Viva La Cola!

Founded in January 2009, PubliCola is a blog about Seattle written by journalists who are dedicated to non-partisan, original daily reporting that prioritizes a balanced approach to news. Started by longtime local editor and award-winning reporter Josh Feit, PubliCola is the first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol.

PubliCola was off and running. In June 2009, PubliCola hired another award-winning journalist, super-sourced Seattle city hall reporter Erica C. Barnett.

People were afraid that blogging would change journalism. Instead, we believe journalism can change blogging. Twenty-first century journalism may look and feel different, and yes Erica isn't afraid to get cranky, but we're committed to making sure online news still delivers independent, reliable, even-keeled coverage. And most of all, we're committed to making sure the coverage sparks honest civic debate.

Bringing you cola for the people, PubliCola is named after Publius Valerius PubliCola, the alias for the authors of the Federalist Papers—the original bloggers.

The first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol and Seattle city hall, PubliCola has been called a “must-read” by the Seattle Post Intelligencer and a hot “New Media Mover and Shaker” by Seattle Magazine—which also cited our own Erica C. Barnett as the city's No. 1 news nerd.

Russell Heads to Seattle

Erica C. Barnett contributed to this report.

The Seattle Times has the news that Russell Investments, a global financial investment firm that manages $151 billion in assets, is moving into the Chase Center (former WaMu headquarters) in downtown Seattle.

The city of Tacoma put together a local, state, and federal incentives package worth more than $141 million to keep Russell in Tacoma, where the 1,100-employee company has outgrown its current location.

Although Mayor Greg Nickels issued a press release claiming the city “did not offer any tax breaks or incentives” to win Russell, that’s not exactly true: The city created a new tax classification that lowered Russell’s business and occupation tax substantially back in June.

No word yet on whether Team Nickels will continue pushing for repeal of the supposedly onerous $25-per-employee “head tax,” the transportation tax that became a political issue earlier this summer. Russell reportedly leaned on the mayor and city council members to repeal the “head tax,” which is still very much in place.

Here’s Nickels’ statement:

SEATTLE – Mayor Greg Nickels today issued this statement regarding the announcement by Russell Investments that it will relocate its headquarters to Seattle:

“I am pleased with today’s announcement that Russell Investments has decided to locate in downtown Seattle.  We warmly welcome Russell and its employees.  With an international reputation, Russell will be a tremendous addition to our city.  We know that Russell evaluated all its options and considered many factors in making this business decision, and I am heartened by its conclusion that Seattle is an excellent place to do business.  Across the world, Seattle is known for its innovative companies and we look forward to having Russell join our community.  As we welcome the employees of Russell Investments, we recognize the effect of Russell’s decision on our neighbors in Tacoma.  Ultimately, the most important fact is that workers can stay in the Puget Sound area and that a prominent company will continue to call the Northwest home.”

Earlier this year, Russell Investments contacted the city of Seattle asking how much it would pay in taxes if the company headquarters were to move.  To clarify the tax code, the city Department of Finance proposed an ordinance to bring Seattle in line with the State of Washington and Tacoma with regard to businesses classified as “International Investment Management Services.” The city of Seattle did not offer any tax breaks or incentives to Russell.  The company is expected to pay approximately $250,000 a year in business and occupation taxes to the city.

The bolds are ours. And they’re meant to be snarky. Here’s why: Despite widespread opposition by businesses, including Russell, to the “head tax,” the tax was hardly a major burden on employers. And today’s good news about Russell Investments adds evidence to the case that all the noise about repealing the “head tax” was gimmicky campaign posturing by Mayor Nickels.

We have a call in to Mayor Nickels office to see if the mayor told Russell the head tax would be repealed.

We’ve also contacted Russell to ask how the “head tax” figured in their decision. They said they would call us back on that issue. In the meantime, they sent over their press release.

We’ve linked that below the fold.

Russell Investments will relocate to 1301 Second Ave. in downtown Seattle

TACOMA, WASH, September 9, 2009 – Russell Investments announced it will relocate its global headquarters to downtown Seattle. The company will move into 1301 Second Ave. which, upon occupancy in 2010, will become the Russell Investments Center.

“After a thorough search and analysis of multiple sites in the Puget Sound region, we came to the clear conclusion that this is the right decision to best serve the long-term interests of our business, both from an economic and qualitative standpoint, and particularly given the unique conditions of the commercial real estate market in Seattle,” said Russell Investments President and Chief Executive Officer Andrew Doman.

Russell will consolidate all of its Puget Sound associates into its new headquarters location. The move will provide the company with access to a large talent pool and will place Russell in the center of a major Pacific Rim city, alongside other like-minded global firms and business pioneers.

Russell noted that the decision was driven in part by the current economics of the Seattle real estate market. “All of the key factors lined up and pointed us in the same direction,” said Doman. “At the same time, we recognize that this news will be disappointing to some. We weighed all considerations carefully, and in the final analysis our decision was based on what would best serve Russell over the long-term.”

Doman added, “I greatly appreciate the time and leadership that Congressman Norm Dicks and the Tacoma Partnership invested in the process. Tacoma and Pierce County are important parts of Russell’s history, and areas we will continue to support through our commitment in improving the quality of life in communities where our associates live and where we do business.”

Doman concluded, “Moving to Seattle is an important milestone in Russell’s extraordinary history and will serve as an outstanding platform from which to embark on what I believe to be a future filled with enormous opportunity. This will be good for Russell and for the entire Puget Sound region.”

