t care.

  • Good Grief

    @14: Don’t forget about building a citywide fiber optic network with subsidized high speed internet for all.

    Did anyone ask him if/how RapidRide to West Seattle and Ballard fits into this, or ar those just more underway projects he wants to kill?

  • Good Grief

    @14: Don’t forget about building a citywide fiber optic network with subsidized high speed internet for all.

    Did anyone ask him if/how RapidRide to West Seattle and Ballard fits into this, or ar those just more underway projects he wants to kill?

  • Good Grief

    @14: Don’t forget about building a citywide fiber optic network with subsidized high speed internet for all.

    Did anyone ask him if/how RapidRide to West Seattle and Ballard fits into this, or ar those just more underway projects he wants to kill?

  • Good Grief

    @14: Don’t forget about building a citywide fiber optic network with subsidized high speed internet for all.

    Did anyone ask him if/how RapidRide to West Seattle and Ballard fits into this, or ar those just more underway projects he wants to kill?

  • Good Grief

    @14: Don’t forget about building a citywide fiber optic network with subsidized high speed internet for all.

    Did anyone ask him if/how RapidRide to West Seattle and Ballard fits into this, or ar those just more underway projects he wants to kill?

  • Good Grief

    @14: Don’t forget about building a citywide fiber optic network with subsidized high speed internet for all.

    Did anyone ask him if/how RapidRide to West Seattle and Ballard fits into this, or ar those just more underway projects he wants to kill?

  • Good Grief

    @14: Don’t forget about building a citywide fiber optic network with subsidized high speed internet for all.

    Did anyone ask him if/how RapidRide to West Seattle and Ballard fits into this, or ar those just more underway projects he wants to kill?

  • Good Grief

    @14: Don’t forget about building a citywide fiber optic network with subsidized high speed internet for all.

    Did anyone ask him if/how RapidRide to West Seattle and Ballard fits into this, or ar those just more underway projects he wants to kill?

  • Good Grief

    @14: Don’t forget about building a citywide fiber optic network with subsidized high speed internet for all.

    Did anyone ask him if/how RapidRide to West Seattle and Ballard fits into this, or ar those just more underway projects he wants to kill?

  • Good Grief

    @14: Don’t forget about building a citywide fiber optic network with subsidized high speed internet for all.

    Did anyone ask him if/how RapidRide to West Seattle and Ballard fits into this, or ar those just more underway projects he wants to kill?

  • Good Grief

    @14: Don’t forget about building a citywide fiber optic network with subsidized high speed internet for all.

    Did anyone ask him if/how RapidRide to West Seattle and Ballard fits into this, or ar those just more underway projects he wants to kill?

  • Good Grief

    @14: Don’t forget about building a citywide fiber optic network with subsidized high speed internet for all.

    Did anyone ask him if/how RapidRide to West Seattle and Ballard fits into this, or ar those just more underway projects he wants to kill?

  • Good Grief

    @14: Don’t forget about building a citywide fiber optic network with subsidized high speed internet for all.

    Did anyone ask him if/how RapidRide to West Seattle and Ballard fits into this, or ar those just more underway projects he wants to kill?

  • Good Grief

    @14: Don’t forget about building a citywide fiber optic network with subsidized high speed internet for all.

    Did anyone ask him if/how RapidRide to West Seattle and Ballard fits into this, or ar those just more underway projects he wants to kill?

  • Good Grief

    @14: Don’t forget about building a citywide fiber optic network with subsidized high speed internet for all.

    Did anyone ask him if/how RapidRide to West Seattle and Ballard fits into this, or ar those just more underway projects he wants to kill?

  • Good Grief

    @14: Don’t forget about building a citywide fiber optic network with subsidized high speed internet for all.

    Did anyone ask him if/how RapidRide to West Seattle and Ballard fits into this, or ar those just more underway projects he wants to kill?

  • Good Grief

    @14: Don’t forget about building a citywide fiber optic network with subsidized high speed internet for all.

    Did anyone ask him if/how RapidRide to West Seattle and Ballard fits into this, or ar those just more underway projects he wants to kill?

  • Transit Voter

    abc @16, McGinn’s line wouldn’t be 14 miles long like the monorail Green Line, more like 10.5 miles — the distance from the West Seattle Junction (California @ Alaska, to the uninitiated) to 15th & Market. Those termini are the hubs of existing local bus transit networks, making a perfect fit with high-capacity express service.

