Viva La Cola!

Founded in January 2009, PubliCola is a blog about Seattle written by journalists who are dedicated to non-partisan, original daily reporting that prioritizes a balanced approach to news. Started by longtime local editor and award-winning reporter Josh Feit, PubliCola is the first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol.

PubliCola was off and running. In June 2009, PubliCola hired another award-winning journalist, super-sourced Seattle city hall reporter Erica C. Barnett.

People were afraid that blogging would change journalism. Instead, we believe journalism can change blogging. Twenty-first century journalism may look and feel different, and yes Erica isn't afraid to get cranky, but we're committed to making sure online news still delivers independent, reliable, even-keeled coverage. And most of all, we're committed to making sure the coverage sparks honest civic debate.

Bringing you cola for the people, PubliCola is named after Publius Valerius PubliCola, the alias for the authors of the Federalist Papers—the original bloggers.

The first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol and Seattle city hall, PubliCola has been called a “must-read” by the Seattle Post Intelligencer and a hot “New Media Mover and Shaker” by Seattle Magazine—which also cited our own Erica C. Barnett as the city's No. 1 news nerd.

Evidently, She Meant It.

fizz

1. At last night’s meeting of the 34th District Democrats, mayoral candidate Joe Mallahan was asked (by community activist and former City Council contender Sharon Maeda) about a statement he made to PubliCola during his endorsement interview that Mayor Greg Nickels had neglected basic services and instead pursued a “racial agenda” in the neighborhoods during his tenure. (Mallahan told reporters and bloggers that we had “badly misquoted” him, which isn’t true; background here).

Although Mallahan backed away from the “misquoted” allegations (noting afterward to me that “you’ll notice I didn’t say you misquoted me”), he did incorrectly claim he was “quoted in a blog quite out of context.” Ironically, in his attempt to clarify or add context, he simply restated the point he’d already made in our original post: “I said that I understood that the mayor, after changing leadership in [the neighborhoods] department had shifted to a race and social justice agenda and I hadn’t seen the results.”

And then he added: “Quite honestly, I think I spoke somewhat out of ignorance.”

Joe Mallahan, at last night's meeting

Joe Mallahan, at last night's meeting

2. Last night’s 34th meeting wasn’t nearly as lengthy or raucous as the group’s primary-endorsement meeting (which, thanks to new rules adopted by the district, went on for five hours and resulted in a controversial decision to revisit the district’s primary endorsements in the general; links to my live coverage of that meeting here), but it had its moments.(Points of order, a former district chair loudly telling a former district parliamentarian to “shut up!”, loudly contested vote counts, etc.)

Under yet another new rule adopted last night, district members decided they would not ditch any previous endorsement; instead, members could add new endorsements to the roster (resulting, ironically, in even more of the dual endorsements that members complained about in the primary). In the end, the group added just a handful of new endorsements to its roster: Position 4 candidate David Bloom (who shares the endorsement with his opponent Sally Bagshaw); school board candidates Mary Bass and Kay Smith-Blum, both running for position 5; and school board candidate Wilson Chin, running for Position 7.

Side note: Mike O’Brien, running for Position 8, didn’t win a dual endorsement with Robert Rosencrantz (whom the district endorsed in the primary along with David Miller, who didn’t make it through), but he came close. One 34th District member spoke passionately for O’Brien (and against Rosencrantz), noting that Rosencrantz had given a “qualified” answer on several surveys when asked if he supports a woman’s right to abortion. (Additionally, at a meeting of the Metropolitan Democratic Club yesterday, Rosencrantz reportedly would not “affirm” his support for a woman’s right to choose.

“Mike fully supports a woman’s right to choose, unequivocally … and doesn’t support a physician’s right to deny care based on religious reasons,” the member said. O’Brien received 57 percent of last night’s vote, nine percent  shy of the two-thirds he needed.