Kinzer Real Estate Services led the site search with support from Seneca Real Estate Group Inc., NBBJ and Sellen Construction Company. Russell was also assisted by external counsel Davis Wright Tremaine and McCullough Hill, PS.


  • rtm

    great news for seattle. awful for tacoma.

  • rtm

    great news for seattle. awful for tacoma.

  • Kathryn

    I really feel bad about this. Russell is an old Tacoma company. Glad they found a home, but I am not so into municipal competition that I can feel good about this.

  • Kathryn

    I really feel bad about this. Russell is an old Tacoma company. Glad they found a home, but I am not so into municipal competition that I can feel good about this.

  • Timothy

    Here’s what I don’t get. We in Seattle are to feel bad whenever a company chooses to locate here, but those in other Washington cities are supposed to feel good when a company leaves Seattle to locate there?

    It has been made abundantly clear that Seattle is in competition with other cities around the State. So, let’s play fair, may the best city win.

  • Where’s your head tax?

    Thanks, Erica, for connecting the dots back to the so called “head tax.” The bizarre urgency at City Hall to repeal the tax now makes more sense. So much for playing hard to get.

    Now that the deal is done we’ll see if our Council feels obliged to add to the $72 million dollar hole in the budget or if now, since they’re here, we can leave the tax in place.

  • Timothy

    Here’s what I don’t get. We in Seattle are to feel bad whenever a company chooses to locate here, but those in other Washington cities are supposed to feel good when a company leaves Seattle to locate there?

    It has been made abundantly clear that Seattle is in competition with other cities around the State. So, let’s play fair, may the best city win.

  • Where’s your head tax?

    Thanks, Erica, for connecting the dots back to the so called “head tax.” The bizarre urgency at City Hall to repeal the tax now makes more sense. So much for playing hard to get.

    Now that the deal is done we’ll see if our Council feels obliged to add to the $72 million dollar hole in the budget or if now, since they’re here, we can leave the tax in place.

  • better-future-now

    I’m certain the amount paid by Russell in the form of a head tax would be insubstantial to them. They probably would barely notice if it was kept in place.

    That’s why this whole thing has been a tad on the ridiculous side.

    @4: I agree–It’s not too smart, when you’re in a hole, to keep digging (to paraphrase Jean Godden).

  • better-future-now

    I’m certain the amount paid by Russell in the form of a head tax would be insubstantial to them. They probably would barely notice if it was kept in place.

    That’s why this whole thing has been a tad on the ridiculous side.

    @4: I agree–It’s not too smart, when you’re in a hole, to keep digging (to paraphrase Jean Godden).

  • lorax

    I’d feel worse about this if the Port of Tacoma hadn’t been poaching Seattle’s cargo shippers for years and years now.

  • lorax

    I’d feel worse about this if the Port of Tacoma hadn’t been poaching Seattle’s cargo shippers for years and years now.

  • DW

    Timothy @#3 – Well said! If Tacoma or Redmond or Bellevue had taken an HQ from Seattle, you can bet that the Seattle Times would be cheerleading about it.

  • DW

    Timothy @#3 – Well said! If Tacoma or Redmond or Bellevue had taken an HQ from Seattle, you can bet that the Seattle Times would be cheerleading about it.

  • me likey the kool aid

    ECB so basically what you are saying that you have evidence to suggest that Seattle created a specialized tax exemption for Russell but chose to report it anyway.

    Great.

  • me likey the kool aid

    ECB so basically what you are saying that you have evidence to suggest that Seattle created a specialized tax exemption for Russell but chose to report it anyway.

    Great.

  • joshuadf

    Too bad for Tacoma, but honestly the real deal here must be the new skyscraper built for a company that no longer exists. Does anyone not believe that Russel is getting an even bigger steal for the tower than Chase did for WaMu’s branches?

  • joshuadf

    Too bad for Tacoma, but honestly the real deal here must be the new skyscraper built for a company that no longer exists. Does anyone not believe that Russel is getting an even bigger steal for the tower than Chase did for WaMu’s branches?

  • Jazzercise

    I think you’ve got it wrong. Seattle has yet to adopt the new tax district, as you claimed it did in June. That matter has yet to be adopted, scheduled for committee later this month. What the city did (in July, not June) was say it would consider adding the new tax district for Russell, which Tacoma already has in place, btw.

  • Jazzercise

    I think you’ve got it wrong. Seattle has yet to adopt the new tax district, as you claimed it did in June. That matter has yet to be adopted, scheduled for committee later this month. What the city did (in July, not June) was say it would consider adding the new tax district for Russell, which Tacoma already has in place, btw.

  • Mikos

    Why is a multi-billion dollar company concerned about $25-$26,000 in taxes? Are they that close to going broke?

  • Mikos

    Why is a multi-billion dollar company concerned about $25-$26,000 in taxes? Are they that close to going broke?

  • hram

    Bigger deal for tacoma who are losing 200 of their wealthier citizens. Any ideas on where all these people live? Gig harbor is a long way from seattle

  • hram

    Bigger deal for tacoma who are losing 200 of their wealthier citizens. Any ideas on where all these people live? Gig harbor is a long way from seattle

  • http://seattlehome.com/ Seattle Homes

    Congrats to Russell Investments, and welcome to Seattle.

    Sam DeBord
    SeattleHome.com

  • http://seattlehome.com Seattle Homes

    Congrats to Russell Investments, and welcome to Seattle.

    Sam DeBord
    SeattleHome.com