    Go Mike!

  • Transit Voter

    abc @16, McGinn’s line wouldn’t be 14 miles long like the monorail Green Line, more like 10.5 miles — the distance from the West Seattle Junction (California @ Alaska, to the uninitiated) to 15th & Market. Those termini are the hubs of existing local bus transit networks, making a perfect fit with high-capacity express service.

    Go Mike!

  • Transit Voter

    abc @16, McGinn’s line wouldn’t be 14 miles long like the monorail Green Line, more like 10.5 miles — the distance from the West Seattle Junction (California @ Alaska, to the uninitiated) to 15th & Market. Those termini are the hubs of existing local bus transit networks, making a perfect fit with high-capacity express service.

    Go Mike!

  • Transit Voter

    abc @16, McGinn’s line wouldn’t be 14 miles long like the monorail Green Line, more like 10.5 miles — the distance from the West Seattle Junction (California @ Alaska, to the uninitiated) to 15th & Market. Those termini are the hubs of existing local bus transit networks, making a perfect fit with high-capacity express service.

    Go Mike!

  • Transit Voter

    abc @16, McGinn’s line wouldn’t be 14 miles long like the monorail Green Line, more like 10.5 miles — the distance from the West Seattle Junction (California @ Alaska, to the uninitiated) to 15th & Market. Those termini are the hubs of existing local bus transit networks, making a perfect fit with high-capacity express service.

    Go Mike!

  • Transit Voter

    abc @16, McGinn’s line wouldn’t be 14 miles long like the monorail Green Line, more like 10.5 miles — the distance from the West Seattle Junction (California @ Alaska, to the uninitiated) to 15th & Market. Those termini are the hubs of existing local bus transit networks, making a perfect fit with high-capacity express service.

    Go Mike!

  • Transit Voter

    abc @16, McGinn’s line wouldn’t be 14 miles long like the monorail Green Line, more like 10.5 miles — the distance from the West Seattle Junction (California @ Alaska, to the uninitiated) to 15th & Market. Those termini are the hubs of existing local bus transit networks, making a perfect fit with high-capacity express service.

    Go Mike!

  • Transit Voter

    abc @16, McGinn’s line wouldn’t be 14 miles long like the monorail Green Line, more like 10.5 miles — the distance from the West Seattle Junction (California @ Alaska, to the uninitiated) to 15th & Market. Those termini are the hubs of existing local bus transit networks, making a perfect fit with high-capacity express service.

    Go Mike!

  • Transit Voter

    abc @16, McGinn’s line wouldn’t be 14 miles long like the monorail Green Line, more like 10.5 miles — the distance from the West Seattle Junction (California @ Alaska, to the uninitiated) to 15th & Market. Those termini are the hubs of existing local bus transit networks, making a perfect fit with high-capacity express service.

    Go Mike!

  • Transit Voter

    abc @16, McGinn’s line wouldn’t be 14 miles long like the monorail Green Line, more like 10.5 miles — the distance from the West Seattle Junction (California @ Alaska, to the uninitiated) to 15th & Market. Those termini are the hubs of existing local bus transit networks, making a perfect fit with high-capacity express service.

    Go Mike!

  • Transit Voter

    abc @16, McGinn’s line wouldn’t be 14 miles long like the monorail Green Line, more like 10.5 miles — the distance from the West Seattle Junction (California @ Alaska, to the uninitiated) to 15th & Market. Those termini are the hubs of existing local bus transit networks, making a perfect fit with high-capacity express service.

    Go Mike!

  • Transit Voter

    abc @16, McGinn’s line wouldn’t be 14 miles long like the monorail Green Line, more like 10.5 miles — the distance from the West Seattle Junction (California @ Alaska, to the uninitiated) to 15th & Market. Those termini are the hubs of existing local bus transit networks, making a perfect fit with high-capacity express service.

    Go Mike!

  • Transit Voter

    abc @16, McGinn’s line wouldn’t be 14 miles long like the monorail Green Line, more like 10.5 miles — the distance from the West Seattle Junction (California @ Alaska, to the uninitiated) to 15th & Market. Those termini are the hubs of existing local bus transit networks, making a perfect fit with high-capacity express service.