3. As we reported yesterday, King County executive candidate Susan Hutchison—a longtime Republican donor and conservative who has taken pains to paint herself as “nonpartisan”—announced two Democratic endorsements yesterday: Lieutenant Governor Brad Owen and former Seattle mayor Wes Uhlman. Uhlman called Hutchison the “moderate candidate running for this nonpartisan office” and praised her as a “tremendous opposite to the person she’s running against,” King County Council member Dow Constantine.

But the animosity between Constantine and Uhlman appears to go back much farther than this election. According to Constantine, Uhlman and the Apartment Owners Association, which Uhlman used to head, pushed for a new law back in the ’90s that would have made state law preempt all local landlord-tenant laws. The result would have been weaker protections for renters in Seattle, which has stricter tenant protections than the state.

Constantine, who was a state legislator when the law was proposed, says he refused to support the law despite an endorsement from the apartment association, and sarcastically proposed an “alternative”: if the apartment owners group would support a statewide law banning discrimination against gay and lesbian tenants, he’d get behind their proposal. Obviously, that didn’t happen, and Constantine says there’s been bad blood between him and Uhlman ever since.

4. Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-WA), who’s on Sen. Max Baucus’ (D-MT) Finance Committee (which currently holds the cards on the health care bill), won accolades from the left in late August when she went on CNN opposite Republican naysayer and fellow Finance Committee member Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-UT) and called the public option a “key component” of “reforming the system” because it would “get true competition into the system” and “give consumers choice.”

cantwelltv

Evidently, she meant it. In her statement on President Obama’s health care speech last night—in which the president defended, but fell short of, demanding a public option—Cantwell came out even more strongly for the public option.

Here’s what Sen. Cantwell said (in a press release that dropped just five minutes after Obama’s speech ended):

“We must extend health care coverage to those who don’t have it now while protecting the coverage of those who do.

“The key to both of these goals is reducing out-of-control costs and I believe that providing real competition in the health care insurance marketplace through a robust public option will help us get costs under control. I will be fighting to include a public option at every phase of the debate – as a member of the Finance Committee and on the Senate floor.”

In addition to “supporting a strong Public Option,” Cantwell also listed three specifics that she wanted in any bill, including reforming the Medicare reimbursement formula so that states like Washington with efficient (low-cost) care aren’t penalized with lower payouts.

Washington state’s senior senator, Patty Murray, issued a statement about 20 minutes later that was less specific and less forthright about the public option than Cantwell’s. After mimicking a GOP speaking point about making sure health care decisions are “in the hands of patients and their doctors,” Sen. Murray added this limp line: “And I support the President’s vision of the public plan.”

Today’s Morning Fizz is brought to you by Washington Conservation Voters.

wcv1


  • jone

    Mallahan didn’t act out of “ignorance” he said it because he’s been listening to NIMBY’s in southeast Seattle who think Jim Diers was the second coming. And he’s been listening to those who are threatened by the efforts to get more people of color involved in neighborhood councils. Under Diers, neighborhood councils were primarily the domain of white home owners.

  • jone

    Mallahan didn’t act out of “ignorance” he said it because he’s been listening to NIMBY’s in southeast Seattle who think Jim Diers was the second coming. And he’s been listening to those who are threatened by the efforts to get more people of color involved in neighborhood councils. Under Diers, neighborhood councils were primarily the domain of white home owners.

  • http://peacetreefarm.org N in Seattle

    Whoda thunk that Cantwell would be the WA Senator pushing hard for real healthcare coverage?

    Good on ya, Maria!

  • http://peacetreefarm.org N in Seattle

    Whoda thunk that Cantwell would be the WA Senator pushing hard for real healthcare coverage?

    Good on ya, Maria!

  • wtfbbq

    Oh look, it’s Publicola getting a hard on because they get to report on some sort of flub Mallahan made. That or any mention on McGinn’s name seems to do it for you every time.