    Go Mike!

  • Transit Voter

    abc @16, McGinn’s line wouldn’t be 14 miles long like the monorail Green Line, more like 10.5 miles — the distance from the West Seattle Junction (California @ Alaska, to the uninitiated) to 15th & Market. Those termini are the hubs of existing local bus transit networks, making a perfect fit with high-capacity express service.

    Go Mike!

  • Transit Voter

    abc @16, McGinn’s line wouldn’t be 14 miles long like the monorail Green Line, more like 10.5 miles — the distance from the West Seattle Junction (California @ Alaska, to the uninitiated) to 15th & Market. Those termini are the hubs of existing local bus transit networks, making a perfect fit with high-capacity express service.

    Go Mike!

  • Transit Voter

    abc @16, McGinn’s line wouldn’t be 14 miles long like the monorail Green Line, more like 10.5 miles — the distance from the West Seattle Junction (California @ Alaska, to the uninitiated) to 15th & Market. Those termini are the hubs of existing local bus transit networks, making a perfect fit with high-capacity express service.

    Go Mike!

  • Transit Voter

    abc @16, McGinn’s line wouldn’t be 14 miles long like the monorail Green Line, more like 10.5 miles — the distance from the West Seattle Junction (California @ Alaska, to the uninitiated) to 15th & Market. Those termini are the hubs of existing local bus transit networks, making a perfect fit with high-capacity express service.

    Go Mike!

  • Jay

    “has prompted some to question McGinn’s familiarity with neighborhoods south of the Ship Canal”

    Last time I checked Capitol Hill, Madison Park, Eastlake, SLU, Belltown, Queen Anne, Magnolia, Downtown and West Seattle were all south of the Ship Canal. He seems pretty familiar with those neighborhoods.

  • Jay

    “has prompted some to question McGinn’s familiarity with neighborhoods south of the Ship Canal”

    Last time I checked Capitol Hill, Madison Park, Eastlake, SLU, Belltown, Queen Anne, Magnolia, Downtown and West Seattle were all south of the Ship Canal. He seems pretty familiar with those neighborhoods.

  • Jay

    “has prompted some to question McGinn’s familiarity with neighborhoods south of the Ship Canal”

    Last time I checked Capitol Hill, Madison Park, Eastlake, SLU, Belltown, Queen Anne, Magnolia, Downtown and West Seattle were all south of the Ship Canal. He seems pretty familiar with those neighborhoods.

  • Jay

    “has prompted some to question McGinn’s familiarity with neighborhoods south of the Ship Canal”

    Last time I checked Capitol Hill, Madison Park, Eastlake, SLU, Belltown, Queen Anne, Magnolia, Downtown and West Seattle were all south of the Ship Canal. He seems pretty familiar with those neighborhoods.

  • Jay

    “has prompted some to question McGinn’s familiarity with neighborhoods south of the Ship Canal”

    Last time I checked Capitol Hill, Madison Park, Eastlake, SLU, Belltown, Queen Anne, Magnolia, Downtown and West Seattle were all south of the Ship Canal. He seems pretty familiar with those neighborhoods.

  • Jay

    “has prompted some to question McGinn’s familiarity with neighborhoods south of the Ship Canal”

    Last time I checked Capitol Hill, Madison Park, Eastlake, SLU, Belltown, Queen Anne, Magnolia, Downtown and West Seattle were all south of the Ship Canal. He seems pretty familiar with those neighborhoods.

  • Jay

    “has prompted some to question McGinn’s familiarity with neighborhoods south of the Ship Canal”

    Last time I checked Capitol Hill, Madison Park, Eastlake, SLU, Belltown, Queen Anne, Magnolia, Downtown and West Seattle were all south of the Ship Canal. He seems pretty familiar with those neighborhoods.

  • Jay

    “has prompted some to question McGinn’s familiarity with neighborhoods south of the Ship Canal”

    Last time I checked Capitol Hill, Madison Park, Eastlake, SLU, Belltown, Queen Anne, Magnolia, Downtown and West Seattle were all south of the Ship Canal. He seems pretty familiar with those neighborhoods.

  • Jay

    “has prompted some to question McGinn’s familiarity with neighborhoods south of the Ship Canal”

    Last time I checked Capitol Hill, Madison Park, Eastlake, SLU, Belltown, Queen Anne, Magnolia, Downtown and West Seattle were all south of the Ship Canal. He seems pretty familiar with those neighborhoods.

  • Jay

    “has prompted some to question McGinn’s familiarity with neighborhoods south of the Ship Canal”

    Last time I checked Capitol Hill, Madison Park, Eastlake, SLU, Belltown, Queen Anne, Magnolia, Downtown and West Seattle were all south of the Ship Canal. He seems pretty familiar with those neighborhoods.

  • Jay

    “has prompted some to question McGinn’s familiarity with neighborhoods south of the Ship Canal”

    Last time I checked Capitol Hill, Madison Park, Eastlake, SLU, Belltown, Queen Anne, Magnolia, Downtown and West Seattle were all south of the Ship Canal. He seems pretty familiar with those neighborhoods.

  • Jay

    “has prompted some to question McGinn’s familiarity with neighborhoods south of the Ship Canal”

    Last time I checked Capitol Hill, Madison Park, Eastlake, SLU, Belltown, Queen Anne, Magnolia, Downtown and West Seattle were all south of the Ship Canal. He seems pretty familiar with those neighborhoods.

  • Jay

    “has prompted some to question McGinn’s familiarity with neighborhoods south of the Ship Canal”

    Last time I checked Capitol Hill, Madison Park, Eastlake, SLU, Belltown, Queen Anne, Magnolia, Downtown and West Seattle were all south of the Ship Canal. He seems pretty familiar with those neighborhoods.

  • Jay

    “has prompted some to question McGinn’s familiarity with neighborhoods south of the Ship Canal”

    Last time I checked Capitol Hill, Madison Park, Eastlake, SLU, Belltown, Queen Anne, Magnolia, Downtown and West Seattle were all south of the Ship Canal. He seems pretty familiar with those neighborhoods.

  • Jay

    “has prompted some to question McGinn’s familiarity with neighborhoods south of the Ship Canal”

    Last time I checked Capitol Hill, Madison Park, Eastlake, SLU, Belltown, Queen Anne, Magnolia, Downtown and West Seattle were all south of the Ship Canal. He seems pretty familiar with those neighborhoods.

  • Jay

    “has prompted some to question McGinn’s familiarity with neighborhoods south of the Ship Canal”

    Last time I checked Capitol Hill, Madison Park, Eastlake, SLU, Belltown, Queen Anne, Magnolia, Downtown and West Seattle were all south of the Ship Canal. He seems pretty familiar with those neighborhoods.

  • J.R.

    @14: Damn, that’s a good point. Sorry, McGinn believers.

  • J.R.

    @14: Damn, that’s a good point. Sorry, McGinn believers.

  • J.R.

    @14: Damn, that’s a good point. Sorry, McGinn believers.

  • J.R.

    @14: Damn, that’s a good point. Sorry, McGinn believers.

  • J.R.

    @14: Damn, that’s a good point. Sorry, McGinn believers.

  • J.R.

    @14: Damn, that’s a good point. Sorry, McGinn believers.

  • J.R.

    @14: Damn, that’s a good point. Sorry, McGinn believers.

  • J.R.

    @14: Damn, that’s a good point. Sorry, McGinn believers.

  • J.R.

    @14: Damn, that’s a good point. Sorry, McGinn believers.

  • J.R.

    @14: Damn, that’s a good point. Sorry, McGinn believers.

  • J.R.

    @14: Damn, that’s a good point. Sorry, McGinn believers.

  • J.R.

    @14: Damn, that’s a good point. Sorry, McGinn believers.

  • J.R.

    @14: Damn, that’s a good point. Sorry, McGinn believers.

  • J.R.

    @14: Damn, that’s a good point. Sorry, McGinn believers.

  • J.R.

    @14: Damn, that’s a good point. Sorry, McGinn believers.

  • tpn

    West Seattle isn’t a neighborhood any more then North Seattle. Westwood, Gatewood, Fauntleroy, Delridge, both Junctions, Admiral, Alki to name just a few. Then we have South Park, Beacon Hill, Seward Park, Georgetown, SoDo, the ID, the CD, etc. etc. Anything south of Madison and east of West Seattle is off his map, big time.