  • tus madres

    oh look, erica c barnett so dilligently warning us all that susan hutchison just might be a REPUBLICAN again. how dare that susan hutchison. HOW DARE SHE not vote the way erica c barnett does.

    seriously, why is this so important to you? can you not handle the fact that someone is in the race as a republican? yes, hutchison is disingenuous, but do you really think anyone doesn’t know she’s in the GOP?

    find some new material to cover because this is making you sound bitchy, juvenile and totally one-track minded.

  • tus madres

    oh look, erica c barnett so dilligently warning us all that susan hutchison just might be a REPUBLICAN again. how dare that susan hutchison. HOW DARE SHE not vote the way erica c barnett does.

    seriously, why is this so important to you? can you not handle the fact that someone is in the race as a republican? yes, hutchison is disingenuous, but do you really think anyone doesn’t know she’s in the GOP?

    find some new material to cover because this is making you sound bitchy, juvenile and totally one-track minded.

  • Justin Camarata

    ECB,

    Orrin Hatch is a Republican.

  • Justin Camarata

    ECB,

    Orrin Hatch is a Republican.

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @4,

    Susan Hutchison called a press conference yesterday to hit her own campaign theme that she’s not a Republican. Susan, not Erica, is framing the debate. Erica is doing what any reporter should do: She’s fact checking Susan’s pitch.

    As we’ve written before, it’s fine that Susan is a Republican. Lots of candidates are. It’s not fine that she’s being dishonest about her history.

    Meanwhile, Erica’s item was actually about Dow Constantine and Wes Uhlman.

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @4,

    Susan Hutchison called a press conference yesterday to hit her own campaign theme that she’s not a Republican. Susan, not Erica, is framing the debate. Erica is doing what any reporter should do: She’s fact checking Susan’s pitch.

    As we’ve written before, it’s fine that Susan is a Republican. Lots of candidates are. It’s not fine that she’s being dishonest about her history.

    Meanwhile, Erica’s item was actually about Dow Constantine and Wes Uhlman.

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @5,

    That was my fault. Despite writing: “when she [Cantwell] went on CNN opposite Republican naysayer and fellow Finance Committee member Sen. Orrin Hatch,” I went on to write (D-UT).

    Thanks for catching the goof. It’s fixed now.

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @5,

    That was my fault. Despite writing: “when she [Cantwell] went on CNN opposite Republican naysayer and fellow Finance Committee member Sen. Orrin Hatch,” I went on to write (D-UT).

    Thanks for catching the goof. It’s fixed now.

  • http://twitter.com/fattailed Fat-tailed

    Sharon Maeda is not just a “community activist” but also an employee of UFCW Local 21. Not sure if it’s relevant in this case, but seems worth disclosing.

  • http://twitter.com/fattailed Fat-tailed

    Sharon Maeda is not just a “community activist” but also an employee of UFCW Local 21. Not sure if it’s relevant in this case, but seems worth disclosing.

  • Trevor

    @1: Can’t it be both? That Mallahan was/ is ignorant, and that he got his talking point on something he knew next to nothing about from a reactionary “neighborhood activist”?

    However, why the hate for Diers? Nickels and Co. basically labeled the man a racist out of expediency, to get rid of someone whose power he was jealous of. Continuing to slander Diers misses the fact that Nickels came in with an agenda to clear the way for increased development not by working with neighborhood councils (no matter what their racial composition), but by trashing neighborhood plans. To avoid an honest debate over that agenda, some of Nickels supporters have rewritten history and labeled Diers a racist, which is both unfair and dishonest. Worst of all, it whitewashes Nickels’s poor record on issues like gentrification and racial profiling.

    All that said, Mallahan clearly has no idea what he’s talking about on racial justice and many other city issues, and I don’t trust him. I think McGinn’s instincts might be better, because slightly more populist, but his lack of experience on this (indeed, the whole environmental movement’s lack of engagement with social justice issues) is troubling.

  • Trevor

    @1: Can’t it be both? That Mallahan was/ is ignorant, and that he got his talking point on something he knew next to nothing about from a reactionary “neighborhood activist”?