  • tpn

    West Seattle isn’t a neighborhood any more then North Seattle. Westwood, Gatewood, Fauntleroy, Delridge, both Junctions, Admiral, Alki to name just a few. Then we have South Park, Beacon Hill, Seward Park, Georgetown, SoDo, the ID, the CD, etc. etc. Anything south of Madison and east of West Seattle is off his map, big time.

  • Kellen

    @18: I would imagine RapidRide would be unchanged for quite some time, given the amount of time it takes to build light rail

  • Kellen

    @18: I would imagine RapidRide would be unchanged for quite some time, given the amount of time it takes to build light rail

  • hjkl

    Well, if the state can move forward with the tunnel with gas tax money, without any special additional tax funding and utility rate increases from the city, bully for it.

    Because we’re going to be spending that money on more light rail! Yay us! F’ the haters.

  • hjkl

    Well, if the state can move forward with the tunnel with gas tax money, without any special additional tax funding and utility rate increases from the city, bully for it.

    Because we’re going to be spending that money on more light rail! Yay us! F’ the haters.

  • Good Grief

    Exactly — so we are going to invest in a dedicated high(er) speed bus service and then tax ourselves again to tear it out and put Light Rail down the same corridor? Genius….

  • Good Grief

    Exactly — so we are going to invest in a dedicated high(er) speed bus service and then tax ourselves again to tear it out and put Light Rail down the same corridor? Genius….

  • mike bikes …well electric

    File this with his other ridiculous ideas: (Clarification: The timeline is ridiculous. Transit options to these areas is a POSITIVE thing)

    1. Take over schools
    2. Stop the Tunnel
    3. Fire consultants and strategic advisors
    4. Save the whales

    The worst part is that Mallahan is just as bad

  • mike bikes …well electric

    File this with his other ridiculous ideas: (Clarification: The timeline is ridiculous. Transit options to these areas is a POSITIVE thing)

    1. Take over schools
    2. Stop the Tunnel
    3. Fire consultants and strategic advisors
    4. Save the whales

    The worst part is that Mallahan is just as bad

  • http://twitter.com/fattailed Fat-tailed

    @25 In W. Seattle at least, RapidRide will be rapid only in that it drops the space between the two words in favor of interCaps. Other than that, it’s just the #54 route, minus a couple stops, plus a somewhat better bus design. And we already have a 54 express. Issue is that the choke point for W Seattle traffic is the Duwamish crossing, and the RapidRide includes zero dedicated right-of-way to address that, making it less than rapid.

  • http://twitter.com/fattailed Fat-tailed

    @25 In W. Seattle at least, RapidRide will be rapid only in that it drops the space between the two words in favor of interCaps. Other than that, it’s just the #54 route, minus a couple stops, plus a somewhat better bus design. And we already have a 54 express. Issue is that the choke point for W Seattle traffic is the Duwamish crossing, and the RapidRide includes zero dedicated right-of-way to address that, making it less than rapid.

  • Jake

    With few exceptions, all candidates running for office overstep their capabilities when it comes to campaign promises. What those promises do is give you a window into their world view. True, McGinn will likely not be able to deliver 100% of what he’s saying. But I do believe he will work toward those things, not against. In my opinion, McGinn is the clear choice.

  • Jake

    With few exceptions, all candidates running for office overstep their capabilities when it comes to campaign promises. What those promises do is give you a window into their world view. True, McGinn will likely not be able to deliver 100% of what he’s saying. But I do believe he will work toward those things, not against. In my opinion, McGinn is the clear choice.

  • Carlos

    props for eating at the silver fork and not at the over priced breakfast joint in gentrified, oops, i mean, columbia, city.

  • Carlos

    props for eating at the silver fork and not at the over priced breakfast joint in gentrified, oops, i mean, columbia, city.

  • Cleve Stockmeyer

    Bravo.

    We need to connect the green line corridor communities with each other and with the rest of Seattle via rapid transit and links to Link; that way, the Link light rail becomes more than a line inside Seattle, it becomes an X shaped useful system for in city transit. So when you get on the light rail at Northgate or at Roosevelt, or in SE Seattle, you can use it to transfer and get to Ballard or West Seattle, too. And vice versa.

    Synergy through multiple lines, every other big city has it. That’s the diff. between a system, and a line. Waiting to plan this until ST 2.0 is built out is waiting too long.

  • Cleve Stockmeyer

    Bravo.

    We need to connect the green line corridor communities with each other and with the rest of Seattle via rapid transit and links to Link; that way, the Link light rail becomes more than a line inside Seattle, it becomes an X shaped useful system for in city transit. So when you get on the light rail at Northgate or at Roosevelt, or in SE Seattle, you can use it to transfer and get to Ballard or West Seattle, too. And vice versa.

    Synergy through multiple lines, every other big city has it. That’s the diff. between a system, and a line. Waiting to plan this until ST 2.0 is built out is waiting too long.

  • CC Meye

    Mike I Will let you borrow my razor and iron. Its okay just ask. I will even bike to your house!!!

  • CC Meye

    Mike I Will let you borrow my razor and iron. Its okay just ask. I will even bike to your house!!!

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr. Baker

    Doa, the retailers will kill a raise in sales tax (kind of regressive anyway), and the mvet would have to be approved by a legislature he is planning to fight with over the tunnel.

    Can’t we just have more bus service? Does this always have to involve fixed assets?

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr. Baker

    Doa, the retailers will kill a raise in sales tax (kind of regressive anyway), and the mvet would have to be approved by a legislature he is planning to fight with over the tunnel.

    Can’t we just have more bus service? Does this always have to involve fixed assets?

  • joshuadf

    Can’t we just have more bus service?

    No without taxing authority, unless you have magic free buses that pave roads while they drive themselves.

  • joshuadf

    Can’t we just have more bus service?

    No without taxing authority, unless you have magic free buses that pave roads while they drive themselves.

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr. Baker

    @33, what do you think the mvet and sales tax increase would require?

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr. Baker

    @33, what do you think the mvet and sales tax increase would require?

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr. Baker

    Taxing authority.

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr. Baker

    Taxing authority.

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr. Baker

    Here, I know, I will fight the state on an expensive tunnel and then ask for taxing authority for light rail.

    The state will be drilling a great big hole before they give McGinn mvet authority.
    They would sooner give that to King County for expanded bus service.

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr. Baker

    Here, I know, I will fight the state on an expensive tunnel and then ask for taxing authority for light rail.

    The state will be drilling a great big hole before they give McGinn mvet authority.
    They would sooner give that to King County for expanded bus service.

  • Mickymse

    I’m with a couple of others above… How about we drop the non-story of what was probably a young staffer reading Google maps wrong. (It lists both names for the street.)

    I’m fairly certain BOTH McGinn and Mallahan know it’s called MLK Jr. and have visited SE Seattle.

  • Mickymse

    I’m with a couple of others above… How about we drop the non-story of what was probably a young staffer reading Google maps wrong. (It lists both names for the street.)

    I’m fairly certain BOTH McGinn and Mallahan know it’s called MLK Jr. and have visited SE Seattle.

  • Jay

    @35-36

    The city doesn’t need state permission to raise taxes. There are numerous tax sources that the city could use besides an MVET.

  • Jay

    @35-36

    The city doesn’t need state permission to raise taxes. There are numerous tax sources that the city could use besides an MVET.

  • chicagoexpat

    McGinn the Magic Mayoral candidate decides Seattle only needs a part-time mayor.

    He’ll take the $100,000 pay check but plans to spend most of his term peddling around the Sound and to Olympia rather than working on the city’s business. Be…cause cars are evil, and must be outlawed.

    If he can’t make the urgent budget meeting cause he’s across the state, he’ll just wave his wand and turn his bike into a magical flying unicorn!

    http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/the-road-warrior/Content?oid=2190648

  • chicagoexpat

    McGinn the Magic Mayoral candidate decides Seattle only needs a part-time mayor.

    He’ll take the $100,000 pay check but plans to spend most of his term peddling around the Sound and to Olympia rather than working on the city’s business. Be…cause cars are evil, and must be outlawed.

    If he can’t make the urgent budget meeting cause he’s across the state, he’ll just wave his wand and turn his bike into a magical flying unicorn!

    http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/the-road-warrior/Content?oid=2190648

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com/ Gomez

    So he’s trying to re-do the Green Line, except linked with an existing citywide rail transit system. I actually like this idea… even if the feasibility appears doubtful.