    However, why the hate for Diers? Nickels and Co. basically labeled the man a racist out of expediency, to get rid of someone whose power he was jealous of. Continuing to slander Diers misses the fact that Nickels came in with an agenda to clear the way for increased development not by working with neighborhood councils (no matter what their racial composition), but by trashing neighborhood plans. To avoid an honest debate over that agenda, some of Nickels supporters have rewritten history and labeled Diers a racist, which is both unfair and dishonest. Worst of all, it whitewashes Nickels’s poor record on issues like gentrification and racial profiling.

    All that said, Mallahan clearly has no idea what he’s talking about on racial justice and many other city issues, and I don’t trust him. I think McGinn’s instincts might be better, because slightly more populist, but his lack of experience on this (indeed, the whole environmental movement’s lack of engagement with social justice issues) is troubling.

  • Where’s Charla?

    What did Joe Mallahan do with Charla Neuman?

  • Where’s Charla?

    What did Joe Mallahan do with Charla Neuman?

  • me likey the kool aid

    @9 Nickels’ poor record on issues like gentrification and racial profiling??/

    Mallahan listens to whoever is the flavor of week and McGinn is a NIMBY in sheep’s clothing.

    Frankly, as a person of color, I find it insulting that Mallahan thinks that 8 years of conversation on the issue of race can erase 100 years of institutionalized policies that have worked to exclude everything but the white voice.

    Trevor, as a southeast activist, the level of involvement that I was “allowed” in the Neighborhood Council under the Diers Regime was pathetic. These were the speaking points – All blacks are in a gang, the way to clean up the streets is to hire more gang officers, we dont need more prevention techniques we need more enforcement.

    The list went on and on. The facts are the Diers might of not been bad to the white middle-class activist but he completely advocated against inclusion in neighborhood districts (i.e. New School, Rainier Beach Community Center). If Mallahan wants the support of activist groups he is going have to do better than this.

    Oh and dont ever quote Dawn Mason again Joe. She along with Pat are so out of touch with Southeast Seattle.

  • me likey the kool aid

    @9 Nickels’ poor record on issues like gentrification and racial profiling??/

    Mallahan listens to whoever is the flavor of week and McGinn is a NIMBY in sheep’s clothing.

    Frankly, as a person of color, I find it insulting that Mallahan thinks that 8 years of conversation on the issue of race can erase 100 years of institutionalized policies that have worked to exclude everything but the white voice.

    Trevor, as a southeast activist, the level of involvement that I was “allowed” in the Neighborhood Council under the Diers Regime was pathetic. These were the speaking points – All blacks are in a gang, the way to clean up the streets is to hire more gang officers, we dont need more prevention techniques we need more enforcement.

    The list went on and on. The facts are the Diers might of not been bad to the white middle-class activist but he completely advocated against inclusion in neighborhood districts (i.e. New School, Rainier Beach Community Center). If Mallahan wants the support of activist groups he is going have to do better than this.

    Oh and dont ever quote Dawn Mason again Joe. She along with Pat are so out of touch with Southeast Seattle.

  • GaryS

    Here’s the deal: Mallahan is such a political novice, he’s got kooks, whackos and cranks giving him advice. Better to have a couple nuts helping in your clueless campaign than nobody at all.

    Afterall, the extent of Mallahan’s civic activism involves walking in a parade at the Wallingford Wurst Festival.

    This guy is embarrassing. I hope Charla Neuman is making some big money. Otherwise, defending a clueless liar isn’t going to be worth the hassel. And the notches taken out of her career and credibility.

  • GaryS

    Here’s the deal: Mallahan is such a political novice, he’s got kooks, whackos and cranks giving him advice. Better to have a couple nuts helping in your clueless campaign than nobody at all.

    Afterall, the extent of Mallahan’s civic activism involves walking in a parade at the Wallingford Wurst Festival.