    Still not sold on McGinn, but it’s a neat, ambitious idea.

  • http://gomezticator.livejournal.com Gomez

    So he’s trying to re-do the Green Line, except linked with an existing citywide rail transit system. I actually like this idea… even if the feasibility appears doubtful.

    Still not sold on McGinn, but it’s a neat, ambitious idea.

  • Windbags!

    When making a proposal of this sort, McGinn shows he has no grasp on the basic financial realities city government and citizens face. His position on the Alaskan Way Viaduct replacement is completely baffling. Seattle’s $1B contribution to the viaduct project is to rebuild the crumbling Alaskan Way Seawall and some other associated facilities, not to build the tunnel itself ($3B which is paid for by the State — with funds collected across the state). This points toward the issue both mayoral candidates miss, basic infrastructure maintenance. The city struggles to maintain what it has, whether it be the Seawall or the hundred year old water main.

    Nickels ran as the pothole mayor, but was quickly distracted by the grandiose: tunnels, greenhouse gasses, monorails, streetcars. Meanwhile, city infrastructure and services continued their decades long decay. Seattle has deferred infrastructure maintenance reaching past the billion dollar mark. Citizens want sewer and drainage infrastructure that doesn’t flood and keeps lakes, stream and Sound healthy. We want streets, sidewalks and bridges in good repair so that pedestrians, bicyclists, transit and freight can move safely and efficiently (for example: see C for Crank’s gribbling about the Ballard Bridge). We want community policing that keeps neighborhoods safe and livable. We want parks to relax in on sunny days. We want buses that get us there.

    New transit lines, a fiber optic network… Why don’t we start taking care of what we have and maybe see how that light rail line to the UW works out? You know, the 3.15 mile one that costs $1.9 billion and opens in 2016…

  • Windbags!

    When making a proposal of this sort, McGinn shows he has no grasp on the basic financial realities city government and citizens face. His position on the Alaskan Way Viaduct replacement is completely baffling. Seattle’s $1B contribution to the viaduct project is to rebuild the crumbling Alaskan Way Seawall and some other associated facilities, not to build the tunnel itself ($3B which is paid for by the State — with funds collected across the state). This points toward the issue both mayoral candidates miss, basic infrastructure maintenance. The city struggles to maintain what it has, whether it be the Seawall or the hundred year old water main.

    Nickels ran as the pothole mayor, but was quickly distracted by the grandiose: tunnels, greenhouse gasses, monorails, streetcars. Meanwhile, city infrastructure and services continued their decades long decay. Seattle has deferred infrastructure maintenance reaching past the billion dollar mark. Citizens want sewer and drainage infrastructure that doesn’t flood and keeps lakes, stream and Sound healthy. We want streets, sidewalks and bridges in good repair so that pedestrians, bicyclists, transit and freight can move safely and efficiently (for example: see C for Crank’s gribbling about the Ballard Bridge). We want community policing that keeps neighborhoods safe and livable. We want parks to relax in on sunny days. We want buses that get us there.

    New transit lines, a fiber optic network… Why don’t we start taking care of what we have and maybe see how that light rail line to the UW works out? You know, the 3.15 mile one that costs $1.9 billion and opens in 2016…

  • Christi S.

    @13 and @19

    McGinn biked that day.

    But ya know, sometimes, he uses a car. Sometimes, he ride shares. Sometimes, he walks. Sometimes, he busses. Sometimes, he does all of the above in a single day.

    Hypocrite? Nah, just a guy who makes thoughtful choices, based on the facts, while living his values. As any reasonable person knows, balancing the two is about where your “baseline” is.

  • Christi S.

    @13 and @19

    McGinn biked that day.

    But ya know, sometimes, he uses a car. Sometimes, he ride shares. Sometimes, he walks. Sometimes, he busses. Sometimes, he does all of the above in a single day.

    Hypocrite? Nah, just a guy who makes thoughtful choices, based on the facts, while living his values. As any reasonable person knows, balancing the two is about where your “baseline” is.

  • Louis

    Does McGinn know there is a difference between Southeast Seattle and South Seattle? And does he know that Southeast Seattle is more than Columbia City?