    This guy is embarrassing. I hope Charla Neuman is making some big money. Otherwise, defending a clueless liar isn’t going to be worth the hassel. And the notches taken out of her career and credibility.

  • Gidge

    @11–I disagree with you that McGinn is a NIMBY. He favors a lot of things that the core NIMBYs actively fight against. If anyone is a NIMBY, it’s Mallahan, who’s taken up a lot of Pat’s talking points.

    I agree with you on everything else in your post, though.

  • Gidge

    @11–I disagree with you that McGinn is a NIMBY. He favors a lot of things that the core NIMBYs actively fight against. If anyone is a NIMBY, it’s Mallahan, who’s taken up a lot of Pat’s talking points.

    I agree with you on everything else in your post, though.

  • ivan

    It’s clear that NIMBY is becoming one of those worthless labels that means whatever the person using it wants it to mean, even though 10 different people might mean 10 entirely different things just as they have done to “progressive.”

    What the hell is a core NIMBY, and who is to decide? Is there a membership list? A secret handshake? If you like high-rises on arterials but not on side streets, are you a NIMBY? If you think mother-in-law units should be allowed on certain lots but not others, do you qualify for core NIMBY status, or just plain entry-level NIMBY status?

  • ivan

    It’s clear that NIMBY is becoming one of those worthless labels that means whatever the person using it wants it to mean, even though 10 different people might mean 10 entirely different things just as they have done to “progressive.”

    What the hell is a core NIMBY, and who is to decide? Is there a membership list? A secret handshake? If you like high-rises on arterials but not on side streets, are you a NIMBY? If you think mother-in-law units should be allowed on certain lots but not others, do you qualify for core NIMBY status, or just plain entry-level NIMBY status?

  • Progressive Prism

    @12 “he’s got kooks, whackos and cranks giving him advice” You’re talking about McGinn there, right? The candidate that has zero paid staffers and runs his campaign by committee?

    I called it when Joe made that comment last night. Erica was sitting 20 feet from me with a weird grin on her face, shaking her head and trading knowing looks with the lady next to her. I knew it would top Morning Fizz! I mean, why report ACTUAL news when you can whine about Mallahan being inaccurate by saying you were inaccurate?

    As an avid reader of Publicola and overall fan of Josh and Erica: your coverage of the mayors race stinks. It flat out blows. You have a hard-on for both McGinn and Mallahan, but in opposite ways. It is now significantly detracting from the overall quality of Publicola. I’ve heard many, many people voice similar opinions since the primary. Please, take a deep breath, or get Sandeep to write about the Mayors race now that his horse is finished. Outside of this, I thoroughly enjoy your work. Keep it up!

  • Progressive Prism

    @12 “he’s got kooks, whackos and cranks giving him advice” You’re talking about McGinn there, right? The candidate that has zero paid staffers and runs his campaign by committee?

    I called it when Joe made that comment last night. Erica was sitting 20 feet from me with a weird grin on her face, shaking her head and trading knowing looks with the lady next to her. I knew it would top Morning Fizz! I mean, why report ACTUAL news when you can whine about Mallahan being inaccurate by saying you were inaccurate?

    As an avid reader of Publicola and overall fan of Josh and Erica: your coverage of the mayors race stinks. It flat out blows. You have a hard-on for both McGinn and Mallahan, but in opposite ways. It is now significantly detracting from the overall quality of Publicola. I’ve heard many, many people voice similar opinions since the primary. Please, take a deep breath, or get Sandeep to write about the Mayors race now that his horse is finished. Outside of this, I thoroughly enjoy your work. Keep it up!

  • Trevor

    @11:

    Nickels squashed the racial profiling task force in 2002, put forward an alternative plan that he hasn’t enforced. I bet that wasn’t mentioned in the SPD’s review of its own institutionalized racism. I don’t think it was addressed by his Blue Ribbon Commission either.

    And yes, Nickels has had a poor record on gentrification, which he sought to obscure by supporting the levy. Meanwhile behind the scenes he tried to transform the levy’s historical mission (to serve those at risk of homelessness) by steering money away from low-income people to middle-income people, from rentals to homeownership. Just cause a handful of homes went to people of color doesn’t change the fact that subsidizing homeownership reduced affordable rental opportunities for as many if not more people of color at the same time. Nickels fought against Judy Nicastro’s pro-renter politics. He has done little that I’m aware of to either contest displacement caused by HOPE VI or hold SHA accountable to its own mitigation plans. Track the property value increases in Seattle in the last 8 years, and then tell me what Nickels has done to mitigate displacement of low-income people from the city. Not nearly enough, as far as I’m concerned.

    None of this means that Nickels was all bad. Nor does it mean that Jim Diers was perfect, or that McGinn or Mallahan are even good. But uncritical support for Nickels tends to unfairly portray all that preceded him as bad, and all that he did as great. That’s dishonest enough. But when you add the politics of race to the mix, I think a lot of unfair accusations are made on both sides that do nothing to actually promote racial justice for everyday people.

    For example: Feel free to offer up your name and some details about how Jim Diers actively promoted racism in the Dept. of Neighborhoods and forced racist policies down the community’s throat. I for one am extremely skeptical, in part because Diers was a community organizer in the South end for years and did amazing work with the South End Seattle Community Organization in the 1970s and 1980s. Was Diers really responsible for the racial politics of your neighborhood council? If so, then why did the SE Community Council oppose the relocation of Casa Latina years after Diers was long gone? I think there’s something more complicated at play here, and name calling won’t help you figure out what it is.

  • Trevor

    @11:

    Nickels squashed the racial profiling task force in 2002, put forward an alternative plan that he hasn’t enforced. I bet that wasn’t mentioned in the SPD’s review of its own institutionalized racism. I don’t think it was addressed by his Blue Ribbon Commission either.

    And yes, Nickels has had a poor record on gentrification, which he sought to obscure by supporting the levy. Meanwhile behind the scenes he tried to transform the levy’s historical mission (to serve those at risk of homelessness) by steering money away from low-income people to middle-income people, from rentals to homeownership. Just cause a handful of homes went to people of color doesn’t change the fact that subsidizing homeownership reduced affordable rental opportunities for as many if not more people of color at the same time. Nickels fought against Judy Nicastro’s pro-renter politics. He has done little that I’m aware of to either contest displacement caused by HOPE VI or hold SHA accountable to its own mitigation plans. Track the property value increases in Seattle in the last 8 years, and then tell me what Nickels has done to mitigate displacement of low-income people from the city. Not nearly enough, as far as I’m concerned.

    None of this means that Nickels was all bad. Nor does it mean that Jim Diers was perfect, or that McGinn or Mallahan are even good. But uncritical support for Nickels tends to unfairly portray all that preceded him as bad, and all that he did as great. That’s dishonest enough. But when you add the politics of race to the mix, I think a lot of unfair accusations are made on both sides that do nothing to actually promote racial justice for everyday people.

    For example: Feel free to offer up your name and some details about how Jim Diers actively promoted racism in the Dept. of Neighborhoods and forced racist policies down the community’s throat. I for one am extremely skeptical, in part because Diers was a community organizer in the South end for years and did amazing work with the South End Seattle Community Organization in the 1970s and 1980s. Was Diers really responsible for the racial politics of your neighborhood council? If so, then why did the SE Community Council oppose the relocation of Casa Latina years after Diers was long gone? I think there’s something more complicated at play here, and name calling won’t help you figure out what it is.

  • Sam

    Mallahan spoke “out of ignorance”?

    Well, that’s nothing new!

  • Sam

    Mallahan spoke “out of ignorance”?

    Well, that’s nothing new!

  • wtfbbq

    Oh look, it's Publicola getting a hard on because they get to report on some sort of flub Mallahan made. That or any mention on McGinn's name seems to do it for you every